Oct. 20, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:49
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| President Obama got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Thanks for joining us. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Lower the temperature and get back to work. | ||
| We decided that wasn't where we're going to go. | ||
| I'm still running for speaker, and I plan to go to the floor and get the votes and win this race. | ||
| But I want to go talk with a few of my colleagues. | ||
| Particularly, I want to talk with the 20 individuals who voted against me so that we can move forward and begin to work for the American people. | ||
| Are you going to the floor today, sir? | ||
| Jim Jordan is not going anywhere. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters. | ||
| It is Thursday, October 19th, Year of Our Lord 2023, hosting War Room, filling in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| And just like Jim Jordan, I'm sure the War Room posse is not going anywhere when it comes to calling your members, making sure that we hold the line. | ||
| There's just been some reporting coming out from Jake Sherman over at Punchbowl that even David Joyce, sort of the author, the architect of this idea to extend McHenry to become the speaker light, as Matt Gaetz called it, that he's going to be revising that resolution potentially. | ||
| But as you guys know, the big interests, the special interests in Washington, D.C., do not go down without a fight, so it is all the much more imperative for you to be continuing to call your representatives. | ||
| You guys have probably picked up by now, I am not in studio, I am out of town, I'm not in Washington, D.C. | ||
| I guess I chose a different time. | ||
| A good week to skip town, but don't worry, we'll be focusing on our nation's imperial capital for most of this show. | ||
| Joining me to discuss all of this and so much more is Mark Paoletta. | ||
| Now, Mark, before we get into, of course, the importance to continue with the calling of our representatives and where we actually stand with Jim Jordan and all of that, I'd love if you could just sort of frame going forward, I know we were talking before the show, How you were sort of behind the scenes, you worked on the confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas. | ||
| Given that, using that as a paradigm, how would you advise Team Jordan, Team MAGA going forward to actually get the votes and become Speaker of the House like we so desperately need? | ||
| Natalie, thanks for having me on. | ||
| And you're right. | ||
| The defining sort of moment that I learned so much from was working on the Justice Clarence Thomas confirmation fight back in 1991, right? | ||
| 32 years ago. | ||
| And the lesson I learned in that fight was stand and fight and never back down and take the fight to your opponents. | ||
| And that's what needs to happen right now. | ||
| Jim Jordan is the only Republican who can get 217 votes. | ||
| Everyone needs to understand that and recognize that. | ||
| There are these past grievances, you know, that need to be put aside and we need to move forward. | ||
| And the Jordan people need to stay in the fight. | ||
| They need to take it, you know, to go on offense. | ||
| These 20 holdouts, what's their problem? | ||
| Who would they support? | ||
| You know, this idea, which was this fever pitch this morning of this temporary speaker pro tem idea, is an absolute absurdity and a surrender. | ||
| And it would be a betrayal to the voters, the American people, who put the Republicans in charge of the House, to bring and keep their promises. | ||
| And that type of proposal would turn over the House to the Democrats. | ||
| It's unacceptable. | ||
| And the Jordan people, as Jim just said right there, he's going back to the floor. | ||
| He's going to look for another vote. | ||
| And my view is you just keep voting until you become your elected speaker, because there's no one else who can do it right now. | ||
| So from your perspective, the Jordan team, they don't quite seem to be the killers that you have on the other side of the Republican Party, right? | ||
| The McHenrys. | ||
| the Scalise's of the world, right? | ||
| Their knives are out, of course. | ||
| They are no match for the callers from the War Room Posse, but they play hard. | ||
| They play for keeps. | ||
| Why do you think Team Jordan, or really this coalition of people, which like you said, is the majority of the Republican conference, why have we not seen these continued votes? | ||
| McCarthy had to go through, it was over a dozen rounds. | ||
| Why do you think they keep having these intermittent breaks? | ||
| Because as Steve has said on this program repeatedly, it's in those breaks that, you know, the lobbyists, the special interests over at Capitol Grill or Capitol Hill Club can really get their hooks into these members. | ||
| And that's where you've probably seen some of the numbers of the original 20 grow. | ||
| Yeah, look, again, it starts at the top. | ||
| You know, going back to Justice Thomas's confirmation, Justice Thomas was a fighter. | ||
| He didn't back down. | ||
| Jim Jordan is a fighter. | ||
| Nobody will ever accuse him of not being a fighter. | ||
| OK, and he's an effective fighter. | ||
| So I think his staff is great. | ||
| I think they're going to get the job done. | ||
| You know, there's a lot of holdouts that need to need to be confronted in terms of why are you opposed to Jim Jordan? | ||
| And stay in the fight. | ||
| So I have every confidence in the Jordan people to bring this home. | ||
| And it's curious, I was actually going through your Twitter, which people should follow after the break, but you had flagged what we would call probably a buried lead or saying the quiet part out loud in the Washington Post, their big piece about how Jim Jordan is not going to become speaker, but it's Representative Jayapal, and I'll read the quote in reference to the potential of coalition government, coalition governance. | ||
| I'm waiting to see what the assurances are on power sharing. | ||
| What do we have to ensure what happens here reflects the fact that Dems are essentially governing this body. | ||
| I don't know about you, but I don't think the war room policy and Republicans work so hard to get the majority in 2022 to make sure that Democrats have The ability to, quote, govern the House of Representatives. | ||
| I'm curious, first of all, your thoughts sort of walk us through that, but also conversely, why are House Republicans, specifically in that 22-member faction, so upset that average, everyday Americans are calling their offices or actually doing their jobs as patriotic citizens? | ||
| You know, all you need to know, right, is that the lobbyists are against Jim Jordan and for Patrick McHenry, right? | ||
| And who is for Jim Jordan? | ||
| The American people and people who are calling in across the country. | ||
| And I would urge your viewers to call the Capitol, call their members and urge them to vote for Jim Jordan tonight. | ||
| OK, not tomorrow, not next week, tonight, because this needs to get done now. | ||
| And you're right. | ||
| You know, these breaks and, you know, looking to work through. | ||
| I'm glad that Jim Jordan, again, he's a unifier, right? | ||
| He's a fighter, but he's a unifier. | ||
| And he wanted to meet with these 20 or 22 and want to find out what their concerns were, right? | ||
| So he's trying to do that. | ||
| Some of them are refusing to meet with Jordan, apparently, which is outrageous. | ||
| My view is, you need to keep the pressure on. | ||
| Again, going back to, it's a long time ago, but it's one of the greatest victories in the past hundred years was getting Justice Thomas confirmed. | ||
| And we went out to the Southern states and to those Democrats. | ||
| You know, I think it was 11 Democrats voted for Justice Thomas in his confirmation. | ||
| And those were a lot of Democrats in the South who heard from their voters that they want Justice Thomas confirmed. | ||
| So, you know, long time ago, but a great, great victory. | ||
| That's the template and that's what needs to happen now. | ||
| There's no other choice. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And they should keep voting until they have a speaker, not a speaker pro tem, not a, not a, a speaker light or whatever you want to call it. | ||
| They need to have a speaker today, uh, to, to, to, to get back to work and protect the American people because right now, right, the Democrats are going to be running this joint. | ||
| They run the Senate. | ||
| They run the executive branch. | ||
| They're coming after the Supreme Court. | ||
| One of the great defenders, and I testified a couple times at Jim Jordan's invitation, Is the attacks on the Supreme Court in Jordan has been the most effective defender, in my view, on defending Justice Thomas, on defending Justice Alito, on defending the Supreme Court. | ||
| That's what the Democrats are coming for. | ||
| That's what's at stake here is when you do this coalition government, right, in the House, it could turn into that they're going to somehow open up an inquiry into the Supreme Court, which is what the Democrats want to do. | ||
| That's the last bastion to protect our liberties today. | ||
| And that's what these 20 holdouts are putting at risk. | ||
| And it needs to end. | ||
| Voters need to make sure they know that this is what they want, because that's the way our American system works. | ||
| And so, you know, Jordan's, in my view, a great conservative. | ||
| He's got a fantastic record. | ||
| He's a fighter. | ||
| He does terrific oversight. | ||
| There's no substantive reason to oppose Jim Jordan. | ||
| OK, he'll be a great speaker. | ||
| Everyone needs to come together now and vote for him. | ||
| Mark. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| If people want to follow you on social media, go to the center. | ||
| Where can they go to get all of that information? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| At Mark Paoletta, M-A-R-K-P-A-O-L-E-T-T-A is my Twitter handle. | ||
| And I have a website, markpaoletta.com, which has all my op-eds. | ||
| I write a lot on these sorts of things. | ||
| And you can go to the Center for Renewing America where I'm a senior fellow. | ||
| But thanks very much for having me on, Natalie. | ||
| Thank you so much, Mark. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Have a good one. | |
| Thanks. | ||
| How about this? | ||
| Imagine if Democrats and their establishment Republican counterparts control the House. | ||
| What's to stop them from introducing legislation that would increase the lawfare and election interference, probably ban Trump from the ballot? | ||
| You know the Senate would probably pass it. | ||
| Just putting that out there. | ||
| But we're going to pivot a little bit away. | ||
| Although, of course, as you know, all things are interconnected, at least under the Biden regime. | ||
| No conspiracies, no coincidences. | ||
| But Darren Beattie is joining us, my fellow UChicago graduate. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| I would love to get your thoughts. | ||
| I saw a, as you would call it, probably white hot story popped on Revolver News. | ||
| A few days ago that has to do with their senior director for intelligence programs over at the White House and his interesting, will be euphemistic, but his interesting background, of course, in the context of everything that's been going on with the Biden regime and the infiltration from the Iranian government, Robert Malley, and a bunch of other people. | ||
| So Darren, I'll hold you through the break, but if you want to start walking us through that story. | ||
| Absolutely, Natalie, and always a great pleasure to be here. | ||
| And you're absolutely right. | ||
| It's kind of a scandal upon scandals. | ||
| Within the Biden administration, we've seen at least draw attention to what in the world is the Biden administration been doing? | ||
| And it almost seems redundant to point to personnel matters when the president himself can barely Um, stand up straight, uh, as we saw in that pretty remarkable video from the plane. | ||
| So I think that's pretty, the first order of business is figuring out how the president can, you know, get through a day without, you know, soiling his diaper and standing up and so forth where, you know, it's getting greedy to expect to actually have good personnel who, you know, God forbid would put America first, but this story and revolver news that you mentioned. | ||
| And it is indeed white hot, it's been white hot for a while, is about a certain official, senior intelligence official within Biden's NSC called Mar Bittar. | ||
| And he drew some controversy when he was, here's a guy with a demonstrated history of pretty extreme Palestinian activism. | ||
| He was a member of the Students for Justice for Palestine group. | ||
| And we've seen a lot of chapters of this organization effectively celebrating the recent Hamas attack on Israel, which gives a sense of how extreme it is. | ||
| This isn't just a group saying, we want peace. | ||
| This is a group that actively celebrates terrorist acts and is at the very least adjacent with, you know, Hamas and some of the more unsavory elements. | ||
| And this guy was not only a member of it, he was a senior member. | ||
| He was an executive member of this and helped to host various conferences and such. | ||
| And when this came out, of course, you know, I got to kind of give them credit for this, that they stand up for their own. | ||
| There was a big controversy over this. | ||
| A lot of conservative media outlets were calling attention to this guy, which a lot of people have sensed. | ||
| Biden stood strong. | ||
| You didn't fire him. | ||
| That is a lesson that you don't need to fire people in the face of media accusation. | ||
| In this case, accusations are true and you certainly don't need to do it when these are false. | ||
| So just a word to the wise with it for future Republican administrations. | ||
| But this guy, in fact, you know, he's given a senior role and he has a lot of interesting associations. | ||
| So like a lot of these people, the networks, you have to look at the networks. | ||
| He goes back. | ||
| I'm gonna I'm gonna hold you there because we gotta we gotta jump to break. | ||
| I want to hold you through. | ||
| We won't bury the lead. | ||
| And Darren, you're usually always correct, but I have to humbly suggest it's not the Biden administration, the Biden regime. | ||
| And frankly, from a personnel perspective, they're proving that they're very deserving of that moniker because they're quite literally staffing this regime with people who are linked to some of the worst regimes across the entire planet. | ||
| We'll be right back after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Your host, Stephen K. Bound. | |
| Well, they say personnel is policy, so I guess that also means bad personnel is bad policy. | ||
| And in the case of the Biden regime, corrupt personnel is corrupt. | ||
| Policy, which is why it's so important now more than ever that you go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the end of the dollar empire the fourth installment read it talk to Philip Patrick It's quite nice. | ||
| I think I met him at CPAC about a year ago Very smart guy birchgold great people great group. | ||
| Like I said, you gotta go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the end of the dollar empire but speaking of the end of empires we got Darren J Beattie and Thank you for joining us to discuss truly horrific personnel or maybe intentionally horrific personnel decisions coming from the Biden regime. | ||
| So Darren, I'll let you pick up where you left off. | ||
| You can finish that story and then I'd love to sort of go on the more macro level in terms of who really is running this show when it comes to the Biden regime. | ||
| Indeed. | ||
| So the story here is one of Mara Bittar, which You know, it goes back a long way to his history with the Students for Justice in Palestine in a leadership role, a lot of unsavory associations going back to his graduate years. | ||
| And then his career after that was something of a rogues gallery of associations. | ||
| He worked for a brief time at the State Department, where he crossed paths with none other than Norm Eisen, Whom he befriended and Eisen, who we told the story of Eisen, the color revolution architect against Trump, who basically wrote the lawfare playbook that was used to undermine the Trump regime at every angle. | ||
| He celebrates, but in addition to being a Palestinian, Palestine sympathizer in foreign policy was actually. | ||
| The chief counsel to Adam Schiff in the impeachment of Donald Trump. | ||
| So it shows how these people's nefarious influence can span both foreign and domestic policy. | ||
| In that respect, he's quite analogous to Norm Eisen, who's caused a lot of destruction in both foreign and domestic policy domains. | ||
| So he crossed paths with Norm Eisen at the State Department. | ||
| He in the Bama NSC, where he had the Israel-Palestine portfolio. | ||
| Imagine that. | ||
| The guy who's a member of Students for Justice for Palestine gets the Israel-Palestine portfolio under Obama, and guess who he crossed paths with there? | ||
| None other than Rob Malley, the guy who's recently come under scrutiny. | ||
| It's still not a story that's been fully told. | ||
| If people haven't heard this, look into it. | ||
| He's a guy who Mysteriously had his security clearance revoked. | ||
| He's on leave. | ||
| Biden appointed him to sort of re-engage the Iran deal. | ||
| And, you know, think about it. | ||
| You know, it's one thing for Trump, you know, they'll do anything to go after him. | ||
| But for a favored royal Obama-Biden official to have his security clearance revoked, just imagine what that actually takes. | ||
| Just imagine what he had to have been doing. | ||
| to have his security clearance revoked. And this is a guy who comes from a very interesting family. Incidentally, he went to school in France as a kid and his classmate was Anthony Blinken, the current Secretary of State. So the sociology of this is absolutely fascinating. We don't have time to get into all of it, but Malley's parents were sympathizers of the FLN in Algeria. So there | ||
| are a lot of tracing of these kind of radical Mideast sympathizers on the left is a fascinating endeavor in its own right. | ||
| But long story short, Bittar crossed paths with Malley and Malley is enthusiastic. | ||
| He's over the moon when he hears that Biden is putting him at a top role in the NSC. | ||
| And so that's yet another association. | ||
| So between Mali, between Students for Justice in Palestine, between Norm Eisen. | ||
| This guy is at the center and really the intersection of a lot of nefarious networks, both foreign and domestic policy. | ||
| And he's sort of re-upped in our consciousness due to the fact that Biden seems to have bungled this latest Mideast disaster, and people are bringing renewed attention to the disastrous Personnel decisions which accompany the Biden's regime's disastrous handling of the recent geopolitical chaos in the Middle East. | ||
| I think the only connection that could probably make this story crazier would be if he had attended Goucher College, but something tells me he wouldn't dare go there. | ||
| But Darren, I'll probably keep you through the break, because real quick I do want you to address the Douglas Mackey case and the sentencing. | ||
| I'm just, I'm just curious because, you know, when you take a step back and this Robert Malley story really is important, not just the timing of it, but the significance, but that, you know, his, his counterpart, the liaison was the senior Pentagon official. | ||
| And it just came out, I believe yesterday in the free beacon, um, that she's actually keeping her security clearance after they conducted an internal review. | ||
| It's, it's absolutely mind blowing stuff that I really think. | ||
| Evidence is the case that we've been making here on the show that it's not incompetence. | ||
| It's intentional. | ||
| So particularly in the paradigm of what transpired in the Middle East, do you think that it was an intelligence failure that led to this? | ||
| Or do you think there actually are bad actors conspiring? | ||
| Here in the United States that want to see the continued ascent of Iran and the geopolitical axis that exists between them and China, North Korea, Russia, and all of their, you know, Belt and Road proxies. | ||
| But what exactly do you think, you know, is sort of fueling the fire here? | ||
| Is this sort of case closed? | ||
| It's intentional? | ||
| It's not incompetence? | ||
| Well, there's no question that Malley and his network are Iran sympathizers, worse than sympathizers. | ||
| One could, I think, comfortably say collaborators who are very much interested in normalizing relations with Iran and bringing Iran back into the fold, which is, you know, not advisable policy from America's point of view or really from anyone's point of view other than Iran and other nefarious actors. | ||
| But as for whether This particular attack was something on the radar that they didn't warn about. | ||
| I mean, that's that's harder to say. | ||
| That's a more kind of granular question because it's unclear whether Iran benefits from this attack on the end. | ||
| It's you know, we have to see how it plays out. | ||
| And there are people who say. | ||
| You know, that Bibi may have, you know, let it happen in order to enhance or solidify his own political position. | ||
| So there are a lot of theories out there. | ||
| It is very bizarre to me that this could have happened given Israel's capacity for security. | ||
| It doesn't take a lot to secure that area, which is normally secure. | ||
| And so I think ultimately that does require some explanation, but it would be premature to say, oh, the Biden people knew this or You know, Israel knew this, but it does certainly raise questions. | ||
| And in terms of the broader strategic trajectory, it's absolutely the case that Mali and his network are beyond Iran sympathizers. | ||
| They're collaborators. | ||
| And you mentioned this woman who didn't have her security clearance revoked. | ||
| That just reinforces my earlier question. | ||
| Imagine what Mali had to do to get his revoked. | ||
| His status as a favorite of the Obama-Biden regime, royalty due to what his family, his very prominent family, for him to get his security clearance yanked, he's got to do something pretty bad, like, you know, beyond Hunter Biden level in the geopolitical arena. | ||
| God knows what he was doing to get this revoked. | ||
| Well, you know, it's not a surprise that there would be so many foreign collaborators, or I guess that's maybe too euphemistic a term, you know, traitors, people engaging in treason against this country in the Biden regime when you have Hunter Biden, the poster child. | ||
| Thank you for doing all of that with America's, you know, sworn enemies like the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| I guess it gives the green light, right? | ||
| If the president's son can do it, then I guess Robert Malley can too. | ||
| Darren, I'll let you start, but give us the latest, you know, a stark juxtaposition between those who are with the regime and those who are against it. | ||
| You get to keep your security clearance if you're leaking secrets to Iran, but apparently you go to jail for several months if you post memes against Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Yeah, it's remarkable. | ||
| So we've been covering this case for a long time, and I think most War Room listeners by now are well-educated on this. | ||
| But there is a guy, Doug Mackey, who at the time was basically just a kid, a young guy in the 2016 election cycle, and he was having fun on Twitter. | ||
| He did memes, jokes, satire. | ||
| One satirical tweet that he didn't even make the tweet, he just shared the tweet. | ||
| He didn't make the meme, he just shared it. | ||
| Um, and it was mocking Hillary Clinton and, um, the Biden's department, Biden's department of justice used an innovation on some old statute that was originally designed to prevent the Klan from physically preventing African-Americans from voting. | ||
| They sort of re-imagined, so to speak, this statute in a way that sort of attempts to codify the disinformation scam into criminal law. | ||
| And saying that this satirical meme, which is the joke of saying, you don't need to vote, just text the number, which no one really believed. | ||
| And incidentally, the government was never able to prove that a single person was actually deceived by this and ended up not voting as a result. | ||
| But notwithstanding that, they use this innovation in the law called conspiracy against rights, which is actually one of the same charges Trump now faces. | ||
| Trump is the second time that it's been used in this fashion. | ||
| So in a weird way, the Doug Mackey case was a kind of trial balloon legally, which is maybe unfortunate for Mr. Mackey because it meant that he was sort of, from the political side of things, his fate was hitched to Trump's. | ||
| And if the judge was, you know, reasonable about it, That would have maybe implications for the Trump campaign in terms of that law. | ||
| Hang on, because we've got to jump to break, but I'll hold you through. | ||
| Remember, I always said the very lead of that Hillary Clinton now viral clip where she calls for the formal deprogramming isn't so much that she's calling for the formal deprogramming But then Seth, she's calling the emphasis on formal. | ||
| In other words, the informal kind of secret clandestine deprogramming of America has already begun. | ||
| And I think this Doug Mackey case is a prime example. | ||
| We'll be right back after the break. | ||
| really puts into perspective the weaponization of this government against the American people. | ||
| So you can be sure that they're not looking out for you or your finances, which is why you got to go to Birchgold.com slash Bannon to take your financial future and everything you're doing in that regard into your own hands so you're not beholden to the lies, or frankly, the policy and personnel, as Darren is so eloquently exposed, of the Biden regime, emphasis on regime. | ||
| Darren, we've got to let you go because we've got Dr. Wolf, Ginger Gates, and I think Mike Lindell joining us in the last few minutes of this show. | ||
| But Darren, real quick, I hear you're working on some good stuff over at Revolver.News. | ||
| Where can they go to find that? | ||
| What's the story? | ||
| And where can they find you on social media? | ||
| Big pieces brewing, big pieces brewing about the refugee resettlement, the recent call by some to settle Palestinian refugees. | ||
| The people who would be doing that are beyond what you could possibly imagine. | ||
| So we have a major piece on this coming up soon. | ||
| We're covering all the issues relevant and more. | ||
| That's revolver.news. | ||
| We're white hot as always. | ||
| Check us out, revolver.news. | ||
| I'm on Twitter at Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| And we're on Getter at Revolver News. | ||
| So thank you so much, Natalie. | ||
| He is a must-follow, and I look forward to getting ridiculously scared about the evil, deranged people who are going to be running that policy if it does indeed come true. | ||
| As you guys remember, we had Representative Ogles on the show yesterday talking about the legislation that he introduced to prevent that nightmare from ever becoming reality. | ||
| Darren, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Now, I think we have Dr. Wolfe, as you guys know. | ||
| She's a good friend of the show, probably one of the largest foes of Anthony Fauci and what is the biopharmaceutical medical-industrial complex that exists in this country. | ||
| And I understand that you obtained some really alarming emails through the Freedom of Information Act request that has to do with the negative side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, most egregiously on children and young adults. | ||
| So if you could walk us through that, I'm sure the audience would appreciate it. | ||
| Sure, it's absolutely shocking. | ||
| So, you know, in addition to our 3,250 doctors and nurses and scientists, volunteers, War Room, Daily Cloud volunteers, working on the scientific side of the Pfizer documents, we also have 250 volunteer lawyers. | ||
| And one of these is Ed Berkovich, and he has FOIAed anything, any mention of myocarditis by the CDC. | ||
| And the last time I was on War Room, I shared that there's a whistleblower at the CDC, because in addition to the pages that he had asked for, he got 46 pages that he hadn't requested, that showed that in fact, the White House communications team was freaking out at the highest levels in April of 2021, because news of blood clots and heart damage had reached them. | ||
| And instead of coming clean with the American people, pulling this injection off the market, they looped in Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, Dr. Walensky, and created a script, 17-page script, their word, which is wholly redacted to keep everyone on message and downplay these dangers. | ||
| And in fact, as you recall from 2021, rather than pulling this injection off the market, they doubled down and they mandated it. | ||
| That was the year they mandated it. | ||
| Well, there have been additional FOIA productions, is I guess what it's called in FOIA land, and this tranche of emails is even more shocking. | ||
| In its report 89 on Daily Cloud, FOIA emails reveal highest level leaders at White House, HHS, CDC, NIAID, AAP, which is the American Association of Pediatrics, All new COVID vaccines linked to myocarditis, specifically teen myocarditis, yet publicly covered up the findings. | ||
| So this is the third release of documents from Ed Berkovich's FOIA. | ||
| It's 131 pages. | ||
| And Amy Kelly has done a masterful job there kind of explaining what's going on with these top level leaders at these agencies. | ||
| March through May of 2021, colluding and conspiring to hide the harms of teen myocarditis specifically from the American people. | ||
| And I guess, to me, as a former political consultant and former White House spouse, what is incredibly important, a couple of things are very, very important. | ||
| One is Dr. Rachel Levine, assistant secretary for HHS, for health at HHS. | ||
| It seems to be running the show. | ||
| So it seems as if all the front people, like Dr. Walensky, are taking direction from Dr. Levine. | ||
| Anthony Fauci is CC'd, Janet Woodcock is CC'd, Vice Admiral Vivek Murthy, David Kessler, all the key players are CC'd. | ||
| But additionally, there is a template, and this is so significant, That is designed to raise up information from these conversations to POTUS. | ||
| And it says to POTUS. | ||
| So that is stands for everybody president of the United States. | ||
| So this would suggest very strongly because in this level of communication, you don't create a template to surface insights from communications for POTUS. | ||
| Unless you are getting the insights from the communications to POTUS. | ||
| The last tranche just showed that the White House communications team was directing the action of the cover-up. | ||
| This shows that President Biden probably received this template designed for him to receive this information. | ||
| That all these people colluded in essentially discussing and populating. | ||
| Other key moments that you guys have to take a look at They just went through and redacted, erased critical evidence of the dangers or the relationship between heart damage in teens and vaccination. | ||
| For instance, myocarditis email to all these people for awareness, they deleted investigating and they went on monitoring report of myocarditis. | ||
| And they deleted the words after vaccination. | ||
| Like there's just a strikethrough. | ||
| You can still read it, but the people who received this email, all these top officials leading all of our public health government agencies were supposed to not say the words after vaccination in relation to myocarditis. | ||
| They weren't supposed to say the words investigating these reports. | ||
| There's a strikethrough. | ||
| It's not even a redaction. | ||
| It's a strikethrough. | ||
| I'm going to skip ahead. | ||
| There's all kinds of evil, evil, Basically, you'll see, you know, conspiring to hide and cover up the evidence that all these public health officials are being confronted with, that teens are getting heart damage from these injections. | ||
| And you'll see that the American Association of Pediatricians had a call with these people. | ||
| They did it on the phone rather than by email, so there's no paper trail. | ||
| I am well aware that that's what, you know, White House-level officials and senior-level officials do when they don't want a paper trail. | ||
| But the AAP warned them that myocarditis is not mild, it's not temporary, it's very serious, it can be fatal, and it requires the whole family of the teenager to have ongoing medical monitoring of their child's heart. | ||
| Well, this was not presented to Dr. Walensky, Dr. Levine, Dr. Fauci, and brought to the American people when this was brought by the top pediatricians in the land to our health leaders. | ||
| Rather, they covered it up. | ||
| And you'll remember in all of 2021, when the issue of The last thing I'm going to call people's attention to is an email from Dr. Walensky. | ||
| While all these people are discussing the very, very serious subject of teens' hearts being damaged by this injection that all that year they were pushing parents of teens to give their teens, someone brought to Dr. Walensky information about Paul Offit, who's kind of cute, and Dr. | ||
| Walensky responded, in a communication of teens getting injured, we don't have a ton more to share but I do know the SHOs, I don't know what that means, are interested in being looped in, dash dash dash, dot dot dot, I've never met Paul, dash just an admirer from afar, blushy smiley face. I'm here to help and really grateful for all your misspelled are doing. So while the most senior people in the land tasked with | ||
| our public health in the middle of what was represented as a major national crisis that required lockdowns and forced injections of everyone including you know schools mandating teenagers to be injected, They were being told by pediatricians at the highest levels, including POTUS it appears, that teens were having their hearts damaged in serious medically compromising ways. | ||
| They conspired to cover it up in these emails And Dr. Walensky took time on your dime to send a flirty emoticon to someone who brought up Paul Offit to her. | ||
| That's what was happening in the offices of our national leadership during this public health crisis. | ||
| Well, when they mocked and ridiculed you for not trusting the experts, I'm sure you're probably pretty confident in that decision and that move. | ||
| Unfortunately, Dr. Wolfe, I got to let you go. | ||
| But first of all, tell the audience where they can find you and follow you. | ||
| But more importantly, or I would say equally as important, where they can find this story and go to Daily Cloud and get all the latest stories that you guys are working on. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Come to dailycloud.io. | ||
| And this is report 89. | ||
| And the last two reports are really You know, stunning. | ||
| And also Facing the Beast, my new book, which tells the story of my journey with you all over the last two and a half years, is out now. | ||
| So you can order that. | ||
| And it also tells the story of what the War Room accomplished with Daily Cloud in bringing this incredible truth to the American people. | ||
| Thank you all. | ||
| Thank you, Posse. | ||
| Thank you so much, Dr. Wolfe. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Now only in the War Room can you get all the news of the day with that level of analysis and expertise, but you also get, this is the reason why you guys probably enjoy or maybe don't enjoy when I host, but we're going to get into an issue that we probably wouldn't cover if Steve were hosting today, but there was a pretty big story released By CNN not too long ago sort of made its way to the social media. | ||
| Twitter trail became viral. | ||
| But going on now with Victoria's Secret, they sort of dropped their whole wokeness act in favor of pursuing what they call sexiness. | ||
| I think it's a prime example of how when companies go woke as the old saying goes, they go broke. | ||
| But joining me to discuss this is someone who's been on the show before. | ||
| I know we may have differing viewpoints on the Barbie movie, but is a good friend of mine, Ginger Gates. | ||
| Now, Ginger, we've got about two minutes before I have to jump to break. | ||
| I'll hold you through. | ||
| But real quick, before we get into sort of the broader ramifications of this, you know, what exactly has Victoria's Secret been experiencing as a result of their sort of remake and the image of being a brand? | ||
| But more importantly, why should people in the War Room Posse care about this story? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, thanks for having me on, Natalie. | |
| And I know we've talked before about how we kind of relate on the different health trends and whether that's beauty or fitness. | ||
| But I think this Victoria's Secret kind of narrative is really showing that capitalism can be the way out of something that the social side just doesn't agree with. | ||
| And so I don't think that we would be harsh on, you know, men that have their fantasy football teams and say, you can't have those because it's not real. | ||
| We should be able to have our fantasy, you know, bra at the runway show. | ||
| And so I applaud the owners of Victoria's Secret to say, we know we have to steer in the right direction. | ||
| And I will say personally, I'm optimistic. | ||
| And I'll walk you through after the break, kind of the original story and thought behind Victoria's Secret and why it's actually very meaningful to, I think, a lot of young women. | ||
| I know a lot of viewers here may not be the ideal client, but I want to share the story because I think we might be able to see a 360-degree turn if they're able to do this right and capture that market and truly brand loyalty that they had. | ||
| So let's dig into that. | ||
| No, it's really an important story, especially with all the discussion going on about femininity, what it means to be a woman, of course, the age-old debates of feminism versus, you know, gender roles versus what we should really be looking for, what it means to be a woman, since in today's America, you can't always define what exactly it means to be a woman. | ||
| Now, I know we like to have Matt Gaetz on this program a lot, but I don't tell anyone I know or on live TV. | ||
| I think Ginger Gates is the person to have on to discuss this issue. | ||
| War Room Posse will be back after this break. | ||
| We've got Ginger Gates. | ||
| Mike Lindelli is some great new discounts for you guys. | ||
| Promo code warroom as always. | ||
| And in the meantime, go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| We still got Ginger Gates with us to discuss, I would say, one of the most pressing news items of the day, which is, of course, Victoria's Secret. | ||
| But no, Ginger, I mean, in all seriousness, and I'd love to get your thoughts on this, because, you know, through the lens of what Victoria's Secret represents to women, first sort of the juxtaposition with how I would say the mainstream media has made it sort of demonized the brand, right, in terms of traditional femininity, what women can aspire to be, versus body image, body positivity, that whole movement they've sort of always been clashing. | ||
| But really analyzing it through the lens of a company, seeing that going woke didn't work, it was not financially feasible, do you think that this represents sort of a, I'll call it a white pill, but a moment of optimism for Americans to see that maybe these corporations will drop the WOKE Act if you just don't support them? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think it's really two things. | |
| I think it's two parts. | ||
| I think the first part is clearly the marketing on this. | ||
| People are just not buying. | ||
| It is not their marketing to a customer that they don't have. | ||
| So I know they need to figure that out. | ||
| And while the media is trying to spin this in a way that it's pitting women against each other, saying it has to be, you know, feminism or a feminist. | ||
| I just, I just don't think that narrative is true. | ||
| So that's the first part is the marketing they need to solve. | ||
| Um, the second part is, I think that if they go back to the roots, they actually had a brand loyalty, unlike we've really seen in the industry, where you weren't just buying their intimates, right? | ||
| I grew up as a tomboy, so kind of thinking about what that looked like transitioning into womanhood and it's some unique feelings and being with a brand that's kind of there from your first training bra into your now swimwear line, then loungewear, then regular clothes. | ||
| I mean, it's something that you almost feel like you grew up with. | ||
| So I think that's why there's kind of an emotional connection with their previous target customers and why maybe you see so much focus on this brand specifically. | ||
| Like I said before, I'm optimistic that they'll come back, but they do have to make some changes. | ||
| And I think from a business perspective, they're calling out that they need to make these changes. | ||
| And I just encourage everyone, I always think voting with your dollars is the best way to go. | ||
| So whether you're moving from one state to another because of taxes, whether you're buying certain things that you kind of align with the mission behind that brand, I'm a big proponent of voting with your dollars. | ||
| Ginger, I wish we could do an hour-long special on this and, of course, the fact that Sweet Green went seed oil-free. | ||
| I think that's a big news item that people should be paying attention to, but we've got to let you go. | ||
| We've got a few minutes left. | ||
| We've got to get to Mike Lindelli and some new offers for the War Room Posse. | ||
| So, Ginger, I know Matt likes to come in hot on Twitter, or Congressman Gates likes to come in hot on Twitter, but I think you come in even hotter. | ||
| You have some great takes. | ||
| If people want to follow you, I was going to say support your work, but probably not that. | ||
| But if people want to follow you, where can they go to get you on social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They can follow me at Ginger Gates on Twitter and Instagram. | |
| And I will say, thank you, Natalie, for having me on. | ||
| I know this is not news of the day, but it's important to talk about. | ||
| So I'm still rooting for Matt, too, always. | ||
| So thank you for having both on. | ||
| It is, and next time you come on, we will duke it out over the Barbie movie. | ||
| That was the last time she was on. | ||
| She was slamming the film, which I respectfully disagree, but I digress. | ||
| Ginger, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Natalie. | |
| Now, Mike, I think we have a clip that if the studio wants to roll, we can play. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
| Hi everyone at the War Room Posse. We just want to get on here and thank every one of you for your great support. And here we are making the MyPillows and here keeping everybody working and keeping the factory busy. God bless you all. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| I love that video. | ||
| It's a very populist approach to advertising and marketing. | ||
| So Mike, if you want to walk us through what exactly we're seeing, the deals you have for the War Room Fosse. | ||
| Yeah, well, I was thinking of the War Room Posse. | ||
| We've got the factory up to 100% capacity now, and we're making the MyPillow 2.0 today. | ||
| I was down there doing commercials. | ||
| We did five new commercials today. | ||
| We just got done about a half hour ago. | ||
| And we have put all the specials up for the War Room Posse before they're even going to hit the commercials, and they're lower priced than the commercials, some of them. | ||
| One of them is our new six-pack towel sets. | ||
| I think we got a There it is, right there. | ||
| Look at all the colors, everybody. | ||
| We put these out for $29.98 to the War Room Posse. | ||
| You can call 800-873-1062 or you can go to mypillow.com, use the promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Remember, these are towels that work. | ||
| These sets of towels, $29.98 with the promo code War Room. | ||
| And they all just came in. | ||
| These are brand new colors, brand new, so they're awesome. | ||
| And then we have the MyPillow 2.0. | ||
| This is one that's kept that you've all responded to, because this is the one we make. | ||
| 100% made in the USA. | ||
| The MyPillow's patented fill with the cooling technology. | ||
| They're $39.98. | ||
| These are on sale too for the queen size. | ||
| King size just $5 more. | ||
| And then I want to show this quick. | ||
| All the slippers. | ||
| We just did the slipper commercial. | ||
| All these new styles, sizes, wide sizes, long sizes, women's, small size. | ||
| Sizes we've never had and styles we've never had, but we're putting them on sale for the War Room Posse $39.98. | ||
| The commercials that come out, they're going to be on sale for $49.98. | ||
| So this is extra savings for you all at the War Room Posse. | ||
| We've got the kitchen towel saving 25%, but we've got over a hundred or over 230 products. | ||
| On sale right now at MyPillow. | ||
| So if you think you've looked at them all, we have blankets, we have couch pillows. | ||
| One of the things I love about MyCouchPillows I have, you know, you have all these decorative pillows on couches, but they're hard, they don't work. | ||
| You just take your arm, move them up. | ||
| But MyPillows, for the couch pillows, they're decorative, plus they're with the MyPillow patented fill. | ||
| So if you do want to take a nap, you can take a nap. | ||
| It's awesome. | ||
| And then we have all the roll and go pillows with all the sayings on it. | ||
| With God, all things are possible. | ||
| And I just want to thank you all. | ||
| Use the promo code War Room. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com. | ||
| You guys have made it possible. | ||
| We have been attacked in the last two months, probably more than we ever have in three years. | ||
| Because why? | ||
| Because I'm trying to secure the elections in our country. | ||
| If you want to learn about that, you can go to LyndalePlan.com. | ||
| LyndalePlan.com. | ||
| If you want to learn our plan that's going to secure our elections, it's all right there. | ||
| Mike, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| And we got to bounce, but thank you. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| The numbers on the screen always go to the website and War Room has a special little square. | ||
| I say it's a reward for all the wonderful calls they've been making to make sure that Jim Jordan becomes our next speaker. | ||
| Thank you, Mike. | ||
| Thanks, Ellie. | ||
| God bless y'all. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Warren Posse, thanks for hanging with me. | ||
| We're expected to see a vote for Jim Jordan later tonight. | ||
| Unclear when exactly it will happen, but that reporting is coming out from Jake Sherman over at Punchbowl. | ||
| Like I said, the representative behind the temporary speaker resolution has already admitted that he's going to sort of be redrafting that resolution, so it seems like the tides are changing. | ||
| In our favor, but make sure you call. | ||
| The number is 202-224-225-3121. |
Export Selection