Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Same thing with young voters, and I can't emphasize what you've said enough about this economy. | ||
This economy disproportionately hurts Americans, I think, under 35, under 40, who can't afford their first home. | ||
Who really can't afford to live the type of life that their parents lived? | ||
Who see themselves falling further and further behind every single week? | ||
And they hear us talking about how great the economy is. | ||
And what I hear an awful lot, and I know you hear an awful lot, I hear younger Americans saying, I'm not seeing that. | ||
I can't even afford to rent a house, let alone buy one. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, that's it. | |
I mean, I would put myself in that category, honestly. | ||
It's very difficult. | ||
And I would also just say that the lack of real competition in American democracy at this point is a problem. | ||
Because if those voters are looking at their choices as either Donald Trump or Joe Biden, and that's what the choices seem to be at the moment, The option is clear, but they're being asked to swallow a whole lot. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And so, there's no real alternative that's saying, you know, hey, I will attend to your needs, because the Democratic Party has essentially, I believe for many years now, and this is not a new phenomenon, it has taken the votes for granted of both black people, people of color in general, and young people. | ||
that hasn't changed and as these numbers really... | ||
Let me have it. | ||
People, you know, vote on their lived experience. | ||
People, all this nonsense you hear, I jumped the guys on the circus on the last episode of that show after eight years, where, you know, Heilman tries to come up with this trope, oh, elections are about the future. | ||
That's all nonsense. | ||
Elections are about the lived experience of people. | ||
That's what I told him. | ||
This was weeks ago. | ||
The lived experience of people. | ||
And my able, trusty assistant here, Captain Bannon, thank you very much, Captain Bannon, for getting a thing of Warpath for me. | ||
Thank you, Mo. | ||
I appreciate that. | ||
The lived experience of people under 35 years old, they know it's horrific. | ||
The other thing is not calculated in there. | ||
I'm going to get Joe Allen up. | ||
And this is why the Sam Altman situation It's so important this thing about artificial intelligence. | ||
Artificial intelligence is going to cut through the job market like a Sith through grass. | ||
And the jobs are going to go are not the plumbers and not the carpenters and not the blue-collar value-added jobs of people with skills and crafts and craftsmen. | ||
The first wave is going to be administrative. | ||
It's going to be white-collar. | ||
It's going to be lower white-collar jobs. | ||
A lot of folks who went to college are going to be quite shocked that their college education didn't really prepare them for this. | ||
I tell you, the other thing that's going to be cut in two, and I know a lot of very smart programmers. | ||
I have a lot of people that are just amazing programmers, and they're sitting there going, hey, half of my job right now is managing the AI. | ||
In a couple of years, AI is going to be doing this. | ||
Teach to code. | ||
You've got to teach people to code. | ||
That's the future. | ||
Teach to code. | ||
Not so fast there shipmate. | ||
I think that's going to be so the people under 35 are going to look at a not just these world crises of the of the financial what we've done to the balance sheet of the United States, which is going to impact them every day of their life going forward. | ||
Let me repeat just one thing. | ||
We're never going to pay down one penny of the face amount of the debt. | ||
That ain't going to happen. | ||
We're barely going to be able to keep up with the structure of how we've built this federal government and allowed this federal government and the administrative state to metastasize out of control. | ||
You're barely going to keep up with the interest payments. | ||
And we have to have massive cuts and plus the deportation. | ||
It's one of the things I gave, as I say, the speech in Pioneers. | ||
I think on Saturday I'll be able to break it down for everybody, kind of, and take and do some analysis as we break it down and I get to what the crisis is going to happen. | ||
And if you think there's problems on the campuses right now because of the Muslim Brotherhood's war against the Israeli people, You ain't seen nothing yet, folks. | ||
Is Dr. Malone with us? | ||
Dr. Malone, you've got a tweet out, if we can put it up, a number of things I know you want to talk about we've got today, but I know you're pressed for time. | ||
I've got to talk to you about, and you were at I think the Romanian conference, you came out, you put a tweet out about the excess deaths. | ||
And this is something I think we've got vaccine injured and now we have this concept this thing about excess deaths. | ||
And you said that you've been able to analyze there's not it's verifiable now that there were 17 million excess deaths. | ||
That you guys can tie directly back to the vaccine. | ||
I want to explain that tweet, explain what the receipts are in back of it, because I know it's going to be very controversial. | ||
So in the vaccine, we know we have the vaccine injured and we know we've got the situation with potential excess deaths. | ||
So walk me through that. | ||
So what this is, is Dennis Rancourt and his team in Canada. | ||
So it's a team of three PhDs. | ||
One's a former full professor academic who spent his entire career focused on All-cause mortality analysis. | ||
He has extensive data going back to the turn of the century, so basically 1900. | ||
And together with his team, they have performed many analyses of all-cause mortality and correlation with various factors. | ||
And the announcement by the Nobel Prize Committee in awarding the Prize for Medicine and Physiology Triggered them to examine the merits of the claim that 14 million lives had been saved by the vaccines. | ||
And these are guys that are hardcore analysts. | ||
They, they're doing similar stuff to what Ed Dowd does, but from the standpoint of doing it with the rigor that withstand peer review and They have a published peer-reviewed paper now focusing on the correlations that were asserted in a Lancet manuscript to support the claims from the Nobel Laureate Committee that 14 million lives have been saved. | ||
And they decided to go through that and dig in. | ||
And what they did was find that there were a number of artifacts, even though this is a peer-reviewed journal and a peer-reviewed publication that was published in 2022 that supported this thesis. | ||
What they found was that that was severely flawed in terms of its statistical analysis, and then they went beyond that and analyzed, well, what actually has been the attributable increase in all-cause mortality, like what Ed's been doing. | ||
Deaths is something that states tend to track quite rigorously, and it's a binary endpoint. | ||
You either died or you didn't die. | ||
We're not going to argue about how dead you are. | ||
When they applied their toolkit, this is advanced statistics, and done in a rigorous fashion by a well-established team, what they were able to document is not only was the paper wrong, that there weren't 14 million lives saved, but in fact there were 17 million deaths attributable to the vaccine as they looked, as Ed Dowd has been doing, looked over time. | ||
Uh, at the increase in all cause mortality that followed the deployment of the vaccine products. | ||
And what they did was they were able to compare different nation states, uh, and that allowed them to, uh, demonstrate that, uh, there was this increase in all cause mortality in those states. | ||
That, uh, deployed the vaccines and they were able to take the, uh, percent uptake of vaccines. | ||
And back-calculate this in a rigorous way, and that's what gives rise to this excess all-cause mortality attributed to the vaccines in this analysis of 17 million, as opposed to the Nobel Prize Committee's assertion that it was 14 million lives saved. | ||
Okay, hang on one second. | ||
This is what's so shocking. | ||
Two things are so shocking, and I want to make sure we go slow because this audience needs to understand this. | ||
How, what's shocking to me about this, the most shocking, because I'm no expert, but I see, I read these peer reviewed journals and I, you know, everybody sends them to me and I go through it as best I can. | ||
And I've got a couple of master's degrees from, you know, pretty reputable institutions and I try to weave my way through it. | ||
The thing that's most shocking to me, so go back and explain this and correct me if I'm wrong. | ||
Isn't Lancet one of the most revered, this is the British journal, isn't it one of the most revered peer-reviewed journals in the world about medicine and these types of things? | ||
When they eviscerate, I guess the Nobel Prize, they eviscerate the first part about the 14 million and show the serious flaws, and I mean grievous flaws. | ||
How does that happen? | ||
This gets back to this fourth turning concept of lack of trust of institutions. | ||
How did that happen? | ||
And how do these guys, it looks like they're experts, but how do they eviscerate this? | ||
So what they did was they analyzed the statistical models, the calculations that were being performed in this Lancet paper, and they were able to demonstrate the specific statistical analysis flaws that had been missed by the peer reviewers. | ||
Remember that during the COVID crisis, we've clearly had a bias towards publishing material which supports the established narrative. | ||
And this is another case of this, where the peer review process was soft and squishy, not rigorous. | ||
And so this skill team that does this for a living and has for decades, dived into this, was able to show the specific flaws in this paper Uh, in which, uh, let's see, give you the title. | ||
You can download it from the website that, uh, uh, was cited there. | ||
Uh, quantitative evaluation of whether the Nobel prize winning COVID-19 vaccine actually saved millions of lives published as a brief report in October 18, 2023, I'm sorry, October 08. | ||
So they were able to go through, find the specific statistical flaws, then correct them. | ||
then apply the correct statistical algorithms and work through their databases in which they were comparing northern hemisphere to southern hemisphere in different nation states. | ||
It's a 31 million swing. | ||
Oh, upon further review, we didn't save 14 million lives. | ||
They actually had excess deaths of 17 million. | ||
This is not a small thing. | ||
This is like the heart of the matter. | ||
And the question gets to be, how can, I mean, is there criminal, You know, responsibility here. | ||
You say they made statistical... Well, these guys are supposed to be experts that did the paper and then you're supposed to have all these outside peer review people that did it. | ||
I mean, these people have to be exposed. | ||
This is so outrageous. | ||
And they sit there all day long on the other media and beat this audience up and beat... And this is why, folks, I want you up in... This is one of the ones I want you up in people's grill about tomorrow over a drumstick and cranberry. | ||
Right? | ||
It's not time now to, when they're giving you a stink eye about the vaccine, right, and the effectiveness and Pfizer's profits, get up in the grill about this study. | ||
This cuts to the heart of what the problem is. | ||
This was the institutions and whose payroll they're on were to find out, because this wasn't a hard thing for the new team to do. | ||
That's what I'm saying. | ||
They went through it in the basic statistical models and just eviscerated the first report. | ||
Which is shocking in the fact that you had a world-class team that actually did it, and you supposedly had all these experts on peer review exactly in this field of statistical analysis that approved it. | ||
And it came out with one of the biggest brands out there, Lancet. | ||
Am I wrong in any of those assertions? | ||
No, it's correct. | ||
And we've seen similar things with the studies on hydroxychloroquine, the studies on ivermectin, the Imperial College London School of Tropical Medicine modeling that asserted that we had 3.4% case fatality rate. | ||
And in fact, what we have is, depending on who you ask, somewhere between 0.2 and 0.02% case fatality rate across all ages associated with the COVID virus. | ||
The SARS-CoV-2. | ||
That's another big lie. | ||
And all of these egregious measures were justified based on another faulty modeling. | ||
What we have, and this was something that Dennis Rancourt really pointed out in his lecture in Bucharest two days ago, was that we must have more rigorous independent analyses of these key mathematical models. | ||
His point was that what we had here were fundamental mathematical flaws, and that there needs to be some sort of mathematical team set up, and that there needs to be some mathematical team set up to oversee These kinds of public health assertions that are again and again coming out wrong. | ||
And you're dead on Steve. | ||
It's just been lie after lie after lie supported by bad men. | ||
Hang on. | ||
I'm going to hold you through the break. | ||
Hang on. | ||
It's one thing to make a mistake. | ||
This is not a mistake. | ||
This is not a mistake. | ||
If you read the new analysis that shows the fundamental flaws, somebody knew what was going on here. | ||
That's why they've got to be held responsible. | ||
This is another outrage of the experts, of your betters. | ||
Your betters. | ||
Because this audience is nothing but troglodytes, right? | ||
Incredible. | ||
Short break. | ||
back in a moment dot among that there's this big piece of any fair on wuhan I'm going to get to that. | ||
I think my colleague, Natalie Winters, is going to get to that in the evening show tonight. | ||
I don't have time for it, but I got to go. | ||
You and I have talked about the Epoch Times has an amazing piece on the Army. | ||
They've missed their recruiting so hard. | ||
They're going back to, now look at people, they drove out of the military that were unvaccinated. | ||
What's the importance Of this of this conference in Romania in Bucharest, and I know you and I have talked about we need to have one here in the United States, even if it's by even as digitally sometime in the first quarter. | ||
There's something there's something quite important that's going on, and I want to make sure the audience knows. | ||
Although we may not have it on every day, there's huge efforts underway, huge movement underway to get to the bottom of the pandemic, what the real issue was. | ||
Was this thing planned? | ||
Do people know about it? | ||
Is the CCP in back of it? | ||
And the whole issue with the vaccines and what the vaccines have actually done, you know, with research and data and analysis. | ||
So tell me first about what happened in Romania. | ||
And then what can we look forward to if we try to? | ||
And I think you and I working together and other people will be able to have hopefully some sort of at least digital conference centered in Washington, D.C. | ||
in the first quarter of 2024. | ||
Your thoughts, sir? | ||
I think that there's, I floated this and thank you Steve for your response, in response to advocacy by the minority party in Romania that we take the next step and have it in DC and focus more on the political side of the COVID crisis because their perception, and they're carefully watching their polls, they have an election coming up this year also, | ||
They're currently pulling it over 30%, but they only hold 10% of the seats. | ||
So they were the sponsors for this particular conference in Bucharest in Ceausescu's palace. | ||
And of all the ICS, this is the fourth international COVID summit or crisis summit meeting that we've had. | ||
And this one really was strong. | ||
We, I mentioned the other data, but there were data from scientists all over the world and physicians. | ||
That are breaking this story open and then we have the various disclosures now coming out of NIH. | ||
We had further reinforcement of the adulteration with the DNA fragments and the consequences of that. | ||
Ryan Cole presented more data on the turbo cancers and there were Europeans there that were disclosing ahead of the official date letters coming from the European Medicines Agency, which indicate that Uh, these vaccines are explicitly not licensed for the purpose of preventing infection or spread of the virus, according to the European Medicines Agency. | ||
And we also have disclosures coming out of thousands and thousands of deaths as official statements by various governments. | ||
So you're right. | ||
The thing is snowballing and people are understandably pissed off, particularly in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. | ||
Here in the United States, we continue to be bombarded by the mockingbird media that is censoring all of this. | ||
But it's getting increasingly hard to hide the truth. | ||
And you mentioned the Catherine Eben Vanity Fair story, which I think is an absolute must-read. | ||
It's biased. | ||
I know Catherine well. | ||
Vanity Fair is strongly anti-Trump. | ||
But still, it's full of pearls. | ||
And we have additional stories. | ||
concerning the cover-ups that have occurred in NIH and NIAID chain of command, concerning the engineering of the virus. | ||
This is what the Select COVID Committee has been focused on. | ||
And now we have more momentum on the House and Senate side to start to dive into the tragedy. | ||
Really, many people are asserting the criminality of what has been imposed on the world with these, quote, vaccine products that are neither safe nor effective. | ||
unidentified
|
So I've got to bounce, but yeah, go ahead. | |
Go ahead and finish. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm sorry. | |
The thinking is regarding this fifth summit to be held in D.C. | ||
that we really need to focus more on the political side of what's been going on. | ||
Well, no, this is what I want to get to. | ||
There's been recommendations I know from Matt Gaetz and others to Speaker Johnson. | ||
One of the ways to start driving momentum on the COVID Select Committee is there should be a criminal referral right now on Tony Fauci. | ||
What are your thoughts on that? | ||
unidentified
|
Dr. Malone, can you hear me? | |
Thank you. | ||
you I think we just, it just froze. | ||
Let's try to re, let's try to reboot him. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
Let's try to re, I can't hear the, he can't hear me. | ||
Okay. | ||
Um, we're having been having technical problems with Dr. Malone all day. | ||
Let's see if we can get him rebooted. | ||
If not, let's, let's drop it and reboot it. | ||
Cause I want to get his answer. | ||
Um, the, um, we need momentum on the impeachment side. | ||
We need momentum on this Select Committee on COVID. | ||
We cannot let that go. | ||
When you think about it, Biden is there seeing Xi. | ||
Xi needs a bailout because of the financial collapse of the real estate market in China. | ||
He needs more access to American capital. | ||
He needs more access to American technology. | ||
At the very moment, Roger Robinson, Frank Gaffney, and the Committee on the Present Danger actually gets the government pension fund, which is three quarters of a trillion dollars. | ||
To their advisor, Aon, the insurance company's advisor, recommends no more money into any funds they're putting money into these companies in China. | ||
And a huge win there. | ||
They have this meeting where they meet the 400 top oligarchs, capitalist oligarchs, and they give a standing ovation to Xi. | ||
Not one mention. | ||
Not one mention. | ||
In any readout about the Wuhan lab, not any mention of COVID, the thing that they did to stop Trump, it was a bioweapon. | ||
Now, I'm not saying it was released on purpose. | ||
I'm still of the belief that it inadvertently escaped, but they exacerbated the threat. | ||
Now, there's some people are saying, no, they absolutely released this. | ||
So the point is, nobody's, you know, the people in authority just want to look the other way. | ||
You can't do that. | ||
And we're not going to allow that to happen. | ||
I strongly believe that the select committee on the COVID have got to pick up the pace. | ||
There's just not enough sense of urgency. | ||
Should be working through the Thanksgiving holidays. | ||
I don't know why they're gone. | ||
They should work through Christmas. | ||
You've only got a year till the election comes up. | ||
Why? | ||
Why is all this time off? | ||
I just don't get it. | ||
Where are the referrals on the COVID committee? | ||
It's just they're dealing and they're doing solid work. | ||
So I want to say with you, they're doing solid work, but they're doing solid work, but it's not coming fast enough. | ||
It's not coming quickly enough. | ||
It's not enough of it. | ||
Dr. Moore, we're pressed for time, but my point about this committee, do you believe we have enough information right now to give a criminal referral on Tony Fauci? | ||
I think we're there and there's evidence that the NIAID and NIH have been hiding information and deleting information actively. | ||
One thing about the COVID Select Committee is there's a number of physicians on it and I hear from third parties that they're very hesitant to look into the vaccines because that might lead to, here comes that word, vaccine hesitancy. | ||
So one of the reasons they're pulling the punches and dragging their feet is that you've got a bunch of docs there that are afraid of what they might find. | ||
Unbelievable. | ||
Dr. Malone, your Substack, all your information, where do people go to get it? | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
rwmalonemd.substack.com and at rwmalonemd on Truth Social, Getter, Gab, and X. | ||
Thank you, sir. | ||
Honored to have you on here this morning. | ||
Thanks for carving time away. | ||
I know you're doing a big project with Epoch Times, the best broadsheet in the nation. | ||
Thank you, sir. | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
Thanks for having me on. | ||
Do I have Joe Allen? | ||
Thanks, brother. | ||
Make sure you go get all of Dr. Malone's. | ||
The COVID select committee is going to pick up the pace. | ||
Let me just say that. | ||
And this focus by the audience is going to be quite important on this. | ||
In the coming days and weeks ahead. | ||
There's a lot there's a lot of information. | ||
They have not made public yet So there's a lot going on Semaphore has a big piece. | ||
I want to bring in Joe Allen Joe we got a couple of minutes on this side. | ||
I'm gonna toss the ball to you, but Folks don't think this thing with Sam Altman is just a bunch of geeks Going at each other in Silicon Valley. | ||
This is quite important because it cuts down it cuts to the heart of one of the issues we have artificial intelligence has so much potential to assist mankind, but it's got also unbelievable potential to quickly get out of control and to overwhelm mankind. | ||
And if you know, if you're looking at this, people should be thinking about how you mitigate risk. | ||
This board fissure, Altman's hired back now, Microsoft, and this is Consolidated Power and basically four companies on artificial intelligence. | ||
It's happened very quickly. | ||
Walk me through the rationalist, as Semaphore magazine has a piece up, they refer to all of us that are concerned about this as the actual rationalist versus the accelerationist. | ||
Walk through, Joe, what's the issue here? | ||
Why is it important? | ||
We've got a minute on this item. | ||
We'll bring you back. | ||
Well, Steve, they call them the rationalists, but I think the more popular and perhaps more accurate is effective altruists. | ||
And the whole concept of Is that any technology that is being deployed should benefit the largest possible proportion of people and any technology that threatens humankind or even the majority of humankind should be suppressed or at least delayed until it's been refined. | ||
And so what does that mean in this board fight that turned out to be a struggle between people who want to go forward no matter what the risk are as quickly as possible for power and for profit versus those who are saying, hey, we've got to slow down and really think this thing through. | ||
Well, you've got Sam Altman, you've got Greg Brockman. | ||
Those were the two who left initially. | ||
Apparently, as of the latest report, Sam Altman is back and the board itself is going to be removed. | ||
But it's really a battle, Steve, not unlike communists versus capitalists. | ||
It's a battle between those who want to accelerate at all costs and those who want to decelerate at all costs. | ||
Hang on for one second. | ||
We're going to take a short break and dive down on this. | ||
I think we're trying to get Charlie Kirk up. | ||
We've also got MSNBC is touting again Mike Davis as Attorney General. | ||
We're going to get into all of that here on the day before Thanksgiving in the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
I said it is bringing back Sam Altman, a CEO, just days after they forced him out. | |
Meanwhile Elon Musk facing a legal battle and mass exodus of advertisers over reports that X promoted pro-Nazi ad content on its platform. | ||
NBC's Christine Romans has more. | ||
Hey, there are two big names in tech and a whole lot of drama. | ||
This morning, we're learning more about Altman's big return after- Okay, um, Altman's returned under- Okay, so for this audience, let's cut to the chase. | ||
It's, and I know this is going to shock you, but the most irresponsible people in the world now control AI. | ||
Let me repeat that. | ||
The most irresponsible people in the world, and that is these geeks in Silicon Valley that hate populism. | ||
They consider you to be excess baggage on the carrying capacity of the Earth. | ||
There's a whole crowd is in back of the sustainability, all of it. | ||
You got Gates and Microsoft, you have the Chinese agent Elon Musk at Twitter, you have the worst guys, the guys at Google, and then you have Amazon. | ||
Those four entities right now, through subsidiaries, they control artificial intelligence. | ||
They control the development of artificial intelligence, and most important, the acceleration. | ||
I'm not trying to be Cassandra here, but I've seen this in other weapons technology. | ||
Remember right now, we've had a bioweapon. | ||
What do you believe the CCP did or they did in conjunction with Fauci, the University of North Carolina? | ||
We had a biological weapons attack on the world, leading with the United States with the COVID-19. | ||
We have a chemical warfare attack right now going on in this country with fentanyl. | ||
Fentanyl is nothing more than a chemical warfare attack on the United States, killing more people in a year than we lost in all the Vietnam War fiasco. | ||
Artificial intelligence, by the way, we have nuclear weapons, obviously a big threat, but as I've always said, social media and now artificial intelligence are actually greater threats than even nuclear weapons. | ||
People say, Steve, how can you say that? | ||
Because you can control entire populations. | ||
The artificial intelligence, and particularly the inextricably linked nature with the Pentagon, and remember, all of these companies I just mentioned are huge contractors for the Pentagon. | ||
Now, Musk does it in a slightly different way. | ||
But those four companies, and those individual groups of individuals, I know the fanboys are going to say, well, Elon, that's terrific. | ||
He made, you know, he threw a couple of Jewish hate things out there, so we love him. | ||
All the fanboys say that. | ||
No, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
He's one of the instigators and back of the standing ovation of the 400 with Xi. | ||
He's completely, totally bought and paid for by the Chinese Communist Party because they finance him. | ||
Anything else he does is not cash flow positive. | ||
Gets his cash out of the joint venture with the CCP and Tesla. | ||
And that's how you can margin his stock. | ||
That's where his source of capital is, the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
And when those lads put a penny into something, they control it. | ||
They control it. | ||
Joe you got the rationalist now or the effective altruist as you give the fancy, you know Silicon Valley term But this is quite important. | ||
I want you to tell in this audience in your personal life This is gonna have a mass what's happened in the last 72 hours. | ||
No, oh the top it off Larry Summers, you know the running dog for for the Clinton regime and the running dog as a you know, partially for Obama and Larry Summers is now on the board. | ||
That's the parental supervision you've got. | ||
He did such a great job at Harvard. | ||
What's the impact, you see, because right now the acceleration is one. | ||
They're putting them pedal to the metal on this thing in a land grab to see who can get there first and devil take the hindmost. | ||
Joe Allen. | ||
Yeah, the accelerationists and the effective altruists or rationalists, those are the extreme ends. | ||
They're the ones saying the acceleration is putting forward the idea AI leads to utopia, the altruists or rationalists saying that it could destroy everyone. | ||
But in the middle, you have the practical impacts of this. | ||
And these companies, Microsoft especially, but these companies want to insert artificial intelligence in every possible institution in society. | ||
That begins with education, it moves on to medicine, they want AI doctors, That moves on to psychotherapy. | ||
That moves on to social media. | ||
They want AIs to both control speech on social media and to some extent for generative AI to actually generate the speech on social media. | ||
That goes all the way up to the military-industrial complex where you have accelerationists arguing that you should have lethal autonomous weapons that are able to identify targets, human targets, And decide whether or not they are a legitimate target to kill. | ||
They want killer robots, in essence. | ||
So in all of these different spheres, we have the people in the middle who are going to increasingly see sort of digital and algorithmic minds being placed in positions of authority, whether it's your doctor trying to diagnose your ailment, or whether it is a child trying to answer an academic question, or whether it is a soldier | ||
faced with an opponent and an AI is supposed to be a higher authority, a better decision-maker than him. | ||
And so as we move into this, it becomes, in essence, the sort of technocratic dystopia, or at least a very undesirable sociological state wherein human agency is overridden by digital minds. | ||
That is the goal of the accelerationists, and honestly, Steve, that's the goal of the opposing side, the altruists. | ||
It's just they want to do it slower. | ||
Exactly. | ||
Real quickly, how close are we, do you believe right now, with this billions of dollars coming to research, the rush to AGI, which is kind of the God brain, right? | ||
Artificial General Intelligence on the horizon. | ||
How long do you think before we get there? | ||
I'm very skeptical of any of the claims to be honest, but I do think that something like an AGI is probably going to emerge in the next 10 years. | ||
And maybe within five years you have one of these companies saying, okay, we've done it. | ||
It doesn't mean they've done it, but it does mean more than likely they've created something that they think is worthy of authority. | ||
And I suspect that that situation, wherein they actually claim, at least, that they have some artificial god-like intelligence, I think that's very likely in the coming years, within five. | ||
Joe, real quickly, by the way, that means humanity, you're on the clock. | ||
You're on the clock now. | ||
Because once you got AGI, I don't know how you pull this thing back. | ||
And this is where it's all going. | ||
The accelerationists have won. | ||
There's going to be nothing that controls these people right now. | ||
And they're in a mad land grab against each other, right? | ||
To double down and triple down. | ||
They have unlimited capital put into this thing. | ||
And with the stock price is going to go up on this, they're going to raise more capital. | ||
This is really going to be something. | ||
This is signal, not noise. | ||
You've got some big events coming up. | ||
Walk people through where they can get you. | ||
And I really want to thank the Warren Posse for the great Great show of enthusiasm. | ||
Coming out and seeing Joe, I know you guys learned a lot. | ||
Where are we going to go next? | ||
Next stop is Los Angeles, California. | ||
The Lux Hotel on Sunset Boulevard. | ||
That's December 2nd. | ||
You can find the links for tickets on my social media, at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z, or my website, joebot.xyz. | ||
And then after that, December 15th to Larry, California, Reawakened Tour. | ||
And then of course, I'll be joining you guys at AmFest. | ||
I believe that's December 16th, 17th, and 18th. | ||
So, a big event coming up though, the December 2nd Lux Hotel on Sunset Boulevard with the American Freedom Alliance. | ||
Big thank you to Karen Siegman. | ||
Karen Seidman, great job. | ||
Make sure everybody in LA goes check it out. | ||
Classy place, classy person, and Karen and a classy organization, AFA. | ||
Joe, we'll let you go back to work. | ||
Thank you for jumping in and walking us through this battle in Silicon Valley and the impact it's going to have on the war room posse in MAGA. | ||
Joe's going to join us out at AmFest. | ||
We're going to be there for the entire 16th to the 19th, and we're going to be doing tons of side events. | ||
I want everybody in the Warren Post to go there and check it out right now. | ||
I want to bring in Charlie Kirk. | ||
Charlie, walk us through. | ||
This is, I think, the biggest one you've ever put on. | ||
You've put on a couple, three big ones for the speakers roster is the best I've ever seen. | ||
Walk us through what people can anticipate and why should they show up? | ||
Thank you, by the way. | ||
I'm loving the show lately, Steve. | ||
I watch every morning. | ||
When you get into economics and you just riff, it's a tough act to follow, Steve. | ||
I've got to be honest. | ||
You're raising the bar here on Real America's Voice, but I love it. | ||
unidentified
|
You and Posobiec do a pretty good job. | |
I've got to give a hat to you. | ||
You guys do a pretty good job. | ||
At AmFest, by the way, Steve, we've got to get a picture of all three of us together. | ||
We've got to do something, because eventually media matters once they get through their fight. | ||
They've got to realize that the Bannon-Kirk-Poso triumphant is kind of anchoring the middle of the day. | ||
That's a story waiting to be written, right? | ||
But no, we have a day of action at AmFest, and Steve, you're our keynote. | ||
We can't wait. | ||
No, yeah, five hours of something, I'll tell you. | ||
And by the way, then you got another two hours you do in the afternoon. | ||
We can't keep up with you, Steve. | ||
But no, A.M. | ||
Fest is going to be amazing. | ||
I'm going to go through some of the speakers. | ||
But on Sunday, it's our Day of Action, which I thought it was perfect. | ||
Action, action, action. | ||
Steve, you were our keynote on that day. | ||
We have amazing speakers on that specific day. | ||
Don Jr. | ||
We have Josh Hawley. | ||
We have Vivek coming down. | ||
Hopefully we have the president. | ||
We're working on that. | ||
And then also you see some of these other speakers we have that's more in our educational programming. | ||
uh... roseanne barter carlson canada sounds rob schneider patrick that david ben carson dennis prager yummy park i mean you are right now that this is a second and on uh... lineup but you know steve you and i both to our shows out there and kind of a general mezzanine and i love it I love meeting everybody, taking pictures, you know, we're there for a couple hours. | ||
Uh, War Room, I know you guys are going to have a whole setup. | ||
Rav is going to have a beautiful booth there. | ||
Um, so we want to have the entire War Room posse from the country, but especially the Southwest and even more specifically from Arizona. | ||
Come on by, use promo code War Room. | ||
Uh, and Steve, you've now done this. | ||
It, the energy, it fills you up, right? | ||
Because there's just, There's a lot of heaviness right now. | ||
I mean, here you are, you're talking about super weapons with Joe Allen. | ||
I mean, it's good to be around fellow patriots, right? | ||
Uh, we cannot forsake the gathering of believers. | ||
That's what the scriptures say. | ||
And AmFest is about believers in the country, believers in faith and freedom. | ||
Um, and honestly, you know, Steve, we're giving you the keys to the kingdom, however many, you know, breakouts you need and all that. | ||
And I think it's so important because I think the breakouts in some ways are even more powerful. | ||
Mainstage stuff is awesome. | ||
Great. | ||
You know, it gets all the headlines, the pizzazz, all that stuff. | ||
But you know, when you've got a couple There's a couple hundred people in the room and they're asking specific questions and Steve, I got this from you and I totally agree. | ||
I can't keep up with the audience. | ||
They're coming up to me at these events and they're doing annotations to the creature from Jekyll Island and I say, my goodness. | ||
They're the best. | ||
Charlie, how do we use it as a springboard? | ||
They're the best. | ||
How do we use this as a springboard for 2024? | ||
What I love about it is the timing. | ||
It's right before the Christmas holidays, whenever I can take a break. | ||
But how is this a springboard into the most decisive year in modern American history? | ||
Yeah, especially on the day of action brought to you by Turning Point Action. | ||
The media is coming. | ||
We have over 120 media outlets, Steve, coming. | ||
That's even more than we had over the summer where you gave that incredible speech. | ||
And, you know, we had Donald Trump there. | ||
They're gonna try to make a, here's my current theory, Steve, with the Bob Vander Plaats endorsement, with the Kim Reynolds endorsement, the media is salivating for a primary right now. | ||
The fact that Donald Trump is dominating the way he is right now in the primary is a big threat to their plans. | ||
A lot of what they thought was gonna happen in 2023 was that Donald Trump was gonna be in a five or six or seven point race, and it was gonna be nasty and rancor in debates. | ||
They're gonna try to resurrect that with everything they possibly can. | ||
So we're gonna do a straw poll at AmFest, and you better believe that's gonna be a very well-covered straw poll. | ||
Who's in, you know, who's the leader? | ||
What do we think about this primary? | ||
What do we think about, you know, the RNC partnering with NBC? | ||
But more importantly, Steve, the primary, Donald Trump's gonna win. | ||
We need to focus on precinct committeemen, ballot chasing, securing our elections. | ||
We need to make sure that every single person that comes through Turning Point Action, and Steve, I know you're gonna do this, they have their marching orders. | ||
What is your duty? | ||
What is your obligation? | ||
And it's going to be more than watching War Room, Charlie Kirkshaw, and Jack Posobiec. | ||
That's great. | ||
That's important. | ||
Big time. | ||
But guys, we need the specific marching orders. | ||
I'm going to own my neighborhood, for example. | ||
So you come to AmFest, you listen to Steve Bannon, you hear Don Jr., I'm going to own my precinct. | ||
We'll talk more after the break, but the website is AmFest.com, A-M-F-E-S-T dot com. | ||
unidentified
|
Amazing. | |
A short commercial break. | ||
Charlie Kirkshaw joins us on the other side. | ||
the world here's your host steven kate okay of virtual dot com slash banning Go there, check it out today. | ||
Make sure you get all the information of why the BRICS nations are buying gold at record rates. | ||
You may want to ask Philip Patrick and the team when you go, why has gold been a hedge against turbulent times for 5,000 years? | ||
Just get the answer. | ||
Get a hot mug of Warpath coffee by going to warpath.coffee. | ||
Sit in a corner and think. | ||
Just think. | ||
Think it through. | ||
This is about your free men and women. | ||
This is about self-reliance. | ||
And on the Black Friday show on Friday, we're going to talk to all the entrepreneurs that support the War Room, and you get to hear their stories. | ||
What we're trying to do is inspire you to be an entrepreneur, to go out and do it. | ||
And it's going to be incredible. | ||
The folks we have are just absolutely incredible. | ||
Tomorrow I've got Dr. Larry Swickert. | ||
We're going to be on to go through the Thanksgiving, the history of it, President Lincoln's involvement in it, the first Thanksgiving, all of it. | ||
So you guys will know I love it. | ||
We'll love it. | ||
Charlie, you're one of the best entrepreneurs I know. | ||
Talk to me once again about AmFest. | ||
You've put together the best speakers, breakout sessions. | ||
This is all about empowerment. | ||
The only way we win in 2024, the only way we take the country back is the populist movement, the MAGA movement. | ||
Talk to me about why it is more important than ever to come to conferences like this, to meet, to network, and to get empowered. | ||
Yeah, three things come to mind, and thank you, Steve. | ||
The first of which is we need a battle plan. | ||
I mean, we need to get the right minds in the room. | ||
And I know you and I, Steve, we're planning some private time together with, you know, the guys that really get it. | ||
Jack Posobiec, Tyler Boyer, you know, the people that are actually doing the work, not just, you know, talking. | ||
And we need to whiteboard some stuff out, right? | ||
We need to go one, if not this, then this. | ||
Like chess moves, how the left operates with us. | ||
There's no plan right now. | ||
Unfortunately, we need to figure out the RNC situation. | ||
We need to figure out the data situation because you know, the clock is ticking right now. | ||
The bad guys are going to spend billions of dollars. | ||
Arabella advisors, Mark Elias, they are in full offense mode and they're freaking out and we have, we can only, we can only bring our superstar so far. | ||
I mean, we have Donald Trump who is a one man, you know, supernatural turnout machine, which is, we can only count on that. | ||
So far, if we do even a little bit of the work, we're going to win in 2024. | ||
We are going to win. | ||
We got to worry about ballot access though. | ||
Again, they're going to try to kick them off the ballot, put them in prison, all that sort of stuff. | ||
The second thing though, is hope and encouragement, uh, our rank and file, the war room posse and those that watch our program. | ||
I understand that it's, it's tempting to despair. | ||
Got to cut that out. | ||
Coming to AmFest, you get filled with hope. | ||
You get filled with optimism. | ||
You get filled with energy. | ||
You get filled with spirit. | ||
It's amazing to see the passion from the rank and file, and then you get to meet Steve, you get to meet us, you get to meet Jack, you get to ask the questions, you get to do all that sort of stuff. | ||
And then finally, the third thing, which I think is important, is the next generation piece, Steve, which is, you know, the vast majority of people attending these events are going to be under the age of 25. | ||
And Steve, I've loved your kind of pattern of what you're talking about. | ||
One of the main thrusts of your recent dialogues have been, hey, if you're under 30, you're a Russian surf man. | ||
That's not a political statement, by the way. | ||
That is resonating with younger people and younger voters. | ||
Steve, I don't want to get too far ahead of myself. | ||
The polling is showing this and what we're doing on campus is showing this. | ||
And again, there's going to be a lot of shenanigans and stuff. | ||
I think we can do historically well. | ||
I'm not saying we're going to win, but historically well with younger voters under the age of 35. | ||
They don't own anything. | ||
They're being pummeled by the regime. | ||
They're getting destroyed. | ||
So Steve, all those things across the board. | ||
And just again, look at those speakers, Tucker Carlson, Roseanne Barr, Rob Schneider, Glenn Beck, Candace Owens, Patrick Bette David. | ||
And then you're on our day of action. | ||
That's Sunday. | ||
It's the primetime day. | ||
It's all about 2024. | ||
Donald Trump, MAGA, learning from 2020, learning from 2022. | ||
It's gonna be amazing, Steve. | ||
By the way, one of the parts of the hope, and to put aside despair, is the fact that you've got the old warriors, and you've got some of the warring posse coming, and you see the energy of these young people. | ||
You will be empowered and I'm thrilled about the direction of America and saving this Republic when you combine both groups and it's amazing. | ||
I tell you, this AmFest and the scale of it, the scale of it will blow you away. | ||
It's the biggest thing I've ever seen. | ||
Look at those speakers over a couple days. | ||
Then you get breakouts, you have booze, you'll get access to literature, to books, to merchandise, to everything, and you get to network. | ||
The one thing everybody takes away is not just seeing the show live or hanging out, it's your networking. | ||
You're seeing like-minded people and that empowers people. | ||
Charlie, I know you've got to get ready for the noon show. | ||
You guys are on fire there. | ||
I've got to bounce. | ||
I really appreciate you guys. | ||
The effort of your team over at Turning Point to put this on, the scale it is, right before the holidays, right before Christmas, is fantastic. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
Can't wait to see you down there. | ||
God bless, Steve. | ||
See you soon. | ||
Thanks, brother. | ||
Really want to thank Rob and Parker Sigg and the team at Real America's Voice. | ||
I mean, the RAV will be there. | ||
You'll have the Charlie Kirk show. | ||
You have Poso. | ||
We'll be doing the afternoon shows. | ||
It's just incredible. | ||
And the and the way we do it live is just it's just absolutely amazing. | ||
Absolutely amazing. | ||
Back here at five, we're going to go through... I didn't get to the MSMEC breakdown of the cabinet. | ||
They're doing it again. | ||
They're obsessed with Mike Davis and our folks here at the War Room that are making all the efforts, setting the policy, getting focused on taking over the government and deconstructing the administrative state. | ||
They're melting that because they understand we have the ability to break The uniparty, the globalists, the oligarchs basically hold on Washington DC. | ||
Also E.J. | ||
Antoni is going to join me. | ||
There's a bunch of financial data we have to go through. | ||
I want to make sure you fully understand it before the holidays. | ||
We're going to get to that. | ||
The 5 o'clock show is going to be on fire. | ||
Charlie Kirk's up next. | ||
You get a couple hours of populist nationalism served up hot. | ||
Then you've got the one and only Jack Posobiec. | ||
I think Posobiec, hopefully he's going to say a few words. | ||
Posobiec's doing reviews now of the movie Napoleon. | ||
He was one of the first guys to see it. | ||
You'll get to hear, I think, hopefully today, he'll give a few comments. | ||
I know they talked about it a little bit last night, I think on Rumble. | ||
Tomorrow, our special that we always do on Thanksgiving, Dr. Zweikart's going to be with us. | ||
I'm going to play what the left thinks about. | ||
They don't call it Thanksgiving. | ||
They want to call it the truth day, truth giving, this whole thing about we're occupiers. | ||
They trash the pilgrims, they trash the folks at Jamestown, the pioneers, the frontiersmen, the people that actually built this country out of a vast wilderness. | ||
So we'll talk about that this afternoon, tee up tomorrow. | ||
Then on Friday, we're going to have the entrepreneurs. | ||
We're trying to, and this is one of the great things about coming to AmFest, You're going to meet so many entrepreneurs. | ||
So many entrepreneurs are making it happen. | ||
Remember, the MAGA movement is predicated upon entrepreneurial capitalism, not finance capitalism. | ||
We're the total opposite of state-controlled Wall Street finance capitalism. | ||
It's the energy of entrepreneurs. | ||
And you're going to meet some great folks on our Black Friday special. | ||
So anyway, Safton, we'll be back here 5 to 7. | ||
The show will be on fire. | ||
Until then, make sure that you go to our Getter account. | ||
Totally free. | ||
Our app is totally free. | ||
Bill Blaster, totally free. | ||
Getter's totally free. | ||
I'm putting up analysis, comments, and coming in a little hot every now and again. | ||
Grace Chung and Captain Bannon coming a little hot too. | ||
Jane Zirkle, so you can check it all out. | ||
Download Getter. | ||
unidentified
|
Do it today. |