Oct. 11, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:57
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| And I was right. But who Kamala has allowed into our country at the expense of our children, our mothers, our fathers, our grandparents, our uncles, and our aunts. | ||
| Under the Trump administration, we will put American citizens first, American children first, American patients first, American taxpayers first, American workers first, and American communities first. | ||
| We will put Communists, Marxists, and fascists last. | ||
| We're in the war room, where we, of course, always put America first. | ||
| So I think that's at Harrow C, where we're coming at you live from Washington, D.C. We're going to let President Trump speak some more, but we have a packed show for you. | ||
| We got Jeff Clark, Eric Tietzel, both from CRA and Studio, to break down so much incoming news. | ||
| You aren't going to want to miss it. But until then, we got President Trump speaking live in Aurora, Colorado. | ||
| Title 42 medical rejections. | ||
| People come in. They're very sick. | ||
| Very sick. They're coming into our country. | ||
| They're very, very, very sick with highly contagious disease. | ||
| And they're let into our country to infect our country. | ||
| And they're coming in at numbers that nobody's ever seen before. | ||
| I will send Congress a bill to ban all sanctuary cities in our country, including Denver. | ||
| And we will begin the largest deportation operation in the history of the United States. | ||
| We will close the border. | ||
| We will stop the invasion of illegals into our country. | ||
| We will defend our territory. | ||
| We will not be conquered. | ||
| We will not be conquered. | ||
| We will reclaim our sovereignty and Colorado will vote for Trump as a protest and signal to the world that we are not going to take it anymore. | ||
| We're not going to take it anymore. | ||
| I will liberate Colorado. | ||
| I will give you back your freedom and your life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And together, we will make America powerful again. | |
| We will make America wealthy again. | ||
| We will make America healthy again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will make America strong again. | |
| We will make America proud again. | ||
| We will make America safe again. | ||
| And we will make America great again. | ||
| Thank you, Colorado. | ||
| Vote for Trump. God bless you. | ||
| God bless you all. Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm going to be playing a game called, The Godfather. | |
| I think those who have been spreading these lies to try to undermine the opposition are | ||
| going to pay a price for it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boosting Trump back in 2016. | |
| Thank you, Denver, for doing that splendidly. | ||
| You're in the war room where technological difficulties are, I guess, just part of the show. | ||
| You know, we are very keen on timing here in the war room. | ||
| Joe Biden saying the quiet part out loud that you Americans are going to be paying the price if you spread hurricane disinformation. | ||
| Now, I want to spread this, lay the groundwork for what is, I think, essentially going to be a test run, what you're seeing right now when it comes to the pushback. | ||
| Against misinformation about floods and hurricanes. | ||
| It's the dry run for the election. | ||
| Right? And I want to link this to a very important story that came out in the Washington Post just last week. | ||
| Titled, As Election Threats Rise, Justice Department says its options are limited. | ||
| And buried in that story, they admit that the FBI is, quote, conducting training seminars for local officials, setting up regional and national command posts, and that various officials who are involved with election security are busy setting up more or less back channels to work with election offices across this country at a level much higher than they ever did in 2020 and conveniently in swing states. | ||
| Now, we say no conspiracies, but no coincidences. | ||
| But I'm going to call that a conspiracy. | ||
| Now, the best part of this article is that you can hear them foaming at the mouth, melting down about the First Amendment, right? | ||
| But they sort of take this approach where they essentially say that, oh, we're being asked to do more in election offices because MAGA is so crazy and And barreling down with threats, conveniently, you know, the Trump assassination attempt, that doesn't really work with this story. | ||
| They make you think that election officials and election workers are the sole target of the MAGA audience. | ||
| They're the saints of the First Amendment. | ||
| But what they're doing is laying the groundwork for a massive censorship issue. | ||
| On the ground in both digital campaign that will make what they did in 2020 look like amateur hour. | ||
| It's going to be industrial grade censorship and they're going to use what's happened with this hurricane, though false. | ||
| That's why MSNBC, all these people won't let it go. | ||
| They're going to use it as the pretext saying lives are being lost. | ||
| So much so that House Democrats actually today just put forth a letter demanding that social media companies do more to censor misinformation. | ||
| Let's read their demands. | ||
| This is a direct quote. | ||
| It's not me paraphrasing. | ||
| Increase the monitoring and rapid removal of misinformation and disinformation. | ||
| Enhance fact-checking partnerships with local agencies. | ||
| strengthen algorithms to flag and prevent the spread of harmful conspiracy theories. | ||
| Now it's quite interesting that this culmination of the whole hurricane misinformation story comes on the heels of what was it? | ||
| The Senate Intel chairman demanding that more resources are allocated to CISA to ramp up ahead of the election for censorship. | ||
| You got Adam Schiff penning a letter to all the social media platforms saying that they need to do more when it comes to election censorship. | ||
| But here's the real tell. | ||
| What was the first thing that FEMA did in response? | ||
| Not to the floods. | ||
| And I'm not talking about Kamala because that was give more money to Ukraine and Lebanon. | ||
| But FEMA set up a rumor control website. | ||
| That was interesting because that's the second time in history this administration or shall I say regime has ever put up a rumor control website. | ||
| And you know what the first time was? | ||
| It had to do with the 2020 election, and it was hosted on the CISA website. | ||
| Quite an interesting correlation there, that they're using the same tactics, like I said, a dry run, to dispel hurricane disinformation that they did to dispel disinformation about the 2020 election. | ||
| And we know they hate free speech, because then they lose. | ||
| But the same goes for free and fair elections, right? | ||
| And here's the scariest part, because in the same news cycle, you already start to see articles in Denver, you can put it up on screen, where they're now over at the University of Berkeley in California, using cohorts of children age four to seven, trying to teach them how to fact check misinformation. | ||
| And the best part, the quiet part out loud, is that over in Australia, they put up the headline, misinformation law would prevent, quote, Trumpian lies. | ||
| That's the point. | ||
| Right? It's disinformation. | ||
| It's word games where election integrity is voter suppression. | ||
| A ballot becomes synonymous with a vote. | ||
| A man becomes synonymous with a woman. | ||
| A president becomes synonymous with a cadaver. | ||
| An illegal alien becomes a citizen. | ||
| Liz Cheney's a Republican. | ||
| And it's Trump who's the weaponizer of government, right? | ||
| Well, the issue is that the Biden regime... | ||
| They have no authority. | ||
| They have no legitimacy. | ||
| And they only derive their legitimacy from fact checks. | ||
| It is a presidency that is underwritten by an unsubstantiated fact check of the 2020 election. | ||
| It's all they know. | ||
| And it shows you how desperate they are, that they're going back to their old tricks. | ||
| They're scared by, I'm sure, all the internal numbers they're seeing, but even the public ones, too. | ||
| So much so that they have to wheel Barack Obama, I guess he's probably better than Joe Biden, out on stage in Philadelphia last night. | ||
| To say something that I think is probably almost as outlandish as when Kamala Harris said sovereignty down on the southern border for the first time. | ||
| Like I said, the Warren Posse is very glad to have added that word to her vocabulary because I've never heard her use it before. | ||
| But Barack Obama wanted to lecture you guys about what it means to be a man last night and masculinity. | ||
| Now, I'd humbly ask, was Michelle Obama not available? | ||
| Remember last time I made those comments? | ||
| Maybe you, Barack Obama, the same person who, what, probably more than half of this country thinks your wife is a man shouldn't be the one lecturing us on what it means to be masculine in America? | ||
| But it's quite an interesting tell of what your party thinks it means to be a man in America today, what masculinity is. | ||
| Because it's sitting by and sitting on the sidelines as your community is overtaken by criminal drug lords and gangs that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden flew in using your taxpayer dollars. | ||
| They want to put you in the metaphorical cup chair while you have to sit and watch your country get taken from you, your children get taken from you, jam down their throats, not just with how to debunk misinformation, but how to become trans. | ||
| Fun fact... | ||
| A Loudoun County school board meeting just last week was actually shut down because parents were raising five alarm fires over the fact that a member of that very same gang that President Trump was just speaking about in Colorado, that he brought a gun to school, threatened a student, and he was actually allowed to return. | ||
| But it's Kamala Harris who says it's President Trump that doesn't have empathy, right? | ||
| Well, maybe you should have a little less empathy for gang members and terrorists, the same terrorists who are so keen on plotting Election Day terrorist plots in the name of ISIS, and more empathy for actual American citizens. | ||
| You know, you talk so much about sanctuary cities and safe havens for people who are fleeing economic persecution. | ||
| And political persecution and religious persecution, well, I think that hits a little close to home, especially in the war room. | ||
| So thanks, Barack Obama, but I don't think I'm going to take your lectures on what masculinity in America means from the same party that for I don't know how long has only ever used the word masculinity with toxic preceding it. | ||
| And the people that you think represent what it means to be a man in America are willing to weld the floodgates open, and that's not a metaphor in this case, that's literal, to illegal aliens who can come in And attack and assault women in this country. | ||
| So yeah, I would rather have President Donald Trump who just announced a plan to deport forcibly members of criminal gangs. | ||
| I would rather have him being my protector than Kamala Harris being the welcome committee for people from some of the most backwards, shall I say, women-hating countries and cultures that exist in this universe. | ||
| Just like I said to Vanity Fair yesterday, thanks, but no thanks. | ||
| We are going to be joined after this short break. | ||
| There's so much to get to. Kamala Harris has been exposed as a lying prosecutor yet again by Jeff Clark and the Daily Mail. | ||
| And now it's Democrats who are saying they're not going to certify the election. | ||
| Meanwhile, they're trying to intimidate Republicans who want to stand up for President Trump when it comes to election integrity. | ||
| And catch this. It's not just that they're giving the FEMA funds to illegal aliens. | ||
| They're actually stripping funds from Customs and Border Patrol. | ||
| I guess that's what it means to be man in Kamala Harris' America. | ||
| There's a lot at stake in this upcoming election, but regardless of who is sitting in the White House, the fuse on the economy has already been lit. | ||
| Even four years of a conservative presidency will not be enough to turn the tide on our $35 trillion national debt. | ||
| And if the left wins, it's like throwing gas on a dumpster fire. | ||
| The election is in the hands of the American people. | ||
| But what you can do right now is protect your savings by diversifying into gold with the help of Birch Gold Group. | ||
| For millennia, gold has stood firm in the face of greedy governments, economic upheavals and global strife. | ||
| And it can protect you now. | ||
| Birch Gold will help you convert an IRA or 401k into an IRA in physical gold. | ||
| Tax-free and penalty-free. | ||
| And it doesn't cost you a penny out of pocket. | ||
| In the past four years, the buying power of the U.S. dollar has declined significantly. | ||
| Price of gold has increased 40%. | ||
| Coincidence? Text the word Bannon to 989898. | ||
| Get your free info kit on gold and trust Birch Gold to protect your savings. | ||
| text Bannon to the number 989898 today. | ||
| Homes across America are being stolen every day. | ||
| It's called title theft and it's why you need to get home title protection | ||
| from HometitleLock.com today. | ||
| If no one's keeping an eye on your title, then it's just a matter of time | ||
| until they target you too. | ||
| Don't fall prey to these thieves. | ||
| Go to HometitleLock.com today and make sure your title is safe. | ||
| Use promo code Bannon and get a complete title scan of your home's title | ||
| and your first 30 days of Triple Lock. | ||
| Home Title Protection for free. | ||
| That's HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| Promo code Bannon. | ||
| You're back in the War Room where we are joined now by Jeff Clark and Eric Tietzel of CRA. We will start with you, Jeff. | ||
| Fun fact, Eric and I were Claremont Institute Lincoln Fellows together. | ||
| Yeah, we were. You were a much better student because I always took the afternoons off to host War Room, but I blamed the Deep State and DOJ. Right. | ||
| For that, speaking of the deep state and DOJ who's told us that is the original sin of anyone to dare to even contest election results, now there's an Axios scoop. | ||
| Some top Dems won't commit to certifying a Trump win. | ||
| One of the top people they mention is Jamie Raskin, beloved by this show. | ||
| Just walk us through the article and the absurdity of it. | ||
| Sure. Well, look, let me go back a little bit in time. | ||
| So Jamie Raskin tried to contest the 2016 election, right? | ||
| So it's sort of like when they want to contest an election, the Democrats, and Raskin comes from a communist background, his father, Marcus Raskin. | ||
| It was tied to the Soviets back in the 80s and runs a think tank like that. | ||
| So I think he imbibed that right at the table. | ||
| But then magically when President Trump questions an election and he has allies in Congress | ||
| and they want to question the election, it becomes insurrectionist activity. | ||
| But now since we're facing the prospect of President Trump returning to office, now it's | ||
| no longer insurrectionary. | ||
| It is now something that is their duty to protect democracy. | ||
| So now Jamie Raskin is saying, you know, I might have to contest the certification depending | ||
| on what happens in the election. | ||
| And then the Axios article clearly making obvious that this is a trial balloon, Natalie, | ||
| they indicate that Hakeem Jeffries and others associated with him have said, oh no, we would | ||
| So they're covering both bases. | ||
| If they decide they want to contest it, they'll say that Raskin put everybody on notice that he was going to do this. | ||
| But on the other hand, if they decide that it's too hot to handle politically, then they'll let maybe Raskin Complain on the floor for a few hours, but then they'll cut it short and Hakeem Jeffries will be the man of reason. | ||
| So they're covered in either direction. | ||
| We'll see a little bit of a struggle session on the House floor. | ||
| Well, how about this, Jamie Raskin? | ||
| I look forward to it, and I look forward to you guys having to try to block the certification of President Trump's victory. | ||
| We will use all of your old quotes against you, and I will look forward to doing that opposition research. | ||
| But this story dovetails quite interestingly with something that I know hits quite close to home for you, but a new ad in Denver while we talk, if you want to just play it on screen because there's no sound associated with it. | ||
| One of these dark money, David Brock, you know, Hillary Clinton operative type link to George Soros, Media Matters, all that stuff, groups called the 65 Project has put out a new ad trying to intimidate lawyers from basically going and working to help election integrity efforts on behalf of the Trump campaign. | ||
| And if the audience is seeing the ad on screen, some really damning threats. | ||
| I mean, it's explicit. | ||
| It's blatant. Walk us through what this means. | ||
| Sure. So what is the 65 project is the first question. | ||
| The 65 project was started by David Brock and he gave the first scoop to Axios. | ||
| So now he's purporting to give this scoop around to other agencies, other media outlets. | ||
| The scoop was that David Brock had put together a team of lawyers who were going to go after the 65 lawyers who had tried to help President Trump contest in various battleground states the results of the 2020 election or at least raise litigation questions about it. | ||
| And David Brock says, you know, quite openly, the goal of this was to make those lawyers toxic in their communities so that they would be shunned. | ||
| And in order to structurally and systematically make it difficult for Republicans, especially conservative Republicans, MAGA Republicans, supporters of President Trump, to ever again get off the legal playing field and provide legal support for President Trump. | ||
| So it's clearly an effort to create a one party monopoly essentially of litigation about elections. | ||
| The Democrats can challenge that however they want using Mark Elias and all of the billionaires who are funding his operation and his fake things he was involved in like the Russiagate dossier. | ||
| But if Republicans simply want to bring challenges and say, hey, state law is being violated here. | ||
| You just changed the rules inexplicably due to COVID or you're not doing signature verification | ||
| and a host of other issues, then the Democrats are going to have sick lawfare on you. | ||
| They're going to have the 65 Project file one or more bar complaints and they do it | ||
| in multiple jurisdictions. | ||
| So if you're barred in two different states, they'll file in both places. | ||
| And there are allied groups too, like this organization called LDAD, which is like Lawyers | ||
| defending something democracy. | ||
| You can take a guess. | ||
| And CRU, CRU filed a complaint against me. | ||
| And they're all working together. | ||
| And they've taken it out to another concentric circle. | ||
| They actually went after one of my lawyers, the 65 Project did. | ||
| And the Georgia authorities, they dismissed that complaint, so that was good to see. | ||
| But they're going to try to intimidate anyone who stands up or wants to stand up for President Trump. | ||
| And it's just an attempt to monopolize the system and take all of the legal warriors for conservatives off the playing field. | ||
| Well, and it seems like such a double standard, too. | ||
| And I'll bring you in on this, Eric, since you've been around D.C. You'd recently joined CRA as their new vice president, but you were previously at Heritage. | ||
| There's a funny, like, double standard that they're now placing where they say Elon Musk explicitly supporting Trump is tantamount is the same as what Mark Zuckerberg did in 2020, which there's an implicit tell there that Mark Zuckerberg essentially rigged the 2020 election in favor of Of Joe Biden, but these people are allowed to get away operating under the auspices of being, you know, nonpartisan or independent, bipartisan. | ||
| The behemoth that we are up against, I think, is so captured so poignantly by the 65 project, right? | ||
| Coming after people like Jeff, Republican lawyers. | ||
| Your thoughts just kind of being in the D.C. circle of what we are up against in terms of this dark money nonprofit stuff, especially in the context of the 2024 election. | ||
| Somebody said at one point that every accusation is a confession. | ||
| And I have thought about that almost nonstop every day that I work in Washington because you see it every day. | ||
| The so-called defenders of democracy are the ones who perpetrated the Russia collusion hoax against President Trump, right? | ||
| The defenders of democracy are the ones suppressing information, suppressing free speech under the guise of protecting democracy. | ||
| Once you hear that phrase, you can't help but see it in everything that the regime does against people like Jeff and any conservative who deigns to stand up against what they're doing. | ||
| Yeah, it's all part of the plan. | ||
| And we were talking yesterday a lot about this Vanity Fair article, and I think it honestly dovetails quite nicely with Mr. | ||
| Masculinity, Barack Obama. | ||
| They've been having to sit quietly, not laugh while I go through my rants. | ||
| But masculinity in America, I think, is a virtue that they have exploited. | ||
| to underwrite the kind of global, not just financial order and system, but the way that | ||
| we conduct foreign policy here in the United States. It rests upon the masculinity of especially | ||
| young boys in this country who are forced to go and spill their blood and their lives and give it | ||
| for, you know, defending the borders of other countries. | ||
| And when you see stuff like this happening, I mean, it's, you know, my background is in | ||
| investigating the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| It's so reminiscent of what they've done over there when they were, you know, pulling out | ||
| Hu Jintao of that recent, like, that's what they tried to do to President Trump. So I'm just curious | ||
| your thoughts. Just give us an update on your bar case, if you are complaint, if you if you can, | ||
| I know we're going to get into it last show. Sure. So there are three stages inside the DC | ||
| local process before you can potentially ask the Supreme Court for review. | ||
| And also, I've tried to take the case out of the local D.C. process into federal court. | ||
| So there are like six different proceedings. | ||
| But let me say this. | ||
| Diversity is your strength. Yeah, I mean this kind of complexity is something I've dealt with my whole career, so it's good. | ||
| I think a lot of lawyers would find it maddening. | ||
| But I'm at the second stage of the local process. | ||
| Briefing is going to – it's just started this week and it's going to wrap up in November. | ||
| And then that entity, it's called the Board on Professional Responsibility, they're going to hold an oral argument on December 19th. | ||
| So that's, you know, we're gearing up for that. | ||
| That's going to be very interesting. And then it relates at some level to the Fannie Willis case. | ||
| We have our appeal to the Georgia Court of Appeals that's going to be argued on December 5th down in Atlanta, arguing that she should be disqualified. | ||
| So that's just a quick update of where things stand. | ||
| So it'll be an exciting December. | ||
| You know, the Warren Posse always has your back. | ||
| And like we always say, it's quite the tell that the January 6th report from the Inspector General's office, they're doing everything they can to delay that until after the election, when in reality, you would think that the democracy defenders, the January 6th LARPers and crisis actors would want that report to be their October surprise. | ||
| But it's quite interesting that they're going the route of the Bob Woodwards of the world and the Christopher Steeles of the world, right? | ||
| Speaking of lawfare, we're going to get into Kamala Harris's, I would say, track record, but there's really nothing there when it comes to her prosecutorial abilities. | ||
| We know they spin her as someone who's gone after cartels and human trafficking organizations, and that's why she's going to be so tough on the border. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But oh wait, it's all a sham. | |
| Which I guess is quite indicative of the Harris regime's border policy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. Jeff Clark, Eric Keetel after this short break. | |
| Trump back in 2016. | ||
| But I also think there are Americans who are engaged in this kind of propaganda. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And whether they should be civilly or even in some cases criminally charged is something that would be a better deterrence. | |
| If the platforms, whether it's Facebook or Facebook, Twitter X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control. | ||
| And it's not just the social and psychological effects, it's real harm. | ||
| It has an agenda, and they're putting out disinformation. | ||
| Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence. | ||
| The U.S. is a tough one because, you know, we have the notion of the First Amendment. | ||
| We should have free speech, but if you're inciting violence, if you're causing people not to take vaccines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Also how to immunize people against misinformation prospectively, not always playing catch up. | |
| Are you concerned that individuals involved in the recovery effort are being threatened online? | ||
| We most certainly are. | ||
| We are seeing horrific hate speech of all types propagated on online platforms. | ||
| That deplorable speech has an impact on people's lives. | ||
| I think we need to push back on this. | ||
| There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our | ||
| democracy. | ||
| We don't get mad in the war room. | ||
| We have a little something called righteous indignation. | ||
| And I hope that that montage of clips not just confirmed what I was talking about in | ||
| the opening, how they're using this whole disinformation narrative as the test run for | ||
| what they're going to jam down your throat using the apparatus of the DOJ, the FBI, big | ||
| tech, you name it, ahead of the 2024 election. | ||
| It's quite interesting timing. | ||
| All of those comments were made basically within the time span of a week, with the exception of Tim Waltz, who I guess has been a real early adopter of the censorship of misinformation. | ||
| I guess maybe he's what their interpretation of masculinity is. | ||
| Sit on the sidelines while Kamala Harris destroys the country. | ||
| Yeah. Basically zero evidence that she ever first chaired a case, right? And she had very poor reviews when she was working in San Francisco. | ||
| But you had an interesting scoop, too. | ||
| So let's start with that, and then we can broaden out to the Daily Mail piece. | ||
| Sure. So what I discovered by redoubling my efforts was I found a habeas case that tied to Kamala's prosecution of this child rapist. | ||
| There are actually two child rapists. | ||
| The one in question was named Carvin Evans. | ||
| And he eventually got nine years in jail and he filed a habeas suit to try to get himself | ||
| out of jail in California about four years after he went to start his sentence. | ||
| And by reading that decision carefully, which took a while to track down, | ||
| it was a decision written by a female judge on the Northern District of California Federal Court | ||
| in California. | ||
| I learned that there was both a male and a female prosecutor involved in what he was complaining about. | ||
| And the main thing he was complaining about was that all of the African-American prosecutors Potential members of the jury were stricken off by the prosecutors. | ||
| And so this is inconsistent with the idea that she first chaired this trial. | ||
| I suspect that probably the male referred to in the case by the federal judge in the habeas case is the one who actually was the first chair, which is why when I've challenged... | ||
| To have brought forth some transcript that shows that she actually was the lead prosecutor on an important criminal case, that that challenge has not been taken up. | ||
| It's now day 12 of my tagging her with that challenge and day 32 of me raising it and saying, show me the transcript, show me the money, and no one can. | ||
| And so you're going to talk about the Daily Mail piece, but let me mention another piece and urge people to go watch it. | ||
| Today or so, Tucker Carlson's interview with Harmeet Dillon launched, which was about Kamala's record as a prosecutor. | ||
| And so she, based on her research, indicates that we're talking about the incredible shrinking prosecutorial record. | ||
| So originally Kamala claimed that she... | ||
| Had prosecuted hundreds of cases. | ||
| Then her opponent, Fazio, explained in a debate that actually, you know, they couldn't find evidence of that. | ||
| And then she dropped it back to 50. | ||
| Now Harmeet Dillon says there's only evidence that she ever prosecuted eight cases. | ||
| Six in Alameda and then two in San Francisco. | ||
| But, you know, if you're only talking about eight cases, it's quite possible that she never first chaired a trial, which is what I've been honing in on from the start. | ||
| Maybe now we know why the gender pay gap exists. | ||
| It's because Kamala Harris never worked. | ||
| But I want to link this because if you watch MSNBC every day, you hear them chipping away at the narrative that Donald Trump was a successful businessman, right? | ||
| That's something they've launched a new book, they have new documentaries coming out, and they're really going after his sort of origin story, right? | ||
| As, you know, Trump the builder. | ||
| And I think it's quite interesting that they haven't obviously put Kamala Harris's origin story under the same But linking the Daily Mail piece, and you can kind of walk through how it showed that she just, again, has a poor track record by her own firm or the government's admission if you look at her reviews. | ||
| I mean, this really is damning to her whole narrative. | ||
| Put it this way. If the only case that she can make that she's tough on the border is because she used to be a prosecutor, then that's a damning non-answer, as I recently heard in a vice presidential debate, that they're not going to be tough on the border. | ||
| Exactly. Look, you know, kudos to the Daily Mail for sending some reporters out to do some work to explore, as you said, Natalie, the origin story as a prosecutor for Kamala Harris. | ||
| And what they discovered actually was that she had a kind of interlude in between being | ||
| in Alameda and being on these various boards that Willie Brown put her on and being in | ||
| the San Francisco DA's office where she was actually a civil lawyer for the city law department | ||
| of San Francisco representing child services. | ||
| And there she was reviewed by court employees and the court employees gave her very bad | ||
| marks in her performance review. | ||
| In particular the one that really stuck out to me is timeliness. | ||
| She got a two on the five-point scale for producing timely results. | ||
| And again, it goes to the issue of it doesn't look like someone who works very hard. | ||
| And now that we're only down to a universe of potentially eight cases, of which now I've found one, and I still can't locate the transcript, it's an indicator that she has puffed herself up beyond all proportions. | ||
| Okay. Well, Eric, I want to bring you in on this because the story that you're going to break, I know CRA was behind it, I think speaks to the, again, just shoddy track record, although it's intentional. | ||
| It's not a result of incompetence when it comes to facilitating this mass invasion. | ||
| You guys over at CRA uncovered that it's not just that FEMA's allocating funds to illegal aliens. | ||
| They're actually stripping funds away from CBP. We have the picture up on screen. | ||
| It's not disinformation. | ||
| MSNBC, don't try to fact check us. | ||
| But walk us through this new story. | ||
| Yeah, that's right. That's text from the FY24 DHS appropriations bill. | ||
| If anyone does want to try to fact check Natalie in the war room, happy to give them the reference. | ||
| This will make your blood boil. | ||
| It's truly crazy. I mean, just when you thought that Congress couldn't be worse than it is, here we are, where they actually wrote into the text of the law that we're going to appropriate funds to Customs and Border Patrol. | ||
| So that they can transfer those funds to FEMA in order to facilitate the passage of illegal immigrants into the inland of our country. | ||
| They wrote it into the law as a shell game so that they could juice their numbers on CBP as if they were taking Border Patrol seriously, which of course we know they don't. | ||
| And then as soon as the law passes, CBP is required to give that money to FEMA so that they can help these folks take a train or an airplane, get a hotel room, in some cases cash in an envelope or a gift card, and go about living their life in the United States. | ||
| And in total, how much funding are we talking about? | ||
| I think the numbers are astounding. | ||
| We're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars. | ||
| And you're saying that House Republicans, who don't worry, Speaker Johnson, I have a bunch of tweets of yours that we'll get into, that they signed off on. | ||
| They are squarely responsible for this. | ||
| Well, I suppose that you could argue that this was part of a $1.2 trillion minibus and they couldn't possibly be expected to read the bills that they were voting for before they voted for them. | ||
| But it's right there in the black letter of the law. | ||
| You know, House Republicans and Speaker Johnston, I'm looking at you. | ||
| It's so funny because I was going through your Twitter account last night and here's what you guys have been tweeting. | ||
| Border security is national security. | ||
| Hashtag Harris border crisis. | ||
| With a nice scarily edited picture of Kamala. | ||
| And then just for good measure, you guys who what, routinely failed to pass, or sorry, you passed the SAVE Act, then you cheapened it as a tool of political leverage and refused to force a vote on it in the Senate, you guys had the nerve to tweet, only American citizens should vote in American elections. | ||
| And meanwhile, you guys are busy appropriating funds, not to CBP, but to various cutout agencies, so it can then be stolen from the hardworking men and women who are Customs and Border Patrol agents that you guys have absolutely provided no cover for, just like you've provided no cover for the administration of safe and secure elections here in the United States. | ||
| And now we find out, which again, we always knew on this show, that you guys are in on the trade. | ||
| You guys signed off, squarely responsible for being okay with ripping funds from actual American citizens and giving it to illegal aliens. | ||
| Who are being shipped into your districts, your constituents' hometowns, oftentimes from countries—let's not make the mistake here, let's not miss this part—from countries that their children and grandchildren were sent overseas to die fighting against. | ||
| How's that for a social contract? | ||
| You get to send your kids overseas to die in a war for the globalist ruling class in this country? | ||
| And in exchange, we'll accept hundreds of thousands of migrants from countries, including Afghanistan, where they're going to plan terrorist attacks on election day in the name of ISIS. Oh, and then the best part of it, too, is that the hundreds of national security advisors and foreign policy experts, yeah, the 51 disinformation agents, sorry, national security officials who said that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, they're going to come out and endorse Kamala Harris and scores of hundreds of them, hundreds, 741, I think, | ||
| was the last article that I saw, and say that you're a nativist and you're a racist and you're a xenophobe because you support President Trump. | ||
| That's the system that they uphold. | ||
| And that's the system that you underwrite, Speaker Johnson and House Republicans. | ||
| So spare me not just the strongly worded letters. | ||
| I know that's what I usually come at you guys for. | ||
| But now you're so weak on the freaking issues that you're just sending out tweets. | ||
| Tweets. Americans are dead because of the border crisis that you facilitated. | ||
| And you want to put out tweets. | ||
| Meanwhile, House Democrats, who for years said that we were domestic terrorists because we questioned the integrity of elections, are now getting ready to do that same exact thing, and you guys will probably do nothing. | ||
| I guess that's what it means to be a man in Obama's America. | ||
| Yeah, we're going to keep going back to that. | ||
| Because we could use some real men in the House GOP. Not just some tweets. | ||
| We'll be right back after this short break. | ||
| Homes across America are being stolen every day. | ||
| It's called title theft, and it's why you need to get home title protection from HometitleLock.com | ||
| today. | ||
| If no one's keeping an eye on your title, then it's just a matter of time until they | ||
| target you too. | ||
| Don't fall prey to these thieves. | ||
| Go to HometitleLock.com today and make sure your title is safe. | ||
| Use promo code Bannon and get a complete title scan of your home's title and your first 30 | ||
| days of Triple Lock home title protection for free. | ||
| That's HometitleLock.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room where we survived yet another week of attacks from the deep | ||
| state, whether it was Bob Woodward's book, Christopher Steele's new book, the Kavanaugh | ||
| The timing is always curious when it comes to, I call him, Deep State subcontractors, and I know the two men who were kind enough to join me for the hour in studio know just a little something about that. | ||
| Eric, before you give us your coordinates, just your sort of concluding thoughts on the, you know, dark money NGO apparatus that we are so clearly up against. | ||
| Yeah, that's where it gets even worse. | ||
| People might ask, why FEMA? Couldn't CBP just as easily facilitate the invasion of our country under the orders of the Biden-Harris administration? | ||
| And the answer is that FEMA is really good at doling out the money they receive from | ||
| taxpayers to these NGOs, these non-government organizations, many of which have the word | ||
| charity in their name, who have gotten rich from taking government money and using it | ||
| to facilitate the invasion. | ||
| The CEOs of these organizations oftentimes make six figures, in some cases a million | ||
| dollars a year of your money so that they are the ones who can facilitate the housing, | ||
| the feeding, the education, the legal advice that illegal immigrants need to evade the | ||
| justice system in the United States, all at your expense. | ||
| And then what do they do? | ||
| They turn right around and they write letters opposing things like HR2. | ||
| And they use their gravitas as supposedly religiously affiliated organizations like | ||
| Catholic Charities or Lutheran Social Services and say, we can't have these inhumane and | ||
| un-Christian immigration policy. | ||
| you all, all the while they get rich from the open border scheme. | ||
| It's a cartel. We have a dangerous Mexican cartel on one side of the border and we have this very elite, well coordinated, religiously affiliated intersection between government and charity cartel on the other side. | ||
| Yeah, Kamala Harris is so beloved by the cartels. | ||
| I don't really even think she would have needed a Secret Service detail when she was down there speaking in Arizona because they so desperately want her to win. | ||
| Jeff Clark, who really have been driving the point home. | ||
| They can't say that they're not seeing your tweets because we know they're obsessed with you. | ||
| They can't get enough of you. | ||
| So they're definitely seeing it. Give us your kind of concluding thoughts and where people can follow. | ||
| Sure. Look, people need to be very aware of this problem with the NGOs. | ||
| It's a problem that occurs in the immigration space. | ||
| It's a problem that occurs in the environmental space, which is about trying to deindustrialize America and to stop America's energy dominance from continuing. | ||
| And it's also particularly dangerous in terms of the NGOs who've taken up this cause now in a kind of next wave of going after lawyers for conservatives. | ||
| And I can tell you that if Kamala Harris becomes president, Natalie, that they're going to institutionalize things like the 65 Project. | ||
| They're going to start giving them grants from the Justice Department to say, well, | ||
| we need to protect our democracy by funding lawyers who are going to prevent democracy, | ||
| anti-democracy inroads, as they would put it, by MAGA lawyers, by lawyers who deny elections, | ||
| etc. | ||
| And all of this is facilitated by their side's billionaires, especially in the tech industry. | ||
| It's facilitated, I'm convinced, in the environmental sector, the anti-energy sector, by America's | ||
| foreign competitors, and especially China. | ||
| And on the legal side, it really has the prospect of structurally taking over. | ||
| There's nothing you can do in America and its government and its policy anymore without lawyers. | ||
| So if you can chill all the lawyers so that you're the only side that has lawyers on your side, that's half the ballgame or more. | ||
| Yeah, the several hundred scores of, you know, NATSEC officials who've come out and endorsed Kamala Harris, that will be the public face of the operation that will be coming after MAGA in a way that we haven't even seen. | ||
| Like I said, it'll make 2020 look like amateur hour. | ||
| Real quick, one more time, if people want to follow, get all the shows, all the stuff, where can they go? | ||
| I'm online at Eric Tietzel. | ||
| Awesome. I'm at JeffClarkUS on X and Getter and at RealJeffClark on Truth Social. | ||
| And we're at the Center for Renewing America, americarenewing.com. | ||
| Thank you guys for joining and sitting through the rants. | ||
| We'd love it. I appreciate it. | ||
| Mike Lindell, you join us now. | ||
| Let's see what your background is today. | ||
| It's a unique one today. | ||
| Hit us with the latest, all things MyPillow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right on. And I'm going to tell everybody, you guys, I really want you all to get involved in the election, even if you think your state or county doesn't matter. | |
| Check out lyndaleplan.com. | ||
| You'll find out why it does matter and what you can do in your own county at this point in time. | ||
| So check that out. | ||
| But you guys make it all possible. | ||
| I've been on the road. I've been speaking in churches and so on for this election. | ||
| You guys make it possible that I can get away from my pillow. | ||
| And we've hired over 50 new employees this week. | ||
| But here's the last day for this special. | ||
| This is the percale sheets that came in for the fall here. | ||
| And this line, we did it for one week on sale just for the War Room Posse. | ||
| A special price, $34.98 for the Queen. | ||
| Get all the colors and sizes, $39.98 for the King. | ||
| This is it. Last airing on this. | ||
| Long staple cotton. | ||
| The best sheets you're ever going to sleep on in your life. | ||
| Best gifts ever. And get them for everyone in the house. | ||
| Use promo code WARROOM. Go to the website and the other specials are up there yet. | ||
| There you see the sheet one that's going to go away in a few hours and then you have the classic collection there. | ||
| We've got that 80% off closeout overstock sale. | ||
| We put everything on that, exclusive for the War Room. | ||
| You guys take advantage of that. | ||
| We do have free shipping options available, still available, and you'll have to check those out. | ||
| But we've got everything, the $25 Roll and Go Anywhere pillows, the USA Made socks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Best socks you're ever going to use. | |
| There's the bathrobes on sale. | ||
| Most of these are War Room exclusive. | ||
| Now, the beach towels, we're closing them out. | ||
| $25. Check those out. | ||
| And all of these things that are exclusive for the War Room Posse, you guys, take advantage of it, especially the sheets. | ||
| Last day for the sheets. Use promo code WARROOM. Go to the website to see Steve's face. | ||
| And by the way, I told him all you guys are all breaking records. | ||
| I emailed him and he just put back epic. | ||
| So he's very, I think, very excited that we are breaking records here with the War Room Posse. | ||
| And I want to thank you all. | ||
| And my new sling is a win, win, win, win, everybody. | ||
| And we're going to win in a couple of weeks. | ||
| And so get the best sleep of your life while we're waiting. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us, Mike Lindell. | ||
| That's the most Steve response I've ever heard. | ||
| Epic, no matter what you send, it's always what you get back. | ||
| The only variable is how many exclamation points are attached. | ||
| For those of you who ever texted with Steve, you know what I'm saying is very true. | ||
| Mike Lindell, we'll have you back on soon. | ||
| Have a nice weekend and Warren Posse, thank you for hanging with me for the entirety of this week, | ||
| use this weekend to make sure, obviously, not just that you're voting. | ||
| We know you got that under control. | ||
| You got to outvote the fraud. | ||
| We've got to outvote the non-citizens. | ||
| It's not just enough for you to vote yourself, your family, your friends, everyone. | ||
| We've got to make sure they have a plan to vote and make sure they do vote. | ||
| Because we want to set the terms of victory. |
Export Selection