Oct. 27, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:49
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
In a public forum, I'm just curious. | |
| As far as I'm concerned, the debate about debates is over. | ||
| I'm running my campaign the way I'm running my campaign. | ||
| I'm going to continue to make the case directly to voters. | ||
| The case you make to them, and not to belabor that point, is they do. | ||
| There are tough times for a lot of folks. | ||
| We talk about the economy, inflation, and I know there's a rising cost of living here. | ||
| People are putting somebody in that office that they want to stand up for them and fight for them. | ||
| At worst, it could come off as you're scared to step on that stage. | ||
| And at best, you're not willing to confront. | ||
| We're in a new era where sometimes some politicians are seen as bullies. | ||
| And we've been taught since we were little kids, you've got to stand up to a bully. | ||
| You understand how that might come across? | ||
| How do you make a case? | ||
| We want to send you to fight for us, but you won't even step on stage with us. | ||
| I have stood up to this bully for the past two years, and Arizonans have seen that, and I'm going to continue to do that. | ||
| It's literally Kramer Clip. | ||
| up. I have no earthy idea what that is. Steve Cortes, can we play Denver? Can you get focused? | ||
| Stop. Can we please play the James Kramer clip? Because I've got limited time with Cortes. | ||
| Let's do it. Do we have it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's the Kramer clip. It's the label clip. Kramer clip. | |
| Okay. Let me bring in Cortes. | ||
| This is total mass confusion here. | ||
| This is beautiful. | ||
| Cortez, we're going to get the Kramer clip up in a second. | ||
| Tell me about the meltdown last night. | ||
| I want to talk about meta last night. | ||
| After the market closed, Facebook came in a massive miss. | ||
| Tell us what happened. | ||
| Yeah, huge miss, down 22% last I checked just a few minutes ago today. | ||
| A move like that for a company this size, a company that is absolutely mega cap, a company that is as mature as Facebook Meta is, these moves are insane, and particularly because it comes on the heels of similar moves, not quite as pronounced, but still massive moves down for Microsoft and for Google Alphabet. | ||
| Now look, the deplorables out there are not fans of any of these companies, and that's totally understandable, okay? | ||
| Because management of these companies, these are the very oligarchs that our movement in many ways is fighting against. | ||
| But it is also important for us to realize and to recognize that these are important takeaways on the health of the consumer, particularly the Google plunge, because it related specifically to advertising on YouTube. | ||
| Companies are not spending because consumers simply don't have the firepower to buy. | ||
| So there is a serious economic takeaway there. | ||
| Speaking of the economy, by the way, pretty big news out. | ||
| The Wall Street Journal has it front and center right now on its website about mortgage rates, the consequences of Joe Biden's inflation. | ||
| Mortgage rates are now well above 7% for a 30-year fixed. | ||
| That is the highest in 20 years, Steve. | ||
| Let's talk about the economic reality. | ||
| What does that mean for an actual buyer? | ||
| Because I was just doing some of the math. | ||
| So right now, today, if you are buying a median priced home in the United States, and we plugged in $425,000, which is right about the median right now in the United States, for that priced home, If you have 20% to put down, which is significant, of course, $85,000. | ||
| Not many people with real wages crashing can come up with $85,000. | ||
| But let's say you did. | ||
| You're a diligent saver. | ||
| You've got $85,000 to put down. | ||
| At the beginning of this year, Steve, this calendar year, when rates were 3.25%, your monthly payment was just over $1,800. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was $1,825. | |
| Your monthly payment was just over $1,800. | ||
| It was $1,825. | ||
| That was your monthly payment for that home, 20% down, $425,000 home. | ||
| Today, that payment is over. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$2,653. | |
| It has gone up over $800 per month. | ||
| That's almost $10,000 per year, Steve. | ||
| It has risen. | ||
| It has gone up over $800 per month. | ||
| That's almost $10,000 per year, Steve. | ||
| It has risen, your monthly payment has risen 45% in this calendar year. | ||
| Steve, that prices out an entire swath, the vast preponderance of people from buying a home, particularly first-time home buyers. | ||
| I mean, they're just simply priced out. | ||
| And the reality for young people, and I want to speak to the young people out there in the audience, the reality right now is if we don't change this trajectory, you are never going to own a home. | ||
| You will be renting your entire life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That is the reality that we face unless we start to change. | |
| This is a world economic forum. | ||
| You're never going to own anything. | ||
| You're going to be happy. | ||
| Just hit me the last part of that math again on the rise of it because it's not stopping. | ||
| This is not the top. | ||
| They're not at the penthouse yet. | ||
| It's going to get worse. | ||
| This is my theory of the case about young generations, just Russian serfs. | ||
| You don't own anything now. | ||
| You're not going to own anything. | ||
| Walk me through the math. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| So, again, this is a medium-priced home, not a luxury home. | ||
| In a lot of parts of America, this doesn't even buy a medium-priced home. | ||
| But $425,000 home, which is roughly the medium price right now in America, if you have $85,000 to put down, if you can afford that substantial down payment, the monthly payment at the beginning of this year was just over $1,800. | ||
| It is now over $2,600. | ||
| It has gone up $800 Per month, almost $10,000 per year, just this year, because of Joe Biden's inflationary madness and what it is doing to mortgage rates, which have now spiked to above 7%, well above 7%, for the first time in 20 years. | ||
| This is the tangible, on-the-ground reality. | ||
| This is why consumer sentiment, as measured by the University of Michigan, a survey that goes all the way back to the 1950s, just hit an all-time low. | ||
| Lower than during the oil embargo of the 70s, lower than during 9-11, than during the housing and credit crisis. | ||
| Broke all of those lows, just hit the lowest level of all time. | ||
| This is why 66% of Americans in today's new USA Today survey say that we are either in a recession or a depression. | ||
| Because they know that buying a home, affording a home, has become out of reach. | ||
| This is for young people. | ||
| majority of Americans and only the wealthy and institutions are going to own single-family homes. That's the reality that Joe Biden is creating right now, Joe Biden and the Democrats, and if you vote for that please don't dare ever complain that you can't afford your house because that's what you're voting for. | ||
| This is for young people. If you vote for this, you deserve it. And we talk about the asset management... | ||
| This is what BlackRock. | ||
| This is why they're going around and buying up all the housing stock. | ||
| So then you can just pay the rent. | ||
| They own the asset. | ||
| They get the ups when the ups to kick back in. | ||
| I want to make sure everybody understands as the mortgage rates increase and it gets more and more out of reach, you've had 18 consecutive months of real wages. | ||
| Dropping. | ||
| So it's getting harder. | ||
| The harder you work, it's getting harder. | ||
| And savings... As the mortgage rate gets out of thing, you've got less ability to pay for it, Steve Cortez. | ||
| And savings crashing. | ||
| So, you know, that's the thing too. | ||
| Look, this assumes that you can come up with, for most Americans, $85,000 is a mountain of money, okay? | ||
| Most Americans don't have this down payment, so forget about the payment. | ||
| It's irrelevant. | ||
| If you don't have the down payment to even get in the game to start with, that's the ante to get into the poker game effectively. | ||
| Most Americans can't come up with that right now, particularly because savings have crashed. | ||
| So let's talk about the math there. | ||
| Savings in America, we showed these charts a few days ago, but just a quick review. | ||
| Savings in America were at only 3.5% rate. | ||
| Other than the 08-09 crash, that's the lowest of all time in the United States, 3.5% for almost All of American history, the savings rate is above 5%, often above 10%. | ||
| We're all the way down to 3.5. | ||
| In dollar figures, relative to two years ago, savings have crashed by 87%. | ||
| So if you had $10,000 in the bank two years ago, you now have $1,300 in the bank. | ||
| That is the reality. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because Biden's inflation has eaten all of it up. | ||
| And then some, for most Americans who are middle or lower income, by the way. | ||
| They don't have any savings at all. | ||
| As a matter of fact, they have negative savings, meaning they have credit card debt, which is absolutely ballooning. | ||
| So that's the reality on the ground. | ||
| And I say all this, Steve, not to depress people, okay? | ||
| But number one, they need to know the reality, right? | ||
| We need to know where we are, and we need to know Statistically, based on data and evidence, where is the economy? | ||
| But then, number two, we need to be adults and talk dispassionately about, okay, what's the road out? | ||
| We didn't make this mess. | ||
| We didn't create this absolute crisis, okay? | ||
| Biden and Pelosi and Schumer created it. | ||
| However, it's going to be incumbent upon us as patriots to get us out of this mess. | ||
| How do we fix it? | ||
| Particularly, how do we fix it for working-class people, for young people, for people who are not right now enjoying the fruits of a formerly prosperous American economy? | ||
| How do we broaden The prosperity, and how do we broaden the political coalition? | ||
| All of that is happening, okay? | ||
| And I'm really, as dour as I am on the current state of the American economy, I'm incredibly optimistic about our opportunities, both politically and economically, going forward. | ||
| But it's going to take 12 days of laser focus. | ||
| Laser focus, okay? | ||
| Everyone who hears my voice, not only do you need to vote, Everyone in your sphere of influence needs to vote, and if you need to persuade people to vote on our side, persuade people to go and get registered, please do so, okay? | ||
| This is crunch time. | ||
| We are absolutely in the political red zone. | ||
| It is within our grasp to reclaim our republic from the oligarchs and to restore prosperity in this country. | ||
| We can do it, but it's going to take a lot of work these next less than two weeks. | ||
| By the way, we're trying to get Rasmussen on to talk about this blockbuster Georgia poll. | ||
| Kemp up 10, Herschel Walker up 3. | ||
| Independence breaking 15%, plus 15 for Walker, plus 17 for Kemp. | ||
| Blockbuster news, Alex DeGrasse just gets me. | ||
| Rochester, New York. | ||
| The new battleground is upstate New York. | ||
| We need every MAGA, everybody in MAGA, every New Yorker to man the ramparts. | ||
| Rochester, a district of Biden won, plus 20. | ||
| is now in play. | ||
| NRCC is going in with big dollars. | ||
| It's dead heat right there. | ||
| Cortez, this is what we're talking about. | ||
| You're expanding the map and making Democrats put $10 million into New York City in the next 10 days. | ||
| You're making them defend a Biden. | ||
| We said on this show six, eight months ago, we're going to be competing in Bidens plus 12s, plus 15s. | ||
| I never thought we'd get to a Biden plus 20. | ||
| What do you think, Cortez? | ||
| No, Steve, listen, let me give you roughly Biden plus 20 state of Illinois. | ||
| Biden won Illinois by 19%. | ||
| We have an absolute horse race going on there right now for governor. | ||
| And even the totally complicit and corrupt Chicago media is waking up to that reality that Pritzker is in trouble. | ||
| And I think the CDC really put him on the hot seat because he's probably the most pro-mandate, pro-lockdown governor in America. | ||
| And Illinois parents, many of them moms who may not consider themselves at all to be conservative, certainly not MAGA, they are waking up to the reality of a second Pritzker term very likely means he will use the CDC ruling as the excuse, as the imprimatur to force the injection into children. | ||
| An illogical and unscientific and unjust decision. | ||
| That is looming. | ||
| That is on the ballot in Illinois. | ||
| And you know, you mentioned New York, Steve. | ||
| I've said several times, I believe this more firmly than ever, New York, Illinois, Oregon, okay? | ||
| Three states that have been reliably blue on both coasts and one in the literal middle of the country. | ||
| At least two of those states are going to have Republican America first governors and perhaps all three of them if we really do our job. | ||
| So the Democrats are having to play defense absolutely everywhere. | ||
| It's a game of whack-a-mole for them. | ||
| And it's got to be chaos for them. | ||
| Not that I feel sorry for them because of what they've done to the American people, particularly working class people. | ||
| And we need, Maga, you don't need to write a check, if you can, fine, but what we need you is manning phone banks, get out to vote, all of it, and we're going to talk about securing this vote. | ||
| Let me play, can I play? | ||
| Okay, I want to make sure we're all happy, everybody's good, and have a big team hug afterwards. | ||
| Can we play Jim Cramer? | ||
| Can we play Cramer? | ||
| Let's go and play it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think that if they, let's say Mark Zuckerberg said, you know what, maybe it is too early. | |
| Let's slow the spending until we have a better idea. | ||
| Or maybe he says, you know what, the other businesses, let's cut back on some of the people there because we need to have some discipline. | ||
| And then I wouldn't have to give my Miranda warning to myself. | ||
| We should remind people... Did you just hear something here? | ||
| The hubris is extraordinary. | ||
| I saw it. | ||
| I read your list this morning. | ||
| You did? | ||
| I did. | ||
| Do you know how mortified I am about this? | ||
| I'm aware. | ||
| I almost feel so bad I want to give you a hug. | ||
| I really do. | ||
| I feel like... I'll take one. | ||
| Would you? | ||
| I'd take one right now. | ||
| It's okay. | ||
| It is okay. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| You work your ass off for everybody. | ||
| You really do. | ||
| I see it every day. | ||
| I went to sleep last night and I turned to my wife and I said, You know where I am? | ||
| I'm in a goddamn metaverse. | ||
| Just, again, not to put too fine a point on it, the metaverse, by the way, that you're in, they're going to spend between $96 and $101 billion. | ||
| Okay, let me have it. | ||
| It was the inverse Kramer. | ||
| Maybe we should... This is a disaster over at CNBC. | ||
| It's a total disaster. | ||
| And we don't give hugs here in the War Room. | ||
| It's a no-hug zone. | ||
| Steve Cortez, what was that debacle? | ||
| He buried so many pension funds in this thing. | ||
| Tell me what happened. | ||
| Listen, it's hard not to laugh, obviously, when you watch that kind of, you know, circus television. | ||
| But of course, there's nothing funny about the very real losses that are out there for American investors. | ||
| And a lot of Americans own these companies and may not even know that they own them because it's through a 401k and a managed account. | ||
| People like Jim Cramer, unfortunately, continue to just spread toxic narrative rather than doing real journalism, rather than fact-checking, rather than doing storytelling. | ||
| And it's really too bad because CNBC, and I think I speak with some authority here. | ||
| I worked for CNBC for a lot of years. | ||
| I did a lot of television with Jim Cramer. | ||
| It used to be a fantastic network. | ||
| I think, you know, in its early days, it pulled the curtain back so that regular investors could be involved in the club that was Wall Street. | ||
| And it was very empowering, really, to America. | ||
| But unfortunately, over time, The NBC part took over CNBC, and they are now totally committed to narrative. | ||
| It functions effectively as a quasi-financial version of MSNBC. | ||
| And I say quasi because they don't even really cover finances very well anymore. | ||
| What they do, and they do it reasonably effectively from their point of view, is they act as a PR agency for the Democratic Party. | ||
| Because of that, people like Jim Cramer unfortunately mislead a whole lot of folks out there. | ||
| And Steve, congratulations to you. | ||
| I think you have become, you're not even a business show, but I think you have become the best business show on television. | ||
| I think that's the reality. | ||
| And by the way, I hear that not just from regular individuals, I hear that a lot from regular folks when I'm out on the Hustings campaigning, but I also hear it from some of the most sophisticated hedge fund people in the world who don't vote for us, don't give money to us, but they watch War Room. | ||
| That is absolutely absurd. | ||
| of people get to all your writings. We have about 20 seconds. | ||
| Yeah, find me at Steve on the on the getter. | ||
| By the way, sub stack, he's got it all. Cortez and he's on getter nonstop. Short break, we're gonna get back into how we're gonna win and how we're gonna close in the wind next in the war room. | ||
| That is absolutely absurd. And are you guys buying that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you really buying This just sounds like a Jesse Smollett part two. | |
| I can't believe that she would blame my amazing people, blame me for something like that. | ||
| I don't even know where her campaign office is. | ||
| I'm assuming it's in a basement somewhere. | ||
| Because that's where she's been campaigning. | ||
| Okay, that's the great Carey Lake. | ||
| Carey Lake, if we can put the, and I want to thank Denver for getting it right. | ||
| We got it right this time. | ||
| No temper tantrum by your host. | ||
| By the way, it's why you're a little gonzo, right? | ||
| If we can put up the chart. | ||
| A poll came out, I think last night or yesterday afternoon, Carey Lake up by 11 over Katie Hobbs. | ||
| The mainstream media, the left, is eviscerating Katie Hobbs. | ||
| Eviscerating her. | ||
| The left media, for not debating. | ||
| They said that strategy is not working. | ||
| Your excuse is not working. | ||
| You've got to step up and take on Carrie Lake on a stage. | ||
| You've got to do it. | ||
| And she refused to do it. | ||
| She's not going to do it. | ||
| The campaign's in meltdown. | ||
| And now they're saying that the Cook Report turned, which is, you know, it's center left. | ||
| And they're always, you know, they're always wrong. | ||
| When you look at the ones that get wrong, always, or the breaks, it's always to the Republicans because they wait it to the Democrats. | ||
| They're calling Arizona Senate a toss-up right now. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Carrie Lake is, is, her updraft is, is helping Blake Masters, who's had no money. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Blake's a great guy, but had no money. | ||
| And Kelly is unlimited. | ||
| I think 40 or 50 million dollars of TV ads on Blake's head. | ||
| What Katie Hobbs pulled last night, I don't know, something to do with her campaign headquarters, like Carrie needs to break into Katie Hobbs' headquarters. | ||
| I think that was actually the debate society, the Concerned Women voters or whatever it is in Arizona that put on debates. | ||
| They were breaking in to find out if Katie Hobbs is hiding they can get her to a stage. | ||
| But here's the lesson of modern MAGA politics. | ||
| And this is why Carrie Lake is so important. | ||
| She, like in everything, she immediately comes to the sticks. | ||
| She immediately puts it forward what's going on. | ||
| She frames it perfectly. | ||
| And then she takes on and she always calls on the nastiest reporters. | ||
| She calls on the nastiest reporters, have them ask their chief shot questions. | ||
| She then deconstructs the question, makes the reporter look like a fool, and gets her message out. | ||
| This is why, with also virtually no money, Carrie lakes up by 11 in Arizona, and she's setting a new standard. | ||
| A new standard for modern MAGA politics. | ||
| This is going to be the template going forward. | ||
| Fully aggressive, but done with poise and class and unflappable and boom, but no back down. | ||
| And anytime there's a controversy, get right up to the mic and let's take it on and bring it and bring your best stuff. | ||
| Now that's 25 years of training. | ||
| That's a broadcast TV expert in a major media market in a competitive media market. | ||
| But like I said, there's some skills you can't coach. | ||
| OK, that that is you that got it or you don't. | ||
| But right there, the desperate Katie Hobbs. | ||
| So we understand there's always going to be their ability to try to cheat and steal. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| We got to outvote that. | ||
| We got to outrun that. | ||
| I want to bring in Cleta Mitchell now. | ||
| Cleta, tell me, there's this controversy in Pennsylvania. | ||
| We're getting more data. | ||
| Representative Ryan, who wrote the letter, whose name's on the letter with the other members of the House in Pennsylvania. | ||
| We're going to get him on the show either this afternoon or tomorrow morning. | ||
| He's tied up in a conference right now. | ||
| But walk me through exactly what happened. | ||
| You were very involved in the drafting of the letter. | ||
| Explain to people what's going on, and then we're going to explain to people what a solution is. | ||
| Well, thanks, Steve. | ||
| I mean, what's happening, Pennsylvania is always ground zero for a mess in their elections. | ||
| And this year is no different. | ||
| And you have a lawless secretary of state appointed by the Democratic, outgoing Democratic governor. | ||
| But according to the Department of State's own record, they have sent out 250,000 mail ballots. | ||
| And according to their own data, you can go to the website. | ||
| I'll tell you where to go to find it. | ||
| They sent out where the there's either no driver's license number. | ||
| There's no voter ID number that matches the voter database. | ||
| There's no the last four digits of the Social Security number don't match the information and the voter database. | ||
| So they sent that those ballots out notwithstanding the fact that they are not verified. | ||
| So our Volunteers in Pennsylvania have documented this and have raised the questions and have started asking the counties, what are you doing to verify that these are real people who are duly registered in the state of Pennsylvania? | ||
| And of course, they're getting a complete stiff arm from the Secretary of State's office. | ||
| And this letter that was signed and sent Representative Ryan was the leader. | ||
| There were 15 Republican House members who signed the letter and sent it to the Department of State and said, are you going to issue a directive to every county requiring, requiring that no ballots are to be sent? | ||
| And certainly not put into the hopper when they come back until and unless the identity is verified. | ||
| So what we're doing, if you want to see the full report, go to VerityVote.us. | ||
| Heather Honey is the head of the Volunteer Coalition in Pennsylvania. | ||
| She's a professional researcher. | ||
| She studies this data. | ||
| And so what we need now is an army of Pennsylvania citizens who are willing to sign up. | ||
| Go to our website at www.whoscounting.us if you're from Pennsylvania and you want to sign up. | ||
| We need people to go to every county in Pennsylvania and to ask, what are you doing to verify the identity of everyone who wants to vote by mail in our county? | ||
| And there's another issue. | ||
| In Philadelphia, The law requires that before an election can be certified, that the number of votes has to be reconciled to the number of ballots, which has to be reconciled to the number of voters. | ||
| And in Philadelphia in 2020, there were 8,000 more votes than there were voters. | ||
| And so there's no directive from the Philadelphia Election Board, their mandatory training Does not include the requirement under state law for reconciling the ballots and votes and voters. | ||
| That's all supposed to be the same number and there is no directive to the people who are doing the counting in Philadelphia That those numbers have to be reconciled before they can certify the election. | ||
| So Pennsylvania is yet again ground zero, but we're watching them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're watching them and we need more people to have a say. | |
| Hang on. | ||
| So we're doing this beforehand, not afterwards, which is what happened last time because people didn't take our warning. | ||
| And the – I assume that people are working nonstop behind the scenes to make sure we're ready to go into court, like, I'm going to pick a random time this afternoon. | ||
| Today. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Today. | ||
| Today, with – to shut this whole thing down. | ||
| And this is why everyone out there has to be talking to their friends and neighbors about the lawless Josh Shapiro. | ||
| This all goes to, it's not Wolfe, this goes right up to the Attorney General. | ||
| He knows exactly what's going on. | ||
| This is how he's gunned down. | ||
| He has no shot to win. | ||
| Fetterman is done. | ||
| Oz is going to beat him by 3 to 5 points. | ||
| He's done. | ||
| That thing the other day was humiliation. | ||
| And Shapiro still hasn't come out and disowned it. | ||
| Shapiro's going to lose to Doug Mastroianni. | ||
| The only way Shapiro can win is to cheat. | ||
| And you're seeing it right here. | ||
| You think this is random? | ||
| 250,000 ballots. | ||
| Now this tells you How you have to be on watch to find this. | ||
| That's where the Verity people are just so amazing, the researchers, to actually find this. | ||
| And the Secretary of State, they haven't had really a coherent response, have they, Cleta? | ||
| No, they don't answer, they don't respond to anything. | ||
| They don't think they have to, and so they don't. | ||
| And, you know, remember, this is an appointed Secretary of State. | ||
| The first Secretary of State that Tom Wolf appointed two years ago Pennsylvania is not going to be stolen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not. | |
| We're not going to let it happen. | ||
| We're on watch. | ||
| We have it. | ||
| on the absentee ballot. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's just disregarding that. | |
| Pennsylvania is not going to be stolen. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| We're not going to let it happen. | ||
| We're on watch. | ||
| We have it. | ||
| I didn't say it wasn't going to be a fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| I didn't say it wasn't going to be a fight. | ||
| It is Pennsylvania, okay? | ||
| They've been doing this. | ||
| They're kind of like Nevada, right? | ||
| These big eastern... These are professionals. | ||
| They've been doing this for decades. | ||
| They've been doing it for decades. | ||
| I want, once again though, today, now, Right? | ||
| Where do people go in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to sign up to be part of this, to get this sorted? | ||
| I know we got an army of people trained already of what they're doing, but we need additional bodies. | ||
| Where do they go right now, Cleta? | ||
| I know Heather's going to kill me, but if you go to VerityVote.us, There should be an info, a place to sign up to receive their emails. | ||
| But if there's not, because I didn't have a chance to look at that, come to our website www.whoscounting.us. | ||
| And if you're from Pennsylvania, we're going to get that list. | ||
| You sign up, we're going to get that list to Heather today. | ||
| And we want to start making sure, she started already, but she needs more bodies. | ||
| To get people to go to county election offices and ask, how are you verifying the identity of every male voter? | ||
| We want it all done by tomorrow. | ||
| That's why we're going to focus a big time on the afternoon show also. | ||
| on the afternoon show also, on the afternoon show also, we're gonna get all into this. | ||
| So, once again, where did they go to the website? | ||
| Because this is all hands on deck. | ||
| Yeah, www.whoscounting.us. | ||
| If you're from Pennsylvania, we will get your name and contact information and we will get your county and get you deployed to go and we'll tell you what you need to ask. | ||
| But we need every county election administrator in Pennsylvania to tell the citizens what they are doing to make sure that nobody gets to cast an absentee ballot until they have verified their identity. | ||
| It's that simple. | ||
| And citizens can make it happen faster than a judge. | ||
| We're going to make it happen. | ||
| But we're also going to get a judge. | ||
| We're going to get into court. | ||
| People have to understand the Democrats don't care if the media matters or the left-wing media or MSNBC don't like this. | ||
| If they can't cheat, they can't win. | ||
| And they understand they're about to get blown out in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. | ||
| A bunch of House seats, the entire governor's race, the Senate seat. | ||
| It's over. | ||
| This is why they panic about Fetterman. | ||
| They hate Mastroianna more than anything. | ||
| This is why Josh Shapiro and these guys are setting up to cheat to try to steal it. | ||
| You are not going to steal this. | ||
| You're going to get beaten. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| You're going to get beaten with, guess what? | ||
| Certifiable, chain of custody, legal votes. | ||
| Verification. | ||
| That's what counts. | ||
| Verification. | ||
| You are who you say you are or you don't vote. | ||
| Clean up. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| In the war room. | ||
| Ain't the war room for nothing, baby. | ||
| Okay, short break. | ||
| Anthony Fauci and Bolsonaro and the evangelicals in Brazil. | ||
| There's a lesson there, next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, we got a lot of wood to chop. | ||
| Don Bolick up at the top of the hour with this live stream. | ||
| Grace Mo and I think Jane will be on top of that. | ||
| We had a great one last night with Sarah Palin. | ||
| We're going to be doing these non-stops to make sure you're in the getter live stream. | ||
| Adam Andrzejewski joins us now from Open the Books. | ||
| You found a pretty blockbuster. | ||
| You've got Anthony Fauci. | ||
| This is the beginning of the Anthony Fauci investigation, just so the mainstream media understands it. | ||
| I've got Natalie Winters Our executive editor is going to join us here in a second. | ||
| Adam, walk us through what you found out in going through the books of Tony Fauci. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's been a knock-down, drag-out dogfight to open up the financial books on the Fauci family finances, but also with our legal partners at Judicial Watch. | |
| Steve, as you know, we filed four federal lawsuits, and one of those lawsuits we filed for five months of Dr. Anthony Fauci's calendar. | ||
| And it's an historic record. | ||
| It starts on November 1st of 2019. | ||
| So in the months leading up to the publicly disclosed pandemic, and then it goes through March 31st of 2020, in the months after the publicly disclosed pandemic. | ||
| It's historic because it's an hour by hour timeline of who Fauci was meeting with, how he was spending his time, and it's his official work calendar. | ||
| So on there, I mean, basically Dr. Anthony Fauci, I mean, he meets with everyone that you might suspect. | ||
| So he even meets in the fall of 2019 with his future biographer. | ||
| On December 19th, he meets with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. | ||
| It's the sixth annual NIH Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation meeting, and on that morning was the infamous prediction from Bill Gates on Twitter. | ||
| And he said, quote, that, what's next for our foundation? | ||
| I'm particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health, vaccines. | ||
| Highly predictive. | ||
| By the way, the first, in the week of, uh, and by the way, we've got this article, I think it's a news week. | ||
| We're going to put it up so everybody can see it into the chat rooms. | ||
| It's got, um, he, the very first day that the, no, it's, it's the day we actually start the show. | ||
| We're in pandemic. | ||
| Fauci meets with, wait for it, Moderna CEO. | ||
| How, how does that, how does, there's no conspiracy here as we say, but man, what is that? | ||
| How's that coincidental? | ||
| I think the 24th or 25th. | ||
| When they're just about to get into the Situation Room, you read Navarro's book about the big knockdown-dragout fight. | ||
| How does he just happen to meet with the Moderna CEO on the first day he really knew things were big? | ||
| Or at least the world started to know it was big. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I mean, he's meeting with the CEOs of Moderna and Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, as you might expect maybe during a pandemic. | |
| But he's also meeting with people that, you know, for instance, like Peter LeDuc. | ||
| So who is Peter LeDuc? | ||
| He heads up BSL-4, think Moonsuit Lab down in Texas. | ||
| He's also trained the BSL-4 lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. | ||
| So, LeDuc, he doesn't call Fauci on the phone. | ||
| He doesn't send him an email or a text. | ||
| He actually flies to Washington DC. | ||
| That meeting is on the 23rd of January. | ||
| He meets with Fauci in person Presumably to talk about the moon suit lab training at Wuhan and what he'd been hearing from his Chinese contacts. | ||
| Which he totally denied until later. | ||
| Natalie, jump in here. | ||
| You were on this deep national pulse. | ||
| You and Rahim were deep into this in those months. | ||
| In fact, you were posting blockbuster stories on this back in April. | ||
| Tell us about LeDuc. | ||
| What are the bad dudes that are starting to pop up here in Adam's, in Open the Book's story, in Tom Fenton's story? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| So James LeDuc runs the Galveston National Laboratory, which is of course funded by U.S. | ||
| taxpayer dollars and works with very, very, very dangerous pathogens. | ||
| But what's more interesting about what this lab is doing is that it's actually training a similar caliber of research over at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| About a year ago, I had unearthed a presentation that the director of this laboratory was giving ostensibly to either get more taxpayer funds to fund their research or just to boast about the program that they were running. | ||
| But they said that they were training Wuhan Institute of Virology personnel to work with quote the world's most dangerous pathogens. | ||
| Now, that's something that I want nowhere near the hands of a Chinese Communist Party and Chinese military-run lab. | ||
| But unfortunately, these U.S. | ||
| researchers seem to think differently. | ||
| So these are a lot of the key figures who've had really, really close relations with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who've sort of just tried to stay as hidden figures in the background. | ||
| But luckily, thanks to the work of groups like Open the Books and, of course, my reporting at The National Pulse, we've dragged them out | ||
| Into the forefront and believe me this is only the beginning all these people honestly should have been registered foreign agents on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party and frankly registered lobbyists on behalf of big pharma and those are of course punishable crimes Hang on for a second Natalie Adam This is you have I want you to tell the audience how tough it's been for you to get his financial records is the longest-serving government employee out there in the highest paid | ||
| Well, Steve, we've come to realize that the Fauci family finances are buried deep in a government bunker. | ||
| and even this calendar, which should be open to anybody. | ||
| It should be open to the government and people to see immediately. | ||
| How tough has it been? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Steve, we've come to realize that the Fauci family finances are buried deep in a government bunker. | |
| So whether it's been Dr. Anthony Fauci's job description, you know what I mean? | ||
| Just basic oversight documents, his employment contract, his ethics and financial disclosures, his royalties, you know, all of this, we had to sue for it. | ||
| with Judicial Watch as our legal partner. | ||
| So we've got four federal lawsuits. | ||
| The calendar lawsuit was filed back in December of last year. | ||
| The White House had to clear the release of it to us. | ||
| And what I want everybody to know is we've posted it at OpenTheBooks.com, right on our homepage. | ||
| You can go there, you can download that calendar and take a look. | ||
| Here's what I want everybody to realize. | ||
| There are 60,000 documents that NIH will not produce to us, but the federal court is, and they're not giving us license for all of them, they're calling in an undue burden to release the 60,000 documents that support this calendar. | ||
| But we can request individual documents. | ||
| So if you want an individual document, send me a note at adamantopenthebooks.com and we'll make that a part of our federal court request. | ||
| I want everybody to get that. | ||
| Let's get that up in the chat rooms. | ||
| Adam, how do they get, how do people find out more about your great work? | ||
| Where are they supposed to go? | ||
| And what's your social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So just come to OpenTheBooks.com. | |
| When you get there, you'll be hit with a pop-up to enter your email address. | ||
| That'll put you on our breaking news list. | ||
| Okay, brother. | ||
| Adam, thank you so much. | ||
| Opened the books, doing fantastic work. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| Natalie, you hang around. | ||
| We've got another Black Buster story by you, but I've got to get – do I have Tiermon? | ||
| Matthew, Tiermon, this is – I can't tell the audience how big Sunday is in the run-up to Sunday. | ||
| This is not just Trump of the tropics. | ||
| Actually, Bolsonaro's gone next level with this, in putting this coalition together. | ||
| And today, my beloved Financial Times of London, which you know are big, huge populist nationalist fans, right? | ||
| Being the newspaper for the globalists. | ||
| It has a huge story. | ||
| The right-wing machine Bolsonaro built. | ||
| And if you turn inside, it's absolutely amazing. | ||
| The foundational element for this is the evangelical Christians. Matthew, you know this, by the way, I've got to do that right there, it's fantastic, we're going to get it up on Getter later so everybody can read it, it's incredible. | ||
| Tell us about Bolsonaro and the right-wing machine he built and what it's forcing the communist, atheist, CCP puppet Lula to do. Hey, can you guys have me on? | ||
| Yes sir, you're on right now? | ||
| Yeah, we have some tech issues, but yeah, the FD has been covering this and as you and I have talked many times, the FD has become like the economist. | ||
| It used to be a Wall Street Journal, you know, financial press, sort of up the middle politically, maybe trending toward the establishment. | ||
| But not spinning out the same stuff as the New York Times and the Washington Post. | ||
| Well, you know, the evolution of the mainstream media in the world has been such that the FT has totally sold out the same globalist cabal. | ||
| And they've been covering Brazil pretty in depth, especially in the last week when Bolsonaro made this runoff. | ||
| And most of the coverage has been really, really lackluster. | ||
| Very, very, very back pattern. | ||
| And, you know, things like talking about Lula's annulled conviction on corruption, never mentioning the most important part of that fact pattern, which is those who annulled his conviction were his judicial appointees who are writing laws by fiat in contravention of the Brazilian constitution. | ||
| These are the key points, and they leave them by the wayside. | ||
| This piece that they put on the cover today, on page 17, this whole page, | ||
| It really is apoplectic because they're making these ties to him as the Trump of the tropics and saying he's, you know, carved out this right-wing coalition of, you know, with the sneer, if the subtext of the tone of their dispatches, the sneer of the uneducated, of the gig class economy, you know, the polite salons of Brazil in the biggest cities, you know, they're still in with the, you know, the red diaper babies like we have in the U.S. | ||
| They're for Lula. | ||
| But the fact that Bolsonaro has won so much in this first round with his Chamber of Deputies gaining seat, that's the lower house, and in the Senate absolutely routing this election, they're pretty apoplectic. | ||
| They're saying that the lead of Lula has shrunk to 52-48. | ||
| Well, we saw the lead that Lula had going into the first round by most of the mainstream establishment polls, 15 or so points, and it was neck and neck. | ||
| So 5248, I mean, that's a coin flip, and I think there's a lot of suppression polling and a lot of Tory effect, because who does the polls? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The mainstream press, the Globos in Brazil, Globos... This is where we're going to have non-stop coverage. | |
| The headline inside The populist president's socially conservative coalition will continue to shape the country's politics, whether he wins or loses against Lula. | ||
| He's created a massive movement down there, and I want to reiterate, this is predicated upon the evangelical Christians, which I think are a third of the population down there now. | ||
| Matthew, is my number roughly correct? | ||
| Yeah, and there are some estimates that it's even approaching 100 million out of a country of 212 million. | ||
| So, you know, trends are the most important things in all numeric analysis. | ||
| You know, change happens on the margin and trends really change what's happening on the margin. | ||
| And, you know, even JB, you know, a lot of these Brazilians grew up Catholics, but the evangelical fervor, it kind of reminds me of an American history. | ||
| We look at what happened with, you know, the Great Awakening in the mid part of the 19th century. | ||
| That's going on in Brazil right now. | ||
| This is the key point. | ||
| There's an awakening, a great awakening going on in Brazil. | ||
| It's the fervor of evangelical Christianity that's grassroots. | ||
| This is why Brazil is so important. | ||
| You have all the elements. | ||
| You have the intelligentsia, you have the globalists, you have the World Economic Forum, which Lula's a darling of. | ||
| The CCP is up to the neck in it. | ||
| I mean, Even more here in the United States, this is like the thing itself, and Bolsonaro is leading a total grassroots move, he's put this coalition together of the working poor, middle class, and evangelical Christians. | ||
| Matthew, how can people, you're putting stuff up non-stop, we're going to have coverage non-stop today, tomorrow, all through the weekend and Sunday, how do people get to you? | ||
| It's at Matthew Tierremond at Getter, at Twitter, all over social media. | ||
| There's one other point I want to direct people to, which is the FD also did another piece on Brazil. | ||
| And they said that the Bolsonaro playbook is a scare tactic using the Venezuelan sort of migration diaspora as Venezuela is such a failed state that in Colombia and Philly, the right was saying all these Venezuelan migrants coming are going to stress our social safety net. | ||
| Crime is going to rise. | ||
| And it did not work in Colombia, in Chile. | ||
| They moved part of the left. | ||
| And now the worry is that they're going to replicate the policies of Venezuela. | ||
| That's all the things that the Marxists in Latin America have been pushing for 20 years in the Sao Paulo Forum, where Petro grew up in politics, the Colombian leftist, who was a former member of FARC, the paramilitary terrorist group. | ||
| And that's where Lula helped found the Sao Paulo Forum. | ||
| So there's big storm clouds ahead for Latin America and Brazil if Lula does win on Sunday. | ||
| Oh, no, it's all the chips in the middle of the table. | ||
| Matthew Tierremont, thank you for breaking away to give us this hit here. | ||
| Okay, short break. | ||
| We've got a lot of wood to chop in the last segment. | ||
| Actually, Darren B is going to join us quickly. | ||
| We've got Elon Musk. | ||
| Looks like he is in the process or has closed on the public town square of Twitter. | ||
| We'll get to that in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
...has arrived. | |
| The new social media taking on big tech, protecting free speech, and cancelling cancel culture. | ||
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. | ||
| Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. | ||
| Okay, two things happening. | ||
| We got another Blockbuster story from Natalie Winters. | ||
| Natalie, walk us through what you've got. | ||
| Then we got Darren Beattie. | ||
| It looks like Elon Musk is actually announcing he's closed on the Twitter deal, so we're going to get all the details from Darren, who's right now getting his pom-poms out of the closet. | ||
| Natalie, walk us through another. | ||
| Every day it's Natalie Winters, another Blockbuster reveal. | ||
| What do we got, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's no secret that Big Pharma's North Star has always been profit, and that Big Pharma sees very big profits in little kids. | |
| But how they've been going about doing this really is engaging in full-blown information warfare and using these proxies, like the one I just exposed today, to really fight on behalf of them. | ||
| So there's a group called the Unity Consortium. | ||
| And this is a group that has actually been coaching healthcare providers, doctors, on how to most effectively convince parents to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. | ||
| They never warned of any side effects except for quote, arm soreness. | ||
| But what's so interesting and what this group never discloses in any of its social media posts or anything of the like, is that they're actually not only partnered with Pfizer, but their founder is actually a Pfizer consultant. If you look at her healthcare consulting company, one of the most prominent clients that she works for is Pfizer, Inc., the very same manufacturer of the vaccines that they're promoting. | ||
| So this is a perfect example of, I think, the conflicts of interest that you've seen. | ||
| Believe it or not, this group has also partnered with the CDC, which may offer some insight into why the CDC voted to authorize COVID-19 vaccines for children. | ||
| And real quick, another story we have up. | ||
| People may have seen that PayPal reintroduced their $2,500 fine for misinformation, if you are deemed a spreader of that term, whatever that means. | ||
| Well, believe it or not, the head of public policy at Twitter is currently serving as a young global leader over at the World Economic Forum. | ||
| So it's a perfect example, I think, of this sort of social credit score system that the WEF wants to introduce, not just here in the United States, but abroad. So make sure you head to warroom.org to check out those stories and some more breaking news throughout the day. | ||
| By the way, the reason we brought Natalie on to be executive and co-host is that she's not pundit, She never goes into punditry. | ||
| It's always receipts. | ||
| It's always investigations. | ||
| It's always details. | ||
| You can see that we're looking on the other side of the hill. | ||
| There's going to be a new sheriff in town starting on the evening of the 8th, the morning of the 9th, and the war room is going to be at the tip of the spear. | ||
| On the investigations and everything that's happening on Capitol Hill, and of course, Natalie Winters' research. | ||
| I think you will see it quoted, actually, in a lot of these hearings, a lot of these investigations. | ||
| So, Natalie, once again, fantastic job. | ||
| Hang over a second. | ||
| Let me go to Darren. | ||
| Darren Beattie, you got the pom-poms out. | ||
| Nobody can figure out on Wall Street exactly how this is closed, because these banks, you're basically buying a $10 billion asset for $44 billion, and you're doing it with tons of leverage, or stock you've barred against in Tesla which has lost $600 billion of market cap. | ||
| So explain to the audience what's happening and what do you know from an operating point of view? Is this going to be a breath of fresh air? Is Trump going to come back? What's going to happen over at Twitter? | ||
| So many great great questions there. | ||
| As to the structure of the deal, I mean, at $44 billion, he effectively made an offer that they weren't in a position to refuse. | ||
| And so how that offer is actually delivered, how the $44 billion gets accumulated, and how that's linked to the leverage that the regime might wield on Musk in order to ensure that maybe he doesn't implement as much free speech as Intended. | ||
| I mean, there's a range. | ||
| People talk about it like it's a black or white thing, but it would be revolutionary if he could simply move the level of censorship on the internet, in this case, Twitter, from 80, 85% where it is now down to 50%. | ||
| That alone would be revolutionary. | ||
| So there is a question of exactly how much free speech he intends to implement and in what fashion. | ||
| And to what degree is this going to run afoul of the numerous operations that U.S. | ||
| intelligence— But hang on, because we—hang on. | ||
| We only have a couple minutes. | ||
| I got to ask you this. | ||
| I want to have you back on. | ||
| You at Revolver have proven, I think, more than anybody else That Twitter's essentially an intelligence apparatus operation from all over the world, but particularly U.S. | ||
| That's a fact. | ||
| It's not a business. | ||
| We also know that's a fact from his text messages they were going to use in court of all his buddies, all the mandarins in Big Tech giving him ideas about how to actually make money on this thing. | ||
| So with that, is he going to blow out 75% of the people? | ||
| Is he going to get rid of the intelligence apparatus? | ||
| Tell me, on this public square that's an intelligence apparatus, What will happen, sir? | ||
| Such a fantastic question. | ||
| I said, you know, I encourage him not to fire 70 percent based on what I've heard and conversations I've had. | ||
| He should really be going up to 80, 85 percent. | ||
| And I hope he really follows through with that and takes the advice of Machiavelli, which is you deliver severity in one fell swoop. | ||
| Do it all at once and get it over with. | ||
| And that's what he needs to do. | ||
| And I do think he intends to do that. | ||
| As to the speech issue and the intelligence operations, that's a much more thorny issue. | ||
| There's, just as a template that shows you exactly the type of operations going on in Twitter, there's an organization called the Integrity Initiative. | ||
| I'm going to need your help in the coming weeks to make this term a common household concept. | ||
| Integrity Initiative Revolver.news has done an extensive expose on just the tip of the iceberg of their operations. | ||
| This is really probably the greatest national security leak since Snowden, which gets into the architecture of how these clusters of operatives function on Twitter in order to influence and manipulate the political process in the United States. | ||
| Elon needs to understand this to understand what he's up against. | ||
| And ultimately, to come to some type of understanding with these intelligence organizations as to exactly how far and in what manner he's able to implement free speech. | ||
| We've got to bounce. | ||
| How do people get to you right now? | ||
| How do they get to Revolver, get on top of this? | ||
| Revolver.news, do the required reading here to understand what's going on with Elon Purchase and what's going on with Intel infiltration of Twitter. | ||
| And I'm on... | ||
| Twitter at Darren J. Beattie and Revolvers at Gitter at Revolver News. | ||
| Okay, I want everybody up. Natalie, the non-pundit, how do people get to you, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Natalie G. Winters on all platforms, primarily Gitter. | |
| You're the best. She's just begun to fight here. | ||
| It's going to be amazing what she's going to do. | ||
| Natalie, thank you. | ||
| Stick around. | ||
| You've got the Boldic. | ||
| Go and get her right now. | ||
| Look at the live streams. | ||
| The Boldic debate. | ||
| Very important. | ||
| Do it. | ||
| We're going to be back here five to seven. | ||
| Pennsylvania, all of it. |
Export Selection