Oct. 15, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:41
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well, the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China, and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always, because if you don't and the worst happens, Okay, you're in the War Room. | ||
| We're closing in on 100 million downloads on the podcast. | ||
| Of course, we're live everywhere thanks to Real America's Voice and also GNU's GTV. | ||
| We're in Mandarin, we're in Japanese, all of it. | ||
| It's Friday, 15 October, Year of Our Lord 2021. | ||
| There is so much to get to. | ||
| We're going to get to the Order of Battle right now. | ||
| You get into it in Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, the historic Marine Corps base. | ||
| There's a sentencing phase of a court-martial going on for Lieutenant Colonel Scheller. | ||
| I want to go now to, we've got both MTG, who actually was a witness yesterday, Congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene, but I want to start with Bernie Kerrig. | ||
| Bernie is one of the advisors to the pipe hitters That is Senior Chief Petty Officer Andrea Gallagher's group that now assists folks in the military for going through the trials and tribulations that Senior Chief Petty Officer Gallagher went through. | ||
| Okay, Bernie joins us by phone from Arizona. | ||
| He's out there helping Mark Fincham and Boris and everybody get to the bottom of 3 November. | ||
| Bernie, can you set the stage for us? | ||
| Because it's kind of confusing. | ||
| Newsweek had a very confusing article. | ||
| Some people are misinterpreting. | ||
| Sheller's up on a number of charges. | ||
| One is conduct on becoming an officer and a gentleman. | ||
| Another is dereliction of duty. | ||
| It's all about the Facebook post and his calling out people to be held accountable. | ||
| Set the stage for us right now, Bernie. | ||
| What exactly is going on? | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| First, let me just give a big shout out to Eddie and Andrea Gallagher, who put the Pipe Hitters together and did exactly what they said they would do the day they walked out of court and that he was acquitted. | ||
| They said they would help First responders that would help the military in the future. | ||
| And this is one of their first examples of how important their help was. | ||
| So that's number one. | ||
| Number two, MTG. | ||
| I think she's on the air right now. | ||
| I hear from the attorneys. | ||
| She did a phenomenal job. | ||
| She testified yesterday. | ||
| Ralph Norman, Louie Comer testified, the three of them. | ||
| But MTG did a fantastic job. | ||
| Give the court some understanding of why somebody like Stu Scheller would feel the way he did. | ||
| I read the Newsweek article. | ||
| It was confusing. | ||
| So let me give you a rundown of what's happened. | ||
| The legal team right now is on the way back home. | ||
| The court end of this has concluded with this finding. | ||
| Stu Scheller fled guilty to the six misdemeanor counts. | ||
| The government wanted six months of $5,000 a month fine. | ||
| The judge gave him one. | ||
| One month of forfeiture of $5,000, $5,000. | ||
| Called for an investigation into the misconduct by the command in the case. | ||
| The judge said that it was certainly, it certainly seemed in his eyes, seemed like there was UCI, Undue Command influence. | ||
| And we made, the defense made a motion and talked about to the judge that they leaked medical records, they leaked records of Colonel Schillers, and the judge questioned why that wasn't brought up. | ||
| Why didn't the defense, I mean, why didn't the prosecution respond to it? | ||
| Which leads you to believe that they didn't want to talk about it. | ||
| He questioned the illegal confinement. | ||
| He saw a Marine in crisis, not a crime spree. | ||
| And I think this was a major victory for Scheller to get people to understand two things. | ||
| One, yeah, he was wrong. | ||
| He went outside the chain of command. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| He was asking for accountability. | ||
| He held himself accountable. | ||
| He was asking for accountability for 13 Marines that died. | ||
| In an incident that was preventable and should have never happened. | ||
| He asked for accountability by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of Defense. | ||
| And as of doing so, he winds up in court. | ||
| He was the only guy in court being held accountable. | ||
| And there were far worse things that should have been looked at. | ||
| So now, basically Shell has gotten a letter of reprimand, plus the $5,000 forfeiture. | ||
| And the discharge, his discharge has been kicked up to the Department of Defense, and there's three things can happen. | ||
| He can get an honorable discharge, he can get a non-honorable with honorable conditions, or he can be given a discharge with non-honorable conditions. | ||
| Now, the last one is important, and I don't think the government's going to go in that direction, because if they give him a non-honorable discharge, He has a right to a Board of Inquiry, and the last thing I think Milley and the Secretary of Defense wants is to be a witness in a Board of Inquiry as to why he felt the way he did and went outside the chain of command. | ||
| So I think overall, right now, we're just going to wait for the Department of Defense to make their decision, and I want to give a lot of credit to Impalatory, Brian Ferguson, Jay Sullivan, Those of the lawyers involved, they were all involved in the Eddie Gallagher case in San Diego two and a half years ago. | ||
| They did a phenomenal job. | ||
| And again, MTG, outstanding work. | ||
| Bernie, just one last thing. | ||
| Thank you for this update, and thanks for all the work with the pipe hitters. | ||
| It's just fantastic what you guys are accomplishing. | ||
| But we have a great warrior in Lieutenant Colonel Scheller. | ||
| He is retiring. | ||
| He's out of the military, so he's not a warrior anymore with the Marines, right? | ||
| He's gonna resign short of his retirement. | ||
| He's forfeiting all his retirement. | ||
| He doesn't get any retirement pay. | ||
| Nothing from the Marines for 18 and a half years of service? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's really going to be up to the Secretary of Defense. | |
| That's what we have to wait for. | ||
| And listen, when they make that decision, the lawyers are going to put forward a case on why he should be given an honorable discharge. | ||
| Let him retire with full service. | ||
| And the judge, I want to point this out, Steve, and the SecDef has got to take this into consideration. | ||
| One of the reasons the judge was so compassionate toward Schiller, he said he had a perfect record. | ||
| He had never seen anybody come into a courtroom. | ||
| This guy wasn't a criminal. | ||
| This guy was not a criminal. | ||
| He was a 17, 18 year warrior that had a perfect record. | ||
| He said, I've never had anybody in my courtroom with this type of record. | ||
| So they have to take that into consideration. | ||
| And I think the Secretary of Defense, I think it would be outrageous for him to give Scheller anything but an honorable. | ||
| Bernie, once again, people, thank you and Senior Chief Petty Officer Gallagher and Andrea for jumping in here and having Colonel Scheller's back. | ||
| The one that called for accountability and the only one that's been put under any scrutiny is Colonel Scheller. | ||
| One last thing. | ||
| We're going to ask you back, Bernie. | ||
| This situation with the vaccine mandates across the country to fire them in first responders and particularly police officers is out of control. | ||
| Huge news out of Chicago where the head just says, hey, we're not going to, I'm not going to enforce that. | ||
| Bernie, thank you so much. | ||
| We don't have time now, but we have to have you back on. | ||
| I know you're in Arizona out there helping the team, but we've got to have you back on hopefully this afternoon or tomorrow to do this, to go into the vaccine mandates among law enforcement. So Bernie, thank you. | ||
| Bernie, what's your social media? I know you're, you're blowing people up all day long. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bernard Carrick on Twitter and you know, it's Bernard Carrick on everything, everything out there. | |
| Bernie, thank you so much. Thank you for helping out here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks. | |
| I want to bring in now Congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene. | ||
| People don't realize she was a critical part of the entire sentencing, the entire defense for Colonel Scheller. | ||
| First off, Congressman Greene, thank you. | ||
| I know you're busy and you broke away today to do this for us. | ||
| Explain to people why congressmen were involved. | ||
| Why were Louie Gohmert, why did Louie Gohmert, who's beloved by this audience, why did he reach out to you? | ||
| Tell us, why did you guys even have a role in the sentencing phase of the court-martial of Lieutenant Colonel Stu Scheller? | ||
| Well, we took a particular interest and the reason why we did is because it matters so much to the American people and Congressman Louie Gohmert had driven down to Camp Lejeune to go visit Lieutenant Colonel Scheller just a few weeks ago. | ||
| I was going to head down there as well and I was in contact with Louie talking about how to get in and how to visit. | ||
| He made contact, met with the attorneys, met with Lieutenant Colonel Scheller, Where he gave him a message that I want to deliver to him is that no matter what happens out of this, I wanted him to know that I would make sure that I would give him a job. | ||
| And if he didn't want to work for me, that I would help him find a job after this is over, because this is, uh, everyone knows this is a witch hunt over someone that did nothing wrong and respect is earned from leaders. | ||
| It shouldn't just be given. | ||
| And the military command, that structure is very important, but the military leaders have to earn respect in order for the people under their command to be able to follow it. | ||
| And Lieutenant Colonel Scheller took so much courage and he knew what he was doing when he recorded that video and put it out on social media. | ||
| And he knew, he knew the consequences, but he was willing to call out the leaders because they had caused 13 members of the military to be killed needlessly. | ||
| And it was one of them that he knew personally. | ||
| And so when I went to the court and testified yesterday in his defense, I was happy to report what people had said to me. | ||
| Not only people from my district, but people all across the country, Steve. | ||
| And I think that's what really made the impact to the court. | ||
| No, we heard what you had to say about it was very important. | ||
| And number one, I know what you told me. | ||
| You said, hey, this is a big deal for my constituents. | ||
| This is my constituents. | ||
| One of the number one things in their mind is about Colonel Shuller. | ||
| What's going to happen? | ||
| But the prosecution did object. | ||
| I think it was twice on statements that you were making. | ||
| Can you tell us about that? | ||
| Why did the prosecution object to anything that a United States congressman would be saying in defense in a sentencing phase of a court martial? | ||
| Well, they did. | ||
| They objected to me twice. | ||
| The first objection was when I was describing to them how we ended up in Afghanistan and reminding the court of the public opinion and what President George Bush, his statements as Commander-in-Chief at the time were and how he was calling the Taliban murderers and anyone giving them aid and comfort and abetting Along with these radical Islamic murderers was part of their terrorist organization. | ||
| But yet here we had Joe Biden. | ||
| We had him arming the Taliban, arming these enemies, which only 20 years ago, we set out to defeat after they attacked our nation. | ||
| And I was describing how watching on television, the planes hitting the Twin Towers, how I fell to my knees and I was crying and the prosecution objected to that. | ||
| That was the first objection. | ||
| The second objection was when I was describing how horrible it was that the only person on trial at this time after the disaster in Afghanistan, after we abandoned Americans when our motto was no man left behind, after we armed the Taliban with $85 billion worth of military equipment and weapons, | ||
| And how we had 13 killed when the intel was known by all of them that there was going to be an ISIS attack. | ||
| They knew and those 13 were still killed. | ||
| And I said that Joe Biden should be the one on trial and Joe Biden should be impeached because he is the commander in chief and not Lieutenant Colonel Scheller should not be on trial for having the courage to speak out against this. | ||
| And they objected, the prosecution objected when I said, To impeach Joe Biden. | ||
| So we understand you had a major, your testimony had a major impact, and obviously everybody thanks for that. | ||
| I want to hold you over, I know you're jammed for time, we've got to hold you over to the next break, but I've got about a minute here. | ||
| And Denver and the team, I'd like to put up, you've sent some tweets out about a poll you've done. | ||
| We know that Colonel Scheller, the court marshal, is at the top of the mind, one of the things top of the mind of your constituents, obviously the inflation, the implosion of the supply chain, all that. | ||
| But you went out and did a poll on something that's quite a controversial topic. | ||
| Tell us what that topic is. | ||
| It's called the Great Divorce. | ||
| You got about 30 seconds for a break. | ||
| What do you mean by the Great Divorce? | ||
| The National Divorce. | ||
| Actually, the team put up my tweet about Lieutenant Colonel Scheller. | ||
| The National Divorce. | ||
| So many people talk to me about how divided our country is and how it's irreconcilable. | ||
| And I've been hearing that from so many. | ||
| Let's take a short commercial break. | ||
| of our union and talking about dividing the country between Republican and Democrat states that I actually took a poll. | ||
| I went to Twitter and left the poll up for three days and I'd be glad to talk about that when we come back. | ||
| Let's take a short commercial break. | ||
| We'll be back with Congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene on the national divorce next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, we got a lot to go through, and we'll get there in a second. | ||
| Remember, this week we're commemorating the 10th anniversary of when MyPillow actually became kind of a real company. | ||
| That's when Mike Lindell finally got an infomercial up on TV, and that infomercial worked. | ||
| It went viral, and it made the company. | ||
| It started the company on the path of what it is today. | ||
| In commemoration of that, only for the War Room audience, Mike Lindell is putting up a throwback sale. | ||
| If you go to MyPillow.com right now, promo code WARROOM, You get the pillows that are now $69.98. | ||
| You get them for the price of 10 years ago, $19.98. | ||
| As low as $19.98. | ||
| That's for the standard, the classic. | ||
| Also have the Queen and the King. | ||
| Just look at it all. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com, Promo Code War Room. | ||
| You also have the towels that are still on sale. | ||
| This amazing sale on the towels. | ||
| $109 down to $39. | ||
| Right? | ||
| $109.99 down to $39.99. | ||
| Also, Giza sheets. | ||
| Buy one, get one free. | ||
| All types of sales. | ||
| Make sure you take action, action, action. | ||
| down to $39.99. Also, Giza sheets, buy one get one free. | ||
| All types of sales. Make sure you take action, action, action. Support the Forces for Freedom as they continue to fight every day. | ||
| I kind of want to go back around. | ||
| I have Darren Beattie in a second about the 6th January fiasco. | ||
| We're going to drill down with the revolver. | ||
| So Congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene, thank you for staying over. | ||
| You did a great job with Colonel Scheller. | ||
| Just incredible, amazing, and particularly the fact the prosecution tried to strike, tried to object to your making the case for the impeachment of Joe Biden. | ||
| We love you for that. | ||
| I gotta talk about this poll, because this is an idea that really, particularly as a southerner, you know, from hometown of Richmond, it's one that really strikes to the heart of, it gets me very upset when I see this. | ||
| But talk about this poll called the, what is it, the National Divorce, because it's something that I'm adamantly, obviously opposed to, vehemently, and I don't even like some of these commentators starting to talk about it. | ||
| For the simple reason, we control two-thirds of the country. | ||
| Two-thirds of the country actually back what President Trump stands for, nationalist populism. | ||
| So walk us through, why did you take this poll and what are the results of it? | ||
| Well, I took the poll because I really like to understand what people think and feel. | ||
| And I'd heard so much talk about it and I continue to hear so much talk about it. | ||
| And I think it truly shows the devastation in the hearts of Americans, hearts and minds of Americans. | ||
| Americans are so upset about the moral decline in our country, wide open borders, democratic communism, and just the horrible failure with the withdrawal in Afghanistan. | ||
| And what Joe Biden is trying to do to our country, but not just Joe Biden, the entire Democrat Party. | ||
| And so I took the poll because I really wanted to understand how do people feel? | ||
| And there's obviously a big difference in the way Someone like Governor DeSantis governs his Republican-controlled state, and then the way, say, Governor Newsom governs his Democrat-controlled state, and there's such a clear difference in policy. | ||
| So I took the poll, and you understand, everyone needs to know that Twitter is very hard left. | ||
| You know, it's a big bias there on Twitter. | ||
| And when I first put the poll out the first day, the yeses were very high. | ||
| They were above 60%. | ||
| The poll was three days long and the left attacked it. | ||
| They were very angry. | ||
| They spread it everywhere, put it all around, and worked hard to drive the numbers down. | ||
| But it still ended with 43% of Americans wanting a national divorce. | ||
| But here's how I see this, Steve. | ||
| This is a wake-up call. | ||
| This should be the wake-up call to Democrats, in particular, that they cannot do this to our country. | ||
| Their path, that they have chosen to take America down, It's devastating. | ||
| It should be. | ||
| It should be the big wake up call to Democrat voters that what they voted for and the election fraud that happened in 2020 is very serious. | ||
| And the outcome that we've experienced in nine short months has put us in a very bad place where people are wanting to divide. | ||
| And so I'm putting this out because I'm so concerned over it, Steve. | ||
| Just as you are, and I think that it just shows that we have a lot of work to do, and we've got to take our country back. | ||
| We've got to heal our nation. | ||
| We've got to heal the differences between our people, and we've got to make sure that we're taking care of our household, and that's our country. | ||
| You see, this is so great that we're doing this. | ||
| We got Darren Beatty on next, who's one of the White House speechwriters and one of the first guys to really get what this program is all about. | ||
| I take this data and I come to a very different conclusion. | ||
| We have to start to govern like we mean it. | ||
| We've won enough elections. | ||
| We need more Marjorie Taylor Greene's than Donald Trump's program. | ||
| What we need to do is the problem is we win elections and we have these country club Republicans and we basically are the controlled opposition even in power. | ||
| I take this that if you're going to keep this country together, and we are going to keep this country together, no doubt, is start acting like you're in charge. | ||
| Act like you're doing what's right for America. | ||
| We're putting together a coalition from the Rio Grande Valley to the inner cities. | ||
| African-American males to hard-working blue-collar Hispanics in these hardscrabble counties in South Texas. | ||
| This is a movement that has two-thirds to 75% of the people with us. | ||
| And as soon as I start to be able to convince people in the economic plan about taxing the super wealthy, we'll be at 80%. | ||
| So anyway, Congressman Green, I want to thank you for doing this. | ||
| Because, no, you understand modern media and information warfare. | ||
| You understand very smartly how to get this stuff out and put it into the conversation. | ||
| So I thank you. | ||
| And I thank you for doing the poll, because it is a wake-up call. | ||
| And you're just the person that can wake us up. | ||
| So Congressman Greene, how do people get to your Twitter? | ||
| How do they get to Getter? | ||
| How do they track you during the day? | ||
| Because you're putting up stuff all day long. | ||
| Real Marjorie Greene on Getter. | ||
| And Getter is so great. | ||
| I'm so thankful for that platform. | ||
| At MT Greene with two E's on the end on Twitter. | ||
| Marjorie Taylor Greene on Facebook and all the other social media platforms. | ||
| But thank you, Steve. | ||
| And you're right. | ||
| That national divorce poll really should wake up the Republicans that refuse to act like Republicans. | ||
| And not just the Democrats. | ||
| Thanks for pointing that out. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| Okay, have a great one. | ||
| Thank you, Congressman Green. | ||
| We got to start governing like we mean it. | ||
| I want to bring in Darren Bede. | ||
| You got a lot to report on 6th January. | ||
| Darren, a poll like that, give me your hot take when you see these polls and you see these people talking about breaking up the country. | ||
| Well, I do have a hot take and I don't know, it might be somewhat Controversial but sobering. | ||
| And I just think the talk about national divorce is, is kind of absurd and ridiculous for multiple reasons. | ||
| But one of the reasons is that talk about divorce presupposes some degree of, of symmetry. | ||
| But in this case, I think the more appropriate analogy would be, imagine you're shotgun married to a six foot five domineering Why? | ||
| Who controls all of your finances, who controls all your communications, who controls the courts, and has armed guards outside of your house, and you threaten divorce? | ||
| It's it's a ridiculous proposal. | ||
| Because there is no symmetry, there is no institutional control, and there is no infrastructure from which one could even take advantage of the leverage of that conversation. | ||
| So I think a more sober perspective would encourage us to Start to kind of build up our infrastructure and kind of smartly correct some of that asymmetry such that in the future maybe talk about a national divorce would have the type of leverage that people now think does have. | ||
| But how about this? | ||
| How about this is a take? | ||
| Why don't we institutionalize Trumpism, right? | ||
| Let's institutionalize national populism in our institutions. | ||
| And those institutions that need to be rejuvenated, and I'll start with the CIA and the FBI, the National Security State, we get Darren Beattie and others, we have a commission like they had back in the 70s, the Church Commission, and we start to rejuvenate And deconstruct and then reconstruct these along the lines of this American Republican, not with guys like Brennan and all these globalists that have essentially come in and tried to destroy this country, okay? | ||
| Why don't we act like sovereigntists? | ||
| Why don't we act like nationalists? | ||
| We're in charge of this country! | ||
| When you actually talk the basic policies of what President Trump stands for, two-thirds of the American people, when fully explained to them, agree. | ||
| And you can see that in the Rio Grande Valley. | ||
| Never talking about that on CNN or MSNBC. | ||
| They're talking about, oh, this is a party in decline. | ||
| The Trump movement is more aggressive and expanding every second of every day. | ||
| Every second of every day. | ||
| Among minorities. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Across every demographic, every ethnicity, every religion. | ||
| Yes, sir? | ||
| I think that's a great point, and it underscores the real important task before us. | ||
| Because as you point out, there's a tremendous degree of popular support for what we're talking about. | ||
| What I think we're lacking in is an infrastructure that can translate that support into real policy. | ||
| There are several bottlenecks preventing that from happening. | ||
| And as I've been saying on your show, and I think we're in complete agreement on this, Is that one of the chief bottlenecks, perhaps the dominant bottleneck, is the out-of-control national security apparatus. | ||
| And until that's under control, the idea that we can translate this popular will into real policy is fictional. | ||
| And the politics that we see will simply be spectacle. | ||
| It will be fake and performative until the national security state is brought under control. | ||
| So let's talk, let's pivot now, we got about a minute in this segment, we'll hold you over obviously, let's pivot now to the article you've got up on Revolver.News that kind of blows this up. | ||
| No, it blows it up and it was an article, big article that we published a little over a week ago and I have to say Revolver News's investigative pieces are such an embarrassment of riches that there are a lot of big like scoops within the scoop that people can miss and I think it's newly relevant | ||
| In light of this ridiculous January 6th persecution of you and their obsession with you, in this piece, just to recap before I get into the other details, the piece basically points out that this January 6th commission is seeking the communications records of basically everyone who ever set foot in the Capitol, no matter what. | ||
| There's just anyone who was in Anyone who is remotely close to Washington, D.C. | ||
| on January 6th, they're seeking their communications records. | ||
| And it seems like they're interested in everyone except for the one person who's the head of a major militia group. | ||
| We've got to take a break. | ||
| It's a great hang. | ||
| People will hang for this. | ||
| We're going to return in a minute. | ||
| Darren Beatty, about 6th January. | ||
| We return in the War Room in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, breaking news out of the UK, sir. | |
| David Almas, who's a Conservative Member of Parliament, has been stabbed to death and died at a constituent meeting in, looks like in Essex. | ||
| Lee-on-the-Sea in Essex. | ||
| We're going to get Rahim Ghassan, who's going to join us here in a minute, to give us some details. | ||
| Pretty shocking. | ||
| I want to go back to Darren B, by the way. | ||
| We've got Philip Patrick on here to talk about inflation, the collapse of the, Biden's collapse of the supply chain under his watch. | ||
| Also going to have Robert Beatles back on here about how to get involved, how to become a precinct committeeman today. | ||
| You need to do it. | ||
| Darren Beattie. | ||
| So who, they've asked for everybody's communication, everybody's cell phones, all your text messages, everything from everybody involved that even wandered by the Capitol except for one interesting person. | ||
| Darren Beattie, who would that be? | ||
| Right. | ||
| So that person is known as person one in charging documents. | ||
| His name is Stuart Rhodes, and he's the founder and leader of the main key militia group that's imputed to all of the kind of insurrection elements of January 6. | ||
| And the thing is, and at first pass, you might say, oh, this is just standard congressional incompetence. | ||
| But it's actually much darker than that and much more damning than that, because the chairman of the January 6 Commission actually issued a lawsuit in his personal capacity that outlines his narrative theory of January 6. | ||
| And this lawsuit named as defendants Roger Stone, the Oath Keepers, and Trump. | ||
| So and in the lawsuit, he says he basically accuses the Oath Keepers of coordinated coordinating with Trump and Trump's inner circle prior to January 6th, and that constitutes the conspiracy. | ||
| And so you have the head of the January 6th Commission, who's very aware of the Oath Keepers. | ||
| In fact, the Oath Keepers play a starring role in his theory of the case outlined in his own lawsuit. | ||
| And yet in his capacity as chairman of the January 6th Commission, he obsesses about you, and he obsesses about any old person who was just simply standing around the Capitol that day. | ||
| They want their communication records. | ||
| And the glaring omission is he seems to have zero interest in the communication records or anything involving Stuart Rhodes, which reflects the still more curious Um, lack of interest in Rhodes by the Department of Justice, which has not indicted him. | ||
| And in fact, um, they haven't even properly searched him. | ||
| The full extent of their search has been they took one cell phone four months after the case. | ||
| And I think this is particularly disturbing. | ||
| So talking about the role of the national security state, um, the chairman Ben Thompson really is something of a congressional stooge for the security state. | ||
| He basically does what they tell him, and in exchange they give him little perks. | ||
| And in fact, one of his perks is more than little. | ||
| He basically oversees the Department of Homeland Security. | ||
| And this is coming right off the heels of the Department of Homeland Security calling anyone who claims that there was fraud or something wrong in the 2020 election as a potential terror threat. | ||
| So one could actually look at his role in the commission as an extension of The Department of Homeland Security's persecution of basically anyone espousing the idea that there could be fraud in 2020. | ||
| And again, he was a mouthpiece for the DHS in emphasizing the so called domestic terror threat. | ||
| He said, he always emphasized the domestic element of the DHS's duty was the most important and most overlooked. | ||
| And yet again, if he's so attentive to the domestic Uh, threats. | ||
| And if the Oath Keepers play a key role in his theory of the case as reflected in his own lawsuit, why do you not hear a word from him or from his sham commission about the head of the Oath Keepers, Stuart Rhodes, and all you hear about is random people standing around, uh, who have their lives destroyed. | ||
| And all you hear about is them, you know, pestering you. | ||
| They're, they're, they're going to be, We've got to get to the bottom. | ||
| It's one of the reasons you and I argued for a real commission with real support by the Republican Party. | ||
| You've got to get to the bottom of this government informant. | ||
| You've got to get to the bottom of the FBI's involvement. | ||
| You've got to get to the bottom of DHS involvement. | ||
| The Capitol Hill Police, by the way, is not revolver. | ||
| This is the New York Times talking about there's active communications between the FBI and their informants. | ||
| The handlers are there. | ||
| And the whole question is, what did Ray know? | ||
| What did he brief the president? | ||
| Why was there not more security? | ||
| I mean, the whole issue about what happened is quite fascinating. | ||
| And they've got to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| We've got to bounce because of the breaking news. | ||
| How do people get to Revolver? | ||
| You guys are all over this in a very sophisticated way. | ||
| You're very all over Michigan in a very sophisticated way. | ||
| As soon as you guys... I noticed as soon as you guys make something important, the rest of the thing kind of goes to crickets. | ||
| You haven't heard that... They were banging the drum on Michigan every day. | ||
| Then you did your reporting, BuzzFeed did the incredible investigative reporting, and it was on Chris Hayes one night, and Chris Hayes kind of agreed with, yeah, I think we've got to find out about these informants, and then total crickets. | ||
| I think Mr. Hayes got it talking to from some of his higher-ups. | ||
| But yeah, this piece, when you hear about January 6th, when you hear about the committee, when you see Steve Bannon trending on Twitter and in the news because of this sham committee, read this piece at revolver.news. | ||
| It absolutely devastates the committee and asks the one question that they don't want you to ask and raises the one name that they want you to forget. | ||
| So go to revolver.news, read this piece if you haven't already, and share it to anyone. | ||
| You hear one thing about the January 6th Commission from friends, whatever, send this piece to them and show them what a sham it is. | ||
| Yeah, mention Stuart Rhodes. | ||
| Okay, thank you very much. | ||
| By the way, CNN had the lead stories about us this morning by Stephen Collinson, who's one of the smart guys over there. | ||
| We put a lot of his pieces up. | ||
| But I want to put it up onto the page, and I want to make sure it goes into the live chat. | ||
| Everybody should read this piece by Stephen Connelson in today's CNN, on the homepage of CNN. | ||
| A very important piece, you ought to read it. | ||
| It goes into the... The heading should be, put it in your file under the law of unintended consequences. | ||
| You know, there's a famous saying, There's more tears shed for answered prayers than for unanswered. | ||
| Stephen Collison's piece, you should read that with that in mind and make sure you file that away. | ||
| Okay, we've got Rahim Kassam. | ||
| Rahim, what is going on? | ||
| Is this Sir David Amos? | ||
| He's a Tory, a Conservative Member of Parliament. | ||
| He was stabbed to death today. | ||
| Do you know what's happening? | ||
| Yeah, so earlier this morning we got the news that Sir David Amess, long-standing member of the Conservative Party, long-standing Brexiteer, Eurosceptic, campaigned with the Leave Means Leave group during that 2016 referendum. | ||
| Sir David Amess was stabbed multiple times this morning at a constituency surgery, and for those that don't know what a constituency surgery is, that is a one-on-one meeting with your Member of Parliament. | ||
| Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom hold these Surgeries all the time across their constituencies to allow their constituents to come and talk to them face-to-face without security, without barriers, usually just sitting down at a flimsy fold-up table and it transpired that this morning a man decided to use that opportunity to stab Sir David, 69 years old by the way, several times. | ||
| I know he was just an amazing Charity worker. | ||
| He did so much work in his community. | ||
| I had met him several times in my early days in Westminster. | ||
| He was a very warm, very welcoming guy. | ||
| Highly involved in the Conservative Friends of Israel group, but also as a result of his staunch convictions around things like gay marriage, he refused to vote for same-sex marriage. | ||
| He was routinely targeted for those views on social media, especially targeted by the political left. | ||
| Now, the interesting backstory, recent backstory to all of this is, of course, it had just been party conference season in the United Kingdom, where the political parties each take a week to all go together into a different UK city and host their conferences. | ||
| Lobbyists go, members go, MPs go, people go to talk to people, influence, rub shoulders, network, all the usual political stuff. | ||
| But in the last week, a Labour member of Parliament actually singled out Conservative members by calling them scum, which is quite a, you know, quite a serious term used in British politics to kind of target and harass the other side. | ||
| It's not usually done by members of Parliament, other members of Parliament. | ||
| Her name is Angela Rayner and Angela Rayner is now coming under fire for perhaps inciting this kind of hatred that has led to today's incident. | ||
| Now we don't know much about the assailant. | ||
| 25 years old and a male is all we know to this point in time. | ||
| The stabbing took place in Essex. | ||
| We know that. | ||
| David Ames didn't leave the scene. | ||
| He was attempted to be treated at the scene. | ||
| Unfortunately, he succumbed to those stab wounds in the past few moments. | ||
| But this is another incident now. | ||
| We had Joe Cox on the run-up to the Brexit campaign. | ||
| There's another incident now that will raise questions about the security of representatives out in the wild. | ||
| And you'll update us throughout the day. | ||
| We don't know any of the motivation. | ||
| I understand one person was taken and they say that's it. | ||
| It was one person that did this attack, but right now we don't know anything about the motivation. | ||
| Yeah, that's right. | ||
| There is. | ||
| I mean, we do know that the counterterrorism police are involved in the investigation now. | ||
| That's about the extent of which we which we understand this is taking place. | ||
| But apart from that, the remaining very tight lipped on who the who the suspect is, what else we know about them. | ||
| And, you know, I hate to say it this soon after a tragedy like this, but you know, if it were a right winger, their face would be all over the television by now. | ||
| Raheem, real quickly, I know you've decamped in New York City, but talk to us, you're helping us put together the Women of Gotham. | ||
| There's 10 women running for different positions in New York City that we're going to try to highlight starting next week. | ||
| Just real briefly, talk about that. | ||
| You're finding, I know you're in New York City to unite the various factions in the conservative movement, the populist movement, the national movement up there. | ||
| Tell us real quickly about the women. | ||
| It was amazing. | ||
| I went to an event last night. | ||
| Just these mothers who are concerned, who are angry, who are taking action and taking matters into their own hands, running for city council seats and other positions. | ||
| It was so inspiring to be down there in Tribeca last night, hearing from these people, these speeches, the passion which flows from them so freely. | ||
| And I said, you know, I don't think that there is a greater cause right now than helping these people organize. | ||
| Stop fighting amongst yourselves, New York Republicans. | ||
| Come together. | ||
| Turn your guns outwards and actually face down the enemy that is imposing tyranny on you. | ||
| And I saw that last night. | ||
| These people are, you know, true American patriots. | ||
| In my six years in this country, I've gotten to know a lot of American patriots. | ||
| These are at the top of the top. | ||
| And I just can't wait to see them on this show over the next week. | ||
| By the way, Tribeca is the belly of the beast. | ||
| I gotta tell you, Raheem, real quickly, how do people follow you? | ||
| How do they get to the podcast? | ||
| Yeah, TheNationalPulse.com, and we had a great podcast with Dr. Navarro the other day. | ||
| We've got another one coming out today, TheNationalPulse.com. | ||
| Okay, by the way, Rahim up there now to unite the various factions in New York City. | ||
| Rahim, thanks for joining us. | ||
| If we have any update, come back and we'll get you up about Sir David Emmett's assassinated murder today in the United Kingdom. | ||
| Very shocking. | ||
| Shocking. | ||
| Terrible. | ||
| I want to bring in Philip Patrick from Birch Gold. | ||
| Philip, you and I have been doing this a long time. | ||
| By the way, I don't know if we got Philip or not. | ||
| If not, we'll do it after the break. | ||
| But Philip and I have been talking a long time with Dr. Murrow, Steve Cortez, others about the Biden policies and how they're actually focused on destroying the United States dollar. | ||
| The inflation we've warned about from the beginning. | ||
| Philip Patrick, we got about 45 seconds. | ||
| Just walk us through, what's your headline on what Biden's done and how, is this inflation transitory or is it now baked into the system and going to explode on us, sir? | ||
| I mean, look, even the White House have changed their tune on inflation being transitory. | ||
| That was the line for most of this year. | ||
| Now they're suggesting we may not have toys at Christmas. | ||
| We're facing empty shelves. | ||
| And if there's anything there, expect to pay higher prices. | ||
| So they've certainly dropped the transitory line. | ||
| I think it's a very tough argument to make in this climate. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We'll return with Philip Patrick from Birch Gold to talk about the supply chains. | ||
| By the way, it's not just empty. | ||
| We thought it was going to be empty at Christmas. | ||
| It's empty at Halloween. | ||
| Buttigieg is on, what, three months maternity leave, paternity leave, whatever it is. | ||
| Shocking, shocking, shocking. | ||
|
unidentified
|
all next in the war room war room Pandemic. | |
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| All right, this is the yard. | ||
| It's one of the reasons why everything's backed up is our container yards are stuffed to the tilt with containers. | ||
| We need truck drivers to pick up their goods. | ||
| And truck drivers for us, they're all robots. | ||
| This is an automated terminal pretty much. | ||
| Except for these bad boys right here. | ||
| We drive these. | ||
| These are not automated. | ||
| Right there, you're hearing it from a deplorable. | ||
| This thing is a fiasco. | ||
| I want to bring in Philip Patrick from Birchgold. | ||
| Philip, just really quickly, I know you're one of our British cousins, right? | ||
| Did you ever think that the United States would be in a situation where you couldn't go in a restaurant and order everything off the menu? | ||
| You couldn't go in a store, the food shelves would be empty. | ||
| There's not going to be Halloween costumes. | ||
| There's not going to be Christmas presents. | ||
| I could never predict it. | ||
| I mean, look, everyone knew Biden was going to be a disaster, or most people did. | ||
| I don't think anyone expected this level of chaos. | ||
| So the answer is no. | ||
| I became a citizen of the United States a couple of weeks ago, officially, and looking at the direction we're going, obviously, I'm very proud and thankful to be, but Looking at the direction we're going down, it's a little bit frightening to say the least. | ||
| Let's talk about that. | ||
| You've been one of the most sophisticated guys talking to us for months and months and months about inflation and the impact it's going to have on the dollar, but the fact it's going to have on people's savings, on fixed incomes, on all of it. | ||
| This is just exacerbating it. | ||
| I mean, now we've got like the convergence of so many forces brought on by human action and policy. | ||
| Tell us how bad a path we're on. | ||
| Well, you're exactly right. | ||
| Listen, we know inflation's here, right? | ||
| Courtesy of your Biden administration, courtesy of a Federal Reserve printing huge amounts of money and stimulating the economy. | ||
| McConnell's, you know, given, I think, the Democrats the time they need now to Sort of, they already had the votes they needed to push through this $3.5 trillion for budget reconciliation, so he's just given them the time they need as well. | ||
| So, courtesy of all of this policy, we have inflation, right? | ||
| And it's here already and rising every single day. | ||
| Supply chain issues that we're seeing now just exacerbate the issue. | ||
| As that video showed, we've got traffic jams essentially at major ports here in the United States. | ||
| Same thing's happening in China. | ||
| Things are so bad that Coca-Cola and Walmart now are leasing their own container ships, right? | ||
| This, or these supply chain issues, we haven't, as consumers, even felt that inflation yet, right? | ||
| But the producers are starting to feel it, right, in higher material costs. | ||
| Reflected actually in the producer price index, which is up over 8.3% right now. | ||
| That's the inflation we haven't even seen yet, but manufacturers have. | ||
| And it's a leading indicator of street-level inflation to come. | ||
| So these two forces inflation shortages, they feed into one another, essentially creating a self reinforcing cycle of inflationary pressure. | ||
| It's a disaster. | ||
| It's the worst possible scenario for inflation. | ||
| Okay, Jason Trennert, one of Wall Street's top strategists, Steve Cortez, a hedge fund guy, Peter Navarro, Ph.D. | ||
| from Harvard, and Philip Patrick from Birch Gold. | ||
| You guys have also been saying for months and months and months, the spending plans they have of the five trillion when you add it all up are going to metastasize this. | ||
| It's like throwing kerosene or napalm on a dumpster fire. | ||
| All the other economists say no, no, no. | ||
| But now economists at Yale, others are coming forward and saying, hey, look, this thing is not transitory. | ||
| It's getting fixed into the system. | ||
| We haven't seen the worst of it. | ||
| If you do this massive stimulus right now, you're just going to explode it. | ||
| What are your thoughts? | ||
| You guys have been right on this from the beginning. | ||
| A lot of the guys on these other channels saying, no, no, no, they're totally separate. | ||
| Are they separate or are they one? | ||
| Well, the massive stimulus package they're trying to push through, all these phony names. | ||
| Will this just exacerbate the problem, Philip Patrick? | ||
| The answer is absolutely yes. | ||
| You know, I'd love to hear a strong argument as to how printing huge amounts of money, funneling it through the economy, doesn't lead to inflation. | ||
| It doesn't stack up at all. | ||
| Here's the thing that really concerns me. | ||
| Inflation's bad enough. | ||
| What we usually get in inflationary climates, at least, is a red hot economy to go with it. | ||
| We don't have it this time, right? | ||
| This economic environment in front of us, to me, is increasingly looking like the 1970s, right? | ||
| We have this combination of persistently high inflation with stunted economic growth, and it came to be known as stagflation. | ||
| We called the 1970s the lost decade here in the United States, and this is looking frighteningly like that climate. | ||
| Phillip, I want to make sure people know how to get to you, get your research, do your analysis. | ||
| And I tell you, from the audience members, it's amazing your availability and your accessibility. | ||
| So how do people get to you? | ||
| Very simple. | ||
| You can reach me personally at phillippatrick on Getter, and also, of course, for a lot of good information, birchgold.com. | ||
| Let me ask you just one thing before I let you go real quickly. | ||
| You've been talking about stagflation now for months and months and months since Biden came in. | ||
| Do you look at us, because people I'm seeing now, the smart guys are starting to do some analytics, do you see us potentially going into a major recession under Biden in either the fourth quarter of this year, first quarter of next? | ||
| Yeah, I do. | ||
| I really, really do. | ||
| And you look at all of the economic indicators and they're reflecting it, right? | ||
| Inflation's at a 30-year high. | ||
| Economic growth stunted, right? | ||
| We account for inflation, which is very important in this climate. | ||
| GDP is currently negative 2.5. | ||
| Look at unemployment, right? | ||
| The government is saying 4.8%. | ||
| It's a nonsense, right? | ||
| If you factor in long-term discouraged workers, which basically means people have been unemployed for a long period of time, Short-term discouraged workers. | ||
| Unemployment's closer to 20% in this climate. | ||
| These are the key indicators of a healthy economy, and they're all off. | ||
| So yes, I'm predicting heading into next year, we have recession, correction on the horizon. | ||
| Phillip Patrick, according to him, the Biden Misery Index is 25% or north if you add real inflation and real unemployment. | ||
| Phillip, thank you so much. | ||
| Everybody go to Phillip, follow him on Gettr, but get over to Birchgold. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Another great piece of analysis. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| By the way, next hour we're going to have Robert Beatles. | ||
| We've got a live report from Vienna. | ||
| With our international editor Ben Hardenwell. | ||
| We got Joe Allen on a new piece that's coming up on the Federalist on transhumanism. | ||
| We've also got one of the fathers of the revolt in Loudoun County about how the education CRT is playing in the Virginia gubernatorial race. |
Export Selection