Sept. 6, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
47:46
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
| All this nonsense. | ||
| All this spin. | ||
| They can't handle the truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| It's Tuesday. | ||
| 6 September in the year of our Lord 2022. | ||
| You're in the battleground and man, we've got what, 60 some days until November 8th. | ||
| It's going to be a fight every day. | ||
| We're going to talk about some of the biggest issues that are driving people to the polls. | ||
| I want to start with Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| We've got a packed show this afternoon. | ||
| I want to start with Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Dr. Navarro, you're the first guy to really call stagflation back, I don't know, three weeks into the, actually, I think you said it on the afternoon broadcast on the 20th. | ||
| on when the regime became the residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. | ||
| You've more fully developed that over the next couple of months, but you were the first guy. | ||
| But now I want to get you on a day because the specter, you keep hearkening back to the 70s. | ||
| You keep saying, hey, we've been through this before. | ||
| We're not the same country. | ||
| We don't have the same balance sheet. | ||
| We don't have the same manufacturing base, but We made many of these mistakes back in the 1970s. | ||
| What has occurred over the last 72 hours is this issue of price controls, particularly in Europe as they try to keep energy costs down. | ||
| Walk us through stagflation, where are we, and is history repeating itself, the debacle that was price control, sir? | ||
| Yes, Steve. | ||
| History is repeating itself with the stagflation scenario. | ||
| Let me do the the 70s history briefly. | ||
| You start with Lyndon Johnson's failure to abide by the guns versus butter trade-off. | ||
| He went ahead and did both the Great Society programs and prosecuted the Vietnam War. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was 68. | |
| That sparked An inflation that bled into the beginning of the 1970s. | ||
| Nixon gets elected and Arthur Burns becomes Fed Chair. | ||
| And he just opens his spigot, starts printing all sorts of money. | ||
| The dollar collapses. | ||
| And what does Nixon do? | ||
| Wage and price controls. | ||
| Yeah? | ||
| And then as we move in to 76 and that period before Carter, we get Gerald Ford having his win campaign, whip inflation now, and he's whipsawed. | ||
| Every time he tries to control inflation, he deepens the recession. | ||
| Every time he tries to stimulate the economy, he worsens inflation. | ||
| And by the time Jimmy Carter rolls around, he doesn't know what the hell he's doing. | ||
| So that's a span that goes like 12 years, Steve. | ||
| Long years, and so Volcker comes along under Ronald Reagan and basically shocks the system with the recession to beat all recessions and kind of resets the inflationary expectations. | ||
| So what have we got here in terms of similar kinds of mistakes? | ||
| Hold it, hold it, hold it. | ||
| I just want to make sure people, we don't come out of there until really the morning of, it's really 83, 84. | ||
|
unidentified
|
82. | |
| So you're talking 12 or 14. | ||
| 82 has stopped, yes, but it didn't pivot until really the unemployment. | ||
| We didn't really start getting polling and people, like 83. | ||
| You're talking, it took, was it 12 years, 13 years, 14 years to work through? | ||
| This is a decade and a half, essentially, that America was gutted. | ||
| By the way, I did leave something really important out, which is kind of analogous to the pandemic, and that was the supply shocks in the early 70s. | ||
| There were two of them. | ||
| One was the OPEC oil cartel oil price shocks, which spiked both oil prices and food prices. | ||
| And we also had a weather phenomenon like anchovies dying off the coast of Peru that was actually a profound shock in the animal feed area because that all fed into what was part of the livestock supply chain. | ||
| So the analogy here is very direct. | ||
| We've got both profligate fiscal and monetary policy. | ||
| Joe Biden in Congress with all the trillions of dollars of bills. | ||
| They're passing that are going to have too much spending for too little productivity. | ||
| We've got profligate monetary policy with Jerome Powell essentially not seeing the inflation that you and Cortez and myself and others on the war room saw and basically had easy money for too long. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And we got the supply shocks that are policy induced. | ||
| By the Biden regime, things like forced vax, which put a lot of people of prime age out of the workforce and disrupted our supply chains. | ||
| And now, lo and behold, Waging price control chatter among the Biden White House, which is totally predictable. | ||
| The problem here, Steve, is that none of this works, okay? | ||
| The basic insight of Donald Trump and Ronald Reagan, and what I was seeing back in May of 2020 to try to stave off, is that economies grow and prosper because of their underlying structure. | ||
| And if you want to make an economy more processed, Prosperous, you have to have the right structure. | ||
| So when Biden wiped out strategic energy dominance, That alone, that alone ensured this stagflationary impulse to begin to ripple through the economy, and then he did all the other stuff. | ||
| So if you contrast that with what Trump would be doing now in office, he certainly would maintain strategic energy dominance. | ||
| But let me go, we've got limited time today, and by the way, I want to talk about your book for a second. | ||
| Europe is out of control. | ||
| These first price controls, it's the Europeans. | ||
| I know Biden and those guys are kicking around waging price controls, but that's kind of theoretical. | ||
| Right now, they're actively moving to put caps on Russian energy, particularly Russian natural gas. | ||
| And because they've got two choices, either do that or they've got to come up with massive subsidies, which they can't afford to pay because they don't have the balance sheets. | ||
| So in Europe's situation, if they don't put price controls in or try to force that on the Russians, What are their alternatives, given that their energy policies are so awful anyway? | ||
| That's why these things are long-moving events, Steve. | ||
| I mean, Germany and Europe laid their bed when they got into bed with the Russkies. | ||
| I mean, Trump, in a very prescient speech to the UN, warned, flat out, the Germans, they were sitting right there in the audience, literally laughing at Trump, warning them about an over-dependence on Russian energy. | ||
| I mean, you can't make that up, these arrogant Germans. | ||
| No one was more arrogant that I had to deal with in Europe than the Germans. | ||
| And they're sitting there and it's just like now Attila the Huns in Moscow. | ||
| And, you know, they're paying the price. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Here's the thing. | ||
| Make America great again. | ||
| All I know right now about Europe is that stuff's coming home right here to roost. | ||
| Because as that continent is falling apart, They're not going to buy our stuff. | ||
| Our dollar's going to spike. | ||
| We're going to buy more of their stuff, provided we can get it. | ||
| And everything we buy from them is going to have a higher price tag. | ||
| So they're going to import inflation and unemployment to this country because they were too stupid to have a coherent energy policy at the same time. | ||
| You can't fix stupid, Steve. | ||
| At least not quickly. | ||
| Dr. Navarro, we've got a lot to do rolling out your book up to, I think, the 19th. | ||
| Walk people through. | ||
| How do they get it right now? | ||
| How do they get the podcast? | ||
| How do they get the audio version? | ||
| Well, yeah, you buried the lead there, Ben, and the name of the book is Taking Back Trump's America. | ||
| Go to peternavar.com, and that's the gateway to Amazon. | ||
| You can read about it. | ||
| But Taking Back Trump's America is absolutely critical. | ||
| I want to thank Steve for the Labor Day weekend show, because War Room Posse went out and bought that, and it really boosted the rankings on Amazon. | ||
| Buy it for a friend. | ||
| We've got to get this Taking Back Trump's America out, because it's the blueprint and battle cry to win back the House. | ||
| signal, went back to White House, signal and change these policies. | ||
| Taking back Trump's America, please, deplorables, buy it. | ||
| Also I think you're helping people understand economics and how it impacts their life. | ||
| And this thing in Europe, we've been tracking for a while. | ||
| You and Cortez and Dave Wilson, frankly, have been so spot on. | ||
| Well, one thing on that, Steve, one thing on that I think is important with Joe Biden with his Goebbels attack on MAGA, there's a beautiful set of chapters in there which are straight homage, not just to Trump, but to you, Steve, when you were in the White House explaining what Make America Great Deplorables And how it's distinguished from the rhino traditional Republicans versus the Trump Republicans. | ||
| And that alone is worth a read in Taking Back Trump's America because it'll help people in our posse be able to explain simply and coherently why we are peaceful people in search of prosperity and not the kind of wackos, extremists that Joe fascist Biden wants to portray us as. | ||
| Peter, real quickly, how did it get to you on Getter? | ||
| Yeah, Getter is the Twitter killer. | ||
| Let me say that one more time. | ||
| Getter's the Twitter killer. | ||
| Real Pinovaro. | ||
| Please sign up for Getter. | ||
| Send something to me through Getter and we'll welcome you to the community, get you engaged. | ||
| I just, I mean, it's like I put stuff up on Twitter and Getter all the time. | ||
| Same stuff. | ||
| And Twitter bans you. | ||
| They just, they shadow ban you. | ||
| You can't even see that they're doing it. | ||
| But I see, comparing the results on Getter and Twitter, I know those SOBs are doing that. | ||
| They just did it over the weekend on something I sent out. | ||
| No, no, no, no, Twitter. | ||
| You're dead. | ||
| Getter's coming for you. | ||
| Coming for you. | ||
| Peter Navarro, Dr. Navarro, thank you very much for joining us, taking time away from your schedule. | ||
| Well, we're on social media. | ||
| I want to bring in two of the heaviest hitters we got. | ||
| Let's bring in Will Tebow from Heritage Tech Policy Group. | ||
| Will, you wrote an amazing piece about Facebook essentially working for the Biden campaign to make sure that Biden had an attempt to steal this. | ||
| But pull the camera back for a second. | ||
| Just the social media oligarchs overall. | ||
| They are out of control. | ||
| You just heard Peter Navarro. | ||
| He puts up economic analysis on things related to the vaccine or the virus, and he was one of the leading White House guys. | ||
| He puts it up on Getter. | ||
| It gets to run. | ||
| You get engagement. | ||
| He puts it on Twitter. | ||
| He's banned immediately. | ||
| Walk our audience through the tech oligarchs and particularly how Facebook really helped them with Joe Rogan, you know, got it out of Zuckerberg, how they really helped to win the 2020 election. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for having me, Steve. | |
| You put it right. | ||
| They are oligarchs. | ||
| And what distinguishes them from other people or other business owners is they operate with impunity from the federal government or from state governments. | ||
| But what I think is distinctive is that they don't merely help the Biden administration in this case. | ||
| They are one in the same with the unipart. | ||
| They are part of the administrative state. | ||
| They are part of the ruling class that seeks to define American values that seeks to define the future of American political discourse. | ||
| And Zuckerberg came out and said it on Joe Rogan that the FBI, in no uncertain terms, gave them orders to suppress certain information. | ||
| What this comes down to, though, is the fact that we don't have laws or political accountability for Internet platforms in the digital age that define Our public discourse. | ||
| And what that means is conservatives, certainly America First conservatives, do not have representation in the only type of discourse that really matters in this day and age, as you know all too well. | ||
| They operate above the rule of law because there are no laws that are relevant to the internet in 2022. | ||
| You know, we're going to have Darren Bede on here from Revolver in a second. | ||
| He's been all over this on Twitter. | ||
| Here's one of the problems is that these guys have generated so much cash because of such huge margins. | ||
| They've bought, you know, they've retained every lobbyist. | ||
| They retained every law firm. | ||
| You have these bills kind of floating around right now. | ||
| And Mike Davis from Article 3 is, you know, on the show every other day. | ||
| His big project right now is this tech bill, but he says they can't even get it up at a committee for a vote. | ||
| What is MAGA to do? | ||
| Because right now, even the MAGA side, you know, you got the Jim Jordans, who's a beloved guy, but Jim Jordan's kind of a little bit in the big tech camp. | ||
| You have other people like Matt Gaetz who want to go full firebrand. | ||
| What is your perspective of how do we work our way through this to actually get a policy set that MAGA can get in back of? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think big tech is, frankly, Steve, one of the areas where an unlikely alliance is necessary to survive for America First conservatives to thrive in this day and age. | |
| It might mean that we support a bill sponsored by Amy Klobuchar. | ||
| It might mean that we make strange bedfellows with a Democrat like David Cicilline or that Republican officeholders, co-sponsor legislation. | ||
| There are some pieces of legislation that have been written and proposed and have sponsors on each side that are really worth considering. | ||
| And I think you will see a lot of Republicans get support, put their support behind. | ||
| But I'm a little frustrated, I think, like you, is we have a lot of proposals, some sitting committee, but we haven't had much discussion. | ||
| And it has to be a priority for Republicans and Democrats for anyone who cares about. | ||
| The integrity of our democracy to actually put forth some laws that give the American people some sense of what happens in the servers of these tech companies so we know what's happening. | ||
| Tech policy by podcast, tech policy by whistleblower does not work. | ||
| I want to, by the way, part of Heritage, what you guys are doing is working through all these policy, the group you work for, you're in the tech policy group. | ||
| This is what you're raising DETRA is. | ||
| You guys are sitting there trying to work through these different policy, because it's quite complicated. | ||
| And you're, like you said, it's not going to be the natural, traditional political alignments. | ||
| Is this what you guys are doing right now? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Exactly, Steve. | |
| You know, and I direct you and all of your, your listeners to my boss, Kara Fredericks. | ||
| Really magnum opus, a paper called Combating Big Tech's Totalitarianism. | ||
| She lays out the abuses of power. | ||
| She lays out the heinous impact that technology and these social media companies in particular are having on American culture in our families. | ||
| And she starts to chart ahead the political path towards taking action. | ||
| And I think that will perhaps include some form of antitrust. | ||
| That'll include conversations about digital privacy. | ||
| and property rights as they're understood on the internet. | ||
| But that's exactly right. | ||
| At Heritage, we're gonna be putting our name behind a lot of these pieces of legislation that will give Americans a voice and restore some trust to these internet platforms, because none exists now. | ||
| We'll have hearings, Zuckerberg will go on podcasts, but we don't have a sense of what is real or not. | ||
| And that's unacceptable because it's the ruling class who benefits from that chaos. | ||
| you Let me bring in, hang with me for a second Will, let me bring in Darren Beattie. | ||
| Darren, I think if I had to say, and Will had the introduction, this is the reason Revolver.news was created. | ||
| You wanted to take on these topics that quite frankly in the old days people didn't even talk about or didn't understand or we talked about, you know, Section 202. | ||
| And you said, hey, we've got a bigger problem here. | ||
| We've created an economy of oligarchs and the biggest one is tech. | ||
| And you've been at the forefront of this saying, It's, you know, the media is bad. | ||
| This is bad. | ||
| That's bad. | ||
| But the merger of big tech and the national security state and now really the law enforcement national security state is probably the biggest issue we have with the administrative state. | ||
| Darren Beattie, your perspective on this? | ||
| No, it's a hundred percent. | ||
| I mean, we have multiple things going on at once, but really converging into one large problem. | ||
| The weaponization of the national security state against the American people. | ||
| We saw a major inflection point in that with Biden's recent speech, which really amounted to a declaration of war against over half of the country, really. | ||
| And the instrumentalization of big tech as a weapon for the security state. | ||
| And I think that's something that a lot of people on the right who get caught up in this distinction of, oh, big tech, these are private companies versus the government. | ||
| Ultimately, where it really matters, big tech is they're not private companies. | ||
| They are cutouts of the government. | ||
| to which our government has outsourced certain functions that it can't actually implement on account of various constitutional restrictions. So we have the same kind of censorship that really you have in China, it's just implemented differently in order to work around the constitution. | ||
| Let me, there was a, I got your piece over the weekend. | ||
| You know, you and I are all over the situation in Ukraine, and we've been pretty adamant since the beginning, and we've been right since the beginning, that this is something that was ridiculous. | ||
| This border dispute in Russian-speaking Ukraine was something we shouldn't get dragged into, and now we're the driver of it. | ||
| But when you talk about the national security state, and Will talks about this, Really, at the apex of that is the National Security Agency out at Fort Meade. | ||
| It is the elite of the elite. | ||
| Talk to me about this article that came out over the weekend, because it's so shocking. | ||
| But there's something deeper. | ||
| It's almost like Biden's speech. | ||
| You see Biden's speech, and you really can't, as an American, kind of absorb it at first. | ||
| You've got to go back and watch it again and again and think. | ||
| The same with this article. | ||
| It's like, this is the most elite unit in cyber warfare at Fort Meade. | ||
| And tell the audience what they were working on. | ||
| Well, this organization, it has a Twitter account. | ||
| These are the CyberwarMemetic experts, and their Twitter account has a whopping 26,000 followers. | ||
| To give you some perspective, my account isn't even that huge, and it's about 150,000. | ||
| We have very successful people on the right, like Jack Posobiec with over a million. | ||
| And this is the account of an elite cyber security unit that specializes in psychological warfare, memetic warfare, and it's only got 26,000 followers? | ||
| That's why they have to resort to censorship. | ||
| And if you go to their Twitter timeline, it's just one thing after another, the usual junk that you'd expect from a government group like this, a military group like this, Russian disinformation, this disinformation, that. | ||
| Um, one interesting piece that they, uh, that they promoted, they're not behind this particular operation, at least publicly, but they've been promoting it on their timeline to show how hip and, uh, in touch they are with the internet cyber culture is they've been promoting this group that allows you to put memes on weapons sent to Ukraine. | ||
| So that's one interesting thing they did. | ||
| Another thing they did that's equally disturbing and directly impinges on free speech in the West is they're promoting basically an intelligence agency attack, spearheaded by UK intelligence, against a news organization called Grey Zone, which has been extremely critical of the West's operation against Russia and our sort of money laundering and weapons laundering to Russia. | ||
| And so they've at least helped to provide some kind of signal boost to UK intelligence attack on domestic media. And so you can only begin to understand what these guys are involved in. | ||
| We're doing a deeper study on them. But it's just one. | ||
| One little piece of a larger puzzle, which is that all of these groups are absolutely terrified of free speech online. | ||
| Free speech online is, genuinely speaking, a number one national security threat to the corrupt and illegitimate regime that unfortunately now runs the United States of America. | ||
| So it's very dangerous stuff. | ||
| It's totally antithetical to the spirit, if not the letter of the Constitution. | ||
| And it's really something that needs to be changed if we want our country back. | ||
| How do people get to you on social media and how do they get to you at Revolver? | ||
| Revolver.news, we've got a white hot piece about the great Blake Masters and his recent comments on affirmative action. | ||
| If you're interested in this topic, go to revolver.news now. | ||
| A lot of really, really astonishing details in this piece. | ||
| I'm on Twitter at Darren J. Beattie, and we're at Gitter at Revolver News. | ||
| Darren, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Will, people want to find out more about your group. | ||
| Give us the name of the paper again. | ||
| We're going to put a link to it. | ||
| And I want to know how to get to you on social media and how do people go over to Heritage Today to find out more about your policy group? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm at William Tebow on Twitter. | |
| It's not spelled like you think, but hopefully they'll stumble upon it. | ||
| It's spelled a little more authentically, I guess, to my ancestors' roots. | ||
| Um, but the paper I mentioned is, uh, was written by my boss, Cara Frederick, uh, who's the director of the tech policy center. | ||
| She wrote it back in January, uh, combating big text totalitarianism. | ||
| Uh, it's at heritage.org, uh, under, under our section on, on big tech. | ||
| And, uh, again, that is the framework that we will use, uh, to bring this cabal, uh, to heal and, and to end their unchecked influence on our country. | ||
| We'll be getting more specific in the coming months and then a year ahead, but we couldn't be more excited about what's to come. | ||
| No, here's the reason. | ||
| That and the way it ties in also to tech with big pharma in the medical industry is that this is the most complicated issues we're going to have to deal with through the administrative state. | ||
| These are highly complicated. | ||
| Like I said, there's going to be new alliances, there's going to be People falling in and out, but we got to get it right first. | ||
| And I keep telling people, we're kind of feeling our way through here as I have discussions with people I admire and realize, hey, I'm on the other side of the football for some of these people and closely more aligned with others. | ||
| And these guys are aligned, but it really is going to require a ton of policy work to get this right. | ||
| So really appreciative that Heritage is all over this, sir. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, thank you, Steve. | |
| They're not hiding it. | ||
| They're emailing from their government and Facebook email addresses. | ||
| So it's time we match them. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| The oligarchs. | ||
| Let me talk about oligarchs. | ||
| There's two areas I got. | ||
| Naomi was going to join us at the break, but I want to go to Dr. Maria Ryan on this fentanyl situation and about Big Pharma. | ||
| I think people, Dr. Ryan, what people don't can't get their hands around is that we've been talking about this now for years. | ||
| And this crisis is starting to overwhelm communities. | ||
| In the United States, where are we and how is this thing exploding so much when supposedly so many billions of dollars going to stop it, ma'am? | ||
| Well, the problem is, is that it's coming through the border at such a rate in such amounts that there is no stopping it until we put a moratorium on the border. | ||
| There are literally cartel members in all 50 states of the union. | ||
| And this drug, particularly fentanyl, is pushed by the Sinaloa cartel and the Jalisco New Generation cartel primarily. | ||
| But it's an illicit synthetic opioid coming from China, now from India as well, and they work with the cartels to push it into the United States. | ||
| It is 50 times more potent than heroin, 100 times more potent than Morphine, and it's highly addictive. | ||
| They're putting it in cannabis, they're putting it in heroin, cocaine, and separately you could buy some fentanyl. | ||
| But my concern is with our young people. | ||
| The DEA, Drug Enforcement Agency, eight days ago put out a warning. | ||
| Take a look at this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Look at this. | |
| I tell you what, hold up, hang on for one second. | ||
| Hang on for one second. | ||
| I want to get to that. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We've got Dr. Maria Ryan. | ||
| We have Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| We have Kerry Sheffield. | ||
| All next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Battlegrounds with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| War Room Battlegrounds with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| you Welcome back. | ||
| Maria, hold up, and I want to make sure you describe it for our audience. | ||
| The DEA put this out as a warning, given that this is the most addictive thing we've ever seen. | ||
| It's 100 times more powerful and addictive than, what, morphine, 50 times more than heroin. | ||
| It's all over now, cannabis and marijuana and all this. | ||
| Put up what the DEA warned us about. | ||
| So eight days ago, the Drug Enforcement Agency put out a warning about brightly colored fentanyl pills. | ||
| They are now, meaning China, the cartels are going after our youngest people. | ||
| This is so brightly colored. | ||
| It looks like candy. | ||
| They're chalk colors and they're pushing it along with fake pills. | ||
| So here in the United States, if a provider prescribes you Xanax or oxycodone or a multitude of other drugs, it's compounded in a pharmacy. | ||
| These illicit drugs that are manufactured in, not a pharmacy, in drug cartels' labs look exactly like the real drugs, but they put a little bit of fentanyl in it. | ||
| So a young person who thinks they're buying a Xanax just to get some sleep because they're stressed about finals, they could wake up dead in the morning. | ||
| One pill can kill. | ||
| We believe as little as two milligrams of fentanyl can kill you. | ||
| But I have another alert for your audience. | ||
| There's new drugs on the market and they're called Nitezine. | ||
| There's a family of drugs called Nitezine. | ||
| Florida has put out a advisory for eight of these drugs, which can you believe it? | ||
| They're even more potent than fentanyl. | ||
| So I give you three examples here. | ||
| N, Pyrolidino. | ||
| Etonitazine, street name Pyro, 10 times more potent than fentanyl. | ||
| Can you believe it? | ||
| That's crazy. | ||
| Etodesonitazine, and this one is big on the streets, Isotonitazine. | ||
| So how are we, look, we understand, we understand, okay, we understand we've got supply from the Tongs in, you know, China. | ||
| We've got India now, and you've got the cartels coming through. | ||
| We've got about a minute here. | ||
| How do we cut demand? | ||
| How do we stop demand? | ||
| Because it's a supply-demand situation, and I realize they're putting it in everything, but basically, fundamentally, how do we cut demand for this, ma'am? | ||
| Well, it got worse during the pandemic. | ||
| People were isolated. | ||
| There were mandates that didn't make any logical sense, did not follow the science, and it isolated our young people. | ||
| It isolated everybody, but more importantly, our young people, and they turned to other people on social media. | ||
| And they were groomed, almost like being groomed for sexual exploitation. | ||
| They were groomed that you need to take a pill to solve your problems. | ||
| This will make you happy. | ||
| This will make you sleep less. | ||
| So we do need, not only to have a moratorium on the border, but we have to work with how to handle stress, how to cope with today's world, and how to make a difference. | ||
| But it's multi-factual. | ||
| We're going to have you back on here to drill down here. | ||
| How do people get to you on social media? | ||
| I know you've been putting up reports. | ||
| You've been doing the morning show on Sundays with Rudy. | ||
| You've been doing the podcast. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| Getter at Dr. Maria. | ||
| Truth at Dr. Maria. | ||
| I still do a little work on Twitter. | ||
| I don't like to because they shadow ban me all the time when I'm just trying to talk about science and facts. | ||
| Dr. Ryan, thank you very much. | ||
| Look forward to having you back on here on this crisis of fentanyl, which is destroying the working class in this country, and now it's destroying the youth. | ||
| Let's bring in Dr. Naomi Wolfe. | ||
| Dr. Wolfe, I want to make sure this is true. | ||
| People send it to me and that's on the morning show. | ||
| Is the UK government, and I know that you're rolling on lawsuits, I want to get to all that, but has the UK government now stopped the vaccinations to 5 to 11 year olds? | ||
| Is that official or is this some people just surmising this from certain things that the British government's doing? | ||
| Well, Naked Emperor is the source, and this is the byline of a very credible commentator on vaccine issues who was very early to be critical of the narratives and the mythology of COVID in general and the lockdowns as well. | ||
| So I don't have independent verification except for that. | ||
| However, he does link his substack directly to a UK government site Which quietly, you know, these people don't make announcements. | ||
| According to Naked Emperor, quietly vaccinating any child that now turns five in Britain ended in August, meaning last month, without any announcements. | ||
| And so it used to be that there was a one-off program, you see how they're suddenly changing language, applying to those aged five to 11 years, including those who turn five years of age before the end of August 2022. | ||
| And so that's been quietly dropped So now the new one-off program, the ongoing one-off program, is expected to be for children in the academic years where children are aged 11 or 12 years and up. | ||
| So, pending additional verification, it actually does look like this audience can add another notch to its belt of saving the children. | ||
| But they have not put up with all the things that we're doing. | ||
| They have still not come up and said why they're doing that. | ||
| I just want to make sure that's correct. | ||
| Because a lot of these things they're doing now are quite sneaky. | ||
| All of a sudden they just kind of ghost it and you're left to kind of track it down. | ||
| You agree that this is in this category. | ||
| There hasn't been any big public announcements. | ||
| They haven't come forward and said, hey, we're stopping this for the following reasons. | ||
| On the contrary. | ||
| And this is a methodology that you see in our country as well. | ||
| You know, in the countries that are kind of tiptoeing away, the spokespeople who are tiptoeing away, Dr. Birx, they just will change their position without doing that normal human thing of saying, well, this was my position, and now my position is 180 degrees the opposite, and I'm going to explain to you why that changed. | ||
| No, they just launch with this, and this is why trying to You know, read these documents or listen to these spokespeople is so often sounds like gibberish because they're not using normal logic. | ||
| They're using soundbites that have probably been vetted by lawyers. | ||
| And they're, you know, just kind of gently changing the website, gently, you know, changing the language. | ||
| CDC does that too. | ||
| They gently changed the website to, you know, to make it seem as if they hadn't been, you know, mandating everything they mandated for the last two years. | ||
| And the trouble with these websites is that, you know, digital technology is hard to pin down. | ||
| So people have to kind of struggle to compare versions in order to really understand what the government is doing. | ||
| And this is just sneaky governance. | ||
| I mean, the clean, transparent way to run a government policy is to issue a press release and have a spokesperson answering questions and to announce to the people of Britain, yes, up until this past August, last month, We were encouraging you or making you inject your 5 to 11-year-old child. | ||
| Now we've changed the guidance and this is why. | ||
| But no, they're never going to say why because there is no why. | ||
| The whole purpose of what Daily Cloud's doing with the War Room Posse and the lawyers and Amy Killing and all that is to hold people accountable and make sure that we get facts out there. | ||
| Walk us through, I think you're making some big announcements now of moving forward, maybe even in some of the legal sphere and going after people in lawsuits. | ||
| Yeah, finally. | ||
| And I want to thank all of the Posse and you for finally getting to yet another benchmark, the gears of the law grind exceedingly slowly. | ||
| But when you get there, you really get there. | ||
| So the FDA declined our citizen's petition. | ||
| They sent their lawyers, which is kind of exciting to me. | ||
| I mean, this is the same FDA that stood by, well, you know, all these people were horribly harmed or killed. | ||
| All these kids were sterilized in the Pfizer documents. | ||
| The same FDA tasked their lawyers with reading our citizen's complaint, our lawyer's citizen's complaint, and then Declining it in a 31 page response. | ||
| So they spent some serious taxpayer dollars on that and some serious manpower. | ||
| But that was a necessary step. | ||
| They had to decline it in order for our lawyers, Scott Street and John Howard, who you remember, won against the Biden administration regarding masking. | ||
| They're the best of the best in their space. | ||
| So now they are free to do what they're doing, which is seeking potential plaintiffs in legal action against Pfizer. | ||
| So now we can Finally, ladies and gentlemen, sue Pfizer. | ||
| The legal grant is clear for us to sue Pfizer. | ||
| We're doing it. | ||
| And so this is the announcement that I've asked your producer to post on your socials. | ||
| We're looking for someone who owns Pfizer stock and would be willing to be a plaintiff in an action seeking access to books and records regarding the company's COVID-related business qualifications. | ||
| Individuals who have owned Pfizer stock from October 1st, 2021 to the present. | ||
| Further qualification is you must own the shows directly, i.e. | ||
| not through a mutual fund. | ||
| So you reach, you know, a million people, every podcast, everyone out there who possibly owns Pfizer stock, please consider. | ||
| And this is, and this is, yeah, but this is because they came back and the 31 page response, I want to make sure if we can put that up, that everybody sees it. | ||
| The 31 page response. | ||
| To your citizens petition, I assume they said, thank you very much. | ||
| We're not interested, correct? | ||
| Well, so just to be clear, and I'll resend the 31 page response. | ||
| Cameron may not have it because I sent it, you know, a while ago, but it is still news. | ||
| So definitely you want to read it. | ||
| You want to see it. | ||
| It's really, again, it's quite satisfying. | ||
| We couldn't send it directly to Pfizer until the FDA took You know, responded to our demand for citizens petition. | ||
| So they responded by declining. | ||
| Now we're free to sue Pfizer. | ||
| So it's not the same entity, but we had to get through that bureaucratic hurdle of the FDA responding and saying, no, we're not going to engage with people on this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And they gave their reasons. | |
| Walk me through daily clout. | ||
| Where can people that are interested in this and particularly people if they do own Pfizer stock or other people are interested. | ||
| Where do they go to Daily Cloud? | ||
| What part of it do they go? | ||
| Cause you've got the, you've got all the reports you're doing. | ||
| Where do they go for this specific? | ||
| Cause this is where you're kind of pivoting a little bit. | ||
| Where do they go on the, uh, on the site itself to get more information here? | ||
| Well, I literally just got this email from our lawyers, um, 15 minutes before we went live. | ||
| So this is brand new news. | ||
| It's not up yet on the site, but it will be by tomorrow. | ||
| Um, and there's going to be the call for plaintiffs up on the site. | ||
| It'll be up on, you know, your site with your wonderful team. | ||
| And so go to dailycloud.io after tomorrow around 10 a.m., and you'll be able to fill out a form if you are, you know, if you meet these criteria and you want to be a plaintiff. | ||
| But I also really want to share, it's not exactly a pivot because all the work that these 3,500 experts have done has brought us to this moment. | ||
| Yes, yes. | ||
| Yeah, led us to this. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| And the last thing I want to call your attention to is that it's not just a lawsuit, it's books and records. | ||
| So we get to see a lot more badness, probably, and material criminality through the call for records that is part of this lawsuit. | ||
| So it's not just, we're suing them, we're going to stop them, it's also behind the curtain. | ||
| People know how to go to dailycloud.io. | ||
| How do they get to your getter? | ||
| Because I keep up with you on getter where you're putting up stuff all night long. | ||
| Where do people go? | ||
| Yeah, I'm Dr. Naomi R. Wolf on getter. | ||
| And it's the book is the bodies of others. | ||
| The website is dailycloud.io. | ||
| And, you know, I always hate to ask for money, but we have big legal bills now that, you know, we're finally on offense and in a very aggressive way. | ||
| So please do keep supporting us everyone. | ||
| It makes all the difference in the world. | ||
| Naomi, your people are on fire. | ||
| So it's the support I know you guys use. | ||
| Everything you grinded through, it's just incredible what you've done. | ||
| So thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| Thank you all. | ||
| This is a victory for all of you that we reached this moment. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Very, very much. | ||
| Very huge. | ||
| Thank you for sharing it with us first. | ||
| Let's go to Carrie Sheffield. | ||
| Carrie of the Independent Women's Voice. | ||
| Talk to us about what you're driving for. | ||
| I think it's a Women's Bill of Rights. | ||
| Is that what it is? | ||
| You're trying to get legislation. | ||
| Talk to us about this and why do we need this now? | ||
| You've been one of the fire breathers on this issue of gender ideology and making sure that we actually have the traditional family, women's sports. | ||
| Because right now, people come to me and just say, this is madness. | ||
| They can't even get their bearings on it. | ||
| Walk us through what Independent Women's Voice is doing, Kerry. | ||
| Yeah, Steve, thanks for having me. | ||
| And we were really happy to have your daughter, Maureen, at our rally to save women's sports. | ||
| And that happened on the 50th anniversary of Title IX earlier this summer. | ||
| And basically what we are promoting, it's called the Women's Bill of Rights, as you said, and it's at the website womensbillofrights.com. | ||
| And folks can check it out yourself. | ||
| You can sign your name. | ||
| We have a place for citizens to sign on. | ||
| We know that's the most important title. | ||
| Democracy is citizen. | ||
| We also have an area for lawmakers and candidates to pledge to sign on to the Women's Bill of Rights. | ||
| And it's not creating, sometimes when conservatives hear this phrase, they think, oh, you're trying to create new fake rights. | ||
| No, actually, what this is really about is about the Constitution and about the Equal Protection Clause. | ||
| So under the Equal Protection Clause, and this has been recognized by the courts, women are biologically distinct from men. | ||
| And that's been recognized over and over by the courts. | ||
| And in order to fulfill the Equal Protection Clause, which says that our government will give equal protection, there are certain things that women get as a result of being a woman to protect us from biological men. | ||
| And it makes us genetically distinct. | ||
| So for Title IX, for example, it meant that we had funding and resources for sports because we were biologically distinct from men that allowed us to flourish. | ||
| And your daughter spoke so eloquently about what sports meant for her and her career and her confidence and what it gave to her as a young woman and allowed her as a springboard into leadership roles. | ||
| And so just, you know, multiply that with millions of women across the board. | ||
| All of that is under threat right now with this move of gender ideology to supplant the definition of a woman. | ||
| And so the definition of a woman is spelled out in the Women's Bill of Rights. | ||
| We're not biologists. | ||
| None of us that I know have a biology degree at Interpret Women's Voice. | ||
| But we spell out what a woman is in the Women's Bill of Rights, and then we spell it exactly The rights that are acknowledged under the Constitution that are biologically distinct from men that spring from that definition of what it means to be a woman. | ||
| And yes, you're right. | ||
| We're pushing it through at the federal level. | ||
| We have four senators who have signed on to this from Capitol Hill and 28 members in the House. | ||
| And we've also got 10 attorneys generals in states across the country who have signed on also to have this at the state level. | ||
| And so we welcome any of your viewers to come put your name and also put pressure on your local lawmakers. | ||
| We're going to have you back to drill down more, but right now, what I want to do is introduce it and make sure people go there. | ||
| Where do they go to find this document, to read it themselves and all the other collateral information you have? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| So it's womensbillofrights.com. | ||
| And that's where you can put your name. | ||
| You can also follow us at Independent Women's Voice. | ||
| It's iwv.org. | ||
| I'm at Carrie Shuffield. | ||
| I'm on Truth Social. | ||
| I'm on Getter. | ||
| I'm on Instagram, Facebook, all over. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So. | |
| Carrie, this is amazing. | ||
| And we want to have you back on here and getting back to this because this, this thing has got to be sorted out. | ||
| I mean, people's heads are blown up about this and really honored to have you at the tip of the spear on this subject. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Thanks so much, Steve. | ||
| Appreciate your support. | ||
| Thanks, Carrie. | ||
| Carrie Sheffield. | ||
| I want to finish tonight in with one of the, the best men I know. | ||
| John Gibbs up in Michigan three had one of the toughest primaries. | ||
| Outspent, I don't know, 20 to 1. | ||
| Tell me about the general, Brother Gibbs. | ||
| They've kind of singled you out. | ||
| The Soros woke mob is coming after you as hard as I've ever seen. | ||
| Why is that, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because they're afraid. | |
| They know that they're starting to lose their grip. | ||
| See, people like us, we don't view people in terms of your race. | ||
| We view people in terms of our ideas and your character. | ||
| But many aspects of the left, they do divide up people and for the purpose of pitting them against each other for a political gain. | ||
| They're trying to do that here. | ||
| They don't want a black man that's conservative to gain any type of prominence. | ||
| So they're pointing all their guns at me and it's really not going to work. | ||
| They also believe they can flip this seat. | ||
| This is a historically conservative area, so they think that they can flip it Democrat, but that's not going to happen. | ||
| We're already out there pretty strong. | ||
| We look good in our numbers. | ||
| We're going to keep doing that. | ||
| And by the way, my opponent's name is also Hillary, so we're going to have a lot of fun using that fact against her. | ||
| She's a clone of Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden. | ||
| She's going to support all those Totally failed policies that got us all the high gas prices and inflation that we see today But I think that the funding machine of the left knows that their policies are a failure They know how much more people are paying at the grocery store and breaking their bank Just having to go to the grocery store and go to the gas station And so they don't want to focus on that instead. | ||
| They want to call people like me regular American They want to call me an extremist. | ||
| So they're gonna try to do that It's not gonna work, but they're gonna spend a lot of money trying to do it John, the reason I want to have you kick off, you're the first, the candidate we've had on, you and Carolyn Levitt about, and she has not won her primary yet, you're the first general election, to show people the grassroots of the tip of the spear. | ||
| How do people find out more about the campaign? | ||
| Because this is something I want people to If they're so inclined to come and volunteer and look at your, because you're not going to raise, you're going to be out raising this thing 10 to 1. | ||
| But you got to get the 1 and maybe the 2. | ||
| So how do, how do, where do people go? | ||
| How do they find out more about you? | ||
| And particularly how do they find out that they can assist you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
VoteJohnGibbs.com. | |
| VoteJohnGibbs.com. | ||
| That's where folks can go. | ||
| You can sign up for our prayer list. | ||
| That's the most important thing. | ||
| You can pray for our campaign. | ||
| You can volunteer at a door knock if you're local. | ||
| It's a phone bank as well. | ||
| And you can also give. | ||
| We are going to be up against a heavily funded opponent, and we are not going to raise as much as her, but we don't need to. | ||
| I was outspent 100 to 1 in external spending in the primary. | ||
| So we know we can beat these folks without as much money, but we do need something to get my name out there. | ||
| So votejohngibbs.com. | ||
| You can donate, pray, volunteer, and keep up with everything we're doing on the socials as well. | ||
| You can link there from votejohngibbs.com. | ||
| Are there any events this week that people should know about, or they also go to VoteJohnGibbs and it'll all be up there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have that on VoteJohnGibbs.com. | |
| We'll be doing door-knocking this weekend and several other events as well. | ||
| But yeah, check out the website. | ||
| That's where we have all of our events at. | ||
| So yeah, folks, keep up to date with everything there. | ||
| Last question, quickly. | ||
| Has she agreed to debate you yet, or is she going to get on a debate stage with you, Brother Gibbs? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We believe so. | |
| Now, they like to do these roundtables where there's no live audience and several other restrictions. | ||
| But we are pushing for a full debate. | ||
| We want people to be able to ask me any question, point blank, direct. | ||
| We love that. | ||
| We welcome that. | ||
| My opponent does not. | ||
| They want things to be controlled and scripted. | ||
| So we're working on that. | ||
| John Gibbs, now you're a man of God. | ||
| You are a man's man. | ||
| Thank you so much, brother, for joining us. | ||
| And thank you for being in the fight. | ||
| Great honor to have you on here, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| John Gibbs, Michigan 3. | ||
| Okay, back tomorrow morning, 10 o'clock. | ||
| I'll guarantee one thing. | ||
| The war room will be on fire! |
Export Selection