Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not gonna stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
MAGA Media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
unidentified
|
This is London. | |
London calling in the home, overseas, and European services of the BBC, and through United Nations radio, Mediterranean. | ||
And this is John Snag speaking. | ||
Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force, have just issued Communique No. | ||
1, and in a few seconds I will read it to you. | ||
Under the command of General Eisenhower, Allied naval forces supported by strong air forces began landing Allied armies this morning on the northern coast of France. | ||
I'll repeat that, communique. | ||
Communique number one. | ||
Under the command of General Eisenhower, Allied naval forces supported by strong air forces began landing Allied armies this morning on the northern coast of France. | ||
Soldiers, sailors, and airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force, you are about to embark upon the great crusade toward which we have striven these many months. | ||
The eyes of the world are upon you. | ||
The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. | ||
In company with our brave allies and brothers in arms on other fronts, you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world. | ||
Your task will not be an easy one. | ||
Your enemy is well-trained, well-equipped and battle-hardened. | ||
He will fight savagely. | ||
But this is the year 1944. | ||
Much has happened since the Nazi triumphs of 1940-41. | ||
The United Nations have inflicted upon the Germans great defeats in open battle, man to man. | ||
Our air offensive has seriously reduced their strength in the air and their capacity to wage war on the ground. | ||
Our home fronts have given us an overwhelming superiority in weapons and munitions of war and placed at our disposal great reserves of trained fighting men. | ||
The tide has turned. | ||
The free men of the world are marching together to victory. | ||
I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty, and skill in battle. | ||
We will accept nothing less than full victory. | ||
Good luck, and let us all beseech the blessing of Almighty God upon this great and noble undertaking. | ||
Many men will pass this way. | ||
Many men will count the hours as they hear the longest day. | ||
Many men are tired and weary. | ||
Many men are here to stay. | ||
Many men won't see the sunset. | ||
THE LONGEST DAY, THE LONGEST DAY, THIS WILL BE THE LONGEST DAY, TILL THEIR HOMES AND TILL THEIR PEERS, TILL THEIR POWER AND TRENT AND CHEERS.. | ||
... THE END THE END Oh, | ||
♪ What she wrought, my dear, to honor her ♪ ♪ As we live her all blessing ♪ ♪ As we live her all blessing ♪ ♪ Any man can be her soul, any man can be her soul ♪ | ||
♪ Oh, yeah! ♪ ♪♪ It is Tuesday, 6 June in the year of our Lord, 2023. | ||
It's the 79th commemoration of the landings at Normandy on D-Day that, as you heard General Eisenhower say, commenced the Great Crusade that would go across Europe. | ||
Within one year of this landing, 150,000 combat troops landed over a period of several hours. | ||
Early in the morning, starting at dawn. | ||
Previous to that, the 82nd 101st Airborne had dropped in on the western beaches behind Utah to secure the transportation nodes and cut off the railroads and take bridges so that the Germans could not reinforce their troops on the beach. | ||
Of the 150,000, about 10,000, they assume 10,000 to 12,000 casualties, The most famous is Omaha Beach. | ||
The reason Omaha Beach was a four-mile stretch Right there that connected Utah in Pointe de Hoc with the Canadians and the British at Gold Sword in Juneau. | ||
And it actually, because of the centerpiece, had to be taken against enemy bluffs. | ||
That's, if you've seen The Longest Day, if you've seen Private Ryan, that's the beach that really gets the most focus because of the slaughter, almost virtually the entire first wave. | ||
They came at a short dawn were casualties, either KIA or wounded. | ||
The reason Omaha is so important It became late in the morning, early in the afternoon, there was actually the second wave hadn't really had much effect. | ||
They were up against the seawall. | ||
And there was discussions, actual discussions on the beach, because back in those days, the problem we had was NCOs and junior officers, the training of NCOs and junior officers, because all the troops were basically quite green. | ||
And they actually discussed extraction from the beach. | ||
Which had been catastrophic, number one. | ||
It had been a terrible morale killer. | ||
Number two, you would not have been able to unite or connect the paratroopers of the 101st and the 82nd and the troops that landed at Utah Beach or the rangers that went up at Pointe du Hoc. | ||
The Germans would have been able to split the invasion in two and start to drive guys back into the sea. | ||
So Omaha had to be held. | ||
Late in the morning, Colonel George Taylor Going up and down where the troops are in absolute shock said, hey, there are two types of people on this beach. | ||
Those are dead and those are about to die. | ||
We've got to get out of here. So they started to put Bangalore torpedoes and went up to the seawall to blow it up. | ||
But there's an amazing piece by Eric Hogan today. | ||
I think it's actually up on National Review. | ||
It's in a bunch of newspapers throughout the country. | ||
And Eric is, I think, an amateur historian. | ||
wrote an incredible piece about the three angels of Normandy and its captain, Joseph Dawson, Lieutenant John Spaulding, and particularly Tech Sergeant Philip Streisick. | ||
They actually worked their way up through a gully, got up above the cliffs, or right there, not a cliff, but a very high ridge where the Germans were, and were able to work themselves around. | ||
These are just three Average guys, right? | ||
This is the average American that was the infantry. | ||
Remember, all the elites had gone into the Army Air Corps. | ||
All the elites were in Special Forces. | ||
They were Rangers, OSS. The infantry was kind of the cream of the crop. | ||
As they would say, right? As infantry normally is, you've got to get the job done. | ||
Dawson, Spalding, and Strasick got up above and behind the Germans. | ||
Dawson waved to guys and then sent Strasick and Spalding in back of them to attack the German guns from the rear. | ||
And actually was able to suppress the fire so that the troops in front of the seawall could actually get the Bangalore's torpedoes underneath and blow up and breach the seawall. | ||
Act of heroism. | ||
The They were awarded, those three were awarded Distinguished Service Crosses, and it's said that they should have been up for the Medal of Honor, but they got the Distinguished Service Cross. | ||
Streisick himself is a very interesting kind of prototypical American of Polish descent. | ||
Eighth grade, he dropped out of eighth grade to become a truck driver to help the family because In those days, obviously with the Depression, he needed help. | ||
He was awarded, he fought in North Africa. | ||
This is a tech sergeant. He fought in North Africa, Sicily, and then Normandy landed, went all the way across Europe, fought in the Hurtgen Forest. | ||
Stracik was awarded four silver stars and six bronze stars. | ||
In his time, at the Hurkan Forest, he actually had a breakdown, PTSD or combat fatigue, after winning four Silver Stars, six Bronze Stars, who actually awarded, I think, a Silver Star for Hurkan, and was shipped back to a hospital, back in the rear. | ||
He actually said, at the time, of all the combat he had had, he had been 440 straight days in combat, that the worst thing that happened is a young soldier had his jaw shot off and begged Streisick to kill him. | ||
Streisick killed him. He said that never left him. | ||
And it was a huge reason he had this breakdown in the hurricane forest. | ||
Tech Sergeant Philip Streisick, an American hero. | ||
Just incredible. | ||
Those are the angels of D-Day, the angels of Normandy. | ||
And this article by Eric Hogan, we're going to get out and make sure everybody can read it. | ||
Also, in closing, before we break this first segment off, we're going to have Congressman Anna Polina Luna is going to join us for breaking news at the end. | ||
Right before his 40th birthday, after moving to Florida after the war, becoming a developer, a construction chief, Because of the PTSD, right before his 40th birthday, Tech Sergeant Streisick committed suicide. | ||
unidentified
|
We're going to be right back in the War Room. | |
Many men will pass this way. | ||
Many men will count the hours as they live the longest day. | ||
Many men... | ||
Okay, welcome back. We're going to talk more about D-Day throughout the day. | ||
Also, we're going to talk about really Overlord and the Battle of Norma. | ||
People think, you know, kids are taught today Pearl Harbor, D-Day, Holocaust, and Hiroshima. | ||
That's not World War II. We're going to talk throughout this month About one of the biggest, most complicated battles in American history. | ||
That's Normandy. It took all the way to Paris, and we're going to go and talk about that. | ||
More of D-Day later in the day. | ||
We've got so much to go through, though. | ||
By the way, were you a tech sergeant? | ||
unidentified
|
No, I was a senior airman. | |
Senior airman. | ||
By the way, if Congressman Annapolino Luna hadn't showed up a little earlier for a hit, I don't think I would have gotten to do that first segment. | ||
So thank you for your moral. | ||
Thank you for your moral. | ||
That was tough. That was tough. | ||
You've broken a lot of news. | ||
By the way, we've had also announcement of the day. | ||
The breakup of the biggest spy ring in the history of the United States, yes, Sequoia Capital announced this morning that they're splitting in two, right? | ||
They're going to separate out their Chinese part from the American part. | ||
Too late, Sequoia. We're still coming after you. | ||
Colonel Derek Harvey, Brian Costello, Lee Smith, Natalie Winters. | ||
We have an entire team on the investigation of the most corrupt organization in America, and that's saying something, Sequoia Capital. | ||
But Sequoia Capital, you can run, but you can't hide. | ||
Just like on oversight... | ||
Okay... | ||
unidentified
|
You're a firebrand, but you're not a bomb thrower, right? | |
You're a firebrand, but there's a difference. | ||
You're a firebrand, but not a bomb thrower. | ||
But you threw a bomb yesterday. | ||
I think it was during our afternoon show. | ||
And also, I'm looking down because we've got the Anna Paulina Luna alerts. | ||
And all of a sudden, I see this thing coming out of committee. | ||
And by the time I saw it, I think, Tim, it's had a million retweets. | ||
What did you actually say? | ||
And how many retweets is this thing? | ||
This is one of the most viral things I've ever seen. | ||
unidentified
|
So I think now it's upwards of 3.3 million impressions just on Twitter alone. | |
3.3 million impressions. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes. So obviously that's huge because, you know, had it not been for social media, I don't know that this truth would be out there like this. | |
But I simply just put out a fact that came out of a briefing and oversight. | ||
So we know that Comer has been obviously working to get a certain document from the FBI that proves that That Biden was receiving money from a foreign national $5 million when he was a vice president. | ||
So it's public corruption. And the FBI not only did not want to hand over this document, it's not classified, but they also said that if the informant who has been with the FBI for over 10 years, very credible sourcing, has been paid over six figures, this is not just some random schmuck. | ||
Paid over six figures for other things. | ||
For information. Of other things he's worked on, so obviously has a level of credibility. | ||
unidentified
|
100%. The FBI was basically saying that this is one of their most trusted informants dating back to the Obama era, but ultimately that they were in fear that this individual would be killed if they were unmasked. | |
Hang on a second. Slow down. Because this is like now in a mob movie. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, and it's like, I mean, between that and to the other point of the FBI is infiltrated. | |
You have a spy by the name of One Eye. | ||
I mean, I say it and I feel like I'm in a James Bond movie, but unfortunately it's true, who has been leaking information to their knowledge to Hunter Biden in regards to the ongoing investigation into him. | ||
Okay, so let's connect all this. | ||
By the way, Yesterday, I think, until Sequoia came along, the biggest spy in American history, Hanson, died, and we still, I think, totally know the reason, out in Supermax prison out in Florence, Colorado. | ||
FBI agent. And this was the guy that Angleton, at the CIA, went after. | ||
Angleton knew, and this drove Angleton mad and, quite frankly, destroyed the careers of probably 200 CIA and FBI officers. | ||
Hunting for the greatest mole we ever had was an FBI agent, Hanson. | ||
You're saying now, so connect the dots here. | ||
They got an informant, but they also have a mole in the FBI. This is FBI testifying to Comer or talking to Comer? | ||
unidentified
|
Talking to Comer. So we have, in regards to specifically Biden information, there's a whistleblower and there's a human source, an informant. | |
So that's separate. | ||
Aside from that, there is a mole within the FBI who is leaking information to Hunter Biden, and his code name is OneEye. | ||
So we have the ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden via the FBI. They have information that they are refusing to give to Congress. | ||
They are telling Congress that they have a genuine fear that this individual will be killed if they are unmasked. | ||
This is one of their most trusted sources. | ||
And while this is all happening, we are finding out that not only is the president, this is not a conspiracy theory, we have evidence, okay? | ||
So now we're also finding out that the man sitting in the White House is basically guilty of national security violations. | ||
He's corrupt. Hang on. | ||
So how do you know he's, from the information you have, how do you know, that's a big leap to say he's guilty. | ||
unidentified
|
Why do you say that? Because of the information that the FBI has, proving that he has received a $5 million payment from a foreign national while he was, as the vice president, sitting basically next to Obama in the White House. | |
And that's in addition to the funding that we're seeing coming out. | ||
Yeah, leave all the Chinese stuff aside. | ||
This is totally separate. This is $5 million, and we still don't know whether it's through Romania, from the CCP. But you're saying there's a whistleblower informant, and the FBI is informing Comer and the Oversight Committee that the FBI believes, or the informant believes, that if their name is exposed... | ||
They're afraid for their lives? | ||
They're afraid of being assassinated? | ||
unidentified
|
The FBI told Comer that they had a credible fear that this individual would be killed if they were unmasked. | |
So where does that leave? | ||
I mean, you can't stop the investigation because of that. | ||
To me, that would drive it up to the highest priority to get done. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, we can't stop the investigation. | |
And the fact that they don't want to give Congress, which is basically the answering authority that the FBI has to answer to, we are the people. | ||
You have to answer to us. | ||
You can't continue, one, to hide this information. | ||
And also, two, if you are in fear that you can't even protect your witness, why would you then continue to try to put that person in jeopardy, right? | ||
They would need to go into witness protection and we have to open it. | ||
Did Comer, to your knowledge, in talking to Ray and the FBI, say, if you have a fear and you're our lead federal law enforcement agency, where is that threat coming from? | ||
Is it from a foreign threat or is it from associates with Biden and the people that this point to? | ||
Where is the threat coming from? | ||
unidentified
|
I wasn't in the room, and I didn't hear the full back and forth. | |
But what was interesting is that Comer was not the only one that heard this, right? | ||
There was other staff present in the room. | ||
And I find it very alarming that the FBI still chose to hide that information from us, saying that it was an ongoing investigation, which we know that the FBI can keep ongoing investigations forever. | ||
Ultimately, though, the bigger issue is that they are basically... | ||
I'm thinking that they're not accountable to the people. | ||
And so on Thursday, we will be holding a hearing to mark up the bill to hold the director of the FBI in contempt of Congress. | ||
And frankly, that will go to the floor. | ||
So they think that this is the old, you know, 1.0 Republican Party. | ||
And I think that we absolutely have to hold these people accountable. | ||
You know, Steve, like I say this stuff and it's crazy because it sounds like something that is made for a movie. | ||
But if we don't, who's going to do it? | ||
If we don't do it, who's going to do it? | ||
So we have to, and to my understanding, McCarthy has been working with Comer on bringing that to the floor. | ||
Even if that's brought to the floor, is that going to be a civil or criminal? | ||
unidentified
|
I think it'd be criminal. | |
Okay. There'll be two of us then. | ||
Here's what I understand. When they say it's an ongoing investigation, to the best of your knowledge, or Comer or the staffs, This is from, what, six or seven years ago? | ||
unidentified
|
Six or seven years ago. | |
At least. It could be earlier. What is the... | ||
Where did they stand in their investigation? | ||
unidentified
|
I think that that's the questions that we want to know. | |
If this is ongoing, you've had this information, you know that the law was violated, you did nothing, you had this information going into 2020. | ||
And by the way, the same FBI that's conducting the investigation has a mole That's leaking information to Hunter Biden, probably leaking information on this as well to Hunter Biden. | ||
I mean, the extent of which the corruption exists is unknown. | ||
Your point is that they've known at least somewhat about this before the 2020 election. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, they 100 % did. No doubt in your mind. | |
Yes, no doubt in my mind. And particularly they knew it also in 2019 when the laptop from hell was given over to the FBI. This goes back to when Joe Biden was vice president. | ||
Vice president, yes. But even when they got that, it connected more dots. | ||
Let's talk about the mole. | ||
How did the mole come up? | ||
How did you guys actually learn about the mole? | ||
unidentified
|
The mole has been briefed to us from the committee from what we've been able to find out. | |
But all I know is that this individual, they have not been able to identify who it is and that they are leaking information about an active investigation into Hunter Biden to Hunter Biden. | ||
So, I mean, even in just saying that, you know, if this was you, for example, you can bet they would be trying to figure out who that mole was. | ||
On this whistleblower, other whistleblowers are coming up. | ||
By the whistleblower law, that takes them out of the system for the FBI and deals directly with the committee as a whistleblower. | ||
Can't you just tell the FBI we want to just deal directly with the whistleblower? | ||
They're not giving over the name. | ||
They're not identifying you have any contact. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, this is their human source. | |
That's a violation of the law, isn't it? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, there's a whistleblower and there's an informant. | |
The informant has been with the FBI for over 10 years and is one of their highest paid informants and sources. | ||
So they're saying that this individual, if unmasked, if we know who it is, that they have a credible fear that this person will be killed. | ||
And what about the whistleblower? | ||
unidentified
|
There's many whistleblowers that have come forward. | |
We know that one recently, I think it was on May 30th, just basically came forward and said that he was an Israeli officer that was working alongside as an advisor with a Chinese company. | ||
He came forward and now he's being charged with cooked up charges from the DOJ. They're trying to say that he's an illegal arms trafficker. | ||
You have to bolt, right? | ||
You have to bounce. Where do people get social media? | ||
Where do they follow you? Because this is an explosive ongoing. | ||
unidentified
|
Where do people go? At Rep Luna or at Real Ana Paulina. | |
I want everybody to go there. Once again, real quickly, on Thursday, what's going to happen to the best of your knowledge? | ||
unidentified
|
So we are marking up a bill to hold the director of the FBI in contempt of Congress in House Oversight. | |
And you're working diligently on that? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes. It's going to be an entire hearing. | |
30 seconds. Shifty shift. | ||
unidentified
|
So, to my knowledge, tomorrow we will be taking the vote to censure him and potentially fine him. | |
Tomorrow? Tomorrow night. | ||
And that has that backing of leadership? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, we're working on the bill right now. | |
They're giving us lots of things now. | ||
unidentified
|
Great work. Thank you. | |
Fantastic. And you're having a huge impact, I can tell you. | ||
Just the buzz around town, so fight on. | ||
Thank you. At first they thought, oh no, what's this shifty shift? | ||
The shifty shift thing tomorrow is going to be historic. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, I mean, he's going to go down as a liar, as he should. | |
Yeah. As should he should, I'm not going to be in the Senate, I don't think, after tomorrow night. | ||
Congressman, thank you very much. | ||
Thank you. And thank you for helping me get through the first segment. | ||
That's your moral support. | ||
And I'm Polina Luna. Thank you, ma'am. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. Short break. Okay, welcome back. | |
It is 6 June, the 79th anniversary of the landings in Normandy. | ||
Obviously, the 80th anniversary is going to be one that is going to absorb the nation because there's very few of the greatest generation left. | ||
Throughout the day, we're going to be talking about this. | ||
One thing on the Normandy landings, It was the most, I think it's the most complicated, probably even more I think maybe than the moonshot, I know that sounds, but it was the combination, it was so meticulously planned. | ||
And it was a convergence of technology and personnel. | ||
And remember, the U.S. infantry always fought. | ||
We were technology-dependent, I think people would say, right? | ||
We were very technology-dependent. | ||
And so it was meticulously planned with all types of contingency plans and was just from an industrial process. | ||
Was a masterpiece in planning and even everything went wrong. | ||
Of course, stuff is always going to go wrong, particularly when we have that, remember, 150,000 troops on this day. | ||
And I think the Americans put over 1.1 million Into the beaches and up into Normandy for the battle through the through the through the first or the allies I should say the allied armies 1.1 million by the end of June just extraordinary extraordinary human achievement of everybody had to come together to make that happen in the war that we're in today the war that's been declared on us by the Chinese Communist Party also is about personnel but is also about technology The biggest source inspiring that we've had, | ||
it's ironic, it's the day after Hanson left this Veil of Tears out there in the Supermax prison. | ||
That Sequoia Capital today announced this morning that they're breaking up in either two or three segments, but the central thing is they're breaking up the Chinese piece from the American piece. | ||
And, you know, with Brian Costello and Colonel Derek Harvey and Natalie Winters and Lee Smith's going to be on in the next day or two, and an investigative team that we've got on this, as we've been arguing, there is a Mike Turner, | ||
Republican from Ohio, has shut down an investigation at the House Intelligence Committee on Sequoia Capitol, and particularly Neil Shen, right, in their transfer of investments and transfers of technology to the Chinese Communist Party and the PLA. There's also, my understanding, a quite thick FBI report that's sitting on the desk of Lisa Monaco. | ||
You know her as the hatchet woman for Merrick Garland, his deputy. | ||
The investigations is an open secret in this town about the transfer of military technology from the United States and from emerging companies, whether it's artificial intelligence or any type of military technology. | ||
Voice of America today, the Voice of America, Jeff Selden over there, has done a piece about the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, has done this very thorough analysis, and they've come up with the fact that China, the CCP, is leading in basically every category of military technology. | ||
100 % of that technology, 100%, has been transferred from the West, principally from the United States of America. | ||
I want to bring in Dr. Bradley Thayer right now, and we're going to get to your amazing piece. | ||
I think it's up in National Review about holding the Chinese Communist Party accountable, and particularly accountable for their crimes. | ||
But we've got to wake up to the fact that they're at war with us. | ||
Dr. Thayer, connect the dot here, but from the Australia Policy Institute that Selden's done this summary piece, it's quite good. | ||
I'm going to have Mo and Grace put it up so everybody can see it. | ||
With the fact of the ongoing problem and the London Times has had a huge investigative piece on Sequoia. | ||
On Sequoia Capital and the venture capital firms and private equity firms in this country allowing the military. | ||
The Chinese Communist Party did not become the leaders in these advanced things of military technology including artificial intelligence by their own work. | ||
Starting in the in the 90s with the Clintons, this is it was a Bernie Schwartz in Laurel that the transfer of American technology really based upon this audience because it's either been the it's either been the it's either been the your tax money. | ||
That paid for this, that they stole or was given to them, or your pension fund money that was done through these private equity and venture capitalists. | ||
Walk me through Sequoia Capital and the Australian Policy Institute story that says how advanced they are in all these military technologies, sir. | ||
Well, Steve, it's great to be with you again today. | ||
They're linked. As you said, We've been funding the CCP and China's rise since Carter gave them most favored nation status in 1980, really, but that greatly accelerated under Clinton. | ||
When Clinton put them on the path to a World Trade Organization membership, and in 1994, essentially said that they could have most favored nation status without any human rights safeguards whatsoever. | ||
So it was KD bar the door from that point. | ||
They were off to the races. | ||
Sequoia shows that the problem as well as the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, those two issues are linked. | ||
Sequoia is funding them and they're trying to get ahead of what they would see as measures that might be taken to restrict their ability to make profits in the US and the West as well as within China by doing that division. | ||
But the ASPI, again the Australian Strategic Policy Institute study, revealed that in 23 key categories of military technology, the Chinese were leading in 19 of them. | ||
So the vast majority And particularly, specifically in hypersonics, electronic warfare, and undersea capabilities. | ||
And in hypersonics, nine out of the ten leading research institutes are in China, not in the West or in Japan or other key allies in the Indo-Pacific. | ||
So this funding of China, of the Chinese Communist Party, has really allowed them to become Leaders in military technology, which of course threatens American security, the security of our allies and our interests around the world. | ||
But very specifically though, most of the technology they lead in is exactly the technology you would want if you wanted to put a carrier battle group to the bottom of the Straits of Taiwan. | ||
I mean to be brutally frank about it, And we want to avoid a kinetic conflict. | ||
The working thesis, the theory of the case of the war room in the Committee on the Present Danger China, in the Miles Guo Group, the whistleblower movement in New Federal State, is we cannot get into a kinetic war with the Chinese. | ||
Because in getting into a kinetic war with the Chinese, it's going to be an away game. | ||
And right now you're going to have a carrier battle group defending the Straits of Taiwan or trying to break a blockade. | ||
And with the technologies that they've developed, stolen from us and transferred from us by these venture capital and private equity firms or companies that just look the other way, you're going to have a carrier battle group with 10, 12, 15,000 sailors at the bottom of the carrier battle group and all its support and combatants with a ton of aircraft at the bottom of the Straits of Taiwan. | ||
And the American people have never had that, right? | ||
That's even Coral Sea and Midway and other places didn't have that. | ||
It would be a psychological shock to the system. | ||
And the CCP knows that. | ||
Dr. Thayer, doesn't it concern you as a strategist that they've focused on so many of the technologies from the hypersonic to the underwater warfare that would be perfect to set up to really take on a carrier battle group of the United States defending Taiwan? | ||
Absolutely, Steve. I'm not surprised because this is what they want to do. | ||
They want to be able to evict the 7th Fleet from the Western Pacific and also target our bases in Japan, in Guam, Hawaii, and the West Coast. | ||
We need to keep in mind, of course, the spy balloon was not just about intelligence collection, but that also was a key political warfare message. | ||
The Chinese or the Communist Party is saying that we can reach out and touch the American homeland if war comes. | ||
That's what they're trying to signal. | ||
So we have obviously a huge problem in terms of the fact that we've allowed them to reach this point of where they're at least our peers, if not in many capacities ahead. | ||
of the US military and they're employing it, right? | ||
The sharp end of the sword is directed against our military and our interests. | ||
So there's so much work to be done to address this threat immediately. | ||
And sadly, we're not seeing that from the Biden administration to the extent which is necessary. | ||
You were a key component. | ||
By the way, the Biden, you're not going to do that because the Bidens, you know, they're going to find eventually that this $5 million bribe, even if it came through Romania, you're going to see that the funding of that bribe and others coming from the CCP. Maybe not whole, but you're going to find the CCP's got hands in every pot. | ||
You've been a key part of the Committee on Present Danger, particularly the War Room's first book. | ||
As I told the new federal states, the commemoration of the third anniversary, we waited at War Room so we could put out the indictment, the indictment of the Chinese Communist Party, and particularly their friends here in the United States. | ||
You've got an amazing piece up on National Review about holding the CCP accountable for their crimes. | ||
unidentified
|
Walk us through that. Well, certainly, Steve. | |
What we need to do is to act, and that means holding the Chinese Communist Party to account for their crimes, whether those crimes are historical ones that they've committed against the Chinese people in the wake of the Civil War or with the Great Famine, which may have killed in excess of over 40 million people in China, or the ones that they're committing today. | ||
We need to hold them to account, and the way to do that is to create a tribunal. | ||
made up of diaspora individuals, people, Chinese citizens, people with experience, people who've been abused, to form a tribunal and to start holding the CCP to account. | ||
We can't rely on the UN to do it. | ||
We can't rely on the Hague to do it and, of course, states to do it. | ||
So we need to essentially have action today to form a tribunal So that we can document the crimes while they're in living memory, the historical crimes as well as the ones that are being committed presently, and then to move into essentially a court and to hold specific individuals to account for the genocide against Muslims taking place in Xinjiang and Yunnan provinces. | ||
in China, the gross human rights abuses, the abuse of religious freedom, and essentially allow the Chinese people in absentia, in fact, to hold the Chinese Communist Party to account. | ||
It's not going to be done by anybody but the Chinese people themselves, and the Chinese people are only free to act in the diaspora. | ||
That is in the United States, Australia, And elsewhere around the world. | ||
So, Jiang Li-Yong and I are calling for a tribunal to be created and to research, to document these crimes, and then move forward to essentially a prosecution against the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
It's a brilliant idea, and we are committed to work with you to make sure this happens. | ||
Absolutely brilliant idea. It's so stunning. | ||
It's one of those ones that's like, how did I not think of that? | ||
But I'll steal it, but I'll give an homage to Dr. | ||
Thayer. Dr. Thayer, incredible idea. | ||
How do people get to you in your writings, social media, all of it, your books? | ||
Centerforsecuritypolicy.org, or you can find me on Getter and Truth at Bradley Thayer. | ||
Thanks very much, Steve, for your support. | ||
Thank you, bro. I keep your book right over here, but I got a bunch of them in one of my stacks, but just incredible. | ||
Thayer, you're a patriot and a hero. | ||
Keep grinding, sir. | ||
Thank you, Steve. What would the first wave at Normandy think that 79 years later, some of the biggest and most important institutions in the nation that they fought to make sure they were forever free were actually working with and making money with the existential threat of the 21st century? | ||
How would that play? | ||
Think about that for a moment. | ||
Short break. Darren Beattie's up next. | ||
unidentified
|
Getter has arrived. | |
The new social media taking on big tech, protecting free speech, and canceling cancel culture. | ||
Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
Superior technology. | ||
No more selling your personal data. | ||
No more censorship. | ||
No more cancel culture. | ||
Enough. Getter has arrived. | ||
It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
Download now. | ||
Hello, I'm Steve Stern, CEO of FlagShirt.com, a third-generation veteran-owned small business. | ||
I believe that the American way of life is for all of us. | ||
I'm asking you today to visit FlagShirt.com. | ||
Help keep the American dream alive. | ||
Be a flag waver. | ||
Carry a nation's heritage. | ||
Use coupon code ACTION10 for 10 % off site-wide and buy a flag shirt today. | ||
Action, action, action. | ||
Remember, at Normandy, and the reason we did the first hour today, I wanted to show you with Anna Polina Luna what exactly these scumbags, the Biden crime family, and not just that, the apparatus, the FBI, the CIA, Justice Department, DOJ, they're not working for you. | ||
When they talk about this anti-institution, it's not Steve Bannon saying that. | ||
It's their own actions that are doing this. | ||
You see this, what Congressman Luna's pointing out. | ||
And now you've got to go to court to try to get this information. | ||
They've known it for years. It's a disgrace. | ||
Now they're saying that they are afraid. | ||
The FBI, our largest federal police or investigative force, can't give congressmen the name because they're afraid the guy will be assassinated, be killed. | ||
They're afraid. What does that tell you about the people we're dealing with? | ||
Then you have Thayer and you talk about Sequoia. | ||
These Sequoia guys, some of the richest people in the country, they've made billions of dollars personally off of selling, monetizing American innovation, principally coming out of universities that you pay for, right, for the advanced, you know, research that is then in applied research turned into techniques and processes and technology sold or given to the CCP. That's become our greatest defender. | ||
Now we're worried about a carrier battle group defending Taiwan? | ||
Think about that for a second. | ||
What would the 10,000 dead and wounded in Normandy think about that? | ||
What would the first wave at Omaha Beach in the Big Red One, the 1st Infantry Division, the 29th, they got slaughtered. | ||
Those kids, not particularly well trained, got slaughtered right there. | ||
I think of the 4,000 casualties in Omaha, 1,000 were in the first hour or so. | ||
How would they think of that? | ||
How are they going to think of this? Darren Beattie's here. | ||
Darren, I think over a year ago on this very show, you called out, think about this for a second. | ||
Think about this on the 79th anniversary of the landing at Normandy, that Darren Beattie's on here now to talk about another win, but it deals with the Pentagon. | ||
It deals with the Pentagon, you know, what the Pentagon is doing to our young men and women. | ||
Darren Beattie, how did you stop this, sir? | ||
You're right. It recalls an historic appearance on the War Room, one of many results achieved by the War Room and Revolver News in collaboration. | ||
This has to do with an individual called Bishop Garrison, whom longtime viewers might recall. | ||
This was the political hatchet man appointed by Lloyd Austin to purge the Pentagon to undertake an extreme vetting procedure to make sure that no quote unquote extremists were in the military. | ||
But of course what we found and what we reported and what we exposed is that this guy's idea of an extremist is anybody who supports Trump. | ||
And we showed all of his tweets indicating as much. | ||
And we basically made Bishop Garrison pretty close to a household name. | ||
It went from our reporting to War Room, to the Hegseth show on Fox, to Jesse Waters, then to Tucker Carlson, and then back to War Room. | ||
And the funny thing is, Media Matters, the disgraced, second-tier, low-status, Soros-funded rag, one of Soros's go-to janitors at Media Matters, did us the favor and really the compliment of chronicling in detail the influence of this story on Bishop Garrison all the way from Revolver and War Room around the conservative media, | ||
around the patriotic media, lamenting, really fuming about the fact that this generated so much negative attention and public pressure that this Pentagon office designated to purge conservatives and Trump supporters is now quote-unquote Neutralized. | ||
Done. It's over. | ||
It's just a battle. | ||
I'm not saying we won the war here, but it's a significant battle. | ||
This is huge. | ||
This is huge. This is huge. | ||
This is huge. How many of the first wave at Normandy do you think were MAGA? How many were Make America Great Again? | ||
How many were the backbone of this country? | ||
Patriots. Give me that again. | ||
We know what he was trying to do. | ||
This is the extremists. | ||
These domestic terrorists are trying to get this all out of the military. | ||
If you get the backbone of the country, the warriors out of the military, you're not going to have a military. | ||
You're going to have these people prancing around doing DOD Pride Day. | ||
Pride this. A lot of pride in the first wave at Normandy. | ||
A lot of that. Don't think so. | ||
unidentified
|
Don't give me pride. People need to hear this. | |
Just to be reminded of this kind of really affirmative action mediocrity that was selected by Lloyd Austin to run this purge. | ||
Just an example of one of the tweets that we exposed. | ||
He said, Support for him, a racist, is support for all of his beliefs. | ||
He's talking about Donald Trump here. | ||
This goes to show, on the one hand, people might hear and say, oh, extremism, that's a bad thing. | ||
Of course we don't want it in the military. | ||
They don't mean extremism. | ||
They mean any normal, healthy American who supports Trump, who wants a secure border, who doesn't want tuck-friendly bikinis at Target. | ||
That's what they mean by And it's a great occasion here on the anniversary of D-Day to really reflect on the disturbing fact every single one, I would venture to say at least 95, if not 90 plus percent, Of the people, the soldiers, the fighters, the heroes at Deer Day, they would have been vetted out by Bishop Garrison. | ||
In fact, they would be considered too far right for any mainstream position in the Republican Party. | ||
You'd have the GOP denouncing them as Nazis, ironically. | ||
And it's beyond this piece. | ||
unidentified
|
It gives us occasion to reflect what were they fighting for? | |
If they saw what America has become, the globalist American empire, would they look back and say, oh, the sacrifice was worth it? | ||
No. Just hang on for a second. | ||
90-second break. I've got to get you in. | ||
I want to follow up on that. | ||
I want to talk about this target business model. |