March 29, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:48
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Do you believe what you said, that Putin can't remain in power? | |
| Or do you now regret saying that? | ||
| Because your government has been trying to walk that back. | ||
| Did your words complicate matters? | ||
| Well, you asked three different questions. | ||
| I'll answer them all. | ||
| Number one, I'm not walking anything back. | ||
| The fact of the matter is, I was expressing the more outrage I felt toward the way Putin is dealing and the actions of this man. | ||
| Just brutality. | ||
| Half the children in Ukraine. | ||
| I had just come from being with those families. | ||
| But I want to make it clear, I wasn't then, nor am I now, articulating a policy change. | ||
| I was expressing the more outrage that I feel, and I make no apologies for it. | ||
| My personal feelings. | ||
| Secondly, you asked me about, uh, well, what was the second part? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Complicate the diplomacy of this moment. | |
| No, I don't think it does. | ||
| You know, uh, the, uh, uh, the fact is that we're in a situation where, uh, um, what complicates the situation at the moment is the, uh, the escalatory efforts of Putin to continue to engage in carnage, the kind of behavior that, uh, That makes the whole world say, my God, what is this man doing? | ||
| That's what complicates things a great deal. | ||
| But I don't think it complicates it at all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I still want to get back to your original words that he cannot remain in power. | |
| Can you help us understand? | ||
| You have more foreign policy experience than any president who has ever held this office. | ||
| Whether those are your personal feelings or your feelings as president, do you understand why people would believe you, as someone commanding one of the largest nuclear arsenals in the world, saying someone cannot remain in power is a statement of U.S. | ||
| policy? | ||
| And also, are you concerned about propaganda use of those remarks by the Russians? | ||
| No and no. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tell me why. | |
| You have so much experience. | ||
| You are the leader of this country. | ||
| Because it's ridiculous. | ||
| Nobody believes we're going to take down... I was talking about taking down Putin. | ||
| Nobody believes that. | ||
| Number one. | ||
| Number two. | ||
| What have I been talking about since this all began? | ||
| The only war that's worse than one intended is one that's unintended. | ||
| The last thing I want to do is engage in a land war or a nuclear war with Russia. | ||
| That's not part of it. | ||
| I was expressing my outrage at the behavior of this man. | ||
| It's outrageous. | ||
| It's outrageous. | ||
| And it's more an aspiration than anything. | ||
| He shouldn't be in power. | ||
| There's no, I mean, people like this shouldn't be ruling countries, but they do. | ||
| The fact they do, but doesn't mean I can't express my outrage about it. | ||
| Last question. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, thank you. | |
| You've said that you're confident that your comment won't undermine diplomatic efforts. | ||
| But just to be clear, are you confident that Vladimir Putin sees it that way, that he will not use this as an escalatory... I don't care what he thinks. | ||
| Look, here's the deal. | ||
| He's going to do what he's going to do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Putin, look... But you're not concerned that he may see your language and view that as a sign of a reason for escalation, use that as an excuse to escalate, given his recent behavior? | |
| Given his recent behavior, you should, excuse me, I shouldn't say that to you. | ||
| Given his recent behavior, people should understand that he is going to do what he thinks he should do, period. | ||
| He's not affected by anybody else, including, unfortunately, apparently his own advisors. | ||
| This is a guy who goes to the beat of his own drummer. | ||
| And the idea that he is going to do something outrageous because I called him for what he was and what he's doing, I think is just not rational. | ||
| No, it's not a question. | ||
| The question is, is there something to meet on that would justify him being able to end this war and be able to rebuild Ukraine? | ||
| Are you worried that other leaders in the world are going to start to doubt that America is back if some of these big things that you say on the world stage keep getting walked back? | ||
| What's getting walked back? | ||
| It sounded like, just in the last couple days, it sounded like you told US troops they were going to Ukraine. | ||
| It sounded like you said it was possible the US would use a chemical weapon. | ||
| And it sounded like you were calling for regime change in Russia. | ||
| And we know... | ||
| None of the three occurred. | ||
| None of the three? | ||
| None of the three. | ||
| Mr. President? | ||
| You interpret the language that way. | ||
| I was talking to the troops. | ||
| We're talking about helping train the troops in that are the Ukrainian troops that are in Poland. | ||
| That's what the context. | ||
| I sat there with those guys for a couple hours. | ||
| That's what we talked about. | ||
| So when you said you're going to see when you're there, you were not intending... I was referring to, with, speaking with and talking with the Ukrainian troops that were in Poland. | ||
| And when you said a chemical weapon used by Russia would trigger a response in kind. | ||
| It will trigger a significant response. | ||
| What does that mean? | ||
| I'm not going to tell you. | ||
| Why would I tell you? | ||
| You've got to be silly. | ||
| The world wants to know. | ||
| The world wants to know a lot of things. | ||
| I'm not telling them what the response would be. | ||
| Then Russia knows the response. | ||
| And did you get any chance to watch much of the news? | ||
| I can't listen to any more of this. | ||
| I can't listen to any more of this. | ||
| Oh, I do want to save that Supreme Court clip. | ||
| My crack production team. | ||
| Thank you, Denver, and thank you, production team, for putting it together. | ||
| It's Monday, 28 March, Year of Our Lord 2022, almost end of the first quarter. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are in deep, deep trouble. | |
| That is a guy making decisions. | ||
| And number one, you got to remember, always Biden was the. | ||
| Was always laughed at how dumb he was and what a big mouth he was and how we go on and talk forever. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The council on the Senate Foreign Relations. | |
| What he was considered a joke worldwide, you know, was he last in his class at Delaware Law School? | ||
| Maybe that's just rumor. | ||
| Let's say bottom of the class. | ||
| If you remember the show House of Cards, they had that goofy vice president that was from Pennsylvania that sat in the chair. | ||
| Remember that? | ||
| The real the moron that was that was Joe Biden. | ||
| But we're in a serious, you know, elections have consequences. | ||
| Stolen elections have catastrophic consequences. | ||
| And we say that all the time. | ||
| It's our mantra here. | ||
| But this is so dangerous. | ||
| We are putting people in harm's way. | ||
| The people in harm's way are the Ukrainian people. | ||
| Look at that grab bag of not even thought through, half-baked sayings. | ||
| This is what I'm saying. | ||
| All the constitutionists on the right, let me start with Sean Hannity and all the crowd running, why are you not sitting there and demanding that Joe Biden go before Congress or at least on the War Powers Act or with a declaration of war? | ||
| He's declared and we're in an active | ||
| Economic war with the Russian people to take down their central bank to destroy their currency They have all these sanctions and stop everything from going and they can't trade to to to Have regime change His gaffe is what they say in the DC The funny joke is that the gap is when you actually say the truth when you know, you didn't mean it to get out But that's a cute way to say this is not cute Right there these half-baked ideas Or no ideas at all? | ||
| Or contradictory ideas? | ||
| Oh, nobody's going to stop him? | ||
| Why is all the deterrence? | ||
| What were you doing? | ||
| What was the walk-up? | ||
| Was it day after day after day? | ||
| You're going to have deterrence? | ||
| You're going to do this? | ||
| You're going to do that? | ||
| Nothing's going to stop him? | ||
| Why don't you tell the American people that then? | ||
| Why are you saying that now? | ||
| The reason is you have no earthy idea what you're doing. | ||
| You're just wandering around. | ||
| And this is not because of reduced mental capacity. | ||
| Let's stop that argument. | ||
| This guy was dumb and unfocused at the top of his game. | ||
| Obama and them used to mock him. | ||
| Remember, he said, the thing is, let Joe get going on the Senate Foreign Relations. | ||
| He'd talk forever and never say anything. | ||
| And of course, Gates and all those guys said he was on the wrong side of every big strategic effort we've had in 50 years on the wrong side of. | ||
| Because he's a moron. | ||
| He's just not a smart guy. | ||
| And this is complicated. | ||
| This is why he had the cheerleading and you know, going there and in this big speech and oh, they're sitting there. | ||
| I was like Kennedy and like Reagan at the Brandenburg Gate. | ||
| Will you give me a break? | ||
| A bored salad of all this highfalutin rhetoric. | ||
| Why people are getting slaughtered in Ukraine. | ||
| And he's too gutless to go to the southern border. | ||
| We're gonna go to the southern border. | ||
| Now, I gotta bring in Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Man in the news, Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| But on The War Room, we only focus on signal, not noise. | ||
| So we're not going to talk about any of the noise around you, Dr. Navarro. | ||
| We're going to talk about the signal. | ||
| And the signal is, Dr. Navarro, you've been in there. | ||
| You've been in the Situation Room. | ||
| You've been next to President Trump, a real leader when the tough decisions are made. | ||
| Please explain to our audience what is going on here. | ||
| And the press, who kind of doesn't want to... | ||
| They're bracing him up with pretty straightforward questions and just look at the expression on these people's faces. | ||
| They cannot believe he's giving these answers. | ||
| They don't even know how to ask a follow-on because it's like, oh my God, he could melt down in front of me. | ||
| My boss is going to blame me. | ||
| The network's going to blame me for the end of his phony presidency. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| I think we've got to get back to Joe Biden's basement and just put him in there, because the dangerous dynamic here is that this whole mess started war through weakness. | ||
| Remember Donald Trump, four years in office, nothing, no problems with Russia, North Korea, China, Venezuela, Iran. | ||
| Peace through strength. | ||
| We get Biden in there. | ||
| It's war through weakness. | ||
| And the problem, Steve, in this dynamic, and it's not funny when you see this moron do his thing, is that he is projecting in his mind toughness. | ||
| But every time the White House pulls him back, it's clear he's not in charge and that we people are. | ||
| So we're worse off Every time he opens his mouth, just from a geopolitical point of view. | ||
| You're one of the experts on economic, you and I are sanctioned by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| You and I are considered, in Josh Rogan's book, we are the co-heads of the super hawks, which are harder than the realists and the hawks because we want to take, we don't think the Chinese Communist Party is legitimate, we want to take it down. | ||
| A direct question to you. | ||
| Are we, has the United States initiated an economic war against the Russian people? | ||
| Yes or no? | ||
| Of course they have. | ||
| The whole notion of economic sanctions is just that. | ||
| And the danger here, we did that with China with sanctions, and we've been very overly reliant on financial sanctions because of the special privilege of having the dollar as the reserve currency. | ||
| The problem is that by waging economic warfare against Russia, against China, against Venezuela, against Iran, we've set in motion the steady deterioration of the dollar itself. | ||
| It's the de-dollarization of the world financial currency system. | ||
| And that's just going to come back and bite us in the butt. | ||
| And so, we also, in waging economic war, of course, Steve, look, it's like Putin's doing his kinetic thing. | ||
| That's the hot war, the tanks, the missiles, the guns, right? | ||
| You and I know that nuclear weapons in some sense are passe. | ||
| The real dangerous weapons these days are what the Chinese communists have memorialized as unrestricted warfare. | ||
| It's the cyber warfare that can take out our transportation systems, our supply chains, our electricity grid. | ||
| And I'll tell you what, I mean, it's a neck and neck race between the Chai Koms and Russia as to who does that better. | ||
| So bottom line, we're on very, very dangerous ground. | ||
| And I think I think I'm personally going to do this. | ||
| So if you don't have the sign, I am going to make the sign that says stolen elections have catastrophic consequences and replace it with the one at your left shoulder about conspiracies and coincidences, which is a beautiful quote, Steve. | ||
| But the quote of the day really is that stolen elections do indeed have catastrophic consequences. | ||
| And we are We're just hurtling down a path, and there's nothing funny about it. | ||
| I mean, you laugh all you want at this clown, but this is very, very, very, very serious business, Steve. | ||
| Very serious business. | ||
| And let's be blunt. | ||
| We're trying to have regime change. | ||
| In fact, that's kind of the reason we said this morning, and he said not walking it back, because that's what he really meant. | ||
| Don't use the we here, Steve! | ||
| Don't use the we there. | ||
| Be careful there. | ||
| It's like that government, that regime, there was regime change on November 3rd. | ||
| That was a regime change. | ||
| That was a coup d'etat, a stolen election. | ||
| And now we have one regime in Washington, D.C. | ||
| trying to take out another regime in Moscow. | ||
| You and I not only have no part about it, we were at the vanguard of trying to stop that regime change. | ||
| Here in Washington D.C. | ||
| and all we get is Jack we got to bounce when we're back in a moment after us | ||
|
unidentified
|
Take down the CCD Everything's just beginning for the games you want to play Bring it on and I will fight to the end just watch and see | |
| It's all started, everything's begun and you are over Cause we're taking down the CCD Spread the word all through Hong Kong We will fight till they're all gone We rejoice when there's no more Let's take down the CCD But as he tries to steer the U.S. | ||
| and its allies away from an escalating conflict on the continent, his standing at home is in dire straits. | ||
| Our new NBC News National Poll has President Biden's job approval at just 40%. | ||
| That's the lowest it's been at any point since he took office. | ||
| More broadly, voters are not happy with the current state of this country. | ||
| About 7 in 10 Americans say it's heading on the wrong track. | ||
| And underneath those numbers is an alarming trend for the White House. | ||
| The public's economic frustrations are growing, and its confidence in Biden's ability to address them is shrinking. | ||
| Biden's handling of the war hasn't seemed to help his standing either. | ||
| A month into the conflict and 71% of Americans say they have just some or very little confidence in President Biden leading the U.S. | ||
| through the crisis in Ukraine, compared to 28% who say they have a great deal or quite a bit of confidence in Biden's wartime leadership. | ||
| ...a decline for the president. | ||
| Our new numbers here at the NBC poll give him an approval rating of just 40%. | ||
| Compare that to the last time we took a poll a couple months ago in January. | ||
| He's down three points from 43 down to 40. | ||
| So what's driving these numbers? | ||
| One interesting thing is it may not be COVID. | ||
| At least not to the degree it was before. | ||
| This is the president's job approval rating when it comes to his handling of COVID. | ||
| And you see he's now over 50% back above water on this. | ||
| That's actually a change in the right direction for Biden since our last poll. | ||
| Now, cases have come down. | ||
| You see mask regulations going away. | ||
| Life may be feeling a little more normal to some people here. | ||
| Biden's handling of COVID, he's actually improved there. | ||
| And yet, as we say, the overall approval rating is down. | ||
| So what is driving it? | ||
| Here's one thing. | ||
| You mentioned it, the handling of Russia in Ukraine. | ||
| There's broad consensus in the poll when you talk about who Americans perceive as the good guys and the bad guys when it comes to this conflict. | ||
| But the president's handling of it, only a 41% approval rating right there. | ||
| And then there is this, and I think this is the big one. | ||
| We've been asking since the start of Biden's presidency, how do you think he's handling the economy? | ||
| And just look at this trend line. | ||
| The first time we tested it back in April of 2021, he had a 52% approval rating on the economy and every single poll since then, that number has come down and now it's at a new low. | ||
| He is down to just a 33% approval rating on the economy. | ||
| This is basically 2 to 1 disapprove on the economy and this comes as voters are saying that what is on their mind most, well they are thinking about the Russian-Ukraine war. | ||
| But that's not one or two. | ||
| One and two is cost of living, jobs in the economy. | ||
| So you add that together with Biden's, the voters assessment of Biden on the economy. | ||
| And I thought this is another interesting question we asked here. | ||
| We basically said, hey, look, both of these things are important. | ||
| Let's stipulate that. | ||
| But what do you think the president's top priority should be? | ||
| Should it be helping to reduce inflation, improve the economy, or helping to end the Russia-Ukraine war? | ||
| Again, more than a two to one margin. | ||
| Folks saying it should be helping to improve the economy, helping to improve the inflation situation. | ||
| And one of the things this adds up to, it's not just bad news politically for the president, Haley, it is bad news politically for the president's party. | ||
| What you see here is the generic congressional ballot. | ||
| We asked folks, which party would you like to see control Congress after the midterms this year? | ||
| Republicans now have the lead in our poll on that, 46-44. | ||
| Just look what a difference that was. | ||
| The last midterm around this time, March 2018, Donald Trump was president. | ||
| Donald Trump had low approval ratings. | ||
| It was the Democrats who were way up in the generic congressional ballot, the Democrats who had a big year. | ||
| Now the Republicans are up two points. | ||
| And you can see how in the past, this is often, you can see it this time of year. | ||
| March 2006 is another time. | ||
| Democrats had a big lead. | ||
| They had a big November election as well. | ||
| Those big Democratic leads that have preceded those big Democratic years, you're not seeing them right now in the generic congressional ballot. | ||
| You are seeing a Republican lead there as well. | ||
| So that's also got to be concerning for the White House and for Democrats on Capitol Hill. | ||
| Kornacki's misleading you with the NBC data. | ||
| He's supposed to be good, and he is good, but he's misleading you, and the producers are going to mislead you. | ||
| Among independents, it's a 10-point spread. | ||
| We broke that today with Steve Cortez. | ||
| It's 41-31. | ||
| They're going to get wiped out. | ||
| We have a unique opportunity, and we must do this. | ||
| We must destroy the Democratic Party as a political institution on a national basis. | ||
| We have the opportunity to do it. | ||
| You can see by every number. | ||
| Karnanky right there, as bad as that report was he had, it's so much worse out of their poll. | ||
| The independence spread on the Congressionals, 41-31, 10 points. | ||
| I think it's a historic spread. | ||
| Peter Navarro, your assessment of the polling in this new Biden budget they just put out? | ||
| See, what does jump out at you is that what people primarily care about is the economy and inflation in particular. | ||
| And this is shaping up as kind of a Carter-Reagan 1970s-style election redux. | ||
| Back in the 70s, when Carter, a one-term president, was running against Reagan, the misery index topped 20%. | ||
| What was that? | ||
| That was unemployment rate Plus the inflation rate. | ||
| We're not there quite yet, but we are certainly going to head there. | ||
| And today's news with Biden's budget is really going to shove, not push, but shove Biden further towards that stagflationary problem. | ||
| Let me just break it down for you really quick, Steve. | ||
| It's a $6 trillion plus spending package, but we've got $4 trillion now of tax hikes, Biden tax hikes in the pipeline, $1.5 billion Already for his bill back better, and he's proposing another two and a half trillion dollar tax hike. | ||
| The Dems MSNBC standard, they're going to try to market it as taxes on the rich and the big fat corporations. | ||
| But what it really is, Steve, is a tax on blue collar manufacturing workers and middle class families. | ||
| And here's why that is so. | ||
| If you look at the corporate tax hike that they're proposing, they want to go Uh, from 21% up to around 29%. | ||
| Okay, so you and I are populist and our guts would say, yeah, tax those corporations. | ||
| But the thing that we learned early on Steve at Harvard and elsewhere. | ||
| Was that when you tax American corporations here, they send their jobs over there. | ||
| So if Biden thinks that that's going to create jobs by taxing those corporations, he's absolutely wrong. | ||
| And people are going to get hurt by an increase in the corporate tax rate, which Donald Trump lowered is going to be blue collar, black and brown manufacturing workers. | ||
| The other part of the tax hike, which I think is troublesome, Is raising the top bracket to thirty nine percent. | ||
| That's going to catch a lot of middle class families and small business owners who have their tax rates set by that rate. | ||
| So this is this is a mess. | ||
| What that tax will do, Steve, this is this is the buried lead is going to slow the economy down. | ||
| That's what tax hikes do at a time When the increased spending that's being pumped into the system along with the supply chain fragilities are pushing the inflation rate up. | ||
| That's quintessential stagnation. | ||
| So I'm looking at an approval rating that probably will get down to 20%. | ||
| Here's the one thing we know they're going to do. | ||
| It's like when they say border. | ||
| Oh, we're going to give everybody an embassy. | ||
| We're going to have security. | ||
| They always let people in and never get the security. | ||
| The spending's coming. | ||
| It's a $6 trillion spending bill, and that'll get somehow that budget gets translated into appropriations. | ||
| Unless Republicans have the stones, because we're going to be in control, have the stones to stop this. | ||
| The Spain is going to be there. | ||
| I'm not sure I totally agree with you on some of these tax sites on the super wealthy in particular corporate. | ||
| These will corporate. | ||
| I didn't talk about it. | ||
| You can say, Hey, I can raise, I can raise the tax. | ||
| Hey, I can raise the tax. | ||
| I can raise the tax and make sure they don't ship. | ||
| Don't ship the job. | ||
| When we were in the White House, Steve, when we were in the White House, you went, no, Peter Navarro, Peter. | ||
| Peter Navarro went totally AEI on me right there. | ||
| Went totally AEI. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But no, no, no, no, no. | |
| The billionaire tax cuts, Steve, that we talked about in the White House on the very top of the top, the way Biden's doing is not the way we would do it. | ||
| But that would have cut the legs out from Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders and everything. | ||
| So what I'm talking about is just simply the marginal tax rates being raised that are going to capture middle class families. | ||
| Tell me when the reality is this, when we have another $2 trillion deficit next year, unless the Republicans have the stones to stop this. | ||
| Tell me, Peter Navarro, how inflationary is that going to be, when you're dumping another $2 trillion of deficit spending? | ||
| How inflationary is that going to be, sir? | ||
| We're going to have double-digit inflation rates, and our mortgage rates are going to spike. | ||
| A housing bubble collapse. | ||
| And it will look like the 70s. | ||
| We got all the ingredients of the 1970s with the food and energy price shocks, the high interest rates, the mortgage rates that are creeping up. | ||
| Very interesting, Steve. | ||
| Right now in the stock market, I called a short call back in November. | ||
| That's worked out well. | ||
| It's down from there. | ||
| But I'm also shorting the long bond. | ||
| Follow me here. | ||
| When you short the long bond, you're betting the 10-year is going to go up, right? | ||
| And it's really kind of interesting. | ||
| It's like that thing's panning out in spades too. | ||
| And so what you're seeing is a pure Inflationary stagflationary signal from the bond and stock markets together. | ||
| This is going to be bad. | ||
| It's and today when they do stuff like this Steve, it just signals to the financial markets in America and everyone in between. | ||
| They don't understand basic economics. | ||
| The beauty and genius of Trump was structural adjustments to promote productivity and prosperity and real wage growth. | ||
| OK, tax cuts, deregulation, most of all, fair trade and strategic energy dominance. | ||
| And Biden is systematically undoing everything. | ||
| And that's just going to slow us down even as inflation goes up. | ||
| So that's the stagflationary forecast. | ||
| And this is, you know, the only good news is it could be the ban on 100 seats for 100 years, destruction of the Radical Democratic Party as we know it. | ||
| But boy, it's going to be a costly victory, Steve, economically. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| It's going to be tough. | ||
| Look, there's going to be so much carnage. | ||
| All right, Peter, quickly, how do people get to you on social media, sir? | ||
| Yeah, real Peter Navarro getter is the Twitter killer. | ||
| Please go to PeterNavarro.com. | ||
| Take a look at the In Trump Time book. | ||
| It's back in the news. | ||
| Chapter 21. | ||
| Read about the Green Bay Sweep. | ||
| Why? | ||
| We wanted only legal votes counted. | ||
| I'll donate all the proceeds to get you a haircut. | ||
| up there and answer questions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're shameless. | |
| You use a contempt charge to sell books. | ||
| You're shameless. | ||
| I've donated all the proceeds to get you a haircut. | ||
| That's it, baby. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa! | |
| Take this. | ||
| We're going to the border next. | ||
| We're at Eagle Pass, Texas. | ||
| Ben Burquham and Audie Caballo, next. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| We've got pillows as low as $19.99. | ||
| These sales are not going to take place forever. | ||
| Go to our square, that's what it's called, when you go to MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| We've got it all up there. | ||
| Take action, action, action. | ||
| We're working on having this... | ||
| Webinar. | ||
| Dr. Naomi Wolf, her webinar has been so successful that we're going to try to help do it for some other people here, including the people looking at these machines. | ||
| So we're going to put that together for Mike Lundell. | ||
| Make sure you support the armor-piercing shell that is Mike Lundell. | ||
| Of course, you're humble servants here at the War Room. | ||
| Promo code warroom on mypilot.com. | ||
| I'm glad we got the clocks right. | ||
| I'm just in sync with my producer here all the time. | ||
| We're timed right. | ||
| Peter Navarro is good. | ||
| I cut him off 50 seconds ago. | ||
| He's still hung in there. | ||
| I want to go to the Texas border. | ||
| This is the one that Joe Biden should be down at. | ||
| Our team, Ben Berquam, the great investigative reporter for Real America's Voice, plus Auden Cabello are down at Eagle Pass. | ||
| Guys, take it away. | ||
| What do you see? | ||
| Steve, we just left. | ||
| We were with you in Acuna earlier this morning. | ||
| We left Del Rio. | ||
| On our way down from Del Rio, we saw two apprehensions of vehicles out in the desert, pickup trucks loaded with illegals. | ||
| These are the illegals that don't want to get caught. | ||
| I'm going to talk about the group that's behind us. | ||
| The one that's behind us are the ones that turn themselves in they become a strain on border patrol resources so that the guys out in the desert have an easier time getting away. | ||
| And Alden, I'll let him talk to you a little bit about that, about the fact that these guys, the ones out in the desert, he's never, he hadn't seen that before. | ||
| It's really a cartel tactic. | ||
| Those guys are all led by the cartels. | ||
| But as soon as we got down here to Eagle Pass, as we were setting up our cameras on the vista just to our right, the river's right next to us, we're on an affluent area, big massive mansions over here on the Eagle Pass side. | ||
| This group of about 50, we noticed them walking along the Mexico side. | ||
| We got a drone up in the air and actually caught them going across the river. | ||
| Now they're being processed behind us. | ||
| This is how prevalent it is. | ||
| 2,500 illegals in the Del Rio sector alone this weekend. | ||
| And now this in broad daylight, even one of them came across on crutches. | ||
| It's that easy to come across to invade our country now that you can simply come across on crutches in the saddest part. | ||
| It was watching the National Guard actually be relegated to bringing chairs out for people to have them sit on. | ||
| The invasion is ongoing out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
As I've been reporting all of last week, we not only have eyes on the ground, now we also have eyes in the air, and our investigative instinct brought us all the way over here, and we're able to catch these guys on the Mexican side as they're crossing over. | |
| We followed them, and we're seeing them right behind us as they're being processed, and this is what we've been talking about that's continuous day in, day out, at all times, and we're going to go to another location where it's also Slow down. | ||
| The podcast audience can't see you. | ||
| Describe what the drone is showing right now because I need the podcast and the radio audience to see what the TV audience and the live stream audience see because it's shocking. | ||
| Walk us through. | ||
| Describe, Auden, what your drone is showing us right there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so as Ben was describing, we're at the bank of the river and as we looked back to the Mexican side, we saw a group of about 50 making a run all along the river. | |
| I immediately got the drone up in the air and followed them. | ||
| And sure enough, there was already guys waiting them and getting them across on a raft, what it seemed like, and getting them across to an island area of the river. | ||
| And then right as they got them across, they walked up the hill and turned themselves into National Guard. | ||
| So it's a massive group, and these are the size of groups that we're constantly seeing Especially here in Eagle Pass, but also it's becoming prevalent in Acuna and Del Rio. | ||
| And a couple things on that, Steve. | ||
| Right before we saw that massive group start walking along the riverbanks, we actually got video of one of the cartel SUVs. | ||
| The scouts, they come down, they look out, they're coordinating all of this. | ||
| Every single person that you see behind me had to pay the cartels for the privilege of breaking into America. | ||
| That's what we're doing right now. | ||
| And the worst part about this, we're standing in a community that has been many of the houses that are being built on the U.S. | ||
| side of the border now are being purchased and built by the cartels. | ||
| They're leaving Mexico. | ||
| They're coming to America, taking refuge in America to get away from the violence that they created in Mexico, bringing that to a community near you. | ||
| And this is, again, this is just the beginning of what's coming in 2022. | ||
| Look, we know Title 42 is going to get lifted, or when it gets lifted, April and May, before the desert heats up. | ||
| We're going to be two explosive months, so talking about maybe 300,000, 400,000, with over 150,000 a month, which is, as I keep saying, the size of the army at Normandy, the Canadians and the British and the Americans that landed. | ||
| We've seen that every month, that could explode. | ||
| But I want you guys to explain, you know, from La Jolla, Texas to McAllen to Del Rio, you guys are up and down the Rio Grande Valley. | ||
| But the other day you told me, hey, the part we got to look at is Eagle Pass because they're getting so savvy now, they know where the weak parts of the chain are. | ||
| Why all of a sudden is Eagle Pass starting to heat up as a port of illegal entry? | ||
| Well part of it, I'll answer the first part, part of it is because it's been wide open. | ||
| This has been an area that cartel hadn't controlled. | ||
| It's really the cartel government on the Mexico side, the Acuna side, had controlled that area. | ||
| Now the cartel see this as a new exploit, a place that they can exploit. | ||
| And it's an area that's wide open, an area that hadn't been tapped into yet. | ||
| And so many of these areas are so overrun, they're just looking for new opportunities and new areas to go into. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, and I'll just add that the next border town up is Laredo, and Laredo is controlled by drug cartels. | |
| So they're making the inroads, as I mentioned earlier, into Eagle Pass, Piedra Negras, and then also into Acuna and Del Rio. | ||
| This is really, Steve, an expansion of cartel territory into America. | ||
| They see no hindrance. | ||
| They see nothing stopping. | ||
| They see nothing coming from Joe Biden and the Democrats in Washington, D.C. | ||
| to stop them. | ||
| And they're simply brazen and not worried about it. | ||
| They're just taking over more territory in the United States. | ||
| This is the invasion that will destroy this country if we don't stop it. | ||
| Real quickly, you said the National Guard was down there putting chairs out for people. | ||
| Can you describe what exactly? | ||
| Give me 30 seconds on that. | ||
| What happened? | ||
| We'll show you the video. | ||
| We captured it on video. | ||
| There was one woman who came across on crutches, and the National Guard actually brought a chair out for her to sit down on. | ||
| I mean, this is how... And look, I get it. | ||
| She's on crutches. | ||
| You feel bad for her. | ||
| But this is what they've been relegated to, that we're simply allowing people... If it's that easy to cross, that you can do it on crutches, there is a major problem with our borders. | ||
| And that's the thing. | ||
| These guys are National Guard. | ||
| They are here to protect the nation. | ||
| And this is what they've been relegated to. | ||
| And we'll be showing you some of that footage that we captured a little bit later. | ||
| The team is there all week. | ||
| We've got Auden Cabello. | ||
| You've got Ben Berquam. | ||
| We've got Oscar Blues down in Tapaloocha. | ||
| We've got, I think, Michael Yohns heading down there. | ||
| So we're going to have wall-to-wall coverage. | ||
| Since Biden won't cover it, we're going to cover it, okay? | ||
| Non-stop. | ||
| I want to thank you guys. | ||
| And we're not demonizing the people coming across, the woman on crutches. | ||
| We're making the point. | ||
| I totally understand it. | ||
| They're incentivizing. | ||
| This is the first impeachment. | ||
| The first impeachment part is going to be the initiating and the exacerbation of the invasion of the southern border to the detriment and destruction of hard-working Hispanic Americans in the Rio Grande Valley from Laredo, All the way down to McAllen, okay? | ||
| This is the first article of impeachment, and we will be able to document it. | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| We tell all these guys, hold your receipts right now. | ||
| Preserve your documents. | ||
| I think ISA told the Hunter Biden thing. | ||
| We're going to get to the second wife. | ||
| Fauci and these guys have got to preserve their documents, too, because it's going to be Hunter Biden, Fauci, and the southern border. | ||
| Those are going to be the three big first impeachment charges. | ||
| One, two, and three. | ||
| Ben and Auden, how do people follow you 24-7 when you're not on War Room or Real America's Voice? | ||
| How do they get to you? | ||
| Americasvoice.news, FrontlineAmerica.com, and at Ben Berquam on all social media for myself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm on Twitter as Cabeon and also on Getter. | |
| Okay, you guys be careful. | ||
| Be safe. | ||
| Godspeed. | ||
| We'll see you tomorrow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Incredible team down there. | ||
| Incredible footage. | ||
| And now they got the drone up so we'll be able to show that. | ||
| Okay, very honored. | ||
| We're going to go from Eagle Pass, Texas to Paris, France. | ||
| Dr. Peter Khoury, one of the most renowned and patriotic physicians that have come out, doctors have come out and really laid out for people the CCP virus and all the madness in it. | ||
| Dr. Corey's in Paris to talk at one of these COVID-CCP conferences. | ||
| Dr. Corey, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
| Good to be here. | ||
| Honored to have you. | ||
| Look, one of the things is that we're very focused on the Tony Fauci book and Bobby Kennedy Jr., and because we want to make sure it doesn't get on people's minds. | ||
| Fauci's trying to take out the administration's guy and taking a low profile, but he's still out there. | ||
| They're talking about maybe he now leaves, but we've got to keep Fauci around because the congressional inquiry, then leading to the criminal inquiry, has got to be all-important about this. | ||
| You've also got a new book coming out, though, called The War on Ivermectin. | ||
| Tell me about the book, and all I hear in mainstream media, MSNBC, is that this is the craziest thing in the world. | ||
| It's a dewormer for horses, and anybody that takes it is an absolute nutcase. | ||
| Dr. Peter Kory. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so Steve, you know, you keyed in on an important aspect. | |
| So, first of all, Bobby's book is transformative. | ||
| I mean, he details essentially the rot which is in our system of health care agencies. | ||
| You literally have one person Who wields inordinate control over what gets researched, what gets studied, what gets approved in medicine. | ||
| And, and it's terrifying because actually Bobby's book goes over the last 30 to 40 years of his career. | ||
| But when you go to COVID, that's sort of where I come in. | ||
| You know, what happened to me is I became an expert on the use of COVID in, in, uh, I mean the use of ivermectin and COVID-19. | ||
| And it is, it is absolutely one of the most effective drugs in any disease model I've seen. | ||
| However, you won't know that. | ||
| You just mentioned that. | ||
| The way in which these generic repurposed drugs are attacked, and have been attacked for decades, but the scale in which they did that, for instance, on drugs like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, are just terrifying. | ||
| So, when you see this PR campaign brought through the entire major media, where every single broadcast host, every talk show host, every news host, All say horse dewormer, horse dewormer, horse dewormer. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| It's a human drug. | ||
| It won, you know, the Discoverers won the Nobel Prize for its effects in parasites. | ||
| And it's one of the most potent antivirals that we know. | ||
| And in COVID, it's incredibly effective. | ||
| And it's literally emptying hospitals, preventing hospitalizations and deaths in many countries worldwide. | ||
| One quarter of the planet lives in a country where ivermectin is approved and recommended. | ||
| And here in the US, it's a horse dewormer. | ||
| It's really about disinformation. | ||
| That's what my book is about, Steve. | ||
| It's about the disinformation tactics of the pharmaceutical industry and how they do it. | ||
| They do it through the agencies, they do it through the media, and most importantly, they do it through the medical journals. | ||
| And I'm detailing all of that. | ||
| I didn't know this two years ago. | ||
| But hang on, this I think what people, they think about peer review, they think about these medical journals, they see whether it's Johns Hopkins here, they've got the other Ivy League school here, you've got these doctors, the guy from Baylor is on TV every night, you've got these great institutions, you've got these great journals of peer review, And then they come out and all they're doing is saying hydroxychloroquine is for nut cases. | ||
| The others are dewormer. | ||
| How did we get the institutional rot that had to be there that got manifested during COVID? | ||
| We've got a minute here and we're going to hold you through the break. | ||
| But how did that happen? | ||
| How did the institutions get so corrupted? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the institutions have been well described for decades. | |
| It's called regulatory capture. | ||
| They are literally intertwined with the pharmaceutical industry and any policy that comes out of them Literally gets the sign off of the pharmaceutical industry. | ||
| And repurposed generic drugs are anathema. | ||
| They are absolutely the main enemy of the entire business model. | ||
| And so when you have agencies that are literally intertwined and are effectively acting in those interests, you have what you just said, institutional rot. | ||
| The solution really is we need to rebuild a new system. | ||
| You have to somehow restructure these agencies to remove that influence and to protect patients. | ||
| Because what's happening now, Doctors are getting restricted. | ||
| We're not allowed to prescribe drugs. | ||
| We're getting investigated when we prescribe medicines that we know work, that have a lot of evidence of efficacy. | ||
| So, they're going after doctors, hurting the patient. | ||
| Dr. Corey, just hang on one second. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We'll return to Paris and Dr. Peter Corey in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Big Tech monitors us, censors us, de-platforms us. | |
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it, until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what Big Tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| There's been a, I don't want to say disturbing, it's worse than disturbing. | ||
| It's a frightening and scary oligarchs between the big media, big tech, big pharma, and it's got to be broken. | ||
| It has to. | ||
| It's going to be tough work, but it's got to be broken apart. | ||
| That's why you've got to get this book. | ||
| This is really the bill of indictment on Tony Fauci, the real Tony Fauci. | ||
| And as Bobby Kennedy said when he came on the show I think five months ago or six months ago when the book first came out, he says he calls Fauci a murderer. | ||
| He says he'll never sue me because they don't want to have discovery. | ||
| He says I've got the receipts. | ||
| This is the real Tony Fauci. | ||
| It is the bill of indictment against Fauci. | ||
| You've got to get it and read it. | ||
| Get it and read it. | ||
| It'll shock you. | ||
| Every page is a page turner. | ||
| I want to go back to Dr. Corey. | ||
| Dr. Corey, I need you to address something. | ||
| You go to Wikipedia, and on your thing, the very last thing of your biography, they say, he cited the anti-parasitic medication Ivermectin falsely, and it's a false claim, and then it clicks to the reference. | ||
| The reference is an AP story. | ||
| It's got some doctor that cites something. | ||
| I think you had 40 studies at the time that showed that was not true, that Ivermectin worked. | ||
| You have 80 today, so you've doubled it. | ||
| But that citation by the Associated Press, which is the biggest press service in the world, is still there. | ||
| So how can people, how can they start to feel comfortable about ivermectin if Associated Press has that up there, it's on your Wikipedia page, and it doesn't look like it's moving any time shortly? | ||
| How do you counter that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we just keep trying to speak truth. | |
| However, this is a war, right? | ||
| I'm not saying that we're winning the war. | ||
| We are trying to counter it, but it's a war of information. | ||
| And when they control the levers of the information, that's the thing that's been most terrifying to me in the last two years is that we're just speaking truth. | ||
| We're taking care of patients. | ||
| Our protocols have gone all over the world. | ||
| Many people are awake and aware and know that we're credible and that what we're recommending is very evidence-based and is data-driven. | ||
| However, One article, like you just mentioned Steve, and the Associated Press saying that we're wrong or we're claiming things that aren't true because someone says this, they get one doctor or they cite the agencies, that's how they win. | ||
| They have amazing powerful control over messaging. | ||
| And so when you ask me, how do I counter that? | ||
| We're doing the best we can. | ||
| I'm the head of a nonprofit organization whose sole mission is to build the most effective treatment protocols for COVID. | ||
| We've done a phenomenal job. | ||
| We've saved hundreds of thousands, if not millions around the world. | ||
| We know this because we're written to all around the world. | ||
| But in the U.S., I got to tell you, Steve, we're having a real problem here. | ||
| They literally controlled the journals and the media. | ||
| I mean, they will not support Ivermectin. | ||
| In fact, there are many forces directing attacks on Ivermectin. | ||
| And anyone who claims it's effective, we get attacked personally. | ||
| Any evidence that we put forth is dismissed and distorted. | ||
| And we have to fight this war. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| I'm morally and ethically obligated to do this. | ||
| Patients are dying because of being deprived of really effective early treatments with generic medicines. | ||
| And I'm just going to keep doing what I'm doing. | ||
| I can't tell you that we're perfect at it, but I think we've done a pretty good job. | ||
| So you're saying that generic medicine is the problem, that's against the business model because they sell like hydroxychloroquine for like $2 a pill or whatever, by the pound. | ||
| The others have super high margins and that's what the big pharma wants. | ||
| But how do you get out, like right now if you had to pick one study, one peer-reviewed study, That showed that ivermectin, that you said can't be questioned, that this shows you in a study that it works. | ||
| It's not coming from me, Dr. Corey, it's not coming from Dr. Malone or Bobby Kennedy in the Tony Fauci book. | ||
| What study would you cite? | ||
| It would be the study in Curious by Flavio Carragiani and a group of authors about the city in Brazil called Itajai, which in June of 2020, they offered every single inhabitant of the city, 220,000 people, The opportunity to take Ivermectin twice a month. | ||
|
unidentified
|
166,000 patients signed up for that and took their Ivermectin twice a month. | |
| And what they noticed, out of the 166,000 that signed up, 113 took Ivermectin and the other 50,000 did not. | ||
| And they noticed, not they noticed, but they recorded in very Accurate and painstaking detail using digital computerized records over a six-month period, there was up to a 90 to 100 percent reduction in hospitalizations and deaths for those who took ivermectin. | ||
| It's an astounding result in a massive population-based study or experiment and it's inarguable. | ||
| The data is out there. | ||
| The source data is out there. | ||
| Anyone could attack it. | ||
| They've been trying and they can't. | ||
| They just ignore it, but that's the problem. | ||
| It's not about data. | ||
| We put out as much data as we can, and it's either ignored, distorted, or attacked and dismissed. | ||
| And again, it's going back to this information, but that's just one study. | ||
| When you talk about studies, you don't need one study. | ||
| Eighty-one studies in almost every single case showing benefits, and when you summarize them, the benefits are profound. | ||
| Time to viral clearance, time to clinical recovery, hospitalization rates and death. | ||
| It's one of the most effective drugs in any disease model I've studied in my career. | ||
| Dr. Corey, how do people get to you, social media? | ||
| How do they find out your new book, The Organs of Ivermectin? | ||
| People can go to Skyhorse or Amazon. | ||
| The Bobby Kinney book has already sold a million copies. | ||
| We want to sell another million because we want everybody to get the bill of indictment on Fauci and not have the New York Times come in the middle of it. | ||
| How do they get to you, Dr. Corey? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Appreciate that. | |
| So it's The War on Ivermectin. | ||
| You can pre-order that on Amazon. | ||
| My organization, which is a non-profit, it's flccc.net. | ||
| And then I'm writing on my Substack, I'm detailing all of these actions taken, corrupt actions, using media, using journals, and using the agencies against Ivermectin. | ||
| I'm piericorey.substack.com, if anyone wants to read my writings on this. | ||
| We're going to put it up in all the chat rooms, all the platforms. | ||
| Dr. Corey, thank you very much for staying up and joining us from Paris tonight. | ||
| Really appreciate it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Dr. Corey. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short break, come back. | ||
| We're going from Missouri to Michigan to Pennsylvania to Florida. | ||
| All of it next in the hardcore part of the political thing. | ||
| We've got a lot of explosive news, a lot going on on redistricting, a lot going on on polling, a lot going on on who's going to win, who's going to lose. | ||
| Short commercial break, back with War Room Battleground in just a moment. |
Export Selection