Sept. 24, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
49:29
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| Welcome to The War Room. | ||
| It's Monday, September 23rd in the year of our Lord 2024. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters holding down the fort here in The War Room where last week we delivered the great unmasking yet again of the Uniparty America Last Republican Party in Washington, D.C. | ||
| Of course, the latest charade, the latest form of political theater, though I think that's too nice a term. | ||
| Maybe we should start calling it agitprop because that's what it is, was the SAVE Act, right? | ||
| That was the cavalry that was coming to save us. | ||
| We now know it was nothing but a cheap, shiny toy, which frankly, it's disgusting that House Republicans would even try to use election integrity as an excuse to continue to fund the government at these ridiculously bloated and weaponized levels. | ||
| We're not just talking About fiscal irresponsibility. | ||
| We're talking about funding our own demise. | ||
| The only reason that election integrity was even a salient talking point is because MAGA forced the issue on that conversation since 2020. | ||
| And actual patriots who actually held the line on election integrity are sitting and rotting in federal prison because you guys have refused to do anything about it. | ||
| So don't lecture us about not wanting to defend elections. | ||
| And by the way, your little SAVE Act, which I'm pretty sure you guys took a six-week vacation, even though it passed in July, Would have hypothetically been passed, despite, of course, the Senate shirping it, President Biden vetoing it, the day that voting in person already started and mail-in ballots had already started being sent out. | ||
| Now, we know all the fiscally responsible conservatives who say, oh, I don't usually vote for CRs. | ||
| The only reason that I voted for this one was because of the SAVE Act. | ||
| But it was always a lie from the get-go. | ||
| And that's why now we're facing a three-month CR That is setting us up on the track to have, you guessed it, an omnibus favored by the lobbyists, the Democratic Party, and the Republicans. | ||
| The bad ones. | ||
| Here's the issue, and this is why the SAVE Act is something that we're going to keep hammering here. | ||
| Not just because it shows you that these people are liars. | ||
| Again, I don't think we need a lot of evidence on that one. | ||
| It's not just confirmation bias. | ||
| Joe Biden has naturalized 3.5 million people since 2020, purposefully reversing Trump-era policies that cracked down on that number. | ||
| 97% — that's what current polls are showing — of new citizens are so eager to vote, and they overwhelmingly vote Democrat. | ||
| So I'm all gung-ho to focus on noncitizens voting, But House Republicans who want to continue funding the Biden regime with now a three-month CR? | ||
| You guys are directly responsible for those naturalization processes and funding the Department of Homeland Security, aiding and abetting and importing tens of millions of people always conveniently into swing states. | ||
| So don't lecture the war room. | ||
| I've heard, as you guys know, I was in DC last week, some angry group chats from Republican members of Congress. | ||
| They're triggered by you guys, the audience, and me for daring to call out their bluff on the SAVE Act, because that's what it always was. | ||
| I know exactly how Washington works. | ||
| This audience knows exactly how Washington works. | ||
| You guys purposely don't do your single-subject spending bills, so now we're stuck with our backs against the wall and you use that as the evidence that we need to pass CRs only so you can get your omnibus in December. | ||
| Single-subject spending bills have always been the demand. | ||
| You guys shouldn't have gone on vacation if you didn't have it all together. | ||
| But I guess maybe that's what being America last is, right? | ||
| Maybe I should put this in a strongly worded letter so Mike Johnson and his cronies get it. | ||
| You know, I'd say the revolution's not going to be televised. | ||
| That's probably true. | ||
| But only because House Republicans are too busy funding the salary of the CISA director and not cracking down on censorship programs that the revolution's probably going to be codified in strongly worded letters that Speaker Johnson's going to write after this country is on the brink of financial collapse because of the debt that you want to keep plunging us into. | ||
| So this audience is going to keep doing what we do best, which is what I always say, metaphorically, but that is burning down the phone lines. | ||
| And believe me, they're so scared of you. | ||
| You guys are raw political power. | ||
| It's the only reason I'm sitting in this chair and Stephen K. Bannon isn't. | ||
| And it's probably why a few years down the road, I'll be in prison too. | ||
| But we're actually raw grassroots power, and they frickin' hate it. | ||
| So in the honor of Stephen K. Bannon, to keep that reputation up, I hope you guys continue to call 202-225-3121, and of course, download the Bill Blaster app, because now the CR that they're pushing, it's not even six months, it's three months, teeing us up perfectly for an omnibus. | ||
| Business as usual, right? | ||
| Well, business as usual always seems to cut one way, and it's never for the American people. | ||
| But maybe that's just part of the plan, and it's why you're trying to replace this country, and I'm using that word intentionally, with illegal aliens, because you know your policies are so unpopular. | ||
| Frankly, it's asymmetrical warfare. | ||
| It's an arms race. | ||
| We're focusing on winning issues and trying to vote legally, and they're importing a whole new electorate. | ||
| And they have the nerve to say, yeah, you can be a non-citizen and vote in the United States, just like the White House, by the way, came out today. | ||
| They have the nerve to say that they oppose the Stop CCP Act, which would sanction members of the Chinese Communist Party and their family members. | ||
| You can't do that in the United States, but you can throw American patriots in jail. | ||
| And what's Speaker Johnson going to do about it? | ||
| Nothing except continue to fund that regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's why we're going to call 202-225-3121. | |
| Now, I'm honored as much as I speak so harshly against House Republicans, there are a few good ones, and I'm honored to be joined by one of them now. | ||
| That is Congressman Tim Burchett, Tennessee's favorite, I would say. | ||
| Congressman, if you can sort of walk the audience through this new three-month CR and how it is setting us up on the path for an omnibus come December. | ||
| Yeah, well, I can't argue with anything she stated. | ||
| It does not include the SAVE Act, which was just that shiny object you described earlier that was just trying to get us to vote for something that would continue Pelosi's and Schumer's bad spending levels. | ||
| You've got to realize, these are COVID-level spending, if you can imagine that. | ||
| We've got until September 30th to fund the government, allegedly. | ||
| There's a lot of discussion on that, too, when you allegedly shut the government down. | ||
| Are you really shutting the government down? | ||
| We have laws in place to stop anybody from losing their home or, you know, like your military and things like that. | ||
| So there's a lot. | ||
| They always throw that up there. | ||
| We're expected to vote on it this Wednesday. | ||
| It's got $231 million in new money for the Secret Service. | ||
| You know, my point on the Secret Service was $3 billion. | ||
| They They ought to be able to manage their money. | ||
| They need to get out of the business of counterfeit enforcement. | ||
| That should be over in Treasury. | ||
| I see an opportunity to reduce the size of government with this, but I got a feeling it's not because it's always we need more money. | ||
| Really, the reality is that we've got until the end of the week, Thursday or Friday before you see the shutdown go into effect. | ||
| I mean, there's It's mind boggling that every hundred days we add another trillion dollars to our debt. | ||
| And that's what this is all about. | ||
| And you're exactly right about single issue spending bills. | ||
| That's what we have in Tennessee. | ||
| And frankly, that's why one of the reasons it's constitutionally mandated. | ||
| But we have a balanced budget because every one of these fat cats up here has got to get up and make would have to make every one of their bills justifiable. | ||
| And that's just not possible. | ||
| It is just not possible when you have a 3,000-page spending bill that's dropped on your desk two hours or three hours before the bill is actually taken up. | ||
| So it's all by plan. | ||
| It's the same old game. | ||
| And yeah, I'm frustrated, but we got to keep in the fight. | ||
| And how will we change this? | ||
| People will ask me this. | ||
| You know, I hear people say, well, we're going to beat them at the polls. | ||
| Well, no, you're not. | ||
| 98% of them will get reelected and 13% of the population or something like that's voting and 20 to, I heard the other day, almost 40 million evangelical Christians aren't even going to go to the polls this time. | ||
| We get what we deserve. | ||
| And the only thing that's going to save this country is Donald J. Trump. | ||
| If Trump gets in there, all these moderate or squishes or whatever, Yeah. | ||
| Well, what it does is it just continues the bad funding and the bad programs, and there's nothing he can do about it. | ||
| how a three-month CR will uniquely limit, if not handcuff, his ability, potentially | ||
| if the omnibus then passes, to do, to implement his agenda? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Well, what it does is it just continues the bad funding and the bad programs. | ||
| There's nothing he can do about it. | ||
| Then when you pass the omnibus on top of that, after that, that just combines it all together. | ||
| That in effect is a budget. | ||
| We're constitutionally mandated to pass a budget, and we don't pass a budget because we're gutless. | ||
| And that's the bottom line. | ||
| And we've elected a bunch of gutless people up here in both parties, and they play ball and they get rewarded. | ||
| Are you expecting then to see the nose on this three-month CR grow among your Republican ranks, forcing Speaker Johnson to collect the votes from Democrats, or do you think he will be able to get votes just from within the Republican side of things? | ||
| I think he'll get the majority of Democrats without asking, because it's all their programs. | ||
| It's everything they wanted, and it's all the things that the Republicans want. | ||
| You know, here's what they do. | ||
| They get together, and then they'll say, one side will say, You know, I need this, and I hate your programs. | ||
| The other side will say, I need this, and I hate your programs. | ||
| And guess what? | ||
| They both get their programs because they both give in on the spending. | ||
| And that's how we've got this bloated budget, and we'll continue to have it. | ||
| And there will be no budget discussion. | ||
| You know, we have a budget committee, Jody Arrington out of Texas. | ||
| Budget committee. | ||
| Dadgum. | ||
| Let him do his budget. | ||
| He gets up there and talks to conference. | ||
| Here and they give him the ability to give him his five minutes or whatever, then they give him the obligatory golf clap and he's, and then they send him on his way and don't, and don't, don't require the committee to do it. | ||
| And he would do it. | ||
| He would gladly do it. | ||
| Matter of fact, he, he cherishes that role and would love to do it, but we don't. | ||
| And is there any discussion, I'm just curious, going on behind the scenes? | ||
| Is this obviously a problem not limited to Speaker Johnson, but people getting ready to potentially move? | ||
| What do you think is the fate of his speakership given this current CR fight? | ||
| I think the state of his speakership will rely solely, I know everybody's going to say Congress will elect the Speaker, but if Donald J. Trump wins, and I think he will, then he will have a great role in that. | ||
| And then you'll see, again, you'll see things shift more towards a conservative bent, I guess you would say, hopefully, in the spending department anyway. | ||
| And what I hope doesn't happen is that when Trump first gets in there, if they get beside him and whisper in his ear that, hey, let's pass this CR, one more CR. | ||
| We just need one more and then we can get it all worked out. | ||
| You know, it's just always one more. | ||
| It's one more. | ||
| It's one more. | ||
| It's never. | ||
| Let's pass a dot-com budget. | ||
| That's all we want. | ||
| It's almost as concerning when you hear a comprehensive immigration reform or Democrats complain about a certain bill being too expensive or policy proposal, i.e. | ||
| the border wall. | ||
| I've never heard them complain about that. | ||
| Before, Congressman, if you can hang with us through the break, I know you've got a new letter, a re-authoring Secret Service. | ||
| I'd love to drill down on that with you. | ||
| Warren Posse. | ||
| In the meantime, it's Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| You can also text Bannon to 989898, getting the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| And they have a bunch of new hot deals, at least until election day. | ||
| So go check them out while you still can. | ||
| Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. | |
| Can you turn JD off my screen? | ||
| I'm like trying to host a show. | ||
| I don't need to watch a rally. | ||
| I don't know if that's you guys or them. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | ||
| You're back in the worm. | ||
| We're still joined by Congressman Tim Burchett. | ||
| Like I always say, one of the best. | ||
| He's exempt from a lot of my criticisms that I opened this show with, but one of the interesting things that they sort of tacked onto this CR, right? | ||
| Congressman is saying that, well, in exchange for what? | ||
| Hundreds of millions of more dollars, you guys have to release your preliminary findings, at least when it comes to the, you know, Johnson anointed task force. | ||
| On the first assassination attempt against President Trump, it's all a sham. | ||
| I don't think they've really produced anything of substance or value. | ||
| You have a new letter out trying to get actual answers, but is it safe to say that it seems like the Secret Service funding is sort of in some ways the new SAVE Act equivalent? | ||
| In other words, the shiny toy, the red meat for the base saying, you know, the Sword of Damocles, if you don't fund the government, you know, then you're not keeping President Trump safe? | ||
| Secret Service is all political. | ||
| You've got an agent down in Miami that was told to be promoted to remove all your anti-Trump stuff, as you know. | ||
| It's completely political. | ||
| The lady in charge of it, D.E.I. | ||
| Hiram, we all know that. | ||
| was close with the Cheneys and then with the president's wife. The whole Secret Service | ||
| thing is a debacle. That's why I'd like to get Dan Bongino in. I know he's a talk show host, | ||
| but Dadgummit, he's a former Secret Service agent. He was on a presidential detail. He | ||
| apparently was involved in recruiting, and I didn't talk to him about this before I sent | ||
| the letter. I just sent the letter saying, let's get him in there. We got to put him in the skiff, | ||
| talk about confidential stuff, let's do it. But this culture that is alive and well at | ||
| the Secret Service needs to end, and we've got an opportunity to do that. | ||
| I think his perspective as an officer, and he's on the outside, he's not worried about losing his job, I think would be paramount to what we're trying to get. | ||
| We're not going to get any answers out of these committees because it's just relying on somebody to Tell us the truth. | ||
| And I'm afraid the only person to know the truth on that first assassination got his head blown off on that building. | ||
| And then within hours, there was agents washing that roof off. | ||
| All the evidence, you know. | ||
| Funny how that works. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I've talked about this before, but in Knox County or East Tennessee, our sheriff's department, our police department, you know, dadgum, there's a shooting. | ||
| There's tape up. | ||
| They'll put a tent up over it. | ||
| There's all kinds of stuff. | ||
| And then they couldn't dispose of that body fast enough. | ||
| Either. | ||
| They cremated the body and then, you know, the parents have shut up and they've lawyered up and now nobody's talking. | ||
| And just like I say all the time, and I'm guilty of this, you know, we want our pizzas in 30 minutes or less. | ||
| And dadgummit, that's about our attention span. | ||
| And we'll move on to the next one. | ||
| Of course, there was another assassination. | ||
| We wouldn't be talking about the first one if the second one attempt hadn't occurred. | ||
| And again, how in the hell Is that guy able to sit out in the weeds 12 hours and waiting on President Trump? | ||
| We, um, uh, yeah, I go to a high school football games on the week on Fridays, usually when I'm back, or Thursday, East Tennessee, and everybody's got one of those crazy drones. | ||
| I mean, this guy flew over the top of me and he can see the, the part in my beautifully coiffed hair, as you've commented many times, Steve Bannon as well, about having the best hair in the business. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And, but dadgummit. | |
| The technology that is available to us and we don't use to me is just beyond belief. | ||
| And these guys get up and gals and get up and tell us these, they just fluff us up and tell us, you know, what we want to hear. | ||
| And, you know, we're going, we're cleaning house. | ||
| Well, they're not cleaning house. | ||
| All they're doing is promoting bad people up the ladder and that's going to get somebody killed. | ||
| And by God's grace, Donald J. Trump was not killed on two attempts, but what about the next one and the next one? | ||
| And you look at, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | ||
| I mean, dadgummit, his secret service detail was denied him. | ||
| Name me one family in this country that has suffered more under assassin's bullets than the Kennedys, and they didn't give this guy secret service detail. | ||
| Biden wouldn't. | ||
| It was political. | ||
| His own son, going into federal court, had more secret service than Trump or Kennedy did. | ||
| It's a two-tier system of justice, and I think it's not just about a cleaning house. | ||
| It's about fundamentally transforming that house, right? | ||
| As Stephen Bannon would probably say. | ||
| Congressman, if people want to follow you, I have to say, shout out to your staff. | ||
| You have a wonderful staff, too. | ||
| If people want to follow you, stay up to date with everything you guys are working on, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| Well, my cool Twitter is at Tim Burchett. | ||
| I think I got the Congressman. | ||
| I've got the Facebook and I guess I got Instagram. | ||
| Yeah, I've got Instagram. | ||
| I've got all this stuff. | ||
| So anyway, that's that right there is my daddy's grave and my mama's grave, the one with the rock on it. | ||
| A lot of my Jewish friends. | ||
| I love my daddy, because he fought in the Pacific, but mama lost her brother fighting the Nazis, and they're both buried right there, and they always come by and put rocks on daddy's grave, and I think that's cool. | ||
| So, anyway, I love the war room. | ||
| I love the posse. | ||
| The posse, I'm out everywhere. | ||
| I'm out in the Claiborne County, Union County. | ||
| Well, they love you, too. | ||
| The feeling is definitely mutual. | ||
| Congressman, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back soon. | ||
| In War Room Posse, there's a member of Congress. | ||
| You guys know the roots of this show, which I think we're coming up on, what, the four-year anniversary of? | ||
| I think War Room Impeachment was making people famous. | ||
| Today, we're going to make Representative Mike Turner of Ohio, that is, the man who represents Springfield, famous. | ||
| Now, there's probably no one in the United States Congress who has done more to fund Ukraine, and you can see that story up right now. | ||
| Mike Turner doesn't want Trump coming to Springfield. | ||
| He thinks his rhetoric has been tearing the community apart. | ||
| Now in the same breath, I've never seen someone do so much media, spend so much time leading congressional delegations to Ukraine, we can toss those pictures up, repeatedly meeting with Zelensky, leading other members of Congress overseas, To visit and grovel for more of your taxpayer dollars to go overseas. | ||
| All he does is give interviews to Politico and MSNBC and the New York Times saying that we have to get this done. | ||
| House Republican pushes for Ukraine aid stat. | ||
| Oh, and it's not just a one-off. | ||
| It's every time there's a Ukraine aid package. | ||
| He was basically the architect of connecting border funding To Ukraine funding. | ||
| Also, the House Intel Chairman, kind of an important job, so much so that he was actually accused and referred for investigation by a friend of this show, Congressman Andy Ogles, for creating fake information about Russia wanting to shoot down American space satellites only as a fake pretext to get more aid to Ukraine. | ||
| In other words, this guy is Mr. Ukraine. | ||
| I think he wouldn't shut down the government for anything except trying to get more funding for Ukraine. | ||
| Now it's so interesting, because where has he been on Springfield? | ||
| The only thing I've ever heard him say is criticizing President Trump for daring to share the stories from members of his community and his constituents. | ||
| I want to read you some tweets that he's put out about Ukraine. | ||
| Quote, the US does not have the luxury. | ||
| To sit by when a sovereign democracy is being threatened. | ||
| We cannot ignore Russia's continued threat to international law and Ukraine's territorial sovereignty. | ||
| The U.S. | ||
| must remain committed to protecting the sovereignty of Ukraine. | ||
| Putin's actions today are a deliberate violation of Ukraine's sovereignty, that last one going back all the way to 2014. | ||
| Warmongering for nearly a decade. | ||
| What's new? | ||
| To make matters worse, September 10th, way into this whole Springfield drama, he actually led the House Republican effort writing letters to Joe Biden demanding that we authorize the use of long range missiles in Ukraine. | ||
| While his district and his constituents are getting pummeled Overburdened, destroyed and invaded at the hands of the very same regime that he's begging to fund more conflict in Ukraine. | ||
| Wonder how he's managed to get all those Ukraine aid packages passed. | ||
| Have you been selling out your constituents? | ||
| Wasting your political capital to make sure that Ukraine's borders are protected and not your cities? | ||
| Every breath, every ounce of blood, every sweat, every tear that this man has wasted on Ukraine aid, he could have put forth trying to defend his district. | ||
| And I've never seen a better example of what America Last looks like than Congressman Mike Turner, who in the same news cycle has the nerve to push for more aid, weapons, and intel to be sent to Ukraine While demanding that his constituents shut up about the 20,000 Haitians that have been bust in or flown in by Joe Biden. | ||
| He's too busy arming Ukraine to see there's another arms race going on and that's called the importing of new voters and the replacement of American culture and it's going on in his backyard and he doesn't seem to care about it. | ||
| Now one of my favorite things about Mike Turner Is that he tweeted back in 2014, Mr. President, in case you haven't noticed, Russia has invaded Ukraine. | ||
| Well, Congressman Turner, in case you haven't noticed, Haitians, aided and abetted by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, have invaded your district and you've done absolutely nothing about it. | ||
| Oh, sorry. | ||
| You wrote one little strongly worded... Oh, no, you didn't even write a strongly worded letter. | ||
| You held a meeting. | ||
| So I get it. | ||
| Bullets, tanks, missiles, intel. | ||
| Billions, tens, hundreds of billions of dollars are enough for Ukraine, but you don't even have the appetite, political will, or courage to do anything for people in your district who are getting destroyed by mass migration. | ||
| Actually, if they want to talk about it, you think it's racist. | ||
| And it's a conspiracy theory. | ||
| That's what we're up against. | ||
| I think I probably know where he's voting on the CR and something tells me it's with the Uniparty. | ||
| So let's make sure we give Mike Turner a call to tell him to go hell no on the CR and do something about Springfield. | ||
| That's 202-225-3121. | ||
| We'll be right back after the break with Norbin Lawden. | ||
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| I'm sure you guys have seen by now that Zelensky has been making tours, I think, in preparation for the UN General Assembly. | ||
| Yesterday was in Pennsylvania touring an ammo factory. | ||
| So it's safe to say that Zelensky is now quite literally a de facto campaign surrogate for Kamala Harris. | ||
| I'm sure this audience knows last year it was reported that the Biden-Harris White House was secretly trying to leverage the American people to support what was going on in Ukraine, not by saying, let's audit the aid packages, but rather aid packages are actually great for the United States manufacturing base and they're great for American jobs. | ||
| And now you have Zelensky touring American factories saying the same exact thing. | ||
| So that's maybe we should start calling Zelensky here in the war room. | ||
| Top campaign surrogate for Kamala Harris. | ||
| I'm sure with the amount of money he has received, he probably would, what, rank number one? | ||
| Maybe Mark Elias would give him a run for his money. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| But joining us to discuss the UN General Assembly, I'm already triggered just saying that out loud, and so much more is the wonderful and lovely Nora Bin Laden, who joins us now. | ||
| I'd love to just kind of get your top line assessment of what you think we should expect | ||
| to see. | ||
| Give us it all, the ugly, the bad, and the sinister, nefarious parts too. | ||
| Well, the first thing I'll say, bouncing off of what you just said, Natalie, with regards | ||
| to Zelensky being in the US. | ||
| and making his way to New York for the General Assembly, it's not surprising because essentially this meeting that happens once a year in New York is essentially a meetup of all the international frauds that purport to be leaders of our countries. | ||
| And Zelensky is obviously the epitome of such a quote, leader. | ||
| And That's the first thing I'll say. | ||
| The second thing, I'll just give a little bit of context for the Posse as to what's actually happening in New York. | ||
| As I just mentioned, you know, it's the General Assembly. | ||
| It takes place every year in September. | ||
| It kicked off on September 10th and is ongoing until September 28th. | ||
| And within that timeframe, you have some key events taking place. | ||
| The first one I'll mention is what they refer to as action days. | ||
| Those two days took place on September 20th and September 21st, focusing, you know, there were panels and basically what they refer to as interactive dialogues focusing on global governance, multilateralism, digital IDs, digital health infrastructure, And also the remaking or the future of the financial system, to name a few of the, quote, globalist agenda points. | ||
| And those two days took place in the lead up to the big, big highlight of this year's UN General Assembly, which is the Summit of the Future, which I'm sure you know the policy has been or is aware of. | ||
| It's been trending the last couple of days. | ||
| And the Summit of the Future took place basically yesterday, September 22nd, and today, September 23rd. | ||
| And why is this particular event important. | ||
| It's because essentially the member states of the UN signed or adopted a key document entitled the pact for the future. | ||
| And this pact also comprises two other annex documents, which are the global digital compact and the declaration on future generations. | ||
| And, um, These were announced quite a few years ago. | ||
| Secretary General Antonio Guterres announced that this summit of the future would take place back in 2021. | ||
| So they've been working on this now for three years, leading to this key moment where these basically international instruments would be adopted by our member states, which obviously we are not really privy to. | ||
| There have been intergovernmental negotiations happening during this time span leading up | ||
| to this event, and we the people obviously are not really privy to these discussions. | ||
| And we just wake up on the morning of the 22nd of September, and there is this ceremony and this, you know, round of applause in the auditorium at the UN headquarters in New York, whereby there's this announcement that this pact for the future is essentially adopted. | ||
| Seems like there's two competing interpretations of the United Nations. | ||
| One is that, you know, just a bunch of people who sit around and do nothing. | ||
| They get nothing done. | ||
| They pass meaningless resolutions. | ||
| But I think what we've seen in recent years is that there actually is some Bite to the bark in the sense that they do have a globalist, broader agenda for us. | ||
| In terms of what you see rolling out right now or even with the WHO, they just concluded new pandemic treaty negotiations. | ||
| What do you think the Posse needs to be most kind of attentive to when it comes to, I know it's all interrelated, but what do you think is sort of the tip of the spear that the audience should really be paying a close eye or paying close attention to? | ||
| You know, the Summit of the Future is basically a reiteration of the stated goal of the United Nations, which is essentially the implementation of the New World Order, which, you know, we've talked about many, many times on the show. | ||
| And just coming back on the question of the Summit of the Future, I would just like to essentially summarize What this summit is about using the title of one of their interactive dialogues, which is a call to action to transform global governance and turbocharge the implementation of | ||
| And what that means, essentially, is that they are looking to, again, turbocharge what they refer to as the Sustainable Development Goals. | ||
| And we know that the timeframe is 2030. | ||
| And there's a lot of fear mongering going on and alarming rhetoric coming out of all of these institutions, like the UN, the WEF, the World Economic Forum, and all the different satellite or daughter organizations, you know, you mentioned the WHO, there are so many to name. | ||
| But the the main point that they're, that they're driving is that only 17%, obviously, so called 17%, they come up with these arbitrary markers, but 17% of the SDG targets have been reached. | ||
| And we are, you know, six years away of 2030. | ||
| And so this event in particular is about transforming global governance, strengthening global governance, strengthening multilateralism, strengthening cooperation. | ||
| They use all of these terms that in appearance sound like something positive, when in fact it is anything but. | ||
| It's actually very nefarious. | ||
| And I've talked about this many, many times before, you know, that the UN itself from its very inception was a vehicle, a treacherous, nefarious vehicle set up for the purpose of completely eroding and destroying the sovereignty of our nations in favor of a one world centralized government. | ||
| And they've been, you know, if you look at the founding documents of the United Nations, of UNESCO, They've been talking about, you know, world citizenship since the late 40s, and they really do want to relegate our nation states to mere, you know, entities drawn on a map, and they want to do away completely with the Westphalian system of the nation state, you know, something that Steve talks about a lot. | ||
| And so this is just one more step The summit of the future is one more step towards that goal. | ||
| And when you look at these documents, these three documents that I mentioned, it is very clear that we are being led towards a system of total control and total mass surveillance. | ||
| And they are doing this via the implementation of this digital public infrastructure, i.e. | ||
| this digital grid to which we will all be tied and tracked. | ||
| And that's why digital IDs in particular, I focus really on digital IDs, because that is very much the linchpin upon which the entire system rests. | ||
| And so they're using all of these pretexts, like we've discussed previously, Natalie, on on the show, you know, they're using, you know, whether it's the pandemics, whether it's climate change, whether it's censorship, That's a really big one. | ||
| They're also including AI in that, you know, with the fake information and not being able to say what is real or not. | ||
| They really want to crack down on our speech and completely remove online anonymity. | ||
| And obviously, they're remaking the Internet. | ||
| in order for us to be able to access it only if we do have this digital ID. | ||
| This is what's coming down in the pipeline. | ||
| And the rhetoric is very clear, despite, again, the fact that they use all of these lofty terms and positive goals. | ||
| The reality is very, very different. | ||
| And just give me two minutes. | ||
| Your thoughts on how Kamala Harris, her worldview sort of aligns and dovetails, I would argue, quite nicely with this agenda that we're seeing on full display, the full unmasking at the UNGA up in New York this week. | ||
| You know, Natalie, I came up, I came up with a term a few years ago, which is ANOS, Americans in Name Only. | ||
| to represent the people that supposedly represent the United States of America and the people of the United States of America, but who are in fact completely beholden to this globalist caste, to this globalist cult, and they've made a total Faustian bargain with these people, and they are proper traitors. | ||
| to America and the American people. | ||
| And obviously, when you look at the Biden regime, when you look at, you know, the political class of the United States of America, for many, many, many decades, you know, when you you go back to the Woodrow Wilson era, Woodrow Wilson himself was like the the number one a no, I would say, who really signed off on so many of these programs, Noor, if people want to follow you, I know you always have a myriad of projects going on that are all equally wonderful. | ||
| Where can people go to check those out, follow you, stay up to date with all that? | ||
| Thank you so much, Natalie. | ||
| I'd say my substack, norbinladin.substack.com, and my Twitter, which is at norbinladin. | ||
| Nora, thank you so much. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
| We're going to have you, as painful as it may be, track everything that they're talking about this week up at the UNGA in New York, and we thank you for your service on that front. | ||
| Thank you so much, Natalie. | ||
| Always a pleasure. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| Warren Posse, it is interesting. | ||
| I think it is sort of a reflection of the globalist sentiment among the Democratic Party. | ||
| There's news breaking in Politico yesterday that for the first time really ever, Democrats are making a significant play for overseas voters. | ||
| Now, sure, I also buy into the narrative that this is predictive programming for foreign ballots and wanting to up the vote count so they can, in the late night ballot dumps, secure a victory for Kamala Harris. | ||
| But Democrats are allegedly pouring out record levels of funding. | ||
| and dollars to ensure that overseas voters buried lead in the Politico story in swing | ||
| states will be turning out for Kamala Harris. | ||
| Now, like I said, perhaps it's predictive programming for shepherding in the foreign | ||
| vote. | ||
| I would also say you do have overseas voters. | ||
| They're actually just already residing here, thanks to the Biden-Harris regime. | ||
| Or it does show, I think, that internal polls for the Harris campaign are not looking good, so much so that they're having to court overseas voters in swing states. | ||
| That's what we call a buried lead, as Stephen K. Bannon would say. | ||
| Stephen K. Bannon would also probably tell you to check out birchgold.com slash Bannon, texting Bannon to 989898 to get the latest installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| And while you're at it, you know, you've got to check out Public Square. | ||
| They're not looped in or linked into any of this UN globalist agenda. | ||
| Scammy BS, so that means they're a good company. | ||
| They're not anos, as Nora said. | ||
| We'll be right back after this break. | ||
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| I guess all the lawfare cases certainly didn't work against President Trump, so much so that we see two assassination attempts, one certainly having interesting links To the Biden regime in the form of his ties to Ukraine. | ||
| And the other, well, we don't even know his ties or links because the sham task force committee that Speaker Johnson, yet another failure, sorry, Polly Pockets, established has yet to produce any actual receipts on that front. | ||
| But just today, there's of course breaking news that the DOJ released a letter showing that the would-be assassin, Ryan Ruth, Said, I dare someone to finish the job to assassinate President Trump in exchange for a bounty of $150,000. | ||
| Now what's so interesting about this letter, first and foremost, not only that the media has rushed to cover it with such glee and that the DOJ released it in the first place, like I said, outsourcing their now obvious attempts at lawfare and coming after President Trump to the American people and to people like Ryan Ruth by then publicizing and laundering their dirty work. | ||
| It's not a letter. | ||
| It's a call to arms. | ||
| It's a call to action. | ||
| What's even more interesting about this letter, frankly, is the $150,000 sum. | ||
| Because for those of you who watch this show, when we played clips from Ryan Bruth's interview with Newsweek Romania back in 2022, he talked about needing $5 from his family to be sent to him overseas while he was in Ukraine. | ||
| Steve would say, make that make sense to someone who's begging for $5, also saying they have an $150,000 bounty to put out. | ||
| But that's also the same mainstream media that won't air Trump rallies or cover Trump in his entirety without fact checkers because that would be, you know, normalizing violence. | ||
| Yet they'll air, and believe me, 24-7 air a letter that is a call to arms against President Trump. | ||
| Just when you thought you didn't hate the media enough. | ||
| And real quick before we bring on Mike Lindell, I just want to set the record straight one more time because I know you guys have a busy night of calls and I will be joining you on that. | ||
| And that is the CR. | ||
| It was a six month plus SAVE Act CR with the logical next step if that failed. | ||
| Again, this is still operating under the paradigm that we have to fund the government through continuing resolution. | ||
| We've always maintained that single subject spending bills of which 75% of the government has already been funded by the bills they have passed thus far. | ||
| have been the way to go. But it's interesting that immediately after the six month plus save | ||
| act failed that Speaker Johnson cowered so quickly and now it's a three month CR. | ||
| The fundamental difference there being at least the six month plus save act CR would have kicked | ||
| us into hypothetically March. So president Trump would then hypothetically be president. | ||
| Republicans did anything to actually secure elections. But now this three month one uniquely | ||
| positions us for an omnibus, which like Congressman Tim Burchett said in the beginning block of the | ||
| show that will then hamstring and purposefully kneecap president Trump in his potential first | ||
| year of the term of his presidency. | ||
| Which is really just a continuation of what House Republicans have been doing, aided and abetted by Democrats, whether it's not making it so anyone can withdraw from NATO, forcing to do anything about a pandemic treaty, which could potentially usurp really any president what they want to do when it comes to public health, HHS, the WHO says there's a pandemic, apparently you can't push back. | ||
| So that is how it works in Washington, D.C. | ||
| That's how weak and feckless and spineless these people are. | ||
| And I hope that when you make your calls tonight, all the representatives who told you, oh, this is the only CR I'm going to vote for because it has the SAVE Act attached to it and it's about election integrity. | ||
| Well, then they better not be voting for this one, right? | ||
| Or they're liars, which we know they are, but I hope you call their bluff on it. | ||
| That's of course, 202-225-3121 or download the Bill Blaster app. | ||
| It's a heck of a lot easier. | ||
| download the bill blaster app it's a heck of a lot easier that is how they | ||
| frankly they're just used to losing Maybe they're compromised. | ||
| Or maybe they're too busy focusing on giving aid to Ukraine, like Representative Mike Turner. | ||
| Make sure you give him a special phone call, too. | ||
| Tell him to stop pushing for another damn penny to Ukraine before he figures out what's going on in his home district and stops shepherding and shuttling in tens of thousands of Haitian migrants to take services, take over that city, and yeah, I'm going to say it again, eat the cats and dogs. | ||
| It's 202-225-3121. | ||
| Mike Lindell, I think you are in the position that you find yourself most frequently, which is in the hot zone when it comes to the media. | ||
| What have you done now and what deals do you have for the posse? | ||
| Well, we were on the war room last week. | ||
| Everybody knows that box store that canceled our order, so I gave it to the war room posse, a standard MyPillow for $14.88 wholesale price. | ||
| Well, apparently the media then decided to attack all the way up to the Daily Mail, attack us for I'm calling it, and then at some 88, it stands for Hitler or something, and they have attacked, full-blown attack, and so you know what? | ||
| I'm putting all these on sale while it's up there. | ||
| I want to tell you, so all the media outlets in the world have called me, I think, the last two days. | ||
| Why did you do that? | ||
| Why did you put that up there? | ||
| You should apologize. | ||
| Apologize for what? | ||
| That I put my pillows on sale? | ||
| The New York Post called me, and here's what I told them. | ||
| This thing is another attack on Mike Lindell and my pill because I want to go to paper ballots hand-counted in our country. | ||
| I have a plan to get rid of the machines and that's what it's all been about. | ||
| Last year they attacked my company and myself this past year relentlessly. | ||
| This is all in this another attack because just like tonight CNN's doing a big thing tonight on me attacking me tonight and But you know what? | ||
| We're doubling down. | ||
| This is what we're doing. | ||
| All of our classic pillows for $19.98 for the King or $19.88 for the King. | ||
| $18.88 for the Queen. | ||
| $9.88 for the Go Anywhere one. | ||
| So we're just doubling down. | ||
| And the $14.88 for the standard, the one that they're having a fit about. | ||
| But we're doing even more for the War Room Posse. | ||
| You guys, I'm doubling down. | ||
| Free shipping on your entire order. | ||
| They're trying to ruin our economy through shipping prices so the price of all the goods go up. | ||
| I'm doubling down. | ||
| So you guys, you guys have been our biggest supporters. | ||
| Free shipping. | ||
| Take advantage of those big ticket items. | ||
| The mattress toppers. | ||
| 100% made in the USA. | ||
| The mattresses. | ||
| And all these classic pillows that the media is going crazy about because we put a price on them that they say it stands for something else. | ||
| That 88 is the 8th letter in the alphabet. | ||
| It stands for Hitler. | ||
| I mean, where do they come up with this stuff, Natalie? | ||
| All I know is we're doubling down on our sale. | ||
| 800-873-1062. | ||
| Free shipping on your entire order, everybody. | ||
| Maybe you've tapped into a new marketing strategy. | ||
| Just numerology. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pick numbers if the left media doesn't like. | |
| Mike Liddell, thank you for joining us. | ||
| I'm sure we will have you back on soon if you can withstand the barrage of mainstream media attacks. | ||
| Warren Posse! | ||
| Do it for Steve. | ||
| Keep your reputation of the most hated audience in the belly of the beast, Washington, D.C. | ||
| And let your representative, Democrat or Republican, frickin' have it, because they deserve it. | ||
| 202-225-3121. | ||
| Bill Bostrop. |
Export Selection