April 24, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
47:51
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | |
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We've already attracted nearly $700 billion in private sector investments in advanced manufacturing and clean energy, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America. | ||
| And all across the board, we're lifting up communities and workers too often left out in urban, rural, suburban, tribal communities all across the country. | ||
| But, folks, despite the overwhelming devastation in red and blue states, there are still those who deny climate is in crisis. | ||
| My maggot Republican friends don't seem to think it's in crisis. | ||
| They don't — they don't want to — they actually want to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, which provides the funding for a vast majority of these projects. | ||
| And roll back clean air — protections for clean air and clean water. | ||
| And I'm not going to go into it now, but you — I'm not making it up. | ||
| It's real. | ||
| Just listen to what they say. | ||
| Anyone in or out of government who willfully denies the impacts of climate change is condemning the American people to a very dangerous future in the world, I might add. | ||
| They want to take us backwards, sideline our workers, let China and others lead the race for clean energy. | ||
| I'm determined, absolutely determined, that we move forward. | ||
| We move forward. | ||
| Let me close with this. | ||
| In 1933, and it was referenced by the Congress lady, that when Roosevelt outlined the Civilian Conservation Corps, he said, quote, and I'm quoting, "...more important than the material gains will be the moral and spiritual value of such work." He always put it in a context that went beyond just what the immediate need was. | ||
| I'd say the same holds true for what we're doing here today. | ||
| It has a moral imperative. | ||
| And I've never been more optimistic about America's future. | ||
| We just have to remember who we are. | ||
| We're the United States of America, and there's nothing, nothing beyond our capacity. | ||
| We work together. | ||
| Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| Thank you, Steve, for talking to me. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters filling in for, what is it, the fourth hour of programming today, April 23rd in the year of our Lord 2024. | ||
| But I guess maybe the silver lining of living under the Biden regime is that there's never any shortage of content that we can cover and stories we've got to keep you guys ahead of the curve on. | ||
| And of course, we're always following the sort of environmentalist narrative to a close. | ||
| Luckily, we have Dave Walsh to come in. | ||
| Break it down for us. | ||
| I don't really think we celebrate Earth Day in the climate change cultist sense here in the War Room, in the United Nations sponsored element of it, but we of course love the Earth here in the War Room. | ||
| Dave Walsh does Two, but it doesn't seem like the Biden regime really likes the Earth because it doesn't really seem like they want Americans to be able to live free and prosper and have energy and really do anything. | ||
| Can you walk us through some of the legislative moves that the administration, or regime as we like to call it, took yesterday to celebrate Earth Day? | ||
| Well, we're certainly glad, Natalie, that Earth Day is behind us, but we didn't get out unscathed with several major new initiatives coming up last week and yesterday to further this cause. | ||
| But I'll say, to his remarks in the cold open, mine is condemning Americans to energy devices that work one-fourth to 20 percent of the time only, and intermittently so, and that cost 8 to 11 times more than conventional combined-cycle gas-fired power. | ||
| I think that's the problem, condemning Americans to the lack of energy produced by these intermittent, very part-time solar and wind devices along with battery storage that only operates two hours a day. | ||
| That's the problem we're condemning Americans with, is the lack of energy in this country. | ||
| Significant lack of electricity. | ||
| He came out with a more draconian announcement on Alaska, the ANWR, and all of the federal lands in Alaska wanting to now shut down, decreeing that he's endorsing and finalizing Deb Haaland's plan to stop drilling on 13 million acres of federal land in Alaska permanently. | ||
| So here's the same administration that wanted to fund and did fund is funding 60 more billion for a war in the Ukraine and now military efforts in Taiwan and with Israel, siding with Israel together in a joint massive bill that's a military bill taking a key part of the country that forms in part the National Reserve for the U.S. | ||
| Naval backup supply of oil and gas in Alaska and shutting down production of 13 million acres including the area for ConocoPhillips, formerly known as the Willow Project, that looked like it was gonna be approved last year, swept under this, so we're taking a drastic action to reduce American dependence on oil and gas in Alaska, in Anwar, in the Arctic, by the way, in our most productive fields. | ||
| Then secondly, he came out with, yesterday announced a $7 billion portion of his IRA now to be devoted to rooftop solar for needy communities, to support 900,000 applicants across the country for having rooftop solar, additional incentives provided through states, counties, and governments, and NGOs to support individuals looking for rooftop solar, which by the way, is about three times more costly because it's so tiny. | ||
| to taxpayers than the utility-scale solar, which is a huge problem to begin with. | ||
| This is a gross misuse of funds when America needs an electricity increase, a drastic electricity increase in production of baseload, continuous duty, supercritical clean coal, gas, and nuclear power that produce energy all of the time. | ||
| He's messing around with massive incentives for tinker toys that work four and a half to 5.2 hours a day only, and intermittently so. | ||
| It's very, very sad. | ||
| In the middle of a totally necessary energy dearth that we're running into across the country, in Texas, in California, MISO, PJM, Tennessee, North Carolina, now noted for all-in electricity shortages due to the lack of power generation coming off of this part-time stuff. | ||
| As much as we mock Earth Day, I do think it is sort of an interesting either metaphor or parallel to draw another word, say, use, right, the pretext of a climate emergency, oh, impending doom, the hockey stick, to sort of use it as justification to implement this radical backwards, I mean, frankly, humanity last agenda. | ||
| I'm just curious, sort of extrapolating it to the broader initiatives that have been pushed by the Biden regime. | ||
| How do you reckon, how do you sort of make it make sense, as Steve would say, that they are pushing these policies that are just not conducive to Americans being able to heat their homes, have energy? | ||
| Is there something, you know, more sinister going on here? | ||
| What is the driving force behind this? | ||
| Oh, I think there is, because, Natalie, what you just said is patently obvious. | ||
| This is all about making the cost of living here drastically higher for average citizens, making it much more difficult for average citizens to subsist with a shortage of electricity and a shortage of fuel, oil, and gas. | ||
| So, what's behind this? | ||
| I'm going to tell you, in the industry I spent my life's work in, power generation, equipment supply. | ||
| Only seven years ago, China only had about one and a half, two percent of the market for that equipment. | ||
| That's about a 65 billion a year market in supplying equipment that makes electricity. | ||
| Turbines, generators, excitation equipment, wind and solar included. | ||
| China was about two percent of that U.S. | ||
| market. | ||
| The next 10 years, according to all the forecasts that now are only wind and solar battery storage in the main being installed and coal being shut down, China content will be 76% of the next 10 years electrical equipment supply for power generation. | ||
| They've won. | ||
| They've gone from 2% market share in this space to 75% market share. | ||
| And by the way, the aggregate market value has tripled because the cost of this stuff, on average, is two to three times more per kilowatt hour generated than combined cycle gas, nuclear, and coal. | ||
| It's much more costly. | ||
| Therefore, the sheer amount spent in the next 10 years is going to be far higher, but on far less kilowatt annual electricity. | ||
| Who's winning? | ||
| China's now got 75% of that market as the main supplier of solar panels, then film PV, inverters, and batteries for battery storage. | ||
| They've won. | ||
| So if you look what's behind this, in actual fact of what's happened, the results of this, That's the result. | ||
| They've swept the market. | ||
| They've swept the table in electrical energy supplying equipment supply. | ||
| This is amazing how this has happened in such a short time period. | ||
| I think if you look at Sinister, follow the money, that's what this has resulted in. | ||
| It's not about save the planet. | ||
| Because as we know, they're not doing this themselves. | ||
| They're building 350 new coal plants as we speak in China. | ||
| They're not doing this. | ||
| They're making manufacturing easier to manufacture more of this stuff to sell to the West to reduce energy supply in the West and make it all the more costly in the West. | ||
| Well, I don't think it's lost on anyone. | ||
| One of the Chinese companies that Hunter Biden was invested in was a firm called Yancol among a variety of Chinese energy companies. | ||
| But just to link this to what's going on currently in the news cycle, I mean, again, you know my background is in unrestricted warfare. | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party has been waging on us for decades. | ||
| And one of the, I would say, main kind of fields or domains of warfare that they're doing it in has to do with energy and energy security. | ||
| We know energy Security is national security. | ||
| But when we see what's going on today on these college campuses, right, Steve always says, don't miss the forest for the trees. | ||
| It's not just about the Israel-Palestine thing. | ||
| It is that you have a neo-Marxist class of people who are running those institutions, running those universities. | ||
| And I don't think it should be lost on anyone that so much of the academic backing, right, the institutional support for this kind of climate change ideology is emanating, is coming from higher education, right, is coming from these colleges. | ||
| How much do you think, whether it's the foreign money that's flowing into these universities, or just how have they sort of helped shape the discussion, shape the narrative, to really get us to a point where Joe Biden can push these America Last energy policies, yet simultaneously, you know, earn praise from that kind of sector of the political sphere who is just so intensely committed, devoted to this climate change cult? | ||
| I'm not pausing to be an expert in everything, but I was a trustee at the second largest university in the country for five years here in Florida. | ||
| The amount of research money that comes from our federal government and global governments on, let's say, proving the point of man-caused climate change, As solution-driven research, that is, we have the conclusion in the first place, and we want to build a factoid base to support the conclusion we have already, funded by the U.S. | ||
| government and foreign governments, is huge. | ||
| It's huge. | ||
| It dwarfs any funding of natural gas, oil and gas, coal-fired nuclear energy projects, for example. | ||
| So narrative-based funding in these institutions and the notorious left-wing management of them is a fact of life. | ||
| I personally, with my background in doing what I was doing as a trustee, was not surprised at all by the reaction of most liberal institutions, and most of them are across the country, on the topic of Hamas and Hezbollah when the invasion of Israel occurred last October. | ||
| Did not surprise me. | ||
| That's where these guys are coming from, on their belief set of No surprise there. | ||
| So, to your point, the conclusion-driven research is supposed to be about, hey, let's look at something and let's see where the facts take us, not start with a conclusion, for example, on global warming being man-caused. | ||
| There are numerous eminent scientists in the country who actually are housed at a couple of these places, Princeton and MIT, most notoriously, who have won Nobel Prizes who are saying in unison, no, this whole narrative is a false one, and if you do get into real science, It's easily proven to be the case on the notion, for example, of man-caused global warming. | ||
| But that's not the only thing. | ||
| Across the board of ESG topics that these institutions promote aggressively and brainwash their incoming on, you know, these are facts of life, where they're not. | ||
| Dave, if people want to follow you, keep up to date with all your analysis on all things, where can they go to do that? | ||
| You can reach me on Getter at DaveWalshEnergy and True Social the same. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Of course, thank you for joining us, and happy Earth Day! | ||
| Only 364 more days to go. | ||
| Our next guest is another one of my favorites, Colonel John Mills. | ||
| He always brings the presentations, the slides that I love from an aesthetic perspective, but on topics that I don't love from an aesthetic or geopolitical or national security perspective, and that is Chinese Communist Party Election interference. | ||
| I also want to get into what's happening in Niger with you. | ||
| But before we go there, you had a wonderful piece that I just loved. | ||
| I believe it was originally published in the Epoch Times, cross-posted to Gateway Pundit, and made the rounds on how the Chinese Communist Party waged active information, psychological, you could even in some ways say kinetic warfare, in Taiwan around their recent election. | ||
| And you sort of, you know, were raising the red flags, the warning signs about how they could potentially do Similar things here in the United States, and more importantly, how the Taiwanese government combated it. | ||
| So can you walk the audience through that piece a little bit, and then we can maybe get into on the other side, you know, how we should look at it here in the United States and sort of counter it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, absolutely. | |
| Thank you, Natalie, so much. | ||
| So I went to a press conference at the National Press Club by Taiwan. | ||
| about the outcome of the election. | ||
| And it was all about the malign fifth generation warfare of China to disrupt the election in January in Taiwan, before, during and after. | ||
| And it was just, it was an excellent session. | ||
| They had five experts from a number of different organizations, Uh, uh, private organizations, uh, research academics, uh, from one from the Taiwanese government. | ||
| And they talked about like the role of Tik TOK and that absolutely that was malign and intentional. | ||
| Uh, and it was almost as if the Tik TOK influencers had been handed a script. | ||
| And one day they were, uh, fashion experts. | ||
| The next day there was suddenly X election experts and did everything to so mistrust. | ||
| They also manipulated actual video footage. | ||
| One of them was of Rob Whitman, Virginia 1st District, where they totally took what he was saying in the real thing. | ||
| He was talking about Ukraine, but they manipulated his voice so that it sounded like he was talking about supporting the green candidate, the DPP, which is the Make Taiwan Great Again Party. | ||
| So this was clearly they were trying to create hate and discontent, but one major theme that stood out was the role of the on-the-ground collaborator or insider, and they went into great detail about this. | ||
| I was a bit surprised, but they provided, because you can have the best cyber influence operation, but you always need that person on the ground. | ||
| It helps adjust The message, it helps tweak the message. | ||
| It gives feedback and maybe even provides muscle. | ||
| Um, now, uh, when I was there in January, uh, they, they arrested like 200 of these, uh, Chinese, uh, influencers on the ground in Taiwan. | ||
| And they first did this back in January of 2020. | ||
| And, uh, they had to arrest far more back then, but even this time it was the number given was 200 could have been more. | ||
| And so with that, all of these are lessons learned for America, and especially with the great number of Chinese special operators coming across the unsecure southern border. | ||
| This is the muscle for the Summer of Love 24, which has already started with all the crazies, all the Palestinian crazies in New York and other places, and now add in They're on the ground provocateurs. | ||
| They're collaborators of those Chinese special operators. | ||
| And they're also, in America, they're always gravitating toward high cash operations, such as legal cannabis. | ||
| Bad idea. | ||
| And then massage parlors. | ||
| Gambling. | ||
| They actually gravitate toward those, and there's actually been a lot of Chinese on Chinese violence and murder inside the United States, but this is their on-the-ground collaborators. | ||
| So just like in Taiwan, they had on-the-ground collaborators to help tweak their cyber manipulation and their TikTok message, they have a lot of special operators on the ground inside of America. | ||
| That's their muscle for 2024 and the summer of love that has already started. | ||
| Can you walk us through a little bit more some of the other operations whether it's the social media side of things the actual I always say I know you know unrestricted warfare they prefer infiltration as opposed to invasion but I think you could have a serious discussion about whether or not what's going on at the southern border constitutes Some form of kinetic warfare in some sense of the term. | ||
| But do you see any other instances of these election interference techniques already happening or sort of laying the groundwork as we get closer to November? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I think TikTok in America, no question, is is that same vehicle. | |
| If you just look at the demographics of who uses it, the user base, and that, again, you have all these influencers. | ||
| And that's one of the interesting carve-outs in this possible TikTok legislation is, it's a carve-out if you're a Product review or you you're just you're just giving reviews on restaurants or this or that well what's to prevent these folks from all of a sudden flipping a switch like they did in Taiwan and One day they're a fashion influencer the next day. | ||
| They're giving all these coded messages. | ||
| Don't trust the election system Trump is gonna try to take over Trump is gonna kill people. | ||
| Yeah things like that which is what was happening in In Taiwan, the fashion influencer suddenly was an expert in everything about elections. | ||
| So TikTok is definitely going to be used here. | ||
| I think Facebook, they put out a lot of hate and discontent messages in Taiwan. | ||
| The U.S. | ||
| can't be trusted. | ||
| I found this one interesting. | ||
| Don't trust U.S. | ||
| pork. | ||
| This is interesting. | ||
| China gets a lot of its pork from North Carolina and Iowa. | ||
| So they get like 50% of their pork from America. | ||
| So should Chinese not trust America or should they not trust their own government, which has to import 50% of their pork? | ||
| So they put out a lot of message streams that are clearly intended to create hate and discontent. | ||
| And so there might be some success in throttling TikTok They're just going to move to other social media forums to create this hate and discontent in America toward each other. | ||
| So they'll, you know, don't trust the, don't trust Trump, don't trust the Republicans. | ||
| Oh, you know, something we're going to have another, you know, it's, it was racism, no matter what the issue was, it's racism. | ||
| They're definitely going to stoke a, and they use, they use TikTok to create that digital twin. | ||
| And, oh, this was an interesting thing. | ||
| In Taiwan, they noticed about 10% of the messages were tailored to the individual user. | ||
| They were replaying back to an individual user a very finely tuned feed because they knew everything about that person through their digital twin program. | ||
| They knew what they liked, what they disliked, what triggered them. | ||
| And so positive and negative reinforcement. | ||
| So transgender movement here, you know, the transgender movement here just gets reinforced with all this. | ||
| People hate you. | ||
| People will love you if you go through the transition. | ||
| It's just they know how to pull, just spin these people into the ceiling because they've used big data, big data analytics and AI to regurgitate right back to them a tailored feed. | ||
| And that's also important, the tailored feed. | ||
| And if it's not TikTok, it could be coming from Facebook or other ones. | ||
| I have to say, in defense of the fashion expert turned election expert, kind of you myself is one of those nine get it getting out every undetected but i'm great yes and strong animus towards that tick-tock fashion influencers i'm sure that i'm not the uh... probably shares you in that sentiment and and rightfully so uh... but speaking of uh... animus and animosity i guess that | ||
| the nigerian government also has that towards the united states has that for a pivot What was it, a thousand troops being sort of evacuated? | ||
| We've spent, what, over a billion dollars there, sort of a smaller scale, Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. | ||
| Another botched withdrawal, probably only get worse under Joe Biden. | ||
| I'll hold you through the break because we only got three minutes, but I want to let you start and I'll interrupt you and we got to jump, but walk us through what is happening in Niger. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, this is an embarrassing failure of statecraft. | |
| We have a lot of special operators in Niger to interdict the Trans-Sahara Islamic extremist activity, which has been going, it goes back thousands of years. | ||
| But I think this is ultimately, though, a failure of State Department. | ||
| And this is this is the the why we have to read, you know, totally reset some of these departments and agencies like State Department. | ||
| State Department has become excellent at lecturing down to these poor, pathetic countries and essentially holding foreign aid hostage unless they | ||
| adapt to really important themes such as transgenderism and it is literally they will prioritize these issues and and and so number one you know alternative lifestyles transgenderism and in Niger you you you don't you better start showing that militant Antifa transgender flag or else and these countries this is this is horrible horrible statecraft Niger is putting is | ||
| It's M-N-G-A. | ||
| It's making Niger great again. | ||
| They're going, look, we're being lectured on, we don't agree with this, and we're going to focus on Niger interests. | ||
| Colonel Mills, I want to hold you through the break, but I'm just curious, do you see this as just a continuation of what is it, country number four, five, six, that the Biden regime has just routinely failed, despite lecturing the Trump and Maga movement, right, that we're the ones who are destroying democracy? | ||
| We have no—right, they're the experts. | ||
| Trust the experts. | ||
| All their, you know, degrees from the Kennedy School and where Johns Hopkins, the Strategic Institute, whatever, the one that all the Chinese money flows through, up there. | ||
| But isn't it—can't we rest the case? | ||
| These are not the experts in the room. | ||
| They don't know what they're doing. | ||
| I mean, their track record is just abysmal, right? | ||
| Can you sort of broaden in the context of what this is happening in? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, absolutely. | |
| I've seen it firsthand so many times. | ||
| This is a victory of just imperious lecturing down to, and our diplomatic corps should be advocating America first, which does not mean niche, obscure issues like transgenderism. | ||
| And and they will or or you know you poor pathetic country you're not green enough And so you better make sure you're recycling everything it is just bat guano crazy elitism lecturing down to a country that can't feed itself and These issues that we focus on make no sense, and the state permit... And Colonel Mills, I'm gonna hold you through the break, but no, I sometimes go through the USA Spending Database website. | ||
| The grants that we fund in these countries, I mean, I'm talking like transgender dance class. | ||
| They're not making it up. | ||
| They're not just talking points. | ||
| It's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
| Warren Posse, we'll be right back after this break. | ||
| We got Colonel Mills, Bradley Devlin, Naomi Wolf, the Hoff Brothers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room Battleground with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| We still got Colonel Mills with us. | ||
| Now, Colonel Mills, I gotta let you go. | ||
| We got a bunch more news to get through, but just real quick, where should The War Room Posse kind of be looking when it comes to the news with Niger and everything happening there? | ||
| Do you think this is gonna be another kind of Afghanistan-esque failure, or where do you think the trajectory is leading? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, we have a thousand troops essentially. | |
| Now, somebody wrote an email to one of our Congress members saying they were essentially, well, he used the word, I don't think he literally meant hostage, but essentially they were locked down. | ||
| So this is not a good situation from a security, but also just a waste of resources because we have a thousand troops takes a lot of support to make sure they're, Colonel Mills, as always, thank you for joining us. | ||
| If people want to follow you, get the charts, get the Substack, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| in case something like Benghazi happens. | ||
| This is a very bad situation, so watch this space. | ||
| Ultimately, this is a failure of State Department and just an absolutely lame State Department that likes to lecture, not actually do anything. | ||
| Colonel Mills, as always, thank you for joining us. | ||
| If people wanna follow you, get the charts, get the sub stack, where can they go to do all that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you so much, Natalie. | |
| Yes, Colonel Rhett John, Colonel R-E-T, John, Substack, Getter, and Truth in the two books, War Against the Deep State and The Nation Will Follow on MyStore. | ||
| Use code WAROOM. | ||
| And those are autographed copies. | ||
| First book forward by Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Thank you so much, Natalie. | ||
| I think I know that guy. | ||
| Colonel Mills, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Natalie. | |
| Take care. | ||
| We got Dr. Naomi Wolf joining us too. | ||
| Speaking of information warfare, you know, her team over at the Daily Cloud, they're always charging ahead, exposing the truly information warfare that the big pharma medical industrial complex have been waging on us when it comes to a lot of things, but particularly the COVID-19 vaccine, gene therapy, whatever you want to call it. | ||
| But Dr. Wolf, I hear you have some new numbers when it comes to, wow, no coincidence there, fertility and reproductive issues. | ||
| When it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine, if you want to walk us through those figures. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| I mean, it's heartbreaking, but it's also so important. | ||
| This is the first large-scale study, large-scale analysis using government data, government medical data that proves what, as you know, I've been trying to sound the alarm for since June of 2021. | ||
| And it's a very important summary by my colleague Amy Kelly of Daily Clout, the head of the War Room Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers Analysis Project. | ||
| And so basically what I'm sad to say the headline is, is that there are massive now fertility harms both for women and for men subsequent to receiving the mRNA injections. | ||
| So this is exactly what the group found. | ||
| So Amy Kelly worked with a Canadian group that's very well respected called Canadian COVID Care Alliance, and Canadian COVID Care Alliance obtained data starting in January 2015 right up until December 2022 from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing code data via two Freedom of Information requests. | ||
| So the reason that's important to know is that Canada has socialized medicine. | ||
| So by making these FOIA requests, this group got a massive tranche of primary documentation of real Canadians Real non-emergency healthcare diagnoses and insurance claims, obviously with the privacy redacted. | ||
| So this is just the best possible data you can get. | ||
| So what they found is that there was a particular emphasis on female reproductive health and female cancer insurance billing codes. | ||
| They found that menstrual disorders codes had trended down from 2015 to 2019 but in 2021, Which is of course when COVID vaccines became widely pushed on the Canadian population, that changed. | ||
| And that post-2021, the billing data for these insurers showed a massive bump upwards for fertility problems. | ||
| There was a code for menopausal and post-menopausal bleeding, which again I've been trying to call everyone's attention to as a serious danger sign. | ||
| It increased in 2021 and 2022 once much of the Canadian population had been vaccinated for COVID. | ||
| Menstrual disorders as a whole of women of all ages increased in 2021 and 2022. | ||
| So did female infertility, unsurprisingly. | ||
| Also, there was a code 629 Not to get graphic, it's other disorders of female genital organs. | ||
| This showed a marked increase in diagnoses in 2021 and 2022. | ||
| Now it gets super sad. | ||
| Missed incomplete or complete abortion, meaning miscarriages or spontaneous abortion, notably escalated after the widespread uptake of COVID vaccines, the code 634, which is when the baby dies, basically in utero. | ||
| Not only did women's fertility and babies get damaged appreciably, but male fertility suffered as well, and I'm just about done with this summary. | ||
| Live births in 2021 through 2022 remain lower than up until 2020. | ||
| And lastly, the Code 606, which codes an insurance for male infertility, oligospermia, which is low sperm count, and azoospermia, absence of sperm altogether, in the semen showed a notable increase in both 2021 and 2022, way up from 2019. | ||
| So that's it, Natalie. | ||
| We have the smoking gun at last. | ||
| Unfortunately, the first major, you know, multi tens of thousands of Canadians, their real insurance data, real billing codes really show post-menopausal bleeding, menstrual dysregulation, menstrual disorders, | ||
| Dying babies, dead babies, spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, no sperm in the semen, which is a condition I've literally never heard of before, impaired sperm count, horrible, horrible harms to fertility starting in 2021 when the vaccines rolled out on the population. | ||
| Truly outstanding. | ||
| People have got to read the paper, I'm sure, the analysis. | ||
| It's so much to take in, written out. | ||
| I'm sure it'll still be a lot to take in, but people, I'm sure, will want to drill down and see all the numbers. | ||
| I've got to let you go, but before you give us your socials, if people want to read the story, what's the best way to access it? | ||
| Right, it's up on dailyclout.io, Amy Kelly's fantastic summary, crunching down this very detailed set of presentations by Canadian COVID Care Alliance, And you can also support us on DailyClout.io. | ||
| Please support the War Room Daily Clout experts who are doing this incredible life-saving work. | ||
| And this is really a clip and a link that you need to send to your loved ones, to your daughters, your granddaughters, your sons, and to your providers, and to your representatives. | ||
| Sadly, the evidence is finally in, and it's catastrophic. | ||
| Thank you for supporting us and helping us. | ||
| And thank you War Room Posse. | ||
| Of course, and if people want to follow you, where can they go to do that? | ||
| Sorry, I'm on Outspoken on Substack. | ||
| You saved the best for last. | ||
| That's very kind. | ||
| I'm on Outspoken on Substack, and I'll be interviewing Amy Kelly later today, so I'll put that interview up on my Substack, Outspoken, and also on dailycloud.io. | ||
| Thank you, everybody. | ||
| Thank you, Dr. Wolf. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Warren Posse, we're really covering all the topics today. | ||
| We've got Bradley Devlin from the American Conservative. | ||
| Now, last time I had you on, I'm having a little bit of deja vu. | ||
| We were talking about Speaker Johnson and how he's failing. | ||
| The only question is, will Democrats bail him out? | ||
| But now you're on, I think we want to talk a little bit more about his Senate counterpart, Mitch McConnell, when he's not glitching out. | ||
| More concerned with the borders of Ukraine, which I guess is maybe a prerequisite for working on Capitol Hill nowadays. | ||
| There's a great story coming, just a quick shout out to the D.C. | ||
| Young Republicans, Kingsley Cortez, John Wilson, they have a great leadership committee. | ||
| They exposed how one of the top staffers in Speaker Mike Johnson's office I believe retracted or wanted to retract her dues because the club was bold and endorsed President Trump And she threw a hissy fit Via email and said I don't want to be affiliated with this club that shows you are up against In the swamp shout out to Kingsley and John they're great But Bradley if you could sort of walk us through some of the recent remarks all it all let you Have the audience get triggered You can say them. | ||
| But what Mitch McConnell is saying with regards to Russia and Ukraine and just more broadly how the swamp is just in action. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Natalie. | |
| Last time we spoke, we were thinking about what's going to happen with the motion to vacate. | ||
| We think Dems are going to push this foreign aid package across the line, and they did over the weekend. | ||
| Now it turns to the Senate, where the deliberation process is going to be extremely limited as well. | ||
| Senators only have an hour to speak. | ||
| Only a few of them are going to be able to delay these procedural and ultimately the final vote on this package. | ||
| And Mitch McConnell gets what he wants in the end. | ||
| I mean, it's just disgusting how the inside the Beltway Press Corps, Politico and Punchbowl, who rely on access to leadership to make, to pay the bills, they're just salivating over Mitch McConnell and his genius. | ||
| But in reality, I mean, obviously these Inside the Beltway publications don't want conservatives to win. | ||
| So they're happy to support Mitch McConnell in his efforts to undermine everything that Republicans stand for just before the November election and side with the deep state and the establishment. | ||
| uh... and so much mcconnell they're they're trying to portray him as this big winner in reality we have a lame duck in the senate and because of his incompetence in pushing all of this on to speaker mike johnson which by johnson wears a lot of the blame but he he was under a lot of pressure now we essentially have to lame duck leaders uh... | ||
| You know, if I was in the House or if I was in the Senate, I'd say, OK, enough of this. | ||
| We are closed for business until the election. | ||
| We're going to have a referendum on all of these things. | ||
| And number one in that referendum is the border. | ||
| And we have been unable to do anything about it because Mitch McConnell has undermined that process at every turn. | ||
| And Johnson has decided to go with Ukraine and Israel aid. | ||
| Rather than securing the southern border. | ||
| So it is really disgusting to just see the establishment in action, just how clear they are about hating the priorities of the MAGA movement, of Republican voters, of the war room posse. | ||
| It's just so brazen. | ||
| And then they take a victory lap about it. | ||
| Aren't I so great at this whole democracy thing when I don't listen to my constituents? | ||
| Yeah, I know, I'm pretty awesome. | ||
| You don't hate the media and you don't hate these representatives enough, Natalie. | ||
| It's hard to believe, but you don't. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I feel like I may hate them enough. | ||
| I think I moved out of D.C. | ||
| because of my animosity towards them. | ||
| But I'm just curious, and you may not, just your hypothesis on this, but do you think that Speaker Johnson was always sort of captured by this class, or do you think when he ascended to that role, whether it was, you know, the closed door CIA briefings on what's going on in Ukraine, all that intel stuff, the, you know, just proximity to power kind of turned him into a, you know, McConnell-esque It's a good question. | ||
| Do you think we ever really had a chance with Speaker Johnson? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a good question. I think right now, I'm holding out hope for sort of a conservative reversion to, for Mike Johnson, if let's say conservatives gain ground in the House come 2025. | |
| I'm holding out hope for that. | ||
| It's a slim hope. | ||
| But yeah, I mean, he's been very open and honest about the reason he's changed his mind is because they go to the SCIF and basically the intelligence agencies bully people into doing what they want. | ||
| Oh, you want warrants for American citizens? | ||
| Well, guess what? | ||
| You're going to be responsible for the next 9-11. | ||
| And Mike Johnson is a good and decent and faithful human being, and he thinks, wow, that's a terrible thing. | ||
| So it's almost like we have someone who's too decent for the job inside the job, and he gets run over for it, which is a really, really sad thing. | ||
| I think what it really speaks to, though, is just how different the priorities are, even amongst the kind of red meat-coated Republicans in Congress. | ||
| Their number one priority was getting aid to Israel. | ||
| That's not any commentary on the Israel lobby or anything like that. | ||
| It's just they were all against Ukraine aid, and then all of a sudden Israel's brought into the equation, and they decide to vote for a rule that would ensure a bulk of this $95 billion, $60 billion, is going to go to Ukraine. | ||
| And, oh, we'll deal with that because $26 billion is going to go to Israel, and we won't touch the border, right? | ||
| Like, that was an acceptable tradeoff. | ||
| Meanwhile, I think the American people and conservative voters see that Israel is doing just a fine job prosecuting this war, right? | ||
| They're not running out of weapons. | ||
| They have made 100 different arms purchases from the United States since October 7th. | ||
| and they don't seem limited in being able to wage that war. | ||
| So, you know, what's the point? | ||
| And it shows that their priorities are often with prosecuting unpopular wars, even for American allies, right? | ||
| Ukraine is not an ally of America in any meaningful sense. | ||
| Well, Israel is, but they're more interested in war and borders of other countries than they are our own. | ||
| And that's really, really telling about where we're at as the Republican Party. | ||
| They want to get rid of the MAGA movement. | ||
| We're coming up against the end of the show, so I've got to cut you off. | ||
| I'll be back. | ||
| But if people want to follow you, get The American Conservative, where can they go to read it and follow you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, go to TheAmericanConservative.com. | |
| We'll be covering this as we have been throughout the past few weeks. | ||
| Go to my Twitter, at Bradley Devlin. | ||
| You'll see my stories posted there, as well as some... We're going to poke some fun at some people on there. | ||
| We love that. | ||
| Bradley, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for having me. | |
| And Warren Posse, while you're going to follow him, maybe go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| We don't trust the experts. | ||
| We don't trust the elites, especially when it comes to what they're doing with the Fed and anything financial. | ||
| Gold has always been ahead, as Steve always says, and you've got to go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| Maybe while you're at it, you go to MyPatriotSupply2. | ||
| Joe Reek and the team, they can get you set up. | ||
| They have wonderful financing deals available. | ||
| I'm very into the whole prepping stuff. | ||
| I have been ever since I was a kid, probably explains how I ended up here in the War Room, and that's why I love my Patriot supplies, so you gotta go check them out. | ||
| I also love The Gateway Pundit and the work that the Hoff Brothers do. | ||
| We got Jim Hoff joining us to really what is, I think you guys called it, the kind of sleeper issue of the 2024 election. | ||
| Some great work coming from True the Vote, showing what is it, 1.7, I believe, million new shady voter registrations in Texas. | ||
| Can you walk the audience through the latest story on The Gateway Pundit? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Natalie, thank you for having me on. | |
| This is the most important issue in my mind for 2024. | ||
| We have to stop these bogus registrations, or Democrats come out on election night and you're wondering, where did they find those 500,000 extra votes? | ||
| In 2020, we saw that the polling stations were all empty in the inner cities during the day, but then at night they suddenly have You know, late night ballot drops and they overcome Trump's tremendous lead in all the swing states. | ||
| And then Joe Biden's declared the winner. | ||
| What we've been working on since the 2020 election at the gateway pundit is voter rolls. | ||
| And cleaning up the voter rolls. | ||
| If Democrats don't have the millions upon millions of extra names on these rolls, they cannot win. | ||
| That's my theory. | ||
| That's my hypothesis. | ||
| And so what happened in Texas, which of course is a state that Democrats are shooting for, a report came out that 1.2 million ballots were registered that were registered that only had The last four digits of the social security number on these on these registrations and that number may be high. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What we found at Gateway Pundit is 1.7 million registrations were clocked for Texas in 2020, and so far there's been 1.2 million since 2020 to 2024 of new registrations in Texas. | |
| Think of that. | ||
| 1.2 million registrations. | ||
| We don't know who these people are. | ||
| What this goes back to, Natalie, and I spoke to you about this earlier, a few months ago, and that was our story on GBI strategies. | ||
| Democrats are pumping millions of dollars into these get out the vote agencies, these leftist organizations, to register voters. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But what we found was that they were actually filling out fraudulent registrations in Michigan, 8 to 10,000 in just one county. | |
| And we know now, Natalie, and I wish I had more time to explain this, but we know now that there are these groups in every state. | ||
| The GBI changed its name around the country when it was operating in all of the battleground states. | ||
| We don't even know some of the names that they use. | ||
| We know that they hide themselves. | ||
| They're shell groups. | ||
| We also know that in Michigan they were tied to Empower Michigan, which had the same address as the Democrat Party in the state. | ||
| So this is how Democrats are registering all of these, I believe, phony registrations. | ||
| We found that in Michigan in 2020. | ||
| And this is what their strategy is. | ||
| They're running a guy who can't even speak. | ||
| They can't put two sentences together. | ||
| Can you imagine if Joe Biden ran in 2000 or 1996 or 1998? | ||
| He would have been shellacked. | ||
| But now today, all of a sudden, Democrats have this very unpopular candidate who doesn't even go campaign, who can barely speak. | ||
| That should be the giveaway that the fix is in. | ||
| The Democrats are ready to steal this election also. | ||
| And I think the one thing we must do is to crack down on these voter rolls and these fake voter registrations. | ||
| And we know now some of the groups that are doing this and we know that in Texas things better wash out because if they get a million or two million of these extra registrations, that's enough to flip the state. | ||
| So people need to be aware of this. | ||
| I think it's frightening. | ||
| And I wish I would have done a better job explaining this, but that's what's going on with the Democrats today. | ||
| And we see that they've tripled or quadrupled the amount of funding into these groups that get out the vote. | ||
| And Jim, we're coming up against the end of the show, so I've got to cut in, but if people want to follow you, where can they go to do that? | ||
| And if they want to read the story, how do they get it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Natalie. | |
| It's on TheGatewayPundit.com. | ||
| It's one of our top stories today. | ||
| It's getting a lot of traction. | ||
| I'm not surprised. | ||
| And you did a great job explaining it. | ||
| They intentionally make it hard. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, thank you. | |
| There's a lot there. | ||
| Thank you, Jim. | ||
| You have a good one. | ||
| There's always a lot there. | ||
| You know where else there is always a lot? | ||
| Public Square! | ||
| You gotta go there. | ||
| The Patriot Parallel Economy. | ||
| How's that for a segue? | ||
| PublicSquare.com. | ||
| Support businesses that don't hate you, that actually love this country, and that are not involved in all this neo-Marxist Anti-America hatred. | ||
| It's Natalie Winters and Steve Bannon. | ||
| We'll be back tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. |
Export Selection