Nov. 16, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| President Trump got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish, in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| Okay, a couple things just to reiterate. | ||
| The, um, um... | ||
| Um... | ||
| You can see the playing field shifting and this all ties together with the money. | ||
| Remember the money always gets a vote here. | ||
| And the vote is always against you. | ||
| It's never to make your life better. | ||
| It's never to give you a bigger voice. | ||
| It's never to give you a bigger platform. | ||
| None of it. | ||
| It's always to thwart you. | ||
| This is what they fear about Trump. | ||
| They fear Trump has initiated a movement that's now taking over the Republican Party. | ||
| In process. | ||
| Because we still, as you know, you can tell, you still have a number of representatives that will not get with the program. | ||
| And we're going to talk about this. | ||
| I'm going to get Brad in here in a minute. | ||
| I got to get on with it because he's got to bounce. | ||
| But you've seen the merger coming together. | ||
| This is why Ronald McDaniel is still at the at the RNC. | ||
| And this is why they continue to push These debates that are the ones pushing debates, pushing debates because they're trying to highlight, particularly for the mainstream media, an alternative to Trump. | ||
| And now Fox News has come in and Zwick has come in and you can see what their plan is. | ||
| To have her hang around the rim long enough that if anything was to happen to Trump in this legal situation, which we think is quite remote, but you never know. | ||
| You never know how this stuff's going to break. | ||
| It's obviously all made up, but today you're going to see in Denver, Davis will be out there in the afternoon show. | ||
| Excuse me, I think it's Friday. | ||
| It's Friday that it comes in, so we'll be covering that tomorrow. | ||
| Her, you know, when she rules to take Trump off the ballot. | ||
| But it's a no risk situation for them because what they do is they galvanize or collect the 10, 15, 20% of the never Trump vote, anybody but Trump, and with the donor money and with Fox News. | ||
| And they make the argument at the end, well, she came in second. | ||
| She's female. | ||
| She's got to be your VP. | ||
| And they push her to be the prime minister, the Cheney to Trump's Bush. | ||
| This is going to happen. | ||
| You can see quite evident what they're doing now. | ||
| And that's why Zwick, the Axios story is so important. | ||
| Because he is the Wrangler. | ||
| He was the Romney Wrangler, but he's the number one Wrangler of all these donors and he can make an organized effort of what they got to do. | ||
| So more on that later. | ||
| And they're inextricably linked with the 400 that gave Xi the standing ovation because they don't want Trump's policies. | ||
| They don't want America first. | ||
| They don't want confrontation with the CCP. | ||
| A big tell this morning. | ||
| I want to bring in, bring in Dave Brat. | ||
| By the way, this is why you got to go to Birch Gold. | ||
| A story in the FT this morning, Brett join me now, a story in the FT that the central banks of the world are sitting on 30 trillion dollars of assets. | ||
| When I say they say assets, they mean their own bonds that their own treasury departments have created of how they just, this is how they print money. | ||
| This is the way they do it, quantitative easing. | ||
| When I say the central banks, I just mean the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank, The German, the Deutsche Bank, Bank of England and the, not Deutsche Bank, the German Central Bank and the Federal Reserve. | ||
| 30 trillion dollars. | ||
| 30 trillion dollars. | ||
| 30 trillion. | ||
| And on our books is 8 trillion of that. | ||
| On the other side, you've got the BRICS, led by China they had the meeting with last night, that are buying gold at record rates, 22 and 23. | ||
| They ain't buying their own bonds. | ||
| Number one, it's very tough for them to do it. | ||
| But number two, they're buying gold. | ||
| Record rates in 22 and 23, and China bought 25% of that. | ||
| That tells you the difference in philosophy between this new world order that the Chinese are trying, the CCP's trying to impose, that we're now in a kinetic conflict with in the Middle East. | ||
| And, you know, they try to draw us into a kinetic conflict in Ukraine, but the CIA's over there to tell Zelensky the game's over, the game's up, your military's revolting on you. | ||
| Harnwell's going to come and talk to us about that. | ||
| Brad, you've also done some additional work on that chart. | ||
| Can we get the chart? | ||
| I put up everybody and I'm gonna have a whole show just on this chart because I want over Thanksgiving everybody to understand it. | ||
| The chart about cash in, cash out on 23, which shows a 1.6 trillion dollar deficit. | ||
| It's gun-decked. | ||
| Should be two, but don't worry about that. | ||
| But, Brett, because people run around happy talking, saying, oh, if you get higher growth rates, you know, we're going to get higher, I'm going to bring higher growth rates in of four and five percent, which is not going to happen. | ||
| Now we have this crushing debt and interest. | ||
| Now we're going to take over a trillion dollars. | ||
| But even in the, you've done some math. | ||
| That's even a fantasy. | ||
| Even if you were to achieve that, you don't get very far, do you, sir? | ||
| No, that's a great chart right there. | ||
| Cash in, cash out. | ||
| And then that you noted yesterday, there's another 700 billion interest payments come into there. | ||
| And the gold story is also all true, but it's an effect of the larger fact that the Chinese and Wall Street and the rest of the world knows now, and that's that we are passively defaulting on our debt already, as E.J. | ||
| and Tony pointed out yesterday and you covered. | ||
| And so today, I want to lay out the economics. | ||
| There's only a few variables that are needed to understand that chart right there from an economic standpoint. | ||
| And it's the same thing. | ||
| It's cash in and cash out, right? | ||
| Revenues. | ||
| How do you get your revenues? | ||
| What are the costs known as government spending? | ||
| And so Denver will put up the first chart. | ||
| This thing's mind blowing. | ||
| If we had any economists in the country right now doing their job, they would be doing this. | ||
| This is 10 years old, but it's kind of good because it's not biased by any of the modern, you know, current political warfare going on. | ||
| This gentleman out on Alpha, one of the good financial blogs, just takes out stimulus spending, not all of government spending. | ||
| All he does is takes out deficit stimulus spending and shows what economic growth would be without it. | ||
| So everything I'm saying here is way worse than this. | ||
| This is 10 years ago when the deficit wasn't even a trillion dollars. | ||
| Now it's $2 trillion, as you note, and CBO has $2 trillion for the next 10 years, resulting in $50 trillion in debt. | ||
| And that's an optimistic scenario. | ||
| That's without any wars or any other surprises. | ||
| So what does this chart show? | ||
| And by the way, this holds for Europe and it holds for China on steroids because their stimulus is even worse than ours, right? | ||
| It's all government spending, all central planning. | ||
| And the basic upshot, I always forget to get to the upshot, is there's only one solution to this, all this mess I'm going to show you, and it's to cut spending Massively. | ||
| So what does this chart show you? | ||
| This shows you back then, kind of like now, GDP growth is at 2%. | ||
| If you took out stimulus spending, deficit spending by the government, the growth rate for the U.S. | ||
| would be negative 8%. | ||
| And that's the positive scenario. | ||
| Right now we have $2 trillion deficit spending. | ||
| So you can extrapolate from that, but I'll just stay with this. | ||
| Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hit rewind. | ||
| Right. | ||
| The audience is going to have to, I want them to embrace this because this is reality check. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Give me that again. | ||
| Give me that the growth rate is really, how do you, how do you, how do you work? | ||
| What's the math to get you to a negative 8% growth? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And the math, as you point out, right, if anyone wants to challenge this chart, You know, in all my spare time, I wish I could replicate all these studies. | ||
| But if you don't buy this, and this to me makes eminent sense, any of the House economists, I'd be nice if they did this, any of the White House economists, any Democrat that wants to come on and refute this and the rest of the story is just as damaging. | ||
| But what this shows is if you take out deficit spending from the government accounts, right, the Keynesian central planning government accounts, Where we count government spending and debt as GDP growth, right? | ||
| Let's borrow from our kids, put the money over here into this bucket and call it GDP growth. | ||
| Oh, cool idea! | ||
| Makes us look good. | ||
| So, bottom line here is, really, if you take out the deficit spending, the funny money coming from the government, we're growing at negative 10% GDP. | ||
| And just, you can look at it back in the envelope style also. | ||
| Just bottom line, If you take away $2 trillion, roughly speaking, that's one-tenth of your economy. | ||
| What would happen to your economy if you just chopped off one-tenth of it and it fell into the ocean? | ||
| Something like this graph. | ||
| It's just common sense. | ||
| None of the economists, if anyone at Harvard or Princeton or Yale wrote this article and replicated it, they'd be fired immediately. | ||
| All the foundation grants would go bye-bye. | ||
| But let's get to the second chart because this is just a bit of a doozy. | ||
| The other side, that one just shows you at 2040 to 2050, our GDP growth is estimated to be 1.5. | ||
| This is CBO using the best models out there, probably optimistic, and so they're just stating we're not going to be growing at 3 or 4% or 5%, but 1.5% for the entire decade, a couple decades out. | ||
| Feeds right into the next chart, Denver. | ||
| Here's the doozy. | ||
| You'll hear a lot of the free market folks and our friends say we can grow our way out of this thing. | ||
| Again, this is from 10 years ago. | ||
| Avoids all the bias of today, the wars going on. | ||
| With GDP growth of 5%, you don't pay off the debt back then, when the debt was merely in the $10-20 trillion range and the deficits were less than a trillion. | ||
| Now we have deficits of $2 trillion. | ||
| Debt at 50 trillion in 10 years. | ||
| And what this chart shows is it would take a decade ago, 7.5% GDP growth to break even, to pay off your debt. | ||
| And that's over a 10-year horizon. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| Not to pay off your debt. | ||
| Not to pay off your debt. | ||
| That's just to get the growth you need to be able to pay for the annual deficit, not the debt. | ||
| You're never going to pay off. | ||
| You're never going to pay off a penny of the debt. | ||
| Not one penny. | ||
| The face amount. | ||
| Very good nomenclature from the Oxford Don. | ||
| Caught me in a loop there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So what is this show as well? | |
| This is only with less than a trillion deficits and you take and you need seven and a half percent to grow. | ||
| Well, today we're over two trillion and productivity growth is lower and GDP growth is lower. | ||
| And I just showed you CBO's long run productivity growth figure at one and a half. | ||
| It would take you can double that one easy. | ||
| And again, if any Democrats want to come forward, Bernstein from the White House and explain this to me. | ||
| It would take 15% GDP growth right now to pay off just the deficit spending we're doing. | ||
| Here's what the Democrat response was before that. | ||
| I want to get that down. | ||
| I'll just show you the other side. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Keep going. | ||
| Keep rolling. | ||
| You're on a roll. | ||
| Next one after that, Denver. | ||
| Here's what the Democrat response, before that I had a bunch of text. | ||
| I'll just summarize it. | ||
| It was called Table 4 or something like that. | ||
| It was a bunch of text. | ||
| Paper came out by Wharton this year. | ||
| They have a whole bunch of, you know, maintain economic growth through tax increases. | ||
| Now, that's also faulty. | ||
| Tax increases, and I've got this all at Brad Economics. | ||
| People can go look it up. | ||
| But they had a whole slur of tax increases. | ||
| Raised the top income rate from $37 to $45. | ||
| Tax gains way high, pass-through income. | ||
| Minimum tax, 45%. | ||
| Raised corporate tax from $21 to $28. | ||
| Every tax under the sun. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Dear Democrats, that only gets you $4 trillion in savings over the 10-year window. | ||
| You just raised every tax on the earth. | ||
| That's going to slow down the economy. | ||
| And all of those tax increases, which won't get voted through, right? | ||
| The left has all the billionaires right now, as you just pointed out, supporting China, right? | ||
| And all political views are my own. | ||
| This isn't politics. | ||
| This is just economics. | ||
| All those tax increases only result in $4 trillion gains over 10 years. | ||
| So if we would just balance the budget for two years in a row, right? | ||
| We have a COVID economy, a COVID government budget right now. | ||
| It's $7 trillion. | ||
| Back when I was in, it was $4.5 trillion or $5 trillion. | ||
| So we had COVID and we kept the COVID spending when COVID's all done. | ||
| And so that makes no sense. | ||
| We got to get back to a $5 trillion spending, if that, right? | ||
| So we're talking $2 trillion a year cuts, anything less than that. | ||
| And I think that the new speaker, Mike Johnson, is going to go home with a break. | ||
| And he's going to see we're in a forcing function right now, and he's got to come back with some plan that approaches this logic. | ||
| Because he's got the leverage, we have a forcing function in history, and the time's now. | ||
| Hang on for one second. | ||
| Let me just hold you. | ||
| I know you've got to bounce. | ||
| I'm going to hold you for a quick break, bring you back. | ||
| I just want to summarize this for folks. | ||
| Uh, brilliant. | ||
| You see what happens when I get, I'm like a Zen master, I get, I get, uh, Bratt to not give me moral philosophy, but to get back to the math. | ||
| He's pretty good on the math. | ||
| See how, see how revelatory that was? | ||
| Our moral philosopher, Dave Bratt, doing some real work here, rolling up the sleeves, crunching some numbers in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| So I realize in the chat they're saying, hey, okay, we can understand the math of what we do about it. | ||
| Well, look, here's a couple things to think about. | ||
| It's a $2 trillion deficit with the new higher, more interest we have to pay. | ||
| So tell me how we get there. | ||
| Brad just laid out, if you increase all the taxes and even increase the tax on the wealthy, and maybe we haven't done a good enough job there, but that's $4 trillion over 10 years. | ||
| That's $400 billion a year. | ||
| So let's say we do that. | ||
| I'm not advocating that. | ||
| Right now, certainly you can't pay more taxes. | ||
| It will slow the economy and the economic growth, but so that'll drive number them. | ||
| But just for purposes of discussion, they get you 400 billion a year. | ||
| I'm still a trade 1.6 trillion short. | ||
| So you see the chart where the car and you can't touch Social Security and Medicare. | ||
| Those two are locked in. | ||
| You got and will explain these categories more. | ||
| Over the weekend and next week so you can get I want people playing around with this, but you see that you see the horns of the dilemma are cut on now. | ||
| Dave Brat and our solution is hey, it's quite simple. | ||
| We got to go back to this is why we keep using this piece of nomenclature pre covid spending levels. | ||
| When Donald Trump was in office in 19, the fiscal year 2020, I don't remember the 2020 budget. | ||
| I don't remember people saying we were under, you know, we had too little government then. | ||
| I think that, I think it was over four, I think it was got to 4.5 trillion dollars as the budget. | ||
| You just go back to that level. | ||
| Brad, I mean, we got to do something. | ||
| Folks, you got, you can't, if this thing's locked in, systemically if this is locked in as a in perpetuity the nation's over the country's over finished done you're not you're not gonna uh... you don't believe that this is why you get a good go to birchgold and get the end of the dollar empire birchgold slash ban and get the end of the dollar empire Learn for yourself. | ||
| Immerse yourself. | ||
| I don't care if you don't have a high school education. | ||
| I don't care if math, you know, you had to do math with tears with your dad back when you're in elementary school. | ||
| This stuff is fairly basic and you can learn it and then you become empowered. | ||
| But this is the, and remember, and they come back and they talk about these cuts and they got, oh, McCarthy agreed to this. | ||
| At most, I think you're talking $200 billion in cuts, which the Democrats are never going to agree to, and Biden's not going to agree to. | ||
| So this, that's a drop in the, that's a tiny drop in the bucket. | ||
| They're going to melt down and call you the worst people in the world for just doing that. | ||
| Brat, I know you've got to bounce. | ||
| The audience loves you, particularly not being moral philosopher today, but actually doing some work, which you did. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| So tell the audience, what's the Brat solution? | ||
| My solution is with the new speaker, Mike Johnson, who's going to go home and read the Bible and reflect on this country and see that in 2025 we have $50 trillion in debt with a 5% interest rate, and that's $2.5 trillion in just interest payments per year. | ||
| $2.5 trillion in interest payments. | ||
| We're at a forcing function. | ||
| The Tea Party, the grassroots have been asking, when does this thing go bust? | ||
| The answer is right now. | ||
| This is not sustainable. | ||
| Any economist force the Democrats up there to give an explanation, but the real answer lies in he's got to revive the American animal spirits. | ||
| The excitement, the work ethic for the kids, the innovation, believing in America again. | ||
| If he rolls up his sleeves and hits the good book and revitalizes our soul, That is what made America great in the first place. | ||
| We all had a huge swath of liberty around us that size. | ||
| Now we're constrained by a $7 trillion Leviathan government that restricts us in every move we make, with social media sending falsehoods across the board, with Xi saying yesterday, hey, there's room for two of us on this planet. | ||
| Oh, thanks for the notice, Xi. | ||
| Glad to hear that. | ||
| You know, if we made a statement like that, there's room for two of us on the planet? | ||
| What in the world is the subtext there? | ||
| So the speaker needs to revive the animal spirits that economists know drive economic growth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If he puts us on a course that makes sense, we'll do it. | |
| When he says forcing function, he's talking about this audience. | ||
| You are the forcing function. | ||
| One thing before I let Brad go. | ||
| When we talk about it, everybody says, oh, it's the Tea Party movement. | ||
| It's this war room posse. | ||
| They're disrupting the government. | ||
| They're forcing a default on, and we've never defaulted on government debt. | ||
| Moody's just showed you. | ||
| We have already defaulted on our debt. | ||
| And don't take it from me. | ||
| Call your friends that bought 30-year government bonds, the safe bonds, the 30-year bonds, and have them call their broker right now and mark to market those bonds. | ||
| Those bonds are 50 cents on the dollar. | ||
| Is that not a default? | ||
| 50 cents on a dollar if you had to trade them today. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Also, your money is 17 to 20 percent drop in purchasing power. | ||
| They're defaulting to valuing on you all day long. | ||
| This is why the BRICS, this is why the Financial Times saying the central banks of the West are sitting on 30 trillion dollars of created assets, made up bonds to force money into their system, fiat currency, and the BRICS are buying gold at record rates on the other side of the trade. | ||
| It's quite evident what's happening here. | ||
| And the BRIC nations are saying, hey, these Americans got so much freedom. | ||
| Well, they ain't got freedom to get away from the dollar and they're just going to have to suck on it. | ||
| But we don't. | ||
| That's the point. | ||
| If you look at this math, you have to be the adults in the room. | ||
| You're going to get called every name in the book about these cuts. | ||
| And this is why I gave that speech at Pinehurst a couple weeks ago. | ||
| I said, look what's happening outside of Columbus Circle. | ||
| Look what happened last night in front of the DNC. | ||
| When you start doing the massive cuts to Discretionary spending to get to the pre-COVID levels you have to do, coupled with having to deport, seal the border and deport 8 million invaders that are costing us half a trillion dollars that are not even baked into these numbers according to the Republican, I think, study committee. | ||
| A half a trillion dollars is not even in here. | ||
| You tell me what this nation is going to look like. | ||
| What you're seeing now is a garden party compared to that. | ||
| Brett, how do people get you on social media? | ||
| Amazing work. | ||
| Let's get this stuff up today. | ||
| Just incredible work that day, Brett. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Sorry, I've been behind. | ||
| It's all posted. | ||
| Brett Economics on Getter. | ||
| I'm at Liberty University. | ||
| Oxford Don, Steve Bannon, is doing just the work of a maestro here. | ||
| Remember, I believe each one of you is made in the image of God. | ||
| Whether you believe it or not, I believe it. | ||
| And if you go around the world and survey every issue Steve's going to go over today, it's going to come down to a philosophy which recognizes that versus a philosophy, theology, or religion which rejects that premise. | ||
| At every single turn, you're going to find that reality. | ||
| And that standing ovation last night by those secular and atheist and pagans in that room, that's the difference in world philosophy. | ||
| That's the difference in the two philosophies and belief systems. | ||
| The biblical worldview says, no, we're made in the image and likeness of God and we're never going to kowtow ever. | ||
| We are never going to cheer. | ||
| We're not going to stand up. | ||
| We're not going to pay for a plate. | ||
| We're not going to be there. | ||
| on a murderous dictator. | ||
| We will never, ever do that. | ||
| In the wealthy in this country, the people that have leeched off this country are sitting there giving him a standing ovation. | ||
| That's not me. | ||
| That's the headline of today's Financial Times. | ||
| They're proud of it. | ||
| Brad, thank you very much, brother. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| God bless. | ||
| What a treasure that guy is. | ||
| You wanted the answer. | ||
| It ain't pretty. | ||
| Not easy. | ||
| That's why, hey, Johnson blinked this week. | ||
| Let's be blunt. | ||
| Oh, shut down the government. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The National Park Service is going to shut down for three days. | |
| You need a forcing function. | ||
| As Charlie Kirk said, you got to keep them here. | ||
| Get them here and keep them here. | ||
| They have to miss all the holidays. | ||
| There shouldn't be any holidays. | ||
| You should have the religious observance and then get to work. | ||
| That's where our society is based upon. | ||
| is making sure we're taking care and we're setting things right. | ||
| Hanwell, a story today in the Asian Times, I think, is very clarifying. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It talks about Z-Day. | |
| Why is the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, with everything we got going on in the world, world on fire, why is he overspending a couple of days with our favorite oligarch grifter, Zelensky, sir? | ||
| It's a very good question, Steve. | ||
| And I'll add to that question, how come this story hasn't appeared in a single Western newspaper? | ||
| Not a single one. | ||
| Even our beloved Langley Bugle hasn't reported this. | ||
| This is the only article I can find on this which has been repeated in foreign press. | ||
| It's from the Hong Kong-based Asia Times. | ||
| And that's it. | ||
| Literally no. | ||
| Not the FT, not the New York Times, not the Washington Post. | ||
| Nobody carries it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a very interesting article, by the way. | |
| Very well written. | ||
| Very balanced. | ||
| And the rhetorical question it raises is how come Burns, Bill Burns, the head of the CIA, is on an urgent mission to Ukraine? | ||
| And it answers the rhetorical question. | ||
| The answer to the question is that Ukraine is imploding. | ||
| And it then sets the scene, Steve, saying that the American strategy here, and this is something that you've been saying for months now on the show, the US strategy here is attrition. | ||
| And as the article explicitly states it, the Washington's objective now is to keep this war in motion throughout the next year, after the next US election, November 24, in a year's time. | ||
| And the suggestion of this article is that Burns is there basically to try to get Zelensky to cease his attacks on mainland Russia in order to stop antagonizing Russia, because they don't want Russia to go all the way. | ||
| Because the more they do that, the more Russia responds and weakens Ukraine's defenses. | ||
| So the idea is to keep this status quo on its feet. | ||
| For the rest of the year. | ||
| Now, obviously, there's a wider dynamic. | ||
| I mean, the question is, of course, why is the CIA... Ben, hang on for one second. | ||
| We're taking a short commercial break. | ||
| We'll come right back to you. | ||
| I want to get into this article. | ||
| Zidey in Kiev as a CIA director goes over there and he's got some unfortunate news for Zelensky. | ||
| He says, hey, I noticed there's a split in your government. | ||
| The military is saying one thing, you're saying another. | ||
| So we've got to make a decision here. | ||
| What are we going to do? | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Make sure, by the way, get to Birchgold today. | ||
| Birchgold.com. | ||
| Ask Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| Why are the central banks in the West sitting on 30 trillion of paper assets in the bricks of buying gold? | ||
| Wait for the answer. | ||
| You deserve it. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| We'll be right back in a moment. | ||
| Now they know they have the business community with their back. | ||
| Think about that for a second. | ||
| Everything we had the dissidents on yesterday, the new federal state on, Lao Beijing, everything that's happened under this bloody dictatorship. | ||
| That's not even a question. | ||
| They don't debate that. | ||
| They don't care. | ||
| I'm not saying they're racist, but hey, they just don't think Chinese lives matter. | ||
| And the Chinese people know that. | ||
| They understand that. | ||
| That the elites don't just think they're trash. | ||
| Oh, by the way, which they think you're trash too. | ||
| Just your sons and daughters just cannon fodder, just pay your taxes. | ||
| You'll notice in that, uh, you'll notice in that chart that I keep referring you back to that the taxes are $2.2 trillion. | ||
| That, that is your, And then you throw in the substrate, but that is your effort here. | ||
| That's what they need you for. | ||
| For your labor and then the spiff they take off it. | ||
| Well, make sure you don't play the games. | ||
| That's why Jace Medical, I'm really proud that they're a sponsor and because they took action on this issue about the supply chain. | ||
| Just go to jacemedical.com and find out how you can be prepared. | ||
| Of the, um, as we move into the further stages of the kinetic war, they have us, they have us, they have a chokehold on the supply chains, in particular in generic drugs and active pharmaceutical ingredients. | ||
| They have 100% of it. | ||
| And that was a strategic move, not just to make money, which they're making tons of, but a strategic move, just like they have all the PP&E. | ||
| Remember the first days of the pandemic. | ||
| So go to jacemedicalrightnow.com and check it out. | ||
| Don't get caught up in this. | ||
| Don't allow yourself personally to be overwhelmed by what's going to happen in the turbulence ahead. | ||
| So, the point in this article that hasn't made it into the Western media, because they don't want to talk about it, and it's obvious we've talked about it, the military high command in the Ukrainian armed forces are at, not just loggerheads, they violently disagree with what Zelensky and his political guys want to do. | ||
| And the article says that Zelensky keeps the political guys together because they're still stealing 10-20% off the top and everybody knows it. | ||
| This is why there's been no audit. | ||
| This is why MTG, when she put this thing in, they said, yeah, you'll go in, but they haven't done anything on it and they want to shovel more money. | ||
| And this is the power of even the small thing we accomplished. | ||
| We took the supplemental off, but you should know in the Senate, they're working nonstop on how we slide some sort of supplemental in. | ||
| There can be no more money for Ukraine. | ||
| Zero. | ||
| And the article lays it out and I'll get it up. | ||
| I'll get it up later so people can read it. | ||
| The article goes through how there's a, and the reason is the military understands they're going to be blamed for this ultimately. | ||
| Now that now they're battalions, there's no recruiting going on. | ||
| People are paying to get their kids out of there, that you've got young kids, you've got women that are men in these battalions and old men, and they're getting chewed up. | ||
| And he continues, you know, they got a beachhead on the other side of the Dnieper River that the Russians are now panning them to... the troops over there are getting ground up. | ||
| But that's the difference. | ||
| You have a big cleavage. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, it can't continue on like this. | ||
| This is why Burns is over there. | ||
| He wants some sort of rapprochement between the sides to at least stumble through the winter and be able to get through the election so they can get more money to him. | ||
| Because I understand in the election this is going to be a huge issue. | ||
| This is how it started with Stavridis and all these great thinkers on MSNBC. | ||
| They're the same great thinkers that lied to you from day one about the progress of this war. | ||
| And what do the Ukrainian people have to show for it? | ||
| A country that looks like Dresden in 1945. | ||
| Oh, by the way, 60,000 to 75,000 dead Ukrainians. | ||
| Oh, by the way, 60,000 to 75,000 dead Ukrainians. | ||
| Ben Harnwell. | ||
| That's absolutely right, Steve. | ||
| So the article frames the situation in this. | ||
| It says Ukraine either must find a way to make a deal with Russia or face an internal rebellion. | ||
| Now, there's no point Talking about coming to terms with Russia, we've hit that on the war room repeatedly over the last 18 months. | ||
| I'm going to drill down on this internal rebellion that's brewing under the surface here. | ||
| Basically, the division is between Zelensky and what the Asia Times calls the thugocracy, which is all the oligarchs together, and the Ukrainian army high command. | ||
| And the difference in strategy is this. | ||
| Zelensky wants to push on. | ||
| He doesn't want a ceasefire. | ||
| He wants to push on and increase pushing Russia back. | ||
| The army generals realize that there's no army left. | ||
| And this is a quick way to defeat. | ||
| They want to hold on in expectation that more support is going to come through from the United States. | ||
| And in fact, the general who's in charge of this, the leading general Valery Zelensky, we mentioned him last week on the show, because this is the guy that said in The Economist about ten days ago that this war is settling into a First World War dynamic. | ||
| A stalemate was the words he used. | ||
| He was then slapped down by Zelensky's spokeswoman, and his own chief of staff was blown up by a hand grenade in his own home. | ||
| at his birthday party. | ||
| We hit all of this on the last week. | ||
| Now, Asia Times says this guy's about, this general here, Valery Solisny, he's about to be purged in addition to three other very senior generals. | ||
| I won't list their titles, but they are basically the hierarchy that run the Ukrainian army. | ||
| So what I would speculate and what the article suggests is that Bill Burns is there to try and to give support to the Ukrainian military position, Martyn Zelensky's position, for the reasons I was indicating before the break. | ||
| But right now that's where this audience is so important. | ||
| No more money for Ukraine. | ||
| They want to figure out how to keep them on the battlefield and not collapse. | ||
| Because they can live to fight another day and hope they beat Trump and then they figure out how to get more money out of this thing. | ||
| But right now, that's why this audience is so important. | ||
| No more money for Ukraine. | ||
| In fact, I want, and I think MTG was onto something about this accounting. | ||
| We have to find out where our money went. | ||
| And when I say that, when we find out they stole it and put it in the south of France and put it in these DACAs in the nation of Georgia and on these beautiful resorts that are over there, we want the money back. | ||
| We want these guys tried for stealing our money, because this is what happened here. | ||
| Ben, I've got to bounce because we're jammed today, but I've got to get you back on tomorrow. | ||
| We've got so much to go through that we haven't had you on for the last couple of days. | ||
| We fought this congressional thing, but where do people go? | ||
| I am jealous of your engagement. | ||
| Mine's pretty good. | ||
| Yours is amazing. | ||
| Engagement. | ||
| I think it's because you're a little more spicy than I am. | ||
| Where do they go and get her? | ||
| Steve, the Warren posse is a very discerning group of people. | ||
| Look, before I hit the socials, I have to read this quote from the article. | ||
| It says that Zelensky's success is built on the base of graft and theft. | ||
| He finances his support by allowing officials to steal as much as they can. | ||
| That's the way they stay loyal. | ||
| And there's more to it. | ||
| I'm going to post it. | ||
| You're going to post it. | ||
| Chase me down on Bannon's War Room on Rumble, on the newsletter on warroom.com or on at Steve Bannon, where you very kindly share me. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| I tell you what, I tell you what, you post it with one of your great introductions and I'll repost it and let you get the, because you're doing a great job. | ||
| And this, the reason this article is so important, the Asia Times is a very good paper. | ||
| David Goldman and his team, I think, are still over there, is that it kind of cuts to the chase, and it kind of makes sense when you think it through. | ||
| And they're stealing money with both hands, and he looks the other way because that keeps the thugocracy together. | ||
| Remember, it was rated the third most corrupt country on Earth when we started this fiasco, and we poured in $120 billion already. | ||
| And it's another 60 to 80 ready to go, and thank God, the one thing that Johnson did right was just say, we're not even going to address the supplementals. | ||
| And you should know in the Senate, they're working nonstop to figure out how to slide something in right before Christmas to get money, because they've got to keep the money laundering operation over. | ||
| They've got child trafficking, money laundering, bioweapons lab. | ||
| When we pick that scab, who knows what pus comes out of there. | ||
| But it's going to be a lot of puss and it's not going to be pretty. | ||
| And people got to be held accountable. | ||
| Ben, thank you so much for doing this. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks. | |
| Go ahead, Steve. | ||
| Do I have my guy? | ||
| Is he up yet? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| OK, fine. | ||
| Mike Lindell. | ||
| Brother, man, they are all they're all over you on the media. | ||
| You're taking more incoming than Trump is, and that's hard to do since President Trump all day long. | ||
| God, you're broke. | ||
| You're flailing around. | ||
| Nobody's at the company. | ||
| Nothing's happening. | ||
| It looks a little different when we look at the factory floor. | ||
| Employees are happy, they're getting ready for the holidays, they're making stuff like crazy, the operators are answering the phone with a cheery voice. | ||
| What's the reality? | ||
| Is it Newsweek and these other stories, right? | ||
| Or are my lying eyes seeing the right thing? | ||
| Well, they're definitely, the media loves attacking, but I do want to quick say this, everybody. | ||
| Just yesterday, a judge ruled that a person that questions elections or machines are not conspiracy theorists. | ||
| This just came out last night. | ||
| A judge ruled this. | ||
| So I got to take off my tinfoil hat, and I got to say, wow, really? | ||
| You can actually question elections? | ||
| So maybe they'll stop attacking now, but I doubt it. | ||
| They're under full attack. | ||
| You can check LyndalePlan.com, everybody. | ||
| But I want to tell you, to get through this big attack, the War Room Posse now is the number one supporter we have on MyPillow. | ||
| It's above and beyond. | ||
| You guys have been absolutely amazing. | ||
| Given all my employees filled up the factory floor and they owe you a debt of gratitude, all of you. | ||
| And so we put, we've extended for, for, um, and added to the, my, or to the, my pillow specials for the war room posse. | ||
| Uh, you can go to the, uh, go to my pillow and go down to the war room square. | ||
| You'll see, uh, Steve's face there. | ||
| All the stuff we put on, all the stuff we're gonna do for Black Friday and Cyber Monday, we did it all early for the War Room Posse. | ||
| The best one right now that you guys get, that no one else in the country gets, is the Giza Dream Sheets. | ||
| These are the sheets that made us famous. | ||
| They're on sale on TV everywhere for $89.98 for the queen size. | ||
| You guys get them for $59.98 as a big thank you to you all. | ||
| The best sheets in history and king size on sale for $99.98 everywhere. | ||
| This flash sale, I'm going to continue it for the War Room Posse. | ||
| $69.98, the best Christmas gifts ever. | ||
| For yourself and for your loved ones. | ||
| Use promo code War Room. | ||
| The home reps, they thank you too. | ||
| Not just the factory floor. | ||
| You guys have kept them busy. | ||
| That 800, the number there to call in. | ||
| But there's our Black Friday sale. | ||
| All of that going on. | ||
| We have the dream sheet. | ||
| There's the bed sheets. | ||
| The MyPillow 2.0. | ||
| The best pillow just got even better. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$39.98. | |
| 50% off for the queen. | ||
| King size, just $5 more. | ||
| The towel sets, the six-piece towel sets, we're going to keep them going for the War Room Posse. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$29.98. | |
| The best towels ever. | ||
| They actually work. | ||
| So, Steve, there's over 240 items on there now that the War Room Posse can get on sale. | ||
| We put every one of them on sale, from our down comforters to our blankets. | ||
| And here it is, everybody. | ||
| I'm doing it for all of you. | ||
| We extended our 60-day money-back guarantee to March 1st of next year so that you can give these as Christmas gifts and they get the same comfort level that they, if they don't, for any reason that they don't work and they're not the best product ever, they can return them. | ||
| So, Steve, I can't thank you enough. | ||
| You guys have been so supportive and the War Room Posse, it's just awesome. | ||
| 800-873-1062 for the operators. | ||
| Let's keep them fully occupied. | ||
| And engage them in conversation, too, when you talk to them. | ||
| They want to hear your voice and to get to know you. | ||
| Because the IRS is trying to throw them out of business. | ||
| Mike, we gotta bounce. | ||
| Get you back over this afternoon. | ||
| We got your guys back 1,000%. | ||
| We cannot let and will never let MyPillow get through the turbulence that The left wants to, uh, they're already putting President Trump through that in this Manhattan jury. | ||
| Ridiculous, this trial distributor of his assets. | ||
| Hey, Steve, do you think they're gonna let up? | ||
| Do you think they're gonna let up on me now that I'm not a conspiracy theorist? | ||
| Yeah, you know, I think the jury's out on that, Mike. | ||
| Lindell, see you this afternoon. | ||
| Thanks, bro. | ||
| Let's go back to work. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| Natalie joins me on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there is no more, let's take down the C.C.P. | |
| Host, Stephen K. Babb. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm gonna go. | |
| Bye. | ||
| Huge event yesterday that was not in the Bay Area about the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Natalie's going to join me here in a second. | ||
| You know, Charlie Kirk is always on fire. | ||
| His show follows us here on Real America's Voice. | ||
| Particularly the last couple of days, he's really been the point man of this fiasco in the house that we're trying to be of assistance. | ||
| We're not trying to be negative. | ||
| I think Charlie's doing it in a way that's really dropping the hammer. | ||
| Charlie follows us. | ||
| Here at noon for a couple hours and the great Jack Posobiec after that. | ||
| We're back at we're back at five to seven tonight. | ||
| A couple things. | ||
| Eric Prince, who now is in, you know, pretty open about it in the Middle East in various locations, has spent the last couple years of his life really focused on security for your telecommunications. | ||
| I don't think anybody knows the ins and outs of this better than Eric Prince. | ||
| His phone is unplugged. | ||
| You get all the details at Unplugged.com. | ||
| You will want to understand how this blocks out the government and anybody else like the CCP and anybody else from listening to you or getting to get access to your information. | ||
| Also what it blocks out for the the impressions that can get to your teenagers and children. | ||
| So take and no ability he's cut the ability stop the ability of the phone for them to take your data and to sell it to monetize it. | ||
| So, this has been years in the making, and we strongly recommend you go take a look. | ||
| Unplugged.com. | ||
| Go check it out. | ||
| Immerse yourself in the information, and you've got access to people if you have more questions on you there. | ||
| Unplugged.com. | ||
| Also, about the situation with the interest rates, remember, the merger of cyber criminals with new artificial intelligence is creating a criminal weapon of really incalculable power. | ||
| Make sure it doesn't get to your home title. | ||
| Last thing you need right now is a hard money loan taken out on the title of your home that you have to pay off. | ||
| Not the high interest rates, but the face amount where they suck out the cash. | ||
| And of course, nobody wants to hear your tale of woe after that happens. | ||
| So make sure you go to HomeTitleLock.com today. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| Make sure you learn everything about it. | ||
| Natalie, something happened yesterday in this city that was very important. | ||
| What was it, ma'am? | ||
| So yesterday, Peter Daszak, I'm sure fans of the show know him, but he's the president of EcoHealth Alliance. | ||
| That's, of course, the New York-based nonprofit that received your taxpayer dollars from Anthony Fauci to fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| And you'll probably also know Peter Daszak because he's notorious for lying about it, and he also played a lead role in the WHO's COVID origins investigation team. | ||
| But what is so interesting, and frankly, I would call it an abysmal failure on behalf of our congressional bettors, which I think we should get used to at this point, he testified in front of the select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic, and they tweeted out some of their initial findings. | ||
| I'll read them real quickly. | ||
| Ecohouse Peter Doshak testified for 9.5 hours. | ||
| We learned that he briefed Dr. Fauci after visiting Wuhan in 2021. | ||
| He received a strangely accurate warning about COVID before China told the world. | ||
| He calls Dr. Moran's alleged records violator a mentor. | ||
| Now, I have many issues with that. | ||
| Not just the fact that they certainly should have kept him for at least double digits. | ||
| I think 10 hours would have been just the bare minimum. | ||
| But more importantly, I take issue with the framing. | ||
| We didn't learn any of this stuff. | ||
| We've known this for years. | ||
| We've been talking about all of this stuff for at least two years on the War Room Pandemic Show. | ||
| But more importantly, this scratches the surface of someone who really is the central figure in unearthing the origins of COVID-19. | ||
| They don't even get into his role in really orchestrating the largest cover-up of the true origins. | ||
| He ran cover for the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| We know it was the Chinese Communist Party that actually selected, appointing him to the WHO COVID origins team. | ||
| Of course, you also know we have reports. | ||
| It's not just that the NIH funded him. | ||
| DOD, USAID, and even exclusive reporting from myself two years ago showed that Google and some of these big tech companies were also funding him. | ||
| I mean, we have footage of him talking about how he was toying around with, quote, killer viruses. | ||
| We basically did all the legwork for Congress. | ||
| And it's just absolutely Horrific to see that this is the primary takeaways that they had. | ||
| But Steve, I think it cuts to the deeper issue with this committee. | ||
| Again, this is the committee, the subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic. | ||
| Of all of them, I think this has been the biggest flaw. | ||
| And that's a pretty low bar when you put it up against the China committee and frankly, even the oversight and the weaponization committee. | ||
| But remember, this is the same committee that just a few months ago was putting out watered down, lukewarm reports, failing to actually call COVID-19 what it is. | ||
| A bioweapon that developed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, not the wet market. | ||
| So I think this committee really is an example of how Congress is not willing to approach the COVID issue through the lens of how the United States government and the Chinese Communist Party together worked in sync to fund the research that created COVID-19. | ||
| This is the perfect example of a shiny toy, but I think they've underestimated just how smart we actually are. | ||
| Actually, very powerful. | ||
| You get to the bottom of it. | ||
| You'll have more to say about this at five o'clock. | ||
| Also, Adweek has a shocking announcement today. | ||
| I think the Apple TV has canceled the Jon Stewart show. | ||
| Jon Stewart, the darling of the left. | ||
| Well, I'll link it to the story I was just talking about. | ||
| Remember, Jon Stewart was the person who used the Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory example to talk about the origins of COVID. | ||
| And just a few months later, we have reporting in the New York Times showing that his show got canceled. | ||
| Now, Congress stepped in, the China committee, to really link it because they think that his show is potentially canceled by Apple because of his willingness to touch on sensitive subjects like the Chinese Communist Party and AI. | ||
| But we'll get in. | ||
| I'm hosting a show later this evening. | ||
| To the buried leave, which really, Apple, I think, censored the show according to the New York Times report because of his stance going into the 2024 election. | ||
| You know he's someone who doesn't just take the establishment's line. | ||
| And remember, Steve, just last night, the CEO of Apple, where was he? | ||
| At the nice, cushy dinner. | ||
| He's probably sitting right next to Xi Jinping. | ||
| I think it was $40,000 a pop with Xi Jinping as one of the top sponsors. | ||
| So it's a perfect example. | ||
| He was at the head table. | ||
| What's your social media? | ||
| People can get to you before five o'clock. | ||
| Natalie G. Winters on all social media platforms. | ||
| Natalie G. Winters. | ||
| I know you guys will break down also that really tough 60 Minutes interview that they gave him. | ||
| This thing is a scandal of the highest order. | ||
| Thank you very much Natalie. | ||
| See you at five. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Charlie Kirk next. | ||
| Basobic follows. | ||
| War Room back 5 to 7. | ||
| So much going on. | ||
| We're having a tough time crowding it all in, but we will figure out how to do it. | ||
| See you back here at 5 o'clock tonight, 5 to 7 at night. | ||
| Make sure to go check out birchgold.com. | ||
| Asking the question, FT is saying $30 trillion by the Central Banks of the West. | ||
| Lead by the Federal Reserve. | ||
| The BRICS nations, led by China, are buying gold at record rates. | ||
| There's something I don't get. | ||
| Why are one buying more fiat currency and the others buying gold? | ||
| Ask the question. | ||
| Get the answer. |
Export Selection