Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
MAGA media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
unidentified
|
The Secure Fence Act mandated that the Secretary of DHS, that would be you, achieve operational control of our borders. | |
Mr. Secretary, our borders are not under control. | ||
Mr. Secretary, you are derelict in your duties. | ||
I would be derelict to not do something about this. | ||
And that's why I have a draft resolution here that I intend to introduce in the coming days that would require the Senate to take a vote of no confidence on Secretary Mayorkas. | ||
As I've stated on the record before, I stand at the ready to receive articles of impeachment from the House and conduct an impeachment trial in this body. | ||
But in the meantime, I think the Senate must show our colleagues in the House that we've had enough of the failures from the Department of Homeland Security and believe that the Secretary is not fit to faithfully carry out the duties of his office. | ||
I would like to insert this into the record. | ||
Mr. Chairman. Thank you and I yield back. | ||
This is a tremendously exciting day. | ||
One of the most major embassies we have anywhere in the world make this green transition. | ||
It really sets the stage to do even more across the entire State Department enterprise. | ||
It's the Ambassador's Headroom, fulfilling the executive order by the President, but the fact that it's happening here in Japan, Tokyo, is very, very unusual. | ||
Welcome to the War Room. | ||
It's not Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
It's Natalie Winters, the co-host and executive editor, filling in while Steve is busy and out on assignment while he takes the afternoon off. | ||
The same certainly cannot be said for our enemies, foreign and domestic, with an emphasis, of course, on the latter. | ||
But don't fret. Don't go anywhere. | ||
We have a very, very packed show. | ||
If you saw in the cold open, that was the wonderful senator from Kansas, Senator Roger Marshall, who I was on today, War Room earlier, talking about the pretty bombshell-laden, because there's a couple of bombshells in that report, a report that was released from his office about the origins of COVID. He'll be joining us actually later in the show around the 5.30 mark to talk about that, | ||
as well as his decision to introduce the resolution to hold a vote of no confidence on, of course, the infamous DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. | ||
But in the meantime, we have also some very high caliber guests. | ||
We got Dave Walsh and Naomi Wolf joining us to talk about, of course, energy and COVID vaccines, all that good stuff. | ||
Frankly, not so good stuff. | ||
But I think we should have Dave Walsh down the line. | ||
If we could bring Dave in, that would be great. | ||
People may have seen, there's been some reporting It was actually first released on Bloomberg on Monday, a report that actually showed that this whole green energy push that the Biden regime has been angling for, I don't think that's a secret to anyone, is actually coming up against and really kind of at odds with America's national security. | ||
Now that of course makes sense because it makes us more reliant on China, but all the way down to even the DOD, the Pentagon, is actually raising the red flags, raising the really red alarm about what this green energy push is doing. | ||
So, Dave, if you could sort of walk us through what the DOD is so concerned about with this green energy push and why people are right to be concerned. | ||
Well, there was apparently a DOD Navy report issued in October of last year, 2022, that did indicate the entire East Coast is problematic or highly problematic, in their words, With respect to naval activities and naval training and air force training activities. | ||
And I think it gets at specifically one project, the Dominion planned 2800 megawatt, 176 wind turbine farm being planned 25 to 30 miles off the east coast of Hampton Roads, Norfolk and Newport News. | ||
That's where the Newport News Shipyard is where the United States of America constructs all of its nuclear submarines. | ||
It's not a defense secret. | ||
Everyone there knows that. | ||
Everyone lives there. And all of its nuclear-powered aircraft carriers does trials for all that equipment offshore right there. | ||
And that's the home base of the largest naval base in the world that the United States Navy has, where those vessels are frequently housed and overhauled. | ||
and have to get in and out of on a very rapid basis. | ||
So the erection of 176 offshore wind towers to navigate our nuclear navy around doesn't exactly make a lot of sense. | ||
And it looks like the planning and the permitting for these offshore permits has not been well coordinated whatsoever with the DOD in accordance with these reports. | ||
And of course, not to mention the numerous well deaths now. | ||
We've got numerous mayors Mainly Democrat mayors in New Jersey battling offshore wind farms for that reason environmentally. | ||
So we've got several issues. | ||
And before we get off the topic, I do want to talk about the impact on ratepayers because, Natalie, it's a disaster. | ||
The cost of these is absolutely unaffordable to ratepayers. | ||
And shame on our public utilities for getting behind this kind of push to go ahead and see three to four times the operating cost of this kind of power is conventional gas-fired power generation. | ||
Be foisted on ratepayers. | ||
Sure. Well, let's walk through that a little bit more because I think anytime I've had you on, we've always talked about how the issue of climate change, green energy has always come down to one thing, and it's always been about power and control of your life. | ||
So it's curious that they would be pushing these policies that are only gonna make it more expensive for you to heat your home in the winter amidst this ongoing crisis of inflation and really a pretty abysmal and a dismal economy at that. | ||
But as Steve always says, you know, make it make sense. | ||
In other words, why would the Biden regime, specifically in the context of America's national security and the military, Why would they be pushing such radical reforms that basically provide no demonstrable benefit to the United States, right? | ||
It's only raising their rates. | ||
Is this part of this broader global, you know, I'll use the term Great Reset, of course, paying respects to the World Economic Forum. | ||
But it seems like there's something else going on here. | ||
In other words, they're sort of ignoring the side effects of the problem, right? | ||
They have their blinders on. | ||
They want green energy. | ||
They want renewable energy, whatever it may be. | ||
But they're just sort of ignoring the ramifications of that. | ||
Why do you think that is? | ||
I think they want to hide behind the cost profile of this stuff because it's exorbitant and it's unaffordable. | ||
I come from Tremendous experience in this. | ||
I was personally involved in building three, the three largest combined cycle plants for Dominion Energy in Virginia several years ago. | ||
This offshore farm would generate 8.8 million megawatt hours a year, it said. | ||
The cost of a combined cycle plant to generate 8.8 million megawatt hours a year of electricity would be about 1.1, 1.2 billion. | ||
This wind farm is going to cost ratepayers 9.8 billion to erect Producing that level of electricity. | ||
And why is it so low? | ||
You know, one thing, it doesn't operate 58 % of the time. | ||
Offshore wind, there's only enough wind to generate electricity about 42 % of the time, even offshore. | ||
So you've got a massive energy deficit in terms of the amount of shear time that it can operate, which is still less than half the time. | ||
But again, according to the Energy Information Administration under the DOE, this data is all published. | ||
Offshore wind costs about $135 a kilowatt hour to operate. | ||
Combined cycle with current gas costs about $36 a kilowatt hour. | ||
So this is about three and a half times more costly on a continuous basis. | ||
Again, the capex, 8.7 times more. | ||
But on a continuous basis, about three and a half times more, even with natural gas being fueled to a combined cycle plan all the time. | ||
So all this cost gets passed on to ratepayers. | ||
And they're not told about this in a fair, eloquent, objective way ahead of these projects. | ||
It's only all about the environment. | ||
And I hate to say it, but companies like Dominion, who were managed by their ESG shareholding, and they're all about their major capex, their equity share, which it's a major publicly traded company, are all about now making the SEC happy, making the EPA happy, making their green shareholders happy, that they're on board with ESG. And they're transforming their company to a net-zero basis by 2050, according to their mantra. | ||
Well, but they fail to say, at what cost are ratepayers? | ||
At what cost of money in rates? | ||
But be more as importantly, at what cost of reliability when you're replacing continuous-running generation assets with assets that run 38 % to 42 % of the time, you're really having a horrible impact on system reliability to boot. | ||
So the only benefit would be if one is worried about CO2. The costs of these systems are unaffordable. | ||
That's the buried lead on these. | ||
They're unaffordable for ratepayers, but they're not discussed widely. | ||
ESG, diversity, equity, they don't mean much when the lights don't turn on or you can't afford to heat your home. | ||
And I have to say, you did say Dominion, and I know Fox did just settle for $787.5 million with the other Dominion. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, of course, of course, of course. | |
But we got some breaking news about 24 minutes ago that was just released. | ||
Like I said, Dominion and Fox News have reached a $787.5 million. | ||
million dollar settlement in their defamation lawsuit. | ||
We got a few minutes before we jump to break and we're gonna talk about after the break how credit scores carbon tracking are coming to you coming to us here at least those of us who are sad to say they live in New York thanks to the administration of Mayor Eric Adams but before we get on to that because I want to give that issue its due time again like I said we just have a few minutes but I'm just curious because Part of it, you know, it's the kind of age-old question, at least of the Biden regime. | ||
Is it incompetence or is it malintent? | ||
And I think someone like Pete Buttigieg, right, who's running transportation, the Department of Transportation, he's done a pretty abysmal job. | ||
Meanwhile, he announced today I think they're going to plow another What is it? | ||
$1.8 billion to make sure that, you know, roads aren't racist, something along those lines. | ||
What do you think it is when it comes to the leadership within the Biden regime? | ||
Like you said, you have experience in this industry. | ||
I wouldn't be surprised if you know some people who are pretty high up within the federal government working on these issues. | ||
Do you think it's all about transforming America to this radical, green, new energy, new deal type country? | ||
Or do you think these people are just They've kind of bought the, I guess you'd call it, they've taken the green pill, not the red pill. | ||
They just believe this stuff wholeheartedly and are just blind to the consequences. | ||
We've got a few minutes before we've got to jump to break. | ||
I do think the lurch to the left has been so dramatic. | ||
The second term of the Obama administration, President Obama was taking credit for the fracking revolution that occurred in this country that gave us tremendous self-dependence on our own reservoir of natural gas and oil in this country, making us Again, the largest exporter in the world of oil and gas products and enjoying very low cost. | ||
Tremendous job boom. | ||
He bragged about that on several occasions. | ||
This administration wants to consistently, every department head, the SEC, the Federal Reserve Chair, of course, the DOE head Granholm, all about mantra, continuous mantra, on ending the use of fossil fuels, which is all about driving up the hardships and costs on ratepayers And also on fertilizers that emanate from ammonia and nitrogen-based fertilizers, | ||
which have propelled food productivity upward by about a factor of three to four times since the 50s, eliminating the use of those fuels for fertilizers. | ||
This defies any logic except weakening the country, weakening the relative positioning of U.S. consumers, and actually in terms of weakening our national defense, sapping the country's energy reserve in electricity and natural gas is a horrendous backward step in our ability to defend ourselves, both as a competitor economically, industrially, and militarily. | ||
All three. This is unprecedented, what this administration is doing. | ||
That's a lot coming from you because, like you said, I know you have a long track record of working in this industry, in the private sector, but you also understand the public sector, too. | ||
And, of course, emboldening China, pushing them only closer towards Russia. | ||
Of course, Hunter Biden managed to get all of his deals in, whether it was Sinopec, YanCol, China National Nuclear Corporation. | ||
He got all of his money for these Chinese energy companies. | ||
And I'd be remiss to not mention, of course, Burisma and these Ukrainian energy conglomerates, too. | ||
I'm sure there's absolutely no conflict of interest going on there. | ||
Hang with me through the break. | ||
Like I said, I want to get in to what's going on in New York. | ||
Another pretty aptly named aspect of Eric Adams' mayoral office, the Office of Climate and Environmental Justice, wants to tell you that you need to eat less meat, otherwise the world's going to implode. | ||
Climate change is going to wreak havoc and destroy the world. | ||
But Dave is right. Believe it or not, the U.S. has actually seen five years' worth of clean energy investments in just nine months under the Biden regime. | ||
They're really jamming this stuff through. | ||
They want to change this country radically. | ||
We're here to stop them. | ||
Hang through. We've got a 90-second break. | ||
unidentified
|
break we'll be right back we got Dave Walsh on the other side. | |
Host Stephen K. Bann. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
It's my favorite time, my favorite part of the show where I get to tell you why you should use promo code WARROOM when you go to MyPillow. | ||
And I actually have a personal story. | ||
I was at a wonderful charity event for a group called Make 22 Zero Again. | ||
They help with veteran suicide and PTSD. And in their little goody bags that they gave out, they actually gave us MyPillow beach towels. | ||
They're very patriotic. | ||
They have stripes on them and an eagle. | ||
So I think they sell them on the website. | ||
But summer's coming, you should definitely pick up some MyPillow beach towels. | ||
I didn't even know that they made them, but they're really, really, really nice quality. | ||
Like I said, make sure you use promo code WARROOM if you're interested in looking pretty cool and patriotic and fighting for election integrity on the beach. | ||
That $787.5 million dollar sum that Fox just settled with Dominion for. | ||
I think Mike Lindell could probably use some of us to use the promo code WARROOM on my pillow. | ||
But Dave, before we let you go, I think you're still with us. | ||
I just wanted to, you know, again, this dovetails with what we talked about, right? | ||
The broader agenda. I know the World Economic Forum likes to call it the polycrises, that is climate change, that is this kind of, you know, social living through an eco perspective, prioritizing the environment and environmental justice. | ||
So, of course, when I see an article about how down in New York, the mayor's rolling out an initiative, not only among their state agencies to cut their emissions by like 25 to 30 percent, but Introducing a carbon footprint tracker on citizens in partnership with American Express, that to me, my spidey senses go off and say, this seems like the beginning stages of, albeit voluntary, eventually an involuntary social credit score type thing. | ||
I'll read you a direct quote from Adams. | ||
It is easy to talk about emissions that are coming from vehicles and how it impacts our carbon footprint. | ||
But now we have to talk about beef. | ||
I remember when me and you, people like us, were called conspiracy theorists for saying that they were coming for beef. | ||
But alas, we've been proven correct. | ||
Not getting too tired of that, especially when it comes to COVID origins. | ||
We've got Senator Marshall joining us after Dr. | ||
Wolf. But before I let you go, Dave, I'm just curious, what is your reaction to this kind of carbon footprint tracking going on in New York? | ||
Well, there are two. | ||
I mean, one, we're talking here, the mayor's talking about the secondary consequence on CO2 emissions of cow fertilizers and flatulence, cow flatulence effect on CO2 way downstream of when someone finally consumes the hamburger, not the hot dog, the beef sandwich, whatever. | ||
I mean, this is so insanely downstream, this whole theory of cow flatulence and fertilizer emissions from eating the food. | ||
So he's got this tied together. | ||
The more worrisome thing is the money center banks participating in tracking, and they did this on the January 6th event of traveling and now talking about participating in procurement, consumer procurement patterns relative to carbon emissions tracking. | ||
American Express, this is frightening. | ||
This shouldn't be happening. | ||
Dr. Wolf has talked about this ad nauseum on Big Pharma and the medical system being dominated by companies running the medical departments and government. | ||
You've got the same cross linkage in the SEC and the FDIC with money center banks who are highly regulated. | ||
Duke tend to crawl into bed heavily with those who highly regulate them and work very closely with what they want on things that are outside the boundaries of regulations That are about tracking folks, and they wind up working too closely in these kinds of things that are insidious and basically spying on the American people. | ||
I mean, I hate to hear that American Express would decide to be involved in something like this, but it sounds like they're involved. | ||
unidentified
|
It's unbelievable. Yeah, it's wild. | |
I remember when the Department of Homeland Security and CISA, the Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency, all the wonderful agencies that have been meddling in our social media platforms, and frankly, our elections, when they listed who was participating in their meetings, In terms of corporations, I remember J.P. Morgan, I think it was like their vice president, was one of the leading participants. | ||
And I think that shows you, that's kind of, again, the buried lead, the writing on the wall, where they want to go with all of this, the involvement of the financial institutions. | ||
Dave, where can people follow you and stay up to date with your work? | ||
They can find me on Getter and True Social, at DaveWalshEnergy. | ||
Thank you, Natalie. Thank you. | ||
Future Secretary of Energy right there. | ||
Just like the true origins of COVID. You heard that first. | ||
Here on War Room, I think we should have Dr. | ||
Wolf joining us down the line. | ||
I think we do. Maybe a little bit of a spotty connection. | ||
I'll blame it. I usually would say I'd blame it on the Chinese Communist Party, but with you, it's 50-50 between the Chinese Communist Party or Big Pharma. | ||
But speaking of the latter, speaking of Big Pharma, I hear you have some information With regard to how the vaccines from some midwives, about how it's impacting pregnant women. | ||
Can you kind of explain what you've uncovered? | ||
Yes. Yes, Natalie. | ||
And it's very disturbing. | ||
So as a journalist, I'm trained to notice when there's multiple independently confirming signals at the same time from different sources. | ||
And so I'm very disturbed to announce that I've now got two midwives in independent practices. | ||
One in Northern California in Sonora named Ellen Jasmer. | ||
She's a very experienced, distinguished, certified nurse midwife who's been helping women deliver since 1976. | ||
And I just heard from another one, Ruth Cummings, in Sacramento. | ||
And both of them are seeing the same things. | ||
And this, again, adds confirmation to an alert that Dr. | ||
James Thorpe brought forward recently. | ||
And he's the maternal fetal medicine specialist who showed, and I showed them on this show, an image of calcifications, like a netting of calcifications on the placenta of vaccinated moms. | ||
And we've talked in the past, Natalie, about how If you've got lipid nanoparticles traversing every membrane in the human body, they can also compromise the placenta. | ||
Well, I had a tragic interview with Ellen Jasmer, the nurse midwife further north in California, and she said that since 2020, she's been seeing Placentas, and I have photographs that she sent me that are so disturbing. | ||
It was quite an education because I'd never really seen a placenta. | ||
But normal healthy placentas, not to alarm everyone, but we've got to deal with this, are deep purple-maroon and kind of thick, and they're a home for a baby for nine months. | ||
These placentas, and she showed me the images, she's seeing silver-gray placentas. | ||
Some of them are shrunken. | ||
So not big enough to deliver a normal baby and many midwives are reporting that they have to deliver babies early because the placenta can't sustain a full-term baby. | ||
And she showed me an image of a placenta that was like two inches in circumference narrower, shorter, smaller than a normal placenta. | ||
And this confirms what Dr. | ||
Ryan Cole, I just learned, is also finding these shrunken placentas. | ||
But also Ellen Jasmer's images of placentas include What she calls COVID bumps or little white bumps all over them that are visible to the naked eye. | ||
And these are calcifications, she thinks. | ||
And they're also in vaccinated moms. | ||
So she's teasing out what are the impaired uteruses or placentas from vaccinated moms? | ||
What are the impaired uteruses from moms who have COVID? And is there a crossover? | ||
She doesn't yet have those data. | ||
But for sure, since the vaccines rolled out, She said she's seeing no normal placentas. | ||
I asked her to send me an image of a normal placenta post-2020, and she said she doesn't have any. | ||
They're all compromised. | ||
So she's concerned about shedding, compromising the placentas of unvaccinated moms. | ||
But the other horrible thing is that these placentas are flat. | ||
They're pancake-like. In other words, after they're removed from mom's body, After delivery, healthy normal placentas kind of maintain their shape in the sense that they're thick, they're, you know, a place that a baby can get nourished, as I mentioned, for nine months. These just flatten. | ||
They're like, they collapse. | ||
And the tiny blood vessels that bring nutrients to the baby are being impaired by these visible calcifications. | ||
And so Ruth Cummings said the same thing. | ||
She's seeing silver-gray. | ||
Placentas with these tiny white, not that tiny, you can see them in the slides, white dots all over them. | ||
So I guess the thing I also want to alert everyone to, so now that's four independent sources saying that vaccinated or kind of post-COVID vaccinated or possibly shed to, you know, post-2020 women's placentas are being impaired in these dramatic ways. | ||
Ellen Jasmer also said that babies often come out seeming okay and they go home and they get rushed to the hospital within a day because they are in respiratory distress and she's never seen that so frequently before. | ||
So the last thing I would say about all of this and it's so predictable and I'm so angry at Twitter and the CDC and The DHS and the White House, all of whom colluded to de-platform me when I tried to raise an alarm about this a year and a half ago with menstrual disorders, because all of this is so predictable. | ||
If women are having massive menstrual disorders, something's going to be wrong when they try to have a baby. | ||
But what we're seeing now is a 40 % rise in maternal deaths. | ||
And this is in the West, in North America and Western Europe. | ||
I had an in-depth discussion with Ellen Jasmer about what could be causing this and basically these impaired placentas and the blood clots that are also being seen in the placentas really return women to a kind of 19th century reality for giving birth in which you can die in childbirth and you can die from septicemia. | ||
She described the placentas not coming away easily. | ||
The attachments of the placenta to the woman's body, which in a healthy woman kind of very impressively detach when it's time to remove the placenta from the body, are not detaching properly. | ||
Hang with us through the break. | ||
We're coming up against the break. | ||
I want to talk about some new stunning figures coming out of the Israeli Ministry of Health, but I really think she proves it's a whole new meaning to America becoming a third world country because of forced vaccine mandates. | ||
You see young mothers and their babies getting sick. | ||
Hang with us. We'll be back in like 90 seconds. | ||
We'll have another bombshell report. | ||
unidentified
|
Stephen K. Bannon. | |
It's pretty absurd, the same shills and Big Pharma or the Democratic Party who want you to be able to kill your baby like two weeks after it's been born are also the same voices who are telling you COVID vaccines are great and they certainly don't affect any of your abilities to reproduce or have children. | ||
Don't mind if I don't trust them. | ||
I'm sure I'll get fact checked for saying that, but hey. | ||
I think that's a badge of honor. | ||
I think that's been established by now. | ||
I think we still should have Dr. | ||
Wolf down the line. | ||
Like I said, there's a pretty startling figure coming out of the Israeli Ministry of Health, which, as you've said, really sort of led the way, forged the path in terms of these COVID vaccines, but showing that just 0.2 % of infants and toddlers Thank God, have actually received the COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
Can you sort of walk us through this Daily Cloud report, what the significance is? | ||
Sure, and this is an independent journalist named Yafa Shiraz, who sounded the alarm very early on about menstrual disorders that women were having in Israel. | ||
Actually, she reported, so interesting, she reported on the Orthodox Jewish community there, because Orthodox Jewish women track their menstrual cycles more carefully for ritual reasons than secular women in some cases. | ||
And so she was seeing very early signs of horrors like women who were not vaccinated having agonizing menstrual cramps when they had intercourse with their husbands who were vaccinated. | ||
So the word is out in Israel. | ||
I'm not exactly sure how, but it seems like shows like yours have gotten through around the world. | ||
You know, Israel, which was the petri dish of experimentation for getting, for mandates, for the Green Pass, for getting populations mandated against their will, for enlisting religious leaders to, you know, insist that this was God's mission to get everyone vaccinated. | ||
They are rejecting this injection for their kids. | ||
And maybe it's because, you know, everyone knows that quote unquote COVID is over. | ||
Maybe it's because People have been exposed to enough alternative media, but it's a wonderful sign. | ||
I just wanted to switch gears for just a minute and note that I think that the report showing or confirming that or making the case that the COVID virus was a lab leak from a PLA-run lab in China and the fact that American women are having post-2020 horrific damage to their placentas and thus to their babies It's really the same story. | ||
I mean, you know, Natalie, that I see this as a bioweapon. | ||
And if you want to destroy your enemy, you know, how extraordinary to have an injection that makes it virtually impossible to reproduce safely. | ||
For many people, I should say. | ||
And the other thing I want to share is that, you know, consistently through the Pfizer documents, big picture, we've seen a 3 to 1 all the way to an 8 to 1 Um, ratio of damage of women to men. | ||
In other words, women are targeted in a multi-organ system way. | ||
Liver, kidney, anaphylaxis, stroke, and certainly the reproductive disorders that are Pfizer's own words are represented. | ||
16 % of the 72 % adverse events that are women are reproductive disorders in Pfizer's own words. | ||
I bring this up because the same people who brought us the vaccine, not just China, but big tech, you know, Zuckerberg is invested in the vaccine. | ||
Google invested in the vaccine. | ||
Twitter censored people who are critical of the vaccine and so on. | ||
The same people who invest in the vaccine are also invested in lab-grown breast milk and artificial wounds. | ||
MIT just ran a report that was thrilled about advances in artificial wounds. | ||
It's no longer science fiction to think one step ahead about what these monsters appear to be doing. | ||
You know, we've established that it's a war against humanity, but it seems very specifically from these reports from these independent midwives matched with who's behind all of this, matched with the report from the Senate about the lab leak. | ||
You know, this seems like, it seems perfectly plausible that part of the strategy is to impair women and replace The tech mind really likes to find things people do for free or very well without any intervention from technology and impair it or quote unquote disrupt it so that technological or digital gates that are managed by gatekeepers can be imposed. | ||
And for millennia, human beings have managed to have sex and have children, for the most part healthily, for free by themselves and I can see that a last frontier and I'm just putting pieces together you know I don't have a smoking gun except all this massively piling up evidence of disruption of normal human reproduction and the fact that these people are so invested in replacing normal human reproduction it is not beyond them to think well you know immune systems work fine for free You know, | ||
let's just impair the immune system and then make all this money. | ||
Well, you know, farmland works for free. | ||
Let's just, you know, be GMO seeds that are patented and sue farmers who try to grow their own food. | ||
It's the same logic that might say, and this is a hypothetical, well, women have been giving birth for free forever. | ||
That's a huge market. | ||
You know, let's create something that in the Pfizer documents, Natalie, The intentionality of the focus on they knew that conception was made more dangerous. | ||
They told vaccinated men not to have intercourse with women of childbearing age without two reliable contraceptives. | ||
They dissected the sex organs of male and female rats after intercourse. | ||
This is, you know, for a respiratory pathogen. | ||
It's abundantly clear that they were focused on disrupting human reproduction, or they knew it would happen and they didn't stop. | ||
So I'm just hypothesizing here, but all of these pieces indicate that they were, we know, perfectly fine ruining women as childbearing creatures. | ||
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting and I think making it so millions of young women can't reproduce or at least can't reproduce healthily certainly falls into that strategy of unrestricted warfare and like you said that Pretty bombshell COVID report. | ||
I think we should have Senator Marshall joining us semi soon. | ||
Really proves not just that the Chinese Communist Party knew about this in the early days, but that their initial reaction was to go for vaccine development, which is something that is historically and empirically pretty anomalous for the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
Right. Like you said, you know, Google was invested in the development of these vaccines. | ||
Well, Google is also funding bat research in China being conducted by EcoHealth Alliance, that same shady nonprofit that was getting money from Fauci. | ||
I always say if the same people who are creating the cures to these pandemics are also the ones doing the pandemic prevention research, That's a conflict of interest, really to the T. Dr. | ||
Wolfe, where can people follow you and stay up to date with what you're working on? | ||
Thank you. Well, people should know that they can pre-order the Pfizer Documents book, which has all of this horrific expose of the greatest crime against humanity ever. | ||
We've sold out four times now, but you can go to dailycloud.io and sign up. | ||
to pre-order and get the next printing, which should be out in about nine days. | ||
So please do that because we need to get the word out about these crimes. | ||
And otherwise you can find me on Substack, Naomi R. Wolfe, on Getter, Dr. | ||
Naomi R. Wolfe, and on Twitter, Naomi R. Wolfe, in here. | ||
Thank you so much for joining me. | ||
Thank you, Natalie. While we wait for Senator Marshall to get up, I think we have Dr. | ||
Darren Beattie down the line. | ||
Now, we might have to go to Senator Marshall real quick. | ||
So before we get into the good stuff, I'm sure you'll want to whip out your pom-poms for Elon, breaking news. | ||
But can you tease a little bit what you're working on with the Jan 6 piece that is, I don't know if it dropped yet, but if it's dropping tomorrow, what you're working on over at Revolver.News? | ||
Absolutely. It's fantastic to be here, especially with you as the host, which is a rare treat for me. | ||
So I'm very honored to be here in that context as well. | ||
And yes, you're absolutely right. | ||
We have another really big, really important January 6 piece. | ||
I really wanted to have it ready now. | ||
It will be ready by tomorrow morning, maybe tomorrow afternoon at the latest. | ||
It's a piece about a very important whistleblower of January 6, who has received the full weight and political force that the regime brings to bear on whistleblowers, which is a hot thing in the news these days. | ||
It's not just Julian Assange. | ||
Now we have the so-called leaker of these documents revealing that the Ukraine war is not going exactly the way that they told us. | ||
All of the fake news, quote unquote, professionals in the New York Times and other places who make a living off of saying, oh, we need to protect Daniel Ellsberg and these other whistleblowers in the Vietnam era and so forth. | ||
Now, all of a sudden, they've got their pitchfork out and want to basically give the death penalty to this guy who exposed the truth about what a scam the Ukraine situation is. | ||
It's not a good terrain for whistleblowers these days. | ||
There's been a whistleblower called Jeremy Brown who's recently sentenced to over seven years in prison. | ||
So we tell some explosive details about his case, what he did, what he exposed, and what he's had to endure. | ||
So it's going to be a major piece coming out very soon. | ||
I think the most cushy job in the world would probably be being part of the democratic apparatus and being one of these whistleblowers, whether it was the Facebook one, the impeachment witnesses. | ||
They have a pretty nice setup. | ||
Compare, juxtapose that with how whistleblowers on our side get treated. | ||
Like you said, they probably get the death penalty. | ||
Or at least, unfortunately, that's what seems to be the case, or at least a prison sentence. | ||
I think we may have Senator Marshall joining us, but in the meantime, I could be wrong on that. | ||
We've got a few minutes before we have to go to break, but I think we have Senator Marshall up. | ||
Hi, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
We will get back to Darren in a sec, but while we have you, of course, no surprise what I want to talk to you about, this bombshell. | ||
Usually I say bombshell just because there's one bombshell in it, but in this case I think you very specifically have two bombshells, that is, two lab leaks that you think likely occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
If you could just sort of give us a general overview of this report, and then I would love to get in to sort of the actions of the Chinese Communist Party during this now time period with what constitutes the early days of the pandemic, which your report sort of blows a hole through the mainstream narrative on that. | ||
unidentified
|
Right, Natalie. So what this report says is there's a preponderance of evidence that there were two lab leaks, two unintentional lab leaks from Wuhan, China. | |
The first one probably the September 2019 timeframe, and then the second one probably in the November 2019 timeframe. | ||
when they were working on a vaccine. | ||
And the second, really, I think the second bombshell is to say that there's significant evidence to show that this virus was actually made in that laboratory as well. | ||
And then this report totally takes down the concept that this could have came from a natural spillover event. | ||
So it definitely, two lab leaks. | ||
The preponderance of evidence supports that. | ||
This was being funded with U.S. tax dollars for years. | ||
In addition to the money, we taught them how to do this. | ||
We showed them. We gave them the technology. | ||
We gave them the humanized mice that were developed in North Carolina. | ||
We gave those as well to do these same experiments. | ||
So we got about a minute before we have to run to break, so I will tee up my question. | ||
Because as someone who has reported on this extensively, it's no secret that there really is military civil fusion right over in China, right? | ||
Any research that they're doing for civilian purposes is intricately linked to the military. | ||
So I know this report stopped short of calling COVID a bioweapon necessarily. | ||
Right? But when you say that it wasn't intentionally released, do you think the type of research that they were conducting that led to either an unintentional or intentional release, do you think that that research was altruistic in its purposes, right? | ||
Was it about preventing pandemics or was it in the realm of bioweapon research, gain of function type research? | ||
Like I said, we got to jump to break, but I really want to get your answer on that. | ||
And of course, What Anthony Fauci has to answer for, what payment, what, really, accountability looks like from the American counterparts who enabled China to unleash this virus. | ||
unidentified
|
Hang in there. We'll be right back with Senator Roger Marshall. | |
The new social media taking on big tech, protecting free speech, And canceling cancel culture. | ||
Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
Superior technology. | ||
No more selling your personal data. | ||
No more censorship. | ||
No more cancel culture. | ||
Enough. Getter has arrived. | ||
It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
Download now. | ||
If there's anything that COVID proves, it's that you certainly should not trust the federal government and how they spend your taxpayer dollars. | ||
They think sending it to Chinese military labs in Wuhan is a good idea. | ||
So you certainly shouldn't trust them, what they plan to do with the economy. | ||
That's why you should go to birchgold.com and, uh, sorry, birchgold.com slash bannon. | ||
to check out all the wonderful resources that they have. | ||
The end of the dollar empire. | ||
Get informed. Get educated. | ||
Make your own decisions. Certainly don't trust MSNBC, let alone Joe Biden when it comes to what you're gonna do with your personal finances. | ||
But now that we've gotten that out of the way, I think we still have Senator Marshall down the line. | ||
Like I said before we went to break, your take on whether or not the Chinese Communist Party was engaging in bioweapon, which is a very loaded term, I'm aware, but bioweapon research. | ||
unidentified
|
Right, Natalie. So certainly all the evidence for COVID-19 says that this was an unintentional lab leak. | |
But to your point, China themselves considers bioweapons as a national security threat to them. | ||
And just like they're responding to nuclear threats, they are also responding to bioterrorism threats. | ||
So they're developing counter methods, counter measures, as well as offensive measures as well. | ||
So indeed, there's no doubt that they are indeed developing bioterrorism type of weapons. | ||
There's no doubt about that. | ||
And to your point earlier, it's not like in the United States where we have the CDC over in one laboratory and our military laboratories in another state. | ||
This report documents exactly how, folks, the scientists from the PLA are interacting with Dr. | ||
Xi, and the scientists from the CCP are interacting with them as well, sharing the information. | ||
And again, your listeners need to understand that the goal of China and the Trinity Challenge that they're leading is to come up and harvest the DNA from every human, every plant, every animal in the world. | ||
And just like nuclear energy, there's great things you can do with that, and there's also some really bad things you can do with it. | ||
Maybe they're going to help us to find a cure for Alzheimer's at the same thing they could develop vaccines that they could vaccinate their own animals with, but a virus that might hurt American animals. | ||
So, indeed, they're engaged in developing bioterrorism weapons. | ||
There's no doubt about that. | ||
I would certainly bet on American scientific innovation over the Chinese Communist Party any day, and I'm sure that's a position that you would share with me. | ||
We got a few minutes left before, unfortunately, I have to let you go. | ||
But if you can just talk about, again, we know all the elites want pandemic amnesty, but I'm sure you and your colleagues want accountability, as do the American people. | ||
So what exactly does accountability look like here in this country, not just focusing on the Chinese Communist Party, but for officials? | ||
Like, of course, the infamous Anthony Fauci. | ||
What are you guys working on in the Senate to make sure that those people face, really, the fire for their actions? | ||
unidentified
|
Right. So Natalie, most importantly, I want to make sure that this never happens again. | |
There's not a listener on your show right now that doesn't have a loved one that was impacted by this. | ||
So I'm focusing on what legislation we should be passing to get our arms around Let's get our own house in order like you're talking about. | ||
EcoHealth is an NGO agency that received $150 million from 10 different government agencies to fund research in Wuhan, China. | ||
Viral gain-of-function research at that. | ||
I would ask you, why is the United States, AID, the Agency for International Development, spending American dollars on viral gain-of-function research? | ||
So we need to get our arms around this research grant process we have here. | ||
Dr. Fauci was overseeing six billion dollars a year and then he would leverage that with say the Clinton Foundation money or Gates Foundation monies as well. | ||
There's significant conflicts of interest. | ||
We need to stop all viral gain of functional research until we really have our arms wrapped around that as well. | ||
So let's clean up our own house first of all and certainly let's stop funding Any type of research with China right now until, well, I think that they're on the naughty list, as we say here back in Kansas. | ||
So I think that we should be stopped doing research with any type of country of concern, including China right now. | ||
And speaking of cleaning our own house, particularly our southern border, I know you just introduced a resolution. | ||
We only got a few minutes, but can you walk through for the War Room audience what you did? | ||
Mayorkas is certainly someone that the War Room Posse does not like, but it seems like you're taking the steps to, again, hold him accountable for his dereliction of duty down on the southern border. | ||
unidentified
|
Right. So you nailed it. | |
So Secretary Mayorkas is derelict in his duties. | ||
He is charged with keeping the border secure. | ||
So we've introduced this resolution of no confidence. | ||
Now we cannot start an impeachment hearing on the Senate side. | ||
That has to start on the House side. | ||
But we will do some type of unanimous consent process where we bring this resolution to the floor and people can vote it up or down one way or the other. | ||
And I hope that this will give some confidence over on the House side. | ||
I think that people's concerns today are about inflation, the cost of gas and groceries. | ||
But right beside that is just the concern about the safety and security of your own families. | ||
Just curious, right now, if the Senate held a vote whether to convict or not Senator Mayorkas, do you think he would be convicted if he were impeached by the House? | ||
unidentified
|
You know, I think that's a tough one to predict. | |
Remember, the Democrats controlled the Senate. | ||
This is what America gave us. | ||
They gave us a Democrat-controlled Senate and a Democrat-controlled White House, and then this is what we get. | ||
We get 300 Americans dying every day from fentanyl poisoning. | ||
There's 400,000 terrorists I'm sorry, 400,000 people that have been convicted of crimes that are aliens that are in this country right now that need to be removed. | ||
So all those things are going on. | ||
To get 51 votes in the Senate is going to be pretty tough, though, on this issue. | ||
Of course. Senator, thank you so, so, so much for joining us. | ||
Really, it's an honor. You really are a fighter. | ||
And I know sometimes just because you're a Republican doesn't always mean you have a backbone, but it seems like you certainly do. | ||
Thank you for fighting on these issues, whether it's COVID or immigration. | ||
Where can the War Room audience support you? | ||
Where can they follow you and your work and help you get the truth out there? | ||
unidentified
|
Right, so I would just start with marshall.senate.gov, our website. | |
We have a timeline videotape on there that your folks may be interested in on as well. | ||
And of course, we're on Twitter and Instagram as well. | ||
So marshall.senate.gov. | ||
Thanks so much. Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
You bet. Well, I can't believe it. | ||
We've got about 40 seconds left until the show's over. | ||
It's a pretty packed show. I know we got cut short with Darren, but I'm sure he'll be back on the show tomorrow to break down his wonderful scoop, which we'll be dropping on Revolver.News. | ||
Like you said, it's about J6 and whistleblowers. | ||
But in the meantime, we've got Battleground. | ||
Make sure you go to Frank's speech or the War Room Getter feed. | ||
to catch up with another hour of War Room. | ||
I won't be hosting it, but Steve will be back tomorrow morning hosting the show. | ||
I'm sure there'll be a whole another news cycle breaking. | ||
It's really wild times here in the War Room. | ||
But thank you so much for joining me. | ||
I'll be back tomorrow evening hosting the 5 p.m. |