Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies. | ||
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on this, people. | |
You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
unidentified
|
I know you don't like hearing that. | |
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
I wish, in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bass. | |
Welcome back. | ||
22 November in the year of our Lord 2022. | ||
Of course, it's the anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963. | ||
And we'll talk more about that later in the show. | ||
Dave Walsh. | ||
The underlying premise of this, the COP 27's and the Glasgow's and all this stuff, is there, is this science or is it scientism? | ||
Is there any real factual basis for this now massive, and you've, Dave has committed by the way, we're going to get the Indian media article because they're all over this, that US media is lying to people and not covering it. | ||
We're going to get into what the real numbers are. | ||
Because India is obviously very focused on this topic. | ||
We'll break that down for you. | ||
The scale of this will shock you, but John Kerry and Joe Biden in this radical regime has committed you to literally trillions of dollars of reparations to third world dictators, of which China right now may be a recipient of the money. | ||
They're certainly not throwing any cash into the till. | ||
Dave, is there any, before you go, is there any basis in science or in physics, the laws of physical property and back of what the cult of climate change is talking about? | ||
You use the expression scientism. | ||
It's scientism and conflation of some reality. | ||
There's a chart I sent Cameron to have Denver put up, if he can put it up, on the reality of sea level rise. | ||
Here's a chart. | ||
Yeah, this is a real thing. | ||
This is a N-O-A-A, U.S. | ||
government chart of historic sea level rise for the last, get this, 21,000 years. | ||
Yes, this occurs with the benefit of the Vostok ice cores taken in Antarctica years ago. | ||
We're able to now see that in the last 400,000 years, we've had five major glaciation events, five ice ages. | ||
At the peak of them, When the ice begins melting in a 20,000 year cycle, the ocean begins to rise as glacial ice melts. | ||
We're now at the top of that and it's leveled off mightily. | ||
We've had 427 feet of sea level rise in 21,000 years. | ||
It's still going on very mildly, very mildly to the degree, according to the IPCC, according to the UN itself, it's going on to the degree of about one and a half to 1.7 millimeters per year. | ||
That is .07 inches. | ||
That would mean over the next 100 years, if it continues at this present rate of 21,000-year sea ice melt, of which, by the way, they've indicated 95% of this has happened already since the peak glaciation, 95% of ice melt has occurred already in 21,000 years. | ||
There's only 5% to go. | ||
We'd have 22 more feet to go of sea level rise over the next 2,500 years, being about 7 inches per century. | ||
7 inches per century over the next 2,500 years. | ||
So, that's reality, but that's the history of what happens when glaciation begins to melt, and then you get into a new ice age, which is coming in about 1,500 to 2,000 years, based on the cyclic nature of these. | ||
So there's a history, a long, long history that's completely left out of the natural phenomenon we're talking about and how limited it now is at 1.7 millimeters per year. | ||
It's a no-never mind. | ||
It's happening at one-fifth the rate that it's happened over the last 20,000 years because most of the ice from the glaciation is now melted. | ||
Not because of mankind, because of natural phenomenon. | ||
Have William Happer from Princeton, have Dr. Dick Linzen from MIT on the show with Craig Idzo and other scientists, they can go into this very deeply. | ||
This is a false narrative and a conflated narrative. | ||
No, Dr. Happer is the best. | ||
Dave, how do people get to, before we get you back on here, to go through the math of Indian media on the four to seven trillion dollars per year? | ||
At Dave Walsh Energy. | ||
Thank you, Steve. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
Thank you for being on this. | ||
Dave Walsh has been on this from the very beginning. | ||
Okay, I got Joe Kent. | ||
Joe, can you give us an update? | ||
You're fighting this fight. | ||
Why are they slow walking this, Joe? | ||
Why can't we know the number of ballots in Washington 3? | ||
The media has moved on, but there's a fight there and something's fishy. | ||
That they won't let you know how many ballots are still outstanding? | ||
And this whole kind of opaque nature of the curing? | ||
What's going on? | ||
Yeah Steve, we got our last update yesterday. | ||
We're only behind less than one percent, about 2,900 votes. | ||
We were told yesterday that we're not going to get another update until the 28th. | ||
Certification day is on the 29th. | ||
We have to the 28th though to continue to cure ballots, which we're going to do. | ||
As to why it's such a closed door process, we're here, you know, 14 days on and we still don't have any kind of answers. | ||
We just don't get that information. | ||
The people aren't given access to this process. | ||
And that's why I think a lot of folks right now have a lot of consternation. | ||
Like, I won't quit. | ||
I won't throw in the towel until every single legal vote has been counted. | ||
And right now, all we're getting is slow roll and then a bunch of non-answers from our election officials here in the state. | ||
If they were confident, are the Democrats curing ballots at the rate you are? | ||
If they were confident, they would be spiking the football every day. | ||
It's kind of crickets, isn't it? | ||
Yeah, we think the Democrats are doing some ballot curing as well because they're not that confident. | ||
But I 100% agree with you, Steve. | ||
If they had the numbers, if they had blown me out, they would have announced this last week. | ||
They would have announced this a couple of days after the actual election itself. | ||
Or I don't know, radical concept, maybe they would have had their act together enough to actually have everything done on election night. | ||
But that's impossible. | ||
But yeah, the longer this goes on, the more they slow walk it, the less transparency they give us. | ||
That just really indicates that there's something afoot here and we're going to get to the bottom of it. | ||
Joe, how can people get access to your fight out there? | ||
How can they help? | ||
How can they assist you? | ||
Where do they go? | ||
Absolutely. | ||
If you're in Washington state, you need to go to VoteWA.gov to make sure that your ballot was counted. | ||
Go to my social media, JoeKent16jan19. | ||
You'll find screenshots on there, how to walk you through that process to make sure that your ballot was counted. | ||
Go to JoeKentForCongress.com to support our effort. | ||
We have ballot curing teams out there. | ||
And then we're also gearing up for a legal fight, so that's where to find me. | ||
JoeKent4Congress.com. | ||
Joe Kent, fight on. | ||
We know you will, but I want the War on Posse to jump in here and have your back, okay? | ||
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
Thank you very much, Steve. | ||
Joe Kent, the best of the best. | ||
Let me go to Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
Michael, talk to me about, you've got a paper, you've got the whole network of papers. | ||
You're one of our strategic partners here for news. | ||
You've got papers in all the battleground states, including in Arizona. | ||
Tell me about the paper first, so people can get to, and then go to the site that has all your news, because you're breaking stories in all the battleground states. | ||
And then I want to talk specifically about what's going on. | ||
So great to be with you today. | ||
By the way, your coverage of Arizona has just been spectacular. | ||
I watch it every day and you're just doing a great job. | ||
The Star News Network, we're affiliated with you. | ||
The Star News Network is in 11 states, Tennessee Star, the Ohio Star, Michigan Sun, several other states, the Georgia Star News. | ||
And of course, of late, we are really on fire with our reporting at the Arizona Sun-Times. | ||
We have two reporters in Phoenix. | ||
And we are tracking this debacle in Maricopa County very closely. | ||
Look, you can look at this kind of, you're a partisan, but the way the newspapers run, you report facts. | ||
Yes. | ||
Give me your assessment, we're going to get your reporter either on tonight or tomorrow morning, but give me your assessment given that Maricopa County and Bill Gates and these guys knew the microscope was going to be on them from the world, not just the U.S. | ||
and the big media, but I mean BBC, Financial Times, because what happened in Arizona was going to be emblematic of what happens in this country going forward on elections. | ||
What's your observations about how this was handled and where we stand now? | ||
Yeah, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the recorder there, and all the election officials have been extraordinarily, I think, and unnecessarily defensive. | ||
It's been an adversarial situation there. | ||
And by the way, I don't know if you've had anybody mention this to you, Steve. | ||
You know, the recorder there, Stephen Richer, R-I-C-H-E-R, who is a Republican, barely beat Adrian Fontes. | ||
Uh, who's now, uh, the secretary of state, uh, elect, uh, there, if, uh, if it turns out. | ||
unidentified
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa. | |
I got it. | ||
Yes. | ||
I got you. | ||
There's still challenges to be made, but here's what I'm going to say about Richard. | ||
I don't know if you know this. | ||
He, do you know, he organized a political action committee back in 2021, the pro-democracy Republican PAC. | ||
And from what we can tell, he got funding from major Democratic donors there. | ||
Francis Najafi gave him $20,000. | ||
Najafi also gave $60,000 to the Democrats, Arizona Democrats, and $5,300 to Katie Hobbs. | ||
It seems to me that in that group, apparently we're getting some of the details on it, but some of the funding I think we'll show in July went to advertisements in the primary that were opposed to Kerry Lake. | ||
We're developing that story. | ||
The question is how can this guy be fair and objective, at least in terms of his conduct? | ||
He's been very defensive and so that's one of the storylines that we're developing at the Arizona Sun-Times. | ||
Now four counties, correct me if I'm wrong, four counties have now said they're going to hold up certification or maybe they're either holding it up or can't certify. | ||
It's a little confusion about this, at least until they see where Maricopa County, how Maricopa County responds to the, uh, to the letter. | ||
This is a blistering letter from the attorney general. | ||
And that's just the only, the Daily Caller's got another memo from somebody. | ||
You've got Cleta Mitchell. | ||
There's about five memos going around that talks about, In tremendous depth, how this thing was mishandled and basically can't be certified. | ||
Are these other counties hanging back to see how Maricopa County responds to the Attorney General about this certification? | ||
I think they have concerns in their own counties as well. | ||
I know Cochise and Mojave have said they're going to delay certification. | ||
And so they have some concerns as well. | ||
As you know, this, you know, from 2020, the whole process of certification of an election is very elaborate. | ||
Uh, and, um, that's kind of where they're in right now. | ||
They're waiting for kind of the bombshell was the assistant attorney general for Arizona sent this letter to Maricopa County election officials, Tom Liddy, and said, look, we have five or six questions about what happened on election day, particularly with regard to these 70 precincts, uh, at least 70 precincts where the tabulation machines weren't working. | ||
They were very detailed, four or five key questions, logical, common sense, And what they said is, you know, you shouldn't be certifying that election until you answer these questions. | ||
So we have a big battle brewing on the certification issue there in Maricopa County and in the other counties as well. | ||
But the other counties, aren't they arguing, I think this boils down to the disenfranchisement Of their voters. | ||
I mean, in Cochise and Mojave, they're saying, hey, you can't run, you know, you're two thirds of the voter, 65% of the vote in Maricopa County. | ||
You can't be so incompetent. | ||
And we have issues here with machines and other things, but you can't be so incompetent. | ||
You're basically taking the vote away from our people because you've got such a huge center of gravity of this election. | ||
your incompetence, corruption, malfeasance, whatever you want to say is, and I think that PAC is a big deal about, hey, was this done on purpose? | ||
But they're saying out in these smaller rural counties, hey, you're basically taking the vote away from our people because you've got such a huge, you know, center of gravity of this election. Is that it in a nutshell? Yeah, that's part of it, but I think they also have their own concerns about vote by mail in their counties as well, Steve. It's a... | ||
It's a huge mess, and you've talked about this. | ||
This is an embarrassment for the people of the state of Arizona that their election administration has been incompetent, is perhaps the kindest way to describe it. | ||
You know, we looked at the Arizona statutes on this, and There are grounds for suing election officials in the case of misconduct. | ||
And the question is, does misconduct have to be just purely incompetence or does it also involve some level of intent? | ||
I think there are going to be a huge number of lawsuits in the next couple of weeks there. | ||
And I think that there is still a chance that Cary Lake Could become governor. | ||
I think it's my view because it's an outside chance. | ||
We have a little different view on that. | ||
unidentified
|
Leahy, hang on for a second. | |
Michael Patrick Leahy and I have worked together for many years. | ||
We know each other quite well. | ||
Michael, hang on for a second. | ||
We're going to bring you right back. | ||
unidentified
|
If you look up the term chutzpah in the dictionary, You find the idea that Carrie Lake is saying that there is voter suppression. | |
They're complaining that there are long lines. | ||
Well, you know why there are long lines? | ||
There are long lines because the Carrie Lakes and the Republicans have been making it harder to vote in Arizona. | ||
They're complaining that voters were disenfranchised due to voter registration laws. | ||
You know why? | ||
Because Carrie Lake and the Republicans have made it harder to register in Arizona. | ||
They're claiming that ballots were thrown out due to mismatched signatures. | ||
You know why? | ||
Because when we sued Arizona to make signature matching more accurate and make it easier for people to cure their ballots, they opposed us. | ||
And by the way, on the long lines point, while they're crying crocodile tears about people waiting in line for an hour or two in Maricopa County, where are they talking about the students who waited for six hours in the cold in Michigan to vote in their election? | ||
Okay, that is the evil genius Mark Elias. | ||
He's trying to turn the guns back around on you. | ||
Remember, you gotta watch this guy's moves every time. | ||
Hey, and I'm the first one. | ||
People give me grief behind the scenes. | ||
I want a Mark Elias on our side. | ||
I'm still looking for that guy. | ||
I want a Mark Elias on our side. | ||
I want a hammer. | ||
He's a hammer. | ||
Total sleazeball. | ||
But he's an evil genius, and he's now all over- and no, Mark, the thing can't be certified. | ||
You know- see, this is- Leahy, this is big for us. | ||
Mark Elias is now out trying to get ahead of the story and trying to spin it, right? | ||
He understands this thing can't be certified. | ||
He understands the reasons it can't be certified. | ||
But this is Mark Elias, and you're gonna see Mark Elias everywhere. | ||
Folks have to understand that the certification date, or what they call, they use a term of art which is canvas, which is a certification. | ||
That doesn't mean a canvas like we traditionally mean it. | ||
So we continue to like to use the term certification. | ||
That's supposed to happen, Mike, I think next Monday on the 28th. | ||
It looks like no way that's going to happen timing-wise because the Assistant Attorney General Sent a blistering letter to Maricopa County. | ||
And not just that, there's been tons of these other reports. | ||
I haven't gotten it up yet. | ||
The Daily Caller Foundation did a magnificent job of laying out this other memo. | ||
You got Cleta Mitchell. | ||
You have all these groups. | ||
You have thousands. | ||
And now you have hundreds and hundreds of sworn affidavits from voters and election officials and all of it, okay? | ||
So this is coming up. | ||
Mark Elias understands they've got to get through this because what they have to do is force this certification next Monday. | ||
They've got to do that. | ||
They've got to get Katie Hobbs in there by the skin of her teeth. | ||
So this is going to be a massive battle over Thanksgiving. | ||
Leahy, you're on top of the Arizona Sun-Times. | ||
You bring up a couple of great points. | ||
Number one, what people haven't gotten into, they started a PAC, right? | ||
They started a PAC and took Democrat money and got involved in primaries, but the PAC, and they're saying Bill Gates, you know, Fargo, Gates, gave an interview in Arizona media right before the election saying, hey, we got to clean out all these election deniers. | ||
They need to be cleaned out of the Republican Party. | ||
Your thing about lawsuits, personal lawsuits against these people, I think is something that should have been done a long time ago. | ||
But Leahy, as you see it, having a newspaper there, having a news site with reporters on the ground, how could they possibly? | ||
have run this thing and let the whole system collapse when they knew that Game Day voters, because the MAGA voters, the Trump voters, the Carrie Lake supporters, the Fincham supporters, don't trust them because they're incompetent, right, at best and evil at worst. | ||
They're going to come out and they want to vote on Game Day. | ||
They want to bring that ballot that's either a pre-ballot and drop it off or they want to come and vote. | ||
And these guys weren't prepared for it all. | ||
Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
Incompetence is a theme that we hear mostly from when we do our reporting in Arizona. | ||
We have two reporters in Phoenix on the ground who are doing great work on this. | ||
By the way, just as an aside, the fact that Mark Elias needs an intervention right now so he can calm down. | ||
It is a clue. | ||
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
Hold it. | ||
This is a tell. | ||
Mark Elias is out there. | ||
This is a tell. | ||
He's out there this morning. | ||
He's in front of this now. | ||
He understands they have a big, this is the first big tell we've had that they're worried. | ||
He's the, and I don't, people don't give me grief about it. | ||
Hey, he's the evil genius. | ||
This is why Trump is not at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. | ||
It's that guy. | ||
The Transition Integrity Project, remember McGinley and Rahim and I went around the country, a lot of it by Zoom because of the COVID, and walked through what he was saying. | ||
Don't worry about what's going to happen on election night. | ||
Three weeks later, Biden's going to be president. | ||
Time Magazine did the, Molly Ball did the cover story, showed exactly how Elias gamed the system. | ||
And they continue to game it. | ||
They're now... Elias is the chief architect of the ballot manufacturing and distribution business. | ||
We're in two different businesses. | ||
Mark Elias is in a separate business that we're in, right? | ||
But right now, we're so jammed up in Arizona because it's so blatant. | ||
And here's the great news. | ||
It's like Brazil. | ||
Kerry Lake's not really leading this. | ||
Right? | ||
She's fighting for, but just like the Bolsa, you got tens of millions of people in the streets in Brazil. | ||
You have an uprising of, of, of voters in Arizona. | ||
And it's a lot of it's being led by these counties sitting there going, Hey, we have problems too with these machines. | ||
In addition, you've disenfranchised our rural voters and we're tired of it. | ||
We're not going to stand for it anymore. | ||
Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
I think you're exactly right. | ||
And you're right. | ||
It is a tell. | ||
He's out in front because he's worried about it. | ||
What I think, though, is more likely to happen in Arizona, and it's not going to help Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, but I think this is the direction that they're headed. | ||
I don't think they'll respond in full to the Assistant Attorney General's request for information about the election irregularities. | ||
I think they are likely to proceed With the certification of canvassing on Monday, and then you're going to see all sorts of litigation. | ||
And frankly, I think that action is going to increase the likelihood that that litigation from the Carrier Lake campaign and others is going to have an opportunity for a remedy that is, you know, either having a do-over or not certifying the election. | ||
That I think would be. | ||
Uh, unwise on the part of Maricopa County, but everything I've seen is that they are just generally speaking a little bit arrogant. | ||
unidentified
|
And a little bit defensive. | |
A little bit arrogant. | ||
See, Leahy knows how to trigger me. | ||
All the years working together, he knows how to trigger me. | ||
Right? | ||
Very good. | ||
A little bit arrogant. | ||
Michael Patrick Leahy, we're going to have him. | ||
We want to get your local reporters on here now. | ||
And I'm telling people over Thanksgiving, I think Leahy actually nailed it. | ||
Remember, there's a chain of command. | ||
Of how these things, you know, one group after the next, after the next, after the next, have to actually sign off on it and certify it. | ||
Right? | ||
Of course, Maricopa County, to Katie Hobbs, the Attorney General, and then to the Governor. | ||
So, this is a long way from over. | ||
And now, Mark Elias is out in front. | ||
Right there, you see, he's engaged. | ||
Because why? | ||
He only comes out from under the rock, like the scorpion he is, if he knows there's a problem, right? | ||
And he knows there's a big problem, and he knows that he's going to try to nip this in the bud right now. | ||
It's not nippable, right? | ||
It's going to go forward, and this is going to be explosive over this weekend, and I agree with you, next Monday, when they start talking about these certifications. | ||
And I think you're going to see lawsuits flying, everything else. | ||
I think it's going to be quite intense. | ||
Leahy, how do people get to the site to keep up with this? | ||
Go to thestarnewsnetwork.com or arizonasuntimes.com. | ||
Michael, Patrick Leahy, thank you. | ||
Look forward to having your reporters on here over the next couple of days. | ||
Thank you, sir. | ||
Great to be with you today, Steve, as always. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
Remember, no days off in the war room, okay? | ||
Because you got these fights going on. | ||
Important fights. | ||
I want to bring in now Garrett Ziegler. | ||
He was in the Trump White House. | ||
Actually, he was over with Peter Navarro. | ||
These guys were grinding. | ||
One thing about the Navarro shop, as we called it, they worked seven days a week for four years. | ||
Peter Navarro is in that place every day. | ||
Ziegler, all these guys grinding out to protect working-class Americans. | ||
Garrett, thank you very much. | ||
You're head of Marco Polo Research now. | ||
I want to tee it up. | ||
We've got about three minutes in this segment. | ||
I want to just toss the ball to you, then I'm going to bring you back after the break and, of course, our own Natalie Winters. | ||
This is a 600 page report you did. | ||
You literally took the laptop of the whole Hunter Biden situation and kind of broke it down and did really a compilation of research on this. | ||
Walk us through what this report is and then start walking us through the report. | ||
unidentified
|
So we developed a non-profit to do this report and basically it's a comprehensive dossier on the device. | |
There's about a half a dozen to a dozen exclusives in it for reporters. | ||
But mostly, it is a – sort of a historical document to take someone through the suppression operation, the letter by the former spooks, and all of the crimes on the device. | ||
We have a small subsection – I've been watching your show the last couple of days. | ||
We have a small subsection on pure degeneracy, but that's in the endnotes, and that's only about 30 pages. | ||
The vast majority of the report is crimes, business-related crimes, sex-related crimes, and drug-related crimes, because there's a lot of people out there who see the ridiculous, embarrassing photos of Hunter and don't realize that he committed the exact same crimes that they got Paul Manafort for, FARA violations. | ||
It was his business model. | ||
And so I, with two private investigators, an attorney, an accountant, and a digital forensics person, put together this 630-page tome, and basically It is what we think. | ||
Let's put it this way. | ||
There hasn't been one left-wing debunking of the report yet. | ||
We've got about 20 to 20. | ||
This is the amazing thing. | ||
You guys put it out there a couple of months ago now, if I remember correctly, right? | ||
unidentified
|
October 19th, yeah, over a month. | |
Over a month, and the mainstream media immediately, because it had been shoddy, And we know your level of detail that you get into. | ||
If it had been shoddy, they would have been all over ripping, because in 600 pages, you're clearly going to make some mistakes. | ||
They went crickets on it. | ||
That's when you know you got something. | ||
Walk me through, we're going to go to break, but just walk me through the team again. | ||
Because CBS, Catherine Herridge is running around, she's got the knitted brown, she's got, you know, she's got... Walk me through your team that went through this, sir. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, that was a pretty pathetic limited hangout she did. | |
I reached out to her in January and she didn't want to work with us, and I offered to not put my name into it because she didn't want to be working with a former Trump official. | ||
So I am a young guy, and I knew that there was a lot in this laptop, including the secret alias email address. | ||
That Joe used, and I know you know about this, but for all your listeners, there was an email address robert.l.peters at pci.gov that Joe Biden used. | ||
Literally the exact same thing that Killary did, except this one wasn't stored in a server in a closet. | ||
This was actually set up by the government, and we go into this in the report, and the reason why I'm bringing that up is because... Go ahead. | ||
I tell you what, Gary, hang on. | ||
We're gonna take a commercial break. | ||
Okay. | ||
We got Garrett Ziegler of the Marco Polo Research. | ||
It's a 600-page Report on the laptop from hell what's involved in it also got to Natalie Winters on her own independent investigations all of it next And then again in 98 and we we really never learned our lesson That's happening here with these Republicans, and it's astounding to watch from outside the bubble | ||
Because what they're doing is so disconnected from what voters just told America a couple of weeks ago out. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's a way to measure that. | |
Since the end of the Cold War, the House of Representatives has changed hands four times. | ||
94, 2006, 2010, 2018. | ||
Two times to Republicans, two times to the Democrats. | ||
The two times the House flipped to the Democrats, 2006, 2018, the Democrats won the presidency two years later. | ||
the House flipped to the Democrats 2006-2018, the Democrats won the presidency two years later. | ||
The two times it flipped to the Republicans, 1994 and 2010, they lost the presidency two years later. | ||
Why? | ||
Well, there are many explanations, of course, but one of the most important is the Democrats use their... Okay, that's David Frum, the Bush hack speechwriter. | ||
Here's the thing. | ||
He has a big article in The Atlantic, where he's one of the contributing, I think, editors, and it kind of goes after the Natalie Winters and all the investigations, because they're so nervous about this. | ||
They're pleading, oh, if you waste your time doing that and not, you know, fix the economy, trust me, there's been plenty of times of fixing the economy. | ||
You just heard Ralph Norman on here. | ||
What's going to happen? | ||
No debt ceiling increase in the lame duck. | ||
No 11 to 20 million amnesties for the illegal aliens, at least so far we've fought that off. | ||
We're going to try to fight off the omnibus. | ||
We're going to try to fight off the Defense Authorization Act. | ||
Those are all heavy lifts and they're happening, okay? | ||
And you got guys in the southern border today saying not just going to close the border, they're going to take Mayorkas and impeach him. | ||
We're going to impeach Garland. | ||
We're going to start the president. | ||
These are not going to be political impeachments. | ||
They're going to be based upon Investigations. | ||
And you heard Norman. | ||
It's not just investigations. | ||
He wanted investigations with consequences. | ||
Congressman Ralph Norman from South Carolina. | ||
I want to go back to Garrett. | ||
Garrett. | ||
So it's 600 pages. | ||
I just want to make sure people understand this. | ||
This is totally free. | ||
You've got it up online and people can access this. | ||
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
Just go to markupoolusa.org. | ||
It's been online since October 19th and we are printing physical copies, but that's going to come later this month. | ||
And, you know, just before we go on to the report again, I wanted to say that, you know, I have a little bit of a different take of why the mainstream press and the former spooks had such a Pavlovian, dog-like response to this story. | ||
Because I think they're terrified that they're going to be implicated in it. | ||
Because it's not just about Hunter and Joe, although those are the two main actors. | ||
It's really a universe of grifters and hangers-on. | ||
And, you know, we put up this site, BidenLaptopEmails.com, Steve. | ||
There's 129,000 emails on there. | ||
People were searching for their name. | ||
We went into the server and found that a state legislator in California was looking to see if she had emails on this laptop. | ||
So I think this whole universe of lobbyists and influence peddlers are worried that looking into this laptop is going to reveal their schemes and their griefs. | ||
That's why there's such a response. | ||
You've hit the main point of this. | ||
This investigation, when it starts and it's public, and it's going to take a while to get it all organized, but the hearings with Bobulinski, it's not simply about the Bidens. | ||
unidentified
|
It is. | |
And their criminality. | ||
And Garrett can walk you through chapter and verse and Natalie. | ||
But it's also going to say this. | ||
When people talk this cute phrase, the swamp, this is the thing itself. | ||
This is kind of the ether of it. | ||
You're going to get to see it all. | ||
And here's what you're going to see. | ||
They're selling you out, and these are the national security, they're selling you out every day to the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
You're being sold out now. | ||
There's Ukraine and some other things, but they're selling you out to an existential threat in this country. | ||
And the reporter said the other day, isn't this about 2017? | ||
Well, hey, A lot of it's going to be and should be about when the guy was a sitting vice president and in charge of the pivot to Asia. | ||
A lot of what you're going to see in this report is when Obama designated him to be the front man and to negotiate with Xi. | ||
That's why Xi's his buddy. | ||
That's why you see him rubbing up on Xi all the time with the big hand and he's all, they're all good. | ||
They're good together and they're going to make things right. | ||
100%. | ||
Walk me through, when you say crimes, that's a pretty, not just corruption and grift. | ||
When you say crimes, let's leave the personal fallibility of his sexual perversion aside. | ||
Let's just talk about the financial crimes that you guys have uncovered. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, that's a good question. | |
We put 100 pages just to influence peddling, which means These things are gross. | ||
They're corrupt, but we couldn't find a statute that they violated. | ||
So by crimes, I mean literally for 13 months we went through the US code and block by block. | ||
So for example, a lion's share of the federal felonies that Hunter and his business associates committed because he wasn't smart enough to put together these deals. | ||
He just made the intros. | ||
was FARA violations, Foreign Agent Registration Act, which your viewers know of, but some people may not. | ||
And Hunter committed over two dozen of those in six different countries, meaning principals from six different countries. | ||
Tax evasion, and because of the FARA violations, money laundering. | ||
You know well the one million dollar retainer that he received from Patrick Ho. | ||
Hunter didn't spend a day in court. | ||
All he did was introduce Ho to white shoe attorneys at Edward Krieger and Kim in Manhattan. | ||
And so The standard for inclusion in this report is two separate pieces of evidence, because we know that Jimmy Biden and Joe love to say that they have plausible deniability in something. | ||
So if we just included one, they could always say, well, Garrett, you know, you're interpreting this wrong. | ||
I really meant to say this. | ||
And they always talk in code. | ||
They always use initials. | ||
They always use aliases. | ||
And so every time we see that there was a crime or a regulation violated, we have two pieces of evidence. | ||
So, for example, the crime on the screen right there, this is what This is what Jack Maxey, he didn't help me, he actually hates me, but one thing he has done good is talked about the backdating of the financial documents. | ||
These are SEC documents that Eric Schwerin and Joe, along with their now deceased, conveniently, accountant Bill Morgan, they conspired to backdate the documents that their broker-dealer RSPI submitted to FINRA and the SEC. | ||
Most people would go to the pen for this or pay severe civil fines. | ||
How Eric Schwerin has not been indicted yet is beyond me. | ||
And this report is basically trying to put David Weiss and all these prosecutors at the District of Delaware in a corner to say, if you give Hunter a plea deal and slap him on the wrist, this is going to be the most pathetic limited hangout in U.S. | ||
history. | ||
Let me, I just want to go before, and we'll have you back on to go through in more detail, but essentially the business model. | ||
Joe Biden's the asset they got to monetize. | ||
Jim Biden, his brother, is kind of the brains to the degree that they're the brains in this operation. | ||
He's kind of the brains. | ||
And Hunter's the new business guy. | ||
He's drinking what the client's drinking. | ||
He's, he's just out as kind of the golden retriever to go find things and bring them opportunities and bring them back, of which those guys figure out how to monetize them. | ||
Is that essentially the business model? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, and he's the schmoozer. | |
Over a decade of this guy's materials on the laptop, I did not find one Excel document. | ||
He can't do a pivot table to save his life. | ||
I'm not sure Hunter can do long division. | ||
So he's not doing any work. | ||
When I was a boy, I thought that compensation would be tied to value creation. | ||
I've not seen any evidence that Hunter can put together a pitch deck at all. | ||
He knows zero about private equity. | ||
He's the only partner in all these huge private equity funds. | ||
Garrett, how do people get to this report over the holiday weekend, right? | ||
After you spend enough quality time with the family, you might want to go in and check this thing out. | ||
It's voluminous, it's detailed, it's documented. | ||
Where do they go to get this? | ||
And if they want to order a physical copy, where do they go? | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you, Steve. | |
Yes, it's on MarcoPoloUSA.org. | ||
You can read a free PDF copy. | ||
We are going to be printing physical copies, because I love to be able to read a physical book. | ||
MarcoPoloUSA.org, a wonderful reader view that people can access, all free. | ||
We're a charity. | ||
We're 501c3. | ||
I'm not sure how Joe's people didn't stop that at the IRS, but we are. | ||
And it's six guys and me, and I'm the youngest. | ||
The other folks are phenomenal. | ||
What's your social media? | ||
unidentified
|
Just Garrett Ziegler on True Socials, just Garrett Ziegler, two R's, two T's. | |
Go ahead. | ||
I was just going to say all the social media for our nonprofits on MarcoPoloUSA.org and people can go there. | ||
One last thing. | ||
We have an insider, JP Morgan. | ||
that gave us five suspicious activity reports. These are bank documents submitted to the U.S. | ||
Treasury Department. We redacted nothing. You'll see wire transfers to Eastern European women. | ||
Hunter Biden, this is not a speculation, he literally committed sex trafficking at least four times. We can verify, and that's based on the SARS, not my opinion. So that's pretty incredible stuff. This is why Comer said sex trafficking the other day, correct? | ||
That shocked everybody. | ||
Yes. | ||
Okay, fine. | ||
I'm going to have you back on for that. | ||
Let's leave the audience hanging. | ||
This is why Comer said, and sex trafficking. | ||
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
Because of that documentation. | ||
Garrett, thank you very much. | ||
unidentified
|
Appreciate it. | |
Thank you very much for having me on. | ||
Appreciate it. | ||
Thanks, brother. | ||
Natalie, you've spent the last couple of years of your life going through this in detail. | ||
Here's what I want to tell the audience. | ||
You've got Garrett and you've got the report. | ||
But you have literally a half a dozen to a dozen people that are going through these things in a fairly systemic way. | ||
And it is an insight into the way the elites deal with the Chinese Communist Party and each other try to monetize their relationships. | ||
Correct, Natalie? | ||
Yeah, I think the swamp is comprised of sedimentary rock in the sense that you have a lot of different layers, different aspects to it. | ||
And I think the Hunter Biden hard drive and Hunter Biden as a person is sort of a connective tissue, probably the best example. | ||
But that's only because he got caught, right? | ||
That's only because he was dumb enough to turn his laptop into a repair shop and not go and gather and collect it. | ||
There are many more Hunter Biden-esque figures. | ||
So using this laptop, using this sort of entities and companies and business deals that he was engaged in. | ||
I think you can reverse engineer a lot of the policies being pushed by the Biden administration and really by, I think, the swamp writ large. | ||
But just a quick update on the CBS story that we hit yesterday. | ||
They released the written counterpart to the story by Katherine Harridge. | ||
And in there, there's a statement from Hunter Biden's attorney. | ||
And if I have time, I'd love to read it because it's amazing. | ||
Please, please. | ||
There have been multiple attempts to hack, infect, distort and peddle misinformation regarding Mr. Biden's devices and data. | ||
There are ongoing efforts to utilize the infected and distorted data to spread disinformation. | ||
At no time did any individual have Mr. Biden's consent to access his computer data or share it with others. | ||
The statement did not address questions related to the specific data, documents, and personal identification analyzed for CBS News' independent review or Computer Forensics Service's findings. | ||
So basically they're accusing us, the same playbook of spreading disinformation and misinformation. | ||
And I think what's really interesting too, I know we celebrated, we took a victory lap with the CBS news story, but it's so weak. | ||
It's so watered down and the entire 1000 word piece, which most of it is basically running cover for Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. | ||
The word China is mentioned just once. | ||
It's basically all a puff piece. | ||
There's no actually substantive digging in to any of the crimes that Garrett just laid out, the human trafficking, the sex trafficking, the selling out, really every aspect of American society. | ||
So I think it just goes to show you, as Garrett was talking about, the, I mean, from top to bottom collusion between every aspect of the American government, their counterparts in the mainstream media, to really just, I mean, a scam, I think that's an understatement. | ||
But to create figures like Hunter Biden and why these people think they can get away with it. | ||
You've seen the lines of it. | ||
I want to make sure the audience understands this. | ||
The lines of their defense has already played. | ||
You got the Morning Joe. | ||
Oh, you did this in whitewater. | ||
You just American people want you to focus on their things. | ||
You can't do this, right? | ||
You saw that David Frum comes up. | ||
He goes right after you and the other investigators that this is the this is the way that the I think is articles. | ||
This is the way that the Republican Party flops or they flopped already. | ||
You've got the lawyer sitting there going hacked and other information. | ||
Hey, dude. | ||
That dog will not hunt, right? | ||
Go back to the Biden pack of wild dogs and give me a real wild dog because that dog is not going to hunt. | ||
Oh, you've infected with all this false information. | ||
Wrong. | ||
Okay. | ||
And you see the way they're coming at this, Natalie. | ||
You see the way CBS is going to run cover for this already. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
Right. | ||
The new social media taking on big tech. | ||
to the other side. Also, our own Joe Allen is going to be part of a webinar today about one of Natalie's favorite topics, TikTok. Everybody's saying now TikTok. Oh, we finally realized part of Chinese Communist Party intel. Did the Democratic Party know that when they made it a central apparatus in the 2022 midterms? Inquiring minds want to know. In the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Right. The new social media taking on big tech, protecting free speech and canceling cancel culture. | |
Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
Superior technology. | ||
No more selling your personal data. | ||
No more censorship. | ||
No more cancel culture. | ||
Enough. | ||
Getter has arrived. | ||
It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
Download now. | ||
Okay, MyPillow.com, Promo Code War Room. | ||
Go there now. | ||
There's these overstocks, inventory sales up to 90% off. | ||
Okay, before we start our big holidays, up to 90% off. | ||
Go check it out. | ||
You can get some of your great holiday presents right now. | ||
MyPillow.com, Promo Code War Room. | ||
You cannot get this stuff. | ||
You can't go to Big Box. | ||
You can't go to Walmart. | ||
You can't go on this home shopping network. | ||
You can't go to bed, bath, and beyond. | ||
You know why they all gave him the hook? | ||
Because he's fighting for voter integrity and to take those machines out. | ||
Hey, it's his crusade. | ||
He's on a mission, right? | ||
He'd say he's on a mission from God, okay? | ||
But that's why they ripped him out of the stores. | ||
You gotta go to mypillow.com, promo code Warner. | ||
Everybody go there. | ||
Stock up on all your holiday sales. | ||
There's stuff for everybody there, products for everybody, up to 90% off. | ||
Go check it out today. | ||
Natalie, I take it you are going to deconstruct Ms. | ||
Heritage's piece and give us your precise analysis, as only you can do, and I'm sure we'll see that. | ||
Natalie's also going to be stepping up and doing some co-hosting with me over the next couple of days, and I really appreciate that. | ||
Natalie, just before we go to Joe Allen, before I let you go, last thing. | ||
Is the David Frums of the world, or the Joe Scarboroughs of the world, or these guys at Morning Meeker, are they going to back you off one inch, ma'am, from your investigations into all this? | ||
Well, I'll continue with the dog comparisons, but if David Frum is the best attack dog that the left has to try to silence us, they have another thing coming, because I don't think anything he's ever written has scared me. | ||
If anything, it's made me realize how Intellectually weak and frankly vapid these people are, so I look forward to taking down Catherine Herridge's horrible article, of course, kind of buttressed by the thinking of the David Frum types over at The Atlantic. | ||
How did people follow you on social media, ma'am, and how did they get to the site to see all your editorial excellence and reports? | ||
Thank you. | ||
You can go to Natalie G. Winters on all social media platforms and go to warroom.org slash newsroom to keep up with the latest stories we're publishing. | ||
Natalie, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
Thanks. | ||
OK. | ||
You know, we try to – we work with a lot of different groups and help get out information and provide some of the war and personal – one of the ones, the Committee on the Present Danger, the present danger is having this webinar series, both the external threat of the CCP and what they're doing to Lao Bajing and the South China Sea geopolitically. | ||
And then they have another seminar that runs I think every other day. | ||
They have one about the external threat and the other about the internal threat. | ||
Joe Allen, you're on a webinar today with Reggie Littlejohn and the team about TikTok. | ||
Just give us a headline. | ||
I don't want to take it because I want everybody to go see these. | ||
These webinars are magnificent. | ||
I'm really proud to be associated with these guys. | ||
Tell us about what you're going to talk about today on the TikTok webinar. | ||
Yes, Steve, you can find, the audience can find all the links on either the Gitter site or War Room, that's at War Room, or on my Gitter site, the Zoom link. | ||
Just click it, you register really quick. | ||
Very, very easy. | ||
I'll be talking about TikTok as a surveillance tool. | ||
It's Well established that the data being gathered from TikTok users in America and across the West and across the world is being stored by the Chinese. | ||
But in any Chinese corporation that is storing your data, you can assume the Chinese Communist Party has access to it. | ||
So I'll be talking about TikTok as a surveillance tool, but I'll also be talking about the sort of addictive quality of TikTok, the ways in which these apps are really geared to get users addicted to constant stimulation. | ||
And in that process, it becomes what, I don't think it's really hyperbolic to say, it becomes a brainwashing tool. | ||
So, check it out. | ||
The links are up at War Room on Gitter or my social media at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z. | ||
Very easy to get there. | ||
Should be very informative. | ||
I think that TikTok is one of these instances where you have something that's very mundane and normal that is part of everyday life that actually has very sinister qualities. | ||
No, no, no, no. | ||
And there was a huge effort. | ||
This had all the influences in the White House. | ||
This was a central part of their campaign reach to college kids and kids who really don't know, I hate to say it, don't know better, don't know the economic crisis. | ||
Real quickly, Just about this whole thing of TikTok and the phone, you make the case that this is the beginning of really transhumanism, that you don't need a chip in your brain because they basically got a chip in your hand that has become these phones and these devices have really become extensions of yourself and kind of integrated. | ||
It's your digital self. | ||
And you think the addiction in the way that the programming is done is to keep addiction going. | ||
Is that your theory of the case? | ||
Yeah, and I think that the effect that it has, not only on an individual's psychology, but also just the wider sociological effects of being able to monitor in real time what people are sort of thinking, right? | ||
You are able to, if you are YouTube, if you are Google, if you are TikTok, You are able to monitor in real time the sort of public consciousness, what people are interested in, the future decisions they may make. | ||
And the effect it has on children, I think, is really, really profound. | ||
You have young kids who literally live on social media. | ||
In particular, they live on apps like TikTok. | ||
So it's bad enough to have them living on Facebook, right? | ||
Or to have them living on YouTube. | ||
But at least those are American companies. | ||
If you talk about character of formation and the ability to get people to like to read and to read, you know, the classic books and to read classic histories and actually go through and handle a book and its argument, you get into this TikTok, I mean, bang, bang, bang, you're going to lose that. | ||
You wait, you're creating a generation of morons, right? | ||
Because the brain hasn't been formed to handle this. | ||
Joe, once again, what time is this webinar today? | ||
These are totally free. | ||
Absolutely free. | ||
What time is the webinar, brother? | ||
Yeah, that's coming up at 1 p.m. | ||
Check it out. | ||
And again, you can find it on the War Room getter site at War Room or mine at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z. | ||
Very easy to get on there. | ||
Joe, and follow all his writings. | ||
Joe, hopefully see you back up here this afternoon. | ||
Now that we got you back in good old Tennessee, you're so much more productive. | ||
I'm just kidding. | ||
Joe Allen, love you brother. | ||
Good luck. | ||
Much more productive than you used to be in Tennessee. | ||
Just kidding. | ||
Okay, we'll be back here at 5 o'clock. | ||
There's so much to go through. | ||
See you back here at 5 to 7 in the world. |