Aug. 23, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:00
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| But just a short time ago, according to a U.S. | ||
| official, the U.S. | ||
| government announcing up to $3 billion in assistance, military assistance, which will be drawn already from a system they have in place for Ukraine specifically, not taken from U.S. | ||
| stockpiles of munitions and armament. | ||
| That will be something very much welcomed by officials here who feel that their grinding conflict with the Russians hasn't seen much progress in recent weeks. | ||
| It's a stalemate. | ||
| And with the threat of missiles now here in the capital where I'm standing and elsewhere in the country, they want to make sure attention is still on their conflict and their defense of their nation. | ||
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| You're in the War Room Battleground. | ||
| We're going to start in Ukraine and with Dr. Fauci. | ||
| Then we're going to go to some battleground states, Nevada, New Hampshire. | ||
| We're going to talk about Florida, New York. | ||
| Everything's happening today. | ||
| It's a primary day. | ||
| I want to go to Ben Harnwell in Rome. | ||
| And Ben, thank you for staying up with us to do this. | ||
| But Ben, give us a perspective. | ||
| Correct me if I'm wrong, brother. | ||
| Did every European country refuse to send their so-called committed aid in the month of July and nothing as we know has come in August? | ||
| There's some huge controversy around the Financial Times article about equipment getting laundered from Ukraine back into criminal gangs in Europe and making the security situation there worse and also where non-military aid is actually going. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, your perspective, particularly today with the invasion of the southern border of the United States wide open, three billion dollars, they're just up in your face, Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Good evening, Steve. | ||
| Yes, that's absolutely true. | ||
| The story that you're referring to is that in the month of July, not a single European Union country made any further fresh, new pledges of aid. | ||
| Not to say they didn't give anything that they had already committed. | ||
| It's just that in that whole calendar month of July, nothing new was promised from continental Europe. | ||
| Quite, quite different, I have to say, from the United States. | ||
| The three stories I'm going to tie in for you today, Steve, are in and of themselves, perhaps they wouldn't raise eyebrows. | ||
| It's the point, and this is what I'm very proud about, the work that The War Room does. | ||
| It's the connections we make between events which aren't ostensibly connected. | ||
| They are, of course. | ||
| The mainstream media won't draw those lines. | ||
| But this is the forte of The War Room, the connecting of the dots. | ||
| So the first story, and I'll do the three billion. | ||
| I'm going to close with that. | ||
| But the first story is, I just want to indicate how performative The news is that our overlords are spoon-feeding to us. | ||
| So, you've got the context of the three billion, which I'm going to dive into. | ||
| One would think, therefore, that Ukraine is really melting down and in crisis. | ||
| However, I think the War Room is probably the only voice that has persistently been indicating, other newspapers have given little snippets here and there, but the War Room has been absolutely on this. | ||
| We spoke two months ago about how all the Ukrainians were down at the beach when there wasn't baby formula in the United States. | ||
| A month or so ago, when all these fresh inflation reports were coming in one after another, the war room indicated that the Ukrainians were enjoying open-air concerts in Mariupol, right? | ||
| Which is supposed to, we're led to believe it's just a ruined shell of a city. | ||
| There were open-air concerts there and we spoke about the opera, the ballet, the theatre that Ukrainians were enjoying. | ||
| Today, Steve, I don't want, you know, people might hit on the war and say all we do is bring out bad news. | ||
| I've got some good news for you today. | ||
| The good news is that the football season, the soccer season as Americans call it, kicks off today. | ||
| Literally 1pm local time in Kiev, right? | ||
| And I'm just going to quickly cover the remarks given by the captain of the Shakhtar Donetsk team, which is one of the two teams that were playing in Kiev Olympic Stadium today. | ||
| The captain's called Taras Stepanenko, and he said, I think the teams, the players, will be proud of this event. | ||
| We are ready, we are strong, and I think we will show to all the world Ukrainian life and our will to win. | ||
| And interestingly, the Associated Press adds this editorial comment. | ||
| Under threat of Russian attacks in a war that stopped Soccer in Ukraine since February. | ||
| A new league season starts today in Kiev with the goal of restoring some sense of normal life. | ||
| That is what the Department of Defense and the White House briefings aren't going to let you know, right? | ||
| First story. | ||
| Second story. | ||
| Another indication of just how performative things are. | ||
| The U.S. | ||
| Embassy in Kiev urged all U.S. | ||
| citizens to leave, and they said, this is citing the State Department's information, the U.S. | ||
| Embassy urges U.S. | ||
| citizens to depart Ukraine now using privately available ground transportation options if it is safe to do so. | ||
| Totally performative, because as we've just discovered, because the football season is literally kicking off. | ||
| Now let's go to that three billion. | ||
| And I noticed in the cold open, the CNN cold open, one of the guys, the guy there who was speaking, the correspondent, explicitly made a reference to the fact that these funds were going to be very well received by officials in Kiev. | ||
| Hold on to that far away remark, because I'm going to come back to it at the end of this. | ||
| So here's a story here. | ||
| I note that, again, Associated Press indicates that this time, this package of three billion indicates a shift to a longer term campaign, which is more likely to keep American military troops in Europe In the fight for years to come. | ||
| That is Associated Press. | ||
| That is the escalation and then trenching down. | ||
| You guys thought you got out of Afghanistan and a forever war in the Middle East, but you've been thrown right back into another one. | ||
| Here's another line from the Associated Press briefing on this. | ||
| In addition to providing longer-term assistance that Ukraine can use for potential future defense needs, the new package is intended to ensure It's intended to reassure Ukrainian officials that the United States intends to keep up its support regardless of the day-to-day back-and-forth of conflict, right? | ||
| I'm going to repeat that. | ||
| This new package is intended to reassure Ukrainian officials that the United States has to stay in power. | ||
| I read that and I thought, blimey, is that where we are now? | ||
| Is this really where we are? | ||
| It is now the priority of civil servants paid by American taxpayers who are unshackable up until we get this Schedule F in 2024 to kick in. | ||
| Their priority is appeasing Ukrainian officials the very day that they're sending them three billion more of US taxpayers' money. | ||
| I should have given a public health warning before this I should have advised people who suffer perhaps high blood pressure or angina or what have you to take a couple of aspirins because that really got me going. | ||
| The report is amazing. | ||
| Here's the question. | ||
| for you in Europe. | ||
| You know, we're spending a lot of time on Maloney's rise to power in Italy. | ||
| We're talking about what's happened to the rest of Europe. | ||
| They haven't made any fresh commitments. | ||
| The gas prices you saw in the UK, the Citicorp is saying that the inflation is not going to be 13% that the Bank of England says it's going to be 18%. | ||
| And Dave Walsh, our energy consultant and contributor, is on here yesterday saying it's going to quadruple in the UK by spring of next year, natural gas. | ||
| Does it look, when you're in Rome, from the perspective that the only power that's backing Ukraine for a continued escalation is the United States? | ||
| Are there any nations in Europe now, because the Germans are all wrapped around the axle, is even the EU or the party of Davos, is anybody escalatory, at least on the military side, that you see to the level that the United States is? | ||
| They're following America's lead, Steve. | ||
| If America were to change the mood music and the substance and the science of action, the continental Europe would 100% fall in behind that. | ||
| All throughout the beginning, I think it's a six month anniversary tomorrow, of the start of the war. | ||
| Pretty much, Europe, the European Union, I should say, and the 27 member states, they've been waiting at every single step of the way to see what the United States is going to do and then to fall in line behind the United States. | ||
| Obviously, you're the greatest military power, the greatest economy on the face of the planet. | ||
| It'd be pointless moving ahead without American support. | ||
| So the lead is set by the United States and Europe will fall in behind that. | ||
| In fact, the outgoing Draghi, Mario Draghi, government here that resigned in Italy, that was really criticized. | ||
| One of the big domestic accusations against that was that Draghi was following too much of an Atlanticist position. | ||
| Now, that doesn't mean cultural affinity to the values of the United States. | ||
| It means following the lead of the United States military-industrial complex. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Ben, you've been doing great briefings on Getter. | ||
| What is your social media? | ||
| People can get up to you because you're probably the top, I think, at least person, voice into the American media on all the complexity of Ukraine and what's really going on. | ||
| Not the happy talk they're hearing on MSNBC or Fox. | ||
| Not the neoliberal, neocon pom-poms. | ||
| That's very kind of you, Steve. | ||
| My social media is exclusively Getter, simply my surname, Harnwall. | ||
| I'm an at Harnwall. | ||
| Go for the verified account because there are some fake accounts floating around there. | ||
| And that's where I'm pushing out my analysis and my live streams. | ||
| I push out my hits here on the wall room 24-7. | ||
| Thank you very much, Ben Harnwall, our international editor. | ||
| Let's go. | ||
| We have Dr. Paul Alexander. | ||
| Let's play his cold open and then we'll go to him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Today's the day. | |
| Today's the day. | ||
| We've been waiting for. | ||
| We've been waiting for. | ||
| We've been masked to the max and washing our hands galore. | ||
| I'm gonna roll, roll, roll my sleeves. | ||
| When will we be able to hug our families again? | ||
| Dr. Fauci, that's tough for a lot of families right now. | ||
| What's your advice? | ||
| I know it's tough. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You want to hug the ones you love, but you have to be careful. | |
| I would encourage all parents to get their children vaccinated. | ||
| I'm also encouraging children to ask for the vaccine. | ||
| We have an important question from some curious kids about the coronavirus vaccine. | ||
| Will the vaccine be safe and available for kids? | ||
| When do you think a kid my age will be able to take the vaccine? | ||
| And we're anxious to get you vaccinated. | ||
| We're going to start some trials in children, so just hang in there a couple of more months and we'll be in good shape. | ||
| They call it the Fauci Effect. | ||
| More students than ever before are applying for med school inspired by Dr. Fauci. | ||
| The last thing before we go tonight. | ||
| In Fauci, we trust. | ||
| Hey guys, we're going to begin this morning with Dr. Anthony Fauci on the cover of an unlikely magazine. | ||
| InStyle has chosen Dr. Fauci as their cover model. | ||
| I thank Fauci. | ||
| I thank even Mitt Romney. | ||
| You know, you are the most respected, the most admired. | ||
| When you speak, we listen. | ||
| What's your level of confidence in Dr. Fauci? | ||
| Uh, total. | ||
| Which actor would you want to play you? | ||
| Here are some suggestions that I've heard. | ||
| Ben Stiller, Brad Pitt. | ||
| Which one? | ||
| They have lied about Dr. Fauci. | ||
| On behalf of millions of Americans, we appreciate your leadership and your dedication. | ||
| You have to be a moron to believe it, but there are, I guess, a lot of morons out there. | ||
| Something called plandemic. | ||
| A new report shows that under Fauci's direction, the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease funded painful and deadly experiments on dogs. | ||
| The military administered 2.8 million doses. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Later developed chest pain. | |
| Tests showed it was myocarditis. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They might be wondering how someone in such great shape could suffer cardiac arrest. | |
| He has this data. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He knows this data. | |
| He is Mengele on steroids. | ||
| We have breaking news from the White House. | ||
| Dr. Anthony Fauci is retiring. | ||
| I want the audience to calculate the odds of this happening. | ||
| You think divine providence is not working in our lives? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Elect me and I'm going to hire Dr. Fauci. | |
| The Biden administration understands how bad it's going to be and lead to prison for Tony Fauci. | ||
| It's a country you're going to prison. | ||
| Preserve your documents, baby. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A lot of folks coming for you hard, dude. | |
| Everything you've done to this country, every lie, what you did with the CCP, what you did in Wuhan, it's all coming out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How do you debunk something like that? | |
| People want to fire me or put me in jail for what I've done. | ||
| It's preposterous, Chuck, but you are trying to get at me. | ||
| You're attacking science. | ||
| Okay, we have Dr. Paul Alexander. | ||
| Dr. Alexander, in our questioning and prodding and calling out Fauci over the last two years, are we questioning science or medicine, sir? | ||
| Thanks Steve, once again it's an honor to be on your show. | ||
| I know you're not questioning science because Dr. Fauci does not represent science. | ||
| Look, we've been dealing with Fauci now for two and a half years and I can say as an academic scientist, I've schooled all over the world and worked in World Health, the government of the United States, Infectious Diseases Society of America, etc. | ||
| I would say today that Dr. Fauci has to me become, he's probably the most Inept, unqualified, so-called experts, because every single thing that he has done in terms of the lockdowns, with books, has been flat wrong. | ||
| Every single COVID lockdown, school closure, mask mandate, business closure has failed. | ||
| in fact, they've harmed Americans devastatingly. | ||
| Keep going, Dr. Alessandra, because I have a follow-up question, but keep going. | ||
| When Walensky came out two days ago, and she said three days ago that CDC was not up to the task, and that they made a lot of mistakes, etc. | ||
| First of all, I think she came the closest, to be honest, to the truth. | ||
| CDC is not a public health agency. | ||
| It operates today as a political arm of the government, and it worked CDC worked with NIH and FDA to subvert then President Trump. | ||
| It works today, CDC, to cover up and protect President Biden. | ||
| And what she said was a devastating takedown. | ||
| And when Fauci came out the day after to try and clean it up, he then said that, well, we should not blame only Walensky. | ||
| The deficiencies and the problems predated Walensky. | ||
| Well, that's when I was at the Trump administration. | ||
| That goes back to Friedman's time in Obama, when Deborah Birx came out yesterday to say, well, it's maybe a transparency issue. | ||
| Dr. Birx was being very duplicitous and lied. | ||
| This is not an issue of transparency. | ||
| This is an issue of flat rums, lies, deceit. | ||
| The CDC worked to subvert Porter's Trump every single COVID policy. | ||
| From lockdowns to school closures, including the vaccines, these COVID gene injections have all failed. | ||
| And they've damaged America. | ||
| They've damaged the reputation of America. | ||
| They hurt American people. | ||
| Devastatingly, particularly our children and minorities. | ||
| OK, hang on a second. | ||
| Hang on a second. | ||
| Hang on a second. | ||
| I want to go back in because you've got some pretty big charges here. | ||
| And you were part of President Trump's administration. | ||
| Yes. You're saying the CDC and the FDA and the rest of the kind of public health worked to subvert the Trump administration, but they work because they're a political arm, but they work in concert to protect the Biden administration. | ||
| Can you give us a couple of examples to back up your point of subversion of Trump and protection of Biden? | ||
| Well, if you look at, for example, if you look at the reports, the MMWR reports, those reports are written as a political hit piece and during the Trump administration, | ||
| As President Trump, week by week, was moving forward from about June of 2020, you can see that they were keeping in step with what his statements or his policies were, and they were quickly commissioning within CDC, and they have a lot of employees who sit around most of the time. | ||
| They would write a report completely averse and opposite to what his position was. | ||
| So much so that it created tremendous confusion. | ||
| It's not only what I am seeing. | ||
| Dr. Walensky has said that they have made a lot of mistakes and I had the privilege. | ||
| In fact, the reason why I wanted to come on to your show is to say this. | ||
| When I joined the Trump administration, my position was a senior pandemic advisor out of HHS. | ||
| Books, Redfield, Fauci, etc., Hahn, they all had sub-offices in my building. | ||
| So I had the privilege of working with these people, meeting these people in various ways in different meetings. | ||
| I can tell you this, this is what I wanted to share, so you would understand my perspective. | ||
| My task, I was tasked particularly, whilst my job was at the HHS, | ||
| I was requested by persons on both sides of the aisle, be it Democrat and Republican, be it Senate and House, that my actual job was to produce an analysis and reporting that would eventually go to the Congress and the Senate so that they can begin investigations of the CDC. | ||
| The way I was explained it on arrival to Washington, was that this is something in the making for many years. | ||
| And they needed to find someone who could be trusted, would not leak what they were doing, and would actually produce a very high-level reporting and analysis of the CDC, of the alphabet agencies, but starting with CDC. | ||
| Because it's not that they wanted to remove the CDC, they wanted to fix the CDC and help and remake and remodel. | ||
| But they needed an analysis that they can go then to Congress to begin hearings. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why? | |
| Because the way it was explained to me is that the CDC was broken and the CDC is a corrupted agency. | ||
| And I can tell you from my analysis, by not going directly into what the findings were and where I got in the analysis, it was shocking to me that how the CDC uses and used their guidance and the MMWR reports as a political hit piece and how they use them with very shady, very suboptimal methodology. | ||
| The methodology, the statistics, the science was all wrong and they came up with the guidance that actually created more of a problem in the society and created a lot of confusion and that was my position. | ||
| And you know how it ended up with me in the sense that by September I resigned. | ||
| But that was my job. | ||
| My job was to take a deep dive into the CDC. | ||
| And I actually began that process. | ||
| Did you ever end up delivering a preliminary report? | ||
| Well, at the time of my resignation, first of all, I was asked to produce the report. | ||
| Use all of the government facilities and technology. | ||
| So I did all of my reporting. | ||
| I did all of my work using all of the government tools, etc. | ||
| And I would say by the time I resigned, the report was not complete. | ||
| But remember, it was me doing the report, me doing the analysis. | ||
| Everything resides with me. | ||
| And they took back, suddenly, It was kind of explained to me that there's word now in Washington that someone, some group is actually examining the CDC behind the scenes. | ||
| People began to explain to me that they have realized it was myself and I was requested to immediately bring my cell phone, my work laptop, everything back to the office and everything was taken back. | ||
| But the point of view is that the point I'm trying to make is this is such a serious issue. | ||
| What Walensky said three days, four days ago is not something that has happened today. | ||
| Many people in the United States government on both sides, that's the good news. | ||
| They have recognized the failures of CDC and they were trying to do something and they are trying to do something about it. | ||
| And what she said actually is almost true. | ||
| And Dr. Fauci, I believe between Fauci and Birx, they have sat upon the gravest, greatest public health disaster. | ||
| I can say from being in Washington, from sitting in meetings, from listening to these people, listening to all of the confusion behind the scenes, when President Trump was there, they subverted him, they worked against him, and they enacted policies, the lockdown policies, hurt Americans devastatingly. They would have never worked. | ||
| They did not work. And they hurt our people, particularly our children. American children committed suicide because of those lockdowns and school closures. And it falls to the feet of Tony Fauci and Deborah Birx. | ||
| And they cannot, we must investigate them. | ||
| Dr. Alexander, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
| And what is your website, sir? | ||
| My website is DrPaulAlexander.com. | ||
| No spaces, no caps. | ||
| But my substack is alexander space covid space news and it's available for free. | ||
| I put a lot of information out there daily in the substack and I try to just share information to inform the public for their own decision making. | ||
| Dr. Alexander, honored to have you on here, sir. | ||
| Look forward to having you back. | ||
| Dr. Paul Alexander, a former member of President Trump's administration. | ||
| When Dr. Alexander talks about statistics and analysis, he's talking on the medical side and himself as a medical professional scientist. | ||
| I want to go to Richard Barris. | ||
| Richard, we just got about a minute on this side, but I want to keep you over. | ||
| Nevada, we're going to have Jim Marchand up. | ||
| A couple of polls the other day. | ||
| I know you've been all over Nevada. | ||
| as a critical swing state. | ||
| Give me a minute before we go to break of your assessment of where we stand in Nevada because some of these polls come out the last couple days and it's great news for Jim Marchant, maybe not such great news for the rest of the Republican slate. | ||
| Yeah, I gotta tell you, at the Senate level, they really have been making an outreach there, Steve. | ||
| I think it's showing. | ||
| The bottom line is that I think that this is the first ever real big push we've seen from a national ticket to try to win Hispanic voters, or at least try to take a lion's share of them. | ||
| And in the recent polling that we've seen real quick before the break, they're doing better in Clark County than they are doing at the chance of flipping Washa where Reno is. | ||
| So that's the highlight from these polls. | ||
| You know, how much you want me to go into it before the break, but it's a big deal. | ||
| I tell you, let's take a short break. | ||
| When we get back, there's been a couple of polls that have kind of shocked us. | ||
| I think Suffolk University, the USA Today poll, I think the Reno paper published it, USA Today, it talked about, you know, Laxalt, what he was down, you know, maybe, and you're saying, hey, these guys are very strong with the Hispanic voters out there. | ||
| The polls look good for our Jim Marchant, but we've got to question everything else. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We've got Richard Burris, we've got Jim Marchant, we've got General Bolduc up in New Hampshire. | ||
| And breaking news, is John McAfee dead or not? | ||
| His wife claims, wait for it, that McAfee is alive. | ||
| Mark Egglund is going to join us on all that after the break here in War Room Battleground. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Battleground with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Okay, it's primary day. | ||
| John Fredericks, by the way, is going to be doing live reporting tonight. | ||
| Florida, Oklahoma, and New York. | ||
| A bunch of key races there. | ||
| But, you know, these primaries are very late. | ||
| I always question why they're having these primaries in August before these massive either presidential elections or midterms. | ||
| Seems very late to me, but hey. | ||
| Who am I? | ||
| But I will tell you, we're already into the thick of it in a bunch of states. | ||
| Richard, I just want to go back for our audience, because you're kind of revered among MAGA and among the War on Posse. | ||
| Here's the disconnect. | ||
| I see these polls coming out now, and I see all the work you're doing on the Hispanic side, and then I see Marchant. | ||
| Why is it Suffolk and some of these other polls are showing that Laxalt seems to be losing altitude? | ||
| You know, the race was quite tight. | ||
| You had some great polling about this, I want you to get into it, but then now this USA Today Suffolk poll, unless you're going to tell me, It's all one-sided. | ||
| They show him down 7. | ||
| The gubernatorial candidate is, I think, down 4. | ||
| The Attorney General is down 4. | ||
| Jim Marchand is up almost 5. | ||
| 4.85%. | ||
| What's going on from these public polls and what can you tell us is different than the analytics that the People's Pundit is doing, sir? | ||
| Yeah, you know, right off the bat with Suffolk, we went through this in 2021 with Suffolk, Steve. | ||
| I don't know if you remember, but we were headed into the fall and, you know, we told you Virginia in 2021 was going to be close, that Yonkin was, you know, ahead. | ||
| Those polls did not hurt or mirror whatever term you want to use, including Suffolk. | ||
| Uh, until, you know, people like myself and Trafalgar pushed them to herd. | ||
| So we were, we were releasing polls showing that Junkin was up. | ||
| There is a real response bias among Republican voters in the summer. | ||
| Everybody knows it. | ||
| And it would be worse in a state like Nevada because we're having this shift of Hispanics right now and they are very difficult to reach, especially Hispanic men. | ||
| Explain to the audience what response bias is and why it's so prevalent in Republican polling among Republican voters. | ||
| It's huge. | ||
| And what it basically is is that, you know, there are certain times, whether it's seasonal or whether there are events that happen, Where some voters are more willing to participate in polls than others. | ||
| It's typically the case that Democrats are more willing, uh, that even more educated people, whatever you want to call them, they love to give you their opinion. | ||
| Republicans are not like that and working class people are not like that. | ||
| And when you hit the summer stretch, Steve, it's a, it's a fundamental difference between people, which is eventually we, we work, we work hard, uh, and then we want to enjoy ourselves and we don't want to be bothered with some, you know, the politics like, uh, you know, all the time or picking up a, A phone all the time to speak to a pollster, even if they are paying attention, they don't want to give you 20 minutes of their time. | ||
| They'd rather be outside in the pool with their kids or they're on vacation, you know, stuff like that. | ||
| And every, again, this is well known in this industry. | ||
| And this is why for the last three cycles, especially, you know, we have been, you know, telling people over and over again, we've seen this movie before, you know, it looks like the polls are looking better for Democrats. | ||
| What will really matter, you know, is not these pre-Labor Day polls, but the post-Labor Day polls, and the trend. | ||
| Not the headline of what they say, but the trend. | ||
| You know, we have incumbents up this year. | ||
| Ron Johnson, who faced tough re-elections, didn't lead in a single poll, yet won pretty easily on election night, was among the first to be called. | ||
| This is what polling does, unfortunately. | ||
| And I'm not saying, you know, throw it out, you know, ignore polling altogether. | ||
| Of course not. | ||
| But I am saying you have to remember how these people have behaved in the past, how they performed in the past. | ||
| And there's a handful of us who know how to deal with the summer. | ||
| And USA Today, Suffolk University, with all due respect, is not one of them. | ||
| And in fact, they never put Junkin in the lead running up into that election. | ||
| So I was on your show a week before the election telling you why they would be wrong, why we would be right. | ||
| And they were. | ||
| They were wrong. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Last, I know you're doing tremendous work on the Hispanic side and we'll get to that when we have you back on. | ||
| Just one last thing. | ||
| When you see a Suffolk poll, we see these polls and talking about the bias and talking about their, what are we to derive from, I mean, Laxalt, I'm just taking their poll, he's down seven The governor's down 4-5, the AG's down 5, and Marchant, who, let's be honest, even the ticket in the Republican establishment has been beaten on as hard as the Democrats, he's up 4.8%. | ||
| What do you take that? | ||
| That Marchant's name's just out there more? | ||
| His campaign's working? | ||
| Should we forget that too? | ||
| Is that also a misread? | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| I do think there's something there. | ||
| And then also as well that there's just more partisan loyalties when it comes to those, especially those two top of the ticket races. | ||
| But then with the administration, you know, the AG could be, you know, a one-off there, Steve. | ||
| But when it comes to the Senate and the governor, I'm not surprised that it would be more pro-Democrat because you just have more partisan loyalties at the top of the ticket. | ||
| We're seeing that in other places in Ohio, you know, a lot of other states where You know, it leans obviously very heavily Republican, but then down ticket looks like Democrats have the potential to do a little bit better. | ||
| It's the reverse in a state like the Silver State because it doesn't have the right wing leans that a place like Ohio does. | ||
| So, you know, also a matter of interest, you know, really, really is. | ||
| Down ticket, it gets a lot looser. | ||
| That partisan loyalty gets looser. | ||
| It's a good point. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| The message gets through. | ||
| How do people get to the People's Pundit? | ||
| How do they follow you? | ||
| Because people always ask, they want to know what Trafalgar thinks and they want to know what Barris thinks. | ||
| So how did they get to you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Generic Ballad is going to be in the field shortly and they can find it at Locals is the best place. | ||
| peoplespundit.locals.com, but on Getter at People's Pundit and on Truth at People's Pundit. | ||
| And there's an underscore in there on Twitter, Steve, but the best place is Locals. | ||
| peoplespondent.locals.com. | ||
| Coming out soon. | ||
| Okay, Richard, thank you very much. | ||
| Generic. | ||
| We're looking, as soon as you come, we'll have you back on the boardroom and spend a lot of time to go through it. | ||
| Your stuff's great. | ||
| All the best. | ||
| I want to go to Marchant now. | ||
| By the way, I should say your wife's stuff's great. | ||
| You're a pretty good guy on camera. | ||
| I want to go to Marchant. | ||
| Marchant, do you think it's because your message, that's what I want to have Barris tee it up. | ||
| Because he says there's all this partisanship at the top, you know, automatically knee-jerk reaction, governor, Senate. | ||
| But when they get down to AG and Secretary of State, hey, they're looking maybe for who's putting forth the best program. | ||
| Do you think that's true? | ||
| Do you think this is an anomaly? | ||
| Nowhere else in the country, on any poll, do we have such a divergence of You got a Senate candidate down 7, a governor down 5, an AG down 5, and look at it, wait for it, I would say a controversial Secretary of State up 4.8. | ||
| What do you make of that? | ||
| Is that just an anomaly? | ||
| Is that a bad poll? | ||
| Or is there something there, Jim Marchand? | ||
| I think there's something there. | ||
| I've been working hard since November 4th trying to get the message out about the election integrity issue. | ||
| Not only here in Nevada, but all over the country. | ||
| And I think that message is resonating with a lot of people here in Nevada and around the country. | ||
| So, I think there's something there. | ||
| And even though Trafalgar didn't do a poll on the Secretary of State, I think I would have been up in that poll too, maybe even more. | ||
| Because I think they're a little more respected than some of the other pollsters. | ||
| I think there's something there. | ||
| And, you know, I haven't got off my message. | ||
| Normally, when you get by the primary, everybody says, oh, you need to moderate and, you know, you got to go after the middle, the independents. | ||
| But I think that's where I'm getting a lot of the support. | ||
| And I am getting a lot of support from the Hispanics here also. | ||
| Tremendous support from that group. | ||
| And, uh, so I think there's something there and you know, I'm, I'm just staying. | ||
| So Marshawn, but here, Marshawn, here, here's what I don't understand. | ||
| The Guardian of London, uh, the Financial Times, you know, these international papers that only deal in players. | ||
| When I see Jim Marshawn, he's an election denier. | ||
| This is a part of the Trump, uh, cult of Trump. | ||
| What is it that folks in the silver state, what are Nevadans? | ||
| What, when you're making that pitch to independents and Democrats, What are they hearing that the rest of the world either chooses not to hear or twist? | ||
| Well, they're hearing that I'm going to enable and implement a fair and transparent election system here in Nevada. | ||
| And we're trying to roll that out all over the country through our coalition. | ||
| And that's what they're hearing. | ||
| And that's the number one topic everywhere I'm out speaking. | ||
| And I get requests to come speak a lot of places here in Nevada. | ||
| Because they want to hear the message. | ||
| And the number one question is, how are we going to affect the 2022 election with the same people in charge that were in charge in 2020? | ||
| And that's some of the things, the way I answer that, is we've been doing a lot of things behind the scenes to try to make sure that we can mitigate a little bit some of the potential for election manipulation. | ||
| And so they like that. | ||
| And that message is resonating out there. | ||
| You know, that may be why. | ||
| I mean, I was surprised to see this poll also because the amount of money that the Democrats and the Republican establishment have thrown at me. | ||
| Matter of fact, today I just learned that the Nevada Chamber of Commerce, a business organization, is endorsing my Democrat opponent. | ||
| Can you believe that? | ||
| That's how scared they are of me, of winning this election. | ||
| Why would the Chamber of Commerce, if a guy that the Hispanics are turning to because they want free and fair elections, why would the Chamber of Commerce support your Soros-type Secretary of State opposition, sir? | ||
| Well, that's a good question, because I'm a businessman first and foremost, and when I interviewed with them, my opponent is an attorney, he's an activist, he's always been a Harry Reid aide, and has no business experience at all. | ||
| I have enormous business experience as the CEO of three successful technology companies, and you would think that they would endorse me, but no, they're going after the Democrat. | ||
| There's a lot of reasons there. | ||
| They're very soft, they're very establishment, and they're bought and paid for by the Republican establishment and the Democrat establishment. | ||
| They've been told, stay away from me, just like a lot of the other politicians here. | ||
| They haven't embraced me because they're scared, because I haven't got off message yet and am continuing on. | ||
| Like I did in the primary. | ||
| So, they're not, you know, that's fine with me. | ||
| I think I'm up in the polls and they're either not as much or they're down. | ||
| So, I'm just going to continue on and do my thing. | ||
| Pretty shocking. | ||
| Jim Marchant, how do people get to you and find out about this extraordinary campaign? | ||
| Yeah, jimmarchant.com. | ||
| J-I-M-M-A-R-C-H-A-N-T.com. | ||
| And also our coalition. | ||
| I mean, obviously we need help financially. | ||
| I mean, I'm getting blocked by everybody. | ||
| As you see, the Chamber of Commerce is not backing me. | ||
| You can imagine how many donations that includes. | ||
| So we need a lot of help. | ||
| I need the War Room Posse to step up and help me and help our coalition, which is SOS4America.com. | ||
| And that helps all of our candidates. | ||
| We need to get all of our candidates And our coalition elected all around the country and we need all the help we can get because we're not getting it from the establishment on the Democrat side or the Republican side or the RNC or none of them are stepping up and helping us because they're scared of my message. | ||
| Jim, thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you on here as you did in the primary continue to fight. | ||
| I think I got, let's go to New Hampshire now, the Granite State, live free or die. | ||
| Thank you, Jim. | ||
| I want to go to General Bolduc. | ||
| General, Jim Marchand had literally two and a half million dollars dumped on his head by the Republican establishment, the Republican establishment, in a Secretary of State primary, unheard of number for a general election, in the weeks just running up, in the weeks just running up to the election. | ||
| You've had the same situation. | ||
| Tell us what's going on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, same situation's going on here. | |
| You know, the establishment at all levels from everywhere, you know, are against my candidacy. | ||
| They have absolutely no reason other than they won't be able to control me. | ||
| I'll work for the people. | ||
| And so, you know, they have pulled out all the stops and now that I have... But General Bollock, hang on, let me just say for a second. | ||
| You were on the other day, and I can give the pricey of your thing. | ||
| You started as an enlisted man. | ||
| You entered as a private. | ||
| You became a sergeant. | ||
| You were selected to go to Officer Candidate School because of your leadership and your valor. | ||
| You became an officer. | ||
| You're not a West Point grad. | ||
| You didn't go to Princeton like Millie. | ||
| You're a New Hampshire guy, right? | ||
| You've become one of the most revered generals in the Army. | ||
| Not only are you wounded in combat, you've led troops in combat. | ||
| You've lost troops in combat. | ||
| Then you get Positions whether it's Afghanistan or Africa of a scale of like a fortune 50 CEO of the scale and complexity and all I hear is Obolix not really qualified to be a senator and I look at your opposition I got a crypto guy and these are fine people don't get me wrong. | ||
| They're a crypto guy I got a couple I got a guy it's a town councilman or a town manager or city. | ||
| Okay, they're all not a serve They're all kind of very nice people, but it's quite frankly have very tiny Resumes and really don't know anything about the world. | ||
| You've been all over the world leading men in combat, men and women, showing leadership. | ||
| What is it in New Hampshire, sir, that has these guys saying, you don't really have the qualifications to sit in the United States Senate? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I, you know, it's just that I have challenged the status quo. | |
| I've challenged Republicans and Democrats that aren't doing the right thing for Granite Staters. | ||
| I have literally, since 8 November 2020, fought against mask mandates, fought against vaccinations, fought against any kind of lockdowns. | ||
| And at the local state level here in this state, and we know at the federal level, that was the game. | ||
| And they hurt a lot of people. | ||
| And I didn't think that was right. | ||
| And so I, you know, placed blame, whether it was a Republican or a Democrat, on the people that did it. | ||
| And that's what granite staters want. | ||
| They're tired of career politicians. | ||
| So I have people that on one hand, you know, like the governor at one time told me I had the best credentials and the best resume and the best portfolio to be a United States senator when I was running against Jeanne Shaheen. | ||
| But for somehow now that I'm running against Maggie Hassan, I don't have the qualifications. | ||
| And it's quite simple. | ||
| I've emerged as somebody that they won't be able to control, somebody that's going to work for the people, that is going to go down and do what our founding fathers wanted our senators to do. | ||
| And that is be an ambassador from the state in which you come from to serve the people in that state. | ||
| And by doing that, you'll also serve Americans. | ||
| And we can see that is not being done. | ||
| Economically, spending wise, security wise, everything is being done absolutely You know, inappropriately and and it has a negative effect on the American people in Granite Stater. | ||
| So let's not have that. | ||
| Let's not have someone that's going to go down there and work. | ||
| Let's have someone who's going to still invest in the career politician model with special interest in lobbyists and in kowtow to rich people who are politically connected and the hell with the rest of us. | ||
| And that's what we see. | ||
| And that's absolutely wrong. | ||
| And they're fighting this. | ||
| Tooth and nail in there. | ||
| You know, they called over a hundred people. | ||
| Over a hundred people to run against me after Sununu said he wasn't going to run. | ||
| Over a hundred people. | ||
| And only two of them, Chuck Morse and Kevin Smith, said that they would do it. | ||
| Both of them establishment guys. | ||
| Both of them guys that are going to do exactly what they're told. | ||
| They've both been bought and paid for. | ||
| Don Baldick has it. | ||
| And it's as simple as that. | ||
| General Bolduc, I want everybody in the country, and particularly all the live-free-or-die granite staters, to make sure they get to you. | ||
| How do they get to your campaign? | ||
| I want everybody to get to your social media, the friends of Bolduc on Facebook, but I want to get to your campaign. | ||
| How do they do that now? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They do it by going to www.donbolduc.com. | |
| Please go there and help, and we're getting help, and I really appreciate it, and I want to say thank you. | ||
| We've been able to put up ads as a result of of the help that we're getting from your show. | ||
| So thank you. | ||
| It's not us. | ||
| I gotta tell you, that's why I have you on. | ||
| Our audience, once they hear it, they go there, they make their own decisions, and they're big supporters of yours. | ||
| General Bollick, we got a punch. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you on here, sir. | ||
| Live free or die. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Amen. | |
| God bless you. | ||
| Honored to be on as well. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| I want to go, and we're going to have him on more tomorrow. | ||
| Mark Eglinton is the biographer of McAfee, and I had to get him on here because breaking news when we started the show, and he joins us from Scotland tonight. | ||
| Thank you for staying up. | ||
| We only got a couple of minutes. | ||
| Eglinton, here's what I don't get, brother. | ||
| The wife of McAfee, you're the kind of definitive biographer. | ||
| You spent time with him. | ||
| You got the book. | ||
| Is the wife coming out with an HBO movie or special tomorrow, documentary that says McAfee's alive? | ||
| Mark? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, what we've got here, this isn't John's wife saying this. | |
| This is a former girlfriend of John's who fled Belize with him. | ||
| And this isn't even her documentary. | ||
| She's just interviewed in it. | ||
| And this is a documentary by a UK company who approached me. | ||
| And there is a great documentary coming out tomorrow, but the line they are going with at the end of it apparently is that John's still alive. | ||
| And this is, I mean, absolutely news to me and everybody else in the McAfee world. | ||
| But let me just, in the McAfee world, do we have the body? | ||
| It's been over a year, is it not, Mark, when you first came on here? | ||
| Is the body, is it still in a refrigerator in Spain? | ||
| Where is McAfee's, where is either McAfee's remains or McAfee's body today, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, my understanding, and this is something we've discussed before, and this only complicates what we're hearing today, is that that body, as far as my understanding, is still in Spain. | |
| I speak to John's wife quite regularly, as recently as a couple of days ago, and she is still campaigning, trying to get legal help, trying to get financial help to get his remains released. | ||
| So this, in combination with this bizarre claim that John's still alive, just really doesn't add up. | ||
| And quite frankly, at this point, who knows what the truth is. | ||
| Okay, how do people get to your book? | ||
| I want them to read the book. | ||
| Tomorrow you're going to see the documentary, you're going to come back on. | ||
| How do they get to your book? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you can get to the book by going to Amazon. | |
| That's what it looks like. | ||
| The John McAfee tapes. | ||
| You've been kind enough to give it a push. | ||
| I'll keep pushing on Twitter if people want to follow me there. | ||
| It's out there everywhere. | ||
| Barnes & Noble, Amazon. | ||
| Watch the documentary. | ||
| Read the book. | ||
| Go to Amazon and get this book. | ||
| Tomorrow we're going to have Eglinton on and we're going to discuss, is John McAfee still alive? | ||
| We'll see you back here at 10 a.m. |
Export Selection