July 30, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Why should transgender people vote for you? | ||
| Because I have a long-standing commitment to fighting for the rights of transgender people, for the dignity of transgender people. | ||
| I have a long-standing awareness based on my experience in the community. | ||
| Of knowing the lives that people are living every day that are burdened with fear, that are burdened with unequal access to everything from employment, to a response from law enforcement, to access to health care, to access to housing. | ||
| I mean, it covers the gamut. | ||
| And I'm fully aware of it. | ||
| And again, this is not new to me. | ||
| That's why way back when, with the power that I had, I used it in a way that was about pushing forward the movement, frankly, and the agenda. | ||
| And so look at my record to know, when I was Attorney General, I learned that the California Department of Corrections, which was a client of mine, I didn't get to choose my clients. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A client of the Attorney General. | |
| A client of the Attorney General, of the Office of Attorney General. | ||
| That they were standing in the way of surgery. | ||
| For prisoners. | ||
| For prisoners. | ||
| And there was a specific case. | ||
| And when I learned about the case, I worked behind the scenes to not only make sure that that transgender woman got the services she was deserving. | ||
| So it wasn't only about that case. | ||
| I made sure that they changed the policy in the state of California. | ||
| So that every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access to the medical care that they desired and need. | ||
| And I believe it was not only, I know it was historic in California, but I believe actually it may have been one of the first, if not the first in the country, where I pushed for that policy. | ||
| In a department of corrections. | ||
| So you can just look at all the work I've done over the years to know. | ||
| I feel very strongly about this. | ||
| And at its core, it's a civil rights issue. | ||
| It's a justice issue. | ||
| And it's an issue of humanity. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | |
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| Welcome to The War Room. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters hosting today, Tuesday, July 30th, in the year of our Lord 2024, less than 100 days until the election. | ||
| I hope you guys, The War Room Posse, are working in overdrive. | ||
| I'm sure you are. | ||
| You know, that was Steve's kind of final words before he is serving, which is soon to be in just a few days, one month in federal prison, thanks to the weaponization of our justice system by President Biden and all of his Apparatchiks, Kamala Harris included. | ||
| Now, of course, there's, I think, a push right now to sort of look at Kamala Harris as just a kind of crazy wine mom who doesn't really know what she's saying, although it's unclear, I guess, she's actually a mom or not. | ||
| But putting that aside for a second, like we had Trevor Loudon on the show discussing last week, Kamala Harris is someone who has Marxism and far, far left radicalism ingrained in her DNA from the very jumpstart of her political career. | ||
| Do not miss her. | ||
| Do not interpret her as the Trojan horse that's sort of this just left-wing cultural icon that they're trying to present her as. | ||
| And someone who has been really, I think, tracking that quite closely is, of course, Terry Schilling. | ||
| from the American Principles Project, but I think sort of the issue that encapsulates | ||
| right now how we're viewing Kamala, you know, people love to mock her for her just ridiculous | ||
| aphorisms and sayings, right? | ||
| You can be unburdened by what has been. | ||
| And sure, one way to look at that is someone who doesn't know what they're saying, they're | ||
| cackling, but that also has deep roots in communist theory. | ||
| It harkens back, frankly, in my opinion, to the Cultural Revolution and what Mao Zedong wanted to do with destroying the four olds, right? | ||
| What was it? | ||
| Culture, customs, habits, and ideas, right? | ||
| And that's sort of Kamala Harris's, I think, underlying philosophy. | ||
| You even hear her say that. | ||
| right in that clip we just played talking about transgender people being burdened by who knows | ||
| what. But Terry, you guys at APP have always sort of stood up for the nuclear family in Washington, | ||
| DC, which isn't always the most popular position to take. | ||
| And for that, you guys have received some flack. You yourself, Harris was tweeting about you. | ||
| Apparently you want to ban books. | ||
| You met with President Trump recently. | ||
| Can you just sort of walk us through this evolving narrative on the left that is that you guys are the weird ones because you don't want pornography in children's classrooms? | ||
| Well, no, that's exactly right, Natalie, and these are perverted people, right? | ||
| There's no other way to say it. | ||
| You know, if you think that we're weird for wanting to get gay porn graphic novels out of kids' schools, well, you know, you should probably look in the mirror, because this stuff is super gross, it's disgusting, and it is perverting the minds of our children, and they want to pervert the minds of our children. | ||
| That is the big thing. | ||
| But, Natalie, you know, I shared with you the oppo file that we've already conducted on Kamala, and there's still a lot more to come. | ||
| We're digging up more and more every day. | ||
| But this is someone that has a radical, not just anti-family agenda, but anti-child, right? | ||
| America, at a minimum, you know, maybe it's not a great place for families, but it should be a great place for children. | ||
| And that's what we need to get back to, and that's what Kamala wants to stop, and that's why she's attacking President Trump and J.D. | ||
| and myself. | ||
| And walk us through just how radical some of those policies are. | ||
| Well, I can tell you, Shio, first and foremost, she supports what's called the Equality Act. | ||
| This would put gender identity into civil rights law. | ||
| So we all know that, you know, civil rights law says that if you're black or Asian or whatever, that you can't be denied a job or housing. | ||
| You have to have open and public accommodations. | ||
| Well, when you put gender identity in there, it essentially erases all of the protections that we've secured for women and their private spaces, their educational opportunities, their athletics. | ||
| And so when you put gender identity into civil rights law, it basically means that if you're a guy and you claim to be a woman, you get access to all of women's private spaces. | ||
| You get to play in sports against them. | ||
| We're seeing in the Olympics right now, Natalie, guys are saying that they're women and they're boxing women. | ||
| They're beating the crap out of them. | ||
| It's absolutely criminal. | ||
| But on top of that, Kamala's record is so crazy. | ||
| I mean, you opened up with her bragging about securing the first ever taxpayer-funded sex change for a convicted murderer, right? | ||
| So she's taking money that you and I have worked hard for, that we have to pay in taxes, and she's giving it to convicted murderers so that they can get a sex change procedure. | ||
| Just think about how criminal that is in and of itself. | ||
| But I think the scariest thing, Natalie, is Kamala wants to take away custody from parents who protect their children from gender transitions. | ||
| They've started off in the schools. | ||
| The blue states have been passing laws that essentially allow for state-sanctioned kidnapping of children if parents are opposed to giving their kids chemical castration drugs like Lupron or even surgeries like mastectomies simply because you're Child is suffering from gender confusion. | ||
| It's it's absolutely horrific when we can't let her get into the White House. | ||
| So it the good news is we're not going to let her get back into the White House. | ||
| Well, and drill down. | ||
| Are you guys recently rolled out? | ||
| Was that an 18 million dollar ad campaign? | ||
| If I'm not mistaken, can you walk the audience through what you're sort of targeting with APP? | ||
| Yes, ma'am. | ||
| So we are spending 18 million dollars And the top seven swing states in the country. | ||
| There are three states that were focused on for the Senate, Montana, Ohio and Pennsylvania. | ||
| And then there are four states that were focused on winning for President Trump. | ||
| Georgia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Arizona. | ||
| And we are going to be making sure that every voter in the country knows just how extreme Kamala is when it comes to confusing children, when it comes to taking away parental rights, when it comes to ruining our schools. | ||
| You know only one-third of our kids can read or do math at grade level. | ||
| That's not going to change under Kamala because she wants to empower the teachers unions even more. | ||
| We're going to make sure that the American people just know just how bad Kamala Harris is going to be And so much of this trans debate, I think, gets caught up in sort of the ideological framework, right, that undergirds it. | ||
| But there are serious financial incentives, of course. | ||
| Big Pharma, you know, never misses an opportunity. | ||
| To miss an opportunity, it's sort of, I think, a racket, much like pandemic prevention is, right? | ||
| same people who are telling your kids to transition, become trans, also seem to have a financial | ||
| stake, or at least upside when they actually do. You guys have a new report sort of walking | ||
| through that very convoluted kind of nest of vipers. Can you walk us through that? | ||
| Well, the purpose, the name of the report is called the Gender Industrial Complex, | ||
| and the purpose of the report is to question the entire narrative around the transgender | ||
| industry, which is essentially that this is the civil rights movement of our time. | ||
| Well, that's interesting because it's actually a $4.5 billion per year industry. | ||
| They're making so much money off of this, and what they're doing now is they're reinvesting their profits into public relations campaigns into propaganda in our schools, confusing our children. | ||
| But also, I think one of the most criminal things is they're putting it into lobbying. | ||
| They're using this to legislate and change our laws to protect their financial interests. | ||
| There's big pharma, big oil, and there's also big trans. | ||
| And the only thing I think that are going to beat any of these evil industries that are destroying our country is what APP founded three years ago on this show, Big Family. | ||
| And Terry, if people want to support you guys, get the report, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| It's very easy. | ||
| Just go to transgenderindustry.com. | ||
| You can get a copy of the report. | ||
| You can print it off. | ||
| If you would like copies, you guys know how to get ahold of me. | ||
| There's a contact form on our website. | ||
| We will send you out physical copies. | ||
| We want to spread this far and wide. | ||
| And if you have any friends who are trial attorneys, who specialize in medical malpractice, Please let them know about this report because we want to sue all of these bad people. | ||
| Terry, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Natalie. | |
| The next block will have EJ and Tony joining us, but in the meantime, I want to walk through a new story we have up on the warroom.org website broken by yours truly exclusive Hunter Biden's bio firm partnered with Ukraine lab on bird flu research funded by Fauci and the Pentagon. | ||
| You guys may recall I broke the story generally two years ago showing that Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners led the initial funding round for a pandemic data and tracking firm known as MetaBiota, which has since sort of been dissolved into various acquisitions through other Cameroon-based nonprofits, something definitely shady there. | ||
| But back in 2016 and up until its dissolution, This company was receiving your taxpayer dollars, not just | ||
| from the National Institutes of Health, particularly the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious | ||
| Disease, which was run by Anthony Fauci, but also the Pentagon emails from Hunter Biden's | ||
| hard drive show former Clinton associates emailing Hunter Biden saying that they would try to make an | ||
| introduction to the DoD on behalf of the company. | ||
| But old internal documents from this program that I uncovered that you can read, like I | ||
| said, on the war room dot org website show that back in 2016, Ukrainian government officials | ||
| were meeting with representatives just shortly after they received millions from Hunter Biden's | ||
| technology firm, meeting with these officials, meeting with U.S. Pentagon officials as well | ||
| To discuss, and I quote, this meeting focused on existing frameworks, regulatory coordination, and ongoing cooperative projects in research, surveillance, and diagnostics of a number of dangerous zoonotic diseases such as avian influenza. | ||
| Also, other studies that were published under this grant include a 2021 paper that was funded by Anthony Fauci specifically bird flu in Ukraine, and there's a myriad of | ||
| other studies on the article that you can read that shows something that we were talking | ||
| about yesterday on the show with Tom Renz, which is that Anthony Fauci, in concert with NGO | ||
| organizations, oftentimes led by Bill Gates, have been funding bird flu research in | ||
| the same vein, in the same style of COVID-19, this sort of gain-of-function | ||
| manipulation, learning how to insert, whether its cleavage sites or certain proteins to make this virus | ||
| more lethal to humans. | ||
| And I think it goes to sort of the age old question, whether it's the gender industrial complex, the pharmaceutical medical industrial complex, or frankly, even in the case of the secret service going all the way up to the top of the chain of command with DHS. | ||
| The people who are supposed to protect us are also so intimately, I think, invested in at least purporting, right, to stop pandemics from actually evolving. | ||
| There's a major conflict of interest there. | ||
| And I don't know about you guys, but I know the War Room Posse, I think you guys share my concern that I'm sick and tired of these people, whether it's pandemic prevention or DHS and Secret Service or election investigators like the DOJ being deployed in Arizona to oversee the elections that are going on today. | ||
| When they slip up, there's absolutely no accountability, and their mistakes and their errors always seem to go one way. | ||
| Of course, they lied to us about the economy, too. | ||
| Inflation, you guys know all too well. | ||
| We'll have EJ and Tony joining us after the break to walk us through their latest spin and lies on that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room where trusting the experts has had us top $35 trillion in | ||
| national debt for the first time and it looks like there's no signs of stopping. | ||
| It's certainly why you got to go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire with gold hitting record highs. | ||
| I would say the time to call Philip Patrick, especially after you read the end of the dollar empire is now that's of course, birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| Now, EJ, there's, I guess, some bad news for not just the war in Boston, but for the entire country, which is that the national debt aided and abetted by House Republicans has surpassed $35 trillion for the first time ever. | ||
| Can you walk us through sort of how we got here and how it looks like they're already on pace to add yet another trillion? | ||
| Certainly, Natalie, and thank you so much for having me. | ||
| I think one of the things that we need to highlight right away is how Kamala Harris helped cause this absolute disaster for America and for the American people, quite frankly. | ||
| You know, not only was she the main cheerleader of this administration's runaway spending as the vice president, But on top of that, she was also the President of the Senate as part of her role as Vice President. | ||
| And in that, she cast two tie-breaking votes for two of the three biggest blowout spending bills from this administration. | ||
| In other words, without her and her being complicit in this spending, we would not have had trillions of dollars going out the door. | ||
| And again, besides those two bills, she has been the biggest cheerleader for all of the other spending. | ||
| Where has that gotten us? | ||
| An additional $7 trillion in debt. | ||
| On top of that, running the Treasury's cash balance down by another trillion dollars. | ||
| I mean, by the time this administration leaves office, which hopefully will be sooner rather than later, we're going to be over $9 trillion down compared to where we were when they took office. | ||
| I mean, the reckless spending here is just absolutely out of control. | ||
| And you're absolutely right. | ||
| That it's not simply Democrats who are to blame here. | ||
| Let's be clear. | ||
| This is about policy, not politics. | ||
| There have been plenty of Republicans who signed off on a lot of these catastrophic spending measures. | ||
| The infrastructure bill was one of the worst because it did absolutely nothing for infrastructure. | ||
| It just added to the debt. | ||
| And while it caught a lot of headlines the other day, Natalie, when we passed $35 trillion in debt, the same day, which no one seemed to notice, the Treasury also announced that before the end of the year, the Treasury was going to have to borrow another $1.3 trillion on top of what they've already borrowed. | ||
| This year, so things are just continuing to deteriorate. | ||
| And you're you're absolutely right. | ||
| And what you said earlier, people need to protect themselves. | ||
| I mean, obviously, we need to work to protect the country from this disaster. | ||
| We need to work to claw back all just all the disastrous policies of this administration. | ||
| But I think people need to protect themselves on a personal financial level as well. | ||
| And can you walk us through some of these other indicators that seem to be slipping, whether it's consumer confidence or just other metrics like that that sort of show this trend on other levels? | ||
| Certainly, you know, consumer confidence, that's a really important one that we look at, and one of the disturbing things is not just the fact that current conditions are deteriorating when we look at that survey, but also the fact that the labor market component of that, in other words, when we ask people about how easy or difficult is it for you to get a job, how easy or difficult is it for you to get a raise, questions like that, what we find is that labor market conditions today are at their worst since the spring of 2021. | ||
| Now, that's pretty significant because we're talking about a time of job losses in a lot of sectors of the economy. | ||
| We're talking about a period when you had inflation far outpacing wages. | ||
| And on top of that, we also got some additional survey data today from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which shows a similar downturn In the labor market. | ||
| We also have private payroll data where companies publish how many people are on payrolls across the nation, for example. | ||
| And that also indicated a negative number for July. | ||
| So it definitely looks like the labor market in particular here is starting to crack. | ||
| Looking at some broader economic indicators, we still have well over a trillion dollars of credit card debt in this country because people can't afford anymore to make it paycheck to paycheck. | ||
| They're having to go into debt just to put food on the table and pay for other necessities, whether it's their car payment, their rent, you name it. | ||
| So we definitely see a lot of stress, both in terms of federal finance, but also in terms of family finance. | ||
| That's, again, becoming particularly worrying today because consumer spending makes up somewhere between two-thirds and three-quarters of the economy. | ||
| So you pull that block out and the rest of the wall is going to fall. | ||
| I want to link this to another story, which is that I believe it's just reported that illegal aliens are basically outpacing actual American citizen births. | ||
| If you look at the chart, you can see just under Joe Biden, basically illegal aliens, of course, those are the ones that we know of, so multiply it probably 1020x at least. | ||
| But like I said, they're outpacing actual citizens being born here in the United States How do you think the lived economic experiences that, you know, again, we can only go through so many indicators, but when you kind of put them all together are creating an environment where American citizens are not having children and then simultaneously they point to these indicators to say, this is why we need to have mass migration, right? | ||
| To, to, uh, boost up the declining birth rates and to help fix these holes in the economy. | ||
| How does this create a perfect storm? | ||
| It certainly is a perfect storm, Natalie. | ||
| You're absolutely right. | ||
| In fact, it's somewhat of a negative feedback loop, actually, because as people, for example, are becoming more financially stressed, they're deciding to do things like delay marriage, which means delay having kids, and very often it means they're not having kids at all. | ||
| And so the response to that, at least from this administration, but some prior administrations as well, has been to simply import foreign labor to make up for that shortfall. | ||
| But that has actually exacerbated the problem in a lot of instances, especially entry-level positions, low-skill positions, because what it's doing is it's driving Americans out of those jobs, which then, again, exacerbates the financial stress for a lot of young people who now aren't starting families, aren't having kids. | ||
| If you look at, for example, who has gotten all of the jobs in the Biden economy, there are fewer native-born Americans working today than there were before the pandemic. | ||
| So all of the net job growth that we have seen that this administration constantly crows about has come entirely from foreign-born workers. | ||
| Again, it's not native-born Americans who are getting these jobs. | ||
| And actually, Natalie, I think That's another important point for another consideration here, which is the fact that how can we be adding so many jobs to the economy, and yet Americans disapprove so much of how the economy is doing? | ||
| I think part of that has to do with the fact that they're not the ones getting the jobs. | ||
| There's some polling coming out from, of course, Democratic pollsters, so I'll believe it when I see the crosstabs, but basically saying that American voters don't necessarily Place the same blame that they do on Joe Biden on Harris for inflation, and that in some cases they even are seeing a 50-50 split in terms of who Americans think would handle inflation better between Trump or Harris. | ||
| Kind of going back to what you're talking about in the beginning, how mistaken is that? | ||
| In other words, how responsible, even going back to her Senate record, has Kamala Harris been for policies that induce more inflation? | ||
| Great questions, Natalie. | ||
| I think one of the things that's important when we're talking about these polls is you always want to look at the methodology behind them. | ||
| And one of the things that we've seen in several of them is a large oversampling of certain demographic groups, which overwhelmingly vote Democrats. | ||
| So, for example, one I saw, it had a disproportionate amount of young, college-educated, single white women. | ||
| Again, you're talking about a group that is going to disproportionately vote Democrat, and by oversampling them, you are now essentially biasing your polls so it doesn't necessarily reflect reality, reflect the attitudes of the general public. | ||
| And again, it's important to look beyond just the headlines of these things and see what's really going on under the hood. | ||
| In terms of responsibility for inflation, though, again, going back to how we started this conversation, Kamala Harris deserves an incredible amount of blame for the financial mess that so many Americans find themselves in today, and frankly, that the entire government finds itself in today. | ||
| Because without her, we would not have had literally trillions of dollars in spending. | ||
| That's not an exaggeration. | ||
| Again, she was that tie-breaking vote on at least two major pieces of spending legislation. | ||
| And on top of that, as the vice president, she has been the primary cheerleader for so many other spending bills. | ||
| And let's not forget, she also was one of the co-sponsors, when she was still a senator, of the so-called Green New Deal, that whole ridiculous package, which was really just a Trojan horse for more government spending and for more handouts to special interest groups within that green energy lobby. | ||
| In terms of who's going to do a better job handling the economy, look, the American voter this time around is in a very unique position in that they are choosing between two candidates who have essentially already done the job. | ||
| Now you can say Harris hasn't been president, but still she's At least in some capacity, even if it was just as a figurehead, been in some kind of executive role. | ||
| So they can ask themselves, how have my finances done under this administration versus how did they do under President Trump? | ||
| Can my paycheck buy more today than it could when Trump left office? | ||
| Etc. | ||
| And so families, again, have a bit of a unique opportunity in modern American history in that they don't so much have to guess as to what each administration will do. | ||
| They can look back at a record and ask, how did they actually do? | ||
| And of course, everything that she did or didn't do on the border at all exacerbates these problems. | ||
| EJ, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with your analysis, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| Best place to find me, Natalie, is going to be on X, and the handle there is AtRealEJAntoni. | ||
| EJ, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Treasury is projecting borrowing, as EJ was pointing out, $740 billion more this quarter, followed by another $565 billion in the final quarter of the year. | ||
| Total of $1.3 trillion. | ||
| You know House Republicans are probably not going to put up a fight. | ||
| We can't even get people like Eli Crain on the Secret Service Task Force. | ||
| We just get a bunch of rhinos. | ||
| That's why you've got to go to birchgold.com slash Bannon, like I said. | ||
| I don't think we trust the experts here in the War Room, and I would say for very good reason, whether it's pandemics, public health. | ||
| Gotta go to warroom.org to read the new story on bird flu linked to Hunter Biden and Fauci. | ||
| I know, sounds crazy, but I promise you the receipts are there. | ||
| It's good. | ||
| And we got Brian Costello joining us after the break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| We're joined by the one and only Brian Costello to give us updates on all things TikTok. | ||
| Of course, the Chinese Communist Party Trojan horse, though I think that's too euphemistic a term to describe what TikTok is. | ||
| It's psychological and information warfare, but you have some updates in terms of some court filings going on and how it's shaping up in the 2024 election cycle. | ||
| Yeah, thanks for having me on, Natalie. | ||
| As you would know, it's so where we stand on TikTok right now is TikTok has, you know, as we know, the Biden administration has a purported ban of TikTok, which we've covered on the show, we don't believe is actually really a ban, but as a workout situation. | ||
| And on Friday last week, there was a DOJ filing Responding to TikTok suit. | ||
| So this was the DOJ's chance to lay it all on the line. | ||
| Like, hey, here are the things the American public we know about TikTok. | ||
| This is why we're banning it. | ||
| And I don't know if Denver has it. | ||
| There was a large amount of redaction in the document, and it was put out on a Friday afternoon. | ||
| So what you can read between the lines there is that the DOJ doesn't want you to know what they actually have on TikTok. | ||
| If you look, if you scroll down like page 17 through 21 was completely redacted. | ||
| And I understand redacting things because you have confidential human sources, but you can put the information and then leave the source. | ||
| Uh, out on the document, but, uh, I think this is incredibly important. | ||
| We, as we know, the administration has a pattern of conduct of using social media platforms to influence elections. | ||
| We have the current, uh, October surprise, which became in July, which is a new candidate, Kamala Harris going viral on TikTok as the Biden administration is in, you know, negotiations with TikTok about its fate. | ||
| We also have some pretty good reporting from some of the War Room Posse Laura Loomer on Influencers being paid and as we know there's FTC laws that require when you're paying somebody that needs to be flagged as an advertisement So it looks like we have full bore The Democratic apparatus alignment with big tech using the social media to really influence people towards Miss Harris this election And sort of springboarding off of how the other big tech companies, whether it's Facebook censoring the iconic picture of President Trump with his fist in the air, Google censoring search results, you couldn't really even search Trump assassination without basically yielding no results. | ||
| Have you seen a sort of similar pattern of behavior coming from TikTok when it comes to that topic too? | ||
| Yeah, well, I'm not, I'm not on the platform. | ||
| I try and encourage my kids not to be on it too. | ||
| So, but yes, you're seeing, you're seeing a lot of stuff and it dovetails and I think this dovetails into like, You know, I don't know if you guys have covered it today, but there's some news on Project 2025, right? | ||
| And this is why the GOP needs to be very careful, right? | ||
| Information is taken. | ||
| It's put in Trump's mouth. | ||
| It's then short form videos are created by this entire NGO network. | ||
| And then they can use. | ||
| So there's one thing that was in this filing, the DOJ, which was really interesting, that TikTok was caught. | ||
| Collecting user data on abortion and gun rights. | ||
| So why would they be collecting data and sharing it with China on those two issues? | ||
| It's for one of two reasons to influence elections or to divide the people in the country. | ||
| So they can group people on these things. | ||
| So yes, there's a there's a ton of alignment there, too. | ||
| I thought, you know, crazy, right? | ||
| I threw up a tweet today, Natalie, and I think Denver has it. | ||
| I was just looking at election voting laws by state in CHAT-GPT, and CHAT-GPT won't give me any information on state election laws. | ||
| Like, one question I just asked, is it illegal for illegal immigrants to vote in Arizona and Nevada? | ||
| And it won't give me the information. | ||
| Like, very simple stuff like this. | ||
| Why is CHAT-GPT suppressing and censoring information related to state election laws? | ||
| Right. | ||
| So there is an all out alignment with the Uniparty, the big, you know, the existing democratic apparatus and big tech to make sure that the average citizen doesn't get the right information in front of them, that they're getting skewed information, you know, in many cases paid for by the campaign itself. | ||
| Well, it was back, I think, in the twenty twenty two midterms that all of the protests outside of the various SCOTUS Justice's House. | ||
| They were all organized using TikTok. | ||
| I know the activists were bragging about it, saying that they loved the platform so much. | ||
| It was election interference, I think, to a T. But on the influencer side of things, how do you think, since, again, we are seeing predominantly pro-Harris content on the platform, how do you think that that is going to influence how the Democrats are going to kind of approach banning TikTok, knowing that it's an issue that might not be popular With younger voters, but how do you think that that's going to shake out? | ||
| I mean, listen, it should be tremendously concerning to every single person in Congress that the Biden-Harris administration is now in exclusive negotiations with a Chinese propaganda platform about whether or not it faith survives. | ||
| You know, here's, here's the other thing, Natalie, that's, that's incredibly concerning. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| All this redacted info. | ||
| So remember, This wasn't the DOJ or the National Security Division that went in and started to look at TikTok and prosecuted. | ||
| Congress demanded they do it. | ||
| OK, so now you see all this information redacted in these filings. | ||
| That means the Biden-Harris administration had all this information it was covering up. | ||
| You know, there's even some stuff in there that they have information from FISA 702 tech searches and things like that. | ||
| So they had information on TikTok that they were covering up. | ||
| I'm going to argue this is Biden signed this thing so fast he signed it within hours of it being on its desk. | ||
| Right. | ||
| This was a tool for them to get into negotiations with them so they can be having conversations that they're not supposed to be having. | ||
| And think about the position TikTok's in, right? | ||
| They got to they got to help them win the election because they're in the process of negotiating with them. | ||
| And you can't even make this up. | ||
| The band aid is the band date, not the band aid, is January 19th, the day before the inauguration. | ||
| So worst case, best case here is we have a Lame duck Biden administration that's negotiating the fate of a trillion-dollar company on their way out the door. | ||
| I mean, how's that going to go with, you know, are they going to put Hunter in charge of that? | ||
| I mean, it's literally utterly ridiculous. | ||
| So it is not a ban. | ||
| And Brian, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with you, always tracking the latest on the TikTok front, where can they go to do that? | ||
| Best places on X where we do get our real information, and it's BP Costello on X. Yeah, not TikTok. | ||
| I'm with you on that, not having a TikTok. | ||
| That would be sacrilege. | ||
| I think that would be blasphemous if either of us were on TikTok. | ||
| Steve would find a way to fire me from prison. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| Brian, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Okay, Natalie. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Have a good day. | ||
| You do. | ||
| We're joined by the one and only Congressman Andy Ogles. | ||
| Now, Congressman, about, what was it, a week or two ago, you introduced articles of impeachment against none other than Kamala Harris. | ||
| Now, you focused primarily on her actions on the southern border, but you know that when you kind of turn one stone with her, there are a lot of other issues that you can sort of drill down on. | ||
| Make the case to the audience why you think articles of impeachment against her are justified. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you know, there's two sections in the articles of impeachment. | |
| The first deals with the southern border, which is really you can't even debate against. | ||
| I mean, every small town in America is a border town. | ||
| You've got fentanyl flooding our streets, overdoses galore. | ||
| I mean, we've got more casualties. | ||
| Because of fentanyl than we had during World War II. | ||
| And then of course you look at the crimes against women and young girls. | ||
| 12, 13, 14 year old girls being raped by illegals. | ||
| Iowa, New York, Virginia, Louisiana. | ||
| You had a murder, rape and murder down in Texas. | ||
| And so what we have is Central and South America emptying their prisons. | ||
| They're flooding our streets with their criminals. | ||
| You have some of the most violent gangs in the world that have never been here. | ||
| Keep that in mind. | ||
| They've never been here before. | ||
| Now they have footholds in cities all across our country. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because the so-called border czar is inept and was vacant from the job, absent on the job. | ||
| And so we have to define her and lay out this case against her before this woke corporate media who's against you, they're against me, they're against the posse, they're going to reinvent her into something that she's not. | ||
| And I'm not going to stand for it. | ||
| I'm not going to sit idly by and just wait for that to happen. | ||
| I'm going to lay it, lay down the gauntlet, I've got the articles of impeachment. | ||
| Now, the second part of that, that you allude to, has to do with her complicity in covering up for the fact that Joe Biden is absent. | ||
| He is no longer Commander-in-Chief. | ||
| He is not running this country. | ||
| He's abandoned ship mentally a long time ago, and she knew it, and she did nothing about it. | ||
| She has an oath of office that she should have upheld with the 25th Amendment. | ||
| Well, and walk us through the latter part of that, of course, reporting coming out over the weekend since you introduced those articles. | ||
| talking about how Pelosi, Harris, sort of the whole cohort of those Democratic elites | ||
| really seem to have leveraged sort of invoking the 25th Amendment against President Biden, | ||
| some truly shady anti-democratic, as they would say, reporting kind of detailing that situation. | ||
| You know, you guys always seem in Congress to be wanting to set up commissions and committees | ||
| to investigate stuff. | ||
| That seems like something that would warrant an investigation. | ||
| How are your articles of impeachment or looking into what happened that led to Biden stepping down? | ||
| How is that being received by your colleagues? | ||
| Do you have co-sponsors on this bill or are they laughing it off because they're too busy on vacation for the month of August? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I was about to say, you know, I issued the Articles of Impeachment and then we were sent home for August. | |
| You know, I'm one of those that believes that if we haven't done our appropriations bills, if we have unfinished business like investigating the assassination attempt of Donald Trump, like my Articles of Impeachment, we should stay and work. | ||
| We shouldn't go home. | ||
| That means, yes, you have to cancel your vacation. | ||
| Yes, you have to cancel your plans. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| But we took an oath to do the people's business. So we should be in Washington, | ||
| D.C. right now. We should be passing our appropriations bills. We should be investigating the | ||
| assassination attempt on Donald Trump. | ||
| And we should be talking about my articles of impeachment. | ||
| Why? Because we do the people's work. We are the people's house. And you can't do that if | ||
| you're sent home. | ||
| I think the Posse pretty heavily feels that this task force is sort of being set up to fail, | ||
| similar to the Benghazi commission, in the sense of who is on it, or more importantly, | ||
| who's not on it, the fact that they're working from home. | ||
| What are your thoughts on that? | ||
| Do you think that that criticism is misguided? | ||
| Or do you think that this task force is going to be able to deliver, which is something that this Congress seems to be empirically unable to do, but do you think that there's going to be any difference of results coming from this group of people? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I do think that they're going to be compelled by the will of the American people, by the posse, wanting results. | |
| Look, I don't trust the Secret Service to investigate themselves. | ||
| I sure as hell don't trust the FBI to investigate this. | ||
| And so there has to be a task force that's set up by the House of Representatives, by the speakers. | ||
| So our only hope to get to the bottom, to get to the truth, will be this commission. | ||
| And so with that, that's where you, that's where I, that's where the people You need to put pressure on the Speaker's office, on the task force to look. | ||
| This will take some time. | ||
| I think there's a lot of layers. | ||
| There's a lot of, look, was it planned? | ||
| Was it intentional? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| But what I can tell you, I was talking to a general just this past weekend. | ||
| He said, you know, if you have enough gaps in your security, over time, the enemy will find those gaps. | ||
| They're going to exploit those gaps. | ||
| And what you saw on that fateful day when the shot was fired against Donald Trump is that you had gap after gap after gap. | ||
| And you had someone who figured it out, whether it was cleverness, whether it was accidental, or whether it was pre-planned to be determined. | ||
| But the problem is, and I think why you saw a bipartisan passage of the task force bill, is that Biden is less safe because of this assassination attempt. | ||
| Kamala Harris is less safe. | ||
| Anyone who has Secret Service protection, that veil of protection, that aura that was around the Secret Service has been First, they no longer, I mean, look, imagine the next time that Donald Trump is going to be on stage and he's walking out into an open field, open arena, and he knows these are the folks who let me down before. | ||
| So they've got to restore trust in the American people again. | ||
| Congressman, we're coming up against a break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't trust them. | |
| I don't think we should either. | ||
| I want to hold you through, get your thoughts on some more developments on Thomas Matthews Cooks and his political affiliations after the break. | ||
| We will be right back. | ||
| Government gangsters are the group of individuals, career bureaucrats, who have been installed by what we call the deep state into every agency and department in the United States government. | ||
| Had Donald Trump not won in 2016, he would not have exposed the flank of the deep state and their weapon of choice, the two-tier system of justice. | ||
| From Russiagate, to Hunter Biden's laptop, to Joe Biden's classified documents case, to January 6th, to the 51 Intel letter, and everything in between. | ||
| We would never have learned that. | ||
| These people are dangerous and vindictive, learning from their mistakes and perfecting ways to hide their corruption. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is finally time for a straightforward assessment of the state of our nation. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| Today, President Trump shared our very own film, Government Gangsters, on his Truth Social saying he loves it and that you guys should go and watch it. | ||
| Of course, you can go to warroom.film to rent or buy or see if there's a screening or an event near you promoting the film. | ||
| Kash Patel, all the greats, Stephen K. Bannon, and maybe while you're at it, go to Public Square, too, to stop giving your money to companies that absolutely hate you, that despise you for not just Daring to say that you love this country, but remember what they did to you in the days after the 2020 election. | ||
| If you dared to utter anything about election integrity, they came for you with the full force, uh, of their, their companies shutting down. | ||
| What was it? | ||
| Payment processing apps, you name it. | ||
| Uh, just because you dared to speak out against. | ||
| Frankly, a fraudulent election. | ||
| We maintain that here in the war room. | ||
| And as Stephen K Bannon always says, stolen elections have catastrophic consequences. | ||
| Now, Congressman, just give me a few minutes. | ||
| I know you've got to bounce, but we have sort of conflicting reports with the CEO of the social media network Gab saying that the would-be assassin looked to have posts on his platforms kind of expressing a pro-Biden sentiment. | ||
| The FBI today in their Senate hearing, Secret Service members saying that it looked like Thomas Matthews Crooks had posted anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant Uh, conspiracy theories on social media. | ||
| How can both of those be true? | ||
| What do you make of those sort of competing stories? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, again, that gets back to why you've got to have a task force. | |
| I don't trust the FBI. | ||
| I don't trust the Secret Service. | ||
| They are both in CYA mode. | ||
| The assassination attempt on President Trump should have never happened. | ||
| They could have had a drone in the air. | ||
| There should have been a sniper on that roof. | ||
| There should have been someone posted in the alleyway. | ||
| I mean, you don't have to be a security expert to realize that this was a Incredible, incredible gap in security. | ||
| The problem is, is that now they've been revealed for who they are incompetent. | ||
| And when you have a, you know, the new director, when she took office saying that, you know, her commitment was to diverse equity and diversity, and you see the end result, you have a president who's 6'4", give or take, And you have agents who are 5'6", like, protecting his body. | ||
| The math doesn't work, right? | ||
| This is incompetence at the greatest level. | ||
| So you can't trust those two agencies to do their job. | ||
| We've got to investigate themselves. | ||
| That's why we should be up in Washington, D.C. | ||
| for the month of August. | ||
| That's why we should be getting this work done. | ||
| That's why we should be impeaching Kamala Harris. | ||
| We've got to take the fight to them, because the corporate media is against all of us. | ||
| The Republic is at stake. | ||
| And by the way, when I say we should go back to Washington, D.C. | ||
| and work, I've got an election in two days. | ||
| So this has consequences, but we've got to get our work done because we made an oath, we made a promise to the American people. | ||
| And walk us through that upcoming primary, the Never Trump forces are out in their full display of power, trying to make sure that you don't get reelected. | ||
| Walk us through the latest on that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, fortunately, the grassroots, the ground game, you know, we are in the lead. | |
| We're going to take nothing for granted. | ||
| Our kids run cross-country and we tell them at the end of the race, no matter where you're at, if you're in the lead, you turn on your jets and you run through the tape. | ||
| And look, for every dollar we spend, they're spending four or five. | ||
| It's ridiculous the amount of money they've spent to try to take me out. | ||
| But that's because I'm outspoken. | ||
| That's because I've been endorsed by Trump. | ||
| That's because I support Donald Trump. | ||
| That's why I want to take out the administrative state that's going to be working against you, | ||
| me, during our first 100 days in Congress when we win the White House. | ||
| And we can win the White House. | ||
| I'm not afraid of Kamala Harris, but I think we have to expose her for who she is. | ||
| And so, yeah, so if the posse wants to go to andyogles.com, show some love, show some | ||
| support, I would certainly appreciate it. | ||
| They are coming after me with all they got, and it's, uh, they're funded by, my opponent is funded by a never-Trump candidate. | ||
| They can't beat Trump in Tennessee, so they're coming after me. | ||
| One more time, if the posse wants to support you, vote, if it's legal and they can, how can they volunteer, do all those things that can help you out? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, you can go to andyogles.com. | |
| There you can donate, you can volunteer, you can do all those things. | ||
| You know, there's some groups out there like Americans for Prosperity. | ||
| They're on the ground. | ||
| You can volunteer with those guys. | ||
| But look, we're taking nothing for granted and roughly a day and a half Thank you, Congressman, for joining us. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| in the 5th Congressional District or you won't. | ||
| And that really is going to be determined by you, by the posse and you guys getting | ||
| engaged. | ||
| And once we win, we've got to win in November and I'll be out on the road with the president | ||
| fighting for him all over the country because our country and our republic is at stake. | ||
| Thank you, Congressman, for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Of course. | ||
| And Mike Lindell, as always, thank you for joining us. | ||
| I'm sure you have some product or promo updates for the pod. | ||
| I get so excited every time you're on. | ||
| It's so exciting. | ||
| I love Promo Code War Room. | ||
| Give us the latest. | ||
| And you guys check out, and I want to tell everyone to check out Lyndale Plan. | ||
| Everybody's been bombarding me with what can they do to help with the new plan to secure your ballots. | ||
| So go to lyndaleplan.com, everybody. | ||
| You can check that out there. | ||
| I got, by the way, my speeches there from the rally here in Minnesota. | ||
| So you can check that out. | ||
| It'll be awesome. | ||
| But I've got a big surprise for the War Room Posse. | ||
| And once they're gone, they're gone. | ||
| And we'll have to substitute the American flag number. | ||
| We're giving away a commemorative MyPillow. | ||
| It's got me with the Constitution and flag. | ||
| We've got a limited amount of these, but they're free. | ||
| No purchase necessary for the War Room Posse. | ||
| I want everybody to go check out the website and see what all we have there. | ||
| If you haven't done it before, do it now so you get your free pillow and check out all the other items that are there. | ||
| So use promo code WARROOM, go to mypillow.com, And or you could call 800-873-1062. | ||
| But there's the, there's the free pillow right there at the top. | ||
| And anything else you put in the cart, you've got the flash sale | ||
| of the Giza Dream Sheets. | ||
| This is president Trump's favorite product right here. | ||
| The queen, queen and king size 59 and 69. | ||
| We have the dish towel sets. | ||
| All the new colors are in. | ||
| The six-piece towel sets. | ||
| Everybody's getting on those $25. | ||
| All these $25 extravaganza, but there's something exclusive for the wardrobe. | ||
| You see that closeout and overstock sale. | ||
| Right now, you can save up to 80%. | ||
| We have all kinds of clothing, everybody. | ||
| We always give it to the War Room Posse to check it out first. | ||
| They've been such great support. | ||
| Remember, it's a win-win-win. | ||
| You're supporting this show, this amazing show that's saving the country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're supporting my company that's the most... It's a win-win-win, and Mike, we're coming up against the end of show, but I'm sure we'll see you back here tomorrow, War Room Posse. | |
| You'll see me back here tomorrow. | ||
| Thank you for tuning in, 6 p.m. |
Export Selection