Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, I want to thank all our distribution partners, Real America's Voice, guys up on the satellite, on cable, of course all the streaming services, G News have us in Mandarin and in Japanese, Simulcast, I want to thank them, and of course, Getter, now we're up on five languages there. | ||
I also want to thank John Furtick's radio network. | ||
If you go to his app, you can get us nationwide on the radio part, and of course the podcast. | ||
No, I think we're number one or two every day. | ||
Not think. | ||
We swap one or two every day on the Apple podcast with Pod Save America. | ||
It's the top political podcast in the nation. | ||
And now over, what is it, 175 million downloads on the podcast. | ||
And that's all after the live show. | ||
So I want to thank everybody and appreciate it. | ||
By the way, two big stories. | ||
The Shanghai story only gets more and more bizarre. | ||
Fewer cases now, but they're even increasing the lockdowns. | ||
We're back to Ben Harnwell later in the show, later in this hour. | ||
Also live report. | ||
On the situation in France, are there hidden Le Pen voters like there are hidden Trump voters? | ||
We're going to find all that out tomorrow in the big election there against the globalist Macron. | ||
Also Omar, we had Jay Khansara on here last night on the 6 o'clock hour talking about Omar over in Pakistan going rogue. | ||
Very, very dangerous and particularly concerning everything that's going on with our great ally, India and Modi. | ||
So, we're going to get to all that this hour. | ||
Namely, we've got a special on the Pfizer investigation. | ||
War Room posse members have volunteered, have been working away for weeks and weeks and weeks now with 250 lawyers, and Naomi Wolf is going to give us the updates and all that in great detail during this hour. | ||
Also going to go to the Darien Gap. | ||
Let's go back to Kellyanne Conway. | ||
Kellyanne, this, I want to make sure it's very specific, and Kellyanne's been the biggest offender of folks like this, so I know she's going to get a lot of grief, but it's Kellyanne Conway, tough, tough, tough, tough gal. | ||
You made a very important point, I want to make sure to iterate, and in all the different platforms and chat rooms we got going, Right? | ||
And of course, some getter account and everything. | ||
We're going to put up now the legal thing. | ||
This is not some Twitter fight. | ||
This is not a Twitter fight. | ||
This is a serious legal document that's been filed and looks like a lot of people associated with Ricketts. | ||
Kellyanne, given the piece you made with Joe Ricketts and Pete Ricketts and all the Ricketts family with President Trump after all the money they put in on some of the most vicious Never Trump, you know, material back in 16, given that piece, given that Pete Ricketts Clearly has national ambitions. | ||
Why would the Ricketts family stoop to something this low on a guy like Charles Herbster? | ||
If you have national ambitions, this is not the way to put the spotlight on you when you come to the national stage. | ||
And Kellyanne, you're one of the best strategists out there. | ||
I'm confused because the Ricketts are not dumb. | ||
And they got plenty of cash. | ||
So, this is not about the guy running against Herbster. | ||
This is about the Ricketts and Trump, Ricketts and Herbster. | ||
But why would you start your national debut on the political stage by doing this, ma'am? | ||
unidentified
|
Governor Ricketts just seems completely clouded if not obsessed by his distaste and his hate for Charles Herbster. | |
And a couple of things. | ||
I agree with you. | ||
The Ricketts are very smart people, honorable people. | ||
I've worked with Joe Ricketts and Todd Ricketts and their team for a very long time. | ||
With Pete Ricketts, he unsuccessfully ran for Senate the first time. | ||
When he ran for governor, I gave him the idea that he and Kay Ivey Dowd in Alabama and two other states in the country, Steve, are the only ones without a really robust, meaningful, consequential school choice and charter program in those states. | ||
unidentified
|
He has since been really good on educational freedom. | |
He's not been so good on property taxes. | ||
I've tried to be a team player all along, but this seems very personal. | ||
And let me go back to sexual assault. | ||
I'm going to repeat, nobody's going to say about me that I'm trying to silence people. | ||
She's got every right to say what she wants, and so do I. And Charles Herbster has every right to file a suit to get back his reputation and his good name. | ||
Let me also repeat that Charles is ahead in the polls, always has been, still is. | ||
They know that, or they would be releasing their own polling data. | ||
They haven't from this beginning. | ||
Now, if Pete Ricketts really has national aspirations, this was not the way to go toe-to-toe up against Donald Trump for the last six months. | ||
You can be on a different side of something, but they're not letting it go. | ||
You asked why they would run, you know, $600,000 worth of dark money ads? | ||
Because they can. | ||
They're billionaires. | ||
But let the people of Nebraska decide. | ||
Let the people of Nebraska decide. | ||
And I think in Charles's complaint, it's just relevant to fight back and just to give people more facts. | ||
Whether those facts matter to a judge or to the public or to the Republican primary voters, we'll see. | ||
I know what the polls say. | ||
I know what Charles has said. | ||
And I know what my interactions have been with him, how he has elevated and empowered women throughout his entire career, including this campaign. | ||
He's got a young, very sharp female campaign manager. | ||
He's got women all around him as executives and workers in his six companies in different states. | ||
So again, the Senator Sondland and others have every right to come forward, but Charles and others also have a right to fight back. | ||
Last thing, I checked in with one of the pro-life heads who had endorsed Charles Herbster already last week Nice Easter message exchange and she said, you know after Brett Kavanaugh, I take things like this with a grain of salt I just want to see where it all goes. I want to read everything that's available to me But if this is a legal matter, it's a legal matter if it's politically motivated by someone somewhere someone we should all know that as well Kelly and I can't wait for the broker and Tarbis cycle, but the telling detail in this is that suppose she's | ||
She claims he assaulted me and then later she invites him to the destination wedding in Dominican Republic When he can't come, she texts, can you send a gift? | ||
It's the telling detail. | ||
unidentified
|
So, and also had that meeting in his condo. | |
Thankfully, other people were there, and he did give $10,000. | ||
And hey, Steve, you said something coming up about Marie Le Pen, someone you and I have talked about for a long time. | ||
I want to say this, when you said that hidden voter, 2016, we were spot on the hidden undercover Trump voter. | ||
You know, we'll talk about it when the book comes out, but to international ridicule, it was, oh, they'll still be hidden on election day. | ||
There was a mistake in 2020 with people from the Trump campaign, reelection campaign, in which you and I were not involved. | ||
By then, Trump voters were out and about. | ||
They were proudly wearing their red MAGA hats. | ||
They were having boat parades and going to rallies in the snow. | ||
But I think when you are the challenger, when you're Le Pen, there is a hidden vote. | ||
People are afraid to say that they're going up against the established. | ||
They're afraid to say that they're thinking of forcing the current regime out of power. | ||
So, I just wanted to make that clear that 2016 and Le Pen now, a lot of analogy. | ||
We're going to get to Paris later in the hour. | ||
Kellyanne, the book is out in late May. | ||
Can people order the book now on Amazon? | ||
unidentified
|
You can. | |
Here's the deal. | ||
You can order on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, anywhere you want. | ||
And you can also get the audio. | ||
It's me, 20 hours, in my own voice. | ||
Here's the deal. | ||
Scoop it up. | ||
20 hours of Kellyanne in that sweet voice? | ||
20 hours of that? | ||
You could read the phone book and we'll buy that. | ||
unidentified
|
I'll put you down for 20 copies. | |
They're great stocks I've received. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Kellyanne, what's your social media? | ||
How do people follow you, Kellyanne? | ||
unidentified
|
At KellyannePolls. | |
I didn't say I like Twitter, but I'm on it. | ||
At KellyannePolls. | ||
Never been an Instagram mom, never had a Facebook account, but you can find me at KellyannePolls. | ||
And also we have a website, KellyanneConway.com. | ||
Great place to order the book because you make it easy and you get a discount. | ||
Kellyanne Conway. | ||
If you want it signed, we'll do that too. | ||
Kellyanne, thanks for coming on and thanks for explaining this very difficult situation at Nebraska. | ||
Appreciate it. | ||
Kellyanne Conway. | ||
Okay. | ||
Let's go. | ||
We're going to get Naomi Wolf up here in a second, but I want to go to the Darien Gap. | ||
We got Michael Yan and Ben Berquam live to fight another day. | ||
Guys, I want you to be safe down there. | ||
Tell us you're at the Darien Gap. | ||
Walk us through controlled flow. | ||
The first article of impeachment on Joe Biden is going to be the initiation and exacerbation of the Invasion of the United States of America via our southern border by the entire world. | ||
Guys, tell us what's going on in the Darien Gap today. | ||
Hey Steve, I just want to give you an example, to give an analogy of this, as you guys were just talking about. | ||
Basically, you have to carry your passport. | ||
If you're a tourist or anyone down here in Central America, not just in Panama, but all of Latin America, you have to have your papers, and you have to show your papers. | ||
And I've been through probably 10 checkpoints. | ||
You have to show that you have legal right to be here, unless you're an illegal alien. | ||
And right now what's happening is there is a, this agreement between the US, Panama, Costa Rica, and even Mexico and the US on basically just pushing people through. | ||
So if you're down here in Panama and you don't have an ID and you're just walking the streets, you can get arrested on the spot. | ||
But if you're an illegal alien, we're going to put you in a truck and within a day, within 24 hours, you will be in Costa Rica and within 24 hours you'll be out of Costa Rica. | ||
That's the idea of controlled flow. | ||
It's basically a protected class of non-citizens. | ||
These guys are getting a protection class and then just getting pumped into America. | ||
Rather than having stops along the way and points of restriction to make it more difficult, Joe Biden and Democrats are simply opening the doors. | ||
I want to make sure everybody understands, we're not demonizing these folks. | ||
In fact, they're the most rational actor in this entire tragedy. | ||
Now, the people making money off that, don't think that Controlled Flow, look, these guys reported they had Blackhawk helicopters down there with Mayorkas a couple weeks ago. | ||
This thing's all thought through. | ||
Don't think, taking Title 42 off, as you guys reported from the northern border of Mexico, now you're down in Panama. | ||
That whole thing, Todd Bensman, they're lining up folks right now for Controlled Flow for the turnstiles. | ||
This is well thought through. | ||
That's right. | ||
And by the way, preserve your documents in justice, preserve your documents in DHS, preserve your documents in the White House. | ||
This is the first article of impeachment, and he will be impeached. | ||
I didn't say removed from office, but he's going to be impeached on this. | ||
This is going to be a formal investigation of the invasion, and you see that these guys down there, it's not, they're daring to engage in one of the most dangerous places on earth, and now we have 80 nations of folks coming through there, and the women and the children and the trafficking, and cartels are making money on everybody that comes through there. | ||
Okay. | ||
Guys, how dangerous is this for women and children in the dairying gap? | ||
Well, I'd say about 10% die coming through here, Steve, and that's based on many, many interviews from last year. | ||
And already, Ben has also experienced, you know, one person after another saying how many bodies that they found. | ||
One man, for instance, we heard this story numerous times in the last few days. | ||
His son somehow died and the man hanged himself out in the jungle. | ||
Numerous migrants told us they saw the man hanging and the son dead on beside him, pregnant woman with her face eaten off, that sort of thing out here. | ||
Somebody actually gave us video of that. So I would say about 10% to be directionally accurate. Some people say more. Now this is of jungles. As you know I've been in jungles and deserts all over the world. This is one of the most biologically active jungles anywhere. | ||
All jungles are epic. | ||
This is more so. | ||
For instance, the British used to do their survival training up in Belize. | ||
Jungle training. | ||
They moved it over to Borneo because so many people are getting sick out here in these jungles in Central America. | ||
I went to that jungle tracking school in Belize. | ||
That's how I learned this from the British. | ||
So you see, for instance, one of the villages that we've already been at, Canaan. | ||
We're going to go to it again tomorrow. | ||
A doctor told us a couple of days ago that they get 18 to 20 cases of malaria per day in that area. | ||
So that's how serious it is. | ||
Yeah, it's not just COVID. | ||
It's everything else that's coming across. | ||
It's tuberculosis, it's yellow fever, it's dengue fever and so many others. | ||
Guys, your reporting's been unbelievable, and putting yourself in harm's way like this, and the tragedy of seeing these folks come through there, but that's what they'll do to get to the United States. | ||
Look, it is not their fault. | ||
They're the rational actors. | ||
They're being driven here by cartels, but also by the invitation of Joe Biden, and we're going to get to all that later. | ||
something something to note on that Steve is we're getting as we're coming out we actually interviewed and made contact with this young guy Akon who'd lived in Brazil for 10 years and just decided to make the trek now and he said that he said if he knew what he knew now he would not do it and he he actually did that in our video yesterday said tell people don't come get a visa and that's the | ||
That's the sad reality of this, is the globalist leftists, these NGOs, these fake charities, the Democrats, all of these anti-American leftists, they're telling people, do this, do this, do this, we'll protect you, we'll protect you, and they're lying to them. | ||
They're sending them in to the vipers to be killed, to be, you know, and this is, that's the reality. | ||
We hear it over and over and over again. | ||
If I knew what I was getting into, I wouldn't do it. | ||
And that's the truth. | ||
Real quickly, give us your social media. | ||
How do people follow your 24-hour coverage, both of you? | ||
One more thing, really quick. | ||
They are making it much easier than last year, Steve. | ||
Now it's much easier to get through Derry and Gap. | ||
My name is Michael Yon at Locals.com. | ||
Locals.com. | ||
Download the America's Voice app, AmericasVoice.news and FrontlineAmerica.com and at Ben Berkman. | ||
Great reporting, guys. | ||
We'll make sure it's in all the chat rooms. | ||
Naomi Wolf next in Pfizer. | ||
unidentified
|
Here we go. | |
Wondering if the COVID vaccine is right for your child? | ||
If you can trust it. | ||
Want to know what a healthcare professional would say? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I represent over 100,000 family doctors. | |
I represent over 4.3 million registered nurses. | ||
Nearly 67,000 pediatricians. | ||
And we all agree on this. | ||
unidentified
|
It's important for all children, 5 and older, to get a COVID vaccine. | |
Because we know millions of cases of COVID have been in kids. | ||
In kids. | ||
Kids. | ||
So I speak for pediatricians. | ||
The nurses you know and trust. | ||
Family doctors you see all the time. | ||
We've looked at the data. | ||
We've studied the science. | ||
And it's clear to me. | ||
unidentified
|
It's very clear. | |
You can trust the COVID vaccine for yourself or your kids or your grandkids. | ||
I do. | ||
I mean it from the heart. | ||
I'm going to go get my car. Hi, guys. | ||
Both surprised and disappointed because those types of things really are the purview of This is a public health issue, and for a court to come in, and if you look at the rationale for that, it really is not particularly firm. | ||
unidentified
|
And we are concerned about that, about courts getting involved in things that are unequivocally public health decisions. | |
I mean, this is a CDC issue. | ||
It should not have been a court issue. | ||
Okay, there's Tony Fauci. | ||
Remember, you can get the book from the Children's Health Defense. | ||
You can go to Amazon, The Real Anthony Fauci, if you want to see that. | ||
We've invited Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
She's been doing this investigation of Pfizer. | ||
Just want to make sure the posse, because your heads blow up every time we play that commercial. | ||
That's not a commercial for Real America's Voice or any of our outlets ourselves. | ||
We play it because it's so over the top. | ||
And you couldn't tee up, you couldn't tee up Dr. Wolf to come on something that's more over the top than that spot. | ||
Naomi, you've been at this now for, I don't know, five, six weeks, maybe longer, with the War Room audience, the War Room policy and, of course, these lawyers. | ||
The show's yours. | ||
Walk us through what you guys are finding. | ||
And by the way, people could not be more excited about this special. | ||
So take it away, ma'am. | ||
Well, thank you. | ||
It's a really important special because we're going to summarize what the War Room Daily Cloud Posse have found. | ||
And just to remind everyone, you know, it's not me. | ||
I don't have a medical background. | ||
The people who are analyzing these documents are doctors and nurses and biostatisticians and medical fraud researchers, people whose job it is to evaluate documents like this. | ||
And what they're turning up is stunning. | ||
So I'm going to start with some Just big headlines that show what a horrific crime the ad you just saw was in terms of misinforming parents, but also in terms of claiming that the science says something that it doesn't. | ||
Because these documents that I'm revealing to you via the War Room Posse researchers and volunteers are documents that went from Pfizer to the FDA, right? | ||
So these people in that ad should have known that they are lying. | ||
So a big headline I want to give you before I get into Team 5's unbelievable bombshell new report goes like this. | ||
The Pfizer ingredients, according to a contracting letter from the FDA, were not manufactured in the United States. | ||
They were manufactured in Belgium and Germany. | ||
And then only put into a solution and package for distribution in the United States in Andover, Massachusetts and Kansas. | ||
So I bring that up because it's a foreign set of facilities that are creating these. | ||
So we were importing ingredients from overseas and I'll get to why that's so important and problematic in a minute. | ||
And does the FDA even have people on the ground? | ||
in Belgium and Germany to assess these ingredients. | ||
Well, let's move ahead to what happens to them when they get to one of these facilities, which is Pfizer's facility in Kansas. | ||
The FDA did a detailed report in 2019 and 2020, right? | ||
2020 is when the Pfizer mRNA vaccines began to be distributed. | ||
They criticized Pfizer's facility for mold. | ||
Mold and bacteria and for releasing drugs without quality inspection. | ||
And the FDA said that Pfizer, quote, neglected to properly sample drugs for excess levels of certain toxins. | ||
And now this is a quote. | ||
And now listen to me and think of those doctors in that ad and people who have gotten like a million dollars, you know, from Pfizer, like the certain licensing boards, Pediatricians, organizations, they're being bought up, bought up by Pfizer, or bribed, I should say. | ||
The 2019-20 inspection found that the plant had released drugs without reviewing quality issues flagged during routine testing. | ||
Inspectors also turned up mold and bacteria in areas that were meant to be sterile and said the plant neglected to properly sample drugs for excessive levels of certain toxins. | ||
And this is a Bloomberg report, specifically the McPherson-Pfizer plant in Kansas, which is manufacturing these mRNA vaccines that these doctors are asking you to inject into your child, failed to adequately test for endotoxins, which are created by bacteria like Escherichia coli or botulism. Meanwhile, an FDA visit in 2018 also identified mold. The company said, oops, inadequate cleaning. But months later, the FDA also | ||
found mold. As of the latest inspection, Pfizer quote, continues to recover bacterial and or mold isolates from critical zones, according to the FDA. So these are the people. | ||
Manufacturing ingredients, taking ingredients from overseas, from Germany and Brussels, putting them in saline solution, putting them in packages without inserts, sending them to your pediatrician and to your doctor and, you know, getting, paying their spokesmodels to say, safe and effective. | ||
I look at the data. | ||
So let's move on. | ||
Another huge headline. | ||
What is this German company, right? | ||
You know, I keep worrying about what the national security implications of what we're finding in these documents might indicate. | ||
And I will bracket that. | ||
You can make your own decisions. | ||
But Reuters reported that the German biotech firm BioNTech, right, which partnered with Pfizer and the FDA and Dr. Fauci, said that it had secured almost 450 million in government funding to speed up work on its COVID-19 vaccine and expand its production capacity in Germany. | ||
Who is BioNTech partnered with in this venture? | ||
BioNTech and partners Pfizer Inc and China's Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group Company Limited are among The leading developers of experimental COVID-19 vaccines based on molecules carrying a genetic code called messenger RNA. | ||
So just please let that sink in as a train of risk and damage. | ||
An overseas facility in Germany gets $450 million. | ||
They're partnered with our adversary, China, and there's no such thing As a company like Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group, not being in alliance with the CCP, they ship over this dangerous material, lipid nanoparticles, mRNA and spike protein to Kansas and to Andover, Massachusetts. | ||
In Kansas, the conditions are so bad that the FDA keeps saying, no, there's mold. | ||
There's bacteria. | ||
You're not checking for toxins. | ||
You're sending drugs out that are not checked for toxins with basic quality control. | ||
This is the FDA. | ||
And then the FDA says to the American public, it's safe and effective. | ||
So that's the background of what we're finding. | ||
Real quick, real quickly, give us a minute. | ||
How can that happen? | ||
How can they have this record of emails and texts and all this stuff and then have, and letters and then have, say, safe and effective? | ||
Why that gap? | ||
I mean, you've seen how government works, right? | ||
What people know on the inside and what gets sent down the hall to the message people and presented to Jen Psaki or presented to spokesmodels, you know, hired by the FDA and the NIH and HHS with our tax dollars or, you know, bribed by Pfizer. | ||
Those are different things. | ||
So right now you've just seen these pediatricians are saying, I'm hugging my grandchildren. | ||
It's safe and effective. | ||
But what they should be saying, what the FDA knew, right? | ||
What the head of the FDA knew, knew is that this plant in which our American vaccines are being manufactured had two years of citations from the FDA for dangerous conditions in which there was not quality control for toxins. | ||
Going into their drugs that were injectable. | ||
So it's, you know, it's fraud. | ||
It's coercion. | ||
It's fraud. | ||
OK, continue on. | ||
We've got a couple of minutes in the segment. | ||
unidentified
|
All right. | |
Well, this is really important. | ||
So that's the background. | ||
Team 5 just released an extraordinary report. | ||
And this is now the Pfizer documents themselves, which you will recall have, you know, Pfizer and the FDA asked the court not to release these documents for 75 years. | ||
Till we were all dead and gone and the damage was done. | ||
What Team 5 found, among other mind-blowing headlines, was that almost half of the cases are missing. | ||
In other words, 20,761 of 42,086, quote, relevant cases are missing. | ||
They're not followed up. | ||
And yet they were identified as, quote, not recovered at the time of the report. | ||
So we don't know what happened to them. | ||
And I'm quoting, a great deal of data are missing from Pfizer's analyses of adverse events. | ||
Half of the reports are incomplete. | ||
So these are reports of people who are sick, they're not recovered, something's wrong, they're suffering, but oops, Pfizer, you know, dog ate my homework, you know, like it's gone, right? | ||
These reports are gone. | ||
There are other anomalies that should lead these studies to be thrown out and not used as a basis for injecting you or your child with this experimental vaccine. | ||
71% of the people that Pfizer analyzed are female. | ||
Only 22% are male. | ||
And 7% have no gender noted, which in itself is quite an accomplishment in the world of science. | ||
But having said that, why is this important? | ||
You know, if you're really doing a randomized controlled study, you're not going to get, you know, three quarters of the study subjects being female, because 52% of the human beings in the world are female. | ||
So they are They're cherry picking who the subjects are. | ||
Why would they leave out men? | ||
Well, one obvious answer is men get myocarditis disproportionately. | ||
Dr. Wolf, just hang on one second. | ||
We're taking a short commercial break. | ||
We're in return with this blockbuster and shocking investigation under Naomi Wolf with Daily Cloud. | ||
In a minute. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, welcome back. | ||
Let's go to Paris. | ||
We're going to get a quick update from our guy on Getter who follows the French politics. | ||
Huge day tomorrow. | ||
It is Le Pen vs. Macron, the Nationalists vs. the Elitists and Globalists. | ||
Thomas Amgar has been on before and done reports. | ||
Thomas, is there a hidden... We've opened the show with a cold open. | ||
Particularly a lot of young people were interviewed by American media and foreign media over the last couple of days that said they're not going to vote for Macron. | ||
They're going to vote for the opposition, but they were afraid to say the name. | ||
Is there a hidden vote out there? | ||
Because the polling right now looks like Macron may be separating. | ||
This gap may be getting bigger. | ||
What's your sense of things? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, thank you very much, Mr. Bannon, for having me today. | |
It's just an honor, as always. | ||
Concerning this gap, I'd say that it's actually closer than we think, because after the debate, the gap started to seem way, way tighter than usual. | ||
And just as a few hours ago, another poll showed that 51% of the voters will not go to the polls. | ||
And this is something very dramatic, and this is something that will be a game changer for the election on Sunday. | ||
Hold it, 51% of the people in France have told pollsters they're not going to vote? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, that's it. | |
Did they give a reason? | ||
They don't think their vote counts? | ||
They think their election is rigged? | ||
Or are they just not interested? | ||
Why would 51% of the population, because France has very high turnouts, why would they not vote? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, especially because they're not really interested in both candidates. | |
They don't like Marine Le Pen. | ||
They don't like Emmanuel Macron. | ||
And a lot of people are deceived. | ||
And Marine Le Pen is not that great a candidate, actually. | ||
And during the debate, she showed that she was not that competent. | ||
And she wasn't offensive. | ||
She looked like, she looked motherly, but she didn't have the posture of a, uh, of a president actually. | ||
And this marked, uh, for some people, a turn for a lot of, um, well, they shift their vote to, uh, maybe abstention or Macron because they saw how confident she was. | ||
How can people follow you and get her over the weekend? | ||
She has her first debate back in 17 also heard of but boy there if 51% of the people don't turn out That's going to be not great news from Macron either. He's count. They're counting on a on a good turnout How can people follow you and get her over the weekend? How can they follow you? | ||
unidentified
|
You can follow our account get her in France and we'll have every information you need about the election We're going to have lives, we're going to have interviews, and exclusive puntry on the election coming. | |
And you can also check out my account, ThomasVDLF, on Getter, as always, and we've got exclusives coming up. | ||
Okay, we're going to be taking that and putting it up on the War Room Getter account, on my personal Getter account. | ||
Ben Harnow is going to be all over it, so this is a huge deal. | ||
I want to make sure that's what we have Getter for, the live streaming and the 24-hour coverage. | ||
So, Thomas, thank you very much, and thank the Getter team for doing such an amazing job of covering this election. | ||
Better than anybody out there. | ||
It's been insane. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you very much. | |
It's just that now it's going to come up to economic reasons. | ||
A little earlier this week, The European Union is trying to interfere with the election. | ||
And I think that may have something to do with the high abstention that we're going to see on Sunday. | ||
We think that the election is rigged by the European Union. | ||
Because everything is related. | ||
Sorry, everything is related to several reasons. | ||
So the economy is currently entering a zone of turbulence with the return of inflation, which had already started before the war in Ukraine. | ||
And this is clearly visible since the beginning. | ||
Of the inflation, that is more unfavorable to modest households than for rich regions. | ||
It's a lose-lose situation for a lot of people. | ||
So in the United States, we're already talking about a recession. | ||
So what's going to happen to us? | ||
There's still a somewhat anxious climate about the economy, which makes this topic at the heart of concerns. | ||
And then, secondly, the economy is the core of the platform. | ||
I tell you what, Thomas, Thomas, we've got to get back. | ||
We've got a special going on. | ||
So, I tell you what, we'll catch you on Get Her Life. | ||
We've got to get back to Naomi. | ||
Well, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanks a lot. | |
Thank you. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Dr. Wolf, can you continue on? | ||
Yes, sir. | ||
So, if your head is not exploding already, I just will march through this. | ||
Of the The total number of patients over 42,000 that Pfizer looked at, 3.7% died. | ||
That was 1,223 patients. | ||
So the analysts point out if we knew the number of doses that they had shipped, we would understand how lethal this figure represents, what level of lethality, but Pfizer redacted that number in their internal documents before releasing them. | ||
Four of the patients died the very day they received the vaccine. | ||
Moving on, of the 32,000... Hold it, hold it. | ||
Hang on. | ||
My head's blown up again. | ||
Just give me that. | ||
unidentified
|
Right? | |
Give me that again. | ||
No, give me... Slow down. | ||
Give me that again. | ||
Give me... I'm gonna have another hit of my Warpath coffee. | ||
Give me that again. | ||
Yeah, brace yourselves, everyone. | ||
I will. | ||
It's a shocker. | ||
Of the 42,086 patients that Pfizer looked at in their internal documents, 1,223 of them died. | ||
Death was the outcome. | ||
That's 3.7% of the total. | ||
Point being, if we knew how many doses were shipped by Pfizer, we would understand what level of death this represents, right? | ||
But Pfizer redacted that number of how many total doses they shipped. | ||
So we cannot know what level of death this represents, except that we do know that four of the people who were injected with the vaccine died The day they were injected and Pfizer did not tell us, the FDA did not tell us. | ||
Okay, stop. | ||
Obviously, this special is going to continue over to Monday in order to get it live. | ||
The 42,000, keep it simple for me, the 42,000, was that the entire base of the study or was that some subset that had issues? | ||
These were adverse events. | ||
So this is Pfizer detailing what happened. | ||
Within these subcategories, however, they played with this subcategory too, as you will hear. | ||
Of the 32,680, but, you know, again, these were patients and nearly half of them are missing. | ||
We don't know what happened to them. | ||
Of the 32,686 patients with known outcomes, right? | ||
The ones that, you know, we did see Pfizer understood what became of them, 35% or 11,361 are cited as not recovered. | ||
But that's all we know. | ||
Did those 11,361 patients, and this is the quote of the analysts, survive the Pfizer vaccine? | ||
That is a question mark. | ||
60%, 19,382 are lumped together as, listen to this, quote, recovered slash recovering. | ||
That's how Pfizer analyzed what happened to them. | ||
And the analysts asked, did recovering cases get well? | ||
Quote, by combining recovered and recovering cases, is Pfizer attempting to overcount the number of cases in which the adverse events were resolved? | ||
So this is, you know, we know it's safe and effective, do we? | ||
Pfizer took groups of people who were recovered and groups of people who were still sick or still suffering, lumped them together, created a category and called it recovered slash recovering. | ||
Lastly, very quickly. | ||
There was no follow-up by the FDA, which was otherwise normal. | ||
Why? | ||
Because Pfizer asked the FDA for a waiver of the usual way of assigning a code to a patient for pharmacovigilance, right? | ||
Not violating their privacy, but following them so that if there are adverse events down the road, With a new product, a new biological product, Pfizer and the FDA will know. | ||
They'll count it. | ||
It'll send up a signal. | ||
But Pfizer said, no, don't do that this time. | ||
And the FDA agreed. | ||
And Pfizer's request said that this normal way of tracking patients would be burdensome and redundant. | ||
And the FDA agreed. | ||
So the FDA, whose job it is to follow people with a novel injection or a novel product and make sure Everything's all right, that there are no safety signals that may come up two months, three months, five months in pregnancy and childbirth. | ||
You know, when kids are 15 or 17, they wash their hands of it. | ||
They said, oh, OK, this will be, quote unquote, burdensome and redundant to you, Pfizer, though we always do it all the time. | ||
And so we just won't follow them at all. | ||
So the FDA is a thousand percent complicit In covering up, hiding, dropping their usual, you know, method of making sure people are safe, and they're complicit in covering up and hiding bad outcomes. | ||
Let me ask you, the 1,200, they're not saying they died from the vaccine. | ||
They say they died, there are 42,000 adverse effects, adverse incidences, and of that 1,200 died. | ||
Because 3% would seem to me to be like a number that is off the charts. | ||
I'm just putting it out there randomly, right? | ||
I mean, that number would, would, would, would send, you go to general quarters, you go to, if you're the Pfizer CEO, you'd go to general quarters on that number, right? | ||
Well, let me just, you know, read how this report ends. | ||
I'm not laughing, and I'm not trying to make fun, this is serious, but it's almost a theater of the absurd. | ||
It's so ridiculous that now you understand why they wanted to keep the documents secure for 75 years, not in our lifetime. | ||
The numbers are so over the top, ma'am. | ||
And so, bad faith. | ||
Pfizer's report raises more questions than it answers, concludes this analysis. | ||
Yet, in Pfizer's review of adverse events reported after the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was approved by the FDA, they conclude that their review, quote, confirms a favorable benefit-risk balance, end quote, for the mRNA vaccine. | ||
And they say, rightly, with 22% of patients having unknown outcomes, 35% not recovered at the time of the review, and 3.7% dead, Pfizer concludes that the benefits of taking their mRNA vaccine outweigh the risks. | ||
So another question arises, how can that conclusion be true? | ||
I mean, and they go on even without knowing. | ||
Sorry. | ||
Here's the thing. | ||
We got another segment. | ||
We've got a couple of minutes here. | ||
And I'm a clear the deck says we've got it. | ||
We've got to get through this. | ||
Here's it. | ||
Isn't this? | ||
Haven't you shown enough? | ||
Your working group, your task force don't we have to have? | ||
And I hate to say we might have to wait to November till we take the house over. | ||
Isn't what would be beneficial to the American people and to the whole issue, right? | ||
Shouldn't Pfizer come through, not just put this mass of documents out there, shouldn't they have to come through in some sort of formal setting with the FDA and like make a formal presentation? | ||
So you can actually see up on the charts, this is how Pfizer presents this evidence. | ||
Don't get me wrong, I know you're going to continue to go through, you've got other task force, this is an ongoing process, other documents being dumped, but There's just no way. | ||
I mean, the company's going to have to come forward and make this presentation with the FDA and say, no, no, no, no. | ||
Naomi Wolf, they misinterpreted this. | ||
This was not correct. | ||
This is what we do at the time. | ||
In an imperfect world, this is what we did. | ||
Isn't that the logical thing that where this takes us? | ||
Because the numbers are so over the top, you're just kind of gobsmacked, aren't you? | ||
Well, yes. | ||
I mean, I can't think of another time in history that A private corporation, which is partnered with our biggest adversary, right? | ||
An entity that shows that they have no respect for human life, that they harvest organs, that they force women to have abortions. | ||
You know, China has no respect for human life and decent medical ethics. | ||
I've never seen a time when a private corporation partnered with our adversary is in cahoots with the agency that is tasked with keeping us safe From harms from medical products. | ||
So it shouldn't just be the two of them answering questions. | ||
It should be a halt to all of this. | ||
There's a thorough investigation, you know, by the White House and by the Department of Justice. | ||
unidentified
|
Other people who are committing crimes. | |
Short break. | ||
Dr. Wolf of Jonas on the other side. | ||
unidentified
|
Tech monitors us, censors us, de-platforms us. | |
Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it, until now. | ||
Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what Big Tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
Join Getter. | ||
It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
Send a message today. | ||
Join Getter. | ||
It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
Okay, welcome back. | ||
I'm making an announcement right now. | ||
We're going to do every day this week, this coming week, from 1130 to noon on The Morning Show, we're going to have Naomi Wolf on to go through more of this investigation. | ||
Because, and there's a lot more she hasn't even talked about, I mean, that they're doing now to get into this, and we want to make sure. | ||
So first off, Naomi, I want, because I haven't seen a thing that we've done here that's gotten people more excited, so I want to make sure that War Room Posse members, the Cadre, the Vanguard, it's not too late. | ||
You always need volunteers. | ||
So I want to go through Daily Clout. | ||
How do people get to you? | ||
How do people come on board of this? | ||
Even more lawyers. | ||
So how do they support what you guys are doing? | ||
Where do they go and how do they sign up? | ||
Sure. | ||
So go to dailyclout.io upper right hand corner. | ||
You'll see campaigns. | ||
Click on that. | ||
Go to the Pfizer. | ||
War Room Daily Clout campaign. | ||
And right there, you can sign up as a volunteer, especially if you have special skills with medical research, but anyone at all. | ||
And if you are a lawyer, you'll get assigned to the 250 lawyers group. | ||
And by the way, they are sending letters to attorneys general in many states. | ||
They're soliciting clients, meaning you don't have to pay for a client. | ||
But if you had something horrible happen to you, God forbid, or to a loved one, or you had some damages or losses or job losses, there's a place for you to tell your story and then we'll hook you up with the right lawyer to go after the people who did that to you in the government. | ||
And then if also there's a new working group for communication specialists. | ||
So if you have a PR background, a comms background, to help us get the word out, because of course the mainstream media is overwhelmingly turning a blind eye to this biggest story of the 21st century. | ||
But we need everybody. | ||
And I really want to give, as always, a huge shout out to Amy Kelly and Craig Klein, who have, you know, supported these 2,500 amazing, highly skilled volunteers and the 250 lawyers who are readying some important legal actions. | ||
And please do continue to support us because we're using every single dollar and penny you send us To bring these shocking headlines to the light of day. | ||
Okay, I want to, and we've just got a couple of minutes here, so every day, and it's going to be on Get Her Live, we're going to do all this, but every day from 11.30 to noon on this important investigation. | ||
Okay. | ||
You have not been with us politically, and it's a free country, people don't have other politics, but you've been an investigative reporter and doing, you know, a major writer and reporter for many, many years, and you've always been a civil libertarian, right? | ||
I want to put a perspective. | ||
Have you ever seen anything come across anything like this? | ||
Because I keep looking at this and it's it stuns me and it stuns me from an investment banking point of view how companies. | ||
Could have breaches of fiduciary responsibility, at least of what I'm seeing, of what you're sending me, what I'm seeing out of these reports. | ||
But to put it in perspective, have you ever seen anything on any investigation you've done or heard of that that that? | ||
And I know people come at some of this with a big farmers, terrible. | ||
And I didn't come up with that when this whole thing first started with the pandemic. | ||
But man, oh, man, I'm quickly I'm quickly becoming a convert. | ||
Have you ever seen anything like this? | ||
It goes beyond Watergate in scale and the levels of corruption. | ||
It's international in scale. | ||
It's not just one country. | ||
And it goes beyond any example I've ever seen of any individual department or agency of our government being corrupted. | ||
That's why I keep circling back to asking people in the intelligence community and the State Department and the, you know, The military to take a look at this as a national security breach, because what I don't have evidence of this, but what I'm seeing is a wholesale capture of our entire government by entities that are not answerable to the American people. | ||
That's the only way to get, as you know how White House works, the only way to get the White House down to HHS, down to CDC, FDA, NIAID, Anthony Fauci, you know, let alone corrupt pharma. | ||
We all know pharma is corrupt, but to align all of those spokespeople, you know, Rochelle Walensky, all the people who are being served with subpoenas, if Dr. Ely's grand jury investigation, which has been accepted, continues to proceed, that is an alignment you only get and you've got a captured, I have to say it, a captured White House. | ||
I don't see any other way that all these entities can be in alignment for such a massive, you know, systemic allowing of harms to the American people and to American children. | ||
Because if there was a chance this could come to light, that's the end of their political capital, right? | ||
So that's not normal. | ||
When you came to me about that, I didn't even know about the 75 years. | ||
I said, that doesn't seem right. | ||
Why would they keep these documents back for 75 years? | ||
And people went to court. | ||
Real quickly, give me 30 seconds on this grand jury. | ||
When you say grand jury, tell me about this grand jury. | ||
So it's Dr. Henry Ely's project or undertaking along with Really brave patriotic state senators from Oregon. | ||
Senator Dennis. | ||
This is America's grand jury. | ||
The one that the television thing. | ||
Not a real grand jury. | ||
This is the one. | ||
But they're meeting in a grand jury type of thing. | ||
No, this is respectfully much more serious because it's real. | ||
And the America's grand jury is kind of a spectacle. | ||
This is a real grand jury demand that was accepted by a court and it's for data misrepresentation, data mishandling. | ||
And so there are subpoenas that are being served, if all continues, to HHS, which is in charge of all of this, right, in which the state of emergency that Biden rushed through, you know, the HHS is getting billions of dollars to continue engaging this kind of malfeasance. | ||
Also, the CDC, they're going to receive subpoenas. | ||
They're named defendants, and I can send you the documents that are going to be asking these people to account for them. | ||
Naomi will be back with us every day, 1130, this coming week. | ||
This is big. | ||
We're going to get all organized. | ||
Real quickly, how do people get to you over the weekend, Naomi? | ||
Well, over the weekend go to dailycloud.io. | ||
You can email me at Naomi at dailycloud.io and you can send your stories to research at dailycloud.io. | ||
Please join us. | ||
This is a beautiful patriotic effort and it's, you know, you're saving lives. | ||
unidentified
|
You really are. | |
We'll be on Getter Live. | ||
We'll be on Getter, up on our Getter account live all weekend. | ||
Mo Banner will be reporting from the conference down in Williamsburg. |