Aug. 20, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:54
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Welcome to The War Room. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters hosting today, Monday, August 19th, in the Year of Our Lord 2024. | ||
| If you couldn't tell from the background, I'm back here in Florida with the far superior background. | ||
| I'll be in D.C. | ||
| later this week, too. | ||
| So many things happening up in our nation's capital, or frankly, not happening, if you want to go through the What Will That was a 292-page document that House Republicans finally put out, I would say several years way too late, when it comes to the potential impeachment of President Joe Biden. | ||
| Stories that we've been bringing you here in the War Room, over at the National Polls, basically all of independent media. | ||
| Four years, though I'm honored to have been cited in that long, expansive document. | ||
| The goalposts that they have set for what accountability looks like, I don't think that it makes the cut. | ||
| Mike Davis, I'm curious if you agree with me. | ||
| If not, we can have some witty repartee, as of course Stephen K. Bannon would say. | ||
| But can you kind of walk the audience through what you make of House Oversight's Biden impeachment report breaking today at the I mean, it looks comprehensive to me. | ||
| It's 292 pages. | ||
| I wish this would have come out sooner, as you said, Natalie, but this is important to have this document in the public record because it's very clear we have a compromised President of the United States and Joe Biden, they've been able to track $27 million from these corrupt foreign governments, China, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan. | ||
| It seems like every trouble spot around the world has sent over $27 million to what seems like every Biden family member Except for the six-year-old granddaughter who the Bidens won't claim or only claimed under political pressure. | ||
| It's very clear that Joe Biden knew what was going on. | ||
| This report by Jim Jordan and James Comer and Jason Smith from the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Oversight Committee and the Judiciary Committee and the Ways and Means Committee, it's pretty damning. | ||
| It talks about how Joe Biden participated And this foreign influence peddling conspiracy. | ||
| And the big question that we should all ask is, is what did Kamala Harris know? | ||
| And when did she know it? | ||
| How did she not know as the Vice President of the United States that Joe Biden and his family are corrupt? | ||
| They've been corrupt for decades. | ||
| And what did Kamala Harris do about this when she learned of this ongoing corruption. | ||
| There's still an ongoing conspiracy. | ||
| Joe Biden is still lying about this. | ||
| He's still covering this up. | ||
| Obviously, the first impeachment kind of hearing, I think it's fair to say, was a clown show. | ||
| They didn't really achieve anything. | ||
| So in terms of the timeframe, if they want to either relaunch or seriously double down on this inquiry, what does that—what does that look like? | ||
| And like you said, to the point of, you know, Harris's involvement, how do they not make this sort of—even if they were to impeach him, a Pyrrhic victory in the sense that you're impeaching someone, right, who's already sort of on the way out? | ||
| Yeah, that's a very good question. | ||
| I think the bigger issue here is this seems like a good roadmap for a Trump 47 Justice Department to open a criminal probe and actually root out this corruption. | ||
| This is so much bigger than Joe Biden or one scummy family. | ||
| This is about the presidency being compromised. | ||
| The president of the United States is compromised by $27 million in corrupt foreign payments To his family. | ||
| This is unacceptable. | ||
| And what has Joe Biden been doing as president in China and in Ukraine because of these corrupt foreign payments? | ||
| I mean, this is very dangerous for our country to have the president of the United States compromise like this. | ||
| I think this report also shows there's about $8 million, and I think relatively previously unreported loans coming from high-profile Democratic donors to the Biden family that were, of course, never paid back in addition to the $27 million sum. | ||
| But, you know, Nancy Pelosi, what was it, launched an impeachment inquiry into President Trump after she caught wind, I think it was just a week after, of President Trump's, we think it's perfect here on The War Room, but phone call with Zelensky took House Republicans—I mean, how long to piece together this document, which, like I said, really no real smoking guns in it. | ||
| It's sort of a compilation of, I think, evidence and facts that this audience has been well-versed in. | ||
| But when you sort of, I think, look at the other side of the coin, which is the lawfare that the Democrats are engaging in, much more successfully than House Republicans could ever dream of, how do you make I mean, Biden and Kamala's lawfare against President Trump has failed, and it's failed because Trump hired very good lawyers to fight back against this lawfare. | ||
| between Bragg and Mershon on sentencing. | ||
| They want to keep some of the information behind closed doors. | ||
| Can you walk the audience through the latest developments on that front? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, Biden and Kamala's lawfare against President Trump has failed, | ||
| and it's failed because Trump hired very good lawyers to fight back against this lawfare. | ||
| It's failed because we at the Article III Project, along with the War Room Posse, | ||
| have been beating the drum on this for over two years. | ||
| We've done many, over 4,000 medias, constant social media, constant opinion pieces. | ||
| We've changed public opinion. | ||
| And what's so important about that is, is with the Supreme Court, You know, unfortunately, you have to get both the law rights and you have to have the politics right in order for some of these Republican appointed justices to follow the law. | ||
| And the law is very clear on presidential immunity that we just had to change the politics, which we very successfully did in big part because of the war room posse. | ||
| And we have a six to three ruling in the Supreme Court, one of the most monumental cases ever, probably the most important case or one of the one or two or three most important cases The Supreme Court's ever decided, which is the president is immune from criminal prosecution for his official acts, and that drove a stake through the heart of Biden and Kamala's | ||
| Unprecedented, republic-ending lawfare and election interference against Trump. | ||
| But unfortunately, there's collateral damage. | ||
| We have Peter Navarro, who went to prison, and Steve Bannon, who's in prison right now after assertions of constitutional executive privilege going back 250 years to George Washington. | ||
| You have Trump's lawyers like Jeffrey Clark and John Eastman and Rudy Giuliani and others Getting destroyed. | ||
| Jeff Clark is facing disbarment in D.C. | ||
| under a politicized process. | ||
| You saw Trump's supporters on January 6th who were politically persecuted by the Biden-Kamala Justice Department. | ||
| Yes, persecuted, as the Supreme Court made clear in its Fisher decision. | ||
| Julie Kelly's the hero of that, highlighting the January 6th persecutions. | ||
| You had parents being targeted by the FBI, by the Biden-Kamala Justice Department for expressing outrage at gender chaos in schools and the resulting rapes in high school bathrooms. | ||
| You have Christians being thrown in prison for praying at abortion clinics while the Biden-Harris Justice Department gives amnesty to Joe Biden and Hunter Biden and James Biden and every scumbag Biden and BLM and Antifa and Hamas and the You know, the Planned Parenthood, abortion industry activists, and the trans terrorists. | ||
| There must be accountability for what the Biden-Harris Justice Department has done, and that accountability has to start first on November 5th, when people overwhelmingly show up to the polls and vote. | ||
| And make sure you vote, and don't wait until Election Day. | ||
| Vote as early as possible, so you can actually vote. | ||
| If you think the BLM and Antifa rights were bad in 2020, Just wait for the Hamas riots. | ||
| You're going to see the warm up this week at the DNC in Chicago. | ||
| But we also have to have accountability starting January 20. | ||
| And that is, there must be accountability for this politicized and weaponized justice system, intel agencies that started under Obama, and have been on steroids under Biden and Kamala Harris. | ||
| Your legal prowess aside, you also have an uncanny ability to, I think, touch a nerve with far-left crazies on Twitter. | ||
| I know you put out today that all these people who are calling President Trump a convicted felon, that they probably should get sued because it's defamation. | ||
| I just wanted to give you a chance to explain yourself and maybe go viral yet again and have their heads explode even more. | ||
| I love when the left highlights my work, whether it's the MSNBC or these crazies online, because then people go to our website and they donate it to article3project.org. | ||
| They take action, like we want action right now to make sure that Congress stops illegal immigrants from voting in this presidential election. | ||
| They can follow us on social media, but the point is this, is that President Trump is not a convicted And he's never going to be a convicted felon when this is done, because Judge Juan Marchand has to declare a mistrial in the New York case. | ||
| There are so many reversible errors in that case, but the big one is that Judge Marchand let in evidence that's subject to presidential immunity. | ||
| President Trump's discussions with Hope Hicks, for example, his Deputy White House Chief of Staff for Communications, or his discussions with his Deputy White House Chief of Staff for Operations, or his Tweet says the President of the United States, you can't allow that evidence in under the Supreme Court's recent presidential immunity decision. | ||
| So that whole case is going to get thrown out in a mistrial. | ||
| And if Judge Mershawn doesn't do that, this corrupt Manhattan judge, Juan Mershawn, who illegally donated to Biden and who illegally presided over this case while his daughter, Lauren Mershawn, is raising millions of dollars off of this unprecedented trial. | ||
| If Mershawn does not declare a mistrial, the Supreme Court of the United States We'll step up and step up quickly and end that. | ||
| There'll be a stay of execution of judgment pending appeal. | ||
| And then the Soros-funded Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and this Biden-Harris senior political appointee Matthew Colangelo. | ||
| I think I've checked every name that I'm supposed to not. | ||
| But that Trump's not allowed to speak under this unconstitutional gag order by Judge Juan Michon, the corrupt judge. | ||
| So Lauren Michon, Matthew Colangelo, the 87% Democrat Manhattan jury pool, the Rick process. | ||
| I think I've checked every box there, but this is all blowing up on the Democrats as we predicted and made happen at the Article 3 project over the last two years. | ||
| They were laughing two years ago after that presidential immunity decision and after that Fisher decision. | ||
| They're not laughing anymore. | ||
| It's become their nightmare. | ||
| Certainly. | ||
| Mike Davis, if people want to follow you, check out the Article 3 Project. | ||
| Make sure you say it loud enough for all the MSNBC hacks to hear you. | ||
| Where can they go to do all that? | ||
| Yeah, let's have the leftists raise a lot of money for us today. | ||
| Article3project.org. | ||
| Article3project.org. | ||
| Leftists, keep going on and retweeting my tweets so people can come to our website and donate there, take action there, and follow us on social media. | ||
| No media is bad media, right? | ||
| I think I heard someone say that before. | ||
| Mike Davis, thank you for joining us. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Well, I guess there is such a thing as bad media, and I will say bad media is a story that I saw come out in the World Economic Forum today. | ||
| You know, I'm always perusing their website. | ||
| They've warned, conveniently ahead of the 2024 election, of an, quote, era of shock events that we should be anticipating, including but not limited to, and these are direct quotes, A cyber pandemic that is intentional, a new global extremist group emerging, and climate change claiming its first island nation going on to lament, look for global risks to be further exacerbated by unexpected destabilizing shock. | ||
| I don't know about you, but anytime I hear the words cybersecurity, especially an attack that's intentional, just around the time of the 2024 election, I get a little suspicious. | ||
| We know we maintain that there are no conspiracies, only coincidences here in the war room. | ||
| But the World Economic Forum, I would argue, is at it again, engaging in Predictive programming trying to get us, I think, prepared for what we're going to see. | ||
| Some very interesting cybersecurity issues unfold as we barrel towards November 5th. | ||
| Because remember, CISA, the cybersecurity agency that your taxpayers or tax dollars fund, they're too busy censoring Americans online who have issues with the advocacy of, you know, COVID vaccines and mask mandates and election integrity, instead of actually doing their damn job, which is keeping elections Secure but I guess when you got an election to steal election security doesn't actually matter. | ||
| So that's why they have so much free time I guess the less secure elections are the easier it is to steal anyways In the meantime, by the way, speaking of that we're joined after the break by wonderful guests Who's gonna explain to you why Kamala Harris's coronation that's happening tonight actually Actually, it's just a result, frankly, of voter fraud. | ||
| We'll drill into all of that. | ||
| But in the meantime, you can go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| Make sure you also check out sacredhumanhealth.com. | ||
| Beef liver, magnesium, all the supplements that you want. | ||
| The beef liver is fantastic. | ||
| I know that was Steve's. | ||
| Favorite, I second that. | ||
| Has Steve ever led us wrong? | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| So get some grass-fed beef liver if you know it's good for you. | ||
| you but we'll be back with some pretty bombshell Kamala Harris news after this | ||
| short break. | ||
| Welcome back to the war room. | ||
| Like I told you guys, that House impeachment report that came out about Joe Biden may have cited yours truly, some of the early work that I did on Hunter Biden's hard drive. | ||
| But nonetheless, I would say that I am going to be an outspoken critic of House Republicans for dropping this report so late. | ||
| In the game, like I said, with evidence, with documentation that we've had now for years, but also on the heels, of course, of what I would argue was a botched impeachment hearing with Jonathan Turley and other witnesses. | ||
| But even this one isolated incident aside, The issue is that House Republicans are content and okay with writing strongly worded letters. | ||
| We'll be on the other side of a Marxist takeover in this country and House Republicans will be two years late writing a strongly worded report with sure a lot of evidence against probably two years late. | ||
| About how we lost the country to Marxist overlords, probably named Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. | ||
| More on his Chinese Communist Party ties in just a second. | ||
| But the issue is that they're still playing with letters when Democrats are launching impeachment inquiries against people like President Trump for having nothing short of perfect phone calls. | ||
| When they're engaging in hundreds of years of lawfare against President Donald J. Trump, and we're up against a dark money machine and apparatus that has undemocratically, and I use that word not in the way the left uses it, installed Kamala Harris in a coup-like takeover of the Democratic Party. | ||
| Republicans think it's okay to put out a 292-page letter documenting chapter and verse Joe Biden's criminal misdeeds. | ||
| It's absolutely insane. | ||
| This is not the time for strongly worded letters in the same breath in which you're writing those and talking about them and tweeting about them. | ||
| You're funding the very same agencies that you're allegedly doxing in this letter for covering up Joe Biden's crimes. | ||
| Whether it's the State Department, whether it's the Department of Homeland Security, whether it's the FBI, and I'd put probably Two dunks on the State Department because they're also continuing to give aid to Ukraine, which like I've always maintained is just taxpayer subsidized bribes because Hunter Biden needed to have business and energy deals going on in Ukraine despite no prior experience in that sector. | ||
| That's not how you take on the deep state. | ||
| You do nice little charades of letters while meanwhile you're funding them to the tune of billions of dollars and giving them brand new headquarters. | ||
| So much as, I mean, it's the very same State Department that intentionally withheld documentation about Hunter Biden and his father lobbying Italians to get involved in some form of a Burisma deal up until three days ago. | ||
| Oh, and meanwhile, they weaponized, what was it, over at the Department of Homeland Security, CISA, to say that any of us who dare to even talk about that narrative, that we were crazy conspiracy theorists engaging in misinformation. | ||
| By the way, the same misinformation hoax that you guys are funding, DHS, FBI, DOJ, all of those, they're all the same, basically. | ||
| They all serve one purpose, to serve as a Praetorian guard for the regime. | ||
| And by the way, you don't take down the Biden family. | ||
| You don't take down the powers that be in this country with 292 pages of a strongly worded letter that, no offense, most of the work you copy and pasted from investigative reporters like myself and Raheem Kassam and Garrett Ziegler over at Marco Polo, who, by the way, are being met with their own form of law. | ||
| I don't see you guys stepping up to do anything there. | ||
| So, congrats on writing a strongly worded letter. | ||
| I don't really see what it's going to achieve. | ||
| Also, Joe Biden isn't running anymore. | ||
| These people are fundamentally unserious, and I encourage you guys to call them and tell them to actually do something, i.e., strip the funding from these agencies who enabled this cover-up for so long. | ||
| Of course, won't be too hard on them. | ||
| They also did recently put out a letter, it was to the FBI, getting Christopher Wray to join in on their investigation into Tim Walz's ties. | ||
| To the Chinese Communist Party, they cited an exclusive story that you heard first here on War Room Broken By. | ||
| By yours truly, but nonetheless, strongly worded letters aren't going to cut it when people like Stephen K. Bannon are sitting in a federal prison. | ||
| You can't bring a strongly worded letter to a lawfare and gun fight. | ||
| With that being said, this is a very important story that I really want to drill down on and take the time to go through. | ||
| We're joined by Scott Hounsell, who had a wonderful article for Red State a few years prior having to do with Kamala Harris' involvement in I guess the headline says it, voter fraud operations. | ||
| So we'll just, we'll go there. | ||
| We'll cut right to the chase. | ||
| But how this affected her 2010 race for attorney general in California. | ||
| Now, before we get into the nitty gritty, can you just sort of explain to the audience, you know, how you ended up in the ballot counting room, who you are, what your background is? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| So in 2010, I happened to be working on the Attorney General's race for Steve Cooley, who was running against her. | ||
| This was a race between the DA of San Francisco, Kamala Harris, and the DA of Los Angeles County, Steve Cooley. | ||
| Steve was endorsed by every major paper in the state. | ||
| He was widely popular, was doing very well, and in the days leading up to the election, was polling anywhere between five and nine points ahead of Kamala Harris leading into that race. | ||
| And it came down to election night. | ||
| We were all gathered at the Beverly Hilton to do what we thought was going to be Steve's victory speech. | ||
| As the hours counted on, we saw nine point lead slowly vanish. | ||
| I want to stop you there, Scott, because I just want to draw the important parallel between sort of what we saw in the 2020 election, but also, frankly, what we'll probably see coming in the 2024 election. | ||
| In other words, you guys thought you had a relatively sweeping victory that night. | ||
| And now walk us through what happened as they proceeded to chip slowly away at that lead. | ||
| And like I said, a strikingly similar fashion to 2020. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it was specifically regarding the races that you watched. | |
| It was a gubernatorial race year in California, which is off the years of the presidential races. | ||
| So 2010, 2014, 2018. | ||
| And so the governor's race wasn't seeing these expanding leads. | ||
| The Lieutenant Governor's race or the Secretary of State's race wasn't seeing them. | ||
| They were staying within the bounds of what you would expect from these reports coming in. | ||
| It was only this race that saw this narrowing occur so quickly and so drastically. | ||
| And at the end of the night, as we, about two o'clock in the morning, were wrapping things up at the Beverly Hilton, they were in a dead heat. | ||
| Steve had a slight lead leading into the wee hours of the morning, but that lead had all nearly vanished and was down to less than 30,000 votes statewide. | ||
| And we then realized that we would be heading to a recount and would require us to be at the various counting facilities as these recounts considered were Going on and making sure that everything was going according to plan. | ||
| Uh, what started as a 10% lead was watered down to a marginal 30,000% or 30,000 vote kind of upper hand, which then ultimately culminated in Harris taking a 0.8% victory over you guys. | ||
| But what really struck me about this story and what I think this audience is probably going to be so enraged about you were in the room when they started, you know, playing the tricks, whether it was Signature verification, all the mail-in ballots, how those suddenly started to appear. | ||
| Can you sort of walk the audience through, again, through the mindset of trying to prevent this happening in 2024, but the tactics that they used, the Harris team, when it came to really engaging in these, what you rightly call voter fraud operations? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We were in a giant room that had various cubicles throughout the room. | |
| And each station was manned by a county employee. | ||
| And then there was watchers, either from the Republican Party or the Democrat Party, that would be near each of these stations. | ||
| The Kamala Harris team and the Democrat Party had a SEIU employee unabashedly wearing SEIU garb. | ||
| Standing at each of these stations and the Republican Party, we had three people that were at the Los Angeles County counting facility to count. | ||
| And we could not keep up with the amount of signatures that were being challenged from. | ||
| And of course they say that the story was always that party was no longer a process of this, but they could see on the screen how they were registered. | ||
| Uh, they were challenging Republican votes, uh, on the time, i.e. | ||
| time and time again. | ||
| And this is ultimately how I believe that that lead was chipped away and eventually handed over to Harris as Attorney General. | ||
| Again, she was wildly unpopular. | ||
| She had engaged in some pretty underhanded tricks during the campaign, including encouraging Steve to remain on the issues and then only to October surprise him after a debate question which was planted by her team. | ||
| Uh, she has, uh, she should have never been Attorney General, and had she not, I don't think she would be in the place she is today. | ||
| So, it looks like we may have- I just like her, and it's- There we go. | ||
| It's directly as a result of these actions. | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| So, no, no, no, you just cut out for a second. | ||
| But I'm curious from your perspective, having been in the counting room, is this an issue that could have just been remedied by having more Republican counters there? | ||
| Or was the system sort of inherently designed to be flawed to allow these, whether it was Democrat or, you know, nonpartisan, which we all know what that's code for, you know, ballot verification types to help ensure a Democrat victory? | ||
| How do you think we best combat it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
First and foremost is that we need to make sure that we as a party are more ready to combat against this, certainly with our own ballot harvesting programs leading into 2024. | |
| If there is a Republican mail-in ballot in a home, we should be doing everything we possibly can to collect that ballot, regardless of voter engagement, regardless of how many elections they've Uh, they've voted in over the course of the last several years is making sure that we're getting those ballots in. | ||
| That is where we fail time and time again. | ||
| Uh, the Republican party is good about claiming everything from about, uh, voter fraud. | ||
| And certainly from my writings during the 2020 election at red state, I too believe that there was a lot of that going on in various targeted counties throughout various states. | ||
| However, Scott, we're going to have to jump to break. | ||
| I want to I want to hold you because I want to see if there's similar tactics that they're | ||
| going to be rolling out in 2024. I would say I'm all for the use of stolen when it comes to the | ||
| DNC's platform. I don't know if you guys saw they started out their convention by saying | ||
| we're holding this convention on stolen land. | ||
| I would say you're partially right. | ||
| You're holding this convention in a country that underwent a stolen election, not stolen land. | ||
| You can suck on that, media matters. | ||
| We'll be right back with Scott after the break. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bann. | ||
| Make sure you go to Burchicle.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| And of course, vote with your dollars at Public Square. | ||
| That's PublicSquare.com. | ||
| But speaking of voting, not with your dollars, but the ballot extortion scheme that is the Democratic Party. We're | ||
| still joined by Scott Hounsell. | ||
| Now, Scott, I think probably the question with everyone who's listening to this and probably | ||
| rightfully outraged and concerned that they're going to use similar tactics coming in the 2024 | ||
| election, you know, do you see any overlaps already with sort of the narrative that they're | ||
| laying, whether on the election integrity front or even some of the individuals involved in her | ||
| campaign rolling out a similar operation? | ||
| I know, of course, the Democrats announced recently that they're hiring Mark Elias, which is always a red alert, always a bad sign. | ||
| But what are your thoughts on how this is sort of materializing already? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think 2024 will be a different year, largely because there will not be a lot of the counties that are under the forced mail mandate. | |
| That is mail ballots to every home. | ||
| Como is going to have a true uphill battle in that regard. | ||
| In addition to the fact that I think that Republicans have woken up to a lot of it, a good portion of the large money funding that is coming in, specifically that from Elon Musk that has gone to support President Trump in a lot of ways, is directly towards ground operations for Republicans. | ||
| I've long held the statement that if it isn't close, they can't cheat. | ||
| And so our way of combating any type of tactics that should be coming down the pipeline from the Democrats should be through our own aggressive ballot harvesting operations, going out and finding the ballots in the homes and getting them in and making sure we're turning out every Republican vote coming in, because if it isn't close, they can't cheat. | ||
| Scott, if people want to follow you, stay up to date, like you said, you've done a series of reports on this for Red State, too. | ||
| I'm sure you have more coming down through the pipeline. | ||
| If people want to do that, where can they go to follow you and read your work? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can hand me over to redstate.com. | |
| I host the Wednesday Night VIP Gold Show every Wednesday night there that you can check out, as well as my writings there at Red State. | ||
| And of course, on Twitter, at HoundSizzle is the easiest way to follow me. | ||
| Scott, thank you so much for joining us and for trying to at least defend some ballots from being subsumed by the Democratic voting machine in 2010 with that race. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Natalie. | |
| Of course. | ||
| We'll be joined shortly by Rachel Wilson. | ||
| If the studio wants to let me know when we have her up, that would be great, but I figure I would lay the predicate for this next guest, who's a wonderful expert on all things feminism, but I was perusing The Guardian, as I always do. | ||
| Or you know what, actually, we'll pause on a second because there's a clip I want to play, I just thought. | ||
| This is already at the DNC. | ||
| They're trying to make jokes, except we always say there's a little bit of truth in every joke. | ||
| Let's roll this clip at the AAPI caucus talking about Tim Walz. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Tim Walz is going to be the first Chinese vice president of our country. | |
| Uh, when he broke out in Mandarin with me, like, five years ago, my jaw dropped. | ||
| I said, really? | ||
| Well, that, um, unctuous behavior aside, joking that Tim Walz is going to be the first Chinese vice president that the United States has ever had, though I guess Joe Biden would give him a run for his money on that, isn't quite all that funny when the FBI is actively probing Tim Walz for his ties to the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Of course, House Oversight is sending a letter, I believe just yesterday or so, trying to | ||
| get more insight onto this individual who has, what, been taking over 30 trips, going | ||
| to China way too many times for any normal American. | ||
| Of course, being in business with the Chinese Communist Party, speaking at their foreign | ||
| influence groups, all that jazz. | ||
| But I want to go back to something that is vaguely related to the Chinese Communist Party, | ||
| because I would argue it all goes back to pandemic research, which of course brings | ||
| us to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| I was reading the Guardian and like I said when we have Rachel Wilson up feel free to let me know | ||
| And the article that I saw pop up was Slow the Growth, Save the World. | ||
| Why declining birth rates need not mean an end to prosperity. | ||
| With the quote that's trying to really, really get in to read the piece, there's a desperate | ||
| need for population shrinkage. | ||
| Now, I don't know about you guys, the same elites who are bankrolling pandemic prevention | ||
| research. | ||
| They're also admitting that they actually want to shrink the population. | ||
| Maybe that's a little bit of a conflict of interest, not just ideologically, but of course | ||
| financially too. | ||
| But we're joined now by Rachel Wilson, who always approaches these things. | ||
| I'm a fan of her work from a very nuanced perspective that has to do with how feminism and all this cultural warfare kind of leads us to this place. | ||
| I love how mainstream journalists always use a passive voice whenever they're discussing plummeting birth rates, right? | ||
| They act like it's just this, you know, not-so-happy accident. | ||
| But you've really kind of honed in on feminism and how these kind of cultural subversions have really led to this culture where we see these plummeting birth rates. | ||
| Can you sort of walk the audience through your take on what is, you know, causing this precipitous decline in birth rates? | ||
| Yeah, thanks for having me, Natalie. | ||
| This really kind of goes back to a couple hundred years ago, first with Thomas Malthus, then with Darwin and a lot of the social engineers. | ||
| When you talk about the elites, these are a lot of the people we're talking about from the old British Royal Society who, you know, kind of through this Darwinist lens were responsible for eugenics and wanted population control. | ||
| They wanted social engineering. | ||
| They wanted biological engineering of humans. | ||
| For the purpose of having more control and kind of engineering society in the way that they thought it should go. | ||
| They didn't see evolution as something that just kind of takes place. | ||
| They saw it as something that they ought to be in charge of and steering and controlling. | ||
| So one of the ways they've done that is through feminism. | ||
| And if you, anybody out there who's read my book, Occult Feminism, The History of Women's Liberation, there's a whole chapter on this and Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger. | ||
| Very timely since the DNC is out here giving away ...free vasectomies and other services to people. | ||
| The real reason they want to do this is because it gives them the control over resource allocation and the climate fear-mongering is also a big part of this. | ||
| This is why in the 1970s when Women's Studies was created with the help of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller family, one of the first things that came out of that movement in the 70s was ecofeminism. | ||
| And they had a woman named Sandra Harding who kind of pioneered this, this branch of feminism. | ||
| And it's very closely related to the climate change stuff. | ||
| Paul Ehrlich's book, The Population Bomb, which came out in 1968, all kind of part of this same philosophy. | ||
| This idea that human beings are not icons of Christ. | ||
| They're not image bearers of God. | ||
| We are just animals, parasites that are hurting Mother Earth. | ||
| And I don't know about you, but I'm 44 years old and I remember in the 80s growing up hearing about how we were going to have an ice age, that the world was going to freeze, that the ozone layer was depleting and we're all going to freeze, right? | ||
| This has been going on for hundreds of years. | ||
| None of it is new. | ||
| Fear mongering about overpopulation, climate change, humans being a scourge on the planet, and that this is all impending doom and we must do something drastic to end it. | ||
| So this is not unrelated to the Industrial Revolution, to the birth control pill, to abortion. | ||
| These are all just methods for controlling population, and not only population, but managing people groups, right? | ||
| This is another thing that we're seeing now in the UK, where certain people groups are being brought in, others are being suppressed. | ||
| This is all the type of engineering that the elites do use and have used to control populations, to manipulate geopolitics, and to garner more resources for themselves ultimately. | ||
| Yeah, and even reading the Guardian piece, there was another kind of buried lead where they talk about leaders of this movement, and they're saying, but there's a growing movement trying to slow or stop, stop the rate of increase that is in human population, or even to shrink the economy to save the world. | ||
| I mean, maybe you can make sense of what the Biden regime is doing when it comes to inflation, but these are radical proposals that I think the framing of it is even as, you know, population Sort of denies the humanity component of it to begin with, much like these climate change discussions where you see young women saying they don't want to have children because they don't want to, you know, burden the globe with having additional humans on the planet. | ||
| It's absolutely backward. | ||
| So I'm just curious, too, your thoughts. | ||
| You, of course, brought up the infamous, you know, vasectomy bus that's rolling around the DNC. | ||
| And while it's easy to, I think on Twitter, we've done a pretty good job of mock and make fun of it, I think there's something much more Yeah, well, I mean, these things used to be very shocking and taboo subjects to the normal mainstream American public. | ||
| I'm just curious your thoughts on the kind of representation of that more broadly within | ||
| the mainstream Democratic Party. | ||
| It's not even the radical protesters who are really in the bus around. | ||
| It's the DNC and Planned Parenthood. | ||
| Yeah, well, I mean, these things used to be very shocking and taboo subjects to the normal | ||
| mainstream American public. | ||
| Even going back to the 60s, this was crazy to talk about things like abortion and birth | ||
| control and depopulation and, hey, get a vasectomy, sterilize yourself, you know, for the good | ||
| of the planet. | ||
| So they have to turn it into something virtuous because innately as a species, humans want | ||
| to reproduce. | ||
| We want to survive. | ||
| We have a vested interest in future generations. | ||
| How can they possibly spin this into something that's good for people to convince them to | ||
| depopulate, to sterilize themselves? | ||
| Well, they have to create a crisis, right? | ||
| They have to make it into an existential crisis where it's like, if we don't take drastic measures, it's over for everyone. | ||
| There won't be future generations. | ||
| So if you care, if you want to be a good person, if you want to be a selfless person, | ||
| what you really should do is sterilize yourself. | ||
| You should end your genetic lineage. | ||
| You should not have future progeny to care about, right? | ||
| Because mother earth is what you should care about. | ||
| And so this gets into bizarre spiritual territory where you find that a lot of these people | ||
| are very anti-Christian. | ||
| They're very anti-natalist because they see human beings as more of a problem to be managed than, you know, the purpose of all these things, right? | ||
| What does the Democrat Party want? | ||
| You know, what's the DNC convention about? | ||
| You would think it's for, you know, we care about the American people. | ||
| We care about the public. | ||
| We care about the people out there. | ||
| But what they think is caring about people is, hey, we're just gonna go ahead and get rid of a lot of you. | ||
| We're going to reduce your numbers. | ||
| We're going to make sure that, you know, people are too poor to survive, to procreate. | ||
| Uh, because it's good for you and it's good for mother earth. | ||
| You don't want to be selfish, right? | ||
| You don't want to be selfishly thinking about your children and your grandchildren. | ||
| You know, uh, we have to think about the earth and the ecosystem. | ||
| And so they, they create this inverted virtue signaling where now to care about your own children, grandchildren, and the future is the selfish thing. | ||
| And the virtuous thing is to sterilize yourself and to convince your fellow human beings that they should not reproduce. | ||
| Really a demonic inversion in my view, and it really comes down to this global elite social engineering that they've been doing for a couple of hundred years now. | ||
| And I do want to mention real quickly that there is no overpopulation crisis. | ||
| Yes, the population is still technically growing right now, but even UN prediction models say that is just a symptom of what's called population momentum, meaning the low birth rates haven't quite caught up yet. | ||
| But within the next 20 to 30 years, they will. | ||
| Population has been on the decline since 1800 with the Industrial Revolution. | ||
| By 1910, we were already down to 3.6 births per woman in the United States. | ||
| And of course, once the birth control pill was introduced in 1960, by 1986, we were down to like 1.7 and we've been there ever since. | ||
| 1986 we were down to like 1.7 and we've been there ever since. In South Korea, the birth | ||
| rate is now 0.7. That is catastrophic. | ||
| That is looking at societal collapse for South Koreans. | ||
| The average Korean person isn't even reproducing at this point. | ||
| They're not even replacing themselves. | ||
| And there are catastrophic, cataclysmic effects to underpopulation as well. | ||
| It's not that we have to have eternal, massive, explosive growth, but we do need to have something of a sustained growth or And Rachel, we have to jump to break, and I want to hold you through, because I have some more questions for you, but I was also reading, it was in Newsweek, they were reporting that in Ukraine the death rate is three times as high as the birth rate, or sort of the net population increase rate, and it just has already gotten me thinking, I know we've been saying this on this program for so long, | ||
| They have to destroy the country first before they can rebuild it, I'm sure, in the style of the Great Reset, and they'll do it by facilitating it with mass migration, and they'll say they have nobody in the country, so that's why we need a new wave of immigrants. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I'll be right back. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| We're still joined by Rachel Wilson, who I have one last question for, but we'll definitely have to get you back on because there's so much to unpack here. | ||
| But kind of on the other side of the whole feminism and femininity point, you see, I think, an inversion of masculinity, too, with the UK announcing very recently that misogyny, extreme misogyny, who knows what the heck constitutes that, is now a form of terrorism. | ||
| Yeah, terrorism, not even misinformation. | ||
| I feel like that's usually the attack, the angle of attack they go with. | ||
| Your thoughts on how that relates to all of this? | ||
| Yeah, I saw that and I thought the same thing. | ||
| I thought, oh, who gets to define what this extreme misogyny is and how it's terrorism? | ||
| But it's actually not very surprising to me because one of the reasons for instituting feminism is so that they could push the depopulation stuff. | ||
| If you can propagandize women and convince them that motherhood is this ball and chain, this Awful, you know, that you hear people talking about forced birth, right? | ||
| Simply not having abortion is now a forced birth. | ||
| You know, if men want a family, this is now extreme misogyny. | ||
| And it is just part of what's going on there. | ||
| I mean, they're, like you were talking right before the segment ended about replacing populations and things like that. | ||
| They just announced they're going to do Operation Early Dawn which is going to release a bunch of criminals from prison so that they can put thought crime people who are opposed to what's going on in the UK in prison in their stead and continue importing migrants. | ||
| In my book I do talk a lot about this type of global societal engineering and how feminism is really at the center of it. | ||
| Women are easier to manipulate and propagandize. | ||
| You can tug on their heartstrings and this is why every election cycle There's so much appeal to emotion. | ||
| There's so much fear-mongering. | ||
| You know, they're trying to starve children by not giving them school lunch. | ||
| We're going to push grandma off the cliff. | ||
| All this kind of stuff, but at the same time, like you said, it's very counterintuitive that they also want to convince you that getting a vasectomy, sterilizing yourself, is what's the kind and good-hearted thing, while at the same time trying to care about people. | ||
| Or we need to prevent the pandemic Well, at the same time, you know, with the vaccine. | ||
| So it's always this Orwellian doublespeak with these people. | ||
| So I think that the misogyny becoming the new terrorism makes a lot of sense from their point of view because it's going to be a great tool for social engineering. | ||
| My favorite line in the Guardian piece, of which there are many contenders, is not to mention the problematic premise, which is that women bear the responsibility to bear the humans that will help feed this endless growth of population. | ||
| I'm glad we're acknowledging that it's only women who can give birth, but you know, whenever they whip out the word problematic, whatever they say next is always going to be good. | ||
| Rachel, if people want to follow you, get the book, stay up to date with everything you're working on, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| Sure, you can find my book, Occult Feminism, The Secret History of Women's Liberation, on Amazon. | ||
| You can follow me on x at Rach4Patriarchy. | ||
| There it is right there. | ||
| And yeah, I'd be glad to have you guys give me a follow. | ||
| That's quite the username, I'm sure our audience will be all about it. | ||
| Rachel, thank you so much for, although that might make you a terrorist in the UK. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a good thing I don't live in the UK. | |
| Thanks for having me, Natalie. | ||
| We'll see. | ||
| Only time will tell. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
| We're joined by now the one and only Mike Lindell, who something tells me has not signed up for his free vasectomy at the Planned Parenthood bus. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I hope not. | ||
| But you probably want to talk about pillows and, of course, your time at the DNC. | ||
| So lay it on us. | ||
| Well, we're at the DNC convention here. | ||
| We're live streaming on Frank's speech from 12 noon central to 9 p.m. | ||
| central, but here's what I'm doing, Natalie. | ||
| You can watch it exclusively at Frank's speech. | ||
| I'm actually shaving off my mustache, going in disguise. | ||
| We just picked out the hat into the DNC. | ||
| So this should be interesting. | ||
| Hang on, Mike. | ||
| The only disguise you have is a hat? | ||
| I think you're going to need a little more than that. | ||
| I'm shaving off my mustache. | ||
| You won't even know me. | ||
| Trust me. | ||
| So you guys can, you can get the footage over there. | ||
| We're going to be, but we don't, we're not sure what day yet. | ||
| We're going to keep it a surprise. | ||
| But if you check out frank speech.com, everybody, you can get, get your email in there and then you'll get notified. | ||
| As soon as I go in, we're going to go from the time I get shaved, the mustache, the barbershop, all the way through. | ||
| To the DNC inside and it's going to be undercover, incognito. | ||
| It's going to be amazing. | ||
| And for the posse who wants to support your mustache shaving and going undercover at the DNC, which that, there's no Stolen Valor there. | ||
| No. | ||
| If people want to, you know, support you guys, the factory out in Minnesota, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| What are the deals? | ||
| You guys, we ran, this is the last day for this. | ||
| We ran it one more day. | ||
| This is the Giza Dream Sheets, our real presence, favorite product of all the Myfield products, actually my favorite. | ||
| This is it. | ||
| The lowest price in history. | ||
| You're never going to see it this low again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$59.98. | |
| $69.98 for the King. | ||
| This is a War Room exclusive. | ||
| This is it, everybody. | ||
| We're giving the last few hours to get them. | ||
| As many as you want, but it's exclusive to the promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Then you're going to get the free With God All Things Are Possible. | ||
| You get, for any order you sent that pillow, you get that absolutely free. | ||
| We got the MyPillow mattress topper with the free sheets there. | ||
| You've got all the towels on sale, but this is another deal here. | ||
| The clothes out up to 80% off. | ||
| We have blankets from Portugal. | ||
| This is a War Room exclusive. | ||
| I believe they're like $39.98. | ||
| They're normally a hundred and some dollars. | ||
| The most amazing blankets you're ever gonna see. | ||
| Save up to 80% on them and all of our sleepwear and our line of clothing for MyPillow. | ||
| This is War Room exclusive. | ||
| Call my reps 800-873-1062. | ||
| You guys say they've all, they're all working from home, working home moms and dads that they rely on the commission. | ||
| That's a win. | ||
| Helping my employees in my pillow. | ||
| That's a win. | ||
| Helping the war room excel, excel the voice we need for the country. | ||
| That's a win. | ||
| And helping yourself to the best products in history. | ||
| That's a win. | ||
| Natalie, it's no longer a win, win, win. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a win, win, win, win. | |
| Okay, Mike, we have to talk. | ||
| I know for your election, Crime Bureau, you've ripped off the War Room logo. | ||
| I told you that you need to have more wins in your win-win-win marketing strategy yet again. | ||
| For all the work you do for the country, I will overlook it. | ||
| You will not be hearing from my lawyers, frankly, because I think you get hit up by too many mainstream media journalists and lawyers to begin with. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| And we're getting through. | ||
| The Lawfare King, Mike Lindell, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on, somebody tells me, probably tomorrow. | ||
| Good luck at the DNC. | ||
| I might not have the mustache, everybody. | ||
| I might not have the mustache. | ||
| It'll be gone, I think, tomorrow. | ||
| You know, we'll do anything to keep the viewership up here in the War Room now that Steve's gone. | ||
| So we have to entice you by tuning in to see if Mike Lindell has shaved his mustache. | ||
| Then I guess because House Republicans failed to stop Democratic lawfare, that is the state of things. | ||
| It's Natalie Winters, as always, hosting the 5 p.m. | ||
| edition of War Room. | ||
| I'll be back in Florida, at least for the time being. | ||
| Later week, I think I'll be hosting from our DC studio. | ||
| But until then, Natalie G. Winters, she's so right, dot co, over and out. |
Export Selection