March 22, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| OK, it's Monday, 21 March, Year of the Ruler 2022. | ||
| Josh Hawley is having a star turn over at the hearing in the Senate for the Supreme Court for Judge Brown Jackson. | ||
| We're going to have Mike Davis from the Article 3 Project, he was on this morning, give us a pregame. | ||
| He's going to join us at 5.30 for an update of what's going on. | ||
| But that's not the most interesting of all the interesting things Josh Hawley said today. | ||
| Actually, that's not the most interesting. | ||
| He came out with a tweet a little while ago. | ||
| If you hit with a big old picture of Eric Greitens at CPAC giving a speech. | ||
| And I'm reading, I'm quoting from the tweet of Senator Hawley. | ||
| If you hit a woman or a child, you belong in handcuffs, not the United States Senate. | ||
| It's time for Eric Greitens to leave this race. | ||
| So we've asked Commander Greitens, former governor of Missouri, to join us here in the War Room. | ||
| What is going on? | ||
| What's the story of this tweet? | ||
| And why are there shots fired between Senator Hawley and yourself, Commander Greitens? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Steve, the reason why shots are being fired at us is that I was the first guy in the country to come out and say that when I'm elected to the United States Senate as an America first senator, that I'm voting against Mitch McConnell. | |
| And what we found out today is it and your audience has seen this. | ||
| You've seen the lies against President Trump. | ||
| You saw the lies against Brett Kavanaugh. | ||
| We found out today. | ||
| Is that rhinos are now working to make more false allegations. | ||
| Just this past week, literally all the way up until yesterday morning, this past week, I was with my boys for an entire week. | ||
| We had a beautiful time. | ||
| My most important job is being a great father to my boys. | ||
| And we found out, we just learned, that my ex-wife was in Washington, D.C. | ||
| meeting with political operatives And just this morning, they launched a series of false allegations against us. | ||
| And the fact is, these are completely baseless. | ||
| And just like, you know, just like the fact that we saw before a Soros-funded prosecutor came after us, now they've been charged with seven felonies. | ||
| She was found guilty of over 70 instances of perjury. | ||
| The truth will come out. | ||
| And what I can tell you, Steve, is as early as tomorrow morning, The story about how the political operatives worked with Mitch McConnell supporters to bring this out is all coming to light. | ||
| OK, I've got Dr. Peter Navarro is going to join us in a minute. | ||
| He knows a lot about Mitch McConnell, but we found it kind of, you know, there's no conspiracies, but there's no coincidences. | ||
| Mo Brooks comes on this morning and people know Mo was coming on. | ||
| He made this spot. | ||
| It's about 90 seconds long about how he's going to vote once he's in the Senate. | ||
| He's voting against Mitch McConnell. | ||
| He actually framed it on the show. | ||
| We put it out. | ||
| It went viral that this all the Senate races are really McConnell versus Trump, MAGA versus the establishment. | ||
| That's what it comes down to. | ||
| And then right after that happens, your deal happens. | ||
| I just want to go back. | ||
| You're absolutely certain. | ||
| That she was here for, not for business, or I know she's a professor, I think, at the University of Texas. | ||
| She was here with, what you're saying, she was here with political operatives to go through this filing she did today? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What we know 100% with certainty is that while I was with my boys the entirety of last week, that my ex-wife was in Washington D.C., and as early as tomorrow morning, you're going to see a story break With details about the political operatives who are behind this. | |
| Are these political operatives, are you telling us now, because this story will come out tomorrow, are you telling us that these political operatives, people will be able to connect the dots back to Mitch McConnell, with Stephen Law, Stephen Law and that whole nest of vipers? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're going to be able to connect the dots directly to Mitch McConnell. | |
| You're going to be able to connect the dots directly to the rhino swamp Who always does this. | ||
| This is their game. | ||
| They work to push out false allegations. | ||
| They know that the mainstream media will follow them. | ||
| And they attack America First conservatives. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Look, as you know, Steve, I was the first guy in the country right here on War Room to say that when I'm elected to the U.S. | ||
| Senate, we're taking on Mitch McConnell. | ||
| We are winning this race in every single poll. | ||
| President Trump's pollster Has us up 30 points when people know that we're opposed to McConnell. | ||
| So the fact is that what you're seeing now is the rhino swamp engaging in their desperate tactics. | ||
| But the fact is the people of America are a lot smarter than this. | ||
| They've seen these plays run before. | ||
| And, you know, and again, I love my kids. | ||
| It's why I've applied for full custody of my of my children, because I love them and they they deserve to be supported and loved every single day. | ||
| People should know that that give money to McConnell. | ||
| We're going to expose all of you. | ||
| It's not the assassin. | ||
| It's who paid for the assassin's bullet. | ||
| What I find most disturbing. | ||
| Is that, whether it's Mo Brooks, Eric Greitens, is that you can't take them on on policies. | ||
| Is there a big policy debate in Missouri? | ||
| Has anybody been able to take you on on the America First policies that President Trump represents? | ||
| Has that been something that people can get traction against you? | ||
| Or does it just get down to all personal allegations, Commander Greitens? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's exactly why they do this is because they're wrong on the issues. | |
| I'm the only candidate in Missouri who's had President Trump's back on election integrity. | ||
| Went down to Maricopa County twice. | ||
| I'm the only candidate who's had the backs of our police officers and stood up against this crazy defund the police movement. | ||
| I'm the only candidate who not only went down to the border, went down to the Mexican side of the border to expose all of Joe Biden in the mainstream media's lies. | ||
| And the fact is they can't hang with us on policy. | ||
| I've been the only candidate who's also come out and said these rhinos have been selling our veterans out instead of supporting them. | ||
| And we've also called out all of the warmongers who are trying to push towards war with Ukraine. | ||
| They can't beat us on policy, so they engage in this sort of nastiness. | ||
| But the fact is, I'll tell you this, Steve, we are back. | ||
| We are more courageous, stronger, more joyous than ever. | ||
| And we're going to win this race. | ||
| And I will never stop fighting for the people of Missouri and for the America First movement. | ||
| You're also a guy that went down when the full forensic audit was going on in Arizona and supported the 3 November movement from the beginning. | ||
| Joe Biden's illegitimate, not even a question about that. | ||
| Commander Greitens, so tomorrow there'll be, I take it, a full story coming out that's going to connect the dots with the Polok operatives, and I think you're going to find some interesting names here. | ||
| I think we'll wait till that story comes out, but I just want to make sure that every hedge fund guy and every big donor, Because you're all cowards. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay? | |
| We're going to make all of you famous. | ||
| You give money to Mitch McConnell to try to personally destroy guys like Mo Brooks, Eric Greitens, and all the others who are coming against you. | ||
| We're coming after you. | ||
| We're not coming after McConnell. | ||
| We're going to come after you. | ||
| We're going to expose you. | ||
| We're going to expose where you get your money from. | ||
| We're going to expose what you do with your money. | ||
| So if you think you're getting free shots on gold, those days are over and we're going to start with who's in back of. | ||
| Specifically, the people that are financing this are going to be exposed. | ||
| They're going to be exposed in this show. | ||
| And I can tell you one thing. | ||
| Once you're exposed in this show, your life will change. | ||
| So if you're giving money to Mitch McConnell to go after and personally attack MAGA candidates and play this politics of personal destruction, we're not going to tolerate that. | ||
| It's bad enough the left does it, we're not going to let you do it. | ||
| And if you don't think we can do that and throw a punch, ask Megyn Kelly and the guys at Fox how it worked out for them when they came after Donald J. Trump in the first week of August of 2016. | ||
| Ask Megyn Kelly how that turned out for her career-wise. | ||
| I want to repeat this. | ||
| All the people stroking checks and giving money to Mitch McConnell. | ||
| You're not going to be able to hide. | ||
| You want anonymity? | ||
| You want to be able to make your money and give it to some scumbag like McConnell and Stephen Law and these guys around him? | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And let them do it? | ||
| You're going to be exposed. | ||
| Exactly who you are, how you make your money, where you've made your money from, and what you're doing with your money. | ||
| And we're going to see how you like a little public exposure. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So this is a warning shot. | ||
| You come after MAGA candidates on the politics of personal destruction, which Soros does? | ||
| No. | ||
| We're going to stop that and we're going to stop it now and we're going to start tomorrow because we're going to expose the money men in back of this. | ||
| And they're going to whine and moan and hate. | ||
| Doesn't make any difference. | ||
| We don't need any of you guys. | ||
| Don't need your money. | ||
| Don't need your influence. | ||
| Here's what we need from you. | ||
| Squat. | ||
| And we're coming hard. | ||
| Not just as a scumbag like Mitch McConnell and his Chinese Communist Party asset wife. | ||
| We're coming after you with why you did it and where this money went. | ||
| Commander Greitens, how do people find out more about you and your campaign so they can make their own decision? | ||
| They can make their own interpretation. | ||
| When you look at the issues, there's not one MAGA candidate that can be beaten. | ||
| Not one. | ||
| That's where they have to go play the politics of personal destruction. | ||
| That may be fine for Soros, but we're not going to let it happen here. | ||
| Commander Gritens, how do people find out more about you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| If you want to join our fight to take on Soros and to take on Mitch McConnell, come out and join us at EricGreitens.com. | ||
| It's E-R-I-C-G-R-E-I-T-E-N-S.com. | ||
| Come on out. | ||
| Join us. | ||
| This fight is just beginning, but we are. | ||
| We're going to take our country back. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I want to make this warning one more time. | ||
| Starting tomorrow, when this other story breaks out, so I want to wait for that to come out, we're going to take on the money people in back of this, and they're not going to like it. | ||
| And people should understand, that's just the first example I'm going to use. | ||
| I'm going much deeper after that, okay? | ||
| Commander Gritens, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| Say hi to your boys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Appreciate you, sir. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| There's nobody near the Oval Office that saw these games better than Dr. Peter Navarro, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The floor and the microphone is yours. | |
| Steve, I would put Mitch McConnell as the top three people who worked most actively against President Trump and the Trump agenda, and I would include Democrats in that. | ||
| That man is poison. | ||
| Let's talk a little bit about the business model, because you're eluding and implying some stuff. | ||
| Here's the way it works, folks. | ||
| Mitch McConnell maintains His role as Senate Majority Leader or Minority Leader, depending on which party is in power, by going out and begging for money on Wall Street from places like Goldman Sachs, where he used to work and he knows it well, from Big Pharma and Pfizer and all that money that wants to send our jobs offshore. | ||
| Okay, so that's the business model. | ||
| McConnell goes out, raises that money from the anti-Trump crowd, and then uses it to give to Senate candidates who will then pledge their fealty to McConnell, and he hangs on as an octogenarian for far too long to that position. | ||
| Now, what does he do with that position? | ||
| Here's the game he played, and it was really a shame that folks in the White House didn't catch on to it sooner, but they were just stupid and legislators. | ||
| Let me be blunt. | ||
| McConnell had one mission in life, and that was to get judges appointed. | ||
| And so what he would do is he'd keep sending judges over. | ||
| But what he wouldn't do is he wouldn't push forward the appointments for key cabinet positions, not just the cabinet secretaries, but the deputies below that. | ||
| And that dragged on for a long, long time. | ||
| And look, if you're the boss sitting in the Oval Office, and you don't have people in the deep and minute and straight at the top trying to steer You're in trouble. | ||
| And that's all Mitch McConnell. | ||
| That's what he did. | ||
| And then, of course, I mean, the In Trump Time book that I wrote as of the chapter 21, where we talk about what McConnell did right after the election, he did everything he could to stop any kind of investigation about election integrity, Steve. | ||
| Any kind. | ||
| And he, you know, the car rose to this world on Fox News. | ||
| They all got together, the Rinos, the Romneys, and this, that, and the other thing, and they were the ones who basically urged everybody to back away from Trump thinking he can get away with it. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead Stephen. | ||
| Let's go to break. | ||
| I want you to hold that thought. | ||
| But I also want to say, the Rose and these guys are all grundoons. | ||
| They're just grundoons, okay? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| The reason they got the judge is because the donors want the judges and they could care less about the Trump agenda. | ||
| In fact, they're anti the Trump agenda. | ||
| It's the same donors that are trying to now kill Trump, the Trump movement in the Senate. | ||
| They're trying to kill it in the House, and they don't want Trump to run again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I got newsflash for you. | |
| Okay, hang on for a second. | ||
| I'm robbing this train. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro got all warmed up over there bowling. | ||
| You were bowling, got all warmed up when that Newsmax hit. | ||
| Love me some Eric Bolling. | ||
| Okay, short break. | ||
| Peter Navarro, we're going to talk about inflation. | ||
| We're also going to talk about some bills up in front of the House and the Senate. | ||
| Peter Navarro is going to comment on that next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You've heard today the Commission is considering proposing rules to enhance and standardize climate disclosure. | |
| These proposals would require public companies to provide, in their registration statements and annual reports, certain information on risks that climate poses to short, medium, and long-term financial performance. | ||
| And on steps the company plans to take to mitigate this risk, such as an internal carbon price if there is one, scenario analysis if the company does it, transition plans if the company has them, or targets if the company has set them. | ||
| Public companies would also disclose governance around climate issues. | ||
| Besides the disclosures on risk and on the company's response, the proposed rules would require disclosure on current financial impacts and on financial expenditures due to climate-related events and transition activities. | ||
| Finally, the rule would require disclosure about the carbon footprint through Scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions and Scope 3 if Scope 3 emissions are material or used as part of a climate-related target or goal. | ||
| Obviously we have the acute issues with the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, but looking more holistically in a macro view, how does this speed up the efforts at DOE to move in more of a renewable direction since this is going to have an impact on people at Yeah, I mean, we obviously are all in on making sure that we meet the President's goals of getting to 100% clean electricity by 2035 and net zero carbon emissions by 2050. | ||
| And, you know, if you drive an electric car, this would not be affecting you, clearly. | ||
| The ultimate responsibility for price stability rests with the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Price stability is essential if we're going to have another sustained period of strong labor market conditions. | ||
| I believe that the policy approach that I've laid out is well suited to achieving this outcome. | ||
| We will take the necessary steps to ensure a return to price stability. | ||
| In particular, if we conclude that it is appropriate to move more aggressively by raising the federal funds rate by more than 25 basis point at a meeting or meetings, we will do so. | ||
| And if we determine that we need to tighten beyond common measures of neutral and into a more restrictive stance, we'll do that as well. | ||
| Our monetary policy framework emphasizes that having longer-term inflation expectations anchored at our longer-term objective of 2% helps us achieve both of our dual-mandate objectives. | ||
| While we cannot measure longer-term expectations directly, we monitor a variety of survey and market-based indicators. | ||
| In the recent period, short-term inflation expectations have, of course, risen with inflation, but longer-run expectations remain well-anchored in their historical ranges. | ||
| The added near-term upward pressure from the invasion of Ukraine on inflation from energy, food and other commodities comes at a time of already too high inflation. | ||
| In normal times, when employment and inflation are close to our objectives, monetary policy would look through a brief burst of inflation associated with commodity price shocks. | ||
| I can't take any more of this. | ||
| He should be summarily fired. | ||
| For gross incompetence. | ||
| And this gobbledygook today, he did say he's going to raise rates up quicker. | ||
| But this finally, hey, have you ever heard that in the show? | ||
| What's he doing on inflation? | ||
| Have you heard the war room banging on this guy now for months? | ||
| Have you heard his last spring spring a year ago? | ||
| In the spring, where Navarro and Cortez said that this is not transitory, this inflation is going to be systemic, it's going to be long-term, on both the supply side and after they passed the recovery plan, which they didn't need, with that extra trillion dollars laid on top of it, that you're going to have a demand side and a supply side. | ||
| I mean, did Powell take Economics 101 and hear this gobbledygook today, and then to try at the end blame it on Putin? | ||
| But before that, this is the arrogance of the ruling class. | ||
| Hey, if you had an electric car, I want every African-American and Hispanic working class person out there to look at what the arrogance is. | ||
| What are you complaining about the thing at the pump if you drove an electric vehicle? | ||
| If you had a $100,000 Tesla? | ||
| Well, if you had, look at her smug look. | ||
| Well, if you had an electric car, you wouldn't have the problem. | ||
| They don't even calculate how you even get to the electricity generator. | ||
| But let's leave that aside for a second. | ||
| Just look at the arrogance. | ||
| If you had an electric car, you wouldn't even have to worry about it. | ||
| I want to play that over and over and over and over and over again. | ||
| If you vote for these people, you're just destroying yourselves. | ||
| Understand that. | ||
| Their arrogance, their smugness, and their incompetence. | ||
| It's a lethal combination of incompetence, arrogance, and fecklessness. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Steve, I dare say that there's not a lot of electric cars on the road where the electricity came from solar or wind. | ||
| Don't these people understand in the press briefing room that most electricity still comes from fossil fuels? | ||
| Natural gas and oil, right? | ||
| It killed off a lot of the pulp. | ||
| I mean, these people are so friggin' stupid. | ||
| I mean, coming out in those regulations, that regulation clip, we're doing that? | ||
| Well, Russia's invading Ukraine, there's turbulence in the oil market, and we've ceded our strategic energy dominance to Saudi Arabia and Russia and Iran and Venezuela. | ||
| Sorry, not sorry, this is crazy. | ||
| Now, look, calling for the firing of the Fed's dean, Chairman Jerome Powell, look, the big lie he told there, I couldn't believe he said it, he goes, That's a lie. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's a lie. That's a lie. That's a lie. | |
| Everyone's freaking out who's smart about that. That's just wrong. | ||
| Now, that speech is important because you finally recognize what Cortez, you and I have been saying, not just for months, but for months and months and months, not transitory, big problem, stag, place, and coming. | ||
| This 50 basis point acknowledgement. | ||
| That was the big news. | ||
| That's like what's in there. | ||
| That means that that he's going to raise rates faster and we're going to see both both the stock market go down and yields go up on the long bonds and credit. | ||
| So. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| But hang on. | ||
| Hold on. | ||
| Hang on one second. | ||
| For working class people out there, I want you to make sure. | ||
| Wheat is blown through. | ||
| They got the limit up on wheat. | ||
| Wheat's blown through all time high at $11.11 a bushel. | ||
| You've got oil over at $100 a day, $110 a day. | ||
| So you're being hit at the gas pump. | ||
| You're being hit in the stores by buying your bread and basic commodities. | ||
| And now your credit card's going to be up. | ||
| So even the way you kind of get month to month by stretching it, by using a little bit of the capacity you got in your cart, it's going to cause you more. | ||
| These people are destroying you. | ||
| Let me be blunt. | ||
| They are destroying you and they do not care. | ||
| Dr. Navarro. | ||
| Yeah, look. | ||
| One other thing. | ||
| You had a great talk earlier. | ||
| I just want to say something about Josh Hawley. | ||
| It's like that man had no business sticking his toe in that water, making those kind of accusations without knowing the facts and knowing that personal attacks and destruction, they're part and parcel of American politics. | ||
| So I just want to just note, you know, shame on Josh Hawley. | ||
| As we move forward here, there's a lot of balls in motion. | ||
| I'm going to look forward to what you're going to reveal tomorrow, Steve, in terms of who was behind all of that's going to be really important. | ||
| But there's just so many moving targets. | ||
| Powell should be fired. | ||
| People at the White House need to wake up to the importance of strategic energy dominance. | ||
| We have a crisis on our hands. | ||
| Look, the War Room has been on all of this. | ||
| I mean, if you want to find out what you're going to see on Vox or wherever today, just watch like six months ago. | ||
| This is why the hedge funds throughout the world, they put people on to watch the show. | ||
| I want to thank the production team here for doing that great cold open because my recommendation, we just should have taken the clip from the Eric Bolling Show on Newsmax with Navar on there and just run that. | ||
| I want to thank your clip there was better than your performance here. | ||
| Hold it, I got a lot to go through. | ||
| I'm just teasing you. | ||
| I love Eric Bolling. | ||
| He's the man. | ||
| Eric Bolling, he's got a good thing. | ||
| I want to go back to something about the donors and what you saw every day about policies. | ||
| Many of these donors, and by the way, I'm not breaking this story tomorrow. | ||
| This is going to be another renowned news agency. | ||
| It's going to be a huge story. | ||
| We're just going to draft off it here at the War Room and put our own special flourishes on it, particularly about the donors, because they're getting to a point that people have to understand who's paying for this. | ||
| I mean, you got these big Democratic donors, SORS, but you got a lot of these Wall Street guys in back of their woke policies. | ||
| That's what I'm so glad to see in the Daily Mail today. | ||
| The panic rooms, Peter, in Los Angeles, the million-dollar panic rooms, they've got like three-year back orders because the liberals out there in Hollywood that brought this on the nation are now suffering, you know, now they're getting robbed every night. | ||
| So I think it's fantastic, but it's so much of these donors... My all-time favorite episode of the War Room Naomi Wolf won Second Amendment. | ||
| We're turning people every day. | ||
| We're turning people. | ||
| Real quickly, we've got a minute. | ||
| But how many of these donors are taking money out of China? | ||
| They're in business with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| That's where the cash flow is coming. | ||
| And that's why they want to take out Navarro. | ||
| That's why they don't want guys in the White House. | ||
| That's why they don't want Trump. | ||
| Because Trump was standing up to China. | ||
| Well, you've got the Steve Schwartz's and Larry Fink's of the world who are so deep into it. | ||
| Steve Wynn with his casino in Macau. | ||
| I mean, these are formidable people who are going to try to maintain the status quo, even if Xi Jinping makes his move on Taiwan. | ||
| Don't forget, Steve, and this is one of the biggest measures of grief I had at the White House when Communist China took Hong Kong by the jackboots. | ||
| I did everything I possibly could in the Situation Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fighting that, we had a way to stop them from doing that. | |
| I was unable to do anything about it. | ||
| And it was those Wall Street people that you are talking about. | ||
| So this struggle will go on for the hearts and minds, but Communist China, people need to understand how to get us. | ||
| And the thing you said, Steve, about how there's decades where nothing happens, weeks where decades happen. | ||
| Make no mistake, China, Communist China has fully now committed They're taking every drop of Russian oil and having their back for their aggression. | ||
| Because they expect access to Russian resources and a quick pro quo when it comes to them moving on to Taiwan. | ||
| They have made their bed, they're going to lay in it with food. | ||
| And that's a sea change that everybody in this country needs to pay attention to. | ||
| Ten seconds, how do they find your own getter? | ||
| Yeah, a real pain to borrow a getter is Short commercial break. | ||
| Mike Davis next. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Can we put the hearing into the box? | ||
| Do we have it in the box? | ||
| I want to put the hearing up in the box like we had this morning. | ||
| It's over with. | ||
| Oh, it is over with? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Mike Davis is clearing up. | ||
| Are we sure it's over? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Mike Davis is clearing up some stuff. | ||
| He's from Article 3. | ||
| He's going to come with us momentarily. | ||
| I want to go to, by the way, this hearing today where Josh Hawley, this is the situation with the child pornography. | ||
| And like I said, We don't know one way or the other, but we're huge advocates in all the information coming out. | ||
| Why Dick Durbin has not just released this information so that people can have a full review of this and put it behind them is absolutely incredible to me. | ||
| And how they're going to try to play hardball here and give you the spin about why it's not important. | ||
| Why can we see all the information? | ||
| That's a lifetime appointment. | ||
| Judge Brown Jackson's in her early 50s, so she'll be there for 30 years. | ||
| This is incredibly important. | ||
| It should be a full vetting. | ||
| It should be a full vetting for her. | ||
| She should want this vetting. | ||
| So all the information should be turned over. | ||
| People should go through it. | ||
| The Senator should be able to answer the questions. | ||
| Okay, so we've got Mike Davis coming on. | ||
| He's hung up for a moment. | ||
| He's going to join us momentarily, but I've got to get... We haven't had enough Joe Allen since he's been on assignment. | ||
| Joe, some other disturbing news out today, particularly about AI and about these wars that are going on. | ||
| Did Joe have a cold open we can play if he didn't? | ||
| Okay, I'll go right to Joe Allen. | ||
| Joe Allen's back with us. | ||
| Joe, what is this situation about artificial intelligence and about, was it chemical weapons? | ||
| What's going on with this story that broke today? | ||
| Yes, Steve, great to be with you again. | ||
| So this story actually is about three days old and it's It's fascinating how reckless the people who conducted the study really are. | ||
| So, the study was conducted by a company called Collaboration Pharmaceuticals. | ||
| They're working with machine learning systems that, in essence, predict the toxicity of chemical compounds used for warfare or other purposes. | ||
| The original purpose of the system was to determine whether or not a compound would be safe, but the The lead author of the study decided that he would basically reverse the order of operations so that the system would identify more toxic compounds. | ||
| And they eventually moved on to using a generative modeling system, which means that the system itself is operating with no data whatsoever. | ||
| The system is simply Taking physics and chemistry and learning on its own what different chemicals can do and creating, out of nowhere, new chemical compounds. | ||
| When they did that, within six hours, around 40,000 potentially lethal chemical agents were generated. | ||
| What that means is that with a relatively inexpensive artificial intelligence system, it's possible to generate basically endless numbers of potentially lethal chemical compounds. | ||
| Or if you were to extrapolate what's possible in biology, and scientists are doing this all the time, they're working with machine learning models and generative models to create new biological compounds. | ||
| Meaning that it would not be very difficult, nor would it be very expensive for any government or any sort of terrorist organization to create whole cloth, out of nowhere, new potentially lethal chemical compounds. | ||
| It's really disturbing, but maybe most disturbing, I don't know what I would prefer the authors of the study to do, but reading about it in Vox, it's astonishing that they just simply make clear how they did it, what they did, and what's possible. | ||
| It's almost like if you were in the year 2000, and someone said, we have all these airplanes sitting around, And there's no one really guarding the cockpit when they're flying. | ||
| Wouldn't it be very easy to run one of them into a building? | ||
| And it's not exactly easy to come up with the actual substances to create these chemical compounds. | ||
| But again, what this study shows is, you wouldn't need a vast laboratory to figure out Any sort of new compound or to test the toxicity of an existing compound. | ||
| You can simply download it oftentimes for free from various data sets or artificial intelligence open source artificial intelligence programming on the Internet. | ||
| Okay, this is what, when you were back here, when you came off assignment and you were back in studio for a couple of days, one of the things I told you I was most concerned about, and you brought it up here, was in a war like this that, you know, the hybrid war is actually scarier than the kinetic war, and I understand for the people getting shelled in Maripol right now, it's as scary as it gets, but you've got cyber, you've got | ||
| You've got economic warfare, you have information warfare, you have all these things, particularly artificial intelligence is so intricately linked in the cyber into the command chains of the decision making chain that if the if the algorithm is not correctly written. | ||
| You know, all of a sudden the machines can potentially just go into life of its own. | ||
| Is that one of the things we see here? | ||
| I mean, how did all these compounds... What's scary is that this is the chemical warfare part of it, not even the cyber. | ||
| How did all this come about? | ||
| I mean, this is, to me, what gets very scary about artificial intelligence when you marry it with older, more traditional types of lethality. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And so what you see with artificial intelligence is it basically bleeds into every one of the categories you've talked about. | ||
| So in kinetic warfare, already, you know, the drones being used by Ukraine, and recently it was confirmed also now Russia, who has a huge fleet of artificial intelligence powered drones. | ||
| Artificial intelligence is used both to analyze data coming in from the battlefield, to give commanders a better chance at an accurate strategic response. | ||
| But what it can also do, it can power individual weapon systems so that those systems themselves can use everything from object identification to facial recognition, potentially, and certainly just missile guidance. | ||
| And the artificial intelligence, potentially, can simply identify a target on its own and then guide itself to the target before striking. | ||
| This is really true of these loitering munitions that have recently been apparently used by Russia The Lancet is one of the primary models they use and it just simply hovers in the air with a Potentially no oversight whatsoever, and strikes whenever it identifies what it's been programmed to identify. | ||
| It basically kills on its own, potentially. | ||
| It has not been shown to do that at the moment. | ||
| Right now, somebody pulls the trigger. | ||
| In cyber warfare, artificial intelligence is hugely useful in probing a system for different vulnerabilities. | ||
| It takes human beings forever, or even just simple algorithms forever, to crack certain codes to find vulnerabilities in digital systems. | ||
| But again and again, artificial intelligence has been shown, more complex machine learning models, has been shown to really be able to creep in there and identify those vulnerabilities in order to seed in malware, say a wiper or ransomware or any other sort of cyber attack. | ||
| Joe, we've got to bounce. | ||
| What's your social media now that you're back? | ||
| How do people get your writings? | ||
| You've got a lot more disturbing stuff coming out in the next couple of days. | ||
| I want to make sure everybody's on top of your stuff. | ||
| Yeah, you can find my social media, Twitter and Gitter, at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z. | ||
| Also, warroom.org, the transhumanism tab right there at the top. | ||
| And of course my website, joebot.xyz. | ||
| Thank you very much, Steve. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Make sure, by the way, MyPillow.com, make sure you go right now. | ||
| You got our square. | ||
| We have sales across the board. | ||
| This is hand-picked by Mike Lindell. | ||
| Amazing sales up there, including products that have never been on sale before. | ||
| MyPillow.com. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| Go there today. | ||
| Let's play the cold open. | ||
| We got Mike Davis is free. | ||
| Let's play Mike Davis' cold open, then we'll go to Mike Davis about the hearing today. | ||
| United States versus Hawkins. | ||
| This was a child pornography case where the defendant distributed multiple images of child porn, possessed dozens more, including videos. | ||
| The federal sentencing guidelines recommended a sentence of 97 to 121 months in prison. | ||
| Prosecutors recommended 24 months in prison. | ||
| Judge Jackson gave the defendant three months in prison. | ||
| United States v. Chazen. | ||
| In that case, the defendant possessed 48 files of child pornography. | ||
| The federal guidelines recommended 78 to 97 months in prison. | ||
| The prosecutor recommended the same. | ||
| Judge Jackson sentenced him to 28 months. | ||
| United States versus Cooper. | ||
| There the defendant possessed dozens of images of child pornography and distributed, I should say distributed dozens of images of child pornography. | ||
| Possessed over 600. | ||
| The federal guidelines recommended 151 to 188 months in prison. | ||
| That's a long time. | ||
| The prosecutor recommended 72 months. | ||
| Judge Jackson gave the defendant 60 months, which was the lowest sentence permitted by the law. | ||
| United States v. Down, that's a case where the defendant distributed 33 graphic images and videos of child sexual assault to an anonymous messaging app, unfortunately a practice that's becoming more common. | ||
| The federal guidelines recommended 70 to 87 months in prison. | ||
| The prosecutor recommended 70 months in prison. | ||
| Judge Jackson sentenced him to only 60 months. | ||
| Again, that's the lowest level that was permitted by law in that case. | ||
| United States v. Stewart, the defendant there distributed scores of images of children suffering sexual abuse. | ||
| The guidelines recommended 97 to 121 months in prison. | ||
| The prosecutor recommended 97 months in prison. | ||
| Judge Jackson gave him 57 months. | ||
| In United States v. Sears, the defendant distributed over 100 videos of child pornography. | ||
| The guidelines recommended 97 to 121 months in prison. | ||
| The prosecutor recommended 97 months in prison. | ||
| Judge Jackson gave him 71 months. | ||
| ...male to compete and beat a biological woman at the highest level of collegiate sports. | ||
| Some girls have been forced to share locker rooms with biological males. | ||
| Rather than defending our girls, those in power are teaching them that their voices don't matter. | ||
| They're being treated like second-class citizens. | ||
| And Americans need a Supreme Court justice who will protect our children and will defend parents' constitutional right to decide what is best for their own kids. | ||
| And here we need a little clarity. | ||
| At a time when these parental rights appear to be under assault by the radical left, your public comments about, and I'm going to quote you, the transformative power of progressive education, end quote. | ||
| These are deeply concerning. | ||
| You serve on the board of a school that teaches kindergartners, five-year-old children, that they can choose their gender and teaches them about so-called white privilege. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When you were in my office, you were focused on the hearings and a lot of the substance and had such great questions. | |
| I could not stop being just joyous that you were sitting in my office and I couldn't stop bringing up to you the historical nature of this. | ||
| Forgive me, I grew up in a small black church where I was taught to make a joyous noise unto the Lord and this is not a normal day for America. | ||
| We have never had this moment before and I just want to talk about the joy. | ||
| Okay, I want to bring in Mike Davis from the Article 3 Project. | ||
| Mike, give us your assessment. | ||
| You had Josh Hawley, Senator Blackburn, Cory Booker. | ||
| What's your assessment? | ||
| We've got a minute and we'll hold you through the break. | ||
| What's your assessment of where we stand today? | ||
| Senator Josh Hawley showed tremendous courage to do what he did today and it was really important for him to do it because not a lot of other senators would have done it and it is really important for the American people to know that That judge Katonji Brown Jackson has a 25 year pattern going back to law school with her whole her law school note. | ||
| On the Sentencing Commission from 2010 to 2014 and as a district court judge for eight years of advocating for and even ordering reduced sentences for people who possess and distribute child pornography. | ||
| And that needs to be discussed. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Mike Davis, just hang on. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
and get into the nitty-gritty of it all after a short commercial break. | |
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it, until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM right now. | ||
| Go to our Square. | ||
| We've just rebooted this thing over the weekend. | ||
| There's sales all over the place, whether they're towels, pillows, sheets, all of it. | ||
| Record sales go there mypillow.com promo code worm also putting in stuff that has never been on sale before in Association with my pillows go mypillow.com promo code war room. | ||
| You got to put war room so you get to the right Square of the page. | ||
| I want to go back to Mike Davis of the article 3 so walk us through how Holly laid this out Specifically, and where do we go from here? | ||
| And when are the, when's the real drill down going to be? | ||
| And do you think he's done enough and enough Republican supports to actually just put the, make sure all the records are out there so people can go through everything? | ||
| So this is important. | ||
| When you have Supreme Court nominations, you vet them differently from the lower court judges. | ||
| And It is a it's routine. | ||
| It's a tradition that when you have Supreme Court nominees, you get their executive branch records that show their thought process and their deliberation. | ||
| And Judge Jackson served on the United States Sentencing Commission as the vice chair from 2010 to 2014. | ||
| And there are 48,000 pages of records that the Democrats are refusing to make public. | ||
| They're refusing to turn over to Senate Republicans. | ||
| They're refusing to let the American people see. | ||
| And this is highly unusual. | ||
| This is a limited subset of records. | ||
| It's only three years. | ||
| The Republicans are not even asking for Judge Jackson's Records when she became a district court judge in 2014. | ||
| It's only her sentencing commission records from 2010 to 2013. | ||
| And these are her emails, her memos, her deliberate, her internal memos, deliberative thought process. | ||
| There was not an explanation before a few days ago why they were refusing to turn over these documents. | ||
| Now we know. | ||
| Now we know the reason that Chairman Dick Durbin Is not turning over these records is because they are trying to hide Judge Katonji Brown Jackson's advocacy for lighter sentences for more leniency for people who possess and distribute child pornography. | ||
| And she did this on the Sentencing Commission. | ||
| The Article 3 project, the group that I run, was able to piece together from public hearings and statements what she's up to. | ||
| And we have a pretty damning, we have two pretty damning documents out there, research documents, There's a lot more that she was doing behind the scenes, and that's what Democrats are afraid for the American people to see. | ||
| Okay, I want to make sure we get these two reports from Article 3. | ||
| I think we had them the other day. | ||
| I want to put them out into all the chat rooms. | ||
| I want to get them up on Getter. | ||
| I want to push these hard. | ||
| On a real America's Voice, make people see it. | ||
| That's a pretty serious charge. | ||
| You just said advocacy. | ||
| Walk me through, it's one thing to maybe a judge make some misrulings or doesn't follow the guidelines or does this or does that. | ||
| It's different when you say advocacy. | ||
| How do you back that up, Mike Davis? | ||
| Well, I can tell you. | ||
| So when you're on the United States Sentencing Commission, their job is to recommend sentencing ranges to Congress and federal judges. | ||
| And they take incoming requests from Congress, from the Justice Department, from federal judges. | ||
| These are bipartisan commissions. | ||
| They take incoming requests. | ||
| Child pornography cases make up less than 2% of the federal criminal dockets. | ||
| And if you look at what Judge Katonji Brown-Jackson did in her four years on the Sentencing Commission, she's the one who made this the issue for the Sentencing Commission. | ||
| This was not an incoming request from Congress or the Justice Department or other judges. | ||
| This was driven by her. | ||
| And she created a collision. | ||
| Between the Commission and Congress on the five-year mandatory minimum sentences that Congress has imposed for people who possess and distribute child pornography and this is this is documented. | ||
| This is documented in her public statements. | ||
| Let me give you an example. | ||
| She back in 2012. | ||
| She had expert witnesses who came in and And she hypothesized that people who possess child pornography, pornography, these people are sitting around watching kids get raped because that's exactly what child pornography is. | ||
| They can't consent. | ||
| So they have these creeps watching kids get raped. | ||
| And Judge Jackson mused during this hearing that, you know, these are not, these are not people who are attracted to kids. | ||
| They're not sexual predators. | ||
| They're not pedophiles. | ||
| They're essentially technologists who are looking for a group to, you know, to share their hobby of technology. | ||
| And the expert witnesses At this hearing said, oh, no, no, no, that's that's not what they are. | ||
| They are pedophiles and they're very dangerous. | ||
| What Judge Jackson was trying to do is show that they're not actually a danger to kids. | ||
| And so, therefore, we don't need to be so harsh on them. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And so all the experts at this 2012 hearing said that's not the case, Vice Chair Jackson. | ||
| And regardless of that expert testimony, she disregarded it in one of her reports and went forward with this theory that she invented. | ||
| That these child predators who are possessing, distributing child pornography are not pedophiles. | ||
| That, again, their technology is looking for a group association or something. | ||
| It's bizarre. | ||
| Real quickly, the number is 202-224-3121. | ||
| You call that number. | ||
| That's the Senate's general number. | ||
| Ask for your Senator to call and say you want all the records turned over. | ||
| If we get the people on the committee and other Senators calling in, do you believe we'll get the 48,000 pages of documents that we need to see? | ||
| They are. | ||
| This is the biggest cover-up I've seen for any nomination that Chairman Dick Durbin is leading here. | ||
| This is a cover-up. | ||
| There's no other way around it. | ||
| They know that there are bad documents at the Sentencing Commission. | ||
| They know that Judge Jackson has even worse documents at the Sentencing Commission, even worse than what she's publicly, cryptically said at these hearings, and they're hiding this. | ||
| And if the American people know What, you know, what she's all about. | ||
| I think that her nomination goes from a glide path last week to big trouble. | ||
| Mike, we got to bounce real quickly. | ||
| How do people follow you on social media? | ||
| You're putting up stuff on Twitter non-stop. | ||
| So at article number three project, at article three project of my personal is MRDDMIA. | ||
| MRDDMIA. | ||
| And I'm on Twitter and I'm lighting it up. | ||
| Okay, sir. | ||
| I look forward to having you on here tomorrow. | ||
| Thank you very much for your analysis and coverage. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short break. | ||
| We're going to be back. | ||
| It's Battleground next. | ||
| We're in Battleground. | ||
| We're going to be in Arizona, Ohio. | ||
| There are explosive things happening all over. | ||
| Senate races. | ||
| Big debate tonight in Ohio. | ||
| Big news with Blake Masters. | ||
| We have him. | ||
| Also Kelly Ward from Arizona. | ||
| A lot going on. | ||
| See you in a few minutes. | ||
| We're in Battleground. |
Export Selection