July 25, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:35
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| Here's how I got a free shot of all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| That they bribed the Bidens, okay? | ||
| This was given to the FBI. | ||
| When Bill Barr finally found out about it, he sent it to his office in Philadelphia. | ||
| They actually said that this was very credible. | ||
| The FBI kept this from the IRS individuals for them ever to see it. | ||
| So not only do they claim that they were bribed, we now find information that 16 out of 17 payments from Romania were provided to the Biden shell companies while he was vice president. | ||
| When President Biden was running for office, he told the American public that he's never talked about business. | ||
| He said his family has never received a dollar from China, which we now prove is not true. | ||
| We now have some of the most credible whistleblowers. | ||
| These 10-year IRS agents who have come forward said that the Biden family has been treated differently, that what Weiss has told us is different than what Garland and Weiss has told the public. | ||
| And you're sitting here today where now you have found millions of foreign money, just what the 1023 alleges they did to Biden's family. | ||
| Now we found that it has funneled through shell companies. | ||
| If you're sitting in our position today, we would know none of this if Republicans had not taken the majority. | ||
| We've only followed where the information has taken us. | ||
| Hannity, this is rising to the level of impeachment inquiry, which provides Congress the strongest power to get the rest of the knowledge and information needed. | ||
| Because this president has also used something we have not seen since Richard Nixon. | ||
| Used the weaponization of government to benefit his family and deny Congress the ability to have the oversight. | ||
| If we are talking about millions of dollars coming from our top geopolitical foes and that the Biden family has been corrupted and took in all of this money and he was complicit in that, wouldn't that mean that we have a criminal enterprise as President of the United States that had to be on every level compromised by countries that are not particularly fond of us? | ||
| Well, it's interesting that the Biden family runs, if they say, a company but never had an office and shell companies to be able to pay through. | ||
| But if they really ran it for foreign countries, why didn't you get money from France, from Germany, from UK? | ||
| Why does it have to be from China, Romania? | ||
| These countries that have real challenges and had problems going through. | ||
| I believe we will follow this all the way to the end. | ||
| And this is going to rise to an impeachment inquiry the way the Constitution tells us to do this. | ||
| And we have to get the answers to these questions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In the words of John Dean, a malignant cancer now is surrounding the Biden presidency and those walls are closing awfully tight. | |
| This is not going the way I'm sure they wanted it to. | ||
| And then we have on the other side of it, the assistance of the DOJ and the FBI. | ||
| That's Jim Jordan's committee. | ||
| Chairman James Comer today says that the Oversight Committee, excuse me, has evidence that the President in the past communicated directly with foreign business associates of his son Hunter Biden many times. | ||
| Curious if the White House and the President still stand behind his comment that he's never been involved and has never even spoken to his son about his So I've been asked this question a million times. | ||
| The answer is not going to change. | ||
| The answer remains the same. | ||
| The president was never in business with his son. | ||
| I just don't have anything else to add. | ||
| House spokesman for oversight and investigations, Ian Sams, later responded, writing, quote, instead of focusing on the real issues Americans want us to address, like continuing to lower inflation or create jobs, this is what the White House GOP, excuse me, the House GOP wants to prioritize. | ||
| Their eagerness to go after the president, regardless of the truth, is seemingly bottomless. | ||
| Jonathan Lemire, it strikes you, listening to Speaker McCarthy there, that other than that one phone call, private phone call on January 6, 2021, we have not heard that level of outrage, that depth of criticism from Kevin McCarthy about Donald Trump attempting to lead a coup against the United States government around the 2020 election, taking classified information about nuclear secrets, And war plans back to Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| He's held that for President Biden and his son. | ||
| Yeah, and let's fact check him right off the top. | ||
| They haven't proven that there was any wrongdoing here, despite what he said last night. | ||
| And the House GOP is kicking up whistleblower after whistleblower, alleging wrongdoing, but have yet to provide any concrete evidence. | ||
| Did they ever find the fugitive guy, Lemire? | ||
| Have they found him yet? | ||
| The guy with the, was it the guy with the one arm? | ||
| Yeah, no, he's been missing. | ||
| There's another guy who's, I believe, under indictment, in federal indictment, because of his wrongdoings and this matter. | ||
| Look, they had a couple members of the IRS came up last week and did testify that they felt like this should have been a matter that should have been prosecuted further about Hunter Biden. | ||
| And then under oath, they also acknowledged that, well, Actually, superiors disagree with us quite a bit. | ||
| It's actually pretty common for it not to happen. | ||
| So Eugene Robinson, people that I've talked to say that the House is hell-bent on some sort of impeachment. | ||
| They think Attorney General Merrick Garland might be more likely candidate than President Biden, but certainly they're not ruling out the president. | ||
| And I just, if that, what sort of, if they do go there for an impeachment inquiry for President Biden, I just ask you, like, where are we heading now? | ||
| Are we in a moment where impeachment, which is supposed to be rare and almost sacred, is just being tossed around like another political ploy? | ||
| Is every president going forward going to face some sort of impeachment inquiry? | ||
|
unidentified
|
A short answer, it looks like yes. | |
| It looks like this is kind of the default position. | ||
| Much of this Republican party in the House, at least, seems to believe or want to make People think they believe that the impeachments of President Trump were illegal, were totally political. | ||
| And so they believe they have a constituency that wants to see them strike back in the same way at Joe Biden. | ||
| And I think Kevin McCarthy is responding to that constituency, and so we may be in that situation that you described. | ||
| We may be in a situation where impeachment just becomes kind of a phase of a presidency. | ||
| You are correct. | ||
| It is interesting, Ben, though, from what Olivia is saying, right, that not only did the president in this meeting want to do a press conference on how great election security was and it was so wonderful and praising it left and right, that his frustration then and the guy he fired shortly thereafter was the guy who was actually saying that there might be a challenge to election security in the form of Russia. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And that was the third rail for the former president. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, Chris Krebs sort of walked into into a split rail between both Russia and then saying the election was was otherwise secure. | ||
| But all of this and this meeting is particularly important in terms of the reckoning that the country needs to have with Trump's election denial charges. | ||
| Because the 30% of the country not believing in the credibility of our elections is not a sustainable number. | ||
| And Donald Trump, bringing Donald Trump to account, to actually prove the underlying case that he claimed was true, would be a real service to the country. | ||
| Oh my God. | ||
| Tuesday, 25 July, Year of Our Lord 2023. | ||
| So, obviously, a lot going on. | ||
| The Sound of Freedom screens in Congress tonight at the theater that was built for the new visitor's theater over there. | ||
| Kevin McCarthy actually hosting it. | ||
| We're going to get feedback from that. | ||
| Caviezel and Tim Ballard are both, I think, going to make it in town. | ||
| They're on the card to address the house. | ||
| And we're going to see a lot more activity after that. | ||
| Right there, the buried lead. | ||
| We're going to get into all of this because we're packed today and I had to kind of junk what we're going to talk about. | ||
| Geopolitics, capital markets, all that. | ||
| I'm going to do a lot of that at five to seven tonight because we've got to get into this. | ||
| Ginsburg right there. | ||
| What'd he say? | ||
| Remember, Ginsburg is a A major league lawyer over here, I think he ran DHS, he is part of the administrative state. | ||
| He's the Republican version of the administrative and deep state. | ||
| Right there on Aaron Burnett, he said, quote, 30% of the American people do not believe the election of 2020 was fair. | ||
| The number's much higher, but let's just go with his number. | ||
| He said, quote, that is not sustainable. | ||
| That is not sustainable. | ||
| And we have to use what Jack Smith, because they were talking about Jack Smith's, the J6 grand jury or the Jack Smith deal here, not Mar-a-Lago, but here, the one that is supposedly the one that sent Trump a target letter. | ||
| And as a service to the country, we have to prove that the underlying belief of President Trump And 30% or higher, you know, 70, 67% of Republicans is not true. | ||
| Are they saying is what Ginsburg saying is that when Trump gets indicted by this, that this will provide finally a platform in a federal court to put forward the information of the stealing of the 2020 election, because that's what he's asking for. | ||
| So you have the impeachment inquiries. | ||
| Right? | ||
| I've asked my staff to pull the... This show started with an idea that I got in the fall of, I think in September of 2019, when Nancy Pelosi stood in front of a set of microphones in New York during the annual General Assembly meetings of the United Nations. | ||
| She was up there. | ||
| And she said, we're going to begin... We had the Pelosi? | ||
| Can we go ahead and play the Pelosi? | ||
| Let's go ahead and play... Let me play that. | ||
| See if my memory is as accurate as I thought. | ||
| Let's play it. | ||
| The actions taken to date by the President have seriously violated the Constitution, especially when the President says, Article 2 says I can do whatever I want. | ||
| For the past several months, we have been investigating in our committees and litigating in the courts so the House can gather all the relevant facts and consider whether to exercise its full Article One powers, including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity, approval of Articles of Impeachment. | ||
| And this week, the President has admitted to asking the President of Ukraine to take actions which would benefit him politically. | ||
| The actions of the Trump presidency revealed the dishonorable fact of the President's betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our elections. | ||
| Therefore today, I'm announcing the House of Representatives moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry. | ||
| I'm directing our six committees to proceed with their investigations under that umbrella of impeachment inquiry. | ||
| The president must be held accountable. | ||
| No one is above the law. | ||
| Morning Joe ought to go back and watch the tape. | ||
| Watch that tape. | ||
| This show Came literally from that press conference. | ||
| She stood in front of the mics. | ||
| As I had said in going around in 2018 with the movie Trumpet War, going throughout the country, telling people, and I told Hannity on his TV show in the spring, their entire focus is going to be impeach Trump. | ||
| The reason they're knocking on doors in the hot sweltering summer in Iowa and other places to win those seats was to impeach Trump. | ||
| That was the thing that motivated them. | ||
| And they won in 18. | ||
| And the people around President Trump said, Oh, you can accommodate her. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no You know, this thing's rolling, baby. | ||
| They will have the impeachment done in the House by Christmas. | ||
| I actually said they have it by Thanksgiving, and it'll go to the Senate, which will never be removed from office, but they'll go to the Senate. | ||
| The trial will take place in December. | ||
| I think it was off by six weeks. | ||
| And by the way, John Fredericks, the audience goes, Steve, what are you talking about? | ||
| That's fake news. | ||
| That was the beginning of War Room Impeachment. | ||
| That was the beginning of the show back in late September, early October of 2019. | ||
| And here we are again today. | ||
| And this is the real deal. | ||
| And guess what, folks? | ||
| Why is the railhead always Ukraine? | ||
| Why is it always Ukraine? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We're packed today. | ||
| We're going to be connecting dots. | ||
| We're dealing with politics, impeachment, indictments, all of it. | ||
| And polling. | ||
| Where's the math? | ||
| Next, in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're all gone! | |
| We rejoice when there's no more! | ||
| Let's take down the CCP! | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banner. | ||
| Thanks for joining us. | ||
| Their eagerness to go after the president, regardless of the truth, is seemingly bottomless. | ||
| Jonathan Lemire, it strikes you, listening to Speaker McCarthy there, that other than that one phone call, private phone call on January 6, 2021, we have not heard that level of outrage, that depth of criticism from Kevin McCarthy about Donald Trump attempting to lead a coup against the United States government around the 2020 election. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. | |
| Okay, but don't. | ||
| Just keep it right there. | ||
| And I want to thank Real America's Voice and the crack staff of the War Room for putting this all together. | ||
| It's fantastic. | ||
| I want to play this. | ||
| Mitchell's going to come here in a second. | ||
| I want to play this because they're so nervous, baby. | ||
| Instead of taking it right on, you've got Lemire, head of Politico, former head of AP, Associated Press. | ||
| These are Washington D.C. | ||
| inside heavy hitters. | ||
| Also shows you what lightweights heavy hitters are today. | ||
| But you've got Willie, you've got the whole Morning Mika team, and they are scrambling. | ||
| They were not expecting McCarthy. | ||
| And remember, this is all bayonets at the back. | ||
| Don't think this is happening. | ||
| This is happening because... Let me just throw out a theoretical. | ||
| Remember when we got rid of Baynard? | ||
| Of course, it was Mark Meadows at the time. | ||
| He dropped the motion to vacate on the last day before they went on recess. | ||
| Dropped it. | ||
| People go, what is this crazy thing? | ||
| What is he doing? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We had the town halls and the firestorm to get rid of Baynard. | ||
| When they got back from the break, just like they did now, six weeks, the Pope was coming, I think, at the end of September. | ||
| Boehner said, no mas. | ||
| I'm done. | ||
| I'm finished. | ||
| And said, I will surrender. | ||
| Just let me stick around, because I'm Catholic, and have the Pope come to the house. | ||
| And then I'm out. | ||
| And then remember, let's go down memory lane for a second. | ||
| Kevin McCarthy was going to be Speaker. | ||
| He was, I think, Majority Leader. | ||
| He replaced, after Dave Brat upset and blew out Eric Cantor, McCarthy took over. | ||
| And then McCarthy had issues. | ||
| Hello? | ||
| Had issues. | ||
| And they had to go to the bench and that's where Paul Ryan came from. | ||
| That was all because of the motion to vacate. | ||
| McCarthy only moves in the direction he must and needs to move if there's a bayonet to his back. | ||
| Pridden, come along, come along, keep moving. | ||
| That's what we got here. | ||
| So there's a long way from over, but it's a start. | ||
| But I want to just play, I got so much to get to, but I got to just continue to play this because you're going to hear, oh my God, you know, every guy's going to be impeached. | ||
| Listen to their whiny answers. | ||
| Listen to it. | ||
| Let's go ahead and continue to play. | ||
| Around the 2020 election, taking classified information about nuclear secrets and war plans back to Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| He's held that for President Biden and his son. | ||
| Yeah, and let's fact-check him right off the top. | ||
| They haven't proven that there was any wrongdoing here, despite what he said last night. | ||
| And the House GOP is kicking up whistleblower after whistleblower, alleging wrongdoing, but have yet to provide any concrete evidence of it. | ||
| Did they ever find the fugitive guy, Lamir? | ||
| Have they found him yet? | ||
| The guy with the, was it the guy with the one arm? | ||
| The arm, yeah. | ||
| No, he's been missing. | ||
| There's another guy who is, I believe, under indictment, in federal indictment, because of his wrongdoings and this matter. | ||
| I mean, look, they had a couple members of the IRS came up last week and did testify that they felt like this should have been a matter that should have been prosecuted further about Hunter Biden. | ||
| And then under oath, they also acknowledged that, well, actually superiors disagree with us quite a bit. | ||
| It's actually pretty common for it not to happen. | ||
| So, Eugene Robinson, people that I've talked to say that the House is hell bent on some sort of impeachment. | ||
| They think it turns out Merrick Garland might be... Hang on for one second. | ||
| Put a pin in right there. | ||
| Merrick Garland, by the way, they served up. | ||
| We're just about to get to it. | ||
| Jonathan Lemire serves up Merrick Garland. | ||
| Hello! | ||
| Wouldn't Merrick Garland be more appropriate? | ||
| Here's what they do. | ||
| When they go to the bullpen and get Eugene Robinson, They're bringing on, you know, that is the wisdom of the conventional wisdom in town when they go to Eugene. | ||
| Now I want you to listen to Eugene Robinson. | ||
| Just when Jonathan Lemire at Politico serves up, wouldn't Garland be a more logical thing to impeach? | ||
| Okay? | ||
| They go, and now they're going to bring in Robinson. | ||
| Let's go ahead and roll it. | ||
| It's, it's, it's, it's, where are we going now? | ||
| and President Biden, but certainly they're not ruling out the president. | ||
| And I just if that what sort of if they do go there for an impeachment inquiry for President Biden, I just ask you, like, where are we heading now? | ||
| Is it are we in a moment where impeachment, which was supposed to be rare and almost sacred, is just being tossed around like another political ploy? | ||
| It's it's it's it's where are we going now? | ||
| It's so sacred. | ||
| Look at what these people have done. | ||
| They've jammed us into a constitutional crisis, and they have an illegitimate guy in the White House. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| This is what Ginsburg gives us. | ||
| Ginsburg says, we have a duty. | ||
| We have a duty to the American people. | ||
| 30% of them, we have a duty for 2020. | ||
| Bring it, dude. | ||
| Bring it. | ||
| That's what you want to do? | ||
| State by state. | ||
| First time you get, was it Captain? | ||
| We'll get all the folks with all the data. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Day after day after day after day after day. | |
| Where do you think old Joe Biden will be sitting then? | ||
| Think the American people will be buying 81 million votes? | ||
| Homie, don't think so. | ||
| Let's continue on with Gene Robinson. | ||
| Another political ploy. | ||
| Is every president going forward going to face some sort of impeachment inquiry? | ||
|
unidentified
|
A short answer, it looks like yes. | |
| It looks like that this is kind of the default position. | ||
| And this, much of this Republican Party in the House, at least, seems to believe or want to make people think they believe that the impeachments of President Trump were illegal, were totally political. | ||
| And so they have a, they believe they have a constituency that wants to see them strike back in the same way. | ||
| Who would ever? | ||
| Who would ever have thought that the impeachments were political or unwarranted? | ||
| Who would have ever thunk that? | ||
| Thank God you got Ultramaga in the house. | ||
| Thank God for this audience. | ||
| The bannet at the back, and look at the meltdown. | ||
| And these aren't minor players. | ||
| This is the Washington Post. | ||
| This is Politico. | ||
| This is MSNBC. | ||
| We have the Trifecta. | ||
| We have the Holy Trinity of destruction, of misinformation. | ||
| Maybe toss the New York Times in there, too. | ||
| It doesn't get any better than this. | ||
| You see, when McCarthy grows a set, and even just shows a little ankle on Hannity, what happens? | ||
| Only good things happen. | ||
| This is why this house, which has been, let me be blunt, except for a handful of patriots like Gates, Rosendale and, you know, Eli Crane and others have been an unmitigated disaster of selling out, and particularly Rogers and the House Armed Services Committee, a total disgrace of what you voted out of committee on the National Defense Authorization Act. | ||
| You people suck. | ||
| Pardon my French. | ||
| Now we're getting down to it. | ||
| I would love for... I know everybody hates Nancy Pelosi, hate the sound of her name, hate the sound of her voice, but you know what? | ||
| Hate her all she wants. | ||
| She's a stone-cold killer. | ||
| If we could just get some of her testosterone put into McCarthy for the next 72 hours, maybe we have... maybe we salvage something before they go on their six-week boondoggle. | ||
| Their codels to all parts of the world. | ||
| Because it's so important for members of Congress to actually know what's going on in, you know, Vienna and Paris and London. | ||
| You know, it's so important. | ||
| We're going to go through this all morning, and we've got other aspects of this too. | ||
| The Phony Murdoch Primary, all of it. | ||
| But I want to go to Mark Mitchell. | ||
| Mark, you talk about, I know you've got polling we want to talk about you just coming out with, I'm going to get to that, but more importantly, and I've got Neal Howe, breaking news, Neal Howe is going to spend the hour with us on Thursday in the War Room on his new book. | ||
| I think the first book in 20 years, or 25 years, maybe 30 years, on, wait for it, the fourth turning. | ||
| So Neil's got a new book out about that, and he's gonna be, we're gonna go through all of it in depth. | ||
| Mark Mitchell, institutions, now we're in an institutional crisis. | ||
| Tell me what your polling's gonna say about this. | ||
| Now you got them jammed up, and they're sitting there going, I can't believe the sacredness of impeachment. | ||
| Everything they have trashed in our republic, now they're going to be the guardians of, oh my gosh, we can't do this because it's such a sacred process. | ||
| Mark Mitchell. | ||
| There are going to be some really happy Republicans. | ||
| I think Republican voters, they don't like their leaders. | ||
| They're starved for action. | ||
| And for the first time, maybe they're seeing some action. | ||
| We talked about, I think on your show over 10 months ago, that way back then, even then, a majority of all voters supported impeaching Joe Biden. | ||
| And you know, as of the last time we asked in mid-May, the numbers are just astoundingly high. | ||
| 75% of Republicans think it's at least somewhat likely that Joe Biden has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors. | ||
| And 70% of Republicans say, yes, go ahead. | ||
| We want the impeachment proceedings to begin. | ||
| And this is before all this stuff about the whistleblower and the actual financial transactions came out. | ||
| So, I mean, Kevin McCarthy's favorability among Republicans actually isn't that bad. | ||
| It's kind of tepid. | ||
| I think he's at 66 percent, but he only has a 25 percent very favorable rating. | ||
| That's just from Trump endorsing him and some probably some good sound bites. | ||
| But, you know, something big is going to happen now that they're actually talking about impeachment from a public opinion perspective. | ||
| Now, McCarthy, to his credit, we will always give credit when credit is due. | ||
| What I liked about the hand that he hit last night, because it came out of nowhere, right, was he named like Romania, right? | ||
| He said Romania. | ||
| He said Romania as many times as the Barbie movie says patriarchy. | ||
| Okay, so he's talking about why are they coming to these countries. | ||
| I tell you what, short break. | ||
| We've got a lot going on, and I'm on my soapbox. | ||
| So stand by. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Back with Mark Mitchell. | ||
| We got Laura Loomer. | ||
| We have Caroline Wren. | ||
| We're getting to the whole, the phony Murdoch primary, quote unquote, or the stop Trump at any price movement. | ||
| All next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're taking down the CCP! | |
| Spread the word all through Hong Kong! | ||
| We will fight till they're all gone! | ||
| We rejoice when there's no more! | ||
| Let's take down the CCP! | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| It is interesting, Ben, though, from what Olivia is saying, right, that not only did the president in this meeting want to do a press conference on how great election security was and it was so wonderful and praising it left and right, that his frustration then, and the guy he fired shortly thereafter, was the guy who was actually saying that there might be a challenge to election security in the form of Russia, right? | ||
| It's because Russia's the third rail for the former president. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, Chris Krebs sort of walked into a split rail between both Russia and then saying the election was otherwise secure. | ||
| But all of this and this meeting is particularly important in terms of the reckoning that the country needs to have with Trump's election denial charges. | ||
| Because the 30% of the country not believing in the credibility of our elections is not a sustainable number. | ||
| And Donald Trump, bringing Donald Trump to account to actually prove the underlying case that he claimed was true would be a real service to the country. | ||
| Oh my God. | ||
| Last night it sent chills down my spine when I saw it live. | ||
| The reckoning. | ||
| A real service to the country. | ||
| Ginsburg, brother, 1,001,000,000% we agree with you. | ||
| We 100% agree with you. | ||
| President Trump's team right now ought to contact Jack Smith in the target letter, say, hey, you're right. | ||
| This has got to be a reckoning. | ||
| It's got to be a reckoning. | ||
| We'll build our case. | ||
| 30%? | ||
| Ginsburg, that number's incredibly low. | ||
| This gets back to the fourth term. | ||
| This gets back to the crisis of institutions. | ||
| The institutional crisis in our country that have been taken over. | ||
| Whether it's corporations, the universities, the schools, the libraries, media, you pick it. | ||
| The military? | ||
| Don't think the military is? | ||
| Just look at that national defense authorization that Rogers, with the bad rug, And the Republicans voted out, I think, 59 to 1 out of the House Armed Services Committee with Russ votes woke and weaponized up there. | ||
| Some of it out, but a lot of it not. | ||
| Mark Mitchell. | ||
| Ginsburg saying we need a reckoning. | ||
| Your math, sir, correct me if I'm wrong, shows that it's a much bigger crisis when it comes to the 2020 election and people's just understanding of election fairness, integrity in this nation, sir? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| I wish he cited his source. | ||
| I bet that we poll more on the issue of election integrity than that pollster polls on everything all year. | ||
| 62% of voters think it's at least somewhat likely that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 election. 30%. | ||
| 65% of voters think it's at least somewhat likely, including 55% of Democrats, that cheating is going to affect the outcome of the next presidential election. | ||
| And half of America agrees with the statement that there's absolutely no way that Joe Biden got 81 million votes in 2020. | ||
| So I don't know, again, where that 3% number comes from. | ||
| Brother, I could hug you right now. | ||
| Give me those to slow down, hit rewind. | ||
| I want the American people to hear these numbers again, because baby, we're getting down to it now. | ||
| Walk me through that. | ||
| 62% of voters, the highest number we've ever seen, think that it's at least somewhat likely that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. | ||
| 65% of voters think it's at least somewhat likely that cheating is going to affect the next presidential election, including 80% of Republicans. | ||
| And then 49% of Americans agree that it's at least that it's that no way that Joe Biden got 81 million votes in 2020. | ||
| So 33% Say, they strongly agree with that statement. | ||
| So again, nowhere close to this 30% number. | ||
| But my point is, Ginsburg, oh the math is way off. | ||
| Because he couldn't possibly say that. | ||
| If he said that on CNN, he'd be permanently ejected. | ||
| This is the reckoning. | ||
| This is the reckoning the nation needs. | ||
| We've always looked for a venue that you could adjudicate this in a legitimate venue. | ||
| And he just offered it up. | ||
| Is that what this is about? | ||
| President Trump will hit the bid on that. | ||
| We'll hit the bid on that. | ||
| The worst case you get in that, the worst case, is you've shredded Biden's illegitimate presidency forever. | ||
| Because they understand, intuitively they know he didn't get 81 million votes and now you get a chance to prove it. | ||
| This is also ties back. | ||
| I'm going to have Caroline run on in a second. | ||
| This is ties back to the story in the Washington Post over the weekend. | ||
| Biden's not even running a campaign. | ||
| They have a plug and play with $2 billion of outside groups in every state doing voter registration, more on the election laws. | ||
| All these articles are coming out now that the Soros guys and the $2 billion, plug and play. | ||
| So Whitmer with her puff piece they just did in the New Yorker, that's a tell. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Michelle Obama? | ||
| Excuse me? | ||
| What in the heck is going on up in Martha's Vineyard? | ||
| Wow. | ||
| We don't have time to chase every story. | ||
| Pritzker? | ||
| He'll throw in another billion. | ||
| They're all about, they're gonna serve up Biden, all of it. | ||
| But, you get to the heart of the matter, which is the illegitimacy of all of this. | ||
| And Morning Joe, no to Eugene Robinson, Jonathan Lemire, Willie Geist, the entire crew over at Morning Mika, you gotta get better. | ||
| Today, you're just whiny. | ||
| You're whiny. | ||
| And you're exposing everything. | ||
| I want to play, I gotta play, because I had Mitchell on for something totally different, but here's what I got, but his polling is so great. | ||
| On the institutions, remember it's an institutional crisis, that's what a fourth turning is. | ||
| I want to play, okay, understand the other element that's going on here, simultaneously. | ||
| The Murdochs, did I mention that they were a foreign family? | ||
| The Murdochs, Are obsessed, obsessed with the stop Trump movement. | ||
| And remember, they're quite strategic. | ||
| So they will bleed Trump out. | ||
| That's their plan. | ||
| They know they can't have a knockout blow. | ||
| They're going to bleed him out. | ||
| Let's play. | ||
| Let's go to the couch. | ||
| We got to go to the white couch. | ||
| Let's go to the white couch in here this morning. | ||
| One of the things that's going on right now, we were telling people yesterday about how over the weekend out in Deer Valley at the Stein Erikson Lodge, all of the big mega donors for Ron DeSantis got together and they're trying to tweak the campaign because he's kind of stalled out in the polls. | ||
| Well now there's a story out about, and we touched on this briefly a little while ago, about how Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, It has a record high approval rating in the Commonwealth of Virginia. | ||
| A lot of people like what he's doing out there. | ||
| And so, ultimately, you look at a Republican governor in a purple state, for the most part, and you're thinking, I wonder if that guy could possibly run for president. | ||
| You know, doesn't have to get in right now. | ||
| Nobody's in a hurry. | ||
| What about later? | ||
| I'm wondering if that guy could run for president in a promo purple state. | ||
| And Drudge, by the way, Dave Brad sent this one to me. | ||
| Drudge has got in the whole left-hand column, you know, they've got, they've got, they've got the, they've got the Yunkin thing and DeSantis. | ||
| Note to self, we got Loomer and Rigger coming here. | ||
| If that's mega donors, I got news for you. | ||
| They want a mega donor near there. | ||
| Right in a $6,000 check is no big deal. | ||
| You see this thing, this is a group of sad sacks out in Deer Valley. | ||
| Of course, when you're burning cash and you're out of money, where do you go? | ||
| But Deer Valley, to have a wine and cheese weekend, they're playing golf, they're running around with big cowboy hats on, they're all going full Yellowstone, they're all looking, feeling good. | ||
| Total clown show. | ||
| Mark Mitchell, what's your numbers telling us about this? | ||
| What is the math saying about the primary or anything else that you can tell me about this? | ||
| Because Murdoch's, the Murdoch's are so over Ron DeSantis. | ||
| When they've got Steve Doocy on the couch making the elevator pitch right there, they're teeing up TV for stupid people, are about to get now Glenn Youngkin in the best, right? | ||
| Glenn Youngkin. | ||
| Over there, David Rubenstein's grundoon over Carlisle, the most corrupt, not the most corrupt, second only to Sequoia Capital as being corrupt and CCP-influenced. | ||
| Carlisle group, just what we need now in the United States, a guy in a vest, some goofball in a vest, you know, telling the moms, the parental rights movement, what they want to hear and not doing anything about it. | ||
| As soon as some kid comes up with a transgender bedroom, Yunkin wets himself in a bathroom and gives him a bathroom, right? | ||
| Wets himself. | ||
| You think Yunkin can handle things? | ||
| Go look at the Jonathan Karl interview with him. | ||
| I'm so not ready for primetime. | ||
| Anyway, that's for a different day. | ||
| Mitchell, what do you got for us on this primary? | ||
| If they throw Glenn Yunkin into the race, he's probably going to just peel votes from DeSantis at this point. | ||
| Last time we were on, I asked the question rhetorically, Is it already over? | ||
| And I think the rhetorical question now is, like, yes, I think it's kind of over for DeSantis because the numbers do not look good at all. | ||
| The last time we were on among Republicans, Trump was beating DeSantis 62 to 17, a 45 point lead for Trump. | ||
| And Trump's down to 57 now, a five point drop. | ||
| And that's because some people entered the race, the field's getting pretty Crowded. | ||
| But DeSantis is down to 13% now. | ||
| He's lost four points. | ||
| So Trump is still in a 44 point lead over DeSantis. | ||
| And the big change between now and then was that DeSantis actually declared his presidency. | ||
| So if he had a bounce, it didn't register on our numbers and his numbers are moving in the absolute wrong direction. | ||
| If you take the last four times that we've pitted DeSantis against Trump in a matchup, DeSantis has gone from 37 to, I think, 24 to 17, and now he's down to 13. | ||
| And you could say, well, maybe he's still got the ability to win appeal from across the aisle, but he does even worse among independents and Democrats. | ||
| So if you look at all voters, and again, this is a Republican primary question, so all voters doesn't matter other than it just shows you the general feel that people have For each of the candidates. | ||
| And Donald Trump is head and shoulders above everybody else. | ||
| He has 36% support among all voters. | ||
| Ron DeSantis only has 9%. | ||
| Ron DeSantis is actually being beaten by Chris Christie. | ||
| And that's because Chris Christie at least stands for, you know, anti-Trumpism and he's bashing Trump in the media. | ||
| So that's where we're at. | ||
| When Chris Christie has more support than Ron DeSantis does among all voters, I just don't, I don't see where that's going. | ||
| Unbelievable. | ||
| How do people get to all your content? | ||
| Because you're coming now, this institutional polling you're doing, all of it. | ||
| I'm sure the impeachment is going to be back up in the 2020 election. | ||
| No, we're not going to let it go. | ||
| You can't let it go. | ||
| It's the railhead of everything. | ||
| All these guys, you can't talk about it. | ||
| We got to talk about the future. | ||
| We got to talk about the future. | ||
| Everybody says that. | ||
| Goofball. | ||
| Just write down. | ||
| Number two pencil. | ||
| Goofball. | ||
| Same as, oh, the White Hats. | ||
| If they say it's all about the future, it's additive, not subtractive. | ||
| Goofball. | ||
| Write down goofball. | ||
| Somebody says, oh, the White Hats. | ||
| White Hats. | ||
| Goofball. | ||
| Two sets of goofballs on different sides of the spectrum. | ||
| Brother Mitchell, how do people get to all your great content? | ||
| I'll give these candidates some quick algebra, right? | ||
| Over 60% of Republicans think it's very likely cheating is affecting the next presidential election, and Trump has about 60% support in a primary matchup among Republicans. | ||
| That's the math. | ||
| Yeah, Rasmus underscore poll at Twitter and also at YouTube, and I'll be dropping a video where we go more into the primary numbers. | ||
| Okay, perfect. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| I look forward to having you back on. | ||
| Your polling on all this is extraordinary. | ||
| It cuts to the heart of it. | ||
| Okay, we're a little backed up because I've been dealing with the reckoning. | ||
| Not my words. | ||
| That's Ginsburg, another part of the stop Trump at any part of the Republican apparatus. | ||
| Remember, it's all the same. | ||
| Just a few of them like tax cuts for the wealthy more than others. | ||
| The Uniparty, the administrative state, and Ginsburg is deep into the deep state and a Trump hater. | ||
| We need a reckoning. | ||
| We have an obligation, right? | ||
| An obligation to show the nation, hey, I'm in, bro. | ||
| I hit the bid. | ||
| Done. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| Let's roll. | ||
| That's what you got to do. | ||
| That's what you got to do. | ||
| You tell me how it shows up on the other side. | ||
| You're familiar with the math. | ||
| You know what's going to happen. | ||
| What we need is audacity. | ||
| We need boldness. | ||
| We need the toughness of Nancy Pelosi right now injected. | ||
| We need her testosterone injected into the McCarthy crowd. | ||
| Grow a set. | ||
| Word of the day. | ||
| Grow a set. | ||
| Phrase of the day. | ||
| Grow a set. | ||
| Titanium. | ||
| Short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, back in a moment. | |
| These party members are the ones who determine the future of the GOP. | ||
| Let's take our country back, one precinct at a time. | ||
| Visit precinctstrategy.com now. | ||
| You get me out of my mind. | ||
| me sing like that. And I'm ready to go. And I'm ready to go. | ||
| You get me out of my mind. Can't stop this feeling inside. | ||
| You can't you cannot make this content so great. | ||
| I got the easiest job in the world. | ||
| Just show it. | ||
| Laura Loomer. | ||
| Laura, what did we just... Please tell me what we just saw. | ||
| What did we watch? | ||
| First of all, hold on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| I want to make sure. | ||
| You and Ren, you did not touch that video. | ||
| You just pulled over somebody's Facebook or Instagram. | ||
| You didn't add any music. | ||
| You didn't add any photos, right? | ||
| I did not add any music to that. | ||
| Totally untouched. | ||
| I did not touch that video. | ||
| I'm just sleuthing through the FEC reports and looking at donors who are attending the High Dollar Donor Retreat in Deer Valley, Utah at the resort that Ron DeSantis spent over $87,000 of his dwindling campaign resources for this weekend. | ||
| And I don't know if I'm, like, at a strip club or a High Dollar Donor Retreat for Ron DeSantis' campaign. | ||
| But yeah, it's like Hoochie Mama Central in Deer Valley, Utah. | ||
| And these are super bundlers for Ron DeSantis with their Trophy Wives. | ||
| And as you can see from that video, that's what Ron DeSantis is doing with his campaign money, Steve. | ||
| He's blowing it. | ||
| Just after the New York Times came out with his big spec. | ||
| Two observations. | ||
| This is the reboot, reimagining, reset. | ||
| I don't know what it is now. | ||
| We're into deep into the hours. | ||
| I said last night's retreat. | ||
| I have no idea what they're doing. | ||
| But you bring up a very serious sides. | ||
| Obviously, they're mocking themselves. | ||
| Two observations. | ||
| One, there's nobody there. | ||
| And Lambert and these guys are not mega donors. | ||
| These guys are bundled. | ||
| It's a bundle like $25,000. | ||
| I didn't see a mega donor there. | ||
| There's nobody on the deck. | ||
| They're all playing golf, hanging out. | ||
| The other thing is you bring up a very serious point, though, and you don't see this coming out of the Trump. | ||
| You know, Trump and these guys are by the book. | ||
| Tell me what's going on. | ||
| Can you actually, according to your analysis, actually have a group get together of PACs and super PACs and campaigns, ma'am? | ||
| Well, the reason why this is so concerning to answer your question, Steve, is because, uh, if you pull up the video again, you'll see this lady's, uh, her name's Brooke Walter. | ||
| She's a bundler. | ||
| And her own Instagram post says, uh, that she spent lots of one-on-time, one-on-one time with the governor. | ||
| That's DeSantis, of course. | ||
| And then, quote, Spent time with the Super PAC, never backed down to learn about the campaign boots on the ground and fundraising strategy and needs." So she has an admission, if this is true, that's an admission of illegal coordination between a Super PAC and a campaign because the Super PAC is not supposed to be talking about the campaign fundraising or the campaign strategy in terms of door knocking or whatever grassroots strategy they imagine themselves having. | ||
| And so you see Ron DeSantis and Casey DeSantis there. | ||
| You also see Jeff Rowe, who's with the Super PAC, in the video, along with David McIntosh, who's the president of Club for Growth. | ||
| And it looks like you have McIntosh coordinating with Jeff Rowe from Never Back Down, and then Jeff Rowe coordinating with all these donors and Ron DeSantis's official presidential campaign. | ||
| And I just want to know, when is Ron DeSantis going to be held accountable for these egregious and blatant, in-your-face FEC violations. | ||
| This is illegal. | ||
| This is stuff that you used to be able to go to jail for in this country. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Don't bury the lead here. | ||
| Your eagle eye caught the David McIntosh for Club for Chinese Growth is part of this ensemble, ma'am? | ||
| Sure looks like it if you pull up that screenshot. | ||
| And look, I've been zooming into these videos and screenshotting everything and archiving it all. | ||
| That looks like Jeff Rowe, who's been undergoing a massive weight loss lately. | ||
| And then that appears to be David McIntosh of Club for Growth. | ||
| So they're all sitting there at their table. | ||
| And that's exactly who it looks like. | ||
| And that would be pretty devastating. | ||
| And we know that Club for Growth, you know, from my previous reporting, Steve, has been a longtime supporter of Ron DeSantis since his time as a member of Congress prior to President Trump running for president. | ||
| And we know that they supported Ron DeSantis as a congressman and then they committed over $7 million in 2016 to working against Donald Trump's campaign. | ||
| So these are people who... | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Hang on, I'm gonna hold you through the break. | ||
| We're gonna play, we're doing a celebration of American patriotism in music. | ||
| Laura Loomer's gonna stick with us. | ||
| We got Caroline Wren on the plug-and-play of the two billion dollars. | ||
| They're looking for a candidate over the Democrats. | ||
| Rudy Giuliani, we're gonna get back to the impeachment of it all. | ||
| Rudy's gonna join us. | ||
| So we got a lot going. | ||
| Carrie Lake, we're packed in the second hour. | ||
| And I'm going to have some commentary, so Loomer's going to stick with us. | ||
| We're drafting off of this the reboot of the, I guess it's reboot number four of the DeSantis primary as Murdoch goes looking for, just shows he's not that into him. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to leave. | ||
| We got Lead Belly. | ||
| A son of Louisiana, an incredible musician that actually wrote many more songs he's given credit for. | ||
| A lot of people just ripped him off. | ||
| The Midnight Special from Louisiana, Lead Belly. | ||
| This is our celebration of patriotism, our celebration of American music and old glory. | ||
|
unidentified
|
here we go | |
| the | ||
| Bet you bought a dollar and a tangerine pound. | ||
| Let the midnight special shine a light on me. | ||
| Let the midnight special shine a living, loving light on me. | ||
| Well, Judy brought jumpin' to this whole town. | ||
| Let the midnight special shine a light on me. |
Export Selection