March 25, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| You're absolutely right to characterize it that way. | ||
| Some of these folks, their names haven't been mentioned in a long time while we've been covering the Biden, the new White House, the new president. | ||
| But let's just take a few that may be not very familiar to people with the passage of time. | ||
| Ken Cuccinelli, what was his job? | ||
| He was a deputy in charge of the Department of Homeland Security. | ||
| And what was so crucial about what the Department of Homeland Security was hearing in the weeks leading up to January 6th? | ||
| They were hearing from Donald Trump about a plan to seize voting machines and whether or not the Department of Homeland Security had some power to declare that there was a national security issue and that these should be taken. | ||
| Of course, the Department of Homeland Security did not order The seizure of voting machines to quote-unquote rerun the election. | ||
| But that was something that the Department of Homeland Security was sort of briefed on and alerted to. | ||
| Let's take another one. | ||
| Mr. O'Brien, Robert O'Brien, then the national security advisor to Donald Trump when he was president. | ||
| The Department of Defense believed, many senior generals believed, that the president was going to try to, at that time, create chaos and perhaps create a faux reason to declare military law so that he could keep control of the government. | ||
| He was also suggesting sort of wag the dog or some of his aides were suggesting wag the dog moves to create more anxiety and tension, conflict with the foreign with foreign powers. | ||
| And his national security adviser might also have some information about how many classified records ended up instead of in the situation room In President Trump's residence and eventually then later at his home in Mar-a-Lago when he left the White House. | ||
| How were classified records handled? | ||
| Let's talk about one more. | ||
| You know, I find it really interesting. | ||
| Of course, Mark Meadows, many of his texts have been provided to the January 6th committee and the Department of Justice much later also sought those records. | ||
| Who was in the White House at Donald Trump's side every single time he had a series of lawmakers come in to talk about how he could block the transfer of power. | ||
| Members of the Freedom Caucus, and Mark Meadows was a member of the Freedom Caucus before he was the White House Chief of Staff, were trying to help Donald Trump hold on to power and described privately amongst themselves a maximum pressure campaign on January 16 to stop the certification of the vote, | ||
| to bully and lobby their Republican colleagues in Congress, to make sure that Biden was not Seated, essentially, as the official appropriate president-elect. | ||
| Obvious. So do the numbers back this up, this regular people argument? | ||
| You know, if Ron DeSantis was doing as well with voters who make less than $50,000 a year as he is with voters making over $50,000 a year, this race would be tied between him and Donald Trump. | ||
| But in fact, what we see is that Ron DeSantis has a major problem among Republicans who make less than $50,000 a year. | ||
| I mean, you can see it on your slide right there. | ||
| He is down by nearly 30 points at Donald Trump among GOP voters who make less than $50,000 a year. | ||
| And that's the reason why he's trailing in the primary. | ||
| So his clip doesn't make all that much sense to me, to be honest with you, Erin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. So hold this up for one more second, just as I set up the next question. | |
| So you see that Donald Trump is doing much better with this group under $50,000. | ||
| Is that the same way it was for Trump in the last cycles? | ||
| Yeah, if you look back at 2016, you know, there was this whole idea that Donald Trump ran this populist campaign, right, and he was doing well among, you know, the quote-unquote, his quote, poorly educated people. | ||
| But in fact, there was no real gap on income. | ||
| He did about as well with voters who made less than $50,000 as he did with those making more than $50,000. | ||
| So this year we've seen this income gap really grow, and this Trump populist campaign really seemed to take off. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, so that, which is very interesting, because you're talking about things with Trump taking off, right? | |
| The context everyone's hearing about is all this legal issue, and is that going to put, you know, take all the bloom off the rose, such that there was any left? | ||
| But you're talking about not just income, but also a coalition that appears to be coming together for Trump. | ||
| Yes. That Democrats would actually like? | ||
| Yeah, it's very interesting. In a Republican primary, the two groups who Donald Trump is doing very well amongst are white voters making under $50,000. | ||
| He has a double-digit advantage with them, as well as non-white voters. | ||
| This is the type of coalition that Democrats would love to have in a general election. | ||
| And what we're in fact seeing is that in this Republican primary, Donald Trump is doing what Democrats would love to have and what they used to have, but Donald Trump is doing it himself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course, but I should note, with the GOP primary, that's not a high-minority group. | |
| No, but they still make up nearly 20 % of the GOP electorate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Which is important. Okay, so for people who might say, okay, Harry, but it's important, 20 % significance. | |
| Thanks. Now, for two years, we've heard the story from the people on the January 6th committee. | ||
| We've heard the story about how it was an insurrection, and I'm going to tell you something right now. | ||
| It was not an insurrection. | ||
| And President Trump did not tell anyone to go into the Capitol that day. | ||
| And as a member of Congress who lawfully objected against Joe Biden's Electoral College votes, I was following my duty and so were my colleagues that also did the same thing. | ||
| What we have to do is we have to work as hard as possible to defund the two-tiered injustice system. | ||
| And we have to return freedom and due process rights to these pre-trial January 6th defendants. | ||
| And as you can see, there's paid protesters here today. | ||
| And they can whistle and say everything they want. | ||
| But we will not be deterred. | ||
| We do not care about them because they work for evil. | ||
| They work for evil Friday, 24 March, year earlier, 2023. | ||
| That's MTG down at the Gulag. | ||
| A lot going on. We have polling. | ||
| We have capital markets. We have economics. | ||
| We have Mike Davis here about everything legal as they try to surround President Trump, because you see the polling, they can't possibly beat him. | ||
| Richard Barris, first up, brother. | ||
| By the way, we've got Barris, we have Davis, we have Boris, we have Navarro, and maybe a couple of three surprises. | ||
| Barris, talk to me about new polling you're putting out on locals right now on the People's Pundit. | ||
| What do you got for me? Steve, you know, that was a good opening segment because that's true what he brought up about income. | ||
| And one of the things that I went over today that jumped right out at me is that if you really look at how Trump is doing versus Biden and compare that to how DeSantis is doing against Biden, DeSantis looks like a George W. Bush coalition. | ||
| The problem with that is it may work in 2004. | ||
| But the electorate has changed and things are different. | ||
| Trump's looks like an old-school Democratic coalition among income groups. | ||
| Trump leads in every single income group except for 200,000 or more. | ||
| So what we have overall, the headline here, Steve, is that Trump leads Biden by about four and DeSantis is down by about two, which isn't a massive margin, but turnout's going to be very high. | ||
| This is already, it's early and typically people are not this engaged. | ||
| This could be, well, not could be. | ||
| As of right now, this will be bigger than 2020. | ||
| So the main focus for any party nominee is to find as much juice to squeeze, as much blood out of that stone that can be squeezed. | ||
| And, you know, the bottom line is here, one has a bigger coalition than the other. | ||
| Okay. We have right now, we have AP put, Associated Press this morning, Biden's on favorable at 38%, close to the bottom he had at 36%. | ||
| Also the Wall Street Journal, we had Cortez on this morning about this study they've been doing for 30 years. | ||
| I think it's the lowest number ever, or I think they've been doing it since 2000, this century. | ||
| The lowest number ever of people's Enthusiasm or hope for the future for the kids and grandkids, lowest it's ever been as far as America getting better, better opportunities, better economy. | ||
| Is that informed? | ||
| Is your polling showing that too or your polling does not incorporate that yet? | ||
| You know, we do the registered voter economic confidence index, which we have not released yet. | ||
| But I mean, I will tell you this. | ||
| I'm looking at it and I'm thinking maybe people inflation is being reported, at least as rising at a slower pace or, you know, and people are playing word games with that, Steve. | ||
| So I'm thinking maybe people will have a better, you know, optimism or expectations about the six month outlook. | ||
| And so far that's not really looking that significant. | ||
| I will tell you this. | ||
| We did this. | ||
| We really were trying to measure the Trump or bust vote and to compare it to other candidates. | ||
| These are voters who have this Trump or bust and it's about 14 % of Trump's vote. | ||
| I will not vote for anybody but Donald John Trump. | ||
| Others will say maybe I'll consider a nominee or third party. | ||
| But that 14 % Is feeling really dire about the future and they really don't see a difference between the parties. | ||
| So I got some criticism today and people are saying, well, what does that mean? | ||
| They put party or they put a person before party. | ||
| They put a person before country. | ||
| And I just want to make this comment. | ||
| It's the exact opposite. | ||
| If you listen to them, they're so bleak about the future, they don't really view, I don't want to sound over the top here, but they don't really view any hope if this man does not get back in the White House. | ||
| It really is that simple. | ||
| And that is 14 % of Trump's overall vote? | ||
| His overall vote, which Steve, by the way, if you do simple math on that right now, Let's say I'm wrong and it's 10%. | ||
| You're talking about 7.5 million voters. | ||
| The way that turnout looks now, it could actually be higher than that. | ||
| So let's rewind time to 2012 when Mitt Romney was missing about 3.5 million white voters in the Midwest. | ||
| It cost him everything. | ||
| Imagine if you were missing 7, 8. | ||
| Nine million voters. | ||
| And they're not white, because that segment before that you played is 100 % true. | ||
| Yes, he's crushing it with white, non-college, white working class, but he is crushing it with non-white in this working class that he's bringing into the coalition. | ||
| These people just simply are not going to vote for anybody. | ||
| And you don't have them in the electorate. | ||
| Let me put this as clear as I can. | ||
| You have to pray that there is a massive depression in Democratic turnout or you're going to lose. | ||
| And guess what? The numbers don't look that way. | ||
| 83 % of Democrats say they're certain to vote. | ||
| I've told people this forever because of President Trump and stepping up to the leadership of this movement as the first person. | ||
| Essentially, you say 14. | ||
| I've always said between 10 and 20 percent, 20 percent of the total outside range, but at least 10. | ||
| We'll just not vote for anybody. | ||
| If it's not Trump, it's not going to happen. | ||
| That's why I say all these guys in these primaries, not that they have a shot to begin with, but even if you won the primary, it's a pyrrhic victory. | ||
| There's nothing you can say or do that's going to get at least 10%. | ||
| Right now, if you don't bring 100 % of the Trump people with you, you have no chance to win. | ||
| No chance to win. Barris, you've got our locals right now. | ||
| Walk us through how people can get this and absorb it over the weekend. | ||
| Yeah, peoplespundit.locals.com. | ||
| We were just taking a look at the difference in evangelical votes, Steve. | ||
| This looks very 2016 to me. | ||
| It's not just that he's at 77%. | ||
| It's how many of them say we'll vote if it's him versus everybody else. | ||
| That's on Locals right now, peoplespundit.locals.com. | ||
| Go and check it out. | ||
| There is a lot of good data in this survey. | ||
| People say, oh, it's early. | ||
| This is a former president. | ||
| They're having the panic attacks you just saw on mainstream media because they're seeing exactly what I'm seeing. | ||
| This is not 2020. | ||
| This is a different race. | ||
| This is why I wanted Barris to start the evening show because this informs everything. | ||
| They see the same numbers and they've done even more polling. | ||
| They know that Trump right now, this populist coalition, they understand where the economy is going. | ||
| They understand they can't keep bailing this thing out. | ||
| They understand what's going to happen to the banking system. | ||
| They know where the mask is going to go with Sleepy Joe and the Biden crime family. | ||
| They know there are more receipts out there to come. | ||
| They know that the only way they can stop Trump is through lawfare. | ||
| Richard Barris, one more time. | ||
| How did people get to you? Peoplespundit.locals.com. | ||
| But also, you know, I'm on Getter at Peoplespundit on Twitter at Peoples underscore pundit. | ||
| But again, you just added up the best spot, Peoplespundit.locals.com. | ||
| Keep your eyes peeled all throughout the weekend. | ||
| We'll be dripping stuff on locals throughout the next few days. | ||
| So much to go over, Steve. | ||
| Perfect. No, it's not too early. | ||
| You've got to start doing this thing now strategically. | ||
| You've got to start laying down some foundational elements. | ||
| Thank you very much. Okay. | ||
| If you want to know why there's a frenzy in Fulton County and in lower Manhattan and in Washington, D.C. to indict Donald John Trump, Mike Davis is going to explain it all to you. | ||
| And then one of his closest aides, Dr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Peter Navarro, joins us. Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | |
| Okay. We are jammed for the next couple of hours here. | ||
| In the next hour, I've got Bob Lighthouse, his old partner over at Skadden, Doug Wardlow. | ||
| I finally get to TikTok. | ||
| So next hour we're going to do TikTok. | ||
| I've got Dave Walsh going to join us. | ||
| The Guardian's got a story. | ||
| Some professors at George Washington have done a study. | ||
| It's going to be in the Harvard University. | ||
| Environmental Review, which is the equivalent of the Harvard Business Review, except it's the environmental side, but it's kind of the railhead of where ideas like in business, they start the Harvard Business Review, then Boston Consulting Group or Booz Allen or McKinsey pick them up, and the next thing you know, they've infected, the bacillus has infected your company. | ||
| There's an article up about, on climate change, they're going to start, the theories are going to start bringing homicide charges. | ||
| Homicide charges against all executives. | ||
| So it's a leech story in The Guardian from the other day. | ||
| Dave Walsh will be here. Russ Vogt. | ||
| This audience is doing such an incredible job. | ||
| We're going to work out a program of how we're going to put pressure on people starting next week. | ||
| Already, Russ is going to be here to talk about the prioritization of payments. | ||
| Remember the cash flow coming in? | ||
| Politico has a big story. | ||
| The Hill has a big story. | ||
| It's a real thing. Russ is going to talk about the process of how we actually get real cuts in this year to the budget. | ||
| We're getting traction. The conference down in Orlando with the Republicans and Russ just wants to give us So the next hour is going to be absolutely packed with everybody. | ||
| I want you to stay tuned because we're going to finish Friday big, and then tomorrow we're going to go pregame on Waco, have a lot of analysis, a lot of observations, polling all of us. | ||
| President Trump kicks off with a massive rally in Waco, Texas. | ||
| Mike Davis, you've become, I think, one of the most, not just prominent voices, but voices of serious people that are looking at this. | ||
| Today, this afternoon, and this is why I'm so proud of War Room. | ||
| We refuse to take the bait and just cover this stuff nonstop because I'm not going to take our audience's time to do it. | ||
| But on MSNBC particularly, CNN's bad, but MSNBC has lathered up. | ||
| It is a feeding frenzy, Mike, and it's Alvin Bragg and the making excuses for why the grand jury has indicted him. | ||
| Now you've got Evan Corcoran in the Mar-a-Lago situation with Christina Bob feeding frenzy. | ||
| Evan Corcoran, who's one of my lawyers, is over at the federal court today. | ||
| You've got now the J6, Jack Smith, as we saw in the cold open, he's putting out subpoenas on, I don't know, 10 or 12 people around President Trump. | ||
| And you've got Fulton County, and they're all lathered up about Fulton County. | ||
| Am I wrong, Davis? | ||
| You're the lawyer here. | ||
| Am I wrong? But are they just, is it a tell? | ||
| That we're putting up polling every day and shows that Biden is the bottom is falling out of their regime. | ||
| Trump is on a roll. He's putting together a coalition. | ||
| This is not Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, or War Room. | ||
| It's CNN and Harry Enten. | ||
| And Harry Enten is about as straight a shooter as you can get. | ||
| Being with a liberal network. | ||
| That he's talking about a working class, middle class coalition, regardless of ethnicity, race, religion, that he's putting this together, what they even said the Democrats used to do in the old days. | ||
| Is it now obvious that they've weaponized the legal system, that they understand the only way to stop Trump and the Trump movement is through lawfare, sir? | ||
| That's 100 % true, and we have the receipts. | ||
| It's very clear. You have this George Soros-funded Manhattan DA, Alvin Bragg, bringing bogus, trumped-up Charges against President Trump up in New York based upon a settlement. | ||
| President Trump settled a nuisance claim back in 2016 to make Stormy Daniels go away. | ||
| It's pretty routine for wealthy businessmen to make these claims go away. | ||
| This somehow has been turned from at best what could have been somehow a misdemeanor, which that's a stretch. | ||
| This Alvin Bragg has turned this into a potential felony indictment against President Trump seven years later. | ||
| I don't know how it's not beyond the statute of limitations. | ||
| It's a crazy legal theory. | ||
| It's a legal theory that his very office, the Manhattan DA's office, previously rejected at Alvin Bragg's insistence when Alvin Bragg worked for the New York Attorney General. | ||
| It's a theory that's been rejected by the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, and it's been a theory, a federal election campaign finance violation theory that was rejected by the Federal Election Commission. | ||
| It is a completely bogus indictment that they're looking at. | ||
| up in New York. So that's backfiring badly on the Democrats. | ||
| And so that's why you're seeing these other two bogus investigations by Fulton County, Georgia, D.A., Democrat Fannie Willis coming forward with this bogus theory that somehow if President Trump politically twisted arms down in Georgia on presidential electors, that's somehow a crime. That's not a crime. | ||
| That's protected by the First Amendment. | ||
| That is our political process. | ||
| It's an ugly process. It's not a pretty process. | ||
| It's protected by the First Amendment. | ||
| It is not a crime to lobby Elected officials to do things for you. | ||
| That is protective. He didn't threaten them with violence. | ||
| He didn't threaten their families. It is not a crime to twist political arms. | ||
| And then you have to look at what Jack Smith is doing, the special counsel, Merrick Garland's hand-selected special counsel. | ||
| He's looking at two fronts. | ||
| He's looking at the Mar-a-Lago Classified records in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| We've talked about this a lot since June. | ||
| That is a bogus investigation. | ||
| Any president of the United States is allowed to take his presidential records when he leaves office. | ||
| Classified or not, he took them to the office of former president in Mar-a-Lago that is heavily guarded by the Secret Service. | ||
| He gets secure compartment and information facilities or SCIFs. | ||
| He gets congressionally funded office space, congressionally funded staff Congressionally funded staff with security clearances. | ||
| It is a bogus investigation. | ||
| And if they go after Trump for having classified records in Mar-a-Lago, how do they not go after Biden when he was the vice president who illegally took then-president Obama's classified records and took them to several different locations? | ||
| And there's evidence that Hunter Biden used this classified information to secure To secure these illegal deals with Chinese and Ukrainian oligarchs. | ||
| So they can't go after Trump on the records if they don't go after Biden. | ||
| Trump legally could take them as the president. | ||
| Former Vice President Joe Biden could not. | ||
| And so then we're looking at his last front, and that's the January 6th where... | ||
| Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| Before you get to January 6th in that day, New York to get from some bookkeeping misdemeanor to a felony. | ||
| Fulton County in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| I keep hearing the C-word. | ||
| They're talking about conspiracy. | ||
| Is it not true, sir, when you can't really put a crime that they then fall back on some conspiracy? | ||
| All three of them are talking conspiracy now. | ||
| The C-word. Isn't a fact Mike Davis that when they don't have a crime or can't prove a crime, they got to go to the process crime of conspiracy, sir? | ||
| Of course. They know they don't have a substantive crime to charge here, so they're going to try to look at a process crime, a bogus process crime-like conspiracy. | ||
| The crime that they're looking at is that President Trump's attorney, they shoved an affidavit in front of him when they did their illegal, unconstitutional, unprecedented home raid on a former president. | ||
| Which they're not allowed to do because he had the right to have these records. | ||
| So they went to this biased magistrate, Judge Bruce Reinhart, who had just recused from President Trump's civil lawsuit because he knew he was biased based upon his Facebook post attacking President Trump. | ||
| They go down and do this illegal home raid. | ||
| They shove an affidavit in that during the chaos of the home raid, they shove an affidavit in front of one of President Trump's attorneys. | ||
| He signs it apparently to the best of his knowledge. | ||
| Now they're trying to say That it's obstruction of justice because they found these classified documents in Mar-a-Lago after this attorney signed this affidavit. | ||
| Well, President Trump was allowed to have these documents under the Presidential Records Act. | ||
| And you have to also look, there's an OLC, Office of Legal Counsel, OLC opinion at the Justice Department during the Mueller probe back in 2000, I think it was 2019. | ||
| You could not, the Justice Department is bound by this legal opinion. | ||
| You could not generally charge obstruction of justice When you have people who allegedly obstruct justice on investigations of non-crimes. | ||
| If it's not a crime that you're investigating, you can't obstruct justice on that investigation. | ||
| So they need to go back and look at that OLC opinion. | ||
| And even if you have an honest mistake by an attorney, that doesn't make it a crime. | ||
| That doesn't make it an obstruction of justice. | ||
| And compare what they're doing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. No, go ahead. | |
| Go ahead, sir. Compare what the Biden Justice Department did on Trump's classified records, which he's allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act, versus what they did on Biden's classified records, which is espionage. | ||
| He was absolutely not allowed to have them in three different locations or four different locations under anything. | ||
| It's an espionage violation. | ||
| So what did the Biden Justice Department do? | ||
| Instead of sending in a home raid and putting affidavits in front of Biden's attorneys and putting him into an obstruction trap, they kept it quiet. | ||
| They covered it up for two months. | ||
| They didn't do a damn thing about it. | ||
| And then after Biden's attorneys are making, they had this sweetheart deal where Biden's attorneys are searching these different locations. | ||
| When Biden's attorneys represent it to the Justice Department that all the classified records have been turned over, Remember, they sent in the FBI and found more. | ||
| So how is that not obstruction of justice for Biden's attorneys to make these representations to the Biden Justice Department? | ||
| With the time we got left, how tough will it be to defend the executive privilege here? | ||
| That's got to go to appellate court. | ||
| Will that go up to the Supreme Court around this inner circle of President Trump for the J6 situation? | ||
| I'll make this quick. | ||
| So the Jack Smith, the second thing he's investigating is President Trump objecting to the presidential election. | ||
| Well, guess what? | ||
| That's allowed. That is specifically allowed. | ||
| If it's illegal to object to presidential elections, the Democrats would be in jail for President Nixon in 1969, 2001, 2005 with Bush 43 twice. | ||
| Trump, they objected in 2017. | ||
| It is not illegal to object to presidential elections. | ||
| It's only illegal to object to presidential elections in third-world Marxist hellholes. | ||
| And what they're trying to do is use President Trump's objection to this election to go after Trump, to go after his top aides, to go after his supporters, right? | ||
| And so what we've had for 250 years is executive privilege. | ||
| Presidents can get candid advice from their advisors, and they don't have to worry about being hauled before grand juries. | ||
| Mike, just hang on for one second. | ||
| I just want to bring you back and ask about the Electoral Count Act of 1887, a statute that Dr. | ||
| Navarro and I know well. Short commercial break. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro, Mike Davis in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Mike Davis, two things. | ||
| The Electoral Countdown of 1887, which was one of the things that laid out the process for sending it back to the state legislatures, which said they wanted it for them to review. | ||
| Is it...that got changed in the middle of the night, correct? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It did. It got included in an omnibus bill in the middle of the night. | |
| So they never bring that up, do they? | ||
| Well, I don't know if there would have been the support to pass it if it didn't get jammed into an omnibus bill. | ||
| Right? It was stuffed in there like... | ||
| Was that not the governing document of the time? | ||
| Was that not the governing statute of how Pence and everyone were supposed to conduct themselves through procedures laid out in that, sir? | ||
| Well, sure. I mean, it was after there was a disputed election and several close elections back in the late 1800s, and the whole point of the Electoral Count Act of 1887 was was to have a process to resolve these disputes. | ||
| You didn't have to go weeks and weeks and weeks and not have a president decide it. | ||
| So that was the whole point of this thing. | ||
| And so when you make objections under the Electoral Count of 1887, that's permitted by law. | ||
| That's the whole point. When people say that President Trump is investigating him for illegally objecting to the presidential election, he's following this statute. | ||
| It's the Electoral Count of 1887. | ||
| How is it a crime to follow the procedures and process What they're trying to do is they're trying to take a riot that got out of control on January 6th. | ||
| People got out of control on January 6th. | ||
| They're trying to turn that somehow into an insurrection because apparently insurrectionists get to a Senate floor and take selfies and walk out peacefully and they don't burn the damn place down. | ||
| That's, you know... Only the horn man insurrections where they take selfies and walk out peacefully. | ||
| And then they're trying to use this to disqualify Trump. | ||
| They're trying to say because he tried to object to the presidential election lawfully under the Electoral Count Act, Of 1887, he's an insurrectionist and he should be banned from running from office and he should be disqualified because at the end of the day they are terrified to run against President Trump again because they learned the hard way that President Trump can actually surprise people and win presidential elections. | ||
| Mike Davis, how do people find you on social media and what is your website, sir? | ||
| Sure, it's article3project.org, article3project.org, at article3project, at article3project, and my personal on Gitter Twitter Truth is at MRDDMIA, MRDDMIA, and thank you, Steve. | ||
| Thank you, Mike. Thanks for the update. | ||
| Peter, you know, it kills me to take that much time on this and not have... | ||
| You talk about capital markets, but I think it's got to be done. | ||
| And remember, the electoral count on 1887 kept the state legislatures at the heart of it because that's what the Constitution says, and this is all going to be fought on. | ||
| Peter, there's no doubt in your mind, I want your observations, not just on Richard Barris, but Richard Barris combined with Harry Anton over at CNN about the populist coalition with these policies that President Trump is putting together. | ||
| The only way they're going to stop him, Navarro, is if they somehow, not just an indictment, is somehow they legally do some jujitsu here and gain disqualified. | ||
| Is there any doubt in your mind about that, Dr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Peter Navarro? No, Steve. | |
| And the one thing I would say about the Electoral Count Act elimination in that fly-by-night bill is it really underscores how legal, how absolutely legal what the president did was in January of 2021 to try to get a fair count of the votes. | ||
| The fact that they took it out kind of tells the lie. | ||
| And for me, that's the buried lead there. | ||
| The thing that I would like to see from Barris, I love that guy. | ||
| He does such thorough work. | ||
| I'd love to see the numbers in the battleground states as opposed to the whole sample. | ||
| Because this whole notion of what MAGA is, what Make America Great Again means, is simply, you know, I describe it as the Iron Triangle of populist economic nationalism. | ||
| It's first and foremost a strong manufacturing base through fair trade and things like tariffs. | ||
| But it's also the secure borders, which protect particularly black, brown, and blue-collar Americans. | ||
| And then the end to endless wars, whereby it's the fodder. | ||
| It's the working class people, the Lao Bai Jing of America, the Russian serfs of America, who are basically the ones who are sent over to the Hindu Kush to have their arms shot off or blown off. | ||
| And that's where this base of support for Donald Trump comes. | ||
| People in America understand at a gut level, as we breathe through our mouths, that Donald Trump is the person who will bring that home. | ||
| And for me, DeSantos, that guy's a total cipher to me. | ||
| He knows, as far as I know, nothing about The trade issue. | ||
| He's done some cute things on the secure border issue, but it's not clear to me where he stands on that. | ||
| And finally, Carlson flushed him out a little bit on the Ukraine thing, but I think he kind of did a pullback from that. | ||
| So he's an endless war kind of globalist kind of guy, backed by all the people that you and I know are out to get this country into a managed decline. | ||
| So those polling numbers make absolute sense. | ||
| To me, Steve, Donald Trump is the heart and soul of deplorable MAGA America. | ||
| And one last thing, note to Joe Biden, not domestic extremists. | ||
| We're salty-the-earth people, blue-collar people. | ||
| All we want to do... God, country, and family, that's what we put first, not critical race theory and all that crap that you guys did. | ||
| It's the Democratic coalition in the old days. | ||
| Yes. Real quickly, Biden's at 38 % today. | ||
| The Associated Press says 38%. | ||
| You were the first guy to call the bear market in equities. | ||
| That's happened. You were the first guy to call. | ||
| It's not transitory inflation. | ||
| It's going to be dumpster fire inflation. | ||
| What is your assessment going forward? | ||
| The Swiss today blame us for the banking system. | ||
| Credit Suisse is our fault. | ||
| Deutsche Bank is going to be our fault. | ||
| They put $160 billion of cash into the system last week to keep the banks up. | ||
| That's all deplorables money. | ||
| What's your assessment and how bad is it going to get for Joe Biden? | ||
| Well, it's going to get bad for Joe Biden. | ||
| It's going to get bad for the rest of us. | ||
| Here's what you can count on. | ||
| You can count on inflation continuing to erode the real wages and income of middle-class and blue-collar America. | ||
| Take that to the bank. | ||
| Inflation is out of control, and the events that have just happened have led that. | ||
| Let me explain quickly that when you look at it from an economist's point of view, what the bank What the crisis has done is send a contractionary monetary policy shock through the system because it's tightened reserves and pulled cash out everywhere. | ||
| And so what in knee-jerk fashion the central banks around the world, led by Powell, have done is to stop in their tracks any attempts To further control inflation through a rising interest rate regime. | ||
| So effectively what the bank crisis has done is put the war on inflation on hold at a time when it's spinning out of control. | ||
| And so when you see, for example, the stock market have bullish days, slightly one like it had today, that's not about stock prices going up on an expectation of higher earnings. | ||
| It's rather that just there's more money in the system pushing stock prices up. | ||
| And so there will be, and there has been a bear market in equities, primarily, Steve, in the end because inflation is eroding the real earnings of corporations, and it is that which determines stock prices. | ||
| So all of this is very bearish. | ||
| People need to understand this macro stuff. | ||
| It's not as complicated as you think. | ||
| I tried to present it on the War Room and the War Room College here, as simple as it can be without dumbing it down. | ||
| But that's where we stand, Steve. | ||
| But here's what we're going to announce right now. | ||
| Let's go ahead and do it. The College of the War Room, the very first course by Dr. | ||
| Peter Navarro. It's a 10-part series, I think, 20 bucks. | ||
| How did they get there? | ||
| I want everybody to take this. | ||
| Some of the stuff you may not understand, but we'll explain it as we go through. | ||
| It's now time for everybody in the country, once the working class understand macroeconomics, the country will change. | ||
| Once they understand the interconnectivity. | ||
| How do people get to your lecture series that you've put together? | ||
| I'm going to make this real easy for folks. | ||
| The course itself is Strategic Macroeconomics. | ||
| For Business and Investing, it's an online course with beautiful production values that taught for more than 20 years at the University of California, Irvine, at the Business School. | ||
| What we're going to do is get it up on the War Room website with a link. | ||
| I'm going to do a substack at peternavaro.substack.com, peternavaro.substack.com, that I'll release later today. | ||
| Get it up on Getter, Twitter, and Truth, and you'll be able to click a link And get it at a discount because you're the war room posse. | ||
| But what I preach is improving your economic and financial market literacy, particularly in these kinds of times, because even if you don't have a big investment portfolio, it still helps you make decisions about your role and participation in the labor market. | ||
| And if you do have a 401k, which already is down to a 201k, you can figure out Ways to figure that out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hang on, let me give you a plug here. | |
| This goes hand in hand with your gold and your three-volume series on the decline of the dollar because Philip Patrick and Birch Gold offer, you know, I don't recommend anything. | ||
| I'm not a financial advisor. | ||
| Inflation, one of the great hedges is precious metals. | ||
| But hang on. This is the most important thing. | ||
| The issues before the country. | ||
| I got Russ Vogt on the next hour, as we've told you, and I'm so proud of Cortez and Navarro and Dave Brat and Philip Patrick and Russ Vogt. | ||
| There are no easy decisions in front of us. | ||
| President Trump's not going to come in and wave some magic wand. | ||
| As hard as Navarro and all of us fought, For the policies that led to the great year of 2019, that the CCP realized they had to take this guy out, it's ten times harder now because of what the Biden regime's done. | ||
| What we want and what we need and what the country needs is a working class electorate that is up to speed on the nomenclature process and statics and dynamics of macroeconomics. | ||
| Once you understand this, It's going to be a sea change in how people vote and how you compare policies. | ||
| When you hear these other candidates start to pitch you ideas, you say, well, hang on for a second. | ||
| I'm not so sure that that lines up. | ||
| That's why we're doing this. | ||
| Dr. Navarro's done it. | ||
| It's going to be absolutely incredible. | ||
| We'll have the links up later. | ||
| Peter, how do people get to your Substack? | ||
| How do they get to all your different content? | ||
| Yeah, peternavarro.substack.com. | ||
| Peternavarro.substack.com. | ||
| It's really going to be the hub of For the podcast up on Apple and Google Podcasts. | ||
| And of course, my website, PeterNavarro.com, you can always go to that and you can get the immigration report, the Navarro report on election integrity and all that good stuff. | ||
| But if you just stick with PeterNavarro.Substack.com, subscribe. | ||
| It's free to subscribe. There's a paid one, but if you want to just go on free, that's cool with me. | ||
| But what I'm trying to do, Steve, what I spent my career doing is try to explain To people how to protect themselves and grow their businesses by understanding simple macroeconomics and green financial market literacy. | ||
| And if there ever was a time to do that, now's the time. | ||
| And I salute you, Steve, for the pamphlets you've been putting out as well. | ||
| They're very timely. By the way, when Stephanie Pomboy was on today, as smart, and she's one of the best, when she was going through, I was so proud of the fact that she was using terms and terminology that I knew this audience understood because we've been talking about it for the last couple of years. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro, thank you on a Friday for taking time off. | ||
| Thank you very much. Carry on, sir, and enjoy your show on Saturday. | ||
| I know you love that like a son. | ||
| That's my Saturday morning show. | ||
| Okay, brother. Short commercial break. | ||
| We've got some other things to discuss. | ||
| We're going to try to track down Boris about the legal side of President Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll next. And canceling cancel culture. | |
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. | ||
| On Getter, we're going to be up all weekend. | ||
| Remember, tomorrow evening is the big rally in Waco, Texas. | ||
| We're going to do a pregame tomorrow, the Saturday show. | ||
| We're going to have tons of news, breaking news, also going to have a lot of analysis of polling, and then where President Trump starts, where he kicks off the first rally he's got for this year. | ||
| Also, we're going to go through all the legal... | ||
| I don't want to spend too much time on the legal... | ||
| Because it upsets me no end. | ||
| We know what they're doing. It has nothing to do with the law. | ||
| It has nothing to do with these cases. | ||
| It's all something because the power of his ideas, right, is now getting more traction, particularly as you see the alternative. | ||
| One of the things we're trying to do here is go back to my C-SPAC speech, the convergence of the geopolitical and national security of the military with the economics, capital markets. | ||
| The convergence of that is the Third World War. | ||
| That's what we're trying to get you as up to speed as possible on the geopolitical side and also on the capital market side. | ||
| The 10-part Dr. | ||
| Navarro course, 10 parts macros, I've gone through it. | ||
| It's absolutely amazing. You will learn so much. | ||
| $20. We're going to link tonight on our site on that and also back to his site. | ||
| Also, Birchgold. Go to birchgold.com slash Bannon right now. | ||
| Totally free. You get the three-part series, The Politics of Money, The end of the dollars, the world's reserve currency, and the third debt ceiling or the debt trap we just put out. | ||
| I started writing this back in November, December. | ||
| We just finished it a couple of weeks ago, but I am so proud of how prescient it is for today. | ||
| Russ Vogt's going to join us in the next hour. | ||
| We're going to get a set up so that you guys can get actively involved. | ||
| And putting your shoulder to the wheel next week. | ||
| We'll do it next week, but Russ is going to tee us up with all kinds of action items and things that are happening in the negotiation for the debt ceiling because that's everything. | ||
| We've got to stop this. | ||
| If you don't stop the spending, you're not going to stop the inflation. | ||
| If you don't stop the inflation, these bonds are going to continue to get hammered. | ||
| The bonds continue to get hammered. | ||
| You're going to have these banks. Getting the bottom blown out of them in this continuing banking crisis, which is going to have contagion. | ||
| It's going to spread to the economy. | ||
| So make sure you go to Birchgold.com slash Bannon right now. | ||
| Also, you can get all the free information kits. | ||
| Look. It's not lost anybody that gold's on fire, but one of the reasons is Japan, India, and China are buying it with both hands. | ||
| It's time now that you immerse yourself in information. | ||
| That's what this is totally about. This show is to give you access to tools and access to information. | ||
| Boris now joins us. Boris, Barris has got polling that came out at the start of the show. | ||
| He's got President Trump up before over Biden. | ||
| He's got Harry Enten of CNN. We did the clip that Harry Antons got President Trump leading DeSantis in people that make less than $50,000, which is the great vast majority of the Republican voting base. | ||
| He's got a 32-point lead over Ron DeSantis. | ||
| Give us a minute or two of your thoughts on the polling, and then I want to ask you on the latest on the legal side, sir. | ||
| Steve, honored to be with you, honored to be with the posse today. | ||
| It's been a great week, a week of fights, a week of battle. | ||
| And as we go into the Sabbath and the weekend, I am honored to report that President Trump and Harvard Harris, left of center polling, is up 26 points, 26 points on the Florida government, 50 to 24. | ||
| And that's President Trump being up four since the last poll. | ||
| He was at 46 in February. | ||
| So President Trump continuing to take off in all polling. | ||
| And why is it? It's a combination of two things, Steve. | ||
| It's a combination of President Trump's continued strength. | ||
| Continued strength in fighting weaponization. | ||
| Continued strength on policy. | ||
| Continued strength on standing with the American people. | ||
| His speech at CPAC. His trip to Iowa. | ||
| His trip to East Palestine. | ||
| That's number one, President Trump's continued strength and dominance. | ||
| And number two, the fact that the Florida governor has absolutely exposed himself to be what the New York Times call them today, a Bush-Cheney Republican. | ||
| Somebody who's just typical establishment, somebody who will flip-flop on a dime just like she did with Ukraine a couple days ago, and somebody who truly doesn't have any answers to why she may or may not want to, or may not want to, or may want to, or may maybe think about running for president. | ||
| Ron, the sanctimony, as President Trump aptly calls him, is somebody who may have a God complex, but he has absolutely no reason, and he has absolutely no pitch to the American people. | ||
| for why he should be the one opposing President Trump. | ||
| All Republicans have to come together behind President Donald J. Trump and let's go and defeat Joe Biden. | ||
| And that is exactly what is happening. | ||
| You see that at every poll from political morning consult to Harvard Harris to Precision Insights. | ||
| Every single poll, all of them left of center, are showing President Trump more than doubling up the next pretender, and that is the Florida governor. | ||
| We had Mike Davis on here for a whole segment and then some about this. | ||
| The big tell is they see the bottom falling out of Biden. | ||
| It's 38 percent. It's going to get lower. | ||
| The economy's a mess. | ||
| The Swiss are blaming us for the banking system collapse, and the German now, Deutsche Bank, this massive bank, has got problems. | ||
| The whole thing is upside down, and yet they're going after President Trump from every different angle. | ||
| Is that not a tell they understand? | ||
| They understand the power of his ideas. | ||
| The power of his coalition, and how disastrous the illegitimate regime's been, that they gotta stop Trump with something cooked up, some legal thing they cook up, sir? | ||
| They're petrified of President Trump, they're petrified of Manhattan, they're petrified of the war room posse, and they're petrified of the fact that President Trump stands against the establishment, against the Union Party, and against the Chinese Communist Party, which is the absolute sugar daddy of so many of these rhino globalist donors, Who are trying to cook up a challenge to President Trump, but are absolutely failing. | ||
| And if you look at what happened this week, what was proven once and for all is that all of these hoaxes are totally fake. | ||
| The fact that the Manhattan T.A. is now having deep chaos internally, deep chaos between themselves and the grand jury, shows that not just that fake case, because there, there's no error, no misdemeanor, no crime, no case, but all of these hoaxes. | ||
| In Atlanta, everything that the court was special is looking at. | ||
| The fake case of the New York AG, all of these are cooked up. | ||
| They're all absolute witch-humps, and they're all falling apart and causing a further rallying effect against President Donald J. Trump and against the woke, radical, lunatic persecutors. | ||
| Boris, real quickly, where do people get to you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where are your coordinates? Steve, thanks so much for having me on. | |
| Again, we fought all week. We're going to continue to fight through the weekend. | ||
| Tomorrow's a huge day. That's us. | ||
| All eyes on Waco. My information is borisdp.com. | ||
| Set up right now. Hot on borisdp.com. | ||
| Hot on getter at borisdp. | ||
| Twitter at borisdp. Hot on socials at borisdp. | ||
| Stay strong. God bless. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Shabbat shalom. Boris, thank you so much. | |
| I know you're going to Waco with the president. | ||
| We're going to do a huge show tomorrow morning. | ||
| Next, we've got the budget. | ||
| Russ Vogt is here. | ||
| We've got TikTok. We're going to break it all down. | ||
| The testimony. Make sure you go to MyPillow.com. | ||
| Promo code WARROOM. MyPillow 2.0. | ||
| Sleep the sleep of the just. | ||
| And of course, immerse yourself in all the information we put on BurstGold. | ||
| BurstGold.com. Stick around. |
Export Selection