Aug. 29, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:37
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| It's Monday, 29 August, in the year of our Lord, 2022. | ||
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| We've got a lot going on today. | ||
| I want to start with my favorite topic, Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Mike Davis joins us, and Mike, thank you so much for doing this. | ||
| We're going to have Boris join us in a second. | ||
| Mike, I say that with kind of an eye roll for the simple reason is that there's so many massive issues going on in this country right now. | ||
| You and I talked earlier, the economy, the debt that's up, the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve, the 30 trillion dollars of face amount of debt, these massively important midterm elections that are coming up, and yet we're mired in arguing about, and I think you framed it the best, this is a dispute, this is a library dispute. | ||
| over like an overdue book, the equivalent overdue book, between the Secretary for the Administrative State, the Librarian for the Administrative State, which is the National Archives, and others. | ||
| Walk me through, because today they're all blown up, you know, Trump's got to be indicted, this is a major case, they got the spies, you know, spies are | ||
| So remember, in 2020, the FBI would not even look at Hunter Biden's laptop with clear evidence of foreign corruption and other crimes because the FBI said it would be election interference. | ||
| Here we are, 90 days out from the midterm elections, and they're doing this unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful home raid Like you said, Steve, for overdue library book is essentially what this has come down to. | ||
| Fortunately, this magistrate, or excuse me, there's a district court judge in the Southern District of Florida, Aileen Cannon, who has said that on Saturday she put out a ruling that she's tentatively inclined to grant President Trump's request to appoint a special master in this matter. | ||
| That is a Very good sign that what that means to me is this. | ||
| This district court judge does not have confidence that the Biden Justice Department, including the corrupt counter espionage unit within the National Security Division, along with the corrupt counter espionage unit within the FBI, are going to be able to handle these records as honest brokers. | ||
| And so this judge is inclined to appoint a special master to get to the bottom of this. | ||
| The president Trump and his legal team should and will go on offense and they should update and amend their rule 41 G. | ||
| motion to get back all of these records that the Biden administration raided for Mar-a-Lago and tee up the legal arguments that we've been talking about for several weeks now, including the president has the constitutional power to declassify anything he wants. | ||
| He has the statutory power to make any presidential record personal, and therefore it's not even possible that he could have investigated or he could have obstructed investigations into non-crimes. The Presidential Records Act expressly contemplates that presidents have classified materials in the office of the former president and Congress gives former presidents staff. | ||
| With security clearances for the former president and staff, secure office space for skiffs, and secret service protections. | ||
| This is starting to blow up on the Biden Justice Department, the Biden administration. | ||
| And let's see how desperate they get here, because these crossfire hurricane records, these Russian collusion records that they are, clearly that was the reason they went in to do this home raid, as was reported by Newsweek, by Bill Arkin at Newsweek a couple weeks ago. | ||
| Let's see how desperate the Biden regime gets here. | ||
| So, you know, the New York Times thing was yesterday, Maggie Haberman had a huge piece and they go through your arguments and they were talking about, you know, Trump's legal teams needs to come together and he needs a couple of quarterbacks or whatever. But they in that whole piece, they tee up a lot of your arguments and they kind of dismiss them out of hand. | ||
| And they also do this on MSNBC and CNN all night long. | ||
| Like, you know, he doesn't have, there's all sorts of procedures to go through to declassify, that these are not presidential records, that given the long time that he was actually going back and forth, that in fact it talks about Evan Corcoran's letter, I think in May, to the Justice Department. | ||
| What do you say to these people? | ||
| I mean, are they gaslighting the American people? | ||
| Because they never really addressed the legality of it, but they just kind of dismiss the counter arguments or the arguments from the Trump people saying that, hey, there's a whole pattern of judicial decisions. | ||
| There's all types of precedent. | ||
| on both form and substance of how this has been done in the past. | ||
| But on MSNBC and New York Times, they just dismiss this out of hand into the fact that the New York Times actually advocated strongly the other day that the president be criminally indicted. | ||
| That's just complete nonsense. | ||
| These liberal apologists for the Biden regime should go read a 1988 Supreme Court case called the Department of the Navy v. Egan. | ||
| They should read a 2012 decision in the D.C. | ||
| District Court by an Obama judge related to eight years of audio tapes and Bill Clinton's sock drawer. | ||
| They should read The OLC opinion related to the Mueller investigation about how it's illegally impossible for a president to obstruct justice for these non-crimes, they should actually go read the law. | ||
| I will bet them anything that a Supreme Court will side with what I'm saying, and that is precisely why I think that Merrick Garland, who said he deliberated four weeks before he ordered this home raid, | ||
| That he didn't walk down the hall at the Justice Department and go to the Office of Legal Counsel or OLC and get an opinion on the legality of this home raid because he almost certainly would not have liked what they told him because there is a Supreme Court decision directly on point And what I'm saying, and I've been saying since August 8th, whenever this home raid occurred, is the President has the constitutional power as Commander-in-Chief to declassify anything he wants for any reason he wants. | ||
| He doesn't need any bureaucrat's permission. | ||
| And a good example of this was March 2012 when Bill Clinton got caught on the hot mic with the Russian president divulging our most classified nuclear information saying that Obama would have more negotiating room after the November | ||
| 2012 presidential election, eight years later, that is the most classified material President Obama could have conveyed to our enemy, and it was nuclear information, and he wasn't charged with espionage, there wasn't a home raid, because he's the President of the United States, he doesn't need to take off labels or get a bureaucrat's permission, he just did it through his actions, and so could Trump. | ||
| Trump actually did the Russian collusion, crossfire, hurricane, Uh, declassification the right way. | ||
| He did it through a declassification memo on January 19, 2021, before he left office. | ||
| It's the bureaucrats, the Justice Department, and the National Archives dragged their feet and never made it public. | ||
| Let's go to, we have Boris Epstein now. | ||
| Boris, can you get us updated? | ||
| I understand a lot's been going on today. | ||
| Steve? | ||
| Steve, an honor to be with you. | ||
| Big day. | ||
| Important day. | ||
| And, you know, really a ton going on. | ||
| So let's start at the beginning. | ||
| First of all, you had the DOJ make this, you know, interesting filing, really more of a notice to the judge. | ||
| And they said, oh, well, you know, we're already done with the filter team, Judge. | ||
| There's no need for a master. | ||
| We're already done. | ||
| Everything's complete. | ||
| Well, what do you mean you're done? | ||
| You know, the president and his team haven't heard anything from the filter team. | ||
| They haven't heard from the DOJ regarding attorney-client privilege documents, regarding executive privilege documents, which the DOJ did not even mention in this supplemental filing that they did today. | ||
| Let's keep in mind the order of battle here. | ||
| The judge, having made that amazing, thunderous ruling on Saturday, which was really, you know, big news in this In this process, the judge having made that ruling on Saturday and putting the DOJ in a pretty significant way on the back foot and saying, I'm inclined to allow for the special master and want the DOJ to provide, under seal, a more substantial inventory. | ||
| You know, after that happened Saturday, it's really, the ball's already in the DOJ's court and they were supposed to, tomorrow, to file a response. | ||
| And what's interesting is that, you know, the caption of this case is, President Trump is the plaintiff, the DOJ is the defendant, right? | ||
| So the DOJ is the defendant is supposed to file their answer tomorrow. | ||
| They rushed and filed something today to tell the judge, oh, no, no, don't worry about it. | ||
| We're already finished. | ||
| And by the way, we've sent the documents to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence as if somehow that obviates the need for a special master when it does the opposite. | ||
| We have no idea what's in the documents. | ||
| President Trump hasn't been able to. | ||
| Be brief on what was taken, what was left, what was the process. | ||
| Remember, his attorneys were forced to wait outside and were not allowed to observe the raids. | ||
| So tomorrow, now, the government is going to put forth their actual response, let alone this intermediate half-step they took today. | ||
| Tomorrow, they're going to put forth their actual response, and then from there, the president and his counsel are going to put in a reply to that, and then you've got the hearing on Thursday. | ||
| So this is a robust week. | ||
| It's a big week with a lot going on. | ||
| The bottom line being that Judge Eileen Cannon in the Southern District of Florida has now put the onus on the DOJ to explain what happened through this process, meaning, you know, vis-a-vis the affidavit, but further the inventory, how | ||
| The inventory was put together and what's really in the inventory in terms of what was taken during the raid, and the DOJ has to reply why there should not be a special master in this case, a special master being judicial oversight over all the property that was taken, how it was taken, and most importantly, pursuant to what statutes it was taken the only statute applying the President Trump being the Presidential Records Act which he has been in full compliance with and it's consistently been in full cooperation | ||
| With the Department of Justice and all other applicable agencies You know, I just asked Mike a second ago You've had all these articles, you know I had the New York Times article and if you watch if you monitor as we do MSNBC or CNN They continue to go on, you know people like Mike Davis continue to cite precedent regarding, you know the case against the Navy, you know, whether it's the president's ability to declassify anything or | ||
| Or it's all this, you know, the structural issues regarding what is presidential material and how the president can deem what's presidential material or not. | ||
| Why does it seem like the left just, in dismissing it at hand, they never really come back and actually address any things that Mike keeps talking about. | ||
| Mike keeps citing precedent. | ||
| Mike keeps talking about this. | ||
| But you never see that. | ||
| You never see that. | ||
| You never see the pushback come back on those specific details. | ||
| The reason Steve, it's because the other side doesn't have an argument. | ||
| They know that the Presidential Records Act, which President Trump has been in full compliance with, does not have an enforcement mechanism. | ||
| And what they did, what we know from the limited amount of the affidavit we've seen, is that they took the PRA, the Presidential Records Act, and they tried to bolt onto it, Steve, bolt onto it, enforcement mechanisms from these other statutes, which simply do not apply. | ||
| And they've got another huge problem, which is the Fourth Amendment. | ||
| This was an overbroad warrant, which is a general warrant, which as you know very well, Steve, is completely unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. | ||
| There's a reason that the Fourth Amendment is there, and it's because the British used to issue these, you know, the King would issue these general warrants, and the Brits would go into the houses of the folks in the colonies and just take anything they wanted. | ||
| Well, this is exactly what happened in this raid, exactly what happened in this break-in. | ||
| Of the president's home, a beautiful Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida. | ||
| And the DOJ, as they try to leak things here and there, right? | ||
| First, they try to leak nuclear. | ||
| What we now know from the classifications, again, in the limited affidavit, that the nuclear queue is nowhere in there. | ||
| Then they try to leak, oh, there's these super important documents, and they're super classified. | ||
| Not there either. | ||
| Now they're trying to move the goalposts and say, well, actually, classifications don't even matter. | ||
| It's any defense-related documents. | ||
| All of that, Steve, has no application here whatsoever, because the Presidential Records Act is the statute that applies to dot dot dot the President, and the President, President Trump, has been in full compliance with that act, and actually has gone above and beyond to interact And be cordial to NARA and then the DOJ and telling them on June 3rd, hey, let us know what else you need. | ||
| And by the way, if you look at that redacted affidavit, you won't see any mention of June 3rd, at least in the unredacted parts that we, the merely public, are allowed to see. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because that is bad for the DOJ. | ||
| Boris, hang on for a second. | ||
| We dropped Mike Davis. | ||
| We're going to try to get him back up. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| The firestorm around Mar-a-Lago next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| I want to show this. | ||
| I've got Mike Davis and I've got Boris Epstein. | ||
| Of all the ridiculous things they've gone after President Trump for, and they've gone after him with just absurd things. | ||
| The Zelensky phone call. | ||
| There's so many stupid things. | ||
| The nullification project. | ||
| But hear the New York Times. | ||
|
unidentified
|
U.S. | |
| feared Trump files put spies at risk. | ||
| Put spies at risk. | ||
| You gotta remember, this is a CIA that lost 22 or 25 agents, our top agents in mainland China, the Chinese Communist Party, lost all of them, right? | ||
| Because of moles or whatever, inside the CIA, right? | ||
| Lost the entire ability, HUMINT, which is a known story. | ||
| But here, I just want to quote this, and Yela highlighted by the New York Times, I want to thank the New York Times, our beloved paper of record. | ||
| 140 unique documents bearing classification markings, including 67 of 184. | ||
| 67 marked confidential. | ||
| 92 documents marked as secret. | ||
| And 25 is top secret. | ||
| This copy of the New York Times is confidential. | ||
| The overclassification is a joke. | ||
| Navar and I, these pompous asses, and that's what they are, they would sit there with all this stuff, it was meaningless, and we'd sit there and go, Tell me, why is this classified? | ||
| And their heads blow up. | ||
| Because this is how the administrative state separates themselves. | ||
| This is how the priest caste separates itself from the populace, from the citizens. | ||
| Because they have the secret information. | ||
| They have the information that the regular citizen is not... you're not qualified to see. | ||
| Right? | ||
| You're telling me... 184-67 remarked, wait for it, confidential. | ||
| Confidential clearance. | ||
| The daily paper is confidential. | ||
| In fact, most of the stuff you see is marked as confidential if you see anything at all. | ||
| It's something that came out of a news article, right? | ||
| From Aviation Week and Space Technology. | ||
| This is an offensive joke. | ||
| Of everything they've tried to do in the past, from the perfect phone call, all this nonsense, and it's all been nonsense. | ||
| This, to me, is the most ludicrous, and they've lied consistently at every step of the way. | ||
| Mike Davis, you've heard the drumbeat over the weekend. | ||
| He's going to be indicted, you know, and he had these serious wise men, these people come on, this very serious look, knitted brow, just like Merrick Garland had the knitted brow. | ||
| You know, he was like Jesus at Gethsemane. | ||
| Right? | ||
| He would knit a brow and just so, so thoughtful for three weeks. | ||
| He's like Hamlet for three weeks had to think this through before he did it. | ||
| The urgency. | ||
| When you look at this from a lawyer's perspective, and you see what they're talking about, on a scale from one to ten, ten being a complete joke, how ludicrous is this, sir? | ||
| A ten. | ||
| And I'll tell you why. | ||
| If these records We're so dangerous in President Trump's hands in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Why did they wait 18 months to go get them? | ||
| Why did Merrick Garland leak out that he deliberated for weeks? | ||
| before he decided whether to do the home raid to go get these documents. | ||
| Why did they wait three days after they got the home raid from their biased judge, Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart? | ||
| Why did they wait three days after that that warrant was issued before they executed? | ||
| This is bogus, what they're arguing. | ||
| They argued that Trump had nuclear documents. | ||
| Then, whoops, there aren't Q-level classifications on the raid inventory and there weren't Q-level classifications on the affidavits. | ||
| So what do we have here? | ||
| We have paper records at Mar-a-Lago with a former president. | ||
| The Presidential Records Act contemplates that former presidents have classified records. | ||
| That's why he gets a security clearance. | ||
| That's why his staff gets security clearances. | ||
| That's why he has secure facilities or SCIFs. | ||
| That's why he has Secret Service protection to guard these papers with listening devices and cameras. | ||
| There's no allegation or evidence whatsoever. | ||
| That these records got into the wrong hands, unlike Hillary Clinton's illegal home server that was hacked by foreign governments. | ||
| When she was the Secretary of State, she violated the Espionage Act by having that home server. | ||
| She obstructed justice by destroying the home server and the devices. | ||
| She violated, she destroyed government property when she did that. | ||
| There was no home raid, they didn't even question her. | ||
| This is a political witch hunt against President Trump because he has declassified Personal copies of the Crossfire Hurricane, Russian collusion documents, and that scares the hell out of Biden, Obama, Hillary, Susan Rice, Clapper, the FBI, the intel team. | ||
| Boris, pick apart, is there anything in Mike Davis's argument is not actually ironclad, forged steel logic about this situation, sir? | ||
| Absolutely not. | ||
| Mike's got it right. | ||
| Mike's been doing a great job taking War Room over to Fox News and everywhere else. | ||
| Mike and I have been in close touch, and he's been sharing some vital points, vital perspectives. | ||
| He's absolutely on target here, and if you look at the history of this issue, the DOJ's—say we assume for a second That this wasn't just a completely naked political hijab of a break-in, which is absolutely it, okay? | ||
| But say we're living in this alternate universe where, oh, well, this is a real case they're thinking of bringing. | ||
| This would be the most novel, sort of esoteric case that they could think of bringing, and they're trying to do that against the most powerful political figure in America and the world. | ||
| So, just how corrupt this is cannot be overstated. | ||
| And also how weak the DOJ's position is cannot be overstated. | ||
| I think you're going to see that bear out in the DOJ's filings tomorrow. | ||
| There's a reason that they felt the need to preview it today, so I think you'll see it bear out tomorrow, and you'll see it in the president and his council's response on Wednesday, and then in the hearing on Thursday. | ||
| Okay, so I'm getting to the point. | ||
| You ran surrogates for me or for the team in 16. | ||
| You've been a guy that knows how to manage surrogates. | ||
| You were obviously a senior consultant advisor on the 2020. | ||
| Here's what I don't get. | ||
| Mike Davis, and we've had him on the show a lot, but many different issues, the tech oligarchs, the Supreme Court, you know, he's a regular here and the audience loves him. | ||
| He goes over on Fox, and it's a great show, there's two great hosts, and Mike gives the War Room, his analysis, he's been giving the War Room since the afternoon of May 8th, I think it was, the day of the raid. | ||
| And it's bracingly refreshing on Fox, Because you haven't seen that. | ||
| Here's what I don't get. | ||
| Given that Mike laid out the case, you agree with it, and it's forged in steel. | ||
| This is pretty straightforward. | ||
| And Fenton came on the other day and said the exact same thing. | ||
| So we've got three guys who really know what they're talking about. | ||
| Why is it that there doesn't seem to be a just a vast mass of surrogates out there, particularly elected officials in the Republican Party? | ||
| Why is it crickets? | ||
| And to the fact that I'm not saying it's accurate, but you can see how the New York Times and the Axioses can say, well, you know, there's a lot of people now very concerned about this when they're talking about stuff that's nonsense. | ||
| And when they make these articles, it's nonsense. | ||
| Are we anticipating a bigger groundswell of surrogate support here, sir, particularly among senior elected officials? | ||
| Well, here's what I'll tell you. | ||
| I'll take one Mike Davis over 15, you know, sort of middle of the road. | ||
| Trying to have a both ways elected officials. | ||
| Here's one other thing I'll tell you. | ||
| I, you know, have to point to the fact that the president posted a video on truth yesterday. | ||
| You did have Lindsey Graham, of all people, go on Fox and say that there could be riots in the streets if the DOJ continues to press with us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You actually, you know, you've had some, you know... But I don't think we need to, but that's my point. | |
| That's, you just got to my point. | ||
| I don't think we even need to mention that. | ||
| And you know why? | ||
| The case is so ludicrous that we are to dismiss it as something that's not even relevant to an indictment. | ||
| This whole thing of indictment, they're trying to gaslight us right now and all the weekend on the indictment. | ||
| There's nothing here. | ||
| There's nothing here. | ||
| This is the weaker argument than even the first impeachment. | ||
| This is the weakest of all the weakness they've had and it's all been blown up and all been turned To absolutely a joke on all of it. | ||
| This is, and they're just searching and searching, and Mike's right. | ||
| We're now, today's I think 69 and a wake up, right, to an election. | ||
| This is direct election interference, understanding that Biden essentially is getting turfed out. | ||
| His presidency ends on November 8th. | ||
| Well, they did it with 91 days to go, right? | ||
| They did it with 91 days to go on August 8th. | ||
| For an election on November 8th, and there's been accepted practice, you know, that 90 days before an election is supposed to have some, you know, sacrosanct nature to it. | ||
| Obviously, the DOJ doesn't care about anything like that. | ||
| In terms of the elected officials, you know what they're doing. | ||
| I mean, we could call it out, right? | ||
| Oh, well, maybe there's going to be something, and maybe it doesn't, you know, it doesn't benefit us long term that they're playing their usual games. | ||
| Here's the flip side of it, though. | ||
| I will tell you that I'm very proud. | ||
| of the fact that for the last three weeks now to the day, right, today being the three-week anniversary of the raid and the break-in of Mar-a-Lago, we have undoubtedly won the PR war, the media war. The American people undoubtedly see that this break-in, this raid on Mar-a-Lago was unjustified, unwarranted, and un-American. And I think that having strong legal voices out there, like Mike Davis, Tom Fitton, and others, has been vital to | ||
| that because they're breaking it down from a very specific point of perspective, rather than as an elected official doing so politically. | ||
| Now, do I think that every elected Republican should be out there denouncing this? | ||
| No doubt about it. | ||
| Have we had some strength of folks like Jim Jordan and a few others? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Has there been enough? | ||
| Absolutely not. | ||
| Can you hang on one second? | ||
| We're going to lose Mike. | ||
| Mike, can you give, because I want people to stay up with you 24-7. | ||
| What is your social media and how did they get to Article 3, sir? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| It's article3project.org, article3project.org, at article3project, at article3project on Getter, Twitter, Truth, and my personal is MRDDMIA, MRDDMIA. | ||
| Mike Davis, thank you very much. | ||
| Appreciate you coming on. | ||
| I know you've got a busy schedule. | ||
| Boris, I know you're busy too, but I want you to hold through the break. | ||
| We've got another question on the other side. | ||
| We're also going to get Michael Yon in here. | ||
| A bunch of stuff happening in Iraq today. | ||
| We're going to get Michael Yon for an update, and then we've got a brilliant investigative report from the Christian Post. | ||
| We're going to do all this after a short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, I want to bring in Boris, and I understand you're pressed for time, but they're doing | |
| the PSYOP now that they always do around 80 or 90 days, 70 days to go, which is to put out all these polls that the Republicans are losing momentum, President Trump's losing momentum, we're not going to take the House, we're not going to take the Senate. | ||
| When you actually look at the analysis that's attached to these polls, You look at the undercard, you see that that's not true. | ||
| What can you tell people about where your sense is, where things are heading towards November 8th, and the momentum around MAGA and President Trump? | ||
| My sense, Steve, is that MAGA is more on fire than ever before. | ||
| And, I mean, if you look at the turnout at all of the primaries we've had, look at the at the president's rallies, and you're going to see that again on Saturday, on September 3rd, there's never been political fire, political enthusiasm like we've had now, especially, specifically after the unconstitutional raid and break-in of the president's home in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| So, you know, the suppression polls, oh yeah, Republicans, they don't really care anymore. | ||
| They're just, no, wrong. | ||
| Republicans are more energized than ever. | ||
| MAGA is more energized than ever. | ||
| Biden, in a year anniversary of the debacle, disgusting, despicable debacle in Afghanistan, Is the least popular president in American history? | ||
| So, and any suggestion otherwise is a straight, bold-faced lie. | ||
| And if you look at the crosstabs, they will tell you that Hispanic Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans, Jewish Americans, young people, older people, men, women, are all coming over in droves to MAGA. | ||
| And that's the truth. | ||
| That's the reality. | ||
| And any poll that says, oh yeah, You know, now Republicans are complacent, or whatever that might be. | ||
| It's just meant to do that, to cause complacency. | ||
| But the beauty of now versus 20 years ago is that MAGA has world. | ||
| MAGA has President Trump's truth account. | ||
| MAGA has access to information that is truthful. | ||
| And the MAGA voter, As they always have been. | ||
| The MAGA voters are smart. | ||
| We're not going to be fooled by this mainstream media nonsense. | ||
| But we know that the time is ours and we're going to take our 100 seats. | ||
| We're going to be in charge for 100 years and then march on to a major win in 2024 and for President Trump to walk into the Oval Office as we hope and expect on Jan 20, 2025. | ||
| Yeah, we're going to break down, we're going to use some crosstabs tomorrow to show you how this polling is. | ||
| That's vital. | ||
| These are suppression polls and PSYOPs, don't worry about it. | ||
| The momentum, and I've got to tell you, I've never seen people more on fire about this. | ||
| No, all over the country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Defilement. | |
| In New York, in California, in Arizona, and everywhere, all over the country. | ||
| And I think you're getting a lot of independence too. | ||
| Boris, now more than ever, people need to follow you on social media. | ||
| How did they get there? | ||
| No doubt about it. | ||
| Boriscp.com is the website. | ||
| Sign up right now at Boriscp.com. | ||
| Hot on the website. | ||
| Hot on Getter at Boriscp. | ||
| On Twitter at Boriscp. | ||
| Hot on True Social at Boris. | ||
| The hottest one with Grant Boris under Scrub Stein. | ||
| Stay strong, God bless, and I will see you tomorrow. | ||
| You know, later at the 6 o'clock show in Battleground, we're actually going to go to Michigan, talk to Christine Karamo. | ||
| If you saw Gateway Pundit, they had a speech she did over the weekend on fire. | ||
| On absolute fire. | ||
| They call it, I think, the avenging angel. | ||
| We're going to have Christine Karama run for Secretary of State. | ||
| Also, we're going to go to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, talk to Tony Shoup and Sam Faddis. | ||
| Had a huge Patriot rally there. | ||
| They're going to do these rallies every couple of days of these Patriot groups coming together about voter integrity. | ||
| Get out the vote, but also voter integrity. | ||
| So, the two battlegrounds of Pennsylvania and Michigan on fire. | ||
| Also, Dave Brat. | ||
| is going to join us and talk about, there's been some articles recently about this whole concept of Christian nationalism, and they're saying that, you know, David French and others are coming out and saying the MAGA evangelicals, the MAGA traditional Catholics are too hardcore, they're too hard edge. | ||
| They've got to start using kindness and got to start using more humility. | ||
| We're going to have Brandon Showater join us in a moment from the Christian Post on a major investigative piece he's got. | ||
| But I want to first go to our great Michael Yon, who I think is one of the finest combat correspondents around. | ||
| Let's go to the footage coming out of Baghdad in Iraq, and I'll bring in Michael Young. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Video. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| For many of us, either the men and women who served there, or for people that had relatives, sons or daughters served there, or just for the general nation, that brings back very disturbing memories of the 2004, 5, and 6, bringing Michael Yan. | ||
| That was Baghdad, but I've got to tell you, here's the interesting thing, and talking actually to the War Room staff and to others, and pulling these together, you know, you mentioned al-Sadr. | ||
| His name's known to you, Michael, and to people that remember that, but that was 15 years ago. | ||
| Tell us what's going on in Baghdad now after all the blood and treasure we spilt there. | ||
| It looks like it's descended back into chaos. | ||
| Yes, what's going on? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Did we lose Michael? | |
| Michael, are you on mute? | ||
| Okay, can we reboot him? | ||
| Or is he on mute? | ||
| Okay, let's go ahead. | ||
| Let's go to, I tell you, let's take the next one, we'll just drop that and we'll have to reboot him and get him back. | ||
| Do we have Brandon Showalter? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Brandon, let's put up the article while we reboot Michael Yan. | ||
| Let's go ahead and get the, let's talk to you, let's talk about your amazing investigative piece in the Christian Post. | ||
| Very disturbing. | ||
| I want you to walk through what your theory of the case is, how you came up, this is about surgeries being done in young people in this situation of gender-affirming surgery. | ||
| You've actually done an investigation. | ||
| People have denied it's actually happening. | ||
| You say the opposite. | ||
| You've done a deep-dive investigation. | ||
| Walk us through what you found. | ||
| Well, yes, Steve. | ||
| And this all was inspired because I was just so infuriated watching the legacy press, the mass media, run interference for the gender industry, particularly these children's hospitals that have been exposed recently. | ||
| Libs of TikTok, I believe it was last Thursday or Friday, released the audio footage of staffers at National Children's Hospital saying on tape that they had done what they call gender-affirming hysterectomies on 16-year-olds. | ||
| And so then you see NPR and the Washington Post, this corporate media apparatus, basically the communications wing of the gender industry, again, denying that this is just right-wing information. | ||
| And they take the angle that, oh, these are now You know, these horrible people who are making threats against hospital staff, that kind of thing. | ||
| And that this isn't happening. | ||
| They're just flat out denying that these surgeries, these brutal sterilizing and disfiguring surgeries are not happening to youth under the age of 18. | ||
| And I've been in this for a while, Steve. | ||
| And so I just knew that the literature | ||
| I'm just going to make a coherent list here of all of the journals, the peer-reviewed medical journals, JAMA Pediatrics, the Journal of Sexual Medicine, the Journal of Clinical Medicine, the Lancet had an article a few years ago about this, Obstetrics and Gynecology, where the gender clinicians themselves say that they have done these brutal disfiguring surgeries on people under the age of 18. | ||
| So I'm just re-quoting what they've already said and put them all together. | ||
| And I just figured, okay, Legacy Media, you may be able to gaslight people, but you're not going to gaslight me. | ||
| And I'm going to put you on notice that when this mass psychosis spell breaks off of our society about what we're doing to children, I'm not going to let you off the hook. | ||
| You're not going to be able to feign ignorance. | ||
| I tried to tell you, and here's the receipts. | ||
| Brandon, let me ask you a question. | ||
| These surgeries, can they be reversed once children, 15 or 16 years old or 12 years old, however old they are, if they make these decisions and they had these surgeries, are these surgeries reversible, sir? | ||
| Absolutely not. | ||
| Once you cut a body part off, you're done. | ||
| And neither are these drugs reversible. | ||
| That's the famous line that they toss out about puberty blockers. | ||
| They say, oh, they're completely reversible. | ||
| No, they are not. | ||
| If you freeze your endocrine system, and especially if you then follow on with synthetic opposite-sex hormones, you're going to be rendered completely sterile, very likely. | ||
| You'll be sterilized. | ||
| You can't reverse that. | ||
| And it's aligned. | ||
| The NHS in England, not so long ago, updated its website where it used to say that these blockers were reversible, and then they changed it, and they said the long-term effects remain unknown. | ||
| None of this is reversible. | ||
| None of it. | ||
| I want to go back to the railhead of the story because we had Joe Allen on. | ||
| He's our editor for All Things Transhuman. | ||
| He's been on a special project, but we kind of pulled him off because of this situation with the Boston Children's Hospital. | ||
| And also then you had MIT Review and you had the situation at Yale. | ||
| I just want to go back. | ||
| This came up on Boston Children's Hospital. | ||
| They denied it, and then they came out and said, oh my gosh, all these terrible MAGA people, all these terrible Trump followers, all these terrible Christians are calling up and threatening us. | ||
| That is what really drove, and the mainstream media had gotten back at this, that people were lying, they never really said this, and that they were being, for the first time in their history, they were being attacked and they feared for their lives and everything like that. | ||
| That's essentially, and the mainstream media formed like a phalanx around this. | ||
| You said, okay, I hear you. | ||
| I see what's been said, but you deny it. | ||
| I'm going to go back and get the pre-review. | ||
| I'm going to go back and look at the literature, what has been printed already and not denied. | ||
| And by connecting dots, and that's why if we can get his story up on the screen, your story is pretty definitive. | ||
| Not only do you quote The articles, you provide the links. | ||
| I mean, what I love about it, when I first saw it and reached out to you, you deliver the receipts. | ||
| This is categorical. | ||
| Is it not how you went through this, sir? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And with respect to Boston Children's Hospital, from 2017 to 2020, they performed 65 mastectomies, breast amputations on minor girls. | ||
| And for that, you can go to page three, On the Journal of Clinical Medicine's article, and it's linked there in the article, it's the data table, it says it right there. | ||
| In black letters. | ||
| In plain as day. | ||
| So they can deny it, but we've got the goods. | ||
| They are absolutely doing these surgeries on minors, no matter what they say, or they'll speak out of both sides of their mouth, or maybe they'll minimize, well this was just this one very distressed child that we just had to do it. | ||
| No. | ||
| Force them to tell the truth, because you've got the document. | ||
| It's right there. | ||
| Since the piece has posted, have you gotten any blowback? | ||
| Well, I'm getting a lot of gratitude from people, and Steve, you should know, I hear from a lot of people on the left who are adamantly opposed to this nonsense. | ||
| I mean, lesbians, radical feminists, Democrat, lifelong Democrats who say that they'll never vote Democrat again because they watch their daughters go get Planned Parenthood testosterone and then their voice becomes froggy and they wind up Progressively sterilized. | ||
| This is just tearing apart families right and left. | ||
| And look, I'll talk to anybody. | ||
| But as far as blowback, I haven't received so much yet. | ||
| But a lot of the people, because it's the Christian Post, sadly, it has no sway amongst our elite. | ||
| They just think we're a bunch of crazy people. | ||
| But the truth is the truth, no matter who says it. | ||
| And I have the receipts. | ||
| No, because you have the receipts. | ||
| This thing is so professionally done. | ||
| Hang on for one second. | ||
| I think we've worked out the technical problem we have with Michael Young. | ||
| Michael's overseas right now. | ||
| He's in Europe. | ||
| Also, we have Brandon Showalter. | ||
| Quite frankly, a blockbuster investigative piece in the Christian Post. | ||
| We're going to take a short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be back in a moment. | |
| As arrived, the new social media taking on big tech, protecting free speech, I'm cancelling cancel culture. | ||
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. | ||
| Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. | ||
| Okay, the platform we've got, we're on it 24-7. | ||
| Michael Yan's on it 24-7. | ||
| Steve Cortez, Ben Harnwell, Navarro, Boris, everybody, the whole posse's up there putting up stuff. | ||
| It's all free. | ||
| If you want to get a deeper understanding of the show and everything, all the dots, we're trying to connect geopolitically, economically, capital markets. | ||
| Cultural issues, all of it. | ||
| Just go to Getter right now, sign up, and I appreciate if you follow me. | ||
| We'll make it worth your while. | ||
| That we guarantee. | ||
| I want to bring in Brandon Showalter, lead investigative reporter for the Christian Post. | ||
| Amazing article up. | ||
| Brandon, we're going to work with you afterwards. | ||
| We'd love to have you back on the Morning Show because there's so much more I want to go through this article. | ||
| It's so well done. | ||
| But you used a phrase, Brandon, It's called Mass Psychosis. | ||
| Can you explain that? | ||
| We've only got a couple of minutes. | ||
| I want to put it in the context of, isn't this just the Christian Post? | ||
| You're just haters and these people are already traumatized enough and you've just singled out these people that are confused about their gender for more hate, sir? | ||
| Absolutely not. | ||
| And I've known people, I know people who have struggled with that issue. | ||
| They're gender confused, they have gender dysphoria, they have body dysphoria. | ||
| My heart goes out to them. | ||
| We owe those people, whether they're male or female, compassion. | ||
| When I said mass psychosis, when I refer to mass psychosis, that's what, what I mean by that is I say gender ideology has a stranglehold on our institutions. | ||
| And so there are people who live in these bubbles where it's just, this is all that they have been inculcated with and it's, it is like we can't speak the truth normally. | ||
| The word Orwellian is overused in our society, but I think it perfectly fits with this trans dogma that we're now swimming in. | ||
| And I call that mass psychosis. | ||
| We need to snap out of it. | ||
| And I think that as more and more detransitioners are starting to tell their stories, and as they get their stories out, and hopefully, this is happening around the world, but hopefully it'll start here now, legal action, lawsuits against these clinics that have disfigured and harmed these people irreparably, we're gonna see the spell start to break, because the harm will be unignorable. | ||
| Brandon, what is your social media, until we get you back on here? | ||
| How do people follow you, and how do they follow The Christian Post? | ||
| You can follow my byline at TheChristianPost, and my social media is on Twitter, at BrandonMShow. | ||
| Sir, thank you very much for coming on, and we appreciate it. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Blockbuster story. | ||
| Okay, I want to go back. | ||
| The technicality with Michael Yan worked out. | ||
| Michael is one of the people that knows the region where this is happening better than just about anyone. | ||
| Michael, let's play some of the footage again. | ||
| I think we got some of it. | ||
| Go ahead and play it and then I'll bring in Michael for a second. | ||
| The footage is horrific. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Keep the footage on. | |
| Keep the footage on. | ||
| Just open my mic. | ||
| Perfect. | ||
| This, I think, the Presidential Palace. | ||
| This reminds me of 2004. | ||
| It reminds me of what's happened in Sri Lanka. | ||
| I want to bring in Michael Yan. | ||
| Michael, is Baghdad descending into chaos and is this driven by economics or is this just a continuation of the religious strife that we got caught in the middle of? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it's a continuation, Steve. | |
| I mean, this is the Baghdad that you're seeing there. | ||
| Baghdad, many of it. | ||
| I and many watch this experience many, many times. | ||
| I see it's almost 1 o'clock in the morning there and there's almost no moon. | ||
| It's only about 5% illumination. | ||
| Normally on this late at night with really dark moon, they'll start to go home. | ||
| But I'm getting reports, semi-live reports coming in from Baghdad now. | ||
| They're getting more and more mortars fired into the green zone. | ||
| I'm looking at the screen as things come in here. | ||
| And in fact, the Dutch embassy has evacuated to the German embassy. | ||
| The Green Zone, for those who don't know what the Green Zone is. | ||
| Green means safe. | ||
| The safe zone where the embassies are. | ||
| It's been breached. | ||
| Walls have been blown up. | ||
| Some of them appear to have been shot down with large weapons. | ||
| Others may have been blown up with explosives. | ||
| But the bottom line is the Mahdi Army, which is the army that supports Murtada al-Sadr. | ||
| I'll explain who he is in a moment. | ||
| But they have breached into the Green Zone. | ||
| They're actually attacking, also appear to be attacking, Iranian militia. | ||
| And so there's a lot of interesting things going on here. | ||
| But Maqat al-Sadr, for those who don't know, basically his father was a big Shia leader for many years. | ||
| He was a huge cult leader, you might say, and a very big spiritual leader. | ||
| He was assassinated in the late 90s, and then his son took over. | ||
| Many people say his son is not the smartest guy in the world. | ||
| That's Maqat al-Sadr. | ||
| He has a large militia of at least 100,000 people. | ||
| He gave us many hard times in Iraq. | ||
| Uh, we could have killed him many, many times. | ||
| I mean, uh, many times we knew exactly where he was. | ||
| I mean, I was on missions at times where we knew where exactly where he was, what vehicle he was in, tracking him with aircraft and going right by it. | ||
| Nobody did a thing. | ||
| So you'll see reports that, you know, United States was, you know, looking for him dead or alive for years. | ||
| We knew where he was, let him come and go to Iran back and forth. | ||
| And so anyway, he evicted Mikado's father. | ||
| Eventually left from being just a cult leader to joining the actual government. | ||
| He just resigned from the government, and now his militias are going wild. | ||
| Keep in mind, this is not going to be all Shia against Sunnis. | ||
| Shia fight each other just as much. | ||
| So there's a lot of factions within the Shia community, and they're fighting each other now. | ||
| It's clear that the fighting is picking up. | ||
| I'm getting reports again, like for instance, I see 50 cows firing into the green zone now. | ||
| And so I think the way things are looking right now, I think this is more than a spasm. | ||
| That's my guess. | ||
| As you know, let's talk about China for a minute. | ||
| China is deeply involved in Iraq. | ||
| Since we left, they get approximately 40% of their food. | ||
| China gets approximately 40% of their food from Iraq. | ||
| So there's more going on here than just Shia Sunni and government dramas. | ||
| The normal players are at the table, and the Iraqis, They love a good gunfight. | ||
| Many people watch it. | ||
| Your show has a lot of veterans. | ||
| And as many people watch this, I've been in a lot of gunfights there. | ||
| And they know how this goes. | ||
| Iraqis kill each other. | ||
| Michael, we got to bounce for the 6 o'clock show. | ||
| We're going to Michigan and Pennsylvania real quickly. | ||
| How do people follow you tonight before we head back on tomorrow on social media to follow this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
| I'm on Getter. | ||
| That's michaeljohn1776. | ||
| And I'm also, that's my getter page, and I'm also on Locals.com. | ||
| Locals.com, where I publish every single day. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| I know it sounds haunting, but for the audience, there's chaos in the green zone in Baghdad. | ||
| I mean, that takes us back, what, 18 years ago. | ||
| Some things never change. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short break. | ||
| Michael, thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you on here. | ||
| Look forward to having you back. | ||
| Six o'clock we're going to go to the six o'clock show. | ||
| We're going to Michigan. | ||
| We're going to go to Pennsylvania. |
Export Selection