July 1, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
happened on January 6th was clearly an attempt to delay the count of the electoral votes. | |
| Anybody who was there understands the violence that was involved. | ||
| I'm frankly stunned that one of my opponents on the stage, who is a member of the Wyoming Bar, who has sworn an oath, as many of us on this stage have, to the Constitution, Uh, would be in a position where, where she is suggesting that somehow, uh, what happened on January 6th was justified, uh, or that somehow what happened that day, uh, the people have the right to ignore the rulings of the courts. | ||
| Uh, we are in fact a nation of laws and we are a nation of laws only if we defend our constitutional republic. | ||
| And, uh, as I made clear last night, We have to put our oath to the Constitution above party. | ||
| The Republican Party has a long and a storied history of embracing the conservative values that I believe in very strongly of limited government, low taxes, and a strong national defense. | ||
| But we are now embracing a cult of personality and I won't be part of that and I will always stand for my oath and stand for the truth. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Great show today. | ||
| We've got first up Richard Barris, best pollster I know around these days. | ||
| I'm going to be talking a lot about this whole January 6th show that's going on and later in the six o'clock hour we've got A great back-to-back with Miranda Devine on that and Dave Bossi on some of these races. | ||
| We're going to have Doc Malone do the cleanup hitting at the end of the show. | ||
| Before we bring Richard Bereson, I just want to... I saw that clip of Liz Cheney. | ||
| And I'm thinking that that hypocrisy knows no bounds here, because here she's saying we're a nation of laws. | ||
| Here she's saying that we have to put the Constitution above party. | ||
| Okay, let's parse that for a minute. | ||
| She is part of a kangaroo Committee that is neither duly constituted or authorized properly and she's part of what effectively is a TV show that they might call law and order kangaroo court. | ||
| Where all they're trying to do is build a criminal case against Donald Trump that's a hoax, a la the Russia hoax, to stop him from running in 2024. | ||
| And she gets up on her high horse like she does, sounding like to be the most reasonable person in the world. | ||
| And she's at the helm of a ship that is absolutely destroying the Constitution and the rules of the House as we know it. | ||
| So what I want to do is I want to bring in Richard Barris now, and I want to start with Cheney herself and talk a little bit about whether these hearings are giving her any traction in the state of Wyoming. | ||
| And then I want to go writ large and have Richard talk a little bit about the generic polling, whether the January 6th show is eating away at all with the Republican majority now as showing in the polls for the upcoming congressional race. | ||
| How Roe v. Wade is going. | ||
| Without further ado, drumroll please. | ||
| Richard Barrows. | ||
| First, Richard, welcome to the show. | ||
| What's your take, first of all, on Cheney herself and where that Wyoming race stands? | ||
| Has she got a chance? | ||
| Yeah, thanks for having me, Peter. | ||
| I mean, this is what she views to be her only chance. | ||
| She cannot win over Republican voters. | ||
| The last couple of rounds of polls, they're bad for her. | ||
| So she has no choice but to gin up Democratic votes. | ||
| How bad are they? | ||
| Bad. | ||
| She's in the 20s. | ||
| She's in the 20s. | ||
| So we're talking about big double-digit leads here. | ||
| Hagman just started to stretch legs. | ||
| I mean that, you know, after a while, you know, she banked it all on putting, you know, putting this show on and hopefully getting Democrats. | ||
| I just saw a headline maybe eight hours ago, Liz Cheney urges Democrats to vote for her in the primary. | ||
| That's her only shot. | ||
| The problem is, you know, they defeated that runoff bill, Peter, which was for her, by the way. | ||
| They tried that, the state, The establishment and the state legislature tried to push through a bill that would have made it easier for her to survive, but at this point now, she would need a huge turnout from Democrats to fight this back. | ||
| So I imagine in a year from now, two years from now, Liz Cheney's just going to be a Democrat. | ||
| Are you seeing any significant money coming into that race on her side to do that? | ||
| I'm seeing money all over this country from Democrats going in to try to basically interfere. | ||
| Talks about election interference. | ||
| Interfere in Republican primaries. | ||
| Is anybody stepping up to the plate for her in that race? | ||
| That's, you know, the big donor Democrats, the Soros type money, anybody? | ||
| And she's, she's got her own Rolodex too. | ||
| So that is, I mean, that, that, that is a challenge. | ||
| Um, but I'm not sure you can buy, buy this image repair. | ||
| Uh, she effectively, you know, from a state like Wyoming, she effectively abandoned, uh, you know, all the party, the voters. | ||
| Uh, this isn't just about January 6th. | ||
| You know, she's been on this train for a while. | ||
| She just decided to really stake her claim here and the hopes that maybe I can put together. | ||
| A coalition of Democrats and the old Republican guard who didn't like the former president. | ||
| Uh, you know, really a squishy establishment types. | ||
| How much more goodwill can I get out of my daddy? | ||
| And it's not enough. | ||
| It's not enough. | ||
| Twenty-four percent favorability. | ||
| That's horrible. | ||
| That's good news. | ||
| Let's go writ large and right off the bat, spoiler alert, Richard's going to expose me as being not sophisticated enough to understand what's going on. | ||
| We've seen a couple of polls that Richard's going to brief us on come out that show some erosion in the lead that the Republicans generically have over the Democrats in the congressional race. | ||
| And my speculation as a layperson was simply that it was either the January 6th circus was doing something or Roe v. Wade. | ||
| Richard, why am I wrong and what do you think is actually driving that? | ||
| Yeah, January 6th is a little bit more complicated, Peter, but with the Roe v. Wade narrative you hear in the media, it's just not, it really isn't the case. | ||
| It hasn't had the impact that Democrats had hoped. | ||
| And there's a reason for that, and I'll give you some examples in a second, but there's a reason for that, and that is because those Roe v. Wade pro-unfettered abortion voters, you know, from the 1990s, are now not the youth of today. | ||
| Those views on abortion have changed, and they're not as rabid, these younger generation, they're not as rabid as, you know, those 1980s and 1990s kids were, which are now my age. | ||
| They're middle-aged. | ||
| The pro-abortion voter is a middle-to-upper-income educated white in a metro suburb. | ||
| They vote anyway. | ||
| Last month they told us Ukraine was their number one issue. | ||
| For a week there, it was gun violence. | ||
| I mean, they just pretty much move wherever the wind blows them. | ||
| I'm trying not to put them down here. | ||
| Give the folks out there the numbers. | ||
| What's changed? | ||
| You mentioned there's Rasmussen and there's what, Emerson? | ||
| Give the folks out there the numbers. | ||
| What's changed? | ||
| Because there has been some erosion according to your analysis, right? | ||
| Yeah, and I see it in district polling too that we're doing for clients. | ||
| What is happening, I think, just judging by what we hear during the interviews, you have 46-43 for Emerson, which is not that big of a change. | ||
| What changed in Emerson was that Trump widened his lead over Biden from the prior month. | ||
| It was a very small lead, and now it's a five-point lead, 44-39, which, by the way, is exactly what we had before we leaned voters. | ||
| They didn't lean the undecideds. | ||
| When we did, it was Trump 46, Biden 40. | ||
| So Trump gained a little bit more than Biden did there. | ||
| But Rasmussen fell again. | ||
| So they started out in double digits, 11, 13 point lead. | ||
| Now we're down to 5, 47, 42. | ||
| And what we're seeing is just this, they're messing up the motivation that Republican voters have and Republican leaning independents. | ||
| You know, you pass a gun control bill when you're trying to win a majority. | ||
| It's not the smart play. | ||
| When you're Kevin McCarthy and the day of Roe v. Wade, you signal you may be open to a constitutional protection passed by the House for abortion. | ||
| You're messing with people's minds. | ||
| They don't like it. | ||
| They don't like their leaders. | ||
| The Republican Party does not like their leaders. | ||
| If Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell could just stay quiet. | ||
| For a few months and do nothing. | ||
| They wouldn't screw this up, but they are masters at screwing this up, which I'm starting to believe Peter is honestly on purpose when you allow. | ||
| Yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| The plot thickens when you allow, you know, your top lieutenants to talk about amnesty after passing a gun bill, I have to worry about either your state of mind or your, or whether or not you're being earnest that you want to win a big majority, because in the end, uh, I've seen a lot on the ground, just working with different clients. | ||
| Kevin is counting votes. | ||
| He's not counting seats. | ||
| He's counting votes. | ||
| And the truth be told, he would rather some of these Democrats win in some of these congressional districts than some MAGA people that he may not be able to count on for that vote. | ||
| I think Kevin is trying to avoid... Hang on. | ||
| I want you to reinforce that. | ||
| Say that one more time because that's a big charge. | ||
| You're saying that Kevin McCarthy would rather have Democrats win than MAGA people? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Without a doubt. | ||
| And I mean, I can even point to a couple of races to show that. | ||
| Please do. | ||
| Do tell. | ||
| Out in California, we told them that seat E13 was definitely doable. | ||
| They had a person in there that the base loved. | ||
| They decided to bring in this guy who has no chance of winning. | ||
| They carpet bombed the Trump candidate into oblivion, and now they pulled him off the red wave card. | ||
| So they had no intention of really fighting for that seat anyway. | ||
| And that's because the Democrat, Adam Gray, would absolutely vote for Kevin McCarthy, which everyone who lives out there and is involved in politics out there knows. | ||
| He will vote for Kevin McCarthy. | ||
| So Kevin McCarthy would rather lose that seat and get Adam Gray, who will vote for him, as opposed to having somebody like David Giglio win it, who was not a lock for that vote. | ||
| Why would they go and spend a million dollars, almost, to go and destroy Mike Cassidy in Mississippi 3? | ||
| When Michael Guest either can defend his record or not. | ||
| They didn't go pro-Michael Guest. | ||
| They went anti-Cassidy and painted the guy as a lunatic. | ||
| How much money, how far would a million dollars have gone in California 13? | ||
| A long way. | ||
| So this is the RINOs trying to maintain control of the Senate and the leadership of the House? | ||
| It's as simple as that? | ||
| It really is. | ||
| They can't have. | ||
| I want to issue a challenge right now to Jim Jordan. | ||
| I love Jim Jordan. | ||
| He seems like one of the toughest guys on Capitol Hill. | ||
| He walks around without a coat on. | ||
| He has short sleeves. | ||
| He's got the big biceps. | ||
| He's a strong wrestler. | ||
| But when it comes to challenging Kevin McCarthy, he's a coward. | ||
| And somebody's got to challenge McCarthy. | ||
| Look, McCarthy We'll go down in history as committing the biggest blunder, the biggest blunder in congressional history, the way he refused to play ball at all with that kangaroo court committee and wound up giving them Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger and no say, carte blanche. | ||
| Richard, why will no one challenge McCarthy? | ||
| What's wrong with Jim Jordan? | ||
| Yeah, I'll tell you, I've actually inquired with people who know Jim Jordan really well, and I get the look of dismay. | ||
| I don't know what happened here with this 180. | ||
| It's a long, long way, a far cry from the Jim Jordan who would have paired with Mark Meadows after Trump first won in 2016 to take out Paul Ryan. | ||
| What happened to that guy? | ||
| I have no idea. | ||
| But I will say this. | ||
| He's going to go down all right. | ||
| The Republicans have The biggest, the biggest opportunity I have seen in my lifetime in a first term incumbent midterm, all of the metrics are historically negative. | ||
| They can only be their own worst enemy here. | ||
| You know, some of these court decisions that are great and positive that the Republican base loves. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And then you have some that are negative, Peter. | ||
| I'm not sure the voters really blame, you know, the Kavanaugh's for, yeah, I mean, it gets under their crawl when he, When he rules against them on immigration, but the truth is he's appointed and I think they kind of know that. | ||
| It's different with legislators. | ||
| You campaigned on something, you promised to defend us, you didn't, and they get mad. | ||
| So we're starting, in our polling, we're starting to hear that now. | ||
| The old... Hang on, Richard, can you... Richard, I want to pull you over from the break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Can you hang around for a minute? | ||
| All right, my brother. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Peter Canobar in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We're talking with Richard Barris about one of the most significant, significant decisions that will be made when the Republicans take over the House. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay here in the War Room. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We were talking with Richard Barris. | ||
| We're going to bring him back now. | ||
| And the first thing I want to ask Richard is what do you think the number of seats we're going to pick up if people get out to vote Republicans, by the way, and what are the odds that McCarthy will maintain his role as leader of the pack? | ||
| Richard. | ||
| You know, an average pickup for a first-term incumbent midterm, Peter, is around 30 seats. | ||
| Around 30, you know, now I think with 2018, it's around, you know, 32, 33. | ||
| You know, I think Republicans should do much better than that. | ||
| I mean, there are districts that are Biden plus 12 to 15 that we saw in serious danger, but they're Making missteps. | ||
| There's just no doubt about it. | ||
| So I'd have to put it, you know, in, in the ballpark of maybe slightly above average at this point, when it could be a route, a huge route. | ||
| I just don't have any confidence in them to do the right thing. | ||
| And as of right now, it's a golden opportunity here, Richard. | ||
| What would they have to do to make this a route? | ||
| You know, pretend at least that you are what you say you are. | ||
| You know, when the anger, Peter, over the gun bill was significant last week, I had Republicans yelling at us on the phone, yelling at us. | ||
| I could show you the responses through the peer-to-peer SMX texting. | ||
| It's horrible. | ||
| They're angry and they'll, you know, they conduct the survey. | ||
| They carry on like good troops, but you know, they're, they're mad. | ||
| And you really can't blame them because every time they get this close. | ||
| Something happens. | ||
| Which, by the way, is probably why Donald Trump's lead over Joe Biden is bigger than the Republican lead over Democrats in the generic ballot. | ||
| Because every day, Republicans remind Republican voters why they supported Donald Trump in the first place. | ||
| With all the problems the media gave him, as tough as he is to love, at least he defended them and did what he said he was going to do. | ||
| It goes such a long way with voters, Peter. | ||
| Yeah, he led that rhino Republican Party into a Trump Republican Party, and that's really what's at stake here. | ||
| All right, switch quickly to the Senate. | ||
| Tell me the odds that we'll win back the Senate, and then talk briefly about where the Blake Masters race stands in Arizona. | ||
| That's one dear to our hearts here in the War Room. | ||
| Trump endorsed Blake Masters. | ||
| Blake was in the White House when I was in the White House. | ||
| So, odds of getting the Senate back and odds of Blake Master winning his primary and defeating the astronaut? | ||
| You know, the political environment is so bad. | ||
| Biden's approval rating is historically low. | ||
| Right track, wrong track, it's historically negative. | ||
| And especially in these Senate races, that matters. | ||
| So, if you look at Arizona, how Badly underwater, he is there. | ||
| I still think that there's a better shot than not. | ||
| Republicans still are favored. | ||
| It just shouldn't even be this close at this point. | ||
| Oz should not have to deal with people still complaining and moaning that their candidate didn't win. | ||
| Otherwise, take Fetterman. | ||
| What can I tell you? | ||
| Ted Budd's going to win it in North Carolina. | ||
| Blake Masters is, uh, I saw some of the polls that came out today. | ||
| They honestly unfazed me. | ||
| I think at this point, Arizona is always very close, but in this environment, I think Blake Masters is going to win the primary. | ||
| And in this environment, Mark Kelly, he voted like Chuck Schumer. | ||
| He's not Kyrsten Sinema. | ||
| So Masters has a lot of ammunition to use against him. | ||
| And I just don't, I don't see how a first term, you know, he's not even a first term senator at this point. | ||
| He doesn't have income. | ||
| A lot of incumbency power. | ||
| He is primed to be knocked off. | ||
| And Nevada too is another one. | ||
| Surprisingly strong during that primary Republican voting. | ||
| It was very strong. | ||
| Clark County, even in Washoe, I was impressed. | ||
| And I'm always kind of pessimistic about the Silver State. | ||
| Adam Laxalt, he really is, you could see that he really, yeah, unlike the- It's Nevada loyalty there, right? | ||
| I mean, he really brought it all together. | ||
| His daddy or his granddad. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That's the name. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He put all the elements of the Republican Party together. | ||
| The Trumpers love him. | ||
| The establishment loves him. | ||
| And that's the recipe you need in that state. | ||
| As opposed to the governor's race, it's going to be a little bit, I think it's going to be a little bit tougher there. | ||
| But, you know, Walker had some missteps in Georgia. | ||
| That would be the easiest pickup opportunity, but he's got to, he's got to write that shit real quick, Peter. | ||
| You know, I mean, there's, he had good leads in our polling and he's got to, he's got to write it. | ||
| All right, my brother. | ||
| But I think Blake's going to pull it out. | ||
| Give everybody your social media and we'll let you get back to big data. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| Best place to follow me is on Locals, peoplespundit.locals.com. | ||
| You can become a member or a supporter. | ||
| And definitely check out the public polling project, which is bigdatapoll.com forward slash public polling project. | ||
| And that's where we do the monthly national poll, which we're going to try to expand real soon. | ||
| Thanks for spending a little time in the war room here, brother. | ||
| We all love Rich Barris. | ||
| You take care, man. | ||
| Always. | ||
| All right. | ||
| All right, Cameron. | ||
| All right, my brother. | ||
| Cameron, let's bring in That cold open here? | ||
| She's doing great. | ||
| She's in good spirits. | ||
| I think the magnitude of the moment has certainly begun to dawn on her and how significant of a role she's playing in American history. | ||
| She's somebody who I would have trusted in any scenario to keep their word, to get a job done, but she's always been a behind-the-scenes player. | ||
| So to see her front and center with millions and millions of people watching and to maintain such poise and confidence doing what Dozens of people twice her age, three times her age are too terrified to do. | ||
| Refusing subpoenas, not showing up was remarkable. | ||
| It was inspiring, honestly, as a woman to watch. | ||
| I don't even know what the biggest takeaway from today was. | ||
| I had a sense of what she was going to say. | ||
| This went far beyond anything I knew of. | ||
| From the fact that she confirmed the former president wanted to see more violence on January 6th. | ||
| He knew there were weapons and he wanted to see them used. | ||
| To wanting to take over the beast, his car, and potentially drive it to Capitol Hill. | ||
| I mean, she painted a picture of what was even worse than what I knew when I resigned in December, early December of 2020, which was a man unhinged, out of touch with reality, and with advisors around him seemingly doing nothing to stop it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They put Peter Navarro in leg irons for simply doing his constitutional duty. | |
| Now they want to put Peter in prison for standing up for Donald Trump. | ||
| Please go to Amazon right now and order Taking Back Trump's America to help fund Peter's legal defense. | ||
| Taking Back Trump's America provides a critical MAGA blueprint to put Trump back in the White House in 2024. | ||
| Buy Taking Back Trump's America on Amazon today. | ||
| If they can put Peter Navarro in prison, they can come for all of us. | ||
| Yeah, they can come for all of us. | ||
| Look, I wanted to play back-to-back that CNN clip with the Taking Back Trump's America mini-commercial there for a very specific reason. | ||
| One of the key themes of Taking Back Trump's America Is a riff on the old Reagan administration saw that personnel is policy, meaning that if you put personnel in there that are going to have one set of views, your policy is going to reflect those views. | ||
| So as a president, you better get that right. | ||
| What I do in Taking Back Trump's America is expand that fairly dramatically into the principle that bad personnel is not just bad policies, but also bad politics. | ||
| And what we saw During the four years that I served in the White House, really Achilles heel of the presidency was this tendency to put too many people inside the White House perimeter who were either | ||
| rabidly anti-Trump, believe that, that was incredible to me, or simply rhinos with no allegiance to the most important parts of the Trump agenda. | ||
| The thing that distinguishes Trump Republicanism versus Rhino Republicanism is not tax cuts, it's not deregulation, and we all agree on those on the Republican side of the fence, and for good reason. | ||
| It's secure borders, which the rhinos loathe. | ||
| They want to open our borders. | ||
| It's strategic energy dominance, which entails building up things like our fracking industries across this country, from Pennsylvania and New York out to the Dakotas. | ||
| Having a strong national fence, but at the same time having an end to endless wars. | ||
| And so, when I see a clip like that with CNN's Jake Tapper, who is as rabidly anti-Trump as you can get, and who, throughout the 2020 election season, would perpetrate lie after lie after lie after lie against Trump, sitting there with this woman named Elissa Farah, | ||
| As she called the president crazed as she made false allegations against him about he being unhinged. | ||
| I sat with Elissa Farah. | ||
| In the White House when she was in the press corps. | ||
| She was part of the press team. | ||
| She and Kayleigh McEnany. | ||
| And she was supposed to be the head of strategy for the Trump administration. | ||
| And now she's sitting in a chair across from Jake Tapper on the anti-Trump CNN network talking smack against president trump blows my mind to see that The Taking Back Trump's America book is about how all that happened. | ||
| So when we come back in the next segment, I want to walk you through how Elissa Farah, Cassidy Hutchinson, who testified this last week, and some of the other bad seeds in the White House were effectively, I say this with tongue-in-cheek looking at Cameron here, Perfectly the bad seed of none other than Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| A real friend of the War Room. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| I'll be right back. | ||
| back to you today of our interest even kate bannon War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| At the break, we were talking about this principle that bad personnel equals bad politics. | ||
| I'm going to continue on that riff and rant in a minute, but first, I always got to, when I host a war room, it always warms my heart to put in a plug for Mike Glendale at MyPillow.com. | ||
| Mike is a warrior. | ||
| He's pure deplorables. | ||
| He's dear to my heart because he supports made in America, American manufacturing. | ||
| And Mike, because he's had the courage of his convictions, has been under tremendous economic pressure from the big box retailers and from networks like Fox, which at times have refused to run his ads, and everywhere in between. | ||
| And so we in the War Room need to support Mike Lindell. | ||
| So go to mypillow.com, check out whether it's the sheets, or the towels, or the slippers, whatever it is. | ||
| Just if you go in and you put in the promo code war room, you'll get a great discount of war room prices from MyPillow. | ||
| All right, let me get back to what we saw in the last segment, which was a clip from Jay Tapper interviewing this woman named Alyssa Farah, who was a former high-ranking press person in the Trump White House. | ||
| And my Taking Back Trump's America book on Amazon now, the key organizing principle of this is that the bad personnel. | ||
| That we put in the White House beginning from day one back in January of 2017 In that White House, you know, Mnuchin, Tillerson, Mattis, all these bad apples, bad personnel, not only led to bad policies in the sense that they were not Trumpian policies, but often led to bad politics because sometimes we didn't follow through on what the boss promised and that would cost us at the ballot box. | ||
| In this particular case, the backstory behind Elissa Farrow starts With with Mark Meadows and I frankly he was the fourth chief of staff And he would be the second one from the Freedom Freedom Caucus The feckless Mick Mulvaney who almost brought the president down? | ||
| But with the worst press conference in history the turns the reins over to Mark Meadows now the thing about Meadows is Yeah, Mark's a likable person. | ||
| He's a glad hander. | ||
| He knows how to be sweet and whatever, and that's what politicians do. | ||
| But my first encounter with Meadows was when he was still a congressman, but the boss sent me on a mission and I was visiting different congressman with Sean Duffy, who's just the greatest guy in the world, and we were trying to get congressmen to support what was called the Reciprocal Trade Act, which was simply that if a country like India is gonna put massive tariffs on the US, | ||
| under the Reciprocal Trade Act, if Congress passed it, the president would have the ability to do tit for tat. | ||
| Okay, if you're not gonna lower your tariffs, India, we're gonna raise them to yours. | ||
| And we thought that that simple Reciprocal Trade Act would give us a tremendous tool to force countries around the world to stop taking advantage of American workers as American small businesses by sticking us with their real unfair trade practices. | ||
| You know, lo and behold, yeah, go ahead and talk to Meadows and say, oh yeah, we'll look at it, this, that, and the other thing. | ||
| Sean and I got a bunch of people to support the Reciprocal Trade Act, but Mark Meadows was not one of them. | ||
| He simply never supported the Trump tariffs. | ||
| He never supported Buy American, Hire American. | ||
| And so, lo and behold, the guy is like, oh, we're going to appoint Meadows as chief of staff? | ||
| It was like a head shake. | ||
| It was the same head shake I gave when they appointed Bill Barr is the Attorney General. | ||
| Bushy, Bill Barr, what are you doing with Bill Barr in there? | ||
| It's like, that's just nuts. | ||
| But, so Meadows comes in now, now here's where it got interesting, and the joke around the White House was when Meadows came in is he brought his harem with him. | ||
| It's like, he takes, you know, of the major hires he puts, there's like five women that he brings in, right? | ||
| Three What can go wrong there? | ||
| his outer office, right, and two in the press office to replace the people who were there, right? So what can go wrong there? Well, first of all, Alyssa Farah and Kayleigh McEnany would be the two people that would push out Stephanie Grisham. | ||
| And Meadows does it in the worst possible way. | ||
| He's very offensive to Stephanie. | ||
| Stephanie, she was good people, but Meadows treated her so poorly. | ||
| That she did the worst possible thing, which was to turn on Trump and Melania and write one of those kiss-all-tell-all kind of, worst kind of books and shame on Stephanie Grisham. | ||
| But I blame Meadows for that because of his callous disregard for Stephanie herself. | ||
| And so he sticks us with Elissa Farah and Kayleigh McEnany. | ||
| Now, what happened? | ||
| Well, both of those Women, come January 6th, would just trash the President, when in fact the last thing President Trump wanted was any kind of violence that day. | ||
| it interfered completely with our ability to count the votes. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And so, so, Alyssa does her kind of like public prostration in front of the media. | ||
| It's like, oh, I hate Trump now, please hire me. | ||
| And she gets her little cushy little CNN job, and she sits there with Jay Tapper and proceeds to make all sorts of falsehood claims. | ||
| I mean, she mentions the Beast, right? | ||
| This fanciful idea that Somehow the president was in the presidential limo and lunged at the wheel. | ||
| He wasn't even in the beast that day. | ||
| I mean, it's just, it's just so wrong to see her. | ||
| And then the other part of the story, it's like the three women that were inside the outer office of the chief of staff, one of them was this Cassidy Hutchins. | ||
| And look, I don't know if she's telling the truth or whether she thinks she's telling the truth or whatever, but all I remember about her And it was kind of a running joke, was every time I went over there, she was sitting there with a big bag of candy, pretty much doing nothing. | ||
| And I couldn't figure out why she was there. | ||
| And Meadows gave these people, like, high ranks, like special assistants of the President. | ||
| That's a big deal. | ||
| That is a big deal to give somebody. | ||
| And he gave... Meadows handed this stuff out, and the punchline here is that a lot of these people Who are being shown in cameos on this Jan 6th committee. | ||
| They're people who from the get-go hated President Trump. | ||
| I mean this guy Hirschman, Mark Short, and Mike Pence. | ||
| It's like, and for the record, it's like Cassidy Hutchison's like bringing her hands about the treatment of Mike Pence. | ||
| It's like, I like Mike! | ||
| Mike was a good guy, but Mike, in the end, did the worst possible thing for this republic when he got a flawed legal opinion from another in-never-Trumper, Greg Jacob, his own general counsel. | ||
| And Mark Short, Pence gets this opinion. | ||
| And Mike Pence had a moral and ethical obligation to the commander-in-chief, as well as a process obligation, to show that document to President Trump and to Pat Cipollone, the White House legal counsel, before he aired it out to the public, to let everybody kind of look at it and provide input to that. | ||
| And that's why, you know, that alone is why Mike Pence is basically the Brutus to the American Caesar Trump, and that nobody in the Republican Party should ever trust Mike Pence again, much less vote for him for the presidency. | ||
| So the punchline here, and it goes back, taking back Trump's America, On Amazon, by the way, is full of stories about people with inside the White House perimeter who would get in the way of Donald Trump doing the best things for the American people. | ||
| And it always went wrong when you put a Rhino in or a Never Trumper in, and we just had too many in there. | ||
| All right, now, Cameron, if you could play that clip. | ||
| We're going to make an abrupt shift here to economics. | ||
| So, at some point, it's a game, Steve, of musical chairs where, at some point, the Big Short starts, and now, hang on, January 2021, I said this would be the year of Big Shorts. | ||
| Two weeks ago, on this show, and we're gonna get a clip of that for the 5 o'clock show, I said, I'm going today, I'm going short on this market, okay? | ||
| So, this band is War Room, okay? | ||
| You can choose to watch CNBC, Bloomberg, or Fox Business, or Bannon's War Room, and this is the only place where you got a short call. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| A short call, by the way, is when you bet that the market's going down. | ||
| You short sell the stock or the market index rather than buy it. | ||
| If you go long, you're going to make money if the index and the markets go up. | ||
| If you go short, you make money When it's going down, and I made that short call on the basis of a perception that we were slowly being encircled by a stagflation beast, and there would literally be no way out of that. | ||
| And that call, unfortunately, has been spectacularly correct, because the market has been in a steady downward trend. | ||
| What I would warn you now is, for example, the market went up today. | ||
| It's in the green today. | ||
| And it has green days. | ||
| A week ago or so it had a pretty decent week. | ||
| But when you're a speculator, as opposed to one of these buy and hold investors, when you're a stock market speculator and not a day trader, What you always try to look at is the trend of the market, right? | ||
| And the trend right now, the stock market, is clearly down. | ||
| And it's down because their fundamental structural problems, structural rot, In the economy that have to do on the one side with demand pull inflationary pressures because there's simply too much congressional bad spending in the system that's not going to be productive in any way and simply going to be it's going to be incendiary for inflation. | ||
| And then you've got the the structural issues associated with the Biden energy policy, which I think fundamentally is is at probably the most important driver right now of the stagflation problem. | ||
| And so what we're seeing is consumers can now retrench instead of putting out big ticket items. | ||
| Now they're putting off hair appointments and things like that. | ||
| And so Continue to see a downward trend in the market with updates. | ||
| Don't get sucked in to the rhetoric of, you know, buy the dip and all that stuff. | ||
| And just, this is a time to be really cautious and spend some time increasing your economic and financial market literacy so you understand the environment That you and your family are operating in. | ||
| Because these are going to be perilous times, and they're going to go on for a very long time. | ||
| And one of the many reasons is the way we're mishandling the virus. | ||
| So in the last segment of today's show, 5 o'clock show, we're going to talk to Robert Malone, Doc Malone, one of my favorites, coming up next on The War Room. | ||
| from Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I'm Steve Stern, CEO of FlagShirt.com, a third generation, veteran-owned small business. | ||
| veteran-owned small business. | ||
| I believe that the American way of life is for all of us. | ||
| I'm asking you today to visit FlagShirt.com. | ||
| Help keep the American dream alive. | ||
| Be a flag waver. | ||
| Carry a nation's heritage. | ||
| Use coupon code ACTION10 for 10% off site-wide and buy a flag shirt today. | ||
| Action, action, action. | ||
| I love this guy. | ||
| I want one of those. | ||
| Cameron was supposed to get me one before July 4th, so I'm expecting it. | ||
| I'll even pay for it, because I believe in fair pay for fair services. | ||
| So, good for you, flagship. | ||
| Look, we want to finish up the show today, at least in the 5 o'clock hour, with my good friend and patriot, Doc Malone. | ||
| We've been in the foxhole together. | ||
| But the thing that continues to bother me, Doc, is just the continued push to vaccinate our children, younger and younger children, even as studies are coming out now that show the risks of taking the vaccine for even older folks are greater than the benefits. | ||
| So, Doc, if you could, Can you give a quick summary of the latest state of studies and can you explain why kids are still getting jabbed and why the mainstream media refuses to print any of this stuff? | ||
| Well, let's start at the back end. | ||
| Why is the corporate controlled media acting as a propaganda arm for Pfizer and Moderna? | ||
| I think that's kind of self-evident. | ||
| They're completely captured and controlled. | ||
| And it's only alternative media like Real America's Voice and War Room Pandemic that are actually able to cover the news anymore. | ||
| What's going on with the children jabs and also with this new strategy that was just approved to make COVID vaccines analogous to flu vaccines so they don't even have to do any clinical testing when they roll out the next version? | ||
| That is clearly demonstrating that the review committees for the CDC and the FDA have been stacked basically by ringers who support the pharma. | ||
| What they're trying to do with the kids is force vaccination for all, all as low as they can go. | ||
| And the real problem is the data now are quite clear Many, many studies here reviewed in journals like Nature, Science, Cell. | ||
| The problem is immune imprinting. | ||
| And what that means is that your immune systems are getting screwed up by the multiple jabs, particularly if you were infected prior to the jabs. | ||
| And it's just training your immune system to only respond to the antique spike antigens, the ones that aren't circulating anymore. | ||
| And with Omicron, it's actually suppressing both T and B responses when it comes on top of that. | ||
| So what they want to do now is roll out, without any clinical trials next fall, a combination of both a Wuhan-1 strain spike, as well as an Omicron either 0.4 or 0.5 version, which will be obsolete by then also. | ||
| How dangerous is this? | ||
| I mean, I'm watching what Naomi Wolf is doing with her data dive on all this, and it just seems frightening, Doc, the dangers to women and their reproductive cycles, for young boys and their hearts. | ||
| I mean, how dangerous now is it to make this kind of like a cradle-to-grave kind of ritual just to enrich Big Pharma? | ||
| I don't think it's just to enrich Big Pharma. | ||
| I'm bought in in the logic that what they want to do is leverage vaccine uptake to get to digital IDs and all the enabling that has to do with that, that bounces straight back into your core competence, which is the economics of a central digital currency and the ability to control all economic activity once they have this identifier of a digital ID for everyone. | ||
| But how dangerous is it? | ||
| There's a new study just out, nicely covered by Epoch Times, based on the latest BEARS data. | ||
| Let me just read some numbers. | ||
| Abnormal uterine bleeding or menstrual irregularity up 1,000-fold. | ||
| Miscarriages up 50-fold. | ||
| Fetal chromosomal abnormalities up 100-fold. | ||
| Fetal malformation 30-50-fold. | ||
| Cardiac disorders in the fetus, up 40-fold. | ||
| Fetal arrhythmia, up 50-fold. | ||
| Fetal cardiac arrest, up 200-fold. | ||
| It goes on and on and on. | ||
| The data are coming in fast and strong, and because they're using stacked review committees, and all of the things that Marianne DeMasi recently ran to ground as the basis for the pharmaceutical capture of the regulatory authorities in virtually all Western governments. | ||
| This was published in the British Medical Journal just this last week. | ||
| What we've now got is a situation in which we can no longer count on any of the Western regulatory authorities. | ||
| They are all compromised, or to put it less nicely, corrupted. | ||
| All right, sir. | ||
| Give us quick your social media and then you have a good solid July 4th, sir. | ||
| Social media, the best to go to and our favorite as you post there is Getter. | ||
| Thank you so much, Getter crew, for what you've done and to the Getter community for what you have created and for your support. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're now well over 400,000 followers. | |
| And then for the more detailed stuff, It's rwmalonemd.substack.com and I just want to shout out to War Room, my great gratitude for allowing me to speak about these things and about the Substack. | ||
| You guys drive the Substack. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, brother. | |
| We're going to get it. | ||
| Everybody go to all of that. | ||
| Doc, you have a good holiday. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Stick around for the 6 o'clock show. | ||
|
unidentified
|
uh... we've got a great great show coming up uh... and we're out now they put peter navarro in late for simply doing his constitutional duty Now they want to put Peter in prison for standing up for Donald Trump. | |
| Please go to Amazon right now and order Taking Back Trump's America to help fund Peter's legal defense. | ||
| Taking Back Trump's America provides a critical MAGA blueprint to put Trump back in the White House in 2024. | ||
| Buy Taking Back Trump's America on Amazon today. |
Export Selection