May 20, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:54
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
What are we going to do? | |
| Today, you're going to leave here and we're going to break censorship up. | ||
| You're going to get on that phone, mother, daughter, son, grandson, child, and you're going to call the loved one and you're going to tell them, hope has arrived. | ||
| We're going to stand together and we're going to weather the storm because God is in all of us. | ||
| And we're going to lock hands right now. | ||
| Everybody lock hands right now. | ||
| Because I want you to feel the energy. | ||
| I want you to feel the energy in this space. | ||
| I want you to feel that energy right now. | ||
| Feel that energy. | ||
| And I want you to look at each other real quickly. | ||
| And I want you to say it loud. | ||
| I want Zuckerberg to hear this now. | ||
| I want him to hear this. | ||
| I want you to say, I Love you! | ||
| Now hug each other and show the power of power. | ||
| God bless you! | ||
| Now go out! | ||
| Now go out, everyone! | ||
| Now go out! | ||
| You ready? | ||
| Go out! | ||
| So his policies, Biden's policies are dumb and dangerous. | ||
| They're not working. | ||
| It's dumb and dangerous what they're doing at the border. | ||
| It's dumb and dangerous to stop producing American oil and gas, to go from energy independence to dependence. | ||
| The question for us is how do you fix it? | ||
| Biden's never going to change unless somebody makes it. | ||
| The only reason he got more involved in the Ukraine is because you and I and others kicked his ass every night saying that you're letting Putin win, you're betting on Putin winning. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How about betting on Ukraine winning for a change? | |
| So I think the Republican Party owes it to the American people not to just describe the problem, but to fix it. | ||
| Let's come up with a border security... Okay, okay. | ||
| I got a plan to fix it. | ||
| This is the guy, he and Hannity, and they're minting now all over Biden and Fox News. | ||
| This is why you got the $40 billion. | ||
| And you got Buttigieg over there today, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Talking about a Marshall Plan. | ||
| America's fully committed. | ||
| We're going to get into all this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
OK? | |
| Because we're in an economic firestorm, a collapse of the basic underpinning of the economy of the United States, plus our balance sheet. | ||
| We're going to talk about all the games that are about to be played. | ||
| We're going to get into all this. | ||
| But Lindsey Graham bragging last night, oh, we kicked his ass on Fox every night. | ||
| Well, hold it. | ||
| If there are people that are watching that, that are supporting this, then you're going to have a problem with the war room. | ||
| You're just going to have a problem. | ||
| We can't do that. | ||
| We can't do that. | ||
| We want to start, and this is incredibly important, this is about solutions, this is about action, this is about getting things done. | ||
| Yesterday we had and we led up to it and talked about it There was a rally outside of Facebook's corporate headquarters in Menlo Park and this just doesn't happen all the time Particularly you had a combination of coming together of people that have not been part of the Trump movement With some of the cornerstones of the Trump movement on the vaccine safety mandates. | ||
| Okay that that all came together yesterday and it was about The and a lot of these people most of these people Were former Democrats or Independents that leaned Democratic? | ||
| And hey, they ain't voting for Democrats anymore. | ||
| It's kind of like Elon Musk's Great Awakening you've seen over the last 72 hours or 48 hours, right? | ||
| In that situation, which we'll talk more about later. | ||
| There's something very important here, and you've got to get a solution. | ||
| That's Kevin Jenkins, we had him on the show yesterday. | ||
| We also had Nicole Negrete, and we're going to have more footage and more interviews from yesterday, but that was Kevin Jenkins calling people together to confront Facebook at its corporate headquarters right there at Menlo Park. | ||
| And people should know Menlo Park is very small, very tiny. | ||
| It's got that little speaker's corner like Hyde Park in London where anybody can kind of come up, stand on that thing, and give you two cents worth. | ||
| That was yesterday. | ||
| And we'll have more footage and interviews of all that because it's very important. | ||
| The reason we wanted to cover it, there's something else. | ||
| There's a dual track. | ||
| Something else very important that's happening. | ||
| Because we've got to come up with solutions about this. | ||
| We've got to stop yelling over our lunch pail. | ||
| And we also have to figure out who's on our side of the football and who's not. | ||
| OK, I want to bring in Mike Davis. | ||
| Remember Mike from from Article 3 and Mike was so central to making an issue of Judge Jackson, a confirmation project. | ||
| And just for the audience sake, I understand we didn't stop the confirmation. | ||
| That was a long shot to begin with. | ||
| What we did do was make it a political issue. | ||
| And that is going to be weaponized this summer and this fall in the contest, particularly in Arizona and Nevada and other states. | ||
| Where this whole issue of child trafficking and this whole issue of pedophilia and this whole issue of letting these pedophiles off is going to be an enormous issue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay? | |
| People are already working on that. | ||
| And that's because of the good offices of Mike Davis. | ||
| But in addition, Mike is also working on something that I would actually say is even bigger than that. | ||
| And if it gets bigger than confirmation of federal judges in the Supreme Court, I don't know what it is, but this is it. | ||
| And that is, how do you get big tech? | ||
| Because all the fanboys are running around with the pom-poms at Elon Musk, and I said, hey, he's never going to get the deal done. | ||
| The thing is not even a company. | ||
| We've got to find out what the government funding of it is, of Twitter. | ||
| But what we need to do is to go back to the Teddy Roosevelt. | ||
| We need to start breaking up these big asset managers and we need to start breaking up and confronting the tech oligarchs. | ||
| Yesterday you saw kind of this coming together of the people from Naomi Wolf to Bobby Kennedy Jr. | ||
| to all the vaccine safety people, all the people you've seen with the Children's Health Defense and others. | ||
| Kevin Jenkins was just fantastic. | ||
| We'll have more footage and interviews on that later. | ||
| The hard work here in the nation's capital has already commenced. | ||
| That's what we wanted to dovetail this thing. | ||
| Mike Davis, brother, this is, and people should understand, this is where you're really, your center of gravity, your work is, and I want to ask you why you're so revered by this audience. | ||
| Of all the other stuff you got to work on, all the other federal judges stuff, everything like that, why has Mike Davis made this your call celeb? | ||
| Well, the reason we have to break up big tech, Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, Is because they are the online gatekeepers to free speech, to commerce. | ||
| They control too much. | ||
| And they're working right now with the Biden administration. | ||
| Jen Psaki openly admitted this, that she's working with these big tech platforms to censor so-called misinformation and disinformation, whatever the hell that means. | ||
| It's just whatever doesn't go along with the ruling regime's talking points that day. | ||
| And they silence people if you disagree with Tony Fauci. | ||
| And is, you know, evolving science over the COVID pandemic. | ||
| And these big tech platforms, their trillion dollar big tech monopolies, they have too much power and Republicans, conservatives need to start holding them accountable. | ||
| And we have two people in Congress right now, two Republicans in Congress who are serving as the tip of the spear. | ||
| That's Congressman Ken Buck in Colorado, who really started this about two years ago. | ||
| And then Senator Chuck Grassley, my former boss, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and they're working on key pieces of antitrust reforms, working their way through Congress on a bipartisan basis that we can get through Congress before August, before the midterms start heating up, and before the window of opportunity closes, where we can hold big tech accountable. One of these bills... | ||
| Okay, Amber, hang on. | ||
| Before you get the bills, I just want to go back to the ideology or to the philosophy. | ||
| Because, look, I'm a populist nationalist. | ||
| So for me, we've got to do this. | ||
| There's many members of our audience who are more libertarians, more limited-government conservatives, you know, the good folks that have been there fighting these fights for a long time. | ||
| They're going to say, hey, Mike, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. | ||
| These are private companies. | ||
| They've got their rules. | ||
| They have the terms of agreement. | ||
| You want to use them. | ||
| We should be in the business of cutting their taxes and deregulating. | ||
| Why are you, Mike Davis, who is a tried and true, you know, standard stock Republican, why are you going and trying to use the force of government to break up these great entrepreneurial companies, sir? | ||
| Well, a free market requires a functioning market. | ||
| And in order to have a functioning work, you have to have free market competition. | ||
| And when you have when you have these trillion dollar big tech monopolies monopolizing different parts of the tech market colluding to kill competition, you you no longer have a functioning market, you no longer have a free market. | ||
| And as conservatives, we believe in law enforcement. | ||
| And we've had antitrust laws on the books for a century. | ||
| These are targeted law enforcement measures to target the bad actors to target the monopolist to target the tumors So we don't need industry-wide regulations. Facebook is calling for is is is is is the last time this happened? | ||
| basically when the belt when AT&T was broken up in the 80s by federal by a federal court and Broken into the regional belt operating companies the our box and then you had the explosion of all the different Long distance carriers is that the equivalent of what you're looking at to break these things have become essentially What the phone company was and these are monopolies that that people never turn to be monopolies and they have to be? | ||
| Disaggregated is that is that basically the directional attitude you're taking Absolutely. | ||
| We have to break up big tech. | ||
| They are crushing competition. | ||
| They're shuttering small businesses. | ||
| They're canceling conservatives. | ||
| They have too much power. | ||
| They have more power than governments, right? | ||
| And we have to use our century-old antitrust laws. | ||
| We need to update them with Senator Grassley's bill that we'll talk about. | ||
| And Ken Buck's bill. | ||
| We need to update our laws so we can use them to make it where there are... Okay, so tell us about Bucks and tell us about Grassley's. | ||
| And I take it if you want to do something like this by August, which sounds... You've got to have some Democrats agreeing with this. | ||
| Walk us through Buck and Grassley, what they're working on. | ||
| So it's S-2992. | ||
| It's essentially the Big Tech Non-Discrimination Act. | ||
| And there are several pieces of legislation that are working their way through. | ||
| This is one of the most important ones. | ||
| What this one does is it prevents these big tech monopolies, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, from From excluding others from using their monopolistic platforms and self-preferencing. | ||
| So like, for example, if you go on to the Amazon store where they preference their own products and services and then they cut out other products and services. | ||
| on their monopoly market, right? So these bills only apply to the monopolist. These are a special remedy for monopolists because when you have a monopoly in the market, the government has to step in and use all of their... Okay, that's restricting certain lines of their business, so they can't go from 500 billion to 1.5 trillion. But that didn't feel like... I haven't heard anything that lets me hear that you're actually breaking up Facebook, you're breaking up Apple, | ||
| You're breaking up Twitter. You're breaking up Google. | ||
| When you say break up, AT&T was a monolith. | ||
| I know my grandfather and father, I think the only two guys who both worked 50 years there, you know, as blue collar guys. | ||
| Is that what you're trying to do here? | ||
| Are you going to go and actually break up Facebook? | ||
| Are you going to make them get rid of the 50 acquisitions they do? | ||
| came out of there. I mean they broke it up into pieces, massive aggregate pieces. | ||
| Is that what you're trying to do here? Are you going to go and actually break up Facebook? Are you gonna make them get rid of the 50 acquisitions they did? | ||
| Because with the market cap and the cash they're sitting on, they can go buy everybody. | ||
| These have more power than governments. | ||
| They're like city-states back in the Renaissance Italy. | ||
| It's like Florence, right? | ||
| It has its own army, its own cash, it's doing its own thing. | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| Yeah, so there are several bills. | ||
| One of them is to increase the filing fees so you can give more money to the Federal Trade Commission so they can beef up their enforcement division. | ||
| Another one is where they, the venue provision, where they, when the State Attorney General, State Attorneys General bring antitrust lawsuits against Big Tech, they can bring it in their home states and so they don't get dragged out to the Northern District of California with their, you know, with a venue that's very friendly to Big Tech. | ||
| They want to give the tools to federal and state uh... of laws law enforcement agencies so they can actually uphold big tech accountable and break them up and that's where this is that is where this is going to go the the uh... the uh... grassley bach bill that's working its way through is one piece of this but the the endgame here is break up big tech okay uh... i know you got a bounce I want all the documents. | ||
| Okay, ladies and gentlemen, this is the beginning of a journey. | ||
| Okay, now people have been working on this a while, but if we've got to get control of this country back, and we take control, this is going to be one of the big efforts. | ||
| And I don't need to name names, but let me just be blunt. | ||
| I'm going to tell the folks at home, here's how the system works. | ||
| You can't find a law firm in this town that you can retain to go, if you're a little guy to go after these companies, you can't find, if you wanted to hire a lobbyist to represent the war room audience to, hey, we want to go against big tech, or the folks at Menlo Park, if they wanted to retain a lobbyist, there's nobody, the money, these guys have, they have cash machines. | ||
| These things, except for Apple, are all built on algorithms. | ||
| So it's not like a big... the margins here are massive. | ||
| They're sitting on massive amounts of cash and they have stock that's a currency also. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And they have this arrogant management we've seen on Twitter. | ||
| That cash gets spread around, Mike Davis. | ||
| I mean, this is why I admire you so much. | ||
| You're kind of like, you know, this is this is David and Goliath or Horatio at the bridge, right? | ||
| You're one tough guy with some other guys around you. | ||
| They've hired every big lobbyist in this town. | ||
| They have every big law firm. | ||
| We couldn't go hire a law firm. | ||
| They're all conflicted out because they have them all on retainer. | ||
| And they're spreading hundreds of millions of dollars into the political process. | ||
| Mike, give me 30 seconds. | ||
| I want to hold you through the break. | ||
| I know you get a bounce, but I got it. | ||
| Just give me 30 seconds on that and then we'll go to break. | ||
| Yeah, Big Tech controls D.C., and they control both sides of D.C., Republicans and Democrats, and we need to start holding Republican lawmakers accountable for their votes. | ||
| Mike, I've got to jam show, but I've got to keep you through. | ||
| This is so incredible. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, the swamp is too cute a term for it. | ||
| It's not a cute... Let's take the... This is the way the world works. | ||
| They own this city. | ||
| Both sides. | ||
| They own it. | ||
| Every law firm. | ||
| Every lobbyist. | ||
| Every communication specialist. | ||
| The guys you see going on TV. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| That's what we're up against. | ||
| And the asset managers the same way. | ||
| Okay, short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mike Davis back next. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| OK, it's Friday, 20 May, Year of Our Lord 2022. | ||
| I didn't get that at the open, did I? | ||
| I was so jacked up about Menlo Park, the protest yesterday, and then the announcement by Mike Davis of what they're working on. | ||
| This segment, I want to tell you, this is like the 27 Yankees. | ||
| Because we're at a war. | ||
| We're at a war. | ||
| Both globally, but here in the United States, we're at war. | ||
| I got Mike Davis, I got Tim Politore, and I got John Fredericks. | ||
| They don't come any heavier as far as hammers. | ||
| And the issues they're dealing with are some of the most important issues of the day. | ||
| One of the things about the show, you see us on the show, we're juggling stuff behind the scenes. | ||
| How do we get it in? | ||
| Where do we get it in? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boom! | |
| What's the narrative? | ||
| But also, in addition, is working with people. | ||
| Working with people to make sure things come together. | ||
| Because these are long, tough fights. | ||
| I'm not here to mislead you. | ||
| In taking 40 or 50 years to get here, we're just not going to snap. | ||
| There's no magic wand. | ||
| And don't think President Trump, you can't put it all on him. | ||
| Don't think he's just going to show back up. | ||
| Here, let's see all the memes of these people. | ||
| Too much idol worship. | ||
| He doesn't want that. | ||
| He understands what the struggle is. | ||
| This thing's not the swamp. | ||
| Here's what's happened. | ||
| You've got big tech. | ||
| All the market caps are the highest market caps in the world. | ||
| They're getting hammered now. | ||
| But these companies all run on algorithms, so they don't have a lot of production costs. | ||
| They have huge margins, they throw off tons of cash. | ||
| They own this city. | ||
| Big Pharma owns this city. | ||
| The Wall Street big asset managers, Larry Frank, Steve Schwartz, Ray Daly, own this city. | ||
| These people are bought and paid for. | ||
| The swamp is too cute a term. | ||
| It is an imperial city run by an oligarchy. | ||
| It's exactly 100% what the revolutionary generation fought against. | ||
| This is what they fought against. | ||
| They understood that this would become a continental power. | ||
| They understood that this could be the New Jerusalem. | ||
| They absolutely fought against where we are today. | ||
| And to take this back, it's not going to be any one election. | ||
| You saw that in 2016. | ||
| This is going to take a grind every day. | ||
| It's the power of the show is your grinders. | ||
| Out in Menlo Park was really the coming together of Naomi Wolf's 3,000 volunteers from this show. | ||
| 3,000 have worked and grinded through those documents with Pfizer's with about 250 or 300 lawyers also that came about through the show to really get down to what happened with this vaccine. | ||
| The same thing with Big Tech, the convergence of Big Tech and Big Pharma. | ||
| That's one of the reasons everything's banned on these platforms. | ||
| And that's what Davis is fighting for. | ||
| Also, the National Security State. | ||
| We're going to have Tim Parlatory, one of the toughest guys I know, on here in a second. | ||
| Then you got Fredericks. | ||
| Listen, a hundred lawyers are walking into a hundred courthouses in Pennsylvania as we speak from the McCormick campaign. | ||
| They're going to play smash mouth. | ||
| They're going to use Democratic tactics. | ||
| And hey, look, it is what it is. | ||
| But my point in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania after 40-some million dollars, it's going to come down, this victory is going to come down to five or six hundred votes. | ||
| And it's not going to be decided over the weekend. | ||
| It's going to take a while. | ||
| Every vote matters. | ||
| Every segment of the show matters, to put it as a force multiplier. | ||
| You matter. | ||
| You are the deciding difference. | ||
| So, MyPillow.com, go there now, buy one getting free. | ||
| You got the slippers, blew off the shelves yesterday. | ||
| Normally I think $139, now $49, roughly. | ||
| Boom! | ||
| Go to our square, MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Also, The coffee, and I want to thank the audience for saying, hey Steve, chill from being too jacked up. | ||
| Okay, I'm dialing it back slightly. | ||
| Go to warpath.coffee. | ||
| It's a veteran's company. | ||
| We're the marketing partner. | ||
| Go there today. | ||
| You got the Dark Roast Mariners Blend, best ever made, and you got the Breakfast Blend. | ||
| Go check it out. | ||
| Put in War Room, you get 10% off. | ||
| Let's go back to Mike Davis. | ||
| Mike, we know we have a long, tough fight ahead of us, okay? | ||
| Against long odds. | ||
| But this has to happen. | ||
| We don't have a choice. | ||
| We have to break up. | ||
| We never intended. | ||
| These companies are too powerful. | ||
| They're too big. | ||
| They're too irresponsible. | ||
| They have to be broken up. | ||
| So I know we're starting a journey here. | ||
| How do people get the documents? | ||
| And how can they get more information? | ||
| Because you're going to be on here a lot to walk us through. | ||
| This is going to be a titanic battle this summer. | ||
| And that's just for the opening salvo. | ||
| This is not a breakup of these companies. | ||
| This is the first thing. | ||
| Let's see if we get passed. | ||
| And you're going to have every lobbyist, you're going to have every law firm, you have every communications guy, you're going to see Fox News and ads and MSNBC and CNN. | ||
| They're going to have experts on there. | ||
| This is horrible. | ||
| This is going to kill American technology. | ||
| We're going to not compete with the Chinese and the global marketplace. | ||
| It's all going to come. | ||
| It's all coming. | ||
| So Mike Davis, how do people get to you? | ||
| How do they get the information? | ||
| And we know we're up against long odds, but how are we going to do this? | ||
| So the conservative group that I run that takes on big tech is called the Internet Accountability Project. | ||
| It's TheIAP.org, T-H-E-I-A-P.org, and on Twitter and getter at T-H-E-The underscore I-A-P, The underscore I-A-P. | ||
| And we have been doing this fight now for two years. | ||
| We were the first conservative Republican group Fighting big tech and we got laughed at two years ago. | ||
| And here we are, we are about to pass key antitrust reforms. | ||
| The one thing that President Biden, the only thing that President Biden has done right is appointing Jonathan Cantor and Lena Khan, the two top antitrust cops in the Biden administration to take on big tech. | ||
| And so we need to support their efforts on their lawsuits, their antitrust lawsuits against Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, We need to hold big tech accountable. | ||
| This needs to be a bipartisan, populist effort. | ||
| How do people get to you on Getter or other safe, not Twitter, I guess Twitter too, but how do people find you on social media? | ||
| So for me, it's MRDDMIA, MRDDMIA. | ||
| Now, before he goes, you've got to understand something, because I'm hated in this town by the Republican establishment, more than the Democrats hate me, the Republican establishment want to kill me. | ||
| Mike Davis, for all the good he does in the judges, and he's the rock star, he got all the guys, Kavanaugh, all these guys through, right? | ||
| Gorsuch, right? | ||
| Mike Davis is the go-to guy. | ||
| He's hated almost as much for this topic, because he's taken money out of people's pockets in this town. | ||
| He's taking money out of people's pockets in this town. | ||
| This is stopping the cash flow, stopping the money train. | ||
| Mike Davis, patriot and hero. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| I didn't have time. | ||
| Michael Chertoff, another Republican. | ||
| I guess I'll get beady on this later. | ||
| The whole disinformation thing. | ||
| Okay, Tim Pawlatory. | ||
| I'm going to get to Fred. | ||
| Let me do the lawyers back-to-back. | ||
| This is a win. | ||
| By the way, the Mike Davis thing is a win, the beginning of a win, okay? | ||
| Pawlatory, tough guy. | ||
| Been on before on the Eric Greitens, Karl Rove situation. | ||
| He's blowing up Karl Rove. | ||
| He's going to take Karl Rove to court. | ||
| Miranda Devine, about a letter you sent. | ||
| If we can get the letter to Denver and put it up. | ||
| We're finally going on offense, and I love it. | ||
| Tim Parlatory, tell me what we're doing against these scumbag national security officials, high-level intelligence officials that lied to the American people and should have the security clearances, minimum, yanked immediately, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good morning, Steve. | |
| So, President Trump has asked me to go after these 51 former intel officials that wrote that letter claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. | ||
| And right now we've started what is going to be a multi-phased litigation strategy, starting with complaints to the CIA, ODNI, DOD, and all the other intelligence agencies that these 51 used to work for, because the letter is in and of itself a violation of their obligations to their former employers. | ||
| Whenever you release something that relies supposedly on intelligence, Or refers in any way to your former intelligence work, you have to submit that to the CIA and to the other intelligence community components to have it pre reviewed. | ||
| Had this letter been sent to the CIA beforehand, it certainly would not have looked anything like the letter that they actually published. | ||
| Because if you read it, You know, they don't really have any facts about why this letter is Russian disinformation. | ||
| It's just you have to trust them because they have collectively so many years of classified experience working on secret Russian intelligence. | ||
| And so based on their classified experience, you have to trust. | ||
| That is something that the CIA would not have allowed them to publish. | ||
| Moreover, they actually say in there that they believe that the intelligence community agrees with their assessment, which is something that would also have been whacked out, and they would have instead put in a disclaimer saying, this does not represent the position of the CIA or the intelligence community. | ||
| This is incredibly important. | ||
| Remember, let's go back in time. | ||
| Costello, Bernie Kerik, Rudy, myself, part of the team, they got the laptop from hell, got the New York Post involved after, you know, other people said they couldn't verify it. | ||
| It comes out with all that damning information. | ||
| None of which has been, all of which is true, was true at the time, is true today. | ||
| As these other organizations have vetted it. | ||
| Immediately, this 51 who's who of these intelligence and national security officials put out a letter that's really a free advertisement in the New York Times. | ||
| Tim, let's just say what it is. | ||
| The media blows it up and says, this is Russian disinformation and this is Trump's partnership with Putin. | ||
| This letter was horrible. | ||
| And they've gotten away with it. | ||
| They've gotten away with it. | ||
| Remember, in our victory that's coming up in November, we've got to start taking charge here. | ||
| And this is why I'm so proud that finally we're going on offense. | ||
| Finally we're going on offense. | ||
| Tim, walk me through the process. | ||
| Where does it go now? | ||
| You sent this letter and it's up. | ||
| I want to get Captain Bannon and get it on all our platforms. | ||
| I want people to read this. | ||
| And going on offense, walk me through the steps of this, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The first step is the one that we just executed earlier this week, is to send these letters to the intelligence agencies to demand that they initiate investigations and revoke the security clearances and make it so that these 51 can never possibly work in the intelligence community again. | |
| It's exactly the same thing that they did to Navy SEAL Matt Bessonette back when he wrote the book about killing bin Laden. | ||
| But they have to apply that equally. | ||
| And they can't just let these guys go because they happen to be supporting President Biden. | ||
| So that's step one. | ||
| Step two, you actually kind of hit on it a moment ago because you called it free advertising. | ||
| It is. | ||
| Not only that, it's a free consulting of an intelligence assessment, which is worth a lot of money to a campaign and yet was given without any compensation for. | ||
| So we're going next to the Federal Elections Commission to file complaints against the 51 and to file complaints against the Biden campaign itself. | ||
| Or that illegal contribution in kind. | ||
| And then depending on what the FEC does there, that then turns into a lawsuit in the US District Court. | ||
| Tim, hang on for a second. | ||
| I'm going to go to break. | ||
| I got John Fredericks. | ||
| John, please hold. | ||
| I know you're on the bus and things. | ||
| We've got to hold Tim because I want to make sure people can track him during the day. | ||
| The key question I'm going to ask him when he comes back. | ||
| These guys dine. | ||
| See, here's what happens. | ||
| You get a high security clearance. | ||
| You keep it after you leave the government. | ||
| These guys dine off it. | ||
| This is how they make a living. | ||
| You pull that security clearance. | ||
| This is some schmendrick. | ||
| They're a greeter at one of these stores. | ||
| They're nothing. | ||
| They're absolutely nothing. | ||
| They dine off information, highly classified information that they essentially monetize. | ||
| I'm not saying they give secrets away, but they monetize those security clearance. | ||
| That's how they live so high in the hog here in Washington, D.C. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| Tim Pawlatory, the president's lawyer, going on offense against the national security state next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| We're in the in the war room and I got Tim Politore. | ||
| Tim, people are so stoked that we're going on offense. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| And I want to let people know this is just the top of the first inning for what you're doing here, right? | ||
| That you're going after the security clearances of these 51 individuals that came after President Trump and accused him basically of collaboration with with Putin and the Russians. | ||
| Tim Politore. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so you can find me on most social media using TParlatory, my first initial last name. | |
| And you said something right before the break that was, you know, right on the money because all of these former intel officials, we want people to go into intelligence work to protect America and not to engage in partisan politics. | ||
| And yet so many of them, as soon as they get out, they try and monetize that. | ||
| A lot of them even go into that work because they want that moniker of former CIA so that they can then go off and try and make money peddling their opinions, all with the guise of being based on some secret classified information. | ||
| So people trust them. | ||
| And yet they shouldn't, because a lot of them are just putting out false opinions, trying to abuse that former position that they held. | ||
| And that's really what we're doing here is we're trying to hold those people accountable. | ||
| Because no matter what side of the aisle you're supporting, you shouldn't be out there saying, well, I'm a former CIA, and I know better than the rest of you. | ||
| And so you should trust me that this is disinformation, or this is collusion or something like that. | ||
| No, We want the people who actually are currently working that job, who have the proper clearance, who have all the access to the information, to make those assessments and to give the American people the honest truth. | ||
| That's really what we're going on here. | ||
| And the collusion between them and the campaign, that's what we're going after next with the FEC file. | ||
| This is amazing. | ||
| I want all this audience that says, okay, this is Mike Davis on taking on Big Tech, Tim Paltrow. | ||
| You've got tough, hard lawyers, okay, that are smart guys. | ||
| Right before I let you go and go to John Fredericks down in Georgia, I want to go, Steve, a blockbuster announced the other day, Steve Wynn. | ||
| Let's face it, we know he's in back of the Karl Rove attack on Eric Reitens, Commander Reitens, right? | ||
| On this sleazy thing about the family situation that was all false. | ||
| Steve Wynn, the Justice Department is suing him to force him to register as a foreign agent for the Chinese Communist Party because of the cash he's taken out of Macau. | ||
| Well, he took out of Macau for years. | ||
| They're forcing him. | ||
| When is that going to become part of the grain? | ||
| The good folks in Missouri got to understand something. | ||
| Steve Wynn is in back of the Karl Rove hit. | ||
| Right? | ||
| 100% in back of it. | ||
| And Steve Wynn's now been called out as basically an agent for, not just a foreign government, the greatest existential threat this nation's ever faced, the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Which, you talk about Big Pharma having money all over, Big Tech having money all over, Right? | ||
| The big asset managers having money all over. | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party got money all over this town. | ||
| Everywhere. | ||
| So, Tim, is that going to become, are you guys going to make a big deal about wins participation? | ||
| And I think, rumor has it, he's given Schmidt and some of these other guys hundreds of thousands of dollars. | ||
| They're giving the PACs to support them. | ||
| I don't want to break any news here, but is that part of this thing of when, which I've been arguing, look, I've argued quite frankly as chairman of the Republican National Committee, I think finally, I said he should be criminally charged. | ||
| He's an absolute agent and working for the detriment of this country for the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Is that going to become a part of this Missouri situation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I doubt it, because really what Eric's focus now is, is on making sure that this family court case gets dismissed and that Sheena is held accountable for her false statements, and then refocusing back on the campaign to make sure that the people in Missouri select the right candidate. | |
| But you're absolutely right when you talk about the Chinese influence, because that's one of the reasons why Hunter Biden's laptop should have been One thousand percent. | ||
| It was all about the compromise. | ||
| We can go through chapter and verse. | ||
| Tim Parlatory, social media, sir, can people follow you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tim Parlatory on pretty much all the platforms. | |
| Okay, thank you. | ||
| Captain Bennett, we got just the news. | ||
| The great John Solomon and Miranda Devine-Post both have great articles. | ||
| I want both of them up everywhere so people can read them, and I think Revolver's going to do something. | ||
| There's going to be a lot more tempo until we're on offense. | ||
| A guy that's always on offense, John Frederick. | ||
| So John, I'm just going to ask you to put your pom-poms down for one second. | ||
| Because in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and this is why it's so powerful both for the John Fritz Radio Show and in the War Room, this titanic race in the Republican primary | ||
| is going to come down to a couple hundred votes either way uh... in i'm hearing now that in fact i'm getting news reports that uh... that uh... mccormick's campaigns kind of taken on the the style of the democrats they're sending a hundred lawyers into a hundred county courthouses and they're looking to throw out ballots john fredericks you know more about pennsylvania and i defer to your judgment i defer to your judgment uh... tell give us an update on pennsylvania | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oz is gonna win because he's got more votes. | |
| They can send 100 lawyers and they can send 1,000 lawyers. | ||
| Lawyers don't vote in the Pennsylvania Republican primary. | ||
| There's 4,000 votes remaining. | ||
| 10% of those were in Philadelphia. | ||
| OZ is going to win that. | ||
| The numbers don't work for McCormick. | ||
| I told you this last night. | ||
| The numbers keep coming in. | ||
| They're banking on two things. | ||
| They're banking on all of these ballots coming in through the mail. | ||
| OK, 90% of these are Democrat-balanced late. | ||
| And the late ballots that come from the GOP are being split about even. | ||
| So right now, Ozzy's ahead by 1,100. | ||
| The maximum McCormick is going to make up is about 200. | ||
| You've got a minimum win by Ozzy of 900 votes. | ||
| Now, what Jeff Rowe and his firm Axiom, his general consultant has to do is they have to stop chaos. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| John, I want you to call in. | ||
| Just take it down. | ||
| It's too important and I've got to have an accurate thing. | ||
| The Skype's not working. | ||
| I wanted to call in. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Do I have J.R.? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| J.R., can you come on? | ||
| J.R., tell us about these epic fights. | ||
| You had one in Ohio that you were kind of the Doug Mastriano candidate. | ||
| You were the guy that dismissed You're now ready for the General. | ||
| But the reason I wanted to have you on today is that we didn't start with Cortez and I didn't start with Navarro. | ||
| I had to start with the hardcore politics. | ||
| But I want your assessment right now. | ||
| For this nationwide audience, of what's the situation economically in Ohio for working class people? | ||
| Both with food, with formula, with gasoline, with the basics of life and now their credit cards. | ||
| The electorate in Ohio, particularly your area, which is one of the parts of the heart of the country, where are they standing right now? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Steve, you know, I had breakfast this morning with a bunch of farmers from Northwest Ohio and Ottawa County. | |
| My sheriff and I went to the farmer's breakfast and One of the things that they're talking about is the prices that they're paying at the pump. | ||
| One of the gentlemen told us that it cost him over $800 to fill his tractor and there's now limitations on each pump so he had to actually use two different credit cards. | ||
| And they're paying three times as much as they would normally pay for fertilizer. | ||
| So they're really, really, really intimidated by what this farming season is going to look like. | ||
| And then, you know, you have some of them with small children. | ||
| They can't afford formula. | ||
| Hang on a second. | ||
| Hang on a second. | ||
| Let's get up in Denver. | ||
| I want to get up the Economist cover for the Economist that I sent you. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The Economist today, and people say, Bannon, why are you talking about the Financial Times Economist? | ||
| You have to read the Economist magazine and the Financial Times because it is the way the party of Davos thinks. | ||
| And you have to understand, you can never win if you don't understand how your enemy thinks. | ||
| That's how they think. | ||
| That's why we always start with the Financial Times and always start with the Economist. | ||
| This is how the globalists think. | ||
| This is what they look at. | ||
| This is the information. | ||
| On the cover of this week's Economist, Something we've talked about on the show for three, four months. | ||
| The cover is, look at that cover. | ||
| Is the cover up there? | ||
| The cover for our podcast radio audience, it's grains of wheat. | ||
| It's called The Coming Famine. | ||
| The Coming Global Famine. | ||
| It's grains of wheat, and we look at the wheat, instead of the kernels, they're skulls. | ||
| It's absolutely dramatic, it's a very dramatic cover, but as we've had Brother Davis on here, right? | ||
| As we've had Dave Walsh, excuse me, Dave Walsh on here. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And now we've had, what, Alfie Oaks, one of the largest farmers in all of Florida. | ||
| We've been talking about the coming price increases and supply problems on agriculture in this country, but famine in other places like South Asia, like Sub-Saharan Africa, like Latin America and Central America. | ||
| Why? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why? | |
| Because of fuel cost. | ||
| So I want to go back, J.R., when you met with these farmers today, what the Greens have done, okay, and what the progressives have walked us into, we're going to have in a second these hearings about what they talked to us about, about stopping the leases in the Gulf. | ||
| This is why Cortez calls this a created crisis. | ||
| This is because of our policies. | ||
| J.R., go back and tell me about your breakfast with the farmers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So one of their major concerns are fuel prices. | |
| One of the farmers expressed to me that he spent over $850 to fill his tractor. | ||
| And then because of limitations on the pump, he actually had to use a second card to fill the remaining capacity in his tractor. | ||
| And that's over almost three times what he would have normally paid last year. | ||
| And he actually gets a discount because he's a farmer. | ||
| And the other concern that they have is fertilizer prices. | ||
| It's three times as high as what it was last year. | ||
| And another concern that they have is that, you know, they're partnered with Big Ag. | ||
| And some of these Big Ag companies, they're heavily reliant upon these farmers and they're, you know, they don't have the capacity to pay additional money for these crops. | ||
| So, these farmers are struggling with, you know, what do they support? | ||
| The homestead? | ||
| Or do they support the commercial agriculture part of their farming? | ||
| And it's a tough decision for them to make and they're extremely nervous about it. | ||
| They're really concerned. | ||
| Hold it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
on this year's crops and they may actually have to plant without fertilizer. | |
| So that's going to do a lot to their farmland as well because it's going to... | ||
| Hold it. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Hold it. | ||
| Hold it. | ||
| In the United States of America, ladies and gentlemen, the CEO of Walmart, one of the largest companies, one of the most sophisticated analytic companies in the world says the one thing they're concerned about is that they can tell about the robustness of the American economy by the gallons of milk they sell and they're selling half gallons now to families because families are cutting back. | ||
| They have to cut back on milk. | ||
| Here you have J.R. | ||
| talking to the good farmers out in Ohio. | ||
| Number one, the three times cost of fuel for the tractor, the three times cost three times for the fertilizer, that's coming to a loaf of bread and a box of cereal on your breakfast table shortly. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| That's going to all roll through. | ||
| But more importantly saying, hey, think about it in the 21st century with everything that these farmers have gone through for 200 years and their families have gone through in the 21st century in a breakfast with a guy running for Congress and say, hey, you know what? | ||
| We may actually have to plant without fertilizer. | ||
| I want you to just embrace that. | ||
| This is what happens when a complex system starts to collapse. | ||
| And that's what you see in Northwest Ohio with farmers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not only collapsing, but turning on the people that dedicate their lives to feeding the local economy. | |
| People that are dedicated to the community, and they have Democratic municipalities that have historically blamed them for pollution, they blame them for runoffs, they blame them for the algal blooms on Lake Erie, and they blame them for a two-month period out of the summer when Ohioans can't drink their drinking water because Of high levels of phosphorus, high levels of nitrogen that create these vicious algal blooms that could poison our population. | ||
| That's the people we're talking about. | ||
| Those are the people that are suffering right now. | ||
| And they're scared. | ||
| They're not only scared for their families, but they're scared for us. | ||
| And it's a shame. | ||
| It's a sad shame that the Biden administration is committing these self-inflicted wounds, they're ruining our economy, and they're putting America last. | ||
| Jerry Majewski, can you stay through the break? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
| Young man running for Congress, a dark horse candidate that won. | ||
| Pure MAGA. | ||
| In fact, I would actually say he's ultra MAGA. | ||
| The farmers who are facing three times costs and are all going to be bankrupt, they obviously fear for their families and their farms and their homesteads, but they fear for you. | ||
| Because they get what's coming. | ||
| They're in that part of the production process that's called upstream. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Jerry Majewski will join us on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Big Tech monitors us. | |
| Censors us. | ||
| Deplatforms us. | ||
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it. | ||
| Until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what Big Tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Make sure you go to MyPillow.com, a promo code war room. | ||
| You've got the slipper sale, normally $139. | ||
| It is now, the slippers are now $39, right? | ||
| $139 to $49, boom. | ||
| But go there, buy one, get one free, also the slipper sale. | ||
| Slippers are unbelievable. | ||
| You need a good night's sleep. | ||
| I tell you, the people that follow my Getter account know about my sleep patterns now. | ||
| I only get a couple hours a night. | ||
| People were lighting me up last night. | ||
| I'm putting analysis up and articles up saying, hey, the feed's great, but I gotta go to bed. | ||
| That's why we get a great night's sleep. | ||
| Also, when we get up, Warpath Coffee. | ||
| Go to warpath.coffee. | ||
| The Dark Roast. | ||
| The Mariner's Blend. | ||
| My baby. | ||
| Best Dark Roast ever made. | ||
| And I'm an aficionado. | ||
| I've been drinking that stuff for, I don't know, 50 years? | ||
| Maybe longer. | ||
| 55 years? | ||
| And we got a breakfast blend you'll love. | ||
| Got a kick to it called Black Powder. | ||
| Put more of them in when you go to warpath.coffee and you'll get a 10% discount. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| J.R. | ||
| had to bounce. | ||
| I'm gonna get all his social media up. | ||
| You gotta go see this young man. | ||
| He's a fighter, came from nowhere, won the primary. | ||
| It's incredible. | ||
| Let's go to, we got John Fredericks. | ||
| John, is John on? | ||
| We got John by phone. | ||
| John Fredericks, can you hear me, sir? | ||
| Okay, I don't have John Fredericks. | ||
| Yeah, I don't. | ||
| Yep, I don't have anything. | ||
| That's okay. | ||
| I don't think I've got this. | ||
| This doesn't sound like it's on either, but we'll just wing it. | ||
| So here's where we stand. | ||
| In Pennsylvania, in Pennsylvania right now, we are hearing from the McCormick campaign that they're sending out 100 lawyers into 100 counties and they're going to go through every ballot. | ||
| They're going to play hard smash mouth, what Democrats do. | ||
| They're going to challenge ballot after ballot. | ||
| Guys going into courthouses, going to throw down lawsuits. | ||
| They're going to play hardball here. | ||
| Right now, the bid, as John says, I think it's 1,100 votes. | ||
| There's also this question, there's 7,000 ballots that came up in Allegheny County. | ||
| You got these issues with, you got these issues with, you're telling me now military ballots haven't been counted? | ||
| I mean, who knows what's going on? | ||
| But here's the thing about voter integrity. | ||
| Here's exactly what's happening about this voter integrity. | ||
| How can we be in 2022 Given all the promises we had by the Wolf Administration, all the promises we had by Shapiro, all the promises you had by everybody, is John up? | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Hey, there we go, we got Jon Ferguson. | ||
| With all the promises we had, with all the promises we had, how are we having this fiasco? | ||
| I'm telling you, this is not going to get sorted. | ||
| The original fight's not going to get sorted until July, and then you're going to have a recount. | ||
| You're not going to have, right now, as I see it, you're not going to have a candidate to run against Federman until August, or Labor Day. | ||
| And John Frederickson will tell me I'm wrong, but John, walk me through this. | ||
| Because I'm just saying, by the time he dropped, I'm hearing now that the military ballots have not been counted. | ||
| That they got all these military ballots. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I understand that, and all the McCormick people can do right now is spread disinformation and sow chaos. | |
| Because they don't have the votes. | ||
| Whether they have a hundred lawyers, Steve, or a thousand lawyers. | ||
| But hang on. | ||
| They go as But hang on, we know if you go into these county courthouses and you have to validate every mail-in ballot with a signature and stuff like that, they may not have the votes, but they can start taking away from the denominator. | ||
| They can start taking away from votes that were there. | ||
| Can they not? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, no, because the provisional ballots, the only thing they're... First of all, when all the votes are counted, I'm going to be up by about 900. | |
| Or a thousand, right? | ||
| They just don't have the votes. | ||
| So let's put that aside. | ||
| put that aside, there's 4,000 votes remaining. | ||
| John, hang on a second. | ||
| When do you anticipate, let's just take the process. | ||
| When do you anticipate, let's say it's 1,000 votes, that first round, right, before all these fights go, when do you think that, does that get, not called, but do we know that number when 100% of everything that's there is counted? | ||
| Is that Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, as Oz or you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That'll be Monday. | |
| Allegheny County said they'll have the final count by Monday, and then, and then, You have a week. | ||
| There's a week for the mail-in ballots. | ||
| If they're postmarked by Election Day, the 17th, they're going to continue to come in. | ||
| They're going to come in today, tomorrow, Monday. | ||
| And the McCormick campaign has said, oh, there's thousands of ballots out there. | ||
| No, no, they're not. | ||
| And right now, 90, like yesterday, 90 percent of the mail-in ballots that came in late were Democratic primary votes. | ||
| So there's only about 10 percent are Republican. | ||
| So what McCormick is going to do is he's got a hundred lawyers and I've just got lawyers as well. | ||
| And so they're going to, they want to adjudicate every one of the provisional ballots. | ||
| That means two McCormick lawyers will be there, two Oz lawyers will be there, and if they can't agree on a provisional ballot, then it'll go to a judge who's going to make that decision. | ||
| So maybe when that's all said and done, McCormick gets another 200 votes, 100 votes, he's still down by 700. | ||
| Then it goes to the automatic recount, and as soon as the recount is done and every ballot is looked at and re-added up, if Ogg wins by 7, 8, 900, that election is going to get certified and that's it. | ||
| McCormick is not going to be the nominee, and they can send in as many lawyers as they want. | ||
| New votes where there are none. | ||
| And so, and the provisional ballots, there's not enough there. | ||
| And those have to be legally adjudicated. | ||
| The way that works is you look at a ballot. | ||
| You got four lawyers, two from each team. | ||
| They either agree that, okay, this ballot has got to get thrown out because we don't have a signature. | ||
| We don't know who this is from. | ||
| We're going to all agree to throw that out. | ||
| Or they can say, hey, Yeah. | ||
| person's signature doesn't match but it's kind of close and they voted for McCormick and so we're going to give that to McCormick or they can say we disagree and that fact goes to a judge but there's not enough votes to give McCormick the lead going into the recount that's the problem. John just hang on. | ||
| I want to hold you through the break. | ||
| We've got to get to Obama. | ||
| We've got to get to Georgia, even more importantly. | ||
| My question for you to think about in the, what, 90-second break we have. | ||
| We'll short break here. | ||
| It looks like to me, by the process you just laid out, it's the 4th of July. | ||
| Maybe not Labor Day, but it's the 4th of July before we have an announced winner in the Republican primary, if you just do the math. | ||
| But I'll get that from you. | ||
| And everything about Georgia. | ||
| Also the World Health Organization. | ||
| The economy. | ||
| We've got Ed Dowd. | ||
| Big Pharma. |
Export Selection