Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
The person who created a great deal of confusion by saying that this matter was for the reproductive freedom of women. | ||
And I appreciate her yielding to a few questions that I think clarified that point. | ||
If the gentlelady would yield to another clarifying question, and I'm not here to make a partisan argument, I'm here to understand the effect of the bill and what you're talking about in support of the bill. | ||
You used the phrase, unborn child, in your most recent debate. | ||
What does that phrase mean to you? | ||
unidentified
|
Mr. Gates, Ms. | |
Bass would like to answer your questions. | ||
I am finished with you right now, and I do not yield. | ||
So that's telling, right? | ||
I'm just here trying to get answers to questions. | ||
unidentified
|
Ms. | |
Bass, you didn't use the words that were confusing, so I'm not going to yield to you. | ||
unidentified
|
It is my bill! | |
But you didn't use the words in description of it. | ||
unidentified
|
And guess why? | |
It was Ms. | ||
Ross who used those words. | ||
And if I want to ask questions to Ms. | ||
Ross, she could choose whether or not to yield to give the answers. | ||
But you covering for her, she doesn't know the words she uses, and cannot in the Judiciary Committee sit and answer the questions on something as important as life or death when I control the time is outrageous! | ||
unidentified
|
Are you done? | |
I'm done when my term's done. | ||
It's Mr. Gates' time. | ||
You can yield for those questions, but it's crazy that in this committee, when I'm trying to get honest answers to questions about the effect of the bill, whether or not it paves the way to abortions, that you all want to sit up there and squawk at me rather than allow me to ask questions. | ||
When you have the time, you can control the time. | ||
How about that? | ||
But these are fair questions. | ||
She used the phrase, unborn child. | ||
I would like to know what that means to her because what it means to us is that it is a life. | ||
You know what? | ||
I want the answer on the record, Ms. | ||
Bass. | ||
I want the answer for the American people because to all of us, my party that was impugned, we actually think that unborn life is a child and that there is a liberty interest there that is worthy of our defense and our protection and the values that undergird the American Constitution. | ||
I don't think that's too unreasonable. | ||
And by the way, if you use a phrase in this committee, you shouldn't have to have a senior member answer the questions for you. | ||
You should be able to answer those questions yourself. | ||
And if not, I think it speaks to the credibility of the debate that is offered. | ||
So I'll yield, Ms. | ||
Bass. | ||
I got 50 seconds. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
I would like for us to vote on the amendment. | ||
I think the bill is clear. | ||
The rest of this discussion is theater. | ||
I would like to vote on the amendment. | ||
Can we vote on the amendment, Mr. Chair? | ||
I'll tell you what, Ms. | ||
Bass, reclaiming my time. | ||
We'll vote when we're damn well ready and when we're done answering our questions. | ||
Oh, you chair the committee now? | ||
No, we have rights in the minority to utilize time under the five-minute rule to be able to offer our perspective on matters. | ||
And we're sorry if you all are in such a rush to kill unborn life that you're unwilling to answer our questions. | ||
But you know what? | ||
The good news is, with the Supreme Court we currently have, this is now a pro-life country, and we've got all the time in the world for that. | ||
Wow. | ||
The 14th of July is Bastille Day. | ||
We're going to get into that in a little while, but I had to open with Matt Gaetz bringing the heat. | ||
Think about what that's going to be like when we're in charge in January. | ||
Terry Schilling. | ||
And Gaetz is not known as a, I mean, Gaetz is not one of the right-to-life guys, right? | ||
The pro-life guys. | ||
He's good. | ||
But I mean, that was on fire right there. | ||
Tell the audience why that was important. | ||
unidentified
|
We're finally getting a Republican Party, Steve, that's fighting back and not just, you know, telling everyone what they believe. | |
They're holding our enemies accountable, right? | ||
We need 150 more Matt Gaetz in Congress and you're going to see things start to change really quickly. | ||
D.C. | ||
is a town where they go to the gray areas and they try to cover everything up and be polite and fake and be phony. | ||
It's terrible. | ||
And people like Matt Gaetz and Josh Hawley and Tom Cotton, there's this whole crew that's coming up now that is just done. | ||
They're done playing nice. | ||
They're done being fake. | ||
Because guess what, Steve? | ||
It only goes one way. | ||
There's only one side of the aisle that's ever really polite. | ||
And that's the Republicans. | ||
And it's a weakness. | ||
These guys are accusing us of killing women, of killing trans people, of the most horrific things... | ||
Simply for, you know, asking questions about what a woman is or simply for asking for the definition of what an unborn child is. | ||
If you're going to throw these terms out, you better have a definition for it. | ||
And by the way, this is a country that was built on politics. | ||
It was built on robust debate. | ||
If you can't handle the debates and if it's killing people just to debate these things, then you should probably go to a country that doesn't allow free speech because it's not American. | ||
It's just, I just want to say it's beautiful. | ||
Yeah, we had the professor on yesterday with Holly. | ||
We had Gage today. | ||
And you met after this was the testimony. | ||
It was about the right to life, but it got into the trans situation, the gender ideology. | ||
You said afterwards that, and I want you to explain this. | ||
Because I've got up on Getter right now, overnight, stuff from Daily Mail and others that some of the witnesses, what they call the abortion storytellers, she's saying that her abortion was an act of self-love. | ||
This is her, this is not us saying it. | ||
It was an act of self-love and the most important thing she did for herself. | ||
You said yesterday that this is sacramental to them and they're religious zealots. | ||
What did you mean by that? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, what we're really up against, look, the left always projects. | |
And what we're really up against is a bunch of religious zealots, except Christianity isn't their religion, Islam isn't their religion, Hinduism isn't their religion. | ||
It's called human secularism. | ||
And there is no higher sacrament than abortion in the church of human secularism. | ||
If you're Christian and you understand Christianity, Christ said very clearly, this is my body, which will be given up for all of you so that you can have eternal life. | ||
What abortion says is, This is my body, you will be given up for me. | ||
And what happens now is, this has been industrialized, Steve. | ||
So there's now an industry behind it of abortion doctors, of abortion clinics, of hospitals, of Planned Parenthoods, that all build up a huge profit model, and they use that to fund their initiatives. | ||
So it is a religious thing, this is not fake, this is not phony. | ||
This is why they say things like, Well, men can have babies, and men can get abortions. | ||
It's religious. | ||
There's no proof of that. | ||
We know the science. | ||
Men are men, and women are women, and you can't change. | ||
You either have XY chromosomes or XX. | ||
And fine, if you want to dress differently, and you want to feel more comfortable dressing, fine! | ||
But you can't make us decide this. | ||
You can't force your ideology, your religion, on other people. | ||
This is a freedom of speech, a freedom of religion issue. | ||
We have work to do today on this Title IX thing. | ||
I want you to get to Heritage Action. | ||
I want to walk through everybody in the audience. | ||
You have to take some time. | ||
This is free. | ||
It's going to take your time and we need your commitment and your being on this. | ||
It's very important. | ||
Walk through the comments, how they get to Heritage Action, this Title IX. | ||
Why are we having this call to action and what does this audience need to do? | ||
unidentified
|
So you need to go to HeritageAction.com. | |
They have us website our page up to take action and submit public comments on the new regulations that are being released from the Department of Education. | ||
What's important and what's happening here is the Department of Education has announced that they are reinterpreting sex in Title IX civil rights law to mean and include sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. | ||
What this means is Is that your kids are going to be expelled for using the wrong pronouns. | ||
Parents will have custody taken away from them for not going along with the new gender identities and the new pronouns, the new names of their, of their, of their children, boys and girls, locker rooms, boys and girls, sports, the whole shebang. | ||
This gives it's important to understand that civil rights law title nine included is meant to be a very heavy hammer. | ||
It's a sword. | ||
It's meant to reshape society. | ||
And they're going to come down on parents and anyone that disagrees with this gender ideology stuff to force them to accept it. | ||
And so we need to submit public comments. | ||
The great thing for us that we have is that under Trump, they allowed for public comment periods, which means that bureaucrats at the Department of Education can't just enact these new regulations. | ||
They have to review every single public comment that's submitted. | ||
And so what we need the war room to do is go to the Heritage Action site, and fill out a public comment and they make it super easy. | ||
It's so easy. They even have like pre-written tweets you can tweet out. | ||
Submit your comment opposing these new changes because we can slow them down and get to November, take back power and really make some good changes. | ||
This is you at the front line of taking on the administrative state. | ||
Remember, we've gone through with the special how the courts are going to do it. | ||
We're going to do it next year when we take power. | ||
You see the gates is to deconstruct this. | ||
But you are also a foot soldier in this. | ||
This is how you participate. | ||
And we're going to get you to participate even more. | ||
But this is like the opening salvo. | ||
This is all. | ||
Remember, they're not changing. | ||
They've got a law. | ||
They're just doing all these regulations. | ||
This is what the administrative state is. | ||
It legislates its own thing. | ||
And we're going to full stop it. | ||
But you have to do it. | ||
Terry, we're going to do it this afternoon and talk about this again. | ||
Go to Heritage Action right now. | ||
Terry Schilling, how do people get you at American Principles Project? | ||
Because you're building the culture of victory over there. | ||
That's right. | ||
This audience wants to know how to assist. | ||
unidentified
|
So we're building the NRA for families. | |
We're organizing families and politics to take these guys out. | ||
Go to SaveTheFamily.app. | ||
Give us some support. | ||
Help us build this organization because it's very serious. | ||
We're going to make millions of voter contacts. | ||
We're going to unelect a lot of these bad guys and we're going to make them pay a price for hurting our families. | ||
Terry Schilling, thank you very much. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Can we play our Bastille Day and also AOC, our combo platter here? | ||
unidentified
|
here before I bring in Darren Beattie. | |
["The Star-Spangled Banner"] | ||
♪♪ | ||
you Yeah. | ||
To glory and honor, Rich in gift and loss and strife, With tears and tears of pride, With tears and tears of pride, We shall rise, we shall rise, | ||
To the land of gold. | ||
Our song, our song, Will sound and ring The bells of Zion. | ||
Our song, our song, Will sound and ring The bells of Zion. | ||
These insurrectionists, Like the Antifa? | ||
And that there were actual officers working with this and we never got to the bottom of that never got any answers about that. | ||
And then to this day, we're just supposed to pretend that that never happened. | ||
I have no idea what happened to the people on the inside who were very clearly sympathetic with what was going on and opening the doors wide open for that. | ||
unidentified
|
And I'm supposed to sit here and pretend like none of that ever happened. | |
And then right afterwards, you have a massive, you know, you just have this idea that throwing money at that problem is going to make it go away without any accountability. | ||
And so this is where these things are breaking down. | ||
We're not safe. | ||
And it's not just about members of Congress not being safe. | ||
The food staff workers aren't safe. | ||
The janitors aren't safe. | ||
Like, we need to get to the bottom of this. | ||
So that's all I got to say. | ||
Thank you, Congresswoman. | ||
You know, somehow I missed AOC's testimony in front of J6. | ||
I know we've been working crazy. | ||
I've been putting in insane hours. | ||
How did I miss that? | ||
Darren Beattie, and by the way, Bastille Day, the French Revolution had a lot of issues and a lot of problems. | ||
But remember, it started taking down the corrupt aristocracy of Europe. | ||
And you still see the corruption, the reason Europe's still a mess, the Italian government's about to fall. | ||
It's still got this top-down aristocratic mentality. | ||
And yes, I am an Irish Republican. | ||
I detest monarchies and I detest aristocracies. | ||
to the core of my marrow. | ||
And that's why there's certain aspects of the French Revolution that actually took the American Revolution and took it up a notch. | ||
I know guys are going to freak out, but hey, that's just it. | ||
They had a lot of had a lot of problems, went way too far. | ||
But it started the process of taking down corrupt, corrupt aristocracies in these corrupt monarchies. | ||
I want to go to Darren Beatty right now, a revolver. | ||
AOC, this is kind of a bombshell. | ||
Is it not, Darren Beatty? | ||
Or am I am I am I missing things? | ||
No, it's huge and it actually kind of ironically reflects its disconnect between the incredibly rabid and doctrinaire ideologues like AOC who has this fevered idea that the establishment and the executive branch and the bureaucracies and the police forces are full of secret Trump sympathizers and so | ||
From her point of view, the cops who opened the doors are, you know, acting on behalf of Trump as part of this conspiracy. | ||
In all likelihood, they're doing it because the security state wanted to set up Trump people. | ||
Okay, we're gonna get into all that when we get back. | ||
Darren Beatty on the other side. | ||
But AOC may be the first witness called in January as we get down to the bottom of what actually happened next in the war room. | ||
unidentified
|
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
War Room Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, welcome back. | ||
It's 14 July, and we always, as you know, if you're a War Room aficionado, we always definitely celebrate Bastille Day. | ||
Jerome Revere was on the other day and helped Mike Lindell, you know, talking about how the French actually do their voting. | ||
I think it's something we can learn from the French. | ||
We're going to have a special on Saturday, and Jerome has got company, he's going to join me. | ||
The Economist this week is how to win the long war. | ||
How to win the long war. | ||
And I'm going to have Ben Harnwell from Rome, and I'm going to have Jerome, one of the leaders of the, he's a member of the European Parliament. | ||
The economists, and remember, these are all your bettors. | ||
These are all your, the Financial Times of London and this are your bettors. | ||
Remember, they're your bettors. | ||
You just breathe through your mouth and you're these, you know, troglodytes. | ||
This insanity, how to win the long war, is literally a war of attrition now in Ukraine. | ||
A war of attrition that the West is just going to funnel all the money in, everything in, and we're going to, you know, with Zelensky's race, a million-man army, and they're going to take back the eastern provinces and decimate the Russian military. | ||
Essentially what they say. | ||
You know, one small problem with that, this is yesterday's Financial Times, West fears arms sent to Ukraine end up in Europe's black market. | ||
And we now know, because of the great reporting of Ben Harnwell, is that when you read the report of the Europeans, the money we're sending and the arms we're sending, Europe and the United States are sending, are being stolen by the oligarchs in the most corrupt country, third most corrupt country on earth, and they're selling them back to the criminal gangs and the jihadists in Western Europe. | ||
So the criminal gangs are getting, and they're making money off it, and they're gonna start selling to the Russians. | ||
Every member of Conservative Inc. | ||
that backs this Ukraine war is a simp. | ||
Is a simp. | ||
It's a disgrace. | ||
And now The Economist is out, and we're gonna go full on about no. | ||
There is a long war here, and we're at the beginning stages of it. | ||
And it does not, it ain't focused in the eastern Russian-speaking provinces of Ukraine. | ||
I don't see any Republican, you don't see him talking about it anymore, you don't see Fox News ain't running around anymore on this. | ||
You don't see any politicians. | ||
Where's Tom Cotton coming out? | ||
Yeah, get our $40 billion. | ||
Tom Cotton's got a committee today. | ||
I read in Politico somewhere he's got a committee. | ||
He's walking around talking to donors about running for president. | ||
Please, sir. | ||
Please, we don't have time. | ||
We got to be focused on real things. | ||
Anybody that voted for the $40 billion, and Lindsey Graham up there saying, yeah, it wasn't for me up here on Fox. | ||
Biden wouldn't move. | ||
Anybody that voted for the $40 billion, by definition, by definition, Is not smart enough to be President of the United States. | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
We're in a crisis and we can't be messing around and goofing around. | ||
Where's that 40 billion when the house starts burning down here financially economically? | ||
Also, it's wrong. | ||
They take the money and just send it back. | ||
There's the most corrupt real quasi nation on Earth. | ||
The rest are in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East or Asia. | ||
It's a joke. | ||
And Zelensky is now talking about a million-man army, and there's people who are rashly trying to do it. | ||
Frank Gaffney, the guys that are going to come out here and say, we don't even have the ammunition. | ||
And this also takes your eye off the ball on the South China Sea and Taiwan. | ||
And what did Bloomberg have the other day? | ||
It's not just the chips. | ||
If Taiwan goes down, how they're integrated to the West's manufacturing, you're going to see a 10% drop in the GDP of the United States. | ||
That is a depression. | ||
That's even over and above the financial crisis we have. | ||
By the way, when everybody go to Birch—this is free—birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
I'm working on part two, but part one's the biggest thing they've ever had in the history, I think, of birch gold. | ||
It's the end of the dollar empire. | ||
What it means to be the reserve currency. | ||
Look at Argentina. | ||
The kind of crap that we talked about with Jason and these guys that they're thinking of on Wall Street and the Federal Reserve couldn't be done unless you have the prime reserve currency. | ||
And that is going away. | ||
Articles yesterday have China and the Russians and Iranians, they're all looking to put baskets of currencies to make sure. | ||
Because once that happens, we're Argentina. | ||
Also, and Beattie is an expert in this, but Eric Prince is obsessed with the security of your telecommunications. | ||
The phones are not ready, they're not going to be ready until the fall, but go to unplugged.com slash war room. | ||
You go there today. | ||
Unplugged.com slash War Room. | ||
He's got an app. | ||
You download the app. | ||
You can download your other apps. | ||
You can't monetize. | ||
You can't follow. | ||
You can't do anything. | ||
Plus, he's got a crypto key. | ||
I mean, he's got an encryption key. | ||
Encryption key on every call. | ||
But just go check it out. | ||
Unplugged.com slash War Room. | ||
The other is Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
You get your free The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
Darren Beatty first, give me AOC. | ||
How important is that? | ||
Or is she just blowing off steam? | ||
How important is that? | ||
And then I want to talk about our favorite topic, the New York Times, the paper of record, our beloved Republic, and the cover for Ray Epps. | ||
Well, the AOC thing is very funny but also very instructive, and it offers a glimpse into some of the sort of internal strategic tensions within the left. | ||
I mean, there's one faction of the left that is particularly enthusiastic but not necessarily as sophisticated, and in their view, | ||
The entire national security bureaucracy, the entire establishment, is littered with Trump-sympathizing, neo-Nazi, fascist insurrectionists, and that accounts for why these cops opened the door, because of course the cops are evil fascists who love Trump, and they were participating in an insurrection. | ||
And so people like AOC, with this delusional view of the composition of the establishment and the police forces, They unwittingly make life more difficult for the more sophisticated elements of the regime, who know it was a cover-up, who know it was a fedsurrection, who know the national security state is out to get Trump supporters. | ||
And when ideologues like AOC come out and say, hey, look, what about these fascist cops who were acting on behalf of Trump? | ||
The other more sophisticated faction must just shake their head and say, oh boy, AOC, come on. | ||
Don't you understand how things actually work in this country? | ||
And so it's a beautiful thing to see AOC unwittingly draw attention to extremely important questions that will never be addressed by the January 6th committee that get to the beating heart of what really happened on January 6th. | ||
So talk to us about the New York Times and because it all kind of links together in the situation with radios. | ||
Oh, this, this New York Times piece is a, it's a feast. | ||
I'm actually astonished that it was even produced in this fashion. | ||
I mean, the chutzpah alone of producing a puff piece on Ray Epps, the only person caught on camera Expressing a plan to go into the Capitol in advance. | ||
The guy who was right there at the barricades before it happened. | ||
The guy who rushed into the restricted ground right after it happened and continued directing the crowd. | ||
This is the sole singular person among all of the January 6 rioters that the New York Times decides to write a Sympathy Puff piece on? | ||
And I think if we have a couple minutes, it's worth just going into detail as to the what extent this piece is a monument of journalistic malpractice. | ||
By the way, there's a piece white hot right on the top of revolver.news where we go into this extensively, so I'm just providing the highlights here. | ||
Number one, the buried lead. | ||
The buried lead is that Mr. Epps, this is quoting the piece, also said he regretted sending a text to his nephew well after the violence had erupted, in which he discussed how he helped to orchestrate the movements of people who were leaving Trump's speech near the White House by pointing them in the direction of the Capitol. | ||
And if you go to the Revolver.News piece right now, we have a video compilation that depicts precisely how aggressively he orchestrated this movement. | ||
Now, the text in question in this piece, I wonder what exactly he said. | ||
How exactly did Ray Epps describe his actions? | ||
Did he provide any motivation for these actions? | ||
What other texts might come up? | ||
That would be additionally damaging to the already dilapidated official narrative regarding Ray Epps and January 6th generally. | ||
Number two, the whole piece, which is meant to be this rehabilitation piece for Ray Epps, which is bizarre enough, it does not contain a single explicit denial on the part of Epps of any association with military intelligence, the Department of Homeland Security, the Joint Terrorism Task Force, and so forth, or any kind of cutouts or intermediaries thereof. | ||
All there is, is a reproduction of this bizarre and cryptic emphasis that he never belonged to any law enforcement agency. | ||
All of the other agencies I mentioned are not law enforcement, and so that leaves open a lot of different possibilities that are not explicitly Denied. | ||
Foyer, the author of the piece, does not ask him for a denial. | ||
That's kind of weird. | ||
You know what's even weirder than that? | ||
As I mentioned, Ray Epps is the only guy who was talking about going into the Capitol on January 5th. | ||
Alan Foyer, the New York Times guy, the guy who's part of the beat trying to allegedly get to the bottom of January 6th, Does he ask Ray Epps? | ||
How did it occur to you, this bizarre idea to go into the Capitol? | ||
This idea that was so bizarre that when you first presented it to the crowd on January 5th, they immediately thought it was so weird and so incriminating, they started calling you a fed. | ||
But you were so committed to this singular idea of going into the Capitol, That despite the low buying temperature of the crowd, you persisted and kept directing people to this mission. | ||
You followed up on it the morning of January 6, and you were there right by the barricades as the initial breach occurred. | ||
So where did you get that idea, Mr. Epps? | ||
Darren, hang on. | ||
I'm going to hold you through the break because I want to continue. | ||
By the way, even at Breitbart, which the New York Times looks down the nose at, we would have asked the reporter, we wouldn't have put it up, did you ask him for a full denial? | ||
You gotta put a full denial in there. | ||
You can't put the piece up. | ||
You gotta do a full denial. | ||
That's also the editors. | ||
This shows you what a scam it is. | ||
Our piece doesn't have any denial. | ||
Not even a full denial. | ||
That's journalism, kind of standard stock. | ||
I'm sure that's in the style book of the Times. | ||
Where's Maggie Haberman when you need her? | ||
unidentified
|
Right? | |
Beattie? | ||
I don't understand what's going on here. | ||
Short break. | ||
Darren Beattie, next. | ||
New York Times, Ray Epps. | ||
unidentified
|
We rejoice with her no more, let's take down the CCP! | |
War Room, Pandemic, with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room, Pandemic, here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
You know, we haven't gotten a chance to get the show on the road as much as I wanted to in, uh... | ||
And the reason is just we got too much going on. | ||
You know, we got the fourth hour and we're inundated with just people who want to come on, things we're doing, you know, people we're assisting and helping do all this, you know, to build this Army of the Awakened. | ||
But we are going to be in Dallas on the 4th through the 7th and we're going to make a big thing about it for the War Room so everybody will get to meet everybody. | ||
Make sure you go check it out. | ||
CPAC. | ||
I forget the, you got to go to one of the sites. | ||
They'll write it down for me here and I'll talk about it next time. | ||
But go to CPAC Dallas 4371. | ||
All of the War Room Posse in the area to come together. | ||
We're going to do a lot of special things and bring as many of the War Room folks as we can. | ||
Okay, Darren Beatty. | ||
Here's the thing, before I toss back to you. | ||
You know, they talk about, and I want to thank the Injun Room for reminding me of this, they talk about the headline is, it's been hell. | ||
It's been hell. | ||
I think a guy showed up at his ranch to interview him. | ||
It's been total hell. | ||
It's been just hell. | ||
You got guys in solitary confinement. | ||
Cynthia Hughes and the team have been working with these guys. | ||
You got guys in solitary confinement. | ||
They don't take the vaccine. | ||
It's worse. | ||
They're not shaved. | ||
They're living like animals. | ||
All that's going to be, we're going to get to the bottom of all that in January, okay? | ||
We're going to get to the bottom. | ||
People are going to be held accountable. | ||
Okay, adjust the department, all of it. | ||
We're not playing more games. | ||
No more games. | ||
But they're living like animals. | ||
And Ray Epps? | ||
What, is that his farm? | ||
Is that his ranch or whatever in Arizona? | ||
Somebody came up and tried to interview him? | ||
Is that the, is that, we got the Supreme Court every night. | ||
They're there. | ||
Oh, and they passed a big thing last night. | ||
You can't, you can stand in silence, but you can't, you know, honk your horns and shout. | ||
They're trying to intimidate the Supreme. | ||
What, what, they want more assassination attempts like the guy that's already been at the federal grand jury indicted on trying to assassinate, the attempted assassination of Justice Kavanaugh. | ||
These people are radical and they're violent and they, uh, and they're lawless. | ||
They're lawless. | ||
Suck on that. | ||
They're lawless. | ||
Um, and Ray Epps, we're supposed to feel for Ray Epps. | ||
When you got guys living like animals for two years in these jail cells in DC, uh, Darren Beatty, is that, and I want to continue on cause I know you got a lot more to go through on this, on the New York Times. | ||
Continue on, sir. | ||
Yeah, I'm going to continue on with the time series, but just to address quickly that specific point. | ||
Yes, absolutely. | ||
It's just, it's so egregious. | ||
This is the element of the chutzpah here of all of the people, of all the January 6 rioters, the one person they're sympathetic toward and write a puff piece on is Ray Epps. | ||
How about Matthew Perna, the guy who was so destitute being held in prison that he killed himself? | ||
And just a side note about the guy who killed himself, the | ||
Witness that the January 6th committee called on to testify the the guy went into the Capitol He is my understanding is he's cooperated against the guy who killed himself and there's no reference to that conflict of interest that this guy is cooperating and that His sentencing will ultimately hinge upon his good behavior namely being paraded before the committee and promising people that oh, you know I used to believe those Trump lies that the election was stolen and | ||
But now I've educated myself and I know I was wrong. | ||
I mean, look, North Korea would be embarrassed by this kangaroo spectacle. | ||
That's for another day. | ||
Hey, hey, hey, if you don't want to be a spectacle, call me publicly. | ||
Give me a date, a time, a conference room, a microphone, a live camera so the nation can see it, and a holy Bible. | ||
You don't want to hear the truth. | ||
You can't handle the truth. | ||
You don't want to hear it. | ||
It's all staged. | ||
This is a show trial. | ||
Beria and Stalin would be laughing. | ||
Because it's such a clown show. | ||
They ran it the right way. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
Look how the guy is dressed that they had the other guy. | ||
He's wearing his denim jacket. | ||
It's like he's dressed up as a militia guy for Halloween. | ||
And he's there sitting in a Capitol proceeding. | ||
What is that all about? | ||
It's just so dumb. | ||
But let me get to the New York Times piece, because this is really important. | ||
Look, there are journalists, and there are janitors. | ||
The janitor's job is to do a mop-up, and that's what this Alan Foyer piece is. | ||
He's a janitor, not a journalist. | ||
And I'm describing the mop-up job. | ||
First of all, he doesn't ask for any explicit denial of the sort that I described, none whatsoever. | ||
Two, and probably the most egregious one, He doesn't, to my knowledge, or it's not reflected in the piece, whether he asks, gee, Ray Epps, where did you get this idea to go into the Capitol in the first place? | ||
And why were you so doggedly fixated on it? | ||
Where did you get the idea? | ||
Doesn't ask that. | ||
Number three, he describes Epps as a Trump supporter. | ||
Someone who just went to Washington to back Trump. | ||
Someone who went to Washington at the last minute to listen to Trump's speech about election fraud. | ||
The only kicker is, Ray Epps didn't go to the Trump speech. | ||
This alleged Trump supporter travels all the way from Arizona to Washington D.C. | ||
And instead of attending the whole speech, what he does is talk about going into the Capitol and happens to be hanging out right at the site of the initial and decisive breach before the Proud Boys even got there? | ||
That's really interesting. | ||
Did Alan Foyer think to ask Ray Epps about that? | ||
I don't know, but it's not reflected in the piece and there's no mention of how bizarre that is in the piece. | ||
Now this final one is probably the whopper. | ||
This is the whopper. | ||
And you can see the video on this in this must-read piece that's right white hot at the top of revolver.news right now. | ||
And that is this. | ||
The New York Times' own video documentary on January 6th. | ||
Explosively titled, The Day of Rage. | ||
In their own New York Times video documentary, they describe and refer to Ray Epps as someone who planned, who pre-planned the storming of the Capitol all along. | ||
unidentified
|
Oops. | |
I have the video of this. | ||
Stop, stop, stop. | ||
That's too good. | ||
Are you sure about that? | ||
Because that's genius. | ||
I promise you. | ||
It's in the Revolver.net news piece. | ||
I have the link. | ||
And that's not just one time. | ||
Ray Epps appears at least two decisive occasions in the video compilation. | ||
And the narration suggests that Ray Epps is one of the handful of people who pre-planned the seeds. | ||
That's coming from the Times' own documentary. | ||
So, isn't it weird if Ray Epps' behavior was so egregious as to be featured in that fashion in New York Times' own documentary video? | ||
If his behavior was so egregious as to have Epps included as one of the first 20 people in the FBI's most wanted list for January 6th, to be one of the big targets of the Sedition Hunters, the left-wing group that goes after January 6th people, all of those things, and now all of a sudden, he's quietly removed from the FBI list, he's the only January 6th rioter that Adam Kinzinger will defend, and he's the only rioter that the New York Times will write a puff piece about. | ||
Sedition Hunter that. | ||
They're terrified! | ||
They're terrified! | ||
It's Damage Control, because they know Ray Epps is... Hey Ray, hey brother Epps, I know he's looking to get a defamation lawyer against, uh, don't cough your lung up here on the War Room, bro. | ||
God, it's like my production, it's like my production, lay off the cheap cigars down there. | ||
Hold on, Ray Epps got a note, you get all the defamation lawyers you want on Revolver, because that's the big, that's the Barry Lee, they're trying to scare Revolver, he's looking for a defamation lawyer, keep looking. | ||
Um, because Ray, you're going to be like, uh, witness number two or three, right? | ||
Come, come, come the real investigation and that's coming, sir. | ||
So I think the lawyer you might want to get is not the defamation lawyer first, right? | ||
And we want to open up to Ray Epps to come on here and, and, and we'll give him as much time as he needs. | ||
He can take a whole hour and walk through everything. | ||
I love how the lawyer that Ray Epps did actually retain is a, if I recall correctly, the lawyer that Ray Epps did retain is a 10-year veteran of the Phoenix FBI field office, the very field office out of which the FBI agents actually initially denied, acknowledged that Epps even existed. | ||
So look, the bottom line is this. | ||
Ray Epps is the smoking gun of the Fed's direction. | ||
If it turns out that Ray Epps was not acting as an authentic participant in this rally or riot, whatever you want to call it, but he got this idea to go into the Capitol from some government agency or intermediate, intermediary thereof, in one fell swoop, the entire dirty, corrupt narrative collapses before our very eyes. | ||
He's smoking pot. | ||
How many guys talk to the wife, I'm going to go see the Trump thing, and don't go to the speech? | ||
How do you not go to the speech? | ||
How do you just start directing traffic down there? | ||
Anyway, I'm sure Mr. Reps, you got an open invitation to the War Room. | ||
You can do it on Skype, come in. | ||
Your ground rules, just do it. | ||
And here, Epps also has an open invitation with Revolver. | ||
If he wants a real journalist to interview him and not a janitor, if he's interested in a real journalist interviewing him, I'm happy to do so. | ||
And I think he's conflicted. | ||
I think he has a crisis in conscience and he does actually want to tell the truth. | ||
So he still has a chance. | ||
In the meantime, everyone, you need to go. | ||
Revolver.News, we have the whole piece up right now. | ||
It's white hot. | ||
Beatty's just upset because the New York Times refers to him, the janitor refers to him as a fringe right-wing conspiracy site. | ||
I knew as soon as that happened. | ||
unidentified
|
Obscure, obscure, obscure right-wing conspiracies. | |
I knew Beatty was going to get upset about that. | ||
Revolver, Darren Beatty, you're doing great work. | ||
Real quickly, social media. | ||
How do people get to see you on social media? | ||
Social media, revolvers, at revolvernews on Getter. | ||
I am on Twitter, at Darren J. Beattie, and right now, for the full take, for the full video, for the full, um, demolish, the takedown of the Janitor, go right now, top of revolver.news, share it with everybody. | ||
Darren, thank you so much, and thank you for the work you're doing. | ||
By the way, the great Naomi Wolf is gonna be on The Great Tucker Carlson tonight. | ||
I don't know where the slot is, but Tucker's on at eight o'clock tonight. | ||
Dr. Wolf is gonna be on this, so make sure everybody checks it out. | ||
Let's go to Dan Schultz. | ||
Dan, we had Fincham on, and of course, Atlantic Magazine's all over this thing about he's war room's man in Arizona, but they get into the precinct strategy. | ||
Sunday night, CNN's doing a special on the master plan to take over the nation, village by village. | ||
Dan Schultz, get us up to date. | ||
What do people need to do to participate in the Precinct Strategy, sir? | ||
Well, what they need to do, and that's exactly what we all need to do, is ask ourselves, what are we going to do about this? | ||
So what I propose is that you go to precinctstrategy.com. | ||
We get organized and united where we live, locally, politically. | ||
Yeah, there are the two buttons. | ||
Connect with other conservatives in your state. | ||
Click on that button. | ||
That'll take you to the new communications and collaboration platform that Robert Beatles has built for us, where we can share documents, set up chat rooms, set up Zoom-like calls. | ||
And really, the whole goal is to Trump-lify our party. | ||
We need more Pied Pipers like yourself who are going to lead the Trumpers into the political promised land, so to speak, of milk and honey, and that would be a Trump-lified party whereby we get just 200,000 of the 74 million MAGA people. | ||
That's three-tenths of 1% of the 74 million. | ||
That's all we need to fill up the vacant precinct committeeman slots of our party. | ||
There's 200,000 vacancies. | ||
There's about 400,000 slots. | ||
What I want to do is have And start referring to the precinct committeeman as the Republican, the Trump political shock workers. | ||
These are the people who are really making a difference politically. | ||
And you do that locally where you live. | ||
As you know, it's a volunteer position. | ||
It doesn't cost anything. | ||
Some states have nominal dues, but very few do here in Arizona. | ||
It doesn't cost a thing. | ||
You're just a volunteer. | ||
What we need to do is we've got to unite Locally, where we live in our respective local political committees. | ||
That could be a legislative district committee like it is here in Arizona. | ||
Could be called something else in your state. | ||
But if you go to precinctstrategy.com, you can learn all about it. | ||
Everything's there. | ||
Hang on one second, I'm going to keep you through the break, because we had this revolt in Nebraska last weekend, and these guys were precinct committeemen. | ||
You're not going to be welcomed with open arms, but that's why you're political shock troops, okay? | ||
Short break, Dan Schultz. | ||
We've got the government in Italy about to fall, and our own Ben Harnwell from Rome is going to get us up to speed on that. | ||
Next. | ||
unidentified
|
The new social media taking on big tech. | |
Protecting free speech. | ||
And cancelling cancel culture. | ||
Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
Superior technology. | ||
No more selling your personal data. | ||
No more censorship. | ||
No more cancel culture. | ||
Enough. | ||
Getter has arrived. | ||
It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
Download now. | ||
Okay, welcome back. | ||
By the way, also this game, if you want to learn about the details of the election, I'm now convinced for a lot of people, it's just not going to be the Navarro report, right? | ||
He is a Harvard economist, so it's very detailed. | ||
I think it's great, but I think it's this, I do think, again, I think it's electionfund.com. | ||
Go just check out the game. | ||
The game's got stuff about Hunter Biden's laptop. | ||
It's about the Russia hoax, but principally it's to teach you, it's a heuristic device to teach you the details of the big steal. | ||
So go check it out today. | ||
And play it in your circle with your family. | ||
And then I think you'll expand it. | ||
I think you'll want to get your colleagues and neighbors that are maybe not Trump supporters to check this out, because we're going to get to the bottom of the big steal. | ||
We're going to we're going to decertify the Biden electors. | ||
I know they don't like hearing that, but they're going to have to hear it because it's going to happen. | ||
Dan Schultz in Nebraska, we had this revolt out there. | ||
They threw the Ricketts guys out and these were all precinct committeemen. | ||
This is how they got involved. | ||
Your political shock troops. | ||
To really shake up the RNC, and to shake up the Republican Party, and to get MAGA. | ||
This is MAGA, the tip of the spear of MAGA. | ||
I want everybody in the audience to at least go check it out. | ||
Beatles has done a great thing to coordinate everybody. | ||
Schultz has got the book. | ||
He lays it out all for you. | ||
The least you can do is just take your time and go do this. | ||
It's totally free. | ||
It doesn't cost you anything. | ||
Maybe in a state they'll charge you five bucks or something, but be a priest in communion. | ||
It does cost you technically nothing. | ||
One more time, Dan. | ||
How do people go there? | ||
How do they get to the site? | ||
And how do they go through the site? | ||
Yeah, and you just go to PrecinctStrategy.com. | ||
PrecinctStrategy.com. | ||
That's my site. | ||
I've tried to pull together information for all 50 states. | ||
I don't have the territories in D.C. | ||
yet, but eventually I will. | ||
But I've got something there to get you started. | ||
And the idea is this. | ||
Just, would you please just give this a try. | ||
See if you can find your local Republican committee. | ||
See if you can find where they meet. | ||
Go to the meeting. | ||
Walk in and say, hey, I want to volunteer. | ||
I want to help the Republican Party. | ||
I'm a good Republican. | ||
They probably don't want you, but that's okay because it's a volunteer position, right? | ||
And so if you're an American and you want to save the Republic and you want to be a savior of the Republic, the best way to do it is become a precinct committeeman. | ||
And I lay it all out at my site. | ||
I'm just a lovable little fuzzball. | ||
Schultz is one of the most hated guys now by the establishment. | ||
Hated, why? | ||
Because of the precinct strategy. | ||
Because he's opening up an opportunity for you. | ||
Remember, this is a bottom up revolution, revolt. | ||
You can't put all the burden on President Trump. | ||
You can't put it on Trump, it's gotta be on you. | ||
I'm just a lovable little fuzzball. | ||
That's all I am. | ||
unidentified
|
Just laying out some basic American civics. | |
That's all it is. | ||
Let's pull together. | ||
Let's try this. | ||
Let's become, like you said, shock workers, shock troops. | ||
Thank you, Dan Schultz. | ||
This is participatory populism. | ||
Get off the sofa. | ||
This is why this audience, if we're not the biggest in the world, you're the most active in the world. | ||
We have Ben Harnwell, the great Ben Harnwell. | ||
Ben, I know you're going to do a live stream on Getter. | ||
You've been calling this shot that Ukraine was going to have some casualties and they weren't going to be in Moscow. | ||
Is the government in Italy going to fall today, sir? | ||
We don't know. | ||
The government, they did win a vote of confidence this morning in the Senate. | ||
They won it quite substantially. | ||
But the dynamic here is that what's left of the Five Star Movement after their split when Luigi Di Maio pulled off a month or so ago taking away a third of the parliamentary party with him, what was left of that movement has now abstained. | ||
In the vote of confidence that was today in the Senate, I think it was something, I think it was like 38 against and 140 or something in favour. | ||
So the government comfortably won it. | ||
But this now puts a lot of pressure on Prime Minister Mario Draghi, who has said he won't be a political prime minister. | ||
He wants to be a unity prime minister, a coalition prime minister. | ||
So if Five Stars pulls out, then the government looks in doubt. | ||
Now, straight after this vote, the Prime Minister went to go and see the President of the Public, Sergio Mattarella, for an hour, so we're waiting to find out what the situation is. | ||
Look, in the time I've got left to be, Steve, I just want to put a bit of context to all of this, because perhaps it seems a little obscure to be drilling down on votes of confidence in a Central European country. | ||
There's a reason, however, that the government is on the verge of collapse, and this is what the mainstream media isn't presenting. | ||
Let's just take 30 seconds to do it here on the War Room. | ||
What is the substantial issue here between the former Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, who is now saying he wants to pull out? | ||
It's Ukraine, right? | ||
To a large extent, it's Ukraine. | ||
The former Prime Minister, Conte, Take a very different line from Mario Draghi, the current Prime Minister. | ||
Mario Draghi was big, full on in, right, to supporting the US stroke NATO position of maximum punishment for Russia. | ||
Conte instead said, look, Russia's a historic ally of Italy. | ||
Do we really want to be pushing so hard? | ||
This is, in fact, what Giuseppe Conte said, I have a strong fear that September will be a time when families will face the choice of paying their electricity bill or buying food. | ||
That's what he said yesterday. | ||
He accused the government of not doing enough to help families in the surging food and energy costs. | ||
Steve, does any of this sound familiar? | ||
Right? | ||
Does any of this, what I'm saying, sound familiar? | ||
And of course Draghi drilled down, he took a strong stand as I was saying on the invasion. | ||
And he's basically, he's been pushing for tougher and tougher sanctions on Russia. | ||
So that's the dynamic here in Italy. | ||
Perhaps I need to come on the afternoon show if there's any developments between now and then. | ||
Fine. | ||
Are you going to do a live stream? | ||
Yeah, I'm going to do a live stream in about 5 minutes. | ||
I'm just going to tie in what's happening with Italy today, with Germany and Sri Lanka. | ||
Perfect. | ||
On getter, at Hanwell. | ||
I'll be there in about 5-10 minutes. | ||
We're going to be back 5 to 7. | ||
If there's any updates, we're going to have Ben on with us live. | ||
We've got the tons. | ||
We're packed already this afternoon. | ||
Make sure you hear we're going to be on fire back in the war room. | ||
I want to thank everybody and thank our sponsors, advertisers, Real American Voice, everybody. | ||
Be back here 5 to 7 o'clock tonight. | ||
Lit. | ||
See you then. | ||
Bring it on and now we'll fight to the end. | ||
unidentified
|
Just watch and see. | |
It's all started. | ||
Everything's begun. | ||
And you are over. | ||
Cause we're taking down the CCP! | ||
unidentified
|
Spread the word all through Hong Kong. | |
We will fight till they're all gone. | ||
We rejoice when there's no more. |