Feb. 3, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
47:19
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. It's another element that backs them into a quarter and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room, Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I can tell you that I talked to more than two dozen of our good sources in Memphis, and they all told me the same story. | ||
| And they had no first-hand evidence, but they all said sources within the Memphis Police Department had told them the following. | ||
| Number one, One of the police officers and one of the five former police officers who have now been arrested on charges of second-degree murder targeted Tyree Nichols because Mr. | ||
| Nichols had a personal relationship with the significant other of one of the police officers. | ||
| That's one of these rumors that everyone in Memphis is talking about. | ||
| The second rumor is that at least one of the members of this five-member unit of the Scorpion Task Force were connected to the vice, were affiliated in some way with the Vice Lords gang, a very large gang based out of Chicago. | ||
| Now, obviously, these are rumors. | ||
| We didn't have any original sources. | ||
| So we thought the way to kind of flesh this out was to actually ask the Memphis Police Department to comment, to confirm or deny these rumors. | ||
| And they actually did. | ||
| We talked to them last night. | ||
| Via email. And they gave us a very interesting kind of lawyerly parsed response. | ||
| We asked them to confirm or deny those two claims. | ||
| And their statement was, quote, There is no evidence that indicates that either of these claims are true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
End quote. Okay, welcome. | |
| It's Thursday to February in the year of our Lord, 2023. | ||
| It's Groundhog Day. | ||
| We're not playing that from yesterday just because it's Groundhog Day. | ||
| It was breaking news brilliantly framed by one of our strategic news partners. | ||
| This is Michael Patrick Leahy, the Star News Network, and particularly the Tennessee Star. | ||
| That was from yesterday's show. | ||
| Breaking News Newsweek has breaking news and we're bringing Michael Patrick Leahy to explain it. | ||
| And here's why, you know, we don't normally cover a lot of these type stories because we just can't bring anything special to it. | ||
| The coverage is usually so good or other people, the Dan Bonginos and the Bosovics are all over these type of things and do such a great job. | ||
| But there's something, you know, in our six o'clock show, As people know, the Real America's Voice version of War Room is done at Denver, as people know from my shouting at Denver all the time. | ||
| It's a great team there, but I have an Irish temper. | ||
| Our 6 o'clock show is done in conjunction with Lindell TV and Mike Lindell, and it's done out of Memphis, Tennessee. | ||
| I want to bring in now Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
| Let's bring him in again. I watched this the other night, Michael, as I told you over the weekend. | ||
| I said, there's something strange about this thing. | ||
| I don't understand why they initially haven't come out and this guy's got a long drug record, a long gang record, he's a gangbanger drug guy, he's got four or five felonies, you know, he's some bad character, or they have on videotape he's blown through stop signs, he's on a drug chase. | ||
| I mean, why five cops show up and it's still very confusing and you talked about what you were working on. | ||
| Get us up to speed on what this massive story on this that broke today, sir. | ||
| Well, Newsweek advanced the story. | ||
| They followed our lead, and they actually did a very smart thing. | ||
| They went directly to the district attorney's office in Shelby County, and they asked them specifically, Steve, if they are investigating rumors that there was a personal relationship between the victim, Tyree Nichols, and the ex-wife or ex-spouse or ex-girlfriend, of one of the police officers now charged with second-degree murder. | ||
| They also asked if they were investigating rumors that this particular officer sent photos of Nichols after he'd been beaten to his ex-wife or ex-girlfriend. | ||
| Listen to this response from a spokesperson for Shelby County District Attorney's Office that Newsweek elicited, quote, all of this is Still under investigation, they said. | ||
| Those are the things, along with the participation of others, that are now the subject of our investigation. | ||
| So, they said that this connection between the victim and the ex-spouse or ex-significant other of one of the now-charged police officers has not been, quote, Similar to the language we received in the non-denial denial from the Memphis Police Department that we reported on on this program with you yesterday indicates now they've moved the story forward. | ||
| The district attorney's office is actively investigating these rumors. | ||
| The rumors, it should be very easy to either confirm or deny. | ||
| And we're waiting to see what happens on the story. | ||
| Number one is you couldn't make head nor tails. | ||
| And normally they would want to get that out. | ||
| You know, the guy was driving 200 miles an hour. | ||
| He was going through neighborhoods where kids were. | ||
| He's blowing through stop signs. | ||
| The guy's coming back from a shift at FedEx. | ||
| Because people don't know in Memphis, that part of town. | ||
| That part of town, more to the suburban side, more away from the riverside, is where the FedEx headquarters are and the airport FedEx. | ||
| He's coming home from FedEx, which everybody says is a pretty... | ||
| You know, solid employees. | ||
| Coming home from FedEx thinks he works the swing shift. | ||
| Coming home from FedEx, he lives with his mom, no problem, doesn't look like any record, at least nothing you can find. | ||
| Pretty quiet guy. | ||
| Going home to his mom, he's only a block away or half a block away from his mom's house. | ||
| All of a sudden, it's five cop cars instantly on the scene. | ||
| The other thing is when you see the beating, And what MSNBC and these guys went right away said, oh, if you make them run, they're going to be mad. | ||
| Well, the run wasn't that far. | ||
| It's not like he put them on a four-mile chase and these guys are furious. | ||
| The viciousness and the callousness and almost like the torture after he's hurt and laying on the ground, just propping him up there, there's something so over the top. | ||
| about this that it's got to be just your natural inclination has got to be something more than just a traffic stop and it just doesn't make any sense but I want you to go back and read the district attorneys thing because you out the other day you said look and you and I talked before you came on you wrote the article I said look I've talked to over two dozen people every person It's telling me there's something else up here, | ||
| right? Both with the gang affiliation of the Vice Lords and with this personal relationship with a wife or a girlfriend of one of the officers. | ||
| And you guys went and... | ||
| The police department gave a non-denial denial, right, to you guys. | ||
| So right away, Leahy, who used to work with us over at Breitbart and is an incredibly experienced guy, you knew right away, hey, we got something here, right? | ||
| We got to figure out how to get there. | ||
| Newsweek then did something very smart, went to the district attorney. | ||
| I want you to read again the response of the district attorney back to Newsweek that just came out. | ||
| Newsweek just put the story up, because this one's really going to... | ||
| What did the district attorney say? | ||
| They specifically asked them, Newsweek asked the district attorney's office if they were investigating rumors of a relationship between the victim and the ex-wife or the ex-girlfriend of one of the officers now charged with second-degree murder and in the killing of Tyree Nichols. | ||
| And also they asked him, are you investigating rumors that one of the officers who is now charged with second-degree murder took pictures of him after the beating and texted them to his ex-wife. | ||
| Here's the exact quote from Erica Williams, Director of Communications at the Shelby County District Attorney's Office. | ||
| Quote, all of this is still under investigation. | ||
| Those are the things, along with the participation of others, that are now the subject of our investigation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
End quote. Wow. | |
| Leahy, great work. | ||
| Let me, one thing before I let you go, and I want everybody to get access to the Star News Network and all the different news sites that Michael Patrick Leahy has, because it's an ingenious idea to start in these battleground states with these local papers, these local news, because it's all local now. | ||
| Let me just throw something out there. | ||
| The second degree murder charge is not premeditated. | ||
| What you're implying, Michael Patrick Leahy, by your reporting, and if it follows through with what the district attorney is saying, then this was not a random traffic stop. | ||
| And the second degree murder aspect of this, a killing him in cold blood, is this actually gets to be premeditated. | ||
| Do you have any inclination at all that the charges may be up to a capital murder, murder one? | ||
| I personally at the moment don't have any indication. | ||
| However, I will tell you this. | ||
| As you know, talk radio hosts around the state of Tennessee speak to each other about these stories all the time. | ||
| I've talked to several of them. | ||
| Number one, all of them tell me the buzz is overwhelmingly strong in Memphis, that this was a targeted attack by this police officer for personal reasons against Tyree Nichols. | ||
| So that's, number one, the very strong buzz. | ||
| One of those radio hosts told me today that an entertainment-oriented website, which we'll find out, and I haven't confirmed this, quoted a civil rights attorney there who said that there may possibly be reason to increase the charges from second-degree murder to first-degree murder. | ||
| Now, there's only one reason to do that, and that would be premeditation. | ||
| As horrific as this thing is, and it's horrific, if the Memphis Police Department think they have a problem right now, it's incalculable how big a problem they have if this turns out to be premeditated. | ||
| If this turns out that he was targeted because of a personal relationship, I think the outrage of the citizens of Memphis and throughout the country are just going to be enormous. | ||
| It's just going to be incredible. | ||
| And if it turns out that there's any gang involvement at all, You're going to go next level, I think, in people's outrage that things have got to be cleaned up and you've got a major problem. | ||
| Michael Patrick Leahy, I want everybody to make sure they go and get full access to your site. | ||
| How do they do that? | ||
| TennesseeStar.com, TennesseeStar.com. | ||
| And also, this particular follow-up story was written by our new national political editor, Matt Kittle. | ||
| He did a great job, got it up very quickly, and it's up there now. | ||
| Actually, we got it up there just before we went on the air here. | ||
| So go to TennesseeStar.com, TennesseeStar.com, and you can see the story. | ||
| Yeah, I want to make sure that we get everybody to your site. | ||
| In this story, you guys are the lead sled dog on this. | ||
| Newsweek's doing a great job, too. | ||
| But boy, with all the resources of CNN and MSNBC and everything, to have the Tennessee Star and Newsweek out in front of this is fantastic. | ||
| And good luck. We'll follow this up closely. | ||
| Thank you, sir. We'll see what the truth ends up being. | ||
| The investigation should yield the results to determine whether or not these rumors are true or not. | ||
| I'm just saying there's something, there's been from this very first minute, there's just something not right about this thing. | ||
| If you look at it, there's just something not right about this thing. | ||
| And so we'll have to see. | ||
| You gotta go where the evidence takes you. | ||
| But that district attorney, that's a bombshell. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The way that was phrased is a bombshell. | |
| Newsweek, and kudos to Newsweek for following our lead and advancing the story. | ||
| Yeah, big time. Big time. | ||
| Okay, Michael Patrick Leahy, thank you very much. | ||
| Appreciate it. Thanks, honored to have you on here. | ||
| Steve, thanks so much. Okay, let's, and by the way, I want to make sure we're going to get into the chat rooms and everything, the news story up on Newsweek, also the news story Michael Patrick Leahy and the team just did over at Tennessee Star, and we're going to make sure that it gets out and gets viral whenever I can see it. | ||
| They're a very interesting exchange. | ||
| I got a cold open for Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Naomi Wolf has been very focused on Pfizer, so has James O'Keefe. | ||
| The stock is off. | ||
| I think they've lost $43 billion in value since the middle of January. | ||
| So they're feeling it. | ||
| They're feeling the wrath of Dr. | ||
| Wolf. Let's go ahead and play this clip from this morning. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely stunning and extraordinary. | |
| I find it outrageous that now we are three years away from the beginning of COVID and now we are having our first hearing on the origins of COVID-19 because the Republicans are in charge of the House. | ||
| Not one hearing. | ||
| Nobody was I'm just curious as far as how this thing started. | ||
| We're with Sam Waxel this morning. | ||
| Sam, what do you think about what went on in Wuhan? | ||
| And by the way, is Pfizer mutating COVID? The Project Veritas report, they interviewed the director of research and he said that they are doing gain-of-function or mutating COVID so that they can make more vaccines. | ||
| Now, Pfizer came out and said that's not true. | ||
| We are not doing gain-of-function research. | ||
| But what can you tell us? Look, I do believe that there was a laboratory accident in Wuhan. | ||
| And I do believe that that laboratory accident led to a worldwide pandemic. | ||
| And we can talk about that at length. | ||
| I do not believe that Pfizer's doing anything to endanger the world in that way. | ||
| And Pfizer has been working and Pfizer has done, you know, Albert Berla has done an unbelievable job at making a vaccine available with their relationship with BioNTech quickly to the American public and to the world. | ||
| And they've done a great job. | ||
| So I do not believe that Pfizer is doing anything to endanger the world. | ||
| We may have to play that one over. | ||
| Naomi Wolf's head just blew up when we're getting ready to come on. | ||
| It is extraordinary. | ||
| I am stunned. | ||
| And by the way, he's wrong on every account, right? | ||
| And even the $43 billion market cap drop, the gain-of-function things that Veritas and his team, James O'Keefe, got these guys on, As bad as that is, and that's horrific, and Naomi's about to walk you through why the gentleman there is just dead wrong, and quite frankly, just blatantly close to a lie, but definitely media spin, trained media professional spin. | ||
| But the fact that what she has found out is ten times worse. | ||
| You talk about Burla, they're going to give him the Nobel Prize right there. | ||
| Let me bring in Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, I'll bifurcate it. | ||
| Let's take the first part. | ||
| And Maria Bartram is great. | ||
| She is. Her producer is not quite up. | ||
| They didn't quite read the letter as sophisticated as you did. | ||
| Talk about that first part, about their response. | ||
| They responded they had nothing to do with, they have nothing to do with gain of function. | ||
| As you've shown us, that actually is not the response, is it, ma'am? | ||
| I think it's impossible for any journalist to stand up and say for sure it did or didn't originate in this way. | ||
| It was or was not done with intention. | ||
| It was or was not an accident. | ||
| And it's certainly impossible for anyone to say the things we're hearing now, which is give us amnesty. | ||
| We didn't know there were injuries. | ||
| We didn't know there were side effects. | ||
| So on both the virus and the vaccine, the fact that the people who were entirely cheering the rollout and completely uncritical of the government narrative about the rollout of both the virus and the vaccine, you know, really should not be drawing universal exonerating conclusions of any kind right now. | ||
| There's no basis on which to do that. | ||
| And there's so much evidence on the other side. | ||
| And also, let's go back to the letter. | ||
| The letter that they came out as a response to O'Keefe thing, specifically, because they were categorical right there on Fox. | ||
| They've already said they're doing no gain of function, there's nothing to see here. | ||
| That's actually not technically true. | ||
| They said, quite frankly, in a sophisticated reading of the letter, the exact opposite, didn't they? | ||
| Let me just clarify something, Steve. | ||
| Are you saying, and this is so shocking, I probably You know, went into kind of a hypnagogic state if they actually said this. | ||
| Are you saying Fox said Pfizer is not doing gain-of-function? | ||
| Is that how you interpreted what they said? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, let's go. Because Pfizer said they were doing gain-of-function. | |
| Hang on, hang on. That's what I'm saying. | ||
| I said I got to delay getting Naomi on here. | ||
| I think her head is blowing up. | ||
| You didn't quite totally hear it. | ||
| So we're going to play it. We're going to take it from the top. | ||
| This is the great Maria Bartiroma, and she's been fantastic. | ||
| She's been so courageous because she gets stink-eye every time she does something like this. | ||
| But she's got a Pfizer. So let's go ahead and take it from the top. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want to play it again. Absolutely stunning and extraordinary. | |
| I find it outrageous that now we are three years away from the beginning of COVID, and now we are having our first hearing on the origins of COVID-19 because the Republicans are in charge of the House. | ||
| Not one Nobody was curious as far as how this thing started. | ||
| We're with Sam Waxel this morning. | ||
| Sam, what do you think about what went on in Wuhan? | ||
| And by the way, is Pfizer mutating COVID? The Project Veritas report, they interviewed the director of research, and he said that they are doing gain-of-function or mutating COVID so that they can make more vaccines. | ||
| Pfizer came out and said that's not true. | ||
| We are not doing gain-of-function research. | ||
| But what can you tell us? Well, look, I do believe that there was a laboratory accident in Wuhan. | ||
| And I do believe that that laboratory accident led to a worldwide pandemic. | ||
| And we can talk about that at length. | ||
| I do not believe that Pfizer's doing anything to endanger the world in that way. | ||
| And Pfizer's been working and Pfizer has done, you know, Albert Berla has done an unbelievable job at making a vaccine available with their relationship with BioNTech quickly to the American public and to the world. | ||
| And they've done a great job. | ||
| So I do not believe that Pfizer's doing anything to endanger the world. | ||
| Let me take it from the top. | ||
| Naomi Wolf's head just blew up and she had to put it back. | ||
| That's what I'm saying. First of all, I want to go, Maria, the guy goes, they said they had no gain of function. | ||
| Their letter and response as you deconstructed actually said the opposite, didn't it, ma'am? | ||
| Let's start with that. And thank you. | ||
| This may be a first that you had to play something because it was so stunning a second time because a guest couldn't process it the first time. | ||
| But thank you for that. | ||
| Now I understand. | ||
| Super gigantic lies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Super, super huge categorical, shocking, stunning lies. | |
| Thank you very much. Holy cow. | ||
| All right. Hold it. | ||
| You've got to understand how fake farmers are rolling now. | ||
| Because the investigation started, these are just bald-faced lies. | ||
| They're going to look you right in the camera, and these are just bald-faced lies, and they're not going to back up an inch. | ||
| They're not going to concede an inch, because to concede an inch is to concede the whole thing. | ||
| Naomi Wolf. Yeah, and that guy's Chiron read Biopharmaceutical Holdings. | ||
| He's right there in the, you know, in the docket, if indeed Pfizer did intend to hurt the world and is doing gain of function. | ||
| Holy heck. Okay. | ||
| So, yes, for those who didn't watch the first time after the Project Veritas expose of Jordan Walker saying we at Pfizer are essentially doing gain of function. | ||
| We're making viruses more deadly. | ||
| We're calling it directed evolution because we are God. | ||
| No, he didn't say the last part, but he did say directed evolution. | ||
| I read the press release from last Friday that Pfizer released at 8 p.m. | ||
| after the news day was over. | ||
| And it categorically said the opposite. | ||
| And everyone on that set should know that it said the opposite. | ||
| And that was what was so disturbing and stunning. | ||
| It essentially said, yes, we are doing gain of function. | ||
| We're doing gain-of-function with our collaborators. | ||
| And as you and I have discussed, they didn't say who those were. | ||
| They could be, you know, the global church of Satan. | ||
| Like, you know, they could be China. | ||
| And just like BioNTech is in an MOU with China, just like this whole injection has been rolled out with Phosan Pharmaceuticals. | ||
| which is Chinese Communist Party entity and China is building manufacturing plants or built them in the distribution network. | ||
| But they literally said, we're doing it. | ||
| It's a lot of countries are doing it and it's good. | ||
| Like that was their position. | ||
| And I've been very depressed ever since Friday because what that means, you know, as I said to you then with PR, if there's something good to say, you say it. | ||
| If there's a denial, that the world is waiting for. | ||
| No, we would never hurt you again, or we would never hurt you the way the Wuhan lab intentionally or not hurt you. | ||
| We know gain-of-function experimentation is illegal. | ||
| We would never take the risk of unleashing another horrible virus on the world that can't be controlled. | ||
| The next one may be worse. No one would ever do that. | ||
| They're saying the opposite. They're saying it's true. | ||
| We're proud of it. We're not going to name our collaborators. | ||
| They also speak of partners, as I recall. | ||
| Also unnamed, not American necessarily. | ||
| And remember, Pfizer and BioNTech are not American companies. | ||
| They are not German companies. | ||
| They are partnerships with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And they're global partnerships with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| So those people, you know, I couldn't process it the first time around because they were, it's like, it's like 1984, where war is peace and lies are truth. | ||
| And, you know, work makes you free, you know, 1980. | ||
| 41 in that case, but in which there's a public document in which Pfizer said, yes, we're doing gain of function. | ||
| And the reason I'm so scared by that is it means that Pfizer has no expectation of having to defend that. | ||
| Whoever's behind it is so powerful that they would rather kind of get everyone used to the idea that they're doing gain of function or we're helpless to stop them, essentially, is how I read that. | ||
| And There's no recourse, and what is happening now, which is very disturbing, is it's like computer effects but for speech, in which I mean that these spokespeople from the farm industry are going on the media saying they didn't mean to hurt anyone, | ||
| they don't hurt anyone, they're not doing gain-of-function, they're not doing gain-of-function, and they anticipate that you'll forget the actual press release, the formal public document saying we're doing gain-of-function from Pfizer, and instead you'll remember this guy on Fox Who's invested in pharmaceuticals saying no gain of function, no gain of function. And that, unfortunately, is how human memory works. | ||
| I mean, that's why it's propaganda. And you know very well that repetition, repetition, repetition, people can believe something that never happened. | ||
| And they'll end up believing, of course, Pfizer doesn't do gain of function, but Pfizer said they did. | ||
| Talk to me about—we've got about a minute. | ||
| We're going to hold you through the break. But then go to the other part about that Borla should basically get the Nobel Peace Prize. | ||
| He's done such an amazing job. | ||
| He's done such a great benefit for humanity. | ||
| What has your research—I tell you what, why don't we do this? | ||
| Because I want you to get a long runway on this and not have to do a break. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We have Naomi Wolf. Naomi, real quickly, the book is up. | ||
| How many copies of the book sold in the book? | ||
| This is self-published by your group. | ||
| Yes. How many copies are sold and where are we on the bestseller list? | ||
| It's an absolute miracle thanks to all of you out there and the people you're gifting as well as word of mouth because people know these lying liars are lying to them and this book tells the truth. | ||
| So it's the War Room, Daily Cloud, Pfizer's We published it and we just passed the 10,000 coming up to 11,000 copies mark, which in like 10 days, which is absolutely unheard of, you know, solid nonfiction bestseller, even in the midst of all kinds of censorship. | ||
| And we're in the top 25 or so on the Amazon bestseller list. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. Hang on for one second. | |
| and short commercial break. Naomi Wolf will join us on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Battleground with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Welcome back. Naomi Wolf is our guest and one of the obviously major contributors to everything we do here at War Room, particularly putting forward the correct information on the VACs and everything about it. | ||
| Naomi, I want you to go back and talk to us about your latest direction where this is going, and particularly when you see This spin that's happening now. | ||
| And Maria Bartiroma is as tough as you get. | ||
| I mean, she's the one person out there that actually asks some hard questions. | ||
| MSNBC and CNN. But I have noticed they have definitely downsized. | ||
| Remember, it used to be all the time, and the head of the CDC was up there, and Dr. | ||
| Nguyen was up there, and Fauci was there nonstop. | ||
| They really downplayed that because they understand some bad stuff coming with these investigations about the start. | ||
| If they thought the Veritas... | ||
| By the way, Veritas has told us there are going to be other drops coming. | ||
| And the Veritas thing is amazing. | ||
| It's absolutely legendary. | ||
| But even I think that pales in comparison when you actually look at what you guys are going through and the data itself provided by Pfizer. | ||
| Both of them combined are a damning... | ||
| You know, it's like a scissors. | ||
| It's a garden shear. | ||
| You need both blades. | ||
| Their thing and the arrogance and just the flippant attitude of what they're talking about this. | ||
| And then you add your team going through the hard analysis. | ||
| And if you see both of them together, it's like, where are the jail cells, ma'am? | ||
| Yeah. Yeah. | ||
| I mean, you know, I thank God that the Project Veritas expose came out right when our Pfizer... | ||
| War Room Daily Cloud volunteers ebook came out because they really do it's like a lab experiment where you you you add them together and they explode you know they corroborate each other and what they corroborate is among other things that the people running Pfizer meaning the people running you know a billion lives around the world human lives mothers children old people literally have no regard for human life and have moved into a model A business model in which they're very happy to create illness in order to continue to have gigantic profit margins. | ||
| An example I gave the last time I was on was of this shocking discovery, but I want to get to the children in a minute. | ||
| People have to understand that this is now how they work. | ||
| The mRNA injections thicken the blood and I found that in 2017, Pfizer bought Eliquis, which I mentioned here before, which is a blood thinner. | ||
| And they said in five years, it'll be a billion dollar drug. | ||
| And then sure enough, it's in the top five now, right after the two COVID vaccines. | ||
| Well, one of them, Pfizer's. | ||
| Well, now it's clear that, you know, Pfizer's investment in the COVID vaccines is going to drop like a stone now. | ||
| We're doing our part. | ||
| Project Veritas is doing their part, but this is not the long-term play, right? | ||
| It could well be. | ||
| And as I said last time, how do they know that in five years, everyone's going to have thick blood? | ||
| Well, these people are entirely capable of projecting or creating a situation. | ||
| I'm thinking about this more and more with these injections, you know, adding the lipid nanoparticles that really have no use apart from going throughout the body and, um, You know, bringing their payload like a shotgun, as Dr. | ||
| Chandler said, throughout the body. | ||
| But the other thing they do is they thicken the blood. | ||
| And these people are entirely capable of thinking, okay, well, you know, we'll roll out, we've got Eliquis, we'll roll out this injection, such a fantastic opportunity, we'll throw in a blood thickener. | ||
| And then, you know, when COVID's over, and now the president has declared it over, as we've said yesterday, Every year, people who need blood thinners because their blood has been thickened will be paying, you know, this billion-dollar drug. | ||
| In other words, that's the long-term play, right, is Eliquis, not the COVID-19 injection. | ||
| And that's just an inferred example. | ||
| But again and again now, with these 700 pages of fully sourced reports in this e-book, you know, with the Project Veritas Exposé, And now with this new story, we've just busted open that I want to share with you following on from the infamous report number 54, | ||
| which we broke yesterday about these unbelievable story of 34 children damaged by injections unlawfully, very severely, and 28 of them lost, right? We don't know where they went. They could be dead starting in December of 2021. | ||
| What all of this shows is that they're willing, they're ready to harm children, throw away children, damage children, cover up the evidence, drive gain of function, make the world sicker, create new variants, make our biological reality more dangerous, thicken our blood. | ||
| They're willing to do that for profit. | ||
| And honestly, we're in a kind of dimension of the universe now. | ||
| Morally, which is a whole new dimension. | ||
| I've only begun to grapple with this, but we have to understand. | ||
| Up until now, I've been saying, we've got to understand we're dealing with tyrants. | ||
| Then I said, we've got to understand we're dealing with Nazis. | ||
| Well, we're beyond that. | ||
| We're in a whole new dimension, which in order to understand what's really coming at us, we have to accept that there are human beings who are essentially not part of the human family. | ||
| Who have no allegiance to... | ||
| Let me drill down in a second. | ||
| Because you were the first, and I think it's a year and a half ago, or two years ago, almost now. | ||
| You were the first one I ever heard use the phrase Nazi doctors. | ||
| And you're not some person just throwing stuff off the top of your head. | ||
| You're descended from... | ||
| You have relatives that were in the Holocaust, in the camps. | ||
| And anybody's been to the camps in particular, I think Birkenau in Auschwitz, but Birkenau, it's a experience that will never leave you, right? | ||
| The industrial destruction of a people, right? | ||
| Industrial, perfect engineering. | ||
| When you said that, if you go back, and this is the scary thing, and I want to bring it today. | ||
| The Nazi doctors Thought that they were doing the highest thing of medicine, but the people they were working on were kind of subhuman. | ||
| They either had mental issues, had physical issues, were Jewish. | ||
| So they thought they were doing things that were for the betterment of mankind, right? | ||
| Right. Is that the mentality you see here? | ||
| Because there's some weird way they talk about this, that there's a massive separation. | ||
| You can just tell them the way they talk about it. | ||
| It's a massive separation. Like right there, that guy right there. | ||
| I know he's an investor, but Borla should be like up for sainthood of the job he's done. | ||
| And he actually talks about the Chinese joint venture right there. | ||
| He's such a saint. | ||
| I mean, and they treat him when he's on CNBC and these business shows when he's at Davos. | ||
| They're like, this guy is the guy. | ||
| The way he talks about it, it's a separation. | ||
| Is that your analogy to the Nazi doctors, that they just think that everybody else is somehow not at the level of humanity they are? | ||
| Steve, I wish I had an answer for you. | ||
| I'm watching these people make decisions. | ||
| Again, my world collapsed when I saw Report 54, and I saw that they gave a seven-year-old a stroke and buried the information in a footnote, and that they Injected a two-month-old baby who then had kidney damage and then they gave these documents to the FDA and the FDA gave them to the CDC and they all went to the White House and they all knew these 61 children were injured or worse in these documents and they just kept going like my world collapsed so I'm looking at these people lying and And with no, | ||
| like, completely impassively, you know, Borla at Davos being confronted, shame, shame. | ||
| There's not a flicker of human recognition that someone might think that their actions are monstrous. | ||
| So, you know, when I wrote The Bodies of Others, I did describe what I understood at that time, which was, and saw and was part of, really, a kind of global elite who really do think that, you know, we, I'll say we at that time, were I mean, I don't think I was better than anyone else, but I was in a community that definitely thought they were better than everyone else and that they could make decisions for other people. | ||
| And then what happens is there's this kind of cognitive dissonance where if you're already invested in China and you've got a fabulous townhouse and your returns are great, there's an incentive for you not to look at organ harvesting or to say, well, You know, these people who are raising questions, they really need technocrats like us or hedge fund managers like us or academics like us to make decisions for them. | ||
| So that's as far as my analysis could go. | ||
| But now I'm looking at these kind of announcements by Pfizer. | ||
| Yes, we're doing gain of function. | ||
| And look what happened. It's a week later. | ||
| No one's up in arms, right? | ||
| You and I are sitting here going, wait, they just said they're doing gain of function. | ||
| And the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times and the White House isn't saying, or our military isn't saying, what do you mean, Pfizer? | ||
| You can't do that. It's totally illegal. | ||
| You know, we are going to arrest you, right? | ||
| And the finding that I just had, you know, through Amy Kelly and the volunteers of the infamous report number 54 about these kids and the fact that we've just broken this story and No one is showing up at Rochelle Walensky's house outside of Boston to arrest her for covering up the damage, | ||
| possibly mortal damage, to 61 children that she signed off on. | ||
| I guess what I'm trying to say is I can't answer you because I don't think these people are like aliens from another planet. | ||
| But I think they're inhabiting a mindset in which they're so lost spiritually that they're not part of the human family anymore. | ||
| They're part of something else. | ||
| And that's why I keep thinking, you know, we're seeing something spiritual that's unrecognizable, you know, that that's like, it's like the Borg or, you know, I don't even know what the Borg is, but it's like, it's like Legion, right? | ||
| It's like if there was, I mean, and the Old Testament, the New Testament talk about this, you know, about About negative powers that can take over, you know, countries and people and souls and kings and, you know, my people constantly got seduced or drawn away from a moral life in the Old Testament by, you know, going after these false promises to these, you know, negative powers. | ||
| And God was constantly saying, don't do it. | ||
| You know, it's not going to end well. | ||
| As you're saying that in modernity, that that's the golden calf, that there's always a golden calf that comes up. | ||
| You know what you're supposed to do spiritually. | ||
| You know what you've been raised to do spiritually, but that there's always these material incentives out there that get you to drop that. | ||
| Because I want to go very specifically to Yale. | ||
| That is an institution you're very proud to go to, you're a prominent member of, you're very proud to have an association with. | ||
| It's close enough to your heart that it was important to you to go back about the students having to get the boosters to go back to school and show back up, I think, on Tuesday this week, the 31st. | ||
| When it became evident, all of a sudden, institutionally, you could have any waiver in the world. | ||
| That happened the last two or three weeks, right? | ||
| That's because of new information that's coming out. | ||
| The last few days. But the institution itself, that's the institution trying to protect itself. | ||
| That's not the institution actually admitting that not only is it wrong about this, but there's something fundamental. | ||
| I mean, you've got Harvey Risch at Yale. | ||
| You've got some of these prominent people that have gone to these great schools, and they're some of the most prominent. | ||
| They've come out with the great Barrington Declaration, people at Harvard, people at Stanford. | ||
| And they're sitting there going, how did I give my entire life to this place and be part of this with colleagues I know and respect. | ||
| But there's this chasm, this chasm, and it's not bridgeable. | ||
| You're either on one side of it or you're on the other side of it. | ||
| And every day we go forward, the evidence only mounts that we're on the right side of history, right? | ||
| I mean, this is what 54, I think, is so powerful because we've done all these others. | ||
| You guys have worked on this forever. | ||
| You've gone through this. Remember, never forget this for a moment. | ||
| The FDA did not want Amy Kelly, 3,500 middle class and working class people out of the war room, the lawyers that Naomi was able to put together in the daily class. | ||
| They never wanted anybody to see this. | ||
| They wanted only people to see this 75 years from now, when it was all forgotten about. | ||
| But because of a judge and Dell Bigtree and these guys over there, that group, the lawyers, we got it. | ||
| And so every report you see was not supposed to be seen for 75 years. | ||
| And every report you put out incrementally, you understand, well, now I understand why they didn't want to see it for 75 years. | ||
| Now I understand why they didn't want to come forward. | ||
| And put it, the institutional problem actually overwhelms the personal malfeasance here. | ||
| Is it not true? And that's where it scared me, that's where it has me the most scared, because I don't know how you changed that. | ||
| Well, I think I'm agreeing with you, and thank you for pulling me away from kind of theological speculation, which I've, you know, I've no answers for, you know, only questions, you know, back to more material ground. | ||
| I guess what I'm trying to say is, yes, I agree with you that in the past, once it became clear to everyone, as it's now clear that these boosters, for instance, are not good for healthy young adults and harm them in a million ways, and once it's been publicly exposed, and surely Yale has heard from many, many parents and donors. | ||
| I know it. I know it personally for a fact. | ||
| Before 2020, You would never have President Salovey send out an email like the one I got in my inbox as a Yale alumna saying, it's so great, 2023 is going to be all about vaccines. | ||
| I mean, he really said that, you know, and you wouldn't have the, you would have some sort of mea culpa or some sort of press release saying, you know, we thought it was safe, but now it's not safe. | ||
| Everyone can make their own choices about this. | ||
| You're not seeing that. | ||
| So I'm agreeing with you that we're seeing not just individuals, but institutions Behave in ways they never used to behave, in which they're no longer based on what we assumed were basic common human values, which turned out to be Judeo-Christian values. | ||
| You know, I hadn't realized that. I thought they were just basic human values. | ||
| But they're behaving as if there is no such thing as an obligation of care for another human being. | ||
| And there is no such thing as needing to keep children alive and not endanger them. | ||
| And there is no such thing as you don't Destroy the biological environment of human beings because we don't do that. | ||
| We're human beings. We need to be healthy. | ||
| We all took that for granted, you know? | ||
| So there's a whole new set of rules for institutions. | ||
| And I've never seen so many institutions align with these soulless, heartless, you could say materialists, right? | ||
| Or a new golden calf. | ||
| But it's worse, right? Because there's been greed forever. | ||
| You know, there was greed in Dickens' era. | ||
| But But I've never seen this kind of icy neutrality about it, right? | ||
| And maybe that's a cultural moment. | ||
| Maybe it's just, you know, the result of, like, technology everywhere alienating people from their community. | ||
| But I'm going to say, you know, what I do see happening, Steve, is historically something is happening that I can't fully explain in which, as you say, there is a widening chasm. | ||
| Between those of us who still hold humane values and assume everyone should, whether you call that a spiritual thing or just a moral thing, to me, it doesn't really matter. | ||
| The bottom line is that we hold those values. | ||
| And other people, ranging from the media to administrations to leaders around the world to gigantic corporations who seem to have lost any allegiance to those values at all. | ||
| And they're doing their own thing. | ||
| And they're not expecting any significant blowback or repercussions. | ||
| And that I've never seen before in history, but it's happening. | ||
| And maybe it's AI. It's happening and I can't fully explain it, but every day it's sharper, right? | ||
| Every day it's more clear. | ||
| I mean, I could create a list with two categories, two columns on a piece of paper and put people I know on one side or the other, institutions I know On one side or the other, and it is a spiritual battle of the highest order. | ||
| And it's like the chessboard is just, you know, here's the good guys over here and the non-human values over here, and they have less and less to do with each other. | ||
| We've only got a couple of minutes and I want to focus on the book because we want to take this even up to the next couple of levels. | ||
| How do people get it? How do they gift it? | ||
| Where do they go? How do they go and find your other research? | ||
| I want people to be part of this community and particularly people who didn't have time or whatever to pitch in and do the work. | ||
| Their job now is to help push all this out. | ||
| You can still be part of this team and be on the marketing side and the force multiplier side. | ||
| How do they do it? Yeah, that's a beautiful way to put it. | ||
| We all have a role and you guys out there have a huge role to make this a success and to fight for truth and to fight for these kids, really, these sacrificed children. | ||
| You go to Kindle, I'm sorry, you go to Amazon and go to Kindle eBooks and look up the War Room Daily Cloud Reiser Documents Analysis eBook and you can gift it by putting in an email of someone you want to send it to, your doctor, Rochelle Walensky, your elected official. | ||
| And you can also come to dailycloud.io and download a PDF. Though people are having an easier time buying the Kindle than downloading the PDF. Not that there's something wrong with our PDF. It's just not something a lot of people are comfortable doing. | ||
| So I recommend that you go to Amazon and soon there will be a paperback as well. | ||
| And we got approached by a Japanese agent to sell Kindle. | ||
| It starts selling it worldwide in translation. | ||
| So that is all wonderful. | ||
| Do I have time to tell you about the latest findings with People being paid $900 to bring their six-month-old babies in illegally to be injected? | ||
| Or should I save that for another time? | ||
| We're going to save that for tomorrow. | ||
| That's a cliffhanger. We got a hard out, but we needed to have this conversation. | ||
| I'm glad we had it. And tomorrow we're going to drop another episode on. | ||
| It's one shock. These things are so shocking, so stunning and so inhuman. | ||
| Naomi, thank you. Bodies of Others, plus this book, Bodies of Others, you still see the journey of Naomi Wolf. | ||
| You can get it at Amazon, or you can get it also at the publisher's website, All Seasons Press. | ||
| Naomi, thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you on here. We're going to be back tomorrow morning at 10 a.m., and the one thing I can commit to you, we'll be on fire in the War Room. |
Export Selection