Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
MAGA Media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
I would not call a geo-whistleblower in the slightest. | ||
I don't think that there was a goal nor some sort of accomplishment that he was looking for in sharing these documents. | ||
Of course, there's some anti-government sentiment, but that's not unlike most right-wingers in the modern day and age. | ||
OG was not hostile to the U.S. government. | ||
However, he had disagreed with several occasions such as Waco and Ruby Ridge and thought that the government is overreaching in several aspects. | ||
There was no heavy Snowden like conspiracy here like some people may believe People were reading them, and they were not commenting on them They were just sitting there. I want to keep OG's identity secret because I still care for him like he's a family member. | ||
He is not a Russian operative. | ||
He's not a Ukrainian operative. | ||
I'll go as far to say he's not even on the east side of the world. | ||
Any claims that he is a Russian operative or pro-Russian is categorically false. | ||
He is not interested in helping any foreign agencies with their attack on the U.S. or other countries. | ||
He was a young, charismatic man who loved nature, God, who loved shooting guns and racing cars. | ||
He did have sort of a bossy attitude at some points, but it was more of a fatherly bossy. | ||
He did see himself as the leader of this group, and ultimately he was the leader of this group. | ||
And he wanted us all to be sort of super soldiers to some degree. | ||
Informed, fit with God, well armed, stuff like that. | ||
It would appear as if he sort of grew angry with the fact that only one or two people were paying attention to these documents that he was pouring his heart out into. | ||
And as a sign of just anger, he just decided to post the full documents. | ||
He was a very smart man. | ||
There's no way in any world that he would not know that he knew that these were illegal. | ||
Any leak of highly classified information is going to damage our national security, particularly Impacting on the sources of that intelligence. | ||
These are sources that put their lives on the line in order to gather intelligence, and they're now vulnerable. | ||
But secondly, this is also timely intelligence. | ||
It deals with information over the last two months on the strengths and weaknesses of both Russia and Ukraine. | ||
So there's no question that it's going to impact on the military decisions that are going to be made in these next few weeks. | ||
Does it strike you as odd? | ||
Even though, as you correctly say, we don't know the who's, the how's, etc. | ||
But that itself is pretty strange, isn't it? | ||
I mean, you knew almost immediately when WikiLeaks happened, and that was the last big dump of real-time intelligence. | ||
You know, almost immediately after the Snowden, it was different, but those leaks as well. | ||
Are you surprised that they're surprised and caught unawares? | ||
Well, this is information that appeared on a social media app. | ||
I think Discord is the name of it. | ||
And you would think that we would be able to have the forensics to determine exactly how this leak occurred. | ||
I'm sure that the Pentagon, the Justice Department, and the FBI are applying as many resources as possible because, frankly, we don't know whether or not there's additional information out there. | ||
And if there's more to come, this could be particularly damaging. | ||
Not only with regards to what happens in Ukraine and the decisions that are made there, but also the impact that it has on our allies. | ||
We've already had to explain this intelligence to South Korea, to Israel, to the UAE and to others that are involved. | ||
So there could be even more damage to come if we don't plug this leak as soon as possible. | ||
Okay, Thursday, 13 April, Year of the Lord, 2023. | ||
We are absolutely jammed today on so much important stuff. | ||
I've got up on my getter, if you go there now, a chart that shows you, and of course the Mac Daddy on Drudge last night was about, we are adding another trillion dollars to the deficit. | ||
You heard Matt Gaetz on here yesterday talking about this kind of dissension inside the Republican ranks to even get their hands around a budget. | ||
We're running right now at another trillion dollar additional deficit This year, if things don't radically change, we're going to get to all the economics, capital markets, how it's going to impact your life. | ||
We've got the World Health Organization we're going to get into. | ||
Dave Brat's going to be here. | ||
There's a lot that we're going to go to the border. | ||
Explosive footage happening right now outside of El Paso in Juarez. | ||
We'll show you all that. I want to go to Kash Patel first. | ||
Kash, look, you will be at least CIA director. | ||
In the second Trump term, if not SECDF or whatever, you can pick and choose your billet given how highly the president thinks of your judgment. | ||
There's a couple of confusing things going on here, and I wanted to get you on here today to explain to people. | ||
Because Cash, we'll talk about his book in a second, Government Gangsters. | ||
The book, Cash, and I'm going to break some news here. | ||
He said the other day, but I think this week he's going to drop a federal lawsuit because the administrative state slash in their rogue element, the deep state, because the administrative state's not rogue because they run the show. | ||
They don't need to be rogue. They run the show. | ||
The deep state is the rogue element, which it's all bad. | ||
It's all going to be deconstructed and gotten rid of, but they're not letting Cash's book out because Cash names names. | ||
Cash, I want to bifurcate this. | ||
Actually, I want to triage. | ||
I want to do it in pieces. Number one, this information has been on Discord or 4chan, and you've got 16-year-old kids that some guy gave it to them so they would know. | ||
They would be up to speed on world events because they're gamers. | ||
But it's been up on these sites for two or three months, number one. | ||
Number two, it is how did this even happen given the classification? | ||
They're saying this guy's from some base somewhere. | ||
And number three, then I want to talk about the content of it and the implication because that's what they're trying to spin away from. | ||
They're trying to spin away from, this is like the Pentagon Papers as far as content goes, about direct lies they're telling you to your face, and the reality, what they're telling each other is totally different. | ||
So first off, how did this get, how has this been up on these 4chan, Discord? | ||
For people to know, these are all these kind of apparatuses that are out there that people are gamers or people that talk, and eventually they saw it and went up on Telegram, which I think Telegram, as strong as it is, I think it's Russian entrepreneurs living out of Dubai that finance it. | ||
It's a very powerful site, but it's a little sketchy. | ||
What's going on? How is this up for months? | ||
And people, we pay a trillion dollars for this thing, for the apparatus. | ||
How did they not know that? | ||
How did this not get known until like 10 days ago, sir? | ||
Great to be with you, Steve. And look, this is an unfortunate example in the intelligence community. | ||
Our United States government is being schooled by school children. | ||
Literally, teenagers and teenyboppers are running around with the most classified intelligence that we collect, and our United States government is two months behind the football. | ||
Look, I've said this before. | ||
This is going to be the largest disclosure since, what's his name, Julian Assange and company. | ||
And our United States government, we're going to find out the administrative state has been lying to us. | ||
I think they knew. I think they knew this happened before four weeks ago. | ||
And then they spent the last two weeks trying to cover up their tracks saying, oh, it's actually doctored information. | ||
It's not really classified. | ||
What happens a week later? Oh, it is classified. | ||
Not only is it classified, it's the most sensitive information we have. | ||
War document planning, operational planning, strategic relationships with Mossad. | ||
This intelligence isn't held by a random dude on some military base. | ||
It's only accessible to the highest forms of government. | ||
It's shocking to me but not surprising that they go to the New York Times and Washington Post to run their cover-up because they have failed to contain this leak. | ||
John Kirby says they don't know how bad it is. | ||
Secretary Austin says I don't know when asked about the leak. | ||
Millie, here's the kicker, has said nothing. | ||
Why is this guy silent about a DOD leak, which proves one thing, Steve. | ||
It proves one thing, that what you and I have been saying about the US funding the Ukrainian war effort to a tune of $110 billion is failing. | ||
unidentified
|
These documents show that directly. | |
Okay, a couple things. The only thing out of Milley, by the way, these are JCS. A lot of these are for the joint staff, to the chairman, joint chiefs of staff. | ||
Only thing he's announced is his retirement, right? | ||
He's out. He's leaving. | ||
I'm sure it's unrelated. | ||
There are no coincidences. | ||
But Cash, I want to go back. | ||
These are just not top secret. | ||
They're top secret compartmented. | ||
That means when you compartment something, it's a very small slither of people in that segment. | ||
How possibly, brother, given the compartmented nature of two-thirds of these slides, are they trying to say that some gun nut, anti-Semite, white nationalist, white supremacist, that's where they're going, giving this to teenagers on this gaming site? | ||
That works at some base. | ||
How can he possibly have access to things that are the top secrets we have compartmented that go only to a small group of the inner sanctum over at the Pentagon and maybe a couple of other places in NSC, sir? He shouldn't. | ||
And if he does, that's a whole other issue. | ||
But it's preposterous to believe that some low-level nub had access to what you're talking about, code word, classified information. | ||
It's so sensitive, there's a reason that's that sensitive, that the people that have access to it is a very minute number. | ||
And as I was saying, it's not some random guy on a military base. | ||
And look, here's the bigger issue. | ||
This guy didn't just leak this. | ||
Let's say this reporting is accurate. | ||
They have been planning this for months and months and months. | ||
Forget the fact that our United States government intelligence community failed to stop him and shut him down and find out when it happened. | ||
Now they're playing catch up. | ||
But this guy has been at it for a long time. | ||
He just disclosed something this morning. | ||
And I think the disclosures are going to continue to come. | ||
But they want to label him some sort of right wing gun toting Trump guy. | ||
So when the full story comes out, they can say Trump broke the intelligence industry. | ||
That's the false narrative. | ||
The problem is the Biden administration has been lying to the world about the success of the Ukrainian war effort funded by the American government while Brad Paisley and a bunch of bozos are over in Kiev kissing what's-his-name's ring. | ||
And in reality, we have been losing the war effort, Russia has been winning, and the United States government has been lying to the world about our tax dollars. | ||
This is why it's bigger than the Pentagon Papers and bigger than the Afghanistan Papers that Washington Post did that showed the 20 years of life in Afghanistan. | ||
Number one, they say internally the air defense in Ukraine is gone, shot. | ||
Number two, the ammo situation that we're going to be 10 years behind on ammo if we keep supplying these guys and not have enough for Taiwan. | ||
Number three is the hard numbers and the casualties. | ||
There's 70,000 Ukrainian combat troops dead, only 16,000 Russians. | ||
Number four is the spring offensive. | ||
They actually say in there there's no chance the spring offensive is all a nothing burger. | ||
And still the most explosive of all those, including the war dead, they say that if we happened, and there's a lot of people pushing, if we gave them long-range missiles or interim-range missiles, that Zelensky no doubt the first thing to do, yeah, thank you, boom, he's going to start dropping them inside of Russia. | ||
The disclosures on Ukraine show the triumphalist narrative you hear in the media all day long, Cash, is a stone-cold, bald-face, in-your-face lie, sir. | ||
Absolutely. And as bad as the disclosures are and what they undercut and show the Biden administration's lies, Steve, you gotta pause and ask yourself, why did the New York Times first report this? | ||
Why does the Washington Post have a toddler on TV talking about a complex intelligence operation? | ||
Because make no mistake about it, when you disclose classified information this sensitive, It is an actual operation that's been planned. | ||
They go to specific chat rooms. | ||
And how did the Washington Post find this source and his teenage buddy? | ||
It is not a random coincidence. | ||
There are no coincidences. | ||
These guys are laying the tracks like they did during Russiagate and Jancic and everything else when they know the Biden administration and their narrative is totally false and complete lies. | ||
And they are looking to pin this blame on someone. | ||
And it will be the irony of ironies to watch this people now say, we are vigorously chasing down the leaks and the disclosures and the Department of Justice and Merrick Garland won't rest until they find him. | ||
They don't care. | ||
They just want to win the political narrative. | ||
And that's why nobody has faith in this evil. | ||
It's all performative. Cash, hang on. | ||
I got a lot of stuff on the legal front. | ||
I get it. You're with Mark Elias. | ||
The hearing that's going to take place on Monday about Bragg. | ||
There's a lot going on. We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
Return. We got Kerry Sheffield. | ||
We have Reggie Littlejohn. | ||
We got Dave Brat. We're going to chop a lot of wood here in the first hour. | ||
So strap in. You're in the war room. | ||
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
Let's take down the CCP. Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | ||
Oh my God. | ||
From the pages of the Wall Street Journal, I haven't had a chance to go through my paper this morning, but Rahim Kassam... | ||
Puts it up on Twitter, Karl Rove hedges his bets. | ||
It's a Wall Street Journal article, opinion piece by Karl Rove, saying that there's still time for Ron DeSantis to up his game. | ||
No, it's not. The game's the game, bro. | ||
Anyway, we'll talk about this later, but breaking news. | ||
Karl Rove, Ken Griffin's the puppet master. | ||
Ken Griffin had given $500 million to Harvard. | ||
And have the, what, the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, $300 million yesterday. | ||
Give them $200 million up to the $300 million yesterday. | ||
This is Ron DeSantis' guy. | ||
The guy gives Ron DeSantis all the money with all the other oligarchs. | ||
By the way, he did it so his two kids would get in. | ||
That's what you need to do today to get your kids into Harvard. | ||
Don't hit them with $100,000. | ||
They yawn. They, like, send it back. | ||
Not interested. $300 million. | ||
Karl Rove is the chief strategist. | ||
Karl Rove's the guy. It's a failure to launch. | ||
It's an obvious failure to launch. | ||
You can tell that, as we've said. | ||
And we think very highly of Governor DeSantis. | ||
2028, right around the corner. | ||
Do your job in Florida. | ||
Be a great governor. And we'll see you after President Trump's second term. | ||
Cash, real quickly, the book. | ||
The audience, War Room Posse sitting there going, government gangsters, Kash Patel, I got it. | ||
In fact, I'm giving it out for Mother's Day. | ||
I'm giving it out for Father's Day. | ||
I want everybody to read it because Kash names names as only Kash Patel can do. | ||
Why is this book not out yet, sir? | ||
It's simple because we talk about the things like intelligence community leaks and failures and propaganda and how it happens and who the deep state culprits are and we name them. | ||
Look, this DOD has sent this book out to review to more agencies and departments than any other book in modern history. | ||
That's required from a former government employee perspective. | ||
And it's now four-plus months. | ||
We're filing a federal lawsuit. | ||
We're going to take them to federal court. | ||
You can get a pre-sale copy now, but there's got to be a reason, Steve. | ||
They don't want government gangsters out there. | ||
Go to governmentgangsters.com. | ||
Okay, okay, okay. Go right now to the pre-order, but here's the thing. | ||
Even the redacted version, send me the PDF and Warren Books will print it tomorrow. | ||
I'm not kidding you. I'm going to federal prison anyway. | ||
So just tack a little something on the back end. | ||
Screw them. You can't just get in their face. | ||
This book's coming out. | ||
I'm not taking a knee. | ||
And Cash Patel is officially considering Steve Bannon's office. | ||
But I don't want to redact it. | ||
Yeah, your book's going to come out, but I'm going to turn pages. | ||
Everything's going to be redacted. | ||
It's going to be like a black thing. | ||
They're going to redact all the good stuff. | ||
All the good stuff. | ||
Anyway, okay, cash is on point on the government gangsters. | ||
There's a hearing. | ||
First off, they're not reporting this. | ||
The blowhard flopped sweat on a big old head of his. | ||
Alvin Bragg, a federal judge, said, nah, no TRO, this thing's going to roll. | ||
You can come to court on, let me check my calendar, oh, the 19th. | ||
Which is after the hearing next week. | ||
I know. I love it. | ||
So suck on that, Alvin Bragg. | ||
This hearing is going to take place on Monday. | ||
You've got Stefanik. You've got Gates. | ||
You've got the same roadshow that went down to... | ||
Yuma, and had that great hearing on judiciary. | ||
They're in Bragg's Grill right now, and I'm hearing they're calling witnesses from all over, of all of Bragg's group, including the individual that was at the bodega, and the guy came with a knife to kill him. | ||
Of course, he let him have some lead. | ||
The guy went to his just rewards, and our hero had to flee to somewhere. | ||
He's going to testify. This thing's going to be explosive on Monday. | ||
unidentified
|
Give me your assessment. I can't wait for the hearing. | |
Look, the federal judge got it right because it's a completely bogus charade that Alvin Bragg filed a federal lawsuit to quash a congressional subpoena, essentially. | ||
Remember the January 6th committee? | ||
They taught the world the power of congressional subpoena. | ||
You know it. I know it as the first guy subpoenaed by those clowns. | ||
And now let's make sure we utilize that power. | ||
But here's the advice I have for our great members of Congress. | ||
Don't make it a roadshow. | ||
Get him on the hot seat and get him to admit exactly how much money and where it came from in the federal government to falsely prosecute Donald Trump. | ||
Then ask him about all his communication between the DOJ, FBI and federal law enforcement agencies. | ||
Then ask him about all the advisors and political consultants and DNC hacks he hired and spoke to. | ||
Get his text messages, get his communications, subpoena everything and then release it to the world. | ||
I don't really care what Alvin Bragg has to say. | ||
He's just going to sit there. | ||
He might not even show up, Steve. | ||
Let's be real about this. | ||
But we've got to get the documents. | ||
We've got to get the receipts. | ||
So our team needs to be honed in. | ||
The pincer move, whether it's Macalangelo and it's to tie it back, hardwired. | ||
See how it's hardwired because it is back to justice with Merrick Garland and then hardwired back to the White House counsel's office, Susan Rice. | ||
In the Oval Office. And you've got Stephen Miller on the Mar-a-Lago situation, the special access, Biden having to sign off. | ||
You've got Miller and those guys coming from the Mar-a-Lago situation. | ||
You've got Jordan and these guys coming from the Matt Colangelo situation, Mike Davis. | ||
The railhead of all of it is to tie it back to the hardwired, back to where it's hardwired. | ||
That is Merrick Garland in that inner circle of secular Marxist, atheist people. | ||
That want to destroy the Catholic Church, want to destroy the Right to Life movement, all that. | ||
That is our purpose. | ||
Our mission and our purpose in that is to do that, correct, Kash Patel? | ||
Absolutely, because they have been saying and lying for years that the Justice Department and the White House does not interfere with the judicial system. | ||
Not only do they rig elections and interfere with the federal judicial system, but now the state court system to rig elections. | ||
And we called them out long before The documents and the great work Stephen Miller's doing that the Biden White House was directly tied to Garland because we walked you through it. | ||
Of course the White House counsel's office talked to DOJ because the White House counsel's office needed to go to Joe Biden to waive presidential privilege for the prosecution to proceed, which means it could only have come from Joe Biden. | ||
So the way we win here is we show America what actually happened, that this uniform system of justice has become a two-tier system of justice. | ||
Run by government gangsters and it goes all the way to the top. | ||
Remember they accused President Trump of sort of puppeting the DOJ, which he never did. | ||
But these guys are actually doing it and we have to use the Alvin Bragg case to show it. | ||
Why do you think Alvin Bragg is so terrified? | ||
I promise you we're gonna see communications between him and DOJ and federal authorities and the White House counsel's office directly linking them to what? | ||
A criminal investigation of a political opponent. | ||
That is why third world republics are laughing at our judicial system. | ||
Okay. By the way, Elise Stefanik, they're trying to wave her into this because it's New York City. | ||
That's her turf. She was on the first impeachment. | ||
The Democrats trying to get Goldman on the former prosecutor, the Levi Strauss heir. | ||
This is going to be showtime. | ||
Gates is now going to go up. | ||
This is going to be big time, so we're going to figure out how we're going to cover it, but that's Monday. | ||
Before I let you go, Mark Elias. | ||
You have fought with Mark Elias for years. | ||
He is as bad a guy as they got. | ||
He's essentially a criminal. | ||
You know that. However, he's changed the direction of American history. | ||
I want to get him hired immediately for Team Trump. | ||
Give us your thumbnail, because you've probably gone head-to-head with him more than any one person. | ||
Tell us about Mark Elias, what a scumbag he is, and why we want him to be our scumbag. | ||
Remember, Mark Elias, the former partner at Perkins Coie, the DNC money laundering law firm that paid for the Steele dossier with illegal funds from campaign donations via Hillary Clinton. | ||
Mark Elias quarterbacked that. | ||
Mark Elias went out and bought the Steele dossier through Fusion GPS and made sure the money was clean. | ||
I deposed Mark Elias. | ||
Mark Elias was representing people during Russiagate. | ||
We turned him into a fact witness because he hid material from us, and then we deposed him. | ||
But this, Steve, just goes to show how brilliant your tactical move is here. | ||
He is the enemy of the Republican Party because he always finds a way to win in state court and federal court on election matters, and he has been doing it like a machine for the last decade. | ||
So if you want someone who's that talented and that good, there's only one guy, and I hate to say it, it's Mark Elias. | ||
And if we can somehow get him on the team, of course he's never going to come over. | ||
But that would be something we don't have. | ||
I don't know. Don't say that. | ||
It's all about money. It's all about money. | ||
We'll make a bid. | ||
We'll bid him away. | ||
Hey, let's be honest. | ||
This was the most. They not just kicked him to the curb. | ||
They humiliated him. They said, yeah, you know, boom, no more association, you're out, and no explanation, you've done a great job, you know, spend more time with the family. | ||
It was just, you're cut loose. | ||
If they're going to humiliate the guy, and he's a total scumbag, I'm not saying he's not, but he's won everywhere. | ||
Donald J. Trump is not in the White House today because of what Mark Elias did in early 2020 on the mail-in ballots, on the signature verifications, on all of it, at the state, in Pennsylvania, all over the place. | ||
We went out there. | ||
They're the ones that published The transition integrity project that Raheem and Bill McGinley and myself would give the tour starting in July and August. | ||
Raheem found it, broke it down. | ||
That was all Mark Elias. They had already worked through the transition. | ||
They said Trump's going to win by a landslide on Election Day, but just wait. | ||
By 11 o'clock at night, he'll be winning in a landslide. | ||
But give us two weeks to get all the non-signature verified phony mail-in ballots And he said in two weeks, Biden will win. | ||
They laid it out. They laid that out in July. | ||
That's all Mark Elias. | ||
Mark Elias. He's an evil genius. | ||
Go ahead, sir. He did it everywhere. | ||
He did it in Arizona. He did it out in Nevada. | ||
And people just sat back and watched in the Republican machine. | ||
And we don't have a Mark Elias. | ||
And I don't know where we're going to get one, but we need one. | ||
He's a terrorist. He's a terrible person. | ||
Hey, go check the revolutionary generation. | ||
There are a couple of three pretty shady characters in that deal, okay? | ||
There are a couple of three pretty shady characters. | ||
I don't want to mention Sam Adams and some other guys, right? | ||
The smugglers. There's some pretty shady guys that fought for freedom that you might want to not take home and have them to dinner because you'd have to count the silver afterwards. | ||
Kash Patel, how do people get to you in all your writing, sir? | ||
At Cash on Truth Social, at Cash on Truth Social, KSH, and thecashfoundation.com, thecashfoundation.com. | ||
That's a charitable organization. | ||
Political views are my own, but come out, join the army. | ||
We're helping whistleblowers that you're seeing in the live stream every day. | ||
We're helping children. | ||
We're helping vets. We're doing a whole bunch of fun stuff. | ||
Check out the Cash Foundation and join us if you want, and I'll be pounding on Truth Social all day. | ||
And you're going to get us the copy of the federal lawsuit when you go in to get the book free up, right? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. Government gangsters, baby. | |
Cash. Thank you, brother. | ||
Thanks, brother. Thomas Payne. | ||
Sam Adams. You can throw a little John Hancock in there. | ||
It takes a lot of different types to win, okay? | ||
They don't have to be angels. | ||
We're not trying to elect saints here. | ||
Saints are in the church, the martyrs. | ||
Mark Elias, super bad guy. | ||
I want a couple of three of those on our team. | ||
Short break. Kerry Sheffield, Reggie Littlejohn next. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
Okay, um, you need to be highly energized to man the ramparts. | ||
How are you going to do that? One way is to make sure you get a great night's sleep. | ||
You're not going to get a lot of hours of sleep, but you've got to maximize each hour. | ||
How do you do that? The pillows of my product. | ||
Myproduct.com. Promo code WARROOM. Go check it out. | ||
You've got the toppers, and man, oh man, have they been selling the last couple of days. | ||
The topper 2.0. | ||
This will change everything about your sleep with the MyPillow 2.0. | ||
This is the upgrade. Upgrade on the topper, upgrade on the pillow. | ||
MyPillow 2.0. | ||
Buy one, get one free. | ||
Topper, big discount on it. | ||
Topper 2.0. Go to what we call the square. | ||
MyPillow.com. Promo code worm. | ||
We got all the best deals. | ||
Check it out. Make sure you get it. | ||
Dave Brad's going to join us in a moment. | ||
Well, everybody, Drudge MacDaddy last night, as I said at the top of the show, $1 trillion additional deficit. | ||
Where do we hear this first? | ||
Hello? Wait for it. Oh, War Room. | ||
Okay. All the lies and misrepresentation about Ukraine are all in the top secret documents. | ||
All the lies are coming out. | ||
These are bald-faced lies about the spending that's going on, about how they're going to pay for it. | ||
Another trillion dollars. Dave Brett's going to be able to break it all down. | ||
And you, ladies and gentlemen, are about to be crushed. | ||
Unless we get the Republican Party step in here. | ||
We had some big scoop yesterday. | ||
Let's say the budget director Arrington has been trashed in the media by McCarthy and the team around him. | ||
Doesn't know what he's doing. Matt Gaetz said, hey, at the conference they had down in Orlando, that two-day conference, he presented a budget, not with a 10-year balanced budget, but major significant cuts. | ||
Today, starting today. | ||
So we're going to get to the bottom of all that. | ||
That's a big fight. Go to birchgold.com slash Bannon, the end of the dollar empire. | ||
All of it's free. The third installment is The Debt Trap. | ||
It talks exactly about this, and I wrote this back in November. | ||
It talks all about this, about exactly what's going on, how it's so important. | ||
About the dollar. By the way, another huge article up today on the de-dollarization program. | ||
I think it was over at the Hill. Make sure I'll get it up later. | ||
De-dollarization as they try to take the U.S. dollar away from being the prime reserve currency. | ||
We're going to get into all of that on the 6 o'clock show tonight. | ||
An entire hour to go through and break this all down. | ||
The war that's coming, the kinetic war in Taiwan. | ||
South China Sea, plus all the economic warfare that's going on. | ||
So make sure you're there. Go to Birchgold.com to get up to speed. | ||
Get all the information about precious metals right now. | ||
Check it out. Brad's going to be here in a minute. | ||
Carrie Sheffield, I'm totally confused about this abortion pill and what's going on. | ||
There was a ruling today. Only you can make it clear for me. | ||
Walk me through exactly what's happening and what's the status. | ||
Hey, Steve. | ||
Yeah, I'll do my best. | ||
Because the left wants to expand abortion as much as possible, long gone are the days of safe, legal, and rare under Bill Clinton. | ||
It's pretty much anytime, anywhere, expanded abortion by the mail, abortion by Skype, and the health of women be damned. | ||
And so the expansion of mifepristone, which is an abortion drug under the Biden administration, it was first approved under the Clinton administration. | ||
And it was approved in 2000 under very, very shady circumstances. | ||
But abortions by the male, or I'm sorry, abortions by pill were far less common. | ||
Surgical abortions were way more common. | ||
Now that ratio has flipped, and abortions, they call them chemical abortions, so the pill abortion, basically. | ||
It's now far more pervasive than surgical abortions, and that is by design because the left wants to make it easier for women to put their lives at risk by not having a doctor with them. | ||
So that's the history of this lawsuit. | ||
So when it was approved under the Clinton administration, they used a really sketchy, the FDA used a really sketchy methodology. | ||
They categorized pregnancy as some type of illness, and they used it the same sort of emergency categorization of that HIV, AIDS was the same thing essentially as being pregnant. | ||
And that they need to do emergency authorization for mifeprestone. | ||
So they rammed it through. | ||
They didn't follow their protocols. | ||
And this drug is very dangerous. | ||
And we see the results. So there was a study from the Journal of the Obstetrics in Gynecology. | ||
And they found that more than 40,000 abortions in Finland, one in five women undergoing these abortion pills, these chemical abortions, experience complications. | ||
That's four times the number of complications of somebody who gets a surgical abortion. | ||
So this is all the backdrop to say that this is a dangerous drug that was rammed through without the proper authorization. | ||
And it was challenged immediately by people who want to, you know, protect women's health and protect babies. | ||
And the FDA is required statutorily to respond within 180 days to challenges. | ||
They blew past that and ignored it. | ||
So it's been on the books now for 20 years. | ||
And finally, you had the Alliance Defending Freedom file this lawsuit And last week, a Texas judge in a district court, federal district court, blocked Mifeprestone and said this is a dangerous drug, that the FDA was way out of bounds. | ||
But they did give one week for the Biden administration to challenge that ruling. | ||
And so the second ruling just happened late last night. | ||
That's the breaking news. And that was the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals down in Louisiana They said that we are going to continue to allow this on the market for now. | ||
However, we are taking away the Biden authorization of abortion by mail. | ||
And then also they reduce the pregnancy length from 10 weeks to seven weeks of when you could take the pill. | ||
So that's what's happening. | ||
Kind of a split decision, the FDA thing here. | ||
Before I lose, I just want to ask some basic math. | ||
It's been reported now that since Dobbs came out, I guess last June, there have been 5,000 a month fewer abortions. | ||
So right now, at least how they calculate, there's 77,000 abortions per month in the country. | ||
It was 83. | ||
You're down 5,000. | ||
Why... We've got the life guys. | ||
We had John Henry Weston. | ||
They're trying to take him off YouTube. | ||
You, Liz Yor, Terry Sheffield, all the great pro-life people. | ||
You're down, right, I don't know, 8%, 10 % or something like that in the 5,000 off and just in the federal ruling. | ||
Why is the Republican Party not just crickets? | ||
They're running away from you guys because they're every day, whether it's in Wisconsin, they're pointing the finger and saying, hey, these retrograde, hardcore pro-lifers are what's going to lose us every election going forward. | ||
So where's the Republican Party on this? | ||
And walk me through your assessment of the politics of it. | ||
Yeah, I agree. I think that there are a lot of more establishment types who don't want to touch this with a 10-foot pole. | ||
But the reality is that the polling shows that the majority of Americans, they want restrictions on abortion. | ||
It's a tiny minority believes in abortion up until birth. | ||
Which is what many Democrats want. | ||
And in fact, AOC and Ron Wyden, they actually wanted the Democrats to ignore this court ruling, the Texas ruling, and just continue to distribute the drug as if The ruling didn't happen, which is truly horrific. | ||
I mean, they just don't care about the rule of law. | ||
But as far as, you know, going on offense, I think that there there was some sloppiness. | ||
So like, for example, the Kansas, you know, referendum that was smacked down, I think, because it was very poorly worded the way that it was Very broad and very vague. | ||
And so I think it was a sort of an overreach in terms of, I mean, I agree with what they were trying to do, but the way that it was written was too vague. | ||
And so the left used that as a scare tactic to make it fail. | ||
And then you have other states like Texas and California, I'm sorry, California and New York, Who after Dobbs said, well, we're going to move it even further. | ||
We're going to move the needle even further in terms of how far you can kill your child. | ||
So I think that ultimately I'm glad that you're talking about this, Steve, because people need to have courage on this issue. | ||
I'm actually reminded a lot of what happened with slavery in terms of the Lincoln-Douglas debates and how Abraham Lincoln, through the Lincoln-Douglas debates, he completely flipped the narrative because Douglas was this coward who just basically said slavery, take it or leave it. | ||
It was amoral from his perspective. | ||
And Lincoln said, no, right makes might. | ||
Whereas the Douglas approach was might makes right. | ||
It's the majority rule. | ||
And yeah, we are a majority rule country, but ultimately it has to do with the morality of what abortion truly is, which is it is the destruction of an innocent human life immediately upon conception that it's a human life. | ||
So I think that if conservatives make this argument and use science, all the facts are on our side, the morality is on our side, and you don't even have to be, you know, I'm a Christian, but like, you don't even, I was agnostic for 12 years and I was pro-life the whole time. | ||
This has nothing, it has to do with just basic ethics. | ||
If you oppose slavery as an agnostic or atheist or whatever, or a Christian, it's the same thing as opposing abortion. | ||
Carrie, how do people, where do they go to get your writings and all of your work efforts? | ||
Yeah, thanks, Steve. I've got a substack. | ||
It's just Carrie Sheffield Newsletter. | ||
You can find me on there. I'm on Getter. | ||
I'm on Twitter. I'm all on the usual socials, except for TikTok. | ||
That's the substack that Elon Musk is going out of his way not to promote because there's too many voices like yours on there. | ||
So thanks. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll make sure we push it all out there and people get to it. | |
Thanks, Steve. Carrie Sheffield, a real warrior. | ||
Thank you, ma'am. The Right to Light thing has got to get a little more organized. | ||
You've got Carrie, you've got these great talents and people. | ||
Because the Republican establishment is running for the hills in this. | ||
Remember, the big money doesn't support the hobbits in anything that the hobbits believe in. | ||
Zero. None of it. What they want is tax cuts, okay? | ||
And the hobbits just to behave themselves, go about their business, be drones, and make sure that your kids go in the military to serve the war machine. | ||
Reggie Littlejohn, it's the WEXIT, that is the WHO exit, this is the day of action, correct? | ||
Walk me through what people are, why are we doing this? | ||
What impact is it going to have? | ||
Why must we do it? Why is this a core issue about American sovereignty? | ||
unidentified
|
Steve, this is actually the biggest issue I believe of our time, which is that the World Health Organization is poised to steal our national sovereignty and also our personal medical freedom with the backing of the Biden administration and at the behest of the Chinese Communist Party. | |
So let me break that down a little bit. | ||
There are two instruments. | ||
There are amendments to the international health regulations. | ||
There is a new pandemic treaty. | ||
They are currently being negotiated. | ||
These instruments, if they are passed in their current proposed form, would make the World Health Organization not be a body that recommends things, but that could issue binding diktats to the United States and to the whole world. | ||
They would be able to declare not only pandemics, but potential pandemics, not only of people, but also of animals, plants, and the environment. | ||
And they could tell us how to handle our health issues, including by saying we have to vaccinate, forced vaccination, forced quarantine, mask mandates, all of that, without the consent of the United States. | ||
They can just move in and tell us how to do all of this stuff. | ||
So if people do not want to be run by the Chinese Communist Party, and if they do not want Xi Jinping sitting in with them in their doctor's office saying this person must be vaccinated, then they need to take action today. | ||
So the Sovereignty Coalition, I am a member of the Sovereignty Coalition, We are having a national day of action today. | ||
So if people go on to sovereigntycoalition.org, you can contact your senators, your congressional representatives, and tell them to withdraw from the World Health Organization. | ||
We have no choice. | ||
We can't... | ||
People have said to me, oh, why don't we stay inside and fight? | ||
We can't stay inside and fight because we're only one of 194 votes and because... | ||
The Biden administration is pushing this, and because our Senate has said that they don't want to consider it. | ||
So we have to withdraw from WHO. Reggie, hang on. | ||
Go through the break. Dave Bratz with us also. | ||
unidentified
|
So short commercial break, back in a moment. | |
Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
Superior technology. | ||
No more selling your personal data. | ||
No more censorship. | ||
No more cancel culture. | ||
Enough. Getter has arrived. | ||
It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
Download now. | ||
Okay, Reggie Littlejohn. | ||
Okay, Reggie, help me. | ||
We only got a couple of minutes here on this National Day of Action. | ||
But the National Defense Authorization Act, which you've got to do that before you get to the appropriations and the money, was passed before we took control of the House. | ||
But a ton of Republicans voted for this. | ||
And the thing's 2,000 pages long, so nobody could have read it. | ||
Isn't there slugged in there something about the World Health Organization, how they've gun-decked this? | ||
That it's basically going to get approved. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm not saying anyway, but tell me about NDAA. Okay, so the NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act, has to be approved in order to fund our defense, right? | |
Well, that act was 1,772 pages long. | ||
So no one read it. | ||
And on page 950, they snuck in this thing called the Pandemic Preparedness Act of 2022. | ||
And what that does is it pre-approves any agreement by the World Health Organization. | ||
What it says here, here's the exact wording, it obligates the U.S. to comply with and adhere to other relevant frameworks that contribute to global health security. | ||
So what that does is it means that The Senate, the House, they're never going to see whatever is agreed to at the WHO. It's already been pre-approved in this NDAA. Okay, I got that. | ||
But on the sovereignty side, here's what people need. | ||
You need to put up a list of what congressmen and senators, Republicans voted for this already. | ||
So when the people call, they've got to light them up with, hey, why in the hell did you vote for this NDA with that phrase in it and not take any happy talk from it? | ||
So if you can, if you guys over there can just get the list so when people come to your site, they can see if their congressman's on the list or not. | ||
So when they call, they not only say we got a withdrawal from the WHO because, dude, you got us into this because you voted for the NDAA. And I don't want to hear that it's 2,000 pages long and this is on page 950. | ||
This is why we sent you there. | ||
This is the accountability that we need to have. | ||
And they're going to say, well, you know, we're fighting the Chinese. | ||
We're doing this now. Screw you, dude. | ||
This is the kind of thing you've got to fight for. | ||
And they didn't fight for it. I didn't see any Republican congressmen coming forward. | ||
I saw Michelle Bachman and people like yourself, but I didn't see any House members, ma'am. | ||
unidentified
|
I agree completely, Steve, and we'll see if we can get that up there. | |
But meanwhile, people need to go to sovereigntycoalition.org, and it's got a script of exactly what you can say. | ||
Okay, but hang on, but hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
I don't want people to do that. | ||
I just don't. And I'm the biggest supporter of this. | ||
You've got to get the list. If people call and say get out of the WHO and the guys already voted for the NDA, they got to be able to hit them with both barrels. | ||
So let's take some time today and get the list. | ||
So when people go to your site, they've got the list and they say, hey, I see my congressman votes the NDA. And then when they call, they go, why the hell did you do this? | ||
We need to get out of the WHO not to tuck into a Defense Authorization Act that they hold it like Damocles' sword over your neck to say, oh, if you don't do this, you're not going to be able to fight the Chinese. | ||
We're not going to be able to arm Ukraine. | ||
We're going to lose Latin America. | ||
They're not going to have any national defense. | ||
A nuclear weapon is going to go quiet, right? | ||
All that. And then they allow something to be tucked in. | ||
People should know when they come to your site, who are the people that betrayed them? | ||
That's what this is. This is not a small thing. | ||
And this cuts to the heart of the problem because the defense contractors are giving these guys all this money, and this is where they tuck something in that's not related to defense. | ||
It's not related to defense. | ||
And they're going to say, well, it's part of the bioweapons defense project, all that. | ||
It's all crap. This is how they do it. | ||
So can you do that for me? Can you get the list when people go of the senators, Republican senators, Democrats too, but predominantly Republican senators and House members that voted for the NDA. So when the Warren Posse calls, trust me, they'll give it to you with the bark on. | ||
But I want to make sure people are armed with the correct information, okay? | ||
Now, how do they get to your site that's going to be updated? | ||
How do they get to your site to do this? | ||
unidentified
|
We will update it, Steve. | |
Okay, it's SovereigntyCoalition.org, SovereigntyCoalition.org, and you can find me at Reggie Littlejohn on Getter. | ||
Okay, now you've got a script there. | ||
You're going to update the script because this NDA thing, this gets to the heart of what the problem is. | ||
The problem here, and don't call the swamp, it's too cute a term. | ||
The problem here is that the big pharma money and the big tech money and the big defense money controls this city. | ||
And the people that represent you are just little movable characters. | ||
Right? They're just movable characters. | ||
It's money and power. | ||
Why would we go out of the way to teach people macroeconomics? | ||
You've got to understand how economics and politics come together for power. | ||
We're here to take that power away and give it to people. | ||
But we've got to understand it. Reggie, thank you very much. | ||
We'll have the numbers up there then call, but they've got to know if their congressman voted for the NDA. Thank you very much, ma'am. | ||
I appreciate it. Reggie Littlejohn, doing a fantastic job there. | ||
This NDA thing. Brett, you were there. | ||
Tell us about it. Tell us how these scams work, brother. | ||
You were a congressman. That they hated you so much in the Republican conference, they didn't even invite you to the meetings because you would bring these topics up, sir. | ||
Yeah, I would. I'd bring them up in conference, and there were a few with me. | ||
The Freedom Caucus was very strong. | ||
But yeah, they just plugged this stuff in at the end of what's called must-pass legislation. | ||
And most of the time, you don't even catch these things. | ||
Now you got so many folks in the war room doing great research. | ||
That it's coming to mind. | ||
And there's a growing number of these insurgents who are just American patriots doing the obvious, what they should do. | ||
By the way, hey, full disclosure, we didn't catch it at first. | ||
It was after it was passed. | ||
We said not to pass it. | ||
We were adamant to kick that whole thing into the new Congress so that we could control it. | ||
But even at the time, it was only later when this was brought to my attention because nobody mentioned it. | ||
And particularly nobody that voted for it. | ||
And they're all going to claim, as you know, Dave, they're going to say, well, hey, we had to pass it. | ||
The Army's got to roll. | ||
The Navy's got to sail. | ||
They got to do all this stuff. And hey, it was a must pass. | ||
We're all going home for Christmas. | ||
We've got to go home and see what Santa put under the tree. | ||
Right? You've been there. | ||
They hated Dave Brad so much because he's a truth teller, right? | ||
For a guy with such a sunny disposition, you were one of the most unpopular guys, right? | ||
Yep. If you're just honest, you shine the light. | ||
That's the most powerful thing. | ||
And so that's what I've always tried to do in life. | ||
And I'll get into the economics here with some truth that reflects well on the show and stuff we've been saying for three years. | ||
Let's take a 90-second break. | ||
We're going to return. We're in the war room. | ||
I think we're going to do an interesting cold open if we can fit it in. | ||
I got Brat. I got Benzman. | ||
I got Julie Kelly. Murderer's Row. | ||
Batting forth is Lindell. | ||
That's not bad. I've got Dave Brat, Todd Benzman from Juarez. | ||
He's got some footage. He's incredible. | ||
The Julie Kelly, and she's breaking news about the J6 situation, a little bit coming unwound. | ||
Of course, Mike Lindell, the Election Crime Bureau, all next in the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
We rejoice when there's no more. |