July 1, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:07
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Well, look, in terms of loyalty on this front, Erica, it's not clear to me how much Donald Trump can do other than, say, help pay legal fees. | ||
| We don't know what the structure is in terms of payments on Allen Weisselberg's legal fees. | ||
| We don't know, you know, who is covering all of this. | ||
| We don't know what method that they're using to try to make sure that their lawyers are getting paid. | ||
| This is, as you know, been a source of contention with Donald Trump previously with his lawyers. | ||
| So in that respect, I'm not sure how much Donald Trump can do in terms of loyalty. | ||
| My question, though, I guess to your point, is does Donald Trump try to distance himself from Allen Weisselberg in some way? | ||
| If he does that, then I do think, and we have seen him do that with other people before, that'd be very, very hard to do with the CFO of your company who has been there for decades and who has seen everything, knew Trump's father. | ||
| I just think it would be extremely hard to do. | ||
| And I think Donald Trump is aware of that. | ||
| in terms of Weisselberg's loyalty to Trump, again, yes, he is very loyal. | ||
| He has been very loyal. | ||
| He knows where a lot of financial secrets, if there are any, are. | ||
| But he is an older man. | ||
| He has kids who have also been swept up in this investigation. | ||
| He could be worried about them. | ||
| He could be worried about himself and any potential prison time. | ||
| So what this looks like going forward, I think, is a huge open question. | ||
| And anyone making declarations right now, this morning at 6 a.m., before we have seen this indictment, I think is making a mistake. | ||
| Okay, Maggie Haberman goes on to say that she thinks this is going to be a major roadblock for Donald Trump running for the presidency in 2024. | ||
| Raheem Kassam, thoughts and observations. | ||
| Jack Pasovic, thoughts and observations. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you know, how many times have we heard this story before, right? | |
| The walls are closing in, this is going to be a, you know, there is a, it's a narrow, there's a narrow band of people that this type of narrative appeals to. | ||
| I got a, I got a buddy whose mom is actually kind of into this stuff, right? | ||
| You know, this is the guy who's gonna, first it was Mueller, right? | ||
| You know, and then it was Avenatti, then it was the impeachment, then it was the next impeachment, and then now it's all, it's Vance. | ||
| Now it's Vance. | ||
| It's all Vance is gonna get him. | ||
| And so, this does appeal to people. | ||
| It's the Rachel Maddow crowd, it's the Wine Moms, the Wine Aunts, it's the people who are watching Jake Tapper still, the very few people that are still watching him, and what is... | ||
| Ari Melber and Joy Reed, this is all they cover, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right, yeah, so to them it's uncovering the next nugget, but it never goes anywhere. | |
| That well is bone dry, and it's been bone dry for years. | ||
| And here's the question. | ||
| I'd love to ask Maggie Haberman this. | ||
| Trump's not going to be able to run if he's on trial. | ||
| Who do you think he's going to be running against? | ||
| Do you actually think Joe Biden is going to be running in 2024? | ||
| Because I haven't heard anybody talking about that. | ||
| Everybody says, oh, is Trump going to run? | ||
| Is Trump going to run? | ||
| Is Trump going to run? | ||
| Has anybody even asked the question, dared to ask the question, is Joe Biden going to run? | ||
| Because the dirty secret here in Washington D.C. | ||
| is that everybody knows he's out. | ||
| Look, Team Kamala Harris is calling Biden, they're calling those guys the Titanic. | ||
| The shade war is enormous in the White House right now. | ||
| That's why you're seeing these leaks against Kamala Harris, against her team, against Tina Forney, who's her Chief of Staff. | ||
| This is all going on because this huge shade war, and it's between Jill Biden, Ron Klain, and Jen Psaki on one side, though I've heard that Jen Psaki is potentially being wooed. | ||
| They're giving her an opening. | ||
| She's not going to be allowed to be on TV, right? | ||
| But you know, she has good relationships with the press. | ||
| She'll be spared. | ||
| You know, they'll find a nice home for her, they'll find a nice nest for her to roost. | ||
| But no, they know that Team Kamala is the freight train coming forward, because at the end of the day, the Titanic, we all know what happens. | ||
| You know, Steve, I've got to tell you about this Maggie Haberman stuff. | ||
| Maggie Haberman has now been covering President Trump for how long? | ||
| Six years? | ||
| Something like that? | ||
| Oh no, 20 years, really, from the New York Post. | ||
| Remember, she was a tabloid reporter before she went to Politico, before she was in the New York Times. | ||
| She covered Rudy in the issues of Political Reporter down at City Hall. | ||
| She's been covering Trump for 20-25 years. | ||
| The relationship goes back decades. | ||
| So even worse that she fails to understand that Trump thrives in situations like that. | ||
| You know, Trump actually doesn't do particularly well when things are kind of chill and going fine. | ||
| He thrives in those stressful moments. | ||
| He thrives in those, you know, the moments at which he's having to take on all contenders at all times. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's a counterpunch. | |
| Right, but to go back to your point, I mean, you think about it. | ||
| Let me add some names here. | ||
| Daniel Goldman, Adam Schiff, you know, all these people who march towards, I don't know, you're more into graphic novels than I am, but there's got to be some, like, You know, Hulk type figure who people just keep trying to go, I can take him, I'm going to take him. | ||
| I mean, imagine how demoralizing it must be to any of these people in the Democratic Party or the peripheries of it to know that you're going on stage knowing that you're getting your, not even 15 minutes, but you're getting your like seven minutes of fame up there to be the next one who's going to try and, you know, make the walls close in around President Trump. | ||
| And this is the same thing we're seeing today. | ||
| It's the same thing what we're seeing in New York, and I've read through the case pretty delicately, at least in the sense that the left are presenting it. | ||
| This is a particularly clear-cut example of a political prosecution here. | ||
| You're going to take the guy's finance guy from 48 years, 48 years this guy served the Trump Organization, you're going to take him and you're going to say, hey, you actually got too many employee benefits. | ||
| President Trump was too good a boss to you, and we're not sure that the requisite amount of taxes were paid on those gifts, even though the company They had subpoena power for the entire finances of the Trump Organization, and this is the best they could? | ||
|
unidentified
|
He must be running the cleanest real estate operation in New York City! | |
| You want to talk New York real estate? | ||
| Believe me, Cy Vance, that's a target-rich environment. | ||
| They get a couple of G's on a Benz that weren't paid over the course of several years, When actually the company paid it instead of the employer. | ||
| I mean... And this is going to... And it's just like this Arizona thing. | ||
| Just like what we're hearing from the Supreme Court today. | ||
| They are getting over their skis on this stuff. | ||
| The Democrat movement, the left progressive movement, I like to call them communists, but they're jumping the shark at the moment. | ||
| They're taking it too far. | ||
| They don't know their limits and they're getting battered around right now. | ||
| And listen, that's going to translate into popularity points, right? | ||
| That's going to translate into elections. | ||
| I want to reset this for a second and ask you guys the following question. | ||
| You've seen the anarchy, and look, the country cannot get totally turned around until New York City gets turned around. | ||
| New York City, I can tell you, is anarchy, chaos, the crime's out of control, yet Eric Adams, this police officer, he's no hammer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's just the last election. | |
| He's just arguing for law and order, right? | ||
| They can't run an election. | ||
| The city's in chaos. | ||
| The tax base is leaving. | ||
| The entrepreneurs have been crushed. | ||
| People are afraid to walk around the streets. | ||
| You're getting people gunned down in Times Square during the highlight of the tourist season, the summer tourist season. | ||
| And Cy Vance has been a disaster. | ||
| His old man was a disaster as the feckless Jimmy Carter Secretary of State. | ||
| His old man was a disaster. | ||
| He's a bigger disaster as a prosecutor. | ||
| Is this nothing more than a face-saving measure? | ||
| Because this is not going to stop Donald J. Trump. | ||
| Trump is relentless. | ||
| A charge like this, which seems like marginal to marginal, given everything they promised Jack Posobiec and Rahim, they promised there's only going to be these financial scandals, they've got all these tax issues, they've overvalued the buildings, they didn't pay the taxes. | ||
| Is this nothing more than Cy Vance trying to save himself? | ||
| Well, Steve, let me go back to what I was saying earlier about how this appeals to a narrow band of people, but I'll marry it with what I was saying before about the 1%. | ||
| It is a narrow band of people, but these are very influential people, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
advantages for human jack we'll see if it let let me let me go back to what i was saying earlier about how this appeals to a narrow band of people but i'll marry with what i was saying before about the one percent it is a narrow band of people but these are very influential people right these are many of the movers and shakers in both washington dc and in new york where they thrive on this stuff because they still remember we held the screening last night of plot against the president uh... we had a great uh... talk afterwards the great cash patel was | |
| there in the millions uh... it was all benefit for rich higgins and they've mentioned to us at one point what that when they were asking about the f b i and they were saying look the seventh floor at the jigger hoover building has declared war because they view this administration as the enemy That is still, that is very much still, the view of not only the 7th floor of the J. Edgar Hoover building, but of that 1%. | ||
| And so they are still trying to find a way, right? | ||
| They say Strzok couldn't get there. | ||
| Lisa Page couldn't get there. | ||
| You remember all of them. | ||
| McCabe and Mueller and Comey and the rest. | ||
| They just couldn't get there, so there has to be some way to put that lash, those lashes down, not only on Trump, but on what they view as this entire movement because he's the avatar of their destruction. | ||
| Hang on, hang on, I gotta, Rahim, just one second, I gotta go back to this. | ||
| The book was Lee Smith's The Plot Against the President. | ||
| It's absolutely stunning what happened, and I think with everything that the great Darren Beattie is finding out and Tucker Carlson's finding out about the NSA, what we're finding out now about maybe these FBI operatives into this whole situation on the 6th of January, I want you to repeat that. | ||
| Last night, and also what people, you said people were worked up and they want action, action, action, but I want you to repeat what they said about the FBI. | ||
| By the way, these are a lot of hitters in the audience too, right? | ||
| This is a power screening. | ||
| I want to go back. | ||
| What do you mean the 7th floor of the FBI is out to take down the Trump movement? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right, this is the headquarters. | |
| They view, right, and I was even picking up, you know, a couple, I won't name names, but some of my sources in the current administration actually showed up last night, which I was surprised to see them there, but they said, hey, nobody knows us, it'll be fine, it'll be fine. | ||
| And they're telling us that they are currently trying to find, I actually haven't even tweeted this yet, they are trying to find what they call a foreign nexus for domestic violent extremism. | ||
| Now what does that mean? | ||
| Domestic violent extremism is what they declare you are. | ||
| That's what they declare the American patriot movement is, the populist movement. | ||
| January 6th, they view that as all domestic violent extremism. | ||
| If they can find what they call a foreign nexus, right? | ||
| Someone who's thinks they're, it's like those guys who thought in, I think it was Michigan where they thought they were talking to Hamas, but it turned out to be FBI informants or people who are on some blog in Russia or something like that. | ||
| If they can find one of those connections or as in the case we saw in plot against the president that get a guy like Stefan Halper to come up there and tell them that it's happening or somebody like Mark Elias, who we know from all of these election lawsuits, uh, also was involved in the dossier to get someone to just claim there was a foreign nexus. | ||
| That allows the intelligence community and the national security state to bring to bear their full power and their full databases, their full array of FISA warrants, you name it. | ||
| The stuff they did against Carter Page. | ||
| If they cannot find one, they will make a foreign nexus. | ||
| That is the current insight because they view this as, in their view, a threat to democracy and a threat to the nation. | ||
| And that is still the interior logic of so many of the people here in Washington, D.C. | ||
| They're watching CNN, they're watching MSNBC, they're regurgitating this stuff inside the halls of power and at that seventh floor of the J. Edgar Hoover building. | ||
| None of this has changed. | ||
| Rahim, they've done a feckless job against the Chinese Communist Party with all the infiltration you've seen, and you guys have done a great job in taking down Dasik and others. | ||
| What's your observations? | ||
| Because you're also covering 1.6 non-stop. | ||
| Yeah, I just want to reiterate something that Jack said there. | ||
| I think it's very important for people to realise the pure amount of theatre that's going on here, and how little there is in way of having to prove anything. | ||
| They've never had to prove any of these things, and if anything, you know, As things like Plot Against the President show, quite the contrary has been the case in so many of these cases. | ||
| You see it with the case of Brian Sicknick, you saw obviously with the wider case on January 6th that Darren Beattie is doing such a good job of unpacking. | ||
| But once they're that deep into this kind of lie, they can only dig deeper. | ||
| There's no real opportunity now, and they won't create for themselves an opportunity to stop this. | ||
| It would be far too embarrassing, it would be far too hard for them to pull themselves out. | ||
| What I would say to people, um, maybe you're Sausage Jack, maybe other people who are, who are maybe decent people, uh, who are working on the other side, uh, is that you may feel it's, it's too late, uh, to pull yourselves out of this thing, but eventually, uh, eventually, as, as you're seeing what Peter Daszak is seeing, and as you're gonna see with so many other people, uh, the truth will come to get you, and it's, and, and, and history will not Remember you well as it may not remember you at all, but it will not remember you well if it does If you continue on pursuing these the you know, what is effectively evil? | ||
| I say that with it within mind Steve very quickly the story that we've just put up on the national pulse Which is about Charlie Munger and his praise for the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll talk about that more later Absolutely shocking. | |
| Okay, remember, Charlie Munger is Buffett's partner. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| We're interviewing Dave Ramaswamy to give his perspective of India on the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Also, voices from mainland China, all next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| It's 1 July, the year of our Lord, 2021. | ||
| It is Thursday. | ||
| It's the commemoration of the anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party, the most murderous dictatorship in the history of mankind. | ||
| And who is born the brunt of that is the noble Chinese people. | ||
| We're here today to give a counter commemoration of what they gave in Beijing yesterday to tell the truth and let the Chinese people do it. | ||
| We're going to have Dave Ramaswamy in a second to give the perspective from India. | ||
| Before I do that, I want to make sure everybody understands. | ||
| Donald J. Trump yesterday, when he says he's made up his mind, he's made up his mind. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Donald Trump is all in on 2024. | ||
| He's not going to let these little lawsuits, he's not going to let the Maggie Haberman's of the world or the CNN's of the world or Cy Vance's of the world stop him. | ||
| He's down at the border talking about American sovereignty. | ||
| And remember, what's at the border is an invasion. | ||
| We've got Michael Yohns reporting tomorrow from Bulgaria and Turkey. | ||
| We got him over there. | ||
| He's going to tell us about the migrant crisis of 2015, what's happening currently. | ||
| Rahim's going to update it. | ||
| As Nigel Farage says, we have an invasion on the southern border. | ||
| Donald J. Trump went down there yesterday, very symbolic about what's happening to our country under this Biden regime. | ||
| It's a disgrace. | ||
| By the way, to support the Freedom Fighters, go to MyPillow.com right now. | ||
| Promo Code War Room. | ||
| You support the Royal Room Apparatus, the great American manufacturing company that is MyPillow, and of course, the armor-piercing shell that is Mike Lindell. | ||
| The Giza sheets, once in a lifetime, 50% off, as low as $49.99. | ||
| When you go to MyPillow.com, we've now got like a landing page called a square for War Room. | ||
| You go in there, you get all the promo codes, so Promo Code War Room. | ||
| Get on top of these sheets. | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| As Raheem Kassam says, you luxuriate. | ||
| You don't sleep, you luxuriate in these sleeps. | ||
| Guys, before I bring in Dave, I just gotta go back to his Arizona situation. | ||
| A blockbuster decision by the Supreme Court. | ||
| Also, the forensic audit's going on, full count. | ||
| They're doing another, their belt suspender's another belt. | ||
| They're double-checking, triple-checking the numbers to make sure when this thing comes out, when Karen Phan steps forward and gets back to Maricopa County, it's gonna be explosive. | ||
| So talk to me about Arizona, talk to me particularly about the Supreme Court decision, guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I'm quite confused about the Supreme Court decision here because, you know, as a son of the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, we had Democrat Governor Tom Wolf veto, right, the election reform laws just yesterday that were passed by the legislature and the Senate in Pennsylvania, controlled by Republicans, Where they were calling for a reform to the mail-in ballot process, they were calling for reform to these registration issues, and they were calling for universal, not mail-in ballots, but universal voter IDs. | |
| but tom wolfe vetoed that saying that it was because this would create racial disparities this was voter suppression all these other things but now we've got the supreme court in a six three majority this is not a close right this is not a close decision right this is something where we've seen by the way and that they like to say all of the court is stacked because there's too many republican appointed no we've seen this court uh... make rulings all over the place we've also seen a lot of unanimous report uh... votes | ||
| was not a close they said these laws are consistent with the constitution the state the constant their consistent with the constitution of the united states so what tom wolfe did in pennsylvania yesterday is unconstitutional the state legislature the republican party of pennsylvania should sue him for that and take that to the supreme court Rahim. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Well, I completely agree that this is now the victory on the defence. | ||
| They need now to go on the offence. | ||
| That's what the left does every time. | ||
| Rarely ever on the defence, the left. | ||
| And this is an opportunity. | ||
| Legitimate or not, as any one lawyer will tell you one thing, another lawyer will tell you another, but actually to take the fight to the people who have been bringing these vexatious claims, who have been harassing people on vexatious grounds, Frankly, I regard everybody in the state of Arizona, in this case in particular, has been harassed by these false claims about racial discrimination and racial injustice. | ||
| And as we all know, I mean it's trite to say it even, but the actual racial supremacist argument here is that black people don't know how to get an identification card or anything like that. | ||
| So I think it's now time to go on the offence, and it's time to go on the offence all around the country. | ||
| It's time to, not just the audits, but to take every single one of these people and lawyers and operatives who have bandied around falsehoods, who have attempted to defraud the public out of the security of their ballot, because that's what this really is. | ||
| It is an attempt to defraud you out of the integrity of your ballot, the integrity of your election, and the fact that there was no quote unquote no standing in Texas and Pennsylvania about the election, total nonsense, and we need to prosecute those things actively and offensively. | ||
| I want to bring up, Ibrahim, I want to go back to you. | ||
| You brought up also about this ruling at the Supreme Court. | ||
| You outed, what was it, Carlin and her letter, and now Merrick Garland, with the implication of criminal charges for people that are, for citizens that are part of this canvassing, right? | ||
| The canvassing to make sure that the ballots had chain of custody, to make sure they're legitimate, to make sure they're U.S. | ||
| citizens, to make sure these are legal. | ||
| The Justice Department, who all of them should recuse themselves. | ||
| I want to make sure the audience understands this again. | ||
| Go back to that because I think this is all part of a whole cloth. | ||
| You have an out-of-control Justice Department. | ||
| It is out of control. | ||
| It needs to be reined in. | ||
| The Republicans have got to step up and do this. | ||
| These people should all be recusing themselves. | ||
| You just had this sweeping Supreme Court decision in Arizona. | ||
| And what is the Deputy Attorney General doing? | ||
| She's threatened criminal charges. | ||
| And now Mayor Garland's mouthing that for the patriots out there involved in the audit. | ||
| Raheem Kassam. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, you've got an opportunity here. | ||
| This decision today effectively puts the wind at your back. | ||
| And there's a reason that we were able to announce this before it was on MSNBC, which are, for some reason, on the two televisions in front of me. | ||
| They don't want to touch it. | ||
| They don't want to talk about this. | ||
| You know, they're pivoting now to, oh, you know, this guy worked for the Trump Organization, he had $50 in tax that he didn't pay over 15 years, send him to jail, you know, all of this stuff. | ||
| Banana Republic stuff and Banana Republic media type stuff. | ||
| So it is... | ||
| I'll say this and I really hope everybody takes this to heart. | ||
| It is incumbent upon the conservative media, not even the conservative media, the fair media, it is incumbent upon every single person who's beat this is, who's in this milieu, | ||
| To push this story as hard as possible, because I'll tell you, this won't be dominating CNN's Chiron today, it won't be what Joy Reid is talking about tonight, it won't be tomorrow morning on Mika and Joe, and so people need to realise that while the Supreme Court has made a decision, that doesn't mean that everybody in the country necessarily knows that the Supreme Court has made this decision, and on what grounds the Supreme Court has made this decision. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And if they do bring it up, they're going to say, this is why we need to pack the court. | |
| This is why we need to push more. | ||
| The super conservative majority is pushing this out. | ||
| They're going to use it. | ||
| So they already have a prepackaged spin for this. | ||
| Yep. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Agreed. | ||
| People, Rahim said something very early when we broke this news in the last hour. | ||
| Victory begets victory. | ||
| And what we're saying now is this is why you're a force multiplier. | ||
| We're going to get it up on the site. | ||
| We're going to push it out. | ||
| Jack Posovic will be tweeting it. | ||
| We need to get this out and to have the backs of the patriots in Arizona. | ||
| I hope that the other state legislatures, particularly Jack Posovic, In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. | ||
| Georgia's heading that way. | ||
| We're going to get a special session in Georgia. | ||
| We know that because redistricting, this is all going to happen. | ||
| You're going to get a full forensic audit in Georgia. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| We know that the results of Arizona because of the Patriot are going to be explosive. | ||
| But this decision, coupled with some other things, particularly this coming to Arizona, Has to be enough and it's only the patriots that listen to this show are going to be able to put the pressure on places like Wisconsin, places like Michigan, but particularly the one that gets under my skin the most, Jack Posobiec, is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Look, when it comes down to Pennsylvania, right, we know what's going on, and it really is still that that Pennsylvania kind of construct, but it's really even switched to a point where you've got sort of the Acela part of Pennsylvania, that's Philadelphia and the surrounding counties, and then you've got the entire rest of the state, where it is much more of a Midwestern state. | |
| Look, we had a guy who showed up at the event last night who's from Butler, Pennsylvania. | ||
| Butler, that is fracking country. | ||
| That's the heart of the Marcella Shale Fund, which straddles that sort of western border between Ohio and Pennsylvania. | ||
| They had 50,000 people come out there, almost 10 times the size of the town of Butler in Pennsylvania, for Donald Trump. | ||
| And that we were supposed to be told that all of those votes, all of that momentum, meant nothing? | ||
| No. | ||
| We know what went on in Pennsylvania. | ||
| Look, they learned it from New Jersey, because New Jersey is where they invented the stuff. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And now New York is getting some of that, too. | ||
| We're finding out, or Eric Adams is finding out, with 135 test ballots, I believe they're calling. | ||
| Look, this is going to come down in Pennsylvania. | ||
| The referendum is going to be on Tom Wolfe. | ||
| He is up. | ||
| His term limited. | ||
| The open seat in Harrisburg. | ||
| It is going to come down to the wire and the Republicans need to put up somebody serious, a hard-nosed patriot who is going to take on this mantle as the banner of election for taking back Harrisburg. | ||
| Not just say, oh I'm a Republican and I'm running, no. | ||
| Take it back for the people. | ||
| The one lesson I hope that we have a large audience, obviously, of Lao Bai Jing. | ||
| We're in Mandarin, thanks to Miles Guo, GNews, GTV. | ||
| I hope people understand, all the Lao Bai Jing understand, this is a struggle every day. | ||
| When you overthrow the Chinese Communist Party, it's still going to be a fight, like it's a fight in the United States. | ||
| Every day we've got to fight for democracy. | ||
| This fight for democracy now. | ||
| Our country's in the balance on this. | ||
| And that's why we're part of the 3 November movement. | ||
| You can't go forward. | ||
| As President Trump said the other day in Ohio, in Wellington, Ohio, 2022 and 2024, it's all going to turn out the same. | ||
| The people in France said that about Bakken-Le Pen. | ||
| 25% didn't come out and vote. | ||
| Why should I vote? | ||
| It's not going to matter. | ||
| This is why it's so important to get to the bottom of what happened on 3 November. | ||
| And Jack, this is why the patrons in this audience, we've got to put the maximum pressure on the elected officials, particularly in the Pennsylvania Senate, have got to step up. | ||
| They've got to start sending out subpoenas. | ||
| We need to have a full forensic audit. | ||
| Okay, we're going back to the takedown of the Chinese Communist Party, Dave Ramaswamy, plus the voices of the Chinese people, all next in the War Room as we continue the 100 years of the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese Communist Party at 100, the chaos, death, and destruction to all mankind, next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The Communist Chinese behave the way I am talking in favor of. | ||
| And our own wonderful free enterprise economy is letting all these crazy people go to this gross excess. | ||
| The people who are avoiding it are the Communist Chinese. | ||
| They step in preemptively to stop speculation. | ||
| Charlie, you said Communist China is doing all the things that we should be doing right now, and I can't help but think of what they've done to Jack Ma. | ||
| That amuses me, you know. | ||
| Well, what about what they've done to Jack Ma? | ||
| He's kind of disappeared as... Well, yes, but Jack Ma's one of the swangers. | ||
| So they just cut his... they said, the hell with you. | ||
| He basically gave a speech when he said to a one-party state, well, you guys are a bunch of jerks, don't know what you're doing, and I know what... | ||
| I'm doing it and I'm going to do it better. | ||
| And he was going to wade into banking and no rules and just do whatever he pleased. | ||
| The Chinese communists did the right thing. | ||
| They just called in Jack Ma and said, you are going to do it, Sonny. | ||
| And I wish we had a, I don't want all of the Chinese system, but I certainly would like to have the financial part of it in my own country. | ||
| Although Ant Financial was bringing banking to a huge unbanked population before. | ||
| I mean, there were things that they were doing that... I know, but you don't want a swinger to run... The banks have the implicit guarantee of the government, and you don't... You don't want to let any swinger run a bank. | ||
| Let the swingers do something else. | ||
| Who are the swingers here? | ||
| Okay, right there, that's Charlie Munger, it's Warren Buffett's partner. | ||
| By the way, anybody who calls Warren Buffett his rabbi is very suspect. | ||
| Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, all the partners of Warren Buffett, these are all authoritarians. | ||
| You just saw right there, Charlie Munger said the quiet part out loud, Rahim Ghassan, amazing get. | ||
| They support the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| They're in business with the Chinese Communist Party, okay? | ||
| They are business partners with the Chinese Communist Party, and they like their method. | ||
| They want to kill entrepreneurs. | ||
| And look, Jack Ma's no day at the beach, trust me. | ||
| But it's the concept of Jack Ma and the entrepreneurs. | ||
| More importantly, it says, hey, they stopped the speculation. | ||
| These are the people that are trying to crush the ape army. | ||
| Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett do not like the little guy having a say-so in what's going on in the stock market. | ||
| Charlie Munger's corrupt up to his neck. | ||
| People have been taking money from him forever. | ||
| He's the business partner of Warren Buffett. | ||
| Warren Buffett's totally corrupt, okay? | ||
| You look at the financial crash in 2008. | ||
| He's up to his neck, up to his eyeballs in Goldman Sachs, all the nonsense there, right? | ||
| And bailing that out with a government guarantee in back of it. | ||
| These people are totally and absolutely corrupt. | ||
| Okay, and Munger right there, Rahim Ghassan Munger, basically saying, I like the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| He said the quiet part out loud. | ||
| Yeah, and you can hear him kind of stopping himself from going, you know, whole hog and saying... He caught himself. | ||
| Yeah, he caught himself saying, I wish we had the Chinese system here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, not all of it. | |
| I don't want a whole Chinese system, but I want the financial part. | ||
| You can't have the financial part without the political part. | ||
| And the political part is authoritarianism. | ||
| The political part is oppression. | ||
| The political part is locking up your opponent, not even your opponents, but people who say things that are just slightly off kilter with the rest of the regime's priorities, like Jack Mardit. | ||
| You heard the conversation Oh, he said Jack Ma said something that was slightly inconvenient to the Chinese Communist Party, and therefore they've taken their... He shouldn't be allowed. | ||
| He shouldn't be allowed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He shouldn't be allowed. | |
| Shut him up. | ||
| These are the people who are funding the far-left Democrats, the Berkshire Hathaway groups, buying up all the land, buying up all the houses, funding the Democrats, and they want the Chinese to say, hey, it's their words, not ours. | ||
| Buffett and Gates are partners. | ||
| Munger is his partner forever. | ||
| This is the people that are driving the radical nature of the schools. | ||
| They're taking the playbook of the Cultural Revolution and they're stepping back but they're funding these organizations behind the scenes that are doing it. | ||
| These people are totally corrupt. | ||
| Absolutely corrupt. | ||
| Look at Buffett, he doesn't pay any taxes. | ||
| One of the 24 billionaires doesn't pay any taxes. | ||
| The deplorables pay the taxes. | ||
| The Oracle of Omaha, complete scam artists, and Charlie Munger's a scumbag. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| They want the Chinese Communist Party system. | ||
| And his sister goes, I just want their banking system, their financial system. | ||
| It's so great. | ||
| It's absolutely obscene is their banking and finance system. | ||
| Absolutely obscene, okay? | ||
| Run like the Nazis, right? | ||
| Your buddies and your associates get all the grift and the Lao-Bai Jing get the grind, okay? | ||
| I want to bring in now Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
| Dave, you just heard it. | ||
| I know you're a finance guy. | ||
| I know you're a venture capitalist. | ||
| I know you want to talk about India, but I got to ask you about the great find See, I wanted to give the Chinese Communist Party a chance, but unfortunately there are too many red flags. | ||
| See, what Charlie is saying, it's like the oligarchic party line. | ||
| I thank Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
| See, I wanted to give the Chinese Communist Party a chance, but unfortunately there are too many red flags. | ||
| See, what Charlie is saying, it's like the oligarchic party line. | ||
| They are ideological brethren with the Chinese Communist Party because they want financial totalitarianism where billionaires and oligarchs can borrow at zero to no or too little cost from the Fed discount window and use that borrowings to finance the purchase of real assets. | ||
| Thereby not only disenfranchising large numbers of Americans, but also disempowering them from a shot of the American dream. | ||
| I mean, as you mentioned, Steve, they want to convert America into a nationhood of serfs, where nobody owns anything. | ||
| They're gonna eat bug flower food, live in a pod which is rented, and be happy. | ||
| That's what the oligarchs in the US and the West want for us. | ||
| And there, ideologically, it's a match made in heaven with the Chinese Communist Party, who want the same thing, and who have done the same thing in China for the last seven decades. | ||
| Dave, by the way, it's a brilliant analysis. | ||
| This is why Blackrock, Blackstone, all the guys in business with them, Berkshire Hathaway, as Reem just said, they're buying up all the assets. | ||
| They want to have this younger generation rent. | ||
| Remember, the party of Davos and the Great Reset say, you're not going to own anything, but you're going to be happy, right? | ||
| You're essentially going to pay the finance charge by your lease. | ||
| They're going to own the assets. | ||
| As the central banks keep the zero interest rates, assets explode. | ||
| They get the upside. | ||
| And the deplorables end up paying for it. | ||
| This is the greatest scam and con in the history of the country. | ||
| Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
| See, Steve, in the World Economic Forum, their draft documents, the original phrase for the Great Reset was the Great Leap Forward. | ||
| Unfortunately, some intern flagged it and had them change it at the last minute. | ||
| So as you rightly said, you know, BlackRock, other private equity funds based in the U.S. | ||
| buying up assets. | ||
| Remember, they're getting money and cash infusions from Chinese limited partners. | ||
| So it's a surreptitious and it's like a slate of hand. | ||
| It's a subterfuge way of Chinese high net worth individuals, princelings who are affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party to come in, use American front organizations to buy up | ||
| The rise of nationalism in India is directly related to the threat of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Give the perspective of India of the 100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party and what we call the most murderous transnational criminal organization in history, Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
| See, India is the world's largest democracy and America is the oldest. | ||
| And so India and America have always been aligned and have always fought against authoritarianism, totalitarianism and tyranny. | ||
| If you remember during World War Two, Indian soldiers fought alongside British, French and American soldiers to beat back the communists, the fascists and the Nazis. | ||
| So in the 21st century, it Behooves our two great peoples to once again come together to take on the Chinese Communist Party, defund the Chinese Communist Party, and essentially put them out of business. | ||
| And Steve, you have mentioned two key things which I want to add on, which is your recurring story, which is the economic warfare and information warfare. | ||
| On the topic of economic warfare, the Chinese Communist Party has been funded, especially over the last 20 years since it joined the WTO, by the savings of the American people and the savings of the Indian people. | ||
| So our trade deficits have exploded. | ||
| Both India and America export raw materials to China and import finished goods. This gap of course is growing. In the US it's much bigger than what India has. I mean India has probably a 65 billion to 70 billion dollar trade deficit with China while America has close to a 400 billion dollar trade deficit with China. So imagine each American citizen and you have audience listeners from all around the world which is every purchase you make unchecked unbridled | ||
| consumerism without reading the label or checking the tag if you are buying just blindly a made in China product it's like you're making a donation to the Chinese people liberation army. | ||
| So, your listeners have to ask themselves, do they want to actually go around and go ahead in the months and years to come, financing the Chinese military? | ||
| And in the wake of the pandemic, it's been clear. | ||
| I mean, you've done great reporting and so has Rahim and The National Pulse. | ||
| We have Discovered, demonstrated, foreseeded links between the academic class, the bureaucratic class and the corporate class, the ABC complex in the West and many countries, which we who are sympathizers and collaborators with the Chinese communists. | ||
| So the question, the second question to ask ourselves is, do we really want these unelected, unaccountable people determining our fate? | ||
| And I think most of your listeners will answer in the negative. | ||
| Dave, give us an action plan that you think can get us out of here. | ||
| What would you recommend to this audience who's action-oriented? | ||
| What are the two or three steps they can take right now in their personal lives or to be force multipliers to get people to wake up to this? | ||
| What would you recommend? | ||
| We got about two minutes. | ||
| What would you recommend people do? | ||
| I would say, number one, I say hashtag read the label, hashtag check the tag, which is Before you buy anything, either online or in a store, just turn over the product and see where it's from and buy products. | ||
| I mean, let me coin, I've just coined a phrase on the fly. | ||
| Be American, buy American. | ||
| Be British, buy British. | ||
| Be Indian, buy Indian. | ||
| So, the working class people in Europe, in America and India need to support their own business owners The own family businesses who have skin in the game, who don't have affinity and collaboration with the Chinese Communists. | ||
| That's number one. | ||
| Second, you know, people think voting every two or four years, you know, expecting a professional politician to help you is like expecting a professional escort to love you. | ||
| You know, you're going to be waiting a long time. | ||
| So we vote, we vote every day with our time and wallets. | ||
| So choose wisely where you spend your money and where you spend your time. | ||
| Dave, how did people get to your website? | ||
| You're now one of our contributors. | ||
| We're going to make a little more formal announcement. | ||
| We've got this new website up. | ||
| You're going to be writing for it. | ||
| You're one of the smartest guys around. | ||
| How do people follow you? | ||
| What's your Twitter handle? | ||
| Let me end by saying, Steve, Communism is a virus. | ||
| It has had many variants in the past. | ||
| The Stalin variant, the Mao variant, the Castro variant, and right now, the Xi Jinping variant is the most prevalent in the world, especially in the Belt and Road countries. | ||
| And so, we gotta protect ourselves. | ||
| I mean, Disney, historically, America's mascot was Mickey Mouse, but now, unfortunately, our mascot is becoming Mickey Mao, and Duck Zhao Ping. | ||
| So let's guard against that. | ||
| And people can reach me on Gab at Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
| Gavin, Dave, we're almost ready. | ||
| Dave, thank you so much. | ||
| Very, very perceptive. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| By the way, I'm announcing that tonight we're going to continue this show with breaking news, a lot of breaking news coming to Arizona, but we're also going to be talking about the Chinese Communist Party and tomorrow, all the way through Independence Day. | ||
| We're only going to get our independence when we assist Lao Baijing, the Chinese people, in taking down the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| We're going to hear the voice of China next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, we have a full meltdown going on with the Democratic Party about Arizona. | ||
| I want to go Raheem Kassam. | ||
| Chuck Schumer's got a tweet out. | ||
| He's got a statement. | ||
| Pasova, Katie Hobson, meltdown. | ||
| Let's start with Raheem. | ||
| So Chuck Schumer says this morning, quote, if you believe in open and fair democracy and the principle of one person, one vote, today is one of the darkest days in all of the Supreme Court's history, end quote. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Katie Hobbs is now rushing, rushing to CNN, who apparently is the new comms department. | |
| For the Secretary of State of Arizona and she's on there saying this decision is very harmful and it's going to make it harder for anyone to be able to challenge discriminatory voting laws. | ||
| So she's making a very veiled reference there to the Dred Scott decision of the Supreme Court. | ||
| She's saying this is essentially saying this is a racist decision from on behalf of the Supreme Court because she knows that the sound that she just heard is her chances of winning the governorship of Arizona | ||
| going up in smoke. | ||
| I want to go now to Rachel. | ||
| Rachel, can you tell the American people what it's like to live under the murderous dictatorship of the greatest transnational criminal organization in mankind's history, the Chinese Communist Party? | ||
| Do we have the audio right now? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Uh, guys, we'll, we'll get that hooked up in a second. | ||
| I want to go back to Jack and to, uh, and to, uh, Jack, we've got a couple of minutes here. | ||
| Let's summarize. | ||
| I want to, I want to just be very specific on, give a historical perspective. | ||
| As we go into the weekend, we have a bunch of other shows given historical perspective on the Chinese communist party, how murderous it's been and why the elites in this country bowed down to it. | ||
| Why the business model of the party at Davos and why they're in business. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, if you look at the U.S.' 's relationship with China, with Communist China, it goes back to Kissinger and it goes back to Richard Nixon. | |
| They go over there as part of the rapprochement geopolitical framework. | ||
| They say, we need a strategic alliance. | ||
| With China. | ||
| Not philosophically, not commercially, not financially, not any of this stuff. | ||
| We just need a geopolitical rapprochement with them in order to box in the Soviets during the Cold War. | ||
| That's all it was supposed to be about. | ||
| So you see Nixon go over, you see Zhou Enlai, he's sort of the power behind the scenes there. | ||
| Mao is syphilitic, he's dying, but he's still around. | ||
| That all changed when Deng Xiaoping got in. | ||
| Then the financial money started flowing in. | ||
| He allowed that, the foreign direct investment, for the first time in the 1970s, starting in 1978 when he took over as the Supreme Leader, the paramount leader of China. | ||
| You then see that continuing with Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao. | ||
| Now they moved in more of a technocratic line, right? | ||
| They wanted to be, hey, we're not, you know, we're not ideological. | ||
| We're just doing what's best for the country. | ||
| We know you're doing what's best for your country. | ||
| So this is where you see the seeping in of the ideological, right? | ||
| The ideological absorption and the ideological assimilation of the Chinese 1%, the CCP and the Western 1%. | ||
| You then see them marrying up. | ||
| It is an infiltration and it is a marriage made in hell. | ||
| Now, Xi Jinping comes on the scene, he's throwing all of those political reforms out the window and completely turning backwards. | ||
| It's almost like you would call it, you have the Great Leap Forwards. | ||
| This is the Great Leap Backwards of Xi Jinping. | ||
| He said, no, we are not going to be this global force for whatever it is you want in the West. | ||
| We are the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| We are going to be the avatar of the Chinese people, the avatar of communism, of Marxist-Leninism in the United States, in the world, I should say. | ||
| And there's nothing you can do about it. | ||
| Rahim, this is what's so amazing what National Pulse brought up. | ||
| People don't think about the two 1%s. | ||
| Look at the Charlie Munger thing. | ||
| And we've got to drive this story. | ||
| This is the great tell. | ||
| China changed our 1%. | ||
| We didn't change China. | ||
| They didn't get any more free market oriented. | ||
| It's state-controlled capitalism over there. | ||
| They're not a free market at all. | ||
| They're mercantilist power. | ||
| Remember, what Dave Ramaswamy said is something very important. | ||
| We're a tributary state to China. | ||
| We send them raw materials. | ||
| They send us finished product back, particularly advanced manufactured products. | ||
| The trade deficit this year could be a trillion dollars, one trillion dollars. | ||
| We're financing their military. | ||
| We're financing everything. | ||
| We are a tributary state because our elites want us as a tributary state. | ||
| Rahim Kassam. | ||
| Well look, I'd like to draw some attention very quickly to a National Pulse Reader poll. | ||
| You know, we have these very, very large-scale polls that we run on the site, and I noticed the other day that we had seen a massive influx in voting in this survey. | ||
| So I went into the data, and I noticed that a bot had voted on this poll. | ||
| Now the poll's question was, does China owe reparations for COVID-19? | ||
| And it was shaping up to be about 80% in favor, 10% against, and 10% who weren't sure. | ||
| In the middle of June there was this massive spike in activity on the poll with 20,000 new entrants voting no. | ||
| I tracked that back and it came from a foreign IP address, all the same IP address, Of people who are voting with the same email address and the same IP over and over to try and shift the numbers. | ||
| Now I've just managed to clean up the data and I will be publishing the results very shortly, but I'll tell you right now, 81% of survey respondents voted that yes, China owes reparations for COVID-19. | ||
| There was a further, I think, 11% said no and the rest, I think it was 8%, said they weren't sure in the poll. | ||
| But this is how This is how fragile they are in terms of their control of the narrative. | ||
| They feel like they have to weigh in on a National Pulse report to that extent. | ||
| Yeah, it's a womb-out attack. | ||
| And, by the way, let me just tell you something. | ||
| It failed. | ||
| I caught it. | ||
| But they understand the National Pulse. | ||
| Dude, you're doing 50 times what the New York Times and Wall Street's doing. | ||
| You're punching way above your weight. | ||
| That's why you've got Posobiec now at Human Events. | ||
| Rahim Ghassan at National Pulse, Darren Beattie at Revolver. | ||
| They're watching this. | ||
| They understand you guys are punching way above your class, right? | ||
| And the War Room helps with a little lift with our audience, but you guys are just doing it. | ||
| Okay, we're gonna be back at five o'clock today. | ||
| We had a technical problem. | ||
| We're gonna have more of the Chinese voices on today. | ||
| We're also gonna have them tomorrow, Friday night, and Saturday. | ||
| We're talking about the revolutionary generation, what fought and got our country its initial freedom, and tying it back to today when the elites We fought an aristocracy in 1776, you're fighting another aristocracy today that is enslaving you. | ||
| Jack Posobiec of Human Events. | ||
| Jack, what's your Twitter handle so people can follow you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm Jack Posobiec, J-C-K-P-O-S-O-B-I-E-C. | |
| It's hot all day. | ||
| Rahim, you got a podcast today? | ||
| Yes we do. | ||
| Rahim. | ||
| Okay, Rahim Kassam, go to the podcast, go to National Pulse, be back here at 5 with more of the 100 years of the death, destruction, and chaos of the Chinese Communist Party against the world at 5 p.m. |
Export Selection