July 17, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:05
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| So you don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| What the Arizona Republicans are doing here, this process by which they are bastardizing the actual secure election from November 2020, and they're going to produce some result that says that it was some other fraudulent thing, will be used by the Trump part of the Republican Party and the Trump right to cast doubt. | ||
| On the 2020 election, among their most fervent supporters, in a way that none of their failed lawsuits in the past have been able to do. | ||
| They got the actual ballots and they handed them to conspiracy theorists who say that, you know, QAnon is the mastermind, or whatever it is, that they need to use to stop the steal. | ||
| I mean, the craziest parts of the pro-Trump conspiracy theory world have the actual ballots and are going to declare that something different happened in the election in Arizona than what really happened. | ||
| And that will become a lie that they try to live on and build on for a long time to come. | ||
| You watch. | ||
| This is a ridiculous story that will become very dangerous in the long run. | ||
| But come time for a statewide election, a presidential election in Oklahoma in, say, 2020, it was not competitive. | ||
| It was not even particularly contested. | ||
| I mean, Joe Biden didn't even get 33% of the vote in Oklahoma. | ||
| But now, today, NPR reporter Chris Polanski in Oklahoma was first to report on a new effort by pro-Trump Republicans in the Oklahoma state legislature. | ||
| They are now making a public contention, making a public case, that the presidential election results in Oklahoma in 2020 should not be trusted. | ||
| There must be a forensic audit of the Oklahoma presidential election results. | ||
| Because they think it was rigged for Joe Biden? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh yes! | |
| Can't you see? | ||
| Sure, of the 77 counties in Oklahoma, Donald Trump won all 77 of them. | ||
| But if the Oklahoma election hadn't been so obviously rigged for those Democratic cheaters, Trump would have won 200 of the 77 counties in Oklahoma. | ||
| Or something. | ||
| Do the math, you communists! | ||
| They say the election results should not be trusted. | ||
| We're 178 days away from the inauguration. | ||
| We're many, many more days away from the election. | ||
| And yet, in Maricopa, Arizona, Maricopa County, Arizona, they continue to count votes. | ||
| This Cyber Ninjas operation, which has all sorts of things in it that smack of anti-democratic sentiment, continues to count votes. | ||
| I think they're going to count votes until the votes disappear or the number of votes they get are found. | ||
| The fact of the matter is, so far, There have been under a couple hundred votes that are questionable, that are worthy, perhaps, according to the Cyber Ninjas, of further investigation. | ||
| Nowhere near the number of votes that Donald Trump would need to counter his defeat in that county, let alone in that state. | ||
| We now have the House panel, the House Oversight and Reform Committee, which is looking into the cyber ninjas and trying to get them to provide information. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| And to provide context, not just a couple hundred votes, but a couple hundred votes out of more than three million. | ||
| And so when you do hear someone say, oh, see, there was voter fraud, when you put it in perspective and in context, you see how insignificant it was. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, it's insignificant. | ||
| Hey, note to Ali Velchey, 70K, 70,000 more ballots received than requested. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just on that alone, you guys are lying through your teeth. | |
| That is like, that is like good cop, bad cop. | ||
| Hair on fire, comedy, tragedy. | ||
| I'll throw it into clips. | ||
| MSNBC can't figure out whether they want to scare you or make you laugh or anything in between. | ||
| I'm going to let Stephen Caban in the chat room sort this out. | ||
| Steve, what's going on there, man? | ||
| You're on assignment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's the reason that we continue to show MSNBC because at least they have enough respect For the audit and for this audience and for the war room posse to cover it, unlike Fox, unlike Newsmax. | |
| These people now, you know, now Hannity's telling us, oh, it doesn't make any difference. | ||
| They're going to talk a little bit about Georgia. | ||
| No, that we're not going to let Fox get away with that. | ||
| We're not going to let Newsmax get away with it. | ||
| This is the most important story in the world. | ||
| It's driven by dedicated patriots. | ||
| The America First audit. | ||
| The chat room and channel has just announced, I think last night, 25,000 new people. | ||
| They had 50,000. | ||
| 25,000 new people have onboarded in three days since we had Dave Clements, who's going to be on later, on the show. | ||
| Look, they're in absolute panic mode. | ||
| The Rachel Maddow warned months ago when we got our hands on ballots. | ||
| And remember, everything that happened at the hearing the other day does not get down to the basic full forensic account that's going to be announced either this week or shortly after because guess what they're going to count them again just to make sure they're right but everything we're hearing there's a large delta between actual physical ballots they have and recorded votes and that's going to be announced I'm sure Karen Fann is going to send some missive over to Maricopa County about exactly what's going on. | ||
| They're in full meltdown. | ||
| The railhead of this movement is in Arizona, but it's spreading. | ||
| It's not just metastasized in Georgia, which Dr. Peter Navarro has told us from the beginning. | ||
| Is the biggest cesspool out there. | ||
| Maybe only topped by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. | ||
| We know now that Mastriano, they're fighting in Philadelphia, Board of Electors, don't want to turn off any information. | ||
| Shapiro, the Attorney General, who's running for governor, doesn't want to turn in any information. | ||
| Joe Biden has to go up there. | ||
| And this audience and this show forced Joe Biden, as a forcing function, to defend his legitimacy. | ||
| Rachel Maddow couldn't do it. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| Surrogates could do it. | ||
| He had to defend his legitimacy. | ||
| By going through how all these other audits were so great and he's the legitimate winner. | ||
| Well, we're going to see that. | ||
| And right now, the 3 November movement, the only thing we have to focus on is adding people to these chat rooms, adding people to this crowdsourcing, get a million people. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And that is we're going to audit every state, every congressional district. | ||
| I think every state legislature vote. | ||
| We are a massive majority in this country, there's no doubt about it. | ||
| Because a guy yesterday on our show told me, Dr. Peter Navarro said, did Trump win, Dr. Navarro? | ||
| In a landslide, sir. | ||
| Let me put a little clip in here. | ||
| David Clemens, join on Telegram, search America First Audits, right? | ||
| At America's First Audits or at America First Audits chat. | ||
| This is amazing. | ||
| Steve, you said like 25,000 more joined just in a matter of a day or two. | ||
| Hey, Steve. | ||
| One thing, it's like, where's Reince Priebus in Wisconsin? | ||
| Wisconsin is kind of like one of the easiest cases to prove. | ||
| It's all in my report. | ||
| You've covered it extensively on the show. | ||
| I thought Reince was going to ride to the sound of the guns here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's going on in Wisconsin? | |
| I think it's beyond Reince now. | ||
| They just had a state legislature come out yesterday and saying, Hey, we've got to have a full forensic audit. | ||
| Listen, you're going to have this audience needs to pound, pound, pound through emails, text messages, phone calls. | ||
| They're offices in Pennsylvania and in Wisconsin. | ||
| Wisconsin, as you know, Peter, is the lowest-hanging fruit of all. | ||
| That's the one that's most obvious, because although they have a lot of progressives there, they have very tight voting laws, and the clerks change them. | ||
| Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin are the ripe fruit that will fall immediately. | ||
| In Pennsylvania and Michigan, which is the cheating so overwhelming, You're going to have a dogfight, given how tough those political establishments in Detroit and Philadelphia are. | ||
| You're going to be in court, you're going to be battling, but eventually we'll get to all of them. | ||
| But most importantly, we need a full forensic audit of all 50 states. | ||
| We need to get to the bottom of the corruption, not just of the Democratic Party, but their enablers, which is the RINOs. | ||
| The Standard Stock Country Club Republican has allowed this to happen. | ||
| Look at the Patriots in Arizona. | ||
| What you have done, what you have found, has been historic. | ||
| And it's going to change the direction of American history, and that's why I've got to tell you, the inferno we're about to go into is so much harder than what we've come through so far. | ||
| So this is why people have to hunker down, people have to join these crowdsourcing groups. | ||
| It is now time for the Patriots to put their shoulder to the wheel. | ||
| You've got a couple of guests the rest of the show that are going to be amazing, but the intellectual construct of this was done by Dr. Peter Navarro in the days after November 3rd, because he understands, being a Harvard PhD in economics and a guy that His entire life has worked on statistics and no statistical analysis. | ||
| He knew immediately, like every hedge fund guy in the world I know, mathematically it was impossible for Joe Biden to win. | ||
| Mathematically impossible. | ||
| And that's database, evidence-based and science-based. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Quick question here, Steve. | ||
| Finally, Fox came out and acknowledged election fraud based on the numbers coming out. | ||
| Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Outlier, or do you think you've turned the tide of Fox? | ||
| Because so far they're canceling anybody who talks about this stuff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know this. | |
| Tucker's fantastic, and he talked about Georgia the other night. | ||
| But quite frankly, we're not insuring Georgia. | ||
| We're insuring Arizona. | ||
| Fox, and this is the Murdoch's. | ||
| That's who pays their paycheck. | ||
| The Murdochs changed the entire direction of election night when they called it at 930 at night. | ||
| It was outrageous when they did it, and they're going to be proven. | ||
| You know, three people that don't want to see these results next week is General Milley, Mike Pence, and Rupert Murdoch. | ||
| Okay, the Murdochs don't want anything. | ||
| They want to pretend Arizona's not happening. | ||
| Well, guess what? | ||
| it is happening and that is a that's gonna be a physical fact right that you're not to be able to avoid so what's in the end but brett bear said yesterday on the new show after the great by hearing that they always nothing there saving elevation couple hundred votes not to make a difference no bread uh... you know i know you're behind two-digit iq but your producer's pretty good focus that that what's happening in yeah you took the news reader it what's happening in arizona is going to change the course of american history is all driven by | ||
| by a populist movement. | ||
| This is a leaderless movement that's led by patriots, and you had heroes like Senate President Karen Fann, Gunny, State Senator Sonny Borelli, and others, Mark Fincham, patriots out there that were ridiculed, mocked, and you're starting to see guys like Brnovich, the Attorney General, all of a sudden Raffensperger, and George has got old-time religion. | ||
| He wants to fire the Fulton County guys. | ||
| He wants to put it in receivership. | ||
| You know, after he lied, and lied to President Trump, and after he lied to 60 Minutes, it's too late for these rats to come back, okay? | ||
| The people are taking charge of this, and this is what's so powerful about this grassroots move in these chat rooms. | ||
| Crowdsource the information. | ||
| Full forensic audits on all 50. | ||
| you're gonna see that Dr. Peter Navarro's right, that Donald Trump won in a massive landslide because you're gonna get to California, you're gonna get to Illinois, you're gonna get into New York, and you're gonna see the massive amount of votes that Donald Trump actually got in those states, the suppressed votes that you see. | ||
| These are Chicago, New York, LA, the corrupt, they're just as corrupt as Atlanta, they're just as corrupt as Philadelphia, they're just as corrupt as Detroit, and yes, they're just as corrupt as Maricopa County. | ||
| Remember, this is nonpartisan. | ||
| Maricopa County and the senior officials in Georgia are Republicans and they're white. | ||
| This is not about race. | ||
| This is not about gender. | ||
| This is not about political affiliation. | ||
| This is the Uniparty. | ||
| They're corruption. | ||
| They're continued corruption, and this is why it's so breathtaking that the American people, and I gotta tell you, those patriots out there that did the count on the floor itself are the true heroes of this. | ||
| The interesting development in Arizona for me this week was the uncovering of the login server data, right? | ||
| They found like tens of thousands of logins to erase data. | ||
| I always thought like Maricopa County, the Republicans there were Basically have in the back of the John McCainites. | ||
| But I think there might be real criminal misconduct here, Steve. | ||
| Because they don't want us to get our hands on that login data. | ||
| And for them to erase it is a criminal thought. | ||
| Take us out on this block, Steve. | ||
| Thoughts on that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thoughts on that. | |
| You've got to get to the bottom of it, obviously. | ||
| But the buried lead, Dr. Navarro, to quote you, it's the canvas, not the count. | ||
| We've got to get the canvas done in Arizona. | ||
| We've got to get the canvas done in Georgia. | ||
| And then we're going to canvas California, Illinois, and New York. | ||
| You're going to see Donald Trump, as Peter Noir told us, not just one. | ||
| He wanted a massive landslide. | ||
| We're the vast majority in this country. | ||
| We've got to start acting like it. | ||
| We've got to start putting our shoulder to the wheel and say, you're not going to stand in our way. | ||
| We don't want to hear you have to say it's all nonsense. | ||
| We're the vast majority. | ||
| We're going to prove it by data, evidence, and science. | ||
| Dr. Peter Noir. | ||
| All right, my brother, we're bringing in Seth Kessel. | ||
| Stick around if you want. | ||
| Otherwise, it's a great day here in America. | ||
| We are going to get to the bottom of this with the November 3rd movement and the power of the American people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro, sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon, who you just heard in the last segment. | ||
| We are going to get a gentleman up now, we hope, Seth Kessel. | ||
| He's a former army captain in military intelligence. | ||
| Let's not bury that lead. | ||
| And what he's been doing is kind of a forensic Investigation of voting patterns across the country and I think what's interesting about it from what I can see is it dovetails nicely with the kind of work I did with the Navarro reports and If we can bring in Seth Denver, see if we got him on the line Not yet, okay so | ||
| Here's the issue. | ||
| What we're going to do when we get Seth up, we're going to talk about how if you look at kind of historic Democrat voting patterns and kind of compare them to what happened, you're going to see like a dramatic, inexplicable push in what happened in the 2020 election. | ||
| And this is the kind of thing that we need to understand. | ||
| We need the receipts, right? | ||
| And we need as much statistical evidence. | ||
| When I did my report, in the first volume of the report, there were a number of very strange statistical anomalies that we observed, particularly in the hours after midnight of November 3rd. | ||
| What we're finding now in Arizona, for example, we have 70,000 more ballots received than requested. | ||
| Let's think about that for a minute. | ||
| It's like, okay, so X number of ballots were supposed to come in from the people who they were sent to or requested, right? | ||
| And you've got a number over and above that. | ||
| And that simply shouldn't happen. | ||
| There are also kinds of things where just by lax rules, whether it was Michigan or Pennsylvania or Arizona, where they allowed voters to come in and vote sometimes after the election, contrary to state law. | ||
| So how are we doing here? | ||
| We got Seth on the line? | ||
| Working on it. | ||
| Bottom line here is what we're trying to do across the six battleground states and now out to the chat rooms around the rest of the country for the 50 states is to get back to all of the different kinds of election irregularities that we have. | ||
| So let me talk a little bit about what I found in my report and just do a little deeper dive into the outright voter fraud. | ||
| One of the things, obviously, is the dead voters. | ||
| It's like, okay, people dead voted, okay? | ||
| It's like the Sixth Sense election, if you remember that movie. | ||
| But the bigger problem here is what we call the ghost voters. | ||
| And this is where I think a lot of the fraud can easily happen. | ||
| A ghost voter is when you get a ballot coming in from an address. | ||
| Good morning, Dr. Navarro. | ||
| Jane Doe is coming in and you count that ballot and then you actually go to the address and there's no Jane Doe. | ||
| That would be your quintessential ghost voter. | ||
| We're going to bring Seth Kessel in now on the phone I assume here. | ||
| Seth, are you there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good morning Dr. Navarro, I'm here. | |
| Okay, the floor is yours. | ||
| Let's focus initially on Arizona and Georgia, because these are the ones that are specifically in play, and then we'll go around the world. | ||
| But tell me, tell our audience kind of what your statistical approach is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I'm a 30,000 foot data analyst. | |
| I'm going to go over the entire country, county by county, as we have slides that show that. | ||
| And I'm able to see, based on historical trends, some of these going back over 120 years, based on population growth, based on party registration, where that's available, and that's available in places like Arizona, and able to quickly identify where the data is off, where the trends are off, where the trends have been reversed or interrupted against what registration numbers may say, and really identify locally for these audit groups where the biggest issues are and what the best low-hanging fruit to chase is so we have fruitful audit. | ||
| And in Arizona, People need to look back at history and understand about Arizona. | ||
| It's one of the biggest Republican strongholds that there's been since World War II, won by the Democrat candidate two times in 1948 and 1996. | ||
| But in 96, when Bob Dole managed to lose Arizona, he still carried Maricopa County. | ||
| Trump carried Maricopa County in 2016 with fewer votes than Mitt Romney had in 2012. | ||
| So to believe the number that's certified in Arizona, you have to believe that Donald Trump decided to gain a Republican record of 248,000 net new additional votes in 2020 just so he could turn around and lose this county for the first time in 72 years. So what we have on the Biden increase column, 338,000 vote increase over Hillary Clinton's increase and over her total just so they can win the state by 10,000 votes. | ||
| So from a data perspective, that's what you see is they needed every single one of these votes, the stuff that the cyber ninjas talked about the other day, just to get over the top. | ||
| So that is why people looking at Maricopa County without a knowledge of their history should understand why people are at arms about these numbers. | ||
| Do you look at, Seth, do you look at how the votes for president track with some of the down-ballot stuff? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| I think that if we really laid all the cards on the table, the entire country, I think you would see a pickup of at least five Senate seats for Republicans. | ||
| You would have Perdue in Georgia. | ||
| People aren't talking about Perdue, but on November the 3rd, he was pushed out of the 50% threshold by about 14,000 votes. | ||
| So he would have won on election night if not for the massive amount of fraud that occurred in Georgia. | ||
| And then you have Jason Lewis in Minnesota. | ||
| You have Mark Ronchetti in New Mexico. | ||
| You know, probably Martha McSally in Arizona, and absolutely John James in Michigan. | ||
| Plus, the House would have flipped Republican as well. | ||
| There's a couple governorships. | ||
| Dan Forrest would have been the governor of North Carolina. | ||
| That's a state that few are talking about, much like Texas, where the numbers are just tremendously off. | ||
| But because Trump still carried those states, it's stuff that's really ignored. | ||
| Which is why we have these audits everywhere. | ||
| Yeah, this is why I think the work David Clements is doing on on going around to all 50 states and get audits done is going to be so important. | ||
| We're going to be talking with him soon. | ||
| What's your take on Georgia? | ||
| Is it worse? | ||
| Of the six battleground states, what's the one that jumps out at you the most in terms of anomalies? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're all pretty bad. | |
| Like you've said on the show many times, Wisconsin is the easiest one to prove, given that most of the endpoint fraud occurred in two counties. | ||
| Nevada's the second way, since most of their votes come from Clark. | ||
| But I would say the one that disgusts me the most is Pennsylvania. | ||
| And the reason why is because they have a very predictive indicator of the trajectory of their next election, which is party registration. | ||
| The Democratic Party in the Midwest, in the industrial Midwest, or Westville as we call it, is going extinct. | ||
| Republicans had a net new voter registration advantage of 21 to 1 in the last four years, which perfectly indicated Trump's victory in 2016. | ||
| 21 to 1? | ||
| Yep. | ||
| 242,000. | ||
| 242,000 new Republicans registered. | ||
| 12,000 Democrats. | ||
| In the state of Pennsylvania? | ||
| Pennsylvania. | ||
| Is that in the state of... Pennsylvania was not a nail-biter state. | ||
| This was an easy 3-400,000 vote state. | ||
| So that one makes me the sickest. | ||
| George is pretty bad. | ||
| So let's stay on that for a minute. | ||
| When you do your county by county, what pops out at you there? | ||
| Was it all counties stole or was it Philly County or what? | ||
| Bucks County? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was a 67 county operation. | |
| So you have an operation to shave Trump's totals in the rural counties and in the suburban counties and in these These Democrat Siberia counties where they have absolutely no support anymore. | ||
| So instead of Trump having 80% margins or 80 to 20 kind of wins, you have 65 to 35 kind of wins. | ||
| I did a show recently where I looked at Butler County, Westmoreland, Luzerne County. | ||
| And by the way, Luzerne County has gone to the winner of Pennsylvania in every election since 1936, regardless of party. | ||
| And then York County. | ||
| And just in those four counties alone, I estimated that Trump's margins were cut by 62,000 votes in a state where he supposedly lost it by 80,000 votes. | ||
| So it was a 67-county operation. | ||
| He still managed to trend a few counties out in the West more Republican, but only 20 counties overall were more Republican than they were in 2016, despite 60 of them becoming more Republican in registration, which was perfectly predictive in 2016 that he would flip the state. | ||
| Could you account for this simply through a higher voter turnout? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's the, that is the excuse. | |
| So every statistical indicator that's been good for decades, if not more than a century, is being explained away as high voter turnout, which shows that the coronavirus pandemic was, was exaggerated to allow for relaxing the integrity of the voting laws, particularly absentee ballots. | ||
| But you'd also, in Pennsylvania, need to believe that When Barack Obama, after eight years of a Republican administration that finished very poorly, with all the women in the back, all the unions supporting him, record minority turnout, soft Republicans, that Trump is not only going to go blow by Obama's total in a state with a declining population, but also Joe Biden is going to go blowing past Trump's total in a state where the Democratic Party is massively being walloped, and they're actually still being walloped to this day. | ||
| Where are you taking this analysis next? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's going all over the audits, the audit channels, the America First audits. | |
| We have a ton of traction, people in all these states that nobody's talking about, places like Washington State, Oregon, places that we've kind of written off as so-called blue states where there's tremendous anomalies. | ||
| So Trump up 363,000 votes in Washington State. | ||
| One of the Republicans couldn't budge for three straight elections. | ||
| So there's massive traction. | ||
| New, big tent-type voters. | ||
| Do me a favor. | ||
| I want to hang on. | ||
| We're going to take a break now, but phone back in. | ||
| We're still having a little trouble with your line. | ||
| I'm bringing David Clemens in for the next segment. | ||
| I'd like to maybe have you interact with him if we can get your phone working. | ||
| This is the War Room, Steve Bannon's War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be back forthwith. | |
| War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon, and what we're going to do now is jump right to a gentleman at the Concord Bridge here, basically helping to organize the grassroots. | ||
| I'm going to bring in David Clemmons now. | ||
| First of all, you have some news, David, about the growth The numbers talk to us a little bit first about that and then I want to walk you through the mechanics of how people can actually Get involved and what they can expect When they log in and through the telegram site Sure. | ||
| Well, there are there are three major audit groups out there The one that's the largest the one that will direct your viewers to at least for now is the America first audits They've got a one-stop shop To get patriots involved, basically find their digital quarters and get involved in the election audit movement. | ||
| And so last time I joined... And that's on Telegram, to be clear? | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| That's on Telegram. | ||
| And last time I was with Steve on air, we had about 50,000 patriots that were in the various state chat groups. | ||
| Now we're up to 75,000. | ||
| And we have representation in 43 states in that group alone. | ||
| That main channel of America First audits. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have representation in all 50 states. | |
| Let's walk through this. | ||
| So let's suppose that I live in Orange County, California, hypothetically. | ||
| And I want to put some pressure on the local board of elections there. | ||
| How am I going to join your effort and how are you going to direct me through the maze so that I can be talking to Californians in the chat room rather than everybody? | ||
| How does that work mechanically? | ||
| Well, first you just got to download the app and get on Telegram. | ||
| Once you get on Telegram, it's absolutely free. | ||
| You'll look for America First Audits and at that point you'll have a main administrator that can direct you to whatever state. | ||
| So we have a state set up for California and that would be at C-A-L audit chat. | ||
| So, if you're a Californian and want to get involved, you go through the main channel, we'll direct you to your state. | ||
| It's that easy. | ||
| At that point, there's a little bit of an organic... Let me ask you this question. | ||
| Are these live chats or are they kind of asynchronous chats where you can put information in and come back in an hour and see? | ||
| Or are they live? | ||
| Asynchronous you can come back so you can you can drop data come back check comments It can feel very live because you can stay on there and monitor traffic non-stop But there is the ability to create independent live chats in the sense that you could actually have people communicate to one another and that's another function that telegram provides And then the canon of Bannon, it's action, action, action. | ||
| It's like, if I'm in a specific community, what are my agency in terms of what can I do actually, other than talk about what's going on? | ||
| What's the action, action, action through these chat rooms? | ||
| What are we trying to do here? | ||
| Well, it's one of the major failures of Say the Republican Party is that they're very good at command and control. | ||
| They're not very good at spontaneous liberty. | ||
| So we have to let these audit channels breathe because you've got a lot of patriots that don't want to go through the traditional channels. | ||
| They're very distrustful. | ||
| So we have to be very flexible on how we direct people because they're going to do whatever they want. | ||
| And that also inoculates us from being attacked easily. | ||
| So that's actually a good thing. | ||
| But for example, one of the things that we can do. | ||
| is have people like Captain Seth Cashel who is dropping statistical analysis within each of these state chat rooms. | ||
| We can have someone like Lisa Draza-Smith who's a former National Syndia Labs cybersecurity expert. | ||
| She's also providing data. | ||
| We've got Dr. Douglas Frank. | ||
| So we've got experts that are communicating and giving this information that is reliable. | ||
| I mean these are expert mathematicians. | ||
| With that what we're doing is prompting each of our patriots to Contact your county GOP. | ||
| Contact their libertarian parties and give them the information and confront them with it. | ||
| So we can basically adopt Dan Schultz precinct strategy and make sure that we have the most informed patriot group out there to ensure that we have accountability. | ||
| And if they don't want to play ball with us, we'll help support these folks, run them out of office. | ||
| And in terms of the administrators that are in place on these things, is this something that your organization does to recruit these administrators and you supervise them? | ||
| Or is it just organic? | ||
| How does this work? | ||
| It's a little bit of both. | ||
| So we have to account for infiltration. | ||
| We have to account for trolls and bad actors. | ||
| And so we're building protocols on how to identify trolls. | ||
| You see a troll, you toss a troll. | ||
| We have some white hats and some security experts that are doing vetting to create trusted admins and committees in each state. | ||
| We have very good admins in many of the states. | ||
| We're still developing it. | ||
| So, we actually have 50 skeletons in America First audits, but we're still looking for admins in 7 states. | ||
| What does that mean? | ||
| Well, we have the structure. | ||
| We have the chat channels for all 50 states. | ||
| 43 are ready to go. | ||
| We have 7 more that we're actually trying to vet right now to make sure that we have the right admins and the right message discipline to ensure that we can keep these chats and channels clean. | ||
| We're going to be under attack. | ||
| We know that. | ||
| It's organic but we have a plan to make sure that we have healthy bots that can throw out the bad messages and people that are just there to start trouble because we are seeing an uptick with that. | ||
| We have the bad with the good. | ||
| And is your organization kind of organizing this or I mean how many people do you have involved in this? | ||
| Is there any funding or people helping with the donations? | ||
| Is there any way you can You can solicit small donations or something to help finance this. | ||
| Anything you want to share on that? | ||
| Well, all I can tell you is this isn't my organization. | ||
| I am just a trumpet of sorts for the folks that have organized it spontaneously. | ||
| But I know many of the admins that are responsible, at least on the main channels and the states that I'm involved in getting audits set up. | ||
| So it's liberty at its best. | ||
| So if people need donations or money, we basically direct resources and people Do a call to arms. | ||
| There's many times where we've asked for fundraising. | ||
| So, for instance, we needed more funds for Arizona and we were able to raise close to $285,000 over the past two weeks to ensure that they had the resources necessary there. | ||
| And so this is just by us vetting. | ||
| Focus on that. | ||
| Focus on that, David. | ||
| Like, who are you raising funds for and how was the money spent? | ||
| Well, it's so Arizona, you know, there are four Major contributors to the audit that are through We The People groups. | ||
| You've got the groups that were set up through Sidney Powell, through Lynn Wood, through Matt DiPerno, and I also believe that Patrick Byrne and General Flynn have organizations. | ||
| There's non-disclosure agreements on just how detailed they can be in ensuring the accounting, but we vetted those four as good sources and we know that the money is getting directly sent to Doug Logan, Cyber Ninjas, and the groups. | ||
| And so, that's, those are the main four. | ||
| There have been promises from the GOP to donate money, and we're having problems with confirming whether a dollar, a single dime is going to these groups from the Republican Party. | ||
| Are you dealing with the, are you dealing, David, with the Republican National Committee and Ronna McDaniel on that? | ||
| Or when you're asking for Republican money? | ||
| We don't ask them. | ||
| We know that they've basically fundraised tens of millions of dollars for election integrity. | ||
| Where they're spending that money, we don't have a clue. | ||
| We haven't found out where one single dime has actually gone to these audits. | ||
| So at least earlier on, there was a fundraising effort On behalf of the RNC to take people's money, but they're not putting it back in the audit. | ||
| So we've steered everyone clear of the RNC and the Republican party. | ||
| We're going through these Patriot groups because we can account for it. | ||
| So Matt DiPerno, for instance, the $285,000 that was donated that I can speak to, I just got an update today from him and know that that's going directly to Cyber Ninjas in Arizona. | ||
| So we were demanding accountability one way or the other. | ||
| So in Arizona, the calls to action, we've got this problem with the Board of Supervisors there, who are Republicans, who are doing everything they possibly can to get in the way of the audits. | ||
| Are there specific call to actions to contact them, or what would be the ban on action, action, action? | ||
| I think it's really important, David, that when you get... we want a million people in these things, okay? | ||
| We'd love to see a million patriots, basically, going across the 50 states. | ||
| It's important to have action, action, action, so these folks can do more than just chat, right? | ||
| The mission, really, is change, not chat, right? | ||
| So tell me, is there a... do you have, like, strategists who are, like, thinking about what each action is going to be in which states? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Well, Arizona's was one of our earliest audit chat groups. | ||
| It's been around the longest and we've got various. | ||
| You also have conservatives take action, which is another audit group. | ||
| These folks are on the ball. | ||
| So if we have a problem and we need to exert pressure on a judge or we need to exert pressure on legislators, if we need to exert pressure on the bad ones and also lift up the good ones, we have calls to action where we'll give you an entire list of emails. | ||
| Phone numbers and we can confirm that we'll get thousands of emails sent like that. | ||
| Phone calls where they're actually turning off the phone lines and not receiving messages from Patriots. | ||
| So we have inundated these systems. | ||
| And so to a larger degree, Arizona, the audit there, we the people basically pushed and dragged many of these legislators. | ||
| We had some that were on the go from day one, Mr. Borrelli, Ms. | ||
| Phan. | ||
| And you had some others that I won't name that were fair weather testing the air to see whether they wanted to get involved in the audit movements. | ||
| They're now firmly a part of this because we the people have spoken up. | ||
| But it's been through efforts in these channels to identify names, numbers, emails, and we activate these Patriots. | ||
| And Arizona, the reason why we're not going away is we have entire groups dedicating to watching the live feeds of the audits through these channels. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we are posting and sharing information. | |
| We buried the lead. | ||
| We got to the best part towards the end of the interview. | ||
| You're doing really patriots work here. | ||
| David, I want you to keep us posted here on the War Room as your numbers grow. | ||
| Everybody out there in War Room land, give this a try in your state and see how you can use your own agency I'm going to let you go now, David, because I want the last minute here to go off on a little bit of rant on what you said about the Republican Party, okay? | ||
| Because here's the deal. | ||
| Message to Rona McDaniel. | ||
| Message to Mitch McConnell. | ||
| Message to Kevin McCarthy. | ||
| Message to all you traditional Republicans who have had your head, I'll say, in the sand, but I'm thinking something else. | ||
| On this whole election issue. | ||
| McConnell, Mitch McConnell, you fool. | ||
| You should have the Senate. | ||
| You should be the Senate Majority Leader. | ||
| If you were smart enough to join hands with the people of this country and challenge these elections, you would have probably a 53 to 47 majority in the Senate. | ||
| And Seth Kessels told us that. | ||
| David Clemens is trying to help you do that. | ||
| You gotta get involved, RNC. | ||
| Rona, we're holding your feet to the fire. | ||
| Rona, we're holding your feet to the fire. | ||
| Get into this, help these guys out. | ||
| Show me the money! | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Steve will be back Monday morning, hot as the proverbial firecracker. | ||
| I want to finish out with a little pitch for my pillow. | ||
| Did wake up this morning in geese's sheets. | ||
| Did take a shower and use the $39.99 special. | ||
| Bought six towels. | ||
| What was interesting about the towels is I actually compared them to the towels I had bought on Amazon a while ago, where I got like, okay, yeah, the Alcantara, this, that, and the other thing. | ||
| Did like a blind field test on that. | ||
| Lindell's towels won on that so you got specials Giza sheets two for one two-inch topper 50% off just go to my pillow calm the promo code war room support look Lindell this guy is is the Patriot of the year my my view because he's fighting for us and | ||
| And all he gets from that is like grief from the cable news stations that he's helped support for the last five years with his advertising. | ||
| I mean, it's like crazy stuff. | ||
| They treat him like dirt. | ||
| Here in the War Room, we treat him like he's in his sheets, like they're beautiful sheets. | ||
| So anyway, support Mike Lindell. | ||
| Okay, today, the theme basically, November 3rd Movement. | ||
| This, I think, I think with the news from last week, I think we've turned a corner because we're beginning now to get hard results out that are consistent with the stuff that I projected in my reports. | ||
| We're seeing folks like Tucker Carlson and Fox finally talking about this and not getting blowback from within apparently so they can maybe keep talking about it. | ||
| We're going to get some more hot results next week but I want to caution you here as these results come out the fight Really, it's just beginning. | ||
| We've seen Biden. | ||
| We've flushed him out this week. | ||
| He's had to try to come to the rescue. | ||
| Rachel Maddow wasn't enough, so they brought in big Joe Biden, like, wringing his hands, clutching his pearls. | ||
| Hey, Joe, you stole the election. | ||
| And you didn't steal it because you were asleep in your basement, but the folks who were behind you, like, well, you know who they are, stole this election. | ||
| What I want to do now is go back and talk just briefly with Seth Kessel, who we talked with in the last segment. | ||
| Seth, I want to ask you, what are the kind of surprises you're likely to basically get up on the board next? | ||
|
unidentified
|
People need to be diligent about going after every state, which is why we started an audit group for everything. | |
| Uh, Minnesota's a state that you have to believe that Donald Trump's campaign spent millions of dollars and time and energy going to campaign in Minnesota just so they could lose that state as badly as Mitt Romney lost it in 2012. | ||
| So there's some hidden treasure out there. | ||
| You have the Attorney General of Minnesota on Election Day, late in the afternoon, this is Keith Ellison, putting out a tweet saying they don't have the numbers to defeat Donald Trump in Minnesota. | ||
| And you're telling me they didn't know that they were going to win the state by 7%. | ||
| So not only do you have the 10 electoral votes there in Minnesota... Seth, let me say something about Minnesota, because that was one I worked really hard on at the White House. | ||
| The thing about Minnesota, people think about Minneapolis and St. | ||
| Paul kind of as moderate areas, things like that, but what you have to understand about that state, if you go up to the Iron Range, That's where all the iron ore comes from to support all the steel mills that President Trump basically got up and running again with stuff like steel tariffs that I personally worked on. | ||
| And there's a lot of logging up there. | ||
| There's some areas there which are very mineral-rich that the President developed. | ||
| So we thought, based on everything I was seeing, that we would win that state. | ||
| So you're telling me, Seth, Based on your numbers, that's likely what happened. | ||
| Is that what you're saying? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| So Pennsylvania and also Iowa, based on their voter registration trends and their recent voting history, reflect the same trends in Minnesota. | ||
| With the working class moving heavily towards the Republican side and also Trump reconsolidating the traditional base, the conservative base, the suburban base even. | ||
| You can look in the Texas suburbs, 20-30% vote increases for Trump in the suburbs as well as Georgia. | ||
| Which makes, and other things that people are going to dig up, you know, we're not even looking at states. | ||
| Trump won. | ||
| I already mentioned North Carolina. | ||
| The registration data and the trends for North Carolina suggested a six to eight point Trump win, not a one point Trump win. | ||
| Texas, Texas, you have 1.4 million new Democrat votes. | ||
| So Biden gained 1.4 million votes, which is double their previous vote record gain. | ||
| We have Tarrant County, Texas, which flipped for the first time in 56 years for an anti-energy campaign as Trump put up a Republican vote record. | ||
| Florida, the entire panhandle turned at several points towards Joe Biden, even though you have massive Republican registration numbers and Democrat extinction in the panhandle. | ||
| So people are not paying attention. | ||
| To be clear here, Seth, what your numbers are saying at the 30,000 foot level is these are anomalies that are likely attributable to election fraud. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely, because when Republican nominees are not popular with the base, you see exactly what you saw in 2008 with McCain flat to Bush, and then 12 Romney flat to McCain, and then Trump 1.0 flat to Romney. | |
| And you have a massive increase for Trump, where since 1878, you've never had a nominee gain votes and not be re-elected. | ||
| Well, we need action, so I'm going to say right now that Lieutenant Governor of Texas has known about these numbers in Texas for seven months. | ||
| And we've had no action, even though there was a $1 million reward put out for information about election fraud. | ||
| Florida, Florida was able to exploit Trump's victory. | ||
| Why is it the Lieutenant Governor that's pivotal in Texas, not the Governor or the Attorney General? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, he is widely considered, that office is considered to be the most powerful office in Texas. | |
| Very influential. | ||
| He's had a lot of sway, Dan Patrick's had a lot of sway with the grassroots conservative base. | ||
| And, you know, obviously we had the crazy election night of November the 3rd, but with Texas being still almost six points in the Trump column, it's something that's overlooked. | ||
| But the margin in Texas was eaten into by 300,000 votes, even with a record Republican vote gain, and also the entire Rio Grande Valley and even El Paso County trending Republican. | ||
| Massive losses. | ||
| Alright, Seth, we're going to close out here. | ||
| Anything for your social media, any way to get a hold of you, see your stuff? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| I'm on Telegram at Real S Keshel. | ||
| That is my channel, K-E-S-H-E-L. | ||
| And I have a Twitter handle, at S Keshel, but I'm using that less and less as I found out just how much they suppress dissent. | ||
| Well, you gotta get on Getter. | ||
| G-E-T-T-R. | ||
| Get that app today. | ||
| Everybody on the War Room, get that app, because they won't suppress your stuff. | ||
| It's the Twitter killer. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Honored to serve here on the War Room today. | ||
| Stephen K. Bannon will be back with you Monday morning, 10 a.m. | ||
| Eastern Time. | ||
| You have a great weekend. |
Export Selection