Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Before I go into the details of today's meeting, I'd like to take this opportunity to speak directly to the American people. | |
Yeah, as the day-to-day cost of living soars, a lot of Americans, including the 60% now living paycheck to paycheck, are looking for ways to increase their cash flow. | ||
Before I go into the details of today's meeting, I'd like to take this opportunity to speak directly to the American people. | ||
Inflation is much too high, and we understand the hardship it is causing. | ||
And we're moving expeditiously to bring it back down. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
We have both the tools we need and the resolve that it will take to restore price stability on behalf of American families and businesses. | ||
The economy and the country have been through a lot over the past two years and have proved resilient. | ||
It is essential that we bring inflation down if we are to have a sustained period of strong labor market conditions that benefit all. | ||
From the standpoint of our congressional mandate to promote maximum employment and price stability, the current picture is plain to see. | ||
The labor market is extremely tight and inflation is much too high. | ||
Against this backdrop, today the FOMC raised its policy interest rate by a half percentage point and anticipates that ongoing increases in the target rate for the federal funds rate will be appropriate. | ||
In addition, we are beginning the process of significantly reducing the size of our balance sheet. | ||
I'll have more to say about today's monetary policy actions after briefly reviewing economic developments. | ||
Today, the FOMC raised its policy interest rate by a half percentage point and anticipates that ongoing increases in the target rate for the federal funds rate will be appropriate. | ||
In addition, we are beginning the process of significantly reducing the size of our balance sheet. | ||
I'll have more to say about today's monetary policy actions after briefly reviewing economic developments. | ||
After expanding at a robust 5.5% pace last year, overall economic activity edged down in the first quarter. | ||
Underlying momentum remains strong, however, as the decline largely reflected swings in inventories and net exports, two volatile categories whose movements last quarter likely carry little signal for future growth. | ||
Indeed, household spending and business fixed investment continued to expand briskly. | ||
The labor market has continued to strengthen and is extremely tight. | ||
Over the first three months of the year, employment rose by nearly 1.7 million jobs. | ||
In March, the unemployment rate hit a post-pandemic and near five-decade low of 3.6 percent. | ||
Improvements in labor market conditions have been widespread, including for workers at the lower end of the wage distribution, as well as for African Americans and Hispanics. | ||
Labor demand is very strong, and while labor force participation has increased somewhat, labor supply remains subdued. | ||
Employers are having difficulties filling job openings, and wages are rising at the fastest pace in many years. | ||
Inflation remains well above our longer-run goal of 2%. | ||
Over the 12 months ending in March, total PCE prices rose 6.6%. | ||
Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE prices rose 5.2%. | ||
Aggregate demand is strong, and bottlenecks and supply constraints are limiting how quickly production can respond. | ||
Disruptions to supply have been larger and longer lasting than anticipated, and price pressures have spread to a broader range of goods and services. | ||
unidentified
|
I think that the conventional feeling among economists, and it's been strengthened over the last few weeks, is that a recession may be inevitable. | |
I think one way to think about this is a doctor treating a patient with a very serious condition. | ||
You do something aggressive, but there may be some unpleasant side effects in the aftermath. | ||
The economy may be the same way. | ||
Raise interest rates, perhaps deal with a recession, but in the bigger picture of things, it may benefit because that will give the economy a shock and therefore that will reduce inflation. | ||
If a recession is coming, are you seeing great recession? | ||
Are you seeing early 2000s, you know, short, shallow recession? | ||
So the thing about a recession, the textbook example is when we see two quarters, six months without economic growth. | ||
Yeah. | ||
As we saw early on in the pandemic, we went into a recession, but it only lasted a few months. | ||
So I think that is the hope, that you do something strong and sudden, have some hardship, but then we see a rebound. | ||
Let me remind you again, I reduced the federal deficit. | ||
All the talk about the deficit for my Republican friends, I love it. | ||
I've reduced it $350 billion in my first year in office. | ||
We're on track to reduce it by the end of September by another $1,500,000,000,000. | ||
The largest drop ever. | ||
I don't want to hear Republicans talk about deficits and their ultra-MAGA agenda. | ||
I want to hear about fairness. | ||
I want to hear about decency. | ||
I want to hear about helping ordinary people. | ||
Okay, you are a liar. | ||
This is nothing but lies and spin. | ||
This is the same group That told you there's no systemic inflation. | ||
None of that. | ||
What are the war room tell you from day one in here between power? | ||
Remember, pal? | ||
It's just a loser. | ||
If you look at this guy's curriculum, Vita, right? | ||
He's he's worked at every marginal investment bank and kind of these mid level. | ||
You know, I never worked at Morgan Stanley, never worked at Goldman Sachs, never worked at any of the, you know, the real powerhouse investment banks. | ||
There's always like Dylan Reed, all these, all marginality with Nick Brady, another Bush hack, okay? | ||
Nick Brady, the great Secretary Treasurer under Bush 41. | ||
He's had all these marginal jobs. | ||
He worked over at Carlyle Group. | ||
Carlyle Group is the epitome of the swamp in this town. | ||
And another marginal job of head of, like, M&A for some, you know, manufacturing, head of M&A for manufacturing, some tiny inconsequential job. | ||
He's just always been a factotum. | ||
And he kind of, you know, got on to the Board of Governors when nobody else was there, and he kind of worked his way around. | ||
And he's been dead wrong in every major policy decision. | ||
What Biden's doing there at the end is just total. | ||
The spin is so obvious. | ||
There lies. | ||
Remember, let's go back. | ||
What do we say at the beginning of war and pandemic that you're going to have a an economic crisis right from this pandemic? | ||
You have an economic. | ||
This is in January 2020. | ||
People that have been with us that long. | ||
Remember, I said the mantra was we have an economic crisis. | ||
Because of a collapse in aggregate demand and problems with the supply chain. | ||
Something we've never really had. | ||
Supposedly a supply problem and a drop in aggregate demand. | ||
Massive drop in aggregate demand. | ||
That's going to trigger a financial crisis or capital markets crisis that will then trigger a geopolitical crisis. | ||
And it's all come to pass. | ||
When he says, oh I cut $300 billion then. | ||
That's off these extraordinary measures that had to be done. | ||
We have, and just so you're not being lied to, his budget we're going to put forward, we have a systemic, we have a one and a half trillion dollar ongoing budget deficit, and anything he says about that is a lie. | ||
They can't or won't increase taxes, and they won't cut spending. | ||
In fact, they increase spending, and they do this thing, the uniparty does this thing, well, the defense budget's got to go up. | ||
I don't know why the defense budget's got to go up, and so the social justice warrior budget goes up. | ||
And they're getting this really tough negotiation. | ||
It's Shelby and these guys. | ||
It's bipartisan. | ||
It's tough. | ||
It's not a tough negotiation. | ||
They don't have accountability. | ||
They just keep printing the money. | ||
That's Powell. | ||
What Powell said, we're going to reduce our balance sheet. | ||
We have talked about this from the beginning. | ||
They have $9 trillion. | ||
Forget the $30 trillion face amount of our debt that's going to bury your children because the interest rates start to kick up. | ||
It's going to suck up all the cash that's out there. | ||
You're going to have even more massive deficits. | ||
You're not going to have any discretionary spending. | ||
Now he's going to bat that very weakly. | ||
We're going to start, I think, at $45 billion, maybe go up to $100 trillion. | ||
He's got $9 trillion. | ||
Trump took a trillion dollars off the balance sheet that Obama had gone from, Bush, $880 billion to $4.5 trillion. | ||
That's the greatest concentration. | ||
Well, that's what bailed us out of the last financial crisis brought on by Wall Street and their factotums. | ||
And now you have today, they will look you in the camera and look at Powell with that little soft voice. | ||
We just had, and he says it's not reflective of anything, we just had announced this morning, in March of this year, we had $125 billion trade deficit, the greatest in the history of this republic. | ||
$125 billion. | ||
If you've gone back to Andrew Jackson, if you've gone back to Hamilton, if you've gone back to Henry Clay, or any of the guys who worked on the American system, a guy named Abraham Lincoln, That built the infrastructure in the railroads to build a continental empire. | ||
If you told them that, yeah, future generations are going to run a hundred billion dollar trade deficit because we shipped all our manufacturing that you're working so hard to bring here and turn us into the greatest industrial power in the history of mankind, they would say, have you lost your mind? | ||
The presentations today by the Federal Reserve and Joe Biden, the head of the illegitimate regime that's occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, is nothing but lies and misrepresentations about what the financial... And here's the thing, all bad as this, he's yelling, screaming, getting all worked up. | ||
Tell me where we have been wrong. | ||
Where have we been wrong over the last year on this financial situation? | ||
Because now you're in a jam. | ||
And they don't remember. | ||
I want to go back. | ||
The heroes of Reagan and Volcker in the 70s and early 80s, they had the political will to get us out of here and the political will to stare down a hard recession and to contract the money supply. | ||
And Volcker raised the Fed funds rate 500 basis points in a day, in an afternoon. | ||
Let me repeat that. | ||
500 basis points, 5% Fed funds rate. | ||
We did the calculation on this show with Dave Brat. | ||
Last week, where Dave Bragg came on here and walked through the 50 years of lack of parking. | ||
We're living on a dead carcass. | ||
It's just juiced by government spending, deficit spending, and the secret ingredient, the secret sauce is quantitative easing. | ||
Juicing the system with cash. | ||
We're living on borrowed time. | ||
And here's the problem, just write this down, get it and write it down. | ||
We were then a creditor nation. | ||
We're the greatest creditor nation on earth. | ||
As the victors in World War II that had no damage to our own continent, Russia destroyed, Germany destroyed, Europe destroyed, Japan destroyed, China destroyed, Russia with 40 million casualties, China with 30 or 40 million casualties, Tokyo firebombed, the industrial power of Japan firebombed, even worse than nuclear weapons. | ||
Oh yeah, we dropped two of those on because these guys would not quit until they got lit up. | ||
And then didn't even want to quit then? | ||
The world devastation, we, the arsenal of democracy, we financed. | ||
That's the Marshall Plan. | ||
We financed the whole thing. | ||
We were a creditor nation. | ||
And we had a, we had the greatest manufacturing base in the history of mankind. | ||
We don't have that now. | ||
We're a debtor nation with 30, look. | ||
Let me give you some bad news here. | ||
We have face amount of 30 or 31 trillion dollars on the balance sheet of the country. | ||
We have another 9 trillion over the Fed with the Quantitative Easing. | ||
That's the secret deal with Wall Street. | ||
They would juice the system to keep the asset prices up, keep the wealthy. | ||
That's how you get the top 1% with the concentration of wealth. | ||
That's how these guys made all the money in the pandemic. | ||
Was it another 500 trillion dollars or what? | ||
Some ridiculous number? | ||
The top 1% made it out? | ||
And 60% of people live paycheck to paycheck? | ||
How many people in this audience have worked all their lives? | ||
Their parents worked all their lives. | ||
Their grandparents worked all their lives. | ||
You've got skin in the game in this nation, in building this nation. | ||
You pay taxes. | ||
Your kids serve in the military. | ||
You fund the Little Leagues. | ||
You build the churches. | ||
You're the little platoons that Burke talks about? | ||
How many generations in your family does it go back of people that get in and punching the clock every week and being a solid citizen? | ||
Being undeplorable? | ||
And you can't go to bed at night? | ||
While the wealthy make out because of the way the system's set up? | ||
You're a sucker and you're a fool and they're gonna sit there with a straight face and he's gonna sit there. | ||
Remember Joe Biden is dumb as a stick. | ||
He's dumb as a stick. | ||
Leave the corruption on the side. | ||
I mean this guy is not a bright guy. | ||
He doesn't know the difference between an income statement and a balance. | ||
He's in the target. | ||
I've cut it three. | ||
Dude, that's all ephemeral because we had these massive bailout plans to bring up aggregate demand, to bring up aggregate demand. | ||
I know, by the way, you have 400 million people right now in China that are totally locked down in Beijing and Shanghai, a couple of small port cities like all of them. | ||
That we have no earthy idea that what's going to go through. | ||
Don't know what that was, but it's a it's a interesting thing in my ear. | ||
I don't know if that's going out, but it's right now. | ||
It's it's it's racking me up big time. | ||
I tell you we're taking a commercial break and say I'm gonna get back to this that they're completely, completely, completely. | ||
misleading you on where this stands. | ||
We just had a trade deficit on March of 125 billion dollars, greatest in American history. | ||
It shows you we have no manufacturing base. | ||
Right now they're not even doing, they're not even doing the quantitative tightening as quickly as they have to be. | ||
The basis point, they're going up 50 basis points. | ||
Dave Brat, who walked through the thing about the economy, hasn't had really any growth in decades, real growth, besides the phony growth put in by the financialization. | ||
Our calculation of the Fed funds rate should be, wait for it, 6.5%. | ||
You would have to increase it 10 times to be where it should be. | ||
To get out of the easy money. | ||
This is all a fiasco. | ||
And they won't be straight with you. | ||
Everything Powell said right there is either a lie, a spin, or wrong. | ||
Okay? | ||
And Biden has no idea where he is. | ||
Let's take a short commercial break. | ||
We've got Naomi Wolf. | ||
We've got Joe Allen. | ||
We've got a PAX show. | ||
A lot to go through. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
unidentified
|
Bring it on and have a fight to the end. | |
Just watch and see. | ||
It's all started. | ||
Everything's begun. | ||
And you are over. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
unidentified
|
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, we have the two-gun approach here in the War Room. | ||
Great sleep on one hand, and great coffee on the other. | ||
The great sleep is from MyPillow.com, and it is great. | ||
We don't get a lot here in the War Room, but the sleep we get is terrific, and the reason is because of the MyPillow products. | ||
Got a special going on. | ||
Buy one, get one free on pillows, on sheets, on towels. | ||
You gotta go check it out. | ||
Go to our Square, MyPillow.com. | ||
Promo code War, and you'll see it all up there. | ||
Things for the children, pillows and blankets, all of it. | ||
Buy one, get one free. | ||
This is not going to last forever. | ||
Check it out. | ||
Plus, we have sales on hundreds of other products. | ||
The other hand is coffee. | ||
We have these special operators, Navy Seals. | ||
They have this coffee company called Warpath. | ||
We've worked with them for a long time to get the blends right. | ||
We have a dark roast, which I'm an aficionado of. | ||
It's French Roast Plus. | ||
A bunch of other blends, and you can get it at warpath.coffee. | ||
Put in promo code WORM, you get 15% off the Dark Roast's Mariner's Blend after the Navy. | ||
And then you've got a Black Powder, which is a breakfast blend, a little lighter, but it's got a kick to it. | ||
And the feedback we've gotten from people is just unbelievable. | ||
Unbelievable. | ||
We're very proud of this. | ||
Worked on it for a long time. | ||
Okay, before I turn to Naomi, I just want to make sure you understand. | ||
All they do is spin. | ||
And they spin because they don't have enough respect for you to come out. | ||
And we're going to have to have this conversation. | ||
And we're trying to have it here and make sure every day we put forward evidence. | ||
We're going to have, like, more webinars, more information. | ||
Cortez, everybody, the team, Navarro. | ||
And Peter, by the way, Navarro will be hosting the show on Friday afternoon. | ||
He's got a bunch of stuff. | ||
He's got a special assignment. | ||
He's got a bunch of stuff he's going to go through. | ||
It's going to be incredible. | ||
On Saturday, we're going to have a special. | ||
NBC did this. | ||
MSNBC did this news piece about the moms of America. | ||
The moms of America are being radicalized now into essentially domestic terrorists or fascists. | ||
The tip of the fascist insurrection is led by moms at school boards and and moms are questioning vaccines and moms and masks and the moms that are signing up for Naomi Wolf. | ||
And it's all these moms are dangerous. | ||
The moms are the problem we have here now. | ||
The most dangerous element of everything is moms. | ||
So on our Mother's Day and then for the next couple days we're going to have the revolt of the Moms of America. | ||
We've got an incredible show on Saturday and we're going to lead up to it with people on tomorrow and Friday to lead you into this because the tip of the tip of the spear is the Moms of America and they are relentless and will not back down whatsoever. | ||
So I just want to make sure before I leave the economics part we have much more tomorrow to go through some analysis but We're in a jam. | ||
And here's why you have to have a frank conversation and why I say the deplorables and the people that watch the show or listen to us on the podcast. | ||
And we always like it better watched. | ||
Even if you listen to the podcast, go to go get the newsletter so you can see the charts or my getter so you can see the charts that we put up because we're essentially bankrupt. | ||
We're bankrupt with just because of the prime reserve currency. | ||
We can keep printing money. | ||
So we're bankrupt. | ||
But since people have an export everybody needs, which is the dollar, we can continue to print money. | ||
But in a bankruptcy, I've done tons of bankruptcies and restructuring work in my investment banking career. | ||
You have a thing called the creditors committee, right? | ||
And the creditors committee kind of makes all the decisions. | ||
And that's what You are. | ||
This audience, the deplorables. | ||
You're the creditors committee. | ||
You've got a seat on it. | ||
In fact, I would say that you guys are the decision makers, the executive committee of the creditors committee. | ||
Because to get out of this jam is going to take hard, all the easy decisions for us are decades ago. | ||
These are going to be tough decisions. | ||
Tough decisions. | ||
Because now we've got the convergence of a monetary crisis, an economic crisis. | ||
We're not productive. | ||
We've got these deficits. | ||
You're going to see this budget come up. | ||
It's going to be another trillion and a half dollars. | ||
We're dead broke, we're literally dead broke, and they're asking for $33 billion to send to Ukraine. | ||
$33 billion to send to a border conflict on the Russian-speaking eastern border of Ukraine with no money talking about the border, nobody going to the border, Pelosi not going to the border, etc. | ||
In the middle of all this, this is a financial, we told you, an economic crisis that will trigger a capital markets and financial crisis. | ||
And we got one now, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
The inflation, the seven, the eight, nine percent is just the tip of it. | ||
And that's the one I know that's on top of everybody. | ||
But it's not about a soft landing anymore. | ||
This is about a real crisis. | ||
But some companies are doing fine. | ||
Those companies would be the pharmaceutical companies. | ||
unidentified
|
Why? | |
because they're basically taking your tax dollars and feeding them and then forcing you to buy their products. | ||
MSNBC every night. | ||
The commercials are all from the pharmaceutical companies. | ||
They're like state TV for big pharma. | ||
That's what it is. | ||
It's like NPR or PBS for big pharma. | ||
Naomi Wolf, you've been on this. | ||
You have an investigative team now of thousands of people. | ||
You have hundreds of lawyers on this. | ||
You're looking at FISA documents that were supposed to be sealed for 70 years and through divine providence, the grace of God, they're not. | ||
Can you walk us through what you're working on, the timeline and all of it, ma'am? | ||
Sure. | ||
I have two important things to share. | ||
One is a report from Cindy Weiss, one of the volunteers, that's asking what happened to 50 pregnant women. | ||
And I'll give you a little background. | ||
But before I jump into that, I just want to say I think this investigation is really making a difference because Pfizer tried to release a lot of their data in this latest document dump for May in the form of unopenable files. | ||
So we've got our tech people working on that. | ||
You know, you don't release things in a way that can't be read unless you really, really, really don't want them to be read. | ||
But moving along. | ||
But hold on. | ||
Couldn't we go back to the judge and say they're playing a game? | ||
Because here's like Trump says, no games. | ||
We can't have these people. | ||
I know you got your tech people, but first off, the public should know this. | ||
We're not playing games with you, Big Pharma, Pfizer. | ||
You were ordered by a court to release the documents. | ||
You got to release the documents. | ||
Is there any way we can go to court and let the judge know they're trying to be cute? | ||
Yeah, so we've tasked the lawyers with what we do about the fact that some of these documents are released in this impenetrable way. | ||
And I'll get back to you all with an answer. | ||
But that's the beauty of having 250 lawyers. | ||
I'll keep you posted. | ||
But yeah, like what's what's so lovely about this is that People can't be hoodwinked anymore. | ||
You can't kind of sneak the outcome in through the back door anymore. | ||
We're on it and we've got eyes on it, expert eyes. | ||
So I do feel highly empowered by that. | ||
But let me tell you about this report. | ||
Those of you who watched last week, you'll remember, and it's really making headlines as it should, that the assurances that all the spokesmodels gave us that the vaccine was safe and effective for pregnant women, and I'm specifically targeting you, a poor Vamanda Vili of the New York Times, you claimed this over and over, and I said, where's the data, where's the data, and then you blocked me. | ||
But there was no study backing that up. | ||
And what we did find in the Pfizer documents to recap was that the only study was one of 44 rats, 44 French rats who were followed for 21 to 42 days, and then their fetuses were autopsied. | ||
The baby rats weren't allowed to be born to check if they were okay as baby rats, and these 44 rats were the basis of telling human American women it's safe and effective. | ||
And if you go to the CDC website to this day, It's a horrible v-safe study, which is basically an experiment on pregnant women, but it's written so convolutedly that if you read it you think, oh, it's safe and effective, I'm a pregnant woman, I should really get vaccinated. | ||
And the American College of Obstetricians and Surgeons, may they face divine judgment, told pregnant women over and over, harassed them to get vaccinated with this mRNA vaccine. | ||
The other outcome that I mentioned, which is horrific, is that the women in the armed forces in 2021, after this forced mRNA injection, you got to get injected or you lose your career as a military woman, they experienced an 8,000 number rise in fetal malformations above the baseline of every other year of about 10,000. | ||
So that's an 80% rise in fetal malformations among our military women. | ||
So as tragic as that is, it's really important to dig into what is the status of what was studied vis-a-vis pregnant women in the Pfizer documents. | ||
So this report, the title is Missing 50 Pregnant Women, Have You Seen Them? | ||
And she points out that they wrongly enrolled pregnant women in an experiment that you're not supposed to enroll pregnant women in, in this way at this point, and then And then you can't find out what happened to them, even though they're supposed to follow them. | ||
And that sounds contradictory, but listen. | ||
So in the first batch of Pfizer documents, she was assigned to review document 5.3.6, which is a cumulative analysis of post-authorization adverse event reports, meaning bad things that happened after the mRNA vaccine was introduced to the American public. | ||
She noted that there were a significant number of adverse events, bad things reported in pregnant women. | ||
So she paid close attention to documents related to vaccine effects on pregnancy in Pfizer documents. | ||
So according to the Pfizer clinical protocol document, women who were pregnant or breastfeeding were to be excluded from the vaccine trials. | ||
So really process this. | ||
The spokesmodel said it's safe and effective, But the internal documents show that pregnant women are supposed to be dropped, left out, breastfeeding women are supposed to be dropped, left out from these trials, meaning the injections, see what happens to them. | ||
So there's a stopping rule criteria. | ||
If you test positive for pregnancy, you're supposed to be withdrawn from the trial. | ||
Nonetheless, right, nonetheless, the clinical overview document below lists 50 women who were part of the clinical trials. | ||
That reported pregnancies, but they weren't dropped. | ||
16 of them withdrew from the study due to pregnancy. | ||
That was what was supposed to happen. | ||
The wording is confusing, she says, but it appears that at least the remaining 34 women, quote, continue to be followed for pregnancy outcomes. | ||
It could also be construed to mean that all 50 continue to be followed. | ||
So even though they were supposed to exclude pregnant women because this was such a preliminary experiment, it wasn't ethical to inject pregnant women with it. | ||
They didn't exclude either 34 or 50 women, and indeed some of them were given BNT162B2, which is the fancy name for the mRNA injection, and others were given a placebo. | ||
Then it says these participants continue to be followed for pregnancy outcomes. | ||
The report says no births have been reported from individuals who become pregnant, but None of them appear later on. | ||
They vanish. | ||
You don't know what happened to them. | ||
Hang on. | ||
We're gonna take a short break. | ||
We'll ask the question and I'll get an answer. | ||
Is this incompetence or malfeasance? | ||
Short break. | ||
Naomi Wolf back with Pfizer. | ||
The investigation continues next in the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
unidentified
|
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, elections have consequences. | ||
Stolen elections have catastrophic consequences. | ||
By the way, one of our top engineers in the in the war room, engine room, reminds me that Janet Yellen, our brilliant Secretary of Treasury, remember during the, remember the contraction toll in Columbine, by surprise, the negative 1.4%. | ||
They thought it was going to be big growth. | ||
If you go back and look at when they, All lies and misrepresentations. | ||
All lies and misrepresentations. | ||
If you want to get to the bottom of the election, start with RIG 2020. | ||
Go to the website right now. | ||
Dave Bossie, the entire team, the movie. | ||
The economy's still fine. We're still OK. They said right there, economy's cooking. | ||
We just had contraction for a quarter. Still growing. | ||
All lies and misrepresentations. All lies and misrepresentations. | ||
If you want to get to the bottom of the election, start with rigged. Twenty, twenty. | ||
Go to the website right now. Dave Bossi, the entire team, the movie. | ||
It's all about Zuckerbox and Zuckerberg. About what happened. | ||
The meal of the meals movie that's coming out right now. | ||
We have Catherine Engelbrecht on here. That kind of plays off of that is actually had got done. | ||
You actually see it down at the deck plate level. | ||
The overall architectonics of it is in rigged. Twenty, twenty. | ||
You see it. Your head will blow up and you want to make sure that everybody in your family sees it. | ||
So go check it out. Also, this Monday, we're starting to do webinars this Monday at noon. | ||
There's a big webinar on we're doing about surveillance of your phone and all that with the Satellite Phone Company. | ||
You get to go into the basis of what they can do with your cell phone, how they can track you, how they can monitor you, all that. | ||
So we're going to have a webinar. | ||
We're going to start doing these things once a week, every two weeks. | ||
Hopefully get Naomi Wolf start to do some webinars like the great one she did with the legal team, both on the civil charges and the criminal charges. | ||
We need those kind of intense period. | ||
You spend a couple hours and immerse yourself all for free. | ||
Naomi, are all trials run this incompetently? | ||
This is what I don't understand. | ||
Or is it just they just select the CCP trial because they're under time pressure? | ||
Because it seems like these big pharma companies are supposed to be so professional. | ||
I just can't get my arms around it. | ||
It sounds like totally confused. | ||
People are getting injected with the mRNA when they should be getting the placebo. | ||
Is this normal behavior, ma'am? | ||
It's, of course, it's not normal. | ||
I mean, these are results that the people who ran them thought would never see the light of day. | ||
And just to finish telling you how shockingly, just shocking this is in terms of them playing God with 50 pregnant women, according to their own clinical protocols document, these women should have been followed for a minimum of six months from their last visit, from the date that they were withdrawn. | ||
And it says they followed them. | ||
But, and the clinical protocols for every phase one, phase two, phase three trial says you have to follow the subject for fewer than 24 months, but no less than six months, right? | ||
That's standard, gold standard for everyone. | ||
But this, our volunteers are geniuses. | ||
One of them created a front end search tool that searches all the released Pfizer documents. | ||
And she searched for pregnant and pregnancy and found no updated information on these 50 women and their pregnancy outcomes. | ||
And she concludes, as more information on the dangers to pregnant women from the mRNA vaccines surfaces, some of which the manufacturers had at their disposal early on, I feel it is imperative that we hear the stories of these 50 women and their babies. | ||
They vanished. | ||
They're gone. | ||
Right? | ||
They were supposed to be followed for six months after they got pregnant, after having been injected. | ||
Nope. | ||
Gone. | ||
And what that means is if, God forbid, they had the kinds of outcomes that these poor female soldiers are having with fetal malformation, 80% rise in fetal malformation, right? | ||
Fortunately, Pfizer can't find them, right? | ||
Dog ate my homework. | ||
I don't know what happened to it. | ||
It's under the couch somewhere. | ||
I don't know what happened to the records of those 50 women. | ||
It's absolutely shocking. | ||
And I'll go further. | ||
My guess, and now I'm speaking as a cultural critic, Is that these were voiceless women? | ||
My bet I will bet you money that if we find out who these women were, they're going to be women who are in prison or women who are in some kind of home or women who don't have the rights that they would otherwise have or women who are just impoverished or in some kind of program, government program in which they are dependent on benefits or dependent on being the good graces of the government for their food or for their childcare. | ||
These are not rich white women who were Oops, injected, oops, given the placebo, oops, I don't know where your records went, with the harms, the level of harms that we're seeing with pregnant women being injected. | ||
And so what I think this is, is medical, it's, it's, it's medical experimentation, not of a Mengele level, but of an early, you know, 1930 to 1933, Nazification of doctors level, where doctors were enlisted at the front lines and scientists were enlisted at the front lines of Nazi ideology to just Separate people into worthless and not worthless. | ||
But I thought we had, I'm not an expert, but I thought after the war, the Nuremberg trials, they also had a whole aspect, a subset of that, about this whole thing of informed consent. | ||
And you had to actually understand what you were signing up for. | ||
The Nuremberg Code or whatever it is. | ||
This is exactly the right question to ask. | ||
And this is why I'm really asking people to understand that what I've just read to you is a record of a very serious crime. | ||
And it's not Naomi saying it's a crime, it's international law and domestic law saying it's a crime. | ||
You're talking about the Nuremberg Code, and you're talking about the Geneva Conventions, and you're talking about the Hippocratic Oath, and one of our lawyers actually, George Smith, the first one to file with the Attorney General's Office in Ohio, it's our second AG letter, he makes exactly that point, that this is a violation of the Liberty Clause and a violation of your due process. | ||
You cannot have informed consent. | ||
If you don't know what happened to these 50 pregnant women or if you don't know that if you bring your 17-year-old to get injected that it has a high likelihood above average of damaging his or her heart or you don't know that 8,000 fetuses of pregnant soldiers are suffering malformation 80% above the baseline. | ||
These are the hiding of these experiments. | ||
And the experimenting on people, right? | ||
These women were not told, just like American people were not told clearly, you're part of an experiment, and we're going to cut corners, or you're part of an experiment with the rat trials. | ||
They didn't tell everyone that the people running it were conflicted, right? | ||
So at every level, there's a denial of informed consent. | ||
And that's coercion. | ||
And it's more than coercion. | ||
It's fraud. | ||
It's battery. | ||
It's a lot of illegal things if you don't have informed consent and medical Procedures are done to you. | ||
I mean Jews got reparations, you know for surviving being forced to do things for experimental reasons that they did not consent to and it's it's illegal in our country as well to submit subjects to medical experimentation without their full consent or to medical processes without informed consent. | ||
As an investigative reporter, do you believe With the standards and practices you've guys have used in this investigation with these documents that it reaches to that to that standard that there's actually questions here and should be pursued further either through some investigation at a grand jury or for further congressional investigations but there should be a formal there should be some formal venue | ||
more than DailyClout.io and the War Room Posse with these lawyers, that this can be adjudicated, either through investigations at the state level, through state legislatures, congressional, and or even criminal with grand juries? | ||
Well, of course I do, and it's beautiful that we have 250 lawyers who are clearly seeing a range of crimes in the evidence that the volunteers have identified, but you're right, it's not enough, because this wasn't just one corporation against one individual, or one corporation against a class of individuals. | ||
It certainly was that. | ||
But it's also one corporation in alliance with our own government, right? | ||
The FDA is our agency. | ||
They're public servants paid with our tax dollars with a legal obligation to protect us from harm. | ||
And so I've never seen anything like this in the history of our country. | ||
It's it rises to a level I don't even know how to describe of A corporation in league with a government agency and probably kind of up and down the chain of command, because otherwise the FDA wouldn't get away with this, uniting to medically experiment on in a way they know is damaging millions of American people and corrupt institutions like doctors organizations, licensing boards in order to achieve that. | ||
So that's a level of really a truth and reconciliation committee. | ||
It's a level of Nuremberg trials. | ||
It's a higher level than an ordinary court. | ||
I know we have to go through the timeline, but I can't do it. | ||
I want to connect with you and see if we can do it tomorrow morning or tomorrow evening, because it's too important to rush through. | ||
But I have one more question on this before I let you go. | ||
When the courts made Pfizer put the information out, and you guys are now in the second tranche or the third tranche in May, Did they put a spokesman or did they put some sort of communications group that you guys can go back and say, hey, we're finding this. | ||
It looks kind of it looks kind of odd to us. | ||
Is there any communication with Pfizer or was any mechanism set up by the courts so that people reviewing the documents could go and if they were misreading something, get an answer? | ||
Or if they found something that was bad, they can say, hey, look, we need to talk to senior authorities at Pfizer. | ||
Nothing like that has been set up that I see by the courts but that would be an unusual thing for a court to set up. | ||
I think the implication is the public is supposed to do what the public is supposed to do, meaning that news media is supposed to review these documents and report on it to the public. | ||
Congress is supposed to review these documents. | ||
The FDA is the entity that's really tasked with being responsive to these documents so I can certainly call the FDA comms office, I'll call Pfizer's comms office but I promise you that they won't talk to me in any meaningful way because it's like asking a murderer to send a publicist to talk to people at the scene of the crime. | ||
They're not going to do it because this is a massive crime and you see what they're doing. | ||
They're rolling out now. | ||
We've got to go after your under fives. | ||
They're boasting about their hundred and two billion dollars. | ||
They're literally not going to take ownership of this crime until they're forced to and that comes down to us. | ||
Not just us. | ||
Do you think it rises to that level? | ||
Do you think it rises to that level? | ||
You actually would be confident in going and having people sue you right now by saying they're... I know Bobby Kennedy Jr. | ||
does it in the book, The Real Anthony Fauci. | ||
He calls them all criminal organizations and he says he can show where they paid 30 billion dollars in fine. | ||
And if you go through here, he shows it, he documents it. | ||
But do you feel confident And by the way, if you want to see how these guys roll, read The Real Anthony Fauci. | ||
Go get it on Amazon. | ||
This book is shocking. | ||
Do you feel that you've got enough now, or the investigative group has enough now, that you could feel comfortable going to local attorney generals or DAs and actually provide this information and that grand juries would be impaneled? | ||
To their credit, our wonderful lawyers are already sending Attorney General's letters based on the evidence that these volunteers have uncovered. | ||
And they're pointing out various causes of action. | ||
They're pointing out that there's false advertising. | ||
They're pointing out, as I mentioned, the Liberty Clause. | ||
And they're pointing out fraud. | ||
So that's happening. | ||
And I, you know, I'm not saying these are criminals. | ||
And that's me being rhetorical. | ||
I'm saying that I know the law about informed consent and you didn't know this, therefore you didn't have informed consent, right? | ||
Yes, I'm certainly confident in that. | ||
And as a mother and a stepmother, I feel like I have standing. | ||
I feel like every mom and dad and parent in this country has standing because Pfizer knew, like there are a number of crimes, right? | ||
But Pfizer knew in May that peer-reviewed studies show that their mRNA injection one week later harmed the hearts. | ||
Of 35 teenagers, and the government waited until August to let the parents of America know. | ||
How is that not a crime? | ||
Naomi, how do people get to Daily Cloud to find out more about this? | ||
I will tell you, but I will also note that we have not received any legal letters to date, so we're on solid ground. | ||
Come to dailycloud.io, join the campaign, support us. | ||
I'm on Dr. Naomi R. Wolf, and just keep sending us your thoughts and prayers. | ||
And if you want to volunteer, volunteer. | ||
Help us shine a light. | ||
By the way, a great collective effort here by the War Room and Daily Cloud. | ||
Short commercial break, Joe Allen next. | ||
unidentified
|
...monitors us, censors us, de-platforms us. | |
Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it, until now. | ||
Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
Join Getter. | ||
It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
Send a message today. | ||
Join Getter. | ||
It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
What if our consciousness, like, right now, like, this is the universe waking up? | ||
Like, what if instead of discovering the universe, this is the universe, like, this is the evolution of the literal universe herself? | ||
Like, we are not separate from the universe. | ||
Like, this is the universe waking up. | ||
This is the universe seeing herself for the first time. | ||
Like, this is... | ||
The universe becoming conscious. | ||
The first time we were part of that. | ||
Yeah, because it's like we aren't separate from the universe. | ||
Like this could be an incredibly sacred moment. | ||
And maybe like social media and all these things, the stuff where we're all getting connected together, like maybe these are the neurons connecting of the like collective super intelligence. | ||
You know, we're a blastocyst of like some incredible kind of consciousness or being And just like in the first three years of life for human children, we'll forget about all the suffering that we're going through now. | ||
I think we'll probably forget about this. | ||
I mean, probably, you know, artificial intelligence will eventually render us obsolete. | ||
I don't think they'll do it in a malicious way, but I think probably we are very weak. | ||
The sun is expanding, like, I don't know, like, hopefully we can get to Mars, but like, we're pretty vulnerable. | ||
I think we can coexist for a long time with AI, and we can also probably make ourselves less vulnerable, but consciousness, sentience, self-awareness, like, I think this might be the single greatest, like, moment in evolution ever and, like, maybe this is true beginning of life and we're just, we're the blue-green algae or we're like the single-celled organisms of something amazing. | ||
Okay, Joe Allen, our editor for all things transhumanist. | ||
As I say, the biggest topic we could cover every day for hours is the hurtling towards the singularity, the section, the part where everything converges, and it'll be in the next 10, 20 years max, that you have homo sapiens on this side and something else on the other. | ||
This young woman calls it, what, techno, homo techno. | ||
And so Joe Allen interpret who is she why is she important? | ||
And she says some very important things don't dismiss her as some sort of musician or artist or whatever because she actually says some things some things are crazy some things they'll have That you can really connect dots here to who is she and why is she important? | ||
Yes Steve that is Grimes the pop star who mothered Elon Musk's children or at least two of them and You know, in the same way that Elon Musk is undoubtedly the most outspoken proponent of what we would call transhumanism or post-humanism or technocracy in the media, | ||
Grimes, I would say, in pop culture is the most outspoken proponent of that ideology, that theory of the universe and of the human being. | ||
So a lot of people would say, well, why should anyone care what a pop starlet thinks about the universe and the cosmos and computers? | ||
And I would respond that What pop stars are putting out is what your children are going to believe. | ||
And when she talks about homo-techno being a new species, she's talking about, in particular, the generation, my generation and the generation just behind me, but the new generation, being irrevocably altered by technology. | ||
And you hear in what she's saying, there is this salvation principle in this new religion, this idea that In the end, our technology will be what saves us. | ||
It would be one thing if it was just her, but this is a belief system that pervades not only Silicon Valley, but also many of the elite thinkers funded by DARPA or in the DoD. | ||
This sort of thinking, I think, is quite common among scientists and computer engineers across the world, from Israel to India to China. | ||
And so what she's saying, really, is just, she's saying the quiet part out loud, as they say. | ||
What she's saying reflects a very deep and well-articulated ideology. | ||
Call it transhumanism, posthumanism, technocracy, all of them really fit. | ||
And so there's a new article. | ||
It's up right now on warroom.org. | ||
The title is, The Slippery Slope to Cyborg Theocracy. | ||
You can also find it in my social media. | ||
Check warroom.org. | ||
This basically breaks down the discussion that we just heard with Lex Friedman and every aspect from the way technology affects the human brain | ||
To the theory of evolution that underpins this ideology, in particular cultural evolution, and of course trying to sketch out some general framework of this religious system, this cyborg theocracy, this idea that machines will become superior to humans, will actually become digital gods, and that our salvation lies, quite literally, in the whims and the dispositions of these digital gods. | ||
So again, The Slippery Slope to Cyborg Theocracy. | ||
Check it out on warroom.org. | ||
We're gonna have him back on, Joe, back on. | ||
Here's the reason. | ||
He's worked on this piece for a while, and it is the most, I think, of everything we've had, one of the most disturbing of all. | ||
And we're gonna have Joe back tomorrow to deconstruct it. | ||
Coming up next, in the next hour, we're gonna have Blake Masters running for the Senate in Arizona. | ||
Max, two winners from last night, Max Miller and J.R. | ||
Majewski. | ||
J.R. | ||
was the dark horse candidate that won in Ohio, and Max Miller won in Ohio. | ||
We had both Max. | ||
We're talking hardcore politics. | ||
We've got a lot more to go through. | ||
Also on Monday, I want to make sure everybody knows, on Monday we've got a webinar that's going to start. | ||
Censorship Rising! | ||
The whole aspect of censorship and also aspects about your cell phone. | ||
That is from the satellite phone guys. | ||
There's going to be a webinar. | ||
You gotta go. | ||
Go sign up now to UUTV.US. | ||
That's UUTV.US. | ||
Uniform Uniform Tango Victor dot Uniform Sierra. | ||
Go do it today. | ||
Joe, real quickly, what are your coordinates? | ||
People can get you overnight before we get you back on here tomorrow morning. | ||
Yes, Steve, you can find this article and a ton of other stuff at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z on Twitter and Gitter or my website, JoeBot.XYZ. | ||
Thank you very much. | ||
Brilliant piece, very disturbing. | ||
And don't dismiss her as a flake, because your children and teenagers don't. | ||
It's very important you understand what's going on here. | ||
Okay, short commercial break. | ||
We're going to come back. |