Jan. 31, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:39
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot of all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| What do you make of what's going on with this far-right group in the House right now? | ||
| What is it they want and how will they succeed? | ||
| And how do they make sure that these 18 Republicans who won in Biden districts and many others who are otherwise moderate don't just sort of say, we'll vote with Democrats on some of these things? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, they don't really care about that, Ali. | |
| What they're doing is they're giving their base voters what they want. | ||
| I'd add to what Max said. | ||
| The one defining characteristic of these Republicans these next two years is revenge. | ||
| These two years are all about revenge. | ||
| The base of the Republican Party, Ali, believes the 2020 election was stolen. | ||
| House Republicans reflect that belief. | ||
| So they're going to investigate Fauci and COVID. They're going to investigate Big Tech, who they thought helped steal the election. | ||
| And they're going to go after the deep state. | ||
| Who they believed helped steal the 2020 election. | ||
| I'm so glad you emphasized this in your opening. | ||
| This is revenge. | ||
| This is about settling scores. | ||
| And for most of these Republicans, Ali, it will work. | ||
| They don't care necessarily about these other moderate Republicans. | ||
| Some of them we've talked don't even care if Republicans retain control of Congress in two years. | ||
| This is about feeding the base. | ||
| The only time the Durham investigation moved over into a criminal inquiry was because of a tip about criminal wrongdoing by Donald Trump. | ||
| And then that got leaked to the public, who knows how. | ||
| Oh, Durham's looking into criminal activity. | ||
| And then Fox got a lot of content like that to shove on their viewers, who ate it up. | ||
| So this is what everyone needs to know as we watch what happens with this new Republican House committee, which is doing the same thing, the investigation into the weaponization of the federal government. | ||
| It has already been done. | ||
| It cost $6 million. | ||
| It went on for four years. It failed. | ||
| But, and then this is the key point, it happened behind closed doors because what House Republicans really want is for it to play out in public. | ||
| So they're going to restage this entire failed enterprise using more resources all in front of the cameras. | ||
|
unidentified
|
...are a member of this subcommittee, and apparently you and your colleagues discussing subpoenas during your first closed-door meeting on Friday. | |
| Congressman, tell me about where you feel the subpoenas are most needed right now. | ||
| We just came off of this incredible, stunning story of the Twitter files, where up to a thousand government employees in several different agencies, whether it's FBI, CIA, DOD, DHS, All had their own quote unquote lists of people that they wanted shut down on Twitter. | ||
| There was clearly collusion where the FBI was directing social media to amplify lies and suppress truth. | ||
| Where will the subpoenas be? | ||
| Well, this is going to be some of the most important work of this House Republican majority. | ||
| I'm honored to have been appointed to it. | ||
| And take the Twitter story, for example, Maria. | ||
| And when you talk about spending, we can go after. | ||
| How about the $3 million that the FBI paid Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, which we know and knew then was not disinformation? | ||
| So there is a lot of work we need to do when it comes to the FBI and Department of Justice, whether it's their illegal targeting of parents as domestic terrorists, whether it was the spying on the 2016 Republican Trump campaign. | ||
| Or whether it was illegally not being forthright when it came to the FISA applications, there is a lot of there there. | ||
| And we intend to fight for accountability and transparency. | ||
| When it comes to the subpoenas, you know, we will announce those in due time. | ||
| What I find is most interesting is already this administration under the leadership of Joe Biden is digging in their heels. | ||
| What are they so afraid of? | ||
| Are they so afraid of this transparency? | ||
| The American people deserve transparency. | ||
| These agencies work for the American people, not the other way around. | ||
| And it's gotten way out of control where these agencies are now targeting hardworking Americans. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, this is exactly right. | |
| And unfortunately, Congresswoman, you're getting stonewalled again. | ||
| You saw what Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence, told the entire committee, the Intelligence Committee in the Senate. | ||
| Senators on the Republican and the Democrat side said to her, we want to know what these documents are about. | ||
| And she said, no. | ||
| Go pound sand. | ||
| So, Congresswoman, I'm asking you, subpoenas or no subpoenas, you're going to get stonewalled. | ||
| You know that. Just the way you were stonewalled during the Russia collusion lie. | ||
| Will you hold this president and this White House in contempt? | ||
| Will you hold these leaders, quote-unquote leaders, in intelligence who signed their name to that letter calling the Biden laptop disinformation, will you hold them in contempt? | ||
| How are you going to fight back from the stonewalling? | ||
| Well, everything is on the table, Maria, and certainly these individuals are not above the law. | ||
| I have said I believe there were crimes that were committed here, and this is government abuse at its work. | ||
| I serve on the House Intelligence Committee. | ||
| Our committee was formed going back decades because the intelligence agencies were run amok and there was no oversight from Congress. | ||
| So our role to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars, to stand up for the Constitution and our constituents, is making sure that we hold these agencies accountable. | ||
| Anything is on the table. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, Congressman, we're going to be watching your work. | |
| It's important work. Thanks so much for being here this morning. | ||
| Thank you. Okay, Elise Stefanik there with Maria Bartiroma yesterday morning, Monday, 30 January, Year of Our Lord, 2023. | ||
| I want to bring in Cash here. | ||
| Cash, the complete meltdown over all these investigations. | ||
| I think you've got oversight, You have judiciary. | ||
| You've got House Intel. | ||
| We're not going to have a special committee on the COVID virus, and particularly Wuhan lab, MTGs on that. | ||
| But the jewel of the crown, I think, at least for right now, has got to be weaponization of government. | ||
| This is going to be a classic, like church, maybe even harder hitting. | ||
| Walk us through. There was a lot thrown out there in that cold open. | ||
| Walk us through your initial thoughts of where we stand and how we get rolling on this, sir. | ||
| Absolutely, Steve. Great to be back with you and good afternoon. | ||
| So look, the reason the media, and this is your expertise, is one of many of your areas of expertise, the reason the media is having this combined meltdown, it's not a coincidence, it's not an accident. | ||
| It's because their deep state cronies in the government went to the media and said, We are in fear of the corruption that's about to be exposed. | ||
| So this should tell us we are onto something and we can't stop because they're sitting there calling us treasonous and us seditious. | ||
| When they unify to come after a narrative that they perpetuated falsely for years, i.e. | ||
| Russiagate, i.e. the weaponization of DOJ, i.e. | ||
| Jan 6th, it's all coming to a head, which leads us to the committees that you just talked about. | ||
| And I agree with you, the main one is going to be the weaponization of government committee. | ||
| And you just saw Jim Jordan received a letter from the White House on behalf of the president, which essentially said, here's the Heisman. | ||
| We're not giving you anything because of, quote, unquote, the principles and traditions of the Department of Justice. | ||
| Well, last I checked, principles and traditions They aren't the law of the land. | ||
| They aren't the Constitution. | ||
| Merrick Garland keeps throwing this phraseology out there so he can hide behind it as if he's some sort of behemoth for law enforcement, when, in fact, the principles and traditions they have created are government corruption. | ||
| So, Steve, there's a very poignant question asked in that exchange. | ||
| How do you get this? How do you get accountability? | ||
| And there's a guy who ran Russiagate, and Elise was on the committee with me when I was a chief investigator in House Intel for Russiagate. | ||
| There is one way to do it, and we broke that news on this show. | ||
| And every member of Congress with a steel spine better be listening. | ||
| You don't want to bother withholding them in contempt by a DOJ. This DOJ is not going to hold them in contempt. | ||
| So the one way you get the documentation is you take their money. | ||
| Every single House Republican Committee has a Republican majority, and the levers in Congress allow them to fence the money of every agency and department that stonewalls them for documents. | ||
| It is the one thing the DOJ, FBI, DOD, CIA, NSA, DHS cannot do without our taxpayer dollars. | ||
| So they better go in there and take the money fast, because we know their position. | ||
| The White House has already said, you've issued subpoenas. | ||
| And then if the money thing doesn't work, which it will, it always does, Paul Ryan, even though he was terrible, one time to take the DOJ's money, I got 1,000 pages of documents for Russiagate the next day, including the fraudulent FISA warrants and the FBI documentation. | ||
| And if that doesn't work, then Kevin McCarthy's gonna have to go to the inherent powers of Congress, meaning he sends a sergeant at arms to the Department of Justice, and they have the inherent constitutional authority to arrest people blockading congressional subpoenas. | ||
| That's where we're at. Okay, I want to go back for a second because one of the reasons they took the gavel out of the hand and passed the omnibus bill was to make sure we couldn't defund immediately on this year's appropriations. | ||
| Are you saying although that's passed and they're doing the appropriations bill now that's got to be passed in the spring and summer because they're going to do it by regular order? | ||
| To get all of them organized for September, so we're not going to go through a CR process. | ||
| Are you saying now with actually the money already appropriated for what, fiscal year 23, I think they call this, you can actually still fence the money that's already been in an appropriations bill? | ||
| You can say, hey, if you don't hit that subpoena, I can fence X amount of dollars for anything and that money can't transfer from Treasury or OMB won't approve it to go to that agency, sir? | ||
| 100 % true. | ||
| Each committee of jurisdiction in Congress, Intel for the Intel Agency, Foreign Affairs for the State Department, Judiciary for DOJ and FBI, etc., and so on, has the inherent and the rules are written this way in Congress, where they are allowed to fence already appropriated monies from the prior fiscal budget to any agency and department, and they can fence whatever money they choose. | ||
| It requires approval from the Speaker of the House and approval from the committee by vote itself. | ||
| But you can say, hey, Chris Ray, remember that $250,000 Davos jet you took so you can go tell the world that you want to partner with big tech? | ||
| Your plane's grounded. | ||
| You don't have the next $5 million of runway. | ||
| And hey, Merrick Garland, remember you want to upgrade the DOJ's hallways and hang your portraits here and there? | ||
| We're taking that $10 million too. | ||
| And they will fast. | ||
| They will learn fast and hard that you're not playing because we can't blink. | ||
| It is the only thing that brings them to bear and to bend the knee. | ||
| And it is 100 percent lawful. | ||
| And it's what the Holman rule, everybody keeps talking about the Holman rule, where if people violate congressional mandates and subpoenas, you go and take their money. | ||
| This is a finer point of the Holman rule that can be enacted unilaterally by a Republican Congress without going through all the hoopla to do so. | ||
| It works. Thank you. They should name the weaponization of government the government gangster in honor of you and your book, the Government Gangster Committee, right? | ||
| Do you believe that that's going to happen as a tactical move? | ||
| Do you think that the judiciary oversight and the weaponization committee should do this sooner rather than later to take a couple of shots? | ||
| Because they've already told you they're going to stonewall you. | ||
| Is there any doubt in your mind you're not going to get any information coming from this regime unless they're forced to, sir? | ||
| No doubt in my mind, and don't take my word for it, the Biden White House counsel and the Department of Justice already sent the letter to Jim Jordan that the chair of the Weaponization of Government Committee and the Judiciary Committee chairs both, and said the traditions and principles, again quoting from their verbiage, prevent us, DOJ and FBI from providing you with the documentation that you've requested. | ||
| Unacceptable. Congress and the legislative branch of government is a co-ordinate branch of government with the executive branch, not a subservient branch of government. | ||
| Our founding fathers made sure constitutional oversight of these rogue agencies and departments must be conducted with full authority of the legislative branch unimpeded. | ||
| And that is what these guys, Jim Jordan, Elise knows. | ||
| She was on the committee with me when we did this maneuver. | ||
| And she will testify, and anyone in House Intel, that it worked. | ||
| Jim Jordan was there, too. | ||
| The reason he got all those documents back then and the world got to see them was because we pulled this lever. | ||
| And he's going to have to pull it. | ||
| And so is everybody on the other committees, whether it's Foreign Affairs or Homeland or what have you. | ||
| They are going to have to start doing it in unison. | ||
| When you go after the border and its investigation, that's Homeland. | ||
| When you go after Fauci, you shut down the money for the NIH and everything else. | ||
| And I'm not saying take everyday operational funds, and I'm not saying take the money from the people, the hardworking employees at the FBI and DOJ. I know they're going to twist my words. | ||
| But there are millions and millions, tens of millions of dollars of pockets of money that you can take from these agencies in a heartbeat, and they will provide you documentation the next day. | ||
| This has to be approved by the Speaker. | ||
| Is McCarthy, to be a historic Speaker, he needs to do this, right? | ||
| Paul Ryan did it only one time. | ||
| It only approved one time, and you guys got immediate results. | ||
| Am I correct in understanding that? | ||
| That's absolutely. We had to beg Paul Ryan to do it. | ||
| He did it one time. We had 17 subpoenas out that the FBI and DOJ stonewalled us on. | ||
| We got 1,000 pages of documents. | ||
| You know the documents we got? The exculpatory evidence that they withheld from the FISA court. | ||
| The lies that Strzok and Page were telling us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's how we got that. Fantastic. | |
| Okay, we're going to ask Cash to stay over, the author of Government Gangsters, a perfectly timed book. | ||
| He's going to talk to us about some text messages we ought to review next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no war. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's take down the CCP. Here's your host, Stephen K. Van. | |
| Okay, welcome back. Cash, Matt Taibbi's putting up a bunch of stuff up about Twitter, about another file coming out. | ||
| You've got a way to walk us through this. | ||
| There's some explosive news about to come out, and I'll turn it over to you for that, Cash, the author of Government Gangsters. | ||
| Thanks so much. Yeah, governmentgangsters.com, pre-sale. | ||
| We're going to get this book out. There's two sets of text messages that they wanted buried that we got out during the Russiagate investigation that never saw the light of day. | ||
| But we've got the receipts. | ||
| The War Room Posse has them. | ||
| I hope they push them out to everyone that's watching. | ||
| First set. Senator Mark Warner, the vice chair of the House Intelligence Committee in 2016 and 17, as one of the senior most intelligence officials in Congress, his text messages were publicized because we caught them and they are now out there. | ||
| You know who he's texting? The lobbyists for Oleg Deripaska and Christopher Steele. | ||
| Yup, you just can't make this stuff up. | ||
| Why is the Intel chair subpoenaing or begging to meet with these foreign assets? | ||
| That's exactly what they are. | ||
| And remind you guys, Deripaska is a criminally sanctioned individual who is under criminal prosecution in America. | ||
| Mark Warner is caught red-handed begging their lobbyists for a meeting and introductions and conversations with these guys in the middle of the Russiagate investigation. | ||
| And remember the Senate Intel Committee report differed from the Russiagate report? | ||
| Well, now I wonder why. | ||
| These questions have to be answered. | ||
| I hope you guys read these text messages. | ||
| I mean, just to put it into context, Steve, what if a guy named Devin Nunes, who was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, was caught in 2017 while running Russiagate text messaging a sanctioned lobbyist for a sanctioned oligarch from Russia And Christopher Steele, the author of the Russiagate hoax narrative. | ||
| We would not even be having this conversation right now as to why Mark Warner hasn't answered these questions, but it gets worse. | ||
| The second set of text messages we're talking about that are public are, of course, from the lover, Strzok. | ||
| Strzok is caught texting McGonagall. | ||
| Remember how we said on War Room that McGonagall and Strzok are best friends, and they were partnered in the criminal intelligence division together, counterintelligence, excuse me, to run the Russiagate hoax. | ||
| Specifically, there's a text message that we have given the War Room posse, and hopefully they're putting that one out too, that says they are talking about the DNC server hack and how they're going to run that narrative. | ||
| We have known the entire time the DNC server hack Narrative was run by CrowdStrike falsely, and the FBI didn't want to do its job because they didn't want the questions asked and answered to disprove that it had nothing to do with the Russian hack. | ||
| These guys, it is no coincidence that McGonagall, remember, got paid a quarter million dollars by guess who? | ||
| Oleg Deripaska, the same guy. | ||
| that Senator Warner was begging to have a meeting with in 2017, the same guy McGonigal who was running the Russiagate investigation and the DNC hack narrative for Peter Strzok, is now charged federally for essentially being, for violating the Espionage Act, but they charged him with money laundering, for being on the payroll of the Russian government. | ||
| And if that's not worse, we know Strzok could never keep it in his pants. | ||
| Now breaking news, also McGonagall, while head of the CI division at the FBI, was having affairs outside of the FBI and subjecting himself to national security violations while conducting what was supposed to have been the most above board investigation in FBI history. | ||
| How do we know the last part about the affairs outside the agency? | ||
| Where do you get that information from? | ||
| Those receipts? Sorry, I didn't send you those receipts, but we got them. | ||
| It's been publicized. | ||
| The actual person he was sleeping with went to the media, and he's all but admitted it, and I was a... | ||
| It was not an FBI ploy, at least the one we know about, but I'll get that to you. | ||
| I wouldn't have said it if we don't have it. | ||
| But still opens himself up to blackmail. | ||
| Just tell our audience, when do you think this will kick into high gear? | ||
| Will this be the weaponization of government? | ||
| That's a great question. | ||
| This is what I've told these committees. | ||
| It's got to go to the Weaponization Committee because that's why it was created. | ||
| That's who has the mandate. These other committees can't fight over the food on the table. | ||
| We've got to parse it out. We've got to say, hey, Homeland Security, you do the border. | ||
| We gotta say, hey, Health and Human Service Committee, you do Fauci. | ||
| And then DOJ, FBI, Weaponization, Intel, all go to the Weaponization of Government Committee. | ||
| And you gotta run hard. | ||
| And you have to promise that every document you get under subpoena, you put out there. | ||
| They can't all try to do the same thing. | ||
| It happens too often because Congress gets too eager. | ||
| And I think you're gonna know, Steve, within a week or two, you're gonna know if they're serious about these investigations. | ||
| Okay, I'm going to get to that. I think they've worked out the jurisdictional. | ||
| I think that's why they had the meeting in Amelia Island. | ||
| I think they came back. That's why they had the big meeting. | ||
| And I think they brought McCarthy in for the final sign-off, so everybody's got their vertical. | ||
| What would cash... When you say a couple... | ||
| So let's assume for purposes of discussion that they've been able to work out the different verticals of these. | ||
| And this, I also think, is why... | ||
| Jordan, quite frankly, didn't want to be speaker. | ||
| This is obvious that he wanted actually not just to chair judiciary with everything they're working on. | ||
| He also then wants to chair the subcommittee. | ||
| In your mind, right now, talking to the audience, when do you think subpoenas and letters ought to be flying to make sure we're putting these people on notice? | ||
| What's the timeframe for that? | ||
| And if it's not happening within that timeframe, we should be worried that once again, we're going to go down the route of Benghazi, sir. | ||
| Yeah, well, so Jordan's a perfect example and he's moved methodically. | ||
| He sent letters, even though the January 6th committee went straight to subpoenas, Jim Jordan is still a professional. | ||
| He sent letters to every witness and every agency saying, you're coming in or we're going to use compulsory process. | ||
| We already have responses from the White House and DOJ saying they're not going to answer. | ||
| And then he's going to send subpoenas. | ||
| Those subpoenas have to go out this week. | ||
| He has tried to be a professional and handle it above board. | ||
| These folks, these government gangsters don't want to do that. | ||
| So the subpoenas have to go out this week. | ||
| They've got to start going out this week. | ||
| They don't have to go out once, but FBI, DOJ... Documents witnesses this week. | ||
| Next week, we set a hard deadline. | ||
| That's what should happen. 10 days out from the notice of the subpoena. | ||
| And then when they violate it, we got to go to inherent contempt of Congress powers, and we got to go to the lever that takes their money by the fencing process. | ||
| So it's about a two-week process from when the subpoenas go out to when you really start to throttle down on these guys, and we'll know if our boys are serious. | ||
| But it's got to go to the Weaponization Committee. | ||
| It's the only place it can start right now. | ||
| Homeland can take the border, like I said. | ||
| That's a big investigation of itself. | ||
| And the Health Committee can take Fauci. | ||
| That's a massive investigation of itself. | ||
| Steve, if we do these three investigations even moderately right, it will be a monster win for accountability, and it will be an annihilation of the government gangster posse. | ||
| How do people get the book? | ||
| How do they follow you on social media right now more than ever? | ||
| Cash has always been a key player but now about to be a critically key player in all this going forward. | ||
| So Cash, how do people get to you? | ||
| Thanks so much. At Cash, on Truth Social, at K-A-S-M Truth Social, and GovernmentGangsters.com, GovernmentGangsters.com. | ||
| It's also available on Amazon on the easy button. | ||
| But look, it's on pre-sale right now. | ||
| The book is done. The DOD is reviewing this, as is 16 other agencies. | ||
| They don't want this thing out. | ||
| I'm going to take them to court if need be. | ||
| This book's coming out in a month, GovernmentGangsters.com, pre-sale right now. | ||
| Let's blow up the charts. | ||
| Steve, you guys have been so generous with your time on it. | ||
| I want to get into the top 100. | ||
| Tell everybody you know. That Government Gangsters is on pre-sale right now at governmentgangsters.com. | ||
| Cash, thank you. Thank you for all the work. | ||
| Cash is working 20 hours a day now and also going around the country talking and getting people up to speed. | ||
| So thank you, Cash. Appreciate it. | ||
| Thank you, brother. Have a great day. | ||
| Can we have a drumroll? | ||
| We have a special guest. | ||
| And I've been getting nothing but stink eye from the War Room Posse. | ||
| So we have the one and only... | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Dr. Navarro joins us. | ||
| We by phone? Are we by phone? | ||
| I don't even see your lovely visage. | ||
| Everybody's been on me. | ||
| They want to make sure you didn't go the way of some other former host or co-host. | ||
| We'll be nameless right now. | ||
| Now, you're going to be back with us on a regular basis starting here pretty shortly. | ||
| Why the absence, sir? | ||
| Well, look, Raheem and I, we did like Around the World in 80 days, man. | ||
| We were like kicking back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, here's the serious thing. | |
| As everybody knows out there, and I'm not going to talk about the details of it, I've been in the crosshairs. | ||
| of the Department of Justice, and I've been having to fight that legal fight. | ||
| And you know me, Steve. I stay focused on that, number one. | ||
| Hold it. Hold it. Hold it. | ||
| Hold it. Hold it. Stop. Stop. | ||
| Stop. Yeah. There's no...hold it. | ||
| There's no whining. There's no whining in the war room. | ||
| You're coming back here for the first time in six months. | ||
| I'm not whining! I gotta hear a big whine. | ||
| I gotta hear a big whine. | ||
| Now, let me tell you the good news. I gotta hear a big whine. | ||
| I got an exclusive for you if you want it, Admiral. | ||
| Okay? I've been working on kind of a mini-documentary podcast we can debut on The War Room, which addresses the question of why the red wave never happened. | ||
| So I've been writing scripts, recording some of that. | ||
| And I think, you know, look, all of us, all of us were disappointed in what happened in November. | ||
| And it's a very complex Rubik's Cube episode. | ||
| And I thought it was important to step back from the day-to-day and try to think through that because we're not going to win in 2024 unless we have good answers for why it happened and address the root causes. | ||
| That's my mission right now, Admiral. | ||
| And so I've been focused on that. | ||
| Just full disclosure here, I fractured the fourth vertebrae of my lumbar spine It's been a physical therapy recovery. | ||
| Now the audience understands I've been playing Florence Nightingale. | ||
| I've been nursing Navarro back to perfect health. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No tears. Not a drop of sympathy from the Admiral, baby. | |
| Look, we're worried, baby. | ||
| It's like, you know, wrap it up and get your ass back in the battlefield. | ||
| So here I am. Okay, we're looking forward to the documentary. | ||
| I'm going to let you go. Where do people get to you on social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the best thing to do right now is to go to this wonderful website, give, send, go, forward, slash, Navarro. | |
| Give, send, go, forward, slash, Navarro. | ||
| That's the gateway to my legal defense fund as well as how to reach me on Twitter and the other social media. | ||
| So there it is. | ||
| And look, when we come back, Steve, I want to be talking the economy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We've got... I think a major market event coming to the downside. | |
| We'll talk about all that. But Cortez is doing a great job. | ||
| We've got to bounce, Peter. | ||
| We look forward to having you. Okay, I see the chat across all of our different platforms is ecstatic. | ||
| Yeah, Dr. Navarro's had some serious health issues about his back. | ||
| We're getting more on that. I tease him about no whining, but he's a true warrior. | ||
| He's been working on this documentary podcast about going into the math and the numbers of the 2022 midterm, but he is... | ||
| He's not quite fully back because he's still in pretty bad shape with his back, but we're going to make sure that he gets all the care he needs, and he'll be back with us on a regular basis like he was. | ||
| By the way, massive news out of Pennsylvania. | ||
| Alexander Preet, our great comms person, sends me something we've been tracking very closely. | ||
| Mark Halk, or Hoke, up in Bucks County. | ||
| Remember him? He's the gentleman with seven children. | ||
| The FBI went in and dragged him out and got all these guys rolled up at him as a pro-life activist for saying the rosary at these abortion mills. | ||
| He was just acquitted on, I think, all charges. | ||
| All charges dropped, acquitted on all charges. | ||
| A jury just acquitted him in a federal court. | ||
| This is the weaponization of government. | ||
| This is the scumbag. | ||
| Garland, the U.S. attorneys, the FBI, they're complete scum. | ||
| And here a jury acquitted on all charges just happened up in Philadelphia. | ||
| We're going to get more details and hopefully get them on. | ||
| They've been very restricted about what they do because they're in trial. | ||
| Boris, I got a lot to talk about. | ||
| I really wanted you on to talk about Ukraine and everything there, but you talk about weaponization. | ||
| And this is why, look, even if you're not a fan of President Trump's, There's been nobody that's taken on the administrative state in the deep state like this guy. | ||
| And they're out after him at every level. | ||
| In fact, what this audience sees, and you guys are more dialed in than anybody else, you see one-tenth of what's actually going on. | ||
| Boris, what's the latest on you guys and the team you've put together and these other great lawyers down there are hammering every day? | ||
| For the president, but every day you pick up, it's another outrage. | ||
| And this is nothing but the weaponized administrative state, both federal and state level, coming at President Trump, Boris Epstein. | ||
| Steve, honored to be with you, honored to be with the Posse. | ||
| Here's what I'll tell you in terms of the news today, President Trump continuing to fight against fake news, fighting against misinformation, fighting against corporate overreach and corporate wokeism in the robust powerhouse lawsuit he just filed against Bob Woodward, Simon& Schuster and their parents Paramount Global. | ||
| So that's what President Trump is doing. | ||
| Meanwhile, those who are trying to drag him down, trying to battle against MAGA, battle against President Trump becoming president, as he will, again, at the latest on Jan 20, 2025, they're trying this nonsense, the leaking, oh, there's a grand jury in New York, and it's looking at some nonsense. | ||
| First of all, a grand jury sitting is literally nothing. | ||
| That's not news. They're effectively constantly sitting. | ||
| Second of all, everyone knows President Trump didn't do anything wrong. | ||
| And any and all attempts to attack him, to target him, to persecute him are absolutely naked and violent weaponization of law enforcement. | ||
| Go back to this, the Bloomberg's reporting. | ||
| Go back for a second to the Woodward situation, President Trump on offense. | ||
| What's going on? Is this about Woodward's book? | ||
| Is it about the interview? Is it about the tapes? | ||
| Why is he going after Woodward? | ||
| It's about the tapes. Bob Woodward was specifically told that he had no license to market the audio tapes, to sell the audio tapes, to profit from the audio tapes, that they were only to be used for, quote unquote, the written word, which was for one of the books Woodward was working on, for which President Trump graciously agreed to have several interviews about. | ||
| What does Woodward do? | ||
| He takes those tapes and tries to release them to the world and make money off them and charge the American public money for those tapes. | ||
| But it didn't stop there. It didn't stop with wrongful profiteering and a total abuse of co-pire and a violation of President Trump's rights. | ||
| They also doctored the tapes. | ||
| They actually manipulated the tapes in an attempt to somehow make President Trump look bad. | ||
| And it's easy to see from the transcript versus the audio, they would take a question that Woodward would pose, and they would splice in an answer to a different question from President Trump. | ||
| So several counts in this lawsuit, Bloomberg doing a great story on it today. | ||
| The lawsuit is going to be released publicly as well for all to see. | ||
| President Trump fighting, fighting for the truth, fighting for honesty, fighting for justice, and against the woke, radical, deranged fake news media. | ||
| How do you do with this local, all the local DAs? | ||
| They have no downside. | ||
| They only have upside because they're totally politicized in a place of the hardest core of their base. | ||
| What is their overall strategy for punching back? | ||
| Because all of these things are all nonsense, obviously, right? | ||
| But this is just to get them print and media coverage. | ||
| They want to be stars, and this will make them stars on MSNBC. Am I incorrect in that, sir? | ||
| Of course that's what they want to do. | ||
| They want to get their... They want to get a fancy contract at a fancy law firm. | ||
| They want to get a fancy contributorship and go and spew more of their nonsense. | ||
| This is what's happened in America. | ||
| It's sad. It really is to show us how decrepit our law enforcement is. | ||
| And we respect the men and women of blue with all our hearts. | ||
| We respect law enforcement. | ||
| But the leaders of law enforcement, going back to Comey and Strzok and his lover, Page, And McCabe, and now of course McGornigal, the disaster, right? | ||
| This guy who was the head of the FBI counter into office in New York, supposed to be, quote unquote, investigating any connection to Russia, is taking bribes allegedly from the Russians. | ||
| So you had an absolute disaster, absolute shaming of the leadership. | ||
| Of law enforcement in this country, and it's continued today with this news that just came out about the total acquittal in Pennsylvania of that pastor who was wrongfully accused and wrongfully harassed. | ||
| No, it's just totally weaponized. Stefanik was on, Maria. | ||
| We just had Cash talking about it. | ||
| Do you anticipate a real effort here on this weaponization committee? | ||
| Do you think this is going to be a heavy-hitting committee that's really going to expose the American people what exactly went on here, sir? | ||
| No doubt about it. A thousand percent. | ||
| This weaponization committee is chock full of MAGA champions. | ||
| Jim Jordan's leading it. Elise Stefanik is the leader in the committee. | ||
| You've got Dara Issa, Jack Connick, others. | ||
| You've got tough people in that committee, and that committee appears to be fully focused on bringing an end to this targeting and weaponization of law enforcement that has no place in America. | ||
| It's straight out of a banana republic. | ||
| So yes, high hopes, and I'm very much looking forward to delivery from this committee. | ||
| Boris, you know, you and I talked a lot last week. | ||
| Last Friday was the 80th anniversary of the commemoration of the Holocaust, you know, the Holocaust commemoration, 80th anniversary. | ||
| We're on the eve. Tomorrow is the 80th anniversary of the surrender. | ||
| Field Marshal Paulus' 300,000 man, what was left of it, army, outside of Stalingrad. | ||
| And I know you know a lot of the details here. | ||
| I just don't think the American people understand, because he's got Zelensky's now asking for troops. | ||
| He's saying, hey, they're having a huge call-up in Russia. | ||
| Where am I going to get these troops from? | ||
| I need F-16s. | ||
| I've gotten tanks, but tanks may not be enough. | ||
| And this has shifted from defend Ukraine, or defend the Russian-speaking eastern border of Ukraine on this border skirmish, Now they want to liberate Crimea. | ||
| They want to land war, combined arms with tanks, combat aircraft, all supplied by America, and I think American crews, to liberate Crimea. | ||
| Can you connect that to the Holocaust, the 80th anniversary of the Holocaust, which was the memorials on Friday, and the fall of the German army outside of Stalingrad, sir? | ||
| Steve, I was one of the first people... | ||
| And I'm proud to have done it on air to say that Vladimir Putin was making a major mistake with this invasion into Ukraine. | ||
| And I believed it then almost a year ago now, and I believe it now. | ||
| There's no doubt about it. Full stop. | ||
| Having said that, for America to be sending billions and billions and billions of dollars when we have no border, when our economy is crumbling, when our cities are crumbling, and now, let's just be honest, through instructors and machinery and weaponry, effectively starting to engage in a hot war, With Russia in Eastern Europe, this is a disaster waiting to happen. | ||
| And I'd love to ask all those on both sides of the aisle who are pushing for this, what is their endgame? | ||
| What is their denouement? | ||
| How is this going to actually For the United States of America, are we trying to get into a nuclear war, as President Trump talked about this weekend? | ||
| Or could we get to a resolution? | ||
| What we need to be focused on here is a resolution, and any prolonged war, no matter how much the military-industrial complex wants it, and is now pumping out the F-16s and all that, a prolonged war in Eastern Europe is a disaster for America, which we've got to be putting first every single day, and a disaster for the world. | ||
| President Trump was pretty adamant on Saturday when he really had the second kickoff of the campaign in New Hampshire and then later in South Carolina. | ||
| He said, hey, look, if I was in charge now, but when I'm in charge, I can get a peace deal here and get people to the table in 24 hours. | ||
| Can you elaborate a little bit on that? | ||
| Well, I'll say this. | ||
| President Trump is somebody who obviously has An unbelievable experience, an unbelievable track record of deals, both as a businessman, you know, literally out of the deal, and when he was in the White House. | ||
| Everything from dealing with Kim Jong-un to the tariffs on China, to the USMCA, President Trump, and, of course, the Abraham Accords, the historic Abraham Accords. | ||
| There have been no peace deals in the Middle East in almost 30 years, President Trump getting three peace deals done. | ||
| President Trump gets results, resolves conflict. | ||
| And hey, you know, if Joe Biden actually had a head on his shoulders and wanted a true resolution to live, he would ask the president, hey, let's put the politics aside and let's come to a resolution. | ||
| Do I expect that to happen? | ||
| No. The team in the White House was too hopeless and too arrogant. | ||
| A terrible combination. America First is clearly what the base wants, right? | ||
| They want people to focus on the United States, our southern border, all of that. | ||
| But you look at the people even talking about it, whether it's Bolton or Nikki Haley or Mike Pompeo, who's a good man, I know him very well, others. | ||
| America First really hasn't gotten much traction with them. | ||
| They are very much from the neocon school of thinking. | ||
| I mean, they don't want to double down in Ukraine. | ||
| They want to triple down Ukraine. | ||
| What is that gap? | ||
| Between what President Trump represents and laid out as a foreign policy and national security policy and didn't get us into any conflicts, think the first president in living memory, didn't get us into a war, versus what I call the Keebler elves are cooking up to run against him. | ||
| Keebler elves, I think it's pretty apt. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, a lot of these folks, they're just, you know, they're quote-unquote contenders, which they're much more pretender than contender. | ||
| Yeah, they're lifelong, you know, part of the apparatus, part of the process, and part of the establishment. | ||
| These are establishment folks, and they're used to the old Republican line of, yeah, send money, send troops, send weapons, and let's go to war. | ||
| I mean, John Bolton, literally, you know, war is his favorite meal. | ||
| So, and, you know, Nikki Haley and others, Mike Pompeo, seem to be not too far from there. | ||
| The reason, the reason that President Trump was a historic godsend in 2016 is because he changed the status quo Both for America as a whole, but also for the Republican Party. | ||
| Also for the Republican Party. | ||
| And the same has to happen again. | ||
| He won in 2020. | ||
| Yes, I said it loud and clear. | ||
| President Trump won in 2020, and he's got to win in 2024 to keep us out of these wars. | ||
| And you know what? As sad as this may sound, I'm not convinced that anything is going to be resolved on the Russian Ukraine front until President Trump is back in the Oval Office. | ||
| And when he is, it is going to be resolved awfully quick. | ||
| Boris, can you tell us where your coordinates are? | ||
| How do people get to you? No doubt about it. | ||
| A lot of information coming out follows. | ||
| There's going to be statements coming out on this robust powerhouse lawsuit from President Trump in fighting fake news. | ||
| He's fighting at every single turn. | ||
| My information, hot on the website, borisdp.com. | ||
| Sign up right now on borisdp.com. | ||
| Hot on the getter at borisdp. | ||
| Twitter at borisdp. Hot on social at Boris. | ||
| The hottest on the ground, Boris underscore Epstein. | ||
| Stay strong, God bless, and I will talk to you tomorrow. | ||
| Boris, thank you very much for coming. | ||
| Okay, we've got a lot to get to. | ||
| One thing I want to do is we can put up the CPAC before we go to break. | ||
| We're going to be at CPAC, Real America's Voice is going to be there. | ||
| We're going to have the War Room there. | ||
| All the shows, all your favorite shows are going to be there. | ||
| Live audience participation, just like we did at Turning Point, just like we did at CPAC Dallas. | ||
| We want everybody, everybody that can hear this, we want you to come. | ||
| CPAC is going to be fantastic. | ||
| We're in our breakout rooms. We're going to spend time with you guys. | ||
| Like we did at these other conferences. | ||
| I want to see everybody. You get $47 off the general mission ticket. | ||
| So go right now to cpac.org slash war room. | ||
| $47 off. | ||
| The entire crew is going to be there. | ||
| All of our contributors, all of our production staff. | ||
| You get to meet everybody, including Grace Chong, Captain Bannon, Jane Zirkle, Natalie Winters, Nicole Nagardi. | ||
| The whole team will be there. | ||
| Short break. Back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The new social media taking on big tech, protecting free speech, and canceling cancel culture. | |
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. We have the people with us, but they have the corrupt election officials with them. | ||
| That's how they win. | ||
| That's how they win. Guess who else they have with them? | ||
| The corrupt members of the fake news. | ||
| It's terrible. So we all know there was corruption all across this great country, but nowhere, nowhere in the country was it more blatant and obvious than what happened right here in Maricopa County. | ||
| I wish I could share every bit of testimony we have, every bit of sworn documentation that we have, every bit of evidence, but literally we would have to be here for a full day, maybe a day and a half. | ||
| And I know that you guys are hot. | ||
| So I'm going to go over some of the highlights. | ||
| How's that? But I do want to hit on some of the big bombshells that our team has uncovered. | ||
| First of all, let's start with... | ||
| Last night it was extraordinary. | ||
| Last night it was extraordinary. | ||
| Thousands of people showed up at this Cary Lake rally. | ||
| And she was going to explain. | ||
| It was going to be fairly academic. | ||
| You know, this wasn't going to be like a... | ||
| A jack-up rally. This is going to be, you know, get you updated on the evidence, what we're doing, etc., particularly since, and Wendy Rogers there, Senator Rogers, had Shelby Bush and others testify at her committee. | ||
| And there's actually more bombshells happening right now. | ||
| They're live there right now. | ||
| I'm going to get to it later with an update, hopefully. | ||
| They're out there right now with Senator Wendy Rogers getting more, I think, official about this cheating into the – be documented into actually the public record than it then could be used in court. | ||
| But over the weekend, Arizona, Jeff DeWitt, who is the COO, CFO of the 16 campaign, won, I think, with 80 percent of the vote in Arizona. | ||
| President Trump endorsed him. | ||
| Carrie Lake endorsed him. | ||
| I think the guys over Turning Point endorsed him. | ||
| Then you had a main, you had an establishment thrown out. | ||
| So there's a lot going on. The one thing, the story from my John Fredericks this morning, I think the other day, about I think we have to process what happened at Dana Point. | ||
| It's not just about Rana. | ||
| Being reelected, hey, she ran a campaign and they had these people vote for her and she won big. | ||
| Even though Harmeet started late and Mike Lindell started late. | ||
| But it's something deeper, more fundamental. | ||
| I've got to process it. That just can't be it. | ||
| If that's going to be it, you're not going to take this country back at that level. | ||
| That has to be totally rethought. | ||
| And the state parties obviously... | ||
| When you talk to them, they're being starved for cash. | ||
| They're talking to people over the last three or four days of Mike Lindell and Carrie Lake. | ||
| They need fundraisers. They need to raise money. | ||
| The precinct strategy, though, they still want to block that out. | ||
| So we're going to get to the... | ||
| We're going to sort this entire thing out. | ||
| But like I said, hey, my strongest recommendation right now is just hold the money. | ||
| Don't send any money right now. | ||
| Just hold it. And we'll think this through together. | ||
| And I'm not picking on the RNC. I tell people you want changes in the Catholic Church. | ||
| Hold the money right now. Just don't send it. | ||
| Otherwise, you're going to have more of this madness you see coming out of Rome every day and filtering down to these left-wing bishops and then to the parish. | ||
| So, hey, the way to get their attention, the way to grab them by the throat is just cut off the auction. | ||
| The auction is always the small donors. | ||
| Small donors don't donate, then they understand they got problems. | ||
| There's not enough big donors to write enough checks to make up for that. | ||
| So it's time to really rethink and to kind of process What happened last week. | ||
| On CPAC, I want to make sure, once again, everybody, you get a special deal, $47 off. | ||
| This is going to be a great gathering. | ||
| We're going to do all types of special things. | ||
| We're going to have all of our contributors there. | ||
| We're going to be doing the show live, both the morning and the afternoon version. | ||
| You're going to have tons of speakers. | ||
| They're going to be rolling out huge speakers. | ||
| President Trump's already committed. | ||
| One of the reasons, it's back in Washington, D.C. It's back at National Harbor. | ||
| They were very successful down in Florida. | ||
| They were very successful in Texas. | ||
| But I think Matt and Mercedes and the rest of the team, Lauren and Nassim and others over at CPAC, thought it was time to get back. | ||
| And do it in a more traditional setting. | ||
| It's very important. But go to CPAC.org slash War Room. | ||
| You get $47 off. | ||
| And Moe and them are going to start keeping a list, start making contacts with you guys in the live chats to find out who's coming so that we make sure that we see everybody and spend some time with everybody. | ||
| It's one of the great benefits of doing Turning Point and CPAC Dallas is we got to see so much of the audience. | ||
| We got feedback and got to really put names to faces. | ||
| And it was just fantastic. | ||
| And I think you'll see that We try to go out of our way for audience interaction, and the reason is that you guys make the show. | ||
| The reason the show is so special is, quite frankly, the power that you people have. | ||
| You know this on Capitol Hill right now. | ||
| You know it from whether it's the debt ceiling negotiations or this new one. | ||
| Look, to be brutally frank, we have two huge pieces of work in front of us. | ||
| Well, three. | ||
| Let me throw the transhumanism in for a second, because next hour, Joe Allen's working on it right now. | ||
| You're going to have a great cut from the speech that Peter Thiel gave in Oxford about artificial intelligence, and we're going to break it all down. | ||
| Also, Naomi Wolf and Lindsey from Texas on Twitter, but Lindsey Jones are going to join us. | ||
| About latest developments, about the vax and everything related to the vax. | ||
| And, of course, we've got a kind of a blockbuster at the beginning. | ||
| Adam Andruski from Open Books has been doing one of the toughest nuts he's had to crack in the state of California because they didn't want to turn over documents. | ||
| He's got an explosive investigation into Gavin Newsom and Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel. | ||
| And I know people can't stand the center of their name, but, hey, you're going to have to live with it because they are power players. | ||
| And they're going to have a major impact on this country unless we stop it, okay? | ||
| And you'll see exactly what they're trying to do to promote their local brands. | ||
| That'll all be next. Also, make sure Historic Day, Mike Lindell has worked on this for a long time, MyPillow 2.0. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com, promo code Warren, buy one, get one free. | ||
| He's launched with new technology. | ||
| The 2.0 MyPillow. | ||
| As you know, Mike Lindell for years has been working on the patents for these things and working on the improvements. | ||
| This is actually at the time he felt a 2.0 needed to come out. | ||
| And so we know how you love the pillows and how they've helped you sleep the sleep of the just. | ||
| But go to MyPillow right now. | ||
| Promo code RORUM, buy one, get one free. | ||
| This is the first day of the launch on it. | ||
| Stick around. We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| The second hour is actually going to be on fire, just like the rest of the day's been, okay? | ||
| We got a War Powers Act we got to push. | ||
| We got the financial model from the Treasury. | ||
| We got to force it all out. | ||
| You are the forcing function, the audience. | ||
| The most powerful audience in all media. | ||
| That would be the audience of The War Room. | ||
| Short commercial break. Back with Adam, Naomi, Lindsay, and Joe Allen, next in The War Room. |
Export Selection