Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
We understand that the GAB account is pro-immigration, pro-lockdown, leftist views. | ||
Is that accurate? | ||
unidentified
|
I haven't seen it directly, but I believe, from what I've been told, that is accurate. | |
With the GAB account, we're also, though that's been publicly revealed through the CIO and other things, we're still working to certify and verify that that's his account also. | ||
But it does have differing points of view, it would appear. | ||
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies. | ||
Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
MAGA Media. | ||
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bound. | ||
Welcome to the War Room. | ||
It's Natalie G. Winters hosting today, Wednesday, July 31st in the year of our Lord 2024. | ||
We have Quite the packed show for you today. | ||
We'll be joined shortly by AG Andrew Bailey, who yesterday was responsible for basically commanding and demanding the Biden regime to finish what Donald Trump started when it comes to constructing the border wall using the about $1.4 billion funds that Congress appropriated Not too long ago, despite Democrats and, of course, establishment Republicans' best efforts to not see those funds be used for their proper purpose of building that wall, he filed suit basically, I would say, doing some real nice political football, forcing the Biden regime. | ||
They knew the firestorm that they would come under if they opposed constructing additional wall, especially with Border Czar Kamala Harris, also Congressman Matt Gaetz joining us, and None other than Dr. Robert Malone on all things bird flu. | ||
I think I see Congressman Gates joining us shortly just to tee up that intro. | ||
Now, what you guys saw there, Senator Marsha Blackburn, right? | ||
Grilling individuals on the so-called social media posts belonging to Trump's would-be assassin, Thomas Matthew Crooks. | ||
Now, the buried lead of that clip and why I'm honored to have Congressman Gates joining us is that The FBI, Secret Service, they only brought up posts that sort of fit their narrative that this individual was, right, anti-Trump, right? | ||
This guy, or rather pro-Trump. | ||
This guy was a right-wing kind of lunatic nutjob. | ||
They didn't, conveniently, did not bring up any of the gab posts that CEO Andrew Torba Sort of released independently of any investigations going on, right? | ||
Senator Marsha Blackburn forced that conversation. | ||
You introduced today a letter demanding that the DHS turn over documents related to the ongoing social media censorship of all things related to the assassination attempt on President Donald J. Trump. | ||
Can you walk our audience through what you're looking to garner from DHS from Mayorkas? | ||
As you know, Natalie, there is a censorship industrial complex that operates largely through grants funded by the U.S. | ||
taxpayer distributed through the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the Department of State. | ||
Then that money ends up oftentimes at universities and with NGOs that establish blacklists that create a limitation on how content can be consumed. | ||
And we saw this so viciously during COVID when they were even trying to censor true information. | ||
They acknowledged that where there were true side effects to the vaccine, they thought it would create vaccine hesitancy, and so the ends justified the means. | ||
It's Orwellian, and so much of it is indeed going through CISA and the Department of Homeland Security. | ||
Now, we have to unearth that, But that's only part of the process. | ||
As you and I have discussed many times, you ultimately have to defund it in order to drive any change. | ||
And what stops the defunding of any of those features of the censorship industrial complex, it's governing by continuing resolution and omnibus spending bill. | ||
And so that's why I've worked to get the Department of Homeland Security to fess up. | ||
And what's interesting about this area of oversight, In a lot of the areas of oversight that I do, they're actually trying to hide stuff. | ||
They want to conceal their conduct. | ||
But oddly, when it comes to censorship, they're quite proud of it. | ||
The answer is, yes, we are creating this network, this web of academics and political and social elites to define the nature of truth, to shape what people are able to experience in the digital world. | ||
And you all ought to be very grateful for that as the digital plebs, and you ought to | ||
pay homage to your censorship overlords. | ||
And so it's an odd thing that they're quite willing to confess the conduct. | ||
And maybe that's because they know it won't be defunded, because we have such a corrupt | ||
system that just rolls everything up for one up or down vote. | ||
I do also want to comment on what you said vis-a-vis Torba and this shooter, because | ||
it is so frequent that you see a similar pattern play out where there's the effort to try to | ||
take anything that is bad or scary and lash it to MAGA so that people will think MAGA | ||
is bad or scary or violent, when in fact we are none of those things. | ||
Here, I think Torba really put out what they probably would have preferred him not to in the content of some of those communications and posts by the account that was linked to this shooter. | ||
So I commend Gab for getting at least the truth out while we still can. | ||
It seems like so much of the information that we've been getting that provides us true insight into July 13th, right, whether it was Old social media posts, even more video footage coming out today. | ||
It doesn't really seem to be coming from a congressionally-led investigation. | ||
It seems to be people stepping up, right, and sharing, whether it's Andrew Torba, Gab or individuals who attended the rally. | ||
And you've obviously always kind of been a thorn in the side of the Republican establishment in D.C. | ||
But when you see this task force that they established to investigate this assassination attempt, It seems like they're trying to sort of set the goalpost at the Secret Service, right? | ||
That's what they want to go after. | ||
But what you're alluding to is that this is a much broader and systemic problem that involves all of the Department of Homeland Security. | ||
It's not just DEI. | ||
There are systemic issues going on there. | ||
In your opinion, do you think that this task force is going to be able to unearth the type of evidence, the information that we need to get to the bottom of this attempt? | ||
Or do you think it's going to be more just kind of red meat for the base? | ||
I think it's deeply concerning that Eli Crane and Cory Mills, the two snipers in the United States Congress, were left off of the Congress's work on this. | ||
And I said it plainly on War Room this morning, that I believe that has more to do with their votes on the spending bills. | ||
They vote against a lot of the bloated budgets and wasteful spending. | ||
And so they're not really part of the club inside of Insular Washington. | ||
And I think they were punished for that. | ||
And if you really wanted to get the truth, you wouldn't punish the people who are the most qualified. | ||
So that's concerning. | ||
But your question raises a bigger issue, which is like, do we trust the Congress as an institution to do this work? | ||
Or are we going to have to leverage and rely on a lot of the digital online sleuths? | ||
And it's going to be the latter. | ||
I remember a conversation I had with Devin Nunes when I first got to Congress, where he said, | ||
look, our goal is to get the information and put as much of it out as possible. | ||
And then there are people who sometimes run a non-counts and you've done a lot of this work | ||
where you go through these reports and you're able to pull out the critical information, | ||
analyze it in the context of the other things going on in the world. | ||
And sometimes our job in Congress is just like to release the truth and let it roam free | ||
rather than trying to package it up, kind of like the January 6th committee did with Liz Cheney | ||
and Benny Thompson. | ||
But it's very disappointing that this task force doesn't include the two most qualified people. | ||
That's not a dig on the folks who are a part of it. | ||
Some of them are quite good. | ||
Some of them are NPCs. | ||
You should lash the most relevant skills to the work in any enterprise, Congress not being an exception. | ||
And you have a new article up where I think Fox News is covering what you've done in terms of exposing DEI, everything like that, and the military. | ||
I think it gets to the age-old question that we're always kind of pondering here in the war room. | ||
Is it a result of And competence and, you know, just woke policies run amok. | ||
Or is it intentional? | ||
Is it enemies within the subversion of our military forces? | ||
But I was reading through some of the reporting that you had done. | ||
You can't apparently say, toughen up if you say that's savage. | ||
Apparently that's a microaggression in the military. | ||
Can you walk the audience through what you've found on that front? | ||
Yeah, we uncovered a memo at the United States Air Force where they identified a series of microaggressions that were disfavored. | ||
And you mentioned a few of them. | ||
Man up is deemed gendered. | ||
So you can't say man up to people in the military anymore. | ||
You can't even say toughen up because you may be referring to features of gender. | ||
And you certainly can't say that's savage because of the insults to indigenous peoples. | ||
Give me a break. | ||
Do you think China's doing this? | ||
Russia's doing this? | ||
And I don't encounter this information because I'm like deep in some Reddit thread somewhere. | ||
I represent a heavily Air Force, heavily military district. | ||
And so when this weird stuff gets pushed from the Pentagon, I often hear about it because these are kitchen table issues in my district. | ||
Now, you asked the operative question, which is, is this just a bunch of woketopians at the top trying to live out their social justice dreams? | ||
Or is this intentionally to try to reshape the military? | ||
I don't know that those are mutually exclusive, but I definitely think that the hybrid leans more toward the latter. | ||
Because it's impacting recruitment like when the military was be all you can be an army of one when we when we leaned into the fact that it was often Men from the American South who volunteered for the military, when we leaned into that machismo unapologetically, we had the most revered fighting force in the world. | ||
Now, I still think we could vanquish any foe, but I do worry that they're trying to inform on the type of people who will volunteer for military service. | ||
Because a lot of folks in Huntsville, Alabama and in Beaufort, Georgia are going to see a memo like this. | ||
They're going to hear an experience from a family member who may be serving about this type of pressure, and they may choose something else in life. | ||
And that is the true subversion, the way that the image of the military is changed as a consequence of these bad acts. | ||
And frankly, I struggle with this, Natalie, because I love the military. | ||
My son's in the military. | ||
I want people to join the military and do great things for our country. | ||
And so I hate having to talk about this stuff. | ||
But if you don't talk about it and you don't expose it and you don't work to humiliate the generals pushing it and then ultimately defund it, then you get more of it for sure. | ||
And so I wish, I long for the days that I'm not talking about drag shows on military bases and the way our military leaders are clutching their pearls. | ||
You know, over microaggressions, but that is the reality we live and we have to deal with it. | ||
And on the question of, you know, intentional malice or incompetence, I think you guys being sent home for break despite all your spending bills not being in order, right, is really just a present to the special interest, to the lobbyists, to the the uniparty, the system, the way things are run. | ||
In DC, give me just a few minutes before you have to bounce for the posse what they can do for this month, whether it's making calls, reaching out to their representatives to ensure that we don't get another, you know, government shutdown, debacle, CR type situation. | ||
I think that we have to be ready to make a demand. | ||
And Chip Roy, a guest host in this morning, really laid it out well. | ||
The demand should be illegal aliens don't vote in our elections, or we're not going to extend the Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris inflation agenda through continuing resolutions around the | ||
spending bills. | ||
That ought to be the demand. I think that would unite Republicans. I think it's the most timely | ||
ask we can make now. And yeah, you have to be willing to shut down the government over it. | ||
You have to be willing to say, we don't have a government if you can let 20 million illegal | ||
aliens into the country and then have them voting in elections, diluting the legitimate | ||
ballots cast by our citizens. I think that's a fight worth having. So if the posse is with me, | ||
join Chip Roy, join in that demand that we are making that any government funding bill include | ||
the prohibition against illegal alien voting, then you can hold the. | ||
Congressman, thank you for doing double duty on The War Room today. | ||
I know the audience appreciates it. | ||
officials who color outside the lines. | ||
Right now, in the absence of that federal law, there's a lot of local flexibility to | ||
not check citizenship status, not check a signature match, the types of things that | ||
would give us clarity as to someone's status in this country. | ||
Congressman, thank you for doing double duty on the war room today. | ||
I know the audience appreciates it. | ||
If people want to get your podcast, stay up to date with all your hot takes on Twitter, | ||
on X, where can they go to do all that? | ||
Matt Gaetz, M-A-T-T-G-A-E-T-Z. | ||
And I would ask folks to go to my website, MattGaetz.com. | ||
The posse really helps fund my effort in the United States Congress. | ||
And right now I'm getting outspent about five to one by Kevin McCarthy's handpicked Black Lives Matter loving DEI instructor from Missouri. | ||
We're going to make sure to whoop him, but I need folks to go to MattGaetz.com, help me out, and we'll make sure we deliver a great victory and then make it worth something by fighting for the people we serve. | ||
Congressman, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
I'm sure we'll see you soon. | ||
Thank you. | ||
We'll be joined by AG Andrew Bailey after the break, but in the meantime, you can go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of the End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
We're on the fifth one. | ||
You can always give Philip Patrick, who comes on, of course, the Saturday shows, a call during the week. | ||
If you can't wait till then to hear their thoughts on all things gold, we'll also have Jim Rickards joining us. | ||
Towards the end of the show, but in the meantime, the wall is getting built. | ||
You can cry harder, Kamala, Joe Biden, and all the Democrats who never wanted to see that happen. | ||
and we'll have AG Bailey joining us next. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
It's Natalie G. Winters, still holding down the fort. | ||
We're coming up on the one month anniversary, although that's too euphemistic a term, for Stephen K. Bannon going to federal prison because of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, basically everyone at the DOJ, the FBI. | ||
You guys know who you are and you can assure in Trump's second term. | ||
We'll be doing a lot of investigations into you guys. | ||
But I'm honored to be joined by someone who I really think epitomizes what Steve's kind of | ||
final words were before he entered that prison, which was next man up. | ||
Someone who's stepping up for frankly, most House Republicans, at least | ||
the bad ones. We have the good ones on the show, but those who aren't really using their | ||
congressional authority, their power to make anything happen. | ||
But AG Andrew Bailey joins us. | ||
Now, I understand that you were able to get a court order forcing the Democrats, basically, to finish constructing what President Trump started, which is the remainder of the border wall. | ||
Can you walk the audience through how we got here and how much of a historic victory this is for us? | ||
Absolutely. | ||
This is all about securing our national sovereignty and putting America first and stopping the Biden invasion flow of illegal migrants into this country. | ||
In 2020, Congress appropriated money with the explicit command that the Department of Homeland Security erect new border barrier systems, period. | ||
But on day one in office, President Biden signed an executive order saying walls don't work and we're not going to build any more walls. | ||
And then he hired Alejandro Mayorkas to undermine the will of Congress and vex, harass, and delay border wall construction with endless environmental studies. | ||
This is odd because in 2006, President Biden, as a United States Senator, voted for the Secure Fence Act. | ||
So in a complete reversal policy position and an act of hypocrisy, he has undermined our national sovereignty by refusing to build the border wall. | ||
We took him to task, filed suit, the Department of Justice fought us, and the trial court was skeptical about our standing argument. | ||
We appealed the trial court's decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and won, and went back down to the trial court, and the trial court entered judgment in our favor, ruling that The administration has to build the border wall. | ||
They can't waste your and my tax dollars on endless environmental studies and cameras and other systems that are not actually new border barrier systems. | ||
And so the text of the law matters, the will of Congress matters, and we won. | ||
The Department of Justice has failed to respond or appeal the judgment, which means just this week the judgment becomes final. | ||
And how soon will we see the remainder of that wall going up? | ||
It should be immediate. | ||
I know that there are contractors who have been waiting. | ||
They had contracts with the federal government and were jilted, and their due process rights under those contracts were violated by Biden's policy reversal. | ||
And again, when we talk about the Biden invasion, it's not just that he's not doing his job at the southern border. | ||
It's that policies like this, where he's repealing policies that work, like Remain in Mexico, or instituting policies like this that undermine the will of Congress and the plain text of the statute, Or his perversion of the parole process. | ||
It's that he's not only refusing to do his job at the southern border, but he's perverting the law and hung an open sign at the southern border that exacerbates the problem. | ||
It's a supercharger on the engine in a bad way. | ||
And so that's why this lawsuit is so important. | ||
And I believe that there are contractors that are shovel-ready to continue building Trump's border wall. | ||
And walk us through some of the follow-up actions that you've taken, whether it's Filing suit over illegal aliens being flown into Missouri. | ||
We know every state is a border state now But what's what are some of the the and you don't stop apparently? | ||
What are some of the other actions legal or otherwise that you guys are taking to get to the bottom of this this invasion? | ||
Well, this is a significant problem. | ||
Like you said, every state is a border state at this point. | ||
In Missouri, we had more than 1,100 reported incidences of human trafficking in our state, making Missouri the fourth worst state in the nation for human trafficking because of our position at the crossroads of the nation and extensive interstate system. | ||
And that's reported incidences of human trafficking. | ||
How many go unreported, undetected, uninvestigated, unprosecuted? | ||
There's been more than 1,500 fentanyl deaths in one year alone, 43 innocent lives were lost, young children who died from fentanyl exposure. | ||
All that fentanyl is coming across the southern border in the Joe Biden border invasion. | ||
And remember, Kamala Harris is the border czar. | ||
She owns this policy failure. | ||
Don't let big tech social media and the lamestream media brainwash people into thinking that this isn't her problem. | ||
She is the mastermind of these failed policies. | ||
And so we know that in May, a House committee issued a report that confirmed what the Center on Immigration Studies had previously reported, which is that there are 45 major airports in the United States of America that are being used by the federal government to transport these illegal aliens into our country and deposit them throughout the nation. | ||
Two of those airports are in Missouri and both St. | ||
Louis and Kansas City. | ||
And so we filed a demand for transparency and accountability with the Department of Homeland Security to get to the bottom of how many criminal aliens is the federal government depositing into our state. | ||
And DHS has stonewalled that demand for accountability and transparency. | ||
So just this week, we have filed suit and we're going to get to the bottom of it and hold the wrongdoers accountable. | ||
You know, in Missouri, it's a felony offense to knowingly transport an illegal alien into or through this state. | ||
And we stand ready to enforce that criminal law that prevents and dissuades and deters human trafficking. | ||
Well, they know how woefully unpopular their border policies are, and they frankly probably just wanted to avoid another news cycle that you would have induced, right, that would have, I think, shown that they are aiding and abetting this border crisis, whether it was the wire fencing. | ||
Now, in this case, it's the wall. | ||
Kudos to you for really forcing their hand there. | ||
But you also have had similar success on a similar but parallel track in terms of really weeding out diversity, equity and inclusion. | ||
Just, I mean, I think that's too nice a term. | ||
Far left, I mean, cultural Marxist ideology permeating academic institutions in this country. | ||
Racial discrimination, too. | ||
Can you walk the audience through some of the victories you've had on that front in Missouri's universities? | ||
Yeah, absolutely. | ||
Well, once the students for fair admission case came down last summer, we immediately sent demand letters to all institutions of higher education and public institutions throughout the state, putting them on notice that there's been a change in the law. | ||
Affirmative action was never constitutional, was never legal, and certainly the Supreme Court has clarified that. | ||
DEI programs that make racial quotas and disadvantage people based on the color of their skin are racist policies, and that has no place in public accommodation and public institutions of higher education. | ||
And I'm proud to say that just this week, the University of Missouri has decided to abandon their DEI policies. | ||
But it doesn't stop there. | ||
you look across corporate America and you see this kind of blossoming cancer | ||
on a corporate culture, which promotes people based on the color of their skin | ||
and disadvantages other people based on the color of their skin. | ||
That was on full display last fall when video leaked of the president and CEO | ||
of the IBM Corporation bragging about their DEI program and demanding that corporate executives | ||
institute DEI programs that disadvantage whites and Asians. | ||
And stating that these executives would lose their bonuses if they didn't comply with the president's racist demands | ||
and that their other individuals had been terminated. | ||
And so, here in Missouri, we filed suit under the Missouri Human Rights Act that prohibits racial discrimination in employment law and filed suit against the IBM Corporation in order to harpoon the corporate DEI whale as well. | ||
In seeing your, frankly I think, uncanny ability to go after the Department of Homeland Security, I think Congress should be taking notes from you guys. | ||
I'm just inclined to ask you guys in your office, apparently you guys have the power to conduct these investigations to get actual results. | ||
Do you guys have any ability or is there, you know, anything forthcoming from your office in terms of getting to the bottom of some of the similar, I think, behavior we've seen from DHS In terms of obscuring or covering up some of the information about the would-be Trump assassin or just getting to the bottom of Secret Service, is that something that your office has considered or that you guys are looking into at all? | ||
Absolutely. | ||
It's something we remain vigilant on. | ||
Look, I'm a former Combat Arms Armored Cavalry Scout Platoon Leader who served in Iraq, and I'm here to tell you, we never in a million years would have let a raised platform within 150 yards of a secure area, a secure site, be uncovered Or unsecured. | ||
And so this is a breach in security protocol that's unfathomable when you're talking about a presidential candidate in the heat of a campaign in the most consequential election in this nation's history. | ||
And there needs to be accountability. | ||
And the failures need to be placed at the feet of the policymakers who declined to do their jobs, which is to protect President Trump. | ||
And we will use any weapons, any tools at our disposal at the state level to ensure that accountability. | ||
A.G., if people want to follow you, stay up to date. | ||
Like I said, every day there's new great news coming out of your office, one of the bright spots in an otherwise depressing news cycle. | ||
Where can people go to follow you, support you, stay up to date with everything you're working on? | ||
Yeah, check us out at BaileyMo.com. | ||
That's BaileyMo.com. | ||
You can follow all the great work we're doing protecting the people of the state of Missouri, putting Missourians and Americans first, and fighting to defend our core values. | ||
You can check us out on the official site at ago.mo.com. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
We'll have you back on soon. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Talk soon. | ||
We'll be joined in the next block by the one and only Dr. Robert Malone on all things Fauci-lying, working, establishing a sort of back channel with mainstream media reporters to lie and deceive the American people. | ||
Not necessarily about what he was doing in Wuhan, but what he was doing with beagle experiments, if you guys remember the torment he was putting those poor puppies through in addition to the American people. | ||
But in the meantime, before we jump to break, as always, you gotta go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
to get the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire walking through why gold has always | ||
been a hedge and especially in these turbulent times it should be even more of a hedge as the | ||
world stumbles into just not just financial chaos but utter chaos in every regard and while you're | ||
at it you can go to sacred human health.com you guys know they're already pushing what seems to | ||
be another pandemic despite what is it less than like a dozen bird flu cases or something like that | ||
despite the fact that anthony found she'd been manipulating that virus for years to become more | ||
lethal to humans but their uh grass-fed beef liver i myself am a huge fan of has very high amounts of | ||
vitamin a which is very good for your skin never probably thought you'd hear a plug for good skin | ||
care in the war room but But when Natalie G. Winters takes over the 5 p.m. | ||
hour, you will get that. | ||
You gotta go to sacredhumanhealth.com. | ||
We'll be joined after the break by Dr. Robert Malone. | ||
While you're at it, maybe you can go check out warmth.org, the latest story that I broke yesterday, showing how Anthony Fauci was funding MetaBiota, that kind of shady, swampy pandemic consulting firm. | ||
Who's financial funding, at least their first round, was led by none other than Hunter Biden, doing research on bird flu in Ukraine. | ||
Basically, all the key players are part of that one. | ||
You gotta check out that story. | ||
Like I said, you can read it at warroom.org. | ||
and we will be back very shortly after this break with Dr. | ||
Malone and while Jim Rickards joining us for the end of the show. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the War Room. | |
Now, you guys know we don't necessarily trust the mainstream media ordained experts. | ||
here in the war room in part because they use private email channels to discuss a lot of things | ||
Anthony Fauci the latest offender on that front but one of the experts we do trust is of course | ||
another then Dr. Robert Malone. Now there's some new reporting coming out showing that | ||
we don't call him doctor here in the war room but that Anthony Fauci used a private email server | ||
to establish what I think you could kind of call a back channel with Washington Post reporters | ||
to sort of quell what I'm sure they would call misinformation but really rage and fury over | ||
a story as to how they were terrorizing these beagles doing just absolutely horrific research | ||
on them. | ||
Can you walk the audience through just this other prime example of Anthony Fauci's lying to the American people? | ||
So this white coat group gets the shout out for a good job here in digging this up. | ||
We have yet more with this example, yet more evidence demonstrating the collusion between the Washington Post, often referred among those of us that are here in the region, as propped on the Potomac collusion with the Washington Post and through back channels and the government, in this case, Tony Fauci. | ||
Uh, and, uh, we've had a lot of evidence of the Washington Post functionally acting as a mouthpiece for the U.S. | ||
government and particularly for the NIAID all the way through the last four years and, of course, historically for decades. | ||
In this case, what we have is a smoking gun that contradicts Tony Fauci's statement during the June 3 House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic testimony in which he denied under oath that he was engaged in any backdoor channels. | ||
And yet you had the testimony immediately preceding by his associate, Dr. David Morens, In which Moran's had spoken very clearly about having a, uh, I hesitate to use the word intimate, but I don't know what would be better a relationship with Tony Fauci, not in the biblical sense, but certainly in the business sense. | ||
And that, uh, he could back channel information to Tony via his private email. | ||
But now we have this evidence, which, uh, was explicitly denied. | ||
by Dr. Fauci during his testimony. So there's a case of lying in front of Congress. This is not, | ||
you know, in contrast to Mr. Bannon and Mr. Navarro, who refused to testify to implicate | ||
their former boss, the President of the United States. Here we have clear-cut lying to Congress. | ||
And the open question, once again, is whether or not Congress is just going to roll over and, | ||
like a Tunisian beagle, ask for its belly to be scratched or to be exposed to sand flies. | ||
Or are they actually going to do anything? | ||
I fear that my cynicism will come out here. | ||
I very much doubt that there'll be any actions taken against Dr. Fauci, who has been deified in that testimony and raised to the level of godlike status by both sides of the aisle, with a few exceptions. | ||
The Congresswoman from Georgia being one. | ||
But, you know, unfortunately we are in a situation in which the House Select Committee | ||
seemed to just fawn mostly on Dr. Fauci, and I doubt there's gonna be anything done here. | ||
Well, and that deification process, I think, works into a broader developing news cycle and narrative | ||
that we've been tracking very closely here in the Worm, of course, it dovetailed with Anthony Fauci | ||
rolling out his book, right, trying to do media tour. | ||
saving his image. But then you saw people like Dr. Ashish Jha, the former COVID response | ||
coordinator, even people like Andrew Cuomo, or rather Chris Cuomo, saying that, oh, now | ||
let's talk about vaccine injuries. There was what some might say a little bit of a limited | ||
hangout in terms of daring to discuss vaccine injuries. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
Entirely appropriate use of the term, Natalie. | ||
This is clearly a limited hangout and an evolving strategy that unfortunately is encountering some unfortunate truths or uncomfortable truths. | ||
It was recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine where it was acknowledged that A lot of these claims have been made about vaccines by the likes of the ICANN network and Mr. RFK Jr. | ||
have merit. | ||
And those claims that these products are not adequately tested, they don't have the appropriate controls, is now wrapped into a political statement by RFK Jr. | ||
that my conservative colleagues are wondering whether Mr. Trump will echo some of those themes in which some specific reforms are proposed. | ||
And RFK is directly stating that these members of the VRBAC and other committees that have whitewashed this RNA product Um, should be banned from, uh, federal funding and from future work in terms of sitting on these committees, much like has happened with Mr. Daszak. | ||
Uh, so, uh, time will tell. | ||
We're, we're really looking for leadership on all of this topic, I think from the president, uh, Mr. Trump. | ||
Uh, and, and I hope that, uh, he might come forth with some clear statements. | ||
Well, I think the timing of this limited hangout is curious, you know, the media works and lies of a mission. | ||
And I think when you see them sort of trying to gain back some of that credibility, right, in terms of saying, oh, look, we'll actually deal with COVID-19 vaccine injuries, you know, well, you're a little you're a little late to the party. | ||
But I think when you do that in context with this new emerging bird flu narrative, right, you see them trying to push another kind of pandemic, or at least a looming pandemic, at least similarities to COVID in terms of it being a virus that Fauci has manipulated and gain-of-function research-style tactics. | ||
For a while, do you think that together, those news cycles present a true threat, whether it's for the 2024 election | ||
or just public health more broadly? | ||
So there's no question that the putative risk of bird flu, which has been circulating this | ||
particular variant since 2020, and I think we're now up to four or five cases that are basically | ||
causing conjunctivitis in humans. | ||
There's no human-to-human transmission. | ||
There's no significant hospitalizations. | ||
But the government is still spinning up an emergency use authorization for the Siquirus vaccine through BARDA, as well as these new mRNA products. | ||
Also of interest, and I've just come back from three trips, I think, to Europe over the last three weeks. | ||
There, they're not hearing about bird flu, and yet Ursula von der Leyen and the European Council have already bought millions of doses of bird flu vaccine. | ||
And, curiously, the World Economic Forum has declared that bird flu is a global public health emergency, yet the World Health Organization has not. | ||
Because it isn't. | ||
And yet we still have this biodefense industrial complex in the United States spinning up in conjunction with corporate media and the government. | ||
This is an unholy alliance. | ||
Fortunately, we don't have evidence of significant disease in humans. | ||
And I've been talking about this for six months. | ||
I feel like a broken record. | ||
Please, Posse members, Don't let them provoke you. | ||
Disregard this. | ||
This is psychological bioterrorism. | ||
They are weaponizing the fear of infectious disease in order to promote public health policy measures and justify a variety of different actions. | ||
Will it impact on the election? | ||
God only knows. | ||
Our opponents in this seem to have a very limited playbook, and they keep going back to it. | ||
That plays into fears about Mr. Trump's safety, and it absolutely plays into fears of election interference, fraud, ballot stuffing, and the weaponization of infectious disease to justify Uh, mail-in ballots. | ||
Uh, so that's, I think that, uh, we, we should never, uh, um, rest up on, uh, our, our sensitivity to the weaponization of fear of infectious disease as a political tool and as a tool of this, uh, by industrial, uh, a biodefense complex for generating revenue on the backs of the federal government, which is to say you, the taxpayer. | ||
And what do you make of their efforts to sort of spin the bird flu pandemic on people who consume raw milk, right? | ||
They're shutting down raw milk farms. | ||
What's their sort of narrative? | ||
I know you're aware that we have this parallel agenda or what appears to be an agenda having to do with food and food safety. | ||
that comes back to the interface between USDA and FDA, and we have a constant drumbeat about fear of processed animals being produced in local abattoirs. | ||
That's, of course, this big Amish case in Pennsylvania, and the fear of whole milk or non-pasteurized milk, and the Curiously, the one particular application that made absolutely no sense for mRNA vaccines, since these products are shed in milk, was dairy cattle. | ||
And yet, what they're spinning up is the fear of bird flu in dairy cattle. | ||
And the most severe reports I've heard of impacts on dairy cattle from this particular infection, which may have been going on for decades. | ||
We don't know. | ||
Bird flu has been endemic for a very long time, pretty much most of my professional career, is that it reduces the milk production from the infected cows. | ||
And I put out a substack about a month and a half ago about this, and the CDC has tracked down what appears to be transmission or certainly a possibility of transmission through milking machines. | ||
It seems to be going from cow to cow through the milking process. | ||
So that, again, relates to influenza and coronavirus infecting the, I'm not getting too technical, the cells that line the glands that produce the milk. | ||
But that seems to be what's happening. | ||
There's no evidence of human infection from consuming raw milk. | ||
But there is the appearance of a surreptitious agenda to justify the deployment of vaccines in cows. | ||
And Dr. Malone, we're about a minute out from break, and I want to give you a chance on that note to plug your new book, CyWar. | ||
Can you tell the audience a little bit about it? | ||
Thanks a lot for that. | ||
So the book is coming out on the 24th of September. | ||
It's got a nice forward from General Flynn, a friend of the Posse. | ||
And the intention of this book is to help everybody to understand the technologies that are being deployed against us. | ||
And my hope is that by documenting this, it's 120,000 words, 130,000 words, it's a good long book, tons of information. | ||
That what it'll do is help you to basically arm yourself so that you're resistant to these technologies and so that it makes it harder for them to use them to manipulate you and your colleagues and friends. | ||
Dr. Malone, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
I'm sure the policy is going to pile in. | ||
It sounds like a wonderful read. | ||
I look forward to reading it myself. | ||
We'll have to have you back soon. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
Thank you, my friend. | ||
Of course. | ||
Whether it's psychological warfare or, in some cases, biological warfare, that's why you've got to go to mypatriotsupply.com. | ||
They're one of our go-to sponsors here in the War Room for everything that you may need. | ||
Not necessarily for this hyped-up bird flu pandemic, but as we always talk about with Joe Reek, the guy who runs it on the show, you can't rely on these same authorities, the so-called experts, to protect you. | ||
You've got to put that in your own hands. | ||
mypatriotsupply.com. | ||
Jim Rickards after the break. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
Government gangsters are the group of individuals, career bureaucrats, who have been installed by what we call the Deep State into every agency and department in the United States government. | ||
Had Donald Trump not won in 2016, he would not have exposed the flank of the Deep State and their weapon of choice, the two-tier system of justice. | ||
From Russiagate, to Hunter Biden's laptop, to Joe Biden's classified documents case, to January 6th, to the 51 Intel letter, and everything in between. | ||
We would never have learned that. | ||
These people are dangerous and vindictive, learning from their mistakes and perfecting ways to hide their corruption. | ||
unidentified
|
It is finally time for a straightforward assessment of the state of our nation. | |
Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
You gotta go to warroom.film to get government gangsters endorsed just yesterday by the one and only President Donald J. Trump. | ||
We are honored as your humble servants here in the War Room to have President Trump endorsing that film. | ||
You gotta watch it. | ||
It's warroom.film. | ||
I'm also honored to be joined by the one and only Jim Rickards of Strategic Intelligence. | ||
Now, yesterday we had E.J. | ||
Antoni on the show talking about how we just basically broke $35 trillion in national debt, looking, barreling towards an additional $1.4 trillion just by the end of this year. | ||
If we ever needed President Trump back in office to take the wheels off this inflationary train wreck, I think you could probably make the case. | ||
Thanks, Natalie. | ||
That's right. | ||
The debt is $35 trillion. | ||
So the debt is $35 trillion. | ||
The debt to GDP ratio, so you take the debt divided by GDP. | ||
That's the highest in U.S. | ||
history by far, and one of the highest in the world. | ||
There are two ways out of that. | ||
One is reduce the debt. | ||
Well, I'm not counting on that. | ||
I'm not very optimistic about that. | ||
The debt's going to keep going up. | ||
The other one is to increase growth. | ||
If you can moderate the numerator but increase the denominator, basically grow the economy faster, you will gradually reduce that ratio. | ||
So then the question is, what is the growth plan? | ||
And I follow this very closely with President Trump and now J.D. | ||
Vance on board. | ||
They have a very definite plan. | ||
And the pundits and all the usual suspects of the Financial Times and The Economist, The New York Times, The Washington Post and all that, some of them are just guessing. | ||
They really don't know what they're talking about, but they'll put something out there. | ||
Others are a little closer to the reality, but they put a very negative spin on it. | ||
Trump is going to put tariffs, that's very likely, probably on China, but not just China, other countries around the world. | ||
His advisors on that are Peter Navarro and Robert Lighthizer, both Brilliant economists, they know exactly what they're doing. | ||
So the more simple-minded, you know, journalists and PhD economists say, well, if you put tariffs on, you're going to get inflation. | ||
Not necessarily. | ||
You might get a one-time bump in some things, but what you're going to do is encourage U.S. | ||
industry and U.S. | ||
growth. | ||
What Trump is really saying to the world is, hey, if you want to sell in the United States, that's fine, but build it here. | ||
If you want to sell it here, build it here and increase investment in the United States, increase high-paying jobs. | ||
And by the way, this has a 235 year pedigree. | ||
This is what Alexander Hamilton proposed in the opening days of the Washington administration in 1789. | ||
It was followed in later years by John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay, who was the Speaker of the House, but they gave it the name the American system. | ||
And it has four parts. | ||
One is high tariffs to protect U.S. | ||
industry. | ||
The other one is a infrastructure investment. | ||
So things that we all know about the intercontinent, the Erie Canal and the Transcontinental Railroad and so forth, they were part of this. | ||
One is a national bank, not like the Federal Reserve that's trying to do too many things and micromanage the economy and they don't do a very good job of it, but just simply a bank that would provide liquidity as needed so that commerce can grow and merchants could grow. | ||
And then finally, a strong defense to ward off invasion and piracy, not to go around the world conquering, but just to protect the United States itself. | ||
So that was the four-part program of the American system. | ||
By the way, one of the biggest implementers of it was Abraham Lincoln. | ||
Then there's a line to William McKinley, and then more recently Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump. | ||
So as I said, but there's another side that started with Jefferson and Madison, and then through Other presidents, the Jacksonian presidents, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, James Knox Polk, but really getting acceleration, Woodrow Wilson, Truman, JFK, Carter, Clinton, Obama, and the Bushes as well. | ||
They're in on this. | ||
And Obama and Biden, which is the globalist camp, you know, they proclaim free trade. | ||
There's no such thing as free trade. | ||
There's no free trade in the world. | ||
Everybody has subsidies and they steal intellectual property. | ||
They put up non-tariff barriers. | ||
More importantly, the input factors, the whole idea of comparative advantage, | ||
I'm better at one thing, you're better at something else, so shouldn't we trade? | ||
Well, that's true until the factors get up and move. | ||
And that's what happened with China. | ||
They stole their intellectual property. | ||
BlackRock and Vanguard and all the rest put money in. | ||
So they had the capital and the intellectual property. | ||
And so they just built their own comparative advantage from nowhere. | ||
They're going to put an end to that. | ||
So I'm very optimistic about this, what I call the American System 2.0. | ||
As I said, the pedigree goes back to Alexander Hamilton and Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan and others. | ||
And the way you get out of the debt trap, probably not going to get rid of the debt anytime soon, but you can grow faster. | ||
And that's the key. | ||
Well, and there's an interesting subversion, I think, of one of those key planks of Clay's American system, right? | ||
Investing in infrastructure here. | ||
You sort of see the flip of that. | ||
We're investing in infrastructure overseas, whether it's in Ukraine or, you know, across the globe. | ||
But it even sort of compounds, I think, the negative effects of that as we see the United States funding and just amping up all these conflicts and crises abroad. | ||
How is that sort of making the problem even worse here at home? | ||
Well, it's absolutely making it worse, and you're right, Natalie. | ||
So yeah, they go where the cheap labor is. | ||
The capital is portable. | ||
The cheap labor is sitting in different places, China, but maybe India, Malaysia, Indonesia, and elsewhere. | ||
If you move the capital to where the cheap labor is, you have a comparative advantage that you can't beat. | ||
So how do you deal with that? | ||
Well, one is basically put up protectionist walls, tariffs, so that even if they make cheap goods, they can't get in at their prices. | ||
They have to get in at our prices. | ||
that gives US infrastructure a good advantage. I was on a panel of economists the other day and | ||
basically making the same points for making this interview, talking about the, again, | ||
what I call the American system 2.0. And one of the panelists, a pretty smart guy, said, | ||
well, Jim, if you do this, it's really going to affect the global south. It's going to affect | ||
Brazil and India and China, et cetera. And I said, yeah, well, that's their problem. | ||
That's what America First is all about, not in the isolationist sense. | ||
Jim, we're coming up against the end of the show, so we're going to have to have you back on. But | ||
if people want to get your just wonderful reports analysis, very few people, Stephen | ||
K. Bannon looks to for guidance on anything. You're one of them. | ||
Where can people go to get it? | ||
Thank you. | ||
We have a landing page, RickardsWarRoom.com. | ||
It's RickardsWarRoom.com. | ||
You go there, you'll be able to subscribe to our flagship newsletter, which is Strategic Intelligence, but we also have a free book offer, The New Case for Gold. | ||
By the way, gold today hit an all-time high, so I'm not a gold dealer. | ||
People think I am. | ||
I'm not, but I certainly recommend it for a portfolio. | ||
So it's RickardsWarRoom.com. | ||
Jim, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
Thanks. | ||
The American System 2.0, one of the reasons I'm so honored to have an entirely USA-made clothing line that you can shop at SheSoRight.co. | ||
Use promo code BANNON for 15% off. | ||
That's some breaking news, some developments. | ||
But we also got Mike Lindell, who always is bringing in the hot deals for the War Room Posse. | ||
Hot off his Trump rally speech, Mike Lindell, let it rip. | ||
Yeah, you guys, this is the last day. | ||
We just have a few hours left of the biggest sale, sheet sale we ever had, the lowest price in history, and this was a War Room exclusive. | ||
The famous sheets, the Giza Dream Sheets, the lowest price in history, the Queen only $59.98, the King only $69.98. | ||
This is it. | ||
This is the last of them allotted, but all the colors are there. | ||
You get them, they have a few hours left. | ||
This is it, the last day. | ||
Promo code WARROOM. | ||
800-873-1062 or go to the website MyPillow.com and there it is, right there, the green, that flash sale, this is it. | ||
You will not see these probably on sale again at this price ever. | ||
Then you have the King or Queen's MyPillow, $25. | ||
You got the My Mattress Topper, everybody. | ||
This is a war room exclusive now for $99.99 and $119.99 for the King. | ||
We also have them in dorm room sizes. | ||
The twins, I believe, are $69.99. | ||
Right in time for the college. | ||
All the towels on sale, $25. | ||
All the colors in. | ||
And remember everybody, it's a win-win-win. | ||
My pillows, my employees, the war room, and helping yourself get the best sleep of your life. | ||
We love win-win-wins here in the War Room, just like we're gonna do. | ||
Come November. | ||
Mike Lindell, thank you for joining us. | ||
We'll have you on soon. | ||
Natalie Twinters, I will be back hosting tomorrow at 5 p.m. |