Sept. 1, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:54
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| We're in the War Room. | ||
| Just finished an incredible interview on John Fredrick's Radio Network and Real America's Voice with the one and only, our partner in his national radio apparatus, John Fredrick. | ||
| Let me know as soon as John's ready to go. | ||
| As soon as we're ready to pull John up, I want to find out about this explosive interview. | ||
| With President Trump. | ||
| We're very honored today. | ||
| We've got one of my favorite guys in here. | ||
| Mo Brooks has joined us. | ||
| Congressman Mo Brooks is running for the Senate down in Alabama. | ||
| He's here to join us today. | ||
| Overnight, a couple of big victories. | ||
| Number one, the voting law change in Texas now goes to Governor Abbott's desk. | ||
| Ken Paxson, the team down there, doing a fantastic job. | ||
| And more importantly, I'm not one to really know the technical details of that because it's not really my line of country, but I think Roe v. Wade kind of got overturned last night at midnight when the Supreme Court did not take up this very controversial bill in Texas, but we're going to get the expert. | ||
| From American Principles Project, Terry Schilling is going to join us right after Congressman Borks. | ||
| We've got a lot about Afghanistan. | ||
| We have a lot about 3 November. | ||
| We're going to have a lot about President Trump, and of course we've got Mo Borks, one of the populist, nationalist, conservatives, Tea Party. | ||
| Mo Borks is House Freedom Caucus, all of it. | ||
| Do we have John Fredericks? | ||
| Can I bring John in? | ||
| Okay, just a second. | ||
| Congressman Borks, so yesterday, you know, President Trump talked a lot about Afghanistan in this interview. | ||
| We're going to get John Fredericks up in a second. | ||
| Give us your overview of Joe Biden's performance over the last couple of weeks as far as being, you know, we consider say he's still illegitimate. | ||
| By the way, Rasmussen poll out this morning. | ||
| Jack Versova was getting it to us early. | ||
| 40 to his approval and the Rasmussen poll among Americans. | ||
| 42%. | ||
| Disapproval, 56%. | ||
| But wait for it, wait for it. | ||
| When you talk about independence, I think it's 33%. | ||
| 33% approval. | ||
| That's the proxy for where the country is, because it overweights the Democrats, right? | ||
| And the Democratic Party is still 90% in back of it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
42% overall. | |
| 33% approval by independents. | ||
| And what did we tell you from January 20th? | ||
| Everybody want to curl up in the fetal position? | ||
| Oh, they're going to have 9 new states and 50 new justices. | ||
| The world's over. | ||
| The sky's falling. | ||
| The sky ain't falling. | ||
| We're going to brace these guys up, this regime, every day, question their legitimacy, stop them everywhere, let their own incompetence be shown to the world as they've done, and the American people are going to see it in living color, and they're going to render their judgment. | ||
| Right now, he has no political capital. | ||
| Nancy Pelosi's back up here. | ||
| They're trying to jam through this $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that's for everything but infrastructure with collaborationists collaborators of the Republican Senate, right? | ||
| And then you've got this $3.5 trillion expansion of the big government, $3.5 trillion. | ||
| They haven't gotten any proof on the debt ceiling, and that's why we've got a fire breather here. | ||
| Guys, just let me know when John Frederick's ready. | ||
| Biden's performance, because you know President Trump very well, he's endorsed you, so you know Trump as a leader and as a man. | ||
| Tell me, give me your assessment of Joe Biden. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He is incompetent. | |
| He is extremely left-wing. | ||
| He lacks the mental capacity for the job. | ||
| Quite frankly, when you're in this kind of position, you know you've served in the White House. | ||
| You have information coming from every possible perspective. | ||
| And it's your job as the Commander-in-Chief and the President of the United States to sift through all that information and make a rational, reasoned decision on which direction to take our country. | ||
| He doesn't have the mental capability of doing that, of going through that process, very unlike President Trump in that regard. | ||
| And I think you saw it in spades in Afghanistan. | ||
| He got some bad advice, he got some good advice, he chose to follow the bad advice. | ||
| A good President of the United States, a good Commander-in-Chief would not have done that. | ||
| And this is particularly troublesome given that he's supposed to be the leader of the free world. | ||
| And we can't, he calls it a success. | ||
| And if this is a success, President Joe Biden, I'd hate to see what a failure is. | ||
| This is about as bad as it can get, and it's because he did not follow the path that Donald Trump had set forth. | ||
| He went out on his own. | ||
| In my personal opinion, he was seeking a political photo op come 9-11. | ||
| Regardless of the risk to American lives and American troops. | ||
| That's wrong. | ||
| Did, um, the speech yesterday, where he says, hey, he keeps saying, the buck stops with me, he tries to be Harry Truman, the buck stops, then he blames everybody for everything. | ||
| Give me your assessment of that speech, because the, you know, MSNBC and CNN saying how great it was, and not all of them, but some would say how great it was, it was a presidential moment. | ||
| What did you, what did you think was straightforward and forthright to the American people? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I thought it was deceptive, I thought it was rambling, and I would have liked to have seen him speak from the heart without notes. | |
| It's one thing if you have a speechwriter writing something for you and you're looking at a teleprompter and he's still got the mental acumen to be able to do that. | ||
| But take all that away from him, put him in a leadership position where he has to express his viewpoints without parroting what somebody else has given him, without parroting what the polling data says the public wants to hear given the debacle that we've been through. | ||
| He just doesn't have that ability. | ||
| So in my judgment, he should resign. | ||
| If he does not resign, then Kamala Harris ought to initiate Amendment 25 procedures. | ||
| And if that doesn't happen, then the United States Congress should be initiating an investigation to explore impeachment. | ||
| What are the articles? | ||
| What are the grounds? | ||
| Well, by way of example, the Constitution makes it an impeachable offense to give aid and comfort to the enemy. | ||
| I think most people agree that the Taliban and these terrorist entities in Afghanistan are the enemy, and we certainly did give them a lot of military aid with all the equipment, tens of billions of dollars of worth of military hardware that we just got through giving our enemy, that this president gave our enemy. | ||
| But in addition to that, I think we ought to be exploring what's happening at the southern border. | ||
| Also in the Constitution, there is a duty and obligation of the federal government to protect the states from invasion. | ||
| And certainly California, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, they've been at the point of the spear on that invasion. | ||
| And for clarity, if you look up the word invasion in the dictionary, it's not limited to an armed force. | ||
| It can be any kind of undesirable element. | ||
| And we've got, in mass numbers, illegal aliens crossing our border. | ||
| The definition of illegal means that they're not wanted. | ||
| That is an invasion. | ||
| And instead of Joe Biden protecting us from that kind of invasion across the southern border, he's promoting it. | ||
| That's again a betrayal of his position as Commander-in-Chief and President of the United States. | ||
| So that's another one that should be explored for our... The left's going to sit there and say, this is just xenophobia, nativist, you know, this is the neo-confederate part of the Trump movement when you talk about an invasion on the southern border. | ||
| How do you counter that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I talk about the damage being done to American citizens. | |
| On an annual basis, roughly 2,000 Americans are dead each year. | ||
| Each year, according to federal government crime data, killed at the hands of illegal aliens on American soil. | ||
| 2,000. | ||
| Those Americans would be alive each year, but for the poorer southern border. | ||
| Then you've got what's happening in border security generally with the deadly narcotics that are being shipped across our southern border that account for over 30,000 dead Americans each year from drug overdoses. | ||
| Those are big numbers. | ||
| Those are real people, their mothers, their fathers, their brothers, their sisters, their son and their daughters who are dead because we have a poor southern border. | ||
| And that doesn't even get to the adverse tax consequences to American citizens. | ||
| The average illegal alien costs American taxpayers roughly $9,000 a year in net tax losses. | ||
| That's money that could be used to help Americans or perhaps Money that could have been kept in the hands of taxpayers instead of the federal government, state government, city government, county governments taking it from those taxpayers to then use it to give services to illegal aliens and then you've got the suppression of wages and loss of jobs of American citizens. | ||
| So I focus on American citizens and anyone who takes the kind of position that Joe Biden is taking, they're betraying those American citizens and I'm ready to fight them. | ||
| He's back. | ||
| He's back. | ||
| Feisty. | ||
| Fighting. | ||
| Pissed. | ||
| Gets it. | ||
| All of the above. | ||
| Done with McConnell. | ||
| Gloves off. | ||
| to John Fredericks. John, amazing interview. I think it was supposed to be like 20 minutes, it went almost an hour. We're going to play clips later as soon as we get them pulled. | ||
| Give us your assessment of your interview with President Trump this morning. | ||
| He's back. He's back. Feisty. Fighting. Pissed. Gets it. | ||
| All of the above. Done with McConnell. | ||
| Gloves off. Gloves off. Understands there were 19 quizzling Republicans that stabbed the deplorables in the back. | ||
| Understand that Joe Biden is looking at his watch. | ||
| Could give a rat's ass about who died there. | ||
| Could care less. | ||
| He understands that Jake Sullivan basically said, hey, I had to give up a Saturday at Martha's Vineyard. | ||
| I couldn't go to the beach in the Hamptons. | ||
| I had to deal with these Americans there. | ||
| By the way, we sent them a WhatsApp and they decided to stay. | ||
| He understands this and he took the gloves off. | ||
| And I think, look, I think what you heard today is somebody that understands they stole the election from him. | ||
| We're gonna get to the bottom of it. | ||
| You've been saying it for ever, Steve. | ||
| Signal, not noise. | ||
| Can't get... By the way, he's a fan of your show because a lot of what he said, he got from War Room, right? | ||
| So, signal, not noise. | ||
| And the signal that he said today is, I'm running in 20 24 to save America. And he said, I don't know what the hell I'm going to see, what's going to go on. But you know, you were right when I asked him the question, I said, this was the key. How many seats do Republicans have to win in 2022 for, uh, for you to be convinced to run? And his answer, it doesn't matter what, what the number is. | ||
| As soon as he said that, you know he's in for 2024. | ||
| No question about it. | ||
| Also, what came out today is he's going to stick with McCarthy. | ||
| I think that was obvious. | ||
| A lot of people said, how come you didn't press him on it? | ||
| Look, Steve, I've been doing this a long time, right? | ||
| If I get an answer, I might not want the answer, but that's the answer I get. | ||
| I know what he said. | ||
| I don't have to press him on it. | ||
| He's going to stick with McCarthy. | ||
| He wants nothing to do with McConnell, nothing to do with Brian Kemp in Georgia. | ||
| And I think he understands, too, that he's done with the backstabbers. | ||
| He's done with the people crawling in, begging him for endorsements. | ||
| And then the next day, like Ben Sasser, like Mitt Romney or Mitch McConnell, they stab him in the back. | ||
| And I think he understands the calamity that has gone on here. | ||
| I mean, with the equipment remaining behind, with the whole Biden administration, the open borders on the southern border, I think the president realizes the dire straits this country is in, Steve, based on what Biden has done in seven months. | ||
| You know, the one question I didn't really get to was, you know, you get back in in 2025, you're going to have a $38 trillion Deficit. | ||
| If interest rates go up, this country collapses on your watch. | ||
| He never got there. | ||
| But you're saying he's running the new theme is not Make America Great Again, it's Save America. | ||
| He's got to save America from this regime. | ||
| Save America. | ||
| No doubt. | ||
| From this interview, because you know him as well as anybody. | ||
| You were the one guy that showed up for our Radio Row in 2016. | ||
| He's in, right? | ||
| He's in. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| If there's anything that came out of this thing... | ||
| Donald J. Trump is running for president in 2024. | ||
| No question about it. | ||
| He's going to win Iowa. | ||
| He's going to win New Hampshire. | ||
| He's going to win South Carolina, Florida. | ||
| It's over. | ||
| He's going to be the nominee. | ||
| I don't know who he's going to go up against. | ||
| I don't know where Biden's going to be. | ||
| But Trump is going to be the nominee. | ||
| And he's going to run on all the things that he did. | ||
| And his theme, forget about being great, his theme is going to be, save us! | ||
| He's the guy to save us. | ||
| That's going to be a very compelling message when we get there, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, Rasmussen polls. | ||
| We told you, Rasmussen poll just out. | ||
| Biden's approval, 42%. | ||
| I think Rasmussen's poll started with Biden at 58 or 60. | ||
| It's been a complete free fall. | ||
| And that's including the Democrats. | ||
| They're still at 90%. | ||
| Independence in the Rasmussen poll, in the crosstabs. | ||
| Wait for it. 33%. | ||
| You're down in Nixon territory. | ||
| His political capital is gone. | ||
| John Fredericks, amazing interview. | ||
| We're going to do cuts and play him throughout the two hours. | ||
| Just incredible. | ||
| May want to have you after your four o'clock show. | ||
| Stay on it. | ||
| Come in at five o'clock. | ||
| We'll talk about the interview. | ||
| It's an incredible interview. | ||
| Only John Fredericks could do it. | ||
| Want to thank you, buddy. | ||
| Fantastic job. | ||
| Great job. | ||
| You've got to give me... Let me do a shout-out to... | ||
| To your daughter, Captain Bannon. | ||
| Maureen Bannon came to our Virginia Derby party yesterday all decked out in her hat. | ||
| She looked absolutely fantastic! | ||
| Good thing she takes after her mom, Steve. | ||
| Exactly, a really good thing. | ||
| By the way, I thought it was the Kentucky Derby. | ||
| I know Richmond Downs, but I thought you guys were at Churchill Downs, right? | ||
| It looked like Kentucky Derby Day. | ||
| John, thank you very much. | ||
| Fantastic interview. | ||
| I want to give a shout-out also to Liz Harrington, President Trump's new Chief of Staff, Head of Communications, replaced Jason Miller, doing an amazing job. | ||
| These interviews come in crisp, on point, with tons of information. | ||
| Congressman Brooks, you're running to be in the Senate. | ||
| We've got about a minute and a half here. | ||
| I want to hold you over. | ||
| Tell me about the 19 guys that voted to join hands and work with this regime to have this infrastructure bill, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm very disappointed in their vote. | |
| They're putting America's solvency at risk. | ||
| We don't have the money to do what they want to do. | ||
| And you haven't seen hell break loose in the United States of America until you've seen us go through a national insolvency and bankruptcy. | ||
| That would inevitably cost, if you follow the economic cascading effects, inevitably cost millions of Americans their lives. | ||
| Why do you say that? | ||
| Because this thing implodes, it'll get that bad? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Think of all the people who are now relying on the federal government for their livelihoods. | |
| It might be housing, it might be food, it might be health care. | ||
| What's going to happen to them when suddenly the money's not there? | ||
| What's going to happen when you see anarchy in your inner cities because the police, law enforcement, it breaks down. | ||
| Can't get paid for it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Okay, we're going to be back. | ||
| We're going to talk about what you're going to do about it, right? | ||
| What are we going to do about these 19 guys that are really collaborators to the regime? | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| We've got a packed show today. | ||
| Talk about President Trump's interview with John Frederick. | ||
| We've got Mo Brooks in. | ||
| We've got Schilling. | ||
| Good news. | ||
| You're getting some big wins out there, folks. | ||
| Okay, Roe v. Wade. | ||
| Meltdown on CNN this morning, okay? | ||
| The law in Texas changed. | ||
| Tougher election laws. | ||
| We're going to talk tomorrow when we get back, Congressman Brooks, about the 3 November movement. | ||
| What's it about, why are people spending time on it, and why is it important? | ||
| next in the war room Okay, welcome back here in the war room We're doing this series of specials all week about Afghanistan, and now we just had an amazing interview with John Fredericks and President Trump here on Rural America's Voice and the John Fredericks Radio Network. | ||
| It took almost an hour. | ||
| We'll be deconstructing that. | ||
| We're honored to have Congressman Mo Brooks, who's running for the Senate down in Alabama. | ||
| A very tough fight down there. | ||
| Make sure you go to MyPillow.com. | ||
| Support the fight for freedom, the armor-piercing shell that is Mike Lindell. | ||
| Mike's been out working non-stop with the Secretary of State. | ||
| He's going to have a lot to report, maybe on our weekend show, if not by Labor Day Monday. | ||
| Also, support the manufacturing company, the American manufacturing company up in Minnesota, MyPillow, and of course the worm apparatus. | ||
| MyPillow.com. | ||
| Sales on sheets, toppers, slippers, pillows, across the board. | ||
| Up to 66% off. | ||
| Go to MyPillow. | ||
| You see the square right there next to Hannity. | ||
| That's War Rooms. | ||
| Gotta be promo code War Rooms if you want the special deals. | ||
| I was going to ask you about voter integrity, but CNN's blasting up Mo Brooks. | ||
| You see, we only have the hottest talent. | ||
| Mo's like the hardest get. | ||
| Because all night long, Chris Hayes, Rachel Maddow, now CNN, they're blasting Mo Brooks. | ||
| We had Gates here yesterday. | ||
| They won his records too. | ||
| The corporations, they've gone to the corporations to give them your phone records. | ||
| Include the phone records between you and your wife, right? | ||
| All your personal records? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's the gmails too, okay? | |
| The private communications between myself and my campaign, between myself and my family members, my kids. | ||
| My wife. | ||
| Keep in mind this is CNN that's taking this kind of position. | ||
| They're the ones who adamantly insisted that a process server who went into my house to serve my wife didn't go into our house and they persisted in that position even when we had security videotape that showed that he was committing a criminal offense. | ||
| That gives you an idea of how much CNN loves to go with fake news, loves to misrepresent things rather than tell the truth. | ||
| It's one thing... Does that surprise you? | ||
| Well, when you've got video showing someone unlawfully entering someone's home, no, they don't care. | ||
| They're there to make your life miserable. | ||
| Don't you understand that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're the propaganda outlet. | |
| They're about like Pravda. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| So once you know that, don't you understand that's what they're going to do? | ||
| And by the way, the corporations, the corporations that we've given every tax cut to, every tax break to, all deregulation, it's the corporations they're using as their instrument. | ||
| The progressive left, what I say, the Marxists, are using the corporations to come after the good guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's one thing to limit the request to my having taken a hard stance on voter fraud and election theft and taking on CNN and the socialists and everybody else in that regard. | |
| That's one thing. | ||
| It's another thing if they want to limit their request to communications that related to January the 6th and the rally that I participated in at the request of the White House. | ||
| That's another thing. | ||
| But to go after the communications between myself and my wife? | ||
| You know, some of those things, and my kids, they probably would not want to be splashed on CNN. | ||
| Why should they get access to anything? | ||
| Why should they get access to anything? | ||
|
unidentified
|
By the way, I said... Under the Fourth Amendment, they should not have access to anything unless, first, they're going to be able to establish probable cause before they seize someone's personal communications like this. | |
| But they're just disregarding the United States Constitution. | ||
| Can I have, from the John Fredericks, a great interview on Real America's Voice and the John Fredericks Radio Network, can I have the clip of President Trump talking about 3 November? | ||
| Can I have that clip, and then I'll come back to Congressman Merwertz. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think that people and so many people have told me this. | |
| The reason you lost in Georgia, the two Senate seats, is Mitch McConnell with his $600 vs. $2,000 and using him in the ads. | ||
| Everybody was using him in ads. | ||
| Including him. | ||
| He was buying ads and putting himself in. | ||
| That's the worst thing you can do. | ||
| But also, you lost because people were so angry at what happened on November 3rd because we won that state by so much. | ||
| We want it by so much. | ||
| And I'm telling you, if we don't do what's right, people are not going to vote. | ||
| They're not going to vote. | ||
| They didn't come out to vote. | ||
| I think 800,000 or 900,000 people, they refused to vote. | ||
| It was like a protest. | ||
| I've had people tell me, I voted for the Democrats, sir, because of what they did to you. | ||
| And I understood exactly how they felt. | ||
| They wanted to actually punish the Republicans for allowing that to happen. | ||
| Think about Schumer. | ||
| If he was given the information that Pence should have given and should have presented, where you had in some cases more votes than voters and many, many other things, you know, many, many other things, he would have had a field day. | ||
| He would have never approved that. | ||
| He would have, you would have been, they would have been in lockstep. | ||
| Okay, I want to get to 3 November. | ||
| Mitch McConnell is a disaster. | ||
| Are you going to vote for Mitch McConnell? | ||
| that happened in running our country is that Biden signed 17 executive orders which were a disaster. | ||
| Mitch McConnell is a disaster. | ||
| When you win this seat, are you going to vote for Mitch McConnell to be leader? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I hope that Mike Lee, or Josh Hawley, Cynthia Loomis, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul... I hope someone will run, because we need an alternative, because quite frankly, Mitch McConnell... Is there a worse alternative in the United States Senate, maybe besides Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse, than Mitch McConnell? | |
| Well, I'd already talked with you off-air about one of those that might be worse. | ||
| What about Mo Brooks? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| 3 November. | ||
| A lot of controversy. | ||
| You're obviously a beloved figure in this movement. | ||
| You had this rally. | ||
| 60,000 people. | ||
| No coolers. | ||
| No adult beverages. | ||
| A hot, sticky Saturday night. | ||
| 60,000 coming to see you in honor of Mo Brooks and the President coming down there. | ||
| And you get up on stage, and we don't have time to play, but you're sitting there going, no, elections are all about the future. | ||
| Where does Moe Bork stand on the 3 November movement? | ||
| I think I know where President Trump stands. | ||
| I just heard it. | ||
| So tell me where you stand. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, let me be clear about what I have done, okay? | |
| And also what I've been the target of. | ||
| I've been the target of voter fraud before. | ||
| My first election, the Democrats did not want a Republican elected to the legislature in the northern third of Alabama. | ||
| I was the person who helped breach that dam. | ||
| But in the process, they rigged 25% of the voting machines to register votes for everybody on the ballot except for Mo Brooks. | ||
| 11 out of 45 machines. | ||
| So I have a personal interest in trying to make sure that we eliminate voter fraud as best we can. | ||
| Then after November 3rd, I was the very first United States congressman or senator to publicly state and I'll say it again for you out there in the audience, in my judgment, if only lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens were counted, Donald Trump won. | ||
| And I was the first one to say that and the president thanked me. | ||
| And I led the charge. | ||
| And at first, it was pretty lonely. | ||
| I was the only one willing to go out on that limb and say, look, I've looked at it, and in my judgment, there is massive voter fraud and election theft. | ||
| And ultimately, we got roughly 150 Republican congressmen and senators who joined us with respect to rejection of Arizona and Pennsylvania's electoral By the way, what the left keeps, they did not say flip the election to Donald Trump. | ||
| They said you got to go back to the certification process. | ||
| These electors have not been certified in a process consistent with the Constitution. | ||
| They got to be sent back to the states who requested, Arizona and Pennsylvania specifically. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, we'll see what they do going forward, particularly when we get the forensic audit out of Arizona. | |
| Perhaps there is someone in the United States Congress who has been more publicly supportive of the forensic audits than I have. | ||
| I don't know who it is, if there is someone, but we have to have those forensic audits. | ||
| I've been communicating with Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar probably more than they would like because I bug them so much about what's happening in Arizona. | ||
| I've also been in communication with the people having to pay the bill. | ||
| And that's one of the big problems. | ||
| It should be the government paying the cost of these forensic audits. | ||
| It should not be private citizens who have to dig into their wallet to correct errors made by the government. | ||
| But nonetheless, that's pretty much where we are in Arizona and some of these other states. | ||
| I think the ratio is something like 95% or so is private funding and 5% might be government funding. | ||
| That's not right to put our citizens in that kind of position where they have to pay for these audits. | ||
| What we need to do is we need to hurry up and get those audits out so that the public will understand that with these kinds of audits, there is even more proof of the voter fraud and election theft that transpired. | ||
| Joe Biden clearly in a free fall now at 42%. | ||
| It's stunning. | ||
| No guy in history has ever dropped this far. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| If you look at the 33%, the political capital is done. | ||
| They're here trying to jam through these massive spending bills, which will transform America. | ||
| So with a House that's virtually even and a Senate that is even, they're trying to jam these things through, which are radical transformations of the country. | ||
| The one hammer we have is the debt ceiling, right? | ||
| We have, what, $28-$30 trillion of debt today. | ||
| You just heard John Ferg say if you go out to when Trump will replace Biden, at least in this scenario, it'd be close to $35-$36 trillion. | ||
| What are you going to do about the debt ceiling? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I'm going to do what I've always done. | |
| I'm going to vote against raising the debt ceiling because that's the best way to force the United States of America to act within our means and to minimize the risk of a debilitating insolvency and bankruptcy at the national level. | ||
| Just think for a moment. | ||
| What would the world be like if we didn't have the ability to pay for national defense? | ||
| That's one of the adverse consequences of a central government going bankrupt. | ||
| It's almost unfathomable, the reach The impact of a national insolvency and bankruptcy, but we've got these debt junkies in Washington, D.C. | ||
| who love to get special interest group money, which in turn means that they love spending money we don't have to placate those special interest groups, who in turn give them money to win in campaigns. | ||
| And I'm up against that right now in the Senate race in Alabama. | ||
| Okay, you talk about that. | ||
| Right now, Politico, we're going to go into more in the second hour. | ||
| They have an explosive article. | ||
| It's about It's horrible. | ||
| chamber of commerce large corporations and major progressive groups taking the side of the chinese communist party against working-class people in this country base horrible okay tell me what you're gonna do about it i know it's horrible what is more personal device more books a defender the people in this well i believe that we ought to force fair trade on china We cannot continue with a $400 to $500 billion a year trade deficit where we are hemorrhaging, hemorrhaging our wealth to China. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not only are we hurting ourselves, but we're empowering China to build up a military capability that threatens the stability of the South China Sea. | |
| They're threatening to attack Taiwan. | ||
| A few weeks ago, they even publicly threatened to nuke Japan. | ||
| That's pretty bold stuff. | ||
| And also, that money is being used to develop their bioweapons program. | ||
| Thank you COVID-19 and the People's Liberation Army of China. | ||
| You think the Wuhan, the CCP virus is a bioweapon going awry? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| No doubt in your mind. | ||
| I give it about a 99.99% probability. | ||
| That COVID-19 is a bioweapon that came out of the Wuhan Bioweapons Facility of the People's Liberation Army of the Communist Chinese Party. | ||
| Since they signed a, by the way, we want to ask you to stay over just for a few minutes on the other side. | ||
| No, you got to go, but we're going to take a break and I got to talk about how do people get your website. | ||
| Wouldn't you say that even if it just leaked out, but they exacerbated it as they sent people all over the world, wouldn't you consider that an act of war? | ||
| Yes or no? | ||
|
unidentified
|
If they did it intentionally as a military experiment, then absolutely it is an act of war. | |
| If they did it negligently or recklessly because they failed to have the containment systems, I would consider that not to be an act of war. | ||
| But in either event, Communist China should be compensating every person on the planet who has suffered injury because of either their intentional or reckless or negligent conduct. | ||
| That's what would happen in the United States of America if one of us did it. | ||
| You would move in the Senate to put that forward, the reparations for China? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have legislation in the House of Representatives to do that right now. | |
| China is responsible. | ||
| They should pay. | ||
| We've got a packed show. | ||
| We've got to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Congressman works in the state for a few minutes on the other side. | ||
| Talk to you about how you get access to him. | ||
| We've got Terry Schilling. | ||
| I think Roe v. Wade. | ||
| If it didn't get overturned last night, it got chop-locked, okay? | ||
| First time in history. | ||
| That's because of the work of folks in Texas and people like Terry Schilling. | ||
| Also, there's voter law. | ||
| We got Afghanistan. | ||
| We got more about the Chamber of Commerce working with big corporations and the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| All of it, next, in The War Room. | ||
| Okay, 1 September, the Year of Our Lord 2021, it's Thursday. | ||
| You're in the War Room now with over 82 million downloads on podcasts, of course, live everywhere. | ||
| We're also broadcast in Mandarin, okay, and blown through the firewall by GNews, GTV, nationwide on John Frederick's Radio Network. | ||
| Of course, we're on Dish Channel 219, Comcast on cable and satellite everywhere. | ||
| We want to thank Real America's Voice Streaming. | ||
| Also in Japanese now, I want to thank our audience in Brazil, Australia. | ||
| We're going to have some discussion in the second hour in Australia about the strike of the truckers to kind of force this situation with the vaccines. | ||
| Congressman Mobrooks. | ||
| Real quickly, you're hammering the CCP. | ||
| You're one of the biggest anti-communists in the House or the Senate. | ||
| This bill about reparations from the CCP, where does it stand and what does it actually say? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's in the House. | |
| Nancy Pelosi, of course, will not let it go anywhere. | ||
| That's why it's so important for us to take back the House in 2022. | ||
| But basically, it's real simple. | ||
| China, you have to compensate every American, every American government, for the damages you have caused by recklessly or intentionally releasing COVID-19 on the world with all the damage that has ensued. | ||
| First year, 10% tariff. | ||
| on all imports from China and the United States. | ||
| If you haven't paid reparations, then it goes to 20. | ||
| Then it goes to 30. | ||
| Then it goes to 40, until such time as you've fully compensated America for the damage that you did, either intentionally or through your reckless conduct. | ||
| That having been said, if you agree with me on a lot of these issues, please go to mobrooks.com. | ||
| I'm up against the never-Trump, open borders, debt junkie, special interest group wing of the Republican Party. | ||
| And I need your help if you want a conservative in the United States Senate, someone who fights for our values, not just mouths them during campaigns. | ||
| I'm a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus. | ||
| That gives you a pretty good idea of where I am. | ||
| That's MoBrooks.com. | ||
| MoBrooks.com. | ||
| Thank you so much, Steve. | ||
| Okay, I want everybody today also to become a force multiple. | ||
| Go check out Moe's site, but also take this interview. | ||
| Break it down. | ||
| We're going to have segments of it. | ||
| We're going to push it out there. | ||
| Make sure everybody around you sees this. | ||
| Get to know Moe Brooks. | ||
| One of the best guys in Washington, D.C. | ||
| A good man. | ||
| Okay, Congressman Brooks, thank you so much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My pleasure. | |
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Okay, I want to bring, let's play the clip. | ||
| We've got a clip. | ||
| Okay, complete meltdown overnight on MSNBC. | ||
| Bigger meltdown on CNN this morning. | ||
| The end of Roe v. Wade. | ||
| Is that a fact? | ||
| Let's hear from CNN. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Very good Wednesday morning to you. | |
| I'm Jim Sciutto. | ||
| Breaking overnight, what could be the beginning of the end for Roe vs. Wade in this country. | ||
| As of midnight last night, a new law in Texas which bans all abortions six weeks after conception took effect in that state. | ||
| This after the Supreme Court and a federal appeals court failed to take emergency requests from providers to stop it. | ||
| Many women do not even know they're pregnant until after six weeks. | ||
| Also, a disturbing detail, the new law would allow any private citizen in the country to sue abortion providers or anyone who assists pregnant women in Texas seeking an abortion. | ||
| Opponents argue the law immediately and catastrophically reduces abortion access in Texas, All this as the Supreme Court is set to rule on another abortion case next month which could have implications for the entire country and of course the Roe v. Wade ruling. | ||
| Okay, that was a scene in this morning. | ||
| By the way, they had an actual Jeffrey Toobin, who's their legal analyst. | ||
| Remember, he had a little personal problem there on Zoom, but they still said, no, it's okay, you can come back on here on a family show. | ||
| And he was in full meltdown. | ||
| Said, this is the end of Roe v. Wade. | ||
| Like I said, this is not totally my land, my country, but I want to bring in an expert. | ||
| That's Terry Schilling from the American Principles Project. | ||
| Terry, walk our audience through exactly what happened and how big a deal is this? | ||
| So last year, I'm sorry, earlier this year, Texas passed the heartbeat bill and it went into effect this morning at midnight. | ||
| And essentially, this is one of the most unique laws I've ever seen when it comes to curbing abortion rights, because it's not enforced by the government. | ||
| There are no penalties from the state of Texas or from any localities. | ||
| What it allows, though, is for private citizens to sue abortion doctors or those complicit in committing abortions in the state after a heartbeat is detected. | ||
| So that's the enforcement mechanism. | ||
| It's the people. | ||
| It's something that's never been done before, which is why Planned Parenthood doesn't know what the hell to do right now. | ||
| They're absolutely lost. | ||
| They lost in the Fifth Circuit and now they've gone to the Supreme Court asking for a temporary injunction. | ||
| And I don't know if they're going to get it. | ||
| What I can tell you, though, is this bans all abortions after Heartbeat is detected. | ||
| So it requires that abortionists check for the heartbeat of the child before performing the abortion. | ||
| And if they do detect it, they're not allowed to commit the abortion. | ||
| It's one of the smartest bills I've seen. | ||
| It has Planned Parenthood and utter chaos and a tailspin. | ||
| So we'll see what the Supreme Court comes out with. | ||
| And how the Supreme Court comes down on this issue is going to tell us a lot about how they're going to rule on that Mississippi ban. | ||
| Let me ask you, but wouldn't they have done something to put a stay on this if they were going to act and not just pass on it? | ||
| Wouldn't they have done something before midnight August 31st? | ||
| And so, because now it's in effect, right? | ||
| And I take it, I don't even know how the doctors, like I said, it's not my line of country, so I'm going to ask you a bunch of basic questions. | ||
| How can doctors even get medical insurance given the fact that they could be personally sued now, right? | ||
| This is something, this opens up a whole new venue of risk, right? | ||
| So if the Supreme Court didn't act by midnight, Does that mean they're not going to act? | ||
| Because it seems to me they would have given at least a stay to keep the law as it is until they sort it out. | ||
| And how powerful is this about actual holding the abortionist personal liability and particularly financial liability? | ||
| So we have to be very clear. | ||
| This still allows for abortionists to perform abortions. | ||
| They just can't do it if a heartbeat's detected, which is typically before the sixth week. | ||
| So abortionists can still operate. | ||
| However, their liability insurance is going to go through the roof. | ||
| And rightfully so. | ||
| This bill puts a $10,000 civil penalty on any abortionist who is caught committing an abortion after the heartbeat's detected, or any staff that's involved as well. | ||
| And it doesn't even give exceptions for ignorance of the law. | ||
| The other beautiful thing about this is that women, the women seeking the abortion, cannot have anything put against them. | ||
| And if you think about it, they're really not the killers here. It's these abortion doctors that are doing it. So, it's a super smart bill. The Supreme Court, they're really odd. I mean, they have a bunch of different legal hoops to jump through. So, they we do expect some type of ruling to come from them. | ||
| I think it's likely they could hold this up. But it's going to be very informative to see just how solid our pro-life Supreme Court majority is based on this upcoming ruling. | ||
| So, as of this morning, how is this going to get effectuated? | ||
| Tell me, tell me what's going to happen out in the state of Texas and how many, is this going to now go across? | ||
| I know you got Mississippi, but is this going to go across, is the Texas law a versions of it? | ||
| So now it looks like it's at least got the wink and the nod from the Supreme Court, at least temporarily. | ||
| Is this now going to spread across the country to particularly more conservative states? | ||
| Right. | ||
| So the other conservative, so right now there are 13 states that also have heartbeat bills. | ||
| but they're not enforced through civil remedies where private citizens can sue these abortionists to get the law enforced. So it's their mechanisms are totally different. | ||
| They're enforced from the states. So what we're going to see probably is other states copying this law after seeing the tailspin that Planned Parenthood is. | ||
| They really, I just want to reiterate this, Planned Parenthood has no clue who to sue or where to sue or on what grounds because there's no case right now. | ||
| The effect that this is going to have, so there are around 4,300 abortions that are committed in Texas every month. | ||
| This is going to take that number down from 4,300 to 400. | ||
| It's in a huge effect, and we expect a lot more states to pile on and start passing similar legislation. | ||
| Don't forget, Steve, that one of the hesitancies in passing pro-life legislation is the risk of it getting overturned by the Supreme Court. | ||
| So if the Supreme Court gives the wink and the nod to this bill and this legislation right here, it's going to be a wink and a nod to all the other states to pass their legislation to protect the unborn and save their lives. | ||
| On the way people argue the law, why do people like yourself and others think that the Supreme Court, you know, Amy Coleman Bryant and these others will, Barrett, come down on the side of supporting this? | ||
| What legal theory do you have that because of this mechanism they'll do it? | ||
| Well, so it's their track record in the past. | ||
| Most recently there's been a lot of galaxy brain takes. | ||
| Excuse my, you know, rough analogy. | ||
| But there's been some galaxy brain takes where Amy Coney Barrett's come down on the wrong side on vaccines. | ||
| And so if she's, you know, people are saying that she's coming down the wrong side on vaccines to open up the door to get rid of, you know, some of the private bodily autonomy that allows for the abortion rights to exist. | ||
| I don't see this short long and short of it is we really don't know the Supreme Court is still a mixed bag I'm just hopeful that you know these guys Saw what the movement went through to get them on that Supreme Court and they realize that the moment right is right now to protect The unborn and it's never gonna happen again, Stephen I'm I'm really worried frankly for the country if the Supreme Court does not uphold these this is a 50-year battle and And there's going to be a lot of frustration. | ||
| And the pro-life movement, depending on how the Supreme Court goes, it's either going to die or it's going to take a totally new direction in which we have to buck the legal system and we have to go right to the presidency, to where we have a president that does not enforce the law and actually starts using the law to protect the unborn. | ||
| So, this is a huge case. | ||
| The Mississippi case is huge. | ||
| It's going to change the trajectory of this country. | ||
| Well, I could tell the, we'll get to Ms. | ||
| Sabina in a second, we've got a few minutes left here. | ||
| I knew it was something big because Rachel Maddow broke, she started with this high hosannas to a Biden speech yesterday. | ||
| She was going, she like stops and go, we got breaking news and talked about this midnight, midnight deadline. | ||
| And you could tell from normally here organized thoughts, it was like a plea for help. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They were totally confused. | ||
| So who actually thought of this mechanism? | ||
| Because I know you've got so many smart groups working these. | ||
| How did it come about that the heartbeat bill had this mechanism on the private side versus looking for enforcement on the state side that turns out that might be the key that picks a lock and has Planned Parenthood, which has unlimited resources, unlimited reach to lawyers, on their back foot right now? | ||
| So there is a small little cabal of conservative grassroots fighters in Texas that we've been building relationships with over the past few years. | ||
| But Texas Right to Life had a lot to do with this bill. | ||
| They had a lot to do with it. | ||
| There are some really good, strong fighting legislators in Texas that understand that we have to protect the unborn. | ||
| You know, one thing that I've been talking a lot about lately, Steve, is, you know, you have these blue states that are hemorrhaging voters. | ||
| and they're losing these voters, they're fleeing the economy, and they're going to red states that have good economies like Florida and like Texas. | ||
| And the only way to keep out those blue voters is to pass pro-life and pro-family laws. | ||
| Restrict abortion, restrict transgender access for minors to sex changes, all of that. | ||
| Give these progressives a signal that their social agenda is not welcome in your state, and you'll keep them out, and you'll end up attracting a lot of good pro-family voters. | ||
| But, you know, Steve, one other thing I want to add about the mainstream media freaking out about this is Jeffrey Toobin, right? | ||
| I don't know if you remember this, but he ended up getting one of his good friend's daughters knocked up and then tried to pressure her into having an abortion. | ||
| So that's why he's so passionate about this issue. | ||
| He is not a good man, and he should not be the spokesperson for the abortion movement. | ||
| But here's the beautiful thing. | ||
| This morning he melted down on CNN. | ||
| They had it up, the clip up. | ||
| We went to it. | ||
| I said, this is the one right here, given his background. | ||
| By the time we went to pull it, which is almost instantaneously, it was taken down. | ||
| We're gonna try to grab that, because you're 100% correct. | ||
| They couldn't pick a worse demon to do this than Jeffrey Toobin. | ||
| And he's out there, actually. | ||
| He was at the forefront of doing this. | ||
| Okay, American Principles Project. | ||
| You guys are the cutting edge of this about the American family. | ||
| How do folks get to you? | ||
| I want everybody to pile into this website right now. | ||
| Even if you don't give any money, that's fine. | ||
| You gotta make that decision, but just get the information that Schilling and these guys have, because this is the tip of the spear in this fight. | ||
| How do people get to you, Terry? | ||
| Very simple. | ||
| It's just AmericanPrinciplesProject.org. | ||
| That's our website. | ||
| And you can follow me on Twitter. | ||
| It's Schilling1776. | ||
| It's always fiery. | ||
| It's always interesting. | ||
| At least I try to. | ||
| Rahim always is giving me grief about my Twitter and says that I'm too much of a boomer. | ||
| But I try to turn on my game. | ||
| Good man. | ||
| By the way, as soon as we get, we're trying to have you back on the evening show if you're available. | ||
| We're trying to track down this Toobin clip. | ||
| People have got to see it. | ||
| He's in complete, total meltdown. | ||
| And I'd love to have Terry Schilling talk about Terry. | ||
| You're a good man. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us today. | ||
| And don't want to get too cocky. | ||
| We're not going to spike the football, but there are victories out there. | ||
| One of the lessons of the Right to Life movement, and like Texas Right to Life in these small groups, You have so many small groups at so many different levels that are grinding, grinding, grinding, grinding. | ||
| That's how you're going to take the country back. | ||
| That's how we're going to save this republic. | ||
| It's a grind every day, right? | ||
| And I tell you, the right-to-lifers, they're so humble and decent and indefatigable, they won't give up. | ||
| Massive victory. | ||
| Overnight. | ||
| We'll see how it plays out. | ||
| I've got to tell you, the good guys are winning. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| A lot more coming. | ||
| We've got Frank Wuko, Frank Gaffney. | ||
| We're talking about Afghanistan. | ||
| We're talking about a corporation siding with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| We've also got a shocking bit of analysis about food supplies here in the United States of America. | ||
| All next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is a question for the judges. | |
| There are three other appointees on the court, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and John Roberts, who have spoken out against Roe v. Wade before, although Roberts has later said he supports the president. | ||
| But there are five justices, it appears, the three Trump appointees, plus, there they are on the screen, plus Thomas and Alito, who seem like solid votes to overturn Roe v. | ||
| Wade. | ||
| You know, we've been accused, those of us who have been saying that Roe is about to be overturned as being chicken little, the sky is falling, the sky is falling. | ||
| We'll see, because it certainly looks like the sky is falling now. | ||
| You know, Republicans have been very upfront about what they want to do on the Supreme Court, but they haven't done it yet. | ||
| As of now, as of the Mississippi case, they may actually do it, and we'll see what, if any, political blowback there is. | ||
| You know, it has certainly been a more animating and successful issue for Republicans than for Democrats, but as states start to outright ban abortion, maybe that'll change. | ||
| But I don't hazard a prediction about that. | ||
| Jeffrey Toobin, thanks so much. | ||
| All righty, pal. | ||
| The new overnight signs of progress in the power emergency after Hurricane Ida. | ||
| More than a million people are still in the dark, including all of New Orleans. | ||
| Let's go and kill it. | ||
| It only takes so much of John Berman. | ||
| Jeffrey Toobin right there. | ||
| So, why is that, and by the way, they pulled it down right away. | ||
| Took us the great staff at Real America's Voice in the War Room to dig that up, that clip. | ||
| Why is that, why is he a bad, what's he saying first, Schilling, and why is he a bad spokesman? | ||
| Why is he a bad point person on this topic? | ||
| So I'll do the last part first. | ||
| He's the worst person to be the spokesperson for abortion rights because one, He got caught being very abusive to himself on camera at the workplace during work hours. | ||
| I think it's a different way. | ||
| You would say he was pleasuring himself on a live Zoom call, right? | ||
| And was not fired by CNN. | ||
| Steve, I'm Catholic, so it's called abusing yourself in the Catholic Church. | ||
| That's what we call it. | ||
| I'm Catholic too, but we're trying to broaden it out to our evangelical partners, right? | ||
| I hear you. | ||
| So he's pleasuring himself. | ||
| And so he's terrible, he's a me too guy. | ||
| And he also got caught a few years ago, he knocked up one of his best friend's daughter and wanted her to get the abortion. | ||
| Thankfully she didn't, but this is all publicly disclosed. | ||
| This is a terrible spokesman. | ||
| This is your typical man trying to force a woman to kill her baby. | ||
| And Steve, I just wanna say something. | ||
| I am so sick of these people who are doing everything they can to keep the states from protecting the unborn. | ||
| What is it to Jeffrey Toobin that Texas bans abortion? | ||
| Why does he matter? | ||
| Here's the thing that's hypocritical about Jeffrey Toobin. | ||
| I think that mothers and fathers owe their children one simple thing. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| Nine months in the womb. | ||
| After that, after the nine months in the womb, you can give the baby up for adoption and let it be raised by other parents. | ||
| But as parents, you have a duty to your children to give them food, clothing, shelter. | ||
| Jeffrey Toobin, on the other hand, is fine with mothers and fathers having an abortion, just kill their baby. | ||
| But he also wants us Our parents, us as parents to pay for total strangers to go get gender studies degrees at colleges, to pay for their housing. | ||
| In what world do I have a duty to protect total strangers and give them all of their basic needs, but a mother and a father don't have the duty to give nine months in the womb to their unborn child? | ||
| It's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
| And I think that most Americans are seeing this as the hypocrisy that it is. | ||
| These socialists really suck. | ||
| As a bad, as a, by the way, that's a poll quote for his thing. | ||
| These socialists really suck. | ||
| It's that blinding, it's that blinding analysis, Sheila, that we get you on here for. | ||
| But he's a, he's a smart guy, and he's clearly, he kind of argues your case. | ||
| I mean, he's worried. | ||
| So take us back to that. | ||
| Between Texas and Mississippi, I mean, he's sitting there going, hey, we kind of dismissed these guys as a bunch of clowns, but they're doing it from a level we never thought. | ||
| They're coming at it from the states, not the federal government. | ||
| And they're winning. | ||
| And if people and people on the left don't wake up, they're going to ban abortions in the country. | ||
| He basically agreed with your theory of the case. | ||
| Exactly, Steve. | ||
| And it's because it's right like Planned Parenthood. | ||
| Look, Planned Parenthood, the left, they have the best lawyers you can buy. | ||
| I mean, the best lawyers on the planet to advance their cause. | ||
| And they don't know how to challenge this law in the courts. | ||
| That's the genius of this law. | ||
| And it's not look, Mississippi is different because that's in that bill that's being before the Supreme Court right now. | ||
| That's going to be enforced by the state. | ||
| This Texas bill that they don't know what the hell to do with. | ||
| It's enforced by the people. | ||
| The people can sue these doctors and get civil penalties levied on them for $10,000 for violating the law if they don't check a heartbeat, right? | ||
| So if they actively violate the law and not checking the heartbeat and commit the abortion, or if they commit the abortion after the heartbeat's detected. | ||
| And the thing is, this gets their employees involved, right? | ||
| Because the employees are held liable. | ||
| So let's say an employee, a nurse at the abortionist clinic, sees that a doctor does this and commits an abortion after the heartbeat's detected, they're also gonna be liable for $10,000. | ||
| So then they are incentivized to sue that doctor to get the law. | ||
| This is such a beautiful law, Steve, and it really could be the end of abortion in America. | ||
| Okay, this is why, by the way, all the evangelicals, all the conservative Catholics, everybody says, hey, I don't wanna get into the public square I just stay out of politics. | ||
| This is why you have to get engaged, right? | ||
| This is a living example of how you get engaged. | ||
| This came about by people really just grinding, putting their shoulder to the wheel and getting it done. | ||
| Once again, Terry, not just American Prisoners. | ||
| People want to find out more about what's going on in Mississippi with the case. | ||
| In Texas, who are these groups? | ||
| What's the best way for them to get the information? | ||
| Because I think this is going to fire up people. | ||
| These are the kind of victories. | ||
| Remember, victory begets victory. | ||
| Victory begets victory. | ||
| Always remember that, right? | ||
| No, that's exactly right. | ||
| Momentum is so important in this case. | ||
| The number one place I recommend people to go to to check this out is texasrighttolife.org. | ||
| I think, hold on, it's texasrighttolife.com. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Texas right to life.com. | ||
| They are on the front end of this. | ||
| They're going to be keeping everyone updated on the news. | ||
| You know, Jack told me to tell everyone about my getter. | ||
| It's just shilling 1776. | ||
| I'm pretty active on there as well. | ||
| So there you go, Jack. | ||
| Okay, good. | ||
| We'll put a good mark. | ||
| You'll be back on. | ||
| Schilling, you're doing amazing work. | ||
| Really, you're doing amazing work. | ||
| And part of the amazing work is parental supervision to Rahim, because we know Rahim's on, I think, the Grand Tour of the United States or something. | ||
| So, thank you. | ||
| Brother Schilling, better you than me. | ||
| Brother Schilling, thank you. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| By the way, I'll give a shout-out. | ||
| We're going to take a break. | ||
| We're going to come back. | ||
| We've got Frank Rucco, Frank Gaffney. | ||
| We've got the people at MyPatriotSupply about shortages. | ||
| Talk about the polling and plotting. | ||
| Numbers just came out. | ||
| Private payrolls increased by just 374,000 jobs in August. | ||
| They're supposed to be 600,000. | ||
| It's all coming down around the regime. | ||
| Also want to give a shout out to Lew Oberle Sr. | ||
| He's now, he's a huge member of the posse. | ||
| I think he's 91 years old, 90 years old. | ||
| He's shifting from his own private house. | ||
| He's going to go live in one of these assisted living. | ||
| Didn't want to make the move. | ||
| You know why he didn't want to make the move? | ||
| Could he get war room? | ||
| When they convinced him he could get War Room every day live, he said, OK, I think I'll take it. | ||
| I think I'll take it. | ||
| I think I'll try it. | ||
| So Lou, what we need you to do when you shift over to your new residence the next couple of days, you gotta get everybody there. | ||
| In the assisted living facility, I've got to be a war room 10 o'clock every morning. | ||
| And particularly the ladies. | ||
| We like having the gals. | ||
| Okay, so let's get the ladies all fired up on the war room. | ||
| They're our best. | ||
| They're the best members of the posse. | ||
| Lou Oberle. | ||
| One of the, uh, the salt of the earth. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| As many, many, many folks in the posse are. | ||
| Be back in a moment for the second hour of the war room. |
Export Selection