Feb. 1, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:48
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Okay, we've gone through one month already in this historic year of Remember, there are | ||
| Decades in which nothing happens and then there are weeks in which decades happen I think in one of those years a what they call these types of years hinges of history We're definitely in the middle of it I want to go back to the RNC for a second and I'm gonna get Harnwell and Darren Beatty going to join me here in a moment I think congressman Boebert's gonna come in a little while This RNC situation President Trump, it's like it's like trying to go against | ||
| This well-oiled machine with like a car that's got one flat. | ||
| It shouldn't be lost on you because there's no coincidences in politics. | ||
| Biden announced in the New York Times, I think gave him an exclusive, they announced a quarter of a billion dollars, two hundred and fifty million dollars, a buy for TV, radio and digital in seven battleground states. | ||
| Now, there's a poll out yesterday morning consult or maybe the day before this shows that Trump is up The Daily Mail made a huge big deal about it, which I think was great. | ||
| But Trump is up in all seven of those states, all seven, according to Morning Consult, which is not a pro-right wing or pro-Trump polling service. | ||
| I think overall he's up 48-42. | ||
| Now there was obviously the Quinnipiac that came out about Trump's got a problem with independents. | ||
| He's got real big problems with women. | ||
| He's got a big problem with these Swifties, that sort of thing. | ||
| Shows him down six and really losing ground among women and particularly independents. | ||
| So look you're gonna see a lot of polling live data, but you know the Biden, understanding it's about the battlegrounds, announced a quarter of a billion dollars, $250 million. | ||
| We have spent, and Biden didn't have a primary. | ||
| He's got, you know, Bobby Kennedy running around, but he's going around as a libertarian because they bounced him out. | ||
| They didn't have a primary. | ||
| They should close them all out. | ||
| You got the guy from the Congressman from Minnesota. | ||
| He's wandering around. | ||
| He's got like 10 people because they cut him off. | ||
| The DNC cut him off just like the RNC could have cut him off. | ||
| I said in this speech, if You don't believe that Trump won in 2020. | ||
| It was stolen. | ||
| You shouldn't be a senior party. | ||
| You shouldn't be a senior member of the RNC. | ||
| You just shouldn't. | ||
| It's not a loyalty test. | ||
| It's a logic test because the whole thing flows from that. | ||
| And we wouldn't have spent $350 million. | ||
| Remember in economics, you have two types of costs, the types of costs that cost you money and resources. | ||
| You look at that. | ||
| Hey, here's what it's going to cost me. | ||
| But the other is opportunity cost. | ||
| What could I've done with this? | ||
| These resources by taking another course of action. | ||
| What does that course of action looks like? | ||
| That's why you do so many financial models and perturbations. | ||
| To make sure that you can refine your thinking, your assumptions. | ||
| Where would we be today with $350 million? | ||
| Are the 120 in TV ads that Ron the Robot took from all the donors and Nikki Haley and all this. | ||
| It was a complete vanity play. | ||
| Let's be blunt. | ||
| There's a huge story in Politico this morning. | ||
| It's not just about Nikki Haley and donors and TV. | ||
| It gets down to the heart of it. | ||
| They said, Hey, Trump's a populist nationalist and has a fair, fairly well-defined directional set of policies that the American people have never had before. | ||
| And that's why a lot of his base love him. | ||
| And said, Nikki Haley is running on a playbook that is failed in these ideas of 30 and 40, 50 years old, neoliberal neoconism. | ||
| And it just doesn't resonate in the world as it is today, because so many of those policies created the mess that we're in today. | ||
| This is Poloko. | ||
| It's a very, I think I've got it up on getter. | ||
| It's a brilliant analysis. | ||
| And this is why I keep saying, and this is why when president Trump calls her bird brain, I kind of laugh because she's this kind of bird brain ism. | ||
| Just to repeat this mantra over and over again. | ||
| The opposite forces we have are all converging to come together in one fist. | ||
| Behind a guy that you see today from the O'Keefe tape, that people in the White House say he's got dementia. | ||
| That's not War Room, or it's not the John Fredericks radio show, or it's not Charlie Kirk that follows us at noon, or Jack Posobiec. | ||
| And yeah, a lot of us get on, talk smack all the time, see him at the microphone. | ||
| This is the people inside the White House saying it's an open secret. | ||
| That he's got it. | ||
| Which, hey, I would think the guys in the house might have a hearing like this afternoon on the national security side to make sure, hey, who's actually got their finger on the trigger here if Joe's fading in and out. | ||
| And his staff knows that, particularly the cyber staff. | ||
| So this thing with the RNC is very important. | ||
| And if President Trump, because of his advisors, doesn't make a decision, well, then we're going to make a decision. | ||
| We're impossibly going to say, hey, here's how much money they're going to raise. | ||
| None. | ||
| Just none. | ||
| And don't take it the wrong way. | ||
| RAV did the special yesterday, coming from the documents, I think, from the great reporter over at Red State, who did the analysis last year that showed where their money went. | ||
| She did an update, and somebody leaked her the documents. | ||
| Somebody who wanted to get those documents out. | ||
| And what did they say? | ||
| They haven't changed their spending. | ||
| It's still basically the same thing. | ||
| So, it hasn't changed. | ||
| And all they've done, and now Ron is running around, yes, we have to have a resolution. | ||
| We need a resolution that proclaims that President Trump's the presumptive nominee. | ||
| Stop it. | ||
| Knock it off. | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| You created this situation. | ||
| You can't save your job by running around saying this and going on TV and saying, yes, if things continue as they are, he's the presumptive nominee. | ||
| Stop it. | ||
| You created this mess. | ||
| You created the potential, the platform to spend and waste that money. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why? | |
| Because you wanted to be a big shot with the folks at Fox News, ABC, CNN, have the New York Times talk to you, have be on TV, all puffed up of your importance. | ||
| And this is where we are, where we have an election that the nation hangs in the balance. | ||
| So therefore everything ought to be, and you look at the good folks That Charlie Kirk got out there for this Restoring National Confidence and that conference was magnificent and to see the volunteers and the county chairs and the precinct committee people and others from the state parties and I think 50 or 60 national committeemen and all coming together and workshops in detail and all these different voter IDs and paper ballots and get out to vote and voter integrity all in their own nickel? | ||
| Do you imagine what we'd do if we had the $350 million funding that? | ||
| This is not a game, and they play it like it's a game. | ||
| This is why people hate the Republican Party. | ||
| This is why MAGA's disgusted with it, because you're just an old country club talking about old ideas. | ||
| You don't understand this Republicans hanging the balance, and one of the reasons is you're nothing but controlled opposition, and it's what got us here. | ||
| Of course the Democrats hate America, and they're radical. | ||
| And they've planned and plotted and executed and exacerbated an invasion on the southern border. | ||
| And look at what they've done in our schools, look at what they've done in society, look at the rot in New York City, and look at the rot in Chicago and LA, just look at it. | ||
| Can't get away from it, but look at it. | ||
| They've only got two nodes in the country, they only have two clusters, university towns from all these radicals on the university staffs and what they've done, the propaganda they put in these kids' heads, and the big urban areas, the cosmopolitan areas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Other than that, the country's totally MAGA. | |
| And half of the votes in the cosmopolitan area is, hey, who knows who they are, what they are, or where they're from, to be blunt. | ||
| Like in Philadelphia, where they stole the 2020 election from Donald J. Trump. | ||
| In Atlanta, in Phoenix, in Detroit, just Philadelphia. | ||
| I'll just start some random, some random places. | ||
| Milwaukee. | ||
| On top of all this, you've got another fiasco. | ||
| This is one lie after the other. | ||
| Let's pivot. | ||
| I want to play the cold open. | ||
| Let's go back. | ||
| I've got to play this on Ukraine, because you have to see where your money's going. | ||
| We have breaking news tonight as a major shake-up is potentially underway for Ukraine's military. | ||
| Sources are telling CNN that President Zelensky has now informed his country's top military commander that he has been fired. | ||
| The move, almost two years after Russia's invasion began, comes after weeks of speculation about tensions between the two of them Zelensky and his army chief Valery Zeluzny, I should say. | ||
| It's just remarkable because there have been these tensions between them, but this, if it happens, would be the biggest shake-up that we have seen. | ||
| How significant do you believe that this is? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it could be significant. | |
| General Zelushny has done, by all accounts, a very good job under difficult circumstances. | ||
| He wasn't able to pull off this big counter-offensive that you reported on for a long time. | ||
| But in the beginning of this war, the big war, when the Russians were coming down on Kiev, General Zelushny and other generals, I mean, there are other generals there that did a very good job with him. | ||
| Succeeded. | ||
| It's been hard for the last year. | ||
| So a lot will depend on who takes his place, if it happens. | ||
| I mean, as you said, it's not official yet. | ||
| Yeah, what we're hearing is that it could happen as soon as Friday. | ||
| If it does go forward, as sources are telling CNN tonight, that it is expected to happen, that he already informed him of this on Monday. | ||
| Is it because of the failed counteroffensive that we did report on in the fall? | ||
| Or is it because of the comments that General Zelensky made in that interview with The Economist back in November that kind of sent shockwaves everywhere because he said it was a stalemate? | ||
|
unidentified
|
He said it was a stalemate, and the President said it was not a stalemate. | |
| Frankly, both were right. | ||
| You could do that either way. | ||
| The lines hadn't changed, therefore stalemate, but there was progress. | ||
| The Ukrainians were making progress on the waters, in the Black Sea, in the air, shooting down some airplanes. | ||
| So you could say, the President could say, it's not a stalemate, we're actually making some progress. | ||
| General Zelensky was looking at whether or not the lines moved very much, and he said it was. | ||
| He may not be a household name, Zelensky, in America. | ||
| Obviously, President Zelensky is incredibly well-known since the war almost two years ago began. | ||
| But he's incredibly popular in Kyiv and in Ukraine. | ||
| I mean, what could the fallout be, potentially, from this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The president needs to have a good feel for, confidence in his senior military. | |
| If they make some progress on the ground, if they make some progress on the battlefield, with a new general to take General Zelensky's place, and as I say, there are good candidates, then we'll look back and say, well, actually, maybe that was the right thing. | ||
| But you're exactly right. | ||
| General Zelensky is almost revered by soldiers, by civilians, by the private sector, by the government. | ||
| He is a very popular man. | ||
| As, of course, is the President. | ||
| But this is going to be a difficult one for them to get. | ||
| I'm here. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| As long as Congress didn't approve financial aid for Ukraine yet, what makes you sure that we will have this aid finally? | ||
| Maybe you have some plan B or something? | ||
| Well, let me start by saying the American people understand and admire the miracle That Ukraine has already achieved in defending itself against this vicious Russian aggression. | ||
| And they also understand what happens if you cannot continue not only to survive, but to thrive. | ||
| And so I have great confidence that that understanding will be reflected in the vote that the Congress makes on this request of President Biden. | ||
| You see how excited Zelensky is, how excited about to have Victoria Nuland? | ||
| And Victoria Nuland's the architect of this from 2014. | ||
| They got her out there in a square in the freezing cold in the middle of the night when she gets off the plane. | ||
| There's no inside the presidential palace. | ||
| Zelensky's not sitting next to her and says, oh, this is my wingman. | ||
| Completely abandoned. | ||
| She's the one that's the driver of this. | ||
| The blood is on her hands. | ||
| But the American people, this enormous success. | ||
| Jim Rickards was on this show last week. | ||
| He said there's 500,000 dead. | ||
| The country looks like Dresden in 1945. | ||
| The country's been destroyed and that's the architect of the color revolution and now she's over there. | ||
| You know why she's over there? | ||
| They're trying to suck 60 billion dollars of American taxpayers to kill more Ukrainians. | ||
| Now you got the army who can't meet their goals of 500,000 people. | ||
| They got to go Shanghai or press gang. | ||
| They can't find any young people to fight anymore because they understand the military part of it's over. | ||
| You see Bill Taylor, that liar, who was the ambassador, who was part of the Trump impeachment, and he's sitting there, he can't even, when Kaitlan Collins blows his head up, the failed, the failed spring offensive, and he's like, you can't say that, you can't say that on CNN or MSNBC. | ||
| Stavridis, Victoria Nuland, until the crimes of these people are exposed, the blood of the Ukrainian people is indelible on their hands. | ||
| The blood is on their hands. | ||
| And now it's time to say not one more penny as the military in Ukraine makes a move on the corrupt oligarchs Zelensky and his boys. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| bobert baby ben harwell all next here's your host steven k okay comes from over from colorado joins us She's kind of what we call a budget hawk. | ||
| So, Congressman, help our audience out here because we're totally confused. | ||
| You have a massive fight on this budget. | ||
| It's going to end up another CR. | ||
| You guys are all fighting the fight, you know, the just, you know, the $2 trillion deficit. | ||
| Then we've got A supplemental, which is, I don't know, $100 billion, but $60 billion to the money laundering operation in Ukraine. | ||
| A taste to the border, but not one penny to the border wall. | ||
| You guys are fighting that. | ||
| Then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, comes this, it comes to child credit, which is a Keynesian infusion, more stimulus economy we don't need. | ||
| It helps Biden with his voters, but more importantly, we had Herritsch on yesterday, it's $1.5 trillion to the deficit. | ||
| How does Johnson, who swore... | ||
| You know, Mr. Christian worldview at the prayer being today, big crocodile tear coming down. | ||
| And when they sing the song and he's rubbing up on Biden, he swears he will never rely on Democrat votes again. | ||
| He suspends the rules because he needs all the Democrats and they pass an expansion of welfare. | ||
| And in addition for illegal aliens, that heritage says could add $1.5 trillion to the deficit. | ||
| How does that happen, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, this is part of the swamp's frustration. | |
| People are so irritated with what happens here in Washington, D.C. | ||
| because we talk about all the wonderful things that we could do, the way that we could cut spending. | ||
| Heck, my friends in the Freedom Caucus and myself, we have been fighting over just a few hundred billion dollars to try to save that from all the appropriations, all of the funding of the federal government. | ||
| Meanwhile, we keep getting jammed with all of these bills that are coming out of left field that are spending in themselves hundreds of billions, or like you said with this tax bill, $1.5 trillion being added to the deficit. | ||
| This was a massive welfare expansion, and there should have been more Republicans to vote against it. | ||
| But there's There's some good things in there. | ||
| There are some Trump policies in there when it comes to tax cuts, but that's not what we're looking at here. | ||
| There are child tax credits for people who broke our laws to enter our country illegally. | ||
| This is not something we should be funding when we have a wide open southern border. | ||
| It was just with Border Patrol agents yesterday At a roundtable discussing how horrific this humanitarian crisis is at the southern border, that we have nearly 100,000 children who have gone missing, how the cartel have operational control of our southern border. | ||
| We aren't in control of it. | ||
| The cartel are. | ||
| The fentanyl that is coming in. | ||
| And all the while, we're saying, you know what, if they're here, let's just go ahead and give them a child tax credit and expand the welfare state. | ||
| This is corporate welfare. | ||
| This is welfare for illegals. | ||
| And, you know, there's some nice, pretty language in there about low-income housing, and we're going to give tax credit there. | ||
| Everywhere anyone goes, you hear how expensive it is to live anywhere, how unaffordable things are. | ||
| Well, yeah, that's because Washington, D.C. | ||
| can't get a budget on the floor and get our act together. | ||
| We continue with the deficit spending, continue to print money out of nowhere, borrow money from China and who knows who else. | ||
| And we're not doing anything to actually address the spending here. | ||
| That is why it's unaffordable for Americans to live, to buy homes, to pay their rent, to afford groceries or gas. | ||
| We need to take care of our fiscal responsibilities here at home and produce our natural, God-given resources so we can be stable once again. | ||
| economically. So there's all of these things that we can provide solutions to, but instead, we just come up with these crap bills, put a bunch of stuff in there to get Democrat votes, and further put the American taxpayer in a bind. | ||
| Hang on. Jason Smith, there's a new fetish up on Capitol Hill, and that's this thing called, oh, it's bipartisan. He must have said it a thousand times, it's bipartisan, it's bipartisan, it's bipartisan. | ||
| Who gives a rip? | ||
| The Democrats, when bipartisan, yeah, bipartisan means we've created a, have you ever seen in your time there, the Democrats come and work on things that the Republicans and MAGA think are right for the country, ma'am? | ||
| Or is it always bipartisan means we're cratering to their demands? | ||
| This is a 1.5 trillion dollar expansion of the welfare state, ma'am. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| And on these big-ticket items, it is never a Republican stance where Democrats come and say, you know what, this is a really great move for Americans. | ||
| No. | ||
| We always go farther to the left. | ||
| We vote Democrat-lite. | ||
| We water down our bills, put a bunch of crap and pork in it, and that's how we get Democrat votes. | ||
| It's never the other way around. | ||
| I have a few little victories on my own here with Democrats coming to my side to create a thousand jobs in my district in Pueblo, Colorado. | ||
| Later, they want to take credit for doing it because it was a really good bill. | ||
| But when we're talking about these big ticket items, $1.5 trillion, it's never Democrats just coming along to help us for the good of the American people. | ||
| It's Republicans putting this bipartisan title on it and Bending over to the Democrats. | ||
| It's so frustrating. | ||
| It is not a good thing just because it is bipartisan. | ||
| It's good when it's actually working for the American people. | ||
| This bill does not do it. | ||
| It has a very pretty title. | ||
| Certainly, I'll give them that. | ||
| Who doesn't want relief for the American family and taxpayer? | ||
| But this is Just Nancy Pelosi's con game continued. | ||
| Give it a beautiful name and then load it with a bunch of junk that actually destroys life for the American people, the American taxpayer, for families. | ||
| So this is what my friends and I are trying really profusely to stop, to end. | ||
| This is what your posse is rallying against each and every day. | ||
| That's why they come on to hear from you, because they want to speak up about issues that are actually going To improve their lives at home and get our country back on track, not making excuses to the Democrats. | ||
| So I absolutely was opposed to this bill in its current form. | ||
| And Steve, listen to this. | ||
| This bill had to be voted on this week. | ||
| There was just no way around it. | ||
| We have to hurry up and get this through. | ||
| Well, now we're hearing that the Senate doesn't want the child tax credits and they're going to make some amendments and some edits and send it back to us, but they're going to take their time because it's not a priority and we aren't even going to get it back right away. | ||
| So this vote did nothing but cause more division and it frustrates our faith. | ||
| But you heard that from Johnson. | ||
| How are you going to stop Johnson from screwing us on defeating this amnesty bill on the border and giving any more money to the Ukrainian oligarchs? | ||
| How are you going to personally take responsibility so that he can't do this again because this is what he's going to do? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Well, first of all, suspending the rules is a huge problem. | ||
| We fought really hard to get good rules in the House of Representatives back last January so we could have regular order and actually represent our constituency. | ||
| Yesterday, a group of us were on the House floor speaking with Mike Johnson. | ||
| He was absolutely opposed to this amnesty bill, and it sounded like he is not budging from that. | ||
| There have been other things in the past where we didn't think we were going to get a continuing resolution, and lo and behold, we did. | ||
| We thought we were going to get H.R. | ||
| 2 added on to things, and we did not. | ||
| But the conversations that were taking place yesterday does sound like he is very much opposed to this amnesty bill, and it is Dead on arrival. | ||
| Also, when it comes to these supplementals, right now he is not even negotiating anything with Ukraine. | ||
| I certainly do not want to send one new dime to Ukraine with all of the corruption that's been going on. | ||
| We don't know where the hundred plus billion dollars is even gone in Ukraine. | ||
| And then when it comes to Israel, There has to be a pay-for. | ||
| There are many cardinals in the Republican Party who sit on those appropriations committees that want to give nearly $20 billion without it being paid for. | ||
| Just write a check. | ||
| Just print more money. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| Tomorrow's a new day. | ||
| They'll print more if you need it. | ||
| But this is stuff that we are speaking with Speaker Mike Johnson about on a regular basis all throughout each and every day. | ||
| People are Going to his office, sending messages, we're having group discussions, and hopefully we can keep the pressure on him to hold the line and stand strong on these issues. | ||
| But there has to be accountability. | ||
| There are other members who have threatened to use the lever of accountability that I fought for last January, and that is the motion to vacate. | ||
| And I don't want to get there, but we need leadership. | ||
| We have to have We have to have some follow-through on the promises that we have made to the American people. | ||
| Congressman, how do people follow you on social media? | ||
| Where do they go for your website? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Steve, yes, laurenforfreedom.com. | |
| I need the posse to come in and help me in this fight. | ||
| I certainly have a fight in Colorado, so I can keep this fight on in Washington, D.C. | ||
| and take our country back. | ||
| My friends and I, we are the leaders in this movement, and we're standing For everything that you guys talk about on a daily basis, the reasons why the posse joins and stays motivated because there is some hope that there are people in Washington D.C. | ||
| who will actually do what they say. | ||
| Laurenforfreedom.com. | ||
| I can use all the help that I can get there in Colorado so I can keep fighting for you all. | ||
| Congressman, thank you so much. | ||
| Honored to have you on here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
| Hanwell, we got about a minute. | ||
| We're going to go to break. | ||
| You and BD are going to stick around. | ||
| Update on Orban. | ||
| They finally got to Orban today, right? | ||
| They approved, the EU approved the $50 billion, which is really not $50 billion, but they approved it. | ||
| They did. | ||
| It's around 54 billion USD. | ||
| That's the headline figure. | ||
| Of course, as you point out, there's a reviewing option available after two years. | ||
| So the commitment is for half of that. | ||
| The important thing to stress before the break is that this money is principally for pensions and salaries and other general budgetary support measures. | ||
| It's not for military aid. | ||
| And yet, Ukraine's foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, underlined that it was about Europe investing in its own security. | ||
| That's how dumb, Steve, they think we are. | ||
| And it's an outright total lie, probably because masking the disgrace here of what Western leaders are doing with money, when their own peoples are revolting right across continental Europe. | ||
| Hang on one second, we'll be back. | ||
| It's $12 billion a year. | ||
| It's nothing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Short break. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | ||
| There's tons going on in economics and capital markets. | ||
| I'm not going to be able to get to it this morning. | ||
| I'm going to try to cover some of that this afternoon. | ||
| Also in this afternoon's show, we're going to break down this whole concept of Christian nationalism. | ||
| We have Rob Reiner with an unbelievable interview, I think on PBS, that I'll break down for you. | ||
| And we're going to have Liz Uhr join us. | ||
| We're going to have Mark Pagliato join us, and we're going to have Brandon Showalter join us also. | ||
| So that's going to be at the 6 o'clock hour. | ||
| I'm going to go through a lot of the politics and economics and everything. | ||
| Dave Bratz is going to be with us at 5.30. | ||
| Make sure you go to birchgold.com. | ||
| Promo code war room, the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| Look, we've made this as accessible as possible, right? | ||
| We've tried to explain the terminology, but now's the time, because this is what's driving so much of what's happening in the world today, this kind of breakdown of the American system post-World War II. | ||
| One of the reasons it's breaking down is that the American people realize it's abused them. | ||
| They no longer consent to what's been done in their name, and they're prepared to make big changes. | ||
| So make sure you understand, you've got to understand the currency part of this, the money part of it. | ||
| Money and power. | ||
| In a spiritual war, you know, it manifests itself that way. | ||
| Birchgold.com slash banner, the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| Make sure you get it today. | ||
| Start to understand the impact that gold has had as a hedge against times of turbulence, because folks, I don't think you've seen anything yet when you talk about turbulence. | ||
| Ben Hornwell, real quickly, a shocker about NATO, which we've been told and browbeaten, you know, NATO is great. | ||
| We got to keep putting money in. | ||
| They're not a protectorate. | ||
| They're really a strong ally, although you don't see the Royal Navy. | ||
| The Express newspapers got a big story about the Royal Navy can't even aid us down in the Red Sea because their combatants can't really can't launch anything that hits anybody. | ||
| They got to fly to Cyprus, the brave British pilots, all of that. | ||
| What has happened with Ukraine and NATO? | ||
| Well, Steve, this is all running up now to this key NATO, pivotal NATO meeting in July that's going to be held in Washington, D.C., hosted by Joe Biden. | ||
| For a preparatory meeting held by the U.S. | ||
| State Department with U.S. | ||
| ambassadors and various European lawmakers, an axis had emerged between the United States and Germany, really against the Eastern European members of NATO. | ||
| The U.S. | ||
| and Germany do not want NATO, Ukraine, a formal invitation to Ukraine at this moment. | ||
| Now, there are a number of reasons and motivations behind that. | ||
| But this news, we saw the signs of this already taking place in the annual meeting in Vilnius last summer, and that was a pivotal meeting, certainly. | ||
| But the news of this, Steve, could not come at a worse time for Vladimir Zelensky with all that's going on in Kiev right now. | ||
| Bad news for Ukraine. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| And by the way, Biden, they, they, they did this cause this was going to be his big international. | ||
| I'm the one that allies love. | ||
| I'm the bringer of peace. | ||
| Everybody loves me against Trump. | ||
| It's happening right during the time of the Republican convention. | ||
| It was comparing contrast and it's going to be a train wreck. | ||
| Particularly. | ||
| There's a coup going on right now in Ukraine. | ||
| Told you a year over a year ago was going to happen. | ||
| Um, Please read about President Diem. | ||
| So, BD, we got you on here for breaking news coming out of Revolver on your investigation on J6. | ||
| But I got to ask you, because you're the world's living expert on Victoria Nuland and color revolutions. | ||
| It's kind of sad to see her, really the queen of Ukraine, sitting there on a cold square in the middle of the night, getting off a plane with one microphone there. | ||
| No Zelensky, no big pomp in the circumstance. | ||
| Your thoughts, sir? | ||
| Yes, truly, truly a sad moment for Miss Newland. | ||
| But you know, in the Color Revolution game, there are ups and there are downs. | ||
| And I'm sure that she'll have her next regime change opportunity soon enough. | ||
| But yeah, I mean, she's not a new player to this game. | ||
| She's been around for a long time. | ||
| Revolution, I guess a more successful endeavor than she has now. | ||
| But most recently, I'd like to note that the former Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan, that we've reported on her involvement in his ouster. | ||
| You know, Biden talks about meddling and all this stuff. | ||
| He meddled directly in Pakistani politics to the point of demanding that they overthrow Imran Khan or else. | ||
| They actually did do that and more so they put him in jail and he was recently sentenced to 10 years. | ||
| You know, for Victoria Nuland, there are ups and downs. | ||
| So she's had a recent victory and we'll see how the Ukraine thing turns out. | ||
| But it doesn't look good for her. | ||
| Well, when we went in November, it's going to be, I tell you, I would be very shocked if there were not criminal referrals on what Victoria Nuland and others have done in other countries under the names of the American people. | ||
| The American people had no idea what they were doing. | ||
| You've been all over J6. | ||
| You got more blockbuster news up on Revolver. | ||
| Walk us through where your investigation is taking us. | ||
| Well, this is a rapidly developing piece, and I think this is not only going to be the biggest story in the country. | ||
| This is going to be proven as one of the biggest scandals and operations and cover-ups in recent American history, and that is no exaggeration. | ||
| This pipe bomb story keeps getting worse and worse. | ||
| So, the last time I was on here, I described a video, about a seven-minute video, depicting the DNC bomb being discovered, and there were pretty glaring anomalies. | ||
| Chief among which is the fact that after being informed of the presence of a bomb, feet away, the Secret Service has zero reaction. | ||
| It takes them over a minute to even bother to getting out of their vehicles, at which point they stand around for an additional two minutes in the most lackadaisical fashion imaginable. | ||
| And then, the most flagrant aspect of the video, they allow a group of children to cross the street and walk within feet of this bomb. | ||
| It's clear that they knew the bomb posed no threat to themselves, to their protectee, Kamala Harris, nor to the passers-by, including these children. | ||
| So the question, the damning question, the burning question is, how would Kamala Harris's Secret Service detail at the DNC have known that that bomb was fake and benign? | ||
| It's one of the damning questions. | ||
| And in fact, in a recent meeting with Congressman Massey and some of his staff and some Judiciary staff and some Capitol Hill police staff, including at least one officer who was present at the scene when this DNC bomb was being discovered, they were asked these questions. | ||
| They were asked, well, what's the deal? | ||
| Why did the Secret Service not react? | ||
| Why did you guys not react? | ||
| What was going on there? | ||
| And their answer was, we didn't want to cause a panic. | ||
| You know, you know, Steve, you've dealt with the Secret Service. | ||
| I've dealt with the Secret Service. | ||
| Is it believable for them to say that the Secret Service is informed of an explosive device within feet of where they are? | ||
| Within feet of their protectee, who is the vice president-elect? | ||
| And they allow children to walk right by it, and they do nothing? | ||
| And the reason for that is they don't want to cause panic? | ||
| What about the panic of the bomb blowing up? | ||
| Hold on, hold on. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| Slow down, slow down. | ||
| Are you telling me that that's the official response back to Back to Revolver, when you've shown them the evidence that you had, that that's their response? | ||
| That wasn't their response directly to me. | ||
| That was their response in this meeting that took place recently that I'm describing, that I happen to know for a fact took place, and that's what they said. | ||
| And the fact that that is their cover, so you would think that at least they would come up with a better cover answer than that. | ||
| They've had time to think about it. | ||
| This story has blown up. | ||
| You know, it's been over a week. | ||
| They've had enough time. | ||
| So the fact that the best that they could come up with, the fact that they would look someone in the eye and say, we didn't want to cause panic, so we just did nothing when being informed of this bomb. | ||
| We let children walk right by it. | ||
| We weren't worried about our protectee Kamala Harris. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We weren't worried about our own lives. | |
| That flagrant violation of protocol, that simply does not make sense for them to say they want to avoid panic. | ||
| But is Loudermilk, he's supposed to be on, look, it's one of the fears of infuriating things and one of the reasons McCarthy's gone. | ||
| They didn't want to get into the details of what happened on the Fed's erection and on the standing of the election. | ||
| But is Loudermilk, as your reporting show you or your contacts, is Loudermilk, at least because he's got the subcommittee that's still looking, is he on top of this specific thing? | ||
| And is he going to bring some witnesses in? | ||
| Because if that's ever put into the official record, that then becomes beyond explosive. | ||
| Correct? | ||
| Indeed. | ||
| I can't speak to Loudermilk. | ||
| I can only say that, you know, there have been several stalwarts along the way. | ||
| Matt Gaetz has been great on the Fed's erection issue generally. | ||
| But the key driver who's taken our research to the next level using his power in Congress is Congressman Massey, who's responsible for getting this video released in the first place. | ||
| And so he's the only one The driving force that I can say, he's doing whatever is in his power to get this through. | ||
| I can't speak to Loudermilk. | ||
| I hope that he would take this up and I hope more people would take this up because we're so close. | ||
| Look, I held out 1% chance that maybe there was some exotic, but when you hear it plausible and innocent explanation for the utterly damning fact pattern that we've uncovered in our reporting, But the fact that when asked, what's the deal with this video? | ||
| How do they know that the bomb is fake? | ||
| They clearly know it's fake. | ||
| They said, no, no, we just didn't want to cause panic. | ||
| That is not a believable answer. | ||
| They were also asked, what are the circumstances of discovering this DNC bomb? | ||
| Because remember, this DNC bomb, when it was discovered at 1.05 PM on the 6th, had been sitting out there undiscovered for over 17 hours. | ||
| And so I've always found it strange that this DNC bomb was sitting there undiscovered for 17 hours, undiscovered by passersby, by motorists, by pedestrians on a very high foot traffic morning on January 6th, by the regularly stationed physical DNC security guard who's usually posted no more than 10 feet away from where the bomb was planted. | ||
| And then the coup de grace, the Secret Service of the United States, yep, the very same Secret Service that clearly knows the bomb is fake, managed not to find the bomb in the sweep that they're on record as having conducted prior to Kamala Harris entering the building. | ||
| So the bomb's sitting out there undiscovered for over 17 hours, then magically it's discovered 15 minutes after the first one is discovered at the Capitol Hill Club. | ||
| And the first one is discovered at 12.40. | ||
| This random woman stumbles upon it at 12.40. | ||
| She goes and informs a security guard in the Capitol Hill Club. | ||
| The Capitol Hill police start responding to this at 12.50. | ||
| This is three minutes before the initial and decisive West Perimeter breach in which Ray Epps was involved. | ||
| So just to To summarize that and really help people digest it, we're supposed to believe that both of these bombs, that were planted the evening before, were sitting around for 16-17 hours, undiscovered, and both independently happened to build upon within a 15-minute window of that unfolding attack on the West Perimeter of the Capitol. | ||
| That is infinitesimally implausible. | ||
| And what that means is really dark, really dark and really serious. | ||
| Because look, the regime, they know this story has reached escape velocity. | ||
| They move from suppression mode to damage control mode. | ||
| And one of the things they're going to try to do, Steve, is to keep this mess within the pipe bomb. | ||
| And that's a big enough mess in its own right, believe me. | ||
| But they're going to try to prevent that from metastasizing into the other dimensions of January 6th that we've covered, principally that peace monument breach on the West Perimeter that was the subject of our major piece called Meet Ray Epps Part Two. | ||
| But the smoking gun is the synchronicity. | ||
| You simply cannot explain by mere chance that these bombs were sitting there for 17 hours and were both independently, randomly discovered within a 15-minute window corresponding exactly with that attack. | ||
| And it's even more damning because the official version for why that attack was so successful was that the resources were diverted in order to address the pipe bomb. | ||
| Hang on for one second because I want to give people, people gotta read this story because you're right, we're at an escape velocity right now. | ||
| short commercial break back in the warm in a moment here's your host Stephen K. Babb Darren we're really pressed for time but I need everybody to read this story because this is about to hit escape velocity Just where do they go right now on Revolver to get it and to share it? | ||
| You got to push it out. | ||
| Where do they go? | ||
| Revolver.news, Revolver.news, Revolver.news. | ||
| This is fresh. | ||
| It's white hot, and it's developing very rapidly. | ||
| And just as a parting thought, think about this. | ||
| Secret Service was protecting Kamala Harris. | ||
| Why would this politically opportunistic creature forego The opportunity to milk the fact that she came within a hair's width of losing her life to this MAGA pipe bomb. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Why would Kamala Harris cover this up and not even acknowledge it? | ||
| How dark and how dirty and how embarrassing does it have to be for Kamala Harris to keep this quiet against all political interests? | ||
| You're doing something the House should have done in getting to the bottom of this, but that shows you the greatness of Revolver in you. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| I want everybody, Mo and Grace, Carly Bonet, everybody, we've got to push this out today. | ||
| We'll have them back on. | ||
| I want to make a comment here. | ||
| In 2016, we would not have won Florida unless Susie Wiles was brought into the campaign and hired by yours truly. | ||
| Susie Wiles is one of the best piece of manpower we've ever had, okay? | ||
| She and La Civita are running with virtually no resources. | ||
| One of the tightest, best organized campaign I've ever seen. | ||
| And I've got nothing but shoutouts to them. | ||
| Ronna McDaniel in 2016, I'm not sure we won Michigan unless she was the chairman of the Trump movement there. | ||
| So, Ron has put her shoulder well. | ||
| This is not about personalities. | ||
| What we're trying to accomplish here, and Charlie Kirk and all of us, is to, we only have one task and purpose. | ||
| That is the victory for President Trump in November this year. | ||
| And the hour is late. | ||
| Bottom line is, the RNC as it's currently constructed, with its current leadership, has just lost people's confidence. | ||
| And I realize, La Cervita and Sujit are doing a tremendous job on the campaign. | ||
| I think we all have to pull and harness to make sure the changes are made that need to be made now to reinforce in people, yes, we have an apparatus that's going to merge with the Trump campaign at the convention and then have that final drive. | ||
| That's like, you know, the drive to Berlin, right? | ||
| You get that final thing, you converge your forces and then we just go. | ||
| From mid-July for the next hundred days or so all the way to November. | ||
| That's all we should be thinking about. | ||
| And so they're doing a terrific job on the campaign. | ||
| I think we just got to strategically think what's going on. | ||
| And this is not about Rana personally. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| Like I said, in 16, if she was not there in Michigan, Susie was not there in Florida, I'm not sure President Trump would be President of the United States. | ||
| And I say that as the guy that was overseeing the whole thing and know what great efforts and strides they made in that. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Blockbuster testimony yesterday from Ray. | ||
| I want to play it. | ||
| I got to bring you Dr. Sean. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's hit it. | |
| ...on Capitol Hill yesterday from FBI Director Christopher Wray about hacking attacks by the Chinese government. | ||
| He said China could target our infrastructure causing potentially catastrophic damage. | ||
| Nicole Skanga has more now from Washington. | ||
| China has shown it will make us pay. | ||
| FBI Director Christopher Wray delivered this warning on Capitol Hill. | ||
| China's hackers are positioning on American infrastructure in preparation to wreak havoc and cause real world harm to American citizens. | ||
| Cautioning Chinese hackers are aiming to infiltrate the nation's pipelines, water treatment plants, transportation system, and even the U.S. | ||
| power grid. | ||
| Okay, in Unrestricted Warfare, they're planning, as we've talked about for years on this show, the Committee on Present Danger had webinars, they're planning a cyber Pearl Harbor. | ||
| We know that. | ||
| This is also what's so important. | ||
| Dr. Sean, I just want to take a quick hit about what you've done because they have a total grip on the supply chain. | ||
| And when things start to go down, they're going to cut us off and our audience off from their medicines. | ||
| Dr. Sean. | ||
| Yeah, thank you for talking about this. | ||
| I think, you know, You mentioned this stranglehold that China has on our supply chain. | ||
| Specifically, we're talking about pharmaceuticals here. | ||
| And actually, you know, the government, the FBI comes out with this report now. | ||
| A couple of months ago, a cybersecurity watchdog group also came out and said that they had identified specifically in the healthcare sector, a series of unauthorized accesses, which signified internal reconnaissance and preparation for additional threats. | ||
| Again, in the healthcare industry. | ||
| And so we're starting to see these signals, you know, we know things are just going to get more crazy leading up to November. | ||
| And of when we talk about this infrastructure, this vital infrastructure, I don't, there's nothing that's as vital as the medications that we depend on on a daily basis. | ||
| And so that's where, that's where we come in. | ||
| You know, Jace Medical is what we are all about is empowering people to be better prepared when it comes to their medical preparations. | ||
| So we are out there. | ||
| The information on the sites, they go to the site, can they also talk to people? | ||
| Give the site, can they actually talk to consultants once they go? | ||
| Yeah, so at Jace Medical, it's J-A-C-E, jacemedical.com. | ||
| And you'll be able to, there's a ton of resources on there as far as answers to questions, education. | ||
| You can call, you can email if you've got additional questions. | ||
| We've got people on standby ready to field those questions. | ||
| The encounter itself is really straightforward and typically doesn't require a lot of back and forth with the physician. | ||
| We purposely built it this way to make it as easy and convenient as possible. | ||
| Dr. Sean, thank you very much. | ||
| I want everybody to go to Jace Medical because when Ray says they're coming after the infrastructure, part of that is they're going to lock down the supply chain and cut you out of your medicine. | ||
| Thank you, brother, and thank you for building this company around Rosemary Gibson's idea. | ||
| Mike Lindell, we got a big announcement tomorrow. | ||
| Let's tease it and then tell me how I get my flannel sheets. | ||
| I don't want to run out. | ||
| The audience is going to be very upset if we run out of flannel sheets. | ||
| Right on. | ||
| Okay, everybody. | ||
| Tomorrow we're making a big announcement with, it's called mystore.com. | ||
| This is a site I built for the last three years. | ||
| Thousands of USA products and entrepreneurs are on there. | ||
| And it's gonna be a big, huge war room announcement tomorrow where you'll be able to use the promo code war room. | ||
| You can go pre-check it today. | ||
| You can use the promo code war room, but this is like the pre-announcement. | ||
| So that's gonna be awesome. | ||
| And it helps all USA made products. | ||
| And it's like a mini Amazon, but USAA. | ||
| And I'm really excited about that. | ||
| But right now I'm excited to announce that we have the flannel sheets. | ||
| We got the last of the season in last Monday. | ||
| All the sizes are still in. | ||
| You get this. | ||
| This is it, everybody. | ||
| And we're going to the War Room for as low as $29.98. | ||
| Free shipping on your entire order. | ||
| I just checked. | ||
| All the sizes and colors are still there. | ||
| They're going to be probably gone, I would say, this week. | ||
| The kitchen towels sold out. | ||
| You guys took advantage of the kitchen towels. | ||
| All the specials that we were going to have on Fox. | ||
| Like the blankets, all those are still in stock. | ||
| They all came in all kinds of styles of blankets on sale. | ||
| But here's the one I'm holding in my hand, the MyPillow 2.0. | ||
| You guys, this is the one that keeps the factory going. | ||
| This is the best pillow in history, $29.98 for the queen size. | ||
| King size, only $5 more. | ||
| Remember, you can wash and dry them, 10-year warranty, 60-day money-back guarantee. | ||
| You can't beat it. | ||
| Free shipping, mypillow.com, promo code War Room 800-873-1062. | ||
| Charlie Kirk is next! | ||
| Two hours of populist nationalism. | ||
| Posto! | ||
| After that, we're back here at 5 o'clock. |
Export Selection