Nov. 22, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:01
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room, Battleground. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Monday, 21 November in the year of our Lord 2022, we got a lot to get to and a lot of things we're trying to stop with this illegitimate regime. | ||
| I want to start with Reggie Littlejohn. | ||
| Reggie, you had the amazing webinar today on the community and present danger of China. | ||
| Walk us through what is the, you're having a call to action. | ||
| Tell us what is going on, ma'am. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the webinar, which is called Efficiency or Enslavement, has to do with the fact that we are about to enter a digital gulag. | |
| The trap is about to spring because two things have come together. | ||
| Last week, the G20 has said that they want to institute A global vaccine passport, which can be used as the platform for China's social credit system, and the Biden White House published their declaration on its website. | ||
| Meanwhile, the Biden administration, Biden promulgated Executive Order 14067 about the implementation of a central bank digital currency, which is very, very dangerous. | ||
| This is the opposite of cryptocurrencies, the opposite of Bitcoin. | ||
| It's centralized, and what it will mean is that the central government will be able to control, program our money. | ||
| So it's like going back to your childhood, where your parent can say, here's your allowance. | ||
| You can only spend, don't buy candy, and oh, I'm cutting off your allowance this week because you're a bad boy or bad girl. | ||
| The US government will be in that situation, except that the consequences will be so much more dire. | ||
| They will be able to cut us off from our credit cards, cut us off from our bank account, if we don't go along with the official narrative. | ||
| And by the way, the G20, when they were calling for these vaccine passports, talked about the need for Managing or clamping down on disinformation. | ||
| And I would say that probably most of everything that happens on your war room and most of the things that happen on the Committee on the Presentation of China and most of the things that Dr. McCullough says and all of these heroic figures who are standing up to the official narrative would be characterized as disinformation. | ||
| And who knows what will happen to us? | ||
| Oh, no, there's no doubt. | ||
| I mean, the Hunter Biden laptop is a perfect example. | ||
| This was Russian disinformation. | ||
| I'm going to talk to Koffler in a second. | ||
| This was the 41 intelligence officers came and said, Russian disinformation, Russian disinformation. | ||
| And Biden looked the American people in the eye and lied about it. | ||
| Lied about it. | ||
| And we know, now we know CBS, the great Katherine Harridge, oh thank you Katherine, thank you CBS, oh thank you so much, you've now approved it, two years later, and of course two weeks past the midterm exams, midterm elections. | ||
| Just, you know, that was random, obviously. | ||
| I want to go back to the declaration, because, and I'm going to get Brad on here in a second, as a congressman, talk about the budgeting appropriations for all this. | ||
| We've got Rebecca Koffler, we've got Joe Allen, we've got Mike Davis, we've got Jane Zirkle, boom, from Brazil. | ||
| To the halls of Congress. | ||
| We're going to cover it all in this hour. | ||
| This declaration! | ||
| Who gave the authority? | ||
| Where did they get the authority to actually buy into this G20? | ||
| I haven't seen any legislation. | ||
| These executive orders, the one on transhumanism, the one on digital currency, you know, it's just like the student debt. | ||
| He's signing stuff over there, and of course later the courts outrule it, but where does he actually have the authority? | ||
| I thought Congress somehow had to be involved in this, Reggie Littlejohn. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Steve, the issue just brought up is so important. | |
| They don't have the authority. | ||
| The G20 is just the 20 countries that have the biggest economies in the world. | ||
| They don't have any official authority. | ||
| The authority that they have is the authority that we give them. | ||
| So Biden posted their declaration on the White House website and he agrees with them. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And in my opinion, these guys are all globalists. | ||
| So the problem is that in our legal systems, our legal system is developed under the nation-state model, and then these self-proclaimed people like the G20 and the B20, which is the 20 biggest business leaders, and the World Economic Forum and the United Nations are these supernatural or supranational entities that have self-proclaimed authority, and they don't have any real authority except what we give them, and by | ||
| Giving them authority through all these executive orders, Biden is basically subverting the legislative process so that these horrible policies will never come to a vote. | ||
| That's why we have to stop it. | ||
| We launched this campaign today. | ||
| It's a Line Act campaign. | ||
| People should go to StopVaxPassports.org and sign our Line Act campaign saying, number one, to the Biden administration, We don't want a central bank digital currency, and to Congress, wake up! | ||
| The executive branch is taking away your authority to rule over money. | ||
| Reggie, how do people, once again, I want to get these guys up in all the chat rooms, and Grace Chong, and Captain Ben, and Jane, Nicole, everybody, I want to push it out to all of our different platforms. | ||
| And over to the Midnight Rider and everybody. | ||
| What is, where do people go right now, Reggie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go to stopvaxpassports.org and you will be able to sign this campaign. | |
| Please, we need to stop this immediately because once the central bank digital currency and the vaccine passport come together, there will be no more dissent. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So that's number one. | ||
| And then number two. | ||
| This is total control. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Total control. | ||
| This is the thing, Steve. | ||
| Once they have the central bank digital currency, which is programmable, and they decide what the narrative is, and that people who are counter-narrative, like you and me, and a lot of the people who are watching this, They can just shut us off from our bank accounts. | ||
| They can just shut us off from our credit cards. | ||
| I mean, what happened in Canada with the Canadian truckers and those who supported them, that's what happened to them. | ||
| That's got to be a wake-up call to the whole world, and we have to stop it before it gets implemented. | ||
| Reggie, how do people get to the Committee on the Present Danger? | ||
| How do they follow you on social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, so to follow me on social media, I'm on Getter. | |
| I'm still not restored to Twitter. | ||
| So, at Real Reggie Littlejohn on Getter. | ||
| And then in a couple days, you will be able to see this video or this webinar on the CPDC China, Committee on the Presidency of China. | ||
| It's CPDC China website and also on stopvaxpassports.org. | ||
| Thank you, ma'am. | ||
| Honored to have you on here. | ||
| Brad, this brings up a point. | ||
| You're a congressman, Brad. | ||
| Is she right? | ||
| Are we just ceding our sovereignty to Biden on these executive orders? | ||
| The combination where the Vax in itself is dangerous, the central digital currency is dangerous, you combine those two, basically the citizens of this country have given up what the revolutionary generation fought for. | ||
| Does the executive branch, as you're reading of the Constitution, have the right to do that, sir? | ||
| No, absolutely not. | ||
| And we have a lot of good Congress folks putting in bills on the Federal Reserve in general, but I have not heard of the fight on this one yet. | ||
| And it is, of course, huge, right? | ||
| The digitalization has to do with the tracking reminiscent of the CCP and ESG and all this kind of thing coming from on high. | ||
| And they're very clever. | ||
| They go step by step by step. | ||
| And so I think it's one of the top economic issues of our time, and it's all contingent on House leadership, who I've got no faith in right now after what they did in the past election cycle. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| But I want to go to what the house solution fights fighting. | ||
| We'll have you back on to talk about that. | ||
| Cause you know, the inside, but the two things the house is going to have, you have the anvil of the appropriations process, the budget, the money, and only the house can divvy it up. | ||
| And you have the hammer, you have the hammer of the investigations. | ||
| Walk me through the anvil part of it. | ||
| Walk me through the appropriations part, particularly the budget. | ||
| And do you think people up there are getting focused on what we need to do to set this ship right? | ||
| Not yet. | ||
| They're starting. | ||
| There's inklings. | ||
| And so I'll start on this cycle right now. | ||
| The lame duck going up to this January. | ||
| A couple of data points from Matt Dickerson at Heritage Foundation. | ||
| There is no example after the House flips of voting for an omnibus. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So that context should give us huge leverage and power over our own leadership. | ||
| This has never happened. | ||
| Every House has always let the voters decide at the beginning of the new year, right? | ||
| So in a lame duck, there's no example after the House flips of voting for an omnibus budget, which is the 12 bills, which they need to get the U.S. | ||
| Senators to go along with. | ||
| And then second point, even Boehner in these circumstances got a basically a clean CR with just a defense boost. | ||
| And then against Obama, Right? | ||
| Because he was willing to fight. | ||
| And when the House fights, we can actually win. | ||
| It's unheard of. | ||
| And then after that, he got two CRs in a row with a 1% decrease. | ||
| And so that's great. | ||
| Those two pieces both show that if the House will stand up and fight, we can have leverage, and we always have had it in the past, and they shouldn't be dunking right now. | ||
| I want to make sure people understand. | ||
| I want to make sure people understand, because this is where the Saudis come to play. | ||
| The debt ceiling looks like it may be off the table, the raising of the debt ceiling. | ||
| So the debt ceiling's off the table. | ||
| You had this huge omnibus bill. | ||
| By the way, the amnesty for the $11 million are off the table, it looks like, because they couldn't get the Republican votes. | ||
| They got this omnibus, and the omnibus is going to be a trillion or two trillion dollars, not funded. | ||
| The Federal Reserve is going to print the money. | ||
| We got to somehow stop the omnibus and the Defense Authorization Act, which got all the wokeness, and push that into the new Congress. | ||
| Dave Brat, you've been up there for these tough knife fights. | ||
| How is that going to happen? | ||
| How are we going to shove the two? | ||
| Because they all want to pay off for their buddies. | ||
| And they're sponsors, and they're lobbyists, and the guy's going to hire them later. | ||
| How do we do this last thing, the Sisyphus move to get the rock back up the hill? | ||
| It's huge. | ||
| And the budget number is huge. | ||
| I mean, we're getting used to $6 trillion budgets going forward, right? | ||
| So this is unheard of. | ||
| It used to be $4 trillion, which was an insult to our intelligence back in the day. | ||
| Now they're looking at $6 trillion or $7 trillion going forward because they don't care about our solvency. | ||
| So, of course, you know the answer. | ||
| Everything rests on the grassroots. | ||
| Luckily, we have 20 senators up for election next time, somewhere in this ballpark. | ||
| And so, they do not... Senators, if they have one bad vote, It's risky business for them. | ||
| In the House, you got tons of votes and there's a lot more in play. | ||
| But if Senators have one bad vote that a competitor can use to run against them, they don't want it. | ||
| So this is a big deal. | ||
| We've had 12 Senators in the past misbehaving, terrible, selling the country down the river. | ||
| But coming up, there's a lot of Senate races and if the grassroots calls their Senators and puts heat on them and the House and on the House leadership vote, There's a chance. | ||
| And then I got another bomb to drop going forward after January, if you got a minute. | ||
| Sure, go ahead. | ||
| We love bombs. | ||
| One of my good friends, one of the best congressmen out there, especially on financial issues, Thomas Massey from Kentucky, has a great idea. | ||
| Knowing that the political cycle has already started on the omnibus for next year, which will be October of 23, right? | ||
| They're already starting a cycle of mainstream messaging. | ||
| The Republicans are obstructionists, they're shutting down the government, the full faith and credits at stake, all this kind of nonsense, while we're bankrupting our country and putting it all on the kids, by the way, which no one ever brings up. | ||
| So in order to counteract that omnibus argument, all you do is right now, this coming January 4, you have a vote on a CR that funds 95% of the government. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So you have that vote this January 4 and for the next months or whatever, you can say, hey, we voted 95% of the budget. | ||
| We're only clipping 5% and let's see the reaction. | ||
| Massie's from MIT. | ||
| He's like a physicist. | ||
| He's super libertarian. | ||
| A big brain. | ||
| Walk me through, because that's genius. | ||
| You're saying just give him a cross the board 5% cut, which they'll freak out. | ||
| Walk me through how he does that. | ||
| I love it. | ||
| How does he do that? | ||
| You just, we put forward, we'll be in the House majority, so you put forward a 95% funding of the government. | ||
| So there can be no question about our goodwill toward funding the government, right? | ||
| A 5% cut instead of the usual, you know, $7 trillion budgets. | ||
| And all of this, of course, is about messaging. | ||
| And of course, the left owns the mainstream media. | ||
| Everyone in Congress, my friends back home, you say, Dave, say this. | ||
| And I'm like, to who? | ||
| Right? | ||
| That's the whole problem. | ||
| So you know who owns the ink, so you've got to counteract that. | ||
| The people who own the ink don't care a whit about the American people or the budget or the deficits going to the kids. | ||
| So you pass a CR that funds 95% of the budget right up front, and for the next nine months, hopefully we get an omnibus, right? | ||
| You go through 12 appropriations bills and the 12 committees. | ||
| That's the way it works. | ||
| We've passed three of those in the past 47 years, so you can bet the Vegas odds on that one. | ||
| Pretty low chance of getting through that. | ||
| Following history, and it's getting even worse, so I have less faith in that process, right? | ||
| Three omnibus bills passed, 12 votes in 47 years. | ||
| The reason I love it is they couldn't say you weren't prepared to fund the government. | ||
| We were prepared to fund the government. | ||
| You just got to make some reasonable cuts, and you can't, you're not going to, everybody's not going to be kicked into the street starving. | ||
| It's 95% of the budget. | ||
| Dave, can I ask you to hang on a second? | ||
| I know you got about, so I want to hear Rebecca Kaufman. | ||
| The other big thing, I'm bringing Rebecca. | ||
| Who's probably, I think, the best expert of being inside the minds of the guys in the Kremlin and the KGB and the FSB, all these bad hombres that run this place. | ||
| The other big thing, Rebecca, let me bring you in now. | ||
| The other big thing in the lame duck is this $37 billion commitment for Ukraine, but it's bigger than that. | ||
| It's really about America's continual engagement of just funding the Ukrainian government and now the military and MTG. | ||
| And by the way, I think MTG has been put back on Twitter. | ||
| And at seven o'clock, I think she's going to start live tweeting her stream of consciousness thoughts. | ||
| So be prepared for that. | ||
| But she says she wants a complete audit, a total audit of everything Ukraine. | ||
| You've got a brilliant piece that came up on Fox today saying, hey, look, I kind of warned you guys about it, but China is the big winner in this thing. | ||
| Walk us through where we actually stand. | ||
| The CCP is the winner in the Ukraine situation and particularly the United States. | ||
| The people in Europe are saying, hey, we can't do this anymore. | ||
| The unlimited wants and needs of Ukraine for just cash money, both to run the country and to fund this looks like never-ending conflict on the eastern border, the eastern Russian-speaking border of Ukraine. | ||
| Rebecca Koffler. | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| We have been depleting our own treasury, Steve, but that we have already provided in the nine months more than we provided in Afghanistan. | ||
| in five years but that's not even the biggest problem the biggest problem is that's general millie the same general millie who was uh... | ||
| saying that he's gonna warren china's she if the u s were to plan uh... and military operation against them he on wednesday admitted what we have been warning about on this show all along and that is that there's absolutely no military path to victory for Ukraine. | ||
| So all of this money, $24 billion that has been already spent, and many more, about $70 billion committed, has downed the drain for nothing. | ||
| But even the biggest problem is that we are depleting our own weapons stockpile. | ||
| pile to dangerous levels. | ||
| And if you listen to China Xi, he has been ratcheting up his rhetoric about the one China policy and during the recent visit to the arms forces operational command center, he directed his military to be ready for war. | ||
| And so we are sitting here with our very, very sophisticated weaponry being pumped up We have already provided 20 HIMARS, the High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, with 18 on the way. | ||
| And President Biden himself is concerned now about inability of our military-industrial complex to have enough production capacity to backfill our weapons supply. | ||
| This is reckless policy by the Biden administration. | ||
| We are right now at risk of war. | ||
| Potentially, Russia and China could challenge us in a two-theater war. | ||
| And we are not ready for that because the Pentagon is prioritizing pronouns instead of our own combat readiness, Steve. | ||
| Rebecca, let me let me ask you about Zelensky. | ||
| And the other day, at first, he looks like he because as soon as the Republicans win, he knows the money is going to be cut off or it's going to be an audit. | ||
| It's going to be very tough to get. | ||
| And also he's ready to negotiate. | ||
| Then this guy comes out. | ||
| So we can't negotiate. | ||
| So that's capitulation. | ||
| The way to bring this to a conclusion is somehow to get Zelensky and the Russians in a negotiating room and negotiate an actual settlement to this or it's just going to go on and on and on and more Ukrainians are going to get killed. | ||
| Because, you know, the Russians, hey, they didn't give up in Stalingrad and they didn't give up in Leningrad. | ||
| They ain't going to give up in Ukraine. | ||
| OK, they've had their backs to the wall on many occasions and they just don't quit. | ||
| So how does this play out? | ||
| Because right now, I can tell you from House members, I'll bring Brett in a second. | ||
| The right wing of the Republican Party is saying, actually no more money. | ||
| This is absurd because it's a bottomless pit. | ||
| To run the country is going to cost $100 to $150 billion a year. | ||
| To rebuild the country is almost a trillion dollars. | ||
| And that doesn't include the military part of it. | ||
| So what do you believe is going to take to get Zelensky to actually, in good faith, get to the negotiating table and try to bring this fiasco to an end? | ||
| Well, it's theoretically very easy to get Zelensky to the table, Steve, because we are financing this experimental project. | ||
| And so he should not be dictating the terms of discourse to us. | ||
| The Biden administration must dictate our terms of discourse to him. | ||
| But the situation is right now this. | ||
| My analysis up until recently was that Putin was willing to negotiate if Zelensky were to let him keep Crimea and the four territories that he recently annexed. | ||
| Well, my analysis has changed, Steve. | ||
| I believe Putin thinks that he is winning the war and he's going to keep going. | ||
| Here's why I believe that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Despite the fact that all the... Rebecca, hang on one second. | |
| I don't want to lose Dave Brat. | ||
| I want to answer this question. | ||
| He's got a bunch. | ||
| You hang right there. | ||
| Brat, given what Rebecca's talking about and Putin thinks he's winning the war, your sense of the Tom Masseys, the Gateses, the MTGs, how dug in is the American Republican right on this no more money to Ukraine? | ||
| This thing is out of control. | ||
| Dave Brat. | ||
| Yeah, with the slim majority in the house, there are plenty dug in. | ||
| I can't imagine folks going home and telling their folks this $90 billion, and then $1 trillion, and then $150 billion for maintenance and whatever. | ||
| I mean, good luck with that one. | ||
| You had the right call from the beginning. | ||
| I should have been at the negotiating table right off the start. | ||
| The NATO piece, the Euro piece, the globalist piece, just a disaster. | ||
| And I don't think a lot of people want anywhere near it. | ||
| So, the burden goes to us, and I think we shouldered this one pretty handily. | ||
| Brat, you're going to be all over this lame duck, because lame duck could be historic unless we shut it down. | ||
| Brat, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
| Yep, brateconomics at Getter. | ||
| Brat, B-R-A-T, brateconomics at Getter, and third floor, Liberty University School of Business. | ||
| Bring your young scholars up there along with the parents. | ||
| Love to meet you all. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Happy Thanksgiving. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Rebecca, you just dropped a bombshell because every New York Times, I picked my New York Times up, I got my Wall Street Journal. | ||
| Putin's losing. | ||
| It's going to be a coup against Putin. | ||
| Putin's losing. | ||
| Oh, by the way, they're pulling out of another town. | ||
| Putin's losing. | ||
| The Ukrainians are winning. | ||
| And this is why I always say you got to back the Ukrainians, although it's not about who wins or loses. | ||
| Give me your analysis. | ||
| Why do you say Putin is actually winning? | ||
| And more importantly, he thinks he's winning. | ||
| So this is wishful thinking what you just told me, all the mass media, and I am tired of hearing all these generals, so get on TV. | ||
| And they proclaim that Ukraine is winning. | ||
| It's the same people who kept telling us during 20 years in Afghanistan that victory was just around the corner. | ||
| And right now, it's the same lunatics with towels on their heads, the Taliban, that are ruling that country and are benefiting from billions of dollars of highly sophisticated, top-secret U.S. | ||
| weaponry. | ||
| So, here's why Putin believes he's winning. | ||
| Despite the fact that he strategically withdrew from Kherson, look what he did in the rest of Ukraine. | ||
| 40% of Ukraine's critical infrastructure is crippled. | ||
| And what that means, Steve, is that there's no heat, there's no electricity, and there's no water, with the temperatures having dropped in Kiev and across Ukraine to freezing levels. | ||
| When there's no water, there's no sewage. | ||
| You can't flush your toilet. | ||
| There's gonna be disease just in a few weeks. | ||
| And so Putin is not, you know, he's not a boxer. | ||
| He's not Muhammad Ali. | ||
| So which is what, you know, the US strategist anticipated him to be. | ||
| No, he is not gonna deliver. | ||
| A crippling blow and knockout to Ukraine. | ||
| But what he's gonna do, he's a judo master, right? | ||
| Mixed martial arts. | ||
| Probably some of your viewers watch MMA, right? | ||
| UFC. | ||
| He's gonna do a rear naked choke by choking Ukrainians out of all of these vital | ||
| Vital ability to survive, you know, no water no electricity And so this is why he thinks he's he's winning because his victory is very different It's not territorial gain He has already gained 20% of Ukraine like like we said a next four of them plus Crimea, but it's much more much more importantly he | ||
| He has basically deprived it of its ability to produce any kind of heavy industry. | ||
| He has decimated, absolutely decimated its production capacity and its ability to produce and export its agricultural products. | ||
| So Ukraine as a country right now, it's on the path to become a failed state and that is Putin's goal. | ||
| And this is what Afghans, this is why they need so much cash. | ||
| They're going to need $150 billion a year to maintain it. | ||
| They're going to look for the nations of Europe and the United States, put it in. | ||
| Rebecca, we've got to bounce. | ||
| I need people to go read this Fox. | ||
| How did they get your book? | ||
| How did they get the article on Fox? | ||
| How did they get to you? | ||
| The book is available anywhere on Amazon at Barnes and Nobles. | ||
| Just Google the book, Putin's Playbook. | ||
| Russia's secret plan to defeat America. | ||
| My Twitter, Getter, and true social accounts is at Rebecca0132. | ||
| I have a website. | ||
| I regularly post my unclassified intelligence analysis on the Fox News website, New York Post, Wall Street Journal, and other regular publications. | ||
| She's got a brilliant piece right now up in Fox. | ||
| We're going to put it up on our Getter account and on War Room. | ||
| Rebecca Koffler, Putin's winning. | ||
| And somebody's got to bring this to a conclusion. | ||
| Is this going to be a bitter, dark winter for the Ukrainian people? | ||
| Rebecca Koffler, thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you in the War Room. | ||
| From the battlefield of Ukraine to the battlefield of democracy in Brazil. | ||
|
unidentified
|
next in the War Room. | |
| Battleground with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Welcome back. | ||
| I'm a change up the order just a bit. | ||
| I've got a Jane Zirkle and these massive, the biggest story in the world with all the big stories going on in the big, uh, the news that you need to know the signal, not the noise. | ||
| Um, the biggest and most important is actually happening in Brazil. | ||
| And if you rank order, all these massive things are going on, I'm gonna get to Jane in a second. | ||
| Um, and we're going to have Brazil pieces every day and both the morning and afternoon shows, uh, going forward. | ||
| I want to bring in Joe Allen though. | ||
| Joe, we had the big webinar of Frank Gaffney and Brian Kennedy, the great team of the Committee on Present Danger, which has done so much and will be a big part of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| So much of what's going on in the House on oversight. | ||
| They had the webinar today and one of the things, one of the call to arms here is this shocking occurrence of what happened out of the G20 really brought to light by yourself. | ||
| Which was, hey, they put this proclamation up, they're talking about this digital vaccine passport, but it's even much deeper than that. | ||
| But hey, if you combine that with what they said in their executive order months ago, and you look at the experiment of the 12 working with the Federal Reserve, you combine the digital currency with the digital passport, you essentially have total and complete control of a citizen of the nation. | ||
| This is actually gets to the social credit store of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And isn't it interesting how many things come back to the CCP? | ||
| Isn't that interesting? | ||
| Joe Allen, you're now engaged the committee in the present day, and you're actually giving one of the seminars tomorrow. | ||
| But I just want to talk to that first piece. | ||
| And you brought this up with saying, hey, you know, the Biden administration is having these executive orders, and they're not really giving the fanfare that these things giving how Humongous they are. | ||
| And in addition, they're spinning each one differently. | ||
| The digital currency was kind of like some sort of experimentation, and we're trying to help manage digital assets, and this is for the good of the country. | ||
| The transhumanist was a complete lie. | ||
| This is the moonshot for cancer. | ||
| This is about curing cancer. | ||
| It's the moonshot. | ||
| You know, Joe Biden, I'm big in moonshots, right? | ||
| We're trying to throw the ball downfield, and that's what this is. | ||
| And it's not. | ||
| These are a whole of government. | ||
| And when you see the apparatus of the United States government, the power of the administrative state, you see the power in getting back of a digital currency, you know, and then getting it back of these vaccine passports and getting it back of transhumanism and a whole of government approach. | ||
| Katie, bar the door. | ||
| Joe Allen. | ||
| Yes, Steve. | ||
| I think the interconnection of all these can be hard to organize in the mind, but it's very, very clear. | ||
| All of it falls under the paradigm of the fourth industrial revolution and the language of the G20 Bali leaders declaration certainly echoes again and again the language of the fourth industrial revolution. | ||
| So does Joe Biden's biotechnology and biomanufacturing initiative and the central bank digital currencies that are being piloted right now. | ||
| That also falls under that paradigm. | ||
| And what it is, is an idea of total digitalization. | ||
| And when you look at certain developments that happen just on the heels of the biotechnology initiative, for instance, So that you have now a lot of news about CRISPR experiments that will cure cancer. | ||
| You have a lot of ambitious ideas as to how human beings can be enhanced. | ||
| And then you have the kind of disgusting sci-fi element like the FDA approving synthetic meat for human consumption. | ||
| So that's just lab-grown meat that would be basically developed in vats and sold in grocery stores. | ||
| All of that is reflected in this idea of the digitization of all spheres of life, and all of that is reflected in the G20 declaration. | ||
| And of course, you know, Reggie Littlejohn has been a huge asset in raising the alarm on global digital vaccine passports. | ||
| The Indonesian health minister was talking about how Indonesia is prepared to implement these. | ||
| And of course, the declaration itself talks about how all nations should cooperate or collude in order to create digital proof of vaccination so that people can move across borders. | ||
| And as you just said, all of this adds up. | ||
| Should these visions be realized? | ||
| All of this adds up to the ability for governments in partnership with businesses to control every aspect of your life. | ||
| What you can buy, where you can go, what you can say, what you can think. | ||
| By the way, this can happen by these executive orders. | ||
| This can happen essentially in the here and now. | ||
| The technology is available. | ||
| It's got to be perfected. | ||
| It's got to be integrated. | ||
| But this is a program. | ||
| This is the reason Reggie and Lil Jon are putting these seminars together. | ||
| This is happening. | ||
| If you look at the G20, this is what they're spending time on. | ||
| They got this new thing called the B20, which is kind of the side deal. | ||
| That's the business element of it. | ||
| And right, these are kind of operating apparatuses. | ||
| COP 27 is this thing that used to be Glasgow and all this, that's this annual coming together for the climate change. | ||
| They just agreed to a framework of reparations. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, there's going to be trillions of dollars transferred from the industrial West to third world dictators. | ||
| So don't think this is not happening. | ||
| This is happening every day. | ||
| Now they're in kind of the coordination and execution phase of it. | ||
| Am I incorrect in any of that, Joe Allen? | ||
| No. | ||
| I think that one of the more disturbing elements, we played the video, the excerpt of Klaus Schwab's speech at the B20, and as silly and innocent as it may sound, his big fish analogy in that governments and businesses must partner together and become fast fish, as opposed to big fish. | ||
| We need to keep up with the technological developments in order to survive. | ||
| That came as a warning. | ||
| Some might say it's a threat, but it's a serious issue because we have to figure out what the alternatives are going to be if we're going to reject these technological innovations. | ||
| Because he's right in a sense. | ||
| If you are going to survive, you either have to keep up or you have to figure out how you're going to survive outside that system. | ||
| And I think a lot of people are working on parallel economies and various parallel societies in an attempt to do that. | ||
| I'm very hopeful in that regard, but I'm fairly pessimistic in regard to stopping the development of these technologies and their implementation around the world. | ||
| Well, that's why you're in the worm. | ||
| Senator Mark Warner from the Commonwealth of Virginia warned about TikTok. | ||
| They said, hey, this is absolutely a CCP apparatus for sucking data out of the American people, particularly teenagers. | ||
| It shouldn't be lost on anybody that this was Biden's. | ||
| Well, this was the Biden administration's biggest platform for 2022. | ||
| This is why they had all these bizarre influence in there. | ||
| They use TikTok. | ||
| You tomorrow are going to give the webinar on TikTok, are you not, sir? | ||
| Yeah, I'll be very happy to be at the Present Danger China webinar. | ||
| I'll be talking about TikTok. | ||
| I'll be talking about also its relationship to the various other platforms that are American-born that do much the same thing. | ||
| But I think the real and most immediate problem is that TikTok really has ripped the mind of the youth, and it is a way of extracting data, and it is a way of influencing the mentality and the behaviors of young people in America. | ||
| Hey, Joe, I know you've got a piece on the long-termism on SBF. | ||
| I've got to get to that tomorrow, but I want people to read the piece and get to all the access to your pieces. | ||
| Where do they go with this? | ||
| Because you've kind of really are able to frame this FTX situation that I think is the way that people need to look at it. | ||
| Give me a one-minute pricey on it and then where people go to get the piece. | ||
| Yeah, it's kind of complicated, so I'll just give you two terms, effective altruism and long-termism, both of which overlap and in some sense stem from the philosophy of transhumanism, and both of which were the underpinning or the sort of smoke screen used by Sam Bankman Freed in his FTX scam. | ||
| So yeah, we'll be back about that, but I think those are two terms. | ||
| you want to look out for. You could say in many ways, longtermism is the new transhumanism. | ||
| You can find me at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z on social media, also joebot.xyz and warroom.org under the transhumanism tab. | ||
| If you're confused about the SBF story, if you're confused about FTX, I think we've got a framing device that'll let you to really kind of think through. | ||
| We'll do that tomorrow. | ||
| Joe Allen, thank you. | ||
| Good luck on the seminar tomorrow also on TikTok. | ||
| And thank you so much for connecting the dots here now that we've got the Committee on the Present Danger all over it. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Thank you very much, Steve. | ||
| I've got Mike Davis, I'm going to get to in a second, but I've got to go. | ||
| Jane Zirkle has done amazing reporting on this. | ||
| I gave this talk in Mexico City the other day about the CPAC Mexico to this audience, and I've got to tell you, it was centered around Brazil and what's happening in Brazil. | ||
| The biggest story in the world are the tens of millions of people that have taken to the streets of Brazil to fight for their democracy. | ||
| It's not being covered by the Brazilian media. | ||
| It's not being covered by the world media. | ||
| This is a world historical event. | ||
| The Brazilian Spring is upon us. | ||
| And this is beyond the Bolsonaro's. | ||
| They're not really doing much to be engaged here. | ||
| But people refuse to back down. | ||
| And there have been some horrific scenes. | ||
| If we can bring in Jane Zirkle. | ||
| And Jane, Before we play some of the footage, tell the audience what the radical courts with Lula, the transnational communist tool of the CCP, what are they doing to parents down there that are protesting to defend their constitution and the right to have their vote really count, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So the National Council of Justice in Brazil has issued an order Invoking the Guardianship Council, which is Brazilian CPS, essentially, Child Protective Services, to target the children and families engaging in these election protests. | |
| They are to verify the condition of children and protect the children by any means necessary, including potentially separating the children from their parents, which is what we've seen across Brazil. | ||
| In these absolutely heart-wrenching viral videos that have surfaced on Twitter. | ||
| Now, the justice behind this order is Alexandre de Mores, and he is a far-left-wing Supreme Court justice who has been behind much of the censorship and the debanking of individuals and companies in Brazil who have been aiding and supporting these protesters. | ||
| And it really has been a classic case of We are from the government, and we are here to help, which this audience is well-versed in what that really means. | ||
| And not only has the Supreme Court been a part of this, but also the Justice Inspector, Luis Felipe Salermo, who signed off on this order. | ||
| Now the Justice Inspector's job is to ensure that there is not government overreach or abuse going on, but Mr. Salermo has a left-wing history voting in support of this censorship and he was appointed by then-President Lula in 2008. | ||
| And what's really, really sad here is that Brazil has a bad human trafficking and child prostitution problem that this guardianship council could really be doing a lot of good to solve, but instead it's being used as a political tool to intimidate the public. | ||
| But hang on. | ||
| Jane, I just want to make sure people understand this because it's a blockbuster story. | ||
| If you're showing up at these protests and you're protesting, hey, they stole my vote, the machine stole it, you know, they need to do a recount, they need to do a re-vote, we need to have another election. | ||
| If you're out there in any way protesting, They're actually sending the Child Protective Services to take your child away because they say that you're not being a good parent or the child needs to be protected from your madness and craziness and anti-government, anti-Brazil. | ||
| Is that it in a nutshell? | ||
| They're actually taking the children away from the parents because the parents are protesting a stolen election. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, so that's exactly the incident that occurred on November 18th that was captured on camera. | |
| And when the Guardianship Council moved to do this, they were met with incredible resistance from the Brazilian election protesters. | ||
| The Brazilian election protesters surrounded the council members and essentially said, we're not allowing you to take these children and chase them out of town. | ||
| So they're not taking this. | ||
| They are still marching and protesting. | ||
| And in response to this, parents and their children marched in the streets hand in hand, showing immense bravery. | ||
| Jane, we've got to bounce, but you've been covering this since you met these people in Times Square. | ||
| It was just overwhelming. | ||
| Just tell the audience the scale of the size, because it's not being covered in Brazilian media, and the world media is totally crickets about it. | ||
| What is the scale of these protests? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right, so it's because of the Supreme Court justices, like Alexandre de Moraes, for why it's not being covered in the Brazilian media, because of the censorship. | |
| The scale of these protests are absolutely massive. | ||
| I mean, it is Tens of thousands across the U.S. | ||
| and then tens of millions in Brazil. | ||
| It is really a geopolitical phenomenon that is stretched across the entire globe. | ||
| Jane, you're covering this nonstop. | ||
| How do people get to your social media? | ||
| You're doing live chats. | ||
| You're doing live streams. | ||
| You're putting up great stories. | ||
| You've got this blockbuster story on War Room right now. | ||
| How do people track you on all this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, definitely go check out the interview I did with Kelly DeOliveira, a Brazilian activist. | |
| You can find that interview on War Room's Getter, and you can find me on Getter, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter, at Jane Zirkle. | ||
| Our own Jane Zirkle is the cutting edge of this. | ||
| This Brazilian story is the single most important story. | ||
| With everything going on, this is the biggest world historical event that's happening right now, the Brazilian Spring. | ||
| Jane Zirkle, thank you for covering this, and thank you for being on here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I've asked Mike Davis to join us and to step away from other stuff he's working on. | ||
| Mike, here's the reason. | ||
| There's a bunch of stuff to explain this afternoon and the audience needs Mike Davis to explain this. | ||
| These special counsels, and you don't have a lot of these special counsels or special parties, it's very rare, but they've had a history of being kind of like Caesar's wife. | ||
| You've got to have, you've got to be, because they're worried about the politicization of the Justice Department, this is supposed to be like Caesar's wife, beyond any question of being chaste. | ||
| You've seen all this exploding. | ||
| We had Boris on the earlier show. | ||
| What is going on with the conflicts of interest with this special prosecutor? | ||
| You've already said he's a political left-wing hack, but now it looks like the wife is the queen of the Trump haters, sir. | ||
| Yeah, it's very bad. | ||
| The special counsel is supposed to be independent. | ||
| At a minimum, have the appearance that they're not political, that they're going to be neutral, that they're going to be fair. | ||
| That's the whole point of an attorney general handing this off to a special counsel to alleviate any appearance of conflict of interest. | ||
| And with this Jack Smith, it just keeps getting worse the more we learn about him. | ||
| Not only have we learned that Eric Holder hired Jack Smith to run the public integrity section in the Justice Department in 2010, and then Jack Smith pursued Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, a potential Republican presidential candidate with a bogus corruption theory that got overturned by the Supreme Court 8 to nothing. | ||
| It would have been 9 to nothing if Justice Scalia didn't pass away. | ||
| We're also learning that this special prosecutor's wife was a donor to President Biden in 2020 and helped produce a film, a pro-Obama film. | ||
| So it just stinks. | ||
| The politics here stink badly. | ||
| And remember, these same Democrats are going after a Supreme Court justice like Justice Clarence Thomas. | ||
| Based upon his wife's personal political views, Jenny's personal political views, they're calling for Justice Thomas' recusal on Supreme Court cases based upon his wife's political views. | ||
| Why wouldn't this same standard also apply to Jack Smith? | ||
| It's actually a higher standard for the Department of Justice. | ||
| Not only she donated the Clinton campaign, her Twitter feed which she took down, but of course people had it in the Wayback Machine, it's virulently anti, I mean it is like Trump hate, you know, 10,000. | ||
| Tell me how this gets, does the House just say we've had enough of this nonsense and you're going to get no money whatsoever and we don't care if you want to shut down the government over it? | ||
| Tell me how we, How do you develop this? | ||
| Because it just can't be left to stand. | ||
| The guy's a hater. | ||
| Remember in 2010, Holder hired him in 2010 after the Tea Party revolt. | ||
| He immediately was part of the learner getting on top of the Tea Party for the IRS situation. | ||
| This guy's dirty as you get politicized. | ||
| But now with the wife being such a hardcore anti-Trump partisan, tell me the denouement. | ||
| We've got two minutes. | ||
| Walk me through the Mike Davis. | ||
| How does this thing get resolved? | ||
| Well, I mean, it's an illegitimate investigation. | ||
| They are investigating, I apologize. | ||
| This is an illegitimate investigation. | ||
| This guy is a heat-seeking missile sent by Merrick Garland to take out a presidential candidate, Donald Trump, just like Eric Holder used him to take out a presidential candidate with Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell. | ||
| These are illegitimate This is an illegitimate investigation. | ||
| This guy has at least an appearance of bias, and he's investigating non-crimes. | ||
| It is not a crime for presidents to take personal records when he leaves office. | ||
| That is contemplated by the Presidential Records Act. | ||
| It is not a crime to object to presidential elections. | ||
| Democrats did it in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. | ||
| They are investigating non-crimes here. | ||
| They're trying to put a dark cloud over President Trump after he announced he's running for president again so they can influence the next presidential election. | ||
| They're trying to hurt President Trump to help their boss Joe Biden. | ||
| This is illegitimate. | ||
| House Republicans should defund this thing. | ||
| Mike, how do people get to you, go to your site? | ||
| You're fighting this great crusade against big tech, which is now going to be a monster, monster issue in the new Congress. | ||
| I want people to get totally up to speed on it and to get your thoughts about all the things related to the Justice Department. | ||
| Where do they go? | ||
| So article3project.org, article3project.org, and the Big Tech Fight is on there if you click on War Room. | ||
| We set up a website for the War Room Posse, at article3project on Getter Twitter Truth, at article3project. | ||
| And my personal is MRDDMIA. | ||
| My initial is Des Moines, Iowa, on Getter Twitter Truth. | ||
| And thank you, Steve. | ||
| As good as his Getter feed is, You're not living your best life unless you're following Mike Davis on Twitter. | ||
| It's a totally unique experience. | ||
| Mike Davis, thank you very much for joining us here, brother. | ||
| I want everybody to follow you on Twitter. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Okay, it's Thanksgiving week, but let me tell you, the news is hot and heavy. | ||
| We've got this lame duck. | ||
| We've got Trump's launch of the campaign. | ||
| We've got everything that's happening in DOJ. | ||
| We've got Brazil. | ||
| We've got the Ukraine. | ||
| We've got the CCP. | ||
| We've got reparations. | ||
| All of it. | ||
| Plus, you've got the convergence of the digital currency and the vaccine. | ||
| All of it. | ||
| And more. | ||
| Plus Arizona and Cary Lake tomorrow morning. |
Export Selection