May 8, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:36
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| The problem is that people have taken this on outside and been able to present this. | ||
| It's why we know what the facts are in this heroic judge down in Florida. | ||
| Thank God she exists. | ||
| And tonight she's going to get eviscerated, eviscerated on MSNBC. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, thank you for being here. | |
| I'm so eager to get your expert assessment about the reasoning behind Judge Cannon's decision. | ||
| She cites substantive pretrial motions that need to be dealt with and critical classified documents issues. | ||
| Are you buying it? | ||
| I'm not, Alex. | ||
| And, you know, this is a very unfortunate decision today because I think we've lost any hope of seeing this trial take place before November. | ||
| And this is a trial with very serious allegations. | ||
| Before I was in the Solicitor General's office, I was National Security Advisor at the Justice Department. | ||
| And I can tell you, Alex, that anyone who did this kind of stuff that Trump's accused of would lose their job immediately, go straight to trial, and go straight to jail. | ||
| And I'm not going to characterize the motivations of this judge, but this decision and the handling of this case start to finish have been atrocious and the judge here really tossed overboard our right, the right of the public, the right to a speedy trial. | ||
| And she says there's complex pretrial motions. | ||
| This is not a hard case. | ||
| It does not require the amount of delay that we've had. | ||
| The case is pretty simple. | ||
| It's Alex. | ||
| A guy stole some documents. | ||
| He hid them. | ||
| When the government came and looked for them, he lied about it and hid them again. | ||
| So, you know, that's it. | ||
| It's not rocket science, and yet this judge has slow-walked this thing to death. | ||
| We're in a case that I don't think, for a variety of reasons, should have ever been brought. | ||
| But we're there. | ||
| And they're trying it. | ||
| And then you have the case that most legal experts say It's like the strongest case. | ||
| I mean, this guy stole nuclear secrets. | ||
| This guy stole war plans out of a government building on secret war plans on what we would do in invading Iran. | ||
| This guy sold sensitive secrets that other countries would pay Tens of millions of dollars for, probably even more, stole him, lied to the FBI, lied to the Justice Department, had his lawyers lie to the FBI, lie to the Justice Department, and then tried to get, according to testimony, his IT director to destroy | ||
| The cameras destroy the evidence when he wouldn't do it. | ||
| Then, allegedly, we're hearing he tried to flood the rooms. | ||
| Talked to the maintenance guy who also said, no, I'm not going to do that. | ||
| So you have, you have the most important case of all the cases brought against Trump. | ||
| And it's where the judge is going to make sure it never sees the light of day. | ||
| I mean, it's just. | ||
| Ain't that America for you and me? | ||
| It's just that it is uneven. | ||
| But again, I have faith in the judicial system. | ||
| At the end of the day, everything does balance out. | ||
| So I'm not here like, you know, like, you know, trashing the American judicial system. | ||
| Sometimes stuff just happens, and here we have just a great irony. | ||
| We're living through a case that a lot of people don't think should have ever been brought, and we're never going to hear a case that's actually central to Donald Trump's crimes, what I perceive to be his greatest crimes. | ||
| And she's just burying it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is a man who we better be careful about and I tell you what I'm going to do. | |
| I'm going to ask the Justice Department and I'm going to ask the President to tell us what they're going to do to protect this country against violence if he loses. | ||
| I want to know about all of those right-wing organizations that he's connected with who are training up in the hills somewhere and targeting, you know, what communities they're going to attack. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| It's Wednesday, 8 May in the year of the Lord 2024. | ||
| On this date in 1945, it was declared the victory in Europe. | ||
| The great war against the fascists, the great war against both the Nazis and the Italian fascists, the Nazis in Germany and the fascists was over. | ||
| They had been broken. | ||
| And think about it, I think that's about three and a half years from the day after Pearl Harbor when President Roosevelt Declared war on Imperial Japan because they had done a sneak attack at Pearl Harbor the day before. | ||
| We did not declare war on Germany that day. | ||
| A lot of discussion about that, a lot of debate, particularly inside the White House about why that didn't happen, or should it happen. | ||
| A lot of debate in Congress behind the scenes, down on the floor. | ||
| A couple of days later, Adolf Hitler declared war on the United States of America, and so he had two massive bad decisions in one year. | ||
| One, to go attack Russia in June of 1941, and number two, to declare war on the United States of America on December, I think it was, 10th, 1941. | ||
| So the greatest generation brought home their victory. | ||
| Japan fell, what, four months later? | ||
| Think about it for a second. | ||
| You talk about duration, talk about time. | ||
| It was less than, I think, three and a half years, right? | ||
| If my math is correct, around three and a half years. | ||
| That's less time than, or just about the time Donald Trump's, the election was stolen from Donald Trump and he went back to Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Think about that for a second. | ||
| All of World War II in Europe, for the United States, had been really fighting since 1939 with the rest of Europe when Britain and France went to war with Germany. | ||
| But for the United States' involvement in the war in Europe, at least the kinetic part, Three and a half years. | ||
| Less time, or about the same time, I think, that Donald Trump's been in office. | ||
| This is how long in duration this fight that we've got going. | ||
| What I want to talk about today, I've got Mike Davis going to join me on the five pillars of the case. | ||
| That the Justice Department, FBI, and this conspiracy are bringing against President Trump. | ||
| But we're also going to talk about, I don't know, the five, six, seven, eight pillars of the vast criminal conspiracy against President Trump. | ||
| And this is what needs to be addressed. | ||
| We must be on offense at all times. | ||
| If we're not on offense, if the MAGA movement, the America First movement, if we are not on offense at all times, This neo-Marxist illegitimate regime that is leading America to its destruction, that would be the illegitimate Biden regime, which is just the third term of the radicals in the Obama administration. | ||
| If we're not on constant offense, and when I say offense, I mean up in people's grills and fighting hard every day. | ||
| We're going to lose this, and I think people are taking a much, much too much conventional view of what we're up against. | ||
| Yesterday in New York City, you know, two things. | ||
| One, in the case in Miami with Joe Scarborough's ranting about, and then in the courtroom in New York City. | ||
| The courtroom in New York City, they did what they've always been trying to do. | ||
| They have not laid out a crime. | ||
| There's no crime that they're actually talking about right now. | ||
| No crime they're talking about. | ||
| No crime. | ||
| What they want to do is get Stormy Daniels up there and then have a fake performance by the judge to let her get in all her sleaze, all her smearing of President Trump, all her lies about President Trump so the jury could hear it. | ||
| And of course, MSNBC, Rachel Maddow, Joanne Reid can have a big belly laugh last night as they smear President Trump in front of the American people. | ||
| That is what this entire case is about. | ||
| There's no crime that we've actually talked about four weeks into the trial. | ||
| And the judge is sitting there, oh, you can't get that salacious detail in. | ||
| Stormy Daniels can get it in. | ||
| They can go, oh, gosh. | ||
| No, I didn't see a gag order on the prosecution. | ||
| I didn't see any sanctions on the prosecution because it's all performative. | ||
| Then in Florida, you actually had a federal judge had a belly full of it. | ||
| Joe Scarborough, write this down. | ||
| Have Mika take her number two pencil out and write this down. | ||
| Judge Cannon is putting the Justice Department on trial, bro. | ||
| The hearing in late June and these dismissal hearings, they're actually going to give them, on the motion to dismiss, actual hearings, but the evidentiary hearing, we're going to get down to it. | ||
| Of actually, you know, who sent emails, what is the conspiracy about President Trump between National Archives, the White House, the FBI, and the Justice Department? | ||
| What is the conspiracy? | ||
| And right now, it should just not be this show and a couple other people that are demanding, demanding, demanding of the House Republicans to begin a formal inquiry. | ||
| Yes, you have pieces of it. | ||
| You have a 300-page report here. | ||
| You have a letter going to the Justice Department here. | ||
| You have Elise Stefanik sending over for an ethics probe. | ||
| You have pieces. | ||
| Then you have pieces coming up about the Florida case, these other cases. | ||
| There are all these disparate pieces. | ||
| They need to be pulled together. | ||
| They need to be pulled together in a formal process of adjudication. | ||
| There is a vast criminal conspiracy against Donald J. Trump and his lead followers. | ||
| And not just that, the MAGA people. | ||
| Because remember, Trump just stands between you and who they're coming for. | ||
| They're coming for you. | ||
| And he understands this. | ||
| This is why this motion to vacate must happen. | ||
| My phone's been blowing up for the last couple days. | ||
| You can imagine people, oh, you got to back off. | ||
| We've got to back off. | ||
| You know, this is going to be terrible. | ||
| We're going to lose the House. | ||
| Hey, you're not going to lose the House. | ||
| And this is not, this is not performative. | ||
| We need a great unmasking. | ||
| We need to see who's serious about this. | ||
| If you want Hakeem Jeffries to be the speaker, then you'll get a chance to vote for that. | ||
| I think and I hope what MTG is going to do is a full bill of indictment against Johnson. | ||
| A full bill of indictment. | ||
| And nail it to the church wall like Luther. | ||
| Nail it to the cathedral. | ||
| Put your 95 theses up there. | ||
| Nail it. | ||
| Make the case against Johnson. | ||
| And then let's call the vote. | ||
| Let's vote. | ||
| One of the central pieces, they have not been, first off, they've allowed the southern border of the invasion to continue. | ||
| They've allowed this, you know, the 8 million, 10 million people to continue to be underwritten by the U.S. | ||
| government. | ||
| They've continued to finance the Ukraine war. | ||
| The lead story in the Hill newspaper today is the Senate saying that the motion to vacate might be shut down on just one of Marjorie Taylor Greene's What she's demanding. | ||
| Stop funding Ukraine. | ||
| Because the 60 billion wasn't enough, they lied to you about that. | ||
| It's going to continue on and on and on and on. | ||
| They said that in and of itself should be enough to toss her motion to vacate. | ||
| The UNA party has its own plan. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| I have no problem with a group having a plan. | ||
| It doesn't mean we have to accept it. | ||
| It doesn't mean we have to go along with it. | ||
| It doesn't mean we have to embrace it. | ||
| And most importantly, it doesn't mean we have to approve it and underwrite it. | ||
| Because now there's no excuse anymore for not having that information. | ||
| Not just shows like ours, R.A.V., you've got Tom Fenton, you've got Mike Davis. | ||
| You have Julie Kelly, you have Darren Beattie, you have National Pulse, you have dozens of great sites that are putting forth citizen-free press. | ||
| You've got more than enough information to know exactly how the Uniparty rolls. | ||
| It's now time to make some decisions and say, this is not acceptable. | ||
| We do not consent. | ||
| And I don't want to hear Karl Rove and Newt Gingrich over there whining, whining at Fox, you know, Murdoch's puppets. | ||
| Saying, oh no, this is going to be more chaos, more chaos. | ||
| The changes we've got, at least on accountability, invisibility, is because we fought for them. | ||
| The outrage people felt and acknowledged when McCarthy sold everybody out to give Biden unlimited spending and unlimited deficits with nothing that you can do about it, nothing you can do about it, your representatives. | ||
| He paid for that with his speakership, and he's out in the Milken conferences, he's whining around like some court jester, still whining about being the only speaker in the history of this republic to be removed. | ||
| But he gets more and more irrelevant every day as he should. | ||
| And MAGA gets more relevant. | ||
| It's time to have a flex. | ||
| It's time to have a full flex. | ||
| The world is in chaos. | ||
| We are hurtling towards the kinetic part of a third world war. | ||
| We have the early stages of that irregular warfare and that kinetic war here in the United States. | ||
| Just like Mao did in the Cultural Revolution, it starts on the campuses, but it'll spread everywhere. | ||
| And this is a neo-Marxist and Sharia supremacist combo platter. | ||
| So if you're prepared to accept it, to sit there, oh gosh, you know, Fox tells us it's going to be chaotic, we could lose the house. | ||
| You're not going to lose the house. | ||
| We're not going to lose the House because we're going to work like crazy, make sure we hold those seats and maybe pick up a couple because you, this audience of the people that back people in the redistricting fights, they got us in this situation that we can actually control the House. | ||
| So you don't need to be lectured to by people, oh this is so chaotic, this is going to be so tough. | ||
| We have to do hard things. | ||
| All the easy decisions for the United States of America are behind us. | ||
| There's nothing but hard calls and those hard calls have to be done by tough and hard people. | ||
| We're sick of the whining. | ||
| We're sick of that we can't do anything. | ||
| We're sick of the politics as usual. | ||
| We're not going to sit here and agree and we're not going to consent to politics as usual. | ||
| So put the indictment up and let's call the vote. | ||
| And let's see who stands with us and who stands against us. | ||
| Mike Davis is going to join us next. | ||
| The pillars against President Trump, the criminal conspiracy against him next in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| You think it's turbulent now? | ||
| You ain't seen nothing yet. | ||
| It's going to get much more turbulent. | ||
| Remember the turbulence of World War II brought to an end today, May 8, 1945. | ||
| We honor that. | ||
| We honor those folks. | ||
| They will have more to say about that on the 6 o'clock show. | ||
| Dave Brat is going to join me and Ben Harnwell from our International Bureau in Rome. | ||
| But times of turbulence, you need financial stability. | ||
| Go talk to Birchgold, the team there. | ||
| Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| Phillip Patrick and the team can assist you. | ||
| Remember, every time we work with sponsors, we want to make sure we have full access to the highest levels of the company so that they can be there for your questions, inquiries, and make sure you understand everything that they're trying to either sell you or do for you. | ||
| So go to Phillip Patrick over at Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| You get full access to him. | ||
| Michael Seifert, we're trying to get Michael Seifert on here later today. | ||
| We love the fact that this alternative economy is building every day because you get to vote every day with your dollars. | ||
| Not just every two years in a House and Senate race or every four years for the president. | ||
| Every day you get to say what you believe and what you stand for and who stands with you and who backs your play. | ||
| Mike Davis, breaking news out of Georgia. | ||
| I've got a lot to, you got this amazing tweet up about the five pillars of the case against Trump. | ||
| Then we're talking about really the pillars of the criminal conspiracy by FBI, by DOJ, by the White House. | ||
| But along those lines, you've got big breaking news coming out of Georgia, sir. | ||
| Yeah, the Georgia Court of Appeals has just agreed to hear President Trump's interlocutory appeal on the disqualification of Fulton County DA Fannie Willis for her illegal financial stake in this criminal prosecution. | ||
| She remembers she hired her dumb, unqualified boyfriend, Nathan Wade, paid him $250 an hour, He billed $700,000 including for his time meeting with the Biden White House and the Biden White House counsel before Big Fanny brought her big dumb RICO indictment against President Trump. | ||
| President Trump moved to disqualify her. | ||
| There was that circus of a hearing where, you know, Fanny's talking about how she's a gray goose girl and she just has cash laying around the house because her Black Panther father taught her to keep cash laying around the house and so she Hold it, hold it, hold it. | ||
| Brother, brother, I have no, particularly from the South, I have no problem with people having cash in the house for emergencies. | ||
| I thought that part of her explanation from her dad was actually smart. | ||
| The problem I had is Fannie couldn't tell us the sources. | ||
| She could never tell the judge the sources of said cash, right? | ||
| That was something that just, you know, the $10,000 just magically appeared. | ||
| So this is, I just want to make people know, you had this thing in the Georgia, I guess, | ||
| She says she's not going to testify. | ||
| A lot of folks in Georgia is coming to me and saying, hey, the Republican Party's got to get tougher down there. | ||
| You're saying that's not part of that. | ||
| This is from the judge that we spent four weeks in that hearing where Fannie's personal life became overwhelming to everything else. | ||
| You're saying now on appeals that this is going to be heard now in even a more formal setting? | ||
| Yeah, so let me tell you how this is an extraordinary appeal. | ||
| You're getting interlocutory appeal, meaning you're getting an appeal during the middle of the criminal prosecution at the trial court because this, remember this Kemp judge down in Georgia, he's a little wimp, and he said, oh well, you know, yeah, of course, There's a conflict of interest here, or at least an appearance of a conflict of interest. | ||
| But Fannie, you get to decide. | ||
| You can stay on the case if you want, or you can fire your dumb, unqualified boyfriend. | ||
| That's not how the law works. | ||
| The whole office must get disqualified. | ||
| The entire Fulton County DA's office must get disqualified. | ||
| And then the Attorney General, along with others, need to reassign it. | ||
| They can reassign it to another DA in Georgia who's not corrupt. | ||
| Who's not conflicted like Big Fanny and her dumb boyfriend were and what I imagine is going to happen is this is going to get reassigned to another DA. | ||
| In Georgia, and this case is going to get dismissed because any DA who looks at this with clear eyes is going to see that this is a bogus case against President Trump. | ||
| It's part of the Democrats' lawfare and election interference. | ||
| And so it's yet another yet another case that's crumbling for this Democrat law for this Biden Democrat lawfare and election interference is crumbling before their eyes. | ||
| Let's go. | ||
| I want to go down. | ||
| I want to go to yesterday because I thought immediately this thing should be this case should be dismissed. | ||
| It should be a mistrial called. | ||
| But the prosecution did what they wanted to do, which is smear President Trump. | ||
| This has, as you keep saying, we're four weeks into this thing now, four and a half weeks in. | ||
| They still have not laid out the crime. | ||
| Because there is no crime and there's not going to be some technical decision by the jury on hearing a crime. | ||
| This is all a narrative that President Trump's a bad guy, President Trump's an evil guy. | ||
| And what they tried to do is even that he did this, you know, this, whatever happened with Stormy Daniels was done without consent. | ||
| I mean, they went all in and the judge had some performative, oh, you can't say that. | ||
| He would say it. | ||
| And the next thing you know, she's saying it again. | ||
| Give me, you wrote the five pillars. | ||
| And we want to put that up if Denver has that. | ||
| You wrote the five pillars of the case against Trump in this situation. | ||
| Walk me through that. | ||
| Yeah, so the five pillars. | ||
| You start off with Matthew Colangelo. | ||
| Matthew Colangelo was a senior Biden Justice Department political appointee and a former DNC Democrat National Committee political consultant who got deployed to Soros-funded Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's office, who campaigned on getting Trump. | ||
| They brought this, they resurrected this zombie case Against Trump. | ||
| We still don't know their legal theory. | ||
| Four weeks into the trial, this case was passed over by the prior Manhattan DA, the Manhattan U.S. | ||
| Attorney, the Federal Election Commission, and Bragg himself until this Biden operative got deployed to Bragg's office to bring this law fair. | ||
| Matthew Colangelo is a total political hack. | ||
| He worked for Obama and Eric Holder, And Tom Perez in the Justice Department and the Civil Rights Division. | ||
| He followed Tom Perez when he became Obama's DNC chairman. | ||
| He was in the Obama White House as a labor relations guy. | ||
| He went to the Democrat New York Attorney General's office to run the lawfare against Trump for the four years of his presidency. | ||
| He was on the parachute team. | ||
| To the Biden Justice Department. | ||
| This just proves that Biden is driving this lawfare with Matthew Colangelo. | ||
| You also with this New York case, you have Michael Cohen. | ||
| Michael Cohen is this convicted perjurer and disbarred attorney Who was bitter that President Trump didn't make this clown the White House counsel, and now he's profiting off of this case on TikTok. | ||
| He's making these videos on TikTok and profiting off of it. | ||
| He's one of the star witnesses, along with porn star Stormy Daniels, who has changed her story. | ||
| She wrote a letter in 2018 saying none of this happened. | ||
| Now she's changing her story. | ||
| Oh, by the way, she has a pinned tweet. | ||
| On X, on Twitter, where she's promoting her porn sites. | ||
| Well, you know, she's profiting off this trial, too, just in other ways, right? | ||
| And then you have this Biden donor judge, Juan Machon, who donated to Biden | ||
| and another anti-Trump cause in 2020, whose adult daughter, Lauren Machon, | ||
| is profiting off of her father's unprecedented trial of Trump. | ||
| She's raising millions of dollars as a leading Democrat fundraiser for Biden, | ||
| Harris, Adam Schiff, many other Democrats. | ||
| Even a former Clinton judge went on CNN, on Caitlyn Collins' show on April 5th, | ||
| and said that this judge has to recuse under New York statute because of this daughter's | ||
| fundraising off this trial. | ||
| This judge responded to that by expanding this unconstitutional gag order against President | ||
| Trump and threatening to throw him in jail if he mentions Michael Cohen or Stormy Daniels | ||
| or Lauren Machon or even number five, even if President Trump merely mentions that this | ||
| Manhattan jury pool voted 87% for Joe Biden. | ||
| Somehow that is contempt under this vague and overbroad gag order, this sort of Damocles | ||
| that they have over Trump's head. | ||
| Trump can't talk about the fact that Machon rigged the jury selection process with Bragg | ||
| and Colangelo to weed out, it's already 87% for Biden, probably more than that. | ||
| And so they're weeding out of this potential jury pool people who follow Trump on social media, but they're not—they didn't weed out people who follow Biden. | ||
| This is a completely rigged process. | ||
| Those are the five pillars. | ||
| This is a corrupt Prosecution and these bad actors must face severe political, legal, and financial consequences come January 20th, 2025 when the Trump 47 Justice Department is in place and they open a criminal probe on this obvious criminal conspiracy. | ||
| Since you don't have interlocutor appeals, this is all going to come to an appeal later, but they don't care. | ||
| All they want to do is get Trump now, is get a conviction now so they can tell the world, oh, he's a convicted felon on 34 of these trumped-up counts, correct? | ||
| This thing is so appealable on all the mistakes and all the rigging they've done today. | ||
| Yeah, and the issue is the gag order, the unconstitutional gag order that Juan Marchand and Bragg and Colangelo put on Trump. | ||
| Look, the gag order should be on the witnesses. | ||
| It should be on Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels, because gag orders are supposed to protect a criminal defendant. | ||
| It's a limited time, place, and manner restriction on free speech rights to protect the criminal defendant, to make sure that he's getting A fair, public, and speedy trial under the First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. | ||
| This judge has illegally turned that on its head. | ||
| It's a criminal conspiracy against rights. | ||
| They've turned that on its head to gag President Trump and threaten to throw him in jail for merely responding to Stormy Daniels' attacks, to merely responding to Michael Cohen's attacks, for merely mentioning that the jury pool is 87% Yeah. | ||
| voted 87% for Biden or Judge Rashawn and Colangelo and Bragg rigged the jury selection process. | ||
| They want to throw Trump in jail for mentioning that Colangelo got deployed from the Biden | ||
| Justice Department to bring these bogus charges against Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is lawfare and election interference. | |
| I got Darren Beatty on deck. | ||
| I want to go through some of these other cases and why you're seeing disparate elements come together in an investigation. | ||
| Why it's all not being rolled up into one as it should be. | ||
| Because the railhead of it is the DOJ. | ||
| It's Lisa Monaco and Merrick Garland and the White House Counsel and the White House. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| How do we get jacked up in the morning? | ||
| Warpath Coffee. | ||
| Go to warpath.coffee slash war room for your discount, but check the 4,400 endorsements from your fellow war room posse. | ||
| Go check it out today. | ||
| Warpath Coffee. | ||
| Get jacked up in the morning. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Mike Davis now, Washington Post, New York Times is all their lead story about this appeal. | ||
| This hit like a bomb to this crowd because I don't think they were expecting this, right? | ||
| They would expect the appeal to come afterwards. | ||
| They didn't think it would be what you call interlocutory. | ||
| It would go now. | ||
| But this gets to my bigger issue. | ||
| This is Trump's defense team driving this. | ||
| There's another aspect of this. | ||
| You just walked through five pillars of this conspiracy in New York City alone. | ||
| You then have Florida, where a federal judge is basically saying, and correct me if I'm wrong, she's going to put Jack Smith on trial In June of this evidentiary hearing because she wants to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| She's asked politely. | ||
| She's asked nicely. | ||
| They've blown her off. | ||
| Now she's going to put them in the docket and say, OK, they're actually going to have hearings of motions to dismiss, which a lot of times it has to do with with briefings. | ||
| She's going to have a couple of hearings on that. | ||
| Then she's going to end with the big kahuna in late June of evidence. | ||
| That's there, which you've laid out from the afternoon in August. | ||
| We're almost two years into this thing. | ||
| When you came on here and kind of walked through exactly what the conspiracy was. | ||
| Now we're going to see that, but that's also driven by a federal judge. | ||
| That's not driven by the House. | ||
| You're also now in Fannie Willis. | ||
| You got the appeals court stepping into the action because they've seen enough. | ||
| And they want to have it argued to them. | ||
| This is, you've had the Supreme Court say, we've had enough. | ||
| We've had enough of the nonsense. | ||
| I mean, 9-0 smash mouth humiliation in Colorado, which you were the one that fought. | ||
| They all mocked us that we're never going to get to immunity hearing. | ||
| This is ridiculous. | ||
| Maybe they have a two line brief. | ||
| That's going to be, you know, that's, that's historic. | ||
| You've got the Fisher case about even what the charges are. | ||
| You have a dozen Major, massive things about the rule of law and the way this country is structured legally. | ||
| And the House has completely caught judiciary, weaponization of government. | ||
| They're like church mice. | ||
| And now, after we put the bayonet to the back of a couple of people, oh, by the way, that's right, I think we have a 300-page report. | ||
| Oh, did the trial start? | ||
| Did we miss putting you out by the trial? | ||
| How did that happen? | ||
| Well, here it is. | ||
| It's interim. | ||
| Stamp interim on it. | ||
| It's just interim. | ||
| Then you've got letters flying around, at least the five people doing a great work. | ||
| But this is insane. | ||
| This is a massive criminal conspiracy against Donald J. Trump, because they understand when Trump gets back to the White House, it's game over. | ||
| And now the House is like church mice, and every couple of days they're putting out another report. | ||
| And the stuff they're putting out is great. | ||
| Why is it not consolidated, sir, under one adjudication, whether it's weaponization of government or judiciary, or even bring Comer back from the bullpen? | ||
| You know, Comer, who, you know, who knows why Hunter Biden hadn't been subpoenaed to testify? | ||
| Who knows why there hasn't been criminal referrals? | ||
| Who knows why there's silence from the Kentucky colonel? | ||
| Mike Davis, your thoughts. | ||
| You're exactly right. | ||
| Man, Steve, you sound like a lawyer. | ||
| We're going to have to have Trump make you his lawyer in front of the Supreme Court for these cases. | ||
| That was pretty impressive. | ||
| But I would say this, House Oversight Chairman James Comer is doing fantastic work with his oversight. | ||
| He's uncovered $20 million plus from foreign entities going into it. | ||
| Seems like every Biden family member's bank account, of course, except the six-year-old granddaughter who the Biden trash wouldn't accept until they got publicly humiliated. | ||
| But look, what needs to happen is this House Judiciary Committee, this Weaponization Committee needs to step up. | ||
| I was highly critical of it at the beginning of this Congress because they weren't doing anything. | ||
| They weren't structurally staffed up. | ||
| properly. And then when they issued a few letters and subpoenas, I started praising | ||
| Jim Jordan. I've kept my mouth shut. Look, we are four weeks into a criminal prosecution | ||
| in New York City where you have a corrupt judge whose daughter is making millions off | ||
| of this case, raising millions off of this case with a Soros funded DA who campaigned | ||
| on getting Trump with a Biden and DNC operative, Matthew Colangelo, as the brains behind this | ||
| operation because we all know that Brad's a moron, right? | ||
| Where the hell is the House Weaponization Committee? | ||
| Where is the Judiciary Committee? | ||
| Why aren't they issuing subpoena after subpoena after subpoena, getting documents, having people come in for staff depositions? | ||
| Having public hearings. | ||
| The reason these Democrats, these Biden Democrats in the Biden, President Biden himself, his White House counsel, including Jonathan Su, who orchestrated the Mar-a-Lago raid with the archives in the Justice Department, Jay Bratt at the Justice Department, Jack Smith at the Justice Department, Merrick Garland at the Justice Department, Lisa Monaco at the Justice Department, This magistrate judge, Bruce Reinhart, down in Florida, these other judges who are part of this conspiracy, this lawfare and election interference, this conspiracy to violate rights under 18 U.S.C. | ||
| 241 and many other federal crimes. | ||
| Why aren't we not on office? | ||
| What the hell are we waiting for? | ||
| We are 22 months after this Mar-a-Lago raid. | ||
| We are four weeks into this criminal trial. | ||
| This judge These prosecutors want to put President Trump in prison. | ||
| They've made that very clear with their illegal, unconstitutional gag orders. | ||
| They're threatening to put him in prison. | ||
| The mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, is bragging that he has the Rikers Island ready to go for President Trump. | ||
| These House Republicans, Jim Jordan, this Weaponization Committee, his Judiciary Committee, they need to get their heads out of their asses and start moving now. | ||
| Mike, can you hang on one second? | ||
| I want to get to Darren Beatty before he bounces. | ||
| I got one question more on Fannie Willis, and I got to talk to you just about the Florida situation, about what the House could have done versus a judge or an appeals court. | ||
| So just hang on one second. | ||
| I got breaking news with Darren Beatty. | ||
| Darren, you put up a piece late last night. | ||
| I want you to walk through it, because once again, on the J6, on the phony J6 committee, We didn't get to the bottom of this. | ||
| This has all been suppressed and it takes the independent investigation of you guys over there to get to the ticking time bomb of the bombs on that day. | ||
| What do you have, sir? | ||
| Well, it's great to be here. | ||
| You know, the War Room audience is one of the most informed audiences around and we've been following this saga, the J6 and the pipe bomb saga from the very beginning. | ||
| So I'm very happy to break this on the show this morning. | ||
| And yes, indeed, another major piece of the puzzle is now in place in this expose that we ran on an individual called Donnell Harvin, a deep state never trumper who curiously made one of the most, if not the most, bizarrely accurate predictions about J6 in the entire sphere of J6 commentary. | ||
| His office, he was at a local office, is the head of Homeland Security and Intelligence for a D.C. | ||
| based office called the Homeland Security Emergency Management Agency. | ||
| And the Washington Post did a big puff piece on him, essentially saying all of the federal agencies got it wrong. | ||
| They were caught flat footed. | ||
| Of course, that's not true. | ||
| They weren't flat footed. | ||
| They knew it was coming and they didn't want to stop it because they needed it to promote their narrative. | ||
| But that's another story. | ||
| Their narrative was, all these federal agencies were caught flat-footed, and this one Nostradamus-type figure, this one prodigy, this one genius, this one clairvoyant from the DC Intelligence Fusion Center, Don L. Harvin, he got it right. | ||
| He knew, and the level of specificity here is remarkable. | ||
| I'll give you some quotes from this Washington Post piece. | ||
| It says, For the first time, from coast to coast, centers were blinking red. | ||
| The hour, date, and location of concern was the same. | ||
| 1 p.m., the U.S. | ||
| Capitol, January 6th. | ||
| That's interesting. | ||
| So Donnell's office was concerned not only with the Capitol on January 6th, but with the specific time, 1 p.m., which is right when the certification was to begin and right when that initial Ray Epps orchestrated breach occurred. | ||
| And of course, it's right when both pipe bombs were just by sheer coincidence, independently discovered Within a 15 minute time frame, perfectly synchronized to the certification proceeding and to the unfolding attack on the Capitol. | ||
| But it gets even better. | ||
| So it says Donnell is so concerned about January 6th that he's calling for body bags. | ||
| He's calling the local hospital saying, we need body bags. | ||
| This is going to be a mass casualty event. | ||
| Now, in spite of his dramatic concern for January 6th, The story goes on to say he puts a junior analyst, this mysterious junior analyst, he puts a junior analyst in his office on the case to sort of do a threat assessment of January 6th. | ||
| And this junior analyst has the most remarkable prediction. | ||
| He says the junior analyst was concerned that a worst case scenario of January 6th would be that someone would plant explosives near the Capitol. | ||
| And that these explosives could serve as a diversion of resources and personnel such that it would make it easier for the mob to storm the Capitol. | ||
| Now, I just want to spell out why this is such an amazing prediction, because this is actually the dominant theory of the case for the pipe bombs. | ||
| Those who've been following this case know that the pipe bombs didn't go off. | ||
| They weren't even capable of going off. | ||
| They had one hour mechanical timers. | ||
| The latest they could have gone off was the previous evening of January 5th. | ||
| In a back alley, it would do nothing. | ||
| No, the remarkable thing about the pipe bombs was that they were discovered exactly as the attack on the Capitol was unfolding, and that precise synchronicity led, for instance, Stephen Son, the former head of the Capitol Police, to hypothesize that they were planted not to go off, but as a diversionary event. | ||
| Of course, if the person who planted the bomb wanted to divert, they'd have to count on people finding those bombs at that precise time. | ||
| How you could count on Random pedestrian and plainclothes law enforcement to discover the bombs exactly when you need them to, that is also a puzzling question. | ||
| But for now, I'd like to focus on this junior analyst prediction. | ||
| Now, it would be one thing to say we're concerned with explosives because of the destructive impact of explosives. | ||
| That might make some sense. | ||
| But to say that our chief concern about explosives is not that the explosives would go off and kill people, but the explosives would divert resources for people to storm the Capitol. | ||
| That's a very strange prediction. | ||
| If you're predicting in advance and your chief concern about explosives is not that they blow up and harm people, but that somehow through some bizarre mechanism they divert resources away, why wouldn't the person just put the explosives at the Capitol? | ||
| Why invent this convoluted concern of people planting explosives near the Capitol and that diverting | ||
| resources. | ||
| So that very specific and bizarre prediction by this mysterious and unnamed junior analyst | ||
| is something that is quite interesting coming from Donnell Harvard's office. | ||
| But hang on. | ||
| His brilliant analyst in this in this superstar. | ||
| Here's what I get at that in the time that they did it. | ||
| Correct me if I'm wrong. | ||
| There was no there was no crowd or mob or anything. | ||
| I mean, they actually said this in a real-time basis before that had even transpired. | ||
| It was another hour, hour and a half before it got big, right? | ||
| This specific prediction was days before. | ||
| This was days before. | ||
| That's why this is so remarkable. | ||
| This was days before. | ||
| It's one thing for Don L. Harbin to say, oh, January 6th is such a concern. | ||
| We need body bags. | ||
| We didn't match casualty event. | ||
| but somehow this junior analyst in his office made this extremely specific prediction | ||
| that corresponds with the unlikely and unusual events that have to do with the fact that the bombs | ||
| weren't set to go off, that they were discovered at this precise time, | ||
| that they were, you know, that that's why Steven Sund and others | ||
| think they're diversionary. | ||
| That is not a natural prediction to make. | ||
| Again, if anything, if you're concerned about explosives, you're concerned about the explosives directly killing people. | ||
| You don't have this weird twist where you're saying the explosives will divert resources away from the Capitol and then people will storm. | ||
| That level of specificity and convolution that exactly corresponds to what actually unfolded is what's so bizarre. | ||
| This is why you haven't seen the analyst's name because he clearly said in a planning meeting, he clearly said in a planning meeting and leaked it. | ||
| Darren, hang on. | ||
| I know you've got to bounce at the top of the hour. | ||
| We're going to take a short break and we'll come right back to you. | ||
| We've got to drill down more on this in the rest of J6. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| Don't let somebody get into your title and take a hard money second mortgage. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| Go there today. | ||
| Immerse yourself in information. | ||
| Use the password Bannon. | ||
| Get one month free. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| I kind of got cut off there there. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| HomeTitleLock, all one word, dot com slash bandit, get the first free month. | ||
| But go immerse yourself. | ||
| Once again, go immerse yourself. | ||
| Find out why the combination of A.I. | ||
| and cyber, but also, hey, maybe a lawyer. | ||
| No, maybe a friend, maybe a family member. | ||
| You don't know. | ||
| But there's many ways to get access, unfortunately, to your title. | ||
| It's quite easy for these hard money lenders, people to get their bad guys, take out a hard money, second mortgage on your house that you got to pay off. | ||
| You can't do that. | ||
| We need you at the ramparts. | ||
| Action, action, action. | ||
| Hometownlock.com. | ||
| Get the first month free, but get to immerse yourself in information. | ||
| Ask all the questions. | ||
| Darren Beattie, this thing stinks to high heaven. | ||
| Continue on, sir, because this is getting curiouser and curiouser, and I want to thank the guys over at Revolver, your team, for doing this amazing work. | ||
| Because I think in this topic, it expands out the phoniness of the narrative America's been sold, sir. | ||
| Well, it's a major piece of what is likely a major conspiracy. | ||
| And so we're talking about Darnell Harvin. | ||
| There's a big puff piece on him in the Washington Post celebrating his clairvoyant powers. | ||
| He called for body bags. | ||
| He said there's going to be a mass casualty event. | ||
| And then the biggest one is that there's this alleged junior analyst. | ||
| Now, again, why he would pick the most junior analysts, given that he thought January 6th would be such a big deal, is not explained. | ||
| But I guess it was a lucky choice because the junior analyst was responsible for the most amazing January 6th prediction. | ||
| Namely, that the worst case scenario would be someone would plant explosives. | ||
| Not that the explosives would kill people, but the explosives would divert resources in the capital and then people would storm the capital. | ||
| Remarkably precise that happens to align to the bizarre and unusual configuration of what actually happened with these pipe bombs. | ||
| So the next part of the story is interesting, because we never hear anything about this junior analyst again. | ||
| But Donal Harvin is everywhere. | ||
| He's doing the media rounds. | ||
| He's going on MSNBC, CBS. | ||
| He's doing everything promoting his clairvoyant powers. | ||
| In fact, the typical thrust of the Donal Harvin segments are the news anchors chastise the federal agencies for being caught flat footed, and they champion Donal Harvin for Understanding what J6 would be in advance. | ||
| The only bizarre thing is, in all of these segments designed to amplify the clairvoyant powers of Don L. Harvin, the most amazing and accurate prediction that came out of his office is strangely neglected. | ||
| Not a word about this junior analyst and not a word about this remarkably specific prediction that aligned perfectly with the pipe bomb scenario. | ||
| Why would they forego the opportunity to remind the public of this dangerous MAGA pipe bomb for one? | ||
| And why would they forego The best example of Harvin's alleged clairvoyant powers are at least the powers of his local office that they're trying to trump up in relation to the federal offices. | ||
| So that's another very bizarre thing about his victory tour. | ||
| Now, of course, if you dig into his history, he is as never Trump as they come. | ||
| He wrote an op ed saying that Trump is the number one national security threat. | ||
| In fact, he explicitly said Trump is more of a national security threat than China. | ||
| He actually said this. | ||
| This is the guy whose office made this amazing prediction in relation to the pipe bomb that happened. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| He said this as a federal employee when Trump was commander in chief? | ||
| He said it at the time? | ||
| Let me check the date of this. | ||
| It might have been when he retired. | ||
| Let's see. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, that would be the place in real time. | |
| The place is infested. | ||
| See, this is the problem. | ||
| This was in 2023. | ||
| So he is retired at this point. | ||
| But speaking as a homeland security expert and educator with over 30 years of public safety service, And something tells me that this is not a new position that he held these views about Trump when he was in office as well. | ||
| And that might have inflected the way he did his work. | ||
| But he has a very extensive record of anti-Trump commentary to the point of saying Trump's even more of a threat than China. | ||
| When Trump was indicted, he said the only truth here is that it was a very good day. | ||
| And it's not just Trump. | ||
| He's, of course, anti-Tucker. | ||
| He was fuming when Tucker released some of the January 6th tapes. | ||
| He's, of course, anti-Musk. | ||
| He was fuming that Elon Musk shared a meme of Pepe the Frog. | ||
| I'm not kidding. | ||
| And he touts the ADL, which deems Pepe the Frog and the OK symbol as a hate sign. | ||
| And he endorses that, too. | ||
| He says the OK symbol is a hate sign. | ||
| He uses that to attack George Santos. | ||
| And of course, we wouldn't be complete without a reference to you, Steve. | ||
| He wishes you a lovely time in prison. | ||
| He says, quote, wishing you well in the clank, Steve. | ||
| What a charming guy. | ||
| And then finally, just for good measure, I'm sorry to those who saw this, but he put a tweet out of him getting a pedicure, which is absolutely disgusting. | ||
| So I just put that there just to emphasize what a disgusting guy this is. | ||
| But this is a never Trump radical in the deep state who thinks that Trump is the number one national security threat, even greater threat than China. | ||
| This is the guy who has the clairvoyant powers to predict that January 6 would be a mass casualty event in advance. | ||
| Despite that, he puts a junior analyst on the case, and that junior analyst happens to predict almost exactly the pipe bomb scenario. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead. | ||
| Last part of the piece, which again, everyone needs to go and read. | ||
| This is a major piece. | ||
| If people have been following along, the previous piece was about Ashton Benedict, who we know Very, very with a high level of conviction that this is a cover-up guy, Ashen Benedict. | ||
| Now we have what could be another piece in Don L. Harvin. | ||
| Now, the interesting thing about Harvin is his office was in this emergency management community. | ||
| His office did a lot of business with an organization called FirstNet, which is responsible for broadband services for first responders. | ||
| Now, and in fact, people in his office have explicitly praised FirstNet for its function on January 6. | ||
| Now, here's the interesting thing. | ||
| The random pedestrian who first discovered the bomb near the RNC, 17 hours the bomb was undiscovered. | ||
| The random pedestrian who found that bomb at the precise minute that was aligned with the certification vote and the unfolding attack on the Capitol. | ||
| It's such a joke. | ||
| We're going to push it out right now. |
Export Selection