June 15, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:46
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Actually, it looks like that vote to impeach Donald Trump by Tom Rice was also enough to cost him his seat in Congress. | |
| You can see here, NBC News is projecting that his Trump-backed challenger, Russell Frye, has outright won this Republican primary. | ||
| Remember, there's a 50% rule in effect in South Carolina. | ||
| The question here was, would Frye get over 50% and win this thing outright tonight? | ||
| If he'd fallen short of 50, he would have been sent into a runoff with Rice. | ||
| Rice surely Would have been a heavy underdog in that runoff, but there will be no runoff. | ||
| It's been settled tonight by a better than two to one margin. | ||
| Russell Frye has trounced Congressman Tom Rice in this Republican primary in South Carolina's seventh district, major development. | ||
| It's a special election in Texas. | ||
| It's for a seat that will really only exist for the next few months. | ||
| And yet I think it's a significant result because we talk so much about South Texas and the Hispanic vote in particular. | ||
| And take a look at, let's see if we can get this called up here. | ||
| Take a look at the results in this special election in the 15th district. | ||
| I'm trying to get it called up here. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
| Myra Flores, a Republican, we have projected will win outright the special election in the 34th district of Texas. | ||
| This is one of the most Hispanic congressional districts in America. | ||
| Again, this is a special election for a seat. | ||
| It's being redrawn because of redistricting, but we have been talking since the 2020 election about South Texas, the Rio Grande Valley, the border region. | ||
| We saw county after county in this region of Texas, heavily Hispanic, swing 10, 20, 30. | ||
| 40 points away from the Democrats towards the Republicans in the 2020 election. | ||
| One of the questions is, would those swings persist in 2022? | ||
| Certainly seeing in this special election with a Republican winning in this district tonight, signs that that swing is persisting. | ||
| It's a story in South Texas. | ||
| It's a story in Florida. | ||
| There's a national story here with the Hispanic vote. | ||
| Could be very significant in these 2022 midterms. | ||
| Big shifts there that could affect a lot of races. | ||
| So those are the three biggies we've got so far. | ||
| They put Peter Navarro in leg irons for simply doing his constitutional duty. | ||
| Now they want to put Peter in prison for standing up for Donald Trump. | ||
| Please go to Amazon right now and order Taking Back Trump's America to help fund Peter's legal defense. | ||
| Taking Back Trump's America provides a critical MAGA blueprint to put Trump back in the White House in 2024. | ||
| Buy Taking Back Trump's America on Amazon today. | ||
| If they can put Peter Navarro in prison, they can come for all of us. | ||
| Well, at least not in prison today, nor leg irons, but we do live in a land of lawlessness and lawfare. | ||
| Lawlessness where, around this country, in our two-tiered system of justice, You can break all manner of laws and roam free. | ||
| At the same time, this whole notion of lawfare has really blossomed in the age of Trump, particularly on the Democrat side, where the whole mission really is to attack Republicans, particularly Trump Republicans, and the President himself, | ||
| Talking about Trump, not Biden, in a way which is designed to make us cower, drain us of resources, and perhaps even put us behind bars. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon today because Stephen K. Bannon is going to be where I'm going to be in two days over at the courthouse fighting these charges that have been levied. | ||
| And you saw that ad, 32nd ad, taking back Trump's America. | ||
| It will be my legal defense fund because they're coming at me hard and it's time for me to, as they say, | ||
| Lawyer up and what I've learned in this whole process is yeah, this is like a million dollars or more Simply to stand up to the Constitution and for this country now, let's do let's start this with a jeopardy question So They These they are the only people on the planet the only people on the planet who have served at a high level in the Trump White House and | ||
| Who are sanctioned by the Chinese Communist Party and are charged with contempt of Congress and have been put in leg irons. | ||
| Who are they? | ||
| Yes, Stephen K. Bannon and Peter K. Navarro. | ||
| What is wrong with that picture? | ||
| What is wrong with this country? | ||
| We got a packed show today. | ||
| We're going to talk a lot about what happened last night in the election. | ||
| We're going to talk a lot about why your gasoline continues to move up in price rather than down. | ||
| We're going to talk a lot about the interest rate decisions that the Fed is going to make today and how the left-wing media is packaging it now in a way which is designed to be good news for you and even as they blame everybody but Joe Biden. | ||
| For our predicament. | ||
| And one of the things the War Room does best is to have real folks out in real situations as correspondents. | ||
| And we're going to have an update shortly from War Room correspondent Joanna Miller. | ||
| She's literally yards away from me over at the Supreme Court where there's decisions being released As we speak, and there's masses of protesters over there, peaceful, perhaps on the Republican conservative side, a little bit unruly and perhaps more than that on the other side. | ||
| So we'll get that update. | ||
| What I want to do, though, to finish off this block is really talk at a 30,000-foot level of what's going on in my judgment with this Jan 6th Committee and how I wound up literally in leg irons. | ||
| And I'll tell you that story briefly. | ||
| We have said on the war room for many, many, many, many months That the primary purpose, the primary mission of that Jan 6th committee is to craft a criminal case which will create either negative political fallout for Donald Trump or perhaps even get him | ||
| With a criminal indictment and into jail. | ||
| And why did the Democrats want to do that? | ||
| It's not simply animus against Orange Man Bad. | ||
| They know that Donald J. Trump, Donald John Trump, is the leading contender to win the election | ||
| in november of twenty twenty four and this is this is nothing short of lawfare basically the use the legal and abusive use of the legislative function uh... to pursue judicial function which which basically is to serve as judge jury and executioner of the president and folks like me and steve | ||
| In a way, to advance their political agenda. | ||
| Now, the Constitution is quite clear on separation of powers. | ||
| Legislatures have the right to investigate for purely legislative purposes. | ||
| If, for example, the January 6th Committee wants to raise questions, for example, of why Nancy Pelosi Have the perimeter of Capitol Hill sufficiently guarded? | ||
| That would be an interesting question. | ||
| You could then follow that up with, okay, here's a plan to have more guards there. | ||
| Or you could investigate why Mark Esper, the Secretary of Defense, had the National Guard troops so far away that they couldn't be immediately deployed into the problem. | ||
| And You could find legislative and regulatory issues to basically solve that. | ||
| So that would be legitimate legislative functions. | ||
| Now, what I'm going to do, I'm going to continue this narrative, but let's go right now, because we are boots on the ground breaking news, folks. | ||
| Let's find out what's happening yards away at the Supreme Court. | ||
| Joanna Miller, what are you hearing, seeing, and what's going on? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey Peter, so right now, so they have basically blockades everywhere around the Supreme Court. | |
| There's about a hundred protesters total, half pro-life, half pro-abortion. | ||
| The pro-abortion protesters have been really angry, screaming ugly things at the pro-life people. | ||
| And I remember when I interviewed them last week, Um, you know, for people that worship the CDC in regard to vaccines, uh, they totally rejected the data we presented them that not actually thousands of women died from illegal abortions, uh, or died from illegal abortions before Roe, um, you know, legalized them. | ||
| Um, and so the Supreme Court has not released any, any decisions yet on Roe v. Wade. | ||
| Uh, there was one administrative law case related to a veteran, but so far, um, just a lot of anger and profanity We're coming from the pro-abortion side, pro-life people peacefully protesting, and we're just standing by for more decisions. | ||
| All right. | ||
| We'll get back to you as soon as you've got something breaking. | ||
| Just text our trusty producer here, Mr. Cameron, and he'll bring you right back into the mix. | ||
| Thank you, Joanna Miller. | ||
| Let me return to the main plot here for this segment. | ||
| Which is simply at the 30,000-foot level what we're witnessing with the Jan 6th Committee, this intent to be judge, jury, and executioner with President Trump as a way of keeping him away from the Oval Office in 2025. | ||
| I think There's a couple things interesting about this January 6th committee. | ||
| It should not exist. | ||
| Um, by its own rules and by the rules of the House, it's an illegitimate committee, um, issuing what they call in the law, ultra-virus, in other words, beyond their power subpoenas, which are illegal and unenforceable. | ||
| And yeah, look, I, I have, have resisted up till now, uh, engaging, uh, lawyers because they're very expensive and it's like, just on principle, I don't want to spend that kind of money. | ||
| And as a practical matter, I don't have that kind of money when you're talking about, you know, a million or two million dollar lawsuit to defend yourself against these things. | ||
| So what I've learned in doing this, what they call pro se, is that there's all these major constitutional issues that are embedded in this case. | ||
| So you have First and foremost, this whole notion that this committee itself is illegitimate. | ||
| The worst thing the committee's done in terms of their legitimacy is they don't have what's called a ranking minority member. | ||
| That would be a member of the Republican Party that Kevin McCarthy, the minority leader, Uh, would have put on that committee and in order to issue subpoenas, um, you, you have to have that. | ||
| That's again, according to the house rules, according to the committee rules and Pelosi herself called the formation of this unprecedented. | ||
| The thing that, that struck me when I began reading the constitutional law on all lists is that, that the quote legislative history matters when you're trying to determine Whether the Congress is acting in a punitive way, in a way which violates this issue of bills of attainder. | ||
| And the thing I want you to understand here very clearly about the seven Democrats, of the nine members on this committee, is this. | ||
| There's a clear five-year history, five-year history, where all seven of those members tried coup d'etats to take Trump out of office. | ||
| Two impeachment trials, a phony Russia hoax, three House resolutions that take him out on so-called mental grounds. | ||
| And this is what we're dealing with. | ||
| And then beyond that, there's the separation of powers issue. | ||
| There's what they call bills of attainder violations. | ||
| There's a whole thing about executive privilege and testimonial immunity. | ||
| And the bottom line is we're in a situation now where we're not going to get to the bottom of what happened in January 6th. | ||
| We're not going to find out whether FBI instigated this thing. | ||
| It's simply a show trial and I'm part of that. | ||
| Again, taking back Trump's America is my legal defense fund at this point. | ||
| You can't go to Amazon and buy it, but it's also the key to literally taking back that House of Representatives from Nancy Pelosi and taking back the White House in the name of Trump. | ||
| And as we move through the rest of this show and we begin talking about politics, stagflation, soaring gasoline prices, the root of all this evil It was November 3rd and what happened there. | ||
| And we need to get to the bottom of that in order to have a republic that's going to operate robustly. | ||
| I'll be right back. | ||
| Peter Navarro. | ||
| We've got a very special guest coming up in the next segment to talk gas prices. | ||
| boost production and help lower the cost of the pump in a scathing letter this morning to the CEOs of top U.S. oil refineries. Biden said they are taking advantage of the crisis as their profits have tripled. Biden said his administration is prepared to take any quote reasonable and appropriate steps that would help companies increase their output in the near term. Joining us now U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm. Good to | ||
| have you on the show this morning. | ||
| So tell us more about what exactly he's asking the oil companies to do. | ||
| And I just wonder if the president needs to sort of level with the American people about the situation, the energy situation globally and how it's impacting gas prices here at home. | ||
| Because isn't it the case that some of this he cannot control? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, totally, Mika. | |
| I mean, there's so much that is beyond any leader in the globe's control, unless they own state-owned enterprises that are producing gasoline. | ||
| So, oil is traded at today about $120 a barrel, and that price is being paid by people in Japan, it's being paid by people in Europe. | ||
| I mean, in fact, gas prices today are over $5 a gallon in the United States. | ||
| If you were in Canada, you would be paying over $6.20, something like that. | ||
| If you were in Germany, you'd be paying $8 a gallon. | ||
| If you were in Singapore, you'd be paying $9 a gallon. | ||
| It's happening all across the world. | ||
| The United States is the largest producer of oil and gas, and the President feels like we've got an additional responsibility. | ||
| We as a country, but really, our oil and gas producers have a responsibility. | ||
| We're on a war footing. | ||
| The price of oil, the price of gas, is precipitating the high cost, the high percentage of inflation around the world. | ||
| And so he's asking upon our domestic and international producers to produce more. | ||
| Russia's invasion of Ukraine has caused the price of gas in the United States to go up $1.70 a gallon since the invasion occurred. | ||
| So oil and gas companies, who are part of a global community, need to understand that we need to make up for the amount of Russian barrels of oil that have come off the market since that invasion, because countries like the United States rightfully have said we are not going to purchase. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Oh my, my, my. | ||
| Not Joe's fault. | ||
| line is he's calling for an increase in production, both of producing and extracting oil, but also refining it to make sure that we can have gasoline at the pump. So, okay, oh my my my, not Joe's fault, not Joe's fault. Okay, when I'm in the Trump White House for four years with Donald Trump, one of our key | ||
| missions was strategic energy dominance, which was also to include energy independence in this country. | ||
| And the way President Trump did that was pretty simple. | ||
| He reduced regulations and he encouraged drilling and he was particularly encouraging of so-called fracking, which we, not Saudi Arabia, is the Saudi Arabia! | ||
| Let me say that again. | ||
| America is the Saudi Arabia of fracking. | ||
| So now we're treated to Gasoline pumps being reprogrammed so they can hit the $10 mark in anticipation of that. | ||
| What's wrong with that picture? | ||
| We're in a situation Where everybody's blaming everybody else. | ||
| We've got Joe Biden going to the Venezuelans. | ||
| Whoever controls that country does not belong in power. | ||
| They're ruthless dictators. | ||
| We're begging Middle Eastern countries. | ||
| We're surreptitiously trying to get Russia to allow | ||
| Oil onto the market even as we're publicly trying to shut him down and you know the one one place that Joe Biden is not going to to ask for increased production is the place where Trump went Pennsylvania or the Dakotas or Texas and by the way New York State is sitting on a wealth | ||
| a petroleum that won't be unleashed by the Green New Deal folks that operate that state. | ||
| And let's not forget one of the first things Joe Biden did was undo the executive order I helped write on the Keystone Pipeline. And then there's the matter of, oh, you can't drill on leased lands. | ||
| Let's bring on the expert now on this subject, Dave Walsh. | ||
| And Dave, if you can simply reflect on Meek's leading questions to Granholm, and tell us what's really the truth about all this, sir. | ||
| Hey, very enlightening. | ||
| By the way, morning Joe was leaking around to the right conclusion on this. | ||
| Didn't quite hit home on it, but he got close to it. | ||
| Regulatory issues. | ||
| As you pointed out, Peter, New York, illegal to frack in New York. | ||
| Enormous natural gas reserves. | ||
| We've had, in just the last three weeks, we've had, from the administration, Department of Interior wanting to shutter all offshore leases. | ||
| We've had, a week before that, Alaska and Gulf of Mexico lease abandonment by the federal government. | ||
| Just a continuum of the drumbeat. | ||
| Here's the issue. | ||
| We did have, globally, about $160 billion reduction in CapEx by the oil majors due to demand. | ||
| The problem with reinitiating that, you've got to have a warm, receptive environment for their investing. | ||
| The ESG mantra and the fact of the continued prosecution of the war by this administration on their business activities is the key issue. | ||
| And that's the issue because you're talking to oil majors about investing in new cat-cracker systems at refineries, new compressor trains, new piping and control systems. | ||
| let alone the production you are talking about billions of dollars of investment that takes seven eight nine ten-year payback their long-term things if yours is if you're seeing that eight months after you do these things or uplift production you're going to be right back at war environmentally it it makes no sense to move forward and that's that's the issue one of the key issues with oil and gas majors who are plagued with the s g requirements now and played with six | ||
| money center banks and investment houses from uniform goldman sachs j p morgan morgan stanley u s bank or wells fargo and black rock all with boycott measures in their lending practices now against supporting financially oil and gas So with that as a backdrop, it's very hard to sit there and demand suddenly that oil and gas majors step up the bar. | ||
| They'd love to, but they need a receptive environment economically and investment incentive-wise to do it. | ||
| Let me ask you this. | ||
| Do you think that folks like AOC and the Green New Dealers, as they watch these gas prices explode, fully understand that they're responsible, but in their own minds they're thinking, well, this is what has to happen, this is the pain we have to endure in order to get to their Green New Deal nirvana? | ||
| Or do you think they're simply clueless? | ||
| I think it's a combination of both. | ||
| I mean, we are, unfortunately, trying to jam very long-term strategic issues into a current political discourse. | ||
| So many of these things, because the technology isn't developed, are very, very long-term things, 30-, 40-year-term things. | ||
| In her remarks this morning, again, Granholm began to conflate the discussion was about oil and gas prices at the pump. | ||
| she conflates that over to solar if we're all dependent on solar is great the fact of the matter is solar has nothing to do with with cars today nothing to do with transporting food transporting medical supplies by truck by diesel that's ninety eight percent ninety nine percent of our transportation base including the locomotive transportation for critical food solar has not to do with that but be it's intermittent and non reliable | ||
| now we have changed the lingo for example the EIA has now referred to it as uh... resource constraint just change that definition a few days ago from intermittent months ago from intermittent and non reliable which it actually is the thing that i found most disingenuous about Granholm's whole line of argument was this idea that they're paying eight bucks a gallon in germany and nine in singapore and everybody around the world | ||
| is paying higher prices. | ||
| Therefore, it's not our fault. | ||
| We're all kind of suffering from that. | ||
| I mean, basic economics. | ||
| If the U.S. | ||
| is the world's largest producer, And the person who sits in the Oval Office and the party that controls the Congress are making a war on oil production that significantly reduces that production and price at the margin is determined by the intersection of supply and demand. | ||
| Is it not true, Dave, that what the Germans and the Singaporeans and everybody else is paying is also a product of Joe Biden's energy policy? | ||
| Aren't we to blame just as, like, Donald Trump should have taken the credit for becoming energy independent? | ||
| I mean, have I got my economics wrong? | ||
| Oh, in part. | ||
| I love discussing this with you because you've got the essence of the supply-demand curve marginal impact. | ||
| The fact of our reduction of supply from 2019 by about Two million barrels a day does have, because at the margin, any critical thing, critical commodity that's essential and you can't live without, when you have a supply shortage, prices skyrocket inside of a supply-demand curve. | ||
| You understand that very well. | ||
| That's what we've done. | ||
| We were two million barrels per day more in production in 2019 than we are today. | ||
| Canada about half a million off. | ||
| That has an enormous global impact. | ||
| By the way, some of the data quoted there Germany, England, France, gas prices today, more in the $12 to $14 range. | ||
| They're not 8. | ||
| They're traditionally three times more than ours because of the regulatory and tax environment over there. | ||
| They've always been. | ||
| Now they're still three times ours. | ||
| I was in England a month ago. | ||
| They were $13 a gallon at that time, converted their measurement system to U.S. | ||
| currency. | ||
| Germany, the same. | ||
| And by the way, don't bury the lead here. | ||
| They don't have any oil like we have. | ||
| I mean, again, we are capable of being energy independent and unleash the frackers of America. | ||
| If you can stick around, I want to finish up just talking about the refiners. | ||
| If you have to scoot, let Cameron know. | ||
| But this is Peter K. Navarro in the war room for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| And when we come back next, we'll finish up with Dave on the energy issue and talk a little bit about yesterday's political tsunami ongoing in the Trump world. | ||
| Peter Navarro, be back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We spread the word all through Hong Kong. | |
| We will fight till they're all gone. | ||
| We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
| Let's take down the CCP. | ||
| They put Peter Navarro in leg irons for simply doing his constitutional duty. | ||
| Now they want to put Peter in prison for standing up for Donald Trump. | ||
| Please go to Amazon right now and order Taking Back Trump's America to help fund Peter's legal defense. | ||
| Taking Back Trump's America provides a critical MAGA blueprint to put Trump back in the White House in 2024. | ||
| Buy Taking Back Trump's America on Amazon today. | ||
| If they can put Peter Navarro in prison, they can come for all of us. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro sans leg irons, at least for today. | ||
| Let's resume the narrative with Dave Walsh. | ||
| What we were talking about is why gas prices are moving, I think, inevitably into the $10 range. | ||
| Hey, if they're configuring the pumps, we're probably going to get there. | ||
| The long pole in the tent, besides shutting down the frackers in this country, has been the ongoing war On oil refineries, okay? | ||
| These are... These are... Obviously, in order to get the diesel fuel, the gasoline, you gotta crack the stuff and get it. | ||
| When I lived in California, there was like a war on refineries there, and every time there was even a minor disruption at one of those refineries, gas prices would go up by a dollar or more. | ||
| Just like that. | ||
| Overnight. | ||
| And we've cooked up schemes. | ||
| I mean, we're talking in the Trump administration, doing deals Under NAFTA and the new USMCA, where we'd pump the oil in Texas, we'd run it in a pipeline across to Mexico, let them refine it over there because they didn't have to dodge all the greenies on this side, and then ship it back in tankers to the United States. | ||
| Yeah, one of the two things I tried the most to try to do was save our shipyards and save some of our refineries. | ||
| There was one in Philly that's going to be a shopping mall. | ||
| And it's like, this is the Marie Antoinette energy policy. | ||
| eat solar. And this pain that's being inflicted on the American people is purposeful by the Democrats, by Joe Biden, and then they try to blame everybody else. Dave Walsh, what say you on the refinery issue? Well we haven't had, Peter, in the U.S. any major new refinery capacity, as in a new refinery built for 50 years. | ||
| 50 years? | ||
| 50 years? | ||
| 50, a new one. | ||
| From Greenfield, new refinery. | ||
| In a country whose population has grown by 120 million over that time, and highway traffic and transportation, which is entirely fossil fuel based, gas based, diesel based, Has doubled in that time. | ||
| No new refinery capacity. | ||
| We're shutting down now the, not the government, but regulatory environment have contributed heavily to the decision for the Lyondell Refinery in Houston that produces about 450,000 barrels a day of crude and inside of that about 100,000 barrels a day of diesel to be shuttered next year by December. | ||
| The one in Philly used to be the Sun Oil Facility was shut down last year, diesel. | ||
| That this pressure is enormous. | ||
| Why are they shutting them down? | ||
| Why are they shutting them down? | ||
| It's environmentally driven. | ||
| It's exactly the same thing that caused the coal closures between 2012 and 2015. | ||
| The Obama administration, heavy prosecution of mercury and air toxic standards, cross state air pollution rules, regional haze rules, national ambient air quality standards rules, a clean power plant, all of this including those same regulations impacting oil and gas production and refining have have caused the cost of that activity to radically increase and so now we can have the mantra that coal is no longer competitive | ||
| as a generation source but because of the regulations that made it so not because we don't have tons of it and that's what's needed for electricity more base load continuous duty the same regulations have impacted oil and gas refining which is a gigantic disincentive on the on the cost of that cap acts to go ahead and invest in actually uplifting capacity these are huge long-term investments | ||
| If the administration is not there to support that in terms of at least creating an environment of not terminating it and making it expensive, I mean, incent it that way. | ||
| We're going to call a moratorium on shutdowns of leases. | ||
| We're going to call a moratorium on new environmental regulations that make your business non-competitive. | ||
| I want to play a quick game here. | ||
| I want to play the game Stump Dave Walsh. | ||
| I want to ask you one question, and if you know the answer to that, it's going to be beautiful. | ||
| If not, we'll get you back as soon as you do. | ||
| Here's the question. | ||
| What's the average amount of energy in a battery Going around driving solar-driven cars, excuse me, in a battery that's a hybrid, right, an electric car, that's fossil fuel based. | ||
| Let me say it one more time because I was not precise. | ||
| How much, on average, of the percentage of energy in a battery driving electric cars in this country is fossil fuel based? | ||
| Is it zero? | ||
| 100% or somewhere in between. | ||
| Yeah, let me say a little different. | ||
| 88% of it, 88% of it is non-solar and wind. | ||
| percent of it is non solar and wind. The 88% being 39% of that's gas, 23% coal, 20% nuclear if you take out of the total pie of electric energy. | ||
| So, 88% of the energy in a car battery is coming from non-wind, non-solar sources. | ||
| You know, I'm on a stone's throw from Capitol Hill here. | ||
| Like, are they hearing that? | ||
| Joe Biden, are you hearing that? | ||
| It's like, let us eat electric cars when, hey, you're not solving the fossil fuel problem. | ||
| Go ahead, Dave. | ||
| Finish up. | ||
| Let's let us know where people get in touch with you. | ||
| We'll get you back soon. | ||
| Yeah, we've got kids two years out of college making $45,000, $50,000 a year now expected to go and pick up a car payment of $700, $800 a month to pick up an EV that doesn't exist in the first place. | ||
| Now this is horrendous, but these decisions to move the needle To renewables, even if it made sense, are very, very, very long-term things. | ||
| We were 14% renewable in 1976. | ||
| After 20 years of heavy subsidization, we're now 18%. | ||
| If you take, include hydro plus wind and solar, which is the new definition, by the way, to boost up. | ||
| So many of these terms have been redefined. | ||
| Hydro was always there, now it's in the definition. | ||
| We've moved the needle 4%. | ||
| On added renewables dependence since 1975. | ||
| With all of the incentivization to it. | ||
| So I'm just saying, technically it's not feasible. | ||
| It's not feasible technically. | ||
| The Murray Antoinette Energy Policy. | ||
| Alright Dave, so it was a pleasure to have you on The War Room. | ||
| You got any Getter, Twitter, social media accounts you want people to find you on? | ||
| Yeah, I'm on Getter, Dave Walsh Energy. | ||
| Thanks Peter. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Perfect. | |
| That's all we need. | ||
| Getter is the Twitter killer. | ||
| Dave, you're a killer. | ||
| Thanks, man. | ||
| All right, Denver, if you can, let's play that political clip here, and then we'll talk a little bit about what happened last night in Trump land. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And Rachel, it looks like that vote to impeach Donald Trump by Tom Rice was also enough to cost him his seat in Congress. | |
| You can see here, NBC News is projecting that his Trump-backed challenger, Russell Frye, has outright won this Republican primary. | ||
| Remember, there's a 50% rule in effect in South Carolina. | ||
| The question here was, would Fry get over 50% and win this thing outright tonight? | ||
| If he'd fallen short of 50, he would have been sent into a runoff with Rice. | ||
| Rice surely would have been a heavy underdog in that runoff, but there will be no runoff. | ||
| It's been settled tonight by a better than two to one margin. | ||
| Russell Fry has trounced Congressman Tom Rice in this Republican primary in South Carolina's seventh district, major development. | ||
| It's a special election in Texas. | ||
| It's for a seat that will really only exist for the next few months, and yet I think it's a significant result because we talk so much about South Texas and the Hispanic vote in particular, and take a look at, let's see if we can get this called up here. | ||
| Take a look at the result in this special election in the 15th District. | ||
| I'm trying to get it called up here. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
| Mayra Flores, a Republican, we have projected will win outright this special election in the 34th District of Texas. | ||
| This is one of the most Hispanic Congressional districts in America. | ||
| Again, this is a special election for a seat. | ||
| It's being redrawn because of redistricting, but we have been talking since the 2020 election about South Texas, the Rio Grande Valley, the border region. | ||
| We saw county after county in this region of Texas, heavily Hispanic, swing 10, 20. | ||
| 30, 40 points away from the Democrats towards the Republicans in the 2020 election. | ||
| One of the questions is would those swings persist in 2022? | ||
| Certainly seeing in this special election with a Republican winning in this district tonight, signs that that swing is persisting. | ||
| It's a story in South Texas. | ||
| It's a story in Florida. | ||
| There's a national story here with the Hispanic vote. | ||
| Could be very significant In these 2022 midterms, big shifts there that could affect a lot of races. | ||
| So those are the three biggies we've got so far. | ||
| Yeah, three biggies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You heard it last on CNN. | |
| 10, 20, 30, 40 points swing in the Hispanic community towards the Republican Party, towards the Trump policy of securing our borders. | ||
| How about 50? | ||
| Let's go for 60. | ||
| This is the Steve Cortez effect. | ||
| Cortez has been talking about this stuff for two years on The War Room, and there it is. | ||
| That is a huge result. | ||
| Flores, a Republican, beats two other Democrats, and she gets enough to win the thing outright. | ||
| Yeah, it's a special election, they did some redistricting, but that is yet more evidence, particularly down in the Rio Grande Valley, that the Hispanic vote | ||
| is turning towards Trump populist economic nationalism secure borders low gas prices no endless wars that's a huge result folks that's that was the tsunami last night and every week now on Tuesday we're getting more and more signs that | ||
| There's something significantly afoot in the demographic structure of how people vote in this country. | ||
| And it's not just Hispanics, it's African-Americans, it's Asian-Americans, and these folks are coming home to Trump-Republicanism, not Mitch McConnell-Republicanism, Trump-Republicanism. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now, let's talk a little bit about a couple of other races. | |
| South Carolina, District 7, the fried rice jokes are flying today in the aftermath of Congressman Rice getting trounced. | ||
| I mean, the big question wasn't whether he would lose after saying snide things about Donald Trump and acting in the legislature in a way not helpful to President Trump. | ||
| The only question was how bad the beatdown would be. And this was a beatdown. This is just yet another example of a Trump-endorsed candidate beating a Republican who dissed the President. | ||
| Now, the one thing that was a loss in that state, and it grieves me because I know Katie Arrington personally. | ||
| She's a warrior. | ||
| She fought the good fight. | ||
| She lost a narrow race to Nancy Mace who did vote to impeach Donald Trump. | ||
| But there's a very interesting thing, and we'll be watching this as these primaries go along. | ||
| There's some of these Republicans who, despite the fact that they've done everything to take President Trump out in the past, are using millions of dollars of messaging to make people believe that somehow they support Trump-ism. | ||
| And I think it was a combination of the South Carolina Republican Globalist Mafia down there, the Nikki Haley's, The Lindsey Grahams, who threw endorsements and particularly money Macy's way. | ||
| Macy's had a carte blanche on TV to get on any time. | ||
| They wouldn't let Arrington on. | ||
| But that was a good showing by Arrington, and I think, on net, we had a big win in South Carolina. | ||
| When we come back, we're going to talk to Naomi Wolf about the New York Times yet again, yet again engaging in cancel culture, and we'll talk a little bit about what happened in Nevada as well, if not next segment, certainly in the next hour. | ||
| Peter Navarro, sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| You are in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there is no more. Let's take down the CTB! | |
| Monitors us. | ||
| Censors us. | ||
| Deplatforms us. | ||
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it. | ||
| Until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| What we also know from Dr. Tan and every other expert on COVID-19 is that although two doses still protects significantly well against severe disease and death, two doses are not enough now to protect against infection and transmission. | ||
| And that is why we are transitioning now to An up-to-date vaccination definition of what it means to be adequately protected against COVID-19. | ||
| Fully protected with two doses doesn't work anymore. | ||
| Dr. Tam said that last Friday. | ||
| It's now up-to-date vaccination that needs to be used when you talk about what Canadians should do, which we should expect of Canadians, and what this government should be expected to do in the future. | ||
| Yeah, Getter is the Twitter killer. | ||
| They've got to stop cancel culture and the poster woman for cancel culture of the hour is none other than our own Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| With a great book out, maybe we can get that book cover up there. | ||
| And what, from the front lines, I had it done to me. | ||
| They do it all the time. | ||
| Naomi Wolf, you should have been on the New York Times bestseller list. | ||
| How'd they keep you off? | ||
| And what are you doing about it? | ||
| Yeah, thank you for asking. | ||
| And I know you've been through and you know, maybe going through the same thing. | ||
| It's pretty shocking. | ||
| Essentially, you know, the New York Times, man. | ||
| So my new book, The Bodies of Others, has been a, you know, number one Barnes & Noble nonfiction bestseller, USA Today bestseller, in spite of Amazon playing all kinds of tricks, like telling people, telling me I can't order a fifth copy because I've already ordered four. | ||
| Everyone's limit is four, just like in the Soviet Union. | ||
| As if they're not in the business of making money. | ||
| And Amazon is even telling people who have never had problems with shipment that they don't ship to their area. | ||
| Other kinds of games are being played. | ||
| My publisher's site, sometimes All Seasons Press, people get kind of this is a dangerous site virus warning. | ||
| But in terms of the New York Times, you know, very disappointing and sad. | ||
| The Grey Lady, who's supposed to be the paper of record, Their last list, and the new list comes out tonight, we'll see if they've changed their ways, ranked a bunch of other books that my book sold 45% more than according to BookScan, which tracks every book sold. | ||
| They listed those as bestsellers and not the bodies of others at all. | ||
| Let me say in 30 seconds, as an economist, the value of the New York Times bestseller list is that it's a signal in the marketplace that this is a book worth reading. | ||
| And if it's put on, a broader audience gets access to Naomi Wolf's fine book. | ||
| Let's keep the cover up there. | ||
| Not my picture. | ||
| And Naomi, let's talk quickly now, though, about this new Canada policy and where things stand, because I'm hearing that people now even have to get tested to go back to work, even if they've had all of their boosters. | ||
| Yeah, disgusting and predictable. | ||
| It was distressing to hear that Canadian official actually lie. | ||
| The vaccines never prevented transmission. | ||
| They don't even prevent infection. | ||
| They briefly, in some cases, prevent worsening of symptoms. | ||
| But, you know, the Pfizer documents, which, you know, we're reviewing with experts, show that Pfizer and probably thus Moderna knew a month after the rollout in 2020 that they weren't effective. | ||
| So, you know, for him to say, oh, look, they're not effective over two years later, almost two years later, is just bald face lying. | ||
| And I also want to note that Google owns baseline, which is where you have to sign in to get tested. | ||
| By CBS, a drugstore chain in the United States. | ||
| So this is big tech refusing to let go its grip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa! | |
| Stop the presses here! | ||
| Google owns baseline? | ||
| The testing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, and you know... You can't make that up! | |
| I didn't make that up. | ||
| That would be the same Google and YouTube that doesn't allow you to speak about any of these issues. | ||
| Would that be the same Google? | ||
| Exactly the same. | ||
| And the reason these big tech companies are trying to censor the bodies of others is that I show exactly that 360 degree investment by big tech companies. | ||
| They're invested in the vaccines. | ||
| You know, Google is invested in vaccines. | ||
| Gates, of course, is invested in vaccines. | ||
| Zuckerberg, through his nonprofit, is invested in the vaccines. | ||
| And they're invested in the vaccine passports. | ||
| And they're invested in the testing. | ||
| And they harvest the data. | ||
| And they also benefit, they're all up like 20 to 25% net revenue in the last two years since the pandemic started. | ||
| They all benefit from creating this post-humane society in which we have to do what you just saw. | ||
| We have to swipe the credit cards of our bodies in order just to participate in society, to go back to work. | ||
| We have to check in with Google in order to just go back to the office. | ||
| And the other thing I want to note as someone, CEO of a company that designs Um, digital dashboards based on government data is that when you sign into baseline, the first time I took a PCR test, um, and I signed in on, on baseline, it asked a few basic questions, my name, you know, my address. | ||
| Now, of course, a year or so later, it's asking highly intrusive, very valuable, multiple questions about where do I work? | ||
| You know, what ethnicity am I? | ||
| What kind of job do I do? | ||
| And you're going to get more and more of that. | ||
| And that is basically creating your digital identity so that you can be tracked and that data can be mined and sold. | ||
| And it's not going to stop there. | ||
| If you have to test, you have to answer these questions or whatever questions they put to you in order to test, in order to go back to work. | ||
| And we're just going to see more and more of this unless we reject this technocratic regime that is trying to diminish. | ||
| Naomi, we got 15 seconds to just give you social media and then we're out here. | ||
| But it's always great to see you fighting the Lord's fight and the good fight. | ||
| As are you, Dr. Navarro. | ||
| I'm at dailycloud.io and Dr. Naomi R. Wolf on Getter. | ||
| And you can get the book at allseasonspress.com without any drama. | ||
| Thank you so, so much. | ||
| Yeah, buy that book and strike back against New York Times cancel culture. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon. |
Export Selection