March 24, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:54
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
This is about her being a black woman. | |
| And this is about basically causing, calling... So in each of these cases, you read from the same script. | ||
| So in each of these cases, you say that the distribution of child pornography is an extremely serious federal crime. | ||
| And you point out that the crime involves people who are taking pictures and videos of real children while the children are being sexually abused. | ||
| In Hess, you pointed out that he had hundreds, hundreds of images of children in sexually compromised position. | ||
| Some of them engage in sadomasochistic acts. | ||
| All of this I'm reading from you on the bench. | ||
| And most importantly, the children in these pictures are not knowing and willing participants in the degrading conduct that was being depicted. | ||
| They were being forced, forced by someone off screen to commit unspeakable acts of sexual violence for the pleasure of the people filming them and for the gratification of people everywhere. | ||
| And what concerns me is that many of those people have absolutely no shred of empathy For what that conduct does for the children who were being abused in this way. | ||
| And you read this script in every one of these cases. | ||
| So you talk about that these are terrible, terrible crimes. | ||
| But you also, and in Hess you said, I have to say that what I found particularly disturbing about your offense was that, quote, you apparently concocted a story about having photographed your own daughter who you purportedly were willing to take pictures of to trade with other people. | ||
| I know from your comments and from those who know you that you are unlikely to ever harm a child which I find remarkable that you've got a child predator in your court who says I'm unlikely to harm a child and you say well you told me that so so clearly you're unlikely but you say but in the context of the crime you represented that you would that in and of itself is astonishing so you talk about it is astonishing You nonetheless sentenced him to the very lowest possible sentence allowed under law. | ||
| And what's striking is in these cases, in half of them, in five, you sentenced the defendant to the absolute lowest sentence under law. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is about her being a black woman. | |
| And this is about basically causing, calling her, basically casting her as a radical, as a black radical who is out to get white people. | ||
| That is specifically what they are trying to do. | ||
| That is specifically what the CRT attacks are trying to do. | ||
| They are trying to build on what Glenn Youngkin did in Virginia last November and really linking that to Judge Jackson. | ||
| So the RNC today just tweeted out this little meme saying KBJ should be CRT. | ||
| That is specifically what the strategy is. | ||
| The problem has been that only Marsha Blackburn and Ted Cruz really seem to have gotten the memo and are staying on this point. | ||
| The rest of the senators appear to be departing from these talking points. | ||
| For very good reasons. | ||
| It's really ugly. | ||
| I mean, quite frankly, it looked like I saw Ted Cruz commit a hate crime in that hearing room. | ||
| It was McCarthyism at its worst, where he was sort of insinuating that just because she was on this Georgetown Day School board, that she's responsible for every little thing in every little book that's being written there. | ||
| You know, spoiler alert, Judge Jackson is not going to Supreme Court to call babies racist. | ||
| That is not what he's going to be doing. | ||
| But that is exactly what Ted Cruz wants to do. | ||
| He wants to gin up white grievance. | ||
| Him and Marshall Blackburn, the GOP, want to gin up white grievance ahead of the midterm and link Judge Jackson to that cause. | ||
| I understand you've done a lot, Judge, but none of them have been the centerpiece. | ||
| of your hearing for the last two days. | ||
| Do you really expect this committee to believe that you don't remember what happened in this Hawkins case when it came back before you? | ||
| Yes, Senator. | ||
| I do expect you to believe that's my testimony. | ||
| Well, I don't find it credible, Judge. | ||
| It's been in the news for days. | ||
| Senator Durbin has cited it being in the news for days. | ||
| You've been asked about it probably more than any other case you've ever had, and I just don't find it credible that you weren't prepared For that matter in 2019, you know what I think? | ||
| I think he got caught with child pornography again and he wouldn't have if he had been in prison for the 8 to 10 years the guidelines called for in 2013. | ||
| None of them have been the centerpiece of your hearing for the last two days. | ||
| Do you really expect this committee to believe that you don't remember what happened in this Hawkins case when it came back before you? | ||
| Yes, Senator, I do expect you to believe that's my testimony. | ||
| I don't find it credible, Judge. | ||
| Judge, you gave him three months. | ||
| My question is, do you regret it or not? | ||
| Senator, what I regret is that in a hearing about my qualifications to be a justice on the Supreme Court, we've spent a lot of time Focusing on this small subset of my sentences. | ||
| Joining me now is Joyce Vance, former U.S. | ||
| attorney and professor at the University of Alabama School of Law and Charles Coleman, Jr., civil rights attorney and a former prosecutor. | ||
| I don't even know where to go first on this, except to say, and I will throw this out first to you, Joyce, Maya Wiley tweeted that the idea of that man, Tom Cotton, Telling a sitting federal judge, twice confirmed, with the votes of Lindsey Graham, by the way, that she's a liar, to say, do you expect us to believe you? | ||
| Was one of the most offensive Maya Wiley said things that she has ever seen in a confirmation hearing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want to throw that to you as well. | |
| To tell this woman, who is a sitting federal judge, that she's a liar? | ||
| It was a you lie moment for me. | ||
| What about you? | ||
| OK, welcome. | ||
| We're going to even refine some of these clips and play more during the hour. | ||
| It was not about her being a sitting federal judge, Joanne Reed. | ||
| It's because I think she lied to Tom Cotton and Tom Cotton called her out about the Hawkins case. | ||
| I think there's two examples here in these last couple of days of her. | ||
| She lied twice. | ||
| She lied and they called her out on the when she says, oh, I thought you were talking about public schools. | ||
| There was no thing about public schools is about being taught in schools. | ||
| Twice she obfuscated to the point of, like I said both times, it's strained credulity. | ||
| And Tom Cotton called her out, and there was meltdown. | ||
| Julian Reed melted down even further, but we got to get on with it, and I can't show that. | ||
| Okay, Thursday, 24 March, Year of Our Lord 2022, 23rd anniversary. | ||
| Of NATO, and particularly the United States, as part of that bombing of Belgrade. | ||
| And I think they destroyed, was it 20 Orthodox churches in the bombing that took place over four or five weeks? | ||
| To actually, the first time air power, I think, solely ended, started and ended a conflict. | ||
| That's 23, I think it's 24 March 1999, if I remember correctly. | ||
| I'm sure it's just totally random that the NATO meeting, completely random that the NATO meeting It's happening today. | ||
| Remember, there's no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences, okay? | ||
| And all that connects together now, if you think about it. | ||
| It was very confusing at the time. | ||
| What are we exactly doing here? | ||
| Not quite, don't really understand what we're doing. | ||
| All kind of makes sense. | ||
| We're gonna have John Solomon on later to help us connect dots. | ||
| But we got to focus the work at hand. | ||
| We have so much to do on the economy, on the war, on geopolitics. | ||
| Larry Fink sends out a letter. | ||
| Larry Fink, who's at this conference, and I think the deal book conference, and he's talking about using forcing functions, which we use here all the time to change behavior, that using his $10 trillion fund to change behaviors, particularly Larry Fink is the is the king of woke of forcing corporations to get woke. | ||
| And also to become green, to become social justice woke. | ||
| So that's Larry Fink. | ||
| Today he sends a letter out. | ||
| This war has started the end of globalization. | ||
| As we said, we've said this from the beginning, in the destruction of the US dollar. | ||
| When you start wars, you want to end wars on your terms. | ||
| And what you're going to have now, this is not ending on your terms. | ||
| This is going to be a total and complete free fall. | ||
| of this breakable globalization. | ||
| Remember, we're anti-globalization nationalists, but there's a way to do this, a smart way to do it. | ||
| And you've left the head of the snake still there, the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| We've got Dave Brat. | ||
| Also, stunning news out about education during the COVID, the drop in literacy, the drop in math skills. | ||
| If we could drop any more, I think we're 23rd in the world in literacy. | ||
| It's a disgrace what public education has become in this country. | ||
| And this gets us back to the judge. | ||
| Look, it has nothing to do with her skin color. | ||
| It has nothing to do with she's a female. | ||
| It has to do with her beliefs, her policies, and how she's comported herself as a judge. | ||
| And she is a radical. | ||
| She's outside the mainstream. | ||
| One of two things are going to happen. | ||
| Write this down on the 24th of March. | ||
| There will be a firestorm around her confirmation. | ||
| You can tell it's already building. | ||
| We said this from the very beginning, after Mike Davis and others came to us with this information, because everybody was just prepared to let this escape. | ||
| It's going to be a firestorm for a confirmation. | ||
| It's going to be epic. | ||
| It's going to be very tight. | ||
| I actually think, you know, what the over and under are about she actually may not get confirmed. | ||
| They're prancing around on MSNBC like it's a dumb deal. | ||
| It's far from a dumb deal. | ||
| Even with a confirmation, remember the term Pyrrhic Victory. | ||
| Pyrrhic Victory. | ||
| I use that today, not in the context of Putin and Ukraine, but in the context of putting a radical, with radical beliefs that are so far out the mainstream, particularly for working class people in this country of Hispanic and African American descent. | ||
| It's going to be quite interesting. | ||
| I think these are going to be very tough votes. | ||
| Our objective, now that we go back to work, we've been kind of this breathless news coverage the last couple of days. | ||
| As we go back to work, as we do everything, whether it's taking over school boards, whether it's taking over election officials, whether it's taking over the election apparatus of which we're doing every day, or whether it's taking precinct committeemen. | ||
| And remember, this is all work village by village. | ||
| Didn't say it was going to be easy, didn't say it was going to happen magically, not going to wave a wand. | ||
| You know, sometimes in the chats or in the comments, oh, we got to do this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah. | |
| Grow up. | ||
| This is a process and it's a grind. | ||
| OK, but you're fighting for not just the greatest nation in history, the earth, the most powerful nation in the history of mankind. | ||
| And that means the Larry Fink's of the world and the Mitch McConnell's of the world and all the people we oppose, the radical Democrats, the woke corporations, Disney and Florida. | ||
| They get remember your enemy gets a vote. | ||
| They get a vote. | ||
| They get a say-so, and they get a big say-so. | ||
| And so every time I go into the chat rooms, people are going, oh, you're just blah, blah, blah. | ||
| It's like the same guy's back. | ||
| It's called the Insurrection Act. | ||
| Call the Insurrection Act. | ||
| Grow up. | ||
| We're talking about power, real power, and taking power, real power. | ||
| We're not talking about Fantasyland. | ||
| We're not talking about sitting in your basement with your Cammies on. | ||
| Big talk. | ||
| This is about power and it's a grind. | ||
| And that's why you got these brave mothers at the school board. | ||
| This is why you got these folks that we highlight every couple of days. | ||
| People at the precinct strategy that are running up tens of thousands of people to do it. | ||
| These election officials. | ||
| It's not glamorous. | ||
| It's not Hollywood. | ||
| It's a grind. | ||
| But this is what Burke talked about. | ||
| The little divisions, the little armies, right, of this is what civic society is based upon. | ||
| And this is why we're winning. | ||
| And this is why we're going to win. | ||
| And this is why people for too many years just focus on TV ads and winning elected office and all that crap. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And what happened? | ||
| I keep saying you won all these elections since Nixon. | ||
| You won more elections than you lost, spent more money and you lost the country. | ||
| You know, you lost the country because after Biden illegitimately came to office, you saw what happened. | ||
| You saw the powers in this nation of how they stole power right in front of your face. | ||
| And we sat here on this show on the day the transition took place. | ||
| When everybody else left this town, we're running away because you had troops all over the place, you had barbed wire all over the place, and all conservative media sitting there sucking their thumb, you know, in their diapers, saying, oh my gosh, it's going to be 20 new justices on the Supreme Court, there's going to be 10 new states. | ||
| No, stop. | ||
| If we hammer this every day, we're the greatest republic in mankind's history with the greatest people. | ||
| And the people just need to get information and understand this is doable. | ||
| Well, we're here for another word. | ||
| Let me throw out one more thing. | ||
| On the Pfizer situation, 55,000 pages, 1,500 volunteers from the war room, a couple hundred lawyers from the war room, people that watch this show have volunteered and they're grinding. | ||
| And that's not glamorous work. | ||
| That's a grind. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Just like last night on the Naomi Wolf had the about criminal charges. | ||
| Right. | ||
| About going to school boards and doing it. | ||
| Hey, it's inside the lines. | ||
| Maybe it's something you take into account. | ||
| Right. | ||
| If it's legitimate. | ||
| Another record turnout for that people. | ||
| This is participatory populism. | ||
| This is inclusive nationalism. | ||
| You know, the Royce White, the Guardian has this big article about Royce White, and they go, hey, this guy's got a real chance to beat Omar, OK? | ||
| A standard stock country club Republican's not going to do that, OK? | ||
| A guy like Royce White actually has a shot. | ||
| So that's a long way to say that we've got work to do. | ||
| But a Pyrrhic victory. | ||
| If we do our job properly, and we're fair to the judge, and we have to be fair, but you're fair to the judge, and you put her record up, and her responses, if you put that up for the nation to see, and you drive that home, this will be career-ending votes in Arizona, in Nevada. | ||
| There'll be career end of votes. | ||
| You want to take the Senate back? | ||
| I got a way you take the Senate back. | ||
| You can do it on people that have, they're gonna, Democrats are gonna have to vote for this. | ||
| This is gonna be enormously controversial. | ||
| Enormously controversial. | ||
| We're gonna take a short break and we're bringing two of the people that have put their shoulder to the wheel. | ||
| Hey, let me be brutally frank again. | ||
| There are a lot of conservatives that dine off these kind of things that are just sitting back, okay, on their haunches. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And the question's got to be, hey, you get all this money, you raise all this money, you've got to ride to the sound of the guns. | ||
| OK? | ||
| Because we're in it. | ||
| This is cultural war to the 10th power. | ||
| We're bringing Mike Davis and Terry Schilling. | ||
| We're gonna go through a deep analysis of what went on and what is to come here in the war | ||
|
unidentified
|
for. | |
| We're gonna go through a deep analysis of what went on and what is to come here in the war for. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're gonna go through a deep analysis of what went on and what is to come here in the war for. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Um, Senator, respectfully, I am not familiar with that particular quote or case, so it's hard for me to comment as to whether or not. | ||
| I'd love to get your opinion on that, and you can submit that. | ||
| Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Again, because I don't know the case. | |
| I don't know how I interpret it. | ||
| I need to read the whole thing. | ||
| Can you provide a definition for the word woman? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can I provide a definition? | |
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't. | |
| You can't? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not in this context. | |
| I'm not a biologist. | ||
| So you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. | |
| If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments and I look at the law and I decide. | ||
| So I'm not Judge Jackson, it's not about her qualifications or her intellect. | ||
| I mean, she's a sitting federal judge that has been confirmed by the Senate a couple of times, and she's, you know, she's going from a district judge, she's on the appellate court of D.C. | ||
| That is the court that handles all the really tough, complicated cases right before the Supreme Court. | ||
| She's a, you know, she was a star at Harvard Law School. | ||
| Harvard Law School is a grind. | ||
| She's plenty smart. | ||
| This is not about smarts. | ||
| This is not about her intellect, her intelligence. | ||
| This is not about, this is about her rulings and her thought. | ||
| I mean, this is, if you don't think that that right there is not going to play through, Judge Jackson, if confirmed, will be on the bench. | ||
| She's what, 52, 53 years old? | ||
| She could be on the bench for 30 plus years. | ||
| Right? | ||
| 30 years. | ||
| If you don't think in the decades to come that what happened right there with Senator Blackburn is going to play out on many, many different cases as it all comes up, did I refer you to the swim meet this weekend, the championship swim meet, that picture, that photograph? | ||
| Of the women swimmers, the female swimmers, next to the guy, right? | ||
| I'm not trying to pick on him. | ||
| I'm just making a statement. | ||
| You saw the size of that guy, right, compared to the swimmers. | ||
| And the swimmers are starting to revolt. | ||
| If you don't think that's not going to play through the halls of power here in the judiciary system, you're kidding yourself. | ||
| Just like her thing on CRT. | ||
| Just like this thing with the pedophiles. | ||
| And let's call it is. | ||
| These are pedophiles with the pedophiles. | ||
| No, I'm not a conspiracy guy, but when you see stuff like this, you got to go, what? | ||
| Hey, it just doesn't make sense. | ||
| There's something here that's just not right. | ||
| And this gets to be is that is what is what Judge Jackson, not with her intellect, right? | ||
| Not the way she argued things. | ||
| But her core beliefs, they are so far out the mainstream. | ||
| And here's the Democrats, here's why I know it. | ||
| Because it's silence on MSNBC and CNN. | ||
| They couldn't wait to pivot back to the Ukraine war fast enough. | ||
| If these were superstar turns that could drive their agenda and fool people, it would be non-stop. | ||
| You wouldn't even know Biden was at NATO. | ||
| But it's not, it's crickets, and they're nervous. | ||
| And they should be nervous. | ||
| This is radical. | ||
| And this is my point about empiric victory. | ||
| There's two fights here. | ||
| One is the actual confirmation itself and to make sure that it's all out there and you raise it up. | ||
| And the second is then how it plays and how it is positioned with the American people to see the reality. | ||
| They keep saying on MSNBC and New York Times, these are all fringe. | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Hey, I'm a betting man. | ||
| We'll see how fringe these are. | ||
| We'll see if that comment right there of the judge is fringe. | ||
| We'll see if her handling of the pedophiles is fringe. | ||
| We'll see if her beliefs about the poison that goes in these little kids' minds in public schools, of which, quite frankly, I thought that was an outright lie. | ||
| When he came back and said, well, hold it, you're on the board here. | ||
| Oh, I thought you're talking about private schools. | ||
| No, come on, judge. | ||
| Give me a break. | ||
| You went to Harvard Law School, you knew exactly what the question was. | ||
| You were trying to obfuscate. | ||
| Come on, give me a break. | ||
| And then Cotton later on, as gentlemanly, I thought, as he could, instead of sitting there going, Judge, I think you're lying. | ||
| Right? | ||
| You're very smart. | ||
| You know exactly about this case. | ||
| You know every aspect of this case. | ||
| That's why it's incumbent. | ||
| You've got to get the 48,000 pages of the Sentencing Commission. | ||
| All of it has to come out. | ||
| And I agree. | ||
| That letter yesterday said they weren't going to move forward. | ||
| Ben Sasse out in Nebraska just embraced it. | ||
| Your senator wouldn't sign it. | ||
| He's too good. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's such a holy roller. | |
| No, this is big league. | ||
| This is vitally important. | ||
| Remember, I'm not Lord, we don't do a lot of the Supreme Court stuff. | ||
| Certains don't follow that closely here because other people do it better, but hey. | ||
| There won't be nobody else doing it, so we saddled up. | ||
| I want to bring in Mike Davis. | ||
| The reason is Mike Davis in Article 3. | ||
| Mike, and I want to go to Inside Baseball. | ||
| One of the things we try to do here is make sure that this audience throughout the country and the world has Inside Baseball. | ||
| Punchbowl, started by Jake Sherman, is kind of the new Axios. | ||
| It's just for Capitol Hill, and Jake Sherman from Politico is Mr. Inside Baseball. | ||
| So when you see something in Punchbowl, it's Fabulously reported. | ||
| They're liberal Democrats, but they got fabulous reporting. | ||
| They had something in Punchbowl yesterday, Mike Davis, you got and put up on your tweet. | ||
| I want you to read it because this is reality. | ||
| This is not the spin you get in the media. | ||
| Tell us what Punchbowl said about these hearings, sir. | ||
| So with Punchbowl social or Punchbowl media, they reported that two of the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Senate Judiciary Committee has very partisan Democrats and two of the Democrats Are raising concerns that Judge Jackson was not prepared for her hearing on Tuesday, even though Senator Hawley tweeted out the seven cases of child pornography about which he would ask her. | ||
| And Senator Hawley even told her on Monday in the opening statements, he even specifically told her and previewed for her that he was going to ask her about these cases. | ||
| Yet she comes on Tuesday morning and she was not prepared. | ||
| And that is panicking Senate Democrats. | ||
| I want to repeat this. | ||
| This is signal, this is, hang on, this is signal, not noise. | ||
| This is the most, of all the committees, this is probably the most partisan and they got the smartest bunch of lawyers, right? | ||
| They understood in reality, as we said, she was not prepared. | ||
| She was not prepared. | ||
| She said that one time, Mike, which says, well, I haven't reviewed my file. | ||
| I said, how could that possibly be? | ||
| She should know it. | ||
| Let's just repeat that. | ||
| Punchbowl said two Democrats on the panel are nervous because of report preparation and responses to the to the issues of child pornography. | ||
| And let's call what is pedophilia, the pedophile situation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, that's absolutely correct. | |
| And actually, Judge Jackson doesn't consider it pedophilia. | ||
| She actually has said for many years that people who possess and distribute child pornography are somehow not pedophiles. | ||
| So she doesn't think that this is that bad. | ||
| She doesn't think that they're that dangerous. | ||
| She doesn't think that they should be in prison for that long. | ||
| And that is fundamentally at odds with American values. | ||
| And that's her problem. | ||
| Mike, let's pull the camera back for a second, but it's a range of things. | ||
| The Democrats keep saying, oh, these guys are outside the mainstream. | ||
| Au contraire. | ||
| And we're going to have a vote on November 8th to see about that. | ||
| We'll see where the Hispanic community is, the family-oriented Hispanic community is about these specific topics. | ||
| We'll see where the African-American community is on these specific topics. | ||
| Mike, you've done this for a living under Grassley. | ||
| Are her responses mainstream or is she a radical? | ||
| She's absolutely a radical. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's very clear that she's a radical. | |
| So we have five-year mandatory minimum sentences for people who possess and distribute child pornography. | ||
| And again, for your viewers, plug the kids ears. | ||
| Child pornography is child rape because these kids cannot consent to what is happening. | ||
| So you have this market for child pornography and that market is created by creeps in America and the West who sit around and watch this stuff and they're usually victimizing kids in the third world. | ||
| And because of the explosion of the internet, high speed internet, smartphones with high definition cameras, child pornography is exploding all over the world. | ||
| And the way you deter this is by increasing, not decreasing, the sentence. | ||
| You need people to understand that if you sit around and take enjoyment out of watching this evilness, that you're going to go to prison for a very long time. | ||
| But Judge Jackson has made it her mission From law school when she served on the Law Review and published a note 25 years ago that were essentially unconstitutionally punitive to child sex predators with the sex offender registries. | ||
| Her service from 2010 to 2014 as vice chair of the Sentencing Commission where she ginned up that the Sentencing Commission would put out reports essentially saying that child pornographers are not pedophiles and therefore were, they're not a danger to the community and therefore were too harsh on them and therefore we need to lighten the sentence. And she took that to the district court for eight years. She had 100 cases on the district court where she sentenced people to prison for felonies. About 7% of those, seven of | ||
| those were for our cases where she had discretion to sentence people who had, who possessed and distributed child pornography. So, higher than the national average. The national average is less than 2%. There are a lot of creeps in Washington, D.C. So, she had a higher average in Washington, D.C. with seven. | ||
| Seven out of seven times all 100% 100% of the time she's sentenced below the sentencing guidelines recommendation and the prosecutor's recommendation. | ||
| She blames Congress. | ||
| She blamed the probation office. | ||
| The only person she has to blame is herself. | ||
| She's the one who wants that. | ||
| She doesn't think that child pornographers are that bad. | ||
| We got 30 seconds. | ||
| What what what has to happen is To get the 48,000 pages of the Sentencing Commission and her pre-sentencing, the pre-sentencing memos, what needs to be done on that? | ||
| And what can our audience do? | ||
| So to clarify, there are three buckets now, Steve. | ||
| It's the pre-sentence reports from these seven cases. | ||
| It's the 48,000 pages from the Biden White House from her previous nominations. | ||
| And on the Sentencing Commission, this was my mistake. | ||
| They don't even know the number of records because the Sentencing Commission and the Obama administration are not even telling Senate Republicans how many records are involved. | ||
| And so what they need to do is you need to call your home state senators and demand that they not vote for this nomination. | ||
| Okay, hang on. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Terry Shilling is going to come in and talk about the radicalness of the judge. | ||
| Not about her qualifications. | ||
| She is qualified. | ||
| Definitely qualified. | ||
| Not even a question about her qualifications. | ||
| Top law school in the country. | ||
| Or top one of the law schools in the country. | ||
| Two-time federal judge. | ||
| A district judge. | ||
| And now in the appellate court. | ||
| She's qualified. | ||
| It's about her fundamental core beliefs. | ||
| That's what this is about. | ||
| The radicalness of Judge Jackson. | ||
| Not her qualifications. | ||
| Very smart and very qualified. | ||
| Back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, I want to give you the pillows. | |
| We've got the sheet today is 60% off as low as $39.99. | ||
| War Room, Pandemic. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, I want to give you the pillows. We got the sheet today is 60% off as low as $39.99. | ||
| MyPillow.com. I just had to pull up where our sale was today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$39.99. | |
| I think it's normally $109. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$69.99. | |
| Down to $39.99. | ||
| 60% off for these sheets. | ||
| Not gonna last forever. | ||
| We're doing these short sales. | ||
| Make sure you go to MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| You go to our square. | ||
| We've got so many incredible sales. | ||
| Remember, if you're manning the Ramparts in between now and November 8th and even after that, I guess every day you're gonna have to man it. | ||
| Because we're fighting for the control of the greatest country on Earth. | ||
| And you have highly qualified people like Judge Jackson, who happen to be highly qualified radical people, that you're going to make decisions of whether they're in these positions of extreme and supreme power. | ||
| And that's the Supreme Court. | ||
| So make sure you go to MyPillow.com promo code War Room. | ||
| The sheets are $39.99, as low as $39.99, 60% off. | ||
| Go there today. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I'm gonna give you another number. | ||
| It's not going to be tied to a sheet. | ||
| It's going to be tied to a switchboard. | ||
| 2-0-2. | ||
| Can we put this up on the Chiron? | ||
| 2-0-2-2-2-4-3-1-2-1. | ||
| That's the switchboard for the United States Senate. | ||
| OK, you call there and you get your you ask for your state senator. | ||
| The senator is from your state and you call and you say, hey, under no uncertain circumstances are you to vote for for Judge Jackson now until | ||
| All of the documents are released the Obama White House documents the the Sentencing Commission documents and the in the in the pre-sentence the seven pre-sentence reports Because that's what she's basing these decisions on if you want a full due diligence and to be fair to her Terry Schilling Over and above let's put a pin in the pedophilia situation on her other questions from American principles project which you are the defender of the American family and | ||
| Is Judge Jackson a radical, sir? | ||
| Steve, of course, I think she's a complete radical. | ||
| Any time where you're trying to go less harsh on child pornography or sex abuses against minors, right at the same time where these offenses are exponentially growing, is radical in nature. | ||
| And you don't even need to be on the pro-family side of the aisle To recognize that. | ||
| This is just common sense. | ||
| We've seen an enormous uptick in the sexualization of children from all levels, right? | ||
| You have pride parades on Blue's Clues. | ||
| You have Disney employees walking out in protest of Governor DeSantis' Parental Rights Education Act that forbids teachers from talking to kids about sexual matters. | ||
| And now you have someone that's been nominated to the Supreme Court, the highest court in the land, Who's lenient on child pornography cases and her justification for that is because it's a lot easier to do this stuff today than it was in the past. | ||
| Steve, this is egregious. | ||
| I mean, this is the highest court in the land that's going to have to rule on these types of cases and these types of laws that we are going to be passing in the coming years to protect children from these types of sexual abuses. | ||
| It's absolutely concerning and it's open and shut case as to whether or not she's a radical. | ||
| She absolutely is a radical. | ||
| Before we go back to Mike Davis, I just want to say, because in the chat room people say, why didn't you cover the hard drive from hell? | ||
| Please write this down. | ||
| We're not a talk show that just wants to talk about things. | ||
| The hard drive from hell is an issue because they brought the hard drive from hell, the laptop from hell, to Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Stephen K. Bannon is the one that got it to media outlets, including the New York Post. | ||
| It worked for them to put it up. | ||
| I have forgotten more. | ||
| Then any human on earth, except for the great Jack Maxey, about what is in the laptop from hell. | ||
| And we are going to weaponize all that, all in due course. | ||
| So for you guys sitting there going, you're talking to me, I'll go talk about it, yammer on, that's fine, I love it, they should do that. | ||
| We put throw weight in back of something, and today's business is this, because we're in the middle of a fight, right? | ||
| We're in the middle of a gunfight, essentially. | ||
| That's where we got to focus on this. | ||
| I'm going to get to the laptop from hell. | ||
| There's so much more about that, and how it's going to be weaponized, and Bill Barr, and all these liars. | ||
| You know, Bill Barr's sitting there. | ||
| Bill Barr, all these liars. | ||
| We're going to get to that. | ||
| Just take a deep pause. | ||
| We have a plan. | ||
| Just take a deep breath and bear with us, okay? | ||
| Terry, here's what I don't understand. | ||
| I got Mike Davis at the Article 3 Project American Principles. | ||
| There's so many, and this is for the audience. | ||
| Besides calling the switchboard, I want everyone in the audience to... I've got a little edge today. | ||
| Think of that got the edge because people have got to understand every day on doing this. | ||
| You got to hit it. | ||
| You can't take a day off. | ||
| Sorry if you want to take your country back and get this thing turned around on the right track. | ||
| You've got to hit it every day. | ||
| That's just that is what a fourth turning is. | ||
| That's just the reality we deal with. | ||
| Okay, that's why this show is so powerful because this audience wants to do it. | ||
| So I want everybody in the audience to think about this. | ||
| What we do is we go out of the way to make sure we present groups and let them come on here and they make their pitch and go get more information. | ||
| If you're so inclined, hit them with five bucks, ten bucks or whatever, right? | ||
| We pride ourselves on that and that's what some of the groups want to come on. | ||
| I want you now, as you're sitting, whether you're driving and hearing us on radio, whether you're watching on TV and the streaming services of Real America Voice or any of the Hulu or any of these services, or if you hear the podcast later, The audio. | ||
| I want you to ask yourself about the groups that you give to. | ||
| And I want you to go check their social media, and I want you to go to their website, and I want to see, are they in this fight or not? | ||
| And the question you have to ask yourself, do you believe it's a fight worth having? | ||
| Maybe you don't, and that's fine. | ||
| We're not here to tell you what to do. | ||
| We're here to kind of show you what's going on. | ||
| If you don't think so, that's fine. | ||
| But if you are inclined to think That these last couple of days have actually exposed Judge Jackson to the radical she is, not her qualification and not her intelligence. | ||
| Because, hey, one of the problems we've got in the country, you've got super high qualified people like Judge Jackson who also happen to have radical ideas about the Judeo-Christian West, the underlying values of that, and the United States of America. | ||
| That's the problem. | ||
| And if you so are inclined to agree with Mike Davis and Terry Schilling and others, I want you to ask yourself, I want you to go to the social media accounts of those people that you give that deal with all these cultural warrior stuff, things, which as you know is not my line of country, but deal with it. | ||
| And I want you to ask, are they in this fight or not? | ||
| Because this fight's got to be two-fold. | ||
| Once again, it's got to be two... I think this nomination can actually be non-confirmed, okay? | ||
| Maybe I'm dreaming, but you saw in Punchbowl, there are two guys that sit, or two Democrats that sit on the committee, and they know she wasn't prepared, and they know it wasn't good, and that's why MSNBC and CNN are not carpet-bombing her performance non-stop. | ||
| That's to tell, okay? | ||
| So we know we're winning here. | ||
| We can also make it a tough vote. | ||
| And what I mean by a tough vote, I mean a vote that decides a couple of Senate races. | ||
| As the Hispanic community finally opens up because of the Trump movement's toughness on the border and our economic policies, and also the culturally conservative, this will be a winning and deciding factor on the end of Mark Kelly's political career. | ||
| And in Nevada, and in other states. | ||
| But you have to get to the ramparts, and you have to ask yourself, if you're giving money to these organizations, and I'm not going to name names, because there's still time for people to stand up, but you've got to ask, where have these folks been? | ||
| Terry Schilling. | ||
| Yeah, Steve, it's been interesting. | ||
| You know, part of the benefits of, you know, groups like Mike's and mine at APP is we're still, you know, nimble, right? | ||
| Like a lot of these groups have been around for not just a decade, but a few decades, and they have all this institutional stuff. | ||
| You know, I think there's still time. | ||
| We need them all engaged in this fight because We have to at least fight, right? | ||
| You never know if you're going to win. | ||
| I'm bullish, just like I think you are. | ||
| But we have to keep fighting until the fight is over. | ||
| And it's unfortunate. | ||
| But I still think there's time for these other groups to get on board and really call to action their people. | ||
| I mean, we are doing calls to action right now, getting people to light up the phone lines and send a switchboard. | ||
| And we need more people doing it because... Let me be blunt about these institutions. | ||
| They're all handy. | ||
| They got too much money. | ||
| They got two little guts, and they got not enough fight. | ||
| Let me just be blunt, okay? | ||
| It's one of the problems we got. | ||
| And for the audience, it's for you to make, not me, it's for you to make a decision. | ||
| You just check and see, and hey, maybe you, besides calling the Senate, maybe you want to make a call over there and say, hey, look, I was noticing you're not doing anything here. | ||
| Why? | ||
| If you have a reason, explain it to me. | ||
| Maybe they have a reason. | ||
| Say, hey, we do think it's fringe. | ||
| I can handle that. | ||
| Make a rational argument. | ||
| We don't happen to think so. | ||
| I happen to cut the core of it. | ||
| And let me tell you, ladies and gentlemen, if Judge Jackson is confirmed, her performance here the last couple of days is going to resonate down the halls of power for decades and decades and decades to come. | ||
| Decades to come. | ||
| This is a lifetime appointment. | ||
| And Judge Jackson is a very articulate person. | ||
| She's a very smart person. | ||
| She is not going to be a wilting flower here, OK? | ||
| It's going to resonate for decades and decades. | ||
| And maybe these institutions don't think, maybe they think it's fringe. | ||
| Maybe things like Ben Sassem and these other guys, it's fringy. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| But let him make it. | ||
| If you don't think it's fringe, if you think it cuts to the core of these cultural issues and what this part of the fight's about, then it's incumbent upon you in the audience to become actionable and go find and have somebody that you give money to and support to to make the case. | ||
| And maybe they convince you. | ||
| It's a free country. | ||
| That's what a free country is about. | ||
| But right now, you just got a lot of guys or you got a lot of institutions that are hiding. | ||
| They're hiding. | ||
| Because they want to be invited to the cocktail parties. | ||
| They don't want to be called fringe. | ||
| And you saw Cotton and Cruz and Holling, everybody says, oh, they're running for president. | ||
| It's all performative. | ||
| Hey, Mike Davis, I thought they got a lot of tough questions out there, and I thought they did a very good job of letting the judge explain to herself her radical positions. | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| Yeah, well, and here's something that is not fringe. | ||
| In 2013, Judge Jackson had Wesley Hawkins before her court for sentencing. | ||
| And Wesley Hawkins had child pornography and the sentencing guidelines recommended eight years in prison for Mr. Hawkins and Judge Jackson. | ||
| I didn't think he was that bad, so she sentenced him to three months in prison instead of eight years, which was the recommended sentence under the guidelines. | ||
| Well, guess what? | ||
| Wesley Hawkins went back before Judge Jackson in 2019. | ||
| He reoffended. | ||
| So there are direct consequences for these decisions. | ||
| She has a pattern of 25 years of leniency per sex For sex abusers of kids and you have to ask why well, like why is this her issue? | ||
| Why does she care about this? | ||
| Why does she care about? | ||
| Representing Gitmo detainees who go on to kill Americans. | ||
| Why does she care about people, the worst people on the planet, like Gitmo detainees and child pornographers and child predators, why? | ||
| Right, it goes to her values, it goes to who she is. | ||
| You know, the Democrats talk about the empathy standard because they don't wanna, they wanna pretend like they don't have a judicial philosophy, they have an empathy standard, when it really means they're just gonna get to the most liberal results every time. | ||
| But why does Judge Jackson have empathy for people who possess and distribute child pornography. | ||
| Why does she have empathy for Gitmo terrorists who she helped free and went on to kill Americans? | ||
| You have to ask yourself, does she share your values as an American? | ||
| And if not, why would you want her on the Supreme Court, the highest court in the land? | ||
| Okay, Terry, we've got a minute here. | ||
| Tell us, what is then to be done? | ||
| What should people do today that are so inclined and saw Judge Jackson's performance and are disturbed by it? | ||
| What's your recommendation, Terry Schilling? | ||
| Two things. | ||
| I think you need to call up the organizations that you've been supporting and urge them, if they are not speaking out about this stuff, urge them to get involved in this fight and to oppose this nomination. | ||
| We need all hands on deck here. | ||
| Because there is an opportunity. | ||
| If we put enough pressure on people like Manchin and other senators in these swing votes or swing states, we can get them to withdraw the nomination. | ||
| So that's number one. | ||
| But number two, and this is the most important, light up the Senate phone lines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
202-224-3121. | |
| Again, 202-224-3121. | ||
| That's the Senate switchboard. | ||
| Tell them what state you're from. | ||
| Again, 202-224-3121. | ||
| That's the Senate switchboard. | ||
| Tell them what state you're from. | ||
| They'll connect you to your senator. | ||
| Urge them to vote against this radical nominee. | ||
| And if we put enough pressure on these guys, we can possibly get them to withdraw her nomination or give them a Pyrrhic victory. | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Just hold on, guys. | ||
| I just need to hold you for a minute or two to make sure everybody knows they get to you and final comments when we return in the War Room. | ||
| We're going to go to this NATO. | ||
| We got economics, geopolitics. | ||
| John Solomon talking about the Clintons and the laptop from hell. | ||
| Told you we're going to have something. | ||
| Bang! | ||
| Next, all in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there is no more. Let's take down the CCP. | |
| Monitors us. Censors us. Deplatforms us. | ||
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it. | ||
| Until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| By the way, last night, Naomi Wolfe, this is on the criminal charges, how to go through the process appropriately. | ||
| A huge audience, I think 1,500 people, and people were just overwhelmed, the empowerment. | ||
| This show and what we try to do when we're working with people is your empowerment. | ||
| You have power, you have tremendous power. | ||
| You just have to understand that people can give you access to that power. | ||
| Last night, this is the second in a series, we had the civil charges a couple of weeks ago, the criminal charges today, about how they go about it. | ||
| So we're going to actually link to that on War Room and make sure we push it out everywhere. | ||
| So for Naomi Wolf and the Daily Clout people, really hitting it. | ||
| She's also going to have a briefing tonight for the P.I. | ||
| I think there are 1,500, almost 1,500 war room posse that are working on the Pfizer documents along with over 200 lawyers. | ||
| It's just incredible work going on. | ||
| You guys are changing history right there because I hear there are big revelations coming out of that. | ||
| More great work. | ||
| Mike Davis, today's kind of a wasted day. | ||
| You have people come in and talk about it. | ||
| It's not really important enough for us to pull it. | ||
| But tell us, this audience is about engagement, about agency. | ||
| What is your recommendation? | ||
| They've got to follow your Twitter feed. | ||
| You're going to be this non-stop, but I take it that they've called for the vote of the committee on Monday the 4th, and they hope to do this before they break for Easter, to have the Senate vote on it by April 8th. | ||
| Is that the rough schedule that you understand? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, that's correct. | |
| One of my volunteer researchers just sent me some interesting news that Hawkins, the guy who got three months instead of eight years from Judge Jackson for possessing child pornography, when she gave him three months, she didn't order computer supervision and that probably led to his re-offense that he got caught looking at child pornography again. | ||
| So, a little bit of breaking news there. | ||
| And as for the process, they will have a markup The first markup today, they hold it over for a week. | ||
| And so the markup vote will be on the 4th. | ||
| And like you said, we'll see if she gets out of the committee and we'll see if she gets confirmed. | ||
| I actually think her nomination is now in jeopardy. | ||
| And it was on a glide path last week. | ||
| And it's really important that people call the Senate switchboard and tell their home state senators to not vote on this nomination until the Senate Democrats release her records. | ||
| Mike Davis, that's very important coming from someone like you that does this for a living. | ||
| Walk us through that again. | ||
| You actually believe this nomination is in jeopardy? | ||
| I think this nomination is in very serious jeopardy. | ||
| That is very clear now from Punchbowl's reporting from the two Senate Democrats on the Judiciary Committee. | ||
| These are not Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, the other fake moderates on the Judiciary Committee. | ||
| These are hardcore leftists on the Judiciary Committee. | ||
| And if two of them are going to Punchbowl and air in their concerns about Judge Jackson's fitness for the Supreme Court, they have a huge problem. | ||
| And it's only going to get worse. | ||
| As people learn more about this, as real people in the real world learn about Judge Jackson's shocking and appalling record, and then they start lighting up the Senate switchboard and telling their Senators to not vote for this nomination. | ||
| Mike, how do people follow you on Twitter, Getter, any other social media, and how they get to Article 3? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I'm on all of them. | |
| My Twitter is mrddmia and article3project.org. | ||
| And I really appreciate your giving us an opening here to talk about this stuff, Steve. | ||
| Okay, there will be a lot more of this. | ||
| These votes are going to be historic. | ||
| Okay, thank you very much, Mike Davis. | ||
| You heard it from Mike Davis. | ||
| He thinks it's in jeopardy. | ||
| He does this for a living. | ||
| Terry Schilling, do you agree? | ||
| You're all over American Principles Project. | ||
| One of the big things is the courts. | ||
| Do you think this is in jeopardy or is it wishful thinking? | ||
| No, look, it's still, you know, I think if I were to bet on anything, I bet she gets passed through. | ||
| But it's still, Steve, because of the fight that I don't think it'll get to that point. | ||
| I think that she either withdraws, or we go to a vote and they get a Pyrrhic victory. | ||
| for the lot, right? Like, these guys are going to be held accountable. I think there are a few outs here to get a victory, which is one, her withdrawing the nomination, but then also losing a vote. I don't think it'll get to that point. I think that she either withdraws or we go to a vote and they get a pyrrhic victory. But either way, because we fought and because people like Mike Davis, Josh Hawley, and Ted Cruz and all these guys fought, we're actually going to be getting a win here either way. | ||
| So I'd rather keep this person off the court just because of the decades-long ramifications. | ||
| But either way, we're going to hold these people accountable. | ||
| They're either going to vote for someone that's been soft on child porn to go to the highest court in the land, or they're not. | ||
| One last thing I want to do. | ||
| So how do people get to you? | ||
| Because I got a closing comment, and I want you on for this. | ||
| How do people get to you and support American Principles Project? | ||
| It's SaveTheFamily.app. | ||
| That's our big family membership program. | ||
| Keep updated with us. | ||
| And then also Schilling 1776 across all the platforms. | ||
| Getter, Twitter, True Social. | ||
| What I thought was inexcusable in the last couple of days is to have this kind of people pointing fingers about, you know, policy's not set, the law's not set, it's fuzzy. | ||
| I believe, besides if she does get confirmed, it will be a Pyrrhic victory. | ||
| This will be a hard vote and that vote will go against people that vote for her, okay? | ||
| But almost importantly, we have to now have a national conversation, I mean a serious conversation, Terry, led by you and Liz Yorke and others, about this whole situation with pedophilia and this whole situation with this child porn thing. | ||
| The stats that Liz Yorke gave the other day, that she set up the cyber tip line when she was at Justice, or working for this organization set by Justice, and there's, was it 24 million 24 million hits on it every year of people giving tips. | ||
| The scale of this problem is insane. | ||
| It's insane in a country like this. | ||
| And it's got to be vetted. | ||
| Terry, so I hope you take the lead. | ||
| The War Room will work with you. | ||
| We will do whatever has to be. | ||
| Now, we can never have another hearing like this where people are pointing fingers, oh, this should have been done. | ||
| That day has to be over. | ||
| We have to make a commitment ourselves. | ||
| Okay, 90 second break. | ||
| We're gonna be back, we're gonna go to NATO, we got geopolitics, we got economics, how it's gonna impact you, and some good news on education in this country. |
Export Selection