June 6, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:56
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | |
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bound. | |
| Morning back in the War Room. | ||
| Dave Brat sitting in with Stephen K. Bannon this morning and our special guest for an historic day and morning. | ||
| We're with Patrick K. O'Donnell, one of the foremost war combat historians in the United States and the world. | ||
| He's been kind enough to share stories about his friends. | ||
| That right there says a lot. | ||
| Patrick has relayed stories already this morning. | ||
| He was just closing out one story and was going to add a little about the meaning of those stories for us today. | ||
| Past is present. | ||
| Individuals can change history. | ||
| Academia these days will tell you otherwise that you are not an agent at work in this world for the good. | ||
| At the War Room, we all know better. | ||
| Each one of you out there can make a historic difference. | ||
| Patrick, why don't you finish that story with us today, and then we're going to go over to Ben Harnwell. | ||
| But finish up that story, and you are right about ready to close about the hand of God reaching right down into history to lead great individuals to do great things. | ||
| And so, Patrick, take us away again. | ||
| It's the summer of 1776, and all is about to be lost. | ||
| John Glover and the Marblehead Regiment, the Indispensables, they take the army across from Long Island to Manhattan. | ||
| But it's under the noses of a massive British fleet, one of the largest in North America. | ||
| And dawn is coming. | ||
| It's a race against time. | ||
| And the hand of God plays a role. | ||
| A fog sets in and cloaks and screens the movement and allows the rest of the army to escape in the great American Dunkirk. | ||
| And this is a story, you know, the weather and the hand of God plays a role in all of the, you know, the books that I've written. | ||
| In one way or another, The Unvanquished is no exception. | ||
| The summer of 1774, I'm sorry, 1864, all was looked to be lost. | ||
| The nation's capital was under assault by Jubal Early. | ||
| And, you know, the Seventh Corps comes in at exactly the right time at the right place. | ||
| General and President Lincoln is at the parapets of the fort. | ||
| One of my relatives is actually thrown out in front of the Confederate Army. | ||
| But I mean, this is a case where over and over a small group of individuals through their agency are able to change the course of history. | ||
| And you know, you mentioned where I can be found. | ||
| At combat historian on Twitter and getter. | ||
| And I have a you know, we talked about those those men that were my friends. | ||
| My first book signing day was a reunion of D-Day heroes. | ||
| And I had hundreds of these men that I'm that I talk about Rangers paratroopers. | ||
| We had one of the men received his bronze star medal, a Pathfinder with the 82nd that were the first in by his commanding officer. | ||
| And that's on at Combat Historian. | ||
| But it's, these are the powerful stories that we have. | ||
| The Unvanquished tells them as well as Dog Company. | ||
| And I'm not, you know, you can find this stuff, all the reviews on Amazon or Barnes & Noble | ||
| or on my website, PatrickK.Donald.com. | ||
| Super. | ||
| Super, Patrick, National Treasure, honored to have you with us in the War Room this morning. | ||
| Your integrity and character speak loudly in volumes, and thank you very much for being with us. | ||
| And we're going to turn over to Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Thank you, Patrick. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, do we have you with us? | ||
| I'm here, Vice Provost. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good morning. | |
| Hey, good morning, Ben. | ||
| Great to have you with us representing the European contingent. | ||
| I saw a drudge headline this morning. | ||
| I think you're going to talk about some slip-ups of the President on NATO remarks, but the context now is becoming clearer and clearer and clearer. | ||
| It looks like Putin's coming over to the Caribbean. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That sounds perfect. | |
| to play the golden rule on the United States foreign policy that if we want to play around | ||
| with their buffer zone, they're going to play around with our buffer zone. And so you want | ||
| to give us a minute highlight on that and then give us what you have on the president and the | ||
| NATO language and maybe some of how many press conferences he's given on these issues in totality. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would that Ben Harwell? That sounds perfect. Well, look, the golden rule, | |
| as we are more or less now defining the concepts and the principles behind Christian nationalism, | ||
| I think it's absolutely fair to say that the golden rule, which by the way, | ||
| by the way, I think it's called the golden rule because it transcends Christianity. | ||
| This is, of course, one of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ's most luminous teachings. | ||
| But it exists in one form or another in a whole number of religions. | ||
| Do unto others as you would have done unto you. | ||
| And of course it's negative form as well. | ||
| Do not do unto others as you would not have done to you. | ||
| And I think it's absolutely, look, it's absolutely reasonable for Putin to say this to the United States. | ||
| If the United States expects to have a Monroe Doctrine, then it's perfectly fair for Russia to have an equivalent version of it, I would suggest. | ||
| So as we are trying to move forward towards sort of implementing our idea of Christian nationalism, one thing that that can absolutely mean as a point of national priority is that we will treat other countries, America, the UK, the European Union eventually, Russia itself, countries should teach Countries should treat other countries in exactly the way that they would expect to be treated and themselves, and they would not do to other countries as they would not have done unto them. | ||
| And I think that would create a lot of of of global peace, Dave, a lot of global peace. | ||
| And it would do a lot to defuse tensions. | ||
| around the world because a lot of these tensions that we see, a lot of these forever wars, | ||
| are basically one country, the stronger country, just sort of forcing itself and its own interpretation | ||
| of events on other countries. | ||
| And of course, when you do that for decades, it's not going to go down too well. | ||
| I just saw the headlines and did the math in my head this morning. | ||
| So the message seems very clear. | ||
| It's implicit. | ||
| Has Putin or Russia made this message explicit that this is reciprocal? | ||
| That if we're going to be messing around with their buffers, as John Mearsheimer taught us back in 2008 and then 2014 and currently, The Primrose Path and all that, right? | ||
| Has Russia made this principle explicit yet? | ||
| Is there anything for us to read there yet? | ||
| I think this is going to become more and more explicit as we have the formal peace negotiations, presumably, presumably after November. | ||
| And I say presumably after November because it's becoming apparent now, I think, certainly from from the United States maneuvers, that it's the permission granted to Ukraine to use long range missiles inside The Russian border is explicitly confined to defending Kharkiv. | ||
| So the point, you know, I've made this on the show before, but the point, I think, is that Biden now realizes that it would be electoral suicide or suicidal for whatever electoral hopes he might still nurture in November. | ||
| Firstly, to have full-blown engagement between the United States and Ukraine, full-blown, explicit, connected engagement on the one hand, but also the fall of Kharkiv would also be equally suicidal, having invested so much of the United States' credibility into defending Ukraine beyond the Donbass. | ||
| So I've suggested that the point here is that what the United States is trying to do is to maintain I think. | ||
| territorial status quo until November. | ||
| So to circle back and answer your question, I think Putin's interests here and his policy | ||
| positions will become more and more explicit when it comes around post-November to defining | ||
| what long-term peace negotiations in Ukraine are going to look like. | ||
| I think you also wanted to get at President Biden's press conferences, the lack of availability, the lack of commentary, the lack of strategy on the U.S. | ||
| part. | ||
| Let it rip, Ben Harnwell. | ||
| OK. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| So if Denver would very kindly, if they have it, put up the first article in their list today, which is from the Wall Street Journal. | ||
| I'm not going to dwell on the article. | ||
| I'm just going to go straight in to this point that I want to make. | ||
| And the article is behind closed doors, Biden shows signs of slipping. | ||
| But obviously for the war in Posse, that's not going to be news at all. | ||
| They'll be saying, well, why? | ||
| We know he's senile. | ||
| We know he's got dementia. | ||
| Why are you bringing this onto the show? | ||
| Well, because here is something that I think illustrates the Wall Street Journal's analysis | ||
| there. | ||
| Now, we did touch on this briefly yesterday. | ||
| President Biden gave, Resident Biden, excuse me, gave an interview to Time magazine, which we discussed very briefly on the show yesterday. | ||
| That's only his third interview to print journalists during his Residency. | ||
| And the question is, why has he given so few talks? | ||
| It's because his aides realise how easy it will be for him to make a gaffe and to say something he shouldn't say. | ||
| And I believe he has actually done that in his Time Magazine interview. | ||
| But you won't know that by reading the interview itself, which I have done, and it's long and it's tedious. | ||
| You have to read the actual official transcript. | ||
| I say official, but the published transcript of that interview, which Time Magazine have also published. | ||
| Now, buried in that document is a line. | ||
| Now, I'm going to have to read this out. | ||
| OK, there is a very strange thing. | ||
| So I'm going to read it in full. | ||
| He's asked, Biden is asked, so what is the end game, though, in Ukraine? | ||
| And what does peace look like there? | ||
| And Biden says, and this is the quote that you will have seen in the published version of the interview, but also it's been picked up quite widely elsewhere. | ||
| Biden says, peace looks like making sure Russia never, never, never, never occupies Ukraine. | ||
| That's what peace looks like. | ||
| Then he says, and it doesn't mean NATO. | ||
| They are part of NATO. | ||
| It means we have a relationship with them, like we do with other countries, where we supply weapons so that they can defend themselves in the future. | ||
| And that's more or less what Biden was saying a year ago in Vilnius, when NATO had its annual conference and they declined to extend to Ukraine a formal invitation to join. | ||
| Then he says something, Vice Provost, which is Astonishing, really is absolutely astonishing. | ||
| It's all mangled up in the Biden syntax. | ||
| So bear with me. | ||
| OK, he says, but it is not. | ||
| If you notice, I was the one when and you guys did report it at time, the one that I was saying that I am not prepared to support the NATOisation of Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now, that's that's so badly expressed. | |
| Anyone who's trying to read this will just gloss over it and go on to the next paragraph. | ||
| But there's a lot in that. | ||
| And because it's a mangled, you know, he's not reading or recalling from his notes a prepared statement that's been worked out with his advisors. | ||
| No, this is just from his memory, he's saying this. | ||
| The thing is, actually, at the time, that was not his position, right? | ||
| This is an in-principle no. | ||
| I repeat, I am not prepared to support the NATO-ization of Ukraine. | ||
| That's definitive. | ||
| The position of NATO itself, and this was produced in their Vilnius summit Communicate. | ||
| And all the links of this I will post on the Rumble video of this show, of this specific hit. | ||
| The official position which Biden himself coordinated in Vilnius is this. | ||
| We will be in a position to extend an invitation to Ukraine to join the alliance when allies agree and conditions are met. | ||
| Biden's already ruled it out, and he just threw that away in this interview. | ||
| Now, the importance of this, coming back to your earlier question, is at some point the powers are going to sit down and negotiate peace for Ukraine. | ||
| And what Biden has done, throwing this away and revealing publicly, That he's already given an in-principle veto to Ukraine joining, is that he's conceded a principle negotiating position before he ever sits down with Putin. | ||
| Let's not forget Ukraine's eventual membership of NATO was one of the reasons Putin went in in the first place. | ||
| Excellent, Ben. | ||
| Let's reiterate that point. | ||
| We're going to a hard break right now. | ||
| Back with Ben Harnwell and then wall to wall. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Honored to be back in the war room sitting in with Stephen K. Bannon this morning for a special episode. | ||
| Right now we have invaluable wisdom from across the pond with our very own Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Ben, why don't you, I cut you off at a key point, why don't you close that point out and tell us how to reach you. | ||
| Thank you, Vice Provost. | ||
| Well, so the point is this. | ||
| Biden is clearly going ever so slightly gaga. | ||
| There's nothing wrong with that. | ||
| It happens with age, right? | ||
| It would happen probably to all of us. | ||
| He is 81. | ||
| But here he has released a point of what I would suggest is national security, obliviously. | ||
| And I don't know if Denver has had time to pick this out, but I've gone back in time, back to 2017, when Donald Trump said a few things in a meeting with Sergey Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister. | ||
| And, you know, there was a minor Armageddon because the security establishment, the intelligence | ||
| establishment said that Trump had revealed areas of vital national, national interest. | ||
| So the headline of this Washington posting, which I will put for reference, I will post | ||
| it, Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador. | ||
| What Biden has done, saying publicly that he has already vetoed Ukraine's membership | ||
| of NATO is so many factors above and beyond whatever Trump, Donald Trump, President Donald | ||
| Trump was accused of doing back in the Oval Office. | ||
| And I think it's time for the world's media to apply the same standards impartially. | ||
| OK, so look, Vice Provost, thank you very much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
| Can I just say, before I recite my socials, what a pleasure it's been for me to have you post host me on the show today. | ||
| I could get used to this rather more leisurely opportunity to sort of don't tell Steve. | ||
| Right. | ||
| No, no, no, no. | ||
| I got to be highly demanding. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| No interruptions. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| It's been great. | ||
| Excellent job. | ||
| Excellent job. | ||
| I'll hold you up next time. | ||
| On this show, it's just Dave Brat, no Vice Provost, just sitting in. | ||
| All political views are my own, but always an honor to have Ben Harnwell with us. | ||
| Ben, give us real quickly, in closing, how people get to you. | ||
| Getter at Harnwell. | ||
| It's there. | ||
| I've got some great posts at the top of my feed right now. | ||
| Thanks very much. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Very good. | ||
| God bless you, Ben. | ||
| Thanks for all you do. | ||
| All right, we've got one of the crowd favorites at the War Room stepping up to the plate, Mike Davis. | ||
| I tried to call him this morning. | ||
| He blew me off, but it looks like he decided to show up after all on the War Room set here today. | ||
| And Mike, first of all, pleasure to have you on. | ||
| You're a superstar. | ||
| Everyone loves you. | ||
| And a lot of interest in the question of whether the Supreme Court can step in on any of these Trump court cases, other court cases going on. | ||
| Does the Supreme Court have the authority, if they see fit, that justice has been overridden to step in? | ||
| Do they have the authority formally to do so? | ||
| And if so, will they do it? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, of course, they're the highest court in the land. | ||
| It just depends on the case and the vehicle that you're trying to use to get To the Supreme Court. | ||
| The Supreme Court's already heard oral arguments on President Trump's claim of constitutional presidential immunity going back 250 years to, you know, where we have the separation of powers between the branches. | ||
| The Nixon case from 40 years ago held that Presidents are immune from civil prosecution for their official acts, not their personal acts, their official acts. | ||
| You have members of Congress who are immune from both civil and criminal prosecution for their official acts. | ||
| You have federal judges who are immune from criminal prosecution | ||
| for their personal or for their official, not their personal acts, | ||
| why wouldn't the president of the United States also be immune from criminal prosecution | ||
| for his official acts, not his personal acts? | ||
| And so the Supreme Court is going to decide that by the end of June. | ||
| And then there's also the issue of the New York case with this Soros funded Manhattan DA, Alvin Bragg, | ||
| and this former Obama Biden, senior political appointee, Matthew Colangelo, | ||
| along with this corrupt Democrat judge, Juan Marchand, who made an illegal campaign contribution to Biden | ||
| and another anti-Trump cause and whose daughter is raising millions of dollars | ||
| They ran a rigged, corrupt, partisan process. | ||
| In New York, and where I think this is heading is on July 11th, I think, is the date that Judge Marchand is going to sentence President Trump. | ||
| And if he tries to impose incarceration on President Trump, or even home confinement, or anything that restricts President Trump's ability to run for the presidency, anything that puts these restrictions on his liberties as part of a sentence, President Trump can go two different routes. | ||
| He can file an immediate appeal through the New York system. | ||
| The problem is the New York Appellate Division, which is their intermediate court, is full of a bunch of left-wing hacks. | ||
| Their New York Court of Appeals is less so, but it's still you have these Democrat judges on the New York Court of Appeals, which is their state Supreme Court. | ||
| The other route that you can go is you file what's called a 2241. | ||
| A habeas petition in the Southern District of New York, the federal court in New York City, and then that judge would rule on an expedited basis. | ||
| If that judge doesn't rule, you can go either to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and get a ruling, or you can seek what's called cert before judgment in the Supreme Court of the United States. | ||
| I know that some have advocated that you can go directly to the Supreme Court. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course. | |
| United States, that is a very high hurdle to go directly to the Supreme Court. | ||
| You have to start generally with a lower appellate court. | ||
| Yeah, that's why, and the thing that got a lot of people's attention was the speaker, | ||
| Mike Johnson, made a reference, right? | ||
| Many in the Congress are finally starting to push back, right? | ||
| It takes action, right? | ||
| The American people have now seen, it's not theoretical, a former president of the United States being overrun by the Justice Department. | ||
| So a couple quick questions, rapid fire, but one, do you see any, Like I said, it would be very hard to go directly to the Supreme Court. | ||
| and a link to possible Supreme Court action? | ||
| Like I said, it would be very hard to go directly to the Supreme Court. | ||
| To go directly to the Supreme Court, you have to show that there's no other relief available. | ||
| I think that the more, I don't know if it's the better move, the more realistic move is to go | ||
| to the Southern District of New York, the federal court of New York, seek a 2241 habeas relief. | ||
| And it's not, you're not going to get the appeal resolved on the merits right away. | ||
| It's just to stop the execution of the sentence, to stop the execution of the judgment, to make it where Trump is not going to jail or home confinement or having his ability to campaign Restricted by this corrupt partisan hack judge who should be in prison himself for his corruption. | ||
| Good, good. | ||
| I think Cameron has a clip. | ||
| I also want to ask you, there seems to be widespread commentary across the country now at every level of government after seeing what can be construed as a conspiracy. | ||
| That has to be proved. | ||
| But let's first stop. | ||
| Just give us, you know, 30 seconds on what we would have to believe for there to be four court cases. | ||
| With bypassing seven to ten year evidence way back, all these court cases could have been brought up many years ago with several judges just randomly being selected on the Trump cases. | ||
| Give us just three or four bullet points of what we would have to believe for there not to be a conspiracy or a grand plan to have all this drop just miraculously six months before a presidential election. | ||
| Well, I think what we need to do is open a criminal probe on January 20th, 2025 by Trump's acting Attorney General on day one, a criminal probe on this obvious criminal conspiracy by President Biden, Merrick Garland, Lisa Monaco, Jack Smith, Jay Bratz at the Justice Department, Gary Stern, the General Counsel, of the National Archives, Alvin Bragg, Matthew Colangelo, Tish James, Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis, Judge Juan Machon, Lauren Machon, Judge Tanya Chukin in D.C. | ||
| who put an unconstitutional gag order on President Trump. | ||
| There are so many potential fact witnesses, at a minimum, for this obvious criminal conspiracy against President Biden, for this obvious criminal conspiracy against President Trump, his top aides like Peter Navarro, who's in prison right now, for Steve Bannon, who they're trying to send to prison for their attorneys, Jeffrey Clark. | ||
| John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, and these January 6 supporters. | ||
| This is a criminal conspiracy to violate their civil rights under 18 U.S.C. | ||
| 241 and 242, and there needs to be a criminal probe, and then we'll find out what the evidence shows. | ||
| But I would always say, let's remember what the Democrats always say to us. | ||
| Nobody is above the law, so lawyer up, President Biden, and your allies and your aides. | ||
| Yep, yep. | ||
| And we're going to break in about a minute, Mike. | ||
| But T.S. | ||
| up, the other side of the break. | ||
| There's a lot more attention now going down to state and localities, right? | ||
| We have over 10 million illegal immigrants, all economic piece I got coming up later. | ||
| All new jobs for the past four years have gone to illegal immigrants. | ||
| The country is besieged with with lawfare at every level, federal, state, local. | ||
| Give us a few ideas of how local and state officials who believe in this country and who believe in the rule of law can go about effecting real justice in everyday life, right? | ||
| It seems to me we ought to be putting pressure on everybody who steals $1 worth of merchandise, not $1,000. | ||
| It seems to me we ought to be handing out tickets if you break the traffic laws and bring this country back into reality. | ||
| What kind of strategy could we put forward? | ||
| And I'm going to hold you over into the break, Mike, because we're getting ready to go, but just tee us up with 10 seconds. | ||
| That's his Attorney General Ken Paxton strategy, which is to lean in and lean in more on this fighting back legally. | ||
| Good. | ||
| More with that strategy right after the break. | ||
| hang with the war room and back in a minute. | ||
| I'm going to talk about the states because it really does feel like I said, as the cuckoo | ||
| is cackling from the states on up. | ||
| I mean, the state parties are so extreme, they actually make the national party seem normal. | ||
| And that is what the field Republicans are playing in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, you know, there's always been these crazies that would show up at like state conventions and stuff, and they've just now taken over. | |
| And as I said, there's nobody fighting against that. | ||
| The party just gave themselves all these people who I helped elect who I know don't support this stuff. | ||
| For the most part, they've all been silent. | ||
| And I think it's just really an unprecedented collapse of any sort of moral center to a party. | ||
| So what do they end up with? | ||
| Republicans are going to get crushed in November. | ||
| Absolutely crushed. | ||
| You know, their only hope is a repeal of the 19th Amendment, which doesn't look great. | ||
| And this is going to be, I think, just overwhelming rejection of what they're for. | ||
| You know, if I were in the Democratic Party, I would wake up trying to get in culture wars because Republicans are losing them. | ||
| This isn't where America is. | ||
| People don't want to go back to it. | ||
| And I think it's just, it's going to be absolutely clear come November. | ||
| Yeah, and I think people should realize that most people don't participate in state party politics. | ||
| They don't have time. | ||
| And so it is the most committed people who actually participate in state level politics. | ||
| And on the Republican side, it's these people. | ||
| It's the handmaid's tale people. | ||
| They've completely taken over these state parties. | ||
| And that bubbles all the way up to the top. | ||
| And Donald Trump is just sitting on top of it because he's a transactional grifter. | ||
| And this is just his latest grift. | ||
| He doesn't believe any of this either. | ||
| But he knows he can take advantage of them and get them to vote for him. | ||
| Yeah, Dave Brat sitting in with Stephen K. Band, War Room. | ||
| There's the MSNBC cohort along with the Lincoln Project, the anti-Trumpsters, calling out very clearly the idea that federalism, the way we used to run the republic, all powers not specifically given to the federal government belong to the states. | ||
| Calling that a crazy idea. | ||
| These state parties, these state people are crazy, they say. | ||
| They disagree with us globalists and Atlanticists and neo-Marxist communists that want a grand government strategy. | ||
| It's just, hearing them say it gives great clarity. | ||
| that these state people and the nerve of even at the state level, | ||
| the nerve of these people who have strong views on what this republic should look like. | ||
| I find it all very empowering, right? | ||
| It gives me the strength and courage to know exactly what we're fighting against. | ||
| And so, Mike Davis, you just heard that clip. | ||
| You're the legal expert. | ||
| What should the state and localities be doing to make America great again, to restore this country to greatness, and to bring the rule of law back into some meaningful state? | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| Well, first, I would say it's quite rich for Stuart Stevens to go on anywhere and talk about extremism when he works for the | ||
| Lincoln Project, otherwise known as the pedophile project, because they had a pedophile in | ||
| their top ranks and they knew about it for a long time, but that didn't stop them. | ||
| They kept raising a lot of money and put a lot of money in their pocket with their Lincoln | ||
| Project pedophile project grift. | ||
| And so I don't know if we should be taking moral critiques from someone who's involved | ||
| with the pedophile project. | ||
| So that's number one. | ||
| And number two, I think what needs to happen with the state and local governments. | ||
| Remember what our constitution is. | ||
| It is a loan agreement between we the people and our governments. | ||
| And we loan the federal government specific enumerated and divided powers. | ||
| And what does not belong to the federal government belongs to the states and we the people. | ||
| So that is confirmed by the 10th amendment. | ||
| And we have the right to speak. | ||
| We have the God-given right to speak, for example, because we didn't give away that right to speak in the Constitution. | ||
| We don't have the right to speak because of the First Amendment. | ||
| We have the right to speak Because it is a God-given right, and if we didn't loan that power to the government to take away that right, they don't have it. | ||
| And so I think what needs to happen for the state and local governments is they need to | ||
| follow the lead of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and similar state Republican AGs, | ||
| and they need to start suing. | ||
| And they need to sue in federal courts when the federal government oversteps its power, | ||
| and they need to keep the federal government constantly in check. | ||
| It needs to be constant litigation against the federal government to keep the federal | ||
| government in its place as it's intended. | ||
| We've turned the Constitution on its head from a shield that's supposed to protect us | ||
| from the government into a sword that the government, the federal government, uses to | ||
| come after us. | ||
| And it's so important that we have state governors, state AGs, state legislatures who are willing | ||
| to fight back against this. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Yeah, well said, Mike. | ||
| One of the reasons everyone loves you is because Article 3 is action, action, action, not strongly worded statements. | ||
| Give us again, for the war room, if you had to state two or three bullet points as to You know, what it would take for us to believe that this conspiracy does not exist, right? | ||
| That all of these judges are just randomly appointed, it all culminates six months before an election, the lawfare, you know it better than any of us. | ||
| What are they really asking us to believe on the other side, right? | ||
| That you have to believe, you can't believe you're lying eyes. | ||
| What are they telling us? | ||
| Well, and this is what I pointed out to Maggie Haberman at the New York Times when she said that I stated without evidence that this was a Biden Democrat conspiracy against President Trump to violate his civil rights. | ||
| Remember, it was Matthew Colangelo who went from the number three office in the Biden Justice Department To Soros-funded Manhattan D.A. | ||
| Alvin Bragg's office to resurrect this zombie case passed over by the prior Manhattan D.A. | ||
| Cy Vance, a Democrat, the Manhattan U.S. | ||
| Attorney, the Federal Election Commission, and Bragg himself, who campaigned on getting Trump, but this case was so bad, even Bragg didn't bring it until Colangelo went there, so that's number one. | ||
| You also have Jonathan Sue, Biden's Deputy White House Counsel, colluding with Gary Stern, the General Counsel of the National Archives, and Jay Bratz, One of the counterespionage goons at the Justice Department to concoct the Mar-a-Lago raid for presidential records Trump is allowed to have in the office of former president. | ||
| Under the Presidential Records Act, that led to two of Jack Smith's indictments, the January 6th indictment in D.C., and then the espionage, so-called espionage, indictment in Florida. | ||
| And then you had Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis, big Fannie Willis's big, dumb, unqualified boyfriend, Nathan Wade, was so stupid he actually billed the Fulton County taxpayers that got federal COVID funds. | ||
| 16 hours, $250 an hour for Nathan Wade's two meetings with the Biden White House, including the White House counsel, before Big Fanny brought her big dumb indictment down in Georgia. | ||
| So that's four for four, where President Biden's political appointees in the Justice Department and in the White House have their fingerprints directly On all four of these unprecedented, republic-ending criminal indictments of a former and likely future president. | ||
| So, if that's a conspiracy theory, then I guess the other side wants to bury their head in the sand. | ||
| And has the mainstream media reported on any of these yet? | ||
| It is interesting, right, on the 51 intelligence officers that signed their name to Russiagate. | ||
| Three years later, right, the mainstream press, after the damage has been done and the receipts are out and on full display, they will finally report on these things so they can say we reported on it. | ||
| Is there any evidence on any of the four bullets you just listed that the mainstream press is so embarrassed already that they're folding a little bit? | ||
| No, I just saw a piece today where some, and I think it was the Washington Post, but I'd have to go back, it may have been the New York Times, I can't remember which liberal rag ran this, but They took my points and then they tried to pick those apart like they're the defense attorney for the government, which is amazing that reporters think it's their job to defend the government. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Truth to power. | |
| They're the spokespeople for the government, which they should be very proud of as left-wing reporters. | ||
| Right, outstanding. | ||
| Well hey Mike, we got Raheem Kassam standing in the bullpen ready to go. | ||
| Why don't you let everybody know where they can go find the receipts you just pointed to, to give everyone the full confidence that you have when you go out and defend the rule of law for this great country. | ||
| Article3project.org. | ||
| Article number 3project.org. | ||
| You can donate there. | ||
| You can take action there, like supporting Andrew Clyde's appropriations rider to defund this Biden-Democrat lawfare and election interference. | ||
| You can also follow us on social media. | ||
| And thank you very much, Dave. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great. | |
| All right, Mike. | ||
| Great having you with us. | ||
| You're the crowd favorite by far. | ||
| You're our favorite lawyer, and we look forward to all future great work you're going to do to save this country, make America great again, and your good friend. | ||
| Thanks a lot, Mike. | ||
| And we're going to Raheem Kassam. | ||
| We're going to first play a clip for you. | ||
| Denver, if you want to light it up, and then Raheem, we're looking forward to your response. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're living in a very scary world, and unfortunately, this station is probably one of the few that you can get the truth and find out what it is that their agenda is. | |
| We are in the midst of an election cycle, an election cycle that when you knock on doors, people talk to you about housing prices, they talk to you about food prices, they talk to you about needing to make higher wages. | ||
| And they're saying that we want to vote for whoever's going to do this. | ||
| But the reality is that the Republican Party is only trying to appease a party of one. | ||
| They are not looking out for us as a country. | ||
| They're not looking out for their own constituents. | ||
| Instead, all they care about is making Donald Trump happy. | ||
| That's not what democracy looks like. | ||
| And I need people to wake up. | ||
| This isn't about saying, you know what, I am a Republican, so I'm going to vote R. You may be a Republican, but what these people are, they are not even American as far as I'm concerned, because when we took an oath, it was an oath to make sure that we would swear against any enemy, foreign or domestic. | ||
| And I'm telling you right now, anybody that would propose the death penalty would have a problem with the fact that this guy is a criminal. | ||
| We knew he was a criminal. | ||
| He said it before. | ||
| He said he could go out, kill somebody, and nothing would happen to him. | ||
| And frankly, he's pissed off because one out of four of the prosecutions that he's facing actually went forward. | ||
| But we've actually experienced a breakdown in this country. | ||
| Because the fact that the other three prosecutions are being held up, where we had grand jurors that came together, saw evidence, and saw fit to actually say, you have enough for an indictment, and now you want to challenge and threaten these jurors. | ||
| That makes no sense, and that's not the American way. | ||
| Raheem Kassam, welcome to the War Room. | ||
| Dave Brat sitting in with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Honored to have Raheem, one of the longest contributors at Breitbart, the War Room. | ||
| Good friend going way back. | ||
| Before I bias you, why don't you just react to the clip you just saw. | ||
| Is this what democracy looks like, Raheem? | ||
| Dave, thanks for having me. | ||
| I'll take three issues off the top. | ||
| Number one, Mike Davis is the fan favorite. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| You know, that's you Dave. | ||
| It's you. | ||
| It's Dave Brat. | ||
| Views are his own. | ||
| Dave Brat. | ||
| Number two. | ||
| Gosh. | ||
| You know, firstly, let's, let's, let's take it right from the top of that clip. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So, so I don't actually know much about You know, I suppose they call her Miss Thang, Congresswoman Thang there. | ||
| There was one thing missing, only one thing missing, by the way, by the end of that clip, which was the click and the head bob. | ||
| But you saw her at the very beginning try to start that segment. | ||
| by being polite and erudite and as well-spoken as she could be and by the end of it she's sort of screaming garbled English and obviously defaulting into a plethora of lies and half-truths about what the President has said, what President Trump has said, what others in the MAGA movement has said and this is, you know, and of course the underlying thing about that whole clip Hello, I'm Steve Stern, CEO of FlagShirt.com, a third-generation, veteran-owned small business. | ||
| who have paid their taxes all their lives calling them non-americans and the | ||
| second part of it of course is the is the underlying dehumanization. | ||
| Hello I'm Steve Stern CEO of FlagShirt.com a third-generation veteran owned small business. | ||
| I believe that the American way of life is for all of us. | ||
| I'm asking you today to visit FlagShirt.com Help keep the American dream alive. | ||
| Be a flag waver. | ||
| Carry a nation's heritage. | ||
| Use coupon code ACTION10 for 10% off site wide and buy a flag shirt today. | ||
| Action. | ||
| All right, Dave Brat sitting in with Stephen K. Bannon, War Room this morning. | ||
| We have one of my favorite buddies, Raheem Kassam. | ||
| We go way back. | ||
| Raheem, I know you are itching to get to the European elections. | ||
| We opened the show with World War II, the American heroes, Americana on full display, heroism, the American dream, the heights of the American empire. | ||
| And then now the collapse, and one thing we see is the collapse of the Judeo-Christian tradition at the epicenter of that. | ||
| The pews now in Europe are empty. | ||
| The pews in the United States are emptying little by little by little. | ||
| Give us a little taste of what Americana is going to look like. | ||
| What's going on over in Europe with their elections? | ||
| What do we have to be aware of? | ||
| What planning can we do ahead of time so we don't fully get there? | ||
| Raheem Kassam. | ||
| Yeah, look, I appreciate it, Dave, and I appreciate the kind words. | ||
| I think if there are fan favorites and there are also, you know, guest favorites and commentators, you know, there's such things as the comedian's comedian. | ||
| I like to think of myself as the strategist's strategist, the commentator's commentator. | ||
| Good, correct. | ||
| And with that, you know, comes You have to be able to boil down complicated concepts into just, you know, two minutes. | ||
| And here's those two minutes about the European Parliament. | ||
| And I know people in Europe want me to get into the difference between the Commission and the Council and the Council of Europe and the ECHR and all of this stuff. | ||
| There are major US elections happening this year, probably the most important ever. | ||
| There are major UK elections happening right now, and there is a major European parliamentary election happening. | ||
| 751 seats in the European Parliament. | ||
| It isn't a legislative body in the strictest sense. | ||
| It's more of a revising and a guiding and a shaping body, although that is Changing a little bit. | ||
| But 400 million Europeans will have the eligibility to vote over the next few days. | ||
| And more and more we're seeing the ordinary people using the European parliamentary elections rather than their domestic elections per different country that they live in. | ||
| Those are a completely different thing. | ||
| Those are local democracy versus European-wide pseudo-democracy. | ||
| Those people are using this as kind of a protest vote. | ||
| They're using it as a way to rebuke the globalist establishment, to rebuke the corporate class. | ||
| And so what we're expecting over the next three days with results due to start coming | ||
| out on Sunday, Sunday afternoon, Sunday evening, is a shift to the right. | ||
| Now how far right Europeans are willing to go in their rejection of mass immigration, | ||
| in their rejection of forever wars, in their rejection of corporate cronyism and of a degradation | ||
| of real actual democracy in their lives remains to be seen. | ||
| But the populist nationalist right in Europe is on the upsurge. | ||
| It is ascendant. | ||
| And so we'll be watching it very closely from from this desk over at the National Pulse and the War Room this weekend. | ||
| Awesome, Rahim. | ||
| Concise, succinct, on the money. | ||
| Great summary. | ||
| How do people get to you at the National Pulse? | ||
| The National Pulse dot com forward slash war room. | ||
| And listen, ladies and gentlemen, we are trying to grow this site so that we can deploy assets to bring you news from Europe, from the UK, from all across the United States. | ||
| But we don't take any corporate, political or donor money. | ||
| It's all you. | ||
| The National Pulse dot com forward slash war room if you want to help us grow. | ||
| Thanks, Dave. | ||
| Thanks, guys. | ||
| Yep, you bet. | ||
| Raheem has been covering Europe and the world and helping out Nigel for decades. | ||
| Knows the world better than anyone. | ||
| Go check him out at the National Pulse. | ||
| My honor now to introduce an American hero, a co-Minnesotan, Mike Lindell. | ||
| Are you with us, Mike? | ||
| I'm with you, Dave. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Hey, why don't I throw out the usual Stephen K. Bannon posse. | ||
| Mike, what deals you got for the posse today? | ||
| And I'm a huge supporter. | ||
| I bought about all your products. | ||
| And so what's on sale today, brother? | ||
| Well, we've got most everything on sale, but the one we're doing today for the Posse, by the way, I'm on my way to Canada on a fishing trip here, so I'm bringing with me the same Roll & Go Anywhere Pillow. | ||
| That's what I'm using on this trip. | ||
| It is free. | ||
| It's a multi-use MyPillow 2.0 and American flag case. | ||
| Free! | ||
| Absolutely free with any purchase today for the War Room Posse. | ||
| $59.98 value. | ||
| You guys, I use this pillow everywhere I go. | ||
| And $59.98 value, absolutely free with a purchase. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| Go to the website, though, and here's your deals today. | ||
| You've got the $25 kitchen towel sets, all the new ones came in. | ||
| The MyPillow, the ones that made us famous, the $25 King and Queen, the premiums, All right. | ||
| We've sold over eighty three million of them. | ||
| These are king or queen. | ||
| Doesn't matter. | ||
| Twenty five dollars. | ||
| There's the special right there. | ||
| The my pillow mattress toppers. | ||
| I kept them on sale exclusive for the war room posse 50 percent off up to 50 percent of ninety nine ninety nine as low as ninety nine ninety nine. | ||
| And so all of these specials, exclusive, so many exclusive for the War Room Posse. | ||
| Don't forget our six-piece towel sets, $25. | ||
| Blankets, $25. | ||
| We have all this $25 extravaganza going on. | ||
| But make sure you call the operators, too. | ||
| They work off commission. | ||
| 800-873-1062. | ||
| These are home moms and dads that work from home. | ||
| We finally won, you guys. | ||
| We're in my home state of Minnesota. | ||
| They get to keep working from home on commission. | ||
| Dave, they tried to stop them. | ||
| Imagine all the attacks on my pillow. | ||
| But, um... | ||
| The War Room Posse, by the way, you guys, thanks for making time for me. | ||
| I'm able to go to Canada because you guys keep my voice. | ||
| Go support them all. | ||
| War Room Posse. | ||
| I can vouch for his staff. | ||
| Go support Mike Lindell, a true patriot. | ||
| God bless you, Mike. | ||
| Thanks, Dave. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Zooming out. | ||
| War Room Posse. | ||
| Support Mike. | ||
| Thanks for being on The War Room today. | ||
| God bless you all. | ||
| Keep up the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We look back and we realize we were just inches away from victory, and that's when we decided to give up. | |
| Join us, and thousands of American patriots, for the summer convention that all are invited to. | ||
| You're gonna hear how we're going to win in 2024. | ||
| With the biggest speakers in the movement, featuring President Donald J. Trump, Charlie Kirk, Donald Trump Jr. | ||
| Vivek Ramaswamy. | ||
| Governor Kristi Noem. | ||
| Dr. William Carson. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard. | ||
| Steve Bannon. | ||
| Candace Owens. | ||
| Laura Trump. | ||
| Senator Rick Scott. | ||
| Kimberly Guilfoyle. | ||
| Congressman Matt Gaetz. | ||
| Ben Johnson. | ||
| Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Lee Zeldin. | ||
| Congressman E.I. | ||
| Crane, Brandon Tatum, and more. | ||
| June 14th through 16th. | ||
| 2024 is our final battle. | ||
| In Detroit, Michigan. | ||
| The great silent majority is rising like never before. |
Export Selection