June 2, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:36
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always, because if you don't and the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| OK, it's Thursday, 2 June, Year of Our Lord 2022. | ||
| I want to thank everybody for the first hour and we're going to roll into the second. | ||
| We've got the great Charlie Kirkson joining us here momentarily. | ||
| I just want to say you saw Ben Berquam really called to testify there in the last segment. | ||
| Remember, Burkham's one of these frontline warriors. | ||
| He's been down in Tapachula. | ||
| He's been all over Mexico. | ||
| The investigative reporting he's done on the border. | ||
| He's done so much other stuff, too, on election fraud and all that. | ||
| But this border situation... Remember, he was in Ovaldez two weeks before the shooting. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because of the situation there dealing with cartels. | ||
| He's the one that broke the story that in the academic year of 2020-2021, the academic year, they had 40, he had the tape we played yesterday, of the mayor. | ||
| They were driving around 48 lockdowns in the school system there. | ||
| It's the reason they got a six-man police force just for the school system. | ||
| I'm not talking about the quality of it. | ||
| I'm saying 48 lockdowns. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Every one of them. | ||
| Because of a coyote or every one of them because of an illegal alien or a cartel member that had a weapon in a car or was spotted with a weapon, etc. | ||
| It's lawlessness, it's a breakdown, it's anarchy. | ||
| And what Ben's seen, and what you saw there, is right from the heart. | ||
| These frontline people are saying, hey, they're seeing it every day, and they see the evil. | ||
| Let's just cut and say what it is. | ||
| This is why Drudge had up the other day about Doug Mastriano, right? | ||
| This whole thing, the rise of Christian nationalism, right? | ||
| Which they assigned to, you know, white supremacy, or white nationalism. | ||
| And that's why the Kornacki situation, we're going to cut that and put it up on everywhere. | ||
| Steve Kornacki, in that report on MSNBC last night, was the finest hour of television that's been on television this year, and maybe in multiple years, where a left-wing progressive network went through very even-handedly. | ||
| And look, they took some shots. | ||
| We would take shots too. | ||
| They took their shots, but they walk through something that's quite fundamental in this country, and that is this tectonic plate shift. | ||
| From in the Hispanic community. | ||
| And particularly they focused on Florida and they focused on the Rio Grande Valley in South Texas. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And talked about massive 40, 50, 60. | ||
| It was like Steve Cortez wrote the script because those are the facts. | ||
| And then Cortez brings in the Trophagopole. | ||
| Two-thirds, think about it for a second, two-thirds, 65% of Hispanics in South Texas, in the border, want to close the border. | ||
| That's not DACA, they want to close the border. | ||
| They're to the right of President Trump. | ||
| They're to the right of Steve Cortez. | ||
| They want to close the border. | ||
| Not that we want to limit our restriction. | ||
| We want to close the border. | ||
| This is the reality of America. | ||
| You know why they want to close the border? | ||
| They're tired of the anarchy and chaos in their life. | ||
| The first hour of the show, we talked about the Federal Reserve. | ||
| We went through the mathematics. | ||
| We had Philip Patrick Garner and Steve Cortez to walk through this brutal math. | ||
| And remember, Bloomberg reports yesterday, 25%, embrace this, 25% of people in this nation that make $250,000 are above or above the top 4% of wage earners in this nation live paycheck to paycheck, paycheck to paycheck. | ||
| And I said, hey, you go a quarter, 90 days without a paycheck, 80% of them are done. | ||
| But your betters in Davos, and in the city of London, and Wall Street, and these woke corporations, they think they know how to run this better. | ||
| And you just saw it in Davos last week. | ||
| Something that was very important is Charlie Kirk and the great team over at Turning Point USA have now gotten all over this. | ||
| They put out this whole thing about the Great Reset. | ||
| They are all over this topic. | ||
| Charlie Kirk, I want to say, sending Jack Posobiec over there was a brilliant stroke. | ||
| And I believe this documentary is going to be amazing, but walk us through. | ||
| What is your theory of the case of Davos? | ||
| Why is the Great Reset? | ||
| Why are you coming out now with these publications that are starting to expose, particularly to a younger generation, of exactly what's going on here, sir? | ||
| Well, look, the grassroots of America are starting to realize that there's a global game at play. | ||
| And we use that phrase globalist a lot. | ||
| President Trump used it as well in 2016 and 20 when running. | ||
| But now I think there is a new chapter that is forming where regular everyday people are realizing the time, place, manner, and people that are actually executing a lot of these globalist schemes. | ||
| And we saw it actually in two cities in the same country. | ||
| And Steve, your coverage of it was phenomenal, of both in Davos and Geneva with the World Health Assembly. | ||
| And thankfully, those amendments failed, praise God, thanks to the grassroots of America shining a light on it. | ||
| And then in Davos, we sent Jack Kosobik there to just do grassroots citizen journalism. | ||
| A lot of media organizations just kind of ignore Davos. | ||
| So they don't take it seriously. | ||
| They don't understand the threat the World Economic Forum poses against Western civilization. | ||
| And you look at the promises or the predictions of the World Economic Forum, three in particular, that you'll own nothing and you'll be happy, that America will no longer be the world's superpower, and that Western values will be brought to a breaking point. | ||
| You combine those three together, all of a sudden you realize that the anti-American agenda that's happening here is actually being concocted by the world's elites against the will and against the consent of the American people. | ||
| The final thing I'll say on this, Steve, is that the number one piece of feedback we get on our podcasts and our radio program is confusion. | ||
| Because a lot of people can't understand why would you keep the borders open? | ||
| Why are you trying to deteriorate the currency? | ||
| If you look at things through the prism of the Great Reset, all of a sudden otherwise confusing news items start to make a lot of sense because there's an agenda behind all of it called the Great Reset. | ||
| Do the people, I know because you guys focus under 40, under 35, under 30, does this younger generation, this rising generation that is now coming up to take leadership, do they fully, you think, comprehend this whole concept of serfdom? | ||
| That if you follow Klaus Schwab and exactly what these guys are doing, and look what the Fed, and look what the central banks, and look what your bettors on Wall Street in the City of London are going to do, that you're not going to own anything? | ||
| You're going to be basically condemned to be a serf the rest of your life? | ||
| Is that dawning on people right now? | ||
| Yeah, that's a really smart point. | ||
| I think that that is dawning on people. | ||
| The challenge is going to try to get them to want to buy into a private property-based system that is more market-oriented in nature, because that sort of, let's say, inclination or gut feeling that you could remain a serf has usually actually been energy captured by socialists. | ||
| But Steve, everywhere I go, I try to warn Donors or kind of people over the age of 50 that we are sitting on a political volcano right now. | ||
| It's going to manifest actually an anti-democrat party energy coming into November. | ||
| But if we're not careful, you're going to see some incredibly radical politics come into our zeitgeist very soon, where you're going to have an entire generation that owns nothing, that doesn't have property, and they're renting from the 10 trillion dollar company BlackRock. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're not getting married at rate Right. | |
| And so we're going to have this, I think, political volcano if Republicans and conservatives aren't careful, where all of a sudden you're going to have a generation say, well, why is it that we were locked down, forced to wear masks, forced to get the vaccines, forced to go borrow money we don't have to study things that don't matter, to find jobs that don't exist, all so that we can't own property and everything costs three times as much after the lockdowns. | ||
| And so there's a moment in time where conservatives, those that are populists and nationalists, we can capitalize on this. | ||
| But I'm afraid that if the socialists kind of, like, de-wokify their movement and get a little bit saner on immigration, that they could end up winning this generation away. | ||
| That could be very powerful. | ||
| But there's an opportunity there, Steve. | ||
| There is. | ||
| They're realizing the game is rigged against them. | ||
| But we've got to seize the opportunity. | ||
| I know donors and senior people in the Republican Party, policy people, look to you for guidance. | ||
| When they talked to you, did they comprehend it and did they comprehend the policy changes that have to happen to capture this generation and have this generation as a driving force to turn the country around? | ||
| They're starting to. | ||
| And so we talk about the three conservatizing events that can turn a 29-year-old from a kind of cynical college student into someone who's actually bought into the system. | ||
| And, you know, it's very persuasive when you say that, you know, when you're paying a mortgage, you're less likely to go burn down a Wendy's. | ||
| You know, a lot of the kind of civil unrest that we saw the last couple years is rooted In a lack of property ownership, a lack of meaning, and a lack of strong families. | ||
| So I think there is kind of this union, though, amongst people that otherwise would be just focused on corporate tax rates and focused on kind of international trade to say, hey, if you have a generation that doesn't actually own anything, they have nothing in their name, what exactly are they going to want to conserve or preserve? | ||
| I find that to be very persuasive, and I think that is something that's starting to resonate. | ||
| But it's different, Steve. | ||
| We have to understand that is a completely different type of message than was communicated 20 or 25 years ago, where it was just like, hey, we need to try to find the market equilibrium between supply and demand and let McKinsey close down all of our factories. | ||
| And we're kind of living through the cultural carnage that has come because of all that. | ||
| So I think there's an open-mindedness to a generation of parents and grandparents that are like, you know what, you're right. | ||
| My 31-year-old does have a degree in North African lesbian poetry from Yale, but they don't own anything and they're Why is that? | ||
| And so we have to go about fixing it. | ||
| And I do, I am seeing an increased open-mindedness towards that. | ||
| So the monograph, The Great Reset, and this other series you're doing around that, how do people get, what's the purpose and back of it, and how do people get access to it, and then how can they start to inculcate it into their thinking? | ||
| Yeah, thank you. | ||
| They can go to TPUSA.com and they can get the copy right now. | ||
| It's the conservative response to the Great Reset. | ||
| I wrote it myself. | ||
| It's short. | ||
| It's informative. | ||
| They give a gift of any amount. | ||
| A dollar to a hundred dollars. | ||
| Whatever you feel compelled to do. | ||
| TPUSA.com. | ||
| It's all about the global game. | ||
| But also, Steve, if you read in the book, it also shows these people are far less powerful than they put on. | ||
| A lot of this is a Potemkin village. | ||
| It's a mirage. | ||
| They're an incredibly paranoid group of people. | ||
| A lot of their power is actually trying to silence us. | ||
| Their great fear is that all of a sudden the ground that they built this kind of, let's just say, fake city on, is all of a sudden going to start shaking when the grassroots of the world start to rise up and ask questions and push back against their tyranny and their authoritarianism. | ||
| So at Turning Point USA, we're trying to take a leadership role in this. | ||
| The Lord has blessed us with a lot of members, a lot of students, and a big following. | ||
| And we feel as if the most important game that is unfolding is the global game. | ||
| It's the one of the Great Reset. | ||
| It's Klaus Schwab, Justin Trudeau. | ||
| It's the people at the top levels of society. | ||
| It's Gates. | ||
| It's Fauci. | ||
| But I believe these people are far less powerful than they put on. | ||
| The grassroots, at times, they get fearful and they get afraid when you start talking about this. | ||
| Our approach is going to be the exact opposite. | ||
| You should feel empowered and convicted. | ||
| Because these people are far less powerful than they put on. | ||
| In fact, it's all a game. | ||
| A lot of their power is just saying they have power, when in reality, they understand that if the people rise up, they could be displaced from their leadership positions very quickly. | ||
| Okay, I want to get this link for Captain Ben. | ||
| I want to get this link in all of our chat rooms, forums, everything. | ||
| Get it out there. | ||
| Charlie, we know we've had you on here before about your struggles in social media. | ||
| What social media sites can people get you on that you're not banned, so we can get real Charlie Kirk? | ||
| We love Getter. | ||
| We love Rumble. | ||
| We love all of them. | ||
| They can check it out. | ||
| They can follow us on Getter. | ||
| We stream live every single day. | ||
| And they can also watch us obviously at charliekirk.com. | ||
| We're streaming. | ||
| We put our podcasts up there. | ||
| We are a constant battle against social media. | ||
| But Getter, Truth Social, you name it. | ||
| But we stream every single day at Getter. | ||
| We love them. | ||
| They do a great job. | ||
| And Rumble. | ||
| Keep your eye on Rumble, Steve. | ||
| I'll tell you. | ||
| The world is a freer place because of Rumble. | ||
| They really are growing tremendously, and it's been kind of this unexpected development the last couple years. | ||
| I think they're going to give YouTube a run for their money. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| We love Rumble. | ||
| We've got a very feisty audience over at Rumble every day in the comments. | ||
| Charlie, thank you so much. | ||
| Keep fighting the good fight, brother. | ||
| God bless you. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| You look at this young generation we've got. | ||
| It's incredible. | ||
| Cortez, I know you've got to bounce. | ||
| Give me your summary thoughts on the economy. | ||
| We've got about a minute, and then I need your social media. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Well, Steve, to this point, with Yellen, we start the show talking about Janet Yellen and why she needs to resign or be fired. | ||
| She is one of the leaders of what I would term as generational grand larceny, meaning we have literally mortgaged the future of young people in this country. | ||
| Thankfully, they're waking up to that. | ||
| $30 trillion of debt. | ||
| Roughly a third of that was to fight in constant, unneeded foreign wars. | ||
| So the young people paid the price both literally in terms of death and injury from those wars, as well as now holding the bag economically. | ||
| for that massive amount of debt. | ||
| So, I wrote a sub stack on Janet Yellen and why she needs to be fired. | ||
| People can find it at my social media. | ||
| If they go to Getter, I'm at Steve. | ||
| By the way, I'm doing a live stream tonight, 7.30 p.m. | ||
| Eastern Time. | ||
| I will be live, taking your questions only on Getter on this topic of why Janet Yellen needs to be fired and the road forward for 2022 for the GOP. | ||
| You can also still find me at Twitter at CortesSteve. | ||
| Okay, we're going to push that up. | ||
| In fact, I'm going to put it up on mine tonight, your live stream. | ||
| That's going to be great. | ||
| And we'll get to sub stack up. | ||
| I've already reposted. | ||
| Everybody's got to get on Getter. | ||
| It's all free. | ||
| You get us 24 hours a day. | ||
| Everybody. | ||
| Everybody's up there. | ||
| So make sure you go. | ||
| Cortez, thank you. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| And thanks for taking time away from the family to do this. | ||
| I really appreciate it. | ||
| The great Steve Cortez. | ||
| What a lineup today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Birquam, Kirk, Cortez, Philip Patrick. | |
| Wow. | ||
| Got Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Ukraine news. | ||
| You're gonna be quite proud of your efforts here in the War Room because now the top thinkers in the world and players in the world are saying, hmm, the War Room posse was right from the get-go. | ||
| All next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, we're not going to have it now, but we're going to get some of the feedback. | ||
| Last night they went after us pretty hard on the army that's being built every day. | ||
| Remember, of everything we do, nothing freaks them out more. | ||
| The thing that they get most vapor-locked about. | ||
| And you see the rage starting. | ||
| Is this volunteer army that's across the board, whether it's the moms at the school boards, if it's folks going and volunteering and being election officials, or becoming on canvassing boards or election boards, or becoming poll workers or poll watchers, All of it across the board, right? | ||
| At every level. | ||
| What they can't take is that, and the reason is they just don't have the enthusiasm anymore. | ||
| You heard the Karnacki about the Spanx, but it's all over. | ||
| They just don't have, they have no oomph. | ||
| There's no there there, and they know that. | ||
| Because they've lied to people, they've misrepresented to people, and now they've caused an economic inferno, okay? | ||
| That they can't just gloss over anymore, and they can't kick the can down the road. | ||
| They're gonna try to do all that, but they can't. | ||
| And you saw the Jamie Dimon, Steve Cortez's statement had a lot of wisdom in it. | ||
| Jamie Dimon and the elite, your betters, they're talking about a hurricane that's forming. | ||
| Well, that hurricane is already ripping apart working class folks from around the country and all over the United States. | ||
| It is. | ||
| And they don't get that still. | ||
| Because in the Hamptons, it doesn't matter. | ||
| Right? | ||
| In the Upper East Side of New York, Upper West Side of New York, it doesn't matter. | ||
| In Bel Air, California, it doesn't matter. | ||
| It doesn't matter to these people. | ||
| It's not really affecting them. | ||
| It's affecting everybody else. | ||
| And that's what... And Charlie Kirk... | ||
| is very perceptive in that. | ||
| And remember, I keep saying after November 8, I think 10 days later, the debt ceiling. | ||
| We have many, many, many hard decisions to make to save this republic, to save this country. | ||
| And the way we're going to do it is buy in. | ||
| And the way you're going to get buy-in is you're going to have to have a frank conversation with the American people of exactly where we are financially, exactly where we are economically, exactly where we are geo-strategically, right? Where we are sovereignty and all of it. | ||
| And you're gonna have to get buy-in because these are not going to, there's, there is no magic wand, you know, by, so it has no light. It's no, there's nothing you switch. | ||
| You could start to have incredible policy decisions now that need to be made. | ||
| And when you sit there and talk about build back better and all this, we're going to transition to clean energy. It's not going to, it's not going to be stable. It's all mindless mush. | ||
| That's why I love the young woman that's up there at the podium every day. | ||
| She she's it's like it's like she's a Zen master. | ||
| You know, what's the sound of one hand clapping? | ||
| It's at least she takes it in the sense of the theater of the absurd that it is. | ||
| That's what her answers. | ||
| I think are brilliant. | ||
| I do think they're brilliant. | ||
| Because if you look at the other answers, they're giving you to the toughest questions. | ||
| Some of the toughest questions the nation's ever faced. | ||
| It's redonkulous, okay? | ||
| And you have Janet Yellen, that picture, if we can pull that picture from the, you got a picture, think about it, he's, you know, very few times, you know, Trump had the lowest, they had a chart the other day, the number of times that the Federal Reserve Chair had ever been over to the, because it's supposed to be independent, right? | ||
| It's independently propped up assets so that the wealthy had the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the nation under Obama, and the second time, right, after the COVID response, because of the Fed, And by the way, in the trillion dollar triage, they just decided to create a trillion dollars of cash and they hit a computer and it was done. | ||
| Kind of nobody's authority. | ||
| Didn't bounce it off anybody. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just did it. | |
| That's independent. | ||
| Well, it's not really independent. | ||
| It's owned by a bunch of banks. | ||
| So it's like the bankers making the decision to prop themselves up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's so absurd. | |
| When you look at the world, where the French poet I keep quoting, you know the French poet from World War I, the Catholic who died in the trenches, he said, the most important thing is not to come back and report what you see, the most important thing in your life is to see what you see. | ||
|
unidentified
|
To see what you see. | |
| Think about it. | ||
| We've got one of the oldest and greatest civilizations on Earth, in the history of the Earth, is enslaved by a bunch of gangsters. | ||
| And we kowtow to those gangsters all the time. | ||
| We're going to have another special this weekend about this coming war with them. | ||
| As we've been talking, we're already at war. | ||
| We're already at economic war, cyber war, information war. | ||
| The kinetic part we may be sliding into. | ||
| And it looks like, you know, we've had guys like Captain Finnell say, we may not win that kinetic war. | ||
| And this is not like Vietnam where, you know, we actually won on the field but withdrew politically. | ||
| It's not like Iraq. | ||
| You know, it's not about the valor of Afghanistan, the valor of the American fighting man and woman. | ||
| Or did politicians stab them in the back? | ||
| This could be one that you actually lose. | ||
| I mean, really lose. | ||
| You get, like, smashed. | ||
| And it's potential. | ||
| We have guys like Captain Fennell and the people we had on the first special that are experts in this. | ||
| And they talk about my beloved Seventh Fleet. | ||
| And they said, hey, don't think you're going to pull a miracle out like you did in World War Two in the Pacific. | ||
| You could actually get smashed. | ||
| And this nation, I will tell you, is not psychologically ready for that. | ||
| It's never actually lost a war as defined by like losing a war. | ||
| What happens when you actually lose? | ||
| And that's where we are. | ||
| Ben Harned, I'm so proud of Ben in Rome, of what he's done and particularly being so ahead of the Ukraine situation. | ||
| Today, and if it wasn't so serious, it's kind of like being on Christmas Day, but it's so serious you can't be frivolous like that. | ||
| But just one article after the other from The Atlantic, from The Guardian, from things that are not Citizens Free Press, and not Gateway Pundit, right? | ||
| Not The War Room. | ||
| This is from all your betters, the top intellectuals, the top defense specialists. | ||
| Just as the same time it's now it's shown that we're at offensive war. | ||
| We've joined the cyber war with Ukraine against Russia on offensive basis. | ||
| We are offensively at war with them on economics. | ||
| Yet all these articles are coming out saying The Europeans are losing their appetite for this war quickly. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because it's starting to have an economic impact on them. | ||
| And God forbid that the Europeans would ever want to sacrifice anything for their own defense! | ||
| For their own defense! | ||
| Did we not go back and bail out the elites in Europe in World War I when all the empires collapsed? | ||
| And God, who cares about all the royalty? | ||
| And the whole thing with the Queen... Give me a break. | ||
| Please stop. | ||
| Please stop. | ||
| We did that before, you know, the highest proportion of combat casualties. | ||
| We've done this. | ||
| We've been there. | ||
| We battled them out in World War I. Then they wanted to do the League of Nations. | ||
| We didn't do that, but we... Remember, people forget we saved them from starvation. | ||
| Herbert Hoover, the reason he became president, he went to Belgium and saved them from starvation. | ||
| It was the first Marshall Plan. | ||
| We battled them out then. | ||
| We saved them from starvation, from famine. | ||
| That. | ||
| And then in World War II, we're sucked into that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| And then we win that. | ||
| And then, of course, with our allies, the Russian people, who took only 40 million casualties, and the Chinese people, who only took another, what, 30, 35 million casualties, right? | ||
| They took the hammer blows. | ||
| We were there with our valor and our constancy and our resolve and our weapons. | ||
| And then we rebuilt it again with the Marshall Plan. | ||
| And then, again, we took down the Soviets and President Reagan come in after all that build-up. | ||
| From 1914 to 1989, the whole, one continual war, really around the Eurasian landmass, but centered on Western Europe and that part of it, right? | ||
| And we're there all the time. | ||
| Who's underwriting it? | ||
| Who's bailing it out? | ||
| Whose kids are going to die? | ||
| Whose kids are on Memorial Day? | ||
| Whose kids are over in those cemeteries? | ||
| Ben Harnwell's down there, right at the cliffs over Anzio. | ||
| Who's buried there? | ||
| Americans. | ||
| Who's buried in Normandy? | ||
| Americans. | ||
| They're British and Canadians, don't get me wrong. | ||
| Fight and free French, got it. | ||
| But no offense, they got skin in the game. | ||
| It's their deal. | ||
| Not our deal, but we're there. | ||
| We're there. | ||
| We're there. | ||
| And now again... | ||
| You got Conservative Inc. | ||
| with the pom-poms out, with the $40 billion and the $20 billion, and they're pushing them on in escalation, escalation, escalation. | ||
| And now you're seeing all the bettors in Europe saying, hey, maybe, I don't know, maybe it's going to cost, you know, the air conditioning is going to get high here. | ||
| Maybe we got walked into this and we screwed up. | ||
| But yeah, we screwed up. | ||
| Yeah, you screwed up. | ||
| Let's go ask the dead women and children in Ukraine and get their voices. | ||
| Let's have their vote right now. | ||
| Would they be for escalation or de-escalation? | ||
| I think they would say, you know, why are we doing this? | ||
| Yes, the Russians are bad guys, but what can we do here? | ||
| Ben Harnwell, got a couple minutes here, I'm going to hold you through. | ||
| Tell us where we stand with our betters in Europe and the thinking of the great Davos and Brussels and Atlantis. | ||
| You talk about white supremacy. | ||
| Anybody buys into white supremacy? | ||
| Look at Europe and look at these leaders. | ||
| If you think that's great, then come and tell me about it because it ain't great. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| It's not great. | ||
| And there's nothing supreme about it. | ||
| Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Morning, Steve. | ||
| Well, as you just said in your opening monologue, what we're going to do now is go through a few articles that have, in one way or another, confirmed everything we've been saying here on the War Room over the last hundred days. | ||
| But what we're not doing is we're not taking a victory lap. | ||
| There's a theme, and I'm going to tie it together at the end when I've done this, there's a theme to precisely why I've chosen these articles. | ||
| And I'll tie it together and then I will close on your point just now, which is what is happening here in Europe. | ||
| So here's an article. | ||
| And by the way, you're absolutely correct. | ||
| These articles, every one that I've chosen, they're from the left, left and centre. | ||
| Not a single one is from our terrain here. | ||
| This basically makes the point that if these guys are saying it, So here's the first one. | ||
| It's in the Guardian, which is the UK's equivalent of the New York Times. | ||
| Here's the headline. | ||
| We were all wrong. | ||
| How Germany got hooked on Russian energy. | ||
| And it's a very, very long article. | ||
| And the International Bureau here has done the work of reading it because it's pretty awful, actually. | ||
| So the woman possibly doesn't have to read it. | ||
| Interesting is the fact, however, that they have, from a different direction, corroborated what we, I think, said on the war in the first 10 days to do with Germany's extremely vulnerable position. | ||
| There is a line in here, which I think is absolutely not the point, but it is nearest to coming on to the reality. | ||
| And here it is towards the end. | ||
| One argument places the blame on social democrat politicians and civil servants who were allowed to move seamlessly between public office and Putin's employment and worked hard to manipulate the EU's German regulatory environment to suit Gazprom. | ||
| Ben, hang on one second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Short break, we'll be right back. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, at one o'clock there's another webinar. | ||
| This is one today, the Chinese, the CCP's death camps. | ||
| This is about the Uyghurs. | ||
| It's going to be intense. | ||
| It's over at, it's at the Committee on the Present Danger, China. | ||
| We'll get you the hookups and put it up into the, into all the platforms, and I want to put it on the Chiron. | ||
| But at one o'clock today there's going to be a live webinar. | ||
| It's totally free. | ||
| The participation by the War Impostors has been incredible on these, so this is one you're not going to miss. | ||
| It's quite brutal. | ||
| Details about the death camps run by the CCP that of course you know MSNBC and CNNBC put on the Olympics they want to look the other way we can't look the other way. | ||
| I want to go back to Ben Harwood. | ||
| We've got Terry Schilling on deck about the situation in South Carolina. | ||
| We're going to get to it in a moment. | ||
| I want to go back to Ben Harwood. | ||
| So Ben, continue on with your analysis of all this news that's coming out of now the capitals of Europe regarding the Ukraine, which has a direct, direct impact on U.S. | ||
| policy there, sir. | ||
| So we'll go back to Germany, Steve, here. | ||
| And I was just finishing a point to say that there was a revolving door between the German political establishment and the Kremlin. | ||
| And the Guardian, in this long article, I gained the head down. | ||
| We were all wrong. | ||
| How Germany got hooked on Russian energy. | ||
| Now, the Guardian doesn't take our line on this, that we presented within the opening days of this, that the soft underbelly of vulnerability of a united European front with regards to sanctions was Europe's total energy dependence on Russia. | ||
| But that's not important. | ||
| The important thing is that The Guardian has said what we were saying right from the beginning. | ||
| The problem was Germany and that's why. | ||
| I'm going to move on now to another article. | ||
| This is in The Atlantic. | ||
| Again, it's not a traditionally MAGA magazine. | ||
| Here's their headline. | ||
| Western support for Ukraine has peaked. | ||
| The honeymoon that Ukraine's leaders have enjoyed with the West will not last. | ||
| And the quick line I'm going to take away from this is in the coming months, relations between Ukraine, the Ukrainian leadership and its external supporters will grow strained and the culprits will be economic pain. | ||
| This is something you, Steve, and Steve Cortes have been saying and explaining the reasons behind for the last hundred days. | ||
| Now it's starting to seep in to the left wing media. | ||
| And I'm going to finish my point and make it absolutely clear. | ||
| It's not that the left isn't throwing its hands in the air with a Mayor Culper saying, oh, look, we've got this wrong. | ||
| There's a tactical reason for why they're doing this. | ||
| And I'm going to hit that just at the very end. | ||
| Here's my third article. | ||
| Again, this is The Guardian. | ||
| This is Simon Jenkins, who's one of the UK's most respected writers. | ||
| He says in an article called the EU should forget about sanctions, they're doing more harm than good. | ||
| He says six million households in Britain face the possibility of morning and evening blackouts this winter to maintain sanctions against Russia, as do consumers across Europe. | ||
| Very good there. | ||
| He makes that point that the economic pain is directly related to the sanctions that we have imposed on Russia. | ||
| Now, so I was saying before, why are our globalist overlords doing this? | ||
| There's a civil war between the two factions, the two primary factions. | ||
| There are no good guys in this, Steve. | ||
| They're all grifters, and they're all seeking their maximum opportunity to grift. | ||
| However, let's divide the camp between realists on the one hand, and the escalators on the other, for want of a better word, right? | ||
| The realists Realize that there's an opportunity cost towards an all-in engagement and economic sanctions and war with Russia. | ||
| And it means that they cannot push resources to the grift that they've spent 20 years preparing. | ||
| Al Gore was there 20 years ago. | ||
| And that is the climate hoax, the fanatical environmental lobby. | ||
| Here is what the UN, the Secretary General of the UN said He said this. | ||
| The sense of urgency in the debate on climate has, of course, suffered with the war in Ukraine. | ||
| And that's what he's saying here when he's speaking at an engagement in Sweden. | ||
| And it's exactly the point he's been making as to John Kerry, his personal envoy in Davos last week. | ||
| Bizarrely toned argument, but this is where they want to get back to. | ||
| They want to get back, focus the world's attention onto the climate. | ||
| And that is my point. | ||
| And what I'd like to close with on this is to say that the reason why they're coming out now and admitting these things is they are trying to, like rats leaving a sinking ship, rats leaving a sinking Titanic. | ||
| They do not want to be associated with the explosion of the cost of living, which is going to triple like a tidal wave, the West. | ||
| And they're trying to get out of that now and get back onto the climate. | ||
| And while they still can. | ||
| These, these idiots, these morons that jeopardize, and this is what, uh, uh, was it, uh, Mishar from, um, from, um, Chicago. | ||
| I mispronounced that, but I'll think about it in a second. | ||
| The real politics guy, the great powers politician, Misharmer, said in 2014 about leading down the Primrose Path, he said the West is going to do this and the Ukrainian people are going to pay for it. | ||
| The West, and particularly Europe, Western Europe has a double-barreled shotgun pressed up against their temple right now from the Russians. | ||
| Energy in one barrel, food in the other. | ||
| And they've walked themselves into this trap with the worst, some of the worst people on Earth. | ||
| The guys, Putin and the guys around him, right? | ||
| And so now you're, now you're totally, and now they're bobbing and weaving. | ||
| And the United States, what are we doing? | ||
| We're sending the missiles, they can hit 50 miles in. | ||
| We're still at economic war against their central bank. | ||
| We are, which by the way, the ruble is, you know, all-time high, so that's failed. | ||
| And now we've admitted that we're in cyber war. | ||
| They're a superpower when it comes to cyber war. | ||
| When your grid gets knocked down, and they're saying, hey, it's payback for you guys being in cyber war, and admitting you're in offensive cyber war with these Ukrainian guys, these hackers, when they take down your grid, just remember, we move first. | ||
| This is why if people that love the Constitution, loving up on the Constitution all the time, tell me how much they love the Constitution, why don't you enforce the Constitution and make Biden come forward, at least with the War Powers Act, or make him come before the American people and lay out a plan? | ||
| What is the plan? | ||
| We're already at offensive economic war, we're at now offensive cyber war, and that's two of the four I put up on Getter earlier, that's two of the four things of hybrid warfare or unrestricted warfare. | ||
| That's modern warfare. | ||
| Just tanks and planes and all that, that's kind of old school. | ||
| Yeah, it's important. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's big. | |
| We're going to talk about that this weekend. | ||
| Harnwell, just amazing job. | ||
| Ben, hang on. | ||
| I got more to get to it. | ||
| I want to get in Terry Schilling because this is going to play. | ||
| I'm going to connect dots here down in South Carolina. | ||
| South Carolina won. | ||
| Let's play the spot from Terry Schilling. | ||
| I'll bring Terry Schilling in, get Terry's opinion. | ||
| I'm going to broaden out the conversation to talk about Lindsey Graham. | ||
| That disaster is neocon and what the people in South Carolina ought to be thinking about. | ||
| Let's play it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Congresswoman Nancy Mace says she's a conservative. | |
| But as soon as she got to Washington, she started acting like Nancy Pelosi. | ||
| Mace sponsored a transgender rights bill that would destroy women's sports. | ||
| She thinks it's just fine to let men take opportunities for scholarships and championships away from female athletes. | ||
| The bill would put men in girls' locker rooms, men in women's prisons, and even men in battered women's shelters. | ||
| Conservative? | ||
| Not even close. | ||
| We can do better. | ||
| Vote against Nancy Mace on June 14th. | ||
| Terry Schilling, American Principals Project, you're all over defending the American family. | ||
| What's your beef with Nancy Mace, sir? | ||
| Well, she's really part of this GOP establishment wing that loves wars, loves sending our kids overseas, loves sending the deplorables to die, and then they export LGBT values and then bring those LGBT values into our schools. | ||
| Nancy Mace is the epitome of the GOP establishment. | ||
| She's supporting She's supporting a bill right now called the Fairness for All Act that would put gender identity into civil rights law. | ||
| That's men and women's prisons, men and women's sports. | ||
| It's the whole kit and caboodle, Steve. | ||
| It's everything. | ||
| And it's a total nightmare. | ||
| It's a total disaster. | ||
| And it's what we can make or pay a price in this upcoming primary on. | ||
| Okay, here's the thing, too. | ||
| If you are in South Carolina, and look, Lindsey Graham is poisonous. | ||
| He's there trying to do a red flags law, working with the Democrats right now. | ||
| He is compromised. | ||
| He's working with the Democrats on all these gun laws. | ||
| It's not the point of what the situation is with these shootings. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| It's not the point. | ||
| It's not the guns. | ||
| That's a misdirection play. | ||
| Lindsey Graham's all over that. | ||
| He's the one that goes, yeah, we kicked Biden's ass, we made him do this. | ||
| He is poisonous when it comes to national security. | ||
| Poisonous. | ||
| Not neutral, not a bad guy. | ||
| Poisonous. | ||
| Any vote for Nancy Mace is a vote for what Lindsey Graham stands for. | ||
| And they're exploiting the LGBTQ, and far be it from me to make any, how do you say this, implications on that, but I will leave folks in South Carolina to make their own determination on that point. | ||
| They're warmongers. | ||
| And they're warmongers with your money and with your kids. | ||
| And I can't get this. | ||
| One more time, give me what she supported about this whole thing about the destruction of women's sports and the opportunities that women's sports have made. | ||
| And one of the reasons, this rising generation of leaders, we've got Joanna Miller on here, Captain Bannon comes on. | ||
| Most of the young women we have on here, these fire breathers, most of them were female jocks. | ||
| And I mean, Division One, big league. | ||
| Joanna Miller was so good, she went semi-pro in soccer after American University. | ||
| In fact, I think she went there when she was an undergrad. | ||
| You know, Captain Ben, all these people, these are top-level athletes. | ||
| They're super competitive. | ||
| They're alpha females. | ||
| That's all because of Title IX. | ||
| Gave them the opportunities. | ||
| And they're trying to, they're right now destroying these opportunities. | ||
| Are they not, Terry Schilling? | ||
| They're absolutely destroying them, Steve. | ||
| So this bill that Nancy Mace is supporting, I almost said Nancy Pelosi because she supports this type of legislation too, it would put gender identity into civil rights law. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| That's Title IX, Title VII, Title V. It's all of civil rights law, right? | ||
| And so what's going to happen is you're going to start to see more Leah Thomas' males competing in women's sports, except they aren't being granted permission. | ||
| They're being forced to, and they're able to sue on civil rights grounds to force themselves into these sports. | ||
| Leah Thomas was allowed to compete. | ||
| It's not the law right now, right? | ||
| And that's what makes it even more egregious. | ||
| But Nancy Mace wants to make this our civil rights law. | ||
| She wants to put that up there with With race and creed and sex. | ||
| She wants to do this. | ||
| This is absolutely insane. | ||
| And the thing that makes it most nefarious is that it's got fake religious freedom protections in it. | ||
| So they sell it to other Republicans as a compromise bill. | ||
| When in reality, the religious freedom protections are not that strong and the courts are going to strike the religious freedom protections down. | ||
| This is a nightmare, Bill, and Nancy Mace needs to suffer political consequences for supporting this. | ||
| And we're very close, by the way. | ||
| It's a six-point race, and we've got a little bit less than two weeks to go. | ||
| We have to get her under 50 to get to a runoff at least. | ||
| So we're trying to win this thing outright, but if we can at least keep her under 50, we can get her to a runoff and make her suffer real political consequences. | ||
| And Arrington is the Trump-endorsed candidate, correct? | ||
| We have Arrington down there, who's the former defense official and worked with Peter Navarro on Defense Production Act. | ||
| I mean, Navarro's wingman. | ||
| He went down, I think, stumped for it. | ||
| And to get Navarro to do that's a big deal. | ||
| How do people get to Americans' Principal Works Project? | ||
| How do they get to see and share this spot everywhere? | ||
| How do they do it, Terry? | ||
| It's just AmericanPrinciplesProject.org. | ||
| You can make a donation and help support this campaign to our Super PAC. | ||
| And if you want to share the ad, it's already got over 130,000 views online. | ||
| It's just shilling 1776 across all the social media platforms, Twitter, Getter, True Social, over 130,000 views. | ||
| This thing is catching on. | ||
| It's hot. | ||
| And we need to keep spreading the word so that every voter in South Carolina knows what's at stake this election. | ||
| Terry's one of those secret weapons in the Christian Nationalist movement, right? | ||
| That's how I read all the time, Schilling. | ||
| Keep fighting. | ||
| Terry Schilling, American Principles Project. | ||
| Thank you very much, sir. | ||
| Okay, short break. | ||
| Ben Harnwell is going to join me back on the other side. | ||
| I'm Steve Stern, CEO of FlagShirt.com, a third generation, veteran owned small business. | ||
| I believe that the American way of life is for all of us. | ||
| I'm asking you today to visit FlagShirt.com. | ||
| Help keep the American dream alive. | ||
| Be a flag waver. | ||
| Carry a nation's heritage. | ||
| Use coupon code ACTION10 for 10% off site-wide and buy a flag shirt today. | ||
| Action, action, action. | ||
| One takeaway from all the reporting in the wake of January 6, it is that Donald Trump's attempted coup very well could have worked, as we have discussed on this show before. | ||
| If just a few individuals in a few key positions had been on board with Trump's plan, he may have been able to overturn the results of a free and fair election. | ||
| One of the schemes pushed by the ex-president and his allies was to have the states themselves throw out Biden's victory. | ||
| We saw an attempt at that in Michigan and in Georgia, where there was immense pressure on election officials to put their fingers on the scale for Trump. | ||
| Thankfully, it didn't work. | ||
| Now, Republicans are doing everything they can to make sure it works next time. | ||
| My next guest uncovered Republican operatives who are working on, quote, a multi-pronged strategy to target and potentially overturn votes in Democratic precincts. | ||
| Heidi Krispel broke this story writing for Politico, a remarkable new piece about the ways in which the RNC and other Republican groups are plotting to contest upcoming elections in Michigan and other swing states. | ||
| Heidi, great to have you on. | ||
| So, just tell me a little bit about what this effort is, who's coordinating it, and at what level they're looking to do it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great, Chris. | |
| Election legal experts I talked to all agree that this is a really unprecedented attempt here by a political party, in this case the RNC, to recruit folks, many of whom are election deniers, to become actual workers. | ||
| Workers within the architecture of the election administration system. | ||
| Workers who would be trained beforehand in workshops sponsored by the RNC on how to contest voters as well as voting processes. | ||
| Workers who will be equipped with new tools, for instance, such as a hotline where they will be in touch constantly with roving party attorneys Who can help them determine whether they have a legal challenge, whether they can file a legal challenge, as well as a website, Chris, that's being developed. | ||
| They contracted with a company called Zendesk, which you may be familiar with if you've ever used that online software where you live chat with retailers. | ||
| Well, that's what they're planning to use to connect these individuals with roving party attorneys. | ||
| But it doesn't stop there. | ||
| There's also a much broader network, and this is the unprecedented part as well, which is the talk Of recruiting friendly district attorneys, the talk of reaching out to law enforcement in advance. | ||
| I was in Michigan, Chris, for instance, when a lot of the poll watchers, their untrained poll watchers. | ||
| We're kicked out for violating COVID protocols. | ||
| They said they saw fraud. | ||
| They said that they were bullied. | ||
| In fact, they were violating COVID protocols and law enforcement kicked them out. | ||
| This time, there's a coordinated effort to reach out to law enforcement, even one official who talked about creating a kit to educate law enforcement on the problem of voter fraud. | ||
| Of course, we need to point out that in Michigan there were over 250 audits done by local clerks, as well as a Senate GOP report that found No evidence of widespread fraud. | ||
| So the bottom line here, Chris, is that there's a lot of concern that the end effect of this would be simply to create a lot of chaos in Democratic precincts, because those are the precincts that I heard them talking about again and again on the tapes. | ||
| They were places including Detroit, Pontiac, Southfield, Flint. | ||
| Those also happen to be heavily minority districts. | ||
| So what you're talking about here are bringing in a lot of GOP Trump supporters who think that there was fraud in these minority districts to actually challenge votes and voters. | ||
| And it just gives us a window into the breadth Of this strategy that frankly Steve Bannon has been talking about for quite some time openly on this podcast that he calls the precinct strategy, which is placing a lot of these individuals into positions of authority within the election administration system, which is. | ||
| Different than what happened in 2020, of course, where you just had a lot of untrained poll challengers. | ||
| And it was easy for law enforcement as well as clerks to say, hey, no, you know, you've stepped over your boundaries. | ||
| You got to go outside. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| She's she's got most of it right about we are in a full spectrum dominance in every aspect of it. | ||
| Her thing is that, oh, this is election deniers that are going to try to. | ||
| No, what we want and we demand and we're going to have is a fair and free election. | ||
| OK, in fair and free elections, we will win because the only way the Democrats can win is to cheat. | ||
| Oh, he can't say that. | ||
| Yeah, I say it. | ||
| I say it all the time because you know this reality. | ||
| That's why you're in full meltdown that now you're gonna have people putting the hairy eyeball on you non-stop. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And it's not just this whole thing about the minority districts. | ||
| It's all over the country. | ||
| It's in every district. | ||
| And because of what came out the other day on the machines, we're not machine guys. | ||
| But hey, if the software can be hacked, they gotta go. | ||
| Gotta rip them out. | ||
| Take it out. | ||
| We've reached out to the Dominion guys that come on. | ||
| Hey, that's the Haldeman report. | ||
| He's a Democrat. | ||
| They could be hacked. | ||
| So for all the machine guys, I guess they were right. | ||
| They kept saying they could be hacked. | ||
| And they ever said, no, it's not even hooked up the internet. | ||
| It's impossible. | ||
| It can't be hacked. | ||
| Well, that's not what the Haldeman Report says. | ||
| That's basically been signed off as kind of official. | ||
| Ben, you're doing amazing reporting. | ||
| This Ukraine thing is kind of the specter that we've got to get in back. | ||
| We're going to do a special with Pacific all weekend on geopolitics, Davos, the vaccines, and particularly this coming kinetic war with the U.S. | ||
| Ben, I know you're doing live broadcast all the time. | ||
| What is your social media handle? | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| Because, sir, you are on fire. | ||
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| Folks, if you want to go to getter.com or to the app directly, just go to the search box. | ||
| You'll find me there under my surname. | ||
| That's my handle, and I'm there pushing out my analysis 24-7. | ||
| You're going to do this analysis. | ||
| There's four or five major pieces coming from The Atlantic, The Guardian, other Wall Street Journal. | ||
| I hope you're going to do a summary. | ||
| By the way, they've got it. | ||
| Jamie Dimon right here talks about, we talked about the other day, about the hurricane that's coming. | ||
| And they actually say $175 a barrel oil. | ||
| $175 a barrel oil. I said $150, a buck fifty by at least Labor Day. | ||
| They're talking about 175 barrel ore. | ||
| You think you got inflation now? | ||
| You wait till it gets turbocharged. | ||
| The double barrel shotgun pressed up against the Temple of Europe. | ||
| They kind of placed it there, right? | ||
| They're playing Russian roulette and they forced it. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, thank you so much for being here today with us. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| So we won't bug you tonight. | ||
| You can go do your thing now. | ||
| Go do your work. | ||
| I want to thank Ben. | ||
| Ben was on the 6 o'clock, I think it was 6 o'clock show yesterday. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We're going to be back here from 5 to 7. | ||
| It's going to be intense. | ||
| We're going to have a lot. | ||
| Go to theprecinctstrategy.com. | ||
| That's where the left does not want you to go. | ||
| We want you to go and sign up now. | ||
| Become an active patron. | ||
| It costs you no money. | ||
| How's about this? | ||
| Zero. | ||
| You don't need to be a donor, you need to be an owner. | ||
| Go do it today. | ||
| If the left hates it, you should love it. | ||
| And boy, do they hate it. | ||
| Okay, back here at 5 o'clock today. |
Export Selection