April 2, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:51
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| When Judge Katonji Brown-Jackson was asked why she sentenced a child sex offender to just three months instead of a recommended eight years, she blamed everyone but herself. | ||
| Jackson has ordered lenient sentences in every child pornography case she could, eight out of eight times. | ||
| Activist judges like Katonji Brown-Jackson are more concerned about the well-being of pedophiles than the safety of your children. | ||
| And thanks to her, they may be living in your neighborhood. | ||
| Call your senators today and tell them to vote no on Judge Jackson's nomination. | ||
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| It's Saturday. | ||
| 2 April, year of our Lord, 2022. | ||
| We're live here. | ||
| A lot going on. | ||
| We've got a lot of work to do. | ||
| Of course, we've got an invasion on the southern border. | ||
| We have a financial meltdown, you know, inflation running rampant, all kind of terrible indices, the inverted yield curve, which means a recessions on its way, a massive recession. | ||
| So all of that is happening and we're going to have to deal with it. | ||
| One of the things before us today, because the work of the day is what you've got to get done. | ||
| It's turned into an epic fight in a confirmation hearing that wasn't supposed to happen. | ||
| It wasn't supposed to happen because this one was supposed to just glide through. | ||
| As the Obama administration and mainstream media told us about Judge Brown Jackson, about her qualifications, and there's no question, I want to say this again, I want to start the show with it. | ||
| She is extremely well qualified. | ||
| She's gone to the best universities in the country, if not the world. | ||
| She's excelled at those universities. | ||
| She's at the top of her law school class and she's done everything she's supposed to do in law school. | ||
| She's clerked for the right people. | ||
| She's worked at the big law firms. | ||
| She's got a stellar record of performance. | ||
| She is, I think, a lifetime appointment onto the appeals court in the District of Columbia, which is just one notch down from the United States Supreme Court. | ||
| And she was confirmed by the United States Senate in that process. | ||
| But that does not deal with the issue that we've been forced to deal with. | ||
| One of the reasons we've been forced to deal with is the Biden administration and the Judiciary Committee and the media has gone out of its way to suppress and hide and cover up vital information about a topic which is about the rape and torture of babies and children for pleasure and profit. | ||
| That's what it is. | ||
| It's for people's pleasure and for people to make money. | ||
| And that's what we're dealing with. | ||
| And what we're dealing with is why she allowed this to happen in her courtroom with her judgments about people that were on trial for this. | ||
| So, bring in Mike Davis of Article 3, and that commercial, that spot is running now by his group, and people are donating into his group to continue to have that run. | ||
| I want to bring in Mike Davis, head of Article 3. | ||
| Mike, is that too harsh? | ||
| I mean, how do you back up? | ||
| She's more concerned with the well-being of pedophiles than she is, I guess, about your family. | ||
| And she's letting them loose, or they're there to prey in your neighborhood. | ||
| Is that overselling? | ||
| Have you crossed the line? | ||
| Is that overhyping what the reality is here, sir? | ||
| Well, no, it's very much factual. | ||
| We did a very deep dive at the Article 3 project. | ||
| I used to be the chief counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee for Chuck Grassley, the chairman, during the Kavanaugh confirmation. | ||
| I was, in other words, the staff leader for the Kavanaugh confirmation. | ||
| I helped Justice Gorsuch get through the process as his former law clerk and then served with him on the Supreme Court as a law clerk. | ||
| We did a deep dive on this stuff and it's very serious. | ||
| This is not This is not wacky conspiracy theory stuff. | ||
| This is from her eight-year record as a district court judge. | ||
| And I got this information from going and obtaining the sentencing hearing transcripts where she sentenced these people to prison, along with the prosecutor's recommendations on the sentences before she sentenced these people. | ||
| And what we found is that eight of eight times When Judge Jackson had discretion to sentence these convicts who possessed and distributed child pornography. | ||
| These are the worst people on the planet. | ||
| Eight of eight times, Judge Jackson sentenced below the federal guidelines from the United States Sentencing Commission. | ||
| Eight of eight times. | ||
| And 7 of these 8 times, she's sentenced below the U.S. | ||
| Attorney's recommendation. | ||
| We think she did it 8 of 8 times, but on the 8th case, this Cain case that we'll talk about, the sentencing recommendation from the U.S. | ||
| Attorney's Office is under seal in the courts. | ||
| This is a dangerous pattern. | ||
| It's not exaggerated. | ||
| It's on the Article 3 Project's website with page sites and links. | ||
| So people can go look for themselves. | ||
| This is a very serious matter eight of eight times. | ||
| This is a dangerous policy of leniency and it goes back 25 years for Judge Jackson to her time at Harvard Law School where she published a note on the Harvard Law Review and Arguing that sex offenders of kids, when you have these sex offender registries, after sex offenders of kids get out of prison, she thinks that those sex offender registries are somehow unconstitutionally punitive. | ||
| And you can write that off and say, hmm, maybe she's just a 26-year-old misguided law student. | ||
| We can write that one off. | ||
| But you have to look at her pattern. | ||
| She went on the United States Sentencing Commission, appointed by President Obama. | ||
| The Democrats will not turn over her records from her nomination to the United States Sentencing Commission. | ||
| She was the vice chair when she was there from 2010 to 2014. | ||
| Usually it's incoming. | ||
| Congress or the Attorney General or courts want you to look at a specific issue like Fentanyl, for example, and make sure our federal sentencing guidelines, the federal ranges of sentences, are appropriate and updated for the time so the judges can use these to order sentences in these federal felony cases. | ||
| She took it on her own initiative on the Sentencing Commission to tee up this issue of child pornographers, these people who watch and traffic young kids being raped, tortured and raped for their pleasure. | ||
| And it's the most heinous, awful stuff on the planet that we can talk about today. | ||
| She ginned this up as an issue, and she went in with this theory that these Pedophiles are somehow, or excuse me, these pornographers are somehow not pedophiles. | ||
| They're somehow not dangerous and therefore they're not a threat to the community and therefore we're putting them in prison for too long. We should lessen the sentence for them. The two expert witnesses at this hearing in 2012, one was a Columbia Medical School psychiatrist, one was a federal prosecutor. | ||
| They said, no, no, no, no, your theory's wrong. | ||
| They're pedophiles and they're dangerous. | ||
| Nonetheless, she disregarded that expert testimony right in front of her and made it a key finding in the Sentencing Commission report in 2012. | ||
| And that became federal sentencing policy that these judges point to when they try to give light sentences to these people who watch and trade this child pornography, the most awful filth on the planet. | ||
| And again, that followed her onto the bench eight of eight times, including nine months ago in this Cain case that the Biden White House and Judge Jackson just happened to forget about when they were talking about her Supreme Court confirmation. | ||
| Some would say lied, but it's a disturbing pattern, Stephen. | ||
| We have the receipts. | ||
| It's documented on our website. | ||
| How long, I'm asking my producer right now, the clip that we have of Lindsey Graham and Jorian Reedus, how long? | ||
| Just let me know. | ||
| I want to, we're going to play some clips here in a second. | ||
| Let me go back to, it's 2-17. | ||
| Before I get there, I'll have time here. | ||
| Mike. | ||
| You've run, and I want everyone in the audience to know this, and everybody that's, all the lefties are watching this. | ||
| I mean, Mike Davis has done this for a living. | ||
| He's one of the top professionals that have done this for Senator Grassley, to run these processes. | ||
| What I think people are coming, are finding hard to believe, and I know I did when I first got involved in this, is that Because I was very active in the Gorsuch selection and getting through the Supreme Court as a non-lawyer, right? | ||
| The preparation and the turning over of documents, how have we been, and I just want to make sure we get it right, there's 50, is there 55,000, 48,000 pages, 48,000 pages of documents from the Obama administration, all of her findings from the Sentencing Commission and the documents here with their sentencing. | ||
| That was not all provided to the committee? | ||
| So when you have Supreme Court nominations, it's routine that Supreme Court nominees turn over key documents. | ||
| And the documents that she failed to turn over, and the Democrats are just excusing, she has three categories of documents. | ||
| Number one are 48,000 pages of records at the Obama White House archives related to her nomination to both the Sentencing Commission in 2010, along to the D.C. | ||
| District Court in 2013. | ||
| The 2013 records would be very interesting to obtain because they may have the internal records at the United States Sentencing Commission that they are also refusing to turn over her internal deliberations, her emails, her correspondence internally when she's set in federal sentencing policy on the Sentencing Commission from 2010 to 2014. | ||
| What's key about that is, look at what she's saying publicly at this 2012 hearing about child pornographers not being dangerous pedophiles somehow. | ||
| Just imagine what she's saying behind the scenes. | ||
| So they're hiding those records. | ||
| They're also hiding the records, these United States Probation Office sentencing reports, pre-sentence reports that the judges read Before they sentence these people, Judge Jackson can look at several data points when she sentences people under any statutory minimum. | ||
| She can sentence however she wants. | ||
| She looks at the sentencing guidelines, which is the range from the Sentencing Commission. | ||
| If she's above the guidelines or below the guidelines, her sentence is presumptively unreasonable. | ||
| But if they're within the guidelines, they're presumptively reasonable for purposes of appeal. | ||
| So these guidelines are very important. | ||
| So she can look at the sentencing guidelines. | ||
| She can look at the U.S. | ||
| Attorney's recommendation from the prosecutor's recommendation and or she can look at the probation office's recommendation. | ||
| She is, two of those are public, the probation office's recommendation Generally is not. | ||
| She's cherry picking. | ||
| So what she does is she finds that the lowest sentence she could find in these particular cases and then she goes without or even sometimes lower, right? | ||
| And so she'll blame the prosecutor. | ||
| She'll blame Congress. | ||
| She'll blame her staff, the probation office. | ||
| She blames everyone but herself. | ||
| But at the end of the day, this is her pet project. | ||
| This is her sentencing policy for whatever reason. | ||
| And it's beyond me that she has a reason, but her big pet project as a legal adult, as a legal advocate, has been leniency for people, for sex predators, including those who possess and distribute child pornography. | ||
| It is bizarre. | ||
| And they're hiding these records from the Biden White House, Judge Jackson's chambers. | ||
| Okay, that's what I want to get to. | ||
| Is this a cover-up in hiding? | ||
| Is there any doubt in your professional opinion that, one, these documents should have been turned over in the normal course of business, and by their not turning over, and now that there's a firestorm? | ||
| Because remember, we started this journey three weeks ago. | ||
| She was 65-35. | ||
| This is going to be a layup. | ||
| They were going to use this as a big political moment, and that's been taken away from them. | ||
| They're in hiding right now. | ||
| It's crickets. | ||
| that they're on the committee they're gonna have four or five republican votes they're dead even that will take place on monday because we're going to get into in a second but is there any doubt in your mind that they're suppressing these records and that they're there's a cover-up going on right now mike we got about a minute i worked on the i worked on supreme court nominations for the chief justice for alito for gorsuch for barrett and uh and i led the staff effort in the Senate for Kavanaugh. | ||
| I can tell you that this is absolutely a cover-up of her record. | ||
| 100% a cover-up. | ||
| Now, why have the Republicans, give me 30 seconds, why have the Republicans gone along with this? | ||
| Couldn't the committee have said, once this has become evident, and they had, can't they put up a firestorm on Monday? | ||
| I mean, why would we go forward, even for her own benefit? | ||
| I tell you, I want you to answer this on the other side. | ||
| I think for Judge Jackson, she would want to now. | ||
| Clear the air. | ||
| Clear the record. | ||
| Because even if she's confirmed, and I don't believe if she's here today, she will be confirmed. | ||
| Let me say that. | ||
| I do not believe she's going to be confirmed, and you're going to be a part of that, this audience. | ||
| Because we're going to have to put our shoulders on the wheel. | ||
| But I would believe that Judge Jackson, given her other qualifications, her sterling qualifications in other areas, would want to clear the air for this. | ||
| She would want everything released, and she would want to take whatever time it took to go through it. | ||
| We're gonna take a short break. | ||
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| This is absolutely, uh, couldn't be bigger. | ||
| The lifetime appointment of a Supreme Court Justice, all next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. | ||
| We've got the pillows as low as $19.99. | ||
| We've got the sheets as low as $39.99. | ||
| You've got hundreds of opportunities for saving. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM today. | ||
| Make sure also 202-224-3121. | ||
| That is 202-224-3121. | ||
| We're going to put up on Getter and all the platforms. | ||
| Make sure that you've, that that's the Senate switchboard. | ||
| Make sure you go and call your local Senator or call McConnell or if you're a military family call Congress, Senator Tammy Duckworth, who says she represents all the military families, so make sure you call her and give her, give these folks your opinion about this. | ||
| Has there ever been, I mean, Bork was was highly qualified, just like Judge Jackson, but they got him on all types of his judgments, etc. | ||
| But have you seen anything in the interim? | ||
| Has anything come close to what we're seeing now about one issue that's basically blown up a nominee, sir? | ||
| On records or just a substantive issue? | ||
| Let's do records first, and then we'll do substantive issue. | ||
| I mean, the Democrats tried to make records an issue out of Kavanaugh's confirmation. | ||
| They wanted to get... Kavanaugh was the White House staff secretary for President George W. Bush, and that means he's the inbox and outbox to the President of the United States. | ||
| He determines what records get to the President. | ||
| When they go into the Oval Office, where do they go after that for follow-up? | ||
| It's a big job that you're dealing with. | ||
| In Kavanaugh's time, it was probably 7 million pages of records, and there's just no way we can get through 7 million pages of records. | ||
| But we got all of his other records. | ||
| We got his records when he was in other government jobs, including in the White House Counsel's Office. | ||
| We got his records when he was a nominee several times to the lower courts. | ||
| We got his records when he worked for Ken Starr. | ||
| There are many other records we've got that went into how he thinks as a lawyer, how he thinks as a judge, his deliberative process. | ||
| On substance, I ran that confirmation for Senator Grassley as the Chief Counsel for Nominations. | ||
| The Democrats tried to accuse him of serial gang rape with six different people, including Michael Avenatti's clown car that came in there, and that was all bogus. | ||
| We investigated all that, and it was completely nonsense, bogus garbage. | ||
| and he was confirmed. What we have here in this case are her words on people. These are what she said at sentencing hearings, what she did, what she ordered in response to recommendations from the Sentencing Commission, from the prosecutors. And after hearing these heinous crimes that are described in gory detail in the pleadings posted on Article 3 Project's website, she nonetheless gave these monsters the lowest sentence | ||
|
unidentified
|
possible, eight of eight times. | |
| Unbelievable. | ||
| I tell you, let's play, I want to play the Lindsey Graham, if we can play the Lindsey Graham and the Joy Ann Reid, if we can take a second and play that, I want to, I want Mike Davis to respond to this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This morning, I am going to announce my decision on Judge Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court. | |
| I will oppose her, and I will vote no. | ||
| My decision is based upon her record of judicial activism, flawed sentencing methodology regarding child pornography cases, and a belief Judge Jackson will not be deterred by the plain meaning of the law when it comes to liberal causes. | ||
| I find Judge Jackson to be a person of exceptionally good character. | ||
| Respected by our peers and someone who has worked hard to achieve her current position. | ||
| However, her record is overwhelming in its lack of a steady judicial philosophy and a tendency to achieve outcomes in spite of what the law requires or common sense would dictate. | ||
| After a thorough review of Judge Jackson's record and information gained at the hearing from an evasive witness, I now know why Judge Jackson was the favorite of the radical left, and I will vote no. | ||
| Her record is overwhelming in its lack of a steady judicial philosophy and a tendency to achieve outcomes in spite of what the law requires or common sense would dictate. | ||
| After a thorough review of Judge Jackson's record and information gained at the hearing from an evasive witness, I now know why Judge Jackson was the favorite of the radical left, and I will vote no. | ||
| Whatever, Lindsey, if you watch the Supreme Court nomination hearings for Judge Katonji Brown Jackson, you're probably not surprised that Senator Lindsey Graham, who snarled and barked through the entire four-day proceeding, announced today that he will, ooh, surprise, not vote to confirm her. | ||
| Graham spoke on the Senate floor for over 20 minutes today, rattling off his list of grievances, including Judge Jackson's work as a public defender and the way Democrats treat a Republican nominee, which of course isn't irrelevant. | ||
| But just nine months ago, Graham and two other Republican senators actually voted to confirm Judge Jackson for the position that she holds right now on the U.S. | ||
| Court of Appeals for the D.C. | ||
| Circuit. | ||
| At the time, CNN reported that Graham told reporters, quote, I think she's qualified. | ||
| I think I try to be somewhat consistent here. | ||
| I think she's qualified for the job. | ||
| She has a different philosophy than I do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So what changed in nine months, Lindsey? | |
| What changed in 9 months, Joanne Reed, is what you won't talk about. | ||
| You'll notice right there, this is a huge tell. | ||
| When this has been reported on Lindsey Graham, he said on the revelations on child pornography, not one left-wing media company, broadcasting, nobody picked it up. | ||
| They didn't want to talk about it. | ||
| They are petrified to the core. | ||
| They know this hangs in the balance. | ||
| This went from a 65-35 layup, which they were going to be able to use in the midterm elections, to now it hangs in the balance. | ||
| And it's a career ender. | ||
| They're going to lose the U.S. | ||
| Senate because of this. | ||
| Arizona and Nevada will flip because of this vote. | ||
| Those two at least. | ||
| This is a career-ending vote because those two in Arizona, the Senator in Arizona and the Senator in Arizona, the Democrats need an overwhelming turnout of the Hispanic community. | ||
| That's not Steve Bannon saying that. | ||
| That's Politico's analysis saying that. | ||
| And this is a killer. | ||
| The Hispanic community is not going to support this. | ||
| Because they understand, they're at the forefront of this child sex trafficking that leads into this, the filming of rape of babies and rape of young people and their torture. | ||
| And that's what, it's not child pornography, it's watching the rape and torture of babies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And children. | |
| Mike, have you heard? | ||
| The bombshell wasn't just a child pornography. | ||
| It's Lindsey Graham saying what I'm saying. | ||
| An evasive witness. | ||
| Mike, you do this for a living. | ||
| Was she an evasive witness on these topics? | ||
| First of all, let's go to the spectrum. | ||
| Was she just not prepared? | ||
| Was she evasive? | ||
| Or was she lying? | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| No, I'm a lawyer, so I have to be careful how I say this because she's still a sitting judge. | ||
| But I will tell you that Josh Hawley tweeted out before her hearing the seven specific cases that we knew about at the time, right? | ||
| And seven of seven times where she went below the prosecutor's recommendation, went below the U.S. | ||
| sentencing guidelines, and gave rock-bottom sentences, seven out of seven times. | ||
| He tweeted it several days before her hearing. | ||
| On Monday, he walked through those cases with her very calmly, very coolly, very professionally, I thought, very effectively, and explained to her on Monday in his opening statement what questions he would ask on Tuesday. | ||
| She came in Tuesday And she was unprepared, for certain, because she wasn't able to answer the questions. | ||
| But she also omitted a key case, this U.S. | ||
| v. Kane from nine months ago. | ||
| We're talking about seven of seven cases All day Monday, all day Tuesday, and all of a sudden this case comes out, U.S. | ||
| v. Cain, where it's one of the most egregious cases she had with 6,500 images and videos of very, very young kids, babies. | ||
| And this guy shared this stuff 23 times. | ||
| It's god-awful stuff. | ||
| And if you're a judge and that's not burned into your memory, especially when it just happened nine months ago, It's just not credible, considering she said in one of her cases that she remembered the Hawkins case that we'll talk about from 2013, when she was sentencing a later defendant. | ||
| Because the defendant raised the Hawkins case to get a lower sentence from her, and she said she remembered the Hawkins case. | ||
| So it's just, it's not credible for her to say she did not remember U.S. | ||
| v. King during her Supreme Court confirmation hearing, and they're covering up. | ||
| They were hiding it because it's so egregious. | ||
| You know the preparation goes in this. | ||
| I mean, the murder board, I saw the gorgeous thing. | ||
| I mean, the level of preparation, this is so rare. | ||
| The lifetime appointment and confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice is so rare in American history. | ||
| It only happens every so often. | ||
| It has such a massive impact in the courts in every aspect of your life. | ||
| How could she not possibly, how could the White House not have her prepared on this topic? | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| Well, maybe the Democrats don't think that child pornography and pedophilia is that big of a problem. | ||
| I mean, clearly she doesn't think child pornography is that big of a problem. | ||
| She wants to give lighter sentences to them. | ||
| And she also doesn't think that they're pedophiles, even though the experts, both experts at that hearing in 2012, said not only are they pedophiles, they're dangerous pedophiles who we shouldn't give lighter sentences to. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| I would ask this to the American people. | ||
| Judge Jackson runs on the empathy standard, and she empathizes for these dangerous sex predators, these pedophiles who prey on kids. | ||
| And in the most egregious videos that you can imagine, if you read these transcripts, you can't watch the videos, it's illegal, you'll go to prison, but you can read these transcripts from these court pleadings, from these sentencing hearings, I haven't been able to sleep for two nights. | ||
| It's God-awful stuff. | ||
| If you can read this as a judge and think that these people deserve leniency instead of a bullet in their head, then there's something wrong with you. | ||
| Mike, we're going to take a break and we're going to come back and we're going to talk about the impact. | ||
| People have reached out. | ||
| One of the powers of this, of doing the show and having the show of such reach, and Mike being all over, is that people are reaching out to him today. | ||
| This is not a victimless crime. | ||
| Remember, the babies and the small children that are raped and tortured, and that's why he's raped and tortured, Never recover. | ||
| Their lives are destroyed. | ||
| They're destroyed. | ||
| And Mike's had direct impact on people reaching out to him now. | ||
| We're going to talk about the New York Post. | ||
| He's got a major article up. | ||
| There's links everywhere. | ||
| We're going to talk about how you get this. | ||
| We're going to talk about what we're going to do this weekend. | ||
| We're going to take a short break. | ||
| We've got the heroic Mike Davis from Article 3. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| We'll be back in the war room in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's all started, everything's begun, and you are over because Pandemic. | |
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| When there's no more, let's take down the CCP! | ||
| War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| We're in the boardroom, we've got Mike Davis. | ||
| Mike, I want to go through this in some sort of logical thing. | ||
| I want to talk about first the people who have reached out to you, and particularly the 73-year-old, if you could read it or summarize it. | ||
| What people have to understand, and she's got a lifetime appointment, and these cases are going to come up, they're more and more prevalent as this pandemic spreads, the victims here, the young babies and children that are tortured and raped, tortured and raped, never recover. | ||
| Their lives are destroyed forever. | ||
| Mike Davis, give us the example of people that have reached out to you, sir. | ||
| Yes, so I had a 73-year-old reach out to me and I communicated with this person and this person said that I can share this and I have on my Twitter feed and I can read part of this. | ||
| This person says, I am 73, a survivor of child porn and prostitution. | ||
| Without an audience, my parental figure would not have had a And an incentive to do this. | ||
| Incest was bad enough. | ||
| This torture created a whole new level of pain and suffering. | ||
| It started in the crib. | ||
| I have a great life now. | ||
| It took 27 years of therapy, two hospitalizations, I had DID, and multiple 12-step groups to overcome the torture in my youth. | ||
| I also have a wonderful husband and partner of almost 50 years. | ||
| He can verify the pain and suffering I endured to recover. | ||
| I am the exception. | ||
| One sibling died of an overdose in a skid row mission. | ||
| Another is still drinking and just got fired for too many DUIs. | ||
| Another weighs 600 pounds. | ||
| And another had a heart attack while drunk at 33. | ||
| Child porn and prostitution kills and or cripples its victims. | ||
| It must be stopped by penalties, treatment, oversight, and warning the public. | ||
| I don't hate pedophiles. | ||
| I have great empathy for them. | ||
| No one is born a pedophile. | ||
| Abuse creates them. | ||
| Even in jail, I would pay for treatment with my taxes. | ||
| My psychiatrist said that pedophiles who do the work I do, I did, will have less of a drive to act out. | ||
| I support treatment in and out of prison. | ||
| I do not support three-month jail sentences. | ||
| Thank you for the work you are doing. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| So right now on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was a long time, sorry, survive. | |
| I said I've had many examples over the last several days, especially of law enforcement officers, survivors, experts who have all contacted me, and they're very happy that you're that that we're doing this to you, because there are a lot of there are too many people in this country who are scared to speak up for the most vulnerable people on the planet, which are these child sex sex abuse victims. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
| That's what's happening here, the mainstream media. | ||
| MSNBC is supposed to be so empathetic? | ||
| They could care less. | ||
| You thought it was bad with the Uyghurs in the Olympics? | ||
| This is outrageous. | ||
| They could care less. | ||
| This is absolutely, completely horrific. | ||
| Paul Sperry, the great investigative reporter at the New York Post, has up right now on the New York Post. | ||
| There's links to it all over. | ||
| We're going to have links up on our Getter account of his article. | ||
| Tell us about, just summarize his article. | ||
| What material does he have that he's combined into this article, Mike Davis? | ||
| This guy is just a fantastic reporter, and he did the deep dive with Article 3 Project on the court records. | ||
| He went through the transcripts from the sentencing hearings, what was said to Judge Jackson at these sentencing hearings, at these eight separate sentencing hearings, and the sentencing recommendation Seven times. | ||
| Again, Kane's recommendation from nine months ago is under seal, but for seven of these cases, there was a U.S. | ||
| Attorney's Office sent a detailed submission, and we went through in detail on each one of these cases, all eight cases, and said who the defendant was, talked about what they were charged with, what the specific allegations are on each case, what the U.S. | ||
| Sentencing Guidelines recommended, what the U.S. | ||
| Attorney recommended, and how Judge Jackson Let's talk about how can people get access to the actual documents themselves? | ||
| How can we because we want to we're going to work an effort here to to Make sure that Collins and Murkowski and Romney and all these people actually have it read to them and they can hear it from the voice of the people, as horrific as it is. | ||
| Because we can't, it's not good enough. | ||
| Collins said, well, I had a follow-on meeting. | ||
| She sat on my sofa and had a cup of tea and, you know, it worked out. | ||
| That's not good enough. | ||
| We have no earthly idea what Collins saw, what was said. | ||
| It's not good enough. | ||
| Mike, Mike, Mike Davis. | ||
| I know that these senators were on notice that these records existed. | ||
| And they didn't do their job. | ||
| They didn't do their constitutional duty. | ||
| Their constitutional duty to actually look at these records was politically inconvenience. | ||
| And that is a major failure on their parts as United States senators. | ||
| When you're dealing with a nomination to the highest court in our land for the rest of their lives, there's only nine of these people, right? | ||
| We've had, you know, less than 120 justices in our entire country's history. | ||
| And if they're not willing to take some time to go look at these sentencing records, these sentencing transcripts, these sentencing recommendations. | ||
| If they're not even willing to have their staff go look at them for them, they're failing their duty. | ||
| This is a dereliction of one of their most important constitutional duties, which is to provide advice and consent on a president's Supreme Court nominee. | ||
| And this Supreme Court nominee has one of the most troubling, actually the most troubling record I have ever seen in a Supreme Court nominee, any judge. | ||
| And it's stunning to me that senators like Senator Collins, who I respected, I worked with on the on the Kavanaugh confirmation very closely. | ||
| She went through every record. | ||
| She went through his high school yearbooks. | ||
| She put us through our paces to make damn sure we chased down every one of these bogus allegations that came in, including goofball Michael Avenatti and his trash client, Julie Swetnick. | ||
| We had 45 people on Senator Grassley's staff chasing down About 45 witnesses. | ||
| We dotted her I's. | ||
| We crossed our T's. | ||
| We went after everything for her in that case and she can't even be bothered to go look at sentencing. | ||
| Eight sentencing records for eight specific cases that we've named. | ||
| It's shameful. | ||
| She needs to reconsider. | ||
| Hold on, hold on. | ||
| I don't think this is new information. | ||
| I don't think anybody knew that. | ||
| She actually put you guys through the exercise of a huge staff. | ||
| All the nonsense about Kavanaugh. | ||
| And she had to go through his high school yearbook. | ||
| And I know for the fact she hasn't reached out here. | ||
| She thinks it's beneath her to look at this. | ||
| But the Kavanaugh thing, explain that to me again. | ||
| I respect Senator Collins because I think she really does her job in doing due diligence on these judicial nominations. | ||
| And she put us through our paces. | ||
| I was the chief counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee. | ||
| And she was one of the undecideds, along with Jeff Flake and Lisa Murkowski at the very end. | ||
| And we had to go through our paces. | ||
| We had 45 people on Grassley's staff digging through every allegation that came in, every allegation. | ||
| We went through every bogus tip that went into the FBI tip hotline. | ||
| We went back 35 years. | ||
| We talked to All six of the allegations, including Michael Avenatti's garbage allegations, including the guy, Catalan was his name, on the Rhode Island boat who said that Kavanaugh gang raped some woman on a boat, but then he recanted his story. | ||
| We went through everything. | ||
| We did the most thorough vetting That you can do for a Supreme Court nominee and senators can't even bother to walk over to the Senate Judiciary Committee and read eight sentencing transcripts and seven pleadings from prosecutors? | ||
| There's no excuse for this. | ||
| This is a total dereliction of duty. | ||
| The 8 and the 7, the 8 sentencing and the 7 pleadings from the prosecutors. | ||
| What are people, we're going to make sure everyone that we've got is going to be out there so they can see it and do the work of Collins, Murkowski, and Romney. | ||
| What would they see, what will they see, and remember we're at a family show, what will they see when they go through there? | ||
| I just want to prepare people for this. | ||
| Let me give you one example. | ||
| One example is Wesley Hawkins that we've talked about. | ||
| This is a guy back in 2013 when Judge Jackson joined the D.C. | ||
| District Court. | ||
| He just came onto the bench. | ||
| from the Sentencing Commission, where she concocted this crazy, dangerous theory that these child pornographers are not dangerous pedophiles. | ||
| So what's her first case? | ||
| Wesley Hawkins. | ||
| He's picked up for possession of child pornography. | ||
| He had YouTube videos. | ||
| He had images. | ||
| He had five YouTube videos. | ||
| He had 16 images, 17 videos, and these included eight, 11, and 12-year-old kids. | ||
| Sentencing, guidelines, minimum. | ||
| Minimum, 97 months in prison. | ||
| U.S. | ||
| Attorney's recommendation, minimum, 24 months. | ||
| It's unclear to me why they were so far under the minimum there, but that's during the Obama administration, so that may explain it. | ||
| You have her own staff, when she blames her staff, she blames the probation office for her lenient sentences. | ||
| Her own staff recommends 18 months. | ||
| So 97 months, 24 months, 18 months for sick child pornography of 8-year-olds, as young as 8-year-olds. | ||
| She gave him 3 months. | ||
| 3 months, 97% below the sentencing guideline recommendation of 97 months. | ||
| And this is important. | ||
| Two things happened during that time. | ||
| She did not order computer monitoring after he left prison after three months, which is routine for these cases, so you can make sure that they're not preying on kids online again. | ||
| So she doesn't order routine computer monitoring. | ||
| She lets him out, 97% below the guidelines, and guess what he does during this time? | ||
| He re-offends. | ||
| He comes back in, they have to send him to jail again. | ||
| I mean, it's just This is what I mean by this is a perfect example of when you don't take this stuff seriously, you have dangerous pedophiles. | ||
| You have the same Hawkins guy when reporters, the Washington Post, did their first investigative journalism in this entire ordeal with this child pornography case. | ||
| And guess what their investigative journalism was? | ||
| They go find this Hawkins, And try to write this puff piece to play him up like he's the victim here, like he's the victim. | ||
| He's the predator who re-offended, but somehow he's the victim in the Washington Post eyes because they're trying to carry the water for Jackson and make, just to get her on the Supreme Court to have another liberal activist on the Supreme Court. | ||
| Even he says that he was surprised he only got three sentences, three months sentence to the Washington Post reporter. | ||
| Other defendants, more of these defendants actually cited To Hodkins, this case, when Judge Jackson was sentencing them and said, look, you only gave them three months. | ||
| And she says, I remember that case vividly, or whatever she said. | ||
| We can find it in the transcripts. | ||
| Again, this is all online. | ||
| I have page numbers. | ||
| I have the transcripts hyperlinked with specific page numbers where you can go look at this stuff. | ||
| It is much more horrific than even what I'm describing here. | ||
| It's child sex abuse, including of young kids, including of babies, torture, rape, It's it's the most bio stuff that you can read. | ||
| How do people get to that? | ||
| I want to make sure people get to this over the weekend. | ||
| I want to tell you watch Mike's getter and his Twitter feed and of course War Room and my personal getter feed. | ||
| We're going to be actually coming out with instructions. | ||
| I'm going to probably do a couple of live getters over the weekend to make sure that we're up to speed and people we're going to make sure that we must ensure that Collins Murkowski and Romney get this and force them to basically read this stuff and consider it. | ||
| Mike, how do people get to your site? | ||
| I know you've got to bounce. | ||
| How do people get to your site to actually read this material in its raw form? | ||
| So, article3project.org, article number3project.org, and my getter on Twitter is MRDDMIA. | ||
| MRDDMIA. | ||
| That's Michael R. Davis, Des Moines, Iowa, where I'm from. | ||
| Okay, I want everybody to push out his ads. | ||
| I want everybody to read this material and push it out. | ||
| I'm going to be on Getter Live probably later this afternoon. | ||
| Definitely tomorrow we're going to figure out how to do this. | ||
| We've got a lot of work. | ||
| The committee meets on Monday. | ||
| It's 11-11 right now, but we've got a lot of work before us, but we've taken it down from 65. | ||
|
unidentified
|
M-R-D-D-M-I-A. | |
| And thank you very much, Steve. | ||
| a dead heat and it's a career-ending vote for Democratic senators in Arizona and Nevada, probably other places too. | ||
| But we'll get to all that. | ||
| Mike, one more time, what's your Gitter account? | ||
| MRDDMIA. | ||
| And thank you very much, Steve. | ||
| You've been great. | ||
| Thanks, brother. | ||
| You've done all the work. | ||
| 202-224-3121. | ||
| Call the United States Senate switchboard right now. | ||
| Let folks know how you feel. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| When we'll be back, Joe Allen joins us about the rise of the global New World Order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
all next in the world. | |
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it, until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what Big Tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| Okay, make sure you go to MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| You've got the pillows as low as $19.99, sheets as low as $39.99. | ||
| You need a great night's sleep to man the ramparts of the War Room. | ||
| And I've got to tell you, I know it's a grind every day to man the ramparts, but that's why we need you guys well rested, because we've got a lot of work to do. | ||
| More, I'm going to be on Getter later in the day. | ||
| After you go and read, to go to Mike Davis's Article 3 site. | ||
| Also, in the next hour, we'll be doing this interview with Bobby Kennedy Jr. | ||
| about the real Anthony Fauci. | ||
| You will absolutely melt down about the details of what Fauci has done in his career and what he's done here in this situation with the CCP virus. | ||
| I want to bring in Joe Allen. | ||
| We're going to get to the globalization part on Monday, but he's got some breaking news on AI and the vaccines. | ||
| Joe, tell me what you got. | ||
| Well, first I'd like to say that the book, The Real Anthony Fauci, is phenomenal. | ||
| I've said it many times and I cannot recommend it enough. | ||
| The new piece that I have out, Vaxxed by Machines, Tracked by Machines, is really, like I say, a tiny, tiny contribution to the mountain of work that Bobby Kennedy has put together. | ||
| What I focus on are two different developments, one theoretical, the other that's happening presently. | ||
| The first is The second part of the article, though, is about the future of vaccine production, in particular the way in which they're being generated. | ||
| put together and the technology developed by Moderna's co-founder Robert Langer. | ||
| The second part of the article, though, is about the future of vaccine production, in particular the way in which they're being generated. | ||
| Of all the horrific things we've seen in the last two years, the rapid rollout of mRNA vaccines, the global experiment on the civilian population, and the cover-up of the vaccine injuries obviously has left most of us completely suspicious of what they have up their sleeve next. | ||
| Now, without speculating beyond what I can show, the use of artificial intelligence in vaccine generation is increasing output exponentially. | ||
| For instance, Moderna recently announced through their chief data and AI officer, Dave Johnson, that they've gone from testing 30 RNA sequences a month to 1,000 mRNA sequences a month, meaning that they're using artificial intelligence to both model and test in silico potential mRNA vaccines for 15 different diseases. | ||
| And they're also using deep learning techniques to actually generate mRNA sequences. | ||
| What this means is that they will in the very near future, and this is not something that I'm even speculating on, this is something that they're openly announcing, they will be rolling out en masse Tons of new experimental vaccines that will either be sold to the public through the same devious methods that the COVID vaccines were sold, or perhaps, if they can generate enough fear and panic, they will be able to mandate a significant number of these vaccines. | ||
| So, the article again, Vaxxed by Machines, Tracked by Machines, you can find it at warroom.org, you can find it at my social media, and you can find it at my site. | ||
| Very fascinating material, and I think that it really should inform, to the small extent I can add to what Robert Malone and Naomi Wolf are doing, inform what the shape of the future of vaccination production is going to look like. | ||
| I want to ask you, and pull the camera back just a bit, and we've got, by the way, Bobby Kennedy next with the real Anthony Fauci, because Fauci's going to be another issue. | ||
| It's Fauci, you're going to have Hunter Biden, you're going to have the southern border. | ||
| These are massive issues that we're going to grind down on, because they're all going to lead to the impeachment of Joe Biden. | ||
| About artificial intelligence, I mean, we've had you on here about the war in Ukraine, you're seeing different aspects of it in finance. | ||
| Is the concept of artificial intelligence and its acceptance and use throughout many different modalities and many different segments, is it your belief that it is accelerating at an accelerating rate right now? | ||
| Joe Allen. | ||
| Well, there was a recent study put out by Stanford, their annual AI index. | ||
| And what it has shown is not unlike the comparative sort of Moore's law that you see in computing. | ||
| You see a rapid acceleration in fields like facial recognition, natural language processing, and especially, and I think this is very chilling, facial recognition with masks. | ||
| You see it in pattern recognition in biology. | ||
| You see it in surveillance techniques. | ||
| And you also see it in sifting through social media content to better target certain individuals. | ||
| All of that is accelerating, some of it at an exponential pace, some of it at a slower pace, but all of it is moving forward rapidly, and in particular, the sort of propaganda that these are the sorts of techniques, these are the mechanisms of cognition that we should be relying on significantly in the future. | ||
| Basically, the idea is we should trust the machines, and some people argue we should trust the machines more than humans in many situations. | ||
| It's a terrifying prospect. | ||
| Joe, how do people get to you on social media, and how do they get to your articles? | ||
| It's amazing stuff here. | ||
| How do they get to you? | ||
| You can find me at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z. | ||
| Gitter and Twitter. | ||
| Also my website, joebot.xyz. | ||
| Joe, thank you very much. | ||
| OK, I'm going to be going live on Twitter probably this afternoon and on Getter, excuse me, on Getter this afternoon and tomorrow. | ||
| We've got a lot to do on this Supreme Court justice, a lot of moving pieces. | ||
| We've got a very massive interview next that's going to blow your head up about Anthony Fauci. | ||
| Hunter Biden. | ||
| We ain't forgetting any of this. | ||
| We've got to drill down and get the facts because they're still driving much of the discussion. | ||
| Naomi Wolf and these people are doing incredible, incredible work on the FISA 55,000 pages. | ||
| That's all we're doing, interim reports as we go. | ||
| So join us next for my, I think, incredible interview, one of the best interviews I've ever given with Bobby Kennedy Jr., the real Anthony Fauci, the crimes and what he's done to the American people. |
Export Selection