Nov. 4, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:50
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| I don't expect you today to admit that you approved of NIH funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan, but your repeated denials have worn thin and a majority of Americans, frankly, don't believe you. | ||
| Even the NIH now admits that EcoHealth Alliance did perform experiments in Wuhan that created viruses not found in nature that actually did gain in lethality. | ||
| The facts are clear. | ||
| The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan, despite your protestations. | ||
| You can deny it all you want, but even the Chinese authors of the paper, in their paper, admit that viruses not found in nature were created, and yes, they gained in infectivity. | ||
| Your persistent denials, though, are not simply a stain on your reputation, but are a clear and present danger to the country and to the world. | ||
| As Professor Kevin Esfelt of MIT has written, gain-of-function research looks like a gamble that civilization can't afford to risk. | ||
| And yet here we are again, with you steadfast in your denials. | ||
| Why does it matter? | ||
| Because gain-of-function research with laboratory-created viruses not found in nature could cause a pandemic even worse the next time. | ||
| We're suffering today from one that has a mortality of approximately 1%. | ||
| They're experimenting with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50%. | ||
| Yes, our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses. | ||
| Experiments that combine unknown viruses with known pandemic-causing viruses are incredibly risky. | ||
| Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as much as 50% mortality could endanger civilization as we know it. | ||
| And here you sit, unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus. | ||
| You mislead the public by saying that the published viruses could not be COVID. | ||
| Well, exactly no one is alleging that. | ||
| No one is alleging that the published viruses by the Chinese are COVID. | ||
| What we are saying is that this was risky type of research, gain-of-function research. | ||
| It was risky to share this with the Chinese, and that COVID may have been created from a not-yet-revealed virus. | ||
| We don't anticipate the Chinese are going to reveal the virus if it came from their lab. | ||
| You know that, but you continue to mislead. | ||
| You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. | ||
| You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. | ||
| You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic. | ||
| Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan? | ||
| Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you've said. | ||
| First of all, gain of function is a very nebulous term. | ||
| We have spent, not us, but outside bodies, a considerable amount of effort to give a more precise definition to the type of research that is of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation. | ||
| You are aware of that. | ||
| That is called P3CO. | ||
| We're aware that you deleted gain-of-function from the NIH website. | ||
| Well, I can get back to that in a moment, if we have time. | ||
| But let's get back to the operating framework and guide rails of which we operate under. | ||
| And you have ignored them. | ||
| The guidelines are very very clear that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly is shown and very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and mortality And that you do experiments to enhance that, hence the word E-P-P-P. | ||
| Enhanced Pathogens of Potential Pandemic. | ||
| So when EcoHealth Alliance took the virus, SAC-014, and combined it with WIV-1 and caused a recombinant virus that doesn't exist in nature, and it made mice sicker, mice that had humanized cells, you're saying that that's not gain-of-function research? | ||
| According to the framework and guidelines. | ||
| So what you're doing is defining a way gain of function. | ||
| You're simply saying it doesn't exist because you change the definition on the NIH website. | ||
| This is terrible and you're you're completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab. | ||
| There's the preponderance of evidence now points towards this coming from the lab. | ||
| And what you've done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically. | ||
| That's what you've done. | ||
| You've changed the website to try to have a new definition that doesn't include the risky research that's going on. | ||
| Until you admit that it's risky, we're not going to get anywhere. | ||
| You have to admit that this research was risky. | ||
| The NIH has now rebuked them. | ||
| Your own agency has rebuked them. | ||
| But the thing is, is you're still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say they became sicker. | ||
| They gained in lethality. | ||
| It's a new virus. | ||
| That's not gain of function? | ||
| According to the definition that is currently operable. | ||
| You know, Senator, let's make it clear for the people who are listening. | ||
| The current definition was done over a two to three year period by outside bodies, including the NSABB, two conferences by the National Academy of Science, Engineering, and Medicine on December 2014, March 2016. | ||
| We commissioned external risk benefit assessment, and then on January of 2017, the Office of Science and Technology Policy of the White House issued the current policy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And coincidentally, I have not changed any definition. | |
| On the same day the NIH said that yes, there was a gain of function in Wuhan, the same day the definition appear the new definition to try to define away what's going on in Wuhan. Until you accept it, until you accept responsibility, we're not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won't admit that it's dangerous, and for that lack of judgment, I think it's time that you resign. Thank you, Senator Paul. And I would like to give the time to Dr. Fauci. Yeah, well, there were so | ||
| many things that are egregious misrepresentation here, Madam Chair, that I don't think I'd be able to refute all of them, but just a couple of them for the listens to hear for. | ||
| You have said that I am unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. | ||
| I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. | ||
| The current pandemic. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Number two, you said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that's a lab leak. | ||
| I believe most card-carrying viral phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you that it is much more likely, even though we leave open all possibilities, it's much more likely that this was a natural occurrence. | ||
| Third, you say we contested 80,000 animals and no animals have been found with COVID. | ||
| And third, you made a statement just a moment ago that's completely incorrect. | ||
| where you say we continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| You approved it in August of last year. | ||
| No, no, your statement says, quote, I wrote it down as you were writing, you continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| You were in committee a month ago and said you still trust the Chinese scientists and you still support the research over there. | ||
| You said it a month ago in committee. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senator Paul, I have allowed Dr. Fauci to respond. | |
| You've had your time. | ||
| I'm going to give him one more minute. | ||
| If he's going to be dishonest, he ought to be challenged. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senator Paul, we will allow Dr. Fauci to respond after you've given accusations like that. | |
| Dr. Fauci. | ||
| Well, I don't have any more to say except to say that, as usual, and I have a great deal of respect for this body of the Senate, and it makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| History will figure that out on its own. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will turn to Senator Hassan. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| History doesn't need to figure it out. | ||
| We're going to figure it out right now. | ||
| Fauci's a stone-cold liar, and I want to bring in an expert. | ||
| Rahim Kassam, founder and publisher, editor-in-chief of the National Pulse, he and Natalie Winters, his lead investigative reporter, have taken Fauci apart brick by brick since January of 2020. | ||
| And in the book, In Trump Time, you've got to get this book, read Navarro from the very first time he met Fauci, a stone-cold liar that never mentioned anything about the gain-of-function experiments that he was paying for in the Wuhan lab. | ||
| Rahim, you've had to sit there and go through this. | ||
| Walk us through the whole thing, because Senator Paul did a great job. | ||
| Might have been able to do a little better job if it was you and Natalie, but walk us through what happened here. | ||
| This is historic, so take your time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think Natalie especially could have done a better job. | |
| Not that Rand Paul did a bad job, quite frankly, but Fauci, I think, brought extra circumlocution with him today. | ||
| And that is evident from one of the very most heated clashes we saw in that exchange there. | ||
| So Rand Paul says, Senator Paul says, quote, You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan, end quote. | ||
| Later in that same exchange, Fauci, who's trying to be, you know, set the record straight and fact-check Senator Paul, actually misquotes him back and says he said, quote, you said we continue to support work research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| Now, that is a distinction with an important difference, because of course you have third-party organizations, affiliates, groups like the Echo Health Alliance, Peter Daszak, who have historically openly worked with the Wuhan lab and the Chinese communist authorities in the region. | ||
| But there are lots of other things that Dr. Paul could have challenged Mr. Fauci on this afternoon that would have gone directly to that point. | ||
| He could have asked him why, for instance, 21 American scientists who have received taxpayer funds from 637 grants from Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease have also served as visiting lecturers and researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| He could have asked him why, despite Fauci's claims that things were tightly run, that his disgraced boss Francis Collins actually admitted, quote, we had no control over what else they were doing with those funds. | ||
| The they in that sentence being the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Echo Health Alliance. | ||
| For instance, another example, Senator Paul could have asked why a number of national institutes of health agencies, including Fauci's own NIAID, have funded over 250 studies authored by researchers at institutions controlled by China's People's Liberation Army. | ||
| He could have asked why there have been at least 13 grants sent to the CCP since the outbreak Of the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
| And to Senator Paul's own point, Southern Medical University, which is controlled by the PLA and has close ties with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, recently received two additional grants worth nearly $300,000 from Fauci's NIAID. | ||
| He could have asked why a recent NIH investigation concluded that 54 researchers had to be terminated or resigned for violating rules against simultaneously receiving funds from the U.S. | ||
| government and foreign entities, namely China, in that instance. | ||
| He could have asked why a lab that he funded, that Fauci funded, Galveston National Laboratory, was training researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| He could have asked him why as recently as September of this year, Steve, Echo Health Alliance published a report, I'm going to get it up here, a strategy to assess spillover risk of bat SARS-related coronaviruses in Southeast Asia. | ||
| That was after Peter Daszak had been widely disgraced and removed from the Lancet COVID committee. | ||
| He could have asked why the NIH or NIAID have had anything to do with Bat Lady Xi Jinping's isolation of coronavirus strains that could cause, quote, direct human infection. | ||
| If Fauci said that the NIH or NIAID had had nothing to do with this most recent, this is happening this year, by the way, research, then he could have shot back and said, well, you have funded her before, you have funded her work before, you're named on her grants. | ||
| So how about that being an indirect funding, the opportunity cost, the saved expenditure in the past, and of course, all of the background research and science that has led Xi Jinping to be in this opportunity whereby maybe the Wuhan lab doesn't need American researchers or American grants anymore. | ||
| But that all came from the NIH and NIAID. | ||
| Historically, he could have asked why US researchers, including the US government's own advisors on vaccination policy at the NIH, just recently attended a virology conference Featuring Chinese military scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology at the State Key Laboratory of Virology at Wuhan University. | ||
| The event was sponsored by Sinica, the Wuhan Institute of Virology's house journal. | ||
| Who's the editor? | ||
| That lady, Shi Jing Li. | ||
| And he could have asked why in 2020, as the pandemic was beginning, Fauci was funding Echo Health to write papers demanding more US collaboration with China on the pandemics. | ||
| And one more thing, he could have asked why a coronavirus study funded by the NIAID Which names Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists as authors was carried out in collaboration with an arm of the Chinese Communist Party military, specifically relying on China's Southern Medical University to provide human blood for their experiments. | ||
| If Fauci thinks this is over, he's got another thing coming. | ||
| This is just beginning. | ||
| We have just got, I mean, we have just got reams and reams and reams of research. | ||
| It's all cited, it's all sourced, it's all linked back, and all of what I just said we've just published as an article up on the National Poll, so everybody can go through it with a fine-toothed comb, because this is Fauci's undoing. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| I want our audience to understand something about the quality effort here. | ||
| If we'd had Raheem and Natalie on, we literally could take a Saturday War Room special for two hours, I could take the two-hour morning show, we could just toss the ball to them for two solid hours. | ||
| unjust studies reports except for their reporting the bill of indictment on tony falchi is that long and that deep in the scale of it is breathtaking his national polls for him to some in the early winters expose it we take a short commercial break really back with me because i'm about this topic others more in a moment | ||
|
unidentified
|
pandemic with Stephen K. Bannum. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back to War Room Pandemic. | ||
| I want to make sure that you're putting your shoulder will help our sponsor MyPillow.com particularly with the holiday season coming up. | ||
| Remember at MyPillow they've worked out all the logistics problems years ago. | ||
| They're not dependent upon Pete Buttigieg. | ||
| They don't want to take him off family leave. | ||
| Pete, stay there. | ||
| You've created enough havoc. | ||
| If you order it from MyPillow, you're going to get it from MyPillow. | ||
| And remember, they got the 10-year commemoration price, the throwback price of 10 years ago, as low as $19.98 for the classic pillow. | ||
| Normally $69.98 with this package. | ||
| Because it was ten years ago he was actually allowed to be on TV. | ||
| Did his first infomercial. | ||
| And therefore the company was made. | ||
| He was selling them out of the trunk of the car until then. | ||
| You also got the Giza sheets, which Rahim tells me he luxuriates in, doesn't even sleep in. | ||
| You've got the towels, the Dr. Peter Navarro blind test towels, best towels ever made, six pack, 39 bucks, normally 109 bucks. | ||
| And support the fight for freedom. | ||
| Mike Lindell is going around the country talking to AGs, talking to Secretary of State. | ||
| He's going to be on tomorrow. | ||
| Today's the one-year anniversary of the Big Steal. | ||
| It happened, what, at 4 o'clock in the morning? | ||
| 3 o'clock in the morning? | ||
| 6 o'clock in the morning? | ||
| So we're commemorating it today. | ||
| We're going to have Rudy on. | ||
| We're going to have more people on tomorrow to discuss exactly where we stand on the 3rd of November. | ||
| movement. | ||
| I want to go to the United Kingdom to Campbell McLaughlin. | ||
| We've had him on. | ||
| He's a musician that got inspired by this whole thing, been playing at jams and at festivals and all that. | ||
| But sir, they're taking you to court tomorrow morning. | ||
| Tell us why that they're taking a musician from the United Kingdom. | ||
| Why are you in court tomorrow? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Steve, thank you for having me on once again and shout out to the War Room Posse. | |
| We felt Massive support last time we were on, so thank you so much, guys. | ||
| Tomorrow, the Jam for Freedom will be taken to court. | ||
| They're trying to frame us as the organisers of a protest, which, believe it or not, they believe they have the right to make illegal, but we all know we have the bit of rights. | ||
| We have the right to petition. | ||
| I didn't even organise the protest. | ||
| We turned up with a few musicians, found out about it a couple of days before, and I was then taken into handcuffs, spent the night in custody. | ||
| But you know what, Steve? | ||
| It wasn't too bad. | ||
| Got along well with the police officers, got my Bible, reading about Jesus, reading about the disciples, just made me come back stronger and harder. | ||
| And since then, we have played over 100 shows in the UK, uniting the people. | ||
| We're in Australia now with Jam for Freedom in Australia. | ||
| Shout out to John and Ben and Luz out there. | ||
| We're in Switzerland. | ||
| We're in Spain. | ||
| We just did one in Canada. | ||
| We've got Jam for Freedoms in Ireland. | ||
| This is global now. | ||
| They will never, never stop us. | ||
| And tomorrow at 9am, we will be in court. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Hold on, I just want to understand this. | ||
| Because you played in the Jam for Freedom, you played, they then said you organized this rally and they came and arrested you, cuffed you and took you to the police station? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah. | |
| They framed me as the organizer, simply because I put out a poster saying, inviting musicians to come down. | ||
| But there wasn't, you know, there wasn't more than 30 musicians in the group at our Jam for Freedom. | ||
| There was, you know, a few hundred people around me. | ||
| But, you know, I didn't organize them. | ||
| I didn't tell them to come and I can't tell them to leave. | ||
| So it's a total shambles what they're doing. | ||
| But hang on. | ||
| But hang on. | ||
| Let's say you let's say the person that did organize it. | ||
| What what laws in the United Kingdom did they break by organizing a rally? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, so under the coronavirus regulations, they can say that because there's a public health emergency with many people getting together, They can make protests illegal, basically. | |
| So that's their theory, but tomorrow they're going to be shown in court. | ||
| We've got the Western A. Price Foundation that's been helping us out with a defense statement, and they will be shown up, and we will win. | ||
| Hopefully we come back with some funds from the court for what they've done to us. | ||
| We'll have you back on tomorrow. | ||
| How do people get to you on social media? | ||
| How do they find out more about what you're trying to accomplish? | ||
|
unidentified
|
100%. | |
| So Jam for Freedom was started on the day of national lockdown. | ||
| We're in six different countries. | ||
| You can go to jamforfreedom.com. | ||
| You can learn how to put on your own Jam for Freedom completely for free. | ||
| We'll come and play festivals for you. | ||
| You can support us. | ||
| Grab some t-shirts, grab some hoodies, become a member. | ||
| Whatever you can do to support us. | ||
| We don't take a penny from the government, but we're playing tomorrow before our court date. | ||
| Tune into our live streams on the website and be in the States very soon. | ||
| We're looking forward to it. | ||
| Looking forward to that, Campbell. | ||
| Thank you very much for joining us today. | ||
| Whenever in the posse, go check it out. | ||
| Let's get it up on the live chats. | ||
| So, Rahim, I've got to go back to you. | ||
| Rahim, you did some of the best reporting when you were at Breitbart London, but you wrote a couple of books. | ||
| When I first met you, you kept all that about radical Islam in some of these towns. | ||
| You told me that in Rotherham, we can't even go in the middle of their control. | ||
| Here's what I don't get from our mother country. | ||
| And it's a little bit in the Anglosphere, in Australia, in Canada, in the United Kingdom, New Zealand. | ||
| Rahim, what is going on? | ||
| I don't get this. | ||
| This is actually worse, it seems, than even when they tried to block you from doing reporting on what was a major terrorist threat and a threat to society. | ||
| So what is going on with our mother country? | ||
| It's supposed to be the railhead of all of our liberties. | ||
| Well, and you'll remember I did organize those 20,000 people outside 10 Downing Street when they incorrectly locked Tommy Robinson up and they eventually had to free him as a result of all the public pressure that we brought down on the British government. But here's the thing and it's kind of a nuanced point but I think it bears understanding. This isn't just this isn't the public versus just the general body politic in the United Kingdom. | ||
| The general body politic actually has a remarkably small amount of power. | ||
| Most of British political history, the power has resided within the ultra ruling class, which is to say the Conservative Party. | ||
| Britain's Conservative Party is not conservative in the slightest. | ||
| It is a self Preservation operation of some of the most sort of neoliberal elitists. | ||
| And a lot of the lockdowns, a lot of the neoliberalism, a lot of the climate alarmism that you're seeing emanating out of the United Kingdom at the moment is really being led by one person in particular. | ||
| And it's not Boris Johnson. | ||
| It's actually Boris Johnson's wife, Carrie Johnson or Carrie Simmons, as she was before they got married about a year ago. | ||
| A very, very left-wing political figure, very, very close to the Clintons, close to the Bidens, close to Uh, the, the climate alarmism, uh, groups that, that kind of stop in the streets and protest and, and, and all of that. | ||
| Um, and, and what you have to, what the British public needs to understand out of all of this and what the American public should understand about the British public here is that the, the, the fire is aimed in the wrong direction. | ||
| A lot of the time, the last guest talks about getting along with the police and, you know, typically the police themselves don't really want to enforce these, These anti-Diluvian measures, they actually don't want to have to intervene in public protests in places like Parliament Square or Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park, traditional places of real free speech. | ||
| And they make that very well known to people, by the way, when they're there, that they really don't want to have to police these things. | ||
| What we're seeing right now is another power struggle. | ||
| So on the one hand, you'll have Boris, who kind of has almost libertarian tendencies, | ||
| Trying to avoid a further lockdown this winter, but then you'll have somebody like Carrie Simmons who I will remind the public Does not have an official position in government She's not empowered within the British Constitution to do anything But it's really using the apparatus of the Conservative Party in the apparatus of 10 Downing Street Unconstitutionally to railroad through a you know a build back better agenda She is the progenitor of that in the United Kingdom and the in the greatest cheerleader of it So that is where people need to really focus in on because my understanding of this is | ||
| She is acting remarkably unconstitutionally, unlawfully, and should perhaps even potentially face an investigation as a result of all of this. | ||
| Okay, but where is, you know, you guys are the Brexit guys. | ||
| British nationalism came up. | ||
| Take your country back, get your sovereignty back. | ||
| Was the purpose of getting your sovereignty back to be in this situation? | ||
| Was that what the Brexit fight was for? | ||
| Was it just about some tariffs and some charges on medicine? | ||
| Or was it actually get your sovereignty back? | ||
| And have you ceded your sovereignty to kind of these To the apparatus, and particularly the medical apparatus, for what they deem is a medical emergency, sir. | ||
| Yeah, well, I mean, to quote somebody I know quite well, they're not just going to toss the keys over at you and say, hey, it's your country to run now. | ||
| The powers that were repatriated from Brussels now reside in Westminster, and specifically reside in 10 Downing Street. | ||
| Hence my focus on what's coming out of 10 Downing Street. | ||
| The British public now have to wrest control of those powers back to local levels and back to local authorities. | ||
| in order to be able to effectively have their say. | ||
| The British government is always good at one thing, and especially the Conservative Party is always good at one thing, and that is misdirection. | ||
| They're doing it now, they're doing it now with these members of Parliament embroiled in you know, scandals and investigations and whatever, and they hype those things in the media, so the British public pays more attention to that than from their freedoms being ripped away from them on a daily basis. | ||
| But at the same time, I think people are becoming increasingly wise to what's really going on here. | ||
| And that is to say that Brexit, while it was carried out in name, is not necessarily being carried out, you know, in the fullest spirit of how it was intended. | ||
| And that is to repatriate powers down to the local level. | ||
| I think there is a long way to go in British politics, but I am optimistic because As people take more to the streets, uniting left and right and center and, you know, God knows what. | ||
| I do believe that there are going to be these firebrand populist candidates, like we see here in the United States, who will run for office and take that power back. | ||
| Real quickly, are they planning on more lockdowns, do you think? | ||
| Well, so I think Boris's inclination is to try and avoid it, actually, which is just about the nicest thing I'll ever say about Boris. | ||
| But there is a huge swathe of people who are trying to push him into another lockdown. | ||
| Of course, this Merck pill that's come out today is now putting a little bit of a Spanner in the works for big pharma in, you know, the traditional sense of Merck is still doing a thing with, you know, it's still part of a big pharmaceutical industry. | ||
| But certainly when it comes to vaccine mandates, they just recently announced the NHS staff, national health staff will not have to be vaccinated until at least March next year. | ||
| I actually think that they won't even have to do it at all by the time we get to March. | ||
| So you can see this push and pull right now within the heart of the British government between these kind of more libertarian, laissez-faire policies and the more hardline totalitarian instincts of people like Harry Simmons and others in the Conservative Party. | ||
| We've got about 30 seconds. | ||
| Tell us about the podcast, National Pulse. | ||
| Natalie's going to be in tomorrow with more of your research on Fauci. | ||
| Walk us through the podcast and how did it get to you? | ||
| Yeah, everything's up at thenationalpulse.com. | ||
| Like I say, that whole thing I said about Anthony Fauci, we've put it all into bullet points. | ||
| The article, the lead story on The National Pulse right now. | ||
| I'd appreciate everyone sharing it. | ||
| And hey, if you like that work that we do, which by the way, nobody else is doing, head on over to fundrealnews.com because we are people-powered. | ||
| Project Veritas and all these great groups are people-powered. | ||
| It's fundrealnews.com. | ||
| Rahim, thank you for joining us today. | ||
| Great analysis. | ||
| The Bill of Indictment against Tony Fauci. | ||
| The National Pulse, just absolutely incredible. | ||
| We're going to the border next. | ||
| You're going to be absolutely shocked by the footage we got from Oscar Ramirez, Ben Burkhardt, next in the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, I'm Peter Navarro, and behind me is the house Tony Fauci helped build with your taxpayer dollars. | |
| It's the Wuhan Bioweapons Lab, where COVID-19 likely originated. | ||
| And here's what's funny. | ||
| The Atlantic magazine just came out with an article that, despite the white hot smoking gun this magazine held in its hands, the Atlantic still won't blame Fauci. | ||
| In my new book, In Trump Time, I pull no such left-wing punches. | ||
| Read In Trump Time and there will be no doubt in your mind that Fauci lied and Americans died. | ||
| In Trump Time. | ||
| Buy it on Amazon today and stick a fork in Anthony Fauci. | ||
| He's done. | ||
| In Trump Time is the definitive insider's account of the Trump White House. | ||
| Order In Trump Time today on Amazon. | ||
| Senator Rand Paul in the United States Senate, the National Impulse, Raheem Kassam and Natalie Winters, and of course this book in Trump time of Dr. Peter Navarro, which everybody's got to get. | ||
| You've got to see how it started, right, to understand where we are today. | ||
| As Raheem said, this is not over. | ||
| It's not close to being over. | ||
| We're getting to the bottom of Wuhan Live, like we're getting to the bottom of 3 November. | ||
| We're going to get to the bottom of 6 January. | ||
| Right? | ||
| As we get closer to getting to the bottom of the results, you see how they implode more and more and more and more and more. | ||
| We're never going to cede them the intellectual high ground on this, ever. | ||
| Because they're liars and they're phonies. | ||
| Another aspect of that, by the way, please go to MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM, to support the WARROOM apparatus and the great manufacturing company of MyPillow. | ||
| The logistics chain, the supply chain's worked out at MyPillow. | ||
| You order it, you're going to get it. | ||
| So go there today, MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Get on top of action, action, action about the Pillow Sale Classic. | ||
| It's not going to last forever. | ||
| It's a commemoration of 10 years. | ||
| Okay, another lie they're telling. | ||
| Biden's sitting there today and tells Doocy it's Fox. | ||
| He says, I don't know why you put out that garbage. | ||
| Why are you right wing sites putting out this garbage about a million dollars per family and four or five fifty thousand dollars per per individual? | ||
| That's not happening. | ||
| Of course, his Justice Department is all kind of articles out today. | ||
| Somebody he should tell his DOJ that because they're negotiating for DHS and HHS massive settlements for illegal aliens coming across the border. | ||
| And what they're doing is because the people coming up from the border don't know the fine points of the law, like we don't know the fine points of the law. | ||
| They're saying, hey, it's open borders. | ||
| They're inviting us in. | ||
| And guess what? | ||
| Maybe a free free. | ||
| We may hit a lottery ticket besides getting the United States, maybe big cash money from Uncle Sugar, Joe Biden. | ||
| I want to go. | ||
| If you see what's happening now, the human tragedy that's taking place down there caused by the Biden administration, or I should say Biden regime, illegitimate Biden regime. | ||
| Let's go into Mexico. | ||
| Oscar Blue Ramirez joins us. | ||
| The footage is amazing. | ||
| Blue, tell us what's going on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Mr. Bannon, after 12 days that we spent with the caravan, today a volcano erupted. | |
| And the National Guard tried to stop the caravan today and, you know, they were extremely, extremely aggressive. | ||
| What they report right now is one National Guard officer has been critically hurt, as you see right here in this Bureau video. | ||
| The migrants are carrying him to safety because some migrants, they did not want a confrontation, but others, they are quantity by the hundreds, they wanted the confrontation against the National Guard because they feel that they are violating their rights to transit. | ||
| Even they were throwing rocks at them right here at this video as you see as they were, you know, leaving the area at PP That that is the city that is approximately to the next border city of ariaga It is around 100 kilometers from pp. Japan to ariaga and from ariaga you connect directly to the next state of oaxaca What we have been hearing in our and you know information that they are going to go again tonight to try to raid | ||
| Uh the migrant, uh, you know camp where they are going to be stationed and try to stop them from continuing from walking Look at the footage Okay, hang on for a second. | ||
| For our podcast radio audience, please go to get our newsletter. | ||
| Please go get the show notes. | ||
| The footage is unbelievable. | ||
| It's obviously a crackdown, but here's what I think we're missing. | ||
| And up until now the Mexican government's kind of been helping this and assisting this and giving them passage and giving them papers. | ||
| Why all of a sudden do we have, this is full police state, this is like Germany for the vaccine demonstrations. | ||
| Why have the National Guard with riot gear and the shields and it looks like chaos down there, why have they been called out by the Mexican state, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, apparently this protection claim that it was put has not been directly in effect. | |
| So because of that, that it has not been directly in effect, the strategy of the National Guard and the Institute of National Immigration was to let them walk so they can get tired as humidity, weather, and thunder conditions ...have been, you know, effectively out of the caravan. | ||
| Just for information, sir, more than 60 people have been critically hospitalized and with Dengue symptoms and also COVID symptoms. | ||
| Out of those 60 people, 40 of them are children. | ||
| So the strategy of the National Guard to get them tired, specifically now they are going in, in effect, to try to stop them in the last part of the state of Chiapas, this protection claim has not been in effect as we are hearing information that it's not in effect right now. | ||
| Our Real America's Voice and all the audience. | ||
| For John Fredericks Radio and Podcast, you've got to go get the show. | ||
| You must see this footage. | ||
| It is insane. | ||
| There's now, it looks like riots, riot police out there. | ||
| Oscar, thank you. | ||
| I want to go to Ben Berquam. | ||
| Ben, you're in Yuma, Arizona. | ||
| It's headed to either El Paso or Yuma. | ||
| And you're seeing, by the way, we don't, the caravans are bad enough, but there's thousands coming across every day. | ||
| Ben, tell us what you got. | ||
| Yeah Steve, we've got about a hundred behind me right now and it's continuing every single day. | ||
| You know, the caravan in a lot of ways is a distraction from what the cartel, the cartel operations. | ||
| Cartels control all of this. | ||
| They are operating all around the world in 150 different countries. | ||
| They're marketing their services to terrorist organizations and terrorist countries and bringing people across. | ||
| What you see behind me is simply the continuation of the invasion of our border that the cartels are controlling and that Democrats and Joe Biden are inviting into this country. | ||
| Outside of the $450,000, the million dollars of family, the people are coming because they know once they get here, everything is free. | ||
| Education is free. | ||
| They make a fake asylum claim. | ||
| They buy a child along the way to make their asylum claim because they've been told to by leftist organizations in America. | ||
| They get here, and within 24 hours, this group will be in America, on a plane, on a bus, moving around our country, not tested for COVID, not tested for dengue fever, not tested for tuberculosis or any of the other diseases that they're bringing up. | ||
| Hang on a second. | ||
| And this is not to demonize the people, but if you look at what Oscar's covering in Mexico, they're women, children, they're coming up in this horrific march by cartels. | ||
| If you look there, correct me if I'm wrong, most of the people in that shot look like military-age males. | ||
| Am I missing it? | ||
| How are they being processed and not just sent back across the border? | ||
| Well that's the thing, many of the men, they've been taught, they've been told, they've been taught, there's a whole underground railroad of slavery going on here in the opposite direction where they're enslaving them. | ||
| Children are being bought and sold in Mexico and Central America and the men that are coming up | ||
| are buying those children now a lot of the military age men are those the ones that look military age are sixteen seventeen uh... almost eighteen years old but a lot of these guys are hardened criminals there you know they've been in cartels they've been in gangs for years and and now they're coming up date that's the problem is even young people young men the vast majority that i see it that are coming are still young men uh... they're not compatible with america they're used to death they're used to violence | ||
| And that's what we're seeing happen in our communities. | ||
| They're bringing that in to the migrant communities, the immigrant communities in America, and that's who's getting victimized. | ||
| We've got to bounce, but this is why the Hispanic vote in Virginia is going to the Trump movement. | ||
| The Hispanic American citizens of this country are not going to have the burden put on their shoulders. | ||
| Real quickly, is Yuma ready for this? | ||
| Are they ready for another? | ||
| I know every day is an invasion, but are they ready for a caravan? | ||
| Not at all. | ||
| The reason you see the hundred people behind me, and they've been sitting here for over two hours now, a new group just showed up, is they're already overwhelmed. | ||
| You add another thousand, two thousand, ten thousand on top of that, it's going to be an utter disaster. | ||
| You're going to have people, it's going to be completely out of control. | ||
| Ben, real quickly, how do people follow you on social media? | ||
| You're coming in hot. | ||
| How do they follow you on Real America's Voice? | ||
| America's Voice.News, Dish Network, Roku, Pluto, and then FrontlineAmerica.com or all social media. | ||
| You can find me, Ben Burquam. | ||
| Okay, we're going to have you back on. | ||
| Ben, amazing reporting out there in Yuma. | ||
| Oscar Blue Ramirez, what is your social media? | ||
| How do people follow you for this footage? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course, Real America's Voice News, Facebook, YouTube, Telegram, and Twitter. | |
| It's Oscar Blue, sir, and also Porter Network News and all social media, sir. | ||
| Thank you, Oscar. | ||
| Fabulous reporting. | ||
| Amazing footage. | ||
| Gotta make sure everybody in the podcast and radio sees this footage. | ||
| It'll blow you away. | ||
| How it turned, how quickly it turned. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| I want to go now to Boris. | ||
| Boris, you and I could talk about Yuma and the great state of Arizona and people. | ||
| This is so outrageous. | ||
| It makes me sick to my stomach that the Biden administration, what they're doing to the people in Central America, what's coming up there. | ||
| They're in business with the cartels now. | ||
| They're partners with the cartels. | ||
| The Biden administration is a partner of the cartels. | ||
| That's where we are. | ||
| But Boris, there's so much going on in Capitol Hill. | ||
| We warned people the other night, when we run the tables on Tuesday, this group up here is going to be like a wounded, cornered animal, and they're going to start doing crazy stuff. | ||
| Now right now, correct me if I'm wrong, and I warned people about this for a couple of days, they're over on Capitol Hill right now with a bill that ink hasn't dried on it, nobody's read it, there's been no hearings on it, there's no scoring on it, and tell me what they're trying to do, Boris Epstein. | ||
| What are they trying to jam through tonight, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, we gotta get Boris up and ready. | |
| He's not... we gotta get that... | ||
| Steve, I'm here, I'm here, I'm here. | ||
| Okay, we gotta get... | ||
| Okay, you gotta learn how to hit that, you gotta learn how to take that mute off. | ||
| I get too excited, you know, I get, I'm too jazzed up because I'm working the phones while you're talking to other, you know, your other guests. | ||
| I've gotta be getting up to the info. | ||
| Here's the latest. | ||
| They're jamming through every single piece of liberal nonsense you could imagine. | ||
| You could imagine. | ||
| It's unlimited paid family leave. | ||
| It's their left-wing priorities on social justice, on blowing our economy completely out of the water. | ||
| They may put in a minimum wage and nobody knows. | ||
| Immigration is going to be in here. | ||
| Mass Amnesty, they're trying to get in here. | ||
| Mass amnesty is in there. | ||
| For all you know, the Green New Deal is going to end up being in this thing. | ||
| They're trying to give as many handouts as possible, because that's the only way Democrats know how to govern. | ||
| They're not actually interested in making our country better. | ||
| And you've got smart Democrats, to a degree, like Spanberger in Virginia, who are saying, hey, Joe, you didn't get elected to be FDR. | ||
| You just got elected to give the people some TLC, tender love and kindness, and 10-11 care, and you're not doing that. | ||
| What's going on on the Hill is disgusting. | ||
| It's even more disgusting than when they pushed through Obamacare without reading it. | ||
| They are literally throwing everything into the pot and trying to push it through, but that's the House. | ||
| You really think that's going to work in the Senate? | ||
| Manchin, come out and show what Manchin said. | ||
| It's a center country or a central-left country. | ||
| Hang on, but you've got Spanberg and Virginia 7, which the show goes on Radio 2 and Virginia 2. | ||
| You've got to understand, you vote for this, Your political obituary has been signed. | ||
| Over. | ||
| But here's the thing. | ||
| Are they going to score this? | ||
| Are they going to show the American people, which Joe Manchin was being grilled on by Mika today, are they going to score it so we know what it costs and how it's going to be paid for? | ||
| Boris, are they going to pass this in the middle of the night? | ||
| They're going to try to pass it in the middle of the night, Steve. | ||
| And even if they do score it, it's not going to be a real score. | ||
| A real score takes weeks. | ||
| You know that. | ||
| I know that from being in the White House. | ||
| There's a process. | ||
| It takes time. | ||
| You've got to study everything. | ||
| They are throwing it all into the pot. | ||
| As you mentioned, you've got immigration, minimum wage, unlimited family leave. | ||
| Of course, Pete Buttigieg wants as much paternity leave as possible. | ||
| Him and Chaston are still trying to figure out how to breastfeed their kids. | ||
| So, you've got this orgy of Democrat spending that is directly a result of the win of MAGA. | ||
| And make no mistake about it, Tuesday was all about MAGA. | ||
| Yes, Glenn Youngkin himself It's not, let's be honest, fully MAGA, but this was a MAGA win. | ||
| If you look at the rural counties in Virginia, if you look at New Jersey beating the sitting state senate president, Democrat, with spending $153, all across the country in New York, on Long Island, in Connecticut, in Virginia, in New Jersey, this was a MAGA win, and this overspending as a result. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A quick break, back with Boris with his analysis, next. | |
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, You can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with 2 million users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store. | ||
| The Google Play Store and at Getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel cancel culture. | ||
| Okay, Thursday, 4 November, the year of our Lord, 2021, and it is white hot what's happening here in Washington, D.C. | ||
| I want to bring in Joe Kent from Washington 3. | ||
| New poll up. | ||
| Before we talk about that, Joe, talk to us about your assessment of what's happening. | ||
| They get crushed on Tuesday, and we told everybody, don't think they're going to learn any lessons. | ||
| They're going to try to triple down, get all this passed, so they reorder the American economy. | ||
| Joe Kent, your analysis. | ||
| I think it's really clear at this point with what the Democrats are doing, trying to cram this massive spending bill down. | ||
| They are aware that they do not have the mandate of the American people anymore, if they ever had it to begin with, and they know that their days are limited, especially after Tuesday. | ||
| So now they're trying to go full throttle to just pass this radical bill. | ||
| There's not even an attempt at good faith. | ||
| They're not trying to do anything to solve any of the major issues with our supply lines, to bring back manufacturing, to do something that will benefit the American people. | ||
| Instead, it's extremely radical. | ||
| They're avoiding having it scored by the Congressional Budget Office so the American people can't see what's behind it. | ||
| As you say, they're playing the three-card Monte. | ||
| They're trying to actually hide the bottom line, how much this will cost. | ||
| So again, this is just more evidence that Democrats know that Spanberger said he didn't get an FDR mandate. | ||
| He was here to calm things down. | ||
| She knows she's done if she votes for this real quickly. | ||
| That's why they're getting so much pushback right now. So I think the message is loud and clear the Democrats are well aware They do not have the mandate from the American people. They don't believe that they ever truly had it. They know what happened last November Spamburger Spamburger said he didn't get an FDR mandate. It was here to calm things down She knows she's done if she votes for this real quickly stunning polling coming out of Washington 3 by Troph Algar Which with Richard Barris those two the probably the best at polling MAGA | ||
| Tell us real quickly, Denver, let's get it up. | ||
| This poll's stunning. | ||
| What does it say, Joe Kemp? | ||
| This says that the people in Washington 3, we are sick and tired of the Biden administration. | ||
| We are sick and tired of Republican and name-only candidates like Jamie Herrera-Butler, who refuse to defend the hard-working people of this district. | ||
| from these tyrannical vaccine and mask mandates. | ||
| We've been hit extremely hard by those types of orders, taking people away from their jobs, really going after the kids. | ||
| We've had mask mandates put on the kids. | ||
| Our governor, Jay Inslee, is tweeting about the vaccine being approved by the FDA for our children. | ||
| We know he's coming for our kids next. | ||
| And Jamie Hura-Butler has done nothing to defend this district. | ||
| She's taking money from Pfizer. | ||
| She's done nothing to really push back against the narrative that's been painted since January 6th that everybody who's in trouble This poll says you're up by how many over her? | ||
| It says from Tammy Hera Butler, I am up 7 points. | ||
| Plus 7. | ||
| Pretty amazing from when she came. | ||
| Joe Kent, how do people... by the way, somebody told me they're trying to go to Spokane to see Nutcracker and take the little girls, but they gotta show, like, a vaccine passport, or they gotta wear a mask, be vaccinated, or show 24 hours you gotta test, the insanity. | ||
| Real quickly, how do people find out more about Joe Kent? | ||
| Yeah, please go to joekent4congress.com. | ||
| The War Room Posse has really helped get us this far, get the word out, and really help us with the fundraising against these corporate PACs, these Republican-in-Name-Only PACs that are supporting Jamie Herrera-Butler. | ||
| So joekent4congress.com is where folks can go. | ||
| $5, $10, $15 really helps us push back against the E-Rhinos and against the far left. | ||
| Joe Kent now up by almost eight, according to our Trafalgar. | ||
| Joe Kent, thank you very much for joining us here in the War Room. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Boris, that's a pretty stunning poll, wouldn't you say? | ||
| For Democrats. | ||
| But for Republicans, for the MAGA movement, this is what we're saying. | ||
| Let me get this straight. | ||
| Jack Siderelli in New Jersey, she was not having any shot. | ||
| And I'm going to tell you, as I'm sitting here, if you wake me up in the middle of the night and I ask you who won that gubernatorial race, him or Murphy, I'm going to say I think Cedrelli won. | ||
| And I think the old school Democrat machine in New Jersey, just like the one in Pennsylvania, been doing it forever, they came in and gave it to Murphy over the top. | ||
| The MAGA movement. | ||
| The MAGA sweep. | ||
| Remember what I said yesterday? | ||
| You've got a council seat in Queens where a candidate endorsed by AOC lost by 35 points. | ||
| This is Connecticut. | ||
| Bristol, Connecticut went red. | ||
| There's a MAGA movement. | ||
| And you know who said it today? | ||
| It wasn't Steve Bannon. | ||
| It wasn't Boris Epstein. | ||
| It wasn't Ted Cruz. | ||
| It was Steve Israel. | ||
| Who led the DCCC after 2009 and 2010, said this feels like 2009 all over again for Democrats. | ||
| Steve Israel, a Democrat, said this feels like 2009. | ||
| What came next? | ||
| 2010, the Tea Party sweep, 64 seats, and I'm telling you, I said this now months ago, and I'm proud to say this. | ||
| As long as we do the right thing, as long as we stay strong and back the right candidates, we could be looking at a 100-seat swing in the House. | ||
| And as long as the Democrats keep doing dumb things like they are tonight, and even the Democrats in the Senate, Brian Schatz out of Hawaii, he's no moderate, Jon Tester out of Montana, old-school lib, they're saying, hey fools, Nancy Pelosi, all you guys, AOC, Ilhan Omar, you can send us whatever you want, but we ain't signing it. | ||
| They're backing up Joe Manchin. | ||
| You've got shats out of Hawaii backing up Manchin, not backing up the liberals. | ||
| There are 15 guys back in Sinema and Manchin that have been hiding behind him. | ||
| Real quickly, Boris, this is epic tonight. | ||
| We're going to get the numbers up. | ||
| We need people to plow in, plow into your representatives, make the Republicans hold the line, but most importantly, get to some of these moderate Democrats. | ||
| We're going to have the numbers up. | ||
| Amanda Schaefer will be putting them up. | ||
| Blow up Nancy Pelosi's line. | ||
| Get on the phone. | ||
| In the middle of the night, in the dark of night, we told you, like a cornered, wounded animal, They're going to try to strike back, and we've got to shut this down. | ||
| Boris, real quickly, what's your social media? | ||
| No doubt about it. | ||
| We've got to be all over this and giving back up to those moderate Democrats and saying, hey, we're probably going to take your seats. | ||
| Let's be honest, Jon Tester isn't winning in Montana in 2024. | ||
| I may know somebody who'd be perfect for that seat. | ||
| I don't know if you know anybody, Steve. | ||
| But today, we've got to say strongly and loudly, Do not bend to far-left liberals. | ||
| I'm at BorisZP.com. | ||
| Go right now, sign up at BorisZP.com. | ||
| Super hot on the website, of course. | ||
| The hottest on Getter, at BorisZP, at BorisZP on Twitter, and hottest ever on the gram, Boris underscore Epstein. | ||
| Stay strong. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Do not back down. | ||
| I'll see you tomorrow from Las Vegas. | ||
| Okay, the posse tomorrow morning is going to be pretty explosive. | ||
| Dial in at 10 o'clock and you're going to see why in the War Room. |
Export Selection