Aug. 16, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
47:51
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room, Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, you're in the Battleground. | ||
| It's Monday, 15 August, Year of Error, 2022, the anniversary of the one year of the disastrous pull-off from Afghanistan that we handled in the last hour. | ||
| We've got two massive races, actually three tomorrow, with Chaney in Wyoming and, of course, Kelly Chebaka versus Murkowski. | ||
| So Tegeman versus Chaney and Murkowski versus Kelly Chebaka, also Sarah Palin in the battleground. | ||
| What I want to do for this hour, I've asked two of our more prominent contributors. | ||
| To really drill down on topics of interest, we got to get in back of, and it's Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Everything to dealing with now the new CDC guidance, the vaccines, the mask. | ||
| Philadelphia just instituted last week, mask mandates for the kids for the first 10 days of school. | ||
| Yeah, at the same time you've got universities around the area saying you don't need to be, you know, boosted anymore. | ||
| It's just total chaos. | ||
| And so that's why I asked Naomi, who's been doing the tremendous, or under Amy Kelly's been coordinating all this amazing research done by the War Room Posse, so we want to get a full update. | ||
| Second part of the show, we're going to have Eric Prince. | ||
| Eric has just returned from the Hackers Conference, HackerCon, out in Vegas. | ||
| He's going to tell us everything in the run-up to the summit this weekend in Missouri. | ||
| He's going to walk us through everything they're saying about being able to hack the machines and also other updates on cyber technology and cybersecurity. | ||
| Let's go to Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Naomi, I don't think his entire time, even in the early days of the pandemic, I've seen more confusion, more spin, more, I mean, it's just, you know, the CDC says one thing, get FDA saying another, these world bodies say one thing. | ||
| Just where are we in everything? | ||
| Maybe I start with what should be the easiest one, the mask in Philadelphia. | ||
| Why and what universe are they thinking of putting masks back on the kids to put them in school and do it, I think, for the first 10 days of the year? | ||
| It's so heartbreaking and so surreal. | ||
| I can only imagine that at this point it's gestural. | ||
| The data are so in and so solid that masks don't help in terms of transmission or make a very small difference. | ||
| And what they do effectively, which we've discussed so much, is hurt the development of children's speech and children's emotional perception of other faces. | ||
| So I feel like now it's, it's like a fig leaf, you know, like all these people are being found out, caught out. | ||
| Emperor has no clothes and they're, they're just like, you know, like kind of waving a handkerchief in front of a, a crime scene in order to kind of distract people or say, well, we're not going to drop it altogether. | ||
| Surely it made some difference. | ||
| I can't speculate. | ||
| I'd love to know what parents in Philadelphia were told. | ||
| About why their kids had to have to wear masks for the first 10 days and then not, presumably, but it feels like the dying of an empire in which in which, you know, a priestly cast that no longer has anyone believing in them are still sending up, you know, incense and sacrifices to a non-existent God. | ||
| Part of this is now the evidence is coming back on the vaccine, particularly the vaccine among little kids, children, and also the fact that I think it's Moderna's got 30 million or so many million, tens of millions of unused that people just throughout the world are saying, we're not doing this anymore. | ||
| We don't want to hear about boost. | ||
| We want to hear about more boost. | ||
| I think General Austin. | ||
| Was reported today got, you know, he's, he's quintupled vaxxed. | ||
| He got COVID for the second time. | ||
| I realized now they're saying, oh, it doesn't do anything with transmission. | ||
| It only that, uh, it'll help you not go to ICU. | ||
| Uh, so what, what is the update on, on, on vaccines across the board and particularly CDC's new guidance, which to me is very confusing because it doesn't make any differentiation at all between vaxxed and unvaxxed. | ||
| Was this whole thing just a joke? | ||
| Is that what CDC is saying? | ||
| I mean, can you imagine how I feel on this day, Steve? | ||
| I've literally been saying for a year and a half, vaccines don't affect transmission. | ||
| There's no reason to have mandates. | ||
| There's no physical reason. | ||
| The manufacturers don't claim that vaccines affect transmission. | ||
| This is invented, this kind of mythology that vaccines affect transmission, so you have to segregate people and fire people from their jobs. | ||
| Dismiss people from, you know, the Air Force Academy and keep people from graduating at West Point if they're unvaccinated. | ||
| And so now, you know, a year and a half later, after countless people have had their livelihoods destroyed, and I hear from these people every day, countless people have had their health destroyed. | ||
| The CDC is like, oh, you know, oh, sorry. | ||
| No, not even sorry. | ||
| Oh, well, it never mattered anyway. | ||
| Don't treat vaccinated and unvaccinated differently. | ||
| It's honestly, it's like the end of the Wizard of Oz. | ||
| I said this before, like everything is revealed and there is a tiny person slinking away. | ||
| I mean, that's where we're at. | ||
| So they lied from the start. | ||
| They should be held accountable for lying from the start. | ||
| All of these people who have been fired for no reason You know, have causes of action or more, but it's, I mean, I'm just seeing this edifice crumbling because so many people have exposed their lies. | ||
| Okay, let's go to that. | ||
| So CDC actually, is that your interpretation or is that the interpretation they're putting in front of people? | ||
| Because you call them a priestly caste. | ||
| I don't understand how they can come forward with this today and not think that from the airline pilots to the military personnel, doctors, nurses, I mean, it's stunning. | ||
| Quite frankly, you, I don't even know what you could do for defamation. | ||
| The last two years, and particularly as we got into the, you know, past of 2020 election, You know, people were adamantly sitting there going, hey, now we see science, now we see evidence that you've rolled this out and you can't put these mandates up there. | ||
| How did CDC just come out? | ||
| Did they put forward any evidence studies? | ||
| How did they just kind of drop this on everybody? | ||
| And here's the interesting thing. | ||
| You didn't see it carpet bombed on MSNBC or CNN. | ||
| It wasn't like they were out there. | ||
| Fauci wasn't doing the Sunday shows in this. | ||
| It was kind of like, oh, by the way, So in your mind, how did they actually roll it out and how did they have the audacity just to kind of slide it out there? | ||
| Well, they're very well positioned to do sneaky things in terms of public health messaging. | ||
| Because they have a compliant legacy media. | ||
| So as you say, instead of, if there were real journalists in America at the Atlantic or at the New York Times or at the Wall Street Journal, it would be a front page story. | ||
| What do you mean all that create a Jim Crow society out of thin air in the United States of America was for nothing? | ||
| Were you lying then or are you lying now? | ||
| But it's crickets, right? | ||
| And they just kind of put it out there and have a compliant press. | ||
| But it is funny to see the CDC try to make a story to justify their 180 degree reversal that shows that no one should have been discriminated against in the first place. | ||
| The spokesperson said something like that they make up this kind of It's a fantasy about how viruses work, right? | ||
| And how epidemiology works and how populations work. | ||
| So now they're like, well, we haven't changed our guidance. | ||
| Science has evolved and everyone has herd immunity and a lot of people are vaccinated. | ||
| So it's okay to treat everyone the same as everyone else, even if they're not vaccinated. | ||
| A lot of people have been infected already. | ||
| I mean, it's just a note, as you point out, right? | ||
| No studies. | ||
| No data. | ||
| The CDC is very good at making pronouncements without linking any scientific peer-reviewed studies to their claims. | ||
| It's just the guidance has been revised. | ||
| And unfortunately, we in America, who used to be a nation of independent-minded critical thinkers, have been so bludgeoned ideologically and terrified and locked down. | ||
| Not this audience, but a lot of people we know and love. | ||
| That people react to the guidance has changed as if that has some magical power. | ||
| But really they, the CDC has come up with zero explanation scientifically for why they cause discrimination in the first place, cause people to lose their businesses, to lose their relationships, to lose. | ||
| I mean, I get emails from people whose lives are completely ruined, like an RN who didn't want to be injected, you know, had to give up His home, he's living in a trailer in the middle of the desert with his family with no water, because that's what they can afford now. | ||
| I mean, that's what the CDC has done to the United States of America. | ||
| And now they're like, oh, sorry, no reason, but we're not answering questions. | ||
| Before we go to your research, which is, and how you're connecting dots, which is pretty shocking and damning. | ||
| I just wanted to go back to the Priestly cast. | ||
| Is it just me? | ||
| Or does it seem like Tony Fauci is now in the Witness Protection Program? | ||
| He wasn't out front at all about when Biden had it three times in a row or five times in a row. | ||
| I know he's been doing some podcasts, but he's not rolled out like he used to be rolled out. | ||
| Sunday shows, everywhere, primetime, MSNBC, CNN. | ||
| Is he in the Witness Protection Program? | ||
| And if he is, why is the high priest, why is all of a sudden the high priest somebody that you can't see anymore? | ||
| I mean, yeah, again, exactly like the end of the Wizard of Oz, it's the great and mighty Oz. | ||
| But what is he? | ||
| He's a man of lies. | ||
| I mean, so many stories that we were told by his media apparatus have fallen apart. | ||
| You know, he swore that this virus came from a wet market in Wuhan. | ||
| Well, that's fallen apart. | ||
| And even Legacy Media reports on The fact that it was engineered, it would appear. | ||
| And the scientific consensus is now that it was engineered. | ||
| So much documentation of his conflicts of interest have emerged. | ||
| And I predicted these long ago, just based on his behavior. | ||
| I predicted on Fox, I said, we're going to find out he doesn't work for us. | ||
| He works for someone else. | ||
| And that turned out to be true. | ||
| Scientists getting royalties, hundreds of thousands of dollars in royalties. | ||
| In a conflict at the NIH, that has emerged. | ||
| So he's not looking good. | ||
| And he is, and now, you know, these injections, and I think your platform has made a difference. | ||
| Tucker Carlson, to his credit, keeps reporting on these issues. | ||
| That has made a difference. | ||
| All of the dissident doctors, Dr. Malone, Dr. Alexander, Dr. McCullough, they've made a difference. | ||
| and certainly the amazing Pfizer research volunteers, 3,500 of them now, have made a difference. | ||
| Word has gotten out to your earlier question about the harms of these injections, these mRNA injections. | ||
| Word has gotten out about the menstrual dysregulation problems that yours truly got de-platformed for breaking that important story. | ||
| Deplatformed from Twitter. | ||
| And word has gotten out about the heart damage and people are seeing that, you know, healthy young adults are dropping dead. | ||
| Healthy people are having debilitating illnesses. | ||
| I just have a new sub stack up in which I assess the scale of the injuries and the damage from the mRNA injections and project them based on Very conservative models and from government data and from data from a German insurer. | ||
| So very solid data. | ||
| And I project forward that indeed hundreds of thousands of injuries and thousands of deaths can be attributed in the United States now to these mRNA vaccines. | ||
| Again, super conservatively. | ||
| Don't take my word for it. | ||
| Look at my math. | ||
| Look at my citations. | ||
| This is a catastrophe and that that's on the level If you take the most conservative estimates, it's on the level of the people injured by stroke in the United States every year. | ||
| And if you take the more robust estimates, it's at the level of people diagnosed with cancer in the United States every year. | ||
| So a massive public health crisis, not due to the virus, but now due to the vaccine. | ||
| So to your point about Dr. Fauci, vaccine uptake is flat. | ||
| And it's 2% for children. | ||
| I think you are going to go to heaven. | ||
| Really, Steve. | ||
| I mean, may you live to be 120 as my grandmother would say, but you know, when it's time for you to show up and account for yourself, you really saved. | ||
| Who knows, millions of babies and small children from harm. | ||
| And so did I. Your lips to God's ear on that one. | ||
| Let's go back though, but I want to go, yeah, but I want to go, but look, we were just a platform. | ||
| You, Amy Kelly, your team, amazing team at Daily Cloud, in the War Room Volunteers, walk through, on that subject, walk through the evidence that you compiled Because you're like Miles and Steve Cortez and other people. | ||
| I said, hey, just go back and look at the tracker of what they said, the evidence they put forward, and it all turns out to come true. | ||
| Walk us through what your research, how has it led you to this point? | ||
| Yeah, well, let me share the latest Pfizer Documents Report because there's been news about that. | ||
| You all may remember that I shared with you all last week or so that the America First Legal FOIA, Freedom of Information Act request released 268 pages showing that the CDC had colluded with Twitter and Google and YouTube and Facebook to de-platform | ||
| People, including me, for early on breaking this very serious story about women having menstrual harms when they were injected. | ||
| Well, predictably, and I've been screaming and yelling about this for over a year, predictably that is going to result in harms to fertility. | ||
| And now the Pfizer volunteers, these 3,500 experts, have put up a new report about a 44% Spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate in the Pfizer documents. | ||
| And I will walk you through that report. | ||
| But before I do, I will say that that was posted this morning on Daily Clout Twitter, which they hadn't bothered to ban yet. | ||
| And immediately Twitter banned Daily Clout from Twitter and also locked our account. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hold on. | |
| Hang on. | ||
| Stop. | ||
| Go back to the top. | ||
| You guys did the research. | ||
| What did it show? | ||
| You put it out and they banned you immediately? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| They, and they banned and locked our account. | ||
| Like they're, they're not scared enough yet, obviously, because you know, I am suing Twitter and they must know that. | ||
| But in the meantime, they're racking up more damages by now having banned and, uh, and, and. | ||
| I mean, banned and locked. | ||
| Daily clouts Twitter account with thousands of followers if for a completely I mean when they call this misinformation my post enlightenment head wants to explode because this is Literally and I had an expensive education, right I I went to Yale. | ||
| I went to Oxford. | ||
| I'm a Rhodes Scholar. | ||
| This is how you're trained to make an argument. | ||
| This is primary source documentation. | ||
| It doesn't get better than that. | ||
| This is an internal set of documents released under court order. | ||
| These are Pfizer's own documents, right? | ||
| And they're, they're analyzed by The most highly credentialed people and the links are right there. | ||
| So there is literally no way, and I'm saying this to the judge in this case, I hope he or she is watching. | ||
| There is no way this can be misinformation because it is literally information that is like primary documentation. | ||
| It is the defendant's own documentation. | ||
| So now let's go to why they shut us down. | ||
| And I'm asking you to notice that this is a war on women, Steve. | ||
| And it's a war on babies. | ||
| And it's a war on other people, too, that we can discuss. | ||
| We've got a new report about harms to men, which are horrific, which I'll get to if there's time. | ||
| But right now, I want you to notice that Twitter banned and the CDC banned an early discussion about dysregulating menstrual cycles, which you need to have a healthy baby. | ||
| And now, Twitter banned a This is a thoroughly documented report showing that almost half of the pregnant women in the Pfizer internal trials lost their babies. | ||
| Alright? | ||
| They're keeping this quiet. | ||
| They're keeping these harms quiet. | ||
| And in the meantime, women are being told to this day by their pediatricians and by their obstetricians, it's safe and effective. | ||
| It won't harm your baby. | ||
| You know, go ahead and take the injection. | ||
| Go ahead and have the booster. | ||
| Go ahead and have the second booster. | ||
| And they're suppressing the fact that there were 22 dead babies in this one document out of these 55,000 documents in the Pfizer trials. | ||
| And I can lift out an important paragraph from this critical research if you are willing to hear it. | ||
| Please, please, absolutely, please. | ||
| So the headline is Pfizer misleadingly classified The 44% of pregnancies that ended in miscarriage. | ||
| And this is a direct quote from the report. | ||
| A Pfizer adverse events document released by the FDA. | ||
| So again, like misinformation. | ||
| This is our government releasing this information under court order, right? | ||
| Process that. | ||
| This is your tax dollars paying for the release of this information. | ||
| Reveals, and this is on July 1st, 2022, due to this court order, right? | ||
| Reveals chilling data showing 44% of pregnant women participating in Pfizer's mRNA COVID vaccine trial suffered miscarriages. | ||
| And there's the link, all right? | ||
| A section of the document on page 3643 called Listing of Subjects Reporting Pregnancy After Dose 1 shows that 50 women became pregnant during the internal trial. | ||
| However, one must dig through the rest of the large document, and this is why I worship and love these volunteers, they are doing that, right, to learn that 22 of these 50 women who got pregnant suffered, quote, abortion, spontaneous, end quote, quote, Abortion spontaneous complete, end quote, which means a miscarriage. | ||
| Quote, abortion spontaneous incomplete, end quote, or, quote, miscarriage. | ||
| So this means losing your baby when you don't want to. | ||
| It doesn't mean going to an abortionist. | ||
| It means you're gestating a perfectly normal, healthy baby, as far as anyone knows, and you lose that baby. | ||
| The adverse events report cutoff date was March 13th, 2021, and this will blow your mind, and the FDA received the report from Pfizer on April 1st, 2021. | ||
| So guys, that was, I'm sorry, but that was over a year ago. | ||
| I'm sorry to, I know we're not supposed to cry in the war room, but over a year ago, the FDA received this report that out of 50 pregnant women, 22 of them lost their babies. | ||
| And they did not say anything. | ||
| Thus, the FDA was aware of the horrifying rate of fetal death by the start of April, 2021. | ||
| And were silent. | ||
| And Pfizer was silent. | ||
| They kept up their drumbeat of inject the pregnant women, inject the pregnant women. | ||
| Doesn't hurt your baby. | ||
| It doesn't hurt your baby. | ||
| And now predictably, as you and I have discussed in my sub stack, drawing on other Pfizer reports called, I'm sorry to announce a genocide. | ||
| There is the scaled up evidence of this horrific Cover up this Mengele type cover up and I'm Jewish. | ||
| I don't say that lightly. | ||
| If you if you extrapolate globally to all the pregnant women who are injected it explains it could explain what we're seeing now of a baby die off 200% rise in neonatal deaths or spontaneous abortions and miscarriages in Scotland. | ||
| Sorry 86 babies died in Ontario when they usually have five or six and in Israel a 34% rise of Spontaneous abortions and miscarriages to vaccine versus unvaccinated. | ||
| So this ties back to the Ontario, to Israel, and I think you mentioned Scotland. | ||
| I was very familiar with the Israel and the Ontario. | ||
| And by the way, what we want to do is have you back on tomorrow because it can take you a little past the segment, but this is too meaningful and powerful. | ||
| In, in the documents that you got and the team went through and particularly drilled down, wouldn't, they were supposed to turn over everything, right? | ||
| All the email. | ||
| Am I right? | ||
| When they send these documents over in this research, they were also supposed to send over their emails and their conversations. | ||
| Wouldn't it have occurred that someone inside of Pfizer or the FDA, shouldn't there be some back and forth communication because someone Had to have seen what was happening here and raise the red flag and say, hey, we've got a problem. | ||
| 44% of these women are spontaneous aborting. | ||
| Maybe we ought to have a meeting. | ||
| Maybe we want to get on a Zoom call. | ||
| Maybe we ought to have a chat. | ||
| Right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't believe I do believe in seeing some of them. | |
| Some of them are the Mengele guys, the Nazi doctors, but I can't believe everybody is. | ||
| So the question is, technically, did you get all of the internal emails from this around this topic, or you just had these reports that you had to burrow in and dig out that yourself? | ||
| So, Steve, no, we don't have emails. | ||
| The FOIA was just for these scientific documents. | ||
| So we don't see anyone talking to anyone about these documents, although I'm sure, you know, I don't know why the FOIA did not include all communications around it. | ||
| I can reach out to Erin Seery's organization and ask, but the experts that we have are literally just working with the internal scientific documents that then were all shared with the FDA. | ||
| And that's something that should definitely be FOIAed, especially now that we see that the seat from the other FOIA, that the CDC and Twitter were communicating to silence discussion about this. | ||
| And I can talk to my lawyers, Scott Street and John Howard, who are suing Twitter and the CDC on my behalf to extend that and see if we can include any communications that the FDA had about closing down discussion of this. | ||
| Or as you say, someone at the FDA, because the FDA is a CEO. | ||
| Are there transmission? | ||
| Are there transmission documents in your possession in the tens of thousands of pages that were supposed to be blocked for 75 years? | ||
| And now I think I know why. | ||
| There's no transmission of actually transmitting it to the FDA or transmitting it to any of the priestly cast? | ||
| That's a good question. | ||
| I'll ask Amy Kelly, the Genius Project Director, to search. | ||
| I haven't seen any, and none of the volunteers have alerted me to any, but we haven't done a specific search for like, here's a cover letter saying... My understanding is that there's still a task force. | ||
| You know, remember, we're still under emergency. | ||
| We're still under emergency measures because, as you remember, Biden extended it. | ||
| You said this is a big problem. | ||
| Um, they still have a task force. | ||
| You would assume that information at this, uh, of this import would have gotten to the task force. | ||
| And if it didn't, the question is why did I tell you what, Naomi, hang on for just through the break. | ||
| We're gonna go through a break and I'm gonna hold you over. | ||
| I want to get a couple of things cleared up and then set up for it to have you back tomorrow because this is too, um, important. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Naomi Wolf. | ||
| On these incredible documentation that the team is going through and just what they're finding. | ||
| And now you see the CD saying, hey, no difference between VACs and non-VACs. | ||
| Might have destroyed your career as a pilot. | ||
| Might have gotten you kicked out of the military. | ||
| Might have not let you walked in the graduation ceremony at West Point in the Air Force Academy. | ||
| But hey, no harm, no foul. | ||
| Or in this case, maybe harm and foul. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Back with Naomi Wolf and Eric Prince in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Battlegrounds with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Naomi Wolfe is our guest. | ||
| Dr. Naomi Wolfe about all the studies she's been doing and quite frankly, completely blowing our head up here. | ||
| What I want to do, we don't know the time, we're trying to work at her schedule, but she will be back on the War Room or in Battleground sometime tomorrow. | ||
| We'll figure that out and then we'll put it up everywhere so people know this. | ||
| And Naomi, we haven't finished even with the woman's part yet because there's so many questions we've got to drill down and you've got a whole presentation on the impact on men. | ||
| We'll make sure we get to that at least started. | ||
| I think this probably will be a daily for the next couple of days because we have to do this. | ||
| The CDC just comes out with this flippant You know, oh, there's no difference between vax and unvax, and then the Philadelphia school, oh, what we're going to do is just mask the kids for 10 days. | ||
| It's just people, they're just this priestly caste. | ||
| They think they're off the hook, and they're not off the hook. | ||
| And that's why it's so important what you're doing at Daily Clout and what the War Room posse is assisting you under the tutelage and guidance of Amy Kelly. | ||
| And now your lawyers. | ||
| We got to bring the heat. | ||
| And it just shows you and for people say, oh, well, you know, the pandemic. | ||
| She put out additional reporting this morning. | ||
| And Twitter automatically takes her down for disinformation. | ||
| They're up in your face. | ||
| They're up in your grill on this. | ||
| And it's not going to change until we start punching back. | ||
| It's just, hey, she puts the report up, the study, that's all footnoted. | ||
| It has, you know, all the data, all the evidence, and she can do the math. | ||
| You can argue, hey, she got this wrong. | ||
| I don't believe in that part of the equation. | ||
| You took this and you extrapolate it. | ||
| That's all part of the scientific process and the debate that should go on, obviously, on everything. | ||
| We're not saying what Naomi Wolf puts up is holy writ, but it's not to be taken down immediately by some grundoon at Twitter, which obviously has the team on Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Because like they have on McCulloch and like they have on Malone, like they have on all of them as disinformation, as the mark of Cain, disinformation. | ||
| Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, I'm banned from Twitter. | ||
| So they actually took down Daily Clout and now have banned Daily Clout. | ||
| So even the platform where these primary source documents are being published has now no presence on Twitter, which means there's no way for the whole millions of people on Twitter know what the threats and harms are that are emerging in these reports. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And I guess always... Can we have your other social media? | |
| By the way, you can tell your parents a lot that that expensive education, the Yale-Oxford Broad Scholar, I guess Twitter's telling you, suck on that, baby. | ||
| We don't care. | ||
| It doesn't count. | ||
| It doesn't matter. | ||
| It doesn't mean anything. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Don't pull the credentials on me. | ||
| We're going to take Daily Clout down now and permanently ban you. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| It is. | ||
| Women will understand how tragic this is. | ||
| Pfizer took those deaths of babies, those spontaneous abortions and miscarriages, and recategorized them as recovered, resolved adverse effects. | ||
| In other words, if you lost your baby, It was categorized by Pfizer as a resolved adverse event, like a headache that got better. | ||
| That's the last thing I want to share with the women of America and the grandmas of America. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh my God. | |
| That's what, that's the Orwell, that, hold on, hold on, slow down. | ||
| Give me the Orwell, what did George Orwell himself think that up for him? | ||
| Give me the Orwellian term for the spontaneous abortions, losing their babies, what's it called? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So Pfizer notes the miscarriages as serious adverse events with moderate or severe toxicity ratings. | ||
| However, all of them were recategorized by Pfizer in the internal documents under the category adverse events that were recovered or resolved. | ||
| Like you had a problem when you had a baby, when you lost the baby, you recovered from that problem. | ||
| It resolved the adverse event, the negative thing. | ||
| The miscarriage is in the same category as a headache that went away. | ||
| If you lost your baby, Pfizer said your adverse event was recovered or resolved. | ||
| He's a monster. | ||
| Well, I'm very proud of all of our... No, you called it first. | ||
| We had the guy Daniel Horowitz wrote the book, The Shrouds of Forth. | ||
| You called it a year and a half or two years ago. | ||
| He said, these guys are like the Nazi doctors. | ||
| This would be way before the Holocaust. | ||
| He says it started with the doctors. | ||
| Doctors were there eight years or seven or eight years before all that. | ||
| It starts with that. | ||
| And I'm telling you, you called it out. | ||
| How can people... What's the social media and where do they go to the site that people can get to you? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Go to dailyclout.io. | ||
| You'll read this report there. | ||
| All the reports are there, and also the related one, which I'll be discussing tomorrow, as soon as you can have me back on, about men and sperm count, which really parents of teenage boys and baby boys need to know right away. | ||
| And additionally, you can find me on Dr. Naomi Arwolf on Getter. | ||
| And please keep reading The Bodies of Others. | ||
| As my platforms vanish, it's really my book that speaks for me. | ||
| The Bodies of Others can be got at Barnes & Noble, Amazon, your local bookstore, allseasonspress.com, and it'll show you how we got here and what we can do about it. | ||
| But do please keep supporting us because we're on a mission. | ||
| The bodies of others go to Amazon. | ||
| That is the hero's journey. | ||
| It's just absolutely amazing what the book is. | ||
| It's so powerful. | ||
| And I guess you'll be screaming. | ||
| When you read it, you'll be screaming at the walls. | ||
| But remember, Naomi Wolf's going to punch through this. | ||
| That's how we got to do it. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bye-bye. | |
| Okay, Eric Prince and Brother Patterson are on here and they're going to tell us, Ryan, they're going to tell us about HackerCon. | ||
| You got to make me feel better, guys. | ||
| I'm so depressed. | ||
| I'm actually energized that we're fighting back on Big Pharma. | ||
| And Eric, you and I have spent so many hours talking about this and the implications of it. | ||
| Tomorrow she's going to drop this report they're working on about sperm. | ||
| The abortions and the spontaneous abortions and menstrual are bad enough. | ||
| But what the team has done in research is just incredible. | ||
| So tell us about that. | ||
| You were out there with the rogues and the rebels. | ||
| Part of it was to make sure that you get hackers to try to hack into your own system. | ||
| But give us overall, HackerCon, what was the general tone of things in the most important cybersecurity conference in the world. | ||
| And particularly this weekend, we're going to go with Mike Lindell in the summit, talking about the trial of the machines and hacking into the machines. | ||
| Is that just a fantasy of crazy people like Mike Lindell and Tina Peters? | ||
| Or do the smartest, toughest, most expert people in the world in hacking think that the machines are vulnerable guys? | ||
| Steve, this is my first time at DEF CON, the big hacker conference in Las Vegas. | ||
| I've been to Vegas many, many times, mostly for the SHOT Show and those kinds of places. | ||
| So it's definitely an unusual experience. | ||
| It is basically a, it's 25 conferences within a conference, and they're doing everything from aviation hacking, car hacking, physical lock hacking, a voting machine hacking area. | ||
| Uh, dozens of conference, uh, dozens of speakers, et cetera. | ||
| And we went there because we wanted to crowdsource our security for unplugged phones. | ||
| And so, um, it's the right place to gain the knowledge to, to meet the kind of people that are after this. | ||
| We met people from the military, from, uh, all across the spectrum of, of defenders and attackers. | ||
| And I would say on the, on the election hacking already in 2017, they started doing, um, Attempted hacks on voting machines and they got into them within two hours. | ||
| So, and they were busy at it again, uh, this conference as well. | ||
| And so I would say, um, the voting machines and, and you can even look at it from the business side, making voting machines is not very big business. | ||
| And so it's hard to get companies to spend a lot of money on the, on the defensive measures that they should considering how important voting machines are to the Republic. | ||
| Uh, government tends to buy low cost. | ||
| Goods, not necessarily the highest quality. | ||
| And what I can say, I don't understand the detail of how they were hacking, but they were busy hacking those same kind of voting machines across the spectrum of manufacturers today. | ||
| So again, we were there to meet the right people, to get guidance as to the kind of bug bounty The kind of rewards that need to be out there for us. | ||
| And so I'll pass this to my colleague, Ryan, who is a true pro from the information security and messaging industry about what we're doing to crowdsource our security. | ||
| Ryan? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great. | |
| Thanks, Eric. | ||
| Yeah, what was interesting for me to realize is we had both the technical hacking side of thing, but then also the human hacking side of thing. | ||
| There was an entire social engineering curriculum at DEF CON. | ||
| And normally when we get into things, it requires a little bit of both, right? | ||
| You need to get somebody who's willing to say, here's a pathway in. | ||
| And there was a competition where people were calling into companies and trying to get username, password access. | ||
| What's the physical access in a building look like? | ||
| Who do I need to talk to? | ||
| And so as we sat, we had one idea of what we wanted to do for the balance and the crowdsourcing of our platform. | ||
| Uh, the security of our platform, but then we came away and thought, like, we could make this much better. | ||
| So, so here's what we're going to do, Steve. | ||
| And we're, we're going to announce this, all the rules on the 1st of September. | ||
| Um, so you're getting the first preview. | ||
| Um, we're going to put two dozen phones around the world, um, in Israel, Jordan, South Africa, Ecuador, uh, the United States all over. | ||
| And those phones are gonna be running our unplugged VPN, our unplugged messenger, and they're gonna be passing back and forth to each other in group texts the password for a cryptocurrency wallet that's got $5,000 in it. | ||
| If you can get to that wallet and find our password, that $5,000 is yours. | ||
| If you then Come back to us and say, here's how we got to the wallet and give us the pathway with which you got it. | ||
| We've got $25,000 more dollars for you escrowed with attorneys ready to go. | ||
| We're going to publish the locations of all the phones, city and country, not any more precise than that. | ||
| We are going to publish all the phone numbers of the phones. | ||
| The phones will be continually pushing messages around. | ||
| We'll be able to provide updates and visualizations of where messages flowed all over the world. | ||
| And our whole goal is to get other people To look at it. | ||
| Eric talked about this crowdsourcing. | ||
| You know, you hand it over to one person and they do it. | ||
| You can't replicate it. | ||
| You hand it over to a hundred thousand people and they all get after it. | ||
| You learn so much from the crowd. | ||
| And so we're really excited to be able to announce this first here on your show. | ||
| All the rules will be out on the 1st of September. | ||
| And yeah, we're looking forward to some After what we saw on Las Vegas, we're in, we're looking forward to some very, very competent people, uh, going after our phones. | ||
| Is, is, is the, uh, is the, uh, yeah, go ahead, Eric, go ahead. | ||
| And remember that's unplugged.com forward slash war room, where you can preorder a phone and you can download our secure messenger VPN and app suite right now. | ||
| Uh, come and join and, uh, and guarantee secure communication with your friends, family, and, uh, and colleagues. | ||
| You guys pride yourself in the encryption key and this, that it's unhackable. | ||
| That's why you're going out to the, that's why you're going out to the, uh, to, to the world to say, Hey, we challenge you to do this. | ||
| But in the attitude, when you go to DEF CON is that these people think Everything is hackable. | ||
| They don't think there's been a system yet, whether it's a, whether it's a cryptocurrency or whether it's a nuclear code. | ||
| Now I realize there's, there's a vast percentage they haven't hacked, but the attitude of these guys, these are real rogues, rebels and gunslingers, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And so I started to talk a little bit about the fact that it usually takes some technical and some personal, and we look back to Edward Snowden. | ||
| Some of the biggest stuff that got hacked from our nation, and that included a human, and some technical access, and some technical prowess. | ||
| And, you know, if you can, always the biggest flaw in our systems are the humans that are on the other side of the keyboard. | ||
| And that was why it was so interesting for us to see physical locks, technical locks, and then cognitive locks. | ||
| And people being able to hack humans to get them to give up things that they shouldn't give up. | ||
| If you've got a human on the inside. | ||
| Let me ask you, when you talk about your your system is so sophisticated, right? | ||
| It's like some of the ones in national security, because you two guys come out of national security. | ||
| When I talk about elections and the run-up we've got to the summit this week, That breakout session they had over the elections, that's not really the pros from Dover. | ||
| I mean, they hack into these machines. | ||
| They say, this is not me and I'm not a machine guy at all. | ||
| But they sit there and correct me if I'm wrong at DEF CON and say, hey, we hack into these things in a couple hours because it's just not, they're not that complicated. | ||
| Is that the sense that you guys get also? | ||
| I would say with the amount of money that's been thrown around at elections, the chances of hiring professional hackers to do malfeasance to an election machine is quite high. | ||
| And it's extremely dangerous. | ||
| And it's almost an argument to go back to paper or to something that is a very solid state and less likely to be hacked. | ||
| Well, I'm not even talking about that. | ||
| You get you're gonna have professional hang for a second, Ryan, you jump in nine professional. | ||
| Eric, the CCP, the Russians, Eastern Europe. | ||
| I mean, the guys are the experts in the best in hacking. | ||
| Let's leave the United States folks out for a second. | ||
| Are what I saw bad hombres from bad neighborhoods, right? | ||
| It's all the Eastern European guys, you know, Bulgaria, Romania. | ||
| It's Ukraine. | ||
| It's Russia or it's the CCP North Korea or that area up in Manchuria. | ||
| That's really kind of no man's land, right? | ||
| So forget even the individual entrepreneurial bandits and pirates, but just state sponsored hacking in this has got to be a national security concern, right? | ||
| And I don't know why it's not put up as a higher national security concern by the administrative state. | ||
| Because as you said, these contracts are led to the lowest cost bidder as the state governments and local governments and even where the federal government is. | ||
| They're not that sophisticated, at least not that sophisticated as far as the ability to beat off hacking. | ||
| And I realize I keep saying they're not hooked up to the internet, never hooked up to the internet, but it seems to me enough professionals are out there that are questioning that. | ||
| That is something that's got to be dealt with now. | ||
| Ryan, let me start with you and then we go to Eric. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Again, I just, I think, I think one of the things that gets glossed over a lot is, is that the attack. | ||
| Surface the attack vectors are broad and they start with connection at some point in time. | ||
| These machines are connected to the Internet During the operation of a voting. | ||
| They're not There are folks that can get close enough to a device proximity RFI RFID or other proximity where they can get into those and then there is the human side of this Where somebody can make a mistake and give somebody access that they did not intend to give access to right? | ||
| So there's there's long there's far away and network access, there's proximity access, and then there's human access that come into all of these things. | ||
| And it often gets devolved down to like, this person hacked into the internet. | ||
| And that's not how any of our major breaches that we've seen anywhere in the globe have happened. | ||
| It's always been a combination of those three things. | ||
| Eric, your thoughts on this? | ||
| Yeah, as Ryan says, with broad access, close access, and of course, the invariability of humans either making an intentional or a unintentional mistake, clearly there's a lot of ways for bad things to happen in voting. | ||
| And, you know, I'm not going to get into that. | ||
| Our elections are so contested because government has just become too large. | ||
| It is our job to just make it smaller so people can go on with their lives. | ||
| Things are going to get really, really ugly if people continue to lose faith and to question the validity of these elections. | ||
| And so it must be tightened down. | ||
| And it's something that you can do at your local level to make sure your local election is tight. | ||
| You can demand it at your state level. | ||
| And of course, the federal government, we know, has its own set of issues. | ||
| But that's the strength of our federal system. | ||
| Hopefully, most things still affect us at our state and local level. | ||
| And the federal election has to be tightened up. | ||
| And I believe you said there is a big Supreme Court decision pending that will put those decisions back in the hands of state legislatures and take it away from activist governors and secretaries of state. | ||
| That's a very, very key decision. | ||
| Independent state legislature. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| In the couple of minutes we got left, you know, we have a home title lock. | ||
| We have a lot of sponsors that are there to tell people, hey, it's a new universe out there when everything's digital, everything's online. | ||
| What's just your general takeaway in coming, going to DEF CON and seeing the number of hackers, the depth of their talent, the scale of what they can do? | ||
| Is it a, is a, are you more comfortable with cybersecurity today? | ||
| Or are you saying, hey, this is, this conference ought to be called DEF CON one. | ||
| Well, you know, private companies take this much more seriously because they have legal exposure for disclosure of private information. | ||
| Ford, Tesla have vehicles there where people could hack them and whoever hacks them the best gets a vehicle. | ||
| And the companies learn from that experience. | ||
| It's well worth them spending the vehicle and sending people out there because they are constantly probed. | ||
| They are crowdsourcing security. | ||
| That's why we are crowdsourcing our security for Unplugged by casting it wide for the world. | ||
| The problem with government is it's tend to be slow to adapt, very bureaucratic, even if it's the best intention of people running the government, they're still very, very bureaucratic and slow, and they don't really adapt to the modern threats and nuances. | ||
| Now, if you couple that much exposure on top of, I would say, perhaps bad intent by some bureaucrats, It's a very, very volatile combination and it must be addressed and repaired immediately. | ||
| Ryan, we got about a minute. | ||
| Give us your summary about how can people look forward to the 1 September start of this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So as Eric said, you know, we're really looking forward to putting the crowd on this problem. | |
| I've had the pleasure of serving in a couple of very fun government agencies that did research and development for the Department of Defense. | ||
| And they crowdsource things, everything from autonomous vehicles to cyber defense and other things. | ||
| And so everybody has now realized when you get a larger set of eyes to look at a problem and folks that are willing to spend a few hours, when you bring that together with some potential prizes, whether they be, you know, a little bit of a prize for everybody or a large price for somebody, you get to outsize your ability to have folks help you get more secure. | ||
| I think there is still this place. | ||
| Where people don't understand just how vulnerable we are in our everyday communication on everything we do all the time. | ||
| Agreed. | ||
| Unplugged.com forward slash war room. | ||
| Go there, check it out today. | ||
| We'll be back at 10 o'clock. | ||
| Eric Prince, Ryan Patterson, thank you guys very much for joining us. |
Export Selection