Sept. 12, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:51
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bann. | |
| Welcome to The War Room. | ||
| It's Tuesday, September 11th in the year of our Lord 2024. | ||
| And right off the bat, I want to be straight up with the mainstream media hacks, far left activists who are watching the show. | ||
| We know you do. | ||
| The Russia, Russia, Russia hoax is a false flag. | ||
| And yes, I'm using that word. | ||
| You guys are using it to lay the predicate to crack down on free speech here as we barrel towards the 2024 election. | ||
| And we're not going to fall for it because if you guys actually cared about foreign election interference, He probably would have tried to pass the SAVE Act. | ||
| Or maybe we should just limit the SAVE Act to Russian citizens from voting here in the United States. | ||
| Then maybe Democrats would get behind it. | ||
| But you guys know, in order to expand government power, they always have to create a crisis. | ||
| Look no further than COVID. | ||
| Or should we say a national emergency? | ||
| That's why Joe Biden just two days ago, late Sunday night, decided to renew a national emergency when it comes to foreign election interference. | ||
| What does this come down to? | ||
| Always comes down to censorship of you, of me, but of the populist movement more broadly. | ||
| Now, I want you guys to watch this clip from MSNBC just a few days ago. | ||
| Former Senator Doug Jones saying the quiet part out loud about the First Amendment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Get to the truth, because here you have Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, which has enormous reach. | |
| He himself has endorsed Donald Trump, and day in and day out, he is pushing misinformation, disinformation, and allowing it to run rampant on his platform. | ||
| How does any of this square? | ||
| It doesn't square. | ||
| The only problem is that we have a First Amendment, and he has a lot of money, and he's got that platform and can do whatever the hell he wants to do. | ||
| That's the bottom line. | ||
| He's got millions of followers. | ||
| He's got billions of dollars. | ||
| He has put it all into that one platform, and unfortunately, for at least right now, that's the only town square, that's the only platform that's out there that gets anything other than the young folks on TikTok. | ||
| The only problem, that's how we talk about the freedom of speech in 2024 and Joe Biden's or whoever's running this country, America. | ||
| But there's a new Washington Post op-ed that we're going to drill down today. | ||
| This is the big news that I sort of teased you guys with yesterday. | ||
| How to stop rogue states like Russia from interfering In our politics. | ||
| Now, of course, we're used to this kind of drivel from the Washington Post, but I'm going to walk you through what is the latest—and I use this word intentionally—jihad against free speech, like I said, the populist movement more broadly, and what this article really portends for that censorship industrial complex. | ||
| I want to read some quotes. | ||
| Before we do, I just want to frame this the right way. | ||
| You guys heard about the pandemic treaty, what the World Health Organization wanted to do using public health, right, as a pretext to come after our sovereignty, to try to lock down this country for whatever next disease X they choose it to be? | ||
| Well, they're now wanting to do that with foreign election interference, and they're going to model it after NATO. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| Our elites, our intellectual betters all the way in Brussels. | ||
| You know what we need? | ||
| Unilateral responses are not enough to stop foreign political interference. | ||
| Western democracies should coordinate their defenses by creating a formal response mechanism that would bind allies to aid one of their own in the event of an attack. | ||
| But buckle up, the plan gets even more radical, because they're taking inspiration, directly alluding it to their globalist pals headed up at NATO. | ||
| The right model already exists, argues the Washington Post. | ||
| That's NATO's Article 5. | ||
| I want you to listen to this. | ||
| Quote, a coalition of key democracies should adopt a similar mechanism to handle political interference. | ||
| In a multilateral agreement, they should declare their intent to consider a significant state-based attack on one member's democratic processes to be an attack on all, and they should pledge to collectively respond to that attack. | ||
| Combined responses should include publicizing ongoing foreign interference campaigns, especially | ||
| ahead of elections, sanctioning individuals and entities engaged in malign activities, | ||
| coordinating the expulsion of diplomats, harmonizing criminal indictments, integrating efforts | ||
| to shut down the meddlers financing and joint offensive cyber operations aimed at taking | ||
| down foreign interference networks, or interrupting their work. | ||
| These measures should be in addition to more routine collective defense efforts, including | ||
| intelligence sharing, working together on cyber defense, and coordinating diplomatic | ||
| messaging. | ||
| In other words, they want to create a new NATO-style task force between all the countries | ||
| in the West to crack down on election interference. | ||
| If they go after one country, the United States is going to get involved and vice versa. | ||
| The buried lead here being, of course, they're going for the jugular, right? | ||
| They're not even saying that they're going to model this after the United Nations or the World Health Organization. | ||
| The buried lead being NATO is about military and military control, right? | ||
| This is another form of a military operation where they're using psychological warfare | ||
| in the form of election interference to sow doubt about election results. | ||
| And we know how those mistakes—we know how they always go. | ||
| They always benefit one side. | ||
| Have you ever felt like this democracy narrative that they have tried to retrofit here on the | ||
| United States? | ||
| Because we're a republic. | ||
| a public, we're not a democracy. | ||
| We're not a democracy. | ||
| Something just didn't seem right, seemed sort of astroturfed. | ||
| It's because it is. | ||
| It's not just coming from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. | ||
| It's coming from our elites in Davos and Brussels and Geneva. | ||
| But this plan in particular, why I'm highlighting this and raising the red flag now, is because this comes from the brain trust. | ||
| Not just of the Biden regime, but of the Obama administration, too. | ||
| There's a new axis of evil that we've always warned against here in the world, that is the globalists and the American ruling class. | ||
| So who wrote this op-ed? | ||
| Richard Fontaine. | ||
| Ever heard of him? | ||
| He's the CEO of the Center for New American Security. | ||
| It was launched in 2007. | ||
| Of course, Hillary Clinton gave the opening keynote address at their event. | ||
| But here's what's so interesting. | ||
| It was actually founded by Joe Biden's current Deputy Secretary of State, Kurt Campbell, and one of Obama's top defense aides. | ||
| You know who its former CEO was? | ||
| Ever heard of Ukraine coup architect Victoria Nuland? | ||
| How about that? | ||
| There's also reporting that they've been staffing the Biden regime. | ||
| You can see the article now, that report. | ||
| They did the same thing in the Obama years, too. | ||
| And this is the same group that's funded by the State Department, the Defense Department, Soros, Google, Facebook, Amazon, and every military industrial complex giant. | ||
| Now, why do I bring this story up? | ||
| Don't worry. | ||
| We're going to continue to drill down on how they're using foreign election interference to crack down on our First Amendment rights. | ||
| But this is how we have to look at the election that we're barreling towards. | ||
| It's not about a debate like the debate last night, where it was Trump against ABC moderators and it was nice for Kamala Harris to show up. | ||
| It is Donald Trump against the institutions, very much like this one that they're calling to create. | ||
| There's a metaphorical significance there, though, I think, to the fact that you saw those moderators run cover and fact-check Trump seven, ten times more than they did Kamala Harris, right? | ||
| And there's also a significance to the fact that when you look at Kamala Harris's newly found, newly launched campaign site, Let's look at that picture. | ||
| The source code actually shows that it's actually just Joe Biden's campaign text being copy and pasted. | ||
| They've since changed it. | ||
| But that shows you we're not running against Kamala Harris. | ||
| We are running against the institution, the apparatus that is not just the Democratic Party. | ||
| But as the globalist elite, and why do I bring up NATO? | ||
| Because there's also a through line to the endorsement that we saw last night when it comes to none other than Taylor Swift. | ||
| I think Stephen K. Bannon had a little something to say about that. | ||
| But there was a 2019 conference where NATO elites pitched Taylor Swift as a psychological operation weapon just waiting to be detonated on American elections and the world more broadly. | ||
| Let's watch that clip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's important to recognize that this could be, you know, this is an ethically concerning thing to go out there and try and change hearts and minds, but it's important to think about how would we actually do this in a way that would work with people, so potentially as like a peaceful information operation. | |
| And I'm going to be addressing risks and concerns with each of the four main categories. | ||
| Alright, so the first one that's the most famous and the most common is working with famous people or influencers to share information or a particular message. | ||
| So I include Taylor Swift in here because she's You know, she's a fairly influential online person. | ||
| I don't know if you've heard of her. | ||
| But she's actually, this is a cropped image, but she's standing next to a, you know, go vote sign. | ||
| And actually celebrities, at least in the US, regularly will post pictures of themselves with an encouragement to people to go vote. | ||
| And this has a measurable effect on voter turnout. | ||
| It's not about candidates. | ||
| It's not about Kamala Harris. | ||
| It's the populist movement versus the globalists, and Taylor Swift is just on the front lines for them right now. | ||
| Frankly, I think if Kamala Harris had a better debate performance, they wouldn't have needed to wheel her out last night. | ||
| Interesting timing there. | ||
| No conspiracies, no coincidences. | ||
| But as I also say, no conspiracies, no coincidences. | ||
| I want to bring you back to a major through line that we've been hammering here in the war room. | ||
| I told you guys first just last month that they are going to say they're going to wheel out every election official, the ones that MAGA hasn't scared out. | ||
| That's another key part of the story. | ||
| They're going to say that mail-in ballots are going to cause so many election delays that, well, we're just not going to have results on November 5th. | ||
| So much so that they're going to have just enough time to find just enough ballots—not votes, but ballots—for Kamala Harris. | ||
| What did the AP report today? | ||
| Quote, election officials warn that widespread problems with the U.S. | ||
| mail system could disrupt voting. | ||
| Isn't that convenient? | ||
| And instead of having a holistic discussion about why we need to get rid of mail-in voting here in the United States, they use it to say that there's going to be delays in election results. | ||
| And how about this, Republican members of Congress, who want to continue to fund the federal government that is not just weaponizing against you guys, members—and, of course, your constituents. | ||
| What about all the money that we've appropriated to, like, every department across this great country? | ||
| Guess the Postal Service didn't see any benefit, didn't see any ROI on that. | ||
| How about we give all the aid we gave to Ukraine to our U.S. | ||
| Postal Service to update their systems before the election? | ||
| Democrats probably wouldn't want to do that, though, because they're banking on these delays and this fraud to try to secure a false pretense of victory, not on election night. | ||
| That would be too first world. | ||
| Probably a few days after. | ||
| Peak third world. | ||
| Because that's what we're devolving to. | ||
| And by the way, if we even make that critique, you're racist and you're going to get shut down. | ||
| Probably going to get censored too. | ||
| That's how it works in Joe Biden's America, and that's how it's going to work even worse in Kamala Harris's America. | ||
| And believe me, the elites are laughing all the way to the bank, their offshore banks to be specific. | ||
| I want to play you guys a new trailer from Netflix, but a Bill Gates documentary starring Anthony Fauci. | ||
| I'll leave you there. | ||
| Let's watch it. | ||
| Every country's struggling to find that boundary. | ||
| The U.S. | ||
| is a tough one because, you know, we have the notion of the First Amendment. | ||
| And so what are the exceptions? | ||
| You know, like yelling fire in a theater, you know. | ||
| And because you're anonymous online, you know, it can be worse. | ||
| I do think over time, you know, with things like deep fakes, most of the time you're online, you're going to want to be in an environment where the people are If you're under 35 years old in this country, you're screwed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let me just be blunt. | |
| So if you continue to vote for this, you continue to vote for your enslavement, have at it. | ||
| If you want to get on TikTok and run around and show some videos and vote for Biden because, you know, Taylor Swift, vote for it, baby, do it. | ||
| You deserve it. | ||
| If you vote for it, you deserve it. | ||
| Because it's not going to get better until you start acting like adults. | ||
| Well, apparently Bill Gates controls my production, because I guess we're not going to play the trailer. | ||
| We'll play that after the break. | ||
| But we're going to have Norbin Laden joining us to break all that down. | ||
| Just to conclude my thoughts on last night's debate, I really don't care how Kamala Harris performed, because we're not running against her, because we're not engaging in an actual election where it's about candidates or information warfare. | ||
| Get out the vote. | ||
| It's kinetic warfare. | ||
| It's about verifying ballot signatures, and it's about busing and mail-in ballots from who knows where, which is why it is so important and so critical that we make this election—I know it's cliché, I know it rhymes—but that we make it too big to rig, because that's the only way that we're going to be able to win this, so much so that the margins, they quite literally cannot make up enough ballots to steal it. | ||
| It's the only way. | ||
| way. | ||
| NATO, put that in reference, NATO is putting up Biden-linked operatives in the Washington | ||
| Post to write op-eds about how we need to establish new globalist bodies to go after | ||
| foreign election interference in the United States. | ||
| Just a day after Joe Biden declares a national emergency when it comes to foreign election | ||
| interference. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| No conspiracies, no coincidences. | ||
| Definitely something isn't right there. | ||
| We're going to get to the bottom of it, as we always do here in the War Room. | ||
| Guys, no, we're going to be joined by Norbin Laden after the break. | ||
| But in the meantime, you can go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| You can text Bannon to 989898 to get the latest installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| Make sure you also check out hometitlelock.com and use promo code Bannon. | ||
| Don't let these globalist elites or anyone steal your house, steal your home. | ||
| You know, it's very important. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Norman Lawton, Bill Gates, Fauci, after the break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Climate change. | |
| Creating responsible AI. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Misinformation. | |
| Income inequality. | ||
| Dealing with infectious diseases. | ||
| But I believe we can solve them. | ||
| How will artificial intelligence impact society? | ||
| Crafted text to my son using Gen Z slang. | ||
| Yo fam, what's good? | ||
| How you vibin'? | ||
|
unidentified
|
At a certain point, A.I. | |
| will be good enough to build a better A.I. | ||
| So, A.I. | ||
| builds a better A.I., which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better. | ||
| It's getting hard to write science fiction. | ||
| There's always been conspiracy theories. | ||
| We underestimate how creative Americans are. | ||
| Bill Gates is part of a reptilian race that includes Tom Hanks and Lady Gaga. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Entertainment and information are a lot closer together than they ever have been before. | |
| There's no way to stop it. | ||
| I don't have the solution. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Come on, Bill. | |
| We have to give up Hydra. | ||
| I apologize. | ||
| I think I probably should have put a trigger warning on that for a myriad of reasons, but we're joined now by Norbin Laden to break it down. | ||
| Nor, sort of springboarding off of what I did the opening segment on that documentary, they're trying to whitewash Bill Gates now, which I think is major red flags, a major bad sign. | ||
| Your thoughts on this sort of psyop propaganda operation we're seeing unfold before us? | ||
| Oh my goodness, Natalie, there is so much to be said about this character that is Bill Gates, this manufactured oligarchs that they've been trying to push down our throats for a few decades now. | ||
| He is really what I would call the embodiment of the Davos globalist cult, you know, and a few years ago I came up with this term which is Malthusian psycho freaks to describe the members of this cult and I would say that Bill Gates really is The Malthusian psycho freak par excellence when you look at his track record and what he's basically done to humanity over the course of his | ||
| of his career, if you want to call it that. But in the trailer, there's one really interesting quote | ||
| further down in the video. Later in the video, it's by Bono, who is interviewed, and he says | ||
| that if Bill Gates didn't exist, you would have to make him up. | ||
| And if we did, no one would believe the character. | ||
| And I found that incredibly ironic because the thing is that they did make him up. | ||
| When you look at his background, when you look at his story, at his character arc, and his father more particularly, who was a known eugenicist, | ||
| who had ties to the Rockefeller family, and who was on the board of Planned Parenthood. And it's | ||
| not a coincidence, I think, that Bill Gates himself, Bill Gates Jr., was sort of chosen as this | ||
| heir of the Rockefeller Foundation model, the so-called philanthropic model with the Gates Foundation. | ||
| You can clearly see a continuation of that model, which was instituted in the 20th century, whereby using the pretext of philanthropy or under the guise of philanthropy, the globalist population control and obviously by that I mean depopulation agenda has been pushed on the world and | ||
| And Bill Gates, if I mean, we'll get into that in a second, just looking at all the different activities he's been involved with. | ||
| It's just astounding. | ||
| And that propaganda piece by Netflix, which is coming out on September 19th, I believe, entitled What's Next? | ||
| The Future with Bill Gates is the second installment by Netflix to prop up Bill Gates, the first docu-series they produced a few years ago was entitled Inside Bill's Brain Decoding Bill Gates. | ||
| That was also a few episodes. | ||
| And now they're continuing with this new docu-series. | ||
| And if I may say, I don't want Bill Gates to have anything to do with my future and | ||
| the future of humanity, looking at all the horrible things that he's done already through | ||
| his foundation. | ||
| Quite the euphemism. | ||
| Just give us a few minutes, too, on the clip that we played before the break about how this is all linked to a broader push to roll out digital identities. | ||
| Yeah, so digital identities, that's one of the key, key components of the Bill Gates agenda, of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. | ||
| Well, now they've separated it. | ||
| But his foundation has been pushing extremely hard for digitization and these digital IDs, you know, with his program ID 2020. | ||
| He's very much involved in rolling that out in countries like India. | ||
| where they've made, you know, I don't know how many, the percentage of the population that is already hooked up to this digital grid is absolutely huge. | ||
| And this is one of the most worrisome elements of his agenda. | ||
| When we look at how the walls of this digital society is closing in on us in terms of, you know, the financial, the payment systems, that are going to be tied to this to these digital IDs. | ||
| Obviously the VAX passports. | ||
| There are many different ways through which and many different pretexts that they're using in order to bring us to this point where essentially we will all be hooked up to a grid. | ||
| And we we don't have to imagine what that looks like. | ||
| We can just look to China and their social credit score system to see how this would function here in the West as well. | ||
| And effectively, they are using the pretext of these crises. | ||
| You mentioned it in your brilliant opening, Natalie. | ||
| It's always the same playbook. | ||
| They manufacture these crises, and then they come up with the solutions. | ||
| And these solutions inevitably lead to the loss of our freedoms. | ||
| And this is very much I would say the linchpin. | ||
| And this this digital dystopia that awaits us is is something that we really must stand up against very firmly. | ||
| Same playbook, same villains, for sure. | ||
| Nora, before we let you go, just give us a minute. | ||
| Today's obviously 9-11. | ||
| Your reflections on that? | ||
| Yes, of course. | ||
| You know, I've talked about this on The War Room before in previous years, and 9-11 is always a day of mourning and grieving. | ||
| It has been, you know, for the past 23 years. | ||
| And I'm very much with the American people and my heart is very much on America on this day, like it has been every year since. | ||
| And we cannot and must not forget what happened on that day. | ||
| The lives lost, the people who lost loved ones and who have to deal with the consequences and that pain to this day. | ||
| And we must not forget that war was declared on America and on humanity more broadly 23 years ago today and looking at the ramifications and the weaponization of that event as well to justify horrors afterwards. | ||
| All of that is, you know, we're still feeling the consequences of that to this day. | ||
| And talking about also the whole digitization agenda, very much, you know, the entire apparatus that was built after 9-11 obviously is very much a big part of this global digital governance that they're pushing forward with. | ||
| Norbin Laden, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with all the projects you're working on, feel free to plug them. | ||
| Where can people go to do that? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| You can follow me on X at Nora Bin Laden. | ||
| My substack is norbinladen.substack.com. | ||
| And if you want to participate in finding solutions and learning about the dangers of this digital dystopia that is closing in on us, I invite you guys to go to antimatters.world. | ||
| And to check out all of the content that me and my teammates have put together for you to learn about the digitization of our society, and most importantly, how we must protect the natural expression of the biological human, which is what they're trying to destroy. | ||
| And I hope you will go and learn more about this. | ||
| Norbin Laden, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| I was watching MSNBC's coverage today. | ||
| They always love to throw around the word unity. | ||
| I've always said it's the siren song for when our globalist elite feel like they're losing. | ||
| Maybe we should call it the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| But I like the word unity, but I think a unity that is deserving and that remembers those victims of 9-11 the right way. | ||
| That is not the national security state weaponizing the word terrorist and domestic terrorism, taking it off radical Islamic terrorism and putting it squarely on the back, or I guess in some cases the head of President Donald Trump, the back of the MAGA movement, spitting in the graves, I think. | ||
| The deceased on 9-11, when you see the Democrat Party doing a full-throated embrace of the most radical elements of the Muslim Brotherhood, whether it's Hamas, the protesters outside the DNC, the protesters you've seen on the college campuses. | ||
| Certainly not the unity that you get when you push this country to the brink by doing some sadistic bet where you see how many mass migration narratives and influxes and pushes you can put on this country, some of the most patriotic, most red-blooded towns. | ||
| Threatening the very fabric of this country. | ||
| You want to talk about foreign interference? | ||
| How about interfering with the values of this country? | ||
| You want unity? | ||
| All you guys do is import people from backwards countries that hate the United States and put a target on the back of MAGA every single day and celebrate locking up Americans, pivoting away from making the national security threat that this country faces. | ||
| Not radical Islamic terrorism. | ||
| Obama didn't even say that in his 9-11 statement, because of course. | ||
| You make it MAGA. | ||
| You make it the populist movement, so much so that NATO needs to create a new body to go after foreign election interference to stop President Trump from winning. | ||
| Of course, they're going to use Taylor Swift to do that, too. | ||
| We're going to be joined after the break by Mike Benz to walk through the significance of the Taylor Swift endorsement and Paul Dan's for Project 2025. | ||
| Not so much on Taylor Swift. | ||
| We'll get into some other stuff with him, all Trump campaigned. | ||
| But in the meantime, birchgold.com slash Bannon, or text Bannon to 989898 to get the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire and support the show. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Mike Benz after this short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| Taylor Swift did it last night. | ||
| Like I said, bad sign for Kamala's debate performance, but there's no one I'd rather bring on to break it down than Mike Benz, because he sees the through line to the NATO stuff too. | ||
| Mike Benz, can you walk us through the significance of this endorsement? | ||
| Sure can, Natalie. | ||
| So Taylor Swift is NATO's nuclear weapon for soft power influence. | ||
| There's a there's a funny backstory to this. | ||
| I've been talking about this now for about a year. | ||
| We I found a NATO 2019 Psychological Operations Center Panel discussion on information warfare, where someone from the CIA, someone from the 77th Brigade of British Intelligence, which is psychological operations for British intelligence, and someone who was a contractor for Grafica, which is the | ||
| Psychological Operations Research Center of the Pentagon based out the Minerva initiative there all made this pitch to NATO about how they could win the information war in 2019 against all the rising domestic populist political threats that were challenging support for NATO at home as well as Russian influence | ||
| abroad. | ||
| And to my shock, as I was watching this NATO psychological operations lecture hosted on | ||
| NATO's official YouTube channel, one of the slide deck presentations put up a big picture | ||
| of Taylor Swift. | ||
| And the presenter went on to describe how Taylor Swift and others like her could be, | ||
| quote, trained to spread desired messaging about NATO as they had successfully used her | ||
| and other celebrities for other adjacent priorities around everything from public health to other | ||
| sort of social issues. | ||
| And so this is NATO deliberately planning to, quote, train Taylor Swift to spread desired NATO messaging. | ||
| Now, you have to understand NATO wants Kamala Harris to win. | ||
| NATO wants Macron to win in France, wants Salvini to lose in Italy, wants the Vox party to lose in Spain, wants the AFD party to lose in Germany. | ||
| And so NATO in its 2030 agenda has articulated that it must become a political animal because the biggest threat to NATO is not actually a kinetic attack by Russia, but simply losing domestic elections at home, which would cut back NATO funding, which would cut support for NATO, cut support for its mandate to aggress around the world. | ||
| And so NATO has been leaning on the EU. | ||
| The EU commissioner came out and demanded that Taylor Swift come out to Europe and basically proselytize about neoliberalism and avoiding threats to democracy in the upcoming EU parliamentary elections. | ||
| Amazingly, that is exactly when Taylor Swift extended her ERAs tour into Europe. | ||
| And then you had this, you know, this barrage of headlines that The Taylor Swift is Biden's secret weapon in the 2024 election cycle. | ||
| When I broke that news about NATO having a formal slide to quote, train her to spread desired messaging for the Western world's war machine. | ||
| It was amazing the cacophony of insults that were hurled at me from the New York Times, from the Washington Post, from CBS, NBC. | ||
| It's like all the Confederacy of Dunces, you know, moved around and the Pentagon actually issued two statements denying that they had actually trained her. | ||
| Again, whether they did or didn't, the fact is, is we know they were plotting to, | ||
| to come out, to be used as a political battering ram against opponents of NATO's political preferences. | ||
| But the fact is, is finally, I got so many calls from journalists on this, | ||
| oh, the Wall Street Journal called me, I took the call. | ||
| I ended up explaining the entire story, sending four paragraphs of all the receipts, | ||
| including screenshots and snips of the video on NATO's page. | ||
| And the Wall Street Journal decided, hey, you know what? | ||
| Actually, we're not going to run the article. | ||
| So they know what's up. | ||
| NATO is using Taylor Swift as a nuclear weapon to try to win, to try to stop Trumpism. | ||
| And just give me a minute or two on the impact that you think that this is going to have in the 2024 election. | ||
| Well, it's hard to say because it's coming at a kind of strange time. | ||
| I think this would have been more influential if it had happened at the outset of Kamala's campaign. | ||
| in that first sort of month, month and a half when she was really being defined. | ||
| The fact is, is, you know, I think it was obviously dropped strategically to try to | ||
| lend credence to the idea that Kamala won the debate and was so persuasive that Taylor | ||
| was so moved by her performance that she came off the bench and declared her support. | ||
| But the fact is, is I think this election has actually turned to something quite different | ||
| than 2016 and 2020 when Taylor Swift was brought in as a ringer to support Hillary Clinton | ||
| and Joe Biden. | ||
| You know, I think that at this point in time, given that they shot Trump in the head, given that they've used the Justice Department to arrest the guy running against them, and the fact that they basically desecrated the corpse of the First Amendment, there's so many things happening here. | ||
| that I don't think it's going to change hearts and minds of how people feel about Trump or Kamala. | ||
| The only thing that it really threatens to do, which is not insignificant, | ||
| is mobilize people from the Democrat base to actually get off their butts and vote | ||
| if people were sort of soft for Harris, but they wanna be sort of in good standing | ||
| with Swifty Nation to have done their civic duty to have voted for Kamala. | ||
| So that does represent a kind of latent threat to the Trump campaign. | ||
| But frankly, I think Trump should turn around. | ||
| And ask the same to be done by the 15 different rappers who have expressed their support for Donald Trump. | ||
| You know, I think that the music industry, Trump himself in an interview with Sacha Baron Cohen back when he was Ali G, when Ali G asked him, what's the most powerful thing in the universe? | ||
| And or something to that effect. | ||
| And Trump answered music. | ||
| What's the most popular thing in the universe? | ||
| Most popular thing in the world? | ||
| And Ali G wanted him to say ice cream, but he said music. | ||
| And that's something that the CIA is well aware, as I've done many lectures on the CIA's role in the music industry. | ||
| It's something that NATO is well aware of in terms of their instrumentalization of Taylor Swift. | ||
| Frankly, I think it's something that Trump should be utilizing a lot more. | ||
| He loves music. | ||
| He's playing it always on his iPad at Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| It's a big part of his rallies. | ||
| He should be having musicians for Trump. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| Musicians for Trump, you should play the piano for one of their events. | ||
| How about that? | ||
| And Darren Beattie on the guitar. | ||
| Mike Benz, we'll have you back to walk through the latest and all the censorship wars that we're fighting. | ||
| But in the meantime, if people want to follow you... We're doing Indie Folk Rock Band. | ||
| I love it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| On X. On X. At MikeBenzCyber. | ||
| All one word. | ||
| Now I know what all your premium subscribers are getting. | ||
| It's bonus footage. | ||
| It's B-roll. | ||
| Mike Benz, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
| Thanks, Nat. | ||
| We're joined now by Paul Danz, the former director of Project 2025. | ||
| I call him the white whale of the Democratic Party. | ||
| They're obsessed with you. | ||
| But I just want to set this interview the right way. | ||
| There's a new story coming out in the New York Times with the title, Former Project 2025 Leader Accuses Trump Campaign Advisors of Malpractice. | ||
| Now, we obviously know this election is so critically important, not just for the future of this country, but the world writ large, and we need to make sure That we're getting things right on our side of the football. | ||
| So we want to hear you out, sort of the charges that you make against Trump campaign leadership. | ||
| But let's start off with your thoughts on the debate performance last night. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And it's great to be with you, Natalie. | ||
| I kind of think of myself more as an orca than a white whale. | ||
| But I used to be a lifeguard there at Ocean Beach Patrol. | ||
| You know, look, seriously, we have to step back and say, We should have been debating Joe Biden last night. | ||
| How did we ever get to a state of the world where we were arguing about social issues with a Bay Area progressive and being moderated by one of the biggest fake news houses? | ||
| And that's really just a series of compounded, really bad plays by the current campaign leadership. | ||
| You know, I grew up playing a lot of team sports. | ||
| I was a crease attackman. | ||
| I was a lacrosse player, right? | ||
| And we're in the fourth quarter. | ||
| Let's be serious, people. | ||
| What Mike Benz was just saying, this is about peace coming forward. | ||
| We're on the doorstep of But walk us through, Paul, why you put the focus on them. | ||
| What do you think of the charges that you would sort of put on them? | ||
| You have something happen like last night. | ||
| This is when you call a timeout. | ||
| Trump needs to call everyone to the sideline, basically bench Suzy and Chris, the campaign | ||
| managers, and he's got to put the team back on the field that won this in 16. | ||
| That's going to Kelly. | ||
| But walk us through, Paul, why you put the focus on them. | ||
| What do you think of the charges that you would sort of put on them? | ||
| Why is it them? | ||
| Yeah, sure. | ||
| No, incredibly, there's probably like five of them. | ||
| The first is that, you know, they pushed Joe Biden off the stage without having a plan for Kamala Harris. | ||
| And they did this by hubris and arrogance. | ||
| They, if you remember, in August, in April 11th of this year, they started clamoring for early debates. | ||
| Chris really crowing anytime, anywhere, anyplace. | ||
| And they walked away from that commission on presidential debates. | ||
| Typically, you have the debates after someone is locked in, and that would happen in September. | ||
| So what happened was they played into the Democrat hands, and they clamored for an early debate in June, and they left the Democrats this optionality to slip Joe out if things went south. | ||
| And they did, and they brought in an untested candidate, someone who's never got a vote for any primary in their lives. | ||
| You know, that's the number one thing. | ||
| And what's interesting is this is all told in an Atlantic magazine article that Chris and Susie sat for. | ||
| So imagine that you bring in backstage, literally backstage, a writer for the Atlantic. | ||
| Now, the Atlantic is owned by Stephen Jobs's widow, Lauren Jobs. | ||
| And she, of all things, is one of the early financial backers of none other than Senator Kamala Harris. | ||
| So you bring someone backstage for six months and you tell them about how you're setting up an entire program against Biden and how you essentially admit that you have no plan for Kamala. | ||
| And he has this source of information. | ||
| Why would you ever let your hair down to the Atlantic? | ||
| But they did. | ||
| And if you read that July 11th piece, they go further and they're convinced that Joe is locked in. | ||
| Well, obviously, that was just a terrible assessment. | ||
| He wasn't. | ||
| So, two, you know, it's really Sitting there yesterday watching the debate, the first thing I was struck at was like, what's the difference with the first debate? | ||
| Yeah, the fact is that that President Trump Would have been dead, you know, he should, but for the grace of God, he wouldn't be standing there. | ||
| But if you watch that debate last night, no one was ever reminded that he was almost assassinated. | ||
| And in that vein, the campaigns failed to really take that moment, that assassination moment and bring the country together. | ||
| I was in New York for 9-11 and that obviously was such a chilling day and the heroism that we saw, the coming together afterwards was a singular moment in history and we learned that we have a lot in common and I think That coming out of the assassination attempt, they could have cut a completely different narrative with President Trump and really brought in people like Ben Carson and the rest to really kind of say, this is the moment where America is going to come together. | ||
| And they missed this kind of really golden opportunity to advance President Trump. | ||
| And so that's another fundamental misplay. | ||
| Obviously, with Project 2025, again, they took the bait of the left. | ||
| and played into their narrative. | ||
| The mischaracterization, everything they say about Project 2025, | ||
| it's not in the book itself. | ||
| And the book isn't even Trump's. | ||
| But the fact of the matter was Project 2025 wasn't Chris or Susie's either. | ||
| And they didn't want anything to do with it and realized that they couldn't control it. | ||
| So they wanted to- We know it wasn't Trump's. | ||
| So why do you think the Democrats are so keen, even last night, on always tying it to him? | ||
| Just give me 30 seconds because we've got to jump to break, but just your sort of synopsis. | ||
| Yeah, well, it's all deflection. | ||
| They're not going to tell you the communism that she has in store. | ||
| So it's easy to basically use this as a bludgeon against Trump. | ||
| But the reality is it could have been totally played differently by the Trump team. | ||
| You could have borrowed parts of it. | ||
| You could have distanced yourself from others, but made clear early on that you had nothing to do with it by also standing up your own agenda much earlier. | ||
| So, you know, I can't slight the Democrats for their fake misinformation campaign, but this is the next generation of Russia, Russia, Russia, or, you know, the Biden laptop. | ||
| It's basic, complete gaslighting. | ||
| And Paul, we've got to jump to break, but I want to hold you through because I want to continue to drill down on the shortfalls that you've identified, least allegedly. | ||
| We'll be right back after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Welcome back to The Worm. | ||
| I know we've talked a lot about the debate, but I want to sort of broaden the discussion. | ||
| We're joined by Paul Danz, former director of Project 2025. | ||
| Out to just the election more broadly in terms of the ground game, the ballot chasing, the turnout. | ||
| What do you what do you see going on there that, you know, causes such concern? | ||
| Well, you know, I've been on the ground. | ||
| I've been doing election integrity since the late 90s, really. | ||
| But I did have the opportunity to be in Pennsylvania with the 16 campaign. | ||
| I was there in 20. | ||
| I was there in 2022. | ||
| And, you know, the reports now coming out of the field are that we are outmanned on an order of four to one, that, you know, this whole team hasn't even set up the bricks and mortar operation to get out the vote. | ||
| And then more so, the election integrity, the one thing that Trump asked them to do, | ||
| I mean, he can get the votes, they need to protect them. | ||
| That hasn't been put in place. | ||
| The RNC will always tell you they got this and they don't got this. | ||
| And the reality is that, you know, it's going to be too late. | ||
| But we need, we can still turn around the tide. | ||
| That's where this, this metaphor of, of calling the time out and sending a new team on the field. | ||
| Now we have, you know, Corey out there, we got now Ben Carson, you know, I, you know, | ||
| with a Kelly and out on the field, all these folks, but really you got to put the control | ||
| that they call the ability to call the offense in their hands and put, you know, Chris and | ||
| Susie can move off to a pack, but they're a little bit out of their depths. | ||
| Now they've never run a national campaign and it showed last night, you know, we're, | ||
| we're missing Bannon. | ||
| We, you know, he's, he's up there in the penalty box and in fair in, you know, up in Connecticut. | ||
| But right now we need to, to focus this on critical issues because it's not personal, | ||
| you know, but it's nothing about them personally, but look, everything's on the line. | ||
| And what Mike is saying, Mike Benz earlier on is that we're, we're sleepwalking to World | ||
| War III right now. | ||
| So we need to get out there and play with some urgency and the listeners. | ||
| They have to do everything they can to get out the vote. | ||
| Voting has started. | ||
| It will start imminently. | ||
| I'm just curious. | ||
| Trump obviously put out a true social post a few days ago talking about how he wants to go after, he says, when we win, you know, these far left donors and election operatives, politicians, lawyers, you name it. | ||
| He wants to go after them. | ||
| And I would say it's not retribution, it's justice. | ||
| But what do you make of posts like that? | ||
| Is that more the vein that you're thinking the Trump campaign needs to go down? | ||
| No, I don't. | ||
| I think we have to win right now. | ||
| You need to double check who's in place. | ||
| He's put too few people in charge of too much stuff. | ||
| He's dual-hatted the people in the campaign and the RNC. | ||
| The RNC is just the same retreads. | ||
| The Bush, the Romney, the McCain people. | ||
| They fired them, reportedly 140 people, and then re-hired them two days later. | ||
| Chris has never been a Trump guy. | ||
| He was calling Trump an insurrectionist on J6. | ||
| So that's the guy leading the campaign. | ||
| And we have to step back as MAGA and say, sir, last night in the debate, he was criticizing | ||
| Biden for never firing anybody. | ||
| And it's a little bit, respectively, sir, physician, heal thyself. | ||
| You need to make some changes now because we are down a number of scores and we have to get back on the field. | ||
| We need to play with urgency. | ||
| We need to force And Paul, we're coming up against the end of the show. | ||
| I have just one last question, just for once and for all, because, you know, the Democrat media is going to spin this. | ||
| Project 2025 and Trump, it was like the third word Kamala said last night. | ||
| What is the relationship? | ||
| None. | ||
| You know, it was always to be supportive of the future conservative president, but it had no inner workings with the Trump campaign. | ||
| We stood this up precisely because we know President Trump doesn't like to talk about transition or focus on it. | ||
| But we knew that this work needed to be done for anyone. | ||
| And the point of fact is we got together way before he even announced for president. | ||
| And we did this work really on our own. | ||
| And that's what the war room and that's essentially the story of America. | ||
| We all have to realize no one is coming. | ||
| There is no cavalry. | ||
| You are the cavalry. | ||
| So get out there and volunteer. | ||
| Get these votes. | ||
| Bring them in. | ||
| But hold the GOP and the Trump campaign to account. | ||
| If they're not organized, start organizing yourself and make sure that it gets done because there is no protein coming out there. | ||
| Paul Danz, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on. | ||
| My pleasure. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| Mike Lindell, bring us the good news when it comes to what is the most successful day, I think, in war history when it comes to pillows. | ||
| Yeah, you guys, yesterday we announced what happened. | ||
| You know, we all get cancelled all the time. | ||
| They attack my company every day. | ||
| Well, we had just got a huge order, finally, from a box store about a week and a half, two weeks ago. | ||
| We made them all and they were ready to ship and they cancelled their order last Monday. | ||
| So I'm just getting devastated. | ||
| I said, you know what we're going to do? | ||
| We're going to bring them to the War Room Posse for what they were going to pay, for wholesale prices. | ||
| You guys, these pillows, if we pull up the thing here, here it is. | ||
| We're going to blow out sale. | ||
| You guys respond. | ||
| We're going to put a limit of 10. | ||
| We're doing that so everybody can get a part of this. | ||
| Once they're gone, they're gone. | ||
| These were $49.98 on the website, $29.98 with your promo code. | ||
| For the War Room promo code, $14.98. | ||
| This is the wholesale that the box stores would have paid. | ||
| It's the best deal of my pill in history. | ||
| Get them for everybody you know. | ||
| Get them for your neighbors. | ||
| Everybody wants neighbors sleeping good, right? | ||
| You get them for every room in your house, all your relatives. | ||
| Here's your chance, the lowest price in history. | ||
| You can call 800-873-1062. | ||
| They're working on commission, my home reps, and they're loving this special because we're making lemonade out of lemons. | ||
| And here, if you go to the website, There they are, all these pillows that we have that they didn't take. | ||
| $14.98, the blowout sale, and we have the sheets. | ||
| Now, don't forget that $24.98, the lowest price in history there, the $25, as low as $24.98. | ||
| And there's all the USA socks that came in for $3.75, as low as $3.75. | ||
| You've got the new discos. | ||
| Sarah, it's your one-stop shop for everything you need. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a one-stop shop. | |
| Mike Lindell, we've got to bounce. | ||
| We're gonna have you back, Warren Posse. | ||
| Get the pillows. | ||
| Thank you for joining us, Mike. | ||
| You guys can also check out mypatriotsupply.com. | ||
| Use promo code BANNON to get all the things that you need to prep for whatever disaster may come our way. | ||
| I wasn't even one year old when 9-11 happened, so I don't have any strong memories of it, but I do know how it has been leveraged and exploited. | ||
| To lead to a massive censorship industrial complex, military industrial complex, an infringement of our rights, and it is a disgrace to the legacy and the honor of the Americans who died in that attack. | ||
| I'm all for unity, but I want unity that actually works for all Americans and not just the globalist elite. |
Export Selection