March 23, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:51
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the U.S., Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the U.S. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| OK, welcome back. | ||
| We have massive news on outbreaks in China and Shanghai denying it. | ||
| We have massive news in the Ukraine war, geopolitics, finance, capital markets, inflation, all of it. | ||
| But we've got to deal with the business today and we've got some extraordinary business before us. | ||
| Liz, you're going to join us in a moment on this historic here in confirmation hearings. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, real quickly tonight, your webinar. | ||
| I want to make sure everybody in the world policy knows how to go there. | ||
| And quite frankly, I want them to also understand how they can Download or watch your first webinar on filing civil suits, but tonight it's criminal. | ||
| And when Naomi Wolf goes and does something, it's pretty serious. | ||
| By the way, let me just say, on a scale from 1 to 10, On the Pfizer, and I don't need to give any details, but actionable items, one being none, and ten being so many that it's going to take us a while and guys are going to end up in jail. | ||
| Actionable items coming off of what you've seen to date in the 55,000 pages that the War Room Posse is assisting your great team with. | ||
| Where do you think we stand right now? | ||
| So, you know, again, I can summarize some of the crimes that surfaced in the lawyers meeting without giving details. | ||
| And I really want to credit, it's not me, this is being driven by Craig Klein, my CRO, these 1500 volunteers, these lawyers, I am just facilitating and supporting, or really, they're facilitating and supporting, and I'm just cheering them on. | ||
| But what some of the crimes that surfaced were racketeering, RICO, Denial of civil rights, medical malpractice, device malpractice, and denial of informed consent. | ||
| But the thing that came up over and over was fraud. | ||
| And this goes to, you know, conversations you've had here with Edward Dowd, who's also saying if fraud can be proven against Pfizer, it breaks up their impunity or their immunity from prosecution, civilly and possibly criminally. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Again, not a lawyer, but fraud is a big deal. | |
| So on a scale from 1 to 10, you're at a 7 or 8 or higher? | ||
| Of criminality? | ||
| Of actionable items that will lead to either civil or criminal. | ||
| Civil also. | ||
| It doesn't need to be criminal. | ||
| Civil or criminal. | ||
| So it is too early to say. | ||
| The lawyers were very clear that I need to make that clear. | ||
| The lawyer time takes longer. | ||
| There was affirmative discussion that I can't kind of disclose that serious things happen here with legal repercussions, and they are all over it. | ||
| So let's put it that way. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| By the way, I want to compliment the 1,500 War Room Posse that have put their shoulders to the wheel of getting tremendous feedback. | ||
| A couple of weeks, you're going to have an interim report. | ||
| And maybe a press conference, and then you're going to have a final report sometime four or six weeks after that? | ||
| Correct. | ||
| And the lawyer's actions and benchmarks may likely take longer, but I'll continue to update with the lawyer's consent when there are legal benchmarks, filings, strategies that they want to disclose. | ||
| Are you going to reach out to Pfizer to say, hey, we want to sit down with you with our findings? | ||
| Would you be open to sit down with Pfizer to let them address it? | ||
| That's a really interesting Great question. | ||
| It would make great television, but I would definitely need to have the green light from the lawyers. | ||
| I don't want to mess up what they're doing with my journalistic excitement. | ||
| Perfect. | ||
| OK. | ||
| Tonight, how do people get to your webinar? | ||
| Excellent. | ||
| So, again, these webinars are Craig Klein's idea, execution. | ||
| You can look at the last one, which had huge impact, where James Ostrowski talked about, you know, how to file Civil charges. | ||
| And tonight, at last, James Ostrowski is coming back at 7 p.m. | ||
| It's right on the homepage. | ||
| Webinar, File Criminal Charges Against School Officials and Others. | ||
| This is not just school officials. | ||
| You can use these skills to file criminal charges against any public official who's broken the law. | ||
| And many laws have been broken in this pandemic. | ||
| And it's 7 p.m. | ||
| tonight on Daily Cloud. | ||
| You can register right there. | ||
| You'll get a You'll get a link and we will have the template again posted. | ||
| We'll share it with your wonderful team to post in socials. | ||
| So you can all take this template, take these guidelines and file criminal charges. | ||
| And honestly, this is an army. | ||
| And I see it's having such an impact. | ||
| These people are in a defensive position. | ||
| It's too early to say we won, but it's so powerful to have all of you empowered with your great skills, your great passion and intelligence, whoever you are. | ||
| Out there, you're filing criminal charges, you're filing civil charges, or you will be filing criminal charges after tonight, and it's making a difference. | ||
| Okay, I want everybody to jump all over that. | ||
| It's free, just go to the Daily Cloud. | ||
| Real quickly, social media, how do people follow you? | ||
| Dr. Naomi R. Wolf on Getter, and come to dailycloud.io, and please donate and support us, continue to, because we have had to hire more staff, so we could really use your help to keep doing this well. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| And there's my book. | ||
| Oh, the Body of Others comes out in May. | ||
| You can pre-order as soon as it's up on Amazon. | ||
| We'll have a pre-order day when you actually get up on Amazon. | ||
| Thank you so much, Mr. Bannon, and thank you to your community. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| I want to make sure for my staff that we know when there's going to be more fireworks. | ||
| I'll bring in Liz York. | ||
| Liz, look, we're in Mandarin on G News and now on the Getter side of G News as they reboot the GTV thing, but we're still in Mandarin and Japanese. | ||
| And I want to make sure the audience just real quickly give your bona fides quickly why not just you're an expert in this, you've kind of dedicated your life to this area about the protection of children. | ||
| Just give me a minute on your bona fides and then I want to ask you about what you've seen so far out of this confirmation hearing. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| I was a general counsel of the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, the main statewide child welfare system. | ||
| I was general counsel head of the international division And head of the cyber tick line at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in Arlington, Virginia. | ||
| And I was an assistant attorney general doing child abduction cases. | ||
| So I spent my 30-year legal career on child exploitation and spent many years in trying to protect children from child pornography and child exploitation. | ||
| And as you know, I tell Liz all the time, this is from the first time I sat down with her personally years ago. | ||
| This is not my line of country. | ||
| But her discussion about the scale of this, it's truly a pandemic and it cuts to a very dark place of rot, not just in our society, but globally. | ||
| And it's it's only getting worse. | ||
| So, Liz, as you've seen this, given the given the importance of the Supreme Court, the highest court, In the greatest republic in mankind's history, and how few people actually reach that level. | ||
| I want your professional opinion of what you've heard the last couple days about child pornography, child exploitation, the pedophilia, and Judge Jackson's, one, her actions, but also her responses over the last couple days of inquiry. | ||
| Sure, Steve. | ||
| I'm greatly troubled by her responses, her attitude. | ||
| For example, this little gem, which is really mind-boggling to me, when she said, some people who possess child porn aren't sexually motivated, but simply, quote, in this for either the collection or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community. | ||
| I mean, it's shocking. | ||
| I mean, this isn't trading baseball cards, Steve. | ||
| This is trading videos, pictures of rapes of little children. | ||
| And she is stating for the record that these people are not in it for sexually motivated reasons. | ||
| It's beyond the can. | ||
| And it's, you know, frankly disingenuous. | ||
| It's as disingenuous as saying she doesn't know how to define a woman, yet she believes that a woman has a right to an abortion. | ||
| Um, she, she believes that an 18 year old who has possessed 600 images of child pornography, child rape, um, is, um, not culpable, liable to the extent of the rules under the law because the victims were peers. | ||
| I mean, it's, it's absolutely, you want to choke on the statements that she makes. | ||
| It's almost as if we're in this. | ||
| Hold it, hold it. | ||
| But I want to make sure we're good. | ||
| She said that victims were peers when the victims, I think, were eight, seven and eight years old. | ||
| And the guy was 18 years old. | ||
| I mean, he's a man at 18. | ||
| But he's he's a man. | ||
| They're eight years old. | ||
| Here's the thing. | ||
| Do you think, unless you hear something different today, do you believe in your line of country that this disqualifies her from sitting on the Supreme Court, ma'am? | ||
| Let me tell you. | ||
| Since 1995, there have been at least 12 major pieces of legislation to address the issue of child exploitation, specifically on the internet. | ||
| The American people, law enforcement, has been begging Congress and the courts to stop this evil that is infecting in a pandemic phase. | ||
| It's just 29 million reports of child Sexual exploitation on the internet. | ||
| I mean, this is a pandemic. | ||
| And we have a Supreme Court justice, a nominee, that is not taking, in my opinion, not taking this seriously. | ||
| And frankly, you know, Mitt Romney saying this is, you know, off course, asking questions about this. | ||
| Ask the parents of Adam Walsh. | ||
| Ask the parents of Jacob Wetterling and Megan Cantor. | ||
| And Amber Hagerman, all the children over the years that had to have laws named after them because they were found dead because of sexual offenders. | ||
| And you know, one of the most, I think, you know, her revealing statement is that, you know, she doesn't believe that these people are sexually motivated. | ||
| That to me, is the most troubling statement at all. You know, because, and this is a very interesting intersection of what's happened in the last two years that Steve, what you have followed. | ||
| You know, we have seen parents in school boards pleading with the school boards not to do CRT, not to corrupt their children with sexual exploitation. | ||
| Did we lose Liz? | ||
| Okay, we're going to have to get back to Liz. | ||
| Is Lindsey Graham up? | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Lindsey Graham is about to come on, and we're going to cut into... We've got intense coverage the rest of the way, both on the hearings, as soon as we get Liz back. | ||
| Who's going to help me with play-by-play, but we've got we've got the Thale Academy to give you some good news about education. | ||
| The head of Thale Academy is going to join us. | ||
| We've also got the technology folks that did this incredible analysis of the machines out in Colorado and they're going to have a chance to kind of give you at least the ability to figure out how to go on the line. | ||
| I think Mike Lindell was telling me there's 900,000 downloads yesterday of his of his material. | ||
| The Liz Shore, the reason I want to have Liz on And this talks, look, we don't believe in conspiracy theories here, we also don't believe in coincidences. | ||
| It is incredibly disturbing, I think, when someone like Mitt Romney stands up. | ||
| I understand he can't stand President Trump and he hates the MAGA movie or something like that, but when he calls this fringe, and these are fringe questions, that's very disturbing, because I think this is something that people have to get into, given the scale of this. | ||
| Liz Yor, I think, told us on the tip line. | ||
| Remember, Liz Yor was not just in Chicago as this tough prosecutor, and in Illinois as a tough prosecutor, and she was all over the Catholic Church and all of it. | ||
| She came back, she actually came back and set up for the federal government at DOJ. | ||
| That whole child exploitation and that cyber line was all, that was a federal operation. | ||
| What did she tell us the other day? | ||
| There were 34 million inquiries into that in the last calendar year. | ||
| 34 million inquiries. | ||
| The scale of this, I mean as we've gone around, remember we had a couple of weekend specials about a year ago. | ||
| Talking about the local police departments that have really downsized their operations given defund the police and given other budget cuts. | ||
| And every law enforcement person we talked to said this is a pandemic. | ||
| The child exploitation has reached pandemic levels here in the United States of America and now throughout the world, given the internet. | ||
| So that's why I think it's not fringe. | ||
| And I think it was Mike Davis, the guys at Article Three, and of course, Liz, you were in the American Personal Project. | ||
| You know, to me, Judge Jackson has got to have a full opportunity to answer this. | ||
| But that's what I'm saying. | ||
| I think Grassley said today, we're going to put the phone number up in the next break. | ||
| You have to call your senator today and say, hey, we just need all the documents turned over, all the pre sentencing things that they can be turned over, particularly the 48000 pages from the Sentencing Commission, U.S. | ||
| Sentencing Commission, which she was vice chair of. | ||
| OK. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We'll cut in when we get back. | ||
| Anything in the hearing that is appropriate. | ||
| If not, we're going to be doing a technology review. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Join us in the War Room. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| OK, we've got a little technical problem with our producing partners, and so we can't, our guests have dropped off and we can't go live to the hearing. | ||
| So you're going to have a chance to have my my brilliant analysis here. | ||
| We haven't had a chance to get to Ukraine in the last couple of days. | ||
| Joe Biden is heading over to this NATO meeting. | ||
| And of course, as the economy continues to be on fire and burning down, we got terrible news out of housing. | ||
| We're going to try to get to we're going to try to get to here. | ||
| I got right here. | ||
| OK, well, we got Liz back. | ||
| Let's go to Liz. | ||
| We've got terrible news on housing. | ||
| We're going to Steve Cortez. | ||
| We've got all this analysis. | ||
| Try to get him in the afternoon show. | ||
| I've got a huge analysis coming out with the Birch Gold guys called End of the Dollar Empire will have a big impact on you. | ||
| We just we got so many fronts we're fighting on, but pushing the ball down the road at each one of them. | ||
| Let me go back to Liz. | ||
| Liz, we cut off on your last question. | ||
| We had a hard drop here. | ||
| So can the pandemic, as I was saying, if you drop, Because you've helped me understand this more. | ||
| There's a pandemic, not just in this country, but in the world, and it's bad. | ||
| It's getting worse. | ||
| It's getting exponentially worse. | ||
| And so what is your recommendation? | ||
| How do we get our arms around this? | ||
| And how are we going to get our arms around it if you've got a Supreme Court justice that clearly is soft on this? | ||
| And maybe even worse than soft making excuses one thing about being soft on giving Sentences another kind of making excuses for people some of the comments were beyond the pale. | ||
| How is that? | ||
| How do we get actually start to shut this thing down? | ||
| If you're gonna have a Supreme Court justice that's got a terrible track record on this Yeah, I mean see that's the ultimate question the only way to protect children is for law enforcement to be aggressive and And investigate these cases, lock these guys up. | ||
| Tough sentencing. | ||
| And that's why this judge's comments are so disturbing. | ||
| The sentencing of a sex offender is the most important thing that is done to protect children. | ||
| And additionally, the sex offender registry is what every parent relies on to see who's in their neighborhood. | ||
| Are their children in danger of a sexual offender? | ||
| And the vast majority of sex offenders aren't even identified. | ||
| But when we do have these laws, they have to be enforced. | ||
| And the fact that there's a laissez-faire attitude, this apology to a defendant and his family It is absolutely shocking. | ||
| A defendant, a young defendant, who I would argue is a greater threat to the community because he's so young and he's going to be out there for many, many years. | ||
| And so he needs a tough sentence to send a strong message of punishment and deterrence to this 18 year old man. | ||
| And so, I mean, this is an issue that has gripped the nation, that Has gripped the parents in the last two years as they see the practical effect of wokeism of saying, oh, we're not going to define boys and girls. | ||
| We're going to be able to open up bathrooms for boys and girls or boys that identify as girls. | ||
| So this is the struggle that is going on the cultural. | ||
| This is the cultural fight of our country. | ||
| And fortunately, moms and dads are at the front line and the judges are the last line of defense to protect the kids. | ||
| So my call is to the moms and dads who have manned the battle station at the school board to really speak up. | ||
| We cannot have a judge on the Supreme Court who feels that these laws should be updated, which I think means, clearly from her comments, Um, suggest that she feels that they should be lessen. | ||
| We've got to get the parents at the school boards into this fight. | ||
| There is no more important issue. | ||
| And I take great offense for somebody like Mitt Romney. | ||
| And I'm sure the people of Utah do as well. | ||
| Um, that this isn't the most important issue before America for the future of America, because we are facing damaged children, traumatized children, Children that end up like Megan Kanka and Adam Walsh and Jacob Wetterling. | ||
| And this has got to stop. | ||
| The courts have got to get tough. | ||
| And we need a Supreme Court that views this issue with the fury that the parents at the school board, the mama bears, that have been able to speak on behalf of their children. | ||
| Nothing is more important. | ||
| We have got to stop this pandemic. | ||
| And the only way to do it is through tough laws and the enforcement of tough laws. | ||
| Liz, how do people, we'll pull you back in here. | ||
| Testimony took a short break. | ||
| I don't know why they took a break this early. | ||
| I don't think they took a break yesterday. | ||
| It's interesting. | ||
| We'll try to get some information on that. | ||
| Liz, what's your social media so people can follow you? | ||
| Because you're right, this attack, this is a direct attack. | ||
| And I don't understand why Mitt Romney And guys like Mitt Romney play right into the left's hands by saying, oh, this is all fringe, this is fringe, like he's trying to, you know, smear this as something that's not to the beating heart of the decay and collapse of our civilization. | ||
| There is an outright attack on the family, on the nuclear family. | ||
| And they're attacking the kids. | ||
| This whole thing with the getting to the schools. | ||
| I mean, Ron DeSantis, they passed a bill you think Disney would think the whole world's melting down. | ||
| It's not to talk to kids about this type of sexual stuff. | ||
| Look, from four to seven year olds, right? | ||
| It should be it should be 17. | ||
| You know, once again, in the world, they can figure it out. | ||
| But it's a constant, constant assault. | ||
| Can you give your social media so people would follow you? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| We know the left never sleeps. | ||
| So, my social media is Elizabeth Yorr, Twitter and Getter. | ||
| My website is yourchildren.com. | ||
| Well, Liz Yorr, we know you never sleep. | ||
| You always man the ramparts. | ||
| Always. | ||
| By the way, mypillow.com, speaking of the man of the ramparts, mypillow.com, promo code war room. | ||
| Make sure you go there, check out everything that we've got on our square. | ||
| We've added all types of new sales. | ||
| It's incredible. | ||
| It would take too long to go through, but please go to mypillow.com, promo code war room today. | ||
| Okay, I want to bring in two experts. | ||
| This is controversy. | ||
| I think there were 900,000, Mike told me there were 900,000 downloads. | ||
| Yes, of this information. | ||
| Jeff O'Donnell, Dr. Walter Daugherty. | ||
| Jeff, we got about four or five minutes here in this segment. | ||
| We'll hold you over through the break. | ||
| But walk us through, and if we can put up the links or however you want to do it, walk us through exactly, you spent seven months of your life, walk us through what you looked at and why you think you've come up with this incontrovertible evidence that the machines had a role here in changing the vote. | ||
| Just as simple as you can make it for non-professionals, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, hello. | |
| I had the opportunity to look into the image that was taken, the backup by Tina Peters, before it was destroyed by the Secretary of State in Dominion. | ||
| And basically did a real intense look at the database, the information, the numbers are there. | ||
| And piece by piece, I approached it like I would an accounting problem and made sure the numbers add up. | ||
| Soon found that the numbers of ballots and batches did not add up in different parts of the system. | ||
| And from there, I just kept digging until I found that the timeline of events were not authorized or any way caused by Mesa County personnel. | ||
| The system, about a quarter of the way through the votes, decided to create new databases that contains information about ballots that come in. | ||
| Uh, and copied some information to the new database, some not. | ||
| And that's the way I can think of it. | ||
| It's almost like a company having two sets of books. | ||
| You suddenly had two sets of books and you did not have the same records of batches and ballots in either one. | ||
| Uh, this, this alone, as I said, completely unauthorized. | ||
| They did not know what was going on, uh, in, in the office. | ||
| And it, uh, it caused the ability for them to do whatever they wanted to, as far as reprocessing, uh, 20,000 votes and also like hid About 5,500 votes from the Mason County clerks. | ||
| If they wanted to go back and look at the adjudication, what had happened to a vote in one of those 5,500, they would not have been able to bring it up. | ||
| I think in a nutshell, it's... | ||
| Hang on for a second. | ||
| Have any of the clerks outside of Tina Peters and all of Colorado, including the clerks that are Republican, have any clerks, other clerks, drilled down on this? | ||
| Have any clerks looked into this? | ||
| Have any clerks had a problem? | ||
| And have any clerks asked for your information or your analysis since it was put out yesterday? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Outside of Mason? | |
| No, I've not heard from anyone as of yet. | ||
| Doesn't that strike you as odd? | ||
|
unidentified
|
If this thing was so compelling... I frankly expected to hear from a few. | |
| I thought I would hear from a few. | ||
| I'd be very concerned if it was me. | ||
| Well, what does that tell you? | ||
| I mean, is that because they don't think you've delivered the receipts? | ||
| Is it because you have pretty sophisticated people? | ||
| I mean, Tina Peters is pretty sophisticated. | ||
| She's the county clerk of Mesa. | ||
| You have other people at her level. | ||
| I'm sure there's some even above her level. | ||
| And I'm not talking about the secretary of state or where it gets into the politics of it. | ||
| But just other county clerks and particularly other county clerks that are Republican. | ||
| Did it surprise you that no one's reached out to you or they didn't even do their own analysis given the controversy? | ||
| You guys have been at this now. | ||
| I think you've been at it for seven months, but the fight there has been even well before or from the from the time of the cyber conference, which was in the first week or second week of August of 2021. | ||
| So did it surprise you no one's reached out to you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
In a way, this is still very new information. | |
| And don't forget, I mean, I don't think you can take the political thing out of it, Chris, because, with Steve, because look at what has happened to Tina because she did come full. | ||
| That is a chilling effect. | ||
| across the nation, I believe. | ||
| But hang on, I'm not asking for them to go get backups or anything, just to review your methodology. | ||
| Has anybody called you, we're going to go to break, so hang on, but has anybody called you and asked just to even go through the methodology, the logic of how you went through the databases to come up with your conclusion? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, I've had some people, you asked about clerks, not on the county clerk, But other people that are associated with... Okay, hang on. | |
| Let's take a break and we'll continue this on the other side. | ||
| This is this analysis of the Mesa County database, Mesa County, Colorado, that's been so controversial. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Be back in The War Room in a moment. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| OK, I do want to add. | ||
| So let's go back to the team here. | ||
| One who did the analysis, the other who checked it. | ||
| Jeff O'Donnell. | ||
| Jeff, I want to make sure we get it out there. | ||
| There are other counties that now have sued because of this trusted build situation. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, I've heard from the Albert and Douglas County in Colorado. | |
| The clerks have also filed suit around these same issues. | ||
| And that would be trusted bill in the deleted records and everything like that. | ||
| I just want to make sure at least as presented today, Gina Griswold, the Secretary of State, and they've got this huge bill that's going to be passed either today or tomorrow. | ||
| I know Tina Peters up there fighting in the state capitol in Colorado about would concentrate all the power Essentially all the power in the Secretary of State. | ||
| And I keep saying she's more controversial, I think, than Katie Hobbs, and that's saying something. | ||
| I think she's the most controversial in the country, and particularly how she tries to go forward. | ||
| Real quickly, Jeff, your bona fides, you've been doing this for how long? | ||
|
unidentified
|
40 years. | |
| I've been a software engineer working with companies like Rockwell International, Westinghouse Nuclear, I'm working with big data systems my whole career. | ||
| And what I found, I found. | ||
| The facts are facts. | ||
| What I found, I found. | ||
| And we can argue for 100 years over motives, but the facts are that there was manipulation to this database. | ||
| And it was not authorized by anybody in the Mesa County election office. | ||
| And it's not good. | ||
| What is your best, what do you think the best venue, look there are billions of dollars of lawsuits going on right now between media companies all over in this country, in federal courts right now. | ||
| Is that the best place to adjudicate this given your knowledge of just being a software guy and leaving all the politics aside? | ||
| Just to get to the facts, because I think that's what people most want to do. | ||
| And every American should want to do that. | ||
| Because remember, up until 2020, this was a Democratic thing. | ||
| This was all the Democrats were the leading, you know, Klobuchar and all, Elizabeth Warren. | ||
| This was all pushed by the Democrats about the hackability of these, the problem with these voting machines. | ||
| What do you think is the best place to actually review your material? | ||
| And what's the best venue to do that? | ||
| How would you recommend that, given the work that you've done, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think that it has to go to the courts. | |
| I mean, they are the ones, you know, if we can go to the courts, especially in Colorado. | ||
| And what I want, I want discovery of other counties. | ||
| We found this serious, serious issue that happened in Mesa County. | ||
| And if I was in Colorado, I think my next logical thought would be, Wow, we should probably check other counties in Colorado to see if they exhibit the same issues and the same manipulation. | ||
| That would seem to be the logical next step, in my opinion. | ||
| It's going to take the courts to make them allow their systems to be inspected. | ||
| Well, there's these other lawsuits from these other counties in Colorado, so we'll see how that progresses. | ||
| Real quickly, how do people, when they go to Frank's speech, and they go to the live, what is the best way for people to go through this material, and how can they, are you on social media, how can they get access to you to ask questions if it's not clear about how they go through this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm on social media, and I answer as many questions, hopefully all of them, most of the time. | |
| I am on Telegram. | ||
| My channel is called Alone Raccoon, A-L-O-N-E-R-A-C-C-O-O-N. | ||
| That's probably the best place if you're on Telegram. | ||
| I don't do many of the other ones since I was happy with Facebook and Twitter. | ||
| I'm not very happy about those anymore. | ||
| You're making me feel great when the handle is Lone Raccoon, but we'll leave that for another day. | ||
| That's a top for another day. | ||
| Naomi Wolf has had a lot of success. | ||
| She's now got 1,500 volunteers in the War Room assisting her and her group, Daily Cloud. | ||
| And going through this Pfizer equipment or Pfizer documents, the 55,000 pages of the Pfizer. | ||
| But she's done these webinars on how to actually do civil suits against school officials and now criminal suits against all. | ||
| Would you be open to actually have a webinar where you took an hour? | ||
| By the way, there's a webinar this afternoon also from the. | ||
| I would love to. | ||
| Committee on the Present Danger about the triggering effects of nuclear war, regional nuclear war over in Eastern Europe. I want to make sure everybody goes there. They'll be up on our getter, all of it. Frank Gaffney and the team, another webinar. Would you be open, Jeff, to actually do a webinar where we could have tens of thousands of people come in and actually have you go through a presentation? I would love to. This has been six months of my life or seven | ||
|
unidentified
|
months of my life now at this point, and I think it's a critical, critical thing. | |
| And if anything that I can do to get people to look at this and read it and think critically and ask questions, that's everything right now. | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| And that'd be obviously critics. | ||
| I think we'll work with Mike and figure out how to do a webinar like with you. | ||
| I want to go to Dr. Walter Darty now. | ||
| Walter, doctor, you were brought in to do the checkings. | ||
| Can you give your Quickly, your your bona fides and then talk about the checkings you did, the validation process you went through for this before they published it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
| You know, questions have been raised about voting machines for a long time, and now we finally have some answers. | ||
| My degree, undergraduate degree, was in mathematics, and then I went to Harvard for my master's and doctor's. | ||
| Then for 37 years, I taught computer science and engineering, 32 of those years at Texas A&M University. | ||
| On this project, Tina Peter's legal team asked some computer experts to take a look at the backup that she had, with incredible foresight, made. | ||
| And that's how it got to Jeff O'Donnell, who's incredibly experienced with databases. | ||
| After he started finding things that were there that shouldn't be there and not finding things that should be there, then I was brought in to check that and I did verify and confirm that that is in fact the case. | ||
| When you say that, what do you mean things that were there that shouldn't have been there and things that should have been there that were not? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can you put up Page three, that first graphic that I sent in. | |
| Yes, we can. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, this is a diagram of what Dominion says is in the election server. | |
| So, at the top of the picture, as ballots are scanned, basically the scanner just takes a picture of the ballot. | ||
| And those pictures go into a tabulation database. | ||
| Then, from the tabulation database, they go to an adjudication database. | ||
| And all adjudication means is, who did this ballot really vote for? | ||
| So, if there are two candidates, A and B, and the oval for A is completely filled in, and the oval for B is completely blank, then the machine just says they voted for A. But if they're One of the ovals is 70% filled in, and there's a mark or two in the other oval. | ||
| Then the machine says, depending on its settings, I'm not sure how they voted, and kicks it out to a human. | ||
| And so one of the clerks looks at it and says, yeah, looks like they couldn't make up their mind. | ||
| They made a little dot in B, but they really filled in most of A, so they intended to vote for A. | ||
| Now, if both bubbles were half filled in, then the human would say, I can't determine the intent. | ||
| Overvote. | ||
| Don't count this ballot. | ||
| So that's adjudication. | ||
| Then after they've determined how each ballot voted, those totals go into the main election database. | ||
| And that's what spits out the reports. | ||
| How many votes for A? | ||
| How many votes for B? | ||
| So this is what Dominion says is in the server. | ||
| When Jeff started looking at it, can we go to the next slide? | ||
| Yes, there we are. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When Jeff started looking at it, here's what was actually in the server. | |
| So on the left hand side, the scanner took pictures of the ballots, put those images in the tabulation database, they went to the adjudication database. | ||
| Some of them were adjudicated by machines, some were adjudicated by humans. | ||
| But then there was a second tabulation database and a second adjudication database in the machine. | ||
| So where you see those red arrows, some, but not all of the records from the original tabulation database were copied into the new tabulation database and similarly for the adjudication database. | ||
| And now that's what is accumulating counts in the main election database. | ||
| So at this point we have, in the case of the November, 2020 election, About 5,000 ballots that were in the original tabulation database that were not copied into the final tabulation database. | ||
| And now they've essentially become invisible. | ||
| There's no way that a clerk could say, show me ballot number 374 because it's not in the new tabulation database. | ||
| That's pretty extraordinary. | ||
| Your point is that's pretty stunning to find. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's astounding. | |
| What should have been there is one tabulation database, one adjudication database, each of which contained all the ballots. | ||
| And this is a saying, so don't give any legal weight to this. | ||
| Stupid criminals do stupid things. | ||
| Some of the reason we had a red flag for this is because When they copied some of the records from the first adjudication database to the second adjudication base, they copied some ballots that the clerks had already looked at and then asked them to be adjudicated again. | ||
| So when the ballot popped up and said, how did this person vote? | ||
| The clerk said, Hey, wait a minute. | ||
| I already did this one. | ||
| Oh, well, yes, it didn't take. | ||
| So they did it again when they, adjudicated that ballot that they recognized, again, the count did not increase. | ||
| So there's a little counter on the station that says, you've adjudicated 37 ballots so far today. | ||
| They adjudicate one more and it sits at 37. | ||
| It didn't go to 38. | ||
| And the clerk says, we got a problem. | ||
| So they called Dominion. | ||
| Dominion said, we aren't unable to reproduce the issue. | ||
| But somehow they didn't have any more problems the rest of the election. | ||
| We're talking about the third day of early voting counting, which was October 21st, is when this happened. | ||
| Could this have been a glitch in the software program? | ||
| I mean, what leads you to believe that it's something more than a glitch? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The reason we know it's something more than a glitch is because almost exactly the same thing happened In April 2021 in the municipal election in Grand Junction. | |
| After about 1 4th of the early votes were counted, all of a sudden a new tabulation database and a new adjudication database were created. | ||
| Some but not all of the ballot images and their data were copied to the new ones. | ||
| In the case of Grand Junction, they were shuffled. | ||
| But once again, Evidence shows that the ballots may have been altered because not the same ballots showed up for adjudication in the new database as showed in the original one. | ||
| So because this same sequence of events, almost the same sequence of events, happened twice in two different elections, our conclusion is most likely there's something in the software that either pre-programmed to do this or allows it to be done. | ||
| Okay, short break. | ||
| Jeff O'Donnell, Dr. Walter Daugherty are going to join us on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're taking down the CCP! For the world and for Hong Kong, we will fight till they're all gone. We rejoice when there's no more, let's take down the CCP! | |
| Monitors us, censors us, de-platforms us. | ||
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it, until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| Okay, Lindsey Graham now is doing the questions at the confirmation hearing for Judge Jackson. | ||
| We're going to cut into that. | ||
| They've gone through some abortion questions. | ||
| We'll cut into that if anything else pops up. | ||
| Also, Bob Luddy from the Thales Academy. | ||
| This is a major development as far as education goes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to get Bob back on, try to get him back on tonight. | |
| We've run out of time because of the live coverage. | ||
| I want to go to because it's pretty explosive gentleman O'Donnell and authority and so we got a simple webinar because I know our audience already saying they want to spend the time. | ||
| They're going to go to the site go to Frank speech. | ||
| It's all up there. | ||
| You get links all over the place, but I do think you need a formal presentation where. | ||
| Not appropriate for a new show, but for you guys to actually take an hour or so and go through this in detail. | ||
| But to your knowledge, has anybody at Dominion ever reached out to you guys, or have you guys in this process ever reached out to Dominion to ask them questions about what was going on, or the lawyers just say, don't have any interaction? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've not had any contact from them or to them personally. | |
| Not that maybe others have not but I'm not aware of But you know, I I would love to be able to ask them many questions but because they're right out of the right out of the gate, you know, they throw lawsuits and Again, keep coming back to that term the chilling effect on that I mean nobody wants to even contact them because they're afraid they're gonna get the response is gonna be a billion-dollar lawsuit Yeah | ||
| Jeff, how sophisticated is this system? | ||
| I think a lot of people who are not technology people like myself don't know. | ||
| Is this a highly sophisticated system? | ||
| during your Westinghouse days and other days had very complimentary things to say. | ||
| Jeff, how sophisticated is this system? | ||
| I think a lot of people are not technology people like myself don't know. | ||
| Is this a highly sophisticated system? | ||
| Is it not a highly sophisticated system? | ||
| I mean, in your professional opinion, how sophisticated actually is? | ||
| Forget the glitches and all these things that you're saying that are in there. | ||
| Just the system itself, how sophisticated is it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not what I would consider a modern system in terms of current best practices of databases, data, things called relational issues, the fact that You can have information in one part of the database that doesn't match information in other databases, and there's no internal, in the system, there's no way that that gets flagged or that sort of thing. | |
| In my professional opinion, it looks like a system that has been around for a long time and hasn't really been updated much to make it modernized. | ||
| Walter, Dr. Walter Daugherty, same question to you. | ||
| How sophisticated is this and does it look like it's old technology that's really overseeing or inextricably linked with our elections here, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the way I would characterize it is not, I wouldn't use the word sophisticated, I would just say a highly complex system. | |
| So there are hundreds of moving parts in it. | ||
| Every little part, like copying the ballot image from one place on the disk to another place on the disk, examining each oval to decide what percentage in it, every one of those hundreds or possibly thousands of modules inside the software has an effect on other parts and is affected by them in turn. | ||
| So it's a very complex Combination of software, and as Jeff points out, since he's a professional database designer, not very well designed by modern standards. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead, Jeff. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think to give you to kind of go along with what you're asking, in that all of this is a very complex system. | |
| The databases contain hundreds and hundreds of tables, many of which for some reason aren't used, but nevertheless, It has many tables that are in all of these databases and tables and pieces of information. | ||
| The place where it actually stores how many votes are for what candidate are in one single place. | ||
| With no reference, no checks. | ||
| In other words, what I'm saying is that with all this, if you want to know that a particular thing, there's votes for a particular candidate, that exists in one, we call them databases, and it exists in one table. | ||
| With no ability to check it. | ||
| So the point is, despite all of this huge, complex thing, changing a number in one single table would change the election. | ||
| And with no reference in the database that had ever been changed or anything to alert anything that had been changed. | ||
| It's what we call a single point of attack. | ||
| There is a single point of attack to change votes in the system. | ||
| And that to me is Preposterous. | ||
| Just professionally speaking, preposterous. | ||
| I'll stick with that word. | ||
| Okay, we gotta bounce, we gotta hard out. | ||
| Real quickly, social media, how did they get to you again, your telegram, Jeff O'Donnell? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh yeah, my telegram is A-Lone Raccoon, all one word, L-O-N-E, and the word raccoon. | |
| That's what my channel is, and you can also have a, you can go to Mega Raccoon, m-e-g-a-r-a-c-c-o-o-n dot com. | ||
| It's where a lot of my work is kept there and it has links to everywhere else that you can reach me. | ||
| But I encourage anybody that seriously wants to know more or has questions, reach out and I will do my best to get back to you. | ||
| Go to Frank TV. | ||
| It's all over there. | ||
| We're going to set up a webinar so you'll get more detail. | ||
| We've got about 20 seconds. | ||
| Dr. Daugherty, any way people can get to you on social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, you can direct message me on telegram at dr. D presents dr underscore D underscore presents and I just like to comment, you know, the famous verse you will know the truth and the truth will make you free If we don't know the truth about our elections, how can we be free? | |
| Amen doctor very powerful. | ||
| Okay, the hearings are we're gonna go to real America's voice next we'll see you back here at five o'clock and We'll be all over this hearing today and other topics. | ||
| Ukraine and the Economy and Thale Academy. |
Export Selection