Aug. 2, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:50
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| President Trump got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| It's hard to understate what this moment means, but there's also a different reality for a large part of this country who will not see or will not feel that this indictment is anything but, as Donald Trump has framed in the past a political witch hunt. | ||
| Well, that's exactly right. | ||
| And I think the word used today, gravity, is right. | ||
| We're looking at a former president who likely is to be charged for trying to overturn our democracy and undermine the very republic. | ||
| That's a grave matter. | ||
| It is a complex matter because he is now likely a major party nominee and possibly the next president of the United States once over. | ||
| That creates a complexity That we haven't seen. | ||
| If he was not a current candidate, it's still a grave matter where we're trying to dispose of justice on someone who tried to overturn the election. | ||
| But he is now asking more for political judgment to be rendered by the American people and almost ignoring the criminal justice process. | ||
| Seeing those two play out creates a pretty existential question, a dangerous one for democracy. | ||
| I think the question, the very broad thematic question for our body politic, Is Jack Smith and the prosecutors able to change the current narrative about Donald Trump in a substantive way? | ||
| Donald Trump wants you to let you think that he's just brash. | ||
| He's transactional. | ||
| I wasn't trying to break the law. | ||
| I was asking for people to help me. | ||
| I have a right to think that I won the election. | ||
| I didn't do anything wrong. | ||
| Does the indictment actually present a different Donald Trump? | ||
| Someone who was methodical, who masterminded, laying the predicate of the big lie, executing on trying to change state electors, inviting people to Washington, and ultimately giving them the charge to go to the Capitol with strength, not weakness? | ||
| That's the actions of a mastermind, a methodical mastermind. | ||
| Does Jack Smith have such evidence, and to Barb's point, can it be presented in such a cogent way that the country begins to look at Donald Trump as a criminal mastermind, not just as a guy who was trying to hold on to office? | ||
| The answer to that might inform the political judgment that Donald Trump is seeking to alleviate his current criminal justice concerns. | ||
| Final word right now. | ||
| In this singular American moment, where do you think we go from here? | ||
| Well, I think there actually is some optimism in all of this. | ||
| And it's a very important theme line. | ||
| And that is, we talk about being in the post-truth era, where facts don't matter. | ||
| And as we know the old way, facts did matter. | ||
| And there are roughly four standards in establishing facts. | ||
| Do you have witnesses? | ||
| Do you have participants? | ||
| Do you have contemporaneous notes? | ||
| Do you have documents? | ||
| Look at this indictment. | ||
| What underlies every element of it, every fact? | ||
| A first-hand witness? | ||
| A participant? | ||
| Wednesday, 2 August, Year of the Lord 2023, we're going to get into all that. | ||
| We are highly optimistic here at the War Room, because according to Bob Woodward, facts matter. | ||
| And baby, we get to adjudicate The 2020 election in a federal court with what he called facts, witnesses, participants, all of it. | ||
| The two prong approach here, the two prong strategy is we're going to go on offense. | ||
| Trump's defense is going to be pure offense. | ||
| To put forth before the American people and the world. | ||
| In a federal court. | ||
| The evidence. | ||
| Of the stealing of the 2020 election. | ||
| In addition, coming from another in a pincer move, there's going to be a massive movement to really knock off the games to get down to the impeachment of Joe Biden for selling out his country when he was in charge of the pivot to Asia under President Obama to sell his country out to the Chinese Communist Party for money. | ||
| We're going to get to that momentarily. | ||
| I want to bring in Boris Epstein. | ||
| I know Boris is busy. | ||
| In fact, We cut our cold open short to accommodate Boris because he's got a lot going on. | ||
| Boris, your thoughts and observations having looked at the, I don't know what you call, they call it a talking thing. | ||
| It looks like it's kind of like a cheap novel. | ||
| But tell me your initial thoughts because I love this. | ||
| I'm highly optimistic. | ||
| We finally, we've wanted a chance and a platform to adjudicate the 2020 and their bloodlust to take down Trump. | ||
| They gave it to us, sir. | ||
| Steve, honored to be with you, honored to be with the posse this morning. | ||
| Here's the bottom line. | ||
| President Trump has never wavered on the fact that the 2020 election was absolutely rigged and stolen. | ||
| He's always fought to uphold the American system of justice, our body of law, and of course, our constitution. | ||
| And there's nothing in this quote unquote speaking indictment that suggests the opposite. | ||
| All they have is a bunch of hearsay and this and conjecture, and really all they did was they took the unselect committee's report, condensed it by a little bit, and threw it in a form of a legal document in front of a D.C. | ||
| judge and they hope jury. | ||
| So what the bottom line is, Steve, is that the Biden regime is so desperate, is so desperate to criminalize America's First Amendment rights, and President Trump's not just First Amendment rights, but duty As the commander-in-chief, as the president, to ensure free and fair elections, they're now criminalizing that behavior. | ||
| And why are they so desperate? | ||
| Because they know that Joe Biden did not get 81 million votes. | ||
| They know that Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election, and they will stop at nothing, as they are now showing us, in order to prevent and to scare America. | ||
| From saying those facts. | ||
| But President Trump, as he said in a statement, will not be deterred. | ||
| He will not be stopped from fighting for America and Americans. | ||
| And he will keep calling out these witch hunts, this election interference, and prosecutorial misconduct. | ||
| Not just the election interference. | ||
| I mean, every time you have another massive development in the impeachment effort and fact gathering against the Biden crime family, they got to drop, you know, they got to try to Bigfoot it the next day. | ||
| It's pretty obvious. | ||
| This is pure lawfare. | ||
| It shouldn't be a shock to people. | ||
| All the Santa Pol, CNN with Harry Enten, all these polls came out over the weekend of shows. | ||
| Wait for it. | ||
| Forget the primary. | ||
| That's done. | ||
| I'm talking about he's taken on Biden. | ||
| That's had the whole media with him. | ||
| Wall Street, the oligarchs, Silicon Valley. | ||
| He's beating Biden everywhere, including a spread of 19 points. | ||
| 19 points among independents. | ||
| Boris, your thoughts? | ||
| The American people want President Trump back in office as soon as possible. | ||
| That's clear. | ||
| And it's also crystal clear that the crooked Joe Biden regime wants to do anything they can to obfuscate the fact, Steve, as you said, that they have been selling out, the Biden crime family has been selling out the American people for decades, for decades, including when he was vice president. | ||
| That testimony by Devin Archer earlier this week was debilitating. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was an absolute nuclear earthquake. | |
| And what happens the next day, You know, this quote unquote case is brought in Washington, D.C. | ||
| against President Trump, who the American people are now saying loud and clear is the only one that they see can save us from the destroyed southern border, from our destroyed economy, from runaway inflation, and from this country being debilitated once and for all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So as the backing for President Trump gets stronger, so does... Hang on. | |
| They can't beat Trump at the ballot box. | ||
| Boris, last thing. | ||
| Another small event happened yesterday that we're going to have to spend time on in the evening shows, and maybe if I can tuck in a little bit here in the morning. | ||
| But Fitch, the rating agency, downgraded the United States government securities last night. | ||
| Went from a triple A to a double A plus. | ||
| The reason was the financial mess of the Biden regime. | ||
| Overspending, still quantitative easing, all of it. | ||
| Of course, they tried to, oh yeah, it had something to do with the debt ceiling. | ||
| Hey, the debt ceiling, because the people that try and get the house in order are just not going to comply with this. | ||
| This is not a war room saying this. | ||
| Fitch came out and literally eviscerated the Biden regime and Janet Yellen is trying to put up some defense. | ||
| This is why they understand they cannot beat Donald J. Trump and the Trump movement at the ballot box. | ||
| And they're going to come at him from every different angle. | ||
| This ain't the last of it. | ||
| Boris. | ||
| It is not the last of it, Steve. | ||
| They're coming with everything they've got and they're doing it because they have the strongest, toughest, Most magnetic, but also most accomplished adversary they've ever had in President Donald J. Trump. | ||
| And if you compare, including this disaster with Fitch, if you compare that to what he accomplished in his just four years while fighting the deep state, while fighting the Democrat and Republican establishments, it is clear why these polls are so clearly and so unabashedly stating. | ||
| That the American people want to get rid of Joe Biden and the Biden crime family and bring President Trump back to office as soon as possible. | ||
| And as you said, Steve, these Keebler elves, as you call them, the pretenders, the others, the tier B, the second rung of the quote unquote candidates in the Republican primary, they need to stop now. | ||
| They need to stop. | ||
| They need to realize what the American people are calling for. | ||
| Back President Donald J. Trump and let's go win the White House back and let's save our country. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| We're going to talk about the donors and the establishment because the knives, trust me, the knives are out right now, but we'll take care of that. | ||
| It'll take 48 hours and 72 hours to put that down as we are going to put it down. | ||
| Boris, how do people get your morning newsletter and to follow you on social media, sir, as it looks like the whole world is following Boris Epstein now. | ||
| Steve, honor to be with you. | ||
| Honor to be on the show. | ||
| Always signal, not noise for the audience. | ||
| The website is hotboriscp.com. | ||
| Sign up right now at boriscp.com. | ||
| Hot on Getter at Boris CP. | ||
| Twitter at Boris CP. | ||
| Hot on Truth Social at Boris. | ||
| And the hottest on the gram, Boris underscore Epstein. | ||
| Stay strong. | ||
| God bless on all offense. | ||
| Boris, thank you very much. | ||
| Let's go to a representative of one of my favorite states, the great state of Montana. | ||
| That would be Matt Rosendale. | ||
| Congressman Rosendale, your thoughts on this indictment? | ||
| It's another hoax, Steve. | ||
| We've seen it. | ||
| You know, I'm not an attorney, so I can't dissect these charges bit by bit, sentence by sentence, word by word. | ||
| But I tell you what I can do, and that is talk to the regular man on the street across the state of Montana, which we are now released from the prison of Washington, D.C. | ||
| for the next 30 days, and I will be doing for the next 30 days. | ||
| And already, in three days, back in district, I've got an overwhelming amount of support for President Trump. | ||
| People can see with their own eyes that these charges are false again. | ||
| They're artificial again. | ||
| Bob Woodward, I was listening to the clip before I came on here and to hear him say, yeah, we have to base it on the truth. | ||
| We have to base it on the facts. | ||
| Oh, my gosh. | ||
| What about the fact that we have a sitting president that was receiving funds from China and his son who was forcing money out of Ukraine and has been going on for quite some time? | ||
| What about the Former Secretary of State who had 30,000 emails in her laptop that we never were able to see. | ||
| And we've got a president now, okay, who's being charged, President Trump, and he was the only guy, Steve, I was there on January 6, 2021. | ||
| He was the one who tried to get additional security around the Capitol, knew there was going to be a big crowd, wanted to have adequate crowd control. | ||
| And Nancy Pelosi rejected it. | ||
| Mayor Bowser rejected it. | ||
| And we've got other people that were mixed in with the crowd trying to incite these activities. | ||
| What about all of that? | ||
| How come they aren't pursuing that? | ||
| That's my question. | ||
| Instead of drumming up and creating these charges out of thin air to go against President Trump. | ||
| We know why. | ||
| Because it's election interference and they want to keep him out of the White House. | ||
| Congressman, if you could just hang, we're going to take a short break here. | ||
| I've got, we do have two lawyers. | ||
| We have Cash Patel and Mike Davis are going to be with us. | ||
| We're going to talk two things. | ||
| We're going to talk about the impeachment of Joe Biden. | ||
| And obviously we're going to talk about what Axios breaks down as a five part actions in this indictment of president Trump. | ||
| And we're going to talk about the, you know, the, what I'm so enthusiastic about. | ||
| We get a chance to adjudicate the stealing of the 2020 election. | ||
| It's no, It is no way Joe Biden got 81 million legitimate, certifiable, chain-of-custody votes from people called American citizens. | ||
| And we get a chance in a federal court to prove that. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Congressman Matt Rosendale from the great state of Montana will join us after a short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everything's just beginning for the games you want to play. | |
| Bring it on and I will fight to the end. | ||
| Just watch and see. | ||
| It's all started. | ||
| Everything's begun. | ||
| And you are over. | ||
| Cause we're taking down the CCP! | ||
| Spread the word all through Hong Kong. | ||
| We will fight till they're all gone. | ||
| We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
| Let's take down the CCP! | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | ||
| I want to make sure that we always keep in mind, because, you know, we would love to spend time on transhumanism, and the currency, and geopolitics, and the crushing of the nuclear family, all that, and we're going to obviously spend a lot of time on that, those topics, day in and day out, the important topics of the signal, not the noise, but | ||
| We're going to have to spend a significant amount of time on this show, right, because of you, this audience, on two things. | ||
| Number one is the defense of the Constitution in this republic by Donald J. Trump. | ||
| In those days from 3 November, the evening of 3 November, all the way through January 6 and beyond until he left to go to Mar-a-Lago on the late morning of the 20th of January of 2021. | ||
| And we will be framing and making that case in quite a lot of detail. | ||
| In addition, and I want to make sure everybody kind of understands the other side of this. | ||
| Joe Biden, this is not about just influence peddling. | ||
| This is not about just some, uh, drug addict, pervert, degenerate, uh, you know, manchild, Hunter Biden or, or the rest of the Biden, uh, crime family. | ||
| This is about an individual when he was vice president of the United States that monetized his office to our greatest enemy. | ||
| When he was put in charge by Obama of the pivot to Asia, His family had an active program then and thereafter to monetize access to him. | ||
| To assist our enemies. | ||
| To assist our enemies. | ||
| One of the central most important companies in the One Belt One Road, which is everyone knows that follows the show, is the central element and central part of the consolidation of the Eurasian landmass. | ||
| To break Pax Americana and lead to a rising hegemony Of a brutal, gangster dictatorship that is every bit as bad as Hitler, Goebbels, Goering, all of them. | ||
| Himmler in the 1930s. | ||
| Every bit as bad, and in fact, has murdered more people. | ||
| Murdered more people. | ||
| He sold us out. | ||
| One guy defended this republic, and the other guy sold out the republic. | ||
| That is exactly what we're talking about. | ||
| To put it in just very simple context. | ||
| One individual stood up and stood in the breach to defend the Constitution and defend this Republic. | ||
| And the other consciously sold out his nation, its citizens, its safety, its security. | ||
| Congressman Rosendale, when you're around Montana, which I think is a pretty good indicator Of where the American people are given the hard-nosed, common-sense patriotism of the folks out there in Big Sky Country. | ||
| Give me your sense of how rapidly should we be gathering facts and moving towards an impeachment of an individual that sold his country out to the Chinese Communist Party, sir. | ||
| The people across Montana are ready to begin the impeachment proceedings investigation on Biden. | ||
| Absolutely, they are. | ||
| They are ready to begin the impeachment Proceedings and investigations on Mayorkas because they see that these individuals absolutely do not have our country's best interests at heart and that they are doing serious, serious damage, both economically, both from a national security standpoint. | ||
| And as you summarize very well, this started a long time ago with the Biden family when Joe Biden decided to start making himself benefit from his office. | ||
| I like to say, Steve, when you come to Washington, D.C., you've got to make a decision. | ||
| You've got to make a decision whether you're going to be a public servant or a profiteer. | ||
| And I think that we've got two grand examples of people who have made two stark Starkly different decisions. | ||
| We've got Donald Trump who decided to come to Washington DC to be a public servant and gave up a lot in order to be there and took on a lot of attacks. | ||
| He took on a loss of financial worth. | ||
| And then we see Joe Biden and his family that came to Washington, D.C. | ||
| to be profiteers, to use every connection and every authoritative position that they were placed in to angle and receive more money from more people, both globally and domestically, so that it would benefit them. | ||
| Congressman, leadership. | ||
| How far down the path of this is leadership? | ||
| Or once again, because I've already heard the donors and everybody, they're saying, oh, Trump's electability, you know, in the last 24 hours, although Trump is leading Biden virtually in every poll. | ||
| What about leadership? | ||
| Are they going to move with dispatch on this impeachment issue, sir? | ||
| I think what we have seen consistently is that leadership are a bunch of weathermen. | ||
| They take their finger, they stick it up, they say which way the wind is blowing, and then they climb around in front of the parade and try to lead it. | ||
| We saw the same thing. | ||
| You talk about the credit ratings dropping, Steve. | ||
| Look, man, we worked really, really hard at the beginning of this year to try and put together a debt ceiling package that changed the trajectory of our spending. | ||
| And there was a lot of effort. | ||
| I was meeting with senators, I was meeting with House members. | ||
| A lot of effort was put in to claw back a lot of this Biden spending, to freeze the actual spending amounts, and unfortunately, after we were able to pass that package, Leadership went around behind us again, struck a deal with President Biden, put a debt ceiling limit into January 25 so that we don't have much leverage to do much of anything. | ||
| And so when the financial ratings come out and they reduce us down from AAA to AA ratings, it says right in there. | ||
| And we had this happen previously when we had a government shutdown. | ||
| The reason that the credit ratings went down was not because of any shutdown. | ||
| It wasn't because of Matt Rosendale speaks the truth. | ||
| If Matt Rosendale's plan had been accepted... It wasn't the debt ceiling negotiations Fitch is talking about. | ||
| If Matt Rosendale's plan had been accepted, there would have been no downgrade. | ||
| to address it. | ||
| McCarthy sold out the plan that the rating agencies would have said, OK, it's not perfect, but I see how you guys, I can see how you get there. | ||
| I see how you get there. | ||
| And you're making some significant changes. | ||
| But because leadership sold that out and signed it with Biden, now we've got the Biden downgrade. | ||
| And you've got the Secretary of Treasury whining about it. | ||
| Congressman, we've got to bounce. | ||
| How do people follow you, sir? | ||
| At RepRosadale, all my platforms at Rep. | ||
| Rosendale, glad to take input, glad to hear back from you, and like most of the conservatives, solid conservatives across the nation, we always need your support. | ||
| And Congressman, please give our greetings to all the great folks out in Montana. | ||
| We have a big audience out there. | ||
| We're very proud of it and love those folks. | ||
| Make sure you tell them that the war room's always thinking about them. | ||
| I will. | ||
| Thank you so much for having me on again, Steve. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| Appreciate the boss. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| I've got We've got Cash and we have Cash Patel and Mike Davis. | ||
| Cash, I'll start with you. | ||
| Give me your assessment. | ||
| And here's the thing. | ||
| Mike and Cash are two lawyers and two of the heavyweights in D.C. | ||
| So Cash, give me your cut on this first. | ||
| Yeah, look, everybody knows that the January 6th events citing insurrection, treason, sedition, conspiracy, when the DOJ had the ability to charge Donald Trump with any of those events, like they unlawfully impeached him with, they failed because they knew he did not violate the law. | ||
| Just like the classified documents case, Steve, remember the Mar-a-Lago case, the prosecution had the opportunity to charge Donald Trump with unlawfully possessing actual classified material. | ||
| They didn't use that statute. | ||
| They went back to 1917. | ||
| The DOJ has admitted in their own filings Donald Trump never possessed unlawfully classified information, and he was never an insurrectionist, a seditionist, or a co-conspirator to treasonous activity. | ||
| Why is that important? | ||
| Because they have now utilized charges which we, when we ran Russiagate, we referred criminally the architects of Russiagate, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, etc. | ||
| For the exact same charges the DOJ has now charged Donald Trump with, and the Department of Justice laughed us out of their halls. | ||
| They literally said, we do not use these statutes to prosecute anyone. | ||
| And what do we see here? | ||
| A two-tier system of justice. | ||
| So that's what we have. | ||
| We have the DOJ actually exonerating President Trump in both of these indictments by failing to apply the law and selectively applying the politicization of political speech. | ||
| It is Donald Trump's right, from now until the end of time, to say he won every election he ever ran in. | ||
| That is not criminal activity and America is waking up to it. | ||
| Real quickly, because I'm going to hold you through break and Mike's going to join us. | ||
| Go back to that again about the Comey-McCain. | ||
| I'll tell you what, hang on. | ||
| Cash, we're great. | ||
| Today, in our celebration of America, in our continual effort to bring American music to the American people, we're going to do a replay of what we thought was a good day to do Battle Hymn again, Battle Hymn of the Republic. | ||
| We're going to return with Mike Davis and Cash Patel in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
His truth is marching on. | |
| I have seen him in the watch fires of a hundred circling camps. | ||
| They have builded him an altar in the evening news and dance. | ||
| I can read his righteous sentence by the demon flaring lamps. | ||
| His day is His days of marching on. Glory, glory, hallelujah. Glory, glory, hallelujah. His days of marching on. | ||
| He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never sound retreat. | ||
| He is sifting out the hearts of men before his judgment seat. | ||
| Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer him! | ||
| Be jubilant, my feet! | ||
| Our God is marching on! | ||
| Well, I think there actually is some optimism in all of this. | ||
| And it's a very important theme line. | ||
| And that is, we talk about being in the post-truth era, where facts don't matter. | ||
| And as we know the old way, facts did matter. | ||
| And there are roughly four standards in establishing facts. | ||
| Do you have witnesses? | ||
| Do you have participants? | ||
| Do you have contemporaneous notes? | ||
| Do you have documents? | ||
| Look at this indictment. | ||
| Let me have it. | ||
| The answer is yes, yes. | ||
| Because we're going to adjudicate 2020. | ||
| You guys asked for it. | ||
| You're a bloodlust. | ||
| The other thing that I think, too, they think it's a loser at the polls. | ||
| I, homie, don't think so. | ||
| I think we start presenting the case, the case of how they stole it in the details, in the receipts, in the granularity. | ||
| I don't think that's going to stand up too well to the American people and say, well, hang on for a second. | ||
| Why are we just finding this out now in the summer of 2024? | ||
| Why are we just finding this out? | ||
| Kash Patel, before I turn to Mike quickly, go back, I want people to understand, this is quite important. | ||
| About Comey, McCabe, and what you did, and what you were using, what you were citing as the ability to charge him, and he got laughed out of the building. | ||
| Walk me through that one more time. | ||
| Yeah, look, all roads lead back to Russiagate. | ||
| It's the same corrupt actors. | ||
| We referred everybody that got retired or resigned or fired from the FBI and DOJ as a result of our investigation. | ||
| All 17 of them. | ||
| And I'm going to post the letter, the classified letter that we got unclassified later on Truth Social, referring them for conspiring to actually defraud the United States of America, along with other charges that you see in this Trump indictment. | ||
| And Rosenstein and company just basically said, absolutely not, we never use these, they're on the books, this is laughable. | ||
| That would be a political prosecution against people. | ||
| Wrong, it would have been a righteous criminal prosecution against people who actually broke trust in America and violated their roles as the leaders of law enforcement. | ||
| But that's just not enough. | ||
| All those guys are the reason We went to the federal court to sue Fusion GPS to find out where the money came from from the Steele dossier. | ||
| Why is any of that important? | ||
| Do you know where that case landed, Steve? | ||
| Before Judge Chutkin. | ||
| I was in federal court with federal subpoenas to get the bank records to prove that the Democrats and Hillary paid for it. | ||
| And on the eve of the decision, do you know what Judge Chutkin did? | ||
| She recused herself because she is so entrenched with the Democratic National Committee Wow. | ||
| and the bureaucracy and regime to take out Donald Trump, she could not unbiasedly and unbiasedly participate in the judicial proceedings. | ||
| That is why she needs to be recused right now. | ||
| That is a public filing. | ||
| I will go get that for us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fine. | |
| Hang on for one second. | ||
| Mike, can you help me out here with my framing of one guy that stands in the breach to defend the Constitution of the Republic, another guy who sells out his country. | ||
| Remember, it's not about Hunter Biden. | ||
| Hunter Biden is just some drunk pervert, right? | ||
| And it's not about James Biden, the brains of the operation. | ||
| It's about a guy that Obama entrusted to oversee the pivot to Asia, which was the confrontation with China, which he tells us he started butting up with Xi. | ||
| Is Bob Woodward right? | ||
| Is this going to be a search for truth and facts, sir? | ||
| You know, I'm actually quite I'm thrilled that the Washington Post now cares about facts and the truth when it was the Washington Post and the mainstream media who peddled the Russian collusion hoax in 2016, falsely accusing Trump of colluding with the Russians, which ended up to be just complete nonsense. | ||
| In 2020, the Washington Post and their fellow Travelers in the mainstream, meaning liberal media, peddled the hoax that Hunter Biden's laptop containing clear evidence of Joe Biden's foreign corruption, that he's compromised, that he would be compromised as the President of the United States. | ||
| These 51 former intel goons said that that was Russian disinformation. | ||
| So it's good that the Washington Post actually cares about information now. | ||
| What they're leaving out is that it is not illegal to object to presidential elections or any elections in America. | ||
| It's only illegal to object to elections in third world Marxist hellholes until yesterday when Merrick Garland and Jack Smith charged Trump with the non-crime of objecting to a presidential election. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| Just let me, because you guys are the lawyers. | ||
| I'm just a dumb mick. | ||
| Didn't President Trump have an obligation? | ||
| Didn't President Trump have an obligation to do this? | ||
| Didn't he have a duty to do this? | ||
| He was Commander-in-Chief. | ||
| He's Chief Magistrate, right? | ||
| He's Chief Magistrate. | ||
| I know in this modern interpretation of the independence of the Justice Department, the FBI, which is concocted by the administrative state and the Praetorian Guard, but he's the Chief Magistrate. | ||
| He's the Chief Executive. | ||
| He's the Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces. | ||
| Did he not, sir? | ||
| have a duty and an obligation to do everything that he did in order to make sure that this was a, that this election had actually been fair and the counts at the end were actually fair to the American people and by all the rules and regulations laid out thereof, sir. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it's his job as the president, as the head of the executive branch, to make sure that the laws are faithfully executed And separate from that, he had the right under the Electoral Count Act of 1887 to object to the presidential election, just like the Democrats did in 1968, 2000, 2004, and 2016. | ||
| He also had the right under the First Amendment to twist arms politically, to try to advocate for his position and try to win through the legal and political processes. | ||
| That is Not a crime. | ||
| It's only a crime to object to presidential elections in third world Marxist hellholes and now in Joe Biden's America. | ||
| You bring up a thing, because I keep saying the ceremonial post, the ceremonial post, the ceremonial post, and all the write-ups. | ||
| Help me out here, Mike Davis. | ||
| The Electoral Count Act of 1887, which you've mentioned, was not the same Electoral Count Act that in the middle of the night, back last December, that was a significant change that they couldn't get passed in the House or the Senate if you had to do it in broad daylight. | ||
| They tucked that in to a 2,000-page omnibus bill and passed. | ||
| That is the same Electoral Count Act of 1887. | ||
| of 1887 that you refer to, sir? | ||
| That is the same electoral count act of 1887. | ||
| So it's very interesting that the Democrats advocated for this exact same position to have alternate slates of electors for prior elections. | ||
| And all of a sudden they want to charge Trump with a crime. | ||
| And if you look at what Jack Smith is doing here, it's actually quite sneaky. | ||
| He goes out there and does a press conference and talks about the so-called insurrection on January 6th. | ||
| apparently when insurrectionists get into a... | ||
| nation's capital and get to the Senate floor, insurrectionists don't burn down the damn place, they take selfies and then walk out. But separate from that, what Jack Smith is trying to do is he's trying to invoke this insurrection and the Capitol Police and then trying to backdoor in these bogus allegations that President Trump somehow committed multiple felonies, four felonies, because he objected to a presidential election. They're trying to lump | ||
| this all together. Leave it to Mike Davis to bring up the second major point. | ||
| So not only, correct me if I'm wrong because I'm not a lawyer, but we get, the way that Jack Smith's laid out the case, we get to adjudicate all of 2020 in a federal court because knowingly, he knowingly lied about his belief about the 2020. | ||
| So we get to adjudicate that. | ||
| That's central part of Jack Smith. | ||
| Also, The whole issue of the Fed's erection, because Jack Smith and what he actually said at his press conference, right, is what's in this document, do we not also get to go back, as I've said we needed to do, this is what the country needs to do, we get to go back and look at all of it, you know, what happened about Pelosi, the federal agents, all of it gets to be put in play in a federal court, Mike Davis? | ||
| I mean, yeah, I mean, Jack Smith, Merrick Garland and Jack Smith are alleging that President Trump I actually think I won the election, and here is why. | ||
| defrauded the government somehow by bringing these election challenges on January 6th. | ||
| So Trump's going to say, no, I didn't know I lost the election. | ||
| I actually think I won the election, and here is why. | ||
| And that's the evidence that he's going to be able to put forward in court to show that he had no fraudulent intent. | ||
| And so this will be a wonderful opportunity for the American people to get into the nitty-gritty. | ||
| I think, what do they have, four different charges across seven different states? | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is going to be quite fun. | |
| So cash. | ||
| Cash, this is why I said, my optimism, this is a Blessed day divine providence once again has intervened and now we've always fought for venue. | ||
| We've always fought to be able to adjudicate this and Jack Smith in their own deranged. | ||
| The Trump deranged syndrome, the bloodlust to get Trump, the law of unintended consequences is now upon us. | ||
| Am I wrong, Cash? | ||
| Is Mike Davis wrong? | ||
| Do we not get to adjudicate the stealing and the illegitimacy of Joe Biden and his presidency and at the same time the Fed's erection that went down on January 6th? | ||
| Do we not get to put in front of the entire nation and the world, sir, all of the facts of both of those? | ||
| Yeah, Ben, and you're only wrong once a day. | ||
| Davis is never wrong. | ||
| But listen, you are absolutely right. | ||
| Here's what I put out on Truth Social last night, and I'm going to send it to the president. | ||
| I can't wait for this trial to come, because the subpoena list that Donald Trump should execute in this proceedings is going to be monumental. | ||
| I want him to subpoena every government gangster that has ever called him out bogusly. | ||
| I mean Garland. | ||
| Think about it. | ||
| We're going to subpoena Garland, Wray. | ||
| We're going to put all them in the hot seat. | ||
| We're going to go back to Russiagate. | ||
| We're going to get Rosenstein and all the other gangsters from that era. | ||
| We're going to get documentation from everything because under the Constitution, and as a federal public defender, I know this, you are entitled not just to the discovery the government gives you, but every piece of information the government possesses and every witness they have. | ||
| To stand up your defense. | ||
| That's due process. | ||
| And so the amount, the deluge of subpoenas that is going to come out, you're right. | ||
| It's going to boomerang. | ||
| These people bit way more than they can chew. | ||
| And I can't wait to see the list of people that come in the crosshairs from the defense perspective. | ||
| And I hope the defense team for Donald Trump listens and puts it out there. | ||
| So Mike, is Cash right that we get to do all of this? | ||
| Because I'm saying, what's not to like here? | ||
| What's not to love here? | ||
| Because they forced this and ran so fast and so quick, right? | ||
| They stumbled and they gave us what we've always wanted, the ability to adjudicate January 6th and what led up to it, the federal government's involvement in it, and also the stealing of the 2020 election. | ||
| So is Cash right? | ||
| I mean, he's right on paper. | ||
| The problem is we have a problem called Judge Tanya Chudkin, who is the district court judge who is overseeing this case. | ||
| And, you know, she used to be a federal public defender for many years. | ||
| She used to care about defendants' rights. | ||
| Of course, that was before Republicans and Trump supporters started getting charged in Washington, D.C. | ||
| and started facing welfare in Washington, D.C. | ||
| I guarantee you that Donald Trump is not going to get a fair trial in Washington, D.C. | ||
| He's not going to get a fair appeal with the Obama-stacked D.C. | ||
| Circuit Court of Appeals. | ||
| He will not be able to get to the Supreme Court before the presidential election. | ||
| This is going to have to be resolved by the American people on November 5th. | ||
| 2024 because Trump is going to get railroaded in Washington, D.C. with Jack Smith, this Democrat partisan hitman, as the special counsel, this Obama judge overseeing this trial, and this 95% Trump deranged jury pool called Washington, D.C. | ||
| Cash, we'll take a quick break. | ||
| I know, Mike, you've got to jump. | ||
| We'll clean up with you and we're going to hold Cash. | ||
| Talk about impeachment. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Mike Davis and the Cash Patel. | ||
| Next in the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Spread the word all through Hong Kong. | |
| We will fight till they're all gone. | ||
| We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
| Let's take down the CCP. | ||
| A choice. | ||
| A choice between two worlds. | ||
| Will you take the blue pill and continue living in a world where a corrupt few control everything? | ||
| Or will you take the red pill and join us? | ||
| What the elites don't want you to know is that there are 200,000 open committee man seats in the Republican Party. | ||
| These party members are the ones who determine the future of the GOP. | ||
| Let's take our country back, one precinct at a time. | ||
| Visit precinctstrategy.com now. | ||
| Okay, we're going to have a deeper discussion on this, the precinct strategy and everybody out there in the war on policy. | ||
| The next 72 hours are quite important because the Republican establishment, I know this is going to shock you, the knives are out for a guy named Donald J. Trump. | ||
| They're going to make the big case for the next 72 hours, electability, electability, electability. | ||
| You see, you wait to the arraignment on Thursday. | ||
| Mike Davis, my theory of the case, you said is, yeah, that's the Constitution, all that, but that's not what Jack, you don't think Jack Smith's, walk me through there, because it's not about the rule of law. | ||
| It's not about, you know, justice being blind. | ||
| This is about lawfare, which is quite different. | ||
| Give me Jack Smith's strategy. | ||
| I mean, I think your theory is quaint, and it should be how it works in America, but it's not going to be how it works in this case. | ||
| And we have a track record with Jack Smith, with the Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell case. | ||
| Jack Smith does not care if he gets overturned by the Supreme Court two or three years from now. | ||
| This district court judge, this Obama district court judge in D.C., Tonya Chudkin, does not care if President Trump gets to present evidence fairly in his trial and she gets reversed by the Supreme Court two years from now. The whole goal here is lawfare to take out President Trump as a presidential candidate for November of 2024 like Jack Smith did with Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell back before 2016 | ||
| when he was a likely Republican presidential candidate. | ||
| Jack Smith got reversed 8-0 by the Supreme Court. | ||
| It would have been 9-0 but Justice Scalia passed away. | ||
| It is very hard to get reversed, a criminal conviction reversed By the Supreme Court. | ||
| It is nearly impossible for that to happen unanimously. | ||
| And Jack Smith found the way. | ||
| He is a hitman. | ||
| He is a political scud missile that President Biden and Merrick Garland are deploying to take out President Trump politically because they fear they can't beat him on November 5th, 2020. | ||
| And your point is to get a conviction, and it gets reversed by the Supreme Court in a couple of years, but it's all about the politics of November 2024. | ||
| Mike Davis, social media, particularly your personal Twitter account, or a company formerly called Twitter, and how did it get to Article 3, sir? | ||
| You can donate at article3project.org, article3project.org. | ||
| We're gearing up for all this lawfare, so check us out there. | ||
| At article3project, at article3project on Getter, Twitter, Truth, and my personal is at M-R-D-D-M-I-A, M-R-D-D-M-I-A. | ||
| My initials in Des Moines, Iowa. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| This judge, you've dealt with her before. | ||
| Should she recuse herself? | ||
| Absolutely, Steve. | ||
| Look, when we were doing Russiagate and people told me I was out of my mind for daring to connect Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Party to the Steele dossier that Comey, McCabe, and Strzok, who should have been prosecuted then for the crimes that Jack Smith is bringing now against President Trump. | ||
| Rammed through the FISA process unlawfully. | ||
| I ended up in federal court because the DNC, Fusion GPS, and the Hillary Clinton machine didn't want it revealed that we had caught them funding the illegal steel dossier that the FBI used illegally. | ||
| And when we went to federal court to litigate it, we were on the verge of winning access to the bank records and Judge Chutkin recused herself from the proceedings. | ||
| After finding out the depth of details and the involvement about the Democratic National Party and them trying to bamboozle Donald Trump, she recused because she's so entrenched through her past legal representations and family into the Democratic National Party and the Hillary Clinton campaign that she could not be a fair, detached, and arbitrary neutral arbiter of facts. | ||
| That is the standard that must apply in this case. | ||
| She cannot preside over the Donald Trump criminal prosecution if she could not preside over the adjudication of a congressional subpoena involving the baseless investigation of Donald Trump. | ||
| So we have to go at her hard, not just publicly, but we have to go hard at her legally. | ||
| And hopefully I can get with President Trump's team soon to walk them through it. | ||
| We've got the paperwork. | ||
| We've got the receipts. | ||
| There's a reason. | ||
| And here's the thing, Steve, I didn't even ask her to recuse. | ||
| She did it herself. | ||
| That's how much bias was in that case for her. | ||
| It's the same bias that is metastasized in this case, especially with the way she has treated January 6th defendants. | ||
| Cash, can you hold on for a few minutes? | ||
| We're going to go to break in a second here. | ||
| I want to hold over. | ||
| I got Carrie Lake. | ||
| Carrie Lake had a blistering, blistering, she put up I think on Truth and Getter on Twitter. | ||
| Um, about, uh, people standing down for this, uh, standing down for the primary. | ||
| This town, now time to come together. | ||
| People should understand that behind the scenes the exact opposite. | ||
| The establishment is coming after Trump with the knives out right now. | ||
| Uh, they're, they're gonna make the case he's not electable, which is nothing's farther from the truth. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The Battle Hymn of the Republic is going to take us out. | ||
| We're going to have a short commercial break. | ||
| Kash Patel is going to join us about the impeachment of Joe Biden. | ||
| Of course, Kerry Lake is going to join us also. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Back in the War Room in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hallelujah, glory, glory, hallelujah, his truth is marching on. | |
| I have seen him in the watch fires of a hundred circling cafts. | ||
| They have builded him an altar in the evening dews and damps. | ||
| I can read his righteous sentence by the demon-flaring lamps. | ||
| His day is marching on. | ||
| Glory, glory, hallelujah. | ||
| His day is marching on. | ||
| He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never sound retreat. | ||
| He is sifting out the hearts of men before his judgment seat. | ||
| Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer him! | ||
| Be jubilant, my feet! | ||
| Our God is marching on! | ||
| Glory, glory, hallelujah! | ||
| Our God is marching on! |
Export Selection