Jan. 23, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:40
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
It's done something no person in the world has ever done before. | |
| A dead man, a dead politician has risen. | ||
| Somebody who a year, if we were four years ago at Davos, he's buried, dead politically, known to me. | ||
| He's now returned. | ||
| This is the greatest comeback in political history of a politician. | ||
| And then, therefore, he thinks he can do anything. | ||
| We need to also factor in not only who's won, which is Trump. | ||
| But whose loss, which is to say, us. | ||
| And I guess I would add, throw into that, that the epitome of the us who is losing here is Europe. | ||
| That the European Union and, by and large, its member states have misread the direction where events were going. | ||
| The causes that it is interested in, climate, human rights, some others. | ||
| As well as the methods of diplomacy that it prefers are simply being gradually kind of marginalized as something new. | ||
| Not necessarily something better, but something new moves into the center. | ||
| I was given the option. | ||
| They said, sir, would you like to pardon everybody, including yourself? | ||
| I said, I'm not going to pardon anybody. | ||
| We didn't do anything wrong. | ||
| And we had people that suffered. | ||
| They're incredible patriots. | ||
| We had people that suffered. | ||
| You had Bannon put in jail. | ||
| You had Peter Navarro put in jail. | ||
| You had people that suffered. | ||
| And far worse than that, they've lost their fortunes. | ||
| They've lost their whatever, their nest egg, paying it to lawyers. | ||
| And those people, and people said, and they wouldn't have even taken, most of those people, they wouldn't have even taken apart. | ||
| This guy went around giving everybody pardons. | ||
| And you know, the funny thing, maybe the sad thing, is he didn't give himself a pardon. | ||
| And if you look at it, it all had to do with him. | ||
| I mean, the money went to him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Should Congress investigate that? | |
| Well, I don't know. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, I've always been. | |
| Look, he didn't give himself a pardon. | ||
| And he didn't give some other people a pardon that needed it. | ||
| And I heard Schiff went to him and just begged him for a pardon because Schiff is a crook. | ||
| Schiff is a crooked guy. | ||
| He's a crooked politician. | ||
| He made up the story about Russia, Russia, Russia. | ||
| He totally made it up. | ||
| He was a storyteller. | ||
| And then after he made it up, they found out that there was a tape of the conversation made by, you know. | ||
| I guess, the State Department. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| When you make calls, they make tapes sometimes. | ||
| Not all the time. | ||
| He was the one talking to the Russians. | ||
| So he, in the meantime, made up the conversation, totally made it up, about quid pro quo. | ||
| There was no quid pro quo. | ||
| There was a perfect call. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That is kind of the question that should be, I think, posed to Donald Trump, who is... | |
| Made very clear that he wants these people to be at the table of power. | ||
| And I don't understand how that's going to help everyday Americans who are living very different lives than those at Davos. | ||
| So I don't know that that's breaking through. | ||
| I don't know how much kind of sussing there is of these oligarchs. | ||
| On Fox News or in kind of social media worlds of everyday Trump voters. | ||
| But that's kind of the question. | ||
| How do you get that message that Donald Trump isn't working for you? | ||
| He's working for these oligarchs. | ||
| Well, I mean, that is actually that is a battle that's that has been raging. | ||
| We've seen it raging. | ||
| Steve Bannon, of course, talking about the MAGA base and going head to head in this sort of. | ||
| MAGA battle with Elon Musk. | ||
| And Mika, the question I have is, and there's no evidence that Elon Musk is being pushed aside now or anytime in the near future. | ||
| But the question is, how many distractions will Donald Trump Put up with before he says enough. | ||
| Let's remember that battle. | ||
| I won't repeat what Elon Musk called working Americans. | ||
| And he was just very denigrating to working Americans and the MAGA base. | ||
| And so you had that battle between the oligarch and the MAGA base, the people who elected Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want to ask you about this because we heard this massive announcement of Stargate with Larry Ellison and Sam Altman and Massasan, the head of SoftBank, $500 billion investment, which I think people welcome, that everyone wants, I believe, us to be on the cutting edge of AI. But then Elon Musk came out. | |
| And said, SoftBank doesn't actually have the money. | ||
| SoftBank has well under $10 billion secured. | ||
| I have that on good authority. | ||
| What's the president's reaction to that from Elon Musk? | ||
| Well, President Trump is very excited about this infrastructure announcement in the field of AI, which is obviously growing and something the United States of America needs to capitalize on because our adversaries, such as China, are very advanced in this field. | ||
| And so that was a big announcement for our country, for our industries here at home, and also for the American people, because this is going to create a minimum of 100,000 jobs here in the United States of America. | ||
| So the American people should take President Trump and those CEOs' words for it. | ||
| These investments are coming to our great country, and American jobs are coming along with them. | ||
| Well, it'll be interesting to watch all of that play out. | ||
| And Sam Altman, I should point out, went back at Elon Musk and said they absolutely do have the money for this venture. | ||
| And they have their own bit of back and forth on social media that's been going on for quite some time. | ||
| To give pardons to everybody but him. | ||
| They wanted to take care of me. | ||
| Yeah, but Sean, they wanted to. | ||
| I don't care. | ||
| They're yelling at me. | ||
| This is more important because right now the economy is going to do great. | ||
| I want to know about the economy. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| The reason I got a free shot at all these networks lying. | ||
| About the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mega Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Thursday, 23 January, Year of the Lord 2025. | ||
| Okay, for the morning show this morning, the President of the United States is going to address Davos, He's going to give a speech. | ||
| To Davos, remarks to Davos at 11 o'clock our time. | ||
| I think that's, what, 5 or 6 in the late afternoon, early evening Davos time. | ||
| President Trump, initially there was some discussion of him going over there, but he felt in the first week there was too much to do here, and then the trip to North Carolina. | ||
| And I want everybody watching that remember our kind of special with Ben Berquam last week with the great patrons in North Carolina. | ||
| The clips of that, I think, helped a lot in making sure President Trump understood what the dilemma was there. | ||
| President Trump's going there first. | ||
| I think it's very symbolic. | ||
| Last night he talked about FEMA. You know, is FEMA getting the job done too politicized, maybe incompetence? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| He's talking about maybe going to the state FEMA's and maybe the funding goes there. | ||
| A lot going on. | ||
| We're going to get ready. | ||
| We're going to work through this hour. | ||
| Strategically, where we stand in day three of everything going on in every front. | ||
| A couple things first. | ||
| Sean, I don't care. | ||
| This is more important. | ||
| Sean, buddy, bro, when the president says that, you should take that as a papal bull. | ||
| Just let the man talk. | ||
| He's got something he wants to get across to the American people. | ||
| I understand you want to talk about the economy. | ||
| That's very important. | ||
| But President Trump, very deep discussion there about pardons. | ||
| And you see where he's going with this. | ||
| We are a strong advocate with everything going on. | ||
| We're walking through all the strategy, what's happening in the three vectors that we've talked about. | ||
| The lines of work is what we call it, of what President Trump's working on. | ||
| But one of these is very clearly the... | ||
| Deconstruction of the administrative state, taking on the deep state, and you have to adjudicate in front of the American people exactly what went on here over the last couple of years. | ||
| Let's say maybe the last eight years. | ||
| You have to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| It has to be open, it has to be fair, it has to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| We must make sure as we go forward that this can never happen again, can never happen again to this republic. | ||
| At the top, those were cuts from Davos yesterday. | ||
| We're going to have two. | ||
| We have Noura Bin Laden. | ||
| We also have Larry Taunton is going to join us both at the bottom of this hour to walk through the Davos speech of President Trump. | ||
| Very important, and particularly with Ukraine, everything going on, but also to put the globalists on notice. | ||
| And the theme of Davos is the age of intelligence. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And what they mean by that is AI and everything AI is going to do to kind of seep into every part of life. | ||
| I know in this audience, that's what I thought was so great yesterday. | ||
| They have Noor Ben Laden and the great Joe Allen come in and talk about Stargate itself. | ||
| So we have two issues yesterday. | ||
| There's a ton of questions and concerns, and I think these are good concerns, about this whole Stargate and the direction. | ||
| Of what we're doing. | ||
| I don't think today, as of now, they have reversed the whole government executive order on artificial intelligence, which we talked about when it was signed, I don't know, nine months ago. | ||
| I think they're going to just chuck that like they chucked Biden's border stuff. | ||
| I think they're working through it. | ||
| But this entire issue of the singularity, of the hurtling towards... | ||
| Advances in gene splicing, and you saw that in the vaccine, but gene splicing, everything they're doing in biotechnology, CRISPR, converging with advances in advanced chip design, quantum computing, regenerative robotics, obviously artificial intelligence and artificial general intelligence. | ||
| That convergence, as you know, is called the singularity. | ||
| And I have always wanted to force this into the dialogue of American politics, because to me it's underpinning the most important part of this age we're in. | ||
| And that's why the age of Trump has to be part of setting us on the right path about that. | ||
| Absolutely critical. | ||
| Larry Taunt and Norbin Laden are going to be with us at the bottom of the hour from Davos. | ||
| And what we're going to lay out is, you know, there's a religion in Davos. | ||
| There's a religion in Davos, the technocracy, but underpinning the technocracy is kind of this neo-paganism, that your betters are essentially, you know, we've gone through this issue before, you know, two millennia ago. | ||
| This kind of neo-paganism that underpins the technocracy or this tech feudalism as its religion. | ||
| President Trump strategically... | ||
| The actions over the last couple of days are as fundamental as it has ever happened in American politics since at least 1932. This is far deeper than what President Reagan attempted to do. | ||
| Far deeper than, you know, you can't even compare me all the way back to FDR. This is a three. | ||
| It sets in, you've had Washington, you've had Lincoln, and then you had another big change with FDR, though he's not at their level. | ||
| Of greatness and taking the Republican in a different, better level. | ||
| That would be Trump in the age of Trump. | ||
| The last part there is about Stargate, the other side of it, and I've been very adamant, is that now, let's go back to the lines of work. | ||
| You know, we have the war in Ukraine and everything about the national security. | ||
| Major changes are happening. | ||
| Fundamental changes are happening. | ||
| Incredible changes are happening from Secretary of State Marco Rubio. | ||
| Talking about the end of the post-war international rules-based order and what he's working on to everything of Mike Waltz, Colonel Waltz, over at the National Security Council, letting go 160 of the detailees. | ||
| Remember, the National Security Council is made up of some political appointees, let's say 30 to 50. Plus you have, in the scale of it, when it's at 200, it's over 200. You've got tons of detailees from the Pentagon, CA, all that he sent back home to their home base as 160 major. | ||
| Plus, Zelensky's traps that he's laying for President Trump. | ||
| Very important today in Davos to talk about it. | ||
| Number two, everything on immigration to the border and rethinking immigration. | ||
| It's caught people flat-footed. | ||
| Everything. | ||
| Just amazing. | ||
| From security to deportations to the new immigration, the language we use about it. | ||
| And in the middle, what we talked about, the existential threat, is the spending and the budget out of control. | ||
| And this is what we beseech. | ||
| Elon to focus. | ||
| We're 57 days away from the next, the government running our money. | ||
| We cannot have another CR. That's not going to happen. | ||
| We have to get this thing sorted, and we have 57 days to do it, and I think this budget has got to be out probably at least 20 days in advance. | ||
| Can't wait till the last second. | ||
| This has to be, you know, you have to chew on this. | ||
| And this is where Doge comes in working with Russ Vogt. | ||
| You saw Russ Vogt getting banged up yesterday. | ||
| I mean, they didn't lay a glove on him, but they came hard. | ||
| The cuts have to be made. | ||
| We've been promised a trillion dollars. | ||
| We need to see that. | ||
| Elon needs to focus, focus, focus on Doge. | ||
| Short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Something no person in the world has ever done before. | |
| A dead man, a dead politician has risen. | ||
| Somebody who a year, if we were four years ago at Davos, he's buried, dead politically, known to me. | ||
| He's now returned. | ||
| This is the greatest comeback in political history of a politician. | ||
| And then therefore he thinks he can do anything. | ||
| We need to also factor in not only who's won, which is Trump, but who's lost, which is to say us. | ||
| And I guess I would add, throw into that, that the epitome of the us who is losing here is Europe. | ||
| The European Union and by and large its member states have misread the direction where events were going. | ||
| The causes that it is interested in, climate, human rights, some others, as well as the methods of diplomacy that it prefers, are simply being gradually kind of marginalized as something new. | ||
| Not necessarily something better, but something new. | ||
| Moves into the center. | ||
| I want to thank Larry Taughton. | ||
| He's going to be at the bottom. | ||
| Larry's over there, as he always is, covering Davos. | ||
| He's going to be with us. | ||
| And he's actually got even more explosive than that. | ||
| And Norbert Bin Laden will be with us also with her amazing analysis. | ||
| President Trump speaks at 11 o'clock our time to Davos. | ||
| We're going to cover that. | ||
| We're going to cover it because it's important. | ||
| I want to go back to what they just said. | ||
| This is... | ||
| The power of the war room in this audience. | ||
| Or it's the power of the war room because of this audience. | ||
| A dead politician has risen. | ||
| He's done something that no one else in political history has ever done. | ||
| Three or four years ago at Davos, they wrote him off and thought he was dead. | ||
| This is so important. | ||
| They're being self-reflective. | ||
| Self-reflective on what their current status is. | ||
| They're completely... | ||
| At a loss. | ||
| This is what victory looks like. | ||
| They're at a loss. | ||
| We haven't won. | ||
| Ultimately, they're going to regroup. | ||
| But right now, they are in shock. | ||
| And they're not regrouping. | ||
| This is the same thing with the Democratic Party. | ||
| You saw in the confirmation process of last week. | ||
| There's no counter to Pete Hegseth in the revolution and military affairs. | ||
| There's no counter to Marco Rubio. | ||
| And the end of the post-war rules-based order. | ||
| There's no counter to Mike Waltz making this decision, or President Trump making this decision, Mike Waltz actually letting 160 detailees go back to the Pentagon, back to the CIA, back to DNI, back to DHS, back to the Justice Department, back to the State Department. | ||
| Get him out of the White House. | ||
| Clean out the rat's nest that the National Security Council has been. | ||
| It's a rat's nest. | ||
| Clean it out. | ||
| We're not going to let the interagency process run essentially by the CIA-controlled President Trump. | ||
| He's going to take on the deep state. | ||
| He's going to destroy it. | ||
| Right there, this is so important. | ||
| They're your betters. | ||
| Those people talking right there are your betters. | ||
| They're self-appointed betters. | ||
| They're obviously not better. | ||
| But they run the world. | ||
| The think tanks, I mean, they don't really have their hands on the lever of power, but those are the conferences and the consultants and the advisors and the... | ||
| And the brainiacs of the people in power, the people that actually control the levers, the capital markets guys, the money, certain political groups, and interest groups, right? | ||
| They're shocked. | ||
| You were never shocked. | ||
| We cover Davos every year extensively. | ||
| Why do we cover Davos extensively? | ||
| Because it's important. | ||
| It's a center of the... | ||
| It's like the annual, it's CPAC for the globalist. | ||
| CPAC for the globalist. | ||
| I made a film in 2009 or 10. Peter Schweitzer's in the film. | ||
| Peter Schweitzer's in the film a lot. | ||
| We talk with Peter, I interviewed Peter Schweitzer, one of those interviews where we stand in front of a white screen and you can't hear me or see me on camera when the final, but I'm bouncing questions. | ||
| One section of the film. | ||
| This film came out in 2010 or 11. One section of the film is called The Party of Davos. | ||
| And we go through there, you know, 14 years ago, how powerful Davos was. | ||
| Davos man. | ||
| And setting the agenda. | ||
| A dead politician has risen. | ||
| Look at them. | ||
| They're in shock. | ||
| He was written off three or four years ago. | ||
| We know he wasn't written off by you. | ||
| Not only do you have Trump's back, you knew Trump was coming back and you knew the ideas and you supported the ideas and gotten back at the ideas because ideas have consequences. | ||
| The second, guys, we have misread the direction of where things are going. | ||
| We have misread the direction of where things are going. | ||
| What is one of our watchwords here? | ||
| Let's always look over the other side of the hill. | ||
| Where is this going? | ||
| Where is the critical path? | ||
| What's the process here? | ||
| What's the statics and dynamics of what's happening? | ||
| And you have been magnificent. | ||
| Simply magnificent. | ||
| You know why? | ||
| Your betters are shattered. | ||
| The reason, go back to President Trump, he's talking about Peter and I going to prison and other people being broken and the legal bills. | ||
| The legal bills are horrendous. | ||
| The legal bills, bankruptcies. | ||
| Look at Rudy. | ||
| Look at what's happening here. | ||
| Because they never in a million years thought Trump would rise from the political dead. | ||
| Not in a million years. | ||
| Not in a billion years. | ||
| That's why they treated him with such disrespect. | ||
| That's why they treated him with such outright, almost hatred. | ||
| That's why they're so contemptuous of you. | ||
| You went from being the deplorables under Hillary Clinton to garbage, to garbage under Joe Biden. | ||
| Remember Joe Biden going to Independence Hall, that weird red? | ||
| You know, he's so bright, you know. | ||
| Dark Brandon. | ||
| Remember Dark Brandon? | ||
| These simpletons about how they thought they could stomp on us and stomp on you and crush you? | ||
| This is why this moment right now is so absolutely important for you to fully understand and get all the information about where this is going. | ||
| Because in Flood the Zone, part of this is to overwhelm with action. | ||
| What does Jack Posobiec call it? | ||
| You know, military doctrine, what do they call it? | ||
| The violence of action. | ||
| The violence of action. | ||
| Not the actions. | ||
| Violent. | ||
| But just doing things is how you push things forward. | ||
| They're overwhelmed. | ||
| Strategically, and what President Trump is doing is redirecting at a grand strategy level the country. | ||
| A new economic model. | ||
| A new geostrategic model. | ||
| A new model about our sovereignty. | ||
| A new model about interactions with technology. | ||
| All of it. | ||
| Simultaneously. | ||
| Think about that. | ||
| Simultaneously. | ||
| Now, how has this happened? | ||
| And it seems much more better coordinated. | ||
| It seems bigger in scale and more deep and greater depth. | ||
| It has both scale and depth. | ||
| Both breadth and impact and muzzle velocity. | ||
| How does that happen? | ||
| It happens, folks, because we've been all collectively working on this for four years. | ||
| This just didn't happen. | ||
| These executive orders just didn't get written overnight. | ||
| How they're interlocked. | ||
| The power of what Trump's doing now is the interconnections, the interconnectivity of the strategic moves with geoeconomically repositioning the country and this deep rethinking of our sovereignty. | ||
| What do I mean? | ||
| First, it's talking about America first. | ||
| The homeland must be secured. | ||
| That will come, I think, in three big pieces. | ||
| Number one, the Panama Canal. | ||
| We'll return to American hands of that, there's no doubt. | ||
| I mean direct control. | ||
| That will block, on a naval strategy, that will basically secure or make secure Mexico, North America, from Chinese infiltration, the ability of the Chinese to connect the two oceans. | ||
| At the same time, Greenland. | ||
| Greenland is Mahanian's strategy right there to cut off the Russian Navy. | ||
| Hey, the Russian army can't get to Kiev. | ||
| The Russian army is going to be the problem. | ||
| Zelensky can talk about all the combat troops he wants. | ||
| They can talk about all the money he wants. | ||
| The Russian army is a European problem. | ||
| It just is. | ||
| We're there to assist. | ||
| But I think President Trump's deal with Russia is going to make sure you don't need to assist. | ||
| Everybody's going to put their pens down. | ||
| But for the United States, in defense of the homeland and protection from the Russian Navy, coming out of the Arctic, Greenland, and some sort of partnership, or they declare independence, who knows where that goes. | ||
| But the United States will be a player. | ||
| Also for the new great game, but the great game for the Eurasian landmass was what occupied the 19th century with Great Britain and Russia over Afghanistan and Persia. | ||
| And that part of what is today Pakistan that was then India, right? | ||
| To protect the Raj, to protect the British Empire, and to thwart Russia getting a warm water port, that they could become a global power. | ||
| The new great game will be the Arctic. | ||
| President Trump, geostrategically, he's going to end with an Iron Dome. | ||
| Don't know how we're going to afford it yet, but his view is when he leaves, he's protected the homeland. | ||
| He is put forward and thrust out. | ||
| The strategic fortress of America. | ||
| At the same time, providing an Iron Dome. | ||
| Economically, he's totally... | ||
| It's not just tariffs on avocado coming out of Mexico. | ||
| It's deeper than that. | ||
| Today announced the New York Times has got he wants to bring forward the renegotiation of NAFTA. Right? | ||
| As an economic strategic counterbalance to East Asia and to China. | ||
| At the same time, he doesn't look at tariffs or fees or duties. | ||
| He looks at another income stream, that America is a preferred market, a premium market, because the little guys in America, the MAGA base, and self-organizing create a peaceful society that people want to get here. | ||
| It's prosperous. | ||
| There has to be a premium price paid to enter that market and access. | ||
| This is with external revenue. | ||
| But it looks at trade totally differently. | ||
| Bring back high manufacturing jobs, but also make... | ||
| Trade, not just about punitive terrorists, but a new opening of how the country is actually financed and the economic model thereof. | ||
| These are profound and deep and well thought through over many years with some brilliant people that are now in the administration that can now execute. | ||
| About our sovereignty, what's happening on immigration is so profound, so deep, so well thought through, and all of it's interconnected to strategic, with the economic, The sovereignty interconnected and moving rapidly with our enemies and our opponents broken, shattered, and with no response. | ||
| That's Trump 47 in the days of thunder. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to go to Davos. | ||
| A pregame for the president of the United States as he, on video, live, takes the stage to the party of Davos. | ||
| Next. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Times of turbulence as President Trump enacts this strategic redirection of this great republic, and this is why it's the age of Trump, it's going to get turbulent. | ||
| It's going to get very turbulent. | ||
| First off, the deep state is not going to sit there and say, this is great, just do what you want, Trump. | ||
| You already see him blocking. | ||
| This is why they got rid of the 160 yesterday. | ||
| They just had enough of the nonsense. | ||
| Get out of here. | ||
| But you've seen it now with Tom Holman. | ||
| We haven't had the big raid in Chicago. | ||
| Our own Ben Berquam's there. | ||
| We're going to go to Ben today at 5 for an update. | ||
| Ben's also going to update us on North Carolina, this amazing trip tomorrow, President Trump. | ||
| We're going to try to get some of the North Carolinians that were with us last week on their plea for help on the show. | ||
| Our own Brian Glenn of Roemucker's voice is actually en route to the western part of North Carolina. | ||
| Even as we speak, we can't get him tonight. | ||
| He'll be there tomorrow to tee it all up. | ||
| But birchgold.com ended the dollar empire. | ||
| Modern monetary theory. | ||
| You know where modern monetary theory really got turbocharged and came from academia in France? | ||
| Guess where? | ||
| Wait for it. | ||
| Wait for it. | ||
| Davos. | ||
| Davos. | ||
| The first place, the idea, this was that you could spend massive deficits and never really have to pay for it. | ||
| Another radical bad idea coming out of Davos, as so many have, as you know. | ||
| And they're coming out now. | ||
| Although they're shattered, they're still generating a lot of bad stuff. | ||
| Go to birchgold.com. | ||
| To understand the end of the dollar empire and understand completely modern monetary theory. | ||
| Slash ban it. | ||
| Get it today. | ||
| Talk to one of the experts there. | ||
| Pattern recognition. | ||
| Times of turbulence. | ||
| You need a hedge in your financial life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That would be precious metals. | |
| Also, the one thing you've got going, 90% of your net worth is tied up in your home. | ||
| The only thing that says you own that home is your title. | ||
| It's not that you live there. | ||
| It's not that you show up to work every day from there. | ||
| Go home there. | ||
| It's not that you wake up and leave the house. | ||
| That has nothing to do with actually your ownership and actually ability to make sure that you can take that asset and use it in the future. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com Go there today. | ||
| This very inexpensive kind of underpinning to make sure that no bad guy, either somebody around you or cyber, get into it. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com slash ban and get a discount. | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| Norah Bin Laden, thank you. | ||
| You were up very late with us last night going through Stargate. | ||
| Folks, the Stargate thing is very controversial. | ||
| We're going to get more to that this weekend to talk about it. | ||
| But President Trump's there to herald the new golden age of America. | ||
| Are they buying in Davos today, Norah Bin Laden? | ||
| Well, first of all, Steve, in light of these recent developments coming out of Dallas and Washington, D.C. with the announcement of Stargate, I think it's important. | ||
| I really wanted to reiterate something I said on the show last night, which is that the golden age where we men and women are no longer forgotten. | ||
| Is incompatible with the biohacking, gene editing, AI-replacing techno-human age. | ||
| And while the World Economic Forum's theme this year is collaboration in the intelligent age, this is actually their policies and what they want to implement is actually about the dumbing down of us humans. | ||
| This tech, you know, especially when it comes to AI, will not be used to augment human beings. | ||
| It will be used to reduce and replace human beings. | ||
| And this is very clear when you listen to what these people, what the Davos cult have to say and have had to say throughout this week here during the different panel discussions. | ||
| What do you mean by that? | ||
| Put some meat on that bone for me for a second. | ||
| Well, there is one panel specifically that I'd like to bring up, which took place this morning, which was entitled Technology in the World. | ||
| And it had Mark Benioff as a key participant. | ||
| Mark Benioff, who is a member of the Board of Trustees. | ||
| Of the World Economic Forum, who also wrote the foreword to Klaus Schwab's book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, who now is cozying up and trying to suck up to President Trump with these glorious time cover magazines. | ||
| So he had the following thing to say today. | ||
| He said that there has never been a more exciting time and that this generation's CEOs is the last generation of CEOs. | ||
| That we'll be managing human workers and that actually now we will be entering an age where CEOs will be managing both human workers and digital workers. | ||
| And then he went on to talk about the agentic layer. | ||
| And what he means about that is that all these corporations and institutions will have AI agents to help. | ||
| to engage with customers most notably he used the example of the World Economic Forum itself which this year has an agent that based off of attendees previous participation in various panels because they have to check in with a badge every time This agent now, | ||
| this AI agent, this machine is able to direct and recommend other panels and other events based on the history of that participant. | ||
| So he was very, very excited about that. | ||
| Nor, hang on for one second. | ||
| I think we have a clip from that panel. | ||
| Let's go ahead and hit the clip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How much better does that AI have to be than a human being? | |
| Is 10 times better enough? | ||
| It's 20 times better. | ||
| You know, you look at Waymo, for example, based on their safety statistics. | ||
| Ruth, how much safer is Waymo than human beings probably at this point? | ||
| Meaningfully safer, but your point is well taken. | ||
| There is more forgiveness when it's a human drive. | ||
| And so the question is, when a machine makes a mistake, when an algo makes a mistake, how does society look at that mistake and the cost of that mistake versus the benefits of AI coming into the fore? | ||
| Society reacts very badly, right? | ||
| As we've seen with self-driving cars, which are evidently safer. | ||
| And the question is, will society change as more technology comes, right? | ||
| Will there be a backlash? | ||
| Actually, Albert, let me ask you this question. | ||
| So what Dara is talking about is building much safer technology and facing a backlash. | ||
| You built a product that was like the best product the world ever had and probably saved the lives of a bunch of people in this room, and there was a massive backlash. | ||
| Is there anything you learned from that? | ||
| That will be helpful to people who are bringing in new technologies in the next years that will be useful. | ||
| I'm sure you're referring to the vaccine, but it was not massive backlash, it was significant. | ||
| It was maybe 10-20% of the people. | ||
| I can tell you at the same time we received a lot of love from 80% of the people that felt that their mother or father is alive because of us. | ||
| So let's put things into perspective. | ||
| The fact that some of the voices are magnified through social media doesn't mean that they are the prevalent voice. | ||
| But the example that you use is a good one because AI also will face the same problems and probably... | ||
| Actually, AI machines will create the problems to AI. They are the ones that will spread the disinformation about it. | ||
| And why? | ||
| Because it's a very powerful tool. | ||
| And with every powerful tool, in the heads of good people, will do great things. | ||
| In the heads of bad people, can do bad things. | ||
| And I think that will be magnified. | ||
| Every single mistake that AI will be doing, as you mentioned, will be magnified to the utmost degree. | ||
| Ignoring that humans are making even bigger mistakes and ignoring that the benefits that we got so far were huge. | ||
| It's all laid right out there, is it not, Nor? | ||
| The humans are the problem, ma'am? | ||
| It absolutely is. | ||
| And I think this clip is very important because it shows that they are expecting the backlash. | ||
| And there are two points that I want to make about that. | ||
| The first is that... | ||
| The subtext here of what Albert Borla, CEO of Pfizer, is saying is that they are expecting, or manufacturing, or engineering rather, that with AI, social media is going to be flooded with actual fake information, or what they will be saying is fake information, and they're going to use that as a pretext. | ||
| To impose even more draconian censorship. | ||
| That's the first thing. | ||
| We know that this is coming down the pipeline. | ||
| And it goes hand in hand with what the Prime Minister of Spain was saying also yesterday about having online digital ID for social media use. | ||
| Very important. | ||
| The second thing I wanted to say about, you know, this expectation of backlash is that basically they're going to try and get the public to accept all of this. | ||
| Digitization and these, quote, AI systems that they've been talking about on that panel, claiming that it will be beneficial for them. | ||
| You heard the CEO of Uber right there, Dara Khashrohani, saying that, you know, there's actually a very clear benefit that it's actually going to save lives to have driverless or robotic-driven cars in the same way that they are saying that all of this AI will be used to save lives via health. | ||
| This is the speech that Larry Ellison gave in the Roosevelt Room the other day during the announcement of Stargate. | ||
| And they want to keep touting the benefits of AI so that people won't question it. | ||
| But actually, what this technology is really for and what it will be used for in conjunction with the building of these data centers is the implementation of the total Techno surveillance state and the replacement of human beings, obviously, in various sectors in the workforce. | ||
| But this technology will actually be used to collect, exploit and weaponize data against us. | ||
| This is the game plan. | ||
| This is what's actually going on here. | ||
| Hang on for one second, Nora. | ||
| Once again, a magnificent warning. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play this. | ||
| I've got Larry Taunton. | ||
| I want to show also on the flip side what's the underpinnings, the theological underpinnings of Davos. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Some of this climate action that has really intensified in the last couple of decades. | |
| Switzerland has invested, developed some different ways of engaging in preservation, conservation and management of ecosystems. | ||
| One example is it's become a place where nature has been granted legal personhood so that ecosystems' rights to exist, to thrive, to regenerate are codified and recognized in Swiss law. | ||
| And that context has allowed for different people, different communities to bring lawsuits on behalf of rivers, forests, other ecosystems upon which we are intrinsically reliant and connected. | ||
| So that's what's happening in Switzerland. | ||
| a little window into what's happening at international scales. | ||
| What does that look like where you live? | ||
| Larry Taunton joins us. | ||
| Larry, what did I just hear? | ||
| Are they giving personhood to rivers and forests? | ||
| Is that what they're proposing, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, that is precisely what they're proposing. | |
| And your listeners may be wondering, gosh, what's going on with Bannon's audio there? | ||
| That actually is not white noise. | ||
| It's not some kind of interference. | ||
| the entire time that she's speaking, they have in the background the sound of cicadas and frogs and things of this nature. | ||
| And she walks out and she tells everyone to close their eyes and to imagine their 25 years in the future. | ||
| And then she just keeps talking. | ||
| But I have maintained all along that Davos, that the World Economic Forum, really has as its basis a kind of neo-paganism. | ||
| And this is really what you're seeing play out in something like this. | ||
| Now, these are the people who do not want to acknowledge the personhood of a child. | ||
| But they're talking about giving... | ||
| That's their terminology, not ours. | ||
| To rivers, to streams, to mountains, to nature itself, so that nature can sue us to achieve its own rights. | ||
| Larry, hang on for one second. | ||
| We're taking a short commercial break. | ||
| Larry Taughton's in Davos, Norbin Lund's in Davos. | ||
| Soon, at the top of the hour, if everything runs on time, the President of the United States, President Donald J. Trump, will give his address to Davos and lay it all out, his vision for America's golden age. | ||
| My question to Larry when I come back, is that neo-paganism or is that just flat-on paganism? | ||
| I mean, didn't we kind of put this one to bed over two millennia ago when the visigoths came out of the forest? | ||
| Unbelievable. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Back in the warm in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | |
| Larry, Larry Taunton, why is this neo-paganism? | ||
| Is there anything neo about it? | ||
| Isn't this just flat old? | ||
| Isn't this old-fashioned paganism? | ||
| I mean, it's very scary. | ||
| Personhood for... | ||
| As sacred as personhood is, and they wouldn't give it to fetuses. | ||
| They'll fight that tooth and nail, but they'll give it to a river or to a mountain in Switzerland, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, well, it's neo in the sense that it's a kind of resurgent paganism, isn't it? | |
| And at the end of the day, the World Economic Forum, as I think Neuer could tell you, and this is my third year in a row to... | ||
| Attend the forum. | ||
| It's fundamentally anti-human. | ||
| I mean, the World Economic Forum slogan is improving the state of the world, but it's quite deceptive. | ||
| At its core, they really don't care about human beings. | ||
| And so when Noor is talking about the rise of artificial intelligence and what's going on there, that fits hand in hand with what the World Economic Forum really is. | ||
| And so this, what I'm referring to as a kind of neo-paganism, these are individuals who reject God. | ||
| I mean, they just assume there isn't one. | ||
| And the end result is that they start worshipping and elevating nature and animal life. | ||
| Now, this particular woman, if you were to watch the entire segment, it's astonishing stuff. | ||
| I mean, it looks like an SNL skit. | ||
| It looks like everyone, before they walked in, were going, We're taking a deep hit on some marijuana before they walked into that particular session. | ||
| But this is quite reflective of what the World Economic Forum is. | ||
| It's fundamentally pagan. | ||
| It's fundamentally anti-human. | ||
| Larry, hang on. | ||
| I'm going to hold you through the top of the hour with the president's address. | ||
| Nur bin Laden, thoughts on neo-paganism as the underpinning of the anti-human? | ||
| Well, I couldn't agree more with Larry on this, and I'm so glad, Larry, that you brought up this clip because it is very important and it ties with the whole digitization of all aspects of life. | ||
| Including nature because what's going on here, the key word is tokenization. | ||
| They want to tokenize even nature and it goes hand in hand with the social credit score system as we see in China that they want to implement over here. | ||
| And when it comes to the tokenization of nature, the key group that is behind this push Is obviously BlackRock. | ||
| And I really encourage the posse to go read about this specific topic. | ||
| Whitney Webb of Unlimited Hangout, I believe, did an article a few months ago or a year ago on that very topic, showcasing, explaining and breaking down what this tokenization of nature means and how they're going to use this as a way to control our access to nature, basically. | ||
| Before the president comes on, talk to me about he's going to make the case of the new golden age of America that is before us and what his policies and strategic direction are going to be. | ||
| How's that going to be received at Davos, given what's really happening there? | ||
| And what defenses are they going to have to kind of counter this? | ||
| Listen, I'm very, very much looking forward to listening to the president's remark. | ||
| We're used to incredible speeches from him. | ||
| You know, thinking about 2018, 2019, specifically these two addresses at the United Nations General Assembly were just absolutely amazing. | ||
| Also, previous speeches he gave here in Davos to the Davos cult. | ||
| He has this ability of just throwing in their faces the fact that what they're doing is, as Larry mentioned, anti-human. | ||
| And I would just like to remind the posse of one. | ||
| Of one key statement that President Trump made in one of those speeches, which is that the future doesn't belong to the globalists. | ||
| The future belongs to patriots. | ||
| And I'm really hoping that this is the type of messaging that we're going to hear today from the president. | ||
| Larry, Noor said this yesterday in the morning show, again in the evening show, and again right now. | ||
| Is Davos a cult? | ||
| And your understanding of it, is Davos a cult? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, I would say that it is, particularly at the policymaking, the planner level. | |
| Now, I think Anur would agree with me when I say that down at the bottom, a lot of the attendees, they're often people that are just wearing the swag, they're idealists, and they don't really know any better. | ||
| And then, of course, you have a lot of vendors who are there. | ||
| But the people who are running the show, they are a cult. | ||
| If I may, they absolutely are. | ||
| And you just need to look at the chain of command of that upper caste that are in charge of running the WEF. You look at Klaus Schwab, who was mentored by Henry Kissinger, who he himself was mentored by William Yandel Elliott at Harvard. | ||
| And you can trace back over a couple hundred years. | ||
| The globalist cult. | ||
| And it is an intergenerational plan, which is one of the key characteristics of what we would define as a cult. | ||
| It's a philosophical and ideological group that is being perpetuated over the years to reach their end goal of total control, total centralization of power. | ||
| So in that regards, the President of the United States, they said at the beginning, the clip that Larry got us, a dead politician has risen. | ||
| And they were very blunt. | ||
| They wrote him off as dead, forgotten. | ||
| They said Davos, four years ago, three years ago, two years ago, mocked this guy, mocked his followers. | ||
| He is coming back today, full-spectrum dominance, as a leader of the most powerful nation in the history of the world. | ||
| With a more focused army of the awakened than ever. | ||
| I tell you what, we're going to wait. | ||
| We're going to hang on. | ||
| I got Larry Taunton in Davos. | ||
| Our own Noor Bin Laden is out in the freezing cold, as you would expect, in the Swiss mountains in January. | ||
| The president of the United States, the 47th president of the United States, is about to address the World Economic Forum. | ||
| A neo-pagan cult. | ||
| As laid out by our two experts. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break, and I think it's very fitting we're going to leave this hour with a masterpiece, Philip Kaufman's film, The Right Stuff, based upon another masterpiece, Tom Wolfe's book of the same name, in an Academy Award-winning score. | ||
| Fabulous music about the Mercury and Apollo program. | ||
| Short commercial break, we're going to leave you with The Right Stuff. | ||
| Which Donald Trump and the MAGA movement has in spades. |
Export Selection