July 18, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:22
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Peace. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin. | |
| They can't handle the truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Battleground. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| They put Peter Navarro in leg irons for simply doing his constitutional duty. | ||
| Now they want to put Peter in prison for standing up for Donald Trump. | ||
| Please go to Amazon right now and order Taking Back Trump's America to help fund Peter's legal defense. | ||
| Taking Back Trump's America provides a critical MAGA blueprint to put Trump back in the White House in 2024. | ||
| Buy Taking Back Trump's America on Amazon today. | ||
| If they can put Peter Navarro in prison, they can come for all of us. | ||
| of the authors of a new conservative-led report out today debunking each and every legal claim of election fraud made by Trump and his team as it relates to the 2020 vote. | ||
| And gentlemen, thank you for being with us. | ||
| I was talking about Republicans who call themselves conservatives but still believe in the big And so that's why you are here. | ||
| I first want to ask you about this report that the two of you have put together. | ||
| Who is it for? | ||
| Uh, Ben first. | ||
| We wrote this report for conservatives who may believe the allegations that elections are fraudulent and rigged. | ||
| And what we wanted to do was gather a group of conservative jurists and political operatives to take a look at every single charge Donald Trump or his supporters filed in any of the six battleground states. | ||
| And so we have looked at all 64 cases and 187 counts and confirmed that he did not make his case. | ||
| I think Steve is out there still doing the victory laps he was taking over the CNN documentary last night. | ||
| Curious piece of journalism from CNN. | ||
| It was a blatant, bald-faced attempt To portray Steve in the worst possible light and what they wound up doing, I think... | ||
| was turning him into the savior of our republic by resurrecting the grassroots here in America. | ||
| I think my favorite part of the film, let's call it a film, was the beginning featuring what I would describe as, let us say, very well-spoken soccer mom types from the great state of Georgia | ||
| Who apparently were politically unawake, and somehow they heard Steve on this show, War Room, And we're inspired, the three of them, all to run for some type of office. | ||
| Two of them, I think, for either Congress or State Representative, and another one as an official in the Republican Party, based on Steve Bannon discussing the canon of Bannon, which is action, action, action. | ||
| And the beauty, of course, of Bannon's War Room is that it It empowers people by showing them the levers of power they can grab and participate in, such as the precinct strategy made famous on this show by people like Dan Schultz. | ||
| So, yeah, Steve's probably doing victory laps, but of course you know that's not why he's here. | ||
| There are other reasons for that, and our prayers are with Stephen K. Bannon today, and for the rest of the time, he's going to need to be away from this microphone, which shouldn't be too long. | ||
| At any rate, that fellow there, Ginsberg was his name. | ||
| Okay, bald head, beard, bespeckled, beautiful, gold tie, nice suit. | ||
| Got nothing against bald people. | ||
| I'm getting there myself. | ||
| It happens to all of us. | ||
| But that SOB comes across as a rational, intelligent, | ||
| unbiased human being when that sound of a bitch is anything but that and the first we're gonna have Seth Kessel on I'm gonna get him on here after I complete this uh let us call monologue some may call it a rant I'll call it a monologue um but the first thing I want to tell you about these kind of reports that you see | ||
| They kind of bubble up from the muck where these guys in this case go, we're conservatives who claim that the election was fair. | ||
| My students back at UC Irvine, when I was trying to teach them how to consume news, you always had to first condition what you were consuming on who the people were that were writing it. | ||
| Here's a couple of quotes from Ginsburg, okay? | ||
| My party is destroying itself on the altar of Trump. | ||
| Okay, there you go. | ||
| Look what we've become. | ||
| It is we who must fix this. | ||
| Trump should not be re-elected. | ||
| Vote, but not for him. | ||
| Okay, so there you have it. | ||
| The guy who allegedly is writing an unbiased report along with five other, six other Republican rhino losers, Has been avowedly never Trump since the day Trump got elected in 2016. | ||
| So what kind of credibility do you have there? | ||
| Zero, I would say. | ||
| If you look at Senator Danforth, okay, another one of the beauties. | ||
| He got to be lead author. | ||
| I wonder how that worked. | ||
| I love the title of the op-ed he wrote in 2017, right? | ||
| This is like five years before he would look you in the eye and say, oh, I'm just writing a report unbiased from the Republican point of view. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Here's what the title of that op-ed was. | ||
| Trump is exactly what Republicans are not. | ||
| And here's the thing. | ||
| Five years later, Trump is exactly what the Republican Party has become. | ||
| MAGA. | ||
| Make America Great Again. | ||
| Deplorables. | ||
| Party of the Working Class. | ||
| The Black, Brown, Blue Collar Americans, the New Rainbow Coalition, the party where Hispanic Dems, Hispanic Blacks are coming home to the party of Abe Lincoln, home to the Republican Party. | ||
| So don't tell me, Danforth, that you are unbiased. | ||
| Now, as for the report itself, They make the claim in that report that they looked at every claim of fraud and irregularities and debunk it. | ||
| Well, I was deeply offended by that, personally, because as Steve Bannon has talked about many times on War Room, The unquestioned, definitive, first major analysis of fraud and election irregularities during the 2020 election was none other than that thing called what? | ||
| The Navarro Report. | ||
| Get it on PeterNavarro.com. | ||
| It was something I did Beginning Thanksgiving day after the election in 2020 and finished before the events of January 6th. | ||
| And what I showed in that report, beyond any shadow of a doubt, Cameron do we have slides here? | ||
| So can you pull up the victory margin, the Biden margin slide here? | ||
| See if we can get that up there. | ||
| Because what I found, the top line chart here, the chart's titled The Immaculate Deception at the Head. | ||
| It has some numbers at the bottom. | ||
| That's not the chart. | ||
| No, no, that's not. | ||
| Okay, you'll get it. | ||
| I'll describe it while they're trying to find it. | ||
| But what I did in that report was, look, At the six major battleground states where the election was allegedly won by Biden. | ||
| It was Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And there it is. | ||
| We got this now. | ||
| Now, what I would refer to you, I guess in the small print, first of all, is the numbers. | ||
| What I did was, after looking at all the fraud and irregularities, my top line finding was that the number of possible illegal ballots attributable to fraud and irregularities absolutely dwarfed the alleged Biden victory margin. | ||
| Remember, for example, Georgia Biden allegedly won that by 12,000 votes, Massamanos, right? | ||
| The number of illegal ballots potentially in the state of Georgia alone was well in excess of 400,000. | ||
| And if you look at that chart, what you see is like these different categories of irregularities. | ||
| See, that's the thing. | ||
| It wasn't just Bump in the night, illegal ballots stuffed in drop boxes. | ||
| It was things like the ballot mishandling, the contestable process files, the mistreatment of poll watchers. | ||
| What you find here are a set of numbers that really should drive any reasonable person to want to investigate these irregularities. | ||
| Now, that's not what this report did by these so-called RINO conservatives, who are anything but Trump conservatives. | ||
| What they did was simply ignore the Navarro report. | ||
| I found this curious, right? | ||
| Okay, so, look, that report is out there. | ||
| It's the most heavily footnoted, well-documented report on election fraud and irregularities that was presented to the American people within the first 60 to 90 days after the election, okay? | ||
| It is a part of history, okay? | ||
| There is zero, zero reference to that report and therefore zero repuddle of the statistical claims I make in that report. | ||
| And what I find heartening Based on the hard work I did on that report, if you look at 2000 Mules, that's the bookend. | ||
| That's the film by Dinesh D'Souza coupled with Rigged, the beautiful film by Dave Bossi. | ||
| What those two films have done is basically verify Everything I did in the Navarro report, and my numbers are eerily similar to what Dinesh D'Souza finds when he does his 2,000 mules analysis. | ||
| And what did this Republican report do with 2,000 mules? | ||
| They said it had been completely discredited based on three footnotes from what? | ||
| Left-wing journalists. | ||
| I mean, come on guys. | ||
| This is just total nonsense. | ||
| So with that kind of as a lengthy, a lengthy Introduction to this whole issue. | ||
| If Seth Kessel is on the phone, there he is. | ||
| Look at that man. | ||
| Vest. | ||
| He's in his vest today. | ||
| Never trust a man with a vest except Seth Kessel. | ||
| Alright, Seth, you've heard my rant. | ||
| I'm gonna let you rant a bit. | ||
| Go for it. | ||
| Tell us what your read was of this report done by these alleged rhinos. | ||
| So the report is a dud. | ||
| Steve reached out to me last week, wanted me to run it over and give my two cents. | ||
| And just like you said, your numbers match Dinesh's, my numbers match yours in a different way of analyzing the election. | ||
| Right off the bat, the authors show their bias. | ||
| Trump is mentioned 245 times in the document, Biden 101 times. | ||
| Clearly, they're trying to make the angle that Republicans and Trump don't really go together and to quell down. | ||
| No, I wonder why now, 20 months after the election, you have all these hit pieces. | ||
| I was featured in one in National Propaganda Radio a couple weeks ago that was also a dud. | ||
| Looking through the data, they talk about what would happen if the Americans lost trust in the system of elections thanks to stuff like this. | ||
| Well, they already have. | ||
| Even CNN's own numbers show 52% of Americans don't trust the system of elections. | ||
| More conservative outlets are showing about 60% of Americans believe the election of 2020 was decided by outright fraud. | ||
| And you can go down and through the states, and they talk about support for other Republicans, as if Trump had a weak performance, but no incumbent president since 1888 Grover Cleveland has gained votes from the previous election and failed to win re-election. | ||
| You can look at any of these numerous trends, indicators, bellwethers, and predictors, some of them that go back to 1872, that were disrupted by the magnitude of fraud that happened in our election. | ||
| I wouldn't say on November 3rd, but 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and so on. | ||
| They counted until they needed no more votes. | ||
| About the mail-in ballots, you can look at states that have had mail-in balloting before 2020—Washington, Oregon, Utah, Colorado. | ||
| I did the analysis on those four states, and they had pretty standard increase in turnout over the years as their populations grew until 2020, and they also exploded. | ||
| So why is it that we use mail ballots as an excuse for higher turnout in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and so on? | ||
| Really, the conspiracy theorist here, not the Trump supporters, it would be Robin Voss, the Speaker of the General Assembly in Wisconsin, who was presented with so much evidence of election fraud there that he had to come out and say that there was widespread fraud in Wisconsin. | ||
| The authors of this report say that there may have been some fraud. | ||
| The changes, which by the way, were illegal. | ||
| The state executives going around the legislature to mandate mail ballots in states they don't even have a system to govern mail balloting. | ||
| Some fraud may have happened, but not enough to overturn results. | ||
| They even went as far as to say no results in even a precinct would have been overturned. | ||
| Well, my researchers came back with some interesting numbers on Maricopa County. | ||
| There were 23 precincts out of more than 740 in Maricopa County that were decided within 1% to either side, and five of those We're decided by a single vote. | ||
| So it's not just Trump versus Biden in Arizona that is on the decertification block. | ||
| It should be McSally versus Kelly. | ||
| It should be about 12 other races in Maricopa County that are completely too close to call. | ||
| And ironically, two races for the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. | ||
| The Steve Choukri recording suggests that they did not want an audit in Maricopa County because Sellers and Gates were concerned they may not have won their elections. | ||
| So you can go down the chain in Arizona. | ||
| They even talk about the Cyber Ninjas report. | ||
| And the first thing they say is that Biden actually got 99 more votes and Trump lost votes, 261 votes. | ||
| Unfortunately for them, that was not a recount. | ||
| So if I give you five $100 bills, you're going to say you've got 500 bucks until I show you that two of them are counterfeit. | ||
| You really have 300. | ||
| So the issue with the election from coast to coast and even beyond, I've shown my numbers about Hawaii and Audit to Vote Hawaii was very happy. | ||
| I showed the fraud there. | ||
| But you can see that really these ballots are being cast by, I would say voters, but by entries on voter registration lists that don't exist. | ||
| You can go into Wisconsin, the Gableman investigation, the Secretary of State audits show people registered on the voter rolls as marks of punctuation or in mass registered in 1918. | ||
| 7% of mail ballots trafficked in Wisconsin. | ||
| Now you've seen the ruling from the Wisconsin Supreme Court saying not only are the drop boxes illegal, they were illegal in 2020. | ||
| That should absolutely be a history changing prompt for Wisconsin to decertify its 2020 election. | ||
| But of course, they say that they don't have a mechanism to do so. | ||
| I did send you a few graphics if you want to show the magnitude of the fraud in Arizona in a different way. | ||
| So let's do that. | ||
| Before we get into the numbers, just hang on to that for a minute. | ||
| The thing, here's what I think we need to answer better on our side of the fence. | ||
| I think the major attack on Trump and the results was the almost uniform refusal of the legal system, both the Supreme Court and across the many states, to take on this issue. | ||
| And I think that that's got to be explained better by us. | ||
| And then I also think we need to kind of dissect What these guys had to say about the data in 2,000 mules. | ||
| So Seth, why is it? | ||
| Because you and I both know, and we've said this repeatedly, it's the canvas not the count. | ||
| You can recount ballots until the cows come home, and if there's a bunch of illegal ones in there that you don't know are illegal, you're still going to come to the same result. | ||
| Why is it that the legal system and even RINO Republicans in these battleground states have not allowed a fair counting of the legal votes to take place? | ||
| Do you have any insight on that? | ||
| Yeah, I made a comment today on social media about the six contested states that you've mentioned. | ||
| Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. | ||
| And all defenses are out to make sure that nothing can be uncovered, although that's not been the case. | ||
| We've uncovered so much that you should have already decertified every single state in the union. | ||
| But there are a number of states that aren't thought of as contested states, where there's a very soft underbelly of fraud that is visible, like Washington, Oregon, Hawaii. | ||
| You can go across to the East Coast in New Jersey, Rhode Island, a number of states where you wouldn't even expect to look. | ||
| Red states, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas. | ||
| And in these Republican states, like in Texas, We have Donald Trump wanting an audit in Texas and Greg Abbott said he would support an audit in Texas and we don't have it. | ||
| And it brings me to the question of if these issues in the voter rolls and with all the mechanisms of which narrow races can be manipulated, if it's a two-party system of election fraud in which both parties feed at the same trough and that is not to be exposed. | ||
| That's the main concern of those of us in red states that are looking for audit action in those. | ||
| See, it's, again, I get to, I go back to this report. | ||
| Let's segue over to the 2000 mules. | ||
| I mean, I watched that film. | ||
| As you said, and I said, the numbers that were calculated of potentially legal votes track pretty well with my speculation on the matter. | ||
| And as I understand it, These 2,000 mules were people revealed by the data analysis who were shown to emanate from these non-profit organizations so that they were likely affiliated with these non-profits. | ||
| This is where the ballots were stashed. | ||
| And they went repeatedly, and when I say repeatedly, I mean repeatedly in a pattern not just to one Dropbox, but to many on any given day or night. | ||
| And it seems to me that you can make the case like these alleged Republicans did, That, well, you know, the data can't tell us if they were at the Dropbox, maybe they were 10 or 20 feet away or something like that, picking their nose at the ice cream store. | ||
| I mean, who knows, right? | ||
| But if you have a pattern where these people are near and therefore at Dropbox after Dropbox after Dropbox on routes, Repeatedly over numerous days and they're associated with these non-profits that were put into place by things like Zuckerbucks. | ||
| It seems to me that at a minimum the Justice Department at the federal level and the investigators at the state level should want to Investigate that. | ||
| Yet again, Seth, we have none of that. | ||
| Can you give your take on D'Souza's analysis and why it may be right or wrong? | ||
| Yeah, I feel like 2,000 mules corroborated exactly what it is that I've been measuring for over a year and a half, and I've always called it excess votes. | ||
| Really, it's excess votes of total turnout, but you see it particularly in one candidate's column who failed all the trends indicators, bellwethers, and predictors for almost 150 years. | ||
| Now, I kind of see it as an extra foot on a scale to where there's too many votes. | ||
| Seth, do me a favor. | ||
| Just repeat that once more about defy the trends and bellwethers. | ||
| What do you mean by that when you say that? | ||
| Because that's burying the lead. | ||
| What do you mean by that before you go on and make your point? | ||
| You have the electoral trends, state by state. | ||
| Pennsylvania is a great example. | ||
| I've given you a slide that we can look at for PA. | ||
| It's had a strong Republican trend since Obama walked off the stage in 2008, ever since he took office. | ||
| Look at that right there. | ||
| From 2016 to 2020, the Republican Party—that's Trump's term, obviously—the Republican Party outregistered the Democrats at a ratio of 21 to 1. | ||
| That's 242,000 net new Republican registrations in only 11,000 Democrat registrations, which is a complete beating. | ||
| The previous cycle, we had a similar shift like that, three points in registration towards the GOP, and it resulted in a six-point swing in the state and a Trump flip. | ||
| So what we're saying is Pennsylvania registered a 21 to 1 ratio for the GOP with Trump at the helm of the GOP, just so we could give Trump a record number of net new Republican votes and total votes surpassing Obama's vote total in a state with a declining or stagnant population. | ||
| That's a trend. | ||
| An indicator would be the bellwethers. | ||
| So we've seen the bellwethers on the map. | ||
| 18 bellwethers go to Trump. | ||
| That's an indicator that, hey, it's going to be a long night for Joe Biden. | ||
| million new votes between the two major parties in Pennsylvania, which is actually losing electoral power in the next decade. That's a trend. An indicator would be the bellwethers. So we've seen the bellwethers on the map, 18 bellwethers go to Trump. That's an indicator that, hey, it's going to be a long night for Joe Biden. And of course, he winds up winning the election somehow with all bellwethers lost except for one. | ||
| Then we have some predictive data. | ||
| You can see ones like no president has ever gained votes and lost since 1888. | ||
| And we have Trump gaining 11 million votes. | ||
| So those are the things that I've been looking at. | ||
| So they're really conversation starters in which nobody has a good answer. | ||
| Another good one is, how does Joe Biden outperform Barack Obama? | ||
| In Hawaii, with Hawaii also bearing the largest percentage Republican vote gain in the nation in 2020. | ||
| So the Trump win was so large that it impacted the electoral trends of solid blue states in which they also need to be manipulated to distract from what happened in the Midwest and in Arizona and Georgia. | ||
| So everything looks normal across the board. | ||
| You can't look across the board and see an upset in Oregon, but Pennsylvania, Michigan go to Joe Biden. | ||
| Seth, my clock says we've got 30 seconds left here. | ||
| Is that right, Cameron? | ||
| Yes, indeed. | ||
| All right, Seth, can you hang on for the break? | ||
| We want to finish up with you with your social media and talk a little bit more about Dinesh D'Souza, why his numbers were probably right. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon here, War Room Battleground, making a difference, at least according to the CNN documentary. | ||
| We will be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Battlegrounds with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| you They put Peter Navarro in leg irons for simply doing his constitutional duty. | ||
| Now they want to put Peter in prison for standing up for Donald Trump. | ||
| Please go to Amazon right now and order Taking Back Trump's America to help fund Peter's legal defense. | ||
| Taking Back Trump's America provides a critical MAGA blueprint to put Trump back in the White House in 2024. | ||
| Buy Taking Back Trump's America on Amazon today. | ||
| If they can put Peter Navarro in prison, they can come for all of us. | ||
| And so, Judge Griffith, if you could explain, if you look at all of these cases, what is it about the way you conducted this investigation, this report, that might help bring those who are still believing this election was stolen to reality? | ||
| How do you think this is going to help? | ||
| Well, we started with the assumption that we were not going to rely on anyone else's account of what took place. | ||
| The President of the United States made these serious charges of election fraud, and out of respect for the office of the presidency, we thought Those claims deserve investigation and analysis, so we weren't going to rely on anyone else. | ||
| We did a deep dive ourselves into every claim of fraud or irregularity in all the battleground states. | ||
| I think it's highly significant that three of the members of this group our former federal appeals court judges appointed by Republican presidents. | ||
| Michael Ludig, Michael McConnell, these are two of the most highly respected conservative jurists actually in American history. | ||
| And they joined in this process and we took a deep dive, a fresh look at all of the allegations and we came up with the conclusion that Ben just mentioned. | ||
| There is no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome in any single precinct. | ||
| Let alone the nation. | ||
| So our hope is that when conservatives hear this from fellow conservatives, when they hear this from people who hold their same values about limited government, religious liberty, judicial conservatism, that they'll see what the truth is. | ||
| And hopefully, and this is the thing that I learned most from this process, Other than the fact that it confirmed that the election was lost, not stolen. | ||
| What I learned most from this process is that we have in the United States of America today an election administration system of which we can be very proud. | ||
| The bad old days of stuffed ballots and dead people voting, those are old days. | ||
| They were bad days. | ||
| They're not today. | ||
| American people should have great confidence in the election administration system. | ||
| It held up well in this instance. | ||
| And those who claim that there was fraud in this election that changed the outcome without any evidence are actually doing great damage to our election system. | ||
| They're doing great damage to our democracy. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I'm flat on my heels here watching that crap. | ||
| I mean, this is like the swamp. | ||
| These punks in pinstripes sit there and tell you that there wasn't a single precinct in America where there was any kind of election irregularities juxtaposed against all the statistical anomalies that Seth Kissel talked about. | ||
| In our earlier segment, juxtaposed against all the election irregularities I uncovered in my own report, and juxtaposed against just the visual evidence in the 2000 mules and rigged films of Dave Bossie and Dinesh D'Souza. | ||
| I've got to come back now Briefly, to Seth Kissel, just finish up, Seth, if you will, on your take of how it is possible for people to ignore 2,000 mules based on what we saw with our own eyes. | ||
| Because they don't want the outcomes of the elections to change. | ||
| They want the outcomes of elections to elect candidates that are acceptable for their positions. | ||
| Now, they call themselves conservatives, but conservatives in that sense haven't really conserved a whole lot, except in the way in which they tend to lose races and lose critical issues over time. | ||
| The operative word that they use is widespread fraud. | ||
| They don't say on the headers there for their shows that there's no evidence of fraud. | ||
| They say there's no evidence of widespread fraud, and they don't define what widespread means. | ||
| So just like Dan Crenshaw got himself into a trap arguing with With Bobby Pyton, a few months ago, we had 10,000 vote margin in Arizona, 12,000 in Georgia, 20,000 in Wisconsin, 33 in Nevada. | ||
| And we can go on to Michigan and Pennsylvania, but widespread, does that include 10, 12 and 20,000 votes? | ||
| Of course it does. | ||
| And we only have a certain sampling. | ||
| If you think that it's only in the cities, well, that's not the case either. | ||
| Stephanie Lambert is an attorney from Michigan, and she's just filed a case on Hillsdale County in which they found 11% of the votes are wrongfully tabulated in Adams Township. | ||
| I went and looked at that small county. | ||
| It looks like there's probably 2,000 or 3,000 extra votes sitting in that small county for one particular candidate we will not name. | ||
| So, they don't want the outcomes to change. | ||
| They want to protect a system that, in fact, they're making it worse. | ||
| They're digging deeper trenches. | ||
| Pennsylvania wants to move towards mail-in balloting because the Democrats there know, in a legitimate election system, Pennsylvania is becoming Ohio, which has already become Indiana, which is becoming West Virginia. | ||
| That is the way the working class vote in this country is moving. | ||
| Pennsylvania was easily a six to eight point minimum Trump state. | ||
| We could flip Pennsylvania without even looking at Philadelphia County. | ||
| Michigan is in the same boat. | ||
| So to answer your question, and it's not just conservative people they're pushing, there's a man named Philip Stark. | ||
| He's a leftist academian who's out there and he reviewed Fulton County and he said that there's two to three times Two to three ballots counted God knows how many times, in which any sort of certification of a vote in Fulton County, it really can't even be audited anyway. | ||
| It's so sloppy in its tabulation. | ||
| Nobody has any idea, the foggiest idea, where to even begin, other than the starting point of Joe Biden is outperforming Barack Obama in Metro Atlanta, which doesn't make a lot of sense. | ||
| Seth, here's something that you and I will share right now, because what we want to do is encourage everybody watching this show to action, action, action. | ||
| It's critical that we not only win back the House of Representatives in 2022, but also seize Through the ballot box, through legal votes, the secretaries of state positions in all of these key battleground states and around this country, because | ||
| With the help of Stephen K. Bannon and shows like The War Room, we will find out what happened. | ||
| We will get to the bottom of that, provided that we're able to take back Trump's America for the American people. | ||
| And that's what our mission is. | ||
| Seth, just tell us how people can reach you through your social media or webpage. | ||
| Best way to find me is on telegram or truesocial. | ||
| The handle is at real s keshel k-e-s-h-e-l. | ||
| My brother, you are one of the crispest guests I interview, and it's always a pleasure to have you on, sir. | ||
| We're going to go now, if I can, have that cold open from what was supposed to be a hit piece last night by CNN of Stephen K. Bannon, and they revealed Steve to be the guy the war room knows, which is to say the savior of American democracy. | ||
| So play that, and we're going to bring on Dan Schultz. | ||
|
unidentified
|
These three women and millions like them are what Bannon hopes is the future of the Republican Party and the United States. | |
| Bannon calls it the precinct strategy. | ||
| We're going to take over everything from school boards all the way up to the House and the Senate. | ||
| He is really talking about, from the ground up, remaking a party that is a Trump-loyal, MAGA-loyal kind of party. | ||
| Okay, I want to start with Dan Schultz. | ||
| Precinct strategy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The precinct strategy's author is a Bannon regular, Dan Schultz, a local Arizona attorney. | |
| If we conservatives don't take over the Republican Party, we're going to lose our republic. | ||
| President Trump comes out and endorses the precinct strategy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
His step-by-step tutorial for taking over Republican politics is now considered almost gospel, inspiring thousands of believers in the election lie to get involved. | |
| GOP leaders in more than 20 counties in mostly battleground states told CNN they've seen a spike in participation. | ||
| The precinct committee strategy. | ||
| That's the first thing. | ||
| Dan Schultz. | ||
| I'm like, oh my gosh. | ||
| I'm calling everybody I know. | ||
| Did you even know that we had a precinct in my neighborhood? | ||
| I'm the committee person now. | ||
| You know, just feeling like, hey, I'm actually doing something. | ||
| They are all doing something because of Bannon. | ||
| Yeah, you gotta love that. | ||
| You just gotta love that. | ||
| I mean, look, here's the best part about those three women. | ||
| Like, just intelligent, soccer mom Americans sitting there, and the first time they ever heard of Steve Bannon was not during 2016 when he masterminded the victory of Donald Trump. | ||
| It wasn't in 2017 when Steve Bannon went into the White House as one of the top China hawks and brought about significant policies, albeit the short time he was there. | ||
| It was not because they knew him from Breitbart days. | ||
| None of that. | ||
| It was simply this show, The War Room. | ||
| And he was the only guy talking sense. | ||
| Stephen K. Bannon, in a world where, and they're from Georgia, those women, nothing seemed to make sense. | ||
| Those women knew that Donald Trump knew that election because they knew Georgia. | ||
| And so lo and behold, the only person I think they'd rather be able to talk to Then Steve Bannon might be my next guest here. | ||
| Dan Schultz. | ||
| Apparently, Dan, you are a hero with your precinct strategy. | ||
| But let's bring in Dan now. | ||
| I just want to get your reaction, first of all, to that CNN documentary when you saw what was going on there. | ||
| Thanks, Peter. | ||
| Thanks for having me. | ||
| I thought it was a very good piece. | ||
| As you mentioned, both the article that they wrote, which is very good, which has tutorial videos on the precinct committeeman strategy, and then those wonderful women that they showcased from Georgia, salt of the earth people, good, decent people who want to do something, and now they're doing it, and they're getting involved for the first time in their life in party politics and learning basic American civics, which they probably didn't get taught, unfortunately, | ||
| In the schools they went to, but I did, you know, and what I did in 2017, as I, I put it all in this little book, I wrote how to get into real ball game of politics, where you live to help president Donald J. Trump make America great again. | ||
| It's the precursor to in Trump time, sort of, so, so to speak, I was trying to get Donald Trump to become the recruiter in chief. | ||
| And, um, and you know, he is, he's endorsed the, um, the precinct committeeman strategy. | ||
| And they even linked to the Liz Harrington announcement on Twitter. | ||
| I thought that was very nice of them. | ||
| And what I really liked was when they eventually got to Ben Ginsberg, the former RNC General Counsel, and he said, there's nothing... and he hit the nail on the head. | ||
| There's nothing wrong with people wanting to become poll workers and poll watchers and precinct committeemen and getting involved where they live politically. | ||
| There's nothing wrong with that whatsoever. | ||
| And he's absolutely right. | ||
| And that's what we need to do. | ||
| We, the American people, we the good decent American first years need to fill all the vacancies in our Republican party. | ||
| So the last question I have for you, was your website blowing up today with new recruits and everything like that? | ||
| Were you able to significantly boost the strategy based on that? | ||
| Or does CNN have such few people watching it that it was crickets or somewhere in between? | ||
| It was somewhere in between. | ||
| Last night I got a significant increase and then Today, I know this morning because I was on War Room this morning with Jack Wosowiec, I got a whole lot of email inquiries and I could see real time how many people were going to my site. | ||
| So I'll know after midnight tonight what happened today. | ||
| And so I did want to mention three things real quick, if I can. | ||
| First, you know, first place to go is my site PrecinctStrategy.com. | ||
| And that's what it looks like. | ||
| That's the first action site. | ||
| And then once you get there, you sign up, clicking on, you know, this button here, connect with other conservatives in your state. | ||
| That takes you to our site at pill.net, our precinct strategy site at pill.net. | ||
| And then there's a new voter integrity tool that I want everybody to check out, Votify Now. | ||
| You go to votifynow.org, votifynow.org. | ||
| To see it. | ||
| You can download it to your smartphone. | ||
| It'll make you the eyes and ears, and not just you, but every voter could download this. | ||
| And while they're voting this election cycle, and in 2024, if you see anything untoward, you can report it via Votify Now. | ||
| And there's lots more to Votify Now. | ||
| So just go to votifynow.org to check it out. | ||
| I don't have any financial interest in any of those things. | ||
| At all. | ||
| The only thing I want you to do is get my book. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because if you get my book, you'll become a Christian. | |
| All right, my brother. | ||
| Dan Schultz, you are an American patriot, sir. | ||
| Go visit Dan Schultz and you will become a patriot like him. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| We're going to go next now. | ||
| If we can, we'd love to showcase political candidates who are pro-Trump in various states. | ||
| And so let's introduce that via an ad, a political ad, if we can. | ||
| The engineers play that for us now and then we'll bring in the guest. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, my name is Giordano Schiaparelli. | |
| No one knows better than me what socialism and inflation is. | ||
| This is 500 billion paper money bill. | ||
| Empty shelves, long gas lines, and rising prices are the first signs of a civil unrest. | ||
| We do not want to go that way. | ||
| But sadly, our government is taking us right there. | ||
| We need to stop this path to socialism. | ||
| And I know how. | ||
| Vote for freedom. | ||
| Paid for by Citizens for Giordano Schiavonelli for Lieutenant Governor. | ||
| Kelly Hall, Treasurer. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Let's bring in the real person right now. | ||
| Jordana Schiffinelli. | ||
| So, come on, you got an Italian name and you're Yugoslavian. | ||
| Like, parse that for me first, but then tell us how your campaign's going and what you're running on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, thank you so much for having me. | |
| So the campaign is going great. | ||
| We had a record of primary or early voting in the primaries that just finished a couple of days ago. | ||
| Tomorrow is the Maryland's primary. | ||
| We are fighting a hundred years of Democrats dominance in Maryland House, in Maryland Senate. | ||
| Our people are suffering for freedom and they're dying for freedom. | ||
| And so, we need to deliver the freedom message to them. | ||
| We are fighting against a globalist machine, led by Republican Governor Hogan, who is endorsing Kelly Schultz, our opponent. | ||
| But the people know better. | ||
| But the people know better. | ||
| And we are ready. | ||
| We are ready for tomorrow. | ||
| So, when is the election? | ||
| Is it tomorrow, literally? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Tomorrow, 7 in the morning until 8 p.m., all the precincts open throughout the state of Maryland. | ||
| We have been loud and clear. | ||
| Those soccer moms you mentioned earlier, the parents, Parents for Freedom, parent advocacy groups, they're all sick and tired of mask mandates, vaccine mandates at universities and some schools, the shutdowns that literally destroyed our businesses and our economy. | ||
| Governor Larry Hogan has been ranked D, or the worst rated governor, post-COVID governor in modern history in the state of Maryland. | ||
| So we, the people, are here. | ||
| And the candidates are Dan Cox for governor, and myself, Gerardo Schifinelli for lieutenant governor. | ||
| And we've been sending the message of freedom to every precinct, to every community, and we have a phenomenal response. | ||
| And we are expecting to win tomorrow. | ||
| The absentee ballots play such a role in the steal in 2020. | ||
| What's the absentee ballot situation like? | ||
| Have most people already voted or do you have a big day game turnout? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we expect a big day game turnout. | |
| 86,000 Republican voters Requested mail-in ballots. | ||
| We do not know how these ballots are going to be counted. | ||
| I did verify with precinct election boards in certain precincts that there is no way of knowing who is signing the ballot. | ||
| So there is no signature verification. | ||
| Let me put that clear. | ||
| Um, when it comes to, uh, in-person voting tomorrow, I think, uh, Republican voters are ready to show up at the polls because, and we saw, uh, the early voting, uh, numbers come in in the early voting, uh, week, which, uh, was July 7th through the 14th. | ||
| So, um, we see that people are coming to vote. | ||
| Uh, a lot of them are waiting tomorrow, and I think tomorrow is for Maryland the D-Day. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Well, good luck to you. | ||
| Tomorrow we'll be watching. | ||
| We should be talking about it on The War Room. | ||
| This is Peter K. Navarro sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We'll be back in The War Room tomorrow at 10 a.m. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we love you to be here. | |
| You are the action, action human agency folks that make all of this go. | ||
| It is the number one podcast in the world in politics. |
Export Selection