Oct. 11, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:02
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, every day you're out there. | |
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a quarter and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | |
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room. Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Thursday 10th of October, Anno Domini, 2024. | ||
| Harnold here at the helm, filling in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Good afternoon to you all. | ||
| Well, a couple of days ago, the New York Times carried an article saying first ever high | ||
| school survey had done of kids, and it discovered that 3.3 percent of high school students identified | ||
| as transgender. | ||
| And a further 2.2% are questioning their gender identity. | ||
| And this has been published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a body which I'm sure is very high in the trust rating of the warming policy. | ||
| To help me break down what this might mean for America is Brandon Showalter from the Christian Post. | ||
| Good afternoon. Thanks for coming on the show today. | ||
| Tell me this 3.3% statistic. | ||
| First of all, I'd like to know, do you think it's an accurate reflection of where kids are today? | ||
| But then tell me something about whether this is a natural phenomenon that we're witnessing or whether it's the result of something rather more nefarious. | ||
| It's absolutely the result of something much more nefarious. | ||
| And in terms of the accuracy of the data, I'm surprised it's as low as 3.3%, but it is clearly the result of a systematic social engineering, ideological indoctrination campaign that has been happening. | ||
| I'm troubled enough by all of these surveys from the CDC. You are right to mention why it is so distrusted. | ||
| I mean, there's surveys of all kinds being given to students, to children who are being asked these very personal kinds of questions. | ||
| And I certainly don't trust what they're doing, mining all this data from kids asking them about sexuality and gender. | ||
| Frankly, I don't think it's their business. | ||
| Let's get right to the point here. | ||
| No one has ever been or ever will be born in the wrong body. | ||
| That's the ideological tenet at the core of being transgender. | ||
| The idea of a gender identity that is apart from their sex is a complete anthropological falsehood. | ||
| So clearly what this data, to the extent that it's useful, reveals is that there's a significant swath of our young people that somehow believe that their body itself, their sexed body, is wrong. | ||
| Brandon, can I just interrupt you for a quick moment here? | ||
| You're actually denying this Hypothesis that there is a divergence, a potential divergence between biological sex and gender identity. | ||
| You're just saying straight out that gender identity is the biological sex, the XX chromosome, XY chromosome, if you're a chap, it's dictated by that. | ||
| The rest of it is all hypothesis from academia and has actual no fundamental reality to it. | ||
| It's an anthropological falsehood. | ||
| This idea of a gender identity apart from sex is entirely false. | ||
| Now, that's not to say that there aren't some students with severe trauma, a mental health issue. | ||
| Maybe there are some students that maybe even so does not mean that there is a gender identity apart from their sex. | ||
| That's the construct that is false at its core. | ||
| So in that case, if there is such a phenomenon as gender dysphoria, you're basically saying it's a form of mental illness. | ||
| And the best thing that the authorities can do, the medical authorities, the school authorities, parents, social workers can do, is give sort of coaching, in inverted commas, to a kid that feels that, inverted commas, dysphoria, to help them feel more confident in their own body. | ||
| Again, if they've got a mental health issue, if they are genuinely confused, they are not served by being lied to about their sex. | ||
| Because the philosophical construct is what I and many Americans across the political spectrum object to. | ||
| If children are being told that they have a gender identity apart from their sex, that is a lie. | ||
| That is not to deny the very real suffering that some of them may be experienced, but it's that false anthropology that's at the root of the problem. | ||
| That's an ideological indoctrination campaign that's led by people in high places because no one has ever been or ever will be born in the wrong body. | ||
| That is impossible. And so when people are claiming to be ontologically transgender, That reveals just how thorough that indoctrination campaign has been. | ||
| This is a transhumanist experiment, if you will. | ||
| No one has ever been or ever will be born in the wrong body, and it's a crying shame that we have spent years indoctrinating children into this lie. | ||
| Brandon, let me ask you a question. | ||
| There are at least two states in the Union, South Carolina and Illinois, if I remember this correctly, that prohibit tattoos on children. | ||
| Below the age of 18, even with parental consent. | ||
| Could you tell me something? | ||
| What does it say about the authorities in the United States today, where it is illegal to give in these two states and other states as well, I think, have a limit of 16 with parental consent, right? | ||
| But two states... | ||
| What's it say for the United States that you can't give your 17-year-old boy a tattoo that says, I love mum and dad, or whatever, right? | ||
| Because that's illegal. Because you've got to protect the kids from that. | ||
| A tattoo is a lifelong thing. | ||
| Even if you can remove it. | ||
| No, no, hang on, hang on. What's it say to you that you can't give a tattoo to a 17-year-old, but you can... | ||
| That being too graphic, do an irreversible operation on their genital equipment. | ||
| Well, I'll have to take your word for it about the tattoo statutes, but it does prove the point very clearly because states have all kinds of laws about what minors are and are not able to do. | ||
| In some states, you can't even buy spray paint if you're a minor, and the tattoo is an even better example because it's altering the human body. | ||
| This goes to show that this dogma, gender identity ideology, is a creed, sort of the de facto religion of the day, if you will, that reigns in high places. | ||
| In all of the tops of our institutions and all cultural spheres, gender identity, this notion that people have this essence of themselves apart from their sex body, is the ruthless creed. | ||
| Creed that dominates our discourse and it dominates how people think about these things. | ||
| And so even if it means a radical surgery to remove your secondary sex characteristics or taking hormone blockers that are not FDA approved for gender confusion, by the way, or cross-sex hormones that alter your physiology, alter your reproductive system, somehow that's allowed in the state of Illinois, but you can't get a tattoo. | ||
| Just the cognitive dissonance is truly mind-blowing here, but that's because of the power of the ideology that has invaded all of our institutions. | ||
| You would think, you know, getting a tattoo is a lot less damaging than having your genitals amputated or your breasts removed, but no, according to the powers that be- That really is an irreversible procedure. | ||
| You can remove a tattoo these days through laser work, right? | ||
| But having the gender reassignment is irreversible. | ||
| And no one talks about the phenomenally high suicide rate I think it helps people to make the inquiry within themselves whether the sources of official information that are telling us these things are acting in good faith or bad faith. | ||
| And I think just making that contrast between tattoos and gender reassignment surgery illustrates that there's a certain degree of bad faith in operation. | ||
| Here's a similar question for you. | ||
| What does it tell you, Brandon Sherwater, that... | ||
| I remember about 20 years ago, sexual abusers in prison weren't allowed to have, they're still not allowed to have, chemical castration. | ||
| Even if they want to do it because they say they have demons, sort of desires within themselves that they can't control. | ||
| Many people in this situation have asked for chemical castration. | ||
| It's always been declined to them. | ||
| What does it say to you, Brandon Showalter, that you can't give a convicted paedophile in prison a chemical castration, but you can give the exact same combination of drugs to a six-year-old child, even against the parent's permission? | ||
| What does that tell you about the state of the United States today? | ||
| And feel free to use the word Satan in your answer. | ||
| Well, I don't hesitate from calling this stuff demonic as a Christian, certainly. | ||
| A lot of people who are secular have such issues with that word because they don't have a spiritual understanding of the world. | ||
| And that's not a slam against them because I talk... | ||
| To many people from across the spectrum who are opposed to this madness, but you're correct. | ||
| Lupron, one of the drugs that's used to treat prostate cancer and endometriosis, has sometimes been used to chemically castrate sex offenders, but that's less so now. | ||
| I say used because that was once a thing but doesn't appear to be so much anymore. | ||
| Pediatric Lupron is used to block the normal natural puberty of children who are dysphoric And it's a crime against humanity, in my opinion. | ||
| I mean, these are medical atrocities that need to be seen for what they are. | ||
| I very much believe that gender-affirming care, one of the worst euphemisms ever devised, will one day be seen alongside... | ||
| Scandals such as ice pick lobotomies and thalidomide. | ||
| This is an atrocious medical scandal, and it's heralded and praised at the tops of our institutions, our medical associations, even as European nations like Sweden, which is certainly not a conservative country, are now backpedaling. | ||
| Finland, Europe, all across Europe, they are scaling way back on this treatment protocol for gender confusion. | ||
| But the United States and Canada seem to be still going full steam ahead. | ||
| There has been some resistance here. | ||
| But at the moment, the tops of our institutions are pretty recalcitrant, and the pressure must continue on them because this is absolutely diabolical. | ||
| And I don't know how people live with the cognitive dissonance that, yes, drugs that have been used to chemically castrate sex offenders in the past are now being used for a condition in children that has no scientific basis. | ||
| There's no good science on this. | ||
| You mentioned thalidomide. | ||
| Here's another example. To this day, in Germany, they're still tracking down and finding people who worked in concentration camps in their late 90s and throwing them in prison. | ||
| You mentioned thalidomide. | ||
| I'm willing to say that I was an innocent mistake. | ||
| It was a foolish one, not a prudential one, but I'm willing to assume that was an innocent mistake. | ||
| What is going on now with kids is not an innocent mistake. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing, they know the harm they're causing, they know the high incidence rates of suicide, and yet they're still doing it. | ||
| And in the same way that people who worked in concentration camps are being tracked down in their 90s and thrown into prison for the crimes that they committed, Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Yes, we at The Christian Post are currently in the middle of releasing Season 4 of our documentary podcast called Generation Indoctrination Inside the Transgender Battle. | ||
| It can be available at generationindoctrination.com as Christian Post's landing page. | ||
| It's also available on Spotify and wherever you get your platforms. | ||
| And again, I would just point everybody to a documentary film that I was a participant in that's still relevant today. | ||
| It's called Dead Name, and this is about how this ideology ruptures families, and that can be viewed at deadnamedocumentary.com. | ||
| Don't miss it. And Brandon, where do people go to catch up with you on social media? | ||
| Brandon M. Show is my handle on X, and check out all of our print reporting and, of course, our documentary podcast at christianpost.com. | ||
| From the Christian Post, thanks very much for coming on the show. | ||
| We'll catch up again with you soon. God bless for now. | ||
| Thank you. Polling now, let's go to Rasmussen Reports on Mark Mitchell. | ||
| Mark, good afternoon to you. | ||
| Thanks for coming on the show. It seems that the other pollsters are slowly coming around and confirming what Rasmussen has been finding on its research for many months now. | ||
| How do you feel about this? Good sign, right? | ||
| I think I should be taking a victory lap all week because exactly what we saw coming is what is playing out right now. | ||
| And I said, listen, you know, Trump is beating Biden by over five points. | ||
| Biden's a bad candidate. | ||
| She'll do better and she'll get a lot of press. | ||
| I mean, we talked about this in July on your show and it'll tighten up some, but I still think he stays on top. | ||
| And that's exactly what our latest poll shows today. | ||
| Another for the fifth time in a row. | ||
| Trump plus two result. | ||
| And what you're seeing in the news media, though, today is a lot of things like, oh, the polls take a turn for the worse, or all of a sudden danger signs appear in Kamala Harris's campaign. | ||
| No, the polling didn't change. | ||
| It was always bad for Kamala Harris, and anybody who knows the polls could look at RealClearPolitics. | ||
| The Pennsylvania polls have been exactly tied for over a month, almost a month and a half. | ||
| I've been saying that for months, but they wouldn't allow that narrative to get into the media because they need that FOMO. They need the vibe. | ||
| They need to paint her as a shoe-in candidate. | ||
| But even out of her own mouth now, she admits that she's the underdog. | ||
| And so Again, I'll say that between now and Election Day, she needs an act of God to win because Trump's doing better than he's done at any point in any of the previous cycles. | ||
| And we've seen it coming, but now it's just like everybody's coming to the realization all of a sudden, oh, the internal polls don't match the public polls. | ||
| Like, yeah, right. I've been saying that forever. | ||
| Oh, you know, it's like Pennsylvania is off the table. | ||
| Well, the polling hasn't changed. | ||
| It just hasn't. It's locked in steady at Harris plus two in a national popular vote and that's not as good as Hillary Clinton did even and the polling bias is still going to be to the left. | ||
| I know you guys have Some state-by-state information that you're working on that's going to come out next week, especially on the battlegrounds, and I can't wait to see what those results will show. | ||
| Tell me just quickly, before we talk about the betting markets, you guys, I think, have the only daily presidential tracking poll, right? | ||
| Tell me, is President Biden's approval, his negative minus 20 approval ratings, are they impacting at all on Kamala Harris? | ||
| People have always – let me see if I can pull those numbers up. | ||
| People have always associated her with the Biden campaign. | ||
| We asked before if – who is a fresh start and new direction candidate and who is the change candidate, and she overwhelmingly lost those. | ||
| And so people looking back at Biden's administration say that – they don't give it good marks. | ||
| They say that Bidenomics was a failure. | ||
| And that's always been kind of like the calculus for her and everybody just looking at August. | ||
| This is when we ran those numbers and there's like no scenario in which she's going to be able to distance herself from I'm from the Biden administration and here we are. | ||
| And again, the polling hasn't shifted. | ||
| Trump's not running away with anything. | ||
| It's just been like this. | ||
| And now all of a sudden you see all these internal polling leaks. | ||
| So it's like we've asked multiple times in all those situations on the issues and Kamala Harris loses on every single issue that matters. | ||
| Here we are. It's anybody that convinced themselves that Donald Trump was the underdog here in the mainstream media. | ||
| It looks like they were just lying to themselves. | ||
| And I think Mark Halperin said it best earlier this week. | ||
| If you don't like the fact that Donald Trump has the upper hand right now, you just need to go back and tune into MSNBC and put your head in the sand. | ||
| Mark, you're one of the best, to my mind, the best professional pollster in the business. | ||
| Tell me, how am I to interpret what's coming through on PolyMarkets, which I sort of, along with Rasmussen Reports, is one of the polls I check every single day. | ||
| I think Saturday or Sunday of last week, they were literally on 50-point Zero each, both candidates. | ||
| Over the course of the week, we touched on this light, I think it was Monday. | ||
| As the week has rolled on, there's a real divergence opening up now because Kamala's now on 45%. | ||
| Trump's on 55%. | ||
| It's like nine and a half points ahead in the betting markets. | ||
| I understand with polling, it's to some extent aspirational because you say who you want to. | ||
| To win. You're adding in that right. | ||
| It's what people do. | ||
| When it comes to the betting markets themselves, they're betting with their own money. | ||
| Tell me how am I to interpret this, especially with regards to the battlegrounds, because of those six battlegrounds, there has been movement in this week alone that Michigan and Wisconsin have now joined Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania in coming down Some of them quite strongly in the Trump camp, leaving only Nevada for Kamala Harris, and that's only 4% ahead for Kamala on that one. | ||
| So tell me how, as a professional pollster, how much attention should I pay to the betting markets? | ||
| Yeah. And before I do, I'll just – I got the spreadsheet up. | ||
| When considering the general conditions in the country, which is closer to your feeling, that America needs more of the same or a fresh start in a new direction, fresh start in a new direction, 73 to 20 – And does President Donald Trump offer more of the same or a fresh start in a new direction? | ||
| He's the fresh start candidate, 52 to 39. | ||
| Fifty-eight percent of voters say that Kamala Harris is more of the same. | ||
| So now the way I look at the betting markets is maybe like one leg of the tripod. | ||
| There's polling. There's the betting markets and other prediction sources. | ||
| And then there's all the data that you can run about turnout and early voter stuff and the mail-in ballots and registration changes. | ||
| And the reason I've been watching Polymarket closely, there's multiple betting markets. | ||
| I think they have a very deep market. | ||
| It's a very slick site, very well presented. | ||
| And what has been happening is, in my opinion, the writing has been on the wall for the polls | ||
| for weeks and weeks now, but the betting market was deadlocked. | ||
| Now, Polly Market just runs this market like a financial market. | ||
| People can log on here and trade the free market price of whether they think Harris | ||
| or Trump is gonna win this. | ||
| And if you look at the national popular vote market for really like a month, it's been | ||
| back and forth with Kamala Harris mostly up by a point or two, kind of drifted a little | ||
| bit wider after her debate, but it's been deadlocked. | ||
| And then all of a sudden... | ||
| Right after the vice presidential debate, Pennsylvania, which was also really deadlocked, exactly tied, blew out. | ||
| And everybody knows Kamala Harris has to get Pennsylvania. | ||
| So for the very first time, not only does the polling say she's losing, the prediction market says it as well. | ||
| And with polling, there's always some morning consult poll that you could cherry pick to say that Harris is winning. | ||
| But incontrovertibly, by looking at the betting market, she is the underdog. | ||
| She is losing right now. And then the national popular vote market followed right behind in a really stunning way on, I think it was Monday morning, going from Trump plus two to a stunning Trump plus almost ten in one hour on massive volume. | ||
| And now, even looking at it now, it looks like it's just absolutely blowing out again. | ||
| Just like as we're literally talking here, Trump is now up to lower double digits, 56 | ||
| to 43. | ||
| And if you've been keeping track with Nate Silver's numbers, that's a flipparoo. | ||
| He's got it going the other way. | ||
| So I think you'll see his model start to lean towards Trump too. | ||
| And listen, we're all trying to predict the election. | ||
| It's all this massive consensus-seeking operation, and I think everybody's going to come to where we're at that Trump is winning this thing. | ||
| I do actually check Nate Silver's page every day as well to see where his movements are. | ||
| He seems to, off the top of my head, because I don't have it in front of me, he seems to have Kamala tracking at around, what, three and a half points. | ||
| And that just doesn't move. | ||
| I mean, wherever they move relatively, they sort of, it's a parallel fix between the two | ||
| of them and it hasn't seemed to move across the whole of the last few weeks, which is | ||
| strange because most of the posters are starting to say that I'm starting to affect Rasmussen's | ||
| to one degree or another. | ||
| Right. | ||
| But Nate Silver's off doing his own thing. | ||
| Yeah, we all know Nate Silver used whatever excuse he could to downrank us in his model. | ||
| And whatever. I mean, he's probably got Quinnipiac and Morning Consult rated like number two. | ||
| Who cares about that? | ||
| But he puts two things out. | ||
| He puts an aggregate of the polling, which is what you're talking about. | ||
| And on RealClearPolitics, the national popular vote margin has been about Harris plus two. | ||
| Both Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight, I think, have it more like Harris plus three. | ||
| So, they're taking the left-leaning polling industry and shifting it to be even more left-leaning. | ||
| But he has this other thing that's a lot more volatile. | ||
| He actually produces a probability of a Harris or Trump win that I think he produces based | ||
| on all these simulations he runs. | ||
| And that thing has been all over the place in a way that really, I don't think, matched | ||
| the polling at all. | ||
| Because again, I've been saying, the polling has been pretty flat. | ||
| Now, I think you might see some of these people sort of overexposed on the left, like Reuters | ||
| Ipsos creep their way back to a tied race. | ||
| Scott Adams calls that the great pollster true up. | ||
| I think it's playing out even as we speak. | ||
| But with Nate, I think he has Harris up like 60, couple to high 40s. | ||
| I think he's going to flip that. | ||
| Mike Mitchell, before you bounce, where do people go to break down these figures that we're just talking about? | ||
| Yeah, state polling coming out next week, especially North Carolina. | ||
| Really excited to put a sort of stake in the ground about what Trump should see there so we can all look back. | ||
| But RasmussenReports.com. | ||
| Tax Network USA is a patriot-owned business specializing in aggressive strategies designed | ||
| to help solve IRS problems quickly and in your favor. | ||
| After a two-year pandemic pause in collections, the IRS has stepped up collection efforts with an army of new agents. | ||
| Here's how Tax Network USA can help. | ||
| Tax Network USA has a preferred direct line to the IRS. They know which agents to talk to and who to avoid. | ||
| If they get a difficult agent, they call a different agent. | ||
| Their tough negotiators don't stop. | ||
| They know how to help reduce or even eliminate tax debt. | ||
| Their experts explore every possible solution to help end your debt fast. | ||
| Some tax solutions expire. | ||
| You don't want to wait on this. | ||
| Waiting could make it worse. | ||
| You don't want to miss out on hardship or forgiveness program. | ||
| Never call the IRS yourself. | ||
| You're at their mercy. | ||
| You could sit on hold for six to eight hours. | ||
| They could grind you for all your back taxes plus interest and penalties. | ||
| You need Tax Network USA. They are the warriors. | ||
| TNUSA can handle all your state tax issues as well. | ||
| Tax Network USA is offering a free consult to Steve Bannon listeners. | ||
| Call 1-800-958-1000. | ||
| Visit TNUSA.com backslash Bannon. | ||
| With a massive tax hike proposed by Harris and almost 40% top income tax rate, 7% increase to the corporate tax, a capital gains tax on unrealized gains, and the fact that she's proposing to add almost $2 trillion to a current $2 trillion deficit. | ||
| You might be thinking it's time to make more of your savings tax sheltered and inflation sheltered. | ||
| This is where I trust the good people at Birch Gold to help you. | ||
| Birch Gold will assist you in converting an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA in gold. | ||
| And the best news, you don't pay a penny out of pocket. | ||
| Just text the word Bannon to 989898 and get a free info kit on gold. | ||
| There's no obligation, just information on fortifying your savings before the crazy times really hit. | ||
| With an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and thousands of happy customers, you can trust Birch Gold, too. | ||
| Text Bannon to the number 989898 for the free info kit today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| Welcome back. | ||
| Let's talk election integrity, or the lack thereof now. | ||
| I've got Colonel John Mills down the line. | ||
| Colonel Mills... | ||
| Good afternoon to you. | ||
| Tell me, you were at a pretty important phone call this Tuesday. | ||
| First of all, tell me who was on that call, who was hosting that call, and then let's break it down and tell me whether you were convinced by what you were told. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Ben. So the Office of the Director of National Intelligence led an interagency team, which also included the FBI, included Department of Homeland Security, Cybersecurity, and And Infrastructure Security Agency and State Department with about 50 journalists. | |
| It was a breakdown of what they were doing, their current assessment. | ||
| Now, this was specifically on the foreign influence of the US election. | ||
| Very interesting, but it shows, unfortunately, for $80 billion a year, We're not necessarily getting our top people, as they said in Raiders of the Lost Ark, captured narratives. | ||
| But one of the first things I asked, so what was the legal authority for them doing what they were doing? | ||
| Now, they said, well, this is foreign intelligence. | ||
| So that was okay. | ||
| Yeah, there's a foreign intelligence angle. | ||
| I get that. Now, afterwards, they sent out a graphic, which I can send on in, that showed the roles and missions of the departments and agencies. | ||
| Now, one of the first things I caught was there's only about five federal laws in regards to elections. | ||
| There's really not that many. One of the most important ones, especially for this election... | ||
| is 18 U.S. Code 611. | ||
| You gotta be a U.S. citizen to vote. | ||
| It's not debatable. | ||
| That was not listed. | ||
| And so why are they not listing one of the most important U.S. laws on elections? | ||
| You have to be a U.S. citizen to vote. | ||
| It's like, okay, are they not enforcing that? | ||
| Is that not important? | ||
| I mean, this is crazy. | ||
| So right off the bat, if they're gonna list roles and missions of the departments and agencies, | ||
| you have to list 18 U.S. Code 611. | ||
| Very concerning. | ||
| Cut. | ||
| Colonel Mills, you mentioned the $80 billion budget there for all of these intelligence and security services added together. | ||
| Do you think, is it your suggestion here that they're simply using domestic election integrity as a cover to implement or to deepen their spying network on American citizens? | ||
| Is that really their fundamental goal here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it's several factors. | |
| I think there's a laziness, a lack of intellectual curiosity. | ||
| They are captured by narratives. | ||
| There's that aspect of it. | ||
| There's a deep state aspect where you have hardcore operatives that, yes, they want to go after populists. | ||
| They want to manipulate the vote. | ||
| And you've got those who are just kind of, they like this gig and they're really not going to put a whole lot of energy into it. | ||
| So you've got several factors. | ||
| But yeah, you talk about the spying apparatus. | ||
| We'll get to that because I brought up the Albert sensors that are placed down to the 3,300 counties so that DHS CISA can see what. | ||
| We don't know exactly what they're seeing with these Albert sensors. | ||
| Very concerning. One of the things they started with is they assessed Russia is supporting Trump. | ||
| It's like, okay, hold on a second here. | ||
| Where is this coming from? | ||
| They said, well, because they're attacking Kamala Harris. | ||
| Well, just because they're attacking Kamala Harris doesn't mean they support Trump. | ||
| John Durham just ripped the intelligence community and the government apart for their farcical fake 2016 Russia, Russia, Russia fake and the 51 Intel officer letter. | ||
| And I sat in on the 2016 Intel Community Assessment where they just, Comey and Brennan, I was actually part of that where Comey and Brennan made up the Russia story. | ||
| So they're captured by the Russian narrative again with no basis in fact. | ||
| This is just, this is absolutely wrong in so many ways. | ||
| Colonel Mills, stay in one moment with the BRICS and the BRICS adjacent dynamics here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tell me about Iran. Well, yeah, they said, oh, China's not involved, so just forget that. | |
| We'll come back to that. But Iran, it was very odd. | ||
| They didn't mention the assassination attempts. | ||
| We have at least three Iranian operatives, assassination operatives that DOJ has mentioned, plus this fourth who was working as a contractor for the FAA, which would give them access to flight data and track specific aircraft such as Trump Force One. | ||
| So they didn't mention the assassination attempts as election interference. | ||
| It's like, wow, that seems pretty important. | ||
| Why would they leave that out? | ||
| And it's also been said in public statements Iran is a proxy for China from so many IC and DOJ assessments. | ||
| Well, if Iran is a proxy for China... | ||
| And Iran is interfering in the election. | ||
| They said Iran is definitely interfering in the elections. | ||
| Well, then China is interfering in the election because Iran would not exist today if it wasn't for China. | ||
| So just many non-sequiturs in this whole briefing. | ||
| That seems to be a simple syllogism in terms of logic, right? | ||
| You cannot avoid drawing that conclusion. | ||
| If China, if Iran is a proxy of China, and Iran is definitely trying to manipulate this election, then China needs to be involved in that somehow. | ||
| I don't understand how the US... Is this why I'm coming back to that question, you know, about the good faith here? | ||
| I don't understand how, in good faith, they can make these simultaneous arguments. | ||
| That's why I speculate that there might be another reason that these agencies are coming together, because I'm not remotely convinced they're interested in election integrity. | ||
| There must be another reason. Obviously, they want to justify their $80 billion budget, but they're never going to pass by an opportunity to spy on Americans if they can. | ||
| Whether they get away with it or not, and there seems to be a problem for them. | ||
| Give me a minute or two about that just before you bounce, would you, Colonel Mills? | ||
| Tell me about this, but what that tells you about the intelligence agencies not showing very much intelligence when they're making these conclusions, and how easy is it for you, your own background in the military, to trust these sources of authority? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, with almost 40 years of government service, what I saw was the tyranny of the narrative. | |
| The tyranny of the narrative. | ||
| That's the way this is. | ||
| Just intellectual laziness. | ||
| Don't even question the narrative. | ||
| And that's crazy. | ||
| You always have to test the narrative. | ||
| You always have to red team what is considered the explanation. | ||
| So it's intellectual laziness. | ||
| It is deep state-ism. | ||
| There is this, if Trump gets in office, he's going to take apart our gravy train. | ||
| We better make sure he doesn't get in. | ||
| They also talked about, one of the things they talked about was Threats to election officials. | ||
| You know, we're going to really make sure, well, okay, what federal law are they talking about when they say threats to officials? | ||
| There is some aspect to a federal law on that. | ||
| But I said, okay, how about the election officials in Chicago, Philadelphia, and other places, Detroit, that refuse, refuse to appoint Republicans as election officers? | ||
| Well, that sounds like intimidation. | ||
| Why aren't they looking into that? | ||
| So that seems to be a real one-way street. | ||
| Because when they say, watch out, it's going to be very, very contentious. | ||
| You talk about storms. | ||
| It's going to be stormy in November, December, and January. | ||
| That's a code word to attack mega. | ||
| That's what they're really referencing. | ||
| Well, what about Detroit? | ||
| What about Chicago and Philadelphia that refused to bring a Republican on as an election official? | ||
| Colonel Mills, I was going to ask you that exact same question. | ||
| If they're talking about threats to election officials, it seems to me that they are concerned about MAGA. That's who they have in their crosshairs. | ||
| And that was confirmed in the thesis. | ||
| This is an operation to spy on Americans rather than to do anything about foreign interference in US elections. | ||
| Colonel Mills, thanks for coming on the show today. | ||
| As always, where do people go on social media to keep up with your first-rate analysis? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Ben. So on X, I'm back on X, Colonel Rhett John, Colonel R-E-T John 2. | |
| So Colonel Rhett John 2 on X, on Substack, Colonel R-E-T John, Colonel Rhett John on Substack. | ||
| Thank you so much, Ben. Colonel Mills, thanks very much. | ||
| God bless. Catch up again with you soon. | ||
| Thank you, Ben. Well, just earlier on in the show, I was talking with Mark Mitchell from Rasmussen Reports about the battleground states. | ||
| And I mentioned of the six battleground states, the one battleground state that, according to the betting markets, that isn't yet ahead for Donald Trump is Nevada. | ||
| So who better to sort of talk me through the recent developments in that state than Seagal. | ||
| Chantal, Congresswoman from the RNC, and Sigal, thanks very much for coming on the show again. | ||
| Tell me, as I asked you last time, tell me again, what is the momentum like in Nevada right now? | ||
| Well, good morning, Ben. | ||
| The momentum in Nevada is that we had ballots drop in Washoe County, which includes Reno and the northern regions of Nevada. | ||
| Clark County ballots are dropping today, and we are ready to shift gears. | ||
| People should be receiving their ballots over the next few days, definitely by Monday. | ||
| Early voting starts on October 19th. | ||
| And we are now going to start shifting gears, all hands on deck, to harvesting those ballots. | ||
| Ballot harvesting has been decriminalized in Nevada in 2020. | ||
| And that's where we're at. | ||
| We're going to have all our groups, America Path, Turning Point USA, the Nevada GOP, Trump Force 47. | ||
| We are officially going to start I'm changing gears to ballot harvesting operations. | ||
| So you said that ballot harvesting has been decriminalized in the state of Nevada? | ||
| Correct. Yes. | ||
| So the operation is to make, if I can use this term in this context, the operation is to make Donald Trump the lord of the harvest. | ||
| Absolutely. Folks in Nevada, if they're listening to you now and they want to get involved, could you just recite the principal points, if this is so important, and Nevada is a key battleground state. | ||
| How can people get involved and help CIGAR? So first, what they could do is they can obviously talk to their neighbors. | ||
| When you're talking to parents at school, if you have school children, make sure that people get out and vote. | ||
| Look, the inflation rate, I can't beat this down enough. | ||
| The inflation rate in Nevada is 22 percent. | ||
| We've got the second highest gas prices in the country. | ||
| The only way to turn around the economy Is to vote for Donald J. Trump. | ||
| Also, it is important we have to vote down ballot races. | ||
| So what we need is we need to make sure that the governor secures his legislature because otherwise, let me tell your listeners, Here's the reality of it. | ||
| If the Republicans do not maintain the Senate this legislative cycle, we will see a state income tax be passed in the 25 legislative session. | ||
| So if you enjoy Nevada, you enjoy living in a state that has no state income tax, you better vote down-ballot Republican across all races. | ||
| I cannot emphasize this enough. | ||
| If they need to get in contact with the Nevada GOP, you can go on our website, NevadaGOP.org, Nevada spelled out, GOP.org, sign up, help us out. | ||
| We can never have enough ballot harvesters. | ||
| Turning Point USA has harvested 100. | ||
| Get out, get 100 ballots, and we will keep the legislature this session, and we will definitely deliver Nevada to Trump. | ||
| Segal, before you go, just tell me one thing. | ||
| Are you expecting J.D. or President Trump to come to Nevada for a rally between now and the election? | ||
| Yes, so President Trump is going to be up in Reno Friday, and he will be holding an event. | ||
| It is a roundtable event with a Hispanic community on Saturday. | ||
| I will not be at that event because I want to tell your listeners it is Yom Kippur on Saturday, so I will be celebrating Yom Kippur. | ||
| Thanks so much. | ||
| Before you go, quickly, your own personal social media. | ||
| Chatter for Nevada on Twitter, Getter, Truth and Facebook. | ||
| Sigal Chatter, the RNC committee woman in Nevada. | ||
| Thanks for coming on the show. Catch up again with you soon, Sigal. | ||
| God bless. God bless. | ||
| Vanity Fair, not normally considered MAGA essential reading, has a great article out | ||
| today on the host, the absent host of this transmission, Steve Bannon, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Grace Chong, you've read the article, came out today. | ||
| Tell me a bit about it. | ||
| What's in there? | ||
| Hi, Ben. | ||
| So, you can't see, but I have a smile from ear to ear right now. | ||
| But I want the posse to read the latest Vanity Fair article. | ||
| It's on Steve and the War Room. | ||
| It's incredible. Impact the war room posse is making. | ||
| I mean, even a huge national outlet like Vanity Fair is writing about it. | ||
| So there's an important quote in there that I want to read. | ||
| Bannon has turned his immensely influential War Room show, which has continued to broadcast after his incarceration with guest hosts, into a cross between a daily troop muster and a policy training school, which he uses to tutor millions of quote-unquote peasants, as he likes to phrase his target demographic, on how this global power structure actually functions. | ||
| So, Steve referring to this audience as peasants is deeply symbolic. | ||
| He uses it as a badge of honor. | ||
| So by calling all of you guys peasants, he's not talking down to you guys, as you guys should know. | ||
| He's empowering you guys. | ||
| And he's saying, you may not be part of the elite, but you are the true backbone of this movement. | ||
| You have the power, you have the numbers, and you together can challenge and dismantle these corrupt systems. | ||
| So it is you guys, the ordinary hardworking Americans, It's the army of the awakened, as Steve has coined it. | ||
| And so... I want all of the Posse members to read it. | ||
| It is just an incredible article. | ||
| It actually favors Steve and the War Room. | ||
| And I know Steve's going to pounce on this for a week or two after he gets out. | ||
| So definitely, the Posse must read this. | ||
| And if you think your activism doesn't matter, it does. | ||
| Vanity Fair, like I said, it's a huge national outlet. | ||
| They're paying attention. And the impact you guys are making, it's real and it's shaking the system. | ||
| So your work is being noticed and the momentum is undeniable. | ||
| So thank you, War Room Posse. | ||
| And I just want to get into get out to vote with this is, you know, let's keep that momentum going. | ||
| Get out to vote. The last registration for North Carolina is this Friday. | ||
| So call all your friends, neighbors, everyone that you know to make sure they register. | ||
| And then Wisconsin and Pennsylvania is this coming Monday. | ||
| And then I'm sorry. | ||
| Wisconsin is this coming Wednesday. | ||
| And then Pennsylvania, Michigan is that following Monday. | ||
| And Nevada, just like Segal said, is Wednesday on the 23rd. | ||
| So make sure that everyone is registered. | ||
| Now going into early voting, Arizona already started. | ||
| So make sure you guys get out to vote. | ||
| I was there last year. It was crazy. | ||
| Long lines. It was hot. | ||
| Printers were broken. Let's make sure we have enough time to have everyone vote. | ||
| And just as important, To make sure we have time to chase ballots. | ||
| And Seagal mentioned that for Nevada, but that is a big thing, making sure that we have enough time. | ||
| Democrats have, what, two weeks to do that. | ||
| Last year we had about 12 hours. | ||
| Let's make sure we do it early this time. | ||
| So, and then if you guys have any questions, any general get-out-to-vote questions, and JoJo has been just flooded with emails and just super sweet emails, too. | ||
| So please send her the thank yous because it really has been encouraging her and also the team because she shares it with all of us. | ||
| But if you have any questions, make sure to go to her social media. | ||
| It's at JoJo WFMA or email her directly at JoJo. | ||
| I'm sorry, JoJoWFMA at Proton.me. | ||
| I just want to quickly say that, referring to the Vanity Fair article, which Steve refers to us as peasants, he's meaning it ironically in the same way that he uses Clinton's term, deplorables. | ||
| That's all we've got time for today. | ||
| Thanks very much for joining us. | ||
| We'll be back at 10am tomorrow. | ||
| God bless. America is standing on the brink of an election meltdown. | ||
| And Jim Rickards, editor of Strategic Intelligence, the man who predicted the 2008 financial crisis, Trump's victory in 2016, and the COVID disaster is sounding the alarm. | ||
| Rickards has just dropped a bombshell that could change everything you think you know about the 2024 election. | ||
| He's uncovered what he calls the Democrats' secret plan to keep Trump out of the White House, even if he wins. | ||
| This isn't some far-off theory. | ||
| He's warning that this meltdown could lead to a 50% market crash, the total collapse of the U.S. dollar and violent riots in our streets. | ||
| The stakes are higher than ever, folks, and if you're not prepared, you could lose everything. | ||
| But Jim Rickards isn't just predicting disaster. | ||
| He's laying out five critical steps you need to take now to protect yourself, your family, and your financial future. | ||
| This isn't fear-mongering. | ||
| It's coming straight from a man who's been at the highest levels of intelligence, finance, and national security. | ||
| Go to Meltdown24.com right now to watch his urgent presentation. | ||
| Don't wait until it's too late. | ||
| Meltdown24.com. | ||
| That's Meltdown24.com. | ||
| Homes across America are being stolen every day. | ||
| It's called title theft, and it's why you need to get home title protection from HomeTitleLock.com today. | ||
| If no one's keeping an eye on your title, then it's just a matter of time until they target you too. | ||
| Don't fall prey to these thieves. | ||
| Go to HomeTitleLock.com today and make sure your title is safe. | ||
| Use promo code BANNON and get a complete title scan of your home's title and your first 30 days of TripleLock home Home title protection for free. | ||
| That's HomeTitleLock.com. |
Export Selection