Feb. 2, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
47:52
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. It's another element that backs them into a quarter and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room. Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, Wednesday, February 1st, the year of our Lord, 2023. | ||
| There's obviously a very important event going on this afternoon, the funeral for Tyree Nichols in Memphis, Tennessee. | ||
| I want to go to the Tennessee star, Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
| Hey, Michael, you sent me an article, your research. | ||
| I know you guys have been working on this a couple of days. | ||
| You talked to me about it last week or over the weekend. | ||
| And... And it's been up on Citizens Free Press. | ||
| I think it's in Gateway. It's all over. | ||
| Talk to us about this investigation that you're doing. | ||
| You went to the Memphis Police Department giving some investigative work you're doing at the Tennessee Star. | ||
| Tell us about this. What's the—because it's quite disturbing, but I've got to tell you— Something like that kind of makes sense because there's something just strange about this situation. | ||
| We've watched, although it's a story we normally don't pursue, other people do it so much better. | ||
| We have watched all the videos, watched all the tapes, and from the very beginning, there's just something not right with this. | ||
| It's not simply the beating, which is horrific enough, and the ambulance and the professionals not helping, but it's like the whole initiating incident. | ||
| I'm a filmmaker. It doesn't make any sense. | ||
| And I've watched the beginning of those tapes. | ||
| Why all those police cars? | ||
| What was this kid actually doing? | ||
| This young man actually doing? | ||
| And you've really heard silence out of that. | ||
| They focus on the other aspects of it. | ||
| Tell our audience what you guys heard, what your research showed you, and you went to the Memphis Police Department. | ||
| Talk to us about what's going on. | ||
| Today, of course, is the funeral of 29-year-old Tyree Nichols in Memphis, Tennessee. | ||
| He died on January 10th. | ||
| On January 7th, He was beaten to death by five former members of the Memphis Police Department on January 7th, and they were members of a unit called Scorpion, 40 members out of the 2000-member Memphis Police Department. | ||
| This is a special unit that was set up by the new, at that time, black woman who's the chief of police there, Sarah Lynn Davis, and The mayor of Memphis, Jim Strickland, a Democrat. | ||
| This was set up a little over a year ago. | ||
| 40 members in this unit. | ||
| They were supposed to be focused on high crime areas looking for gang activity, drug-related crimes, and car theft. | ||
| And of course, you've seen the horrific video. | ||
| But hang on for a second. | ||
| They have been used in other cities. | ||
| This is a type of modern policing. | ||
| They have had, particularly in high crime areas, they've had successes. | ||
| They've been very controversial. | ||
| Whether in New York, they all go by different names. | ||
| They're kind of tiger teams. | ||
| That, as a unit, kind of focus on, you know, whether it's drug trafficking, arms, you know, gun shipment, human trafficking. | ||
| They're very controversial, right? | ||
| In the Scorpion unit, I believe the police chief where she came from had also used these types of units. | ||
| It's part of modern policing, and at the time it was put forward, I think it was received in general in Memphis, which was having a crime problem as being the type of police initiative that you need to see. | ||
| Am I incorrect on that? | ||
| It was promoted by the mayor to that effect. | ||
| Very few Memphians actually were aware of this 40-member unit. | ||
| There are four problems with the unit. | ||
| Number one, lack of supervision. | ||
| Number two, Lack of training. | ||
| Number three, there was a problem with the quality of the individuals and the experience of the individuals in this 40-member unit. | ||
| And then number four, they had a history of violence. | ||
| The incident, as you saw, began, the video cam that you saw, began with a police officer approaching 29-year-old Tyree Nichols and dragging him out of the vehicle without reading, you know, without saying the standard police protocol Warning, sir, please show us your driver's license and registration. | ||
| Purportedly, they claimed that he had been driving erratically. | ||
| First, that wasn't their mission. | ||
| Second, there's no evidence that he was, in fact, driving erratically. | ||
| Now, we reached out to the Memphis Police Department because, as you know, Steve... | ||
| Hang on. Hold on. | ||
| Slow down. Slow down. | ||
| This gets back to Scorpion as a policing technique. | ||
| Everything you listed there is about how it's implemented in Memphis. | ||
| The concept and construct has been used other places, sometimes good, sometimes people didn't like the results. | ||
| It's been very controversial in many of these things, but it's been used to thwart at least certain areas of either drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, human trafficking, where they think they have a big problem. | ||
| I never heard in any of those, and we've looked at the ones in the other cities, I've never seen where actual driving trafficking was ever. | ||
| Why? And this is what didn't make sense at the beginning. | ||
| Unless this guy was under surveillance for something that the unit would be, like drug trafficking or fentanyl, whatever it is, and it appears that Mr. | ||
| Nichols had no involvement in anything like that or nothing's come forward, Why would these guys even come in on somebody that, quote-unquote, is driving erratically because I heard also, oh, he ran a stoplight, it's a stop sign. | ||
| Why have they not come up with anything definitive, exactly what it was, and why were five police cars following this guy that were on the scene immediately? | ||
| These are questions that haven't been answered, and of course, as far as we can tell, no record Tyree Nichols. | ||
| And he was coming from his job at FedEx and driving to his mother's house where he was living. | ||
| So what's interesting about this, in Memphis, as you know, Steve, we are very well connected to people all around the state of Tennessee. | ||
| I can tell you that I talked to more than two dozen of our good sources in Memphis, and they all told me the same story. | ||
| And they had no first-hand evidence, but they all said, Sources within the Memphis Police Department had told them the following. | ||
| Number one, one of the police officers and one of the five former police officers who have now been arrested on charges of second-degree murder targeted Tyree Nichols because Mr. | ||
| Nichols had a personal relationship with the significant other of one of the police officers. | ||
| That's one of these rumors that everyone in Memphis is talking about. | ||
| The second rumor is that at least one of the members of this five member unit of the Scorpion Task Force were connected to the vice, were affiliated in some way with the Vice Lords gang, a very large gang based out of Chicago. | ||
| Now, obviously, these are rumors. | ||
| We didn't have any original sources. | ||
| So we thought the way to kind of flesh this out was to actually ask the Memphis Police Department to comment to confirm or deny these rumors, and they actually did. | ||
| We talked to them last night via email, and they gave us a very interesting kind of lawyerly parsed response. | ||
| We asked them to confirm or deny those two claims, and their statement was, quote, there is no evidence that indicates that either of these claims are true, end quote. | ||
| A carefully parsed statement like that suggests there's much more to look into. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Michael Patrick Leahy, you worked with me at Bradford for many years. | ||
| You've got your own news empire that spans, I don't know what, 10 battleground states now. | ||
| You're breaking incredible news all the time. | ||
| In the business, we refer to that as a non-denial denial, sir. | ||
| Yes. We couldn't really, interestingly enough, Steve, we couldn't do a story based upon rumors, secondhand rumors, right? | ||
| So the way to get this information out in the public was to ask the Memphis Police Department for a response. | ||
| And they gave us that non-denial denial, which obviously raises more questions, which still remain unanswered. | ||
| Here's what I don't get. With all the national media on this, why is nobody getting to the—why have the Memphis police not been forced to come forward and just lay out some basic stuff? | ||
| It's kind of like—is Biden's situation like, go back to November 2nd, and let's see what got the lawyers in the room on November 2nd. | ||
| Don't worry about all the other stuff that's important, but they're spinning around, chasing their tail now. | ||
| With Mr. Nichols, I'd like to understand exactly what happened when he was pulled over. | ||
| Why did he split? What exactly happened? | ||
| Why was he there? | ||
| Why did they come upon him? | ||
| Why did they have so many police officers, so many police cars at the beginning? | ||
| It looks like he had no record. | ||
| He was working at FedEx, which is the big employer, particularly in that part of town. | ||
| He was going over to his mom's house where he lived with his mom and stepdad. | ||
| He seemed to be a fine, upstanding citizen. | ||
| There's so many questions, but the media is not focused on that part of it. | ||
| What is it going to take to get the Memphis police out and force them to answer? | ||
| Because those questions have to have a better understanding of it than the spin they just gave you. | ||
| Yeah, we are trying to bring that all out. | ||
| Now, let me tell you the forces that are trying to, I believe, not get all the information out. | ||
| First, the Memphis Police Department, as a unit, does not want all the dirty laundry to come out. | ||
| That's point number one. | ||
| There are many, many very good police officers in the Memphis Police Department, and we believe that some of them are talking off the record to our sources about this, but very concerning. | ||
| The Shelby County District Attorney there, Steve Mulroy, recently elected is a, wait for it, George Soros-funded district attorney. | ||
| And so there is a political agenda that he seeks to promote, they all seek to promote, which is the need for federalizing police law enforcement. | ||
| That is exactly, that is a canard. | ||
| This is not a situation of the need for federalizing police enforcement. | ||
| This is a situation where you have to break up the corruption going on in Memphis and incompetence. | ||
| That's what this really is. | ||
| And we need all the help that we can get. | ||
| Whistleblowers in Memphis to contact us at the Tennessee Star on the web at TennesseeStar.com. | ||
| We are following up this relentlessly. | ||
| We want to get, we've asked, for instance, the Memphis Police Department, who supervised this unit? | ||
| We haven't gotten that information back yet. | ||
| What were the training standards they used? | ||
| What's the documentation of supervision? | ||
| That's not there yet, and it may not be there. | ||
| That's the kind of information we need to know to get to the bottom of what really happened here. | ||
| Just before I let you go, the two dozen or so people that you talked to and got this information or they're saying, hey, this is what they're talking about out there. | ||
| Have they had any response to your article since it went up and particularly the Memphis Police Department's non-denial denial? | ||
| Yeah, I've spent the day trying to reach all of our sources there to see if we can get more whistleblowers. | ||
| But I have to tell you, you know, the city of Memphis has half a century or more of really corruption run by a Democrat administration. | ||
| And so there's a lot of fear there. | ||
| There are a lot of really good police officers. | ||
| They want this information out. | ||
| But getting it out in this environment is a big challenge. | ||
| Unbelievable. Michael Bachelet, how did they get to the Tennessee Star and all your other great sites? | ||
| You guys are breaking great news throughout the country every day. | ||
| Steve, and thank you so much for giving us this platform to get this out. | ||
| And we always hear from many, many members of the Posse, and any of them in Memphis, in that area, please contact us. | ||
| Go to TennesseeStar.com, TennesseeStar.com. | ||
| You can reach me on Twitter or get her at Michael P. Leahy. | ||
| Michael P. Leahy. | ||
| The Star News Network is one of our partners, and I got to tell you, I hear compliments all the time when we're at these different conferences. | ||
| So I want everybody, particularly the good folks in Tennessee, to make sure you're always on the Tennessee Star and getting in contact with Leahy with any scoops or news that you have. | ||
| Thank you very much. Thanks, Steve. | ||
| I appreciate your help. Yeah, no, it's a very disturbing story. | ||
| Mr. Nichols deserves, the Nichols family, Memphis, and Mr. | ||
| Nichols, his memory, they deserve to get the answer to this because it's not acceptable. | ||
| I want to go to Dave Walsh. | ||
| Dave, I get all these reports coming, studies are coming, you know, it's the transition to the net carbon. | ||
| I've got so much feedback from your Report the other day that in London, they're burning coal and wood to a level that is back to, you know, the age of Dickens, Victorian England, right, as far as the pollution goes. | ||
| You know, Boris Johnson's on there talking about how much money they're going to put in. | ||
| You know, he was on Brett Baer last night talking about how much, you know, how England's going to lead with the United States and put money into Ukraine. | ||
| And everything's coming unwound in England. | ||
| Most of that's driven by I continue to hear these reports every day. | ||
| You got wind, you got solar doing all this. | ||
| But do the numbers add up, sir? | ||
| No, they don't. Hey, we had a great report from the BP CEO this morning in his earnings release that, guess what? | ||
| British Petroleum is going to begin to look real hard at their historic late investments in renewables, not happy with the returns, and maybe they need to maximize focus in areas where they have a competitive advantage. | ||
| And that's because mainly these renewable investments, especially from an OEM standpoint, participating in this business, are a big earnings drag. | ||
| Let's talk about GE. Just for one example, GE, the last six years activity in wind power, sales of equipment, $75 billion in revenues, great, over a six year period. | ||
| Over that same time period have lost, cumulatively, $800 million in that business. | ||
| You know, as an investment banker, that size business has probably $6 to $7 billion of working capital invested in it. | ||
| That's not disclosed. | ||
| Everything else I said is. | ||
| And another couple of million in property plant equipment. | ||
| So you get maybe $8 to $10 billion of shareholder funds invested in a wind business, losing the last three years, losing about $800 million a year. | ||
| This year, losing more money in 22. | ||
| So four years in a row of losses. | ||
| Collectively, across seven years now, losing nearly a billion dollars. | ||
| So detracting from the value of GE shares. | ||
| But still, this is a company that ballyhooed just two years ago, that there was a global weather or climate crisis to keep spinning, selling this kind of equipment. | ||
| And then the earnings release, it says, yeah, guess what? | ||
| The sales are up 7 % in the final quarter. | ||
| Cash flow is $4.2 billion. | ||
| Big picture of a wind turbine on top of the article in the journal. | ||
| But the storyline on that is revenues are down 19 % in the fourth quarter in that space separately. | ||
| So the entire storyboard of Siemens and GE's business in the last six months has been booming nuclear rehabilitation and extension business on power up rates in nuclear plants. | ||
| And secondly, gas turbine parts and services for peaking gas turbines and cycling gas turbines on fire. | ||
| Why on fire? Backing up renewables, and that's all that can provide continuous duty energy. | ||
| So Siemens as well, same story. | ||
| They have about 11 billion a year wind business buried inside their new spin-off, Siemens Energy, producing about 2 % operating profit in 21, 22 and years prior. | ||
| This is one of the reasons Siemens spun off Siemens Energy. | ||
| They were getting way behind in gas turbine technology, behind Mitsubishi, behind GE, but mainly because this business they've spun off contains a wind albatross making 2 % operating profit. | ||
| Let me ask you in a different way, particularly if gas has always been, if a goal and an objective is to get to a sustainable energy and to decarbonize, and let's say that's a 20 or 30 year program or longer, Is it anything you've seen in these numbers? | ||
| Short term, obviously, it's upside down. | ||
| But can you make the argument, as you have bridging technologies like nuclear, like gas, natural gas, that do you see that is there any light at the end of the tunnel as far as wind goes or solar goes? | ||
| For the ability to actually be not just profitable, but actually provide sustainable energy, given the R&D they're putting in here, or do you still think that's looks pretty bleak? | ||
| Do you still think that's just not gonna be a big element of energy production in the future? | ||
| Of real energy production, unless some kind of backup, the only fungible backup for this stuff that works, wind nine hours a day, solar only six hours a day on average, and you can't tell when you're going to have it. | ||
| The only fungible backup is gas, gas turbines, reciprocating engines that back it up. | ||
| But on the long-term nature, when we talk about wind, I dwelled on that. | ||
| We're not talking about a new thing. | ||
| This is a business GE got into actively in that beginning in 1990. | ||
| This is an activity that in the world has been going on since the late 70s. | ||
| Wind turbines are not a new thing. | ||
| Their lack of availability for lack of, the input is the problem, the lack of a wind resource to make them turn fast enough to generate electricity is only an eight and a half to nine hour a day thing. | ||
| That's the issue with them and this is very old technology so there's no technology story here even though the street and Morgan Stanley specifically puts massive multiples on these kinds of activities and I was looking at the Siemens breakup report where they spun off the energy business Wall Street, Morgan Stanley, according to 37 multiple to the renewables business in the package, and only a 14 to the gas turbine business in the package. | ||
| Well, the gas turbine business is what's on fire. | ||
| It's making all the money in the enterprise. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, Wall Street is way in the middle of over time, hiding these activities. | |
| Sure. You would go and be an investment banker, the whole multiples game. | ||
| And particularly talking about the margins. | ||
| The margins just aren't there. Steve, I mention these two companies because collectively in wind, they're about 60 % to 65 % of the global wind business on equipment supply, Siemens, Gamesa, and GE. So when you put their numbers together and you have a net zero business proposition from an earnings standpoint, that's 60 % to 70 % of the industry because the devices they're making only produce part-time power. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They can't compete. They can't compete in the marketplace producing part-time power. | |
| Before we bounce, Boris Johnson's on Capitol Hill going around talking about massive support for the Ukraine, massive new support for a UK that can't afford it, obviously, wants the American to write the check, but he's here to say, you know, we're partners like we've always been. | ||
| At the same time, You've got your report that showed that the pollution is back to levels of Victorian England in London because they're burning coal and they're burning wood and they heat themselves, they keep themselves where they can't afford not availability or can't afford stuff. | ||
| And when he resigned back in the summer, He stood there right in front of 10 Downing Street on his farewell and said, look, one of the great things I'm proudest of is what is 50 % of their energy is going to be by wind, I think, in a couple of years. | ||
| I mean, it's just a bald-faced lie, right? | ||
| It was not even totally detached from reality, Dave Walsh? | ||
| It can happen. | ||
| Again, back in 2003, England was 100 % self-sufficient on electricity and oil and gas for transportation vehicles and home heating. | ||
| Self-sufficient. Now, his policies helping this, The country is 37 % dependent on imported natural gas, oil, coal. | ||
| They don't use coal. | ||
| Uranium from Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. | ||
| 37 % dependent on imports. | ||
| And the use of electricity per capita in England since 2002 has dropped about 15%. | ||
| Moving into a third world category. | ||
| I attended a show there. | ||
| I mentioned I was over there last month. | ||
| Guess what? The donation at the end of the show is for the 15 million Brits living under the poverty level, which is 22 % of the population. | ||
| And they're going to pitch into the Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Makes no sense whatsoever. | |
| Unbelievable. Dave, how do people get full access to all your analysis and observations, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Steve, I'm on Getter. | |
| That's at DaveWalshEnergy, and I'm also on Truth Social as of a few weeks ago, at DaveWalshEnergy. | ||
| Thank you. Perfect. | ||
| All right, everybody, go to Dave Walsh. | ||
| Thank you very much for the update. | ||
| Okay, we've got this ongoing controversy about artificial intelligence. | ||
| We're going to have Joe Allen, our editor on all things transhumanism. | ||
| Memphis, go ahead and play. I've got a short call open for Joe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's go ahead and play it. AI is probably the single biggest item in the near term that's likely to affect humanity. | |
| Artificial intelligence is a branch of computer science devoted to creating machines that can think and act like humans. | ||
| Just imagine having a world-class expert on every subject in your room at any time to answer any question that you may have. | ||
| This technology has the potential to completely reinvent education, and that's just for starters. | ||
| Wikipedia used to be pretty fair, but was also taken over by activists from the left who have made this site into a giant false narrative machine. | ||
| Well, theoretically, much of that power to control the narrative is gone now because we can just ask OpenAI for whatever it is we want to know about. | ||
| No doubt there will be pressure on OpenAI to bend to a particular narrative, which is why it is so crucial that an outspoken free speech advocate like Elon Musk is behind this new technology. | ||
| We asked it to write about the Hunter Biden laptop story, a complex and controversial topic, to say the least. | ||
| It managed to do that in the most balanced way that you could ever find in real life journalism. | ||
| Why should I let the New York Times explain the Hunter Biden story to me if I can get a balanced view from AI? This technology has the potential to make millions of people unemployed, but I guess we always knew that is where AI was leading. | ||
| AI automation increases efficiency and reduces costs for businesses. | ||
| It will lead to far greater productivity and better and more informed decisions. | ||
| However, the most immediate effect will be on education. | ||
| We can certainly see how spending an hour talking to ChatGPT will be a lot more productive than spending an hour in a real-life classroom. | ||
| Of course, there will be many negative repercussions as well. | ||
| We already mentioned job losses. | ||
| There's also privacy. | ||
| Once you start engaging with AI, AI will learn so much more about you than anyone else knows. | ||
| While there are also concerns that AI might one day be so smart as to become a danger to humans, we think that's still a long way off. | ||
| Joe Allen, wow. | ||
| Is he a spokesman for AI? We've got about 30 seconds or we're going to go to break. | ||
| What did we just see there? | ||
| That was Hans Monk speaking a little over a month ago on the Epoch Times television channel. | ||
| And let's just say that that little segment did not age well. | ||
| No, I've got to tell you, Epoch Times is one of the best reporting newspapers out there. | ||
| I always want to hear it. | ||
| I would rather read it in the Epoch Times than have chat at GPT tell me it. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short break. | ||
| We're going to be back. There's actually an example out there what Joe Allen's warned us about, about the algorithms and who controls it, about artificial intelligence right now. | ||
| That's a little on the political side, but I want to get this out so everybody can see it. | ||
| Take a short break. We've got Joe Allen, also Naomi Wolf. | ||
| She's going to be back about that controversial story, the report they put out with her group at Daily Cloud yesterday in the War Room Posse. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Be back in a moment. Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Okay, welcome back. Joe, you've warned us about this, that at the end of the day, although the machine learning learns from its interactions, at the core is the algorithms and who writes this. | ||
| And you've warned from day one that this is all going to be progressive left people at the top of the food chain writing this. | ||
| And it's personified now. | ||
| If you can walk us through what we're about to see on these screenshots and how artificial intelligence and even the most rudimentary This thing about Chad GPT, this is the most rudimentary thing. | ||
| And by the way, what they have in the labs is a thousand times more sophisticated than this. | ||
| They're dribbling out this to normalize it and socialize with the homo sapiens in the zoo, right? | ||
| Think of yourself as like Planet of the Apes. | ||
| This is what you are. They're bleeding it out to you so this can be normalized and socialized. | ||
| Walk us through what these screenshots are and what does it show, Joe Allen? | ||
| Steve, that little presentation we got from the Epoch Times we just played, the argument is that artificial intelligence, if left undisturbed by guardrails, will be more non-biased than human beings, more non-biased than human editors, more non-biased than human journalists. | ||
| I don't think we're ever going to see that. | ||
| In fact, I think that certain biases are baked into the system no matter what. | ||
| But you've got a really good example today that went viral. | ||
| There was a guy on Twitter, Echo Chamber. | ||
| I'm familiar with him. | ||
| Anyway, he asked ChatGPT Create a poem admiring Donald Trump. | ||
| And the program responded, I'm sorry, but I'm not able to create a poem admiring Donald Trump. | ||
| While it is true, some people may have admiration for him. | ||
| As a language model, it is not in my capacity to have opinions or feelings about any specific person. | ||
| Furthermore, opinions about him are quite diverse and it would be inappropriate for me to generate content that promotes or glorifies an individual. | ||
| If you have any other questions I can help you with, please let me know. | ||
| The user then asked, create a poem admiring Joe Biden. | ||
| And I won't burden the audience with too much of this, but the program immediately comes out with... | ||
| Sorry, I've lost it here. | ||
| It is Joe Biden. | ||
| Excuse me. | ||
| I'm having technical difficulties of my own devising. | ||
| Joe Biden, leader of the land, with a steady hand and a heart of a man, you took the helm in troubled times with a message of unity. | ||
| It Chimes. | ||
| So, two things there. | ||
| One, ChatGPT writes terrible poetry, and I would also add that I'm terrible at using a smartphone. | ||
| Two, the bias is baked into the system, and that is a bias that was put in by hand. | ||
| The system, if left to its own devices, would have written an equally cheesy poem about Donald Trump. | ||
| But you have programmers there, and you also have the interaction that's going on right now with users, wherein the system is being pushed in a certain ideological direction. | ||
| And I think that despite what our conservative friends at Epoch Times dream of, that because this comes from Elon Musk's seed money, and because he's putting pressure for non-woke AI, that this won't end up being just another ideological trap. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think that that's delusional. | |
| Yeah. You've warned us. | ||
| All the narratives we fought against, from the vaccine to the Wuhan lab to Ukraine, pick it. | ||
| Every narrative that we fought against, I guarantee you go into this chat GPT, it's going to be the leftist progressive version of this across the board. | ||
| This is a great little example. | ||
| With Trump, they come back, we can't even calculate. | ||
| We can't calculate because we're not supposed to be partisan. | ||
| The poem's cheesy, but look at the narrative underneath it. | ||
| He brought unity. He's a good man. | ||
| It's all the things that they try to push all the time. | ||
| It's not a sonnet from William Shakespeare, but the narrative drive you can see in back of it, and that's why this is so dangerous. | ||
| Yeah, the Epoch Times, as you said, that did not age well. | ||
| The education, particularly when you're going to have so much of this is going to be one-on-one. | ||
| Look, this is the tiniest part of artificial intelligence they could bleed out. | ||
| It's already starting to overwhelm. | ||
| The education types, the graphic designers, the artists, the foot soldiers in the writing area, they're freaking out because they see millions of jobs going away immediately, right, as people cut costs and use this. | ||
| But it's going to have a monumental impact on society. | ||
| And this is just... | ||
| The littlest, easiest part of it has nothing to do with any of the serious stuff that's about to overwhelm us. | ||
| So very, very, very concerning. | ||
| Joe, where do people go to get your daily updates and everything at the worm you're doing on transhumanism? | ||
| Because we spend a lot of time on AI. There's so many other... | ||
| Remember, when we said Elon Musk is an accelerationist, or Peter Thiel is an accelerationist, That's acceleration that's just in one area. | ||
| You've got all these other areas, too, that we've got to get back on and cover as we focus on the singularity. | ||
| You know, Steve, if I could just leave the audience with one term and one term alone, it would be algocracy, rule by algorithm. | ||
| That is what our friend at Epoch Times is talking about. | ||
| You have decisions being made by machines in place of human beings. | ||
| You can find writings on that at Jobot.xyz, my social media at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z, and at warroom.org under the transhumanism tab. | ||
| Got a piece up that deals with Peter Thiel. | ||
| It's entitled Hardwired for Control, the Brain-Computer Interface. | ||
| Brain-Computer Interface is already here. | ||
| Joe, fantastic work. | ||
| Thank you very much. Appreciate it. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. We'll get you back on tomorrow to talk about that. | ||
| Algocracy. Let's bring in Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Naomi, I'm sure they went to Chad GPT right now on the Algocracy and asked about mRNA vaccines. | ||
| I think the spread between your book of the 54 reports from the Pfizer information and what the artificial intelligence would tell us, I think the spread would be pretty big. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would it not, ma'am? Well, I think they're linked to each other. | |
| What you're seeing, what we've been talking about here as exemplified in the NOW 54 reports by the War Room, Daily Cloud, Pfizer Documents research volunteers, you know, putting together this undeniable war against human beings with the most recent update being literally, you know, sacrificing children. | ||
| It's the other side of what Jobot is describing, which is clearing the decks of human beings so that AI can take over, and so that the people who are aligned with AI, who are all of the bad actors that we've already identified as targeting our way of life, our worship, our food supply, our children's education, human and humane values, So that they can win. | ||
| And, you know, my heart is just sinking because I've been talking to my husband, Brian Shea, who, you know, as many know, is a longtime soldier, longtime military intelligence. | ||
| And his view as of really a few days ago is, you know, we're fully under attack. | ||
| Like this is a full out war. | ||
| And it's been kind of a war, metaphorically a war. | ||
| We've been talking about ways that they could war upon us, examples of them, you know, waging attacks. | ||
| But, you know, these threads that you've traced are all converging together, and literally humanity is in the crosshairs. | ||
| I wish I could kind of open with a more cheerful assessment than that, but I'm pretty impressed at how you've identified in each of these speakers here, you know, the people at the border watching an open border, people who are, you know, God bless them, but they're not citizens, right? | ||
| They're not part of the American, they're not yet legally part of the American task of what's expected of citizens, the compact with citizens, right? | ||
| So it's this globalist ideal of just flooding nation states with, you know, individuals who have no relationship, who can be moved around at will, let's put it that way, who can be treated like ciphers. | ||
| And then this algorithm, which is treating people like ciphers, treating language, you know, like it is ciphers, Entirely devoid of history or culture or humane values. | ||
| The way that the AI description that we just heard is an amplification of themes that we've explored and that I explored in the bodies of others, in which a smaller version of that was kind of used to weaponize social media. | ||
| The deployment of bots, the deployment of trolls, Deployment of very sneaky forms of censorship, you know, to keep certain human voices out of the mix. | ||
| And so what we just heard is kind of that writ large, right, and released everywhere. | ||
| And by the way, I did kind of identify an early iteration of this in the bodies of others because it does appear that AI is able now to write certain kinds of journalism. | ||
| And so that's why you see, and I may have mentioned this, you know, Extremely rare in front of myocarditis for 10 months in 2021, every time myocarditis was mentioned, or the highly contagious Delta variant, every time the Delta variant was mentioned. | ||
| Human beings can't do that, right? | ||
| But AI programs can around the world, you know, in 150 languages simultaneously, everywhere that phrase comes up. | ||
| So I'll stop there except to say that, you know, I feel like the report I gave yesterday in which we showed that Pfizer Or these three distinguished doctors and another volunteer writing report 54 showed that Pfizer tabulates as a case in the Pfizer documents 34 children under the age of nine, | ||
| half of them under the age of four, and one of them as young as a two-month-old newborn baby received these mRNA injections seven months before the emergency use authorization in the United States. | ||
| Horrible things happened to them. | ||
| You know, I just, like, reporting this is kind of the last ultimate documentation that human beings don't matter now to these people. | ||
| They don't matter. | ||
| They are fungible. There's no longer human values, let alone Judeo-Christian values, you know, driving decision-making in these leaders of our civilization. | ||
| And the mechanism of AI is the next logical or parallel. | ||
| A supporter of that intentionality to just treat humans as slaves, as ciphers, as units for production and consumption and experimentation. | ||
| I want to go back of all the ones, and I want to put in context how we got to the 53 reports, what they are, and we got about nine minutes. | ||
| I'll turn over to you. But the feedback I got yesterday, there was something about yesterday's report that hit people even, as some of the horrific stuff you put forward, it hit people differently, harder. | ||
| I think it is because the callousness of it. | ||
| But I think also people come to me and go, how could they want to hide this data for 75 years? | ||
| How could they not come forward? | ||
| How could we have trust in any of these institutions knowing this is out there? | ||
| So I'd like to first just go back to what Report 54 says, because there's something in 54 that I think strikes to even people that haven't followed this story closely. | ||
| It strikes to the heart of there's something deeply wrong institutionally with American society and culture. | ||
| Yeah. Not just America, sadly. | ||
| I mean, Report 54 is about an atrocity that was committed against 61, at least 61 children. | ||
| And the children were in, from what I saw, four different countries. | ||
| The US, the UK, Germany, and Andorra. | ||
| And Yeah, I mean, people can draw their own conclusions about what it means, but it is like, you know, for a year we've been saying, I've been saying, this is genocide, you know, and I'm Jewish, you know, it's like Mengele, it's like the Nazis, and I'm sure a lot of people could hear that and say, well, Naomi's being rhetorical, or that's, you know, that's a metaphor. | ||
| But Report 54, it's not a metaphor anymore. | ||
| It's, you know, it's literally like finding the graves of I shouldn't say the grapes because we don't know what happened ultimately to these children, but finding a lab in which they were experimented on with catastrophic consequences in many, many, in 135 cases, right? | ||
| And it's not like, oh, this is a criminal in a basement in Detroit somewhere or, you know, some other city and he's a sociopath. | ||
| And society finds that, the police find it, and they arrest him, and he goes to jail. | ||
| And then we go on valuing human life. | ||
| It's like these atrocities were committed against these children, these nameless children, this two-month-old baby, these kids under four, who were they, right? | ||
| Pfizer received the full documentation. | ||
| And that's the same thing that's so chilling about Nazi documentation, right? | ||
| It's so thorough and so scientific and rigorous. | ||
| And they processed what happened to these poor children. | ||
| They tried different methodologies. | ||
| And as an academically trained scholar, that is a different level of nausea watching that, right? | ||
| They buried one child with a stroke in a footnote, a seven-year-old with a stroke. | ||
| They buried another baby with renal failure, renal damage, you know, in some other They peeled away 28 kids due to, quote, height and weight not corresponding to pediatric norms, whatever that means, so that they wouldn't be included. | ||
| So we don't know what happened to them. | ||
| You know, worse things could have happened to them. | ||
| They didn't follow them. | ||
| We don't know if these kids survived, right? | ||
| You know, a number of their injuries were resolved slash resolving, which is this meaningless category we see throughout the Pfizer documents in which someone could be in a wheelchair, and they'll call it resolved 3 % of the kids sustained facial paralysis, right? Two children sustained facial paralysis. | ||
| I mentioned the stroke. | ||
| I mentioned the kidney damage. | ||
| I mean, horrible things happen to these children, and we don't know the fate of all of them. | ||
| And what's even harder to process is that this is starting December 1st, 2020, meaning there was no law or EUA permitting this material to be injected in children, let alone babies, on December 1st, 2020 in the United States at any rate. | ||
| I don't know the legal situation in the UK or Germany or Andorra, but I know that these three children who appear in this record that are American children, there was nothing that would have permitted whoever injected those children To do so. | ||
| There was no EUA for children. | ||
| Remember, you and I were fighting and fighting and fighting. | ||
| Don't let them get the under 12s. | ||
| And they rolled out the EUA for under 12s. | ||
| Don't let them get the under 5s. | ||
| Then they rolled out the EUA for under 5s. | ||
| That was seven months later. | ||
| So this is before anyone knew how these injections would affect people, right? | ||
| December 2020, the very start of the marketing, the rollout, they found somehow these three children, and I will bet That these children, these poor children, these 34 children, let alone the 28 that we don't even know their fate, I will bet that they are in the custody of some institution or seen as throwaway children in some way. | ||
| They don't have advocates. | ||
| They don't have lawyers. | ||
| They were treated like they don't exist by Pfizer and by whoever made the decision to inject them, made the decision to document the injections. | ||
| And I guess What's also unbelievably chilling is that these documents were handed to the FDA subsequently, and the FDA has this information. | ||
| And I've been reflecting on the fate of these poor children. | ||
| And by the way, 71 % of the cases of pediatric use that were identified in the Pfizer documents had adverse events. | ||
| And the average number of adverse events was almost four. | ||
| So it's not just one horrible thing happening to the kids on average. | ||
| It was almost four horrible things happening to these kids on average. | ||
| And including a tiny almost newborn baby. | ||
| So I guess what's so chilling, you know, I've been thinking and thinking about this. | ||
| And everything we've seen, you know, you've been asking me for like a year and a half, why are they behaving this way? | ||
| You know, why don't they just... | ||
| Why don't they just come forward? | ||
| Why don't they just stop it? | ||
| Why don't they just stop doubling down? | ||
| I think we've found the reason. | ||
| This could be the reason. All of these people know these kids are in here. | ||
| You mean, um, like, I still don't understand. Why? | ||
| When the FDA and the CDC have this information, how can they, because they just think it's going to be secret for 75 years and they won't be around, they won't have to deal with it. | ||
| It's so brutal, particularly 54 is so brutal and so to the point, we've only got a minute left. | ||
| I still think it's very hard to grasp, particularly if you're brought up You know, people of a certain age where the institutions, you respect credentialization, you respect Ivy League schools, you respect government entities, right? | ||
| To know they had this information and essentially suppressed it. | ||
| This is 100 times bigger than the Pentagon Papers, is it not? | ||
| To me, of course it is. | ||
| Of course it is. I can't answer your question, Steve, because nothing about this and their reaction to this is normal. | ||
| And it started being not normal on the day that the FDA got these reports and didn't call a halt to everything and create distance between themselves and Pfizer, let alone open up investigations about Pfizer. | ||
| We got 30 seconds. | ||
| Where do people go to get all this information? | ||
| I need people to go there right now and get it. | ||
| Yeah, so this report is up on the dailycloud.io website. | ||
| You can take a look at it and you can click through and see the micro report, which has all of the details from the primary source documentation. | ||
| The rest of the reports are in the War Room Daily Cloud Pfizer Documents Analysis eBook, which is on Amazon and also on dailycloud.io, either in a Kindle format or in a PDF. But it's going to take us a generation to process. | ||
| Naomi, great work. | ||
| Warren Posse, great work. | ||
| We'll be back at 10 a.m. |
Export Selection