June 6, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:41
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
| MAGA media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Monday, 5 June in the year of our Lord 2023. | ||
| We've got a lot of work to do this afternoon in the war room, so we're going to get down to it. | ||
| Congressman Andrew Clyde, the former Navy Commander, CB officer, is going to join us in the second block and talk to us about efforts to make sure that the pistol brace Bill gets back on the calendar and gets to the floor. | ||
| He's going to give us some breaking news here in a few minutes. | ||
| But I want to make sure, because this is obviously the most important vote of the 118th Congress, that you understand how These losers got played and I want to be very specific. | ||
| They're given high hosannas to themselves. | ||
| This is the Sunday morning edition of the Washington Post and this article of brinksmanship, bagels in a broker deal of brinksmanship. | ||
| It is so humiliating, humiliating when you find out the full surrender and not just the cowardice. | ||
| In the malfeasance of McHenry and Graves and McCarthy, but also their staffs. | ||
| And let me be blunt. | ||
| Cowardice, incompetence, malfeasance. | ||
| And we're going to hold them all accountable by name. | ||
| I've got E.J. Antony and Jeff Clark, and I want to walk through some of the details. | ||
| E.J., first you, and this is a story that's been, I don't want, the organization is a tremendous organization There's a news site on the right that's working this story right now. | ||
| But please, I want you to tell me about the work requirements and the permitting as far as you know about just the pure flat incompetence that's in this bill, sir. | ||
| Certainly. Well, Steve, what all of my sources on the Hill have told me is this. | ||
| What the McCarthy negotiators thought they were getting out of this deal is not at all what the Biden negotiators were putting in. | ||
| In other words, they thought certain measures would do X and the Biden negotiators, on the other hand, knew they would do Y. So this started out essentially with incompetence. | ||
| But where it became malfeasance was when other members of the House and their respective staffs went to McCarthy's staff and said, hold on a second. | ||
| This is not going to do what you think it's going to do. | ||
| In the case of welfare reform, for example, it turns out that while there is a modest increase in work requirements for food stamps, for instance, TANF, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program, what that essentially does is reduce the requirements that have to be met to be enrolled in that program. | ||
| In other words, it makes it easier to get on welfare with this legislation, not harder. | ||
| And so when that was brought to the attention of McCarthy staff, instead of going back to the negotiating table and doing a mea culpa and saying, look, we messed this up and we're going to go back and fix it, And get better concessions out of the Biden administration. | ||
| Instead of doing that, they protested and said, no, no, no, this isn't going to do what you think it's going to do. | ||
| Everything's going to be fine. | ||
| And they use that to actually get some Republican legislators to vote for this monstrosity. | ||
| And the exact same thing happened with permitting reform, where this was essentially sold to the Republican caucus as something which would increase the amount of permitting. | ||
| In other words, cut the red tape For things like coal, oil and natural gas, clean, reliable domestic energy. | ||
| But instead, what this is going to do is cut the red tape for green energy boondoggles like solar and wind, which are inefficient and not cost effective and predominantly benefit special interest groups and not the American people. | ||
| And once again, the same thing happened here. | ||
| The McCarthy negotiators thought they were getting X. The Biden negotiators knew they were getting Y. And when that was all discovered, instead of going back to the negotiating table, McCarthy staff tried to convince everyone else that it was all going to be fine. | ||
| And we're going to see very clearly that it's not all fine. | ||
| I just want to go back and I want to go back to that because you had the negotiations. | ||
| They were out-negotiated because these professionals over at the White House and the Hakeem Jeffries guys are killers. | ||
| They knew what they were getting. The amateurs on our side got played. | ||
| But even worse, once they were told by the staffs that worked this on the Hill, hey, you're getting played. | ||
| What this says is not what you think. | ||
| This is what's going to happen. Biden and these guys are smart and they're driving this. | ||
| They even covered it up then. | ||
| They refused to kind of, you know, eat the embarrassment and go back and change it. | ||
| And what we ended up with, and I want to be specific on Medicaid because they pushed Medicaid. | ||
| They were going to be You know, when Gates came into the very war room and pushed a trillion dollars of work requirements that would be savings because people would bounce off the system instead of doing the work requirements, we were told it was going to be Medicaid. | ||
| Then it ends up, it's some small thing on SNAP, but that Technically, when you read the fine print, 72,000 new people are going to be eligible for benefits every month. | ||
| And Dusty Johnson was on TV going, oh, no, no, no. | ||
| Well, that covers multiple categories, and it's not going to be that much. | ||
| Once again, on the work requirements, For basically a snap of the food stamps, we got nothing out of Medicaid. | ||
| There's no work requirements of Medicaid whatsoever. | ||
| That was a lie. | ||
| That fell out because Biden and those guys said we're not going to do it. | ||
| But on the work requirements on the food, we're essentially adding, what is it, 72,000 new bodies per month? | ||
| Right, and Steve, the other thing I want to emphasize is even that the modest increases in work requirements that the Republican negotiators did manage to get into this deal, unfortunately states, people don't realize this, but obviously the Biden negotiators did, states have a lot of leeway in what they can waive in terms of these federal rules in order to increase the welfare rolls. | ||
| And so while you do have some additional work requirements, that doesn't mean that every blue state in the country isn't just going to turn around And waive that. | ||
| In other words, it's going to even further diminish the impact than the Republican negotiators thought they were going to get in the first place. | ||
| When you read the Washington Post and you read these accounts, the CNN account, which talks about McCarthy, both of them talking about McCarthy, giving up, basically offering up the two years with uncapped. | ||
| You don't get any sense that we took any hard positions at all. | ||
| Everything was just performative, and it was all just to get optics in there that could then be spun to Fox News and to try to fool the MAGA base. | ||
| Am I incorrect in that assertion, sir? | ||
| No, Steve, I think that's a really accurate assessment here. | ||
| And once again, I don't believe that this all started with any kind of malice. | ||
| I think it just started with incompetence. | ||
| All of the information that's available to me at time points to that this was just simply, as you said, our team got outplayed, outfoxed, and outnegotiated. | ||
| By their team. | ||
| And as a result of that, essentially what happened was we got a raw deal. | ||
| But humility, I think, forgives a lot of sins. | ||
| And unfortunately, McCarthy staff did not have the humility to say we messed up and we need to go back to the negotiating table in order to get a better deal for the American people. | ||
| There's a major conservative news site that's working on the story right now. | ||
| It's going to be quite explosive. You're kind of getting an early heads up on this. | ||
| I want to go to Jeff Clark. | ||
| Jeff, you came on the other day, but I want you on here after EJ to go back through the permitting thing for a second because permitting, we're totally being gaslit on that. | ||
| I don't want to overstate it, but we're being gaslit on what's really in the deal on the permitting. | ||
| Correct, sir? That's correct Steve and thanks for having me and I was watching EJ who I agree with completely on this. | ||
| Look, the main thing we did in the NEPA reform was to cut out cumulative impacts to eliminate a lot of the red tape that ties down energy projects and ties down physical infrastructure projects and ties down regulatory reform to scale back the administrative state. | ||
| Those were the main things we were targeting. | ||
| The Republicans in Congress could have taken that proposal, that actual final rule, from the Trump administration and then codified it and converted it into amendments to the NEPA statute. | ||
| It's clear now, as we kind of like reverse triangulate on this, that the Biden people made a proposal and they sold it to McCarthy and it is incompetence. | ||
| We'll give you this if basically you let us have free reign on the debt limit. | ||
| What they gave them was not worth anything really. | ||
| Actually, as EJ was pointing out, I didn't talk about this on your program last time, one of the things that the NEPA reform that they have adopted in this debt bill does is it eliminates NEPA for loan guarantees. | ||
| So I just checked the number as I was sitting here. | ||
| The Inflation Reduction Act provided $40 billion worth of Green New Deal slush money in loans. | ||
| So what they're doing is they know that the main problem with NEPA for energy projects is litigation. | ||
| The environmental organizations sue and they block all of the projects. | ||
| They know when they give out these kinds of loan guarantees and so on, first of all, that no one's going to sue. | ||
| And then second of all, they basically fast track those like being on a slipstream through the NEPA process. | ||
| So the McCarthy team, the Garrett Graves team, You know, I think who was supposed to have been the point person on this. | ||
| They got totally outfoxed. | ||
| As DJ pointed out, they could have admitted that. | ||
| But I want to ask a logically prior question of that. | ||
| What are they doing allowing the Biden people to make a proposal that does all the things they want as opposed to saying, look, here's what we want. | ||
| We have an affirmative proposal to get energy projects moving in America and, you know, give us that and then maybe we'll trade that away for something. | ||
| But we're not going to let you make a proposal to us and we just say with a pat on our head, oh, yeah, that's great. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for that. Hang on a second. | |
| You and E.J. got to the key point, as we say. | ||
| We weren't happy about the first deal, but we accepted it because it had the one-year cap, had the duration of one year and a $1.5 trillion cap, and it got a bill passed. | ||
| But it had, remember, it had these things in there. | ||
| Why are you sitting there and allowing Biden to put these things forward and just tell him, instead of just saying, no, that's not going to work, it's not the first thing, it's ridiculous. | ||
| You take these things that are so awful given the first deal. | ||
| This is my point. | ||
| McHenry's never had a job. | ||
| Graves has never had a job. | ||
| McCarthy's never had a job. | ||
| He ran a hot dog stand in Bakersfield. | ||
| The other two guys are pure political hacks from the time they were in third grade. | ||
| They've never had a job. | ||
| Graves, that's supposed to be Graves' area of expertise. | ||
| This is humiliating. | ||
| E.J., when the team over at Heritage, the balance budget guy was sitting there going, this thing's terrible. | ||
| Have you seen anything in this deal that you think is going to lead to any meaningful cuts or anything? | ||
| Or is this just a complete humiliation? | ||
| And by the way, people should know there's a firestorm over there right now. | ||
| On the pistol brace, and we're going to get Congressman Clyde on here. | ||
| And people say a motion to vacay, because this is humiliating, and you can't run away from this deal. | ||
| You're stuck with this deal forever. | ||
| EJ, your thoughts? | ||
| Steve, there's certainly a few good things that are going to come from this piece of legislation, but I don't think it's so much a question of did we get anything good out of the deal? | ||
| I think it's at, you have to ask, at what cost? | ||
| And when you look at the astonishing cost of this, it was certainly not worth cutting a small amount of red tape for a small amount of oil drilling, for instance. | ||
| That was not worth giving away the entire House, for example, like we did in this piece of legislation. | ||
| I don't think almost anything could have been worth giving the Biden administration a removal of the debt ceiling, as we talked about previously. | ||
| And like you said in that conversation, Stephen, as a couple of Republicans pointed out when they were debating this for a short period in the Congress, if the Biden administration had any intent Any intent at all of spending as little as they said, then they would not have needed a removal of the debt ceiling. | ||
| They would have been perfectly fine with capping it and having an increase of only one or two trillion dollars. | ||
| But that was just yet another example of McCarthy staff getting out Fox to you. | ||
| Exactly. If they had believed in any of these cuts, they would have codified that in the deal. | ||
| Okay, E.J., if I can have you hang for a second, and Jeff, hang for a second. | ||
| Congressman Clyde's going to join us. | ||
| There's a lot going on here, a lot of developments today that Boris is going to get us up to speed on, a lot of polling. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to be back. We've got E.J. and Tony. | ||
| He is part of Steve Moore's group on prosperity, also over at the Heritage. | ||
| He's our numbers guy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Also, the great Jeff Clark. | |
| I mean, this is humiliating. | ||
| And this is the key point. | ||
| They got outplayed. | ||
| Then they got informed by people on this hill that know better and say, hey, you gotta make these changes, it's embarrassing. | ||
| And then they said, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| They covered it up. | ||
| Because they didn't want to show they got outplayed. | ||
| And now it's in the bill. | ||
| It's codified and been voted on. | ||
| Suck on that, MAGA. Short break. | ||
| Back in a moment. Okay, as we said, I think in a pretty prominent publication on the right, this thing will break in the next day or two. | ||
| E.J., on the work permits, the work requirements are supposed to be Medicaid, supposed to be all this, given that we were, you know, we were outsmarted and then people weren't courageous enough to come forward and say we made a mistake and try to get a change. | ||
| Now that it's in this, is anything to be done, sir? | ||
| Well, Steve, unfortunately, a lot is baked into the cake right now. | ||
| But the only hope that we do have right now is that it's going to be a very, very vicious appropriations fight coming up later this year and into next year. | ||
| In other words, when Congress is actually voting on how much money to allocate to these different programs and to these different government agencies. | ||
| And that's going to be an even more vicious fight than normal. | ||
| And unfortunately, we gave up our biggest piece of leverage, right, which was the debt ceiling. | ||
| But we still have the opportunity there to essentially draw a line in the sand and try to defund some of these things by simply just not giving them enough federal money to fulfill all of their promises. | ||
| The problem is that the Senate is not going to back us on that. | ||
| We have 19 collaborations in the Senate. | ||
| Then you're going to get into a CR. Take your number two pencil out right now. | ||
| Take it out. Go to September 30th, 30 September of this year, the stroke of midnight. | ||
| Okay? The stroke of midnight. | ||
| That's the end of fiscal year. | ||
| And trust me, folks, when they come back from the, if they take an August, if they come back from the August recess sometime after Labor Day, around the 10th of September, There's going to be a firestorm on this appropriations. | ||
| Supposedly the 12 independent bills are going to come up, regular order, in the House, going to have what EJ's talking about. | ||
| Others are going to have these cuts, and the Senate's going to go, quite interesting, not interested, right? | ||
| Glad you did the work. Huge fight. | ||
| And then you're going to have CR kick through September 3rd because they're going to run out. | ||
| Nobody's going to want to shut down. McCarthy will never shut down the government. | ||
| Never force Biden to, I should say. | ||
| And then we're going to get into, wait for it, Christmas omnibus. | ||
| It's coming, baby. I can see that with a super clarity right now. | ||
| So I agree with you, but I think that we're going to get chop-blocked on that. | ||
| But just hang on, put a pin because I want to ask you about the overall situation here. | ||
| Same question to you, Jeff Clark, in your area of expertise and permitting. | ||
| Did we just get outplayed and we got to live with it or is anything to be done, sir? | ||
| We got outplayed. | ||
| Look, you know, my phone line was open. | ||
| If they were going to talk about amending the NEPA statute significantly for the first time in 53 years, they could have called me and said, what are the top reforms we need? | ||
| But that never happened again because I suspect they just took the off the shelf proposal of, oh, this will be good for you coming from the Biden administration. | ||
| You know, there is one small silver lining, Steve, which is that because of the loan, the way they wrote the loan guarantee program, you know, provisions, probably farmers who get loan guarantees can now argue that they don't have to go through NEPA. So if you're a farmer, take note of that. You know, you kind of got a side benefit. | ||
| And then the last thing I would say is, look, Steve, you know, if Republicans make a comeback to the White House in 2025, right, and I'm called on or something to, you know, hey, you fix this once before, you know, go fix it again. | ||
| Right. You know, now we would have had to have written around the Biden and through the Biden regulations that reverse the Trump reforms. | ||
| But now there's a statute and there are a whole bunch of provisions. | ||
| A lot of them don't do anything except to kind of add, ironically, more red tape. | ||
| And that has to be written around. | ||
| So congratulations, you know, House and Senate. | ||
| You just gave us a more complicated red tape problem in terms of trying to get energy and infrastructure programs moving again. | ||
| Make sure you note that for your next town hall, ladies and gentlemen, Jeff Clark. | ||
| Jeff, how do they get to you at the center and what's your social media? | ||
| I'm at JeffClarkUS on Getter and Twitter, on RealJeffClark on Truth Social, and the center is AmericaRenewing.com, Steve. | ||
| Thanks, brother. Appreciate it. | ||
| E.J., for you, before I let you go real quickly, the Saudis simultaneously with the passing of this bill announced a $1 million barrel a day cut. | ||
| They want $80 minimum per barrel of oil up to $100. | ||
| They went to floor $80. | ||
| Of course, they're selling to the Chinese at 40, and no worse than 30 % discount to what they sell to us. | ||
| Plus, it's got to be in yuan, so they're going to break the U.S. dollar. | ||
| Your sense of other bad things are going to happen to us because of this, sir? | ||
| Well, I think increasingly countries are seeing what the Biden administration has done to the US dollar, and they're trying to run from it. | ||
| You know, Biden promised the Saudis, for example, that he was going to start refilling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. | ||
| Instead, he's still draining it. | ||
| So instead of decreasing the global supply, he is helping to increase it. | ||
| And now the Saudis are having to make production cuts and they're trying to put in a price floor, as you just detailed. | ||
| So he has essentially betrayed the Saudis in terms of what we said we were going to do for a commodity priced in dollars. | ||
| Look at what we did when we confiscated dollars that were owned by the Russian people, for example, as a result of the war in the Ukraine. | ||
| That was another betrayal of the sanctity of the United States dollar. | ||
| And now Biden is threatening sanctions Against countries in Africa for having anti-sodomy laws. | ||
| So once again, and by the way, that was actually something that you and I discussed months ago, that Biden was going to start using the dollar as a weapon, not just against countries that go to war, but against countries that don't agree with his woke agenda. | ||
| And so as this increasingly happens, people around the world are looking at the dollar and realizing it's not a safe bet anymore. | ||
| Not a safe bet. E.J., how do people get to you over with the Steve Moore Group and at Heritage? | ||
| How do people get to you? The best place to find me is on Twitter, at Real EJAntoni. | ||
| Thank you, brother. Great, great work, and we look forward to seeing the story. | ||
| When the story breaks, I want to have you back on. | ||
| Thanks. Thank you. | ||
| By the way, end of the dollar empire, you go to birchgold.com slash bandit, get the end of the dollar empire, the third installment. | ||
| It's all about the dollar's prime reserve currency, what it means to you, third installment, the debt trap. | ||
| Put you right in the middle of this historic moment. | ||
| Also, you get to talk to a Birch Gold representative about why are the central banks in the world buying more gold than ever? | ||
| And why are the Saudis and Sub-Saharan Africa and all these countries running from the dollar, the petrodollar? | ||
| Find out. Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| Get all your questions answered by the great team of Birch Gold. | ||
| A profile in Courage is Congressman Andrew Clyde. | ||
| The pistol brace bill, they came to him and said, you vote for the rule that gets this monstrosity to the floor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will take this bill off of the... | |
| Off of the schedule and jeopardize a minimum of three main American gun owners with 10 years in a federal prison, a substantial fine, and loss of their gun rights for the remainder of their earthly life. | ||
| Congressman Clyde, since we broke that story with you last week, it's been like a firestorm. | ||
| Can you get us up to speed on what's happening? | ||
| So we have demanded all weekend, up on the getter, with posters, talks, everything, that your bill with your name on it, be put back on this week, like today, be put back on so it could be addressed by the House. | ||
| What's our status, sir? | ||
| Well, Steve, thanks again for having me on. | ||
| I will tell you that what you have been doing and the response from the 2A community has been very effective to date. | ||
| We're not quite there yet, but it has definitely had a significant impact. | ||
| I had quite a number of calls from leadership. | ||
| I just had a meeting with leadership a couple of hours ago. | ||
| And it seems that this bill, HJ Res 44, which takes down the pistol brace rule of the ATF, there's a possibility that it will come to the floor this coming week now, but that's not for certain. | ||
| So we need to keep the pressure up. | ||
| There's thought that they could potentially go through the Senate first and then come to the House. | ||
| I've heard that out there. | ||
| I think that's a really bad idea and I expressed that to leadership because the Senate doesn't have the votes right now and they know it. | ||
| If all the Republicans in the Senate aren't confirmed to be voting for this, how do they expect any Democrats to vote for it? | ||
| But here in the House, I know that we actually have a Democrat, potentially maybe two or three or four, that are committed to voting for this, that could potentially vote for this. | ||
| I know we've got one committed to voting for it, and so if we can pass it on the Republican side with a Democrat or two, then it would be bipartisan. | ||
| It would give tremendous support to the Senate for them to pass it. | ||
| That's the way it should be done. | ||
| And that's any other way I think really is a recipe for failure. | ||
| And so I'm very encouraged. | ||
| Like I said, I've had numerous calls from leadership all weekend, but we're not there yet. | ||
| That's the main point I want to drive right now. | ||
| We're not there yet. There's a possibility there's some light at the end of the tunnel, but we're not there yet. | ||
| We need to keep the pressure up. | ||
| People should know that Navy Commander Clyde is a man of great humility. | ||
| Here's what I don't get. So you gotta help me out here, Congressman Commander. | ||
| This is not a tough call. | ||
| I know you've had numerous calls and you had a meeting today. | ||
| This is something that must get brought to the floor of the House, must be voted on. | ||
| This is outrageous when it exposes particularly vulnerable people. | ||
| You know, people with handicaps, injured veterans, women who are just coming to firearms for self-defense. | ||
| Some of our most vulnerable people had these pistol braces, and it's exposed them to just these heinous charges. | ||
| You know, 10 years in a federal prison, substantial fine, and loss of their gun rights for the rest of their life. | ||
| How can this be a tough call, sir? | ||
| It's not a tough call. | ||
| It really isn't. This is an example of the Washington, D.C. swamp. | ||
| And that's what has to be stopped right here. | ||
| Just like you said, Steve, this is so much bigger than Representative Andrew Clyde. | ||
| It's so much bigger than the entire Republican Conference. | ||
| This is about the American people. | ||
| This is about the 3 million to potentially 40 million Americans who own pistol braces, who are law-abiding gun owners, who have pistol braces, stabilizing braces, in order to better enjoy their larger caliber pistols. | ||
| And many of them, as you mentioned, are service-disabled veterans, are Americans with disabilities, and they need these braces in order to be able to properly use the pistols that they currently own. | ||
| And if we don't, if we don't pass this in the House, then we're going to have a serious, serious problem because the Senate, you know, the courage is not there in the Senate. | ||
| And not only that, but you've got plenty of folks that they're going to be denied their rights totally if we don't pass this in the House and send that message to the courts. | ||
| Congressman, if you can just hold on for one second. | ||
| Short break. Andrew Clyde, Navy Command. | ||
| Okay, Commander Clyde, we're going to... | ||
| 202-225-3121. | ||
| It's time to man the ramparts again, folks. | ||
| I hope your blood is boiling on this deal. | ||
| We're not going to give it up. Because this was the most important vote of the 118th Congress. | ||
| Not the vote for speakers. | ||
| This vote in the pregame on that vote was Congressman Clyde and 29 other patriots. | ||
| The 20 is now the 29 that said voted against the rule. | ||
| Said now this thing shouldn't as a closed rule should not come to the floor. | ||
| We have to have amendments. And now you see as we shred this thing every day and you're seeing the Reality of it, think about it, and some of the elements, which weren't great to begin with, when they got outmaneuvered and outnegotiated by Biden in the White House and the Hakeem Jeffries team, who are all hammers. | ||
| They were too embarrassed and humiliated. | ||
| When other Hill staffers came up and said, no, no, no, no, no, you don't understand what they've done here. | ||
| They tried to hide it and try to hide it through a series of talking points and spin and gaslighting you. | ||
| you I want this burned into your soul. | ||
| I want you to absorb what's happened here. | ||
| When you're going to Branson, Missouri, are you going to the Iowa State Fair? | ||
| Are you going out to the Six Flags of America in Ohio? | ||
| Are you going down to New Orleans or out in Disney World? | ||
| Are you going up to Yellowstone National Park? | ||
| Wherever you're going this summer, throwing the kids in the car. | ||
| Trying to have a family trip, time of inflation, save a few bucks, and you look at those gas prices. | ||
| Remember, the Saudis voted what they thought was happening to the U.S. dollar and what they thought about this deal. | ||
| They cut a million barrels all a day, and they're looking to get an $80 price minimum and maybe $100. | ||
| So think about that. You don't think this impacts your life? | ||
| It impacts every aspect of your life. | ||
| That's the reason we're so maniacally focused on this. | ||
| Because this is set, you don't think that million barrel a day cut and $80 to $100 a barrel is going to affect the economy? | ||
| What we told you was going to happen, the Republican Party, those 149 who voted for it, who all have to be primary. | ||
| Let me repeat that. All of them. | ||
| Including people we're quite fond of, and some who we used to be fond of, have to be primary. | ||
| You know why? They have to stand on the debate stage when the primary season, and they have to justify what they did with the knowledge they had at the time of what went on, and then what the impact is. | ||
| Because the impact during primary season is going to be a lot worse than it is today. | ||
| Okay? And now you hear the other side of it. | ||
| They go to a decent and good man Like Commander Congressman Andrew Clyde from Georgia, who's trying to do something to help the American people and make sure that the American people aren't unwittingly with this overreaching leviathan of a federal government in these left wing courts and these judges trying to put decent, | ||
| hardworking people, particularly disabled veterans, Maybe people with affirmities, females, whatever, on pistol braces in a federal prison for 10 years and take your gun rights away and on top of it hit you with a big fine. | ||
| How about that? And so when he does it, he said, no, no, no. | ||
| To play their games and to show you how mean and nasty and quite frankly evil they are? | ||
| Oh, we're going to just pull it. | ||
| You vote for us, we're going to pull it. | ||
| And now he's got to go back? | ||
| And Congressman Clyde has to be a supplicant? | ||
| He has to be a supplicant? | ||
| Is that where we are? It has to be a supplicant? | ||
| Commander Clyde, 202-225-3121 is the number. | ||
| What should the war room posse say, sir, when they get somebody on the line? | ||
| Well, thank you, Steve. We're not giving up, and that's for sure. | ||
| What they need to communicate to the leadership of the Republican Party here is In Washington, is that these are our God-given constitutional rights, our natural rights, their Second Amendment rights. | ||
| We will not give up on those rights. | ||
| Republican leadership has no right to use them as a bargaining chip because that's wrong. | ||
| You know, government is there to protect and defend our rights, not to bargain them away in some deal that they want to create. | ||
| So, no, they need to tell the folks, That H.J. Res. | ||
| 44, which protects our constitutional rights against an overbearing Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, that that bill needs to come to the floor and every Republican needs to be on notice and needs to have their vote recorded as to where they stand on our constitutional rights, on our Second Amendment rights. | ||
| Congressman, how do people get to you? | ||
| We're on social media, particularly your site. | ||
| I can tell you, over the weekend, a lot of people... | ||
| You're now... And you did this on the D.C. crime bill, which was brilliant. | ||
| You've really taken the national stage here, and quite frankly, the international stage, because this is, as you said, much deeper even than this bill. | ||
| This is about... The people in this country's constitutional rights are looked at as a bargaining chip and looked at can be used against against people who stand up for them as the representatives. | ||
| We cannot allow that to stand and this is our this is the party that people work for and ring doorbells for and give money to. | ||
| This is not radical democrats although the radical democrats control this deal. | ||
| How do people get to you on your website and through social media sir? | ||
| Well they can go to clyde.house.gov on our website and they can follow me on RepClyde at Twitter or on Facebook or on Instagram and Getter. | ||
| So that's how you can reach out to my office. | ||
| Thank you. Congressman Clyde, you make people proud to be naval officers. | ||
| So thank you very much, sir. The fighting CBs. | ||
| That's right. Can do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We build, we fight. Can do. | |
| Thank you, sir. Boris. | ||
| I want to get in. I know you've got a bunch of stuff to go to. | ||
| We've got limited time. We've got Liz Uris going to join us and Krom. | ||
| The Nikki Haley, and I don't want to spend a lot of time on this, but I watched the whole Nikki Haley thing last night, plus the hour and a half post-game on CNN. CNN, hey, let me just give you, it's not working. | ||
| That thing's just, it's a joke. | ||
| It's 30 people. | ||
| Nobody knows who they are. They only got a couple minutes to talk. | ||
| It's all pablum. | ||
| They never get to the heart of matter. | ||
| Nikki Haley is from a time that land forgot. | ||
| She talks about a new generation with new ideas. | ||
| Those ideas are old and they're failed. | ||
| I just don't even get it. | ||
| Note to Nikki's staff. | ||
| Write this down. Take your number two pencil out and write this down. | ||
| The only three things that matter, only three things matter in modern politics. | ||
| Authenticity, number one. | ||
| Courage, number two. | ||
| And number three, fighting spirit. | ||
| And courage and fighting spirit are different. | ||
| Courage is the will and the courage and the moral courage to go do it. | ||
| Fighting spirit is that, hey, I'm getting in and I'm never backing down. | ||
| Somehow she's given this pablum from, I don't even know when it is, the 80s, 90s or whatever, but it's not going to work. | ||
| She could go ought double ought She could be down with Asa. | ||
| She could be down with another Southern governor. | ||
| Southern governor is not making us proud right now. | ||
| Boris Epstein, your thoughts and observations. | ||
| I'm actually not aware of what you're speaking about, Mr. | ||
| Bannon. I didn't know there was an event with Nikki Healy yesterday. | ||
| I'm not aware of what he said. | ||
| You're cruel. You're cruel. | ||
| Since none of it went viral, you didn't see any of it, right? | ||
| Well, everyone knows that I come in hot on Getter, on Truth, on Twitter, and on Instagram, and I didn't see any clips anywhere there, so I just assumed it didn't happen. | ||
| But in all seriousness, it was a total joke, and some of the words Sunday night programming, I would love to see about 120 people programs that outrated that town hall on CNN yesterday. | ||
| I will bet you that Cartoon Network, Food Channel, you pick them. | ||
| Nobody can watch it. Nobody can watch it. | ||
| It's impossible. The channel that's like Channel 8 in New York instead of Channel 7, I bet those were outrating CNN yesterday. | ||
| It's not a competition. | ||
| You can't bring, and the same thing goes for the Florida governor, you cannot bring 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 nonsense to curt American politics. | ||
| You just can't. We are not in a country club. | ||
| We are not at some old school roast. | ||
| We here are now fighting for the survival of this country. | ||
| And if anybody thinks that a Sunday night CNN town hall or Towing the poor kids around Iowa pretending to be this beautiful, wonderful, you know, a picture of America is what the American people want. | ||
| It is not. I can't believe Boris went there. | ||
| What? It's just reality. | ||
| Love kids. Okay, go ahead. | ||
| Hey, Boris did, not Bannon. | ||
| It was Boris. Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue on. You know, love kids, love family. | |
| That's all great. But what the American people want right now is courage, not ordering ice cream. | ||
| I can think of another politician who's been ordering a lot of ice cream, and that's crooked Joe Biden. | ||
| That's what we need. With these institutions that are not only not serving the nation, but now in various stages of corruption and collapse, people have to... | ||
| This is an urgent moment. | ||
| All of these kind of photos... All the stuff that was done in traditional politics doesn't quite get to the heart of it. | ||
| We've got to get to the heart of it. | ||
| The main thing. | ||
| And that's why I think it's... | ||
| Talk to me about... | ||
| Talk about institutions. | ||
| Is it pretty obvious that Biden... | ||
| I mean, Biden's losing the polling to Trump. | ||
| How does his Justice Department create some obstruction to indict him for the first time in American history? | ||
| How does that work in American history? | ||
| Boris, help me out here. That's something out of Stalin's Russia, is it not? | ||
| I was going to say, it doesn't work in American history. | ||
| It works in Stalinist history. | ||
| It works in Soviet history, in North Korean history. | ||
| It works in Argentine history. | ||
| It works in Venezuelan history. | ||
| It does not work in the American industry. | ||
| It does not work in a free country. | ||
| Using lawfare, using weaponized law enforcement, targeted illegal channels to persecute a, not just a political opponent, but the political opponent is literally out of the third world playbook. | ||
| And that's what we're living with. | ||
| And that's what we're living with. | ||
| There's absolutely no distinction between what... | ||
| And this isn't just the Democrats. | ||
| It's the Democrats and the Rhinos. | ||
| Because keep in mind, a lot of this decay of law enforcement is attributed to Comey, is attributed even to Mueller, is attributed to Rosen... | ||
| is attributed to those who permeated the Justice Department and law enforcement over the last 10 years and have landed us where we are, which is a lawless country, which is a country where police... | ||
| Departments are burned, courthouses are burned, stores are looted, and those who are responsible are not prosecuted. | ||
| But the most significant leader in modern American history, the strongest president in modern American history, is persecuted. | ||
| For what? For loving our country. | ||
| I don't know what planet they're on. | ||
| Obviously, they can't stop him at the polls. | ||
| They can't stop him culturally. | ||
| This movement gets stronger every day, bigger every day. | ||
| He's the presumptive favorite now in the primary. | ||
| He's leading Biden significantly. | ||
| They're even talking about putting poor Barack Obama back on the ballot as a VP. This is their trillion-dollar coin. | ||
| But they don't need it because it gets feckless Republicans. | ||
| But now they're going to try to do an obstruction charge of Biden's Justice Department. | ||
| I mean, it's so obvious they're going to use lawfare to try to stop Trump. | ||
| And I got news for him, Boris. | ||
| I think his polling only goes up like about 10 points when this happens. | ||
| If the Justice Department decides to bring this incredibly weak, pathetic, lawless, Action against President Trump. | ||
| President Trump is absolutely only going to go up in the polls. | ||
| There's no two ways about it. | ||
| Why? Because the American people are not just MAGA, not just the war room posse, but you better believe the blue dog Democrats and Steve, a group you're pretty familiar with, the old school ACLU liberals, the old school honest liberals who were very suspicious, very suspicious of overreach. | ||
| I've got to look at this and say, no way, we're with President Trump. | ||
| Hang on for one second, Boris. | ||
| Just stick right there. We're gonna finish up with Boris. | ||
| We got Liz Yor. | ||
| We're gonna talk about measles, illegal aliens in the city of Chicago, the city of Big Shoulders. | ||
| Every state, a border state. | ||
| Every town, a border town. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Next in the war room. We rejoice when there's no more. | |
| Let's take down the CCP. Steve Stern, CEO of Flagshirt.com, a third-generation veteran-owned small business. | ||
| I believe that the American way of life is for all of us. | ||
| I'm asking you today to visit Flagshirt.com. | ||
| Help keep the American dream alive. | ||
| Be a flag waver. Carry a nation's heritage. | ||
| Use coupon code ACTION10 for 10 % off site-wide and buy a flag shirt today. | ||
| Action, action, action. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Trump versus DeSantis on taxes. | |
| In Congress, Ron DeSantis pushed a 23 % national sales tax, where the middle class pays more. | ||
| 90 % of families would get a tax hike if DeSantis replaced the current system. | ||
| President Trump cut taxes a lot, lowering tax rates for everyone. | ||
| Trump cut taxes. | ||
| DeSantis tried to raise them. | ||
| Ron DeSantis, wrong on tax hikes, just not ready. | ||
| Make America Great Again, Inc. | ||
| is responsible for the content of this advertising. | ||
| Boris is back. Boris, we had Raheem on today. | ||
| He broke down a little bit of this poll, but can you take another shot at it at the Rasmussen poll? | ||
| What does it tell us? Absolutely. | ||
| It's very direct, very clear. | ||
| The Rasmussen poll, and it's a one-on-one poll. | ||
| When they had President Trump against DeSantis three months ago, President Trump at 45, the Florida governor at 32. | ||
| Now, 58 to 30. | ||
| So that's a double, a double of the difference. | ||
| President Trump was at 45, the Florida governor was at 32, a delta of 13. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now, it's a delta of 28. | |
| President Trump at 58 and the Florida governor at 30. | ||
| And again, that's head to head. And if you compare it to some of the other polling from YouGov to political warning consult, in reality, if you add in the Key Blue Elves, as you call them, President Trump is in the 60s and the Florida governor is under 20. | ||
| And then vitally on the economy, President Trump leads in the battleground states and nationwide by 50 points on the economy. | ||
| And all these polls, Stephen, this is vital, all these polls are taken after that Hindenburg of a launch that the Florida governor attempted on Twitter spaces. | ||
| So that's where this race is, and maybe it shouldn't even be called a race anymore. | ||
| At this point, it's a runaway. | ||
| By the way, Sununu said no MAS today, so that tells you how that's playing out. | ||
| Who? Boris, how do people get to your morning news? | ||
| I think they're planning a town hall with him on CNN tomorrow night. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, I think they were. | ||
| On Sunday night. Boris, how do people get to you on the gram? | ||
| Steve, thank you so much for having me. | ||
| It's an honor to be with you, honor to be with the posse. | ||
| My information hot on the website, BorisCP.com. | ||
| Hot on BorisCP.com. | ||
| Sign up right now. Hot on Getter at BorisCP. | ||
| On Twitter at BorisCP. Hot on Truth Social at Boris. | ||
| The hottest on the gram. | ||
| Boris underscore Epstein. | ||
| Stay strong. God bless. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And all offense. Thank you, brother. | |
| Let's play. We've got a cold open for Legere. | ||
| Let's play it. We're disciplined, and we're executing on it. | ||
| It is my vision to take the next step to this, to go to the faith-based locales, and then move to private residents. | ||
| There are residents who are suffering right now because of economic challenges. | ||
| They have spare rooms, they have locales, and we can find a way to get over the 30-day rule and other rules that government has in its place. | ||
| We'll drill on this tomorrow, but I think the mayor of New York is sitting there going... | ||
| Is it like the British in control of New York? | ||
| They're going to put the troops in... They're going to put people in your homes? | ||
| They're going to put in private residences? | ||
| Liz, you're the great city of Chicago, which I know you love. | ||
| Tell me, it's illegal aliens. | ||
| What is going on here at these police stations, ma'am? | ||
| Well, Steve, you said every town is a border town. | ||
| Well, it's come to Chicago, and it's really a dystopian scene. | ||
| They've had over 10,000... | ||
| Aliens into the city of Chicago. | ||
| 200 illegal aliens arrive every day in Chicago. | ||
| And the city of Chicago has run out of shelters and money. | ||
| And so the new socialist mayor of Chicago has decided to place these illegal aliens in the lobbies of 25 police precincts around the city of Chicago. | ||
| So picture this. The desk sergeant In charge of all these illegal aliens on mattresses, screaming babies, overflowing toilets, trying to find food for these people. | ||
| And instead of dealing with the crime, which has gone sword in Chicago. | ||
| In fact, last week we had 49 shot at, 10 killed. | ||
| That was Memorial Day weekend. | ||
| This weekend, same numbers, exact same numbers. | ||
| So, you know, remember when the left was saying, oh, we have to make police officers social workers? | ||
| Well, in Chicago, they've skipped over that. | ||
| We have policemen who are now sanitation workers and babysitters. | ||
| And now what has happened, of course, which Michael Yan has warned us about, there's a sign on one of the police precincts which says number 24. | ||
| It says, enter at your own risk, measles outbreak. | ||
| And, you know, I've been following the story. | ||
| Policemen are saying, oh, it's much more than measles. | ||
| There's lice. There's scarlet fever. | ||
| There's accusations that TB now is breaking out. | ||
| We're supposed to serve and protect. | ||
| The crime is just soaring. | ||
| And we have illegal aliens now in our police stations. | ||
| The pictures are just shocking. | ||
| They're just shocking. And what's interesting, though, is the working poor of Chicago are the ones that have really had it. | ||
| Because the city council just passed $51 million for the illegal aliens. | ||
| And it's only going to be until June. | ||
| And all the working poor in the Hispanic and Black areas are saying, wait, wait a minute, that money should come to us, not till the illegal aliens. | ||
| They're pouring in all these illegal alien children who have never had shots, never had vaccines. | ||
| And the Chicagoan parents can't get their kids in school because they don't have an updated vaccine schedule. | ||
| So they're up in uproar over that. | ||
| And finally, we see Citadel leaving Chicago. | ||
| We see Caterpillar leaving Chicago. | ||
| We see Boeing leaving Chicago, so the tax base is diminishing drastically while all the expenses are just soaring. | ||
| I would say this is a third-world country in Chicago, but I've been to police stations in third-world countries. | ||
| I've never seen a scene like this, where you We have homeless people filling the lobbies, demanding food, demanding diapers. | ||
| I mean, it's just insane. | ||
| But this- Dystopian. | ||
| What a sanctuary city- In Biden's America. | ||
| This is what a city- That is right. | ||
| That's right. So we're going to see more of this. | ||
| But the working poor of this country are the ones that are being really discriminated against. | ||
| Liz, how do people get to your site? | ||
| How do they get to you on social media? | ||
| I'm everywhere on Elizabeth Yor, all social media platforms, and my website is yourchildren.com. | ||
| The working poor in Chicago, they're getting the brunt of it. | ||
| Unbelievable. Liz, thank you so much. | ||
| Great report. Thanks, Steve. | ||
| Thank you. Okay, next hour, the merger of state and corporate power. |
Export Selection